Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2025 Jun 16;19(6):e0013205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013205

Virological characterization of a new isolated strain of Andes virus involved in the recent person-to-person transmission outbreak reported in Argentina

Rocio Coelho 1,#, Sebastian Kehl 1,*,#, Natalia Periolo 1, Emiliano Biondo 2, Daniel Alonso 1, Celeste Perez 1, Darío Fernández Do Porto 3, Gustavo Palacios 4, Alexis Edelstein 1, Carla Bellomo 1, Valeria Paula Martinez 1
Editor: Jonas Klingström5
PMCID: PMC12201636  PMID: 40523041

Abstract

On November 2, 2018, a person-to-person transmission outbreak of Andes virus (Orthohantavirus andesense) began in the small town of Epuyén, Argentina. The strain demonstrated a high capacity for sustained transmission among the human population requiring the implementation of quarantine measures, rigorous contact tracing, isolation of close contacts, and active clinical monitoring to prevent further spread. In this study, we report the isolation of this strain, which we name the ARG-Epuyén strain, directly from a clinical sample after just three passages in cell culture. Complete sequencing revealed only a single amino acid change post-isolation, suggesting that this strain can be considered a non-adapted wild-type Andes virus, marking a critical step toward the development of medical countermeasures against this emerging pathogen. The pathogenicity and transmissibility potential of ARG-Epuyén were evaluated in hamsters, the only animal model for Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome. Additionally, this strain was compared with Andes/ARG, an ANDV strain previously isolated from the same geographical area in the Argentinian Patagonia, from a rodent specimen. Our findings revealed high infectiousness and efficient hamster-to-hamster transmission through direct contact experiments, although ARG-Epuyén appeared to be less pathogenic than Andes/ARG.

Author summary

Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome (HPS) in Argentina is a devastating disease with a fatality rates up to 50%. Andes virus (ANDV) is the most frequent causative agent of this infection in Argentina, and was associated with two outbreaks of sustained person-to-person transmission. The paucity of studies for vaccine development and other medical countermeasures (MCMs) against hantaviruses was partially due to the limited access to wild type viral strains and the lack of animal models of diseases. American hantaviruses are very difficult to isolate “in vitro” and “in vivo”, and there are only three strains of ANDV from Chile and Argentina that could be propagated in cell culture, but none of them were associated to person-to-person transmission. Also, the ANDV strain most used in “in vitro” and “in vivo” studies were not involved in human disease and has a unclear history of cell passages. In our work we report the isolation of an ANDV strain associated with disease in humans but, most importantly, with person-to-person transmission (Epuyén outbreak in 2018). In this article we also describe the results of the characterization of this strain proving its ability to infect and spread efficiently between hamsters. Our work represents a critical step towards the development of MCMs against this emerging pathogen.

Introduction

Hantaviruses (Bunyaviricetes: Elliovirales: Hantaviridae: Mammantavirinae) are enveloped, single stranded, negative sense RNA viruses with three-segmented genome. The genomic segments consist of a small segment (S), a medium segment (M), and a large segment (L), which encode the nucleocapsid (N) protein, a nonstructural protein (NSs) in some species, surface glycoproteins (Gn and Gc), and an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), respectively [1]. Hantaviruses are distributed worldwide and are hosted by various vertebrate animal species. Pathogenic hantaviruses are primarily associated with rodents as natural reservoirs and are classified under the genus Orthohantavirus. These viruses establish seemingly asymptomatic and chronic infections in several rodent species. The risks of viral spillover have increased due to new farming practices, climate change, the expansion of rural human settlements, and disruptions to the zoonotic interface. Additionally, rural tourism has led to travel-related cases [24].

Several species of orthohantaviruses are responsible for Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome (HPS) in the Americas and Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome (HFRS) in Asia and Europe. HPS, first described in 1993 in the US [5], is caused by at least 24 distinct viruses [6]. In Argentina, most HPS cases are caused by 7 viruses closely related to Andes virus (ANDV), species Orthohantavirus andesense. ANDV was the first hantavirus characterised in Argentina [7]. It was associated with the long-tailed pygmy rice rat Oligoryzomys longicaudatus in the Patagonian Andean region. After human infection, the signs and symptoms of the disease can manifest after a long period of up to 40 days [8,9]. Severe cases had progressive pulmonary edema, hypoxia and hypotension; fatal cases had a severe compromise in hemodynamic function. ANDV-HPS is associated with high case-lethality rates ranging from 21–50% [10,11].

Humans generally become infected through the inhalation of aerosolized rodent excreta. Before 1996, the route of orthohantavirus transmission was considered strictly zoonotic, resulting in “dead-end” human infections [7]. However, in 1996, an ANDV-caused HPS outbreak occurred in the small city of El Bolsón and then expanded to distant cities, such as Bariloche (121 km) and Buenos Aires (1700 km), involving 16 epidemiologically linked cases. This outbreak became a focal point for orthohantavirus research because molecular and epidemiological evidence suggested person-to-person (PTP) transmission [12,13]. A larger PTP transmission outbreak that began in 2018 and involved 34 cases and was curtailed by the implementation of strict quarantine measures. In this outbreak, several individuals were identified as superspreaders, predicting the high transmission potential of this strain [10].

New World Hantaviruses are very difficult to isolate in cell culture. Only three strains of ANDV had been propagated in cell culture (CH-9717869; CH-7913 and Andes/ARG). CHI-7913 was obtained from a serum sample of a Chilean patient before the onset of symptoms [14]. CH-9717869 and Andes/ARG were isolated from long tailed pygmy rice rats captured in Chile and Argentina respectively [15,16]. In 2001, it was first described that CH-9717869 caused lethality and a disease very similar to HPS in Syrian Golden Hamsters, an unusual finding for orthohantaviruses at the time [17], and the model ANDV/hamster became a unique resource for the study of HPS. We were later able to reproduce this highly lethal model with the Argentinean rodent strain Andes/ARG [18]. This was intriguing considering that reservoir infection with hantavirus is considered mostly asymptomatic. Moreover, the human CHI-7913 strain resulted in an asymptomatic infection in the same animal model suggesting that the lethal ANDV model of HPS is strain specific, reinforcing the necessity to obtain and characterise new human strains of ANDV to understand their pathogenesis in humans [19]. In this work, we report the isolation in cell culture of the strain responsible for the largest ANDV PTP-transmission outbreak ever reported, ARG-Epuyén. In addition, we performed a preliminary virological characterization of this strain proving its ability to infect hamsters causing high levels of viremia and to spread efficiently between them through direct contact experiments.

Materials and methods

Biosafety precautions and Ethics statement

The entire procedure of viral isolation, subsequent propagation, and sample analysis before viral inactivation was conducted at the biosafety level 3 facility at the Unidad Operativa Centro de Contención Biológica (UOCCB-ANLIS). All procedures involving animal handling were carried out within an animal biosafety level 3 facility at UOCCB-ANLIS. The hamsters were housed in ventilated cage racks. To ensure compliance with ethical standards [20], procedures were approved by Comité de Bioética Comodoro Rivadavia, Secretaría de Salud, Chubut province, Argentina, under the protocol number 4/2024.

Case description and sample selection

During a PTP outbreak from November 2018 to March 2019, residents of Epuyén (Chubut province, Argentina) and neighbouring areas were invited by the Ministry of Health of Chubut province to participate in a seroprevalence study to assess the previous circulation of the virus. Written informed consent was obtained from all the volunteers. One of them, who had recently been exposed to a previous case of HPS, developed symptoms on December 28, 2018, and was subsequently hospitalized. Hantavirus infection was confirmed through the detection of IgM and IgG antibodies specific to ANDV by ELISA [21], as well as the presence of viral RNA via RT-qPCR. The sample collected for the seroprevalence study one day before symptom onset (day -1) was later analyzed to quantify viral load and antibody titres. Complete genome sequencing revealed that this patient was among the 33 cases involved in the PTP transmission outbreak [8].

Virus isolation on cell culture

The serum sample collected on day -1 was filtered in a membrane of 0.2 (Millipore) and diluted in a concentration of 1:10. Then was inoculated onto a Vero E6 cell monolayer (CRL-1586; ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) and incubated for one hour at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. After the incubation, fresh complete medium (MEM, 10% FBS, antibiotics, and antimycotics) was added to the T25 flask, which was then incubated at 37°C under the same conditions. After 15 days, the cells were trypsinized, washed, and seeded onto a new monolayer, which was incubated under identical conditions (first blind passage). One-third of the cells were stored at -80°C, another third was tested by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA), and the final third was seeded onto a new monolayer. The medium was centrifuged, aliquoted, and stored at -80°C. Three blind passages were performed in total. Each passage was monitored by real-time RT-PCR for ANDV RNA in the culture media and by IFA for detecting viral antigen in the cells. Mock-infected Vero E6 cells, treated under identical conditions, were used as a negative control. After confirming the isolation, a fresh Vero E6 cell monolayer was infected to produce a large viral stock (fourth passage, p4). The supernatant was collected daily over a 10-day period, centrifuged, and titrated by focus-forming assay (FFA) as previously described [9]. Supernatants with the highest titers were pooled, aliquoted, and stored at -80°C. This newly isolated strain was subsequently designated as ARG-Epuyén.

Immunofluorescence assay

Infected and mock-infected cells were resuspended in PBS and washed three times by centrifugation at 400 x g for five minutes at 4°C. The pellets were then resuspended in 1 ml PBS, and several 10 µl drops of each suspension were spotted onto a slide. The slides were left inside a laminar flow cabinet until completely dried. The slides were then immersed in ice-cold acetone for 10 minutes at -20°C, removed from the acetone, allowed to dry, and stored at -20°C until further processing. The slides were blocked with 3% horse serum in PBS-Triton for 15 minutes at room temperature and then washed with PBS. The cells were treated with a 1:500 dilution of rabbit polyclonal serum against ANDV in PBS-Triton-BSA and incubated for one hour at 37°C in a humid chamber [21]. After washing, the slides were incubated with FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Kirkegaard & Perry) in PBS-Triton-BSA under the same conditions. Finally, the cells were incubated with 1 µg/ml DAPI in PBS for 15 minutes at room temperature and then washed. The slides were allowed to drain, mounted, and analyzed under a fluorescent microscope.

Virus infection in Vero E6 and A549 cell lines

Vero E6 (CRL-1586; ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) and A549 (human epithelial lung cell, ATCC CCL-185) cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM high glucose; Sigma) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco), 10 mM HEPES buffer, and 2 mM L-glutamine. The cells were infected with Andes/ARG and ARG-Epuyén at the indicated multiplicity of infection (MOI) for 60 minutes at 37°C. After incubation, the monolayers were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and the cells were maintained in complete DMEM (Sigma). Supernatants were collected for 6 days after infection, centrifuged to remove cells, and stored at -80°C until use. Viral RNA was isolated using the Qiagen QIAamp Viral RNA kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Viral growth kinetics were determined by quantifying ANDV RNA at different days post-infection using real-time RT-PCR as described below.

Evaluation of ARG-Epuyén virulence in the hamster model

To evaluate whether ANDV could be transmitted between hamsters in a manner similar to human transmission, Syrian Golden Hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) were infected with either the ARG-Epuyén or Andes/ARG strains. Eighteen 9-week-old hamsters were distributed across seven ventilated cages. One hamster per cage was infected via intramuscular injection (rear thigh) with 100 µl (104 FFU) of ARG-Epuyén passage No. 4 (two males and four females) or Andes/ARG passage No. 19 (one male). The infected hamsters were placed in direct contact with one or two non-infected individuals in the same ventilated cages on the day they were inoculated (day 0). As a control group, four hamsters were inoculated with cell culture supernatant from non-infected Vero E6 cells. All individuals were monitored daily for 30 days for signs of disease, including fatigue, inappetence, lethargy (reluctance to move), and/or dyspnea. Animals with fatal outcomes were necropsied on the day of death to collect lung samples, which were stored at -80°C until processing. On day 30, all survivors were anesthetized by inhalation of isoflurane, terminally bled by cardiac puncture, and necropsied to obtain lung tissue.

Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay

The detection of IgG antibodies against the viral nucleoprotein (NP) in hamsters was performed by ELISA, as previously described, to confirm infection [18]. Briefly, serial dilutions of hamster sera were incubated in polystyrene plates coated with recombinant ANDV-NP and a nonspecific recombinant protein in a humid chamber at 37°C for 1 hour. After washing, peroxidase-labelled goat anti-hamster IgG (H + L) (Kirkegaard & Perry) was added and incubated under the same conditions. TMB solution was used as a substrate, and optical density (OD) was measured at 450 nm. ΔOD values were calculated by subtracting the OD measured for each sample incubated with the specific (ANDV-NP) and nonspecific recombinant proteins. Samples were considered IgG positive if ΔOD values were greater than 0.4. The IgG titre was calculated as the inverse of the highest dilution that yielded a positive result.

Viral RNA detection and genomic sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from lung samples and from the culture medium of infected cell passages using TRIzol (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RT-qPCR was performed as previously described [22]. Briefly, each RNA sample was amplified in duplicate using the One Step RT-qPCR qScript kit (Quanta Biosciences) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Each reaction mixture contained 12.5 μl of 2X Master Mix, 2 μl of an oligonucleotide mix designed to amplify the ANDV S-segment (1 μM each), 4.75 μl of nuclease-free water, 0.5 μl of the ANDV probe (5´FAM-BHQ-3´), 0.25 μl of qScript One Step RT, and 5 μl of template RNA. Reverse transcription was performed at 50°C for 15 minutes, followed by denaturation at 95°C for 5 minutes, and 40 cycles of amplification at 95°C for 15 seconds and 60°C for 60 seconds in a Real-Time PCR Detection System CFX-96 (Bio-Rad, CA). To obtain complete genomic sequences, an amplicon-based method was selected using a one-step RT-PCR strategy to enrich vRNA, followed by library preparation as previously described [23]. The library was sequenced on a MiSeq sequencing platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA) using 2 x 151-bp paired-end sequencing. Bioinformatic analysis was performed as described previously [8].

Results

A new strain of Andes virus was isolated in cell culture from a human serum sample

A serum sample obtained from an HPS case during the incubation period, with a high viral load (6.3 x 107 copies/ml) and no detectable specific antibodies against ANDV, was used to infect a Vero E6 cell monolayer. After three blind passages, viral RNA was detectable in the supernatant of the infected cell culture (2.5 x 108 copies/ml). Infection was confirmed in the cells by IFA, showing the presence of viral antigen in approximately 50% of the cells in passage No. 3 and 80% in passage No. 4 (p4) (Fig 1). A large viral stock was prepared from the supernatant of passage No. 3, as described above, for use in subsequent experiments. The infectious titre of the viral stock obtained was 2.1 x 106 FFU/ml. This new strain was designated as ARG-Epuyén.

Fig 1. Visualization of ARG-Epuyén by Indirect immunofluorescence assay.

Fig 1

The micrograph shows Vero E6 cells infected with the ANDV ARG-Epuyén strain (p4, 7 days post-infection), micrograph with DAPI, FITC and merge (A, B, C respectively). Vero E6 cell control (mock infected cells), equal condition (D, E, F respectively). Cells were stained with rabbit polyclonal serum against the nucleoprotein of ANDV, followed by an FITC-conjugated antibody against rabbit IgG. DAPI was used for DNA staining (4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole). The images were captured at 400X magnification.

ARG-Epuyén and Andes/ARG showed differential kinetics of replication and infectivity in cell cultures

The growth kinetics of the Andes/ARG and ARG-Epuyén strains were first assessed in Vero E6 cells using an MOI of 0.002 (Fig 2A). Quantification of viral RNA in the culture supernatants of cells infected with each strain showed that Andes/ARG replicates faster than ARG-Epuyén. Both strains produced high levels of infectious viral particles, with the maximum level observed for Andes/ARG, which reached up to 2.1 x 107 FFU/ml, whereas ARG-Epuyén did not exceed 2.1 x 106 FFU/ml (Fig 2B). The growth kinetics were then compared using the epithelial cell line A549 with MOIs of 1. The results were consistent, showing that Andes/ARG replicates faster than ARG-Epuyén in both Vero E6 and A549 cells (Fig 3).

Fig 2. Comparative kinetics curves of Andes/ARG and ARG-Epuyén strains in Vero E6.

Fig 2

Comparative levels of viral RNA (A) and viral particles (B) in culture supernatants of Vero E6 infected with Andes/ARG and ARG-Epuyén strains (MOI = 0.002).

Fig 3. Comparative kinetics curves of ANDV strains in Vero E6 and A549 cells.

Fig 3

RNA load was expressed as the number of copies of the S-segment/ml of supernatant. The curves show the comparative kinetics between the strains Andes/ARG and ARG-Epuyén in both Vero E6 and A549 (MOI = 1).

Both strains of Andes virus are highly transmissible in Hamsters

Seven Syrian Golden hamsters of different sexes (3 males: MI; 4 females: FI) were inoculated intramuscularly with high doses of ANDV (approximately 104 FFU) and placed in separate cages with one or two non-inoculated cage-mates (receptors: MR and FR). During the 30 days post-infection (p.i.) period, neither the hamsters inoculated with ARG-Epuyén (n = 6) nor the receptors exposed to them (n = 9) showed any visible signs of illness. However, infection was confirmed in all of them through seroconversion and/or genomic RNA detection in lung tissues (Table 1). In contrast, the single hamster inoculated with Andes/ARG (MI-1) exhibited inappetence and lethargy starting from day five p.i., and dyspnea was evident from day 13 to day 16 p.i. After 11 days of illness, MI-1 gradually improved and fully recovered by the end of the experiment. However, the two hamsters exposed to MI-1, MR-1 and MR-2, became ill 16 and 22 days after the onset of symptoms in MI-1, respectively, and both rapidly died. After 30 days p.i., all the survivors were sampled and sacrificed. The six index hamsters showed a strong humoral response (IgG titers >25,600), while four out of 11 of their cage-mates (receptors) exhibited low to moderate IgG titers. Nevertheless, all of them (n = 11) were infected, as evidenced by the detection of viral RNA in blood (up to 1.5 x 107 RNA copies/ml) and/or in lung tissues (up to 1.6 x 108 copies/100 ng RNA).

Table 1. Evaluation of virulence of Andes virus strains in the golden hamster model.

The necropsy and RNA extraction was realized after 30 days post infection, except for MR-1 and MR-2 which were realized on day 16 and 22 respectively. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for IgG titer was performed after the necropsy.

Cage N° Infected Receptor Sex ANDV strain IgG titer viral RNA in blood (copies/ml) viral RNA in lung (copies/100 ng RNA)
1
MI-1 M Andes/ARG >25,600 7.4 x 106 1.35 x 108
MR-1 M <100 NA 8.5 x 107
MR-2 M <100 NA 5.2 x 106
2
FI-2 F ARG-Epuyén >25,600 1.5 x 107 5.3 x 103
FR-3 F 400 ND 7.2 x 106
3
MI-3 M ARG-Epuyén >25,600 1.5 x 107 1.5 x 107
FR-4 F 6400 7 x 106 1.6 x 108
FR-5 F <100 7.4 x 106 4.3 x 107
4
FI-4 F ARG-Epuyén >25,600 4.1 x 106 1 x 105
FR-6 F <100 ND 5.8 x 103
FR-7 F 1600 1 x 107 7.8 x 107
5
FI-5 F ARG-Epuyén >25,600 3.3 x 106 3.4 x 107
FR-8 F <100 1.8 x 104 3.9 x 105
6
MI-6 M ARG-Epuyén >25,600 6.5 x 106 2.4 x 107
MR-9 M <100 2.9 x 104 5.5 x 103
7 FI-7 F ARG-Epuyén >25600 4.1 x 106 8.7 x 102
FR-10 F 800 1.2 x 105 6.2 x 106
FR-11 F <100 ND 3 x 104
8
MC-8 M Mock-infected 0 0 0
MR-12 M 0 0 0
9
FC-9 F Mock-infected 0 0 0
FR-13 F 0 0 0

At day 30 post infection blood samples were collected from all the hamsters and then were sacrificed and necropsied. The exceptions were MR-1 and MR-2 which were found dead at day 16 and 22 respectively, then lung samples were obtained post mortem.

The isolated ARG-Epuyén strain accumulated only two mutations

To analyze potential changes that could lead to viral adaptation for growth in cell culture and replication in hamsters, the complete genomes of the isolated virus (p4) and from the lung of an infected hamster (MI-3) were sequenced and compared with the previously published sequence from the human sample (GenBank acc. n° MN258238, MN258204, MN258171). The isolated strain ARG-Epuyén p4 showed only one nucleotide change in the non-coding region of the S segment (position 1522) and one non-synonymous change, K2116E, in the L segment (A6381G). No changes were observed between the isolated strain (p4) and the virus recovered from the infected hamster.

To investigate the molecular basis for the observed differences in pathogenicity between ARG-Epuyén (p4) and Andes/ARG (p19) in the hamster model, we compared the complete sequences of both strains. We identified 25 non-synonymous substitutions: three in the S segment (one in the N ORF and two in the NSs ORF), 10 in the M segment (six in Gn and four in Gc), and 12 in the L segment (Table 2).

Table 2. Evaluation of amino acid changes of Andes virus strains.

ANDV strain
Genomic segment gene Position CHI-9717869 CHI-7913 Andes/ARG, passage N°19 Epuyén/18–19 (HPS case) ARG-Epuyén, passage N°4
S-Segment
GenBank acc. n° MT956622 MT956618 OP555722 MN258238 PQ215668
N 21 A A T A A
NSs (ORF + 1) 40 Q Q Q R R
47 N N N S S
M-Segment
GenBank acc. n° MT956623 MT956619 OP555727 MN258204 PQ215669
Gn 97 S S P S S
114 I I V I I
216 F F F L L
353 T V V I I
499 V V V I I
641 T T T I I
Gc 938 T A T A A
1055 S S A S S
1115 V V V I I
1127 V V I V V
L-Segment
GenBank acc. n° MT956621 MT956620 OP555734 MN258171 PQ215670
RdRp 141 T I I V V
144 R R K R R
364 N N N S S
402 I V V I I
541 A A V A A
876 S S S A A
1295 I I M I I
1440 S S S N N
1665 V I I V V
1675 P P S P P
1965 Q Q Q H H
2113 T A A T T
2116 K K K K E

Discussion

The limited progress in vaccine development and other medical countermeasures (MCMs) against hantaviruses has been partly due to restricted access to wild-type viral strains and the lack of appropriate animal models of the disease. Additionally, no reverse genetic system for hantaviruses has been reported to date. Generally, in vivo and in vitro studies of hantavirus infections have been conducted using cell-cultured strains derived from moderate to high passage numbers. The success of MCM development depends on selecting strains that are actively circulating and have proven pathogenicity in humans.

Following the COVID-19 pandemic, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases proposed a prototype pathogen approach to develop a generalizable MCM strategy. This approach can be applied to other viruses within the same viral family, enabling the rapid development of MCMs and shortening the timeline between pathogen outbreak and regulatory authorization if a virus with similar properties emerges. ANDV has been mentioned as a prototype pathogen of the Hantaviridae family and should be considered for vaccine development and pre-clinical and clinical testing [24,25]. For these purposes, the availability of well-characterized ANDV strains is critical.

In this work, we described the isolation of the strain responsible for the largest ANDV PTP transmission outbreak, which occurred in the small town of Epuyén and began on November 2, 2018. This strain, ARG-Epuyén, exhibited a high capacity for PTP transmission, necessitating the implementation of quarantine measures to curtail further spread [8]. The median reproductive number (the mean number of secondary cases caused by an infected person) was 2.12 before control measures were implemented and subsequently dropped to below 1.0 by late January. Early intervention allowed for the collection of samples leading to the isolation of this new ANDV strain from an asymptomatic case. An early passage of this strain was sequenced, revealing only one amino acid difference from the virus recovered from the patient. Like the Andes/ARG strain, this strain was able to grow in a new host without needing adaptation [26].

Two of the three previously isolated ANDV strains in cell culture caused lethal disease in hamsters [1719,26]. Although this animal model has become crucial for studying the pathogenesis of HPS, the spreading capacity and horizontal transmission of ANDV have only been evaluated in one previous study with the CH-9717869 strain [27]. In this study, we assessed the pathogenicity and spreading capacity of the strain responsible for sustained PTP transmission in this animal model and compared it with the highly lethal Andes/ARG strain in direct exposure experiments. All hamsters—both those directly inoculated and those exposed to infected hamsters—became infected. Our data indicated that ARG-Epuyén was less virulent than Andes/ARG, as none of the six index hamsters inoculated with ARG-Epuyén developed severe disease during the 30-day period, despite showing high viral titres in blood and lungs. However, as five hamsters exposed to the index hamsters were sacrificed during the incubation period—when they had no IgG titres and rising viral RNA loads in blood and lungs—their final outcomes could not be assessed. We demonstrated that both Andes/ARG and ARG-Epuyén were highly transmissible in direct exposure experiments. Although the mechanism of transmission remains to be confirmed through indirect exposure experiments, we hypothesize that the route was likely respiratory or digestive, due to the absence of wounds in the animals. In a previous work, we identified in ARG-Epuyén three positions that are present in other two strains involved in PTP, R40 and S47 in the NSs, and I641 in the Gn [26]. However, to confirm if these positions confers the unusual capacity of spreading, it will be necessary to obtain more completes sequences from PTP cases.

Our preliminary data revealed differences in lethality between the two Argentinean strains. A previous comparative study of two Chilean strains found similar results. The strain obtained from a human serum sample (CHI-7913) caused an asymptomatic infection in hamsters, while the strain obtained from a rodent (CHI-9717869) was highly lethal [19]. The molecular basis for the observed differences in pathogenesis between these strains was evaluated through in silico studies [19,26]. However, the specific differences observed need further investigation through directed mutagenesis experiments. The N protein plays no role, as both Chilean strains share 100% identity. In vitro studies suggested that ANDV virulence could be determined by its ability to alter cellular signalling pathways by restricting the early induction of beta interferon (IFNB) and IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) [2628]. Additionally, compared with other pathogenic hantaviruses, ANDV is unique in that three viral proteins—N, NSs, and Gn/Gc—can block the same signalling pathway at different levels [29]. However, the few differences found in the Gn/Gc between the strains seem to be located outside conserved motifs or domains involved in the regulation of the IFNB response [30]. Further characterization of the NSs and RdRp proteins is needed to evaluate the effects of the observed changes.

As a result of comparing the complete sequences of both Argentinean ANDV strains, several amino acid changes were predicted. None of the substitutions represented drastic changes that could affect key motifs already described for the structural conformation and/or function of the N, Gn/Gc, and RdRp proteins. Exceptions included the changes P97S and T641I in the M-segment; the P residue is in the Gn ectodomain and may impact the flexibility of a loop structure, affecting recognition by some immune response components and/or interaction with cell receptors. The T641I change, located in an alpha-helix structure near the WAASA motif, may result in the loss of an oxygen molecule capable of forming a hydrogen bond with the adjacent residue C642.

In conclusion, we obtained a low-passaged isolate of a prototype pathogen: ANDV. The new strain, ARG-Epuyén, is a well-characterized isolate due to its known outcome in a recent HPS outbreak and its high PTP transmission potential. Furthermore, the isolation was obtained directly from a clinical sample with a low number of passages (p = 4) and only one amino acid change. Future studies will be necessary to determine if these two changes are attenuation determinants for the hamster model, or whether they lack pathogenic impact and therefore this strain could be considered an ANDV wild-type strain. If so, it would represent a critical tool toward developing MCMs against this emerging pathogen.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Comparative kinetics curves of Andes/ARG and ARG-Epuyén strains in Vero E6.

Comparative levels of viral RNA (S1A) and viral particles (S1B) in culture supernatants of Vero E6 infected with Andes/ARG and ARG-Epuyén strains (MOI = 0.002).

(XLSX)

pntd.0013205.s001.xlsx (12.2KB, xlsx)
S2 Table. Comparative kinetics curves of ANDV strains in Vero E6 and A549 cells.

(XLSX)

pntd.0013205.s002.xlsx (8.6KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgments

We thank Silvia Girard and Lara Martin for laboratory support.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Plyusnin A, Vapalahti O, Vaheri A. Hantaviruses: genome structure, expression and evolution. J Gen Virol. 1996;77 ( Pt 11):2677–87. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-77-11-2677 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Castillo C, Nicklas C, Mardones J, Ossa G. Andes Hantavirus as possible cause of disease in travellers to South America. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2007;5(1):30–4. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2006.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kuenzli AB, Marschall J, Schefold JC, Schafer M, Engler OB, Ackermann-Gäumann R. Hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome due to imported Andes hantavirus infection in Switzerland: a multidisciplinary challenge, two cases and a literature review. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2018;67(11):1788–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kofman A, Eggers P, Kjemtrup A, Hall R, Brown SM, Morales-Betoulle M. Notes from the field: contact tracing investigation after first case of andes virus in the United States - Delaware, February 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(41):1162–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nichol ST, Spiropoulou CF, Morzunov S, Rollin PE, Ksiazek TG, Feldmann H, et al. Genetic identification of a hantavirus associated with an outbreak of acute respiratory illness. Science. 1993;262(5135):914–7. doi: 10.1126/science.8235615 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Abudurexiti A, Adkins S, Alioto D, Alkhovsky SV, Avšič-Županc T, Ballinger MJ, et al. Taxonomy of the order Bunyavirales: update 2019. Arch Virol. 2019;164(7):1949–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.López N, Padula P, Rossi C, Lázaro ME, Franze-Fernández MT. Genetic identification of a new hantavirus causing severe pulmonary syndrome in Argentina. Virology. 1996;220(1):223–6. doi: 10.1006/viro.1996.0305 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Martínez VP, Di Paola N, Alonso DO, Pérez-Sautu U, Bellomo CM, Iglesias AA, et al. “Super-Spreaders” and person-to-person transmission of andes virus in Argentina. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(23):2230–41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2009040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Iglesias AA, Períolo N, Bellomo CM, Lewis LC, Olivera CP, Anselmo CR, et al. Delayed viral clearance despite high number of activated T cells during the acute phase in Argentinean patients with hantavirus pulmonary syndrome. EBioMedicine. 2022;75:103765. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Martinez VP, Bellomo CM, Cacace ML, Suarez P, Bogni L, Padula PJ. Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome in Argentina, 1995-2008. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16(12):1853–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tortosa F, Carrasco G, Gallardo D, Prandi D, Parodi V, Santamaría G, et al. Prognostic factors for cardio-pulmonary syndrome and death by hantavirus Andes Sur: cohort study in San Carlos de Bariloche and health influence area. Medicina (B Aires). 2022;82(3):351–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wells RM, Sosa Estani S, Yadon ZE, Enria D, Padula P, Pini N, et al. An unusual hantavirus outbreak in southern Argentina: person-to-person transmission? Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome study group for patagonia. Emerg Infect Dis. 1997;3(2):171–4. doi: 10.3201/eid0302.970210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Padula PJ, Edelstein A, Miguel SD, López NM, Rossi CM, Rabinovich RD. Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome outbreak in Argentina: molecular evidence for person-to-person transmission of Andes virus. Virology. 1998;241(2):323–30. doi: 10.1006/viro.1997.8976 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Galeno H, Mora J, Villagra E, Fernandez J, Hernandez J, Mertz GJ, et al. First human isolate of Hantavirus (Andes virus) in the Americas. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8(7):657–61. doi: 10.3201/eid0807.010277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Padula PJ, Sanchez AJ, Edelstein A, Nichol ST. Complete nucleotide sequence of the M RNA segment of Andes virus and analysis of the variability of the termini of the virus S, M and L RNA segments. J Gen Virol. 2002;83(Pt 9):2117–22. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-83-9-2117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Meissner JD, Rowe JE, Borucki MK, St Jeor SC. Complete nucleotide sequence of a Chilean hantavirus. Virus Res. 2002;89(1):131–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hooper JW, Larsen T, Custer DM, Schmaljohn CS. A lethal disease model for hantavirus pulmonary syndrome. Virology. 2001;289(1):6–14. doi: 10.1006/viro.2001.1133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Martinez VP, Padula PJ. Induction of protective immunity in a Syrian hamster model against a cytopathogenic strain of Andes virus. J Med Virol. 2012;84(1):87–95. doi: 10.1002/jmv.22228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Warner BM, Sloan A, Deschambault Y, Dowhanik S, Tierney K, Audet J. Differential pathogenesis between Andes virus strains CHI-7913 and Chile-9717869 in Syrian hamsters. J Virol. 2021;95(10):JVI.00108-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.National Research Council (US) Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. 8th ed. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Padula PJ, Rossi CM, Valle MOD, Martínez PV, Colavecchia SB, Edelstein A, et al. Development and evaluation of a solid-phase enzyme immunoassay based on Andes hantavirus recombinant nucleoprotein. J Med Microbiol. 2000;49(2):149–55. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-49-2-149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bellomo CM, Pires-Marczeski FC, Padula PJ. Viral load of patients with hantavirus pulmonary syndrome in Argentina. J Med Virol. 2015;87(11):1823–30. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Alonso DO, Kehl SD, Coelho RM, Periolo N, Poklépovich Caride T, Sanchez Loria J, et al. Orthohantavirus diversity in Central-East Argentina: insights from complete genomic sequencing on phylogenetics, geographic patterns and transmission scenarios. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024;18(10):e0012465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cassetti MC, Pierson TC, Patterson LJ, Bok K, DeRocco AJ, Deschamps AM. Prototype pathogen approach for vaccine and monoclonal antibody development: a critical component of the NIAID plan for pandemic preparedness. J Infect Dis. 2023;227(12):1433–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Morabito KM, Cassetti MC, DeRocco AJ, Deschamps AM, Pierson TC. Viral prototypes for pandemic preparedness: the road ahead. J Infect Dis. 2023;228(Suppl 6):S460–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bellomo CM, Alonso DO, Pérez-Sautu U, Prieto K, Kehl S, Coelho RM, et al. Andes virus genome mutations that are likely associated with animal model attenuation and human person-to-person transmission. mSphere. 2023;8(3):e0001823. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00018-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Riesle-Sbarbaro SA, Kirchoff N, Hansen-Kant K, Stern A, Kurth A, Prescott JB. Human-to-human transmission of Andes virus modeled in Syrian Hamsters. Emerg Infect Dis. 2023;29(10):2159–63. doi: 10.3201/eid2910.230544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Matthys VS, Cimica V, Dalrymple NA, Glennon NB, Bianco C, Mackow ER. Hantavirus GnT elements mediate TRAF3 binding and inhibit RIG-I/TBK1-directed beta interferon transcription by blocking IRF3 phosphorylation. J Virol. 2014;88(4):2246–59. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02647-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cimica V, Dalrymple NA, Roth E, Nasonov A, Mackow ER. An innate immunity-regulating virulence determinant is uniquely encoded by the Andes virus nucleocapsid protein. mBio. 2014;5(1):e01088-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01088-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Geimonen E, LaMonica R, Springer K, Farooqui Y, Gavrilovskaya IN, Mackow ER. Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome-associated hantaviruses contain conserved and functional ITAM signaling elements. J Virol. 2003;77(2):1638–43. doi: 10.1128/jvi.77.2.1638-1643.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013205.r002

Decision Letter 0

Jonas Klingström, Andrea Marzi

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases's publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript within 30 days Jun 08 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosntds@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pntd/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Response to Reviewers Revised Manuscript with Track Changes Manuscript

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

orcid.org/0000-0003-4304-636XX

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

orcid.org/0000-0003-1765-0002

Journal Requirements:

1) We ask that a manuscript source file is provided at Revision. Please upload your manuscript file as a .doc, .docx, .rtf or .tex. If you are providing a .tex file, please upload it under the item type u2018LaTeX Source Fileu2019 and leave your .pdf version as the item type u2018Manuscriptu2019.

2) We do not publish any copyright or trademark symbols that usually accompany proprietary names, eg ©,  ®, or TM  (e.g. next to drug or reagent names). Therefore please remove all instances of trademark/copyright symbols throughout the text, including:

- ® on page: 7.

3) Thank you for including an Ethics Statement for your study. Please include:

i) The full name(s) of the Institutional Review Board(s) or Ethics Committee(s)

ii) The approval number(s), or a statement that approval was granted by the named board(s).

4) Tables should not be uploaded as individual files. Please remove these files from the online submission form. For more information about how to format tables, see our guidelines:

https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/s/tables 

5) We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: "All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files". There are not any files uploaded as supporting information. Please confirm at this time whether or not your submission contains all raw data required to replicate the results of your study. Authors must share the “minimal data set” for their submission. PLOS defines the minimal data set to consist of the data required to replicate all study findings reported in the article, as well as related metadata and methods (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-minimal-data-set-definition).

For example, authors should submit the following data: 

1) The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported;

2) The values used to build graphs;

3) The points extracted from images for analysis..

Authors do not need to submit their entire data set if only a portion of the data was used in the reported study.

If your submission does not contain these data, please either upload them as Supporting Information files or deposit them to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories. 

If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. If data are owned by a third party, please indicate how others may request data access.

6) The file inventory includes files for Figures 2a, and 2b. We would recommend either combining these into a single Figure 2.tiff file with separate internal panels, or renumbering them as individual figures, as we are not able to publish multiple components of a single figure as separate files.

Reviewers' comments

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: 1. Reference 22 is very important, as it is listed as the reference for the sequencing approach, but the reference is incorrect—it is a bioRxiv but I believe is now published in PLOS NTD.

2. Line 249, what MOI was used?

3. Line 125-142, what size flasks were used for infection at each step?

4. Where was the anti-ANDV serum obtained and how was it made?

Reviewer #2: The objectives and design of the study are well-defined.

Regarding concerns about regulatory aspects, the manuscript states that the experiments in the animal model were conducted in a safety level 3 facility; BSL4 is typically required.

Reviewer #3: The objective of the study is clear and well design to address the Virological characterization of new Andes virus strain and to support the conclusions. All experiments are presented, not in detail, but well referenced. There are no concerns about ethical requirements, but I ask for the number of the protocals and permissions to be included in the text.

**********

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: 1. Figure 1 legend states there are panels A-F, but there is only A and B on the figure itself.

2. Figure 2, why are there no time points for ARG after day 12 like Epuyen?

3. There is no text in the Figure 2 and Figure 3 figure legends.

4. FFU data is needed for Figure 3.

5. Table 1 should describe at what timepoints post-infection the viral RNA was tested in lung and blood and when the IgG titers were tested.

6. Please show negative controls for ANDV staining in Figure 1.

Reviewer #2: The analysis and results are written in an orderly and clear manner, with their respective subheadings.

The tables and figures are highly relevant, well-prepared, and easy to understand.

Table 1 establishes that there are 18 rodents in cages 1 to 7, and the text establishes that there are 17 in 7 cages.

Reviewer #3: All results match the analysis plan, and are clearly presented. With the exception of figure 1 all images and tables are of sufficient quality.

**********

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: 1. Lines 324-326, 377, and 282, can it be stated that the isolated virus is a wild-type strain and one that doesn’t need adaptation for in vitro growth? It has a mutation in the non-coding region of S and a coding mutation in L. As a comparison, the vaccine TC-83 strain of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus is attenuated due to only 2 mutations compared to the wild-type strain—one in the 5’ UTR and an amino acid change in the glycoprotein. While the number of changes is small in this manuscript after isolation—and impressively so, given the difficulty of isolating hantaviruses—some nuance should be used to discuss “wild-type” and “adaptation.”

Reviewer #2: I believe the discussion is appropriate and well-informed; I would suggest focusing the discussion more on transmission (person-to-person) than on pathogenicity.

It would be interesting to know the authors' opinion on the observation that a significant viral load is detected in some rodents, yet no antibody response is observed.

Reviewer #3: The conclusions are supported by the data, limitations are included in the discussion section.

Throughout the text the authors emphasized the how these data can be helpful to advance and enhance medical

countermeasures with a clear understand of how basic science can impact public health.

**********

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: 1. The manuscript should be reviewed for English grammar and style. Below are a few changes that should be made:

Line 77, please change “After infection, the signs and symptoms of the disease can manifest after a long period of up to 40 days” to “After human infection, the signs and symptoms of the disease can manifest after a long incubation period of up to 40 days”

Line 89, change “could be” to “was”

Line 99, change “since” to “and”

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: Line 21 Andes virus (Orthohantavirus andesense)

Line 47 but none of them were

Line 49 and has an unclear history

Line 58 please refer to the updated taxonomy of hantaviruses (Bunyaviricetes: Elliovirales: Hantaviridae: Mammantavirinae)

Line 112 use PTP that has already been cited in the text

Line 117 use HPS that has already been cited in the text

Line 165 how many days? Please specify

Line 171 … transmission, Syrian Golden Hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus)

Line 197 TRIzol

Line 218/19 – provide the protocols number for the ethics permissions

Line 223 - how many days after the probable exposure?

Table 2 – please include GenBank accession number

Line 299/300 – use MCMs that have already been cited in the text

Line 312 – Hantaviridae needs to be in italic

Line 318 2nd

Throughout the text the terms “in vitro” and “in vivo” need to be in italic

**********

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: The manuscript by Coelho and Kehl et al. describes the isolation and characterization in a hamster model of a strain of Andes hantavirus that caused the largest person-to-person Andes virus outbreak to date. There is thorough detail in the isolation of the virus, a difficult procedure which will be very useful for future hantavirus studies. There is also description of the in vivo infectivity of this virus in hamsters, which appears to be non-pathogenic but capable of animal-to-animal transfer. The manuscript would be improved with some changes as suggested in this review.

Reviewer #2: Isolating the Andes hantavirus from a human is a significant achievement, even more so if this isolation comes from a patient involved in a person-to-person outbreak of the magnitude of the one that occurred in southern Argentina. It is no exaggeration to say that this isolation will contribute to a better understanding of the epidemiology of the infection and the development of therapeutic and control tools. The paper is well-written, with well-founded statements, and the study design and methodology are appropriate. The characterization of the infection dynamics in cell lines, the genetic studies with sequencing, and the evaluation of virulence and transmissibility in the Syrian hamster animal model were very well executed and provide relevant information.

The only general criticism that can be raised about this work is that the title may suggest that the objective of the study is to try to elucidate whether the virus involved in a person-to-person outbreak has some special characteristic that explains why this virus acquires a capacity that is unusual in hantaviruses. I would suggest that the discussion analyze whether some of the substitution changes in the M segment could have made the virus capable of transmitting to humans, or speculate on what circumstances or virological properties could have led to this epidemiological event.

It is very interesting that the viruses tested are transmissible between hamsters, and intriguing that the virus isolated from a human does not cause disease in this model. Both results (transmissibility and lack of disease development with human viruses) confirm previous findings, adequately described in the paper.

Reviewer #3: The work presented here by Coelho et al. brings a very interesting view on person to person transmission of hantavirus, a fallow up on the 2018 outbreak focused on virological characterization and understand of a new Andes virus strain ability to be shared between humans. The manuscript is well designed and have sound methodology using classical and modern assays to accomplish their objectives. The results raise a series of questions in how person to person is spread, but that is not the goal of this manuscript. This is a much need study so we can be a step closer to understand Andes virus unique features. In opinion the article is ready for publication with only some minor revisions and actualization listed bellow:

Line 21 Andes virus (Orthohantavirus andesense)

Line 47 but none of them were

Line 49 and has an unclear history

Line 58 please refer to the updated taxonomy of hantaviruses (Bunyaviricetes: Elliovirales: Hantaviridae: Mammantavirinae)

Line 112 use PTP that has already been cited in the text

Line 117 use HPS that has already been cited in the text

Line 165 how many days? Please specify

Line 171 … transmission, Syrian Golden Hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus)

Line 197 TRIzol

Line 218/19 – provide the protocols number for the ethics permissions

Line 223 - how many days after the probable exposure?

Table 2 – please include GenBank accession number

Line 299/300 – use MCMs that have already been cited in the text

Line 312 – Hantaviridae needs to be in italic

Line 318 2nd

Throughout the text the terms “in vitro” and “in vivo” need to be in italic

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes:  Pablo Agustín Vial

Reviewer #3: No

Figure resubmission:Reproducibility:--> -->-->To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that authors of applicable studies deposit laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols-->?>

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013205.r004

Decision Letter 1

Jonas Klingström, Andrea Marzi

Dear Bsc Biological Sciences Kehl,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Virological characterization of a new isolated strain of Andes virus involved in the recent person-to-person transmission outbreak reported in Argentina' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Jonas Klingström

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Andrea Marzi

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

orcid.org/0000-0003-4304-636XX

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

orcid.org/0000-0003-1765-0002

***********************************************************

p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; line-height: 16.0px; font: 14.0px Arial; color: #323333; -webkit-text-stroke: #323333}span.s1 {font-kerning: none

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: ok

**********

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: ok

**********

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: ok

**********

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: ok

**********

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: The authors did a nice job responding to my critiques, and I feel the manuscript is acceptable for publication.

Reviewer #2: ok

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes:  Pablo Vial

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013205.r005

Acceptance letter

Jonas Klingström, Andrea Marzi

Dear Bsc Biological Sciences Kehl,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Virological characterization of a new isolated strain of Andes virus involved in the recent person-to-person transmission outbreak reported in Argentina," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Comparative kinetics curves of Andes/ARG and ARG-Epuyén strains in Vero E6.

    Comparative levels of viral RNA (S1A) and viral particles (S1B) in culture supernatants of Vero E6 infected with Andes/ARG and ARG-Epuyén strains (MOI = 0.002).

    (XLSX)

    pntd.0013205.s001.xlsx (12.2KB, xlsx)
    S2 Table. Comparative kinetics curves of ANDV strains in Vero E6 and A549 cells.

    (XLSX)

    pntd.0013205.s002.xlsx (8.6KB, xlsx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reviewers respons.docx

    pntd.0013205.s004.docx (21.4KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES