Skip to main content
Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders logoLink to Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders
letter
. 2025 Jun 13;13(4):102216. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2025.102216

Rationale for glue embolization rather than foam sclerosis in the endovascular treatment of pelvic reservoir in pelvic venous disorders

Romaric Loffroy 1
PMCID: PMC12206303  PMID: 40518231

We read with great interest the article by Zhou et al1 recently published in the Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders and evaluating the safety and efficacy of coils plus glue vs coils plus sclerosant in treating pelvic venous disorders (PeVDs).

First, we would like to congratulate the authors for their study, which represents the first series to date showing increased efficacy and reduced complications with the use of glue as compared with sclerosants in such a setting.1 Various embolic materials can be used during endovascular treatment of PeVDs, the most common of which involve sclerosants and coils.2, 3, 4 Unfortunately, solid data supporting the superiority of one material over another are lacking. However, the promising results of this study may be attributed to the properties of cyanoacrylates and highlight the rationale of using them for occluding the pelvic reservoir, which has similarities with the nidus of an arteriovenous malformation.5, 6, 7 Indeed, the cyanoacrylate/ethiodized oil ratio affects the radiopacity and the viscosity of the mixture, as well as the glue polymerization time, helping to achieve a more visible and safer embolization of the pelvic varices and ovarian veins than that with sclerosants.8 It allows for a lower risk of lung migration and systemic complications than fluid sclerosants, as reported here. Furthermore, glue functions independently of the coagulation parameters, such that polymerization occurs immediately upon contact with blood, leading to fast, complete, and durable occlusion of large insufficient veins, with the potential to treat the small tributaries that are often associated and may cause pelvic pain recurrence.8 It is of utmost importance compared with sclerosants, whose maximum quantity that can be used is limited.9 The occlusion obtained with cyanoacrylates is then more efficient, avoiding the need for multiple coils, as shown here.

In conclusion, glue embolization seems to be a safer and better option than foam sclerosis for patients with PeVDs. It can be used to perform a more complete and durable embolization of pelvic varicosities, without the risk of the migration of embolic material. For these reasons, this is our first choice. Large studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

References

  • 1.Zhou Z., Yang M., Guo P., et al. Effectiveness and safety of coils plus glue in slope embankment technology versus coils plus sclerosant in embolization therapy for reflux-type pelvic venous disorders. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024;12 doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Paisant-Thouveny F., Le Pennec V., Loffroy R. Varicoceles, pelvic varices and pelvic congestion syndrome: interventional radiology in diagnosis and treatment. Presse Med. 2019;48:419e434. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2019.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sutanto S.A., Tan M., Onida S., Davies A.H. A systematic review on isolated coil embolization for pelvic venous reflux. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2022;10:224–232.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Daniels J.P., Champaneria R., Shah L., Gupta J.K., Birch J., Moss J.G. Effectiveness of embolization or sclerotherapy of pelvic veins for reducing chronic pelvic pain: a systematic review. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27:1478–1486.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Maleux G., Stockx L., Wilms G., Marchal G. Ovarian vein embolization for the treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome: long-term technical and clinical results. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000;11 doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61801-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gong M., He X., Zhao B., Kong J., Gu J., Su H. Ovarian vein embolization with N-butyl-2 cyanoacrylate Glubran-2® for the treatment of pelvic venous disorder. Front Surg. 2021;8 doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.760600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ignacio Leal Lorenzo J., Gallardo Madueño G., Alcázar Peral A., Pillado Rodríguez E., Cárdenas Santos R., Alonso Burgos A. Bilateral ovarian vein embolisation from a unilateral basilic approach with n-2-butyl cyanoacrylate and crossover technique for pelvic congestion syndrome. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022;63:163–164. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.09.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Comby P.O., Guillen K., Chevallier O., et al. Endovascular use of cyanoacrylate-lipiodol mixture for peripheral embolization: properties, techniques, pitfalls, and applications. J Clin Med. 2021;10:4320. doi: 10.3390/jcm10194320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sarvananthan T., Shepherd A.C., Willenberg T., Davies A.H. Neurological complications of sclerotherapy for varicose veins. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55:243–251. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.05.093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES