Abstract
Inflammatory cytokines play a crucial role in the inflammatory response, and their aberrant expression and overproduction are closely associated with the development of many diseases. However, traditional inflammation treatment strategies are often accompanied by serious side effects, limiting their widespread use. In recent years, hydrogel, as a material with a three-dimensional network structure, good biocompatibility and modulability, has great potential for trapping and neutralizing inflammatory factors. Hydrogels can capture and neutralize inflammatory cytokines through various mechanisms such as electrostatic interactions, coupling with cytokine antibodies or binding nanoparticles. In addition, hydrogel microspheres, an important form of hydrogels, have excellent broad-spectrum binding of inflammatory cytokines in combination schemes with cell membranes. This article reviews recent research advances in hydrogel capture and neutralization of inflammatory cytokines, discussing the advantages of various mechanisms and their applications in different diseases. Overall, we believe that hydrogels are expected to further advance the development of therapeutic modalities for inflammatory diseases in the future.
Keywords: hydrogel, inflammatory cytokine, cytokine capture, cytokine neutralization
Introduction
Cytokines are small-molecular-weight proteins synthesized and secreted by immune cells and some non-immune cells. Among them, inflammatory cytokines specifically refer to those cytokines involved in the inflammatory response, such as IL-1 and TNF-α. IL-1 binds to the IL-1 receptor, activating NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways to promote NLRP3 inflammasome assembly and the and IL-6. 1 TNF-α is mainly produced by activated macrophages. It binds to TNFR1/TNFR2 receptors and activates signaling pathways such as NF-κB, thereby regulating processes like apoptosis and the inflammatory cascade.2,3 In the intricate network of life activities, they play numerous crucial roles and perform diverse functions such as regulating the inflammatory response and promoting tissue repair. However, an increasing body of evidence indicates that the imbalance of inflammatory cytokines is associated with a wide range of diseases.4–6 For example, in rheumatoid arthritis, IL-1 and TNF-α can promote the differentiation and activation of osteoclasts, which in turn leads to bone loss. They can also stimulate chondrocytes and synovial fibroblasts to secrete degrading enzymes (such as cathepsins and matrix metalloproteinases), resulting in cartilage degradation.7,8 During the occurrence of sepsis, when the body’s immune cells are stimulated by pathogen-associated molecular patterns and damage-associated molecular patterns, cytokines such as IL-1 and TNF-α will be released. These cytokines can activate transcription factors like nuclear factor-κB, inducing the release of a variety of inflammatory factors such as IL-6 and IL-8, thus triggering an inflammatory cascade reaction and exacerbating systemic inflammatory symptoms. At the same time, these cytokines will induce vascular endothelial cells to express adhesion molecules, affecting the balance between procoagulant and anticoagulant proteins. In severe cases, it can lead to disseminated intravascular coagulation and multiple organ failure. 9 Additionally, Inflammatory cytokines are crucial in the pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases,10,11 diabetes, 12 and autoimmune disorders,13,14 which are major global contributors to mortality. 15 This serious health challenge highlights the need and urgency of accelerating the development of therapeutic approaches targeting inflammatory cytokines.
Traditional methods for treating inflammation, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), glucocorticoids, and biologics, have many limitations.16–18 First, non-specific effects are one of the main problems. NSAIDs and glucocorticoids lack selective inhibition of specific inflammatory cytokines, and their wide range of mechanisms of action makes it difficult to precisely target inflammatory cytokines, which may inhibit the inflammatory response while negatively affecting normal physiological functions. For example, in the treatment of rheumatic immune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus, the long-term use of glucocorticoids can interfere with the body’s metabolism, giving rise to conditions like elevated blood pressure, abnormal blood lipid levels, increased blood glucose, and central obesity.19,20 Second, these drugs have significant adverse effects. For instance, NSAIDs frequently result in gastrointestinal disorders, which encompass nausea, vomiting, ulcers, and even gastrointestinal bleeding. Moreover, in certain patients, NSAIDs can cause coagulation function abnormalities or hepatic and renal damage.21,22 In the treatment of sepsis, while glucocorticoids can inhibit excessive inflammation, they may also suppress the immune response, causing the body to be in a state of “immune paralysis,” which in turn increases the risk of infection. 23 Immunosuppressants are usually administered subcutaneously or intravenously, and their effects are difficult to be confined to a specific range, which inhibit normal immune function and increase the risk of infection and certain tumors. Although biological agents are more targeted, their rapid clearance in the body and limited maintenance of efficacy, coupled with high production costs, have limited their application. Consequently, this has led to the development of novel, precise, and effective anti-inflammatory therapeutic strategies aimed at surmounting the limitations of conventional approaches.
In recent years, the application of hydrogels in anti-inflammatory therapy has witnessed rapid development. Its core advantages lie in its highly tunable physicochemical properties and excellent biocompatibility. However, currently, the application of hydrogels in the field of anti-inflammation mainly focuses on three directions: Firstly, hydrogels serve as drug sustained-release carriers, loading anti-inflammatory drugs (such as celecoxib and dexamethasone) to achieve local precise controlled release.24,25 Secondly, hydrogels load bioactive substances such as cells and exosomes to regulate macrophage polarization and promote the resolution of inflammation.26,27 Thirdly, hydrogels act as physical barriers to isolate danger signals from damaged tissues and reduce stimulation.28,29 In terms of capturing and neutralizing inflammatory cytokines, hydrogels exhibit unique advantages: (I) High-efficiency capture ability: by chemically coupling with antibodies, hydrogels can specifically capture inflammatory cytokines (such as IL-6), significantly increasing the action time and utilization rate of the antibodies. 30 (II) Local precise action: for example, in-situ acting hydrogels can continuously capture inflammatory cytokines through electrostatic interactions, avoiding the risk of systemic suppression. 31 (III) Ability to adapt to complex inflammatory microenvironments: generally speaking, the inflammatory response involves multiple inflammatory cytokines, and anti-inflammation through a single pathway is often unsatisfactory. Whether hydrogels capture inflammatory cytokines through electrostatic interactions or bind to cell membranes to capture inflammatory cytokines, they have a stronger ability to adapt to complex inflammatory microenvironments.32,33
In view of the important role of inflammatory cytokines in diseases, the mechanisms by which hydrogels capture inflammatory cytokines are mainly divided into four types (Figure 1). First, hydrogels can capture and neutralize inflammatory cytokines through their physical properties. Most typical hydrogels contain glycosaminoglycan (GAG) ingredients, which utilize electrostatic interactions with inflammatory cytokines to capture inflammatory cytokines.31,32 Second, hydrogels can be conjugated with monoclonal antibodies to specifically capture and neutralize inflammatory cytokines, reducing the intensity of the inflammatory response, and improving the controllability, duration, and safety of biologics. 34 Third, the combination of hydrogels and cell membranes allows for broad-spectrum capture and storage of inflammatory cytokines. In addition, hydrogels can also participate in the regulation of inflammatory cytokines by binding to nanoparticles (NPs). 35 In summary, these strategies provide diverse approaches and potential clinical application prospects for the treatment of inflammation-related diseases.
Figure 1.
Four mechanisms of inflammatory cytokine capture by hydrogels. Image was drawn using BioRender.
However, despite the great potential of hydrogels in capturing and neutralizing inflammatory factors, there is still a lack of comprehensive reviews on their application in this regard. This paper aims to review recent progress in hydrogel-based inflammatory cytokine capture and neutralization, analyze the mechanisms and advantages of different strategies (Figure 2), explore the impact of various materials and structures, and discuss future applications in treating inflammatory diseases. Overall, we believe that hydrogels exhibit unique advantages and potential in capturing and neutralizing inflammatory cytokines. In the future, they are expected to become powerful tools for capturing inflammatory cytokines, providing more effective solutions for the treatment of diseases associated with inflammatory cytokines.
Figure 2.
Overview of hydrogel materials for capturing and neutralizing inflammatory cytokines. Image was drawn using BioRender.
Inflammation overview
Concepts and physiologic functions of inflammation
Inflammatory processes are similar to chemical equilibrium (Figure 3), and once this equilibrium is disturbed, the system will tend to recover or deviate further from homeostasis.36,37 However, its underlying purpose is to enable the body to adapt to environmental changes and maintain physiological stability through integrated regulatory response.38,39 Generally, the physiological functions of inflammation mainly include three aspects: defending against the invasion of pathogens, removing and repairing damaged tissues, and enabling the body to adapt to stress and restore the state of homeostasis. Inflammatory mediators are key drivers of the inflammatory process, including chemokines, vasoactive amines, cytokines (e.g. TNF-α, IL-6), and other chemicals. These mediators not only participate in the inflammatory response by activating immune cells, altering vascular permeability, and modulating the immune response in a variety of ways, but also interact to form a complex regulatory network that determines the nature and outcome of the inflammatory response.38,40
Figure 3.
Inflammatory response and balance of inflammatory cytokines. Image was drawn using BioRender.
Inflammatory responses are usually divided into two categories: acute and chronic inflammation. Acute inflammation is the body’s rapid response to infection or injury, typically self-limiting, aimed at eliminating external stimuli and repairing damaged tissues. 41 During the early stages of acute inflammation, inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-6 are rapidly released. These cytokines not only activate immune cells (e.g. neutrophils, macrophages) but also increase vascular permeability, facilitating immune cell infiltration and pathogen clearance. The role of cytokines is particularly critical at this stage, as they play a bridging role in initiating the immune response and driving tissue repair. 42 If the inflammatory response is not promptly resolved or persists for too long, it may progress to chronic inflammation. Chronic inflammation is characterized by an extended activation period of immune cells and the continuous release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. 43 This ultimately leads to an imbalance in inflammatory cytokines, resulting in persistent tissue damage and pathological changes.
Mechanisms of inflammatory cytokines production and pathogenesis
Inflammatory cytokines serve as regulators of the immune response and key players in pathophysiological processes. These cytokines are typically secreted by immune cells, such as macrophages, T cells, and neutrophils, in response to exogenous stimuli (e.g. pathogens) and endogenous signals (e.g. danger-associated molecular patterns released by damaged tissues). Additionally, some studies have shown that probiotics and diet can also regulate the secretion of cytokines.44–46 They work in conjunction with other inflammatory mediators to drive the initiation, progression, and resolution of inflammation. However, when the inflammatory cytokines in the body are unbalanced, they can become the pathogenic factors of various diseases. A large amount of evidence has shown that inflammatory cytokines are closely related to the occurrence and development of diseases (Table 1).
Table 1.
Properties of common inflammatory cytokines and their related diseases.
| Name | Receptor | Related diseases | Characteristic |
|---|---|---|---|
| IL-1α | IL-1R1 IL-1R2 |
Rheumatoid arthritis11,13
Myocardial infarction 47 Leukaemia 48 Inflammatory bowel disease49–51 |
Proinflammatory |
| IL-1β | IL-1R1 IL-1R2 |
Rheumatoid arthritis52–54
Alzheimer’s disease55–57 Neoplasms58–60 Atherosclerotic61–63 Inflammatory bowel disease 64 |
Proinflammatory |
| IL-6 | IL-6R gp130 |
Rheumatoid arthritis11,65,66
COVID-1967,68 ARDS69,70 Neonatal sepsis71,72 Myocardial infarction73–75 |
Proinflammatory |
| IL-10 | IL-10R1 IL-10R2 |
Inflammatory bowel disease76,77
Non-small cell lung cancer78,79 Systemic lupus erythematosus*,80,81 |
Anti-inflammatory |
| IL-17 | IL-17RA IL-17RB IL-17RC IL-17RD IL-17RE |
Psoriasis82–84
Systemic lupus erythematosus14,85 Hypertension86,87 Inflammatory bowel disease88,89 Ankylosing spondylitis90,91 |
Proinflammatory |
| IL-18 | IL-18Rα IL-18Rβ |
Inflammatory bowel disease92–94
Rheumatoid arthritis95,96 |
Proinflammatory |
| TNF-α | TNFR1 TNFR2 |
Systemic lupus erythematosus97–99
Rheumatoid arthritis96,99,100 Aherosclerosis101–103 Inflammatory bowel disease99,104 |
Proinflammatory |
“*” indicates that this inflammatory cytokine may have an opposite effect in this disease.
The secretion mechanism of inflammatory cytokines is complex and precisely regulated. When immune cells recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns or danger-associated molecular patterns through their receptors (such as Toll-like receptors), a series of complex biochemical reactions are initiated. This enables precise regulation of the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which ultimately play an important role in the immune system. 105 For example, cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-6 are classic pro-inflammatory cytokines that promote inflammation by increasing vascular permeability, activating immune cells, and enhancing local immunity. Meanwhile, these cytokines also regulate the immune response through a feedback mechanism. As key regulators in the inflammatory response, inflammatory cytokines can be classified into two major categories: pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g. TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6) and anti-inflammatory cytokines (e.g. IL-10, TGF-β). These cytokines coordinate the activation, recruitment, and functional differentiation of immune cells through autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine mechanisms. Collectively, these cytokines give rise to a dynamic regulatory network that meticulously governs the initiation, evolution, and conclusion of the inflammatory process.
