Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1979 Sep;93(1):117–130. doi: 10.1093/genetics/93.1.117

The Nature of Genetic Recombination near the Third Chromosome Centromere of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

R E Denell 1, D O Keppy 1
PMCID: PMC1217819  PMID: 121288

Abstract

Previous studies have indicated that recombination near the third chromosome centromere is associated with negative chromosome interference, a phenomenon for which Green (1975) and Sinclair (1975) suggested gene conversion as a possible mechanism. In this report, we demonstrate that negative chromosome interference is still observed when deficiencies or translocation breakpoints are scored as the middle markers in recombination experiments and the rate of recombination is increased by interchromosomal effect. We argue that these chromosomal rearrangement breakpoints are not subject to conversion. Since neither successive premeiotic and meiotic exchanges, nor negative chromatid interference, can by themselves account for the negative chromosome interference, we conclude that a greater than expected frequency of multiple exchanges actually occurs. We further suggest that negative chromosome interference may be characteristic of all chromosomal regions normally showing very little exchange in relation to physical length.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (864.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Duncan I. W., Kaufman T. C. Cytogenic analysis of chromosome 3 in Drosophila melanogaster: mapping of the proximal portion of the right arm. Genetics. 1975 Aug;80(4):733–752. doi: 10.1093/genetics/80.4.733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fink G. R., Styles C. A. Gene conversion of deletions in the his4 region of yeast. Genetics. 1974 Jun;77(2):231–244. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.2.231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Graubard M A. Temperature Effect on Interference and Crossing over. Genetics. 1934 Jan;19(1):83–94. doi: 10.1093/genetics/19.1.83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Green M. M. Conversion as a possible mechanism of high coincidence values in the centromere region of Drosophila. Mol Gen Genet. 1975 Aug 5;139(1):57–66. doi: 10.1007/BF00267995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lindsley D. L., Sandler L. The genetic analysis of meiosis in female Drosophila melanogaster. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1977 Mar 21;277(955):295–312. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1977.0019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Novitski E. Evidence for the single phase pairing theory of meiosis. Genetics. 1975 Jan;79(1):63–71. doi: 10.1093/genetics/79.1.63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES