Skip to main content
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology logoLink to Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
. 1995 Mar;121(Suppl 3):R7–R10. doi: 10.1007/BF02351064

Phase I/II trial of dexverapamil, epirubicin and granulocyte/macrophage-colony-stimulating factor in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

W Scheithauer 1,, G Kornek 1, M Raderer 1, K Koperna-Mach 1, C Müller 2, J Karner 3, J Kastner 4, C Tetzner 5
PMCID: PMC12200782  PMID: 8698741

Abstract

A group of 28 previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were entered in this phase I/II study. Treatment consisted of oral dexverapamil 1000–1200 mg/day for 3 days, epirubicin given as an intravenous bolus injection on day 2 with a starting dose of 90 mg/m2, and 400 μg granulocyte/macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) administered subcutaneously from day 5 through 14. Epirubicin dose escalation levels were 90, 105, 120 and 135 mg/m2. Consecutive cohorts of 4–8 patients were planned at each dose level. Treatment cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Haematological toxicity, specifically granulocytopenia constituted the dose-limiting toxicity with a maximum tolerated dose of 120 mg/m2 for epirubicin. Despite routine supportive therapy with GM-CSF, 4, 2, and 5 patients experienced grade 4 granulocytopenia during their first two treatment courses at levels of 105, 120, and 135 mg/m2 respectively. Non-haematological toxicity was uncommon, generally modest, and did not demonstrate a clear relationship with the anthracycline dose. Dexverapamil-related cardiovascular symptoms occurred frequently, but they never resulted in serious toxicity requiring active medical intervention or permanent discontinuation of therapy. Of the 28 patients, 9 achieved partial responses to this therapy. The recommended dose of epirubicin for this regimen with dexverapamil and GM-CSF is 120 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Therapeutic results suggest this regimen to be an effective and tolerable treatment strategy in pancreatic cancer, which should be evaluated further.

Key words: Dexverapamil, Multidrug resistance, Pancreatic cancer

Abbreviations

DVPM

dexverapamil

ECG

electrocardiogram

GM-CSF

recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor

MDR

multidrug resistance

MTD

maximum tolerated dose

References

  1. Altavilla S, Adaao V, Alafaci E, et al (1991) High dose epirubicin in the treatment of advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (abstract). Eur J Cancer 27 [Suppl 2]:74 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bonadonna G, Gianni L, Santoro A, et al (1993) Drugs ten years later: epirubicin. Ann Oncol 4:359–369 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brennan MF, Kinsella TJ, Casper ES (1993) Cancer of the pancreas. In: De Vita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA (eds) Cancer: principles and practice of oncology, 4th edn. Lippincott Philadelphia, pp 849–882 [Google Scholar]
  4. Echizen H, Brecht T, Niedergesass S, et al (1985) The effect of dextro-levo-, and racemic verapamil on atrioventricular conduction in humans. Am Heart J 109:210–214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goldstein LJ, Galski H, Fojo A, et al (1989) Expression of a multidrug resistance gene in human cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:116–123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kerr DJ, Graham J, Cummings J (1986) The effect of verapamil on the pharmacokinetics of Adriamycin. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 18:239–242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Loven D, Figer A, Vigler N, et al (1989) Epirubicin in the treatment of advanced carcinoma of the pancreas (abstract). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 8:113 [Google Scholar]
  8. Lum BL, Kaubisch S, Yahanda AM, et al (1992) Alteration of etoposide pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics by cyclosporine in a phase I trial to modulate multidrug resistance. J Clin Oncol 10:1635–1642 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pastan I, Gottesman MM (1987) Multidrug resistance in human cancer. N Engl J Med 316:1388–1393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Plumb JA, Milroy R, Kaye SB (1990) The activity of verapamil as a resistance modifier in vitro in drug-resistant human tumour cell lines is not stereospecific. Biochem Pharmacol 39:787–792 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Scheithauer W, Schenk T, Czejka M (1993) Pharmacokinetic interaction between epirubicin and the multidrug resistance reverting agent d-verapamil. Br J Cancer 68:8–9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Schulz G, Frisch J, Greifenberg B, et al (1991) New therapeutic modalities for the clinical use of rhGM-CSF in patients with malignancies. Am J Clin Oncol 14 [Suppl 1]:19–26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wils J, Bleiberg J, Blijham G, et al (1995) Phase II study of epirubicin in advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 21:191–194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yahanda ABM, Adler KM, Fisher GA, et al (1992) Phase I trial of etoposide with cyclosporine as a modulator of multidrug resistance. J Clin Oncol 10:1624–1634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES