Skip to main content
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology logoLink to Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
. 1998 Jul;124(6):326–328. doi: 10.1007/s004320050177

Evidence that a “treatment-free interval of less than 6 months” does not equate with clinically defined platinum resistance in ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal carcinoma

Maurie Markman 1, Alexander Kennedy 1, Kenneth Webster 1, Barbara Kulp 1, Gertrude Peterson 1, Jerome Belinson 1
PMCID: PMC12200030  PMID: 9692840

Abstract

The standard definition of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal carcinoma commonly includes patients whose disease initially responded to a platinum-based combination regimen, but recurred less than 6 months after the completion of primary therapy. Recent experience with several patients with these malignancies treated in the Gynecologic Cancer Program of the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, whose disease recurred within this period but who subsequently responded to platinum therapy, calls into question the validity and clinical relevance of this commonly employed definition, both for the conduct of phase 2 trials of new agents in ovarian cancer and primary peritoneal carcinoma, and for the standard management of women in this clinical setting.

Keywords: Key words Ovarian cancer, Platinum resistance, Peritoneal carcinoma, Treatment-free interval

Footnotes

Received: 9 February 1998 /  Accepted: 20 March 1998


Articles from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES