Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0327145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327145

Integrative analysis of the metabolome and transcriptome provides insights into the mechanisms of amino acids and their derivatives biosynthesis in Polygonatum

Xiuzhi Wang 1, Lingjun Cui 1, Qiang Xiao 1,*
Editor: Mojtaba Kordrostami,2
PMCID: PMC12193713  PMID: 40561134

Abstract

The composition and concentration of amino acids and their derivatives in Polygonatum are crucial factors that indicate its nutritional value and have a substantial impact on its potential for market development as a medicinal and edible plant. This study utilized comprehensive targeted metabolomics detection, transcriptome analysis, and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to assess the quality characteristics of amino acids and their derivatives. Additionally, it aimed to investigate the pivotal genes that influence the synthesis of these compounds. The analysis revealed that there was a total of 72 distinct amino acids and their derivatives present in both forms of Polygonatum. Furthermore, there were notable variations in the content of 37 of these amino acids. A total of 271 genes are responsible for encoding 37 enzymes that are involved in the production of amino acids and their derivatives. The WGCNA clustering analysis, along with the metabolic profile of amino acids and their derivatives and transcriptome analysis, categorized the transcripts into six modules. Among these modules, the active components of amino acids and their derivatives showed a positive correlation with the MEturquoise and MEblue modules. This correlation helped identify 10 key genes that are highly likely to influence the synthesis of amino acids and their derivatives. Therefore, we validated these results using qRT-PCR. The modulation of the expression patterns of these crucial genes can establish a theoretical foundation for the subsequent breeding of Polygonatum germplasm with abundant amino acid content and diversity.

Introduction

Polygonatum kingianum var. grandifolium (PzP) and Polygonatum sibiricum Redouté (PS) are both members of the Liliaceae family, specifically belonging to the genus Polygonatum [1]. This is a valuable traditional Chinese medicinal substance that is extensively utilized in the realm of traditional Chinese medicine. The flavor of this substance is characterized by a combination of sweetness, bitterness, and a mild warmth. It is believed to have an effect on the spleen, lung, and kidney meridians. the ability to restore energy and nourish the body’s vital essence, as well as promote the health of the bones and bone marrow [2]. Polygonatum has a diverse range of compounds such as flavonoids [3], saponins, alkaloids [4], and polysaccharides [5], which exhibit notable pharmacological effects. Furthermore, the scientific community has shown significant interest and conducted extensive research on the abundant amino acids and their derivatives found in Polygonatum [6].

Polygonatum rhizomes contain a diverse range of amino acids and their derivatives. These chemicals play a crucial role in protein synthesis in the body and also have many physiological activities and pharmacological effects that are important for human health. Research has demonstrated that serine and alanine are highly prevalent free amino acids and their derivatives in Polygonatum. Additionally, Polygonatum multiflorum contains amino acids and their derivatives such as aspartic acid, homoserine, and diaminobutyric acid [7,8]. At present, our knowledge about how the genes control the production of these amino acids and their derivatives in Polygonatum is still restricted. Research has shown that amino acids and their derivatives are one of the initial substances produced by living organisms [9]. This could be the reason why they play a role in many metabolic pathways and cellular activities [10]. In addition, amino acids and their derivatives are used as building blocks for the production of other secondary metabolites, enzymes, and hormones [11]. Research has found that the production of amino acids and their derivatives relies on chemicals derived from carbohydrate metabolism. Additionally, the breakdown of amino acids and their derivatives results in the release of several metabolites that serve as energy sources in the citric acid cycle [12]. Moreover, amino acids and their derivatives have a substantial impact on pharmacology. Research has demonstrated that asparagine (Asn), glutamine (Gln), arginine (Arg), methionine (Met), serine, and cysteine play significant roles in the metabolic processes of cancer cells. They function as targets for anticancer therapies, by binding to disease sites in order to achieve therapeutic effects [13]. Further investigation reveals that the breakdown of amino acids and their byproducts is linked to immunological responses, obesity (specifically insulin resistance), and the regulation of thermogenesis [14]. Prior studies on traditional Chinese medicinal materials have primarily concentrated on investigating the medicinal properties of the herbs, specifically examining the mechanisms of action of polysaccharides, flavonoids, saponins, alkaloids, and other molecules. However, these studies have overlooked the significance of amino acids and their derivatives, which also exhibit numerous biological functions.

This work utilized metabolite profiling and transcriptomics analysis to examine the crucial genes and regulatory impacts in the biosynthesis pathways of amino acids and their derivatives in Polygonatum. Through the utilization of WGCNA clustering and correlation analysis, we have successfully discovered crucial genes that may play a role in the production of amino acids and their derivatives. This research provides novel insights into the regulatory mechanisms of amino acid and derivative production in Polygonatum species.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

In this study, we used three-year-old Polygonatum plants, specifically PS and PzP, which were grown under similar conditions at the experimental base of the College of Forestry and Horticulture, Hubei Minzu University. The substrate soil was composed of vermiculite and peat soil (in a ratio of 8:1). Three biological replicates of different Polygonatum rhizomes were collected for each group. The sampled Polygonatum rhizomes were chopped, mixed evenly, placed into sterile centrifuge tubes, quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at −80°C until use. They were subsequently used for RNA sequencing and metabolite profiling analysis.

Metabolite extraction and analysis

The data acquisition instrument system mainly comprises an ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) system (SHIMADZU Nexera X2) and a tandem mass spectrometer (MS/MS) (Applied Biosystems 4500 QTRAP).

Liquid Chromatography Conditions: (i) Column: Agilent SB-C18 1.8 µm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm; (ii) Mobile Phase: Phase A is ultra-pure water (with 0.1% formic acid added), Phase B is acetonitrile (with 0.1% formic acid added); (iii) At 0.00 min, the proportion of Phase B is 5%, linearly increased to 95% within 9.00 min, and maintained at 95% for 1 min; from 10.00 to 11.10 min, the proportion of Phase B is decreased to 5%, and equilibrated at 5% until 14 min; (iv) Flow rate: 0.35 mL/min; column temperature: 40°C; injection volume: 4 μL. The UPLC-MS/MS was conducted by Metware Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). Metabolomics data were acquired in electrospray ionization negative (ESI-) and positive (ESI+) modes. The ion spray voltage for ESI- is −4500 V, and for ESI + it is 5500 V; the ion source gases I (GSI), II (GSII), and curtain gas (CUR) are set to 50, 60, and 25 psi, respectively, with collision-induced dissociation parameters set to high; and the electrospray ion source (ESI) temperature is 550°C. Additionally, principal component analysis (PCA), partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA), differential metabolite expression analysis, and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis were performed on the metabolomics data.

Transcriptome analysis

Total RNA was extracted from the rhizomes of Polygonatum using the Plant RNA Kit (200)R6827-02 (OMEGA, USA). A cDNA library was constructed and then sequenced on the Illumina platform. After obtaining clean reads, Trinity was used to assemble the clean reads. Following the assembly, the longest cluster sequence obtained by corset hierarchical clustering was used as unigene for subsequent analysis. The Unigene sequences were aligned with the KEGG, NCBI non-redundant protein sequences (Nr), a manually annotated and reviewed protein sequence database (Swiss-Prot), Gene Ontology (GO), Clusters of Orthologous Groups of Proteins (COG)/euKaryotic Ortholog Groups (KOG), a variety of new documentation files, and the creation of TrEMBL (TrEMBL) databases using the DIAMOND BLASTX software to predict the amino acid sequences of the Unigenes. After the prediction, the HMMER software was used to align with the Protein family (Pfam) database to obtain annotation information for the Unigenes. The gene expression levels were assessed using fragments per kilobase of transcript per million fragments mapped (FPKM), and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were defined.

Transcriptome and metabolome association analysis

To identify key genes associated with the synthesis of amino acids and their derivatives, we conducted an integrated analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and the differential accumulation of amino acids and their derivatives in PzP and PS. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between the differential metabolites and DEGs. The co-expression network was visualized using Cytoscape (version 3.9.1).

Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT–PCR) validation

To verify the accuracy of the transcriptome data, We selected the sequences of 10 target genes identified in the study for primer design and performed qRT-PCR analysis. We extracted RNA using ComWin Biotech (Beijing, China) Plant All-in-One RNA Extraction Kit, and reverse transcribed RNA into cDNA using RTIII All-in-One Mix with dsDNase Reverse Transcription Kit from Monad Biotech (Wuhan, China). primers were synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Sangon, Shanghai, China). The experiment was conducted using an ABI7500 real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR apparatus. The real-time quantitative PCR reaction system consisted of 20 µL, comprising 1 µL of cDNA, 8 µL of RNase-free water, 10 µL of 2X SGExcel FastSYBR Master, and 0.5 µL of each forward and reverse primers. The reaction program involved a predenaturation step at 95°C for 3 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 5 seconds and annealing at 60°C for 20 seconds. The annealing/extension step should be performed at a temperature of 60°C for a duration of 20 seconds. The ubiquitin was selected as a reference gene: forward primer: 5’- GGACCCAGAAGTACGCAATG-3’, reverse primer: 3’- AATTACCAGGGATACAGCACC-5’ [15]. Three technical replicates were prepared for each extract, The complete list of primers may be seen in S1 Table.

Results and analysis

Metabolomic analysis of PzP vs PS

We conducted an analysis of metabolite alterations using UPLC-MS/MS by selecting two distinct samples. A comprehensive targeted metabolomics approach identified a total of 72 amino acid and derivative metabolites in the metabolic analysis (S2 Table). Fig 1A and 1B provide a summary of the analysis of metabolites and the principal component analysis (PCA) of amino acids and their derivatives comparing PzP and PS. The clustering heatmap demonstrates that the six Polygonatum samples can be categorized into two distinct groups (Fig 1A). Significant disparities in metabolite content exist between PzP and PS, underscoring the major variations in composition between the two kinds. In the PCA score plot, the first two principal components (PC1 at 87.69% and PC2 at 4.36%) have a combined contribution of 92.05% (Fig 1B). The plots clearly demonstrate distinct clustering of the PzP and PS types, emphasizing the considerable metabolic disparities between them. The tight grouping of duplicate samples for each variation highlights the experiment’s repeatability and its suitability for subsequent qualitative and quantitative examination.

Fig 1. Multivariate statistical analyses of DEMs.

Fig 1

A: Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed on the identified amino acids and their derivative metabolites in the metabolomes of the three samples. The colors represent the accumulation levels of each metabolite, ranging from low (blue) to high (red). The Z-score indicates the deviation in standard deviation units from the mean. B: Principal component analysis (PCA) of the identified amino acids and their derivative metabolites.

Detection of amino acids and their derivatives that show differential accumulation in PzP vs PS

To reveal the changes in metabolite abundance among different Polygonatum, a quantitative analysis and inter-group comparison were performed on all identified metabolites. The metabolomics data were analyzed using the OPLS-DA model to construct the score plots for each group, further highlighting the differences between groups (Fig 2A). The values of R2X, R2Y, and Q2 being close to 1 indicate that the model is stable and reliable. To identify differential metabolites, we selected metabolites from the OPLS-DA model with a fold change (FC) ≥ 2 (upregulated) or ≤ 0.5 (downregulated) and a variable importance in the projection VIP value ≥ 1. CV is a measure of data dispersion. As shown in Fig 2B, more than 80% of the QC samples have a CV value below 0.2, indicating high stability of the experimental data. Compared with the PS rhizomes, statistical analysis identified 37 differentially accumulated metabolites (DAMs) of amino acids and their derivatives in PzP, including 34 upregulated and 3 downregulated (Fig 2C; S3 Table). Interestingly, most amino acids and their derivatives significantly accumulate in PzP. The significant differential metabolites in this study between PzP and PS were γ-glutamylmethionine and N-Acetyl-L-Glutamine (Fig 2D).

Fig 2. Chemical differences between PzP and PS. A: Score plot of the Orthogonal Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA) model.

Fig 2

The model summary plot shows the R2X, R2Y, and Q2 corresponding to the predictive and orthogonal components in the OPLS-DA model. In the horizontal axis, P1 represents the predictive component, O1 represents the orthogonal component, and the vertical axis represents the corresponding R2X, R2Y, and Q2. B: Distribution plot of sample CVs. C: Volcano plot showing the differential expression levels of metabolites in PzP and PS samples. Red, green, and gray dots represent upregulated, downregulated, and non-significant differential expression of metabolites, respectively. D: The top 10 upregulated and downregulated compounds in PzP vs PS. Red and green colors represent upregulation and downregulation of metabolites, respectively.

The content of amino acids and their derivatives differs among various species of Polygonatum.

Our research focuses on examining the composition of amino acids and their derivatives in various species of Polygonatum. We employed a metabolomic analysis technique utilizing LC-MS/MS to detect and quantify 37 amino acids and their derivatives (Table 1, Fig 3). We found that in PzP, N-Acetyl-L-Glutamine, γ-glutamylmethionine, L-Arginine, N-Alpha-Acetyl-L-Asparagine, N-α-Acetyl-L-ornithine, N6-Acetyl-L-lysine, S-(Methyl)glutathione, 5-Oxoproline, DL-Methionine, L-Ornithine, L-Methionine, L-Glutamine, L-Lysine, N-Monomethyl-L-Arginine, Arginine methyl ester, Homoarginine, N-Acetyl-L-glutamic acid, Trimethyllysine, S-Methyl-L-cysteine, L-Histidine, L-Tryptophan, L-Leucine, L-Isoleucine, L-Tyrosine, L-Norleucine, L-Saccharopine, L-Threonine, L-Methionine methyl ester, NG,NG-Dimethyl-L-Arginine, N,N-Dimethylglycine, L-Phenylalanine, L-Glutamine-O-glycoside, N,N’-Dimethylarginine, 5-Hydroxy-L-tryptophanreached the highest values, while L-Valyl-L-Leucine, S-(5’-Adenosy)-L-homocysteine and N-acetyl-L-tyrosinereached the highest values in PS.

Table 1. Relative content of amino acids and their derivatives in PzP vs PS.
Compounds Q1 (Da) Q3 (Da) Molecular weight (Da) Compounds Q1 (Da) Q3 (Da) Molecular weight (Da)
N-Acetyl-L-Glutamine 187.07 125.00 188.0797 L-Histidine 156.08 110.00 155.0695
γ-glutamylmethionine 279.10 133.03 278.0936 L-Tryptophan 203.08 116.05 204.0899
L-Arginine 175.12 116.00 174.1117 L-Leucine 132.10 86.20 131.0946
N-Alpha-Acetyl-L-Asparagine 173.06 58.03 174.0641 L-Isoleucine 132.10 86.00 131.0946
N-α-Acetyl-L-ornithine 173.11 131.08 174.1004 L-Tyrosine 182.08 136.10 181.0739
N6-Acetyl-L-lysine 189.12 126.00 188.1161 L-Norleucine 132.10 86.00 131.0946
S-(Methyl)glutathione 322.11 130.00 321.0995 L-Saccharopine 275.00 257.00 276.1321
5-Oxoproline 128.04 82.03 129.0426 L-Threonine 120.07 74.00 119.0582
DL-Methionine 150.10 61.00 149.0510 L-Methionine methyl ester 164.07 104.00 163.0667
L-Ornithine 133.00 116.00 132.0899 NG,NG-Dimethyl-L-arginine 203.15 70.07 202.1430
L-Methionine 150.06 61.00 149.0511 N,N-Dimethylglycine 104.07 86.00 103.0633
L-Glutamine 147.08 84.00 146.0691 L-Phenylalanine 166.09 120.08 165.0705
L-Lysine 147.11 84.00 146.1055 L-Glutamine-O-glycoside 307.00 145.00 308.1220
N-Monomethyl-L-arginine 189.13 70.07 188.1273 N,N’-Dimethylarginine;SDMA 203.15 70.07 202.1430
Arginine methyl ester 189.14 70.07 188.1273 5-Hydroxy-L-tryptophan 221.09 204.00 220.0848
Homoarginine 189.13 144.00 188.1273 L-Valyl-L-Leucine 231.16 72.08 230.1630
N-Acetyl-L-glutamic acid 188.06 128.00 189.0637 S-(5’-Adenosy)-L-homocysteine 385.13 250.00 384.1216
Trimethyllysine 189.16 84.08 188.1525 N-Acetyl-L-tyrosine 224.09 136.00 223.0845
S-Methyl-L-cysteine 136.04 91.05 135.0354
Fig 3. Peak areas of the 37 amino acids and their derivatives metabolites identified in the PzP vs PS varieties.

Fig 3

Significance was assessed using Duncan’s test. Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).

Analysis of metabolic pathways for different amino acids and their derivatives

The KEGG database was utilized to perform enrichment and analysis of differential amino acids and their derivatives in various samples to obtain comprehensive functional information for PzP vs PS. There were a total of 38 metabolic pathways were enriched with differential amino acids and their derivatives. The top 20 metabolic pathways are significantly associated with key biosynthetic processes, such as Metabolic pathways, Pyrimidine metabolism, Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, Biosynthesis of amino acids, Glucosinolate biosynthesis, Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis, 2-Oxocarboxylic acid metabolism, Phenylalanine metabolism, Biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, Arginine biosynthesis, etc. (Fig 4). Further research on the differential metabolites of amino acids and their derivatives through the KEGG database elucidates the metabolic levels of different biological samples and the significant changes in metabolites.

Fig 4. Metabolic pathway analysis of differential metabolites of amino acids and their derivatives.

