Skip to main content
BMJ Open Respiratory Research logoLink to BMJ Open Respiratory Research
. 2025 Jun 27;12(1):e002977. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002977

Comparing the CO2 emissions of metered dose inhalers and dry powder inhalers: a cross-sectional environmental impact analysis of asthma and COPD therapies in South Tyrol, Italy

Jonas Mairhofer 1, Katia Sangermano 2, Günther Morandell 3, Giuliano Piccoliori 1, Adolf Engl 1, Christian Josef Wiedermann 1,
PMCID: PMC12207142  PMID: 40579209

Abstract

Introduction

Inhalers for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are essential therapeutic interventions; however, they contribute significantly to healthcare-related CO2-equivalent (CO2eq) emissions, particularly currently used metered dose inhalers (MDIs), which use hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) propellants such as HFA-124a and HFA-227. This study quantifies the carbon footprint of inhaler utilisation in South Tyrol, Italy, and evaluates the potential CO2eq reductions achievable through the transition from MDIs to dry powder inhalers (DPIs).

Methods

This cross-sectional analysis used regional healthcare prescription data for inhalers dispensed in South Tyrol in 2021 and 2022, encompassing approximately 540 000 inhabitants. CO2eq emissions were calculated based on HFA content in MDIs, employing established global warming potentials, while DPI emissions were estimated from current literature values.

Findings

A total of 100 778 inhalers were dispensed in 2021 (45 031 MDIs, 55 747 DPIs) and 101 334 in 2022 (49 711 MDIs, 51 623 DPIs). MDIs were responsible for approximately 1000–1100 tonnes of CO2eq annually, whereas DPIs accounted for less than 55 tonnes. A transition to DPIs could potentially result in significant CO2eq reductions.

Conclusions

Usage of DPIs over currently used MDIs in patients who can use them could mitigate healthcare-associated global warming potential, providing a viable strategy for climate change mitigation in respiratory care. Development of low-global warming potential MDIs is a complementary strategy.

Keywords: Asthma Pharmacology, COPD Pharmacology, Inhaler devices


WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

  • This study provides local evidence from South Tyrol, demonstrating that transitioning from MDIs to DPIs could reduce CO2eq emissions by several hundred tonnes annually, even in a region with a relatively small population.

HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY

  • The findings support policies aimed at promoting DPIs for stable patients in respiratory therapy to reduce healthcare-related emissions, in parallel to developing greener propellants to suit all patients’ needs. This evidence may inform similar initiatives in other regions seeking to mitigate climate impact within healthcare practices.

Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are among the most prevalent chronic respiratory diseases globally.1 In South Tyrol, a province in Italy with approximately 540 000 inhabitants, COPD and asthma significantly strain healthcare, with respiratory diseases accounting for 7.4% of all deaths and COPD responsible for 40% of lung disease deaths.2

Metered dose inhalers (MDIs) and dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are the primary treatments for COPD and asthma, crucial for symptom control and improving patients’ quality of life. MDIs, however, rely on hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) containing hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) propellants HFA-124a and HFA-227, which increase their carbon footprint. Recent studies indicate that switching to DPIs, which do not use HFCs, could reduce CO2-equivalent (CO2eq) emissions.3 This study aims to quantify the carbon footprint of inhaler use in South Tyrol and examine the environmental benefits of transitioning from currently used MDIs to DPIs.

Methods

The investigation quantified the carbon footprint of inhalers prescribed for asthma and COPD in South Tyrol during 2021 and 2022. Its reporting adheres to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines for cross-sectional studies. Prescription data for MDIs and DPIs were obtained from regional healthcare databases, encompassing approximately 100 000 inhalers annually. The analysis focused on calculating the carbon emissions associated with MDIs by multiplying the quantity of HFA propellants used in each inhaler by their respective global warming potential (GWP) values, based on international environmental standards.4 For DPIs, the CO2eq emissions were estimated using available emission factors from recent literature.5

Statistical analyses were used to assess the environmental impacts of MDIs and DPIs by comparing carbon emissions across inhaler types and medication classes. Additional information on prescription data handling, calculation approaches and analysis can be found in online supplemental materials.

Patient and public involvement

Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

Results

This study analysed the distribution and carbon footprint of inhalers used in South Tyrol for asthma and COPD treatment during 2021 and 2022. A total of 199 914 inhalers were prescribed in 2021, with 45 031 MDIs (22.53%) and 55 747 DPIs (27.89%) accounting for 50.42% of all respiratory medications prescribed. In 2022, the total number of inhalers increased to 221 170, with 49 711 MDIs (22.47%) and 51 623 DPIs (23.34%), representing 45.81% of all inhalers (table 1). Online supplemental table 1 details inhaler prescriptions by active substance and type.

Table 1. Distribution of MDIs and DPIs as part of total outpatient respiratory drug prescriptions dispensed in South Tyrol (2021 and 2022).

Year Total respiratory drug use MDIs dispensed (% of total) DPIs dispensed (% of total) MDIs+DPIs (% of total)
2021 199 914 45 031 (22.53%) 55 747 (27.89%) 100 778 (50.42%)
2022 221 170 49 711 (22.47%) 51 623 (23.34%) 101 334 (45.81%)

DPIs, dry powder inhalers; MDIs, metered dose inhalers.

The carbon emissions generated by MDIs and DPIs differed significantly. In 2021, MDIs emitted a total of 1 007 793 kg CO2eq, while DPIs emitted 55 747 kg CO2eq. In 2022, MDIs contributed 1 101 915 kg CO2 compared with DPIs’ 51 623 kg CO2 (figure 1). This represents an increase of approximately 100 tonnes of CO2eq from MDIs in 2022, while DPI-related emissions decreased slightly. Online supplemental tables 2 and 3 detail the CO2eq emissions for each inhaler type and substance class for both years.

Figure 1. CO2-equivalent emissions in tonnes from metered dose inhalers (MDIs) and dry powder inhalers (DPIs) dispensed in South Tyrol in 2021 and 2022.

Figure 1

The inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting beta2-agonists (ICS+LABA) combination inhalers were responsible for the majority of CO2eq emissions, contributing 45.26% of the total MDI emissions in 2022. This was followed by short-acting beta2-agonists (SABA) inhalers, which accounted for 39.85% of MDI emissions. In contrast, DPIs in the ICS+LABA category emitted a substantially lower amount of CO2eq (table 2).

Table 2. CO2-equivalent emissions by inhaler type and substance class in South Tyrol (2021 and 2022).

Substance class Year MDIs (kg CO2eq) DPIs (kg CO2eq) Total (kg CO2eq)
ICS 2021 67 568 709 68 277
2022 89 546 732 90 278
LABA 2021 6983 3924 10 907
2022 6671 2883 9554
ICS+LABA 2021 492 951 29 083 522 034
2022 498 724 28 613 527 337
SABA 2021 389 117 N/A 389 117
2022 439 153 N/A 439 153
LAMA 2021 N/A 17 071 17 071
2022 N/A 13 984 13 984
ICS+LABA+LAMA 2021 24 604 849 25 453
2022 30 235 1033 31 268
SABA+SAMA 2021 12 316 N/A 12 316
2022 15 964 N/A 15 964
LABA+LAMA 2021 943 4111 5054
2022 7166 4387 11 553

DPI, dry powder inhaler; eq, equivalent; ICS, inhaled corticosteroids; LABA, long-acting beta2-agonists; LAMA, long-acting muscarinic antagonists; MDI, metered dose inhaler; SABA, short-acting beta2-agonists; SAMA, short-acting muscarinic antagonists.

To further illustrate the impact of a potential transition, the CO2eq savings were estimated that could be achieved if all MDIs dispensed in 2022 were replaced by DPIs, assuming a DPI emission of 1 kg CO2eq per device. The greatest savings were observed in the ICS + LABA class, where replacing 23 751 MDIs could reduce emissions by over 426 000 kg CO2eq annually. Other notable reductions include approximately 84 500 kg for ICS, 28 100 kg for ICS + LABA + LAMA, and over 6000 kg each for LABA and LABA + LAMA. Detailed results are provided in online supplemental table 4.

Discussion

This study measured the carbon footprint of inhaler use in South Tyrol, a region with around 540 000 residents, finding that MDIs produce significantly higher CO2eq emissions than DPIs. Despite the small population, MDIs emitted over 1000 tonnes of CO2eq annually in 2021 and 2022, while DPIs emitted less than 55 tonnes each year. These results highlight the considerable environmental impact of inhaler therapy in a healthcare system with an MDI to DPI ratio of about 1:1 and suggest significant CO2eq reductions if patients switched from MDIs to DPIs. The findings support the study’s aim to assess the environmental benefits of transitioning from MDIs to DPIs, indicating that such a shift could notably decrease healthcare-related emissions, aiding climate change mitigation.

These findings are consistent with previous research, which demonstrated that MDIs disproportionately contribute to inhaler-related CO2eq emissions due to their reliance on HFA propellants HFA-134a and HFA-227.6 7 In contrast, DPIs, which do not use propellants, have a significantly smaller carbon footprint. Studies have shown that countries such as the UK have already implemented national policies to promote DPI use.8 The data from South Tyrol support similar policy measures, as they reflect the environmental impact of MDI use in a local context. However, while switching to DPIs can be effective, it is critical to consider when and how this switch is implemented to maintain clinical efficacy.9

While environmental concerns are increasingly acknowledged, patients and clinicians primarily prioritise clinical efficacy, ease of use, safety and adherence when selecting inhalers. Environmental factors currently play a secondary role in decision-making.10 The clinical context is crucial when changing inhaler therapy. Transitioning stable, well-managed patients from MDIs to DPIs is possible with proper education and support. Herrera et al11 suggest that stable patients are more receptive to learning new inhaler techniques with professional guidance, minimising treatment disruption and enabling a shift to eco-friendly inhalers. MDIs, often used with spacers, are recommended in acute settings for their ease of use and rapid action.5 A hybrid approach may be optimal, transitioning stable patients to DPIs while retaining MDIs for exacerbations to ensure effective symptom control and care continuity.

This study underscores the need for policies promoting a gradual transition to DPIs or more eco-friendly MDIs for stable patients to achieve environmental benefits without compromising care. Prescribing flexibility must be maintained, keeping MDIs available for acute exacerbations, especially for vulnerable populations such as the elderly, children or those with severe conditions who may require the rapid delivery of MDIs for effective symptom control. In addition, patient preference and inhaler cost can significantly affect adherence.12 Poor adherence, in turn, may increase the risk of exacerbations, leading to greater use of carbon-intensive healthcare resources.13

The analysis also quantified the theoretical CO2eq reductions achievable by switching all MDIs to DPIs within each drug class. The largest emission reductions were attributable to the ICS + LABA class, highlighting this combination as a key target for environmentally sustainable prescribing. Even smaller drug classes, such as LABA or LABA + LAMA, showed measurable benefits. These findings support interventions focusing on high-emission classes, which may yield substantial environmental gains without requiring a full system-wide switch. A full switch from MDIs to DPIs is unlikely due to clinical and patient-related factors. To reflect a more realistic approach, we estimated a 50% switch scenario. For ICS + LABA inhalers in 2022 alone, this would have saved over 213 000 kg CO2eq. Even partial substitution in high-emission classes can yield substantial environmental benefits with minimal disruption to current prescribing practice.

In Italy, SABA medications are currently only marketed as MDIs, with no DPI alternatives available. As a result, all SABA prescriptions in South Tyrol relied on high-emission devices, making this class the second largest contributor to total inhaler-related CO2eq emissions. The development or approval of SABA-DPI formulations could be a key strategy for further emission reductions.

South Tyrol’s inhaler prescription pattern, characterised by a balanced MDI:DPI ratio and predominant use of MDIs for SABA and ICS+LABAis broadly consistent with trends in Italy and other European countries such as Germany and France, where DPIs constitute around half of prescribed inhalers.14 This alignment supports the applicability of the findings to comparable healthcare systems aiming to reduce inhaler-related emissions.

A limitation of this study is its reliance on publicly available data for HFA propellant quantities, potentially missing variations across inhaler brands or patient adherence. Patient-level data were not available, preventing analysis of inhaler use or emissions per patient. The study did not include soft mist inhalers, which are propellant-free and therefore have minimal CO2-eq emissions. Future research should explore the economic impact of switching to DPIs and assess patient preferences for different inhaler types.

This study confirms that transitioning from MDIs to DPIs has the potential to substantially reduce healthcare-related CO2eq emissions in South Tyrol, with annual MDI emissions exceeding 1000 tonnes, comparable to the emissions from driving approximately 6 million km in an average passenger car. However, this environmental benefit must be weighed against patient-specific clinical needs. Blanket switching for all patients is neither feasible nor advisable; instead, transitions should be prioritised for patients who are stable on maintenance therapy and for drug classes where DPI alternatives exist. Clinicians should retain flexibility to prescribe MDIs when clinically necessary, particularly for acute symptom relief or in vulnerable populations such as children, the elderly or those with coordination difficulties.

Low-GWP propellants such as HFA-152a are expected from 2025 and could reduce MDI climate impact by over 90%. MDIs also remain essential for young children and are more easily recycled, offering complementary strategies to reduce emissions alongside switching to DPIs.15 16

Future health policy should promote the use of low-emission inhalers within the framework of evidence-based prescribing and patient-centred care. From 2025, low-GWP propellants are expected to enter the market, potentially reducing the environmental burden of MDIs. These developments may further expand future options for climate-conscious prescribing.

Supplementary material

online supplemental file 1
bmjresp-12-1-s001.docx (34.5KB, docx)
DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002977

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted as part of the thesis of JM at the Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. The authors express their gratitude to the Medical University of Innsbruck for its support throughout the research process.

Footnotes

Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Patient consent for publication: Not applicable.

Ethics approval: Not applicable.

Patient and public involvement: Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

Data availability free text: The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Due to the commercial sensitivity of the drug dispensing data, these data cannot be publicly shared.

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1.Adeloye D, Song P, Zhu Y, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of, and risk factors for, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in 2019: a systematic review and modelling analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2022;10:447–58. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00511-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Osservatorio Sanitario . Relazione Sanitaria 2022. Bolzano-Bozen: Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano-Alto Adige; 2024. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Usmani OS, Levy ML. Effective respiratory management of asthma and COPD and the environmental impacts of inhalers. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2023;33:24. doi: 10.1038/s41533-023-00346-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Myhre G, Shindell D, Bréon F-M, et al. Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing. Climate Change 2013 - The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press; 2014. pp. 659–740. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Panigone S, Sandri F, Ferri R, et al. Environmental impact of inhalers for respiratory diseases: decreasing the carbon footprint while preserving patient-tailored treatment. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020;7:e000571. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Janson C, Henderson R, Löfdahl M, et al. Carbon footprint impact of the choice of inhalers for asthma and COPD. Thorax. 2020;75:82–4. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-213744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Emeryk AW, Sosnowski T, Kupczyk M, et al. Impact of inhalers used in the treatment of respiratory diseases on global warming. Adv Respir Med. 2021;89:427–38. doi: 10.5603/ARM.a2021.0092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Woodcock A, Janson C, Rees J, et al. Effects of switching from a metered dose inhaler to a dry powder inhaler on climate emissions and asthma control: post-hoc analysis. Thorax. 2022;77:1187–92. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-218088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Désy L, Lachapelle P, Couillard S, et al. The Excessive Carbon Footprint of Inhalers Used in Airway Disease and its Remedies. touchREVIEWS in Respiratory & Pulmonary Diseases. 2023;8:1. doi: 10.17925/USPRD.2023.8.2.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lough G, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Roche N, et al. Patient and Provider Perspectives Driving Inhaler Choice: Optimizing Sustainable Health Care. Chest. 2024;166:934–7. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.3774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Herrera H, Charalambous M, Dean H, et al. Patients’ views and behaviours in relation to asthma inhalers use and their impact on environmental sustainability: a cross-sectional survey study. Int J Pharm Pract. 2024;32:i35. doi: 10.1093/ijpp/riae013.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Attar-Zadeh D, Lewis H, Orlovic M. Health-care Resource Requirements and Potential Financial Consequences of an Environmentally Driven Switch in Respiratory Inhaler Use in England. J Health Econ Outcomes Res . 2021;8:46–54. doi: 10.36469/001c.26113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rabin AS, Weinstein JB, Whittington TN, et al. Implementation of a Metered-Dose Inhaler to Dry-Powder Inhaler National Formulary Transition. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7:e2449234. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.49234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Janson C, Maslova E, Wilkinson A, et al. The carbon footprint of respiratory treatments in Europe and Canada: an observational study from the CARBON programme. Eur Respir J. 2022;60:2102760. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02760-2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Murphy A, Howlett D, Gowson A, et al. Understanding the feasibility and environmental effectiveness of a pilot postal inhaler recovery and recycling scheme. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2023;33:5. doi: 10.1038/s41533-023-00327-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jeswani HK, Azapagic A. Life cycle environmental impacts of inhalers. J Clean Prod. 2019;237:117733. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117733. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

online supplemental file 1
bmjresp-12-1-s001.docx (34.5KB, docx)
DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002977

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon reasonable request.


Articles from BMJ Open Respiratory Research are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES