Abstract
A new eco-friendly sensor, 3-((6-((4-chlorobenzylidene)amino)pyridin-2-yl)imino)indolin-2-one (CBAPI) was synthesized and well characterized. The CBAPI sensor was employed for detecting Zn2+ and Fe3+ ions. It exhibited a low limit of detection at pH 6.0, with values of 2.90, for Zn2+ and 3.59 nmol L−1 for Fe3+ ions. The sensor demonstrated high selectivity over other interfering cations. Additionally, the high binding constants reflect the great affinity of sensor towards Zn2+ and Fe3+ ions. To further validate its quantification ability for Zn2+ ions, the synthesized CBAPI sensor was used to determine Zn levels in human hair samples, and the results were confirmed using atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS). The AGREE metric tool was used to assess the method’s environmental impact and practical applicability. These positive outcomes indicated that the new method for detecting Zn2+ and Fe3+ ions is environmentally friendly and safe for humans. The developed CBAPI sensor represents a potential development in metal ion detection, combining sensitivity, selectivity, and rapidity.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10895-024-03798-3.
Keywords: Zinc, Detection, Fluorescence, Sensor, Iron, Pollution
Introduction
Industrial activities over the past century have significantly increased human exposure to heavy metals, whether through water, air, or food. This exposure can lead to acute or chronic poisoning. Heavy metals accumulate in the body, causing various toxic effects on tissues and organs. Additionally, they interfere with cellular processes such as growth, differentiation, and apoptosis [1].
Several heavy metals lack any known physiological benefits for humans. Lead, mercury, and cadmium are prime examples of such toxic metals. However, other metals are essential to human biochemical processes. For instance, zinc and iron serve as important cofactors for several enzymatic reactions in the human body [2].
Zinc, a trace element found in both human and natural environments, serves crucial roles in different biological processes. It is essential for normal growth and reproduction in higher plants, animals, and humans. Additionally, it contributes significantly to physiological growth and fulfils immune functions. Zinc is vital for the functionality of more than 300 enzymes, DNA stabilization, and gene expression [3, 4]. Similarly, iron is an essential element for nearly all living organisms. Due to its ability to exist in one of two oxidation states, it plays a vital role in diverse metabolic processes like oxygen transport, DNA synthesis, and electron transport. However, maintaining precise iron levels in body tissues is crucial because excessive iron can cause tissue damage by promoting the formation of free radicals [5, 6].
Various methods are employed for detecting Zn2⁺ and Fe3⁺ ions, including atomic absorption spectroscopy, inductively coupled plasma (ICP), and electrochemical techniques [7–20]. While these methods offer high sensitivity and selectivity, they often require costly equipment, complicated procedures, and time-intensive processes. In contrast, optical sensors provide valuable tools for precisely identifying clinical, chemical, and environmental species [21, 22]. Fluorescent sensors offer rapid and sensitive characterization of different species in samples. This technique stands out for its high sensitivity, specificity, simplicity, and cost-effectiveness compared to other analytical tools. It finds widespread use in environmental monitoring, industrial processes, medical diagnostics, forensics, and genetic analysis. Fluorescent sensors are applicable for both quantitative and qualitative analysis [23].
Our ongoing research focuses on creating chemosensors capable of detecting a range of environmentally and biologically relevant species [24–34]. In this study, we synthesized a novel fluorescent sensor, 3-((6-((4-chlorobenzylidene) amino) pyridin-2-yl)imino)indolin-2-one (CBAPI). This sensor has been successfully applied for the selective and sensitive detection of Zn2⁺ and Fe3⁺ ions.
Experiments
Materials and Reagents
Zinc nitrate Zn(NO3)2.6H2O, Ferric nitrate Fe(NO3)3.9H2O, and organic solvents were provided by Sigma Aldrich used as analytical grade with purity of ≥ 99.0%. all cationic compounds salts of Ag+, Al3+, Cu2+, Co2+, Hg2+, Ni2+, and Pd2+ were purchased from Aldrich.
Instruments
Utilizing A Shimadzu-UV Probe Version 2.33 spectrophotometer, and JASCO FP-8300 Fluorescence Spectrophotometer.
Methods
Solution Preparations
By dissolving 0.0336 g of CBAPI sensor in a 100 mL DMF to get a 1.0 × 10−3 mol L−1 stock solution. 0.0297 g and 0.0404 g of Zn(NO3)2.6H2O and Fe(NO3)3.9H2O, respectively, were dissolved in 100 mL bi-distilled water get a 1.0 × 10−3 mol L−1 stock solutions. The working solutions were prepared by diluting stock solutions to a known volume with bi-distilled water. Buffer solutions with pH values of 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, and 10.0 were used.
Synthesis of 3-((6-aminopyridin-2-yl)Imino)Indolin-2-one (3)
To a solution of 2,6-diaminopyridine (1) (0.005 mol) in ethanol (20 mL), isatin3(2) (0.005 mol) was added. The reaction mixture was heated under reflux for 2 h, the solid compound (3) was filtered after cooling, washed with ethanol and used directly in the next reaction.
Synthesis of 3-((6-((4-Chlorobenzylidene)amino)Pyridin-2-yl)Imino)Indolin-2-one (4) (CBAPI)
A mixture of 3-((6-aminopyridin-2-yl)imino)indolin-2-one (3) (0.005 mol) and 4-chlorobenzaldehyde (0.005 mol) in butanol (20 mL) was heated under reflux for 4 h, the reaction was then cooled, the solid product obtained after cooling was collected by filtration and recrystallized from butanol to give (4) as red crystals. (yield 72%, m.p. over 300 °C. FTIR (ATR, Ʋ, cm−1): 3365 (NH), 1720 (CO), 1608 (C = N). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.13 (s, 1H), 9.96 (s, 1H), 7.93–7.87 (m, 2H), 7.57–7.50 (m, 2H), 7.46 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 7.05–6.99 (m, 3H), 6.87 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H).