Fig 4

Analysis of gene expression in the metabolic pathways of amino acids and their derivatives in Polygonatum

The carbon skeletons of amino acids and their derivatives are synthesized from glucose through the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP). Based on the reported biosynthetic pathways of amino acids and their derivatives in other species, as well as the transcriptomic and metabolomic data of PzP vs PS, we analyzed the biosynthetic pathways of amino acids and their derivatives in PzP vs PS (Fig 5). A total of 271 unigenes (S4 Table) encoding 47 enzymes from the transcriptome and 37 metabolites from the metabolome involved in the synthesis of amino acids and their derivatives were identified.

Fig 5. The relationship between key genes in the biosynthetic pathways of amino acids and their derivatives and the synthesis of metabolites.

Fig 5

Red font indicates upregulation in PzP, green font indicates downregulation, and blue indicates detected but with little change.

Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) and candidate gene screening

In this study, we utilized the WGCNA clustering tool to cluster genes with similar expression patterns. We clustered 2539 genes detected in the 37 metabolic pathways where amino acids and their derivatives are located (S5 Table). We performed WGCNA analysis on the transcriptome of PzP vs PS, dividing differentially expressed genes into six modules (Fig 6A6B). Genes enriched in each module have similar expression patterns and are represented by a specific color. Furthermore, we conducted correlation analysis between different modules and traits to explore gene clusters related to amino acid synthesis. The module with the highest number of enriched genes is MEturquoise, with 1178 genes, while the MEgrey module has the fewest enriched genes, with 50 genes. The module-trait relationship analysis results (Fig 6C) show that MEblue is highly positively correlated with 34 amino acids and their derivatives (p < 0.05, the same below), with correlations ranging from 0.86 to 1, and MEturquoise is highly positively correlated with L-Valyl-L-Leucine, S-(5’-Adenosy)-L-homocysteine, and N-Acetyl-L-tyrosine, with correlations of 0.97, 0.95, and 0.98, respectively. Using Cytoscape software, we networked the interrelationships between modules and selected candidate genes based on their connectivity within the network. Among them, Cluster-39698.1, Cluster-27133.0, Cluster-28145.0, Cluster-51791.5, luster-29705.11, and Cluster-53239.2 in the MEblue module are candidate genes; Cluster-49006.0, Cluster-35441.2, Cluster-17104.0, and Cluster-49223.2 in the MEturquoise module are candidate genes (Fig 6D6E, S6 Table).

Fig 6. Co-expression analysis of transcripts and active components in all pathways of amino acids and their derivatives.

Fig 6

A: Hierarchical cluster map of co-expression modules. B: Heatmap of sample and module correlations. C: Correlation heatmap between amino acids, their derivatives, and modules. D: Network graph of the top 50 gene connections in the MEblue module. E: Network graph of the top 50 gene connections in the MEturquoise module.

Joint analysis of transcriptal and metabolic groups

Fig 7A depicts the top 20 genes that show significant differences and the corresponding network maps of all metabolites involved in the synthesis pathways of amino acids and their derivatives.L-Valyl-L-Leucine and N-Acetyl-L-tyrosine exhibited negative correlations, but other amino acids and derivatives displayed stronger positive correlations and statistically significant connections. Fig 5B displays a network diagram illustrating 10 crucial genes and differential metabolites that are involved in the production of amino acids and their derivatives. Each of these genes and metabolites is firmly linked to the corresponding amino acid and derivative. Fig 5C displays a heat map that highlights the enrichment of 10 important genes and differential metabolites related to the production of amino acids and their derivatives.

Fig 7. Correlation analysis.

Fig 7

A: The top 20 differential genes associated with amino acid and derivative synthesis pathways and the related network of all differentials metabolites.B: 10 key genes related to amino acid and derivative synthesis pathways are related to all differential metabolites.C: Related hot maps of 10 key genes and differential metabolites involved in the synthesis of amino acids and derivatives.

Validation of DEGs by qRT–PCR

To verify the accuracy of the transcriptome data, we conducted RNA sequencing analysis and reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) on the genes related to the synthesis of amino acids and their derivatives, selected from PzP and PS, respectively, to determine the authenticity and reliability of the transcriptome data. We selected 10 key genes for qRT-PCR validation. Despite some minor variations between the RNA-Seq and qRT-PCR results, the overall pattern was consistent for roughly 80% of the genes (Fig 8). Therefore, transcriptome sequencing is considered reliable.

Fig 8. Results of qRT-PCR assay.

Fig 8

The line graph represents the FPKM results of transcriptome data; the bar graph represents the qRT-PCR results.

Discussion

Analysis of amino acids and their derivative metabolites

Current research on amino acids in Polygonatum species has primarily focused on their composition and nutritional content, with limited insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying their biosynthesis and regulation [16]. As Polygonatum rhizomes develop underground, photosynthetically derived assimilates from aerial parts must be transported to the rhizomes to support their growth and storage functions [17]. These assimilates include carbohydrates, lipids, proteins, and notably, free amino acids and their derivatives, all of which contribute significantly to rhizome development and metabolic homeostasis [18,19]. Studies have found that there are 18 amino acids in Polygonatum sibiricum [20], and 17 amino acids were detected in wild Polygonatum sibiricum [21], which have a high edible value. However, systematic metabolomic profiling of amino acids and their derivatives across different Polygonatum species remains scarce. With the advent of advanced LC-MS/MS techniques, broad-spectrum targeted metabolomics has become a powerful approach for dissecting complex metabolic networks in plants [22,23]. This study utilized LC-MS/MS-based broad-targeted metabolomics to profile amino acid-related metabolites in Polygonatum species. Seventy two amino acids and their derivatives were identified; 37 exhibited significant differential accumulation between species. Strikingly, 34 were found at higher levels in PzP, while only 3 showed higher accumulation in PS. This striking contrast suggests species-specific differences in amino acid biosynthesis and regulation, providing a foundation for uncovering the underlying genetic and biochemical mechanisms.

Biosynthetic pathways and physiological roles of amino acids

Previous studies have revealed that Polygonatum species exhibit divergent amino acid profiles [7,24], which may be linked to their specific physiological roles. For example, arginine plays a crucial role in nitrogen (N) storage and transport; during rhizome development, the catabolism of arginine is essential for the release of nitrogen from source tissues and induces the expression of a suite of related enzymes [25,26]. Glutamate serves as a core precursor for a wide array of metabolic compounds, including proteinogenic amino acids (e.g., proline, arginine, histidine), non-protein amino acids (e.g., γ-aminobutyric acid, GABA), antioxidant tripeptides (e.g., glutathione), heme, chlorophyll, and others [27,28]. Tryptophan is a critical precursor for numerous bioactive compounds such as auxins, tryptophan derivatives, phytoanticipins, terpenoids, and alkaloids, and is thus integral to plant growth, development, and stress responses [2931]. Our metabolomic data revealed that PzP exhibited elevated levels of several amino acids and derivatives, particularly glutamate, arginine, ornithine, and tryptophan, compared to PS. These amino acids function as protein building blocks and act as metabolic signals or precursors to diverse secondary metabolites, potentially contributing to the enhanced growth performance, stress resilience, and medicinal value of PzP. For instance, higher glutamate and arginine levels may promote more efficient nitrogen cycling and storage [32]. Ornithine may enhance polyamine biosynthesis, which supports cell division and rhizome expansion [33]. Moreover, tryptophan is a well-established indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) precursor, and its elevated content may promote auxin biosynthesis, thereby influencing root development and hormonal signaling [34]. Furthermore, these amino acids may regulate the biosynthesis of additional compound classes, implying a broader impact on metabolic homeostasis and adaptive traits. To explore potential regulatory mechanisms, transcriptomic integration identified 271 genes encoding 47 enzymes involved in amino acid biosynthesis. The higher accumulation of metabolites in PzP likely stems from enhanced expression of these biosynthetic genes. Our result indicates a more active transcriptional landscape in PzP, potentially modulated by upstream signals related to nitrogen metabolism, hormonal pathways, or environmental stress responses.

Screening of target genes involved in the synthesis of amino acids and their derivatives

Transcription factors (TFs) play a pivotal role in regulating genes involved in amino acid metabolism, and are also crucial for rhizome development, cellular differentiation, and environmental adaptation. Previous studies in Arabidopsis and rice have shown that specific TFs are tightly associated with various growth stages and responses to environmental stimuli [35]. Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) is an algorithm that discovers genes with similar expression patterns and classifies them into modules based on their distinct expression patterns [36]; genes with similar expression patterns are controlled by the same or similar factors, their functions are closely related, and they are even members of the same signal pathway or biological process, thus jointly exerting specific biological functions [37]. The transcriptomic data revealed six distinct gene modules in Polygonatum, among which the MEturquoise and MEblue modules exhibited strong positive correlations with key amino acid metabolites and their derivatives. Within these modules, highly connected (hub-like) genes were identified: six genes in MEblue (e.g., Cluster-39698.1, Cluster-27133.0) and four in MEturquoise (e.g., Cluster-49006.0, Cluster-35441.2). These hub genes are considered key regulators due to their central position in the co-expression network and potential role in modulating amino acid biosynthetic pathways [38,39]. The elevated expression of these hub genes in PzP suggests a transcriptional basis for its higher amino acid content. These genes may encode rate-limiting enzymes or regulatory proteins (e.g., TFs, transporters, or cofactors) that promote flux through amino acid biosynthetic pathways. These findings provide a functional basis for the observed metabolic divergence and suggest that these genes represent valuable targets for genetic improvement. In conclusion, the differential expression of amino acid-related genes between PzP and PS reveals potential mechanisms driving metabolic differences and offers a genetic foundation for germplasm selection, metabolic engineering, and trait improvement in Polygonatum species.

Results

Metabolomic analysis of PzP vs PS identified 72 amino acids and derivatives, with 37 showing significant differences; 34 were highest in PzP and 3 in PS. From amino acid synthesis pathways, 272 genes encoding 47 related enzymes were identified. WGCNA of 2539 unigenes from 37 KEGG pathways revealed six modules, with amino acid components positively correlated with the MEturquoise and MEblue modules. Key genes such as Cluster-39698.1, Cluster-27133.0, and Cluster-49006.0 showed high connectivity. Ultimately, 10 genes were identified as most likely to affect the synthesis of amino acids and their derivatives. After bioinformatics analysis, qRT-PCR was conducted to confirm the results. It may be possible to use these genes in the future as candidate genes for genetic and metabolic engineering research in order to increase biosynthesis of amino acids and their derivatives in Polygonatum.

Supporting information

S1 Table. qRT-PCR primer list.

(XLSX)

pone.0327145.s001.xlsx (10.9KB, xlsx)
S2 Table. Total amino acids and their derivatives.

(XLSX)

pone.0327145.s002.xlsx (20.9KB, xlsx)
S3 Table. Differential amino acids and their derivatives.

(XLSX)

pone.0327145.s003.xlsx (15KB, xlsx)
S4 Table. Differential genes in the biosynthetic pathways of amino acids and their derivatives.

(XLSX)

pone.0327145.s004.xlsx (24.5KB, xlsx)
S5 Table. Total genes in the biosynthetic pathways of amino acids and their derivatives.

(XLSX)

pone.0327145.s005.xlsx (147.5KB, xlsx)
S6 Table. The CDS sequence of the target gene.

(XLSX)

pone.0327145.s006.xlsx (13.6KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgments

We are deeply in debted to Professor Lingjun Cui for helpful suggestions and comments on bioinformatic analyses, and we thank Professor Qing Xiao for valuable comments on previous versions of the manuscript.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was jointly funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC, grant number 31260057, QX), Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (Joint Fund) [NSFHP, grant number 2023AFD077, QX], The Open Fund of Hubei Key Laboratory of Biological Resources Protection and Utilization (Hubei Minzu University) [OHBP, grant number KYPT012403, LJC]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Li J. Flora of China. Harvard Papers in Botany. 2007;13(2):301–2. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Committee CP. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China. China Medical Science and Technology Press; 2020;319. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wan K, Ban J, Yang F, Zhang X, Huang X, Wang Y, et al. Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals the Flavonoid Biosynthesis Pathway Involved in Rhizome Development in Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua. Plants (Basel). 2024;13(11):1524. doi: 10.3390/plants13111524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bournine L, Bensalem S, Wauters J-N, Iguer-Ouada M, Maiza-Benabdesselam F, Bedjou F, et al. Identification and quantification of the main active anticancer alkaloids from the root of Glaucium flavum. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(12):23533–44. doi: 10.3390/ijms141223533 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cui X, Wang S, Cao H, Guo H, Li Y, Xu F, et al. A Review: The Bioactivities and Pharmacological Applications of Polygonatum sibiricum polysaccharides. Molecules. 2018;23(5):1170. doi: 10.3390/molecules23051170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Xia J, Mei X, Cheng H, Chen S, Ye X, Chen J. The Functional Components of By-Product Resources from the Aerial Parts of Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua. Agriculture. 2023;13(9):1820. doi: 10.3390/agriculture13091820 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li X. Research Progress on Chemical Constituents and Pharmacological Effects of Polygonati rhizoma. Botanical Research. 2017;06(05):255–61. doi: 10.12677/br.2017.65033 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wang D, Zhu W, Zhang C, Li D. Research advance in chemical constituents and biological activity of Polygonatum sibiricum. Journal of Northwest Forestry University. 2006;(02):142–5+53. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hernández-Montes G, Díaz-Mejía JJ, Pérez-Rueda E, Segovia L. The hidden universal distribution of amino acid biosynthetic networks: a genomic perspective on their origins and evolution. Genome Biol. 2008;9(6):R95. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-6-r95 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Perlstein EO, de Bivort BL, Kunes S, Schreiber SL. Evolutionarily conserved optimization of amino acid biosynthesis. J Mol Evol. 2007;65(2):186–96. doi: 10.1007/s00239-007-0013-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Qian L, Li N, Lu X-C, Xu M, Liu Y, Li K, et al. Enhanced BCAT1 activity and BCAA metabolism promotes RhoC activity in cancer progression. Nat Metab. 2023;5(7):1159–73. doi: 10.1038/s42255-023-00818-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hudson AO, Bless C, Macedo P, Chatterjee SP, Singh BK, Gilvarg C, et al. Biosynthesis of lysine in plants: evidence for a variant of the known bacterial pathways. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1721(1–3):27–36. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2004.09.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Butler M, van der Meer LT, van Leeuwen FN. Amino Acid Depletion Therapies: Starving Cancer Cells to Death. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2021;32(6):367–81. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2021.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Torres N, Tobón-Cornejo S, Velazquez-Villegas LA, Noriega LG, Alemán-Escondrillas G, Tovar AR. Amino Acid Catabolism: An Overlooked Area of Metabolism. Nutrients. 2023;15(15):3378. doi: 10.3390/nu15153378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mo X, Wang L, Yu C, Kou C. Combined Metabolomics and Transcriptomics Analysis of the Distribution of Flavonoids in the Fibrous Root and Taproot of Polygonatum kingianum Coll.et Hemsl. Genes (Basel). 2024;15(7):828. doi: 10.3390/genes15070828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sharma S, Joshi R, Kumar D. Metabolomics insights and bioprospection of Polygonatum verticillatum: An important dietary medicinal herb of alpine Himalaya. Food Res Int. 2021;148:110619. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110619 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tegeder M. Transporters for amino acids in plant cells: some functions and many unknowns. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2012;15(3):315–21. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2012.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang L, Hu X, Jiao C, Li Z, Fei Z, Yan X, et al. Transcriptome analyses of seed development in grape hybrids reveals a possible mechanism influencing seed size. BMC Genomics. 2016;17(1):898. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-3193-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li H, Liang X, Zhou B, Chen X, Hong Y, Zhou R, et al. A proteomic analysis of peanut seed at different stages of underground development to understand the changes of seed proteins. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(12):e0243132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang J, Liu Y, Yin H. Analysis of the Contents of Amino Acid in Polygonatum Sibiricum from Different Regions. Journal of Qinghai University. 2016;34(01):109–12. doi: 10.13901/j.cnki.qhwxxbzk.2016.01.018 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Luo C, X I G, Jiang Z, Wu Y. Evaluation and analysis of 17 amino acids in the wild Polygonatum sibiricum red in Chongqing. Chinese Wild Plant Resources. 2023;42(10):24–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang D, Zhang L, Huang X, Wang X, Yang R, Mao J, et al. Identification of Nutritional Components in Black Sesame Determined by Widely Targeted Metabolomics and Traditional Chinese Medicines. Molecules. 2018;23(5):1180. doi: 10.3390/molecules23051180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zou S, Wu J, Shahid MQ, He Y, Lin S, Liu Z, et al. Identification of key taste components in loquat using widely targeted metabolomics. Food Chem. 2020;323:126822. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126822 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang Q, Ban J, Cai R, Zhang X, Lai C, Chen Y, et al. Metabolic Composition and Quality Traits of Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua from Different Germplasms and Age Sections Based on Widely Targeted Metabolomics Analysis. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(7):6077. doi: 10.3390/ijms24076077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Witte C-P. Urea metabolism in plants. Plant Sci. 2011;180(3):431–8. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.11.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Llebrés M-T, Pascual M-B, Debille S, Trontin J-F, Harvengt L, Avila C, et al. The role of arginine metabolic pathway during embryogenesis and germination in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). Tree Physiol. 2018;38(3):471–84. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpx133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Brosnan JT, Brosnan ME. Glutamate: a truly functional amino acid. Amino Acids. 2013;45(3):413–8. doi: 10.1007/s00726-012-1280-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Riens B, Lohaus G, Heineke D, Heldt HW. Amino Acid and sucrose content determined in the cytosolic, chloroplastic, and vacuolar compartments and in the Phloem sap of spinach leaves. Plant Physiol. 1991;97(1):227–33. doi: 10.1104/pp.97.1.227 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tzin V, Galili G. New insights into the shikimate and aromatic amino acids biosynthesis pathways in plants. Mol Plant. 2010;3(6):956–72. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssq048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hildebrandt TM, Nunes Nesi A, Araújo WL, Braun H-P. Amino Acid Catabolism in Plants. Mol Plant. 2015;8(11):1563–79. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Datta A, Bhattacharyya D, Singh S, Ghosh A, Schmidtchen A, Malmsten M, et al. Role of Aromatic Amino Acids in Lipopolysaccharide and Membrane Interactions of Antimicrobial Peptides for Use in Plant Disease Control. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(25):13301–17. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.719575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Coruzzi GM, Zhou L. Carbon and nitrogen sensing and signaling in plants: emerging “matrix effects”. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2001;4(3):247–53. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5266(00)00168-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Alcázar R, Altabella T, Marco F, Bortolotti C, Reymond M, Koncz C, et al. Polyamines: molecules with regulatory functions in plant abiotic stress tolerance. Planta. 2010;231(6):1237–49. doi: 10.1007/s00425-010-1130-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhao Y. Auxin Biosynthesis and Its Role in Plant Development. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010;61(1):49–64. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Behringer C, Schwechheimer C. B-GATA transcription factors - insights into their structure, regulation, and role in plant development. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:90. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nangraj AS, Selvaraj G, Kaliamurthi S, Kaushik AC, Cho WC, Wei DQ. Integrated PPI- and WGCNA-Retrieval of Hub Gene Signatures Shared Between Barrett’s Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:881. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00881 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Al-Jumayli M, Brown SL, Chetty IJ, Extermann M, Movsas B. The Biological Process of Aging and the Impact of Ionizing Radiation. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2022;32(2):172–8. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2021.11.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gao X-M, Zhou X-H, Jia M-W, Wang X-Z, Liu D. Identification of key genes in sepsis by WGCNA. Prev Med. 2023;172:107540. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107540 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lu Y, Liu S, Sun Y, Zhao B, Xu D. Identification of key genes in hepatocellular carcinoma associated with exposure to TCDD and α-endosulfan by WGCNA. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2023;252:114595. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.114595 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Vikas Sharma

Dear Dr. Xiao,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 21 2025 11:59PM;. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Vikas Sharma, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

1. When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: 

the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31260057), Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (Joint Fund) (2023AFD077), The Open Fund of Hubei Key Laboratory of Biological Resources Protection and Utilization (Hubei Minzu University) (KYPT012502).

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." 

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. 

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. In the online submission form, you indicated that "We deeply acknowledge the fundamental importance of data sharing in scientific research. However, due to our inadequate preservation of the original data, they have passed their validity period, and as a result, we are unable to provide a transcription of the original data, for which we sincerely apologize. Should you need any other data, please do not hesitate to contact our corresponding author at any time to request it."

All PLOS journals now require all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript to be freely available to other researchers, either a. In a public repository, b. Within the manuscript itself, or c. Uploaded as supplementary information.

This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If your data cannot be made publicly available for ethical or legal reasons (e.g., public availability would compromise patient privacy), please explain your reasons on resubmission and your exemption request will be escalated for approval. 

4. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information. 

Additional Editor Comments:

Please check the format of manuscript and make it according to journal's guidelines.

Please divide discussion into subheadings.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1:  The submitted MS explains the thorough study of the metabolome and transcriptome analysis on two species of Polygonatum. The overall manuscript has been written very well and the designed experiments are scientifically sound. The major concern is with two points:

1. All the pictures are blurred, hence, i can not correlate the findings written in ms to the figures. Therefore, authors are advised to kindly provide the high resolution figures wherever it is possible because in large dataset, some picture can not be so visible that i understand.

2. All the provided deliverables are generated bioinformatically which is not so reliable till it will not be validated by wet lab experiments. The study could be validated at least targeting few amino acids gene expression analysis.

After the revised figures submission, i would like to review the MS to reach any decision.

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: Yes: Deepanshu Jayaswal

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0327145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327145.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


5 Feb 2025

Dear Editor,

Thank you very much for kindly providing us with the opportunity to revise our manuscript entitled "Integrative analysis of the metabolome and transcriptome provides insights into the mechanisms of amino acids and their derivatives biosynthesis in Polygonatum". The reviewers’ comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper. The revised sections are highlighted in the revision. The main corrections in the paper and the response to the editor and reviewer’s comments are as follows:

Response to Editor and Reviewers:

Editor:

1.Please check the format of manuscript and make it according to journal's guidelines.

Response: We sincerely thank Editor for the meticulous comment. We have reviewed the manuscript carefully and ensure that its format aligns with the journal's guidelines. Please let me know if there are any specific areas you would like me to pay extra attention to.

2.Please divide discussion into subheadings.

Response: We sincerely thank Editor for the meticulous comment. Following your valuable suggestion, we have carefully divided the discussion section into subheadings as requested. Please find the revised conclusion in lines 321-390 of the updated manuscript.

Reviewer #1:

1. All the pictures are blurred, hence, i can not correlate the findings written in ms to the figures. Therefore, authors are advised to kindly provide the high resolution figures wherever it is possible because in large dataset, some picture can not be so visible that i understand.

Response: We sincerely thank you for the meticulous comment. We have taken the necessary steps to enhance the clarity , quality and font size of the figures. Thank you for your valuable comments.

2. All the provided deliverables are generated bioinformatically which is not so reliable till it will not be validated by wet lab experiments. The study could be validated at least targeting few amino acids gene expression analysis.

Response: We sincerely thank you for the meticulous comment. In response to your valuable suggestions, we have already utilized qPCR technology to conduct expression analysis on the 10 target genes selected in the manuscript. Through experimental validation, our study has become more comprehensive and reliable. Please find the revised conclusion in lines 138-155 and 309-319 of the updated manuscript.

Other revisions to the article: Furthermore, after careful consideration of your valuable review comments, we have not only made revisions in accordance with your suggestions but also further enhanced the results to provide a more concise summary of the article. We believe these additional modifications contribute to improving the quality of the research and the clarity of the manuscript. For further details, please refer to lines 392-402 of the revised manuscript.

In addition, the complete statement of the funding disclosure is as follows: “ this study was jointly funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC, grant number 31260057, QX), Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (Joint Fund) [NSFHP, grant number 2023AFD077, QX], The Open Fund of Hubei Key Laboratory of Biological Resources Protection and Utilization (Hubei Minzu University) [OHBP, grant number KYPT012403, LJC]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.” The role of the funders is stated in the last sentence.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0327145.s008.docx (16.2KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Mojtaba Kordrostami

Dear Dr. Xiao,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jun 26 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mojtaba Kordrostami, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: The authors have addressed the raised comments which are satisfactory. Therefore, the MS in the current form may be accepted.

Reviewer #2: The authors were able to accurately identify the research gap in the field of amino acid metabolites in Polygonatum species, and a significant number of genes related to amino acid biosynthesis pathways were reported, indicating extensive data mining and in-depth analysis, But there are a few points that would make the manuscript richer if addressed.

The results are presented descriptively and rarely involve mechanistic or functional interpretation.

Why are metabolite levels higher in PzP? Is it related to genetic differences, developmental conditions, or expression of regulators?

Can changing tryptophan levels affect levels of hormones such as IAA?

The discussion should end with a more practical conclusion. For example: could this difference in metabolites be the basis for germplasm selection or genetic modification?

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: Yes:  Deepanshu Jayaswal

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org

PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0327145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327145.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 2


15 May 2025

Response to Editor and Reviewers:

Editor:

1.Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Response: We sincerely thank Editor for the reminder regarding the accuracy and completeness of the reference list. We have carefully reviewed all references cited in the manuscript. None of the references have been retracted. For references originally sourced from CNKI ([2], [8], [21]), we have ensured that they are cited with complete bibliographic details. These references were retained because they provide critical local or species-specific data that are not available in English literature. All necessary updates have been made in the revised reference list.

Reviewer #2:

1. The results are presented descriptively and rarely involve mechanistic or functional interpretation.

Response: We sincerely thank Reviewer #2 for the valuable suggestion. we have added mechanistic and functional interpretations of the key findings to enrich the discussion. These revisions can be found in the “Discussion” section, particularly under “Biosynthetic Pathways and Physiological Roles of Amino Acids.” We hope this has strengthened the biological relevance and interpretative depth of our results.

2. Why are metabolite levels higher in PzP? Is it related to genetic differences, developmental conditions, or expression of regulators?

Response: We sincerely thank Reviewer #1 for the insightful question. IIn the revised manuscript, we have addressed this point in the Discussion section. We propose that the elevated metabolite levels observed in PzP may be primarily attributed to transcriptional regulation. Integration of transcriptomic and metabolomic data revealed that key biosynthetic genes were more highly expressed in PzP. In addition, co-expression network analysis identified several hub genes potentially involved in regulatory control of amino acid metabolism, which were also upregulated in PzP. These findings suggest that the metabolic differences are likely due to genetic and regulatory factors, rather than only environmental or developmental conditions.

3. Can changing tryptophan levels affect levels of hormones such as IAA?

Response: We sincerely thank Reviewer #2 for the important point. We agree that tryptophan is a key precursor in the indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) biosynthesis pathway in plants. In the revised discussion section, we have highlighted this relationship and proposed that the elevated tryptophan levels observed in PzP may potentially lead to increased auxin biosynthesis, which could influence rhizome development and stress responses. Although we did not directly measure IAA in this study, this connection warrants future investigation. Please find the revised conclusion in lines 360-370 of the updated manuscript.

4. The discussion should end with a more practical conclusion. For example: could this difference in metabolites be the basis for germplasm selection or genetic modification?

Response: We sincerely thank Reviewer #2 for the insightful suggestion. We have revised the final paragraph of the discussion to include a more practical conclusion, emphasizing the potential application of our findings in germplasm selection and genetic improvement. In particular, we highlight that the identified key amino acid-related metabolites and biosynthetic genes may serve as valuable targets for future breeding or metabolic engineering efforts aimed at enhancing the nutritional and medicinal qualities of Polygonatum. The revised discussion now ends with a clear statement of these implications.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers_auresp_2.docx

pone.0327145.s009.docx (16.9KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Mojtaba Kordrostami

Integrative analysis of the metabolome and transcriptome provides insights into the mechanisms of amino acids and their derivatives biosynthesis in Polygonatum

PONE-D-24-36620R2

Dear Dr. Xiao,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Mojtaba Kordrostami, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: Authors addressed the raised concerns sincerely. therefore, the MS may be accepted in the current form.

Reviewer #2: The authors have carefully incorporated the comments and suggestions of the reviewers. The revised version of the article is acceptable for publication in the journal.

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: Yes:  Deepanshu Jayaswal

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Mojtaba Kordrostami

PONE-D-24-36620R2

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Xiao,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Mojtaba Kordrostami

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. qRT-PCR primer list.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0327145.s001.xlsx (10.9KB, xlsx)
    S2 Table. Total amino acids and their derivatives.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0327145.s002.xlsx (20.9KB, xlsx)
    S3 Table. Differential amino acids and their derivatives.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0327145.s003.xlsx (15KB, xlsx)
    S4 Table. Differential genes in the biosynthetic pathways of amino acids and their derivatives.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0327145.s004.xlsx (24.5KB, xlsx)
    S5 Table. Total genes in the biosynthetic pathways of amino acids and their derivatives.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0327145.s005.xlsx (147.5KB, xlsx)
    S6 Table. The CDS sequence of the target gene.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0327145.s006.xlsx (13.6KB, xlsx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0327145.s008.docx (16.2KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers_auresp_2.docx

    pone.0327145.s009.docx (16.9KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES