Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2025 Jun 6;25(24):9779–9786. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c02053

Tuning Ionic Liquids with Charged Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane Nanoparticles for Highly Conductive Quasi-Solid Electrolytes

Soorya Koymeth , Marian Paluch , Mateusz Dulski , Zaneta Wojnarowska †,*
PMCID: PMC12186608  PMID: 40478230

Abstract

Electrolytes are fundamental materials that have been used in various electrochemical devices, including fuel cells and batteries. Herein, we report a new class of quasi-solid electrolytes based on ionic liquids (ILs) and multiply charged polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) nanoparticles that overcome the traditional conductivity–mechanical stability trade-off in solid electrolytes. By precisely controlling the stoichiometric interaction between octa-charged POSS nanoparticles and selected ILs, we achieve unique combinations of properties: room-temperature ionic conductivity σdc RT up to 4 mS/cm, matching or exceeding the parent ILs; reversible shear-thinning behavior enabling easy processing; and exceptional long-term stability against phase separation. Systematic characterization reveals that the 30 wt % POSS loading enhances interfacial charge transfer near the NPs or creates an optimal percolating network where cation–nanoparticle interactions favor fast anion transport. At the same time, the charged POSS framework provides mechanical stability to the quasi-solid electrolyte.

Keywords: ionic liquids, quasi-solid electrolytes, dielectric spectroscopy, thixotropy, nanoparticles


graphic file with name nl5c02053_0006.jpg


graphic file with name nl5c02053_0005.jpg


The efficient production, storage, and use of energy have emerged as major contemporary concerns. As a result, there is an increasing need for low-emission cars, clean and dependable energy sources for businesses and homes, and contemporary electrochemical devices made of eco-friendly materials that can produce energy at a reasonable price. Therefore, designing effective electrolytes for a variety of electrochemical applications has been the most often investigated area over the past 10 years.

Due to their unique combination of properties such as an exceptionally wide electrochemical window (enabling stability against both reduction and oxidation), high ionic conductivity (reaching 27 mS/cm at room temperature), negligible vapor pressure, nonflammability, and thermal stability, ionic liquids (ILs) have emerged as promising electrolyte candidates. , These molten salts, composed entirely of ions, offer additional advantages through their tunable physicochemical properties: characteristics such as density, thermal behavior, and conductivity can be precisely adjusted by selecting appropriate cation–anion combinations. However, their liquid state and relatively low viscosity pose practical challenges, particularly, the risk of leakage in electrochemical devices. This limitation has driven significant research interest in solid-state electrolytes (SSEs), which combine ionic transport functionality with separator capabilities while addressing critical safety concerns. ,

SSEs are broadly categorized into four groups based on their distinct chemical composition: inorganic solid electrolytes (ISEs), polymer solid electrolytes (SPEs), polymerized ionic liquids (PILs), , and composite solid-state electrolytes (CSEs). Regarding the ISEs, mainly oxide-type, sulfide-type, and sodium conductors have gained much attention. Although some of them deliver a high ionic conductivity at room temperature, ISEs still suffer from several challenging issues, including low Coulombic efficiency, low specific discharge capacity, poor rate performance, or poor cycling performance, resulting from their rigid nature. Furthermore, when sulfide ISEs are exposed to air, hazardous for humans, H2S can be released. In contrast to ISEs, polymer-based electrolytes have favorable properties, including low flammability, size flexibility, light weight, ease of processing, good interfacial contact, and electrode compatibility. Most SPEs are fabricated from lithium salts dissolved in ion-solvating polymers, such as poly­(ethylene oxide) (PEO), propylene oxide, poly­(ethylene imine), and polyalkene sulfides. Polymerized ionic liquids (PILs) attempt to bridge this gap by combining polymeric frameworks with IL moieties, but their single-ion conduction mechanism inherently limits charge transport. Since the conducting and mechanical properties are mutually exclusive, i.e., an enhancement in conductivity is achieved at the expense of reduced mechanical strength and vice versa, so far, very few PILs can satisfy all the industrial requirements. Multiphase composites, on the other hand, offer an opportunity to compromise on these often-conflicting requirements. ,

Recent advances in electrolyte design have leveraged precisely engineered nanostructures to overcome traditional material limitations. , Among these, polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (POSS) offer unprecedented molecular control; their cubic silica cores (1–3 nm) with eight strategically functionalized vertices enable programmable interactions with ionic species. The diversity of organic substituents situated at the corners of the POSS cage provides unique surface chemistry, leading to noncovalent interactions with the ions and, thus, the formation of three-dimensional networks, improving the mechanical properties and thermal stability of composites. Consequently, unlike conventional nanofillers, POSS nanoparticles create well-defined percolation pathways through their stoichiometric charge distribution, simultaneously enhancing mechanical robustness. As an example, it has also been shown that the addition of NH2-functionalized POSS particles to an [N2288]­[TFSI] ionic liquid leads to fast cation motions through the POSS-TFSI network, a charge transport mechanism similar to that observed for rigid PILs. As a consequence of the decoupling between the time scale of charge transport (determined by anion motions) and the structural relaxation (governed by the POSS-TFSI network), dc-conductivity (σdc) at the liquid–glass transition temperature (T g) was three orders higher compared to pure aprotic ionic liquids. However, at the same time, the σdc at room temperature conditions was two decades below that of a pure ionic liquid. This result is simple to comprehend if we keep in mind that σdc is directly related to the number of ions, their charge, and mobility (σdc = N·z·μ). Consequently, when nonionized components are added to an ionic liquid, the quantity of ions per volume unit falls, lowering σdc. In this regard, the incorporation of ionized POSS particles is expected to improve not only the mechanical properties but also the electric conductivity of ILs.

Herein, to verify this hypothesis, two types of POSS nanoparticles were selected: octaamonium POSS (C24H72Cl8N8O12Si8,), commercially known as AM0285, and PSS hydrate-octakis­(tetramethylammonium) substituted, abbreviated as TMA-POSS. The chemical structures of both nanofillers are depicted in Figure . As presented, AM0285 contains eight positively charged arms with NH3 + groups and the same number of small chloride counterions. In contrast, the core of TMA-POSS is negatively charged with ammonium counterions, [N1111]+. Consequently, the single silica nanoparticle carries a charge 8-fold larger compared to typical ions in ILs and potentially can bring an increase of σdc. Since the final value of σdc(RT) for the nanocomposite will be limited by interactions between the charged POSS core and ions of the matrix, it is crucial to select the proper ionic liquid enabling effective dissociation of counteranions. For this purpose, representatives of imidazolium-, pyrrolidinium-, and ammonium-based ILs were chosen. Specifically, among the pyrrolidinium ILs, [BMPyrr]­[TFSI], [BMPyrr]­[TFO], and [BMPyrr]­[TCM] were examined. Ammonium ILs are represented by materials containing a [TFSI] anion and [N2228]+, [N1888]+, and [N122(2O1)]+ cations. On the other hand, [BMIm]­[TCM] and [BMIm]­[BETI] fluids belong to the imidazolium class. The selected ILs feature butyl substituents (e.g., [BMPyrr]+, [BMIm]+) because, unlike ILs with longer or shorter alkyl chains, they exhibit a negligible crystallization tendency in the supercooled state. Only ILs with the [BMPyrr]+ cation crystallize when reheated from the glassy state. At the same time, anions like [TFSI] and [TCM] were chosen for their high electrochemical stability and ability to dissociate in the presence of charged POSS nanoparticles. The chemical structures of all of the examined ionic liquids and nanofillers are presented in Figure .

1.

1

Chemical structures of the electrolyte components. The full names of cations and anions are given in the SI file.

The composites were obtained by conventional mixing of an ionic liquid and nanofiller in a ratio that provides a solid-state electrolyte, i.e., 30 and 40 wt % of POSS powder. All 13 samples obtained are viscous homogeneous mixtures (see Figure a). For the initial characterization of obtained composites, temperature-dependent thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed (details in the SI). The decomposition temperature and amount of water adsorbed during the sample preparation are given in Table S1. Since all the examined materials contain around 2% water, time-dependent TGA scans were performed to determine the proper drying protocol. We found that 1 h at 373 K is enough to remove the moisture from AM0285-based composites (note that both IL and AM0285 particles were initially dried; see the SI for details). At the same time, 3 h at 353 K was required to dry TMA-POSS-based systems. The longer drying time was due to the fact that pure TMA-POSS powder contains 9% water, which corresponds to 6 water molecules per single POSS particle. Since the TMA-POSS substrate is highly hygroscopic and chemically unstable during drying at temperatures above 353 K, the number of composites containing this nanofiller was limited to [BMPyrr]-based samples.

2.

2

(a) Composites after one year of storage upside down. (b) DSC thermograms of ILs and their composites. Blue arrows indicate a liquid–glass transition; red arrows denote the onset of cold crystallization; and green arrows indicate the onset of melting. Numbers correspond to ionic liquids and composites listed in Figure .

The dried composites were next subjected to calorimetric measurements to determine their glass-forming ability and crystallization tendency. Almost all examined systems can be cooled to a glassy state without crystallization. The exceptions are composites containing [BMPyrr]­[TFO] (1a, 1b); when they are anhydrous, they easily crystallize when the temperature decreases below 248 K (see Figure 2S). On the other hand, pyrrolidinium composites containing [TFSI] and [TCM] anions, specifically 2a, 2b, 3c, and 3d, crystallize on reheating from the glassy state (see Figure b). The presence of cold crystallization in composites based on [BMPyrr]­[TFSI] (no. 2 series) is rather natural due to the ordering tendency of a pure IL. However, depending on the type of NPs, different crystalline forms are obtained. On the other hand, for [BMPyrr]­[TCM]-based systems, POSS surface chemistry dictates whether IL ordering is partially preserved or fully suppressed. Specifically, in contrast to AM0285-based pyrrolidinium composites (3a and 3b) that remain disordered over a broad temperature range, the addition of TMA-POSS NPs to [BMPyrr]­[TFSI] (3c and 3d) evidently induces cold crystallization. This can be due to the rigid anionic core of TMA-POSS that interacts with pyrrolidinium cations.

From Figure b, it can also be noticed that the liquid–glass transition temperature of every examined composite is quite close to the T g value of the corresponding ionic liquid (see Table S1). Since vitrification temperature is a key parameter controlling the conducting properties of electrolytes at room temperature conditions, higher T g, brings lower σdc(RT), one can expect that prepared composites reveal relatively high σdc(RT). To verify this statement, the dielectric data of pure IL and IL-NPs composites were gathered over a wide temperature range.

The representative dielectric results obtained for composite 4a containing [BMIm]­[TCM] and 30 wt % of AM0285 nanoparticles are presented in a conductivity formalism in Figure a. The conductivity spectra σ′(f) measured over eight decades of frequency (10–1–107 Hz) in a wide temperature range exhibit the behavior typical for ionic materials with an ac-conductivity at higher frequencies, followed by a dc-conductivity plateau σdc and a decrease of σ′ from σdc denoting the electrode polarization. From further inspection of temperature-dependent σ′(f) data, it becomes evident that isobaric cooling brings about a dramatic decrease in the dc-conductivity value, which is a quasi-universal behavior. , Therefore, to describe the ion dynamics in IL-NPs composites more quantitatively, the temperature evolutions of σdc were determined. The log σdc vs inverse of temperature for representative pyrrolidinium, imidazolium, and ammonium composites are depicted in Figure b. As recognized here, log σdc(1000T –1) dependences reveal two characteristic regions separated by the liquid–glass transition (T g). Above T g, i.e., in the supercooled liquid state, the dc-conductivity follows the non-Arrhenius behavior, while below T g (see the dashed line in Figure b), it can be described by the Arrhenius equation. For composite 4a and the related [BMIm]­[TCM] IL, this effect is the most noticeable. However, an essential outcome coming from Figure b is that the dc-conductivity of examined IL-NPs mixtures determined at room temperature conditions, defined here as 298 K, is very close to that of pure IL. To visualize this effect, log σdc values of all examined ILs and their nanocomposites measured at 298 K were compiled in Figure c.

3.

3

(a) The representative conductivity spectra of composite 4a collected over a broad temperature range. The frequency-independent part denotes the dc-conductivity region. (b) Temperature dependence of log10 σdc of selected ILs and their composites. The dashed blue line indicates a dc-conductivity of 10–14 S/cm that usually corresponds with the conductivity value at T g. (c) log10 σdc determined at 298 K for all of the examined systems herein. Red numbers indicate composites revealing the highest conductivity within the pyrrolidinium, imidazolium, and ammonium ILs.

Overall, the σdc(RT) of quasi-solid-state nanocomposites is lower than that of the corresponding IL determined under the same T conditions. An exception from this observation is composite 3a, which shows a slight increase in dc-conductivity compared to the [BMPyrr]­[TCM] ionic liquid. The conducting properties of the 4a composite, although worse than those of its parent IL, are similar to those of the [BMPyrr]­[TCM]-based compound (3a). At the same time, among the ammonium composites, the RT conductivity of 6a shows quite similar conductivity to its parent IL. To recognize the molecular origin of this observation, we performed the Raman measurements of 3a, 4a, and 6a composites (see the SI for details). The pure [BMPyrr]­[TCM], [BMIm]­[TCM], [N2228]­[TFSI], and AM0285 NPs were examined as a reference. The Raman data (Figures 3S–5S) reveal fundamental differences in how ionic liquid components interact with AM0285 nanoparticles depending on the cation structure. For [BMIm]­[TCM], the imidazolium cation shows indirect interactions with NPs primarily through weak hydrogen bonding between the terminal −CH3 groups of the flexible butyl chain (retaining G-conformers) and NP siloxane sides (Si–O···H–C). At the same time, [TCM] anions experience only minor perturbations (2 cm–1 CN upshift) and partial liberation (new 2220 cm–1 peak). This creates a fluid composite with mobile anions. In contrast, the [BMPyrr]­[TCM] system exhibits stronger interfacial organization: the butyl chain of the pyrrolidinium cation undergoes a drastic conformational shift, with G-type conformers (GG/GA) nearly disappearing and A-type conformers (AG/AA) dominating. This suggests rigid, extended chain packing near the NP surface, leading to a more structured interfacial layer around the NPs. This time, [TCM] anions show significant spectral changes: −CN band splitting with new band arround 2137 cm–1, and downshifting (from 2194 to 2159 and from 2218 to 2203 cm–1) indicating hydrogen bonding between [TCM] nitrile groups (−CN) and NP surface protons (−NH3 +) and thus charge transfer with NP surfaces. These cation-dependent mechanisms create distinct nanocomposite morphologies: [BMIm]-based systems maintain ionic mobility through weak, alkyl-dominated interactions, whereas [BMPyrr] systems form structured interfacial layers through hydrogen-bonding networks, enhancing surface charge transfer. The findings demonstrate how cation selection (flexible imidazolium vs rigid pyrrolidinium) controls NP-IL interfacial design, enabling tunable properties for applications ranging from energy storage to functional nanocomposites.

In analogy to the [BMPyrr]­[TCM] composite, in 6a the anion (this time [TFSI]) interacts through hydrogen bonding with the ammonium groups on NPs (N–H+···OS, the new 745 cm–1 band). The downshift and broadening of the 739 cm–1 “breathing mode” indicate in turn weakened [N2228]+···[TFSI] ion pairing due to conformational changes within the anion. . The [N2228]+ cation likely interacts indirectly through steric hindrance as its aliphatic chains disrupt anion–cation coordination without strong binding to NPs. Overall, NPs promote decoupled [TFSI] anions and locally ordered ionic domains, enhancing the interfacial charge heterogeneity.

While this study primarily examines 30–40 wt % POSS composites to demonstrate quasi-solid electrolyte functionality, we extended our investigation to lower loadings (5–20 wt %) to assess practical applicability. Systematic studies of [N2888]­[TFSI] with 5, 17, and 40 wt % AM0285 (presented in the SI file) reveal two key trends: (1) enhanced room-temperature conductivity (up to 17 wt %, Figure 6S) compared to pure IL, suggesting preserved ion mobility at reduced POSS content; and (2) loss of self-supporting mechanical integrity below 30 wt % (see mechanical data in the SI, Figure 8S), confirming the critical percolation threshold for quasi-solid behavior. This trade-off highlights the need for application-specific optimization between ionic transport and mechanical stability.

In the next step, mechanical measurements were performed to determine the extent to which the conducting and viscoelastic properties of the studied nanocomposites are coupled to each other. Since nanodispersions usually exhibit complex rheological properties, two types of experiments were performed: (i) dynamic (oscillatory) shear tests and (ii) steady shear experiments. The former can provide insight into structural relaxation and dynamic heterogeneity in ionic nanocomposites, while the latter is crucial to material verification before production and utilization on a larger scale.

The mechanical data of representative IL [BMIm]­[TCM] and its corresponding nanocomposite (4a) recorded at various temperature conditions in the vicinity of the liquid–glass transition are presented in the form of master plots in Figures a and b. Analogous data obtained for composite 3a and the [BMPyrr]­[TCM] ionic liquid are included in Figure 7S. As depicted, the imaginary component of mechanical modulus G″(f) takes the form of the well-resolved peak with the G′–G″ crossover defining the structural relaxation time τα. Note that G′(f) and G″(f) functions cross each other in G″ maximum only for pure IL. Furthermore, the loss modulus spectra G″(f) of the nanocomposite are much broader compared to IL, reflecting the heterogeneous nature of the structural dynamics. Another noticeable difference concerns the behavior of complex viscosity, which reveals the plateau range for IL and is frequency-dependent for the composite. Since η­(T) dependence of the nanocomposite cannot be determined directly from the viscosity plateau, as for IL, it was calculated by using the Maxwell relation η = τα G . From Figure c, it becomes evident that in the close vicinity of the liquid–glass transition, the η of the nanocomposite is slightly larger than that of pure IL. This result corresponds well with the higher T g of nanofluid 4a when compared to IL. Note that above 233 K, the η­(T) data are unavailable for composite since the time–temperature superposition rule is no longer obeyed. This suggests that the examined nanofluid starts to obey non-Newtonian behavior. Therefore, in the next step, we performed the shear rate experiments at 0.01 to 800 s–1 and at a few different temperatures.

4.

4

(a) Real G′(f) (blue symbols) and imaginary G″(f) (cyan symbols) parts of the complex shear modulus and complex viscosity (green symbols) of the pure [BMIm]­[TCM] IL collected over the temperature range 187–233 K and superimposed to the spectra measured at 188 K. (b) Real G′(f) and imaginary G″(f) part of the complex shear modulus and complex viscosity of composite 4a collected over the temperature range 187–203 K and superimposed to the spectra measured at 188 K. (c) The comparison between complex viscosity determined for pure IL and nanofluid 4a. Green squares indicate viscosity data obtained for IL [BMIm]­[TCM]. Violet circles denote zero rate viscosity of nanofluid 4a, while black circles indicate infinite rate viscosity of composite 4a. Stars denote the viscosity of composite 4a determined from the oscillation experiment close to the liquid–glass transition. (d) Viscosity as a function of shear rate for composite 4a and the corresponding ionic liquid measured at 298 K. The inset shows the stress vs shear rate graph. (e) Viscosity curves as a function of time and different shearing rates for composite 4a, exhibiting its thixotropic behavior. (f) Walden plot constructed for the IL ([BMIm]­[TCM], green squares) and composite 4a. The meaning of violet circles, black circles, and stars is the same as in (c). The reversible shear thinning is depicted.

Figure d shows the apparent viscosity and stress behavior as a function of the shear rate for the 4a nanofluid and the corresponding IL as a reference. The obtained experimental data indicated that a pure IL is a simple Newtonian fluid with constant shear-independent viscosity. On the other hand, the addition of AM0285 nanoparticles results in a much more viscous system with significant shear-thinning properties. Namely, the apparent viscosity at zero rates, i.e., the viscosity of the material when it is effectively at rest, is almost seven decades larger than that of the base fluid. In contrast, the infinite rate viscosity equals η of the IL at the same T conditions (see Figure c). This behavior probably results from the disruption of the NP-IL dynamic network, described above, at higher shear rates. From the inset of Figure d, it can also be noticed that the stress experienced by the nanofluid is related to the shear rate in a nonlinear way, with the yield stress of 25 Pa quantifying the stress that the composite may experience before it begins to flow. Thus, the stress vs shear rate plot of nanofluid 4a follows the Herschel–Bulkley behavior.

To recognize whether the shear thinning properties of the examined nanofluid are reversible, we monitored viscosity changes over time as a function of the shear rate. Figure e shows the experimental results obtained by varying the shear rate gradually, starting from a low value of 10–4 s–1, increasing to a shear rate of 300 s–1, and then decreasing to the initial value. As can be seen, the dynamic viscosity decreased with increasing shear rate and subsequently increased as the shear rate decreased. Furthermore, it takes a relatively short time to attain equilibrium viscosity when introduced to a steep change in shear rate. This indicates that the examined nanofluid reveals thixotropic behavior, i.e., the dynamic POSS-IL network providing efficient dc-conductivity rebuilds over time. Note that analogous results obtained for composite 3a are shown in the SI file. Herein, note that phase separation was not observed for any of the examined nanocomposites after mechanical measurements.

Finally, to quantify to what extent the conducting and viscoelastic properties of the studied nanocomposite are coupled to each other, the Walden plot has been constructed. Figure f represents the Walden graph, with the “ideal” line (dashed line) corresponding to the case of complete coupling of ion conductivity to structural dynamics. Our data demonstrate that in the examined IL [BMIm]­[TCM], the conductivity entirely depends on viscosity, as the slope is the same as that of the ideal case. At the same time, the data below the ideal line indicate a poor dissociation of ion pairs. Such behavior is in line with most aprotic ILs, which show vehicle-type conduction. On the other hand, a high concentration of POSS nanoparticles substantially increases the viscosity while maintaining the conducting properties of the liquid state. Consequently, nanofluid 4a is located above the ideal Walden line; that is, its viscosity is decoupled from dc-conductivity. This result could stem from modified ion dissociation or POSS-induced percolation pathways; however, future studies (e.g., NMR) are required to fully resolve the mechanism. From Figure f it can also be observed that application of the shearing force temporarily decreases the viscosity of the composite while keeping the conducting properties at the same level. This makes the obtained nanocomposites easily moldable.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated a novel class of quasi-solid electrolytes based on ionic liquids (ILs) and multiply charged polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) nanoparticles that overcome the fundamental trade-off between ionic conductivity and mechanical stability in solid-state electrolytes. The NH3R+Cl-functionalized POSS nanoparticles serve as both structural scaffolds and ionic conductors, enabling the formation of nanocomposites with exceptional properties. The optimal 30 wt % POSS composites exhibit ionic conductivities up to 4 mS/cm at room temperature, matching or exceeding their parent ILs, while maintaining quasi-solid-like mechanical integrity and thixotropic processability. This achievement addresses a long-standing challenge in electrolyte design, where the conductivity typically plummets upon solidification. Unlike conventional filters that trap ions, our charged POSS nanoparticles create percolating ion channels that depend on cation selection, while simultaneously providing structural reinforcement. The decoupled ion transport and reversible shear-thinning behavior represent a significant advance over prior POSS-IL composites, which showed either conductivity losses or irreversible aging. The obtained nanofluids are thermally and physically stable without any crystallization or phase separation even one year after preparation, which makes them promising for practical application.

Supplementary Material

nl5c02053_si_001.pdf (1.6MB, pdf)

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c02053.

