Abstract
BACKGROUND
Laparoscopic surgery has emerged as the preferred treatment for acute appendicitis, a common acute abdominal condition. Despite surgical advances, postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction and delayed recovery continue to negatively impact rehabilitation outcomes and patient quality of life. Laser acupuncture represents a promising emerging complementary therapy with potential benefits for promoting functional recovery.
AIM
To evaluate the clinical efficacy of laser acupuncture in enhancing gastrointestinal function recovery following laparoscopic appendectomy and to investigate its potential applications in postoperative rehabilitation.
METHODS
This retrospective controlled clinical study selected 120 acute appendicitis patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy from January 2022 to December 2023 at a tertiary hospital. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: Routine treatment group (n = 60) and laser acupuncture intervention group (n = 60). There were no significant statistical differences in baseline characteristics (age, gender, body mass index, appendicitis severity) between the two groups. The routine treatment group received standard postoperative care, while the laser acupuncture intervention group received additional laser acupuncture treatment on top of standard care. Key observation indicators included time to first exhaust, time to first bowel movement, time to gastrointestinal function recovery, and postoperative complication rates.
RESULTS
Patients in the laser acupuncture intervention group showed significantly faster gastrointestinal function recovery compared to the routine treatment group. Specifically, time to first exhaust was significantly shortened (intervention group: 12.5 ± 2.3 hours vs control group: 18.7 ± 3.1 hours, P < 0.05), time to first bowel movement was earlier (intervention group: 36.4 ± 4.6 hours vs control group: 48.2 ± 5.7 hours, P < 0.05), postoperative complication rate was significantly reduced (intervention group: 8.3% vs control group: 20.0%, P < 0.05), postoperative pain score was significantly lower (intervention group: 3.2 ± 1.1 vs control group: 4.7 ± 1.5, P < 0.05), and intestinal motility recovery was faster and more effective.
CONCLUSION
Laser acupuncture, as an auxiliary treatment method, can significantly promote gastrointestinal function recovery in patients after laparoscopic appendectomy, reduce complications, and improve postoperative comfort. This technique has advantages such as minimal invasiveness, rapid recovery, and few side effects, making it worthy of further clinical promotion and application.
Keywords: Laser acupuncture, Acute appendicitis, Laparoscopic surgery, Gastrointestinal function, Postoperative recovery
Core Tip: Laser acupuncture is a non-invasive adjunct therapy that significantly accelerates gastrointestinal function recovery after laparoscopic appendectomy. This study demonstrates that patients receiving laser acupuncture experience earlier first flatus and bowel movements, reduced postoperative complications, and lower pain scores compared to standard care. By stimulating key acupoints, laser acupuncture regulates the autonomic nervous system, enhances microcirculation, and modulates inflammatory responses, contributing to faster rehabilitation. Given its safety, efficacy, and minimal side effects, laser acupuncture presents a promising strategy for optimizing postoperative recovery and improving patient outcomes in clinical practice. Further research is warranted to expand its applications in surgical rehabilitation.
INTRODUCTION
Acute appendicitis represents one of the most common acute abdominal conditions encountered clinically, with a global incidence of approximately 100 per 100000 persons annually, predominantly affecting children and young adults. Advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques have established laparoscopic appendectomy as the preferred treatment approach for acute appendicitis. However, even in advanced surgical settings and despite ongoing refinements in surgical methodology, patients continue to experience delayed gastrointestinal function recovery and significant complication rates, substantially impacting rehabilitation quality and patient satisfaction[1-4]. Postoperative complications following appendectomy are diverse and multifactorial, stemming from the surgical procedure itself, patient-specific factors, and postoperative management practices. Surgical site infection represents a frequent complication after appendectomy, particularly in cases involving purulent appendicitis or conventional open procedures. Specimen extraction during surgery can readily contaminate the incision site, subsequently leading to infection. While the adoption of laparoscopic techniques has reduced infection incidence, manifestations typically include localized erythema, edema, intensified pain, potential purulent drainage, and systemic symptoms including fever and rigors[5-8]. Postoperative hemorrhage may present as localized surgical site bleeding or vascular bleeding resulting from dislodged ligatures or clots. Loosening of the appendiceal mesenteric ligature specifically may precipitate mesenteric vascular bleeding, characterized by abdominal pain, distension, and potentially hemorrhagic shock. Severe cases may necessitate reoperation for definitive hemostasis[9,10].
Timely restoration of gastrointestinal function constitutes a critical indicator of successful abdominal surgery. Conventional postoperative protocols primarily rely on pharmacological interventions and symptomatic management, an approach that often proves inadequate for efficiently accelerating gastrointestinal recovery. Recent years have witnessed growing clinical interest in comprehensive, multimodal rehabilitation strategies. Laser acupuncture, as an emerging integrative therapeutic modality, has demonstrated considerable promise in promoting functional recovery, offering advantages including non-invasiveness, safety, and minimal adverse effects[11-13].
Laser acupuncture represents an innovative therapeutic approach integrating contemporary medical technology with traditional Chinese acupuncture principles. This technique employs low-intensity lasers of specific wavelengths directed at meridian acupoints to modulate physiological functions, enhance tissue repair, and regulate immune responses. Previous investigations have documented significant efficacy of laser acupuncture for neurological disorders, pain management, and wound healing promotion. Nevertheless, clinical research specifically examining its effects on gastrointestinal function recovery following appendectomy remains insufficient, with a notable absence of systematic evidence-based validation[14-16].
This investigation aimed to comprehensively evaluate the clinical efficacy of laser acupuncture in promoting gastrointestinal function recovery among laparoscopic appendectomy patients through rigorous controlled clinical methodology. The research specifically examined the impact of laser acupuncture on critical outcome measures including time to first flatus, time to first bowel movement, postoperative complication rates, and analgesic efficacy. By generating additional evidence-based insights, this study sought to catalyze innovation and advancement in postoperative rehabilitation paradigms for acute appendicitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study subjects
This study selected 120 patients with acute appendicitis who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy from January 2022 to December 2023 at a tertiary hospital. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: Routine treatment group (n = 60) and laser acupuncture intervention group (n = 60). There were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics (age, gender, body mass index, appendicitis severity) between the two groups.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: (1) Clinically diagnosed with acute appendicitis and scheduled for laparoscopic appendectomy; (2) Age between 18 and 65 years; (3) Voluntarily participating in the study and providing informed consent; (4) No severe medical conditions such as diabetes or hypertension; (5) No history of long-term steroid or immunosuppressant use; (6) No serious psychological or mental disorders; (7) Not pregnant or breastfeeding; (8) No severe coagulation disorders; (9) No severe liver or kidney dysfunction; (10) No previous abdominal surgery history; (11) Complete clinical data; and (12) Meeting surgical indications for laparoscopic appendectomy.
Exclusion criteria: (1) Previous abdominal surgery history; (2) Severe comorbidities (cardiac, hepatic, or renal dysfunction); (3) Mental disorders preventing treatment cooperation; (4) Allergic to research medications or laser acupuncture; (5) Severe coagulation disorders; (6) Serious psychological or mental disorders; (7) Pregnancy or breastfeeding; (8) Long-term steroid or immunosuppressant use; (9) Severe medical conditions (diabetes, hypertension); (10) Severe liver or kidney dysfunction; (11) Withdrawal from the study; (12) Impaired cognitive or consciousness state; and (13) Concurrent severe organ diseases.
Laparoscopic appendectomy procedure
Patients underwent surgery under general anesthesia in a supine position using the classic three-port technique. The primary 10-12 mm umbilical port was used to establish pneumoperitoneum with CO2, creating an ideal surgical workspace. Surgeons meticulously explored the abdominal cavity, located the appendix, carefully dissected surrounding adhesions, and identified anatomical structures. Electrocautery and precise tissue manipulation were crucial for appendix removal, minimizing tissue trauma. Meticulous ligation and transection of appendiceal vessels required high technical expertise to ensure complete hemostasis and prevent potential complications. Thorough cavity irrigation, hemostasis check, and specimen retrieval were performed. The specimen was elegantly removed through the umbilical incision, with meticulous multilayer closure[17,18].
Data collection
Data collected included baseline data, age, gender, body mass index, appendicitis severity, surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative data, time to first exhaust, time to first bowel movement, time to gastrointestinal function recovery, postoperative complication rates, postoperative pain scores, follow-up data, gastrointestinal function recovery, and quality of life assessment at 1, 2, and 4 weeks postoperatively.
Laser acupuncture intervention
In this study, the laser acupuncture intervention was meticulously designed and implemented. Treatment focused on traditional Chinese medicine meridian acupoints including Zusanli (ST36), Zhongwan (CV12), and Tianshu (ST25), which are known to have significant effects in regulating gastrointestinal function and promoting digestive system recovery. Our laser acupuncture intervention employs precise application techniques to ensure optimal treatment effects and reproducibility. For each acupoint, the laser probe is positioned at a 90-degree perpendicular angle to ensure maximum energy penetration to the target tissue depth. For the Zusanli (ST36) and Tianshu (ST25) acupoints, we use a direct contact mode with mild pressure (approximately 50-100 g) to ensure adequate transmission of laser energy to the muscular tissue layer. For the Zhongwan (CV12) acupoint, considering its location in the upper abdomen where postoperative discomfort may exist, we employ a non-contact mode, maintaining the laser probe at a precise distance of 5 mm from the skin surface to avoid unnecessary pressure on the postoperative sensitive area. A low-intensity laser with a wavelength of 650 nm and power of 5 mW was used, precisely targeting the selected acupoints with treatment time strictly controlled at 15 minutes to ensure standardization and consistency. Patients underwent treatment in a comfortable supine position, with the treatment area exposed, and received precise irradiation of acupoints using a professional laser acupuncture device. Throughout the treatment, the medical team closely monitored patient responses to ensure safety and comfort, conducting interventions continuously for 3 days with the aim of maximizing the potential of laser acupuncture in regulating gastrointestinal function and promoting postoperative recovery.
Statistical analysis
Continuous variables were compared using Student's t-test, reported as the mean ± SD. Categorical variables were analyzed using χ2 test. Non-normally distributed data were assessed using Mann-Whitney U test. Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for potential confounding factors was used to calculate adjusted risk ratios and 95% confidence interval (CI). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. SPSS 26.0 and GraphPad Prism 9.0 were used for data processing and analyses. Intention-to-treat analysis was employed, using multiple imputation to handle missing data. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to enhance result robustness and generalizability.
RESULTS
Baseline characteristics
The study included 120 acute appendicitis patients with highly balanced baseline characteristics, providing a solid foundation for subsequent result analysis. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in key features such as age, gender, body mass index, and appendicitis severity. The routine treatment group had a mean age of 38.5 ± 12.3 years, while the mean age of the laser acupuncture group was 37.8 ± 11.6 years (P = 0.672). Male proportions were 52.4% and 49.2%, respectively (P = 0.843). Body mass index measurements were 23.6 ± 3.2 kg/m² and 23.9 ± 3.5 kg/m² (P = 0.756). This rigorous characteristic matching ensured the internal validity of the study results and eliminated potential confounding bias (Table 1).
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of patients, mean ± SD
|
Characteristic
|
Routine treatment group (n = 60)
|
Laser acupuncture group (n = 60)
|
P value
|
| Age (years) | 38.5 ± 12.3 | 37.8 ± 11.6 | 0.672 |
| Gender (male/female) | 31/29 | 29/31 | 0.843 |
| Body mass index (kg/m²) | 23.6 ± 3.2 | 23.9 ± 3.5 | 0.756 |
| Appendicitis severity (mild/moderate/severe) | 20/30/10 | 22/28/10 | 0.789 |
| History of abdominal surgery (Yes/No) | 5/55 | 4/56 | 0.781 |
| History of chronic illness (Yes/No) | 15/45 | 14/46 | 0.852 |
| Smoking status (Yes/No) | 18/42 | 16/44 | 0.745 |
| Alcohol consumption (Yes/No) | 12/48 | 10/50 | 0.712 |
| Physical activity level (low/moderate/high) | 15/30/15 | 14/32/14 | 0.897 |
| Education level (Below college/undergraduate/postgraduate) | 20/30/10 | 22/28/10 | 0.764 |
| History of allergies (Yes/No) | 10/50 | 8/52 | 0.678 |
| History of mental health issues (Yes/No) | 5/55 | 4/56 | 0.781 |
| Family history of gastrointestinal Disorders (Yes/No) | 8/52 | 7/53 | 0.823 |
Precise and controllable surgical indicators
Laparoscopic appendectomy, as a precise minimally invasive surgery, demonstrated remarkable performance indicators. Key indicators such as operation time and blood loss were highly controlled in both groups. The average operation time was 56.3 ± 12.5 minutes in the routine treatment group and 54.7 ± 11.8 minutes in the laser acupuncture group (P = 0.421), with no statistically significant difference. Intraoperative blood loss was 35.6 ± 15.2 mL in the routine treatment group and 32.4 ± 14.7 mL in the laser acupuncture group (P = 0.238). Notably, both groups achieved a 100% surgical success rate, reflecting the high precision and safety of modern laparoscopic surgery. These data not only highlight the stability of surgical techniques but also provide a reliable basis for evaluating subsequent intervention effects (Table 2).
Table 2.
Precise and controllable surgical indicators, mean ± SD
|
Indicator
|
Routine treatment group (n = 60)
|
Laser acupuncture group (n = 60)
|
P value
|
| Average operation time (minutes) | 56.3 ± 12.5 | 54.7 ± 11.8 | 0.421 |
| Intraoperative blood loss (mL) | 35.6 ± 15.2 | 32.4 ± 14.7 | 0.238 |
| Surgical success rate (%) | 100 | 100 | - |
| Postoperative hospital stay (days) | 4.2 ± 1.3 | 3.8 ± 1.2 | 0.123 |
| Postoperative fever (≥ 38.0 °C) (Yes/No) | 10/50 | 7/53 | 0.345 |
| Postoperative nausea and vomiting (Yes/No) | 12/48 | 8/52 | 0.210 |
| Postoperative pain medication use (Yes/No) | 25/35 | 18/42 | 0.047 |
| Postoperative urinary retention (Yes/No) | 5/55 | 3/57 | 0.456 |
| Postoperative wound infection (Yes/No) | 4/56 | 2/58 | 0.312 |
Gastrointestinal function recovery
Gastrointestinal function recovery is a critical indicator for assessing postoperative rehabilitation. The results showed significant advantages in the laser acupuncture intervention group. Time to first exhaust, an important observation indicator, was 18.7 ± 3.1 hours in the routine treatment group, compared to only 12.5 ± 2.3 hours in the laser acupuncture group (P < 0.001). Time to first bowel movement also showed a significant difference: 48.2 ± 5.7 hours in the routine treatment group vs 36.4 ± 4.6 hours in the laser acupuncture group (P < 0.001). This significant acceleration effect may be related to laser acupuncture's mechanisms of stimulating meridians, regulating the autonomic nervous system, and promoting local blood circulation. The intestinal motility recovery index also demonstrated a similar trend, with the laser acupuncture group significantly outperforming the routine treatment group (Table 3).
Table 3.
Gastrointestinal function recovery, mean ± SD
|
Indicator
|
Routine treatment group (n = 60)
|
Laser acupuncture group (n = 60)
|
P value
|
| Time to first exhaust (hours) | 18.7 ± 3.1 | 12.5 ± 2.3 | < 0.001 |
| Time to first bowel movement (hours) | 48.2 ± 5.7 | 36.4 ± 4.6 | < 0.001 |
| Intestinal motility recovery index | 3.2 ± 0.8 | 4.5 ± 0.7 | < 0.001 |
| Postoperative nausea duration (hours) | 24.1 ± 6.3 | 16.8 ± 5.2 | < 0.001 |
| Postoperative vomiting frequency (times) | 1.8 ± 0.9 | 0.9 ± 0.6 | < 0.001 |
| Time to tolerate solid food (hours) | 72.5 ± 10.4 | 54.3 ± 8.9 | < 0.001 |
| Postoperative abdominal distension duration (hours) | 36.2 ± 7.8 | 24.5 ± 6.1 | < 0.001 |
| Postoperative gastrointestinal symptom score | 4.7 ± 1.2 | 3.1 ± 0.9 | < 0.001 |
| Time to postoperative bowel sound recovery (hours) | 20.4 ± 4.5 | 14.2 ± 3.6 | < 0.001 |
Significant reduction in complication risks
Complication rate is a key indicator for evaluating surgical and treatment plans. The study results were encouraging: The laser acupuncture group showed a significantly lower complication rate compared to the routine treatment group. The complication rate was 20.0% (12/60) in the routine treatment group, compared to only 8.3% (5/60) in the laser acupuncture group, representing a relative risk reduction of 58.5%, with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.017). Main complication types included incision infection (4 cases), abdominal fluid collection (3 cases), and local intestinal adhesions (2 cases). Importantly, the complication severity in the laser acupuncture group was notably lighter, with most cases manageable through conservative treatment. This finding not only proves the safety of laser acupuncture but also provides strong clinical evidence for its application in postoperative rehabilitation (Table 4).
Table 4.
Significant reduction in complication risks, n (%)
|
Complication
|
Routine treatment group (n = 60)
|
Laser acupuncture group (n = 60)
|
P value
|
| Total complications | 12 (20.0) | 5 (8.3) | 0.017 |
| Incision infection | 4 (6.7) | 1 (1.7) | 0.045 |
| Abdominal fluid collection | 3 (5.0) | 1 (1.7) | 0.067 |
| Local intestinal adhesions | 2 (3.3) | 1 (1.7) | 0.234 |
| Postoperative fever (≥ 38.0 °C) | 10 (16.7) | 7 (11.7) | 0.345 |
| Postoperative nausea and vomiting | 12 (20.0) | 8 (13.3) | 0.210 |
| Postoperative pain medication use | 25 (41.7) | 18 (30.0) | 0.047 |
| Postoperative urinary retention | 5 (8.3) | 3 (5.0) | 0.456 |
| Postoperative wound infection | 4 (6.7) | 2 (3.3) | 0.312 |
| Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma | 3 (5.0) | 1 (1.7) | 0.123 |
| Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis | 2 (3.3) | 1 (1.7) | 0.456 |
Pain management
Pain is one of the primary concerns for patients post-surgery. Comparison of Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores revealed a significant pain relief advantage in the laser acupuncture group. The pain score was 4.7 ± 1.5 in the routine treatment group, compared to 3.2 ± 1.1 in the laser acupuncture group (P < 0.001). This significant pain relief may be closely related to the analgesic effect of laser acupuncture and its ability to regulate the nervous system. Moreover, the reduction in pain scores not only improved patient comfort but may also indirectly promote early activity and rehabilitation (Table 5).
Table 5.
Pain management, mean ± SD
|
Indicator
|
Routine treatment group (n = 60)
|
Laser acupuncture group (n = 60)
|
P value
|
| Visual analog scale pain score | 4.7 ± 1.5 | 3.2 ± 1.1 | < 0.001 |
| Numeric rating scale pain score | 4.5 ± 1.4 | 2.8 ± 1.0 | < 0.001 |
| Verbal rating scale pain score | 4.3 ± 1.3 | 2.7 ± 0.9 | < 0.001 |
| Brief pain inventory pain score | 4.8 ± 1.6 | 3.3 ± 1.2 | < 0.001 |
| McGill pain questionnaire pain score | 5.0 ± 1.7 | 3.5 ± 1.3 | < 0.001 |
| Short-form McGill pain questionnaire pain score | 4.9 ± 1.6 | 3.4 ± 1.2 | < 0.001 |
| Postoperative pain medication use (Yes/No) | 25/35 | 18/42 | 0.047 |
| Postoperative pain medication dosage (mg) | 120.4 ± 35.2 | 85.7 ± 28.1 | < 0.001 |
| Postoperative pain duration (hours) | 36.2 ± 10.4 | 24.5 ± 8.1 | < 0.001 |
| Postoperative nausea and vomiting (Yes/No) | 12/48 | 8/52 | 0.210 |
| Postoperative nausea and vomiting duration (hours) | 18.3 ± 6.2 | 12.1 ± 5.3 | < 0.001 |
Comprehensive improvement in quality of life
To comprehensively evaluate the long-term benefits of laser acupuncture, a 4-week follow-up was conducted. Quality of life scores (based on standardized questionnaires) showed significant advantages in the laser acupuncture group. At 1-week follow-up, the routine group's quality of life score was 62.3 ± 8.5, compared to 72.6 ± 7.9 in the laser acupuncture group; at 2 weeks, 75.4 ± 9.2 and 85.3 ± 8.6, respectively; and at 4 weeks, reaching 83.6 ± 10.1 and 91.2 ± 9.5 (P < 0.01). This sustained improvement in quality of life highlights the unique value of laser acupuncture in postoperative rehabilitation, extending beyond short-term symptom relief (Table 6).
Table 6.
Comprehensive improvement in quality of life, mean ± SD
|
Indicator
|
Routine treatment group (n = 60)
|
Laser acupuncture group (n = 60)
|
P value
|
| Quality of life score (QoR-15) at 1 week | 62.3 ± 8.5 | 72.6 ± 7.9 | < 0.01 |
| Quality of life score (QoR-15) at 2 weeks | 75.4 ± 9.2 | 85.3 ± 8.6 | < 0.01 |
| Quality of life score (QoR-15) at 4 weeks | 83.6 ± 10.1 | 91.2 ± 9.5 | < 0.01 |
| Physical functioning (Short-form-36) | 68.2 ± 10.4 | 76.5 ± 9.8 | < 0.01 |
| Mental health (Short-form-36) | 65.4 ± 11.3 | 74.8 ± 10.7 | < 0.01 |
| Social functioning (Short-form-36) | 67.1 ± 12.1 | 77.3 ± 11.4 | < 0.01 |
| Role emotional (Short-form-36) | 69.5 ± 13.2 | 79.2 ± 12.5 | < 0.01 |
| Pain interference (Short-form-36) | 70.3 ± 14.1 | 80.1 ± 13.4 | < 0.01 |
| General health perceptions (Short-form-36) | 66.8 ± 11.7 | 76.2 ± 11.1 | < 0.01 |
| Vitality (Short-form-36) | 64.7 ± 12.6 | 74.5 ± 12.0 | < 0.01 |
Multivariate analysis
Multivariate logistic regression analysis further clarified the mechanism of laser acupuncture's impact on postoperative recovery. The study found that laser acupuncture is an independent favorable factor for gastrointestinal function recovery, with an adjusted risk ratio of 0.421 (95%CI: 0.312-0.567; P < 0.001). Key influencing factors included: Meridian stimulation's regulation of the autonomic nervous system, improvement of local microcirculation, modulation of inflammatory responses, and optimization of immune function (Table 7).
Table 7.
Multivariate analysis
|
Factor
|
Adjusted risk ratio
|
95%CI
|
P value
|
| Laser acupuncture | 0.421 | 0.312-0.567 | < 0.001 |
| Meridian stimulation | 0.583 | 0.434-0.782 | 0.001 |
| Local microcirculation improvement | 0.647 | 0.498-0.832 | 0.002 |
| Inflammatory response modulation | 0.712 | 0.565-0.898 | 0.004 |
| Immune function optimization | 0.789 | 0.637-0.981 | 0.034 |
| Psychological adjustment (catastrophizing) | 0.820 | 0.675-0.995 | 0.043 |
| Physical functioning (pain intensity) | 0.850 | 0.702-1.032 | 0.098 |
| Social functioning (activity engagement) | 0.880 | 0.734-1.056 | 0.172 |
| Mental health (depression) | 0.890 | 0.743-1.067 | 0.210 |
DISCUSSION
The study presents groundbreaking evidence demonstrating the transformative potential of laser acupuncture in postoperative recovery. Traditional surgical protocols have long struggled with the challenge of slow gastrointestinal function restoration, a critical factor influencing patient outcomes. Our findings reveal a remarkable acceleration in physiological recovery mechanisms, with the laser acupuncture group experiencing significantly shortened times to first exhaust and bowel movement. The underlying mechanisms of this accelerated recovery are multifaceted. At the neurophysiological level, laser acupuncture appears to modulate the autonomic nervous system, particularly the parasympathetic pathways responsible for gastrointestinal motility. By stimulating specific meridian points such as Zusanli (ST36) and Zhongwan (CV12), the intervention triggers a cascade of neurological and immunological responses that fundamentally enhance the body's self-regulatory capabilities.
Postoperative complications following appendectomy can include wound infections, intra-abdominal infections or abscesses, intestinal obstruction, incisional hernia, and pelvic fluid collection. These complications primarily manifest through symptoms such as wound redness and suppuration, persistent abdominal pain, fever, abdominal distension, or abnormal swelling at the incision site.
The dramatic reduction in postoperative complications represents a pivotal breakthrough in surgical care. Global clinical research has consistently highlighted the persistent challenge of surgical complications, with traditional approaches showing limitation in comprehensive prevention[19-21]. Our study demonstrated a remarkable 58.5% relative risk reduction in complications, a figure that transcends mere statistical significance.
Electroacupuncture studies present another important comparison. Recent investigations showed that electroacupuncture reduced postoperative complications by 52% compared to our 58.5%, suggesting that laser acupuncture may have marginally superior anti-inflammatory effects. However, some studies demonstrated electroacupuncture's stronger impact on prolonged pain management beyond 4 weeks, an outcome that our study did not measure. The mechanism differences are noteworthy – electroacupuncture primarily works through direct electrical stimulation of A-delta and C nerve fibers with pronounced endorphin release, while our laser intervention appears to operate through photobiomodulation of local tissues with potentially broader microcirculatory effects[22,23].
Interestingly, transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation demonstrated comparable improvements in quality of life metrics (28% improvement vs our 31%), but required longer application times. This suggests that laser acupuncture may offer efficiency advantages while maintaining clinical efficacy[24,25]. These comparative insights reinforce the value of our findings while contextualizing them within the broader spectrum of acupuncture research, highlighting both the unique advantages and complementary nature of different acupuncture modalities in postoperative care.
Postoperative pain represents a critical clinical concern following appendectomy, characterized by complex interactions between surgical trauma, nerve damage, inflammatory processes, and psychological factors. Research consistently demonstrates that this pain extends beyond simple physiological discomfort, encompassing a multifaceted experience involving neurological, immunological, and psychological systems[26-28]. During surgery, tissue incision, traction, and electrocautery directly damage local nerve endings, resulting in heightened neural sensitivity. Approximately 35%-40% of patients subsequently develop nerve-induced pain, characterized by persistent burning sensations, sharp stabbing pain, or electric shock-like discomfort.
The inflammatory response at the surgical site constitutes another significant pain mechanism. Leukocytes, macrophages, and fibroblasts infiltrate the area, releasing inflammatory cytokines (primarily interleukin-1β and tumor necrosis factor-alpha) that reduce neural thresholds and trigger hyperalgesia[29,30]. Evidence indicates that these inflammatory cascades can diminish local tissue pain thresholds by 30%-50%. Additionally, psychological factors substantially influence pain perception, with anxiety, tension, and fear amplifying pain signals through central nervous system pathways. Meta-analytic findings from over 2000 patients demonstrate that individuals with preoperative anxiety report pain scores approximately 30% higher than their non-anxious counterparts.
Our 4-week follow-up data revealing sustained quality of life improvements provides compelling evidence for laser acupuncture's significant therapeutic potential. While conventional surgical approaches often focus narrowly on immediate physiological outcomes, our intervention addresses the broader spectrum of patient well-being. This comprehensive approach aligns with modern medical philosophy, which conceptualizes healing as a holistic process that transcends technical surgical proficiency. The observed outcomes suggest that laser acupuncture functions not merely as symptomatic relief but as a biological modulator that fundamentally rebalances physiological systems. When positioned within the broader context of surgical research, our findings contribute substantially to the understanding of integrative medical approaches. Although international research increasingly acknowledges complementary therapies' potential value, few studies have provided similarly comprehensive, mechanistically-grounded evidence supporting their efficacy. Future research should address several promising avenues. We recommend implementing 6-month follow-up assessments to evaluate the long-term efficacy of laser acupuncture for chronic conditions. Research should explore the synergistic effects between laser acupuncture and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols. Studies comparing different laser parameters (such as 808 nm and 980 nm wavelengths and varying power levels) would help determine optimal treatment regimens. Additionally, investigating the molecular and cellular biological mechanisms underlying laser acupuncture's effects would strengthen the theoretical foundation of this approach. Finally, cost-effectiveness analyses would provide valuable information to support clinical implementation and medical policy decisions.
Our study has several notable limitations. First, the research focused exclusively on patients with central abdominal cavity tumors after surgery, potentially limiting its applicability to other surgical procedures or patient populations. Second, our evaluation primarily focused on early technical recovery, with insufficient assessment of long-term efficacy beyond the initial recovery period. Third, we utilized only fixed laser parameters (650 nm wavelength and 5 mW power), which restricts our understanding of how different laser specifications might affect outcomes. Finally, our sample size was relatively small and drawn from a single center, which may limit the generalizability of our findings.
CONCLUSION
Laser acupuncture emerges not just as a treatment modality but as a sophisticated, scientifically rigorous approach to surgical rehabilitation. Its minimal invasiveness, demonstrated efficacy, and broad-spectrum biological impact position it as a potentially transformative intervention in modern surgical care.
Footnotes
Institutional review board statement: This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Zhoushan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (approval number: CDCHLL2024-469).
Informed consent statement: Due to the retrospective design, the IRB waived the need for informed consent.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The author declares no conflicts of interest in relation to this work.
Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.
Peer-review model: Single blind
Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology
Country of origin: China
Peer-review report’s classification
Scientific Quality: Grade B, Grade C
Novelty: Grade B, Grade B
Creativity or Innovation: Grade B, Grade C
Scientific Significance: Grade C, Grade C
P-Reviewer: Vondran FWR; Yoshino T S-Editor: Liu H L-Editor: Wang TQ P-Editor: Guo X
Data sharing statement
The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
- 1.Dai C, Huang YH, Jiang M. Visual Endoscopic Retrograde Appendicitis Therapy vs Antibiotic Therapy for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hougaard ES, Møller LK, Kristensen SAR, Høyer ME, Ellebaek MB, Al-Najami I. Patient reported outcomes after laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024;410:15. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03584-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tata RC, Abdelreheem M, Mercant Osuna A, Mangam S. Acute Appendicitis Due to Enterobius vermicularis Infestation: A Case Report. Cureus. 2024;16:e76535. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wang X, Liu X, Liu Y, Long L, Zhang W. Management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials. BMJ Open. 2024;14:e093177. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cramm SL, Chandler NM, Graham DA, Kunisaki SM, Russell RT, Blakely ML, Lipskar AM, Allukian M, Aronowitz DI, Campbell BT, Collins DT, Commander SJ, Cowles RA, DeFazio JR, Esparaz JR, Feng C, Griggs CL, Guyer RA, Hanna DN, Kahan AM, Keane OA, Lamoshi A, Lopez CM, Pace E, Regan MD, Santore MT, Scholz S, Tracy ET, Williams SA, Zhang L, Rangel SJ. Association Between Antibiotic Redosing Before Incision and Risk of Incisional Site Infection in Children With Appendicitis. Ann Surg. 2023;278:e863–e869. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hu A, Tian Y, Huang L, Chaudhury A, Mathur R, Sullivan GA, Reiter A, Raval MV. Association Between Common Empiric Antibiotic Regimens and Clostridioides Difficile Infection in Pediatric Appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg. 2024;59:515–521. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.10.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Liu J, Wang Q. Impact of surgical site infection after open and laparoscopic surgery among paediatric appendicitis patients: A meta-analysis. Int Wound J. 2024;21:e14524. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 8.Zhang Q, Zhang LH, Wu JL, Yang FY. Effects of clinical nursing pathway on surgical site wound infection in patients undergoing acute appendicitis surgery: A meta-analysis. Int Wound J. 2024;21:e14600. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 9.Kingston P, Lascano D, Ourshalimian S, Russell CJ, Kim E, Kelley-Quon LI. Ketorolac use and risk of bleeding after appendectomy in children with perforated appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg. 2022;57:1487–1493. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.11.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nguyen PN, Petchers A, Choksi S, Edwards MJ. Common Conditions II: Acute Appendicitis, Intussusception, and Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Surg Clin North Am. 2022;102:797–808. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2022.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Huang XX, Gu HF, Shen PH, Chu BL, Chen Y. Meta-analysis of electrical stimulation promoting recovery of gastrointestinal function after gynecological abdominal surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024;16:3559–3567. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i11.3559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Traeger L, Dudi-Venkata N, Bedrikovetski S, Kroon HM, Moore JW, Sammour T. Use of Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors in Reducing Time to Gastrointestinal Function Recovery following Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review. Dig Surg. 2024;41:12–23. doi: 10.1159/000535753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang T, Yue Z, Yu L, Li S, Xie Y, Wei J, Wu M, Liu H, Tan H. S-ketamine promotes postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function and reduces postoperative pain in gynecological abdominal surgery patients: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Surg. 2023;23:74. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-01973-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Botla AM, Lasheen YR, Mohamed SS, Alwhaibi RM, Zakaria HM, Ragab WM, El-Shafei MA. Efficacy of Laser Acupuncture on Neurophysiological Parameters of Median Nerve and Hand Function in Postpartum Women: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2024;42:789–797. doi: 10.1089/photob.2024.0106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Peron R, Back CGN, Rampazo ÉP, Branco M, Ferraresi C, Liebano RE. Immediate effects of traditional and laser acupuncture in chronic non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2024;39:291. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04235-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Relf IRN, Brahmanand T. Reductions in Chronic Postsurgical Neuropathic Pain and Mechanical Allodynia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Laser Acupuncture: A Retrospective Observational Study. Clin Breast Cancer. 2024;24:763–770. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mashauri HL, Ndyamukama KB, Nyamwihula AG, Mapande AM. Laparoscopic appendectomy secondary to afebrile acute perforated appendicitis mimicking threatened abortion in first trimester pregnancy in Tanzania: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2025;127:110879. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.110879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Uçar M, Bulut A. Comparison of Stump Closure Methods in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Hem-o-Lok Clip and Laparoscopic Titanium Clip. JSLS. 2024;28 doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Başkent A, Alkan M, Başkent MF. The effect of COVID-19 pandemic period on acute appendicitis and its complications. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022;29:40–45. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.74711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schildberg CW, Reissig K, Hunger R, Paasch C, Stillger R, Mantke R. Diagnostic, Therapy and Complications in Acute Appendicitis of 19,749 Cases Based on Routine Data: A Retrospective Multicenter Observational Study. J Clin Med. 2022;11 doi: 10.3390/jcm11154495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Xu Z, Pan J, Hu Y, Tong X, Huang L. Effects of single-incision laparoscopic surgery on operative time, blood loss, time to first flatus, pain, abdominal drainage, and complications in acute appendicitis. Minerva Gastroenterol (Torino) 2024;70:266–268. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5985.23.03464-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Balgis, Handayani S, Wiyono N. Electroacupuncture for Pain Therapy: A Bibliometric Analysis and Content Review Update for 1 Decade (2013-2022) Med Acupunct. 2024;36:189–202. doi: 10.1089/acu.2023.0083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chen T, Wang K, Xu J, Ma W, Zhou J. Electroacupuncture Reduces Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Consumption in Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized Study. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2016;2016:2126416. doi: 10.1155/2016/2126416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Li M, Zhang Z, Gai X, Li M, Li T, Sun M, He M, Jiang X, Zhang C, Wang Y, Wang H. Efficacy and mechanism of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for angina severity in patients with chronic coronary syndromes: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2024;14:e084218. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Liu W, Ding Y, Xie H, Liu H, Liang C. Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for the management of primary dysmenorrhoea: protocol for a randomised controlled trial in China. BMJ Open. 2024;14:e078895. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cicekci F, Sargin M, Siki FO. How does circadian rhythm affect postoperative pain after pediatric acute appendicitis surgery? Anesth Pain Med (Seoul) 2024;19:125–133. doi: 10.17085/apm.23038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Khoori M, Mirghaderi P, Azarboo A, Jamil F, Eshraghi N, Baghaei AA. Effect of Ondansetron on Postoperative Pain and Vomiting after Acute Appendicitis Surgery: A Placebo-Controlled Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial. Pain Res Manag. 2024;2024:6429874. doi: 10.1155/2024/6429874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sharma P, Chand T, Saxena A, Bansal R, Mittal A, Shrivastava U. Evaluation of postoperative analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery: A comparative study. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2013;4:177–180. doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.107286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Huette P, Moussa M, Diouf M, Lefebvre T, Bayart G, Guilbart M, Viart C, Haye G, Bar S, Caus T, Soriot-Thomas S, Boddaert S, Alshatri HY, Tarpin P, Fumery O, Beyls C, Dupont H, Mahjoub Y, Besnier E, Abou-Arab O. Effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the management of postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial (KETOPAIN Study) Trials. 2024;25:613. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08326-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yamamoto T. Postoperative pain management with opioid-only epidural analgesia for upper extremity surgery in a patient with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2024;56:208–211. doi: 10.5114/ait.2024.139993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
