Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biochemical Journal logoLink to Biochemical Journal
. 2000 May 1;347(Pt 3):807–814.

Alanine mutagenesis of high-mobility-group-protein-1 box B (HMG1-B).

S Taudte 1, H Xin 1, N R Kallenbach 1
PMCID: PMC1221019  PMID: 10769186

Abstract

We have generated a set of alanine-scanning substitutions in high-mobility-group protein 1 box B (HMG1-B; the second domain of the HMG1 nuclear protein from the rat) in order to explore the influence of specific surface side chains on its function and folding. Guanidine hydrochloride and thermal unfolding studies have been carried out to investigate the effect of substituted residues on the folding pathway. Binding to four-way junction and linear-duplex DNA has been assayed to determine which residues play an important role in DNA binding. We have identified several mutants that are more stable or bind more tightly to the junction than the wild-type, including the particular phenylalanine side chain that is thought to intercalate into the DNA. Thus the interaction between HMG1-B and branched DNA substrates should exhibit differences from present models based on the structure of the complexes that have been solved to date.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (240.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allain F. H., Yen Y. M., Masse J. E., Schultze P., Dieckmann T., Johnson R. C., Feigon J. Solution structure of the HMG protein NHP6A and its interaction with DNA reveals the structural determinants for non-sequence-specific binding. EMBO J. 1999 May 4;18(9):2563–2579. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.9.2563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bednar J., Horowitz R. A., Grigoryev S. A., Carruthers L. M., Hansen J. C., Koster A. J., Woodcock C. L. Nucleosomes, linker DNA, and linker histone form a unique structural motif that directs the higher-order folding and compaction of chromatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Nov 24;95(24):14173–14178. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.24.14173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bianchi M. E., Beltrame M., Paonessa G. Specific recognition of cruciform DNA by nuclear protein HMG1. Science. 1989 Feb 24;243(4894 Pt 1):1056–1059. doi: 10.1126/science.2922595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bianchi M. E., Falciola L., Ferrari S., Lilley D. M. The DNA binding site of HMG1 protein is composed of two similar segments (HMG boxes), both of which have counterparts in other eukaryotic regulatory proteins. EMBO J. 1992 Mar;11(3):1055–1063. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05144.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bianchi M. E. Interaction of a protein from rat liver nuclei with cruciform DNA. EMBO J. 1988 Mar;7(3):843–849. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb02883.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bianchi M. E. Production of functional rat HMG1 protein in Escherichia coli. Gene. 1991 Aug 15;104(2):271–275. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(91)90261-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown B. M., Milla M. E., Smith T. L., Sauer R. T. Scanning mutagenesis of the Arc repressor as a functional probe of operator recognition. Nat Struct Biol. 1994 Mar;1(3):164–168. doi: 10.1038/nsb0394-164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown B. M., Sauer R. T. Tolerance of Arc repressor to multiple-alanine substitutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Mar 2;96(5):1983–1988. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.5.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bustin M., Reeves R. High-mobility-group chromosomal proteins: architectural components that facilitate chromatin function. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1996;54:35–100. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60360-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chow C. S., Barnes C. M., Lippard S. J. A single HMG domain in high-mobility group 1 protein binds to DNAs as small as 20 base pairs containing the major cisplatin adduct. Biochemistry. 1995 Mar 7;34(9):2956–2964. doi: 10.1021/bi00009a027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Falciola L., Murchie A. I., Lilley D. M., Bianchi M. Mutational analysis of the DNA binding domain A of chromosomal protein HMG1. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Feb 11;22(3):285–292. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.3.285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ferrari S., Harley V. R., Pontiggia A., Goodfellow P. N., Lovell-Badge R., Bianchi M. E. SRY, like HMG1, recognizes sharp angles in DNA. EMBO J. 1992 Dec;11(12):4497–4506. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05551.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Grosschedl R., Giese K., Pagel J. HMG domain proteins: architectural elements in the assembly of nucleoprotein structures. Trends Genet. 1994 Mar;10(3):94–100. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(94)90232-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hardman C. H., Broadhurst R. W., Raine A. R., Grasser K. D., Thomas J. O., Laue E. D. Structure of the A-domain of HMG1 and its interaction with DNA as studied by heteronuclear three- and four-dimensional NMR spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 1995 Dec 26;34(51):16596–16607. doi: 10.1021/bi00051a007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jantzen H. M., Admon A., Bell S. P., Tjian R. Nucleolar transcription factor hUBF contains a DNA-binding motif with homology to HMG proteins. Nature. 1990 Apr 26;344(6269):830–836. doi: 10.1038/344830a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Johnson C. A., Goddard J. P., Adams R. L. The effect of histone H1 and DNA methylation on transcription. Biochem J. 1995 Feb 1;305(Pt 3):791–798. doi: 10.1042/bj3050791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kunkel T. A., Bebenek K., McClary J. Efficient site-directed mutagenesis using uracil-containing DNA. Methods Enzymol. 1991;204:125–139. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)04008-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Love J. J., Li X., Case D. A., Giese K., Grosschedl R., Wright P. E. Structural basis for DNA bending by the architectural transcription factor LEF-1. Nature. 1995 Aug 31;376(6543):791–795. doi: 10.1038/376791a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Milardi D., la Rosa C., Fasone S., Grasso D. An alternative approach in the structure-based predictions of the thermodynamics of protein unfolding. Biophys Chem. 1997 Nov;69(1):43–51. doi: 10.1016/s0301-4622(97)00071-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Milla M. E., Brown B. M., Sauer R. T. Protein stability effects of a complete set of alanine substitutions in Arc repressor. Nat Struct Biol. 1994 Aug;1(8):518–523. doi: 10.1038/nsb0894-518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ner S. S. HMGs everywhere. Curr Biol. 1992 Apr;2(4):208–210. doi: 10.1016/0960-9822(92)90541-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pace C. N. Determination and analysis of urea and guanidine hydrochloride denaturation curves. Methods Enzymol. 1986;131:266–280. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(86)31045-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pace C. N., Vajdos F., Fee L., Grimsley G., Gray T. How to measure and predict the molar absorption coefficient of a protein. Protein Sci. 1995 Nov;4(11):2411–2423. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560041120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Paull T. T., Haykinson M. J., Johnson R. C. The nonspecific DNA-binding and -bending proteins HMG1 and HMG2 promote the assembly of complex nucleoprotein structures. Genes Dev. 1993 Aug;7(8):1521–1534. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.8.1521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pazin M. J., Kadonaga J. T. What's up and down with histone deacetylation and transcription? Cell. 1997 May 2;89(3):325–328. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80211-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pil P. M., Chow C. S., Lippard S. J. High-mobility-group 1 protein mediates DNA bending as determined by ring closures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Oct 15;90(20):9465–9469. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.20.9465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sera T., Wolffe A. P. Role of histone H1 as an architectural determinant of chromatin structure and as a specific repressor of transcription on Xenopus oocyte 5S rRNA genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 Jul;18(7):3668–3680. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.7.3668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Struhl K. Histone acetylation and transcriptional regulatory mechanisms. Genes Dev. 1998 Mar 1;12(5):599–606. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.5.599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Teo S. H., Grasser K. D., Thomas J. O. Differences in the DNA-binding properties of the HMG-box domains of HMG1 and the sex-determining factor SRY. Eur J Biochem. 1995 Jun 15;230(3):943–950. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.tb20640.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang H., Bloom O., Zhang M., Vishnubhakat J. M., Ombrellino M., Che J., Frazier A., Yang H., Ivanova S., Borovikova L. HMG-1 as a late mediator of endotoxin lethality in mice. Science. 1999 Jul 9;285(5425):248–251. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5425.248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Weir H. M., Kraulis P. J., Hill C. S., Raine A. R., Laue E. D., Thomas J. O. Structure of the HMG box motif in the B-domain of HMG1. EMBO J. 1993 Apr;12(4):1311–1319. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05776.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Weiss M. A., Ukiyama E., King C. Y. The SRY cantilever motif discriminates between sequence- and structure-specific DNA recognition: alanine mutagenesis of an HMG box. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1997 Oct;15(2):177–184. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1997.10508185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Werner M. H., Gronenborn A. M., Clore G. M. Intercalation, DNA kinking, and the control of transcription. Science. 1996 Feb 9;271(5250):778–784. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5250.778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Werner M. H., Huth J. R., Gronenborn A. M., Clore G. M. Molecular basis of human 46X,Y sex reversal revealed from the three-dimensional solution structure of the human SRY-DNA complex. Cell. 1995 Jun 2;81(5):705–714. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90532-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Widom J. Chromatin structure: linking structure to function with histone H1. Curr Biol. 1998 Nov 5;8(22):R788–R791. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(07)00500-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zlatanova J., van Holde K. Binding to four-way junction DNA: a common property of architectural proteins? FASEB J. 1998 Apr;12(6):421–431. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biochemical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biochemical Society

RESOURCES