Skip to main content
Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research logoLink to Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research
. 2025 Mar 26;12(1):280–286. doi: 10.5455/javar.2025.l894

Morphological and molecular identification of the cat flea Ctenocephalides felis from Bangladesh

Md Shamsudduha 1, Md Mahfuzur Rahman 1, Jannatun Naher 1, Azizul Islam Barkat 1, Sumaiya Akter 1, Mohammad Shamimul Alam 1
PMCID: PMC12186780  PMID: 40568498

Abstract

Objective:

The present study was designed to conduct molecular and morphological identification of cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis) from Bangladesh along with nucleotide polymorphism and phylogenetic analysis.

Materials and Methods:

Samples were collected from two hosts (cat and human). The species was identified through morphological studies first, and then DNA was extracted for subsequent molecular analysis. A part of the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene was amplified by polymerase chain reaction using extracted DNA as a template. The amplified region was sequenced using the Sanger dideoxy method. The sequence was subjected to NCBI BLASTn search. BioEdit and MEGA 11 software were used for multiple sequence alignment (MSA) and generating a phylogenetic tree.

Results:

Morphological features such as shape, size, and appendages showed similarity with C. felis. The metatibial formula of chaetotaxy (2-2-2-2-1-3) was confirmed for species-level identification. NCBI BLASTn search showed the highest sequence identity with the available sequence of C. felis such as 99.78% (NC_049858.1) and 99.12% (MW420044.1 and MK941844.1) with 100% query coverage. MSA of C. felis sequences from different geographical distributions show their sequence affinities with each other, and the phylogenetic tree presents their relationship with each other.

Conclusion:

Both morphological and molecular studies clearly indicate the identity and confirmation of cat flea (C. felis) from Bangladesh.

Keywords: Cat flea, Ctenocephalides felis, ectoparasite, molecular identification, morphological identification, 16S rRNA

Introduction

Cat flea Ctenocephalides felis (Bouché 1835) is a member of the Pulicidae family under the Order Siphonaptera. They are important ectoparasites with veterinary medical significance considered to be the most common species of flea on earth [1]. These are hematophagous ectoparasites that transmit a variety of zoonotic vector-borne pathogens such as Rickettsia felis, Bartonella clarridgeiae, B. henselae, and Yersinia pestis which are the etiologic agents of flea-borne spotted fever, cat scratch disease, and plague, respectively [26]. It also acts as a secondary host of a cestode parasite, Dipylidium caninum, and its bite develops Flea Allergic Dermatitis (FAD) in cats, dogs, and humans [79]. Though the cat flea infests mainly domesticated cats and dogs worldwide, it is also found on other domesticated and feral animals such as domesticated sheep, donkeys, goats, water buffalo, roof rats, Rüppell’s fox, and so on, and its adaptability to various habitat conditions has made it geographically widespread [1,1012]. Cat fleas may occasionally infest humans, resulting in discomfort and skin irritation [9,12,13].

In Bangladesh, R. felis infections vectored by fleas are diagnosed throughout the country [14]. Cat fleas play a potential role in transmitting R. felis (a bacteria) to humans globally, particularly in Bangladesh [15]. Although several morphological and molecular studies on cat fleas are conducted worldwide [1618], only morphology has been studied in Bangladesh [19]. Dog flea C. canis and the cat flea C. felis have often been misidentified based on morphology [20]. Therefore, for this tiny organism, DNA-based molecular methods could provide reliability in species identification [21,22]. Very few morphological studies [19] and the absence of significant molecular analysis for identifying cat fleas in Bangladesh urged further studies to combine molecular techniques with morphology. In the present study, we utilized the 16S rRNA gene of mitochondrial DNA for the identification of the species from Bangladesh.

Materials and Methods

Ethical approval

No animal experiment has been done in this experiment. However, the fleas were collected from the animals without harming or giving minimum disturbances, following the animal welfare standards.

Sample collection and morphology analysis

Several specimens (about 10) of cat fleas were collected from each of the two hosts, a human and a cat. All specimens of cat fleas were collected from two locations on the Dhaka University campus, Dhaka, Bangladesh (23°43’52’’N, 90°23’29’’E and 23°43’28.31’’N, 90°24’03.82’’E). They were identified as C. felis based on external morphology. Due to morphological similarities, two samples were chosen for further study. Each was carried in a separate Eppendorf tube to the Genetics and Molecular Biology lab for morphometric and molecular study. Both specimens were photographed with a stereomicroscope (Leica EZ4). For morphological studies, the existing literature was consulted [16,17,19]. After confirmation of the identification of the species according to the morphological studies, one of the samples was sacrificed for the molecular studies.

DNA extraction, PCR amplification, sequencing, and bioinformatics information

The CTAB DNA extraction method was used for the isolation of DNA from the sample. A previously reported primer pair suitable for insects was used in PCR amplification for the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene [23]. The forward and the reverse primers were (5’-CGC CTG TTT AAC AAA AAC AT-3’) and (5’-TTT AAT CCA ACA TCG AGG-3’), respectively. The purified PCR product was sequenced by the Sanger dideoxy method. After receiving the sequencing file, it was visualized and edited using the software FinchTV. Noisy areas of the sequence, as seen in the chromatogram, were removed from both ends to base the subsequent analyses on a quality sequence. The edited sequence was used for species identification and the comparison among related sequences with the aid of the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLASTn) of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) of the species from different geographical areas was performed with the aid of ClustalW in BioEdit software [24]. DNA sequences were analyzed using both BioEdit [24] and MEGA 11 software [25] to find polymorphic sites.

Molecular phylogenetic trees were constructed using MEGA 11 software [25]. Two neighbor-joining phylogenetic trees were made and analyzed, one utilizing the 16S rRNA region and the other using the CO1 region of mitochondrial DNA. Various species belonging to the Siphonaptera order were selected for phylogenetic analysis. Both phylogenetic trees were constructed with the same species to facilitate a comparative analysis of their phylogenetic relationships. The partial mitochondrial 16S rRNA sequence from our research specimen was incorporated into the construction of the 16S rRNA tree. Fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) was used as an outer group for both the tree. The bootstrap value was 100 for this study.

Results and Discussion

Morphological identification

The flea was initially identified as C. felis based on its morphology before conducting molecular analysis.

Generic morphological features

The specimen is a small, 2.9 mm wingless insect with a shiny surface and a dark or reddish-brown coloration (Fig. 1a). At the posterior or ventral edges of the head, there are rows of dark spines, ctenidia, or comb that faced backward. The pronotal and genal ctenidium on the head both have eight or nine horizontally aligned spines (Fig. 1b).

Figure 1. Female C. felis. (a) The left side of the whole body. (b) Head and thorax region, showing pointed frons; 1st genal ctenidial length exceeds half of the 2nd one; pronotal combs; and maxillary palpus. (c) Leg’s tibia bearing 5 notches; female spermatheca (a holding organ); tergal spiracles.

Figure 1.

The sternum consists of one or two ventral spines; the tergum of the ninth abdominal segment is changed to form the clasper, which is absent in females but present in males [19]. The third pair of legs is far longer than the other two pairs utilized for jumping (Fig. 1a). Each leg has a coxa, femur, tibia, and tarsus, as well as pygidium and antepygidial bristles on the posterior end. The female has spermatheca as a holding organ, and the forehead has maxillary palpus ventrally (Fig. 1c) [19].

Species-specific morphological features

The species C. felis is distinguished by its notably angled frons and more pointed-looking head (Fig. 1b). Length is usually more than double the height of the head. The first spine of the genal ctenidia exceeds at least half of the second in length [16]. Ctenocephalides felis often has two setae in its lateral metanotal area (LMA) [16]. It has small tergal spiracles as shown in Figure 1c. It contains fewer bristles in comparison with other species in this genus [16]. All six legs’ tibiae have five to six notches. One thick bristle between the post-median and apical long bristles [19]. The metatibial formula of chaetotaxy is 2-2-2-2-1-3. Female (the present specimen) spermatheca (a holding organ) contains a short hilla (Fig. 1c) [19].

Molecular identification

After the successful extraction of DNA, a partial region of the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique. The amplification was accomplished using the primers specific for the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene. The resulting PCR products were visualized through agarose gel electrophoresis. The size of the amplified region was 472 base pairs (bp). Based on quality, a 451 bp DNA region was selected for further analysis (Accession no. OR708655). Mitochondrial markers are used in the identification and phylogenetic studies of different species, including insects [26]. 16S rRNA gene is one of the mitochondrial markers that is commonly used in the identification of different animal species [26,27].

More than 99% sequence similarity has been found in the case of 16S rRNA gene fragment of the present specimen when aligned with C. felis of the previous study [28]. NCBI BLAST nucleotide search shows 99.78% similarity with accession number NC_049858.1 and 99.12% similarity with accession number MW420044.1 and MK941844.1 where query coverage was 100% (Table 1). Other species of the Ctenocephalides genus such as C. canis and C. orientis show 97.34% (NC_063710.1) and 96.46% (NC_073009.1) similarity, respectively (Table 1). The sequence of our sample has been submitted to GenBank of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). The GenBank accession number of our sample sequence is OR708655. The result of MSA, as outputs of ClustalW and BioEdit [24], has been presented in Figure 2.

Table 1. BLASTn search results.

Description Max score Total score Query cover (%) E value Identical (%) Accession
Ctenocephalides felis isolate EL2017- DRISC mitochondrion, complete genome 828 828 100% 0.0 99.78% NC_049858.1
Ctenocephalides felis felis mitochondrion, complete genome 813 813 100% 0.0 99.12% MW420044.1
Ctenocephalides felis felis mitochondrion, complete genome 813 813 100% 0.0 99.12% MK941844.1
Ctenocephalides felis 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence; mitochondrial 706 706 90% 0.0 98.03% GQ387498.1
Ctenocephalides canis mitochondrion, complete genome 767 767 100% 0.0 97.34% NC_063710.1
Ctenocephalides orientis isolate F5 mitochondrion, complete genome 745 745 100% 0.0 96.46% NC_073009.1

Figure 2. A partial view of the MSA of 16S rRNA region of C. felis from different countries. The scale on top represents site numbers.

Figure 2.

Analysis of polymorphic sites

Aligning the sequence of the Bangladeshi sample with that of other countries provided information about polymorphic sites. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), insertion, or deletion (indel) of nucleotide bases at the specific site of 16S rRNA gene of C. felis from different countries are shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Polymorphic sites of cat fleas originated from different countries.

Name (Accession number) Country Sites
51 239 241 242 395
Ctenocephalides felis (Present study) Bangladesh A C A
Ctenocephalides felis (MW420044.1) China G T T A A
Ctenocephalides felis (MK941844.1) China G T T A A
Ctenocephalides felis (NC_049858.1) USA A T A
Ctenocephalides felis (GQ387498.1) USA A T
Gap (–) represents base deletion.

Ctenocephalides felis of China with accession numbers MW420044.1 and MK941844.1 contain Guanine (G) at site 51 whereas all others contain Adenine(A) at the same site (Table 2). The Bangladeshi specimen of the present study is distinct from all others at site 239 where there is Cytosine (C) instead of Thymine (T) (Table 2). C. felis of China (MW420044.1, MK941844.1) has a specific “TA” insertion at sites 241–242 whereas all others possess deletion on this site. GQ387498.1 has a deletion of a base at site 395 while others contain Adenine (A) as shown in Table 2.

A comparison of the nucleotides in related species of C. felis has been presented in Table 3. The sample specimen of the present study contains 41.24% Adenine (A), 36.36% Thymine (T), 13.97% Guanine (G), and 8.43% Cytosine (C) in the selected 16S rRNA region. The percentage of A is the highest, and C is the lowest. The AT/GC ratio of the sample specimen was found to be 3.47.

Table 3. Nucleotide base pair study of the sample specimen and other related fleas.

Name (Accession number) Total number of Percentage of GC (GC%)
Adenine (A) Thymine (T) Guanine (G) Cytosine (C)
Ctenocephalides felis
(Present study)
186 164 63 38 22.4%
Ctenocephalides felis (NC_049858.1) 186 165 63 37 22.2%
Ctenocephalides felis (MW420044.1) 186 166 64 37 22.3%
Ctenocephalides felis (MK941844.1) 186 166 64 37 22.3%
Ctenocephalides canis (NC_063710.1) 188 161 64 38 22.6%
Ctenocephalides orientis (NC_073009.1) 190 158 66 38 23.0%
Pulex irritans
(NC_063709.1)
177 165 68 38 23.7%

Phylogenetic analysis

Neighbor-joining phylogenetic trees were constructed based on the sequences of the 16S rRNA (Fig. 3a) and CO1 genes (Fig. 3b) to understand the relationships between the target flea species and other fleas belonging to the Siphonaptera order. A total of 16 partial sequences from the mitochondrial 16S rRNA region (Fig. 3a) and 14 partial sequences from the CO1 region (Fig. 3b) of the same 11 species were taken for phylogenetic relation analysis. Drosophila melanogaster (Accession number: NC_024511.2) was used as an outgroup that falls outside the group of interest.

Figure 3. Phylogenetic relationship among different species from the order Siphonaptera using mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene (a) and mitochondrial CO1 gene (b). *Marked sequence depicts the present study. Numbers representing bootstrap values.

Figure 3.

In the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene-based phylogenetic tree, C. felis of Bangladesh (OR708655) shows a closer relationship with that of the USA (NC_049858.1, GQ387498.1) when compared to the sequences from China (MK941844.1, MW420044.1) (Fig. 3a). Thus, it indicates that the USA origin seems to be more closely related to Bangladeshi origin compared to China.

In the case of both 16S rRNA and CO1, the species C. felis of different origins construct a cluster in the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 3a). One of the two C. felis specimens of China (MW420044.1) shows more relatedness with the USA (NC_049858.1) as shown in the phylogenetic tree based on the mitochondrial CO1 region (Fig. 3b). The relationship of USA, China and Bangladesh origin cannot be ascertained due to a lack of CO1 sequence data from Bangladesh. C. canis (NC_063710.1) and C. orientis (NC_073009.1) cluster together and are separated from C. felis in both mitochondrial 16S rRNA (Fig. 3a) and CO1 gene (Fig. 3b) based phylogenetic tree.

Xenopsylla cheopis (MW310242.1) and Pulex irritans (NC_063709.1) are in the same clade in the 16S rRNA tree (Fig. 3a) but separated in the CO1 tree (Fig. 3b). The cluster of Neopsylla specialis (NC_073019.1) and Ceratophyllus wui (NC_040301.1) is connected to the cluster of Leptopsylla segnis (NC_072691.1), Dorcadia ioffi (NC_036066.1), and Ctenophthalmus quadratus (NC_072692.1); Hystrichopsylla weida (NC_042380.1) is in a separate branch (Fig. 3a). On the other hand, in the CO1 tree, the cluster of D. ioffi (NC_036066.1) and N. specialis (NC_073019.1) is connected with cluster of C. quadratus (NC_072692.1), C. wui (NC_040301.1), and H. weida (NC_042380.1); L. segnis (NC_072691.1) remains in a separate branch (Fig. 3b).

Conclusion

The integration of both molecular and morphological approaches provides a comprehensive and reliable method for the accurate identification of this important ectoparasite. C. felis of different geographical locations showed distinctiveness in the sequence of the 16S rRNA gene, which may help in strain identification as well. To the best of our knowledge, our sequence of C. felis from Bangladesh is the first to be submitted to NCBI GenBank. Besides, the study can aid in further studies on the biology, ecology, and control of cat fleas as well as contribute to our understanding of their potential role in disease transmission.

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge the facilities and support provided by Genetics and Molecular Biology laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Dhaka. The availability of equipment, resources, and technical assistance significantly contributed to the success of this study.

List of abbreviations

BLAST, Basic local alignment search tool; CO1, Cytochrome Oxidase 1; DNA, Deoxyribonucleic acid; MEGA, Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis; NCBI, National Center for Biotechnology Information; PCR, Polymerase chain reaction; RNA, Ribonucleic acid.

Conflict of interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.

Authors’ contributions

MSA designed the study. MMR, JN, and MS performed laboratory works. MS, AIB, SA, and JN drafted the manuscript. MSA and MS analyzed and interpreted the data. MSA supervised and took part in the critical checking of the manuscript.

References

  • [1].Moore CO, André MR, Šlapeta J, Breitschwerdt EB. Vector biology of the cat flea Ctenocephalides felis. Trends Parasitol. 2024;40(4):324–37. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2024.02.006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2024.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Calvani NED, Bell L, Carney A, De La Fuente C, Stragliotto T, Tunstall M, et al. The molecular identity of fleas (Siphonaptera) carrying Rickettsia felis, Bartonella clarridgeiae and Bartonella rochalimae from dogs and cats in Northern Laos. Heliyon. 2020;6(7):4–7. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Beliavskaia A, Tan KK, Sinha A, Husin NA, Lim FS, Loong SK, et al. Metagenomics of culture isolates and insect tissue illuminate the evolution of Wolbachia, Rickettsia and Bartonella symbionts in Ctenocephalides spp. fleas. Microb Genom. 2023;9(7):001045. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.001045. https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.001045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Hamzaoui B El, Zurita A, Cutillas C, Parola P. Fleas and flea-borne diseases of North Africa. Acta Trop. 2020;211:105627. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Ehlers J, Krüger A, Rakotondranary SJ, Ratovonamana RY, Poppert S, Ganzhorn JU, et al. Molecular detection of Rickettsia spp., Borrelia spp., Bartonella spp. and Yersinia pestis in ectoparasites of endemic and domestic animals in southwest Madagascar. Acta Trop. 2020;205:105339. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Dewitte A, Bouvenot T, Pierre F, Ricard I, Pradel E, Barois N, et al. A refined model of how Yersinia pestis produces a transmissible infection in its flea vector. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16(4):1–28. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008440. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Chin HC, Ahmad NW, Lim LH, Jeffery J, Hadi AA, Othman H, et al. Infestation with the cat flea, Ctenocephalides felis felis (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae) among students in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2010;41(6):1331–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Beugnet F, Labuschagne M, Fourie J, Jacques G, Farkas R, Cozma V, et al. Occurrence of Dipylidium caninum in fleas from client-owned cats and dogs in Europe using a new PCR detection assay. Vet Parasitol. 2014;205(1–2):300–6. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.06.008. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Youssefi MR, Ebrahimpour S, Rezaei M, Ahmadpour E, Rakhshanpour A, Rahimi MT. Dermatitis caused by Ctenocephalides felis (cat flea) in human. Casp J Intern Med. 2014;5(4):248–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Loftis AD, Reeves WK, Szumlas DE, Abbassy MM, Helmy IM, Moriarity JR, et al. Population survey of Egyptian arthropods for rickettsial agents. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1078:364–7. doi: 10.1196/annals.1374.072. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1374.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Singh NK, Haque M, Jyoti, Rath SS, Ghosh S. First report of Ctenocephalides felis felis infestation of buffalo calves in Punjab, India. J Parasit Dis. 2011;35(2):235–6. doi: 10.1007/s12639-011-0038-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-011-0038-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Attia MM, Salaeh NMK, El-Gameel SM. Flea species isolated from the human and animals: prevalence and ultrastructural studies. Int J Vet Sci. 2020;9(2):224–8. https://doi.org/10.37422/IJVS/20.025. [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Amini Rarani S, Azami M, Kiani F, Kazeroni TB. First case report of hospital staff infestation with cat flea (Ctenocephalides felis) in Iran. GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2023;18:Doc06. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000432. https://doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Chowdhury NF, Paul SK, Aung MS, Hossain MA, Ahamed F, Ahmed S, et al. Nationwide prevalence of Rickettsia felis infections in patients with febrile illness in Bangladesh. New Microbes New Infect. 2017;19:123–5. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2017.07.005. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2017.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Ahmed R, Paul SK, Hossain MA, Ahmed S, Mahmud MC, Nasreen SA, et al. Molecular detection of Rickettsia felis in humans, cats, and cat fleas in Bangladesh, 2013–2014. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2016;16(5):356–8. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2015.1886. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2015.1886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Lawrence AL, Hii SF, Jirsová D, Panáková L, Ionică AM, Gilchrist K, et al. Integrated morphological and molecular identification of cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis) and dog fleas (Ctenocephalides canis) vectoring Rickettsia felis in central Europe. Vet Parasitol. 2015;210(3–4):215–23. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.03.029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.03.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Ashwini M, Puttalakshmamma G, Mamatha G, Rakshith O, Chandranaik B, Thimmareddy P, et al. Studies on morphology and molecular characterization of oriental cat flea infesting small ruminants by barcoding. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2017;5(4):301–5. [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Zhang Y, Nie Y, Deng YP, Liu GH, Fu YT. The complete mitochondrial genome sequences of the cat flea Ctenocephalides felis felis (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae) support the hypothesis that C. felis isolates from China and USA were the same C. f. felis subspecies. Acta Trop. 2021;217:8–13. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.105880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.105880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Yakub A, Amrita B, Abdullah SM. Morphological identification and prevalence of the dog flea Сtenocephalides Canis (Curtis, 1826) and the cat flea (Сtenocephalides Felis (Bouché, 1835) in Dhaka City, Bangladesh. Parazitol. 2020;54(2):163–72. https://doi.org/10.31857/s1234567806020066. [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Linardi PM, Santos JLC. Ctenocephalides felis felis vs. Ctenocephalides canis (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae): some issues in correctly identify these species. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2012;21(4):345–54. doi: 10.1590/s1984-29612012000400002. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612012000400002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Yang L, Tan Z, Wang D, Xue L, Guan MX, Huang T, et al. Species identification through mitochondrial rRNA genetic analysis. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4089. doi: 10.1038/srep04089. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Galtier N, Nabholz B, Glémin S, Hurst GDD. Mitochondrial DNA as a marker of molecular diversity: a reappraisal. Mol Ecol. 2009;18(22):4541–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04380.x. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04380.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Mzhr NN, Jawad MM, Sabr AJ. Molecular detection of three Coleopteran species found in stored rice from some provinces in Iraq. Int J Health Sci. 2022;6(S3):6756–66. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.7527. [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Hall T, Biosciences I, Carlsbad C. BioEdit: an important software for molecular biology. GERF Bull Biosci. 2011;2:60–1. [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38(7):3022–7. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab120. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Mandal SD, Chhakchhuak L, Gurusubramanian G, Kumar NS. Mitochondrial markers for identification and phylogenetic studies in insects – a review. DNA Barcodes. 2014;2(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.2478/dna-2014-0001. [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Chan AHE, Saralamba N, Saralamba S, Ruangsittichai J, Thaenkham U. The potential use of mitochondrial ribosomal genes (12S and 16S) in DNA barcoding and phylogenetic analysis of trematodes. BMC Genomics. 2022;23:104. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08302-4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08302-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Driscoll TP, Verhoeve VI, Gillespie JJ, Johnston JS, Guillotte ML, Rennoll-Bankert KE, et al. A chromosome-level assembly of the cat flea genome uncovers rampant gene duplication and genome size plasticity. BMC Biol. 2020;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12915-020-00802-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-020-00802-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research are provided here courtesy of Network for the Veterinarians of Bangladesh

RESOURCES