Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1980 Dec;96(4):887–902. doi: 10.1093/genetics/96.4.887

The Role of Dosage of the Region 7d1–7d5-6 of the X Chromosome in the Production of Homeotic Transformations in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

M Gans 1, F Forquignon 1, M Masson 1
PMCID: PMC1219307  PMID: 6790337

Abstract

A high frequency of homeotic transformations appears in Df(3)red/+ progeny of Df(1)snC128 /+ females. Generally, the metathoracic appendages are partially transformed into mesothoracic ones. Df(1)snC128 includes a small region of the X chromosome: 7D1 to 7D5-6. Hypodosage of this region is mainly effective at the level of the maternal genotype, and the effect is probably due to hypodosage of the wild-type allele of the gene fs(1)h. Df(3)red has an effect that is mainly, if not exclusively, zygotic, probably due to hypodosage of the wild-type allele of Rg-bx. The frequencies of transformed flies resulting from the interaction between Df(1)snC128 and Df(3)red are not very sensitive to external conditions and genetic background. Studies of the interactions between Df(1)snC128 and other mutations or deficiencies of chromosome 3 [Rg-pbx, bx, pbx, Ubx1, Ubx130, Ubx80, Df(3)P9] reveal an analogy between the hypodosage effect of region 7D1–7D5-6 and the effects of ether treatment of blastoderm stage eggs. The role of the gene fs(1)h in the process of segment determination is discussed in the light of these results.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. García-Bellido A. Genetic control of wing disc development in Drosophila. Ciba Found Symp. 1975;0(29):161–182. doi: 10.1002/9780470720110.ch8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Lohs-Schardin M., Sander K., Cremer C., Cremer T., Zorn C. Localized ultraviolet laser microbeam irradiation of early Drosophila embryos: fate maps based on location and frequency of adult defects. Dev Biol. 1979 Feb;68(2):533–545. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(79)90224-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Morata G., Lawrence P. A. Homoeotic genes, compartments and cell determination in Drosophila. Nature. 1977 Jan 20;265(5591):211–216. doi: 10.1038/265211a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Nüsslein-Volhard C., Lohs-Schardin M., Sander K., Cremer C. A dorso-ventral shift of embryonic primordia in a new maternal-effect mutant of Drosophila. Nature. 1980 Jan 31;283(5746):474–476. doi: 10.1038/283474a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Puro J., Nygrén T. Mode of action of a homoeotic gene in Drosophila melanogaster. Localization and dosage effects of Polycomb. Hereditas. 1975;81(2):237–248. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1975.tb01038.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Santamaría P. Heat shock induced phenocopies of dominant mutants of the bithorax complex in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Gen Genet. 1979 May 4;172(2):161–163. doi: 10.1007/BF00268277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Schubiger G. Adult differentiation from partial Drosophila embryos after egg ligation during stages of nuclear multiplication and cellular blastoderm. Dev Biol. 1976 Jun;50(2):476–488. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(76)90166-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wieschaus E., Gehring W. Clonal analysis of primordial disc cells in the early embryo of Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol. 1976 Jun;50(2):249–263. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(76)90150-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES