Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biochemical Journal logoLink to Biochemical Journal
. 2000 Apr 1;347(Pt 1):163–171.

Function of the farnesyl moiety in visual signalling.

N E McCarthy 1, M Akhtar 1
PMCID: PMC1220944  PMID: 10727415

Abstract

The aim of this work was to search for the biological function of protein isoprenylation. For this purpose, peptides were synthesized and, by using a convenient protocol, were farnesylated or geranylated at the thiol group of the C-terminal cysteine. The interaction of these peptides with photoactivated rhodopsin (Rho*, which is functionally equivalent to metarhodopsin II) was studied with the use of sheep rod outer segments. The sheep rod outer segments, although chosen because of the unavailability of bovine material in the U.K., had favourable optical properties for the direct determination of spectral changes in membrane suspensions. At 20 degrees C and pH 8.0, the t((1/2)) of the conversion of metarhodopsin II (Meta II) (lambda(max) 389 nm) into Meta III (lambda(max) 463 nm) was 3.2 min (less than 1.5 min at 37 degrees C). The t((1/2)) was unaltered in the presence of non-farnesyl peptides but increased by approx. 20% with farnesyl-N-acetylcysteine, by approx. 60% with farnesyl peptide containing residues 544-558 of rhodopsin kinase and by approx. 140% with farnesyl peptide corresponding to residues 60-71 of the gamma-subunit of visual transducin. The effect of various peptides on the activities of bovine and sheep rhodopsin kinase was also studied. In this assay the non-farnesyl peptides and common detergents were found to be inactive; however, all the farnesyl peptides inhibited the activity to various extents. Cumulatively, the results show that, whereas the farnesyl peptides as well as a number of membrane-disrupting detergents affected the conversion from Meta II into Meta III, the inhibition of the activity of rhodopsin kinase was achieved only by the farnesyl peptides. The results are interpreted as showing that Meta II possesses a binding site for the recognition of the farnesyl group that can be used either by the farnesyl moiety of rhodopsin kinase or transducin to make the initial encounter, which can then develop into multivalent interactions characterized by the structure, and the desired function, of each protein.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (205.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Akhtar M., Blosse P. T., Dewhurst P. B. Studies on vision. The nature of the retinal-opsin linkage. Biochem J. 1968 Dec;110(4):693–702. doi: 10.1042/bj1100693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akhtar M., Blosse P. T., Dewhurst P. B. The reduction of a rhodopsin derivative. Life Sci. 1965 Jun;4(12):1221–1226. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(65)90336-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anant J. S., Ong O. C., Xie H. Y., Clarke S., O'Brien P. J., Fung B. K. In vivo differential prenylation of retinal cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase catalytic subunits. J Biol Chem. 1992 Jan 15;267(2):687–690. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BOWNDS D., WALD G. REACTION OF THE RHODOPSIN CHROMOPHORE WITH SODIUM BOROHYDRIDE. Nature. 1965 Jan 16;205:254–257. doi: 10.1038/205254a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baldwin P. A., Hubbell W. L. Effects of lipid environment on the light-induced conformational changes of rhodopsin. 1. Absence of metarhodopsin II production in dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine recombinant membranes. Biochemistry. 1985 May 21;24(11):2624–2632. doi: 10.1021/bi00332a006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baldwin P. A., Hubbell W. L. Effects of lipid environment on the light-induced conformational changes of rhodopsin. 2. Roles of lipid chain length, unsaturation, and phase state. Biochemistry. 1985 May 21;24(11):2633–2639. doi: 10.1021/bi00332a007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bennett N., Michel-Villaz M., Kühn H. Light-induced interaction between rhodopsin and the GTP-binding protein. Metarhodopsin II is the major photoproduct involved. Eur J Biochem. 1982 Sep;127(1):97–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1982.tb06842.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bigay J., Faurobert E., Franco M., Chabre M. Roles of lipid modifications of transducin subunits in their GDP-dependent association and membrane binding. Biochemistry. 1994 Nov 29;33(47):14081–14090. doi: 10.1021/bi00251a017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Blazynski C., Ostroy S. E. Pathways in the hydrolysis of vertebrate rhodopsin. Vision Res. 1984;24(5):459–470. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(84)90043-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bownds D. Site of attachment of retinal in rhodopsin. Nature. 1967 Dec 23;216(5121):1178–1181. doi: 10.1038/2161178a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Brown N. G., Fowles C., Sharma R., Akhtar M. Mechanistic studies on rhodopsin kinase. Light-dependent phosphorylation of C-terminal peptides of rhodopsin. Eur J Biochem. 1992 Sep 15;208(3):659–667. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb17232.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dean K. R., Akhtar M. Novel mechanism for the activation of rhodopsin kinase: implications for other G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRK's). Biochemistry. 1996 May 14;35(19):6164–6172. doi: 10.1021/bi952480q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dean K. R., Akhtar M. Phosphorylation of solubilised dark-adapted rhodopsin. Insights into the activation of rhodopsin kinase. Eur J Biochem. 1993 Apr 15;213(2):881–890. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb17832.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. ELLMAN G. L. A colorimetric method for determining low concentrations of mercaptans. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1958 Apr;74(2):443–450. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(58)90014-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Farrens D. L., Khorana H. G. Structure and function in rhodopsin. Measurement of the rate of metarhodopsin II decay by fluorescence spectroscopy. J Biol Chem. 1995 Mar 10;270(10):5073–5076. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.10.5073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Findlay J. B., Brett M., Pappin D. J. Primary structure of C-terminal functional sites in ovine rhodopsin. Nature. 1981 Sep 24;293(5830):314–317. doi: 10.1038/293314a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fukada Y., Takao T., Ohguro H., Yoshizawa T., Akino T., Shimonishi Y. Farnesylated gamma-subunit of photoreceptor G protein indispensable for GTP-binding. Nature. 1990 Aug 16;346(6285):658–660. doi: 10.1038/346658a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hamm H. E., Rarick H. M. Specific peptide probes for G-protein interactions with receptors. Methods Enzymol. 1994;237:423–436. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(94)37079-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Inglese J., Glickman J. F., Lorenz W., Caron M. G., Lefkowitz R. J. Isoprenylation of a protein kinase. Requirement of farnesylation/alpha-carboxyl methylation for full enzymatic activity of rhodopsin kinase. J Biol Chem. 1992 Jan 25;267(3):1422–1425. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kamiya Y., Sakurai A., Tamura S., Takahashi N. Structure of rhodotorucine A, a novel lipopeptide, inducing mating tube formation in Rhodosporidium toruloides. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1978 Aug 14;83(3):1077–1083. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(78)91505-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kibelbek J., Mitchell D. C., Beach J. M., Litman B. J. Functional equivalence of metarhodopsin II and the Gt-activating form of photolyzed bovine rhodopsin. Biochemistry. 1991 Jul 9;30(27):6761–6768. doi: 10.1021/bi00241a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kisselev O. G., Ermolaeva M. V., Gautam N. A farnesylated domain in the G protein gamma subunit is a specific determinant of receptor coupling. J Biol Chem. 1994 Aug 26;269(34):21399–21402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kisselev O., Ermolaeva M., Gautam N. Efficient interaction with a receptor requires a specific type of prenyl group on the G protein gamma subunit. J Biol Chem. 1995 Oct 27;270(43):25356–25358. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.43.25356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. König B., Welte W., Hofmann K. P. Photoactivation of rhodopsin and interaction with transducin in detergent micelles. Effect of 'doping' with steroid molecules. FEBS Lett. 1989 Oct 23;257(1):163–166. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(89)81811-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lai R. K., Perez-Sala D., Cañada F. J., Rando R. R. The gamma subunit of transducin is farnesylated. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Oct;87(19):7673–7677. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.19.7673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lambright D. G., Sondek J., Bohm A., Skiba N. P., Hamm H. E., Sigler P. B. The 2.0 A crystal structure of a heterotrimeric G protein. Nature. 1996 Jan 25;379(6563):311–319. doi: 10.1038/379311a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lorenz W., Inglese J., Palczewski K., Onorato J. J., Caron M. G., Lefkowitz R. J. The receptor kinase family: primary structure of rhodopsin kinase reveals similarities to the beta-adrenergic receptor kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Oct 1;88(19):8715–8719. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.19.8715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. MATTHEWS R. G., HUBBARD R., BROWN P. K., WALD G. TAUTOMERIC FORMS OF METARHODOPSIN. J Gen Physiol. 1963 Nov;47:215–240. doi: 10.1085/jgp.47.2.215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Marshall C. J. Protein prenylation: a mediator of protein-protein interactions. Science. 1993 Mar 26;259(5103):1865–1866. doi: 10.1126/science.8456312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mitchell D. C., Kibelbek J., Litman B. J. Effect of phosphorylation on receptor conformation: the metarhodopsin I in equilibrium with metarhodopsin II equilibrium in multiply phosphorylated rhodopsin. Biochemistry. 1992 Sep 8;31(35):8107–8111. doi: 10.1021/bi00150a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mitchell D. C., Straume M., Litman B. J. Role of sn-1-saturated,sn-2-polyunsaturated phospholipids in control of membrane receptor conformational equilibrium: effects of cholesterol and acyl chain unsaturation on the metarhodopsin I in equilibrium with metarhodopsin II equilibrium. Biochemistry. 1992 Jan 28;31(3):662–670. doi: 10.1021/bi00118a005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mitchell D. C., Straume M., Miller J. L., Litman B. J. Modulation of metarhodopsin formation by cholesterol-induced ordering of bilayer lipids. Biochemistry. 1990 Oct 2;29(39):9143–9149. doi: 10.1021/bi00491a007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mullen E., Akhtar M. Topographic and active-site studies on bovine rhodopsin. FEBS Lett. 1981 Sep 28;132(2):261–264. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(81)81174-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ovchinnikov YuA Rhodopsin and bacteriorhodopsin: structure-function relationships. FEBS Lett. 1982 Nov 8;148(2):179–191. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(82)80805-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. PITT G. A., COLLINS F. D., MORTON R. A., STOK P. Studies on rhodopsin. VIII. Retinylidenemethylamine, an indicator yellow analogue. Biochem J. 1955 Jan;59(1):122–128. doi: 10.1042/bj0590122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pfister C., Kühn H., Chabre M. Interaction between photoexcited rhodopsin and peripheral enzymes in frog retinal rods. Influence on the postmetarhodopsin II decay and phosphorylation rate of rhodopsin. Eur J Biochem. 1983 Nov 15;136(3):489–499. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1983.tb07767.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Schafer W. R., Rine J. Protein prenylation: genes, enzymes, targets, and functions. Annu Rev Genet. 1992;26:209–237. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.26.120192.001233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Simonds W. F., Butrynski J. E., Gautam N., Unson C. G., Spiegel A. M. G-protein beta gamma dimers. Membrane targeting requires subunit coexpression and intact gamma C-A-A-X domain. J Biol Chem. 1991 Mar 25;266(9):5363–5366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Stryer L. Visual excitation and recovery. J Biol Chem. 1991 Jun 15;266(17):10711–10714. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wall M. A., Coleman D. E., Lee E., Iñiguez-Lluhi J. A., Posner B. A., Gilman A. G., Sprang S. R. The structure of the G protein heterotrimer Gi alpha 1 beta 1 gamma 2. Cell. 1995 Dec 15;83(6):1047–1058. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90220-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang F. L., Casey P. J. Protein prenylation: molecular mechanisms and functional consequences. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:241–269. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.001325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biochemical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biochemical Society

RESOURCES