  • All experimental details and supporting results of DSC, TGA, Raman and mechanical (viscosity) experiments (PDF)

The manuscript was written through the contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

This research was funded in whole by the National Science Centre, Poland [Opus 21, 2021/41/B/ST5/00840]. For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC-BY public copyright license to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Armand M., Endres F., MacFarlane D. R., Ohno H., Scrosati B.. Ionic-liquid materials for the electrochemical challenges of the future. Nat. Mater. 2009;8(8):621–629. doi: 10.1038/nmat2448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bruce, D. W. ; O’Hare, D. ; I, W. R. . Energy materials, 1st ed.; Wiley: 2011. [Google Scholar]
  3. Xu W., Angell C. A.. Solvent-Free Electrolytes with Aqueous Solution-Like Conductivities. Science. 2003;302:422–425. doi: 10.1126/science.1090287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Frömling T., Kunze M., Schönhoff M., Sundermeyer J., Roling B.. Enhanced Lithium Transference Numbers in Ionic Liquid Electrolytes. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2008;112:12985–1299. doi: 10.1021/jp804097j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Watanabe M., Thomas M. L., Zhang S., Ueno K., Yasuda T., Dokko K.. Application of Ionic Liquids to Energy Storage and Conversion Materials and Devices. Chem. Rev. 2017;117(10):7190–7239. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang B., Tan R., Yang L., Zheng J., Zhang K., Mo S., Lin Z., Pan F.. Mechanisms and properties of ion-transport in inorganic solid electrolytes. Energy Storage Materials. 2018;10:139–159. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.08.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hobold G. M., Kim K.-H., Gallant B. M.. Beneficial vs.Inhibiting Passivation by the Native Lithium Solid Electrolyte Interphase Revealed by Electrochemical Li + Exchange. Energy Environ. Sci. 2023;16(5):2247–2261. doi: 10.1039/D2EE04203G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lago N., Garcia-Calvo O., Lopez del Amo J., Rojo T., Armand M.. All-Solid-State Lithium-Ion Batteries with Grafted Ceramic Nanoparticles Dispersed in Solid Polymer Electrolytes. ChemSusChem. 2015;8:3039–3043. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201500783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhang H., Li C., Piszcz M., Coya E., Rojo T., Rodriguez-Martinez L. M., Armand M., Zhou Z.. Single lithium-ion conducting solid polymer electrolytes: advances and perspectives. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017;46:797–815. doi: 10.1039/C6CS00491A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. An Y., Han X., Liu Y., Azhar A., Na J., Kumar Nanjundan A., Wang S., Yu J., Yamauchi Y.. Progress in Solid Polymer Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion Batteries and Beyond. Small. 2022;18:2103617. doi: 10.1002/smll.202103617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Feng J., Wang L., Chen Y., Wang P., Zhang H., He X.. PEO based polymer-ceramic hybrid solid electrolytes: a review. Nano Convergence. 2021;8:2. doi: 10.1186/s40580-020-00252-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Forsyth M., Porcarelli L., Wang X., Goujon N., Mecerreyes D.. Innovative Electrolytes Based on Ionic Liquids and Polymers for Next-Generation Solid-State Batteries. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019;52:686–694. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wojnarowska Z., Feng H., Diaz M., Ortiz A., Ortiz I., Knapik-Kowalczuk J., Vilas M., Verdía P., Tojo E., Saito T., Stacy E. W., Kang N.-G., Mays J. M., Kruk D., Wlodarczyk P., Sokolov A. P., Bocharova V., Paluch M.. Revealing the Charge Transport Mechanism in Polymerized Ionic Liquids: Insight from High Pressure Conductivity Studies. Chem. Mater. 2017;29(19):8082–8092. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b01658. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wu J.-F., Zhang R., Fu Q.-F., Zhang J.-S., Zhou X.-Y., Gao P., Xu C.-H., Liu J., Guo X.. Inorganic Solid Electrolytes for All-Solid-State Sodium Batteries: Fundamentals and Strategies for Battery Optimization. Adv. Funct Materials. 2021;31:2008165. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202008165. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ngai K. S., Ramesh S., Ramesh K., Juan J. C.. A review of polymer electrolytes: fundamental, approaches and applications. Ionics. 2016;22:1259–1279. doi: 10.1007/s11581-016-1756-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Raut P., Li S., Chen Y.-M., Zhu Y., Jana S. C.. Strong and Flexible Composite Solid Polymer Electrolyte Membranes for Li-Ion Batteries. ACS omega. 2019;4(19):18203–18209. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b00885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen F., Wang X., Armand M., Forsyth M.. Cationic Polymer-in-Salt Electrolytes for Fast Metal Ion Conduction and Solid-State Battery Applications. Nat. Mater. 2022;21(10):1175–1182. doi: 10.1038/s41563-022-01319-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Di Noto V., Lavina S., Giffin G. A., Negro E., Scrosati B.. Polymer Electrolytes: Present, Past and Future. Electrochim. Acta. 2011;57:4–13. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.08.048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wojnarowska Z., Feng H., Fu Y., Cheng S., Carroll B., Kumar R., Novikov V., Kisliuk A., Saito T., Kang N.-G., Mays J., Sokolov A. P., Bocharova V.. Effect of chain rigidity on the decoupling of ion motion from segmental relaxation in polymerized ionic liquids: Ambient and elevated pressure studies. Macromolecules. 2017;50(17):6710–6721. doi: 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b01217. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. MacFarlane D. R., Forsyth M., Howlett C. P., Kar M., Passerini S., Pringle J. M., Ohno H., Watanabe M., Yan F., Zheng W., Zhang S., Zhang J.. Ionic liquids and their solid-state analogues as materials for energy generation and storage. Nature Reviews Materials. 2016;1:15005. doi: 10.1038/natrevmats.2015.5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wojnarowska Z., Knapik J., Díaz M., Ortiz A., Ortiz I., Paluch M.. Conductivity Mechanism in Polymerized Imidazolium-Based Protic Ionic Liquid [HSO3–BVIm]­[OTf]: Dielectric Relaxation Studies. Macromolecules. 2014;47(12):4056–4065. doi: 10.1021/ma5003479. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu M., Qin H., Chen Y., Lu Y., Song Y., Gao Z., Xiong C., Liu F., Liu F.. Recent Progress of Functional Solvent-free Nanofluids: A Review. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2024;16:32. doi: 10.1021/acsami.4c08256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sun M., Dong H., Dougherty A. W., Lu Q., Peng D., Wong W. T., Huang B., Sun L. D., Yan C. H.. Nanophotonic Energy Storage inUpconversion Nanoparticles. Nano Energy. 2019;56:473–481. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.11.086. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Croce F., Appetecchi G. B., Persi L., Scrosati B.. Nanocomposite Polymer Electrolytes for Lithium Batteries. Nature. 1998;394:456. doi: 10.1038/28818. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Shikinaka K., Taki N., Kaneda K., Tominaga Y.. Quasi-solid electrolyte: a thixotropic gel of imogolite and an ionic liquid. Chem. Commun. 2017;53:613–616. doi: 10.1039/C6CC07765J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang F., Lu X., He C.. Some recent developments of polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS)-based polymeric materials. J. Mater. Chem. 2011;21:2775–2782. doi: 10.1039/C0JM02785E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Shang D., Fu Y., Lu Q., Chen L., Yin J., Dong X., Xu Y., Jia R., Yuan S., Chen Y., Deng W.. A novel polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane based ionic liquids (POSS-ILs) polymer electrolytes for lithium ion batteries. Solid State Ionics. 2018;319:247–255. doi: 10.1016/j.ssi.2018.01.050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Bocharova V., Jayakody N., Yang J., Sacci R., Yang W., Cheng S., Doughty B., Greenbaum S., Jeong S., Popov I., Zhao S., Gainaru C., Wojnarowska Z.. Modulation of Cation Diffusion by Reversible Supramolecular Assemblies in Ionic Liquid-Based Nanocomposites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12:31842–31851. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c08323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Floudas, G. ; Paluch, M. ; Grzybowski, A. ; Ngai, K. L. . Molecular Dynamics of Glass-Forming Systems: Effects of Pressure; Kremer, F. , Ed.; Advances in Dielectrics; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  30. Paluch, M. Dielectric Properties of Ionic Liquids; Springer: Berlin, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  31. Shakeel A., Mahmood H., Farooq U., Ullah Z., Yasin S., Iqbal T., Chassagne C., Moniruzzaman M.. Rheology of Pure Ionic Liquids and Their Complex Fluids: A Review. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2019;7:13586–13626. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b02232. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

nl5c02053_si_001.pdf (1.6MB, pdf)

Articles from Nano Letters are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES