Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biochemical Journal logoLink to Biochemical Journal
. 1997 Dec 1;328(Pt 2):401–407. doi: 10.1042/bj3280401

Chromatin structure of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA topoisomerase I promoter in different growth phases.

L Rubbi 1, G Camilloni 1, M Caserta 1, E Di Mauro 1, S Venditti 1
PMCID: PMC1218934  PMID: 9371694

Abstract

We have determined the chromatin organization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA topoisomerase I promoter. Three nucleosomal core particles have been mapped at nucleotide level over the promoter region, encompassing the presumptive TATA sequence and the two RNA initiation sites; the most upstream nucleosome particle forms on to a 29 bp-long poly(dA-dT) element. This simple organization remains constant throughout both the logarithmic and the linear phase of growth, with the exception of an increased accessibility to micrococcal nuclease of the nucleosome covering the TATA box and the RNA initiation sites during the diauxic shift (the switching from the fermentative to the respiratory metabolism) in parallel with an increase of the DNA topoisomerase I mRNA. In addition, a strong disorganization of the bulk chromatin structure in the late stationary phase is also reported.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (395.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Almer A., Hörz W. Nuclease hypersensitive regions with adjacent positioned nucleosomes mark the gene boundaries of the PHO5/PHO3 locus in yeast. EMBO J. 1986 Oct;5(10):2681–2687. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04551.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blank T. A., Becker P. B. The effect of nucleosome phasing sequences and DNA topology on nucleosome spacing. J Mol Biol. 1996 Jul 5;260(1):1–8. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Buttinelli M., Di Mauro E., Negri R. Multiple nucleosome positioning with unique rotational setting for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae 5S rRNA gene in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Oct 15;90(20):9315–9319. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.20.9315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Choder M. A general topoisomerase I-dependent transcriptional repression in the stationary phase in yeast. Genes Dev. 1991 Dec;5(12A):2315–2326. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.12a.2315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Costanzo G., Di Mauro E., Negri R., Pereira G., Hollenberg C. Multiple overlapping positions of nucleosomes with single in vivo rotational setting in the Hansenula polymorpha RNA polymerase II MOX promoter. J Biol Chem. 1995 May 12;270(19):11091–11097. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.19.11091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Durrin L. K., Mann R. K., Kayne P. S., Grunstein M. Yeast histone H4 N-terminal sequence is required for promoter activation in vivo. Cell. 1991 Jun 14;65(6):1023–1031. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90554-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Felsenfeld G., Boyes J., Chung J., Clark D., Studitsky V. Chromatin structure and gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Sep 3;93(18):9384–9388. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.18.9384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Felsenfeld G. Chromatin as an essential part of the transcriptional mechanism. Nature. 1992 Jan 16;355(6357):219–224. doi: 10.1038/355219a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Iyer V., Struhl K. Poly(dA:dT), a ubiquitous promoter element that stimulates transcription via its intrinsic DNA structure. EMBO J. 1995 Jun 1;14(11):2570–2579. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07255.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Karlin S., Blaisdell B. E., Sapolsky R. J., Cardon L., Burge C. Assessments of DNA inhomogeneities in yeast chromosome III. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Feb 11;21(3):703–711. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.3.703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kornberg R. D., Lorch Y. Chromatin structure and transcription. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1992;8:563–587. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.08.110192.003023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kornberg R. D., Lorch Y. Irresistible force meets immovable object: transcription and the nucleosome. Cell. 1991 Nov 29;67(5):833–836. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90354-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kunkel G. R., Martinson H. G. Nucleosomes will not form on double-stranded RNa or over poly(dA).poly(dT) tracts in recombinant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Dec 21;9(24):6869–6888. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.24.6869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lee D. Y., Hayes J. J., Pruss D., Wolffe A. P. A positive role for histone acetylation in transcription factor access to nucleosomal DNA. Cell. 1993 Jan 15;72(1):73–84. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90051-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lewin B. Chromatin and gene expression: constant questions, but changing answers. Cell. 1994 Nov 4;79(3):397–406. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90249-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Losa R., Omari S., Thoma F. Poly(dA).poly(dT) rich sequences are not sufficient to exclude nucleosome formation in a constitutive yeast promoter. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Jun 25;18(12):3495–3502. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.12.3495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lu Q., Wallrath L. L., Elgin S. C. Nucleosome positioning and gene regulation. J Cell Biochem. 1994 May;55(1):83–92. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240550110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nelson H. C., Finch J. T., Luisi B. F., Klug A. The structure of an oligo(dA).oligo(dT) tract and its biological implications. Nature. 1987 Nov 19;330(6145):221–226. doi: 10.1038/330221a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pavlović B., Hörz W. The chromatin structure at the promoter of a glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae reflects its functional state. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Dec;8(12):5513–5520. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.12.5513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Philippsen P., Stotz A., Scherf C. DNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:169–182. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94014-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Prunell A. Nucleosome reconstitution on plasmid-inserted poly(dA) . poly(dT). EMBO J. 1982;1(2):173–179. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01143.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Puhl H. L., Gudibande S. R., Behe M. J. Poly[d(A.T)] and other synthetic polydeoxynucleotides containing oligoadenosine tracts form nucleosomes easily. J Mol Biol. 1991 Dec 20;222(4):1149–1160. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90598-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Russell D. W., Smith M., Cox D., Williamson V. M., Young E. T. DNA sequences of two yeast promoter-up mutants. Nature. 1983 Aug 18;304(5927):652–654. doi: 10.1038/304652a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schild C., Claret F. X., Wahli W., Wolffe A. P. A nucleosome-dependent static loop potentiates estrogen-regulated transcription from the Xenopus vitellogenin B1 promoter in vitro. EMBO J. 1993 Feb;12(2):423–433. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05674.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Schmitt M. E., Brown T. A., Trumpower B. L. A rapid and simple method for preparation of RNA from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 May 25;18(10):3091–3092. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.10.3091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Struhl K. Naturally occurring poly(dA-dT) sequences are upstream promoter elements for constitutive transcription in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Dec;82(24):8419–8423. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.24.8419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Svaren J., Hörz W. Histones, nucleosomes and transcription. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1993 Apr;3(2):219–225. doi: 10.1016/0959-437x(93)90026-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Svaren J., Schmitz J., Hörz W. The transactivation domain of Pho4 is required for nucleosome disruption at the PHO5 promoter. EMBO J. 1994 Oct 17;13(20):4856–4862. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06812.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Thrash C., Bankier A. T., Barrell B. G., Sternglanz R. Cloning, characterization, and sequence of the yeast DNA topoisomerase I gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jul;82(13):4374–4378. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.13.4374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Truss M., Bartsch J., Schelbert A., Haché R. J., Beato M. Hormone induces binding of receptors and transcription factors to a rearranged nucleosome on the MMTV promoter in vivo. EMBO J. 1995 Apr 18;14(8):1737–1751. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07163.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Venditti P., Costanzo G., Negri R., Camilloni G. ABFI contributes to the chromatin organization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae ARS1 B-domain. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994 Nov 22;1219(3):677–689. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(94)90227-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Venditti S., Camilloni G. In vivo analysis of chromatin following nystatin-mediated import of active enzymes into Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet. 1994 Jan;242(1):100–104. doi: 10.1007/BF00277353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Venter U., Svaren J., Schmitz J., Schmid A., Hörz W. A nucleosome precludes binding of the transcription factor Pho4 in vivo to a critical target site in the PHO5 promoter. EMBO J. 1994 Oct 17;13(20):4848–4855. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06811.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Verdone L., Camilloni G., Di Mauro E., Caserta M. Chromatin remodeling during Saccharomyces cerevisiae ADH2 gene activation. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 May;16(5):1978–1988. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.5.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wall G., Varga-Weisz P. D., Sandaltzopoulos R., Becker P. B. Chromatin remodeling by GAGA factor and heat shock factor at the hypersensitive Drosophila hsp26 promoter in vitro. EMBO J. 1995 Apr 18;14(8):1727–1736. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07162.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang J. C. DNA topoisomerases. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:635–692. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.003223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Werner-Washburne M., Braun E., Johnston G. C., Singer R. A. Stationary phase in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Rev. 1993 Jun;57(2):383–401. doi: 10.1128/mr.57.2.383-401.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Winter E., Varshavsky A. A DNA binding protein that recognizes oligo(dA).oligo(dT) tracts. EMBO J. 1989 Jun;8(6):1867–1877. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03583.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wolffe A. P. The role of transcription factors, chromatin structure and DNA replication in 5 S RNA gene regulation. J Cell Sci. 1994 Aug;107(Pt 8):2055–2063. doi: 10.1242/jcs.107.8.2055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Workman J. L., Buchman A. R. Multiple functions of nucleosomes and regulatory factors in transcription. Trends Biochem Sci. 1993 Mar;18(3):90–95. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(93)90160-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wu C. The 5' ends of Drosophila heat shock genes in chromatin are hypersensitive to DNase I. Nature. 1980 Aug 28;286(5776):854–860. doi: 10.1038/286854a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Young T., Williamson V., Taguchi A., Smith M., Sledziewski A., Russell D., Osterman J., Denis C., Cox D., Beier D. The alcohol dehydrogenase genes of the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae: isolation, structure, and regulation. Basic Life Sci. 1982;19:335–361. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-4142-0_26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. van Holde K. Transcription. The omnipotent nucleosome. Nature. 1993 Mar 11;362(6416):111–112. doi: 10.1038/362111a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biochemical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biochemical Society

RESOURCES