Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2025 May 8;301(6):110206. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2025.110206

NOTCH2 disrupts the synovial fibroblast identity and the inflammatory response of epiphyseal chondrocytes

Ernesto Canalis 1,2,3,, Rosa Guzzo 4, Lauren Schilling 3, Emily Denker 3
PMCID: PMC12179613  PMID: 40345585

Abstract

Notch signaling plays a fundamental role in the inflammatory response and has been linked to the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis in murine models of disease and humans. To address how Notch signaling modifies transcriptomes and cell populations, we examined the effects of NOTCH2 in chondrocytes from mice harboring a NOTCH2 gain-of-function mutation (Notch2tm1.1Ecan) and a conditional NOTCH2 gain-of-function model expressing the NOTCH2 intracellular domain (NICD2) from the Rosa26 locus (R26-NICD2 mice). Bulk RNA-Sequencing (RNA-Seq) of primary epiphyseal cells from both gain-of-function models established increased expression of pathways associated with the phagosome, genes linked to osteoclast activity in rheumatoid arthritis signaling, and pulmonary fibrosis signaling. Expression of genes linked to collagen degradation was enhanced in Notch2tm1.1Ecan cells, while genes related to osteoarthritis pathways were increased in NICD2-expressing cells. Single cell (sc)RNA-Seq of cultured Notch2tm1.1Ecan cells revealed clusters of cells related to limb mesenchyme, chondrogenic cells, and fibroblasts, including articular synovial fibroblasts. Pseudotime trajectory revealed close associations among clusters in control cultures, but the cluster of articular/synovial fibroblasts was disrupted in cells from Notch2tm1.1Ecan mice. ScRNA-Seq showed similarities in the cluster distributions and pseudotime trajectories of NICD2-expressing and control cells, except for altered progression in a cluster of NICD2-expressing cells. In conclusion, NOTCH2 enhances the activity of pathways associated with inflammation in epiphyseal chondrocytes and disrupts the transcriptome profile of articular/synovial fibroblasts.

Keywords: chondrocyte, inflammation, NOTCH2, Notch receptor, osteoarthritis, transcriptome, synovial fibroblast


Notch receptors (Notch 1–4) have an established role in the differentiation, fate and function of a variety of cell lineages and play an important regulatory role in the response to inflammation (1, 2). This function of Notch signaling has been associated with the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis, a chronic degenerative and inflammatory disease that affects multiple tissues of the joint including the synovium cartilage and bone (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9). Although there is a degenerative component to osteoarthritis, the disease is a complex disorder affecting the joint and driven by a host of proinflammatory signals (7, 10, 11, 12). These are often released by immune cells infiltrating synovium although articular chondrocytes are also a source of inflammatory molecules that contribute to the pathogenesis of the disease (6, 12).

Notch receptors are activated following interactions with ligands of the Jagged and Delta-like families. These interactions lead to the proteolytic cleavage of Notch at the junction of its extracellular and transmembrane domains and to the subsequent release of the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) (1, 13). Following translocation to the nucleus, the NICD forms a complex with recombination signal-binding protein for Ig of κ (RBPJκ) and mastermind-like (MAML) to activate canonical signaling and induce target gene transcription (14, 15, 16, 17). Notch1, 2, 3 and 4 transcripts are detected in chondrocytes; however, the expression of Notch2 is greater than that of other Notch receptors in chondrogenic ATDC5 cell lines, epiphyseal and costal chondrocytes (4). Since the activity of each Notch receptor depends on the cellular environment where it is expressed, the findings make NOTCH2 the most likely Notch receptor with a function in cartilage tissue.

Sustained supraphysiological activation of Notch signaling is associated with the development of osteoarthritis and the suppression of chondrogenesis, and the deletion of either Rbpj or the Notch target gene Hes1 prevents the osteoarthritis that follows the surgical destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM) in mice (3, 4, 18, 19, 20, 21). Our laboratory created a knock-in mouse model harboring a Notch26955C>T mutation in exon 34 of Notch2 and termed Notch2tm1.1Ecan (22). The mutation replicates the pathogenic variant associated with Hajdu Cheney Syndrome (HCS) and leads to the premature termination of the protein product and the loss of the PEST domain, which is necessary for the proteasomal degradation of the NICD (23, 24, 25). As a result, the NOTCH2 NICD is stable, resulting in a gain-of-NOTCH2 function (22). In accordance with the proposed role of NOTCH2 in inflammation, Notch2tm1.1Ecan mice are sensitized to the osteoarthritis that follows DMM surgeries and to the osteolytic actions of tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) (23, 26, 27). Although one case of osteoarthritis in HCS has been reported, its association with the NOTCH2 gain-of-function was not established, and the prevalence of osteoarthritis cannot be estimated due to the rarity of the syndrome (28).

Chondrocytes are cells of mesenchymal origin present in cartilage tissue. The proliferation and differentiation of epiphyseal chondrocytes present in the growth plate lead to the longitudinal growth of bones (29, 30). Chondrocytes synthesize proteins that form the extracellular matrix of cartilage, including type II collagen, and proteoglycans like aggrecan. Chondrocytes from Notch2tm1.1Ecan mice display increased expression of interleukin (IL) six and are sensitized to the actions of TNFα on the inflammatory response, an effect attributed to the activity of the NOTCH2 NICD (27, 30, 31). In an initial experiment, we demonstrated that in the presence of TNFα, chondrogenic cells from Notch2tm1.1Ecan display enhanced phagosome formation and the osteoarthritis pathway (31). While these observations indicate that Notch signaling itself can influence the expression and activity of cytokines on the inflammatory response, the direct effects of NOTCH2 in the absence of TNFα and the cell transcriptome profile and mechanisms involved were not elucidated. Moreover, the transcriptome profile of the joint environment and of epiphyseal chondrocytes is heterogeneous, and as a consequence, the cell subtypes and genes responsible for the actions of NOTCH2 need to be defined at a single-cell resolution (32, 33).

To have a better understanding of the mechanisms responsible for the NOTCH2-dependent inflammatory response in the chondrocyte environment, the transcriptome profile affected by NOTCH2 at a global and single cell resolution in murine epiphyseal chondrocytes was investigated. For this purpose, transcriptomes of epiphyseal chondrocytes with chondroblast-like properties were obtained from newborn Notch2tm1.1Ecan mice and from R26-NICD2 conditional mice, where sequences coding for the NICD are cloned into the Rosa26 locus downstream of a loxP flanked STOP cassette (34). Exposure of these cells to the Cre recombinase results in the expression of the NOTCH2 NICD and NOTCH2 activation. Epiphyseal chondrocytes from Notch2tm1.1Ecan and R26-NICD2 mice were examined using bulk as well as single cell (sc)RNA-Sequencing (Seq) approaches.

Results

The Notch2tm1.1Ecan mutation inhibits chondrogenesis, enhances the phagosome formation, collagen degradation, and the role of the osteoclasts in rheumatoid arthritis pathway

To determine the direct role of the Notch2tm1.1Ecan mutation in epiphyseal chondrocytes, cells from newborn mice were cultured and RNA was extracted and analyzed by bulk RNA-Seq. Principal component analysis verified appropriate segregation between cells from control and Notch2tm1.1Ecan mice. There were 123 ≥ log2Fold Change (FC)1 and p adjusted <0.05 differentially regulated genes between Notch2tm1.1Ecan and control chondrocytes; 107 genes, including Notch3 were upregulated and 16 were downregulated (Fig. 1, AD). The 50 top dysregulated genes are shown in Figure S1. Hes1 and Hey1 were induced by a log2FC of 0.5 and Notch3 by a log2FC of 1.4 in Notch2tm1.1Ecan cells, confirming activation of Notch signaling and induction of Notch3. Hey2 and Heyl were not detected. Biological pathways affected were analyzed by Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) and by using the R Package clusterProfiler. These analyses revealed the inhibition of genes associated with chondrocyte differentiation and cartilage development, confirming the suppressive role of NOTCH2 in chondrogenesis and an enhancement of cell replication, chemotaxis, and migration (Fig. 1, E and F) (31).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

RNA-Seq profile of Notch2tm1.1Ecan chondrocytes. Chondrocyte-enriched cells from newborn Notch2tm1.1Ecan and control littermate mice were cultured to confluence and RNA was extracted and analyzed by RNA-Seq. A, principal component analysis of RNA-Seq technical replicates (n = 4 for Notch2tm1.1Ecan and n = 3 for control). B, differentially expressed genes as log fold change over means of normalized counts. C, heat map of the 50 most differentially regulated genes between Notch2tm1.1Ecan and control chondrocytes and D, corresponding volcano plots; log2 FoldChange, false discovery rate p adjusted value < 0.05 for C and D. E. Gene set enrichment analysis of biological pathways in epiphyseal chondrocytes from Notch2tm1.1Ecan cells. Enrichment scores (ES) and normalized ES (NES) of pathways affected by NOTCH2 at a false discovery rate (FDR) of <0.05 are shown. F, visualization of gene enrichment analysis by clusterProfiler, as a lollipop chart. Gene count and pathways affected by Notch2tm1.1Ecan at a p adjusted <0.05 are shown.

Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) of bulk RNA-Seq data revealed activation of phagosome formation, collagen degradation, and the role of osteoclasts in rheumatoid arthritis, and idiopathic fibrosis signaling pathways (Fig. 2). A graphical summary of multiple pathways and molecules affected by the Notch2tm1.1Ecan mutation and their interrelationships is shown in Figure 2 (lower panel). Previously, we documented that the phagosome formation and osteoarthritis pathway were influenced in chondrocytes from the Notch2tm1.1Ecan mice in the context of TNFα exposure (31). Whereas the phagosome formation was enhanced, the osteoarthritis pathway was not substantially modified by the Notch2tm1.1Ecan mutation in the absence of TNFα (Fig. 2). Heat maps and volcano plots of the pathways affected by the Notch2tm1.1Ecan mutation are shown in Figure 3, and VENN diagrams revealed that a significant number of genes present in the pathways described were affected by the NOTCH2 gain-of-function.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The phagosome formation, collagen degradation, the role of osteoclasts in rheumatoid arthritis signaling and pulmonary fibrosis signaling are enhanced in chondrocytes from Notch2tm1.1Ecan mice. Chondrocyte-enriched cells from newborn Notch2tm1.1Ecan and control littermate mice were cultured to confluence and RNA was extracted and processed for RNA-Seq. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) of canonical pathways under the genes and chemicals category was performed. Genes affected by Notch2tm1.1Ecan at log2FC1 p adjusted value < 0.1 are shown. Graphical summary of the data input showing activated (orange) and inhibited (blue) pathways. Solid lines lead to activation or inhibition, dotted lines point to inferred relationships, dashed lines to indirect and solid lines to direct interactions.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The phagosome formation, collagen degradation, the role of osteoclasts in rheumatoid arthritis and pulmonary fibrosis signaling are enhanced in chondrocytes from Notch2tm1.1Ecan mice. Chondrocyte-enriched cells from newborn Notch2tm1.1Ecan and control littermate mice were cultured to confluence and RNA was extracted and processed for RNA-Seq. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) of canonical pathways under the genes and chemical category was performed. Genes affected by NOTCH2 at a log2FC1, p < 0.05, p adjusted value < 0.1 are shown. Heat maps, volcano plots and VENN diagrams of differentially expressed genes (DEG) between Notch2tm1.1Ecan and control of the indicated signaling pathways are shown.

NOTCH2 activation enhances pulmonary fibrosis signaling and osteoarthritis pathways, phagosome formation, and rheumatoid arthritis signaling in epiphyseal chondrocytes

To establish the role of the NOTCH2 NICD in epiphyseal chondrocytes, cells from R26-NICD2 mice were transfected with an adenoviral vector expressing Cre recombinase under the control of the cytomegalovirus promoter (Ad-CMV-Cre) so that the biologically active NOTCH2 NICD would be expressed in the cell environment. Control cultures were transfected with an analogous vector expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP), termed Ad-CMV-GFP. RNA extracted from epiphyseal chondrocytes was examined by bulk RNA-Seq analysis. Principal component analysis revealed good segregation between control and NOTCH2 NICD-expressing samples. There were 913 ≥ log2FC1, p adjusted <0.05 differentially regulated genes between NICD2-expressing and control chondrocytes; 468 genes were upregulated, including Hes1, Hey1, Hey2, and Heyl and 445 were downregulated by NICD2 (Fig. 4, AD). The 50 top dysregulated genes are shown in Figure S2 and included Hey1, Hey2, and Heyl demonstrating activation of canonical signaling by the NICD2. Notch3 was increased by a log2FC 4.1 confirming the Notch3 induction by Notch signaling observed in Notch2tm1.1Ecan cells. Biological pathways analyzed by GSEA and the R Package clusterProfiler revealed inhibition of genes associated with mesenchymal and smooth muscle cell differentiation and contraction and muscle development, calcium ion transport, ERK1 and ERK2 signaling and with the activation of negative Smad signal regulation. The epithelial to mesenchymal transition, collagen metabolic processes and activation of limb development and morphogenesis were enhanced in NICD2-expressing chondrocytes (Fig. 4, E and F).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

RNA-Seq profile of NOTCH2 activated chondrocytes. Chondrocyte-enriched cells from newborn R26-NICD2 mice were cultured to ∼70% confluence and transfected with Ad-CMV-Cre to induce NOTCH2 NICD or Ad-CMV-GFP as a control and cultured for 24 h. Cells were collected, and total RNA was extracted and analyzed by RNA-Seq. A, principal component analysis of RNA-Seq technical replicates (n = 4) for NICD2 and control. B, differentially expressed genes as log fold change over means of normalized counts. C, heat map of the 50 most differentially regulated genes between NICD2 and control chondrocytes. D, corresponding volcano plots; log2FC, false discovery rate p adjusted value < 0.05 for C and D. E, gene set enrichment analysis of biological pathways in epiphyseal chondrocytes from activated NICD2 cells. Enrichment scores (ES) and normalized ES (NES) of pathways affected by activated NOTCH2 NICD at a false discovery rate (FDR) of <0.05 are shown. F, visualization of gene enrichment analysis by clusterProfiler, as a lollipop chart. Gene count and pathways affected by NICD2 at a p adjusted <0.05 are shown.

IPA of bulk RNA-Seq data revealed activation of the pulmonary fibrosis signaling and osteoarthritis pathway, the phagosome formation, and the role of osteoclasts in rheumatoid arthritis signaling pathway in NICD2 expressing cells (Fig. 5). A graphical summary of multiple pathways and molecules and their interactions in the context of NICD2 activation is shown in Figure 5 (lower panel). Heat maps and volcano plots of the pathways affected by the NICD2 are shown in Figure 6, and VENN diagrams revealed that a significant number of genes influenced by NOTCH2 were involved in the indicated pathways, confirming the role of NOTCH2 in signals related to inflammation.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The pulmonary fibrosis idiopathic signaling, osteoarthritis pathway, phagosome formation, and role of osteoclasts in rheumatoid arthritis are enhanced in NOTCH2 activated chondrocytes. Chondrocytes from newborn R26-NICD2 mice were cultured to 70% confluence and transfected with Ad-CMV-Cre (NOTCH2 activated) or Ad-CMV-GFP (control) and cultured. Cells were collected and total RNA was extracted and analyzed by RNA-Seq. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) of canonical pathways under the genes and chemical category was performed. Genes affected by NOTCH2 at a log2FC1, p < 0.05, p adjusted of 0.1 are shown. Graphical summary of the data input showing activated (orange) and inhibited (blue) pathways. Solid lines lead to activation or inhibition, dotted lines point to inferred relationships, dashed lines to indirect, and solid lines to direct interactions.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

NOTCH2 activation induces pulmonary fibrosis idiopathic signaling, the osteoarthritis pathway, phagosome formation, and the role of osteoclasts in rheumatoid arthritis pathway in chondrocytes. Chondrocyte-enriched cells from newborn R26-NICD2 mice were cultured to ∼70% confluence and transfected with Ad-CMV-Cre to activate NOTCH2 or Ad-CMV-GFP as a control and cultured for an additional 24 h. Cells were collected, and total RNA was extracted and analyzed by RNA-Seq. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) of canonical pathways under the genes and chemical category was performed. Genes affected by NOTCH2 at a log2FC1, p < 0.05, p adjusted value < 0.1 are shown. Heat maps, volcano plots, and VENN diagrams of differentially expressed genes (DEG) between NICD2 and control of the individualized signaling pathways are shown.

scRNA-Seq of epiphyseal chondrocytes from Notch2tm1.1Ecan chondrocytes reveals disruption of the articular/synovial transcriptome

Epiphyseal chondrocytes from control and Notch2tm1.1Ecan expressing cells were processed in a Chromium iX using a 3′ library kit (10x Genomics). An estimated 8120 control and 7365 Notch2tm1.1Ecan cells were recovered representing a 75% and 69% recovery, respectively and 24,320 genes were detected in control and 24,747 in Notch2tm1.1Ecan cells. Following normalization, cells with ≥10% mitochondrial RNA, <250 transcripts and >10,000 genes/cells were excluded. Normalization and doublet filtering and exclusion reduced the number of cells to be analyzed to 7845 control and 7141 Notch2tm1.1Ecan cells. Clustering analysis of epiphyseal chondrocytes (pooled data from control and Notch2tm1.1Ecan cells) using the uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) non-linear dimensionality reduction algorithm, accurately distinguished 19 different cell clusters (Fig. 7, Table 1). This is consistent with clusters found in studies reporting the effect of TNFα in epiphyseal chondrocytes, sharing the same control cell population (33). The more prevalent clusters were constituted by cells with a transcriptome profile of chondrogenic cells, limb mesenchyme and fibroblasts. An articular/synovial cluster was identified by the expression of Prg4 and Pdgfra and its cellularity was more sparse in Notch2tm1.1Ecan than in control cells (Fig. 7, Tables 1 and S1). NOTCH2 was the prevalent Notch receptor and Notch2 transcripts were detected in all cell clusters (Fig. S3). Notch1 was detected but only low levels of Notch3 and Notch4 expression were found. The canonical Notch target gene Hes1 was present in all cell clusters, and its level of expression was substantially higher than that of Hey1, Hey2 and Heyl (Fig. S3). There was a modest effect of the Notch2tm1.1can mutation on cluster distribution and on the expression of gene profiles used to classify the 19 cell clusters (Fig. 7, Tables 1 and S2).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) for dimension reduction of scRNA-Seq data of epiphyseal chondrocytes from Notch2tm1.1Ecan and control newborn mice reveal modest alterations in cell clusters.A, UMAP visualization of 19 cell clusters of normalized independent data from epiphyseal chondrocytes from Notch2tm1.1Ecan and control littermate newborn mice cultured to confluence. B, bar graph demonstrates the cell distribution present in each individual cluster from Notch2tm1.1Ecan and control cells. Dot plot displaying the differential expression of genes in control and in Notch2tm1.1Ecan cells associated in (C) with mesenchymal cells, limb mesenchyme articular/synovial, chondrogenic, adipogenic and osteogenic cells and macrophages, and in (D) with fibroblast cell clusters present in epiphyseal chondrocytes. Red denotes higher and blue denotes lower than average expression, and the size of the circle represents the percentage of cells expressing each gene. The control culture used for the UMAP visualization was shared with a study on the effect of TNFα in chondrocytes (33).

Table 1.

Cell cluster distribution of epiphyseal chondrocytes from control and Notch2tm1.1Ecan mice

A.
Cell number/Cluster
% Cell/Cluster
Cluster percent
Cluster total
Cluster Control Notch2tm1.1Ecan Control Notch2tm1.1Ecan Control Notch2tm1.1Ecan
Limb mesenchyme 862 677 10.99% 9.48% 5.75% 4.52% 10.27%
Limb mesenchyme 766 566 9.76% 7.93% 5.11% 3.78% 8.89%
Articular/Synovial 716 587 9.13% 8.22% 4.78% 3.92% 8.69%
Limb mesenchyme 787 491 10.03% 6.88% 5.25% 3.28% 8.53%
Undefined 665 544 8.48% 7.62% 4.44% 3.63% 8.07%
Chondrogenic 574 592 7.32% 8.29% 3.83% 3.95% 7.78%
Undefined 641 489 8.17% 6.85% 4.28% 3.26% 7.54%
Chondrogenic 552 495 7.04% 6.93% 3.68% 3.30% 6.99%
Chondrogenic 503 510 6.41% 7.14% 3.36% 3.40% 6.76%
Fibroblast 341 455 4.35% 6.37% 2.28% 3.04% 5.31%
Fibroblast 377 296 4.81% 4.15% 2.52% 1.98% 4.49%
Fibroblast 223 383 2.84% 5.36% 1.49% 2.56% 4.04%
Limb bud 272 328 3.47% 4.59% 1.82% 2.19% 4.00%
Undefined 209 353 2.66% 4.94% 1.39% 2.36% 3.75%
Chondrogenic 270 263 3.44% 3.68% 1.80% 1.75% 3.56%
Undefined 27 63 0.34% 0.88% 0.18% 0.42% 0.60%
Adipogenic 27 15 0.34% 0.21% 0.18% 0.10% 0.28%
Mcam + Fibroblast 18 21 0.23% 0.29% 0.12% 0.14% 0.26%
Macrophage 15 13 0.19% 0.18% 0.10% 0.09% 0.19%
Total 7845 7141 52.35% 47.65% 100.00%

Epiphyseal chondrocytes from Notch2tm1.1Ecan and control littermates were cultured to confluence. RNA-Seq data were aligned to the mouse genome and gene and cell counting and cluster distribution were performed using Cell Ranger and Seurat after normalization. Cell number/cluster, % cells/cluster and cluster percent distribution are shown for epiphyseal chondrocytes from control and experimental cells.

Pseudotime trajectory findings were constructed with Monocle 3 and used to predict the differentiation trajectory among clusters present in epiphyseal chondrocytes. Monocle 3 defines the trajectories and performs the pseudotime analysis applying an algorithm to learn the sequence of gene expression changes placing each cell at its proper position in the trajectory. The differential analysis toolkit was used to find genes that change as a function of pseudotime. Branched trajectories correspond to cellular “decisions” and were analyzed in the trajectories of control and experimental cultures. Pseudotime trajectory analysis selecting clusters expressing articular/synovial fibroblasts or chondrogenic cells as a root node revealed an association and good progression among the clusters from control cells (Fig. 8). In contrast, the articular/synovial fibroblast cluster from Notch2tm1.1Ecan cells was fragmented, indicating an interruption of the ordinate cluster progression. IPA of canonical pathways conducted in the articular/synovial cell cluster revealed greater enhancement in the osteoarthritis pathways in cells from Notch2tm1.1Ecan mice (Fig. S4). Gene analysis of the 50 mostly expressed genes in the articular/synovial cluster from Notch2tm1.1Ecan cultures revealed that Pla1a, Pla2g2e and Dpt were upregulated ≥25% and Clec3b, Dpp4, Agtr2, Pdzk1p1, Col6a6, Cd55, Adgrd1 and Xdh were downregulated ≥25% and these genes have been associated with inflammatory conditions (Table S3) (35, 36, 37, 38).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Trajectory and pseudotime analysis reveal that the progression of articular/synovial fibroblasts is disrupted in epiphyseal chondrocytes from Notch2tm1.1Ecan mice. Pseudotime analysis of 19 cellular clusters from Notch2tm1.1Ecan and control chondrocytes identified by uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP). On the left, using the articular/synovial fibroblast cluster and on the right using the chondrogenic cluster as a root node. An alternative visualization of pseudotime as a progression boxplot of pseudotime values is shown. The control culture used for the UMAP visualization and pseudotime analysis was shared with a study on the effect of TNFα in chondrocytes (33).

scRNA-Req of epiphyseal chondrocytes from NICD2-expressing cells reveals modest alterations in cluster distribution and progression

Epiphyseal chondrocytes from R26-NICD2 transfected with Ad-CMV-GFP (control) or Ad-CMV-Cre (NICD2-expressing) cells were processed in a Chromium iX using a 3′ library kit. An estimated 10,049 control and 10,077 NICD2-expressing cells were recovered, representing an ∼60% recovery and 25,581 and 25,468 genes in control and NICD2-expressing cells detected. Following normalization, using the same criteria described for Notch2tm1.1Ecan and control cells, the number of cells analyzed was reduced to 9957 control and 9924 NICD2-expressing cells (Table 2). Cluster analysis of epiphyseal chondrocytes (pooled data from control and NICD2-expressing cells) using the UMAP linear dimensional reduction algorithm, identified 17 different cell clusters (Fig. 9, Table 2). NOTCH2 was the prevalent Notch receptor and Hes1 the prevalent target gene detected in the various clusters and there was greater expression of Notch2 and of the Notch target genes Hes1, Hey1, Hey2 and Heyl in NICD2-expressing than in control cells (Fig. S3), confirming activation of Notch signaling. Selected clusters were constituted by cells with a transcriptome profile of chondrogenic cells, limb mesenchyme, and articular/synovial cells, although the more prevalent clusters exhibited a gene profile associated with fibroblasts (Tables 2 and S4). UMAP linear dimensional reduction did not reveal substantial differences in cluster distribution between control and NICD2-expressing cells (Fig. 10, Tables 2 and S5).

Table 2.

Cell cluster distribution of epiphyseal chondrocytes from control and NICD2-expressing cells

B.
Cell number/Cluster
% Cell/Cluster
Cluster percent
Cluster total
Cluster Control NICD2 Control NICD2 Control NICD2
Undefined 1136 1001 11.4% 10.1% 5.71% 5.03% 10.75%
Fibroblast 1056 1030 10.6% 10.4% 5.31% 5.18% 10.49%
Fibroblast 898 967 9.0% 9.7% 4.52% 4.86% 9.38%
Limb bud 848 819 8.5% 8.3% 4.27% 4.12% 8.38%
Fibroblast 801 859 8.0% 8.7% 4.03% 4.32% 8.35%
Undefined 718 751 7.2% 7.6% 3.61% 3.78% 7.39%
Chondrogenic 766 662 7.7% 6.7% 3.85% 3.33% 7.18%
Undefined 704 693 7.1% 7.0% 3.54% 3.49% 7.03%
Undefined 656 635 6.6% 6.4% 3.30% 3.19% 6.49%
Fibroblast? 414 635 4.2% 6.4% 2.08% 3.19% 5.28%
Articular/synovial 582 445 5.8% 4.5% 2.93% 2.24% 5.17%
Fibroblast 434 447 4.4% 4.5% 2.18% 2.25% 4.43%
Chondrogenic 424 325 4.3% 3.3% 2.13% 1.63% 3.77%
Fibroblast? 298 451 3.0% 4.5% 1.50% 2.27% 3.77%
Adipogenic 132 113 1.3% 1.1% 0.66% 0.57% 1.23%
Mcam + Fibroblast 57 59 0.6% 0.6% 0.29% 0.30% 0.58%
Macrophage 33 32 0.3% 0.3% 0.17% 0.16% 0.33%
Total 9957 9924 50.08% 49.92% 100.00%

Epiphyseal chondrocytes from R26-NICD2 mice were cultured to 70% confluence and transfected with Ad-CMV-Cre (expressing NICD2) and Ad-CMV-GFP (control) and cultured for an additional 24-48 h period. RNA-Seq data were aligned to the mouse genome and gene and cell counting and cluster distribution were performed using Cell Ranger and Seurat after normalization. Cell number/cluster, % cells/cluster and cluster percent distribution are shown for epiphyseal chondrocytes from control and experimental cells.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) for dimension reduction of scRNA-Seq data of control and NOTCH2 activated epiphyseal chondrocytes from newborn mice identify cell clusters.A, UMAP visualization of cell clusters of normalized pooled data from epiphyseal chondrocytes from newborn R26-NICD2 mice cultured to ∼70% confluence and transfected with either Ad-CMV-Cre (NOTCH2 activation) or Ad-CMV-GFP (control) and cultured for an additional 24-48 h. Dot plot displaying the expression of genes (B) associated with mesenchymal cells, limb mesenchyme, articular/synovial cells, chondrogenic, adipogenic, and osteogenic cells and macrophages and (C) associated with fibroblasts both in 17 cellular clusters from epiphyseal chondrocytes from newborn mice identified by UMAP. Red denotes higher and blue denotes lower than average expression, and the size of the circle represents the percentage of cells expressing each gene.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) for dimension reduction of scRNA-Seq data reveals no differences in cell clusters from control and NOTCH2 activated epiphyseal chondrocytes from newborn mice.A, UMAP visualization of cell clusters of normalized independent data from epiphyseal chondrocytes from newborn R26-NICD2 mice cultured to ∼70% confluence and transfected with either Ad-CMV-Cre (NOTCH2 activation) or Ad-CMV-GFP (control) and cultured for an additional 24-48 h. B, bar graph demonstrating the cell distribution present in each individual cluster from control and NICD2-expressing cells. Dot plot displaying the expression of genes associated (C) with mesenchymal cells, limb mesenchyme, articular/synovial cells, chondrogenic, adipogenic and osteogenic cells and macrophages, and (D) with fibroblasts in 17 cellular clusters from epiphyseal chondrocytes from newborn mice identified by UMAP. Red denotes higher and blue denotes lower than average expression, and the size of the circle represents the percentage of cells expressing each gene.

Pseudotime trajectory findings, constructed with Monocle 3, were conducted selecting the articular/synovial fibroblasts or the chondrogenic cluster as a root node. In accordance with the results in control and Notch2tm1.1Ecan cells, it demonstrated an association between clusters and good progression among the clusters from control cells (Fig. 11). In contrast to results obtained with Notch2tm1.1Ecan cells, the expression of the NICD2 did not alter the pseudotime trajectory of articular/synovial fibroblasts although it modified the trajectory of an indeterminate or ill-identified cluster (Fig. 11). Genes modified by NICD2 in this cluster are shown in Table S6.

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Trajectory and pseudotime analysis reveal a redirection in the progression of articular/synovial fibroblasts by NOTCH2. Trajectory and pseudotime analysis using Monocle 3, was performed in epiphyseal chondrocytes from R26-NICD2 mice cultured to ∼70% confluence transfected with either Ad-CMV-Cre (NOTCH2 activated) or Ad-CMV-GFP (control) and cultured for 24-48 h. Pseudotime trajectory analysis of 17 cellular clusters from control and NICD2-expressing cells identified by uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP). On the left using articular/synovial fibroblast cluster and on the right using the chondrogenic cluster as a root node. An alternative visualization of the pseudotime UMAP as a progression boxplot of pseudotime values is shown.

Discussion

Previous work demonstrated that a NOTCH2 gain-of-function mutation sensitizes mice to the development of arthritis following DMM surgeries and to the osteolytic actions of TNFα (26, 27, 31). The present study extends previous findings demonstrating that NOTCH2 enhances the inflammatory response induced by TNFα in epiphyseal chondrocytes. It explores the direct effects of a mutation harbored by Notch2tm1.1Ecan mice, causing a NOTCH2 gain-of-function and the induction of the NICD2 in epiphyseal chondrocytes. The transcriptome profile of epiphyseal chondrocytes was examined at the bulk and single-cell resolution. scRNA-Seq and bulk RNA-Seq were used as complementary approaches. Bulk RNA-Seq was used to provide a general landscape of the transcriptome profile and signaling pathways affected by NOTCH2, whereas scRNA-Seq was useful in the analysis of the transcriptome profile related to individual cell populations present in epiphyseal chondrocytes and their influence by NOTCH2.

Bulk RNA-Seq confirmed that NOTCH2 enhanced signaling pathways associated with the inflammatory response, arthritis, fibrosis, and collagen degradation. Activation of similar pathways was found in chondrocytes from Notch2tm1.1Ecan mutants and from cells expressing the NICD2. This would indicate that the changes observed were a direct result of an effect of the NOTCH2 ICD and are in agreement with previous observations showing that the NICD2 replicates the effects of the NOTCH2 gain-of-function harbored by Notch2tm1.1Ecan cells (31). Although Notch target genes associated with the activation of canonical signaling, such as Hes1, Hey1, Hey2, and Heyl were induced by NOTCH2, this does not exclude possible additional interactions of the NICD with non-canonical signals that could influence the response to inflammation.

The present work confirms that NOTCH2 is the prevalent Notch receptor expressed by cells present in cartilage (4). Whereas Notch1 transcripts were detectable, the level of Notch3 and Notch4 expression was low, suggesting that, under basal conditions, these Notch receptors do not play a physiological or pathological role in this tissue environment. However, Notch3 transcripts were induced by the NOTCH2 gain-of-function, and as a consequence, NOTCH3 could contribute to the phenotype observed. The results confirm the induction of Notch3 by Notch signaling, an effect that has been attributed to the presence of RBPJᴋ binding sites in intron two of the Notch3 gene (39, 40). Since Hes1 is the canonical target gene mostly expressed in chondrocytes, it likely plays a role in mediating Notch effects in this cell environment. This would be in agreement with previous work demonstrating important roles of HES1 and HES5 in chondrogenesis and cartilage development and of HES1 in preclinical models of osteoarthritis (21, 41). Therefore, it is likely that HES1 is responsible for the actions of NOTCH2 in cartilage, as it has been shown for the effects of NOTCH2 in osteoclastogenesis (42).

scRNA-Seq analysis confirmed cellular heterogeneity in epiphyseal chondrocyte cultures and also observed in the epiphyseal growth plate and articular cartilage (32, 33, 43, 44, 45). The cell composition of each identified cluster is defined by its transcriptome profile and is not homogeneous making the identity of each cluster not absolute. Indeed, there is a continuum among cells from epiphyseal chondrocytes and pseudotime trajectory analysis revealed an association between clusters expressing gene markers identified in fibroblasts and chondrogenic cells. Some clusters could not be identified with certainty since they were constituted by genes expressed in multiple cell lineages. This was particularly evident in the experiment analyzing the effect of the NICD2, making the impact of the NICD2 on cluster distribution and progression more difficult to assess.

Cluster distribution and its potential progression were affected in cells from Notch2tm1.1Ecan mice. The articular/synovial cluster was fragmented in Notch2tm1.1Ecan cells, revealing an interruption in the normal cluster trajectory. Cells spread along a continuum according to their expression profile, and alterations in the pseudotime trajectory may represent gains or losses along a cell lineage or changes in gene expression (46, 47). These alterations in the trajectory and pseudotime often represent crucial decision points in a biological process, such as cell lineage commitment or disease onset. This is an important finding since alterations in pseudotime trajectories across conditions may represent gains or losses along a cell lineage, changes in the abundance of cells along a cell lineage, or in gene expression itself along the pseudotime across conditions (48). Cluster distribution and pseudotime trajectory did not reveal changes in the articular/synovial cluster from NICD2-expressing cells. The difference between these results and those obtained with cells from Notch2tm1.1Ecan mice may reflect differences between treatment and control, naturally occurring sample-level variations, unwanted technical variations, and uncertainties in the inferred trajectory and pseudotime. The latter is possible because cluster identity was often not as clear in cultures from NICD2-expressing cells as it was in cultures from Notch2tm1.1Ecan mice.

Analysis of genes influenced by the Notch2tm1.1Ecan mutation in the articular/synovial fibroblast cluster revealed dysregulation of genes that have been associated with inflammation (35, 36, 37, 38). This would suggest that dysregulation of these genes could be responsible to some extent for the effects of NOTCH2. Since most of the genes affected were downregulated, the effect could be mediated by HES1, a known inhibitor of transcription (49, 50, 51).

A limitation of this work is the fact that data were restricted to the determination of gene profiles and changes were not confirmed at the protein level. We recognize that epiphyseal chondrocytes from newborn mice have properties of chondroblasts, are not fully mature and are not entirely representative of events occurring in the joint in vivo, and that osteoarthritis is a cartilage disorder of mature joints. Although the current work offered an initial understanding of the role of NOTCH2 in cartilage tissue homeostasis, it did not explore the role of NOTCH2 in osteoarthritis. Consequently, the signaling pathways affected by NOTCH2 may or may not have relevance to the pathogenesis of this disorder. The present studies are limited by a lack of functional follow up on either the cells or the pathways influenced by the NOTCH2 gain-of-function in epiphyseal chondrocytes.

In conclusion, NOTCH2 enhances the activity of pathways associated with inflammation and disrupts the transcriptome profile of articular/synovial fibroblasts in murine epiphyseal chondrocytes.

Experimental procedures

Genetically modified mice

Notch2tm1.1Ecan mice harboring a 6955C>T substitution in the Notch2 locus were backcrossed into a C57BL/6 background for ≥ 8 generations and have been characterized previously (22). R26-NICD2 mice, created by Ryuichi Nishinakamura (Kumamoto University, Japan), were kindly provided by Fanxin Long (Philadelphia, PA) in a C57BL/6 background (34, 52). In R26-NICD2 mice, sequences coding for the NOTCH2 NICD are cloned into the Rosa26 locus downstream of a Neo-STOP cassette flanked by loxP sequences. Following the excision of the cassette by Cre recombination, the NOTCH2 NICD is expressed under the control of Rosa26. Genotyping was conducted by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in DNA from tail extracts using specific primers from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT). All animal studies were limited to tissue harvest following euthanasia and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of UConn Health.

Chondrocyte cultures

Epiphyseal cartilage cells were isolated from the proximal and distal joints of the tibiae of 4-day-old Notch2tm1.1Ecan, R26-NICD2 and control mice, following the dissection of surrounding tissues under a Unitron Z850 stereo microscope. Epiphyseal cartilage was placed in high glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) and digested with 0.25% trypsin, 0.9 mM EDTA (Life Technologies) and then 200 U/ml of type II collagenase (Worthington Biochemical Corporation, Lakewood, NJ) in DMEM at 37 °C (30). Following digestions, the tissue was strained through a 70 μm membrane and the cells collected by centrifugation were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, Atlanta Biologics) at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere until reaching ∼70% to 80% confluence (20, 30). Cultures were digested with trypsin once and cells were seeded at a density of one million cells/56.7 cm2, and for experiments using Notch2tm1.1Ecan, cells were cultured to confluency. To induce the NOTCH2 NICD, R26-NICD2 chondrocytes were cultured until they reached 70 to 80% confluency, transferred to DMEM in the absence of serum for 1 h, and exposed overnight to 300 to 600 multiplicity of infection of replication-defective recombinant adenoviruses. An Ad-CMV-Cre (Vector Biolabs) was used to excise the STOP cassette in R26-NICD2 cells, and Ad-CMV-GFP was used as a control. Following infection, cells were allowed to recover for 24 h in the presence of DMEM containing 10% FBS, digested with trypsin, and seeded as described for Notch2tm1.1Ecan cells. Cells were deprived of serum for 8 h or overnight before being processed for bulk or scRNA-Seq (30). Cells were seeded as a pool for bulk RNA-Seq experiments and maintained as biological replicates (n = 4) for scRNA-Seq and pooled immediately before microfluidic partitioning.

Bulk RNA sequencing and bioinformatics analysis

A NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to determine purity ratios of total RNA, and an Agilent TapeStation 4200 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) was used to determine RNA quality using the RNA High Sensitivity assay. Samples used for library preparation had an RNA Integrity Number ≥ 9.0 and were processed for mRNA-sequencing at the UConn Center for Genome Innovation. This was conducted using the Illumina TruSeq Stranded mRNA sample preparation kit following manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina), as described previously (31, 33). Libraries were validated for length and adapter dimer removal using the Agilent TapeStation 4200 D1000 High Sensitivity assay (Agilent Technologies), quantified and normalized using the dsDNA High Sensitivity Assay for Qubit 3.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), as previously reported (31, 33). Sample libraries were prepared for sequencing by denaturing and diluting the libraries per manufacturer’s protocol (Illumina). Samples were pooled for sequencing, normalized, and run across an Illumina Next-Seq 500 using version 2.5 chemistry. Target read depth was achieved for each sample with paired end 75 bp reads. Sequencing raw reads were trimmed with Sickle (Version 1.33), with a respective quality and length threshold of 30 and 45 and mapped to the Mus musculus genome (GRCm39 ensembl release 105) with HISAT2 (version 2.1.0) (53). The generated SAM files were transformed into a BAM format using samtools (version 1.9), and PICARD was used to remove PCR duplicates (54). The counts were generated against the features with HTSeq-count, and the differential gene expression between control and experimental samples was determined using DESeq2 (55, 56). To increase accuracy of the results, covariates were introduced in the DESeq2 analysis and genes showing less than ten counts across the compared samples were excluded from further analysis. A false discovery rate (FDR) adjusted p value < 0.05 was considered significant and used for downstream analysis, as indicated in text and legends. Highly variable functions were identified, and linear dimensional reduction conducted by principal component analysis. The processed RNA-Seq results were analyzed by IPA (Qiagen, Redwood City, CA), GSEA and the R package clusterProfiler enrichment tool (57, 58, 59). The parameters chosen for IPA were a p value of < 0.05, an FDR p adjusted value of 0.1 and fold changes (FC) set at log2FC ≥ 1 analyzed using canonical pathways under the Genes and Chemicals category. For GSEA, the parameters chosen were m5.go.bp.v2024.1.Mm.symbols.gmt permutation gene set and Chip platform Mouse_Ensembl_Gene_ID_MSigDB.v2024.1.Mm.chip. Gene sets larger than 500 genes and lesser than 10 genes were excluded.

scRNA-Seq and computational analysis

To analyze transcriptome profiles on a cell-by-cell basis, live cells from control and experimental cultures of epiphyseal chondrocytes were pooled at the completion of the culture, counted on a Cellometer K2 (Nexceleron) and processed on a Chromium iX instrument using a Chromium Single Cell 3′ library and Gel Bead Kit v3.1 (10x Genomics) to prepare barcoded libraries, as previously reported (33, 60). The single cell gene expression kit used has a cell capture efficiency of ∼65% to 75% and equal number of control and experimental cells were partitioned aimed at a recovery of ∼10,000 cells/group. Following reverse transcription, libraries were sequenced at the UConn Center for Genome Innovation. cDNAs from each single cell had unique barcodes, allowing the sequencing reads to be mapped backed to the cell of origin (61).

FASTQ files were generated using reference genome mm10 to 2020-A and analyzed using Cell Ranger v7.0 or v8.0 (10x Genomics) for sample demultiplexing, barcode processing, transcript counting and output HTMLs for data quality assessment and sample visualization. Secondary analyses of output files were conducted using the Seurat R Package (v5.2.1). These included dimensionality reduction, cell clustering and differential gene expression (62, 63). Cells with <250 transcripts, >10% mitochondrial RNA or >10,000 genes/cell were excluded manually, and the NormalizeData function in Seurat was used to normalize the data set. Highly variable functions were identified, and linear dimensional reduction conducted by principal component analysis and non-linear dimensionality reduction performed by UMAP. Doublets were identified and excluded, and cell clusters were classified according to their gene profile and gene ontology (GO). For this purpose, the FindMarkers function in Seurat was chosen to select the 50 most expressed genes in each cluster. GO was determined in the National Center for Biotechnology Information database. Pseudotime trajectory analysis of pooled and independent data from control and experimental cells was constructed by analysis of the Seurat object in Monocle 3 (64). Monocle 3 cell data set was constructed and the learn principal graph from the reduced dimensional space was applied using learn_graph, as described previously (60). Cells were organized along their trajectory using Monocle plot_cells and order_cells; marker genes for each cluster were identified using the Seurat’s FindAllMarkers function. Gene ontology and IPA of differentially expressed genes was performed on a per-cluster basis, and genes prioritized based on ontology, and relevance to transcriptional control and signaling pathways (57, 58, 59). IPA was performed to analyze canonical pathways under the Genes and Chemicals category.

Statistics

Data are presented as means ± standard deviations (SD) and individual values. Statistical differences were determined by unpaired t test. Values beyond 2 SD from the mean are considered outliers.

Data availability

All data are available from the corresponding author upon a reasonable request. The raw data for bulk and scRNA-Seq were deposited in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under GSE292806 and GSE292807.

Supporting information

This article contains supporting information.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mary Yurczak for secretarial assistance.

Author contributions

R. G., E. C., L. S., and E. D. writing–review & editing; R. G. and E. C. methodology; E. C. writing–original draft; E. C. visualization; E. C. and E. D. validation; E. C. supervision; E. C. resources; E. C. project administration; E. C., L. S. investigation; E. C. funding acquisition; E. C. and E. D. formal analysis; E. C. and E. D. data curation; E. C. conceptualization.

Funding and additional information

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) AR078149 (EC). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Reviewed by members of the JBC Editorial Board. Edited by Robert Haltiwanger

Supporting information

Supplementary Material
mmc1.pdf (7.8MB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Siebel C., Lendahl U. Notch signaling in development, tissue homeostasis, and disease. Physiol. Rev. 2017;97:1235–1294. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00005.2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Canalis E. Notch in skeletal physiology and disease. OsteoporosInt. 2018;29:2611–2621. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4694-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Liu Z., Chen J., Mirando A.J., Wang C., Zuscik M.J., O'Keefe R.J., et al. A dual role for NOTCH signaling in joint cartilage maintenance and osteoarthritis. Sci. signaling. 2015;8:ra71. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aaa3792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hosaka Y., Saito T., Sugita S., Hikata T., Kobayashi H., Fukai A., et al. Notch signaling in chondrocytes modulates endochondral ossification and osteoarthritis development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013;110:1875–1880. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1207458110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shang Y., Smith S., Hu X. Role of Notch signaling in regulating innate immunity and inflammation in health and disease. Protein Cell. 2016;7:159–174. doi: 10.1007/s13238-016-0250-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kapoor M., Martel-Pelletier J., Lajeunesse D., Pelletier J.P., Fahmi H. Role of proinflammatory cytokines in the pathophysiology of osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2011;7:33–42. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Loeser R.F., Goldring S.R., Scanzello C.R., Goldring M.B. Osteoarthritis: a disease of the joint as an organ. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:1697–1707. doi: 10.1002/art.34453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kloppenburg M., Berenbaum F. Osteoarthritis year in review 2019: epidemiology and therapy. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2020;28:242–248. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2020.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.de Lange-Brokaar B.J., Ioan-Facsinay A., van Osch G.J., Zuurmond A.M., Schoones J., Toes R.E., et al. Synovial inflammation, immune cells and their cytokines in osteoarthritis: a review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012;20:1484–1499. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.08.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kolasinski S.L., Neogi T., Hochberg M.C., Oatis C., Guyatt G., Block J., et al. 2019 American college of rheumatology/arthritis foundation guideline for the management of osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72:220–233. doi: 10.1002/art.41142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bannuru R.R., Osani M.C., Vaysbrot E.E., Arden N.K., Bennell K., Bierma-Zeinstra S.M.A., et al. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee, hip, and polyarticular osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019;27:1578–1589. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Goldring M.B., Otero M. Inflammation in osteoarthritis. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2011;23:471–478. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e328349c2b1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gordon W.R., Zimmerman B., He L., Miles L.J., Huang J., Tiyanont K., et al. Mechanical allostery: evidence for a force requirement in the proteolytic activation of notch. Developmental Cel. 2015;33:729–736. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kovall R.A. More complicated than it looks: assembly of Notch pathway transcription complexes. Oncogene. 2008;27:5099–5109. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nam Y., Sliz P., Song L., Aster J.C., Blacklow S.C. Structural basis for cooperativity in recruitment of MAML coactivators to Notch transcription complexes. Cell. 2006;124:973–983. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.12.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Schroeter E.H., Kisslinger J.A., Kopan R. Notch-1 signalling requires ligand-induced proteolytic release of intracellular domain. Nature. 1998;393:382–386. doi: 10.1038/30756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wilson J.J., Kovall R.A. Crystal structure of the CSL-Notch-Mastermind ternary complex bound to DNA. Cell. 2006;124:985–996. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mirando A.J., Liu Z., Moore T., Lang A., Kohn A., Osinski A.M., et al. RBP-Jkappa-dependent Notch signaling is required for murine articular cartilage and joint maintenance. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:2623–2633. doi: 10.1002/art.38076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mead T.J., Yutzey K.E. Notch pathway regulation of chondrocyte differentiation and proliferation during appendicular and axial skeleton development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009;106:14420–14425. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0902306106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zanotti S., Canalis E. Notch suppresses nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) transactivation and Nfatc1 expression in chondrocytes. Endocrinology. 2013;154:762–772. doi: 10.1210/en.2012-1925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sugita S., Hosaka Y., Okada K., Mori D., Yano F., Kobayashi H., et al. Transcription factor Hes1 modulates osteoarthritis development in cooperation with calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase 2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2015;112:3080–3085. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419699112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Canalis E., Schilling L., Yee S.P., Lee S.K., Zanotti S. Hajdu Cheney mouse mutants exhibit osteopenia, increased osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:1538–1551. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.685453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Canalis E. Clinical and experimental aspects of notch receptor signaling: Hajdu-Cheney syndrome and related disorders. Metabolism. 2018;80:48–56. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2017.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Isidor B., Lindenbaum P., Pichon O., Bezieau S., Dina C., Jacquemont S., et al. Truncating mutations in the last exon of NOTCH2 cause a rare skeletal disorder with osteoporosis. Nat. Genet. 2011;43:306–308. doi: 10.1038/ng.778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Simpson M.A., Irving M.D., Asilmaz E., Gray M.J., Dafou D., Elmslie F.V., et al. Mutations in NOTCH2 cause Hajdu-Cheney syndrome, a disorder of severe and progressive bone loss. Nat. Genet. 2011;43:303–305. doi: 10.1038/ng.779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yu J., Canalis E. The Hajdu Cheney mutation sensitizes mice to the osteolytic actions of tumor necrosis factor alpha. J. Biol. Chem. 2019;294:14203–14214. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.009824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zanotti S., Yu J., Bridgewater D., Wolf J.M., Canalis E. Mice harboring a Hajdu Cheney Syndrome mutation are sensitized to osteoarthritis. Bone. 2018;114:198–205. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2018.06.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.von Vopelius E., Oheim R., Amling M., Rolvien T., Beil F.T. Skeletal characterization in a patient with Hajdu-Cheney syndrome undergoing total knee arthroplasty. OsteoporosInt. 2021;32:1899–1904. doi: 10.1007/s00198-021-05914-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Olsen B.R., Reginato A.M., Wang W. Bone development. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2000;16:191–220. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.16.1.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zanotti S., Canalis E. Interleukin 6 mediates select effects of notch in chondrocytes. Osteoarthr Cartilage. 2013;21:1766–1773. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Canalis E., Yu J., Singh V., Mocarska M., Schilling L. NOTCH2 sensitizes the chondrocyte to the inflammatory response of tumor necrosis factor α. J. Biol. Chem. 2023;299:105372. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sebastian A., McCool J.L., Hum N.R., Murugesh D.K., Wilson S.P., Christiansen B.A., et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals transcriptomic heterogeneity and post-traumatic osteoarthritis-associated early molecular changes in mouse articular chondrocytes. Cells. 2021;10:1462. doi: 10.3390/cells10061462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Canalis E., Schilling L., Denker E. TNFalpha has differential effects on the transcriptome profile of selected populations in murine cartilage. Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2024;6:100528. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fujimura S., Jiang Q., Kobayashi C., Nishinakamura R. Notch2 activation in the embryonic kidney depletes nephron progenitors. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2010;21:803–810. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2009040353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Karpus O.N., Kiener H.P., Niederreiter B., Yilmaz-Elis A.S., van der Kaa J., Ramaglia V., et al. CD55 deposited on synovial collagen fibers protects from immune complex-mediated arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2015;17:6. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0518-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Karlsson C., Dehne T., Lindahl A., Brittberg M., Pruss A., Sittinger M., et al. Genome-wide expression profiling reveals new candidate genes associated with osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010;18:581–592. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2009.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bomalaski J.S., Clark M.A. Phospholipase A2 and arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1993;36:190–198. doi: 10.1002/art.1780360208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sun Y., Yang H., Guo J., Du J., Han S., Yang X. Identification of HTRA1, DPT and MXRA5 as potential biomarkers associated with osteoarthritis progression and immune infiltration. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2024;25:647. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07758-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Luo B., Aster J.C., Hasserjian R.P., Kuo F., Sklar J. Isolation and functional analysis of a cDNA for human Jagged2, a gene encoding a ligand for the Notch1 receptor. Mol. Cell Biol. 1997;17:6057–6067. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.10.6057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lopez-Lopez S., Monsalve E.M., Romero de Avila M.J., Gonzalez-Gomez J., Hernandez de Leon N., Ruiz-Marcos F., et al. NOTCH3 signaling is essential for NF-kappaB activation in TLR-activated macrophages. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:14839. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71810-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rutkowski T.P., Kohn A., Sharma D., Ren Y., Mirando A.J., Hilton M.J. HES factors regulate specific aspects of chondrogenesis and chondrocyte hypertrophy during cartilage development. J. Cell Sci. 2016;129:2145–2155. doi: 10.1242/jcs.181271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yu J., Schilling L., Eller T., Canalis E. Hairy and enhancer of split 1 is a primary effector of NOTCH2 signaling and induces osteoclast differentiation and function. J. Biol. Chem. 2021;297:101376. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Haseeb A., Kc R., Angelozzi M., de Charleroy C., Rux D., Tower R.J., et al. SOX9 keeps growth plates and articular cartilage healthy by inhibiting chondrocyte dedifferentiation/osteoblastic redifferentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2021;118 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2019152118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Molin A.N., Contentin R., Angelozzi M., Karvande A., Kc R., Haseeb A., et al. Skeletal growth is enhanced by a shared role for SOX8 and SOX9 in promoting reserve chondrocyte commitment to columnar proliferation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2024;121 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2316969121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zieba J., Nevarez L., Wachtell D., Martin J.H., Kot A., Wong S., et al. Altered Sox9 and FGF signaling gene expression in Aga2 OI mice negatively affects linear growth. JCI Insight. 2023;8:e171984. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.171984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ali M., Ribeiro M.M., del Sol A. In: Vivanco M.d., editor. Vol. 2471. Humana; New York, NY: 2022. Computational Methods to Identify Cell-Fate Determinants, Identity Transcription Factors, and Niche-Induced Signaling Pathways for Stem Cell Research. (Mammary Stem Cells. Methods in Molecular Biology). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Saelens W., Cannoodt R., Todorov H., Saeys Y. A comparison of single-cell trajectory inference methods. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019;37:547–554. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0071-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hou W., Ji Z., Chen Z., Wherry E.J., Hicks S.C., Ji H. A statistical framework for differential pseudotime analysis with multiple single-cell RNA-seq samples. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:7286. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42841-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Coglievina M., Guarnaccia C., Pintar A., Pongor S. Different degrees of structural order in distinct regions of the transcriptional repressor HES-1. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2010;1804:2153–2161. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2010.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kageyama R., Ohtsuka T., Kobayashi T. The Hes gene family: repressors and oscillators that orchestrate embryogenesis. Development. 2007;134:1243–1251. doi: 10.1242/dev.000786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Iso T., Kedes L., Hamamori Y. HES and HERP families: multiple effectors of the Notch signaling pathway. J. Cell Physiol. 2003;194:237–255. doi: 10.1002/jcp.10208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lee S.Y., Long F. Notch signaling suppresses glucose metabolism in mesenchymal progenitors to restrict osteoblast differentiation. J. Clin. Invest. 2018;128:5573–5586. doi: 10.1172/JCI96221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kim D., Langmead B., Salzberg S.L. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods. 2015;12:357–360. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Li H., Handsaker B., Wysoker A., Fennell T., Ruan J., Homer N., et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Anders S., Pyl P.T., Huber W. HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:166–169. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Love M.I., Huber W., Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Subramanian A., Tamayo P., Mootha V.K., Mukherjee S., Ebert B.L., Gillette M.A., et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005;102:15545–15550. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wu T., Hu E., Xu S., Chen M., Guo P., Dai Z., et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: a universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation (Camb) 2021;2:100141. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kramer A., Green J., Pollard J., Jr., Tugendreich S. Causal analysis approaches in ingenuity pathway analysis. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:523–530. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Canalis E., Schilling L., Yu J., Denker E. NOTCH2 promotes osteoclast maturation and metabolism and modulates the transcriptome profile during osteoclastogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2024;300:105613. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ding J., Smith S.L., Orozco G., Barton A., Eyre S., Martin P. Characterisation of CD4+ T-cell subtypes using single cell RNA sequencing and the impact of cell number and sequencing depth. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:19825. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76972-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Butler A., Hoffman P., Smibert P., Papalexi E., Satija R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat. Biotechnol. 2018;36:411–420. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Stuart T., Butler A., Hoffman P., Hafemeister C., Papalexi E., Mauck W.M., 3rd, et al. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell. 2019;177:1888–1902.e1821. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Trapnell C., Cacchiarelli D., Grimsby J., Pokharel P., Li S., Morse M., et al. The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014;32:381–386. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material
mmc1.pdf (7.8MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All data are available from the corresponding author upon a reasonable request. The raw data for bulk and scRNA-Seq were deposited in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under GSE292806 and GSE292807.


Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES