Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biochemical Journal logoLink to Biochemical Journal
. 1999 Jun 15;340(Pt 3):829–835.

Digestion of crystalline cellulose substrates by the clostridium thermocellum cellulosome: structural and morphological aspects.

C Boisset 1, H Chanzy 1, B Henrissat 1, R Lamed 1, Y Shoham 1, E A Bayer 1
PMCID: PMC1220317  PMID: 10359670

Abstract

The action of cellulosomes from Clostridium thermocellum on model cellulose microfibrils from Acetobacter xylinum and cellulose microcrystals from Valonia ventricosa was investigated. The biodegradation of these substrates was followed by transmission electron microscopy, Fourier-transform IR spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction analysis, as a function of the extent of degradation. The cellulosomes were very effective in catalysing the complete digestion of bacterial cellulose, but the total degradation of Valonia microcrystals was achieved more slowly. Ultrastructural observations during the digestion process suggested that the rapid degradation of bacterial cellulose was the result of a very efficient synergistic action of the various enzymic components that are attached to the scaffolding protein of the cellulosomes. The degraded Valonia sample assumed various shapes, ranging from thinned-down microcrystals to crystals where one end was pointed and the other intact. This complexity may be correlated with the multi-enzyme content of the cellulosomes and possibly to a diversity of the cellulosome composition within a given batch. Another aspect of the digestion of model celluloses by cellulosomes is the relative invariability of their crystallinity, together with their Ialpha/Ibeta composition throughout the degradation process. Comparison of the action of cellulosomes with that of fungal enzymes indicated that the degradation of cellulose crystals by cellulosomes occurred with only limited levels of processivity, in contrast with the observations reported for fungal enzymes. The findings were consistent with a mechanism whereby initial attack by a cellulosome of an individual cellulose crystal results in its 'commitment' towards complete degradation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (292.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Atalla R. H., Vanderhart D. L. Native cellulose: a composite of two distinct crystalline forms. Science. 1984 Jan 20;223(4633):283–285. doi: 10.1126/science.223.4633.283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bayer E. A., Chanzy H., Lamed R., Shoham Y. Cellulose, cellulases and cellulosomes. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1998 Oct;8(5):548–557. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(98)80143-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bayer E. A., Lamed R. Ultrastructure of the cell surface cellulosome of Clostridium thermocellum and its interaction with cellulose. J Bacteriol. 1986 Sep;167(3):828–836. doi: 10.1128/jb.167.3.828-836.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bayer E. A., Morag E., Lamed R. The cellulosome--a treasure-trove for biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 1994 Sep;12(9):379–386. doi: 10.1016/0167-7799(94)90039-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Béguin P., Lemaire M. The cellulosome: an exocellular, multiprotein complex specialized in cellulose degradation. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 1996 Jun;31(3):201–236. doi: 10.3109/10409239609106584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bélaich J. P., Tardif C., Bélaich A., Gaudin C. The cellulolytic system of Clostridium cellulolyticum. J Biotechnol. 1997 Sep 16;57(1-3):3–14. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1656(97)00085-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Imai T., Boisset C., Samejima M., Igarashi K., Sugiyama J. Unidirectional processive action of cellobiohydrolase Cel7A on Valonia cellulose microcrystals. FEBS Lett. 1998 Aug 7;432(3):113–116. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)00845-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Johnson E. A., Sakajoh M., Halliwell G., Madia A., Demain A. L. Saccharification of Complex Cellulosic Substrates by the Cellulase System from Clostridium thermocellum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 May;43(5):1125–1132. doi: 10.1128/aem.43.5.1125-1132.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kidby D. K., Davidson D. J. A convenient ferricyanide estimation of reducing sugars in the nanomole range. Anal Biochem. 1973 Sep;55(1):321–325. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(73)90323-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Klyosov A. A. Trends in biochemistry and enzymology of cellulose degradation. Biochemistry. 1990 Nov 27;29(47):10577–10585. doi: 10.1021/bi00499a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Koyama M., Helbert W., Imai T., Sugiyama J., Henrissat B. Parallel-up structure evidences the molecular directionality during biosynthesis of bacterial cellulose. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Aug 19;94(17):9091–9095. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.17.9091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mayer F. Cellulolysis: ultrastructural aspects of bacterial systems. Electron Microsc Rev. 1988;1(1):69–85. doi: 10.1016/s0892-0354(98)90006-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mayer F., Coughlan M. P., Mori Y., Ljungdahl L. G. Macromolecular Organization of the Cellulolytic Enzyme Complex of Clostridium thermocellum as Revealed by Electron Microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Dec;53(12):2785–2792. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.12.2785-2792.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Morag E., Halevy I., Bayer E. A., Lamed R. Isolation and properties of a major cellobiohydrolase from the cellulosome of Clostridium thermocellum. J Bacteriol. 1991 Jul;173(13):4155–4162. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.13.4155-4162.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Moreno J. D., Bayer R. The limits of the ledger in public health promotion. Hastings Cent Rep. 1985 Dec;15(6):37–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Parsiegla G., Juy M., Reverbel-Leroy C., Tardif C., Belaïch J. P., Driguez H., Haser R. The crystal structure of the processive endocellulase CelF of Clostridium cellulolyticum in complex with a thiooligosaccharide inhibitor at 2.0 A resolution. EMBO J. 1998 Oct 1;17(19):5551–5562. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.19.5551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. REESE E. T., SIU R. G. H., LEVINSON H. S. The biological degradation of soluble cellulose derivatives and its relationship to the mechanism of cellulose hydrolysis. J Bacteriol. 1950 Apr;59(4):485–497. doi: 10.1128/jb.59.4.485-497.1950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tomme P., Warren R. A., Gilkes N. R. Cellulose hydrolysis by bacteria and fungi. Adv Microb Physiol. 1995;37:1–81. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2911(08)60143-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biochemical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biochemical Society

RESOURCES