Cytokines, as core mediators of communication between the immune system and tissues, exert their functions not merely relying on single cytokines. 106 More importantly, it is the combined effects resulting from the synergistic actions of multiple cytokines, the responses of body cells, and the changes in the microenvironment that play crucial roles.107,108 The physiological functions of cytokines are principally demonstrated in aspects such as regulating inflammatory responses and facilitating tissue repair. Nevertheless, their functional imbalance, such as excessive inhibition or activation, can lead to a series of pathological manifestations, thus becoming a key factor in the occurrence and development of inflammation-related diseases. For instance, in rheumatoid arthritis, pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-6 are key regulatory factors. 95 TNF-α is mainly secreted by macrophages, synovial fibroblasts, B cells, and T cells. It exerts its functions by binding to TNFR1/TNFR receptors on the cell surface. This binding activates signaling pathways such as NF-κB and induces the expression of downstream cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases. TNFR1 is thought to promote the progression of rheumatoid arthritis by activating inflammatory signals, while the activation of TNFR2 plays a protective role. 109 IL-6 is mainly secreted by B cells and synovial fibroblasts. It functions by promoting osteoclastogenesis, the expression of VEGF, and recruiting Th17 cells.110,111 It should be noted that TNF-α can also promote osteoclastogenesis.
Cytokines are also associated with the occurrence and development of tumors. For instance, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α are involved. IL-1β can promote tumor growth, stimulate angiogenesis, and activate neutrophils.112–114 IL-6 plays a crucial role in early-stage tumors and contributes to the induction of lymphoma and skin tumors by chemical carcinogens. IL-6 can bind to IL-6R and send signals to cancer cells, thereby promoting tumor growth.115,116 It should be noted that blocking IL-6 helps alleviate the cytokine release syndrome caused by potent immunotherapies. 117 Some cancer cells can express TNF-α, which then secretes growth factors by activating the NF-κB signaling pathway within tumor cells. 118 In fact, certain cytokines can facilitate the progression of diseases from chronic infections to cancer. For example, IL-1 can cooperate with Helicobacter pylori to promote the occurrence of gastric cancer. 119
The role of hydrogels in treatment and the mechanisms of capturing and neutralizing inflammatory cytokines
Hydrogels, a class of polymeric materials with a three-dimensional cross-linked network structure, are widely applied in the field of disease treatment due to their tunable chemical and mechanical properties, excellent biocompatibility, and extracellular matrix (ECM)-like characteristics. 120 In the area of drug delivery, hydrogels can encapsulate drugs through methods such as physical entrapment and chemical cross-linking. Moreover, responsive mechanisms (such as pH, enzyme, light, and temperature) can be designed according to environmental conditions, enabling the spatiotemporal and controlled release of drugs. 121 Hydrogels are used in wound dressings. They can not only absorb wound exudate but also provide a moist environment for wound growth and protect the wound surface, which contributes to wound healing and prevents infection.122,123 In tissue engineering, because the three-dimensional network structure of hydrogels is similar to that of the ECM, it can provide an excellent microenvironment for cell migration and differentiation. 124 Hydrogels can also function as biosensors, enabling the detection of Salmonella, human motion, and more.125,126 In addition, hydrogels are applicable in bone repair, nerve repair, intestinal fistula occlusion, etc.
Physical adsorption mechanisms
Physical adsorption represents one of the core mechanisms by which hydrogels capture inflammatory cytokines. The porosity of hydrogels, which serves as the basis for physical adsorption, is not only a crucial parameter determining its adsorption efficiency but also a primary factor regulating the behavior of inflammatory cytokines. This characteristic directly influences whether inflammatory cytokines can successfully penetrate the internal structure of the hydrogel and determines the time scale of their capture or release. 30 The three-dimensional network structure of hydrogels endows them with excellent porosity. This gives them a large specific surface area, providing more active sites and greater space for physical adsorption.30,35,127 Therefore, inflammatory cytokines can not only enter the hydrogel but also enhance the efficiency of cytokine capture. In general, the pore size of hydrogels is influenced by factors such as polymer concentration, crosslinking density, polymerization conditions, and post-processing steps (e.g. freeze-drying, subsequent treatments). Larger pore sizes promote the entry of inflammatory cytokines and their complexes, whereas smaller pore sizes are effective in prolonging the escape of inflammatory cytokines by enhancing the barrier effect. This property provides significant support for the use of hydrogels in trapping and neutralizing inflammatory cytokines. With the advancement of hydrogel fabrication techniques, designing hydrogels with specific pore sizes has gradually become a reality.128,129
Some hydrogels carry a positive charge on their backbone or side-chain groups, such as ε-polylysine hydrogels,130,131 polyethyleneimine (PEI)-modified hydrogels, 32 and poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethylmethacrylate) hydrogels.132,133 In addition, cationic polysaccharide-based hydrogels have been clinically approved for application as dressings for treatment of wounds. These types of hydrogels not only have excellent biocompatibility, but also possess good biodegradability, which lays the foundation for their wide application in regenerative medicine and wound repair. Interestingly, studies have shown that most pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as IL-1, IL-6, IL-12, HMGB-1, and TNF-α) carry a net negative charge (isoelectric point: 4.1–6), while most anti-inflammatory cytokines (such as IL-4, IL-10, IL-11, and TGF-β) carry a net positive charge (isoelectric point: 8.2–11.7; Figure 4(a)). 134 It is this charge difference that makes it possible to capture and neutralize pro-inflammatory cytokines through electrostatic interactions. For example, an injectable hydrogel composed of oxidized chondroitin sulfate (OCS), cationic PEI, and tobramycin (Tob). 32 As we all know, Tob is an aminoglycoside antibiotic and a first-line treatment for many bacterial infections. The combined strategy of the primary amine groups of tobramycin and the cationic PEI provides the Tob/PEI/OCS hydrogel with a large number of positively charged groups, rendering the hydrogel cationic as a whole. Given that lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and pro-inflammatory factors, such as TNF-α, cell-free DNA (cfDNA), and HMGB1, all carry a net negative charge. Among them, LPS can trigger an inflammatory response by activating various cells, including macrophages, monocytes, and neutrophils, leading to the release of numerous inflammatory factors.135–137 There will be interactions due to electrostatic attraction between the positively charged Tob/PEI/OCS hydrogel and the negatively charged cytokines. This enables the Tob/PEI/OCS hydrogel to bind to cytokines and other danger signals, thus achieving their capture. It is noteworthy that the concentration of Tob coupled to the Tob/PEI/OCS hydrogel was able to reach a very high level, a concentration value that far exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentration of Tob (Figure 4(b)). In addition, Zhang et al developed OCMC/Tob/PEI hydrogels using a combination of Tob, PEI, and oxidized carboxymethyl cellulose (OCMC). 138 These hydrogels effectively capture negatively charged hazardous molecules such as LPS, TNF-α, and cfDNA (Figure 4(c)). Interestingly, the OCMC/Tob/PEI hydrogels also exhibit pH-responsive Tob release, enabling a degree of smart control over infection and inflammation.
Figure 4.
Charge characteristics of cytokines and physical adsorption mechanism of hydrogels. (a) Regarding the key cytokines in mice, their molecular weights and PIs have drawn attention. It turns out that there is a remarkable charge difference between proinflammatory cytokines, which typically carry a negative charge, and anti-inflammatory cytokines, which usually bear a positive charge. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 134 Copyright © 2020, The Author(s). (b) Tob’s efficiency in inhibiting E. coli and S. aureus. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 32 Copyright © 2022 Wiley-VCH GmbH. (c) The schematic illustration of the development of the bioactive hydrogel composed of OCMC, Tob and PEI for realizing the “Pull–Push” approach to heal bacteria-infected diabetic wounds efficiently and safely. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 138 Copyright © 2022 American Chemical Society. (d) The schematic representation of the suggested functionality of starPEG-GAG hydrogels for regulating chemokine gradients in chronic wounds over the course of time. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 31 Copyright © 2017, The American Association for the Advancement of Science.
It has been demonstrated that the peptide sequences of multiple cytokines, such as IL-1, 139 IL-6, 140 and TNF-α, 141 contain amino acids like arginine (Arg, pKa 12.48) and lysine (Lys, pKa 10.79). These amino acids endow certain peptide sequences of such cytokines with a positive charge, enabling them to undergo electrostatic interactions with the negatively charged sulfate groups of GAGs, such as heparan sulfate, in the ECM, and subsequently bind to them.142,143 For instance, the starPEG-GAG hydrogel composed of star-shaped polyethylene glycol (starPEG) and GAG heparin(Hep) derivatives can utilize this characteristic of GAGs to effectively remove IL-8, MCP-1, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β from wounds (Figure 4(d)). 31 Interestingly, the binding ability of the starPEG-GAG hydrogel to cytokines can be altered by adjusting its degree of sulfate substitution. Specifically, the higher the degree of sulfation, the stronger the ability to bind inflammatory cytokines. This indicates that the capture and neutralization of inflammatory cytokines can be controlled and selectively regulated. Furthermore, starPEG-GAG hydrogels exhibit a weak ability to bind TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6, showing some specificity, which is consistent with findings from another study. 144 However, it should be noted that this electrostatic interaction is not random but rather exhibits a certain degree of specificity. 145 For instance, common Hep-binding sequences, such as the XBBXBX and XBBBXXBX motifs (where B represents a basic amino acid, typically Arg or Lys), 146 these specific sequence patterns reflect the specific recognition mechanism during the interaction between proteins and GAGs. In addition to this, the binding specificity of GAGs also depends on the oligomerization ability of cytokines on GAGs and the oligomeric structures formed.142,147
In a similar study, the researchers used the same principle to prepare a Cur/HH hydrogel (Figure 5(a)) by mixing hyaluronic acid (HA) and Hep hydrogels with Pluronic F127-encapsulated curcumin (Cur). Hep acts as the capture module for the Cur/HH hydrogel. 143 The capture efficiency of Cur/HH hydrogels was higher than that of HH hydrogels, which was attributed to the higher cross-linking density of Cur/HH hydrogels, which enhanced the physical barrier effect of the hydrogels (Figure 5(b) and (c)). In fact, the physical barrier effect of hydrogel is more than that, for example, when hydrogel is applied to wound tissue, it can isolate danger signals such as bacteria in the outer layer. 28 Moreover, snail GAG (the A.fulica GAG, AFG) demonstrates a stronger ability to capture inflammatory cytokines compared to Hep. In the double-network hydrogel composed of AFG and gelatin methacrylate (GelMA; Figure 5(d)), the AFG/GelMA hydrogel can significantly reduce a variety of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α in the diabetic wound tissue, and it did not trigger immune responses in animal experiments. 148 More notably, the AFG/GelMA hydrogel attenuates the inflammatory response by modulating the NF-κB pathway and downregulating inflammation-related genes, while promoting wound healing by increasing the expression of genes involved in angiogenesis and collagen synthesis. These findings further confirm that the hydrogel not only effectively captures and neutralizes inflammatory cytokines, but also modulates the inflammatory response in multiple ways, playing a crucial role in the treatment of inflammation-related diseases.
Figure 5.
Applications of GAG-based hydrogels in wounds. (a) Schematic representation depicting the multifunctional Cur/HH gel and its progressive therapeutic impact on diabetic chronic wounds. (b and c) SEM images of HH gel and Cur/HH gel are presented in (b and c) respectively. (a–c) Reproduced with permission from Ref. 143 Copyright © 2022 American Chemical Society. (d) The bioinspired hydrogel was fabricated by covalently linking polyanionic AFG and positively charged GelMA polymers, and its activity and mechanism in chronic wound healing were also investigated. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 148 Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd.
In contrast to the direct use of GAG materials mentioned above, some studies have extended this principle to other strategies. For example, Hao et al synthesized an antioxidant Hep-mimicking peptide hydrogel (K16, KYKYEYEYAGEGDSS-4Sa) for the repair of radiation-induced skin injury. 149 Due to the 4-sulfobenzoic acid at the N-terminal end of the K16 peptide, the K16 hydrogel can adsorb inflammatory factors. In this study, although the K16 hydrogel can adsorb a large number of pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as IFN-γ, IL-1β, and TNF-α), effectively alleviating inflammation, it inevitably adsorbs some anti-inflammatory cytokines as well. Moreover, the K16 hydrogel reduces inflammation by enhancing the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines and suppressing pro-inflammatory cytokines. It also shortens the coagulation time after blood recalcification, thereby enhancing its anti-inflammatory properties and accelerating wound hemostasis. This again demonstrates that hydrogels can modulate inflammation through multiple mechanisms.
In general, using charge differences to capture inflammatory factors is a promising strategy. However, cytokines and other signaling molecules have physiological concentrations, and this strategy will inevitably affect the normal physiological concentrations of other cytokines and signaling molecules, resulting in their normal physiological functions being affected. This issue primarily arises from the low specificity of the hydrogel, making it crucial to address this challenge. Nevertheless, when designing such hydrogels, we can optimize their charge characteristics (e.g. by adjusting the degree of substitution of charged groups or carefully selecting materials) to minimize interference with the normal physiological concentrations of cytokines and other signaling molecules.
Biometrics
Strategies for binding hydrogels to cell membranes
In recent years, the strategy of using cell membranes for biological neutralization has gained significant attention in the field of biomedicine.150–152 To start with, the cell membrane is not merely able to identify and bind numerous inflammatory cytokines, but can also neutralize substances like bacteria and endotoxins, conferring selectivity and diversity upon the neutralization outcome. Furthermore, the biocompatibility of the cell membrane allows for low immune rejection when applied in vivo, and enables it to bind well to host tissues and function. In using this strategy it should be noted that the choice of cell membrane source is crucial for its function as well as for the application scenario, and cell membranes from different sources (e.g. macrophage membranes, erythrocyte membranes, neutrophil membranes, and specifically highly expressed cell membranes) can be precisely and optimally designed for specific diseases.153–155 Hydrogel microspheres (HCM), as a significant form of hydrogels, have developed rapidly in many fields due to their unique physical and chemical properties. 156 The combination of cell membranes and HCM can leverage their unique functional properties, offering significant potential for capturing and neutralizing inflammatory cytokines.
Macrophages, as one of the most important immune cells in the body, play multiple roles in immune responses, including antigen presentation, phagocytosis, cytokine secretion, and tissue repair. Its cell membrane expresses multiple receptors such as TNFR, IL-1R and IL-6R, making its cell membrane an excellent choice for neutralizing inflammatory cytokines. The combined strategy of hydrogel microspheres and macrophage membranes can not only inherit the responsiveness of the hydrogel but also retain the receptors on the macrophage membrane. For example, in a study, in order to mimic a bio-inspired hierarchical delivery system, researchers developed nanovesicles (NVs) encapsulating simvastatin (SIM) by fusing the macrophage membranes of the macrophage cell line J774 cells with synthetic lipid membranes. These NVs were then encapsulated into hyaluronidase (HAase)-responsive hydrogel microspheres (NV@SIM-MPs) for the treatment of diabetic wounds (Figure 6(a)). 33 It is worth noting that the hydrogel microspheres can protect the NVs from being destroyed by enzymes, allowing the specific release of NVs in the diabetic wound environment. In this way, they can effectively bind and regulate inflammatory cytokines, terminate the inflammatory cascade reaction, and deliver the encapsulated SIM into cells through the membrane fusion or endocytosis pathway, significantly improving the delivery efficiency and pharmacological efficacy of SIM.
Figure 6.
The application of the combination of hydrogel microspheres and cell membranes. (a) When the NV@SIM-MPs with HAase responsiveness are applied to diabetic wounds, they can release NVs@SIM in a responsive manner, thereby neutralizing inflammatory cytokines and alleviating the inflammatory response. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 33 Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. (b) The changes of gene expression levels in the processes of glycolysis, tricarboxylic acid cycle and oxidative phosphorylation. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 157 Copyright © 2023 The Authors. (c) The lung tissues of healthy, control, PMS, and iAE-PMS groups were subjected to histopathological analysis at 24 and 72 h after ALI induction. Scale bar: 100 μm. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 158 Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc.
The cell membrane can not only be used for neutralizing inflammatory cytokines and drug delivery, but also can transform macrophages into anti-inflammatory macrophages by regulating macrophages in the body. For example, in the research on the treatment of osteoarthritis, the immune cell mobilizing HCM composed of HA methacrylate-grafted streptavidin and chondroitin sulfate methacrylate are used. Among them, HA methacrylate can closely bind to the CD44 antigen on the surface of engineered extracellular vesicles (sEVs), ensuring the stability of sEVs on HCM and providing a guarantee for the subsequent transformation of macrophages into anti-inflammatory macrophages. The sEVs are prepared from the cell membranes of synovial mesenchymal stem cells through the extrusion method. 157 The role of the cell membrane in this study is mainly reflected in the following aspects: Firstly, the sEVs prepared from the cell membranes of synovial mesenchymal stem cells can be efficiently taken up by macrophages. Secondly, the sEVs can significantly improve the efficiency of the transformation of macrophages into an anti-inflammatory state. Thirdly, the sEVs prepared using the cell membrane can promote the transformation of pro-inflammatory macrophages into anti-inflammatory macrophages by regulating the mitochondrial energy metabolism of macrophages (Figure 6(b)). In another study, a similar principle was applied, significantly reducing the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and promoting the expression of anti-inflammatory genes. 159 Unlike the direct use of exogenous macrophage membranes, immune cell-mobilizing hydrogel microspheres directly convert pro-inflammatory macrophages at the inflammation site into anti-inflammatory macrophages, thus exerting the neutralizing capacity of pro-inflammatory macrophage membranes.
The combination strategy of cell membranes and hydrogel microspheres demonstrated excellent synergistic effects, which can be used not only in wounds, joint cavities, but also applied in the treatment of lung infections with the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). For instance, inhaled microfluidic HA methacrylate hydrogel microspheres (iAE-PMS) by double-camouflaging with highly angiotensin-converting enzyme II (ACE2)-expressing HEK293-ACE2 cells and pro-inflammatory macrophage-derived bioactive membranes. 158 Due to the addition of the cell membrane, iAE-PMS has shown remarkable efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 infection. This is because it can be widely distributed throughout the respiratory tract, including areas that are difficult to target with traditional treatment methods, such as the upper respiratory tract, thus effectively preventing the virus from invading. Studies have shown that iAE-PMS has been successfully enriched with ACE2 receptors, IL-6R, IL-1R, and TNFR. iAE-PMS can not only act as a decoy to bind to SARS-CoV-2, significantly reducing the infection efficiency of SARS-CoV-2, but also effectively adsorb and reduce the release of inflammatory mediators such as IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, thereby alleviating the acute lung injury caused by coronavirus disease 2019 (Figure 6(c)). Compared to the physical adsorption strategy of inflammatory cytokines by hydrogels, the combination of hydrogels with cell membranes offers higher specificity and broad-spectrum capability, making it more suitable for complex diseases and diverse applications.
Although research on the combination of cell membranes and hydrogels is still limited, this strategy shows great potential. In the future, the neutralization technology using cell membranes is expected to play an increasingly important role in the treatment of various diseases. However, maintaining the functional integrity and bioactivity of cell membranes during production remains a critical technical challenge to be addressed. Moreover, despite the excellent biocompatibility of cell membrane neutralization materials, long-term use may pose potential risks such as nonspecific immune reactions. In practical applications, large-scale production and cost control still require further optimization and improvement. The clinical translation of cell membrane neutralization technology must undergo rigorous safety and efficacy evaluations, and the complex treatment mechanisms of diseases may further limit its application in the field of biological neutralization.
Cytokine antibody-coupled hydrogels
Cytokine antibody-conjugated hydrogels present a novel therapeutic strategy in biomedicine, capable of locally and systemically regulating inflammatory cytokines while inheriting the binding specificity of cytokine antibodies. This strategy reduces the systemic side effects caused by free cytokine antibodies and increases the duration and capture efficiency of cytokine antibodies. For instance, the IL-6 sponge (IL-6S) is obtained through the chemical coupling of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-methacrylic acid) (P(NIPAAm-co-MAA)) and an IL-6 specific antibody. 30 The mechanism of the antibody specificity of IL-6S is mainly based on the specific binding between the antibody and the antigen, as well as the characteristics of the hydrogel. In this study, compared with the administration of free IL-6 antibody, IL-6S does not affect the physiological concentration of IL-6 (Figure 7(a)). It only exerts a specific adsorption effect when the level of IL-6 is abnormally elevated, thereby significantly reducing systemic adverse reactions and remarkably inhibiting the cytokine release syndrome (CRS) caused by chimeric antigen receptor T cell immunotherapy. Interestingly, the adsorption threshold of IL-6S can be changed by altering the concentration of IL-6 antibodies in IL-6S and the distance of IL-6 antibodies in the hydrogel (Figure 7(b) and (c)). There exists a dynamic binding and restricting effect in IL-6S. IL-6 molecules can reversibly bind to the antibody or dissociate from it. However, due to the physical barrier of IL-6S, the escape time of free IL-6 in IL-6S is significantly prolonged, thereby enhancing the specific clearance effect of the antibody. Additionally, due to its thermosensitive properties, IL-6S can be extracted subcutaneously, offering new possibilities for the management of CRS, from monitoring to prevention. Regarding this strategy to improve the safety of cytokine antibodies, it has been well demonstrated in other studies, as exemplified by the HA-conjugated anti-TNF-α ((anti-TNF-α)-HA) hydrogel used in burn treatment. It significantly prolongs the local action time of cytokine-neutralizing antibodies and reduces inflammatory markers. Moreover, (anti-TNF-α)-HA can reduce the body’s innate immune response to therapeutic antibodies by spatially blocking the Fc region of the antibody. 160
Figure 7.
Advantages of antibody-conjugated hydrogels for neutralizing inflammatory cytokines. (a) Healthy mice were given IL-6S or the same amount of IL-6 antibody for treatment (intravenously, 100 ng). Twenty-four hours later, the concentration of serum IL-6 was measured (n = 5). (b) The actual/theoretical adsorption ratio of IL-6S in the hydrogel with different amounts of antibody conjugation, where the initial molar amount of IL-6 is twice that of the conjugated antibody (n = 3). (c) The graphical representation in the form of a function curve depicts the correlation between the actual/theoretical absorption proportion and the mean distance of neighboring antibodies, with a sample quantity of n = 3. (a–c) Reproduced with permission from Ref. 30 Copyright © 2023, The Author(s). (d) Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) of FITC-dextrans. Their respective FRAP curves have the diffusion coefficients (d) listed beside. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 161 Copyright © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016. (e) A design of KLD2R/Hep hydrogel for dual-drug delivery aiming to boost renal repair is proposed. Through electrostatic interaction, the cationic KLD2R combines with the anionic Hep to form a hybrid hydrogel. Notably, Hep exhibits a strong affinity for HGF. Subsequently, the encapsulated anti-TNF -α and HGF are released from the hydrogel in a particular sequence, which jointly promotes tissue repair in a synergistic manner. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 162 Copyright © 2019 Acta Materialia Inc.
Currently, cytokine antibodies still face challenges such as being easily cleared in vivo and having an uncontrollable duration of action. Cytokine antibody-coupled hydrogels can effectively address these issues. In a study of (anti-TNF-α)-HA hydrogel, (anti-TNF-α)-HA hydrogel increased the time of antibody removal and duration of action compared to free HA, avoiding to a certain extent the side effects on the body due to uncontrollable levels of antibody. 34 (anti-TNF-α)-HA hydrogels demonstrated superior performance in maintaining antibody concentrations around the wound, thus reducing the need for repeated administration. Due to the uneven structures and compositions of tissues, the diffusion of anti-TNF-α may be hindered. However, this unevenness has less impact on the diffusion of (anti-TNF-α)-HA, indicating that (anti-TNF-α)-HA hydrogels are more adaptable to various scenarios. The conjugation of cytokine antibodies with polymeric materials also increases the antibody’s molecular weight, which influences the diffusion rate and modifies its action duration, further demonstrating the advantages of this conjugation strategy. 160 Studies indicate that the conjugation of cytokine antibodies with polysaccharides has minimal impact on the antibody’s binding affinity, 163 consistent with findings from another study, 164 further validating the feasibility of the antibody-polysaccharide conjugation strategy. In addition, antibodies can be conjugated with different polysaccharides to modulate their dissociation rates. 163 Regarding the selection of cytokine antibodies, antibodies targeting upstream cytokines can enhance the efficiency of wound-healing. 165
In another study, the authors investigated the diffusion coefficient of biomacromolecules in low-molecular-weight glycosyl-nucleoside-lipid amphiphiles (GNL) hydrogels and the relationship between biomacromolecule release and shear stress. 161 The diffusion coefficient of biomacromolecules in the hydrogel is closely related to their molecular weight, with lower molecular weights resulting in higher diffusion coefficients (Figure 7(d)). The release of TNF-α from GNL hydrogels significantly increased under shear stress, which is closely related to the properties of the hydrogel. In general, the shear thinning of hydrogels is negatively correlated with their strength, 166 with high strength typically resulting from cross-linked polymer chain interactions within the hydrogel. This suggests that when designing cytokine antibody-conjugated hydrogels, optimizing the shear-thinning properties can alter their release profiles. It should also be noted that the introduction of nanomaterials can enhance the shear-thinning properties of hydrogels, effectively mitigating the decline in this performance caused by crosslinking agents. 167 Compared to the “cytokine antibody-coupled hydrogel strategies” described above, some strategies avoid the involvement of chemical reactions and are able to maintain the biological activity of cytokine antibodies. For example, the KLD2R/Hep hydrogel, formed by the charge interaction between KLD2R (Ac-KLDLKLDLKLDLKLDLRR-CONH2) peptide and Hep, can physically encapsulate anti-TNF-α and HGF. 162 The KLD2R/Hep hydrogel enables sequential release of dual drugs: anti-TNF-α is released rapidly by the protein diffusion mechanism of the hydrogel nanofiber network, whereas HGF is released slowly by the synergistic effect of Hep binding affinity and molecular diffusion, and Hep protects the growth factor from thermal denaturation and protease degradation (Figure 7(e)).
Overall, the strategy of coupling hydrogels with cytokine antibodies can make up for the shortcomings of cytokine antibodies alone, and this synergistic effect, which is expected to break the limitations of the use of biologics, improve the efficacy, safety, and controllability of biologics, and thus promote the development of biologics. More importantly, it can reduce the number of drug administrations, improve patient compliance and lower the cost of treatment for patients, thus bringing more favorable protection for human health.
Other strategies
Hydrogel coatings for trapping inflammatory cytokines
Hydrogel has diverse application forms and scenarios, such as blending GelMA with negatively charged methacrylated Hep hydrogels, which are then sprayed onto electrospun polylactic acid fiber membranes to create an electrospun fiber tape with inflammation self-limiting properties (Figure 8(a)). 168 The methacrylated Hep component imparts the tape with the ability to adsorb inflammatory cytokines.142,143 The thermosensitive property of GelMA ensures the tape’s immediate applicability. 169 Additionally, the tape demonstrates excellent mechanical properties, superior surface wettability, and the ability to promote cell adhesion and proliferation, which are crucial for emergency medical treatments.
Figure 8.
Other application forms of hydrogels for capturing inflammatory factors. (a) During the pre-tape preparation stage, the chemical constituents and the newly generated chemical bonds. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 168 Copyright © 2022 Wiley-VCH GmbH. (b) At 2, 4, and 10 h after the treatment with PKH26-labeled Ce@LTA-NPs suspension and PKH26-labeled Ce@LTA-NPs-F127/chitosan hydrogel, the representative fluorescence images (superimposed with corresponding photographs) of the diabetic wound sites were obtained. The circular region was used to mark the diabetic wound site. All the data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Reproduced with permission from Ref. 35 Copyright © 2021, The Author(s). (c) Schematic diagram of the microfluidic fabrication process for PDA@GM MSs. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 170 Copyright © 2024 Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Joint strategy of hydrogels and nanomaterials
Hydrogels can be combined with NPs to provide various benefits, including prolonged local residence time, enhanced safety, and improved targeting of the NPs. For example, in order to adsorb the inflammatory cytokines continuously released in diabetic wounds, a temperature-sensitive hydrogel composed of Pluronic F127 and chitosan was used to dope and encapsulate Linde Type A (LTA) zeolite NPs loaded with cerium (Ce) (Ce@LTA-NPs), and it was named as Ce@LTA-NPs-F127/chitosan hydrogel. 35 In this study, Ce@LTA-NPs have been proven to possess good adsorption capacity through Brunauer-Emmett-Teller surface area analysis. Its Brunauer-Emmett-Teller surface area is 54.2 m²/g and the pore volume is 0.1 cm³/g, which can provide sufficient adsorption sites for inflammatory cytokines. Thus, it endows the hydrogel with the ability to effectively absorb and neutralize harmful inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IL-6) in the wound. Compared with free Ce@LTA-NPs, Ce@LTA-NPs in the F127/chitosan hydrogel are slowly released from the hydrogel and remain at the wound site for a long time. This avoids multiple administrations and promotes long-term therapeutic effects (Figure 8(b)), achieving the goal of sustained release. In general, the two complement each other. The strategy of combining hydrogels with NPs helps overcome the instability of metal nanomaterials, thereby improving their safety. Ce@LTA-NPs accelerated the transition from inflammation to proliferation and reversed hyperglycemia-induced mitochondrial dysfunction by adsorbing a large amount of inflammatory cytokines from diabetic wounds and enhancing mitochondrial membrane potential.
In contrast to the NPs described above, which endow hydrogels with the capacity to capture inflammatory cytokines, certain studies have enhanced the hydrogel’s ability to capture inflammatory cytokines by incorporating conductive NPs, such as gold NPs, into the hydrogels. This addition increases the hydrogel’s surface area, electrical conductivity, and sensitivity to inflammatory cytokines. 171 However, it is important to note that this pertains specifically to hydrogels that capture inflammatory cytokines through electrostatic interactions. Certainly, research has also indicated that NPs can leverage the principle of electrostatic interaction to capture inflammatory mediators. For example, there exists a nanomedicine-hydrogel composite, which contains cationic NPs capable of delivering and eliminating cfDNA and cyclic guanosine monophosphate-adenosine monophosphate synthase inhibitors. 172 The charge of cationic NPs is a crucial determinant of their binding ability to cfDNA. The hydrogel can mitigate potential adverse effects stemming from non-specific electrostatic interactions between cationic NPs and biomolecules or cells, thereby enhancing the safety of the NPs. Additionally, the hydrogel can achieve the objective of controlled drug release.
Hydrogel microspheres, as an important form of hydrogels, also possess a hydrophilic three-dimensional network structure. However, compared to polymer network hydrogels, hydrogel microspheres with large pore structures have a larger surface area, meaning they provide more contact sites. 173 PDA nanosheets (PDA NSs) were encapsulated in GelMA hydrogel microspheres to form PDA@GM MSs. 170 PDA NSs and hydrogel microspheres respectively served as the capturing and storage components for cfDNA (Figure 8(c)). Although cfDNA is a DAMP in the host body, it acts as a “pro-inflammatory mediator” and plays an important role in the initiation and progression of inflammation.174,175 It is worth noting that PDA NSs capture single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) in different ways. PDA NSs primarily capture ssDNA through hydrogen bonding and π-π stacking with the base pairs exposed on the sides, while they capture dsDNA via π-π stacking between the terminal base pairs of dsDNA and PDA NSs. The polymer chains in GelMA can interact with the side-exposed bases of ssDNA by hydrogen bonding. Additionally, when used as a drug delivery platform, the porous structure of hydrogels may lead to rapid drug release. To improve control, the drug can be encapsulated in the core of NPs, which are then embedded into the hydrogel, creating a synergistic strategy that prevents the sudden release of the drug.176–178
Cytokine detectors
Hydrogels can also be used as cytokine detectors, such as microcapsules consisting of a polyethylene glycol hydrogel shell together with cytokine-loaded antibody sensing beads for the detection of IFN-γ and TNF-α in the blood. 179 The hydrogel shell layer effectively blocks leukocytes while allowing cytokines to pass through, protecting the internal antibodies from interference by immune cells to ensure the accuracy of detection. Currently, in the field of biological sample analysis methods, there are still challenges in achieving rapid and highly sensitive immunoassays. The hydrogel platform can help address this issue. For example, a hydrogel composite material is formed by covalently immobilizing specific antibodies of the target analyte on immunosensing polystyrene microspheres, which are then embedded in a poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) hydrogel. Due to the temperature-induced phase transition property of PNIPAM, the hydrogel shrinks, thereby enhancing the fluorescence signal and enabling the rapid detection of cytokines. 180 Some studies have also shown that hydrogels can be used to detect cytokines by means of fast-response differential pulse voltammetry. Of course, this can be achieved by selecting conductive hydrogel materials such as polypyrrole. In this way, while improving the sensitivity, it can also reduce the detection cost, sample consumption, and operational difficulty. 171 This cytokine detector enriches the application of hydrogel to capture and neutralize inflammatory cytokines.
Material analysis
Glycosaminoglycan-based materials
GAGs are linear polysaccharides composed of repeating disaccharide units, widely distributed in animals, particularly in connective tissues such as cartilage, skin, and the cornea. GAGs not only play a critical structural role in the ECM but also exhibit diverse biological functions, including regulating cellular activities, participating in immune responses, and promoting tissue repair. 181 In recent years, GAG-based materials have been widely employed in hydrogel fabrication due to their excellent biocompatibility and biodegradability, showing great potential in wound healing, anti-inflammatory therapies, and drug delivery. Common natural GAGs include HA, Hep, and chondroitin sulfate.
Hyaluronic acid
Hyaluronic acid is a non-sulfated natural GAG. 182 The primary biological functions of HA include maintaining tissue stability and integrity, promoting cell migration, enhancing wound healing, and suppressing inflammatory responses.183,184 It also exerts significant anti-inflammatory effects by binding to the CD44 receptor on immune cells. It should be noted that the molecular weight of HA is closely associated with its function.185,186 Under normal conditions, HA exists predominantly in a high molecular weight form, serving as a major component of the ECM, exhibiting anti-inflammatory properties and a low affinity for CD44.187–189 However, in response to danger signals such as pathogens, HA is degraded by HAase into low molecular weight forms, which exhibit increased affinity for CD44, thereby modulating the inflammatory response.189,190
Due to its numerous advantages, HA is widely used in hydrogel fabrication, particularly in the fields of medicine, drug delivery, and tissue engineering. 191 One of its primary advantages is excellent biocompatibility, as HA exhibits strong affinity with human tissues, effectively reducing immune rejection and demonstrating great potential in wound repair and tissue regeneration.192,193 Additionally, HA is biodegradable, being broken down by HAase in the body into low-molecular-weight products, thereby avoiding the risks associated with long-term accumulation. Its high hydration capacity enables it to maintain excellent stability in physiological environments, which is crucial for applications requiring high humidity or liquid conditions, particularly in drug delivery systems and wound healing materials. The tunable molecular structure of HA allows for modifications via chemical reactions and crosslinking, enabling adjustments to its molecular weight and physical properties to meet diverse application requirements. This customization makes it one of the ideal materials for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.191,194 Although HA cannot capture inflammatory cytokines through electrostatic interactions, it can be conjugated with antibodies (Figure 9(a)), significantly advancing antibody applications. This conjugation not only preserves antibody bioactivity but also greatly enhances their safety and controllability.34,160,163
Figure 9.
The schematic diagram of the conjugation between antibody and hydrogel, and the Hep-mimicking peptides do not possess anticoagulant effects. (a) The use of N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC), N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide sodium salt (sulfo-NHS), and 4-(dimethylamino) pyridine (4-DMAP) enabled the activation of HA, facilitating the formation of an amide bond with the amine group present on the antibody. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 160 Copyright © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers. (b) Three minutes after the blood was collected, the blood in the test tube containing sodium Hep anticoagulant was still flowing normally, while the blood in the K16 hydrogel group had already clotted, indicating that the K16 hydrogel does not have the Hep-like anticoagulant effect. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 149 Copyright © 2023 Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Despite its advantages, HA, as a primary component of hydrogels, also has certain limitations. First, the mechanical strength of HA-based hydrogels is relatively low, and their stability may be insufficient in environments requiring high mechanical resilience. Therefore, to enhance its mechanical properties, HA is often combined with other materials, such as polyvinyl alcohol or gelatin.195,196 In addition, the degradation rate of HA is influenced by environmental factors, such as pH, temperature, and enzymatic activity, which may result in uncontrollable degradation, posing challenges in certain applications. However, its degradation rate can be regulated through chemical modifications.190,197 Further, although HA is generally considered biologically safe, it may trigger allergic reactions in some cases, especially when applied over a long period of time or in high doses. Therefore, while HA-based hydrogels show great potential in the medical field, their properties still require further optimization to meet the demands of more practical applications.
Heparin
Heparin, a widely distributed sulfated polysaccharide in biological systems, is extensively used in drug delivery systems and tissue engineering due to its unique physical and chemical properties. 198 Hep exhibits remarkable anticoagulant activity and excellent biocompatibility, effectively preventing thrombosis and undergoing rapid degradation in vivo, which underscores its significant value in medical applications. 199 However, its biocompatibility is lower than that of HA, and its anticoagulant effects are less controllable compared to low molecular weight Hep. As a hydrogel component, Hep enhances the affinity of hydrogels for growth factors such as VEGF and HGF, ensuring their stability and sustained release.162,200,201 Additionally, the negatively charged sulfate groups of Hep bind to inflammatory factors such as IL-8, MCP-1, and MIP-1α, playing a crucial role in anti-inflammatory processes.31,101 More importantly, Hep can reversibly bind to IL-10, effectively treating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, further expanding its application scope. 202 In recent years, the development of Hep-mimetic peptides has attracted growing attention. They can not only avoid the immune responses caused by exogenous Hep, but also do not have anticoagulant functions (Figure 9(b)), which greatly improves safety. 149
While Hep materials offer significant advantages, they also have certain drawbacks. Hep molecules are prone to enzymatic degradation, which reduces the stability of Hep-based hydrogels and may lead to degradation during use. Although the anticoagulant properties of Hep are beneficial for certain medical applications, they may increase the risk of bleeding in other scenarios, particularly during surgeries or trauma repair requiring hemostasis. Additionally, Hep may trigger immune responses in vivo, leading to allergic reactions.203–205
Chondroitin sulfate
Similar to Hep, chondroitin sulfate, a natural sulfated polysaccharide, holds significant potential in capturing inflammatory cytokines. Chondroitin sulfate is ubiquitous in the cell matrix and cell surface and has significant lubricating properties, anti-inflammatory effects, anti-tumor effects, and the ability to provide structural support and promote tissue repair and regeneration.206–208 Studies have shown that conjugating chondroitin sulfate with drugs enhances drug delivery efficiency, therapeutic efficacy, solubility, and safety. 209 Its extensive biomedical applications are also attributed to its excellent biocompatibility and biodegradability. Despite its outstanding properties in various aspects, chondroitin sulfate faces certain limitations as a hydrogel component. 208 Its mechanical properties are relatively weak, with insufficient mechanical stability. Therefore, modification of chondroitin sulfate, cross-linking with other polymers or association with NPs is usually required to improve the mechanical properties of hydrogelsv.210,211 Its relatively fast degradation rate may lead to sudden drug release, potentially compromising the sustained effectiveness in certain applications. Additionally, it is important to note that the use of chondroitin sulfate may trigger immune responses.212,213
Chitosan
Chitosan, a positively charged polysaccharide derived from the deacetylation of chitin, is well-known for its excellent biocompatibility and biodegradability. 214 It can gradually degrade into non-toxic small molecules within the body.215,216 As we all know, bacterial resistance caused by the use of antibiotics has become a world health problem. Chitosan, as a natural antimicrobial material, can exert its antimicrobial effect through various mechanisms, for example, by binding its amino group (-NH2) to the negatively charged components on the bacterial surface, altering cell permeability and inhibiting bacterial growth, as well as inhibiting the synthesis of RNA by binding to DNA, and so on. 217 Additionally, studies have demonstrated that positively charged chitosan can capture viruses through electrostatic interactions. 218 Moreover, the advantages of chitosan are also reflected in its hemostatic properties. 219 Chitosan can also be enhanced by combining it with self-assembling peptides. 220 These features form the foundation of its extensive applications in the field of biomaterials. Chitosan materials are less costly and more antimicrobial than compared with GAG materials. A temperature-sensitive hydrogel composed of Pluronic F127 and chitosan was used for the slow release of NPs, which not only improved the stability and safety of NPs, but also avoided the need for multiple drug administrations. 35
However, chitosan is not without limitations. Its poor solubility restricts its applications, as it dissolves primarily in acidic solutions and exhibits low solubility under neutral and basic conditions. To address this issue, scientists have synthesized a range of chitosan derivatives, such as carboxymethyl chitosan and quaternized chitosan. It is worth noting that introducing specific functional groups not only preserves the inherent properties of chitosan but also imparts additional functionalities, significantly expanding its application potential. 221
Gelatin
Similar to the materials mentioned above, gelatin is a natural polysaccharide with excellent biocompatibility and biodegradability. As a natural polysaccharide, gelatin can be enzymatically degraded in vivo by enzymes such as matrix metalloproteinases. It is non-toxic and fully meets the requirements for biomedical materials. 222 Derivatives of gelatin, such as GelMA, exhibit photosensitivity, excellent biocompatibility, biodegradability, and rapid curing capabilities. 223 These properties make GelMA widely applicable in tissue repair and regeneration, wound healing, and drug delivery.224,225 Hydrogel microspheres synthesized from GelMA have excellent mechanical properties and porous structure, which can not only serve as a storage part of inflammatory mediators, but also load growth factors through electrostatic interactions.170,226 One major drawback of gelatin is its source limitation. It is typically extracted from animal tissues, making large-scale production challenging and restricting its availability to specific animal sources. Additionally, it may provoke religious controversies. 227 Gelatin’s stability, mechanical properties, and adhesive ability are relatively weak, limiting its practical applications. These drawbacks are typically addressed through chemical modifications or combination with other biomaterials. 228 However, it should be noted that gelatin is immunogenic and may trigger an immune response, which may not be suitable for some allergy-prone people. 229
Generally speaking, among various strategies for capturing and neutralizing inflammatory cytokines, most of the materials used belong to polysaccharides. Whether natural raw materials or modified materials are used, it reflects to some extent that polysaccharides are excellent materials for capturing and neutralizing inflammatory cytokines.143,163 Although widely available in nature and characterized by good biocompatibility and biodegradability, polysaccharides also have notable drawbacks, such as susceptibility to contamination, complex purification processes, and challenges in large-scale production. Among synthetic materials, PEI, as a cationic polymer, can enhance the efficiency of hydrogels in capturing inflammatory cytokines by modulating charge intensity and crosslinking density. 32 The IL-6S, composed of P(NIPAAm-co-MAA) conjugated with IL-6 antibodies, has been shown to preserve antibody activity and exhibit no toxicity in mouse experiments. These findings demonstrate that synthetic materials also have unique advantages. 30 However, research on synthetic materials in this particular area remains limited.
Challenges and future perspectives of hydrogels in capturing and neutralizing inflammatory cytokines
Current challenges
In-depth study of the mechanisms of inflammatory diseases
Despite significant progress in research on inflammatory diseases in recent years, a comprehensive understanding of their complex mechanisms remains insufficient. The occurrence and progression of inflammatory diseases typically involve the influences of multiple cytokines, signaling pathways, immune cells, and the microenvironment. This implies that clarifying the underlying mechanisms and connections among them is of great benefit for treatment. Moreover, these cytokines may exhibit different degrees of dominance in the context of various inflammatory diseases, or there may be synergistic effects among several cytokines. This is of vital importance for subsequent research, as it can provide researchers with a clear direction in designing hydrogels that target specific cytokines. However, current research still lacks an overall understanding of the cytokine network and the interactions among cytokines. This limitation has hindered the development of novel therapeutic strategies. To further advance the treatment of inflammatory diseases, it is essential to delve deeper into and describe these complex biological mechanisms, uncovering the multi-layered roles of cytokines and their receptors, in order to develop multi-target therapeutic strategies targeting inflammatory cytokines.
Advantages and disadvantages of various mechanisms of hydrogels in the direction of trapping inflammatory cytokines
Hydrogels hold great promise in capturing and neutralizing inflammatory cytokines, but several challenges remain to be addressed. First, the complex in vivo physiological environment and the diverse sites of inflammatory disease present significant challenges for the functional performance and application of hydrogels. Additionally, in the complex and dynamic physiological environment, hydrogels may lose their efficiency in capturing and neutralizing inflammatory cytokines due to structural changes or functional degradation. Finally, the diversity of inflammatory disease mechanisms and sites results in varying requirements for the use of hydrogels in different applications, further impacting their therapeutic efficacy.
These methods each have their own advantages and disadvantages (Table 2). Physical adsorption typically relies on the porous structure or surface characteristics of hydrogels to capture inflammatory cytokines, but this method lacks molecular recognition ability. Inflammatory cytokines (such as IL-6, IL-17, and TNF-α) have complex structures and distribution characteristics, and physical adsorption, based only on physical properties, is difficult to selectively capture specific cytokines. This may lead to non-specific adsorption of non-target molecules, which reduces therapeutic efficacy and may trigger serious side effects, making it difficult to competently perform in complex in vivo environments. A strategy combining hydrogels with cell membranes can achieve broad-spectrum and efficient capture and neutralization of inflammatory cytokines. However, this method still faces several challenges, such as optimizing the stability and biocompatibility of the combination strategy and adapting to the complex and variable pathological environment. Combining hydrogels with antibodies against inflammatory cytokines provides a highly specific and efficient approach for their capture and neutralization. Although this strategy can greatly improve the precision and effectiveness of treatment, the program still faces many problems in practical application that are worth pondering. For example, how can the stability and activity of antibodies be maintained in complex physiological environment? How can production costs be further reduced while ensuring clinical accessibility? In addition, all of these methods are deficient in clinical translation.
Table 2.
Advantages and disadvantages of hydrogels in capturing and neutralizing inflammatory cytokines.
| Mechanism | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Electrostatic interaction | Wide adaptability, adjustable charge amount, broad-spectrum capture | Poor specificity |
| Neutralization by antibody specificity | Strong specificity, high safety, adjustable antibody action time, controllable action range | High cost |
| Neutralization by cell membrane receptors | Broad-spectrum binding | Complex manufacturing process |
| Utilization of nanoparticles | Strong adsorption ability, adjustable charge amount | Poor specificity |
Directions for future research
Innovation and optimization of hydrogel materials
Future research should focus on the innovation and optimization of hydrogel materials, particularly in meeting the demands of complex inflammatory pathological environments. Innovation in hydrogel materials should not only improve their biocompatibility and biodegradability but also enhance their ability to selectively capture various types of inflammatory cytokines. In complex inflammatory pathological environments, cytokine types and concentrations often vary significantly. Hydrogel materials must be capable of precisely recognizing and capturing specific inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β. Therefore, the design of future hydrogels should focus on optimizing their physical properties, surface structure, and functionality. A multifunctional approach should integrate cell membranes, antibodies, or NPs into the hydrogel to enhance its selective adsorption and binding capacity for cytokines. In addition, in order to enhance the adaptability of hydrogels in complex pathological environments, research should also aim to develop responsive hydrogels, such as pH-responsive and temperature-responsive hydrogels, so as to regulate their structure and function under different physiological conditions and precisely regulate the capture and release of cytokines. These innovative hydrogels need to not only exhibit high selectivity but also provide sustained effects at the site of inflammation, avoiding excessive immune responses and side effects. The optimization of hydrogel materials should not only focus on their ability to capture and neutralize cytokines but also on their stability, degradation rate, and long-term controllability of therapeutic effects in vivo. Lastly, it is important to note that production efficiency and cost control directly affect the feasibility of hydrogels in clinical applications. Only by addressing these issues simultaneously can hydrogels transition from the laboratory to clinical applications, ultimately benefiting more patients.
Directions for joint strategies
First, the development of safer antibodies and cell membrane materials is essential for the success of treatment strategies. 230 Antibodies, as precise targeting tools, face issues such as immunogenicity, off-target effects, and long-term side effects. Therefore, future research should focus on engineering antibodies by optimizing their affinity, specificity, and immunogenicity to reduce potential side effects. Although cell membrane materials possess natural biocompatibility, their long-term biological stability and local immune responses still require further investigation. Strict control over the source of the cell membrane and surface modification can enhance its stability and reduce interactions with the host immune system, thereby improving the effectiveness of the treatment. In multi-antibody combination therapy, research should focus on resolving the synergistic effects and potential interference between different antibodies. By rationally designing the combination of antibodies (e.g. covalent ligation, multifunctionalization modification), it is possible to target and neutralize multiple inflammatory cytokines at the same time, thus providing a broader scope of action in inflammation therapy and effectively reducing the occurrence of drug resistance or rebound phenomenon. The strategy of combining multiple antibodies not only enhances the therapeutic effect, but also reduces the limitations of individual antibodies in single-target therapy.
Second, the safety of NPs remains one of the key bottlenecks for their widespread application. Despite their excellent targeting and drug delivery capabilities, the long-term biocompatibility, degradability, and potential immune responses of NPs in vivo still need further investigation. Future research should focus on optimizing the design of NPs to ensure that they can efficiently target and capture inflammatory cytokines without triggering a toxic or immune response.
Only by overcoming these problems simultaneously can the advantages and potential of a combined strategy be fully realized. Looking to the future, we believe that this field will evolve toward high precision, high efficiency, high safety and multi-functional integration. Through the efforts of global researchers and technological innovations, the application of hydrogels in capturing and neutralizing inflammatory factors will break through existing bottlenecks, becoming a powerful tool in combating inflammatory diseases, enabling more precise intervention in the pathogenesis of inflammation-related diseases and more efficient control of inflammation.
Conclusion
Addressing the key role of inflammatory cytokines in disease onset and progression, hydrogels have made significant progress in the field of capturing and neutralizing inflammatory cytokines. Its unique porous structure, biocompatibility, and tunable properties make it an ideal material for treating diseases related to inflammatory cytokines. Whether through physical adsorption of inflammatory cytokines, coupling with specific antibodies, synergistic effects with cell membranes, or integrating NPs, hydrogels demonstrate significant potential in efficiently capturing and neutralizing inflammatory cytokines. However, due to the complexity of the human microenvironment, these strategies still face significant challenges in terms of efficiency, safety, and stability. Future research should focus on material design and functional optimization to further enhance its adaptability to pathological environments and broaden its applications, providing more efficient and reliable solutions for precision medicine and chronic inflammation treatment.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: NSAIDs nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
GAG Glycosaminoglycan
NPs nanoparticles
PEI polyethyleneimine
OCS oxidized chondroitin sulfate
Tob tobramycin
LPS lipopolysaccharide
cfDNA cell-free DNA
OCMC oxidized carboxymethyl cellulose
starPEG star polyethylene glycol
Hep heparin
HA hyaluronic acid
HH hyaluronic acid and heparin
Cur curcumin
AFG the A.fulica glycosaminoglycan
GelMA gelatin methacrylate
K16 KYKYEYEYAGEGDSS-4Sa
ECM extracellular matrix
NVS nanovesicles
SIM simvastatin
HAase hyaluronidase
NV@SIM-MPs hydrogel microspheres encapsulating nanovesicles that encapsulate simvastatin
sEVs engineered extracellular vesicles
SARS-CoV-2 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
iAE-PMS inhaled microfluidic methacrylate hyaluronic acid hydrogel microspheres
ACE2 angiotensin-converting enzyme II
IL-6S IL-6 sponge
P(NIPAAm-co-MAA) poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-methacrylic acid)
CRS cytokine release syndrome
(anti-TNF-α)-HA hyaluronic acid conjugated anti-TNF-α
GNL glycosyl-nucleoside-lipid amphiphiles
KLD2R Ac-KLDLKLDLKLDLKLDLRR-CONH2
FRAP fluorescence recovery after photobleaching
Ce cerium
Ce@LTA-NPs encapsulate Linde Type A zeolite nanoparticles loaded with cerium
PDA NSs PDA nanosheets
PDA@GM MSs PDA nanosheets were encapsulated in gelatin methacrylate hydrogel microspheres
ssDNA single-stranded DNA
dsDNA double-stranded DNA
EDC N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride
sulfo-NHS N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide sodium salt
4-DMAP 4-(dimethylamino) pyridine
ORCID iDs: Hongwei Qin
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8447-7663
Ze Li
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2818-4396
Sicheng Li
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7428-8867
Jinjian Huang
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8951-8935
Jianan Ren
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9011-3989
Xiuwen Wu
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3813-3867
Author contributions: Jianan Ren, Xiuwen Wu, and Jinjian Huang: Conceptualization & Funding acquisition. Hongwei Qin, and Jinjian Huang: Writing—original draft. Ze Li, and Sicheng Li: Discussion and Writing—review & editing.
Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This article was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82270595), the Postgraduate Innovation Fund of Anhui University of Science and Technology (2025cx2137), and the Scientific Research Innovation Project of Jinling Hospital (2023JSYXMS153).
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
- 1. Weber A, Wasiliew P, Kracht M. Interleukin-1 (IL-1) pathway. Sci Signal 2010; 3: cm1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kalliolias GD, Ivashkiv LB. TNF biology, pathogenic mechanisms and emerging therapeutic strategies. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2016; 12: 49–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Hayden MS, Ghosh S. Regulation of NF-κB by TNF family cytokines. Semin Immunol 2014; 26: 253–266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Dantzer R, O’Connor JC, Freund GG, et al. From inflammation to sickness and depression: when the immune system subjugates the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008; 9: 46–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Dinarello CA. Interleukin-1 in the pathogenesis and treatment of inflammatory diseases. Blood 2011; 117: 3720–3732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Iyer S, Bawa EP, Tarique M, et al. Know thy enemy-understanding the role of inflammation in severe acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2020; 158: 46–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Strand V, Kavanaugh AF. The role of interleukin-1 in bone resorption in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 2004; 43(Suppl 3): iii10–iii16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. McInnes IB, Schett G. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 2205–2219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Hotchkiss RS, Moldawer LL, Opal SM, et al. Sepsis and septic shock. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2016; 2: 16045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Henein MY, Vancheri S, Longo G, et al. The role of inflammation in cardiovascular disease. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23: 12906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Weber BN, Giles JT, Liao KP. Shared inflammatory pathways of rheumatoid arthritis and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2023; 19: 417–428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Donath MY, Dinarello CA, Mandrup-Poulsen T. Targeting innate immune mediators in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Nat Rev Immunol 2019; 19: 734–746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Schiff MH. Role of interleukin 1 and interleukin 1 receptor antagonist in the mediation of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2000; 59(Suppl 1): i103–i108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Xiang M, Wang Y, Gao Z, et al. Exploring causal correlations between inflammatory cytokines and systemic lupus erythematosus: a Mendelian randomization. Front Immunol 2022; 13: 985729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. GBD 2017 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018; 392: 1736–1788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Allison MC, Howatson AG, Torrance CJ, et al. Gastrointestinal damage associated with the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 749–754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Li L, Naisbitt DJ, Sun Y, et al. Pathomechanism of adverse reactions to biological treatment of inflammatory skin conditions. Clin Exp Allergy 2024; 54: 973–983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Acosta RD, Abraham NS, Chandrasekhara V, et al. The management of antithrombotic agents for patients undergoing GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 3–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Buttgereit F, Burmester GR. Rheumatoid arthritis: glucocorticoid therapy and body composition. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2016; 12: 444–445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Kaneko K, Chen H, Kaufman M, et al. Glucocorticoid-induced osteonecrosis in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Clin Transl Med 2021; 11: e526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Sostres C, Lanas A. Gastrointestinal effects of aspirin. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 8: 385–394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Bjarnason I, Scarpignato C, Holmgren E, et al. Mechanisms of damage to the gastrointestinal tract from nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Gastroenterology 2018; 154: 500–514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Annane D, Renault A, Brun-Buisson C, et al. Hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone for adults with septic shock. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 809–818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Zhou W, Duan Z, Zhao J, et al. Glucose and MMP-9 dual-responsive hydrogel with temperature sensitive self-adaptive shape and controlled drug release accelerates diabetic wound healing. Bioact Mater 2022; 17: 1–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Liu X, Chen Z, Bai J, et al. Multifunctional hydrogel eye drops for synergistic treatment of ocular inflammatory disease. ACS Nano 2023; 17: 25377–25390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Pan Y, Zheng Z, Zhang X, et al. Hybrid bioactive hydrogel promotes liver regeneration through the activation of Kupffer cells and ECM remodeling after partial hepatectomy. Adv Healthc Mater 2024; 13: e2303828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Song Y, You Y, Xu X, et al. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes biopotentiated extracellular matrix hydrogels accelerate diabetic wound healing and skin regeneration. Adv Sci 2023; 10: e2304023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Zhang G, Song D, Ma R, et al. Artificial mucus layer formed in response to ROS for the oral treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Sci Adv 2024; 10: eado8222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Qian Y, Ding J, Zhao R, et al. Intrinsic immunomodulatory hydrogels for chronic inflammation. Chem Soc Rev 2025; 54: 33–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Li X, Gong N, Tian F, et al. Suppression of cytokine release syndrome during CAR-T-cell therapy via a subcutaneously injected interleukin-6-adsorbing hydrogel. Nat Biomed Eng 2023; 7: 1129–1141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Lohmann N, Schirmer L, Atallah P, et al. Glycosaminoglycan-based hydrogels capture inflammatory chemokines and rescue defective wound healing in mice. Sci Transl Med 2017; 9: eaai9044. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aai9044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Yang C, Dawulieti J, Zhang K, et al. An injectable antibiotic hydrogel that scavenges proinflammatory factors for the treatment of severe abdominal trauma. Adv Funct Mater 2022; 32: 2111698. [Google Scholar]
- 33. Che J, Wu X, Shi Y, et al. Bioinspired hierarchical delivery system with macrophage-like nanovesicles encapsulation for diabetic wound healing. Chem Eng J 2023; 456: 141111. [Google Scholar]
- 34. Friedrich EE, Washburn NR. Transport patterns of anti-TNF-alpha in burn wounds: therapeutic implications of hyaluronic acid conjugation. Biomaterials 2017; 114: 10–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Qi Y, Qian K, Chen J, et al. A thermoreversible antibacterial zeolite-based nanoparticles loaded hydrogel promotes diabetic wound healing via detrimental factor neutralization and ROS scavenging. J Nanobiotechnol 2021; 19: 414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Meizlish ML, Franklin RA, Zhou X, et al. Tissue homeostasis and inflammation. Annu Rev Immunol 2021; 39: 557–581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Colaço HG, Moita LF. Initiation of innate immune responses by surveillance of homeostasis perturbations. FEBS J 2016; 283: 2448–2457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Medzhitov R. Origin and physiological roles of inflammation. Nature 2008; 454: 428–435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Mei S, Chen X. Investigation into the anti-inflammatory mechanism of coffee leaf extract in LPS-induced Caco-2/U937 co-culture model through cytokines and NMR-based untargeted metabolomics analyses. Food Chem 2023; 404: 134592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Hotchkiss RS, Karl IE. The pathophysiology and treatment of sepsis. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 138–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Serhan CN, Savill J. Resolution of inflammation: the beginning programs the end. Nat Immunol 2005; 6: 1191–1197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cells 2010; 140: 883–899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Wang D, Cai M, Wang T, et al. Ameliorative effects of L-theanine on dextran sulfate sodium induced colitis in C57BL/6J mice are associated with the inhibition of inflammatory responses and attenuation of intestinal barrier disruption. Food Res Intern 2020; 137: 109409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Huijs E, Nap A. The effects of nutrients on symptoms in women with endometriosis: a systematic review. Reprod Biomed Online 2020; 41: 317–328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Chen S, Xu Y, Cheng N, et al. Mitigation of DSS-induced colitis potentially via Th1/Th2 cytokine and immunological function balance induced by phenolic-enriched buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum moench) bee pollen extract. Foods 2022; 11: 1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Virk MS, Virk MA, He Y, et al. The anti-inflammatory and curative exponent of probiotics: a comprehensive and authentic ingredient for the sustained functioning of major human organs. Nutr 2024; 16: 546. DOI: 10.3390/nu16040546 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Schunk SJ, Triem S, Schmit D, et al. Interleukin-1alpha is a central regulator of leukocyte-endothelial adhesion in myocardial infarction and in chronic kidney disease. Circulation 2021; 144: 893–908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Stramucci L, Perrotti D. Twisting IL-1 signaling to kill CML stem cells. Blood 2016; 128: 2592–2593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Friedrich M, Pohin M, Jackson MA, et al. IL-1-driven stromal-neutrophil interactions define a subset of patients with inflammatory bowel disease that does not respond to therapies. Nat Med 2021; 27: 1970–1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Cominelli F, Pizarro TT. Interleukin-1 and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1996; 10(Suppl 2): 49–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Cominelli F, Nast CC, Clark BD, et al. Interleukin 1 (IL-1) gene expression, synthesis, and effect of specific IL-1 receptor blockade in rabbit immune complex colitis. J Clin Investig 1990; 86: 972–980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Eastgate JA, Symons JA, Wood NC, et al. Correlation of plasma interleukin 1 levels with disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 1988; 2: 706–709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Thwaites RS, Unterberger S, Chamberlain G, et al. Expression of sterile-alpha and armadillo motif containing protein (SARM) in rheumatoid arthritis monocytes correlates with TLR2-induced IL-1beta and disease activity. Rheumatology 2021; 60: 5843–5853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Dong X, Zheng Z, Lin P, et al. ACPAs promote IL-1beta production in rheumatoid arthritis by activating the NLRP3 inflammasome. Cell Mol Immunol 2020; 17: 261–271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Lopez-Rodriguez AB, Hennessy E, Murray C, et al. Acute systemic inflammation exacerbates neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease: IL-1beta drives amplified responses in primed astrocytes and neuronal network dysfunction. Alzheimer Dement 2021; 17: 1735–1755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Shaftel SS, Griffin WS, O’Banion MK. The role of interleukin-1 in neuroinflammation and Alzheimer disease: an evolving perspective. J Neuroinflammation 2008; 5: 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Wang P, Guan P, Wang T, et al. Aggravation of Alzheimer’s disease due to the COX-2-mediated reciprocal regulation of IL-1beta and Abeta between glial and neuron cells. Aging Cell 2014; 13: 605–615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 58. Li Y, Wang L, Pappan L, et al. IL-1beta promotes stemness and invasiveness of colon cancer cells through Zeb1 activation. Mol Cancer 2012; 11: 87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Wang Y, Wang K, Han GC, et al. Neutrophil infiltration favors colitis-associated tumorigenesis by activating the interleukin-1 (IL-1)/IL-6 axis. Mucosal Immunol 2014; 7: 1106–1115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Wang L, Zhang LF, Wu J, et al. IL-1beta-mediated repression of microRNA-101 is crucial for inflammation-promoted lung tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 2014; 74: 4720–4730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Grebe A, Hoss F, Latz E. NLRP3 inflammasome and the IL-1 pathway in atherosclerosis. Circ Res 2018; 122: 1722–1740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Tall AR, Bornfeldt KE. Inflammasomes and atherosclerosis: a mixed picture. Circ Res 2023; 132: 1505–1520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Abbate A, Toldo S, Marchetti C, et al. Interleukin-1 and the inflammasome as therapeutic targets in cardiovascular disease. Circ Res 2020; 126: 1260–1280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Coccia M, Harrison OJ, Schiering C, et al. IL-1beta mediates chronic intestinal inflammation by promoting the accumulation of IL-17A secreting innate lymphoid cells and CD4(+) Th17 cells. J Exp Med 2012; 209: 1595–1609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Fleischmann R. Interleukin-6 inhibition for rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 2017; 389: 1168–1170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Ohshima S, Saeki Y, Mima T, et al. Interleukin 6 plays a key role in the development of antigen-induced arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95: 8222–8226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Coomes EA, Haghbayan H. Interleukin-6 in covid-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Med Virol 2020; 30: 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Chen Y, Klein SL, Garibaldi BT, et al. Aging in COVID-19: Vulnerability, immunity and intervention. Ageing Res Rev 2021; 65: 101205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Aisiku IP, Yamal JM, Doshi P, et al. Plasma cytokines IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 are associated with the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Crit Care 2016; 20: 288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Sathe NA, Morrell ED, Bhatraju PK, et al. Alveolar biomarker profiles in subphenotypes of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 2023; 51: e13–e18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Doellner H, Arntzen KJ, Haereid PE, et al. Interleukin-6 concentrations in neonates evaluated for sepsis. J Pediatr 1998; 132: 295–299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Önal EE, Kitapçi F, Dilmen U, et al. Interleukin-6 concentrations in neonatal sepsis. Lancet 1999; 353: 239–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Nakao T, Libby P. IL-6 helps weave the inflammatory web during acute coronary syndromes. J Clin Investig 2023; 133: e167670. DOI: 10.1172/JCI167670 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Sun JY, Du LJ, Shi XR, et al. An IL-6/STAT3/MR/FGF21 axis mediates heart-liver cross-talk after myocardial infarction. Sci Adv 2023; 9: eade4110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Alter C, Henseler AS, Owenier C, et al. IL-6 in the infarcted heart is preferentially formed by fibroblasts and modulated by purinergic signaling. J Clin Investig 2023; 133: e163799. DOI: 10.1172/JCI163799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Ip WKE, Hoshi N, Shouval DS, et al. Anti-inflammatory effect of IL-10 mediated by metabolic reprogramming of macrophages. Science 2017; 356: 513–519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Aschenbrenner D, Quaranta M, Banerjee S, et al. Deconvolution of monocyte responses in inflammatory bowel disease reveals an IL-1 cytokine network that regulates IL-23 in genetic and acquired IL-10 resistance. Gut 2021; 70: 1023–1036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Vahl JM, Friedrich J, Mittler S, et al. Interleukin-10-regulated tumour tolerance in non-small cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 2017; 117: 1644–1655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Hatanaka H, Abe Y, Kamiya T, et al. Clinical implications of interleukin (IL)-10 induced by non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 2000; 11: 815–819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Geginat J, Vasco M, Gerosa M, et al. IL-10 producing regulatory and helper T-cells in systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin Immunol 2019; 44: 101330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Wang XY, Wei Y, Hu B, et al. C-Myc-driven glycolysis polarizes functional regulatory B cells that trigger pathogenic inflammatory responses. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2022; 7: 105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Chiricozzi A, Guttman-Yassky E, Suárez-Fariñas M, et al. Integrative responses to IL-17 and TNF-alpha in human keratinocytes account for key inflammatory pathogenic circuits in psoriasis. J Investig Dermatol 2011; 131: 677–687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Chiricozzi A, Suárez-Fariñas M, Fuentes-Duculan J, et al. Increased expression of interleukin-17 pathway genes in nonlesional skin of moderate-to-severe psoriasis vulgaris. Br J Dermatol 2016; 174: 136–145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Martin DA, Towne JE, Kricorian G, et al. The emerging role of IL-17 in the pathogenesis of psoriasis: preclinical and clinical findings. J Investig Dermatol 2013; 133:17–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Zhang Z, Kyttaris VC, Tsokos GC. The role of IL-23/IL-17 axis in lupus nephritis. J Immunol 2009; 183: 3160–3169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Madhur MS, Lob HE, McCann LA, et al. Interleukin 17 promotes angiotensin II-induced hypertension and vascular dysfunction. Hypertension 2010; 55: 500–507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Higaki A, Mahmoud AUM, Paradis P, et al. Role of interleukin-23/interleukin-17 axis in T-cell-mediated actions in hypertension. Cardiovasc Res 2021; 117: 1274–1283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Schmitt H, Neurath MF, Atreya R. Role of the IL23/IL17 pathway in Crohn’s disease. Front Immunol 2021; 12: 622934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Moschen AR, Tilg H, Raine T. IL-12, IL-23 and IL-17 in IBD: immunobiology and therapeutic targeting. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 16: 185–196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Rosenzweig HL, Vance EE, Asare-Konadu K, et al. Card9/neutrophil signalling axis promotes IL-17A-mediated ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2024; 83: 214–222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Miossec P, Kolls JK. Targeting IL-17 and TH17 cells in chronic inflammation. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2012; 11: 763–776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Williams MA, O’Callaghan A, Corr SC. IL-33 and IL-18 in inflammatory bowel disease etiology and microbial interactions. Front Immunol 2019; 10: 1091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Elinav E, Strowig T, Kau AL, et al. NLRP6 inflammasome regulates colonic microbial ecology and risk for colitis. Cells 2011; 145: 745–757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Barrett JC, Hansoul S, Nicolae DL, et al. Genome-wide association defines more than 30 distinct susceptibility loci for Crohn’s disease. Nat Genet 2008; 40: 955–962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Kondo N, Kuroda T, Kobayashi D. Cytokine networks in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22: 10922. DOI: 10.3390/ijms222010922 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Koper-Lenkiewicz OM, Sutkowska K, Wawrusiewicz-Kurylonek N, et al. Proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1, -6, -8, -15, -17, -18, -23, TNF-alpha) single nucleotide polymorphisms in rheumatoid arthritis - a literature review. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23: 2106. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23042106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Richter P, Macovei LA, Mihai IR, et al. Cytokines in systemic lupus erythematosus-focus on TNF-alpha and IL-17. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24: 14413. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241914413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Postal M, Appenzeller S. The role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Cytokine 2011; 56: 537–543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Veerasubramanian PK, Wynn TA, Quan J, et al. Targeting TNF/TNFR superfamilies in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. J Exp Med 2024; 221: 51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Joseph A, Brasington R, Kahl L, et al. Immunologic rheumatic disorders. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 125: S204–S215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Duan H, Zhang Q, Liu J, et al. Suppression of apoptosis in vascular endothelial cell, the promising way for natural medicines to treat atherosclerosis. Pharmacol Res 2021; 168: 105599. 2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Grunfeld C, Feingold KR. Tumor necrosis factor, cytokines, and the hyperlipidemia of infection. Trends Endocrinol Metab 1991; 2: 213–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. McKellar GE, McCarey DW, Sattar N, et al. Role for TNF in atherosclerosis? Lessons from autoimmune disease. Nat Rev Cardiol 2009; 6: 410–417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Papadakis KA, Targan SR. Role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Annu Rev Med 2000; 51: 289–298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Sun SC. The non-canonical NF-kappab pathway in immunity and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol 2017; 17: 545–558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Wei Y, Li J, Huang Y, et al. The clinical effectiveness and safety of using epidermal growth factor, fibroblast growth factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor as therapeutics in acute skin wound healing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Burns Trauma 2022; 10: tkac002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Becher B, Derfuss T, Liblau R. Targeting cytokine networks in neuroinflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2024; 23: 862–879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Cheng CF, Liao HJ, Wu CS. Tissue microenvironment dictates inflammation and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. J Formosan Med Assoc 2022; 121: 1027–1033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Kruglov A, Drutskaya M, Schlienz D, et al. Contrasting contributions of TNF from distinct cellular sources in arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 79: 1453–1459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Komatsu N, Okamoto K, Sawa S, et al. Pathogenic conversion of Foxp3+ T cells into TH17 cells in autoimmune arthritis. Nat Med 2014; 20: 62–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Zhang F, Wei K, Slowikowski K, et al. Defining inflammatory cell states in rheumatoid arthritis joint synovial tissues by integrating single-cell transcriptomics and mass cytometry. Nat Immunol 2019; 20: 928–942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Giavazzi R, Garofalo A, Bani MR, et al. Interleukin 1-induced augmentation of experimental metastases from a human melanoma in nude mice. Cancer Res 1990; 50: 4771–4775. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Mantovani A, Dinarello CA, Molgora M, et al. Interleukin-1 and related cytokines in the regulation of inflammation and immunity. Immunity 2019; 50: 778–795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Wellenstein MD, Coffelt SB, Duits DEM, et al. Loss of p53 triggers WNT-dependent systemic inflammation to drive breast cancer metastasis. Nature 2019; 572: 538–542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Kang S, Tanaka T, Narazaki M, et al. Targeting interleukin-6 signaling in clinic. Immunity 2019; 50: 1007–1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Corzo CA, Cotter MJ, Cheng P, et al. Mechanism regulating reactive oxygen species in tumor-induced myeloid-derived suppressor cells. J Immunol 2009; 182: 5693–5701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Maude SL, Laetsch TW, Buechner J, et al. Tisagenlecleucel in children and young adults with B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 439–448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Kulbe H, Thompson R, Wilson JL, et al. The inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha generates an autocrine tumor-promoting network in epithelial ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Res 2007; 67: 585–592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. El-Omar EM, Carrington M, Chow WH, et al. Interleukin-1 polymorphisms associated with increased risk of gastric cancer. Nature 2000; 404: 398–402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Eric Tzyy Jiann C, Jun Wei N, Ping-Chin L. Classification and medical applications of biomaterials–a mini review. Bio 2023; 4: 54–61. [Google Scholar]
- 121. Wu Y, Wang Y, Long L, et al. A spatiotemporal release platform based on pH/ROS stimuli-responsive hydrogel in wound repairing. J Control Release 2022; 341: 147–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Liu Y, Yang X, Wu K, et al. Skin-inspired and self-regulated hydrophobic hydrogel for diabetic wound therapy. Adv Mater 2025; n/a: 2414989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Huang J, Yang R, Jiao J, et al. A click chemistry-mediated all-peptide cell printing hydrogel platform for diabetic wound healing. Nat Commun 2023; 14: 7856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Shi M, Xu Q, Ding L, et al. Cell infiltrative inner connected porous hydrogel improves neural stem cell migration and differentiation for functional repair of spinal cord injury. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2022; 8: 5307–5318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Shen Y, Li B, Hao G, et al. A CRISPR/Cas12a-based direct transverse relaxation time biosensor via hydrogel sol-gel transition for Salmonella detection. Food Chem 2025; 470: 142693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Roy A, Zenker S, Jain S, et al. A highly stretchable, conductive, and transparent bioadhesive hydrogel as a flexible sensor for enhanced real-time human health monitoring. Adv Mater 2024; 36: 2404225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Jalali S, Ardjmand M, Ramavandi B, et al. Removal of amoxicillin from wastewater in the presence of H(2)O(2) using modified zeolite Y- MgO catalyst: an optimization study. Chemosphere 2021; 274: 129844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Yin S, Wu H, Huang Y, et al. Structurally and mechanically tuned macroporous hydrogels for scalable mesenchymal stem cell-extracellular matrix spheroid production. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024; 121: e2404210121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Huang Y, Zia N, Ma Y, et al. Colloidal hydrogel with staged sequestration and release of molecules undergoing competitive binding. ACS Nano 2024; 18: 25841–25851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Cui W, Gong C, Liu Y, et al. Composite antibacterial hydrogels based on two natural products pullulan and epsilon-poly-l-lysine for burn wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol 2024; 277: 134208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Su Y, Tian L, Yu M, et al. Cationic peptidopolysaccharides synthesized by ‘click’ chemistry with enhanced broad-spectrum antimicrobial activities. Polym Chem 2017; 8: 3788–3800. [Google Scholar]
- 132. Blažic R, Kučić Grgić D, Kraljić Roković M, et al. Cellulose-g-poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethylmethacrylate) hydrogels: synthesis, characterization, antibacterial testing and polymer electrolyte application. Gels 2022; 8: 636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. de Ávila Gonçalves S, da Fonsêca JHL, d’Ávila MA, et al. Synthesis of thermally and pH-responsive poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate)-based hydrogel reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals for sustained drug release. Int J Biol Macromol 2024; 277: 134168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Shi C, Wang X, Wang L, et al. A nanotrap improves survival in severe sepsis by attenuating hyperinflammation. Nat Commun 2020; 11: 3384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Li Y, Ma B, Wang Z, et al. The effect mechanism of N6-adenosine methylation (m6A) in melatonin regulated LPS-induced colon inflammation. Int J Biol Sci 2024; 20: 2491–2506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Gao Y, Yu S, Chen M, et al. cFLIP(S) regulates alternative NLRP3 inflammasome activation in human monocytes. Cell Mol Immunol 2023; 20: 1203–1215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. An SJ, Pae HO, Oh GS, et al. Inhibition of TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, and IL-6 productions and NF-kappa B activation in lipopolysaccharide-activated RAW 264.7 macrophages by catalposide, an iridoid glycoside isolated from Catalpa ovata G. Don (Bignoniaceae). Int Immunopharmacol 2002; 2: 1173–1181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Zhang K, Yang C, Cheng C, et al. Bioactive injectable hydrogel dressings for bacteria-infected diabetic wound healing: a “pull-push” approach. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2022; 14: 26404–26417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Monteleone M, Stanley AC, Chen KW, et al. Interleukin-1beta maturation triggers its relocation to the plasma membrane for Gasdermin-D-dependent and -independent secretion. Cell Rep 2018; 24: 1425–1433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Varghese JN, Moritz RL, Lou MZ, et al. Structure of the extracellular domains of the human interleukin-6 receptor alpha-chain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99: 15959–15964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Andrade H, Lin W, Zhang Y. Specificity from nonspecific interaction: regulation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha activity by DNA. J Biol Chem 2019; 294: 6397–6404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Handel TM, Johnson Z, Crown SE, et al. Regulation of protein function by glycosaminoglycans–as exemplified by chemokines. Annu Rev Biochem 2005; 74: 385–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Zhang X, Feng J, Feng W, et al. Glycosaminoglycan-based hydrogel delivery system regulates the wound microenvironment to rescue chronic wound healing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2022; 14: 31737–31750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Peng Y, He D, Ge X, et al. Construction of heparin-based hydrogel incorporated with Cu5.4O ultrasmall nanozymes for wound healing and inflammation inhibition. Bioact Mater 2021; 6: 3109–3124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Turnbull J, Powell A, Guimond S. Heparan sulfate: decoding a dynamic multifunctional cell regulator. Trends Cell Biol 2001; 11: 75–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Cardin AD, Weintraub HJ. Molecular modeling of protein-glycosaminoglycan interactions. Arteriosclerosis 1989; 9: 21–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Spillmann D, Witt D, Lindahl U. Defining the interleukin-8-binding domain of heparan sulfate. J Biol Chem 1998; 273: 15487–15493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. Zhou Z, Deng T, Tao M, et al. Snail-inspired AFG/GelMA hydrogel accelerates diabetic wound healing via inflammatory cytokines suppression and macrophage polarization. Biomaterials 2023; 299: 122141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Hao Y, Li H, Guo J, et al. Bio-Inspired antioxidant heparin-mimetic peptide hydrogel for radiation-induced skin injury repair. Adv Healthc Mater 2023; 12: e2203387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Wang D, Wang S, Zhou Z, et al. White blood cell membrane-coated nanoparticles: recent development and medical applications. Adv Healthc Mater 2022; 11: e2101349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Zhang Q, Hu C, Feng J, et al. Anti-inflammatory mechanisms of neutrophil membrane-coated nanoparticles without drug loading. J Control Release 2024; 369: 12–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. Gao C, Huang Q, Liu C, et al. Treatment of atherosclerosis by macrophage-biomimetic nanoparticles via targeted pharmacotherapy and sequestration of proinflammatory cytokines. Nat Commun 2020; 11: 2622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Hu CM, Fang RH, Wang KC, et al. Nanoparticle biointerfacing by platelet membrane cloaking. Nature 2015; 526: 118–121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154. Fang RH, Hu CM, Luk BT, et al. Cancer cell membrane-coated nanoparticles for anticancer vaccination and drug delivery. Nano Lett 2014; 14: 2181–2188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Xuan M, Shao J, Dai L, et al. Macrophage cell membrane camouflaged mesoporous silica nanocapsules for in vivo cancer therapy. Adv Healthc Mater 2015; 4: 1645–1652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156. Daly AC, Riley L, Segura T, et al. Hydrogel microparticles for biomedical applications. Nat Rev Mater 2020; 5: 20–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. Xiao P, Han X, Huang Y, et al. Reprogramming macrophages via immune cell mobilized hydrogel microspheres for osteoarthritis treatments. Bioact Mater 2024; 32: 242–259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Wang Z, Xiang L, Lin F, et al. Inhaled ACE2-engineered microfluidic microsphere for intratracheal neutralization of COVID-19 and calming of the cytokine storm. Matters 2022; 5: 2094–2362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159. Wen X, Xi K, Tang Y, et al. Immunized microspheres engineered hydrogel membrane for reprogramming macrophage and mucosal repair. Small 2023; 19: e2207030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160. Friedrich EE, Sun LT, Natesan S, et al. Effects of hyaluronic acid conjugation on anti-TNF-alpha inhibition of inflammation in burns. J Biomed Mater Res 2014; 102: 1527–1536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161. Kaplan JA, Barthélémy P, Grinstaff MW. Self-assembled nanofiber hydrogels for mechanoresponsive therapeutic anti-TNF alpha antibody delivery. Chem Commun 2016; 52: 5860–5863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162. Liu S, Zhao M, Zhou Y, et al. A self-assembling peptide hydrogel-based drug co-delivery platform to improve tissue repair after ischemia-reperfusion injury. Acta Biomater 2020; 103: 102–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163. Sun LT, Buchholz KS, Lotze MT, et al. Cytokine binding by polysaccharide-antibody conjugates. Mol Pharm 2010; 7: 1769–1777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164. Sun LT, Bencherif SA, Gilbert TW, et al. Biological activities of cytokine-neutralizing hyaluronic acid-antibody conjugates. Wound Repair Regen 2010; 18: 302–310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165. Sun LT, Friedrich E, Heuslein JL, et al. Reduction of burn progression with topical delivery of (antitumor necrosis factor-alpha)-hyaluronic acid conjugates. Wound Repair Regen 2012; 20: 563–572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166. Guo M, Pitet LM, Wyss HM, et al. Tough stimuli-responsive supramolecular hydrogels with hydrogen-bonding network junctions. J Am Chem Soc 2014; 136: 6969–6977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167. Xing R, Liu K, Jiao T, et al. An injectable self-assembling collagen–gold hybrid hydrogel for combinatorial antitumor photothermal/photodynamic therapy. Adv Mater 2016; 28: 3669–3676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168. Saiding Q, Cai Z, Deng L, et al. Inflammation self-limiting electrospun fibrous tape via regional immunity for deep soft tissue repair. Small 2022; 18: e2203265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169. Luo C, Xie R, Zhang J, et al. Low-Temperature three-dimensional printing of tissue cartilage engineered with gelatin methacrylamide. Tissue Eng Part C: Methods 2020; 26: 306–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170. Ding T, Xiao Y, Saiding Q, et al. Capture and storage of cell-free DNA via bio-informational hydrogel microspheres. Adv Mater 2024; 36: e2403557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171. Shi D, Zhang C, Li X, et al. An electrochemical paper-based hydrogel immunosensor to monitor serum cytokine for predicting the severity of COVID-19 patients. Biosens Bioelectron 2023; 220: 114898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172. Cheng F, Su T, Liu Y, et al. Targeting lymph nodes for systemic immunosuppression using cell-free-DNA-scavenging and cGAS-inhibiting nanomedicine-in-hydrogel for rheumatoid arthritis immunotherapy. Adv Sci 2023; 10: 2302575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173. Zhao Z, Wang Z, Li G, et al. Injectable microfluidic hydrogel microspheres for cell and drug delivery. Adv Funct Mater 2021; 31: 2103339. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202103339 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 174. Tumburu L, Ghosh-Choudhary S, Seifuddin FT, et al. Circulating mitochondrial DNA is a proinflammatory DAMP in sickle cell disease. Blood 2021; 137: 3116–3126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175. Han DSC, Lo YMD. The nexus of cfDNA and nuclease biology. Trends Genet 2021; 37: 758–770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176. Choi W, Kohane DS. Hybrid nanoparticle-hydrogel systems for drug delivery depots and other biomedical applications. ACS Nano 2024; 18: 22780–22792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177. Liu J, Zhang SM, Chen PP, et al. Controlled release of insulin from PLGA nanoparticles embedded within PVA hydrogels. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007; 18: 2205–2210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178. Yang H, Tyagi P, Kadam RS, et al. Hybrid dendrimer hydrogel/PLGA nanoparticle platform sustains drug delivery for one week and antiglaucoma effects for four days following one-time topical administration. ACS Nano 2012; 6: 7595–7606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179. Rahimian A, Siltanen C, Feyzizarnagh H, et al. Microencapsulated immunoassays for detection of cytokines in human blood. ACS Sens 2019; 4: 578–585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180. Hsu MN, Wei S-C, Phan D-T, et al. Nano-in-Micro smart hydrogel composite for a rapid sensitive immunoassay. Adv Healthc Mater 2019; 8: 1801277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181. Yao Z-Y, Gong J-S, Jiang J-Y, et al. Unraveling the intricacies of glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis: decoding the molecular symphony in understanding complex polysaccharide assembly. Biotechnol Adv 2024; 75: 108416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182. Kogan G, Soltés L, Stern R, et al. Hyaluronic acid: a natural biopolymer with a broad range of biomedical and industrial applications. Biotechnol Lett 2007; 29: 17–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183. Bohaumilitzky L, Huber AK, Stork EM, et al. A trickster in disguise: hyaluronan’s ambivalent roles in the matrix. Front Oncol 2017; 7: 242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184. Piperigkou Z, Götte M, Theocharis AD, et al. Insights into the key roles of epigenetics in matrix macromolecules-associated wound healing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2018; 129: 16–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185. Nečas J, Bartošíková L, Brauner P, et al. Hyaluronic acid (hyaluronan): a review. Vet Med 2018; 53: 397–411. [Google Scholar]
- 186. Litwiniuk M, Krejner A, Grzela T. Hyaluronic acid in inflammation and tissue regeneration. Wounds 2016; 28: 78–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187. Bollyky PL, Lord JD, Masewicz SA, et al. Cutting edge: high molecular weight hyaluronan promotes the suppressive effects of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. J Immunol 2007; 179: 744–747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188. Day AJ, de la Motte CA. Hyaluronan cross-linking: a protective mechanism in inflammation? Trends Immunol 2005; 26: 637–643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189. Puré E, Cuff CA. A crucial role for CD44 in inflammation. Trends Mol Med 2001; 7: 213–221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190. Fallacara A, Baldini E, Manfredini S, et al. Hyaluronic acid in the third millennium. Polymers 2018; 10: 701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191. Burdick JA, Prestwich GD. Hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Mater 2011; 23: H41–H56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192. Graça MFP, Miguel SP, Cabral CSD, et al. Hyaluronic acid-Based wound dressings: a review. Carbohydr Polym 2020; 241: 116364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193. Li H, Xue Y, Jia B, et al. The preparation of hyaluronic acid grafted pullulan polymers and their use in the formation of novel biocompatible wound healing film. Carbohydr Polym 2018; 188: 92–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194. Ding YW, Wang ZY, Ren ZW, et al. Advances in modified hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels for skin wound healing. Biomater Sci 2022; 10: 3393–3409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195. Qi J, Li X, Cao Y, et al. Locationally activated PRP via an injectable dual-network hydrogel for endometrial regeneration. Biomaterials 2024; 309: 122615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196. Shi W, Fang F, Kong Y, et al. Dynamic hyaluronic acid hydrogel with covalent linked gelatin as an anti-oxidative bioink for cartilage tissue engineering. Biofabrication 2021; 14: 014107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197. Benedetti L, Cortivo R, Berti T, et al. Biocompatibility and biodegradation of different hyaluronan derivatives (Hyaff) implanted in rats. Biomaterials 1993; 14: 1154–1160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198. Liang Y, Kiick KL. Heparin-functionalized polymeric biomaterials in tissue engineering and drug delivery applications. Acta Biomater 2014; 10: 1588–1600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199. Baldwin AD, Robinson KG, Militar JL, et al. In situ crosslinkable heparin-containing poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels for sustained anticoagulant release. J Biomed Mater Res 2012; 100: 2106–2118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200. Lu Y, Li H, Wang J, et al. Engineering bacteria-activated multifunctionalized hydrogel for promoting diabetic wound healing. Adv Funct Mater 2021; 31: 2105749. [Google Scholar]
- 201. Fernández-Muiños T, Recha-Sancho L, López-Chicón P, et al. Bimolecular based heparin and self-assembling hydrogel for tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater 2015; 16: 35–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202. Shamskhou EA, Kratochvil MJ, Orcholski ME, et al. Hydrogel-based delivery of il-10 improves treatment of bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis in mice. Biomaterials 2019; 203: 52–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203. Schindewolf M, Lindhoff-Last E, Ludwig RJ, et al. Heparin-induced skin lesions. Lancet 2012; 380: 1867–1879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204. Khandelwal S, Arepally GM. Immune pathogenesis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Thromb Haemost 2016; 116: 792–798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205. Warkentin TE, Greinacher A. Heparin-induced anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions: two distinct but overlapping syndromes. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2009; 8: 129–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206. Mishra S, Ganguli M. Functions of, and replenishment strategies for, chondroitin sulfate in the human body. Drug Discov Today 2021; 26: 1185–1199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207. Sharma R, Kuche K, Thakor P, et al. Chondroitin sulfate: emerging biomaterial for biopharmaceutical purpose and tissue engineering. Carbohydr Polym 2022; 286: 119305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208. Mantry S, Behera A, Pradhan S, et al. Polysaccharide-based chondroitin sulfate macromolecule loaded hydrogel/scaffolds in wound healing- a comprehensive review on possibilities, research gaps, and safety assessment. Int J Biol Macromol 2024; 279: 135410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209. Wang J, Zhao W, Chen H, et al. Anti-tumor study of chondroitin sulfate-methotrexate nanogels. Nanoscale Res Lett 2017; 12: 572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210. Zhou L, Fan L, Zhang FM, et al. Hybrid gelatin/oxidized chondroitin sulfate hydrogels incorporating bioactive glass nanoparticles with enhanced mechanical properties, mineralization, and osteogenic differentiation. Bioact Mater 2021; 6: 890–904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211. Alinejad Y, Adoungotchodo A, Hui E, et al. An injectable chitosan/chondroitin sulfate hydrogel with tunable mechanical properties for cell therapy/tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 2018; 113: 132–141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212. Greinacher A, Michels I, Schäfer M, et al. Heparin-associated thrombocytopenia in a patient treated with polysulphated chondroitin sulphate: evidence for immunological crossreactivity between heparin and polysulphated glycosaminoglycan. Br J Haematol 1992; 81: 252–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213. Greinacher A, Warkentin TE. Contaminated heparin. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1291–1292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214. Abourehab MAS, Pramanik S, Abdelgawad MA, et al. Recent advances of chitosan formulations in biomedical applications. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23: 10975. DOI: 10.3390/ijms231810975 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215. Kean T, Thanou M. Biodegradation, biodistribution and toxicity of chitosan. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2010; 62: 3–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216. Jiang Z, Li L, Li H, et al. Preparation, biocompatibility, and wound healing effects of O-carboxymethyl chitosan nonwoven fabrics in partial-thickness burn model. Carbohydr Polym 2022; 280: 119032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217. Matica MA, Aachmann FL, Tøndervik A, et al. Chitosan as a wound dressing starting material: antimicrobial properties and mode of action. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20: 5889. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20235889 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218. Hao H, Wu S, Lin J, et al. Immunization against Zika by entrapping live virus in a subcutaneous self-adjuvanting hydrogel. Nat Biomed Eng 2023; 7: 928–942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219. Malette WG, Quigley HJ, Gaines RD, et al. Chitosan: a new hemostatic. Ann Thorac Surg 1983; 36: 55–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220. Hao R, Peng X, Zhang Y, et al. Rapid hemostasis resulting from the synergism of self-assembling short peptide and O-carboxymethyl chitosan. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2020; 12: 55574–55583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221. Xu J, Chang L, Xiong Y, et al. Chitosan-based hydrogels as antibacterial/antioxidant/anti-inflammation multifunctional dressings for chronic wound healing. Adv Healthc Mater 2024; 13: e2401490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222. Zitka O, Kukacka J, Krizkova S, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases. Curr Med Chem 2010; 17: 3751–3768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223. Koshy ST, Ferrante TC, Lewin SA, et al. Injectable, porous, and cell-responsive gelatin cryogels. Biomaterials 2014; 35: 2477–2487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224. Xiang L, Cui W. Biomedical application of photo-crosslinked gelatin hydrogels. J Leather Sci Eng 2021; 3: 3. [Google Scholar]
- 225. Piao Y, You H, Xu T, et al. Biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels. Eng Regen 2021; 2: 47–56. [Google Scholar]
- 226. Li X, Li X, Yang J, et al. Living and injectable porous hydrogel microsphere with paracrine activity for cartilage regeneration. Small 2023; 19: 2207211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227. Liu D, Nikoo M, Boran G, et al. Collagen and gelatin. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol 2015; 6: 527–557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228. Ahmady A, Abu Samah NH. A review: gelatine as a bioadhesive material for medical and pharmaceutical applications. Int J Pharm 2021; 608: 121037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229. Jiang Y, Yuan IH, Dutille EK, et al. Preventing iatrogenic gelatin anaphylaxis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2019; 123: 366–374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230. Teli MS, Jhawat V, Sharma AK. Development of a comprehensive regulatory model for medical devices. BIO Integr 2024; 5: 5. [Google Scholar]









