Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biochemical Journal logoLink to Biochemical Journal
. 1999 Jan 15;337(Pt 2):297–304.

Crystal structure of the catalytic core domain of the family 6 cellobiohydrolase II, Cel6A, from Humicola insolens, at 1.92 A resolution.

A Varrot 1, S Hastrup 1, M Schülein 1, G J Davies 1
PMCID: PMC1219965  PMID: 9882628

Abstract

The three-dimensional structure of the catalytic core of the family 6 cellobiohydrolase II, Cel6A (CBH II), from Humicola insolens has been determined by X-ray crystallography at a resolution of 1.92 A. The structure was solved by molecular replacement using the homologous Trichoderma reesei CBH II as a search model. The H. insolens enzyme displays a high degree of structural similarity with its T. reesei equivalent. The structure features both O- (alpha-linked mannose) and N-linked glycosylation and a hexa-co-ordinate Mg2+ ion. The active-site residues are located within the enclosed tunnel that is typical for cellobiohydrolase enzymes and which may permit a processive hydrolysis of the cellulose substrate. The close structural similarity between the two enzymes implies that kinetics and chain-end specificity experiments performed on the H. insolens enzyme are likely to be applicable to the homologous T. reesei enzyme. These cast doubt on the description of cellobiohydrolases as exo-enzymes since they demonstrated that Cel6A (CBH II) shows no requirement for non-reducing chain-ends, as had been presumed. There is no crystallographic evidence in the present structure to support a mechanism involving loop opening, yet preliminary modelling experiments suggest that the active-site tunnel of Cel6A (CBH II) is too narrow to permit entry of a fluorescenyl-derivatized substrate, known to be a viable substrate for this enzyme.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (308.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amano Y., Shiroishi M., Nisizawa K., Hoshino E., Kanda T. Fine substrate specificities of four exo-type cellulases produced by Aspergillus niger, Trichoderma reesei, and Irpex lacteus on (1-->3), (1-->4)-beta-D-glucans and xyloglucan. J Biochem. 1996 Dec;120(6):1123–1129. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a021531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Armand S., Drouillard S., Schülein M., Henrissat B., Driguez H. A bifunctionalized fluorogenic tetrasaccharide as a substrate to study cellulases. J Biol Chem. 1997 Jan 31;272(5):2709–2713. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.5.2709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bayer E. A., Morag E., Lamed R. The cellulosome--a treasure-trove for biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 1994 Sep;12(9):379–386. doi: 10.1016/0167-7799(94)90039-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bernstein F. C., Koetzle T. F., Williams G. J., Meyer E. F., Jr, Brice M. D., Rodgers J. R., Kennard O., Shimanouchi T., Tasumi M. The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol. 1977 May 25;112(3):535–542. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80200-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Damude H. G., Ferro V., Withers S. G., Warren R. A. Substrate specificity of endoglucanase A from Cellulomonas fimi: fundamental differences between endoglucanases and exoglucanases from family 6. Biochem J. 1996 Apr 15;315(Pt 2):467–472. doi: 10.1042/bj3150467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Damude H. G., Withers S. G., Kilburn D. G., Miller R. C., Jr, Warren R. A. Site-directed mutation of the putative catalytic residues of endoglucanase CenA from Cellulomonas fimi. Biochemistry. 1995 Feb 21;34(7):2220–2224. doi: 10.1021/bi00007a016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Davies G. J. Structural studies on cellulases. Biochem Soc Trans. 1998 May;26(2):167–173. doi: 10.1042/bst0260167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Davies G. J., Tolley S. P., Henrissat B., Hjort C., Schülein M. Structures of oligosaccharide-bound forms of the endoglucanase V from Humicola insolens at 1.9 A resolution. Biochemistry. 1995 Dec 12;34(49):16210–16220. doi: 10.1021/bi00049a037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Davies G., Henrissat B. Structures and mechanisms of glycosyl hydrolases. Structure. 1995 Sep 15;3(9):853–859. doi: 10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00220-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gilkes N. R., Henrissat B., Kilburn D. G., Miller R. C., Jr, Warren R. A. Domains in microbial beta-1, 4-glycanases: sequence conservation, function, and enzyme families. Microbiol Rev. 1991 Jun;55(2):303–315. doi: 10.1128/mr.55.2.303-315.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hehre E. J., Brewer C. F., Genghof D. S. Scope and mechanism of carbohydrase action. Hydrolytic and nonhydrolytic actions of beta-amylase on alpha- and beta-maltosyl fluoride. J Biol Chem. 1979 Jul 10;254(13):5942–5950. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Henrissat B. A classification of glycosyl hydrolases based on amino acid sequence similarities. Biochem J. 1991 Dec 1;280(Pt 2):309–316. doi: 10.1042/bj2800309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Henrissat B., Bairoch A. New families in the classification of glycosyl hydrolases based on amino acid sequence similarities. Biochem J. 1993 Aug 1;293(Pt 3):781–788. doi: 10.1042/bj2930781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Henrissat B., Bairoch A. Updating the sequence-based classification of glycosyl hydrolases. Biochem J. 1996 Jun 1;316(Pt 2):695–696. doi: 10.1042/bj3160695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Henrissat B., Davies G. Structural and sequence-based classification of glycoside hydrolases. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1997 Oct;7(5):637–644. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(97)80072-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jencks W. P. Utilization of binding energy and coupling rules for active transport and other coupled vectorial processes. Methods Enzymol. 1989;171:145–164. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(89)71010-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Koivula A., Reinikainen T., Ruohonen L., Valkeajärvi A., Claeyssens M., Teleman O., Kleywegt G. J., Szardenings M., Rouvinen J., Jones T. A. The active site of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase II: the role of tyrosine 169. Protein Eng. 1996 Aug;9(8):691–699. doi: 10.1093/protein/9.8.691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Konstantinidis A. K., Marsden I., Sinnott M. L. Hydrolyses of alpha- and beta-cellobiosyl fluorides by cellobiohydrolases of Trichoderma reesei. Biochem J. 1993 May 1;291(Pt 3):883–888. doi: 10.1042/bj2910883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kraulis J., Clore G. M., Nilges M., Jones T. A., Pettersson G., Knowles J., Gronenborn A. M. Determination of the three-dimensional solution structure of the C-terminal domain of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. A study using nuclear magnetic resonance and hybrid distance geometry-dynamical simulated annealing. Biochemistry. 1989 Sep 5;28(18):7241–7257. doi: 10.1021/bi00444a016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lamzin V. S., Wilson K. S. Automated refinement of protein models. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1993 Jan 1;49(Pt 1):129–147. doi: 10.1107/S0907444992008886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Matthews B. W. Solvent content of protein crystals. J Mol Biol. 1968 Apr 28;33(2):491–497. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(68)90205-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. McCarter J. D., Withers S. G. Mechanisms of enzymatic glycoside hydrolysis. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1994 Dec;4(6):885–892. doi: 10.1016/0959-440x(94)90271-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Meinke A., Damude H. G., Tomme P., Kwan E., Kilburn D. G., Miller R. C., Jr, Warren R. A., Gilkes N. R. Enhancement of the endo-beta-1,4-glucanase activity of an exocellobiohydrolase by deletion of a surface loop. J Biol Chem. 1995 Mar 3;270(9):4383–4386. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.9.4383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Murshudov G. N., Vagin A. A., Dodson E. J. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1997 May 1;53(Pt 3):240–255. doi: 10.1107/S0907444996012255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. RAMACHANDRAN G. N., RAMAKRISHNAN C., SASISEKHARAN V. Stereochemistry of polypeptide chain configurations. J Mol Biol. 1963 Jul;7:95–99. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(63)80023-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Robyt J. F., French D. Multiple attach hypothesis of alpha-amylase action: action of porcine pancreatic, human salivary, and Aspergillus oryzae alpha-amylases. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1967 Oct;122(1):8–16. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(67)90118-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rouvinen J., Bergfors T., Teeri T., Knowles J. K., Jones T. A. Three-dimensional structure of cellobiohydrolase II from Trichoderma reesei. Science. 1990 Jul 27;249(4967):380–386. doi: 10.1126/science.2377893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schou C., Rasmussen G., Kaltoft M. B., Henrissat B., Schülein M. Stereochemistry, specificity and kinetics of the hydrolysis of reduced cellodextrins by nine cellulases. Eur J Biochem. 1993 Nov 1;217(3):947–953. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb18325.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Spezio M., Wilson D. B., Karplus P. A. Crystal structure of the catalytic domain of a thermophilic endocellulase. Biochemistry. 1993 Sep 28;32(38):9906–9916. doi: 10.1021/bi00089a006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ståhlberg J., Johansson G., Pettersson G. Trichoderma reesei has no true exo-cellulase: all intact and truncated cellulases produce new reducing end groups on cellulose. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1993 May 7;1157(1):107–113. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(93)90085-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Törrönen A., Harkki A., Rouvinen J. Three-dimensional structure of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase II from Trichoderma reesei: two conformational states in the active site. EMBO J. 1994 Jun 1;13(11):2493–2501. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06536.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biochemical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biochemical Society

RESOURCES