Investigating the Impact of Zinc and Iron on CBAPI Fluorescence
0.2 mL of CBAPI sensor (2.0 × 10–5 mol L−1) solution and 4 mL of buffer solution of pH 6.0 were transferred to a 1 cm quartz cell, and successive additions of Zn2+ (0.00– 9.09 × 10–5 mol L−1 ppm) solution or Fe3+ (0.00– 3.54 × 10–5 mol L−1 ppm) solution were added. Within a few seconds of the addition of different analyte concentrations (Zn2+ or Fe3+ ions), the emission intensity measurements were monitored, and a calibration curve was developed, revealing an emission signal assigned at λem = 408 nm after applying excitation at λex 335 nm.
Assaying Zinc in Human Hair Samples
One gram of hair was cut using scissor to pieces of less than 1 cm, then washed using bi-distilled water, then methanol, and left to dry in the air at room temperature. 12 mL of 90% nitric acid was added to dry hair and kept at room temperature for 10 min, then 1 ml of concentrated perchloric acid was added and heated on a hot plate at 200 °C for 1 h. until brown fumes converted into dense white fumes [35]. The clear solution was allowed to cool and dilute to 25 mL with bi-distilled water, and then analyzed using atomic absorption spectroscopy.
Results and Discussion
Characterization of CBAPI Sensor
The starting 3-((6-aminopyridin-2-yl) imino) indolin-2-one (3), was synthesized by the condensation reaction of 2,6-diaminopyridine (1) with isatin (2). Subsequent condensation of (3) with 4-chlorobenzaldehyde afforded the target Schiff base (4) (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1.
The synthesis mechanism of CBAPI sensor
The proposed structure of (4)CBAPI sensor was confirmed from spectral data. The IR spectrum showed absorption band at 3365 cm−1 which may be assigned due to ν(N–H) stretching of the indoline ring. A strong absorption band was observed at 1720 cm−1 indicating the presence of ν(C = O) group of isatin. The IR spectrum also revealed the presence of absorption band corresponding to the ν(C = N) at 1608 cm−1 (SI: Fig. 1).
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound (4) showed a broad singlet at 10.13 ppm which may be assigned due to proton of the NH group of indoline ring. The signal assigned to the azomethine proton was observed at 9.96 ppm as singlet signal. Because of the many J values and overlapping signals, the signals of the aromatic protons were observed as complex multiplets at around δ 6.87–7.93 ppm (SI: Fig. 2).
Effect of Solvent on Absorption and Emission Spectrum of the CBAPI Sensor
Figure 1 illustrates the UV − vis spectra of 1 × 10–4 mol L−1CBAPI sensor in different solvents (ethanol, methanol, water, DMF, isopropyl alcohol, benzene, methylene chloride, cyclohexane, and toluene) (1:99) (v/v) DMF: solvent and the corresponding spectroscopic parameters are collected in Table 1. The emission spectrum of CBAPI sensor in different solvents at λexc 335 nm was depicted in Fig. 2.
Fig. 1.

UV absorption spectra for 1 × 10–4 mol L−1CBAPI sensor in different solvents
Table 1.
Spectral and photophysical parameters of CBAPI sensor in different solvents
| Solvent | λabs (nm) |
λexc (nm) |
λem (nm) |
ε (mol−1 cm−1 L) × 103 | Stock shift (cm−1) Δʋ = ʋexc—ʋem |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methanol | 315, 501 | 335 | 411 | 9.27, 1.78 | 5519.8 |
| Ethanol | 316, 501 | 335 | 416 | 9.10, 1.72 | 5812.3 |
| Water | 321, 517 | 335 | 402 | 7.91, 1.41 | 4975.1 |
| Isopropyl | 321, 506 | 335 | 394 | 8.96, 1.77 | 4470.0 |
| DMF | 322, 507 | 335 | 417 | 8.77, 1.69 | 5869.9 |
| Toluene | 314, 501 | 335 | 371 | 7.01, 1.97 | 2896.6 |
| Methylene Chloride | 315, 463 | 335 | 396 | 9.16, 1.81 | 4598.2 |
| Benzene | 319, 511 | 335 | 375 | 7.20, 1.36 | 3184.1 |
Fig. 2.

Emission spectra for 2 × 10–5 mol L−1CBAPI sensor at different solvents with λexc 335 nm
The absorption spectra of the CBAPI sensor exhibited negligible changes with changing solvent polarity. Two absorption peaks occur at approximately 320 nm and 500 nm. These peaks correspond to π → π* and n → π* transitions, respectively. The molar absorption coefficients for these transitions fall within the range of 1360–9270 mol−1 L cm−1, varying based on the solvent used. The peak assigned to the n → π* transition was affected by a large red shift recorded in water over other solvents used (λabs 517 nm), this might be due to the formation of a strong hydrogen bond between the CBAPI sensor and the water molecule. It is clearly shown that the absorption maximum of the CBAPI sensor shows nearly no noticeable shift with an increase in polarity of the solvent, but the emission maximum exhibited an appreciable bathochromic shift with an increase in solvent polarities from 390 to 415 nm on exciting at 335 nm, indicating nearly zero dipole moments in the ground state but large dipole moments in the excited state.
Figure 3 shows the absorption spectra of the CBAPI sensor at different pH values (pH 2 to pH 10) using different buffer solutions. It was noticed that with decreasing pH, the absorption peak assigned to π → π* is greatly shifted towards longer wavelengths (red shift) from λ = 320 nm for pH 10.0 to λ = 340 nm for pH 2.0, while the absorption peak assigned to n → π* is slightly affected by changing pH values. The π-π* peak is indeed pH-dependent, while the n-π* peak shows only minor sensitivity. In an acidic medium, the carbonyl oxygen of the isatin moiety is protonated, affecting the electron density distribution of the CBAPI molecule, and causing changes in the energy levels of the π and π* orbitals. Consequently, the π-π* peak position is altered due to this protonation [36–38].
Fig. 3.

Absorption Spectra of 1 × 10–4 mol L.−1CBAPI sensor at different pH values (pH 2 – pH 10) in DMF/water (0.2:9.8, v/v)
Optimizing the Emission Intensity of the CBAPI Sensor for Zn2+and Fe3+Ions Detection
pH Influence
“The impact of varying pH values on the detection of Zn (II) or Fe (III) using the CBAPI sensor was investigated across a wide range of pH values (from pH 2 to pH 10) using different buffer solutions (Fig. 4). It was noticed that the higher emission intensity for both metals under study was recorded at pH 6, so further studies were conducted at pH 6 using acetate buffer, which is within an appropriate range for biological and environmental applications. The low intensity at low pH values (pH ≤ 4) and higher pH values (pH ≥ 8) may be due to protonation of imine nitrogen N and carbonyl oxygen C = O of the isatin moiety and precipitation of metal hydroxide, respectively.
Fig. 4.

Emission intensity at λem = 408 nm for detection of Zn (II) and Fe (III) ions as a function of pH using the CBAPI sensor
Method Validation
Linearity and Sensitivity
The fluorescence titration of different concentrations of metal ions under study (Zn2+ or Fe3+) to a 20 µmol L−1 CBAPI sensor was carried out at pH 6.0 using acetate buffer and at λexc = 335 nm. Upon the addition of Zn2+ ions, there was a notable red shift from the peak at 410 nm to 422 nm, with a remarkable enhancement of emission intensity. Upon the addition of Fe3+ ions, a remarkable enhancement of emission intensity is only detected without any shift in wavelength (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5.
The emission spectra of the CBAPI sensor at λexc 335 nm in acetate buffer (pH = 6.0) with increasing the concentration of Zn2+ and Fe3+ ions from 3.3 nmol L−1 to 80 µmol L.−1
The calibration curve depicted in Fig. 6 showed a linear enhancement in intensity with increasing Zn2+ or Fe3+ concentrations. The results of the calibration curve for Zn2+ determination exhibited two linear ranges: 3.3 to 70 nmol L−1 and 3.3 to 80 µmol L−1. In the first range, the equation for linear regression is F = 1197.6 + 3.47 × 109 [Zn2+] accompanied by a high correlation coefficient of 0.9972, whereas in the subsequent linear range, the linear regression equation is F = 1449.2 + 2.49 × 106 [Zn2+] with a correlation coefficient of 0.9888. While the results of the calibration curve for Fe3+ determination exhibited two linear ranges: 3.3 to 90 nmol L−1 and 0.33 to 35 µmol L−1. In the first range, the equation for linear regression is F = 1451.75 + 1082 × 109 [Fe3+] with a correlation coefficient of 0.9861, whereas in the second linear range, the linear regression equation is F = 1675.27 + 1.42 × 107 [Fe3+] with a correlation coefficient of 0.9591. The CBAPI sensor exhibits greater sensitivity to Zn2⁺ or Fe3⁺ ions, as evidenced by the steeper slope observed in the first linear range compared to the second. The sensitivity of the measurement decreases as the concentration of Zn2+ or Fe3+ ions increase due to the binding sites of the CBAPI sensor being occupied.
Fig. 6.

The relationship between the fluorescence intensity of the CBAPI sensor and the Zn2+ or Fe.3+ ions concentration at λexc 335 nm, λem 408 nm in acetate buffer (pH = 6.0)
The detection limits (DL) (3SD/slope) and quantification limits (QL) (10SD/slope) were calculated and presented in Table 2. The detection limits for Zn2+ or Fe3+ ions were 2.90 and 3.59 nmol L−1, respectively, and the quantification limits for Zn2+ or Fe3+ ions were 9.68 and 11.98 nmol L−1, respectively. The detection limits for Zn2+ or Fe3+ ions are compared to those of previously reported sensors (Table 3), and the results provide low detection limits over many fluorescent sensors in the literature [39–67]. Furthermore, the World Health Organization (WHO) has defined safe levels of zinc or ferric ions in drinking water as 4.58 × 10⁻5 and 5.37 × 10⁻5 mol L−1, which significantly exceed the levels calculated by the CBAPI sensor [19, 68].
Table 2.
The correlation coefficients, DL (detection limit), QL (quantitation limit), and KD (binding constant) for determination of Zn2+ or Fe3+ ions using the CBAPI sensor at λem 408 nm, λexc 335 nm and at pH 6.0
| Parameter | Zn (II) ion | Fe (III) ion |
|---|---|---|
| DL (nmol L−1) | 2.90 | 3.59 |
| QL (μmol L−1) | 9.68 | 11.98 |
| Regression coefficient | 0.9972 | 0.9861 |
| Slope | 3.47 × 109 | 1.82 × 109 |
| Intercept | 1.20 × 103 | 1.45 × 103 |
| Standard deviation | 3.36 (n = 24) | 2.18 (n = 31) |
| Linearity range (nM) | 3.3—70 | 3.3—90 |
| Binding Constant KD (M−1) | 1.77 × 107 | 6.41 × 106 |
Table 3.
Comparison between the CBAPI sensor with the literature-reported methods for Zn2+ and Fe3+ ions detection
| Sensor | Detection limit (nmol L−1) |
Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Detection limits of Zn (II) ions | ||
| N,N′-phenylenebis(salicylideaminato) | 1.5 × 102 nM | [39] |
| 2-(benzo[d]thiazol-2-yl) phenol (BTP) | 23.6 nM | [40] |
| 2-(((pyridin-2-ylmethyl)imino)methyl)phenol | 62 nM | [41] |
| di-2-picolylamine-dithiolcarbamate (DPA-DTC)/proline-dithiolcarbamate (P-DTC) | 700 nM | [42] |
| Fluorescent quantum dots (QDs) as a promising alternative for organic dyes CdTe QDs | 1.2 × 103 nM | [43] |
| 3-(benzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-4-hydroxy-2H-chromen-2-one | 35.8 nM | [44] |
| (E)-N’-(5-allyl-2-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzylidene) nicotinohydrazide | 4.35 nM | [45] |
| tert-butyl (2-bromoethyl)carbamate (4) | 107 nM | [46] |
| tetraphenylporphyrin β-cyclodextrin | 5.0 × 102 nM | [47] |
| The Schiff-base ligand | 95.3 nM | [48] |
| TYMN ((E)-1-((thiazol-2-ylimino)methyl)naphthalen-2-ol) | 31.1 nM | [49] |
| (L, Dansyl-Asp-His-NH2) | 36.8 nM | [50] |
| 1-[[(2-furanylmethyl)imino]methyl]-2-hydroxyjulolidine | 7.50 × 103 nM | [51] |
| Methyl 2-((7-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-oxo-2H-chromen-8-yl)methyleneamino)-3-phenyl- propanoate | 3.43 nM | [52] |
| 2,20 -(1E,10 E)-(2,2-azanediylbis(ethane2,1-diyl)bis(azan -1-yl-1-ylidene))bis(methan-1-yl-1-ylidene) dipnenol, TAS | 83 nM | [53] |
| CBAPI sensor | 2.90 nM | Present study |
| Detection limits of Fe (III) ions | ||
| 2-azido-1-ethanol, 910-bis(bromo- methyl)anthracene, 2-(prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)naphthalene | 3.14 × 102 nM | [54] |
| Rhodamine-based probe (RC) | 14 nM | [55] |
| Fluorescent probe Rh-2 based on bis- (rhodamine) | 12.4 nM | [56] |
| Polyethyleneimine (PEI)–modified reduced graphene oxide (rGO) | 1.12 × 103 nM | [57] |
| Porous copper nanoclusters (p-Cu NCs) | 23.4 nM | [58] |
| ((E)-2-((4-(diethylamino)benzylidene)amino)benzoic acid, DBAB) | 21.7 nM | [59] |
| Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) | 4.60 × 103 nM | [60] |
| Carbon quantum dots (CQDs) | 1.37 × 104 nM | [61] |
| Fluorescent carbon nanoparticles (CNPs) by using dopamine | 3.20 × 102 nM | [62] |
| Dual-emission carbon dots DCDs | 8.0 × 102 nM | [63] |
| Dual-response fluorescent probe (QLBM) based on quinoline and benzimidazole groups | 1.24 × 102 nM | [64] |
| Water soluble carbon nanoparticles (CNPs) | 3.21 × 105 nM | [65] |
| Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) | 2.54 × 103 nM | [66] |
| 4,4′-(thiazolo[5,4-d]thiazole-2,5-diyl)bis(N,N-bis(4-methoxyphenyl)aniline) (TTz-1) | 0.29 × 102 nM | [67] |
| CBAPI sensor | 3.59 nM | Present study |
Method Selectivity
The selectivity of the CBAPI sensor to other metal ions was separately investigated under optimum conditions. The emission spectrum of the 20 µmol L−1CBAPI sensor in DMF/water (0.2:9.8, v/v) at pH 6.0 and λexc 335 nm was monitored in the presence of 20 µmol L−1 of interfering ions (Ag+, Al3+, Cu2+, Co2+, Hg2+, Ni2+, and Pd2+) (Fig. 7), and the emission intensity at 408 nm was recorded (Fig. 8). The results showed that all cations displayed an insignificant change in the emission spectra of the CBAPI sensor.
Fig. 7.
The emission spectra of the CBAPI sensor at pH = 6.0 in the presence of different metal ions at λexc 335 nm
Fig. 8.
Intensity at λem 408 nm of CBAPI sensor in presence of 10 μmol L−1 different metal ions at λex 335 nm and pH 6.0
Molar Ratios and Binding Constants
To further demonstrate the stoichiometry between the CBAPI sensor and Zn (II) or Fe (III) ions, the molar ratio method was used, as shown in SI: Fig. 3. Emission intensities at λem = 408 nm and at pH 6.0 are measured when using different concentrations of the CBAPI sensor (from 1 × 10–5 mol L−1 to 4.5 × 10–5 mol L−1), while the concentration of metal ions under study is kept constant (1 × 10–5 mol L−1). The [CBAPI]/[M] ratio was simultaneously plotted against the fluorometric intensity for each complex, the results showed 2:1 and 3:1 (CBAPI-to-metal) ratios for Zn/CBAPI complex and Fe/CBAPI complex, respectively.
The Benesi-Hildebrand equation (Eq. 1) was used to determine the binding constants (KD) between the CBAPI sensor and the metal ions (Zn (II) or Fe (III)) under investigation [69]. KD (unit of liter per mole) is derived from the quotient of y-intercept and slope. Where FL is the limiting intensity of fluorescence, and [Mn+] is the concentration of Zn (II) or Fe (III) ions. Fo and F represent the emission intensity at λem = 408 nm and at pH 6.0 in the presence and absence of metal ions under study, respectively.
| 1 |
A plot of Fo/(F-Fo) versus 1/[Mn+] gave a linear relationship (SI: Fig. 4) where the concentration of the CBAPI sensor was kept constant (2 × 10–5 mol L−1), while the concentration of metal ions under study (Zn (II) or Fe (III)) set up from 3.3 nmol L−1 to 80 µmol L−1. Using this calculation method, the binding constants KD for Zn/CBAPI and Fe/CBAPI complexes were determined to be 1.77 × 107 and 6.41 × 106 M−1 at pH 6.0.
Mechanism of Fluorescence Sensitization
The binding mechanism involves the coordination of Zn2⁺ or Fe3+ ions with the imine nitrogen (azomethine) and carbonyl oxygen of the ketone group in the isatin moiety. This coordination leads to a remarkable enhancement of the emission intensity at 408 nm in the CBAPI sensor, making it valuable for analytical and biological applications in detecting Zn2⁺ or Fe3+ ions (SI: Scheme 1). Additionally, the chelation to Zn2⁺ or Fe3+ ions induces rigidity in the formed complexes, thereby increasing the Chelation Enhanced Fluorescence (CHEF) effect [70].
Application to Human Hair Samples
To further confirm the quantification ability of the CBAPI sensor to detect Zn2+ ions, The synthesized (2.0 × 10–5 mol L−1) CBAPI sensor was applied to determine the concentrations of Zn in two human hair samples at pH 6.0. The extracted Zn2+ ions were analyzed using Perkin Elmer Analyst 100 Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS), and the results were compared with the results obtained when using the CBAPI sensor. As shown in Table 4, the results of two hair samples were in good agreement with AAS results, which shows that the CBAPI sensor is an effective and accurate sensor for detecting Zn in human hair elements.
Table 4.
Concentrations (ppm) of Zn2+ ions in human hair
| Sample | Concentration of proposed method (ppm) | |
|---|---|---|
| AAS | CBAPI sensor | |
| Sample No. 1 | 0.355 | 0.348 |
| Sample No. 2 | 0.367 | 0.363 |
Assessing Analytical GREEnness Metric Using CBAPI Sensor
The reliability of the greenness attributes of the spectrofluorimetric method for detecting Zn2+ or Fe3+ ions using the CBAPI sensor was evaluated through the Evaluation of Greenness Attributes [71, 72]. The synthesized sensor received an AGREE score of 0.85, reflecting the high greenness attributes of the fluorometric detection of Zn2+ or Fe3+ ions based on the CBAPI sensor. This high score (0.85) is primarily attributed to the detection method carried out in DMF/water (0.2:9.8, v/v) at a pH near the physiological value (pH 6.0), without the use of toxic solvents even during the extraction and preconcentration procedures emphasizing the eco-friendly nature of this approach (Fig. 9).
Fig. 9.

AGREE Assessment for detecting of Zn2+ or Fe3+ ions using CBAPI sensor
Conclusion
The CBAPI sensor was synthesized and characterized using FT-IR and 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Its spectroscopic parameters in different solvents were determined. The CBAPI sensor, with its remarkable sensitivity and selectivity, has emerged as a valuable tool for detecting Zn2⁺ and Fe3⁺ ions, and its performance was compared with the AAS technique for zinc detection in human hair samples. By calculating detection and quantification limits through fluorescence titration under optimum conditions, we demonstrated the strong binding affinity between Zn2⁺ or Fe3⁺ ions and the CBAPI sensor, as well as its high selectivity over other interfering cations. Finally, the proposed method achieved a high AGREE score, emphasizing its eco-friendly nature.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). No funds, grants, or other support were received.
Data Availability
Not applicable.
Declarations
Ethical Approval
Not applicable.
Competing Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Mood MB, Naseri K, Tahergorabi Z, Khazdair MR, Sadeghi M (2021) Toxic mechanisms of five heavy metals: mercury, lead, chromium, cadmium, and arsenic. Front Pharmacol 12:643972–643910. 10.3389/fphar.2021.643972 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rajkumar V, Lee VR, Gupta V (2024) Heavy metal toxicity. Stat Pearls Publishing LLC. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560920/ [PubMed]
- 3.Deshpande JD, Joshi MM, Giri PA (2013) Zinc: the trace element of major importance in human nutrition and health. Int J Med Sci Public Health 2(1):1–6. 10.5455/ijmsph.2013.2.1-6 [Google Scholar]
- 4.Frassinetti S, Bronzetti G, Caltavuturo L, Cini M, Croce CD (2006) The role of zinc in life: a review. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 25(3):597–610. 10.1615/jenvironpatholtoxicoloncol.v25.i3.40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cassat JE, Skaar EP (2013) Iron in infection and immunity. Cell Host Microbe 13(5):509–519. 10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lieu PT, Heiskala M, Peterson PA, Yang Y (2001) The roles of iron in health and disease. Mol Asp Med 22(1–2):1–87. 10.1016/s0098-2997(00)00006-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ata S, Wattoo FH, Ahmed M, Wattoo MHS, Tirmizi S, Wadood A (2015) A method optimization study for atomic absorption spectrophotometric determination of total zinc in insulin using direct aspiration technique. Alexandria J Med 51(1):19–23. 10.1016/j.ajme.2014.03.004 [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stevens BJ, Hare DJ, Volitakis I, Cherny RA, Roberts BR (2017) Direct determination of zinc in plasma by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry using palladium/magnesium and EDTA matrix modification with high temperature pyrolysis. J Anal At Spectrom 32:843–847. 10.1039/C7JA00033B [Google Scholar]
- 9.Abkenara SD, Dahaghinb Z, Sadeghib HB, Hosseinia M, Niasari MS (2011) Determination of zinc in water samples by flame atomic absorption spectrometry after homogeneous liquid-liquid extraction. J Anal Chem 66(6):612–617. 10.1134/S1061934811060062 [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shamspur T, Sheikhshoaie I, Mashhadizadeh MH (2005) Flame atomic absorption spectroscopy (FAAS) determination of iron(iii) after preconcentration on to modified analcime zeolite with 5-((4-nitrophenylazo)-N-(2′,4′-dimethoxyphenyl))salicylaldimine by column method. J Anal At Spectrom 20:476–478. 10.1039/B416097E [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tautkus S, Steponeniene L, Kazlauskas R (2004) Determination of iron in natural and mineral waters by flame atomic absorption spectrometry. J Serb Chem Soc 69(5):393–402 [Google Scholar]
- 12.Spolaor A, Vallelonga P, Gabrieli J, Cozzi G, Boutron C, Barbante C (2012) Determination of Fe2+ and Fe3+ species by FIA-CRC-ICP-MS in Antarctic ice samples. J Anal At Spectrom 27(2):310–317. 10.1039/C1JA10276A [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wełna M, Lasowska J, Zyrnicki W (2011) Determination of some inorganic species of Fe, Mn and Cr by chemical vapor generation hyphenated with inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry. J Braz Chem Soc 22(6):1164–1169. 10.1590/S0103-50532011000600023 [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hu Q (2011) Simultaneous separation and quantification of iron and transition species using LC-ICP-MS. Am J Anal Chem 2(6):675–682. 10.4236/ajac.2011.26077 [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yaman M, Kaya G (2005) Speciation of iron (II) and (III) by using solvent extraction and flame atomic absorption spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 540(1):77–81. 10.1016/j.aca.2004.08.018 [Google Scholar]
- 16.Aldrich AP, van den Berg CMG (1998) Determination of iron and its redox speciation in seawater using catalytic cathodic stripping voltammetry. Electroanalysis 10(0):369–373 [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tokalioglu S, Kartal S, Elci L (2000) Determination of heavy metals and their speciation in lake sediments by flame atomic absorption spectrometry after a four stage sequential extraction procedure. Anal Chim Acta 413:33–40. 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)00726-1 [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yan XP, Hendry MJ, Kerrich R (2000) Speciation of dissolved iron(III) and iron(II) in water by on-line coupling of flow injection separation and preconcentration with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 72:1879–1884. 10.1021/ac9909655 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ringgit G, Siddiquee S, Saallah S, Lal MTM (2022) A sensitive and rapid determination of zinc ion (Zn2+) using electrochemical sensor based on f-MWCNTs/CS/PB/AuE in drinking water. Sci Rep 12:18582. 10.1038/s41598-022-21926-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kudr J, Richtera L, Nejdl L, Xhaxhiu K, Vitek P, Nedecky BR, Hynek D, Kopel P, Adam V, Kizek R (2016) Improved electrochemical detection of zinc ions using electrode modified with electrochemically reduced graphene oxide. Materials 9(1):31–12. 10.3390/ma9010031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Qu Y, Wu Y, Wang C, Zhao K, Wu H (2020) A new 1,8-naphthalimide-based fluorescent “turn-off” sensor for detecting Cu2+ and sensing mechanisms. J Chem Resz 44(1–2):121–127. 10.1177/1747519819886540 [Google Scholar]
- 22.Soliman MHA, El-Sakka SS, El-Shalakany E, Kamel RM (2022) Development of novel Schiff base fluorophores for selective detection of Cu2+ ions in seawater using test strips. J Mol Struc 1255:132437–132439. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.132437 [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bose A, Thomas I, Abraham E (2018) Fluorescence spectroscopy and its applications: a review. Int J Pharm Chem 8(1):1–8. 10.7439/ijapa.v8i1.4578 [Google Scholar]
- 24.Abbas AM, Anwar ZM, Soliman YA, Abdel-Hadi MM, Kamel RM (2020) A turn-off luminescent europium probe for efficient and sensitive detection of some low molecular weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in seawater. Microchem J 159:105471–105477. 10.1016/j.microc.2020.105471 [Google Scholar]
- 25.Azab HA, Khairy GM, Kamel RM (2015) Time-resolved fluorescence sensing of pesticides chlorpyrifos, crotoxyphos and endosulfan by the luminescent Eu(III)-8-allyl-3-carboxycoumarin probe. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 148:114–124. 10.1016/j.saa.2015.03.098 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Azab HA, Duerkop A, Mogahed EM, Awad FK, Abd El Aal RM, Kamel RM (2012) Fluorescence and electrochemical sensing of pesticides methomyl, aldicarb and prometryne by the luminescent europium-3-carboxycoumarin probe. J Fluoresc 22:659–676. 10.1007/s10895-011-1002-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Azab HA, Mogahed EM, Awad FK, Abd El Aal RM, Kamel RM (2012) Fluorescence and electrochemical recognition of nucleosides and DNA by a novel luminescent bioprobe Eu(lll) -TNB. J Fluoresc 22:971–992. 10.1007/s10895-011-1036-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Azab HA, Duerkop A, Mogahed EM, Awad FK, Abd El Aal RM, Kamel RM (2012) A novel luminescent terbium-3-carboxycoumarin probe for time-resolved fluorescence sensing of pesticides methomyl, aldicarb and prometryne. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 97:915–922. 10.1016/j.saa.2012.07.079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kamel RM, Mohamed SK, Mahmoud MA (2022) High-throughput sensor microtiter plate of new terbium complexes for the determination of anthracene in seawater. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 266:120474–120478. 10.1016/j.saa.2021.120474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kamel RM (2022) A luminescent microtiterplate of europium complex for determination anthracene in seawater. J Photoch Photobio A: Chem 428:113871–113875. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2022.113871 [Google Scholar]
- 31.Azab HA, Abd El-Gawad II, Kamel RM (2009) Ternary complexes formed by the fluorescent probe Eu(III)−Anthracene-9-carboxylic acid with pyrimidine and purine nucleobases. J Chem Eng Data 54(11):3069–3078. 10.1021/je900149x [Google Scholar]
- 32.Azab HA, Al-Deyab SS, Anwar ZM, Kamel RM (2011) Potentiometric, electrochemical, and fluorescence study of the coordination properties of the monomeric and dimeric complexes of Eu(III) with nucleobases and PIPES. J Chem Eng Data 56(5):1960–1969. 10.1021/je101080q [Google Scholar]
- 33.Azab HA, Al-Deyab SS, Anwar ZM, Abd El-Gawad II, Kamel RM (2011) Comparison of the coordination tendency of amino acids, nucleobases, or mononucleotides toward the monomeric and dimeric lanthanide complexes with biologically important compounds. J Chem Eng Data 56(5):2613–2625. 10.1021/je200099n [Google Scholar]
- 34.Azab HA, Anwar ZM, Kamel RM, Rashwan MS (2016) Sensing of nucleosides, nucleotides and DNA using luminescent Eu complex by normal and time resolved fluorescence techniques. J Lumin 169:173–181. 10.1016/j.jlumin.2015.08.029 [Google Scholar]
- 35.Provost JJ, Munnis P, Morine GH (1993) Alternate method for determining zinc in hair. Microchem J 47:28–32. 10.1006/mchj.1993.1007 [Google Scholar]
- 36.Newberry RW, Raines RT (2017) The n→π* interaction. Acc Chem Res 50(8):1838–1846. 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hirose Y, Yui H, Sawada T (2002) Effect of potential energy gap between the n-π* and the π-π* state on ultrafast Photoisomerization dynamics of an Azobenzene derivative. J Phys Chem A 106(13):3067–3071. 10.1021/jp0138375 [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhu H, Li M, Hu J, Wang X, Jie J, Guo Q, Chen C, Xia A (2016) Ultrafast investigation of intramolecular charge transfer and solvation dynamics of Tetrahydro[5]-helicene-based imide derivatives. Sci Rep 6:24313. 10.1038/srep24313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hosseini M, Vaezi Z, Ganjali MR, Faridbod F, Abkenar SD, Alizadeh K, Niasari MS (2010) Fluorescence “turn-on” chemosensor for the selective detection of zinc ion based on Schiff-base derivative. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 75(3):978–982. 10.1016/j.saa.2009.12.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Enbanathan S, Munusamy S, Jothi D, Manojkumar S, Manickamc S, Iyer SK (2022) Zinc ion detection using a benzothiazole-based highly selective fluorescence “turn-on” chemosensor and its real-time application. RSC Adv 12(43):27839–27845. 10.1039/D2RA04874D [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sun J, Yu T, Yu H, Sun M, Li H, Zhang Z, Jiang H, Wang S (2014) Highly efficient turn-on fluorescence detection of zinc(ii) based on multi-ligand metal chelation. Anal Methods 6:6768–6773. 10.1039/C4AY00844H [Google Scholar]
- 42.Xu H, Wang Z, Li Y, Ma S, Hua P, Zhong X (2013) A quantum dot-based “off–on” fluorescent probe for biological detection of zinc ions. Analyst 138:2181–2191. 10.1039/C3AN36742H [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Xu H, Miao R, Fang Z, Zhong X (2011) Quantum dot-based “turn-on” fluorescent probe for detection of zinc and cadmium ions in aqueous media. Anal Chim Acta 687(1):82–88. 10.1016/j.aca.2010.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Jonaghani MZ, Boeini HZ, Moradi H (2019) A coumarin based highly sensitive fluorescent chemosensor for selective detection of zinc ion. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 207:16–22. 10.1016/j.saa.2018.08.061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Patil M, Bothra S, Sahoo SK, Rather HA, Vasita R, Bendre R, Kuwar A (2018) Highly selective nicotinohydrazide based ‘turn-on’ chemosensor for the detection of bioactive zinc(II): its biocompitability and bioimaging application in cancer cells. Sensors Actuators B Chem 270:200–206. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.05.022 [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ahmad T, Abdel-Azeim S, Khan S, Ullah N (2022) Turn-on fluorescent sensors for nanomolar detection of zinc ions: synthesis, properties and DFT studies. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 139:104507–104512. 10.1016/j.jtice.2022.104507 [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yang R, Li K, Wang K, Zhao F, Li N, Liu F (2003) Porphyrin assembly on β-Cyclodextrin for selective sensing and detection of a zinc ion based on the dual emission fluorescence ratio. Anal Chem 75(3):612–621. 10.1021/ac020467n [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Shen LY, Chen XL, Yang XJ, Xu H, Huang YL, Zhang X, Redshaw C, Zhang QL (2021) A highly selective turn-on fluorescent probe for the detection of zinc. Molecules 26(13):3825–3813. 10.3390/molecules26133825 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Aziz AAA, Aboelhasana AE, Sayed MA (2020) A simple fluorescent Chemosensor for detection of zinc ions in some real samples and intracellular imaging in living cells. J Braz Chem Soc 31(8):1635–1647. 10.21577/0103-5053.20200049 [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wang P, Wu X, Wu J, Liao Y (2019) Highly selective and sensitive peptide-based fluorescent chemosensor for detection of zinc(II) ions in aqueous medium and living cells. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 382:111929–111928. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.111929 [Google Scholar]
- 51.Na YJ, Hwang IH, Jo HY, Lee SA, Park GJ, Kim C (2013) Fluorescent chemosensor based-on the combination of julolidine and furan for selective detection of zinc ion. Inorg Chem Commun 35:342–345. 10.1016/j.inoche.2013.07.011 [Google Scholar]
- 52.Arvas B, Ucar B, Acar T, Arvas MB, Sahin Y, Aydogan F, Yolacan C (2021) A new coumarin based Schiff base fluorescence probe for zinc ion. Tetrahedron 88:132127–132127. 10.1016/j.tet.2021.132127 [Google Scholar]
- 53.Yu H, Yu T, Sun M, Sun J, Zhang S, Wang S, Jiang H (2014) A symmetric pseudo salen based turn-on fluorescent probe for sensitive detection and visual analysis of zinc ion. Talanta 125:301–305. 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.03.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tümay SO, Iraninezhad MH, Khataee A (2020) Design of novel anthracene-based fluorescence sensor for sensitive and selective determination of iron in real samples. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 402:112819–112819. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2020.112819 [Google Scholar]
- 55.Mao J, He Q, Liu W (2010) An rhodamine-based fluorescence probe for iron(III) ion determination in aqueous solution. Talanta 80(5):2093–2098. 10.1016/j.talanta.2009.11.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Luo A, Wang H, Wang Y, Huang Q, Zhang Q (2016) A novel colorimetric and turn-on fluorescent chemosensor for iron(III) ion detection and its application to cellular imaging. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 168:37–44. 10.1016/j.saa.2016.05.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Şenol AM, Onganer Y, Meral K (2017) An unusual “off-on” fluorescence sensor for iron(III) detection based on fluorescein–reduced graphene oxide functionalized with polyethyleneimine. Sensors Actuators B Chem 239(2017):343–351. 10.1016/j.snb.2016.08.025 [Google Scholar]
- 58.Huang Y, Zhang H, Xu X, Zhou J, Lu F, Zhang Z, Hu Z, Luo J (2018) Fast synthesis of porous copper nanoclusters for fluorescence detection of iron ions in water samples. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 202:65–69. 10.1016/j.saa.2018.05.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zhu X, Duan Y, Li P, Fan H, Han T, Huang X (2019) A highly selective and instantaneously responsive Schiff base fluorescent sensor for the “turn-off” detection of iron(III), iron(II), and copper(II) ions. Anal Methods 11(5):642–447. 10.1039/C8AY02526F [Google Scholar]
- 60.Zhou L, Zhang H, Luan Y, Cheng S, Fan LJ (2014) Amplified detection of Iron ion based on Plasmon enhanced fluorescence and subsequently fluorescence quenching. Nano-Micro Lett 6(4):327–334. 10.1007/s40820-014-0005-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Xie Z, Sun X, Jiao J, Xin X (2017) Ionic liquid-functionalized carbon quantum dots as fluorescent probes for sensitive and selective detection of iron ion and ascorbic acid. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 529(2017):38–44. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.05.069 [Google Scholar]
- 62.Qu K, Wang J, Ren J, Qu X (2013) Carbon dots prepared by hydrothermal treatment of dopamine as an effective fluorescent sensing platform for the label-free detection of Iron(III) ions and dopamine. Chem A Eur J 19(22):7243–7249. 10.1002/chem.201300042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wang Y, Lao S, Ding W, Zhang Z, Liu S (2019) A novel ratiometric fluorescent probe for detection of iron ions and zinc ions based on dual-emission carbon dots. Sensors Actuators B Chem 284:186–192. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.12.139 [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zhang B, Liu H, Wu F, Hao GF, Chen Y, Tan C, Tan Y, Jiang Y (2017) A dual-response quinoline-based fluorescent sensor for the detection of copper (II) and Iron(III) ions in aqueous medium. Sensors Actuators B Chem 243:765–774. 10.1016/j.snb.2016.12.067 [Google Scholar]
- 65.Singh V, Mishra AK (2016) Green and cost-effective fluorescent carbon nanoparticles for the selective and sensitive detection of iron (III) ions in aqueous solution: mechanistic insights and cell line imaging studies. Sensors Actuators B Chem 227:467–474. 10.1016/j.snb.2015.12.071 [Google Scholar]
- 66.Bozkurt E, Arık M, Onganer Y (2015) A novel system for Fe3+ ion detection based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Sensors Actuators B Chem 221:136–147. 10.1016/j.snb.2015.06.097 [Google Scholar]
- 67.Sathiyan G, Chatterjee S, Sen P, Garg A, Gupta RK, Singh A (2019) Thiazolothiazole-based fluorescence probe towards detection of copper and Iron ions through formation of radical cations. Chemistry Select 4(40):11718–11725. 10.1002/slct.201902994 [Google Scholar]
- 68.Braga MS, Jaimes RFVV, Borysow W, Gomes OF, Salcedo WJ (2017) Portable multispectral colorimeter for metallic ion detection and classification. Sensors 17(8):1730–1714. 10.3390/s17081730 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Benesi HA, Hildebrand JH (1949) A spectrophotometric investigation of the interaction of iodine with aromatic hydrocarbons. J Am Chem Soc 71:2703–2707. 10.1021/ja01176a030 [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kamel RM, El-Sakka SS, Bahgat K, Monir MR, Soliman MHA (2021) New turn on fluorimetric sensor for direct detection of ultra-trace ferric ions in industrial wastewater and its application by test strips. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 411:113218–113216. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2021.113218 [Google Scholar]
- 71.Pena-Pereira F, Wojnowski W, Tobiszewski M (2020) AGREE—analytical GREEnness metric approach and software. Anal Chem 92:10076–10082. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c01887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Essawy AA, Alsohaimi IH, Hassan HMA, El Agammy EF, Hussein MF, Hasanin THA, Essawy AI, Ali HM (2024) Basic fuchsin dye as the first fluorophore for optical sensing of morpholine in fruits crust and urine samples. Anal Chem 96(1):373–380. 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c04392 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.




