Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biochemical Journal logoLink to Biochemical Journal
. 2000 Oct 15;351(Pt 2):527–535.

Proteins of the endoplasmic-reticulum-associated degradation pathway: domain detection and function prediction.

C P Ponting 1
PMCID: PMC1221390  PMID: 11023840

Abstract

Sequence database searches, using iterative-profile and Hidden-Markov-model approaches, were used to detect hitherto-undetected homologues of proteins that regulate the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-associated degradation pathway. The translocon-associated subunit Sec63p (Sec=secretory) was shown to contain a domain of unknown function found twice in several Brr2p-like RNA helicases (Brr2=bad response to refrigeration 2). Additionally, Cue1p (Cue=coupling of ubiquitin conjugation to ER degradation), a yeast protein that recruits the ubiquitin-conjugating (UBC) enzyme Ubc7p to an ER-associated complex, was found to be one of a large family of putative scaffolding-domain-containing proteins that include the autocrine motility factor receptor and fungal Vps9p (Vps=vacuolar protein sorting). Two other yeast translocon-associated molecules, Sec72p and Hrd3p (Hrd=3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase degradation), were shown to contain multiple tetratricopeptide-repeat-like sequences. From this observation it is suggested that Sec72p associates with a heat-shock protein, Hsp70, in a manner analogous to that known for Hop (Hsp70/Hsp90 organizing protein). Finally, the luminal portion of Ire1p (Ire=high inositol-requiring), thought to convey the sensing function of this transmembrane kinase and endoribonuclease, was shown to contain repeats similar to those in beta-propeller proteins. This finding hints at the mechanism by which Ire1p may sense extended unfolded proteins at the expense of compact folded molecules.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (604.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altschul S. F., Madden T. L., Schäffer A. A., Zhang J., Zhang Z., Miller W., Lipman D. J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389–3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrade M. A., Ponting C. P., Gibson T. J., Bork P. Homology-based method for identification of protein repeats using statistical significance estimates. J Mol Biol. 2000 May 5;298(3):521–537. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Biederer T., Volkwein C., Sommer T. Role of Cue1p in ubiquitination and degradation at the ER surface. Science. 1997 Dec 5;278(5344):1806–1809. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5344.1806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bordallo J., Wolf D. H. A RING-H2 finger motif is essential for the function of Der3/Hrd1 in endoplasmic reticulum associated protein degradation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 1999 Apr 9;448(2-3):244–248. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(99)00362-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burns K., Clatworthy J., Martin L., Martinon F., Plumpton C., Maschera B., Lewis A., Ray K., Tschopp J., Volpe F. Tollip, a new component of the IL-1RI pathway, links IRAK to the IL-1 receptor. Nat Cell Biol. 2000 Jun;2(6):346–351. doi: 10.1038/35014038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Casagrande R., Stern P., Diehn M., Shamu C., Osario M., Zúiga M., Brown P. O., Ploegh H. Degradation of proteins from the ER of S. cerevisiae requires an intact unfolded protein response pathway. Mol Cell. 2000 Apr;5(4):729–735. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80251-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen P., Johnson P., Sommer T., Jentsch S., Hochstrasser M. Multiple ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes participate in the in vivo degradation of the yeast MAT alpha 2 repressor. Cell. 1993 Jul 30;74(2):357–369. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90426-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cyr D. M., Langer T., Douglas M. G. DnaJ-like proteins: molecular chaperones and specific regulators of Hsp70. Trends Biochem Sci. 1994 Apr;19(4):176–181. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(94)90281-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Das A. K., Cohen P. W., Barford D. The structure of the tetratricopeptide repeats of protein phosphatase 5: implications for TPR-mediated protein-protein interactions. EMBO J. 1998 Mar 2;17(5):1192–1199. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.5.1192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dobson C. M. Protein misfolding, evolution and disease. Trends Biochem Sci. 1999 Sep;24(9):329–332. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(99)01445-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Feldheim D., Rothblatt J., Schekman R. Topology and functional domains of Sec63p, an endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein required for secretory protein translocation. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Jul;12(7):3288–3296. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.7.3288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Grant B., Greenwald I. The Caenorhabditis elegans sel-1 gene, a negative regulator of lin-12 and glp-1, encodes a predicted extracellular protein. Genetics. 1996 May;143(1):237–247. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.1.237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Green N., Fang H., Walter P. Mutants in three novel complementation groups inhibit membrane protein insertion into and soluble protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1992 Feb;116(3):597–604. doi: 10.1083/jcb.116.3.597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Groves M. R., Barford D. Topological characteristics of helical repeat proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1999 Jun;9(3):383–389. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(99)80052-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gupta R. S., Singh B. Phylogenetic analysis of 70 kD heat shock protein sequences suggests a chimeric origin for the eukaryotic cell nucleus. Curr Biol. 1994 Dec 1;4(12):1104–1114. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00249-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hampton R. Y., Gardner R. G., Rine J. Role of 26S proteasome and HRD genes in the degradation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase, an integral endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein. Mol Biol Cell. 1996 Dec;7(12):2029–2044. doi: 10.1091/mbc.7.12.2029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Holm L., Sander C. Removing near-neighbour redundancy from large protein sequence collections. Bioinformatics. 1998 Jun;14(5):423–429. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.5.423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jacobsen S. E., Binkowski K. A., Olszewski N. E. SPINDLY, a tetratricopeptide repeat protein involved in gibberellin signal transduction in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Aug 20;93(17):9292–9296. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.17.9292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Johnson A. E. Protein translocation at the ER membrane: A complex process becomes more so. Trends Cell Biol. 1997 Mar;7(3):90–95. doi: 10.1016/S0962-8924(97)01029-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Johnson A. E., van Waes M. A. The translocon: a dynamic gateway at the ER membrane. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1999;15:799–842. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.15.1.799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Keitel T., Diehl A., Knaute T., Stezowski J. J., Höhne W., Görisch H. X-ray structure of the quinoprotein ethanol dehydrogenase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa: basis of substrate specificity. J Mol Biol. 2000 Apr 7;297(4):961–974. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kopito R. R. ER quality control: the cytoplasmic connection. Cell. 1997 Feb 21;88(4):427–430. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81881-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Laggerbauer B., Achsel T., Lührmann R. The human U5-200kD DEXH-box protein unwinds U4/U6 RNA duplices in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Apr 14;95(8):4188–4192. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lauber J., Fabrizio P., Teigelkamp S., Lane W. S., Hartmann E., Luhrmann R. The HeLa 200 kDa U5 snRNP-specific protein and its homologue in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are members of the DEXH-box protein family of putative RNA helicases. EMBO J. 1996 Aug 1;15(15):4001–4015. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee T. G., Tang N., Thompson S., Miller J., Katze M. G. The 58,000-dalton cellular inhibitor of the interferon-induced double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase (PKR) is a member of the tetratricopeptide repeat family of proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Apr;14(4):2331–2342. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.4.2331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lorick K. L., Jensen J. P., Fang S., Ong A. M., Hatakeyama S., Weissman A. M. RING fingers mediate ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2)-dependent ubiquitination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Sep 28;96(20):11364–11369. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.20.11364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lyman S. K., Schekman R. Binding of secretory precursor polypeptides to a translocon subcomplex is regulated by BiP. Cell. 1997 Jan 10;88(1):85–96. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81861-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Marcotte E. M., Pellegrini M., Ng H. L., Rice D. W., Yeates T. O., Eisenberg D. Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. Science. 1999 Jul 30;285(5428):751–753. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5428.751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nabi I. R., Watanabe H., Raz A. Autocrine motility factor and its receptor: role in cell locomotion and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1992 Mar;11(1):5–20. doi: 10.1007/BF00047599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Neuwald A. F. Barth syndrome may be due to an acyltransferase deficiency. Curr Biol. 1997 Aug 1;7(8):R465–R466. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(06)00237-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Nishikawa S., Endo T. The yeast JEM1p is a DnaJ-like protein of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane required for nuclear fusion. J Biol Chem. 1997 May 16;272(20):12889–12892. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.20.12889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Noble S. M., Guthrie C. Identification of novel genes required for yeast pre-mRNA splicing by means of cold-sensitive mutations. Genetics. 1996 May;143(1):67–80. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.1.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Panzner S., Dreier L., Hartmann E., Kostka S., Rapoport T. A. Posttranslational protein transport in yeast reconstituted with a purified complex of Sec proteins and Kar2p. Cell. 1995 May 19;81(4):561–570. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90077-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Pietrokovski S. Searching databases of conserved sequence regions by aligning protein multiple-alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996 Oct 1;24(19):3836–3845. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.19.3836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Plemper R. K., Bordallo J., Deak P. M., Taxis C., Hitt R., Wolf D. H. Genetic interactions of Hrd3p and Der3p/Hrd1p with Sec61p suggest a retro-translocation complex mediating protein transport for ER degradation. J Cell Sci. 1999 Nov;112(Pt 22):4123–4134. doi: 10.1242/jcs.112.22.4123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Plemper R. K., Böhmler S., Bordallo J., Sommer T., Wolf D. H. Mutant analysis links the translocon and BiP to retrograde protein transport for ER degradation. Nature. 1997 Aug 28;388(6645):891–895. doi: 10.1038/42276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ponting C. P., Aravind L., Schultz J., Bork P., Koonin E. V. Eukaryotic signalling domain homologues in archaea and bacteria. Ancient ancestry and horizontal gene transfer. J Mol Biol. 1999 Jun 18;289(4):729–745. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ponting C. P., Schultz J., Copley R. R., Andrade M. A., Bork P. Evolution of domain families. Adv Protein Chem. 2000;54:185–244. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(00)54007-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Raghunathan P. L., Guthrie C. RNA unwinding in U4/U6 snRNPs requires ATP hydrolysis and the DEIH-box splicing factor Brr2. Curr Biol. 1998 Jul 16;8(15):847–855. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(07)00345-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Rapoport T. A., Jungnickel B., Kutay U. Protein transport across the eukaryotic endoplasmic reticulum and bacterial inner membranes. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:271–303. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.001415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rapoport T. A. Transport of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Science. 1992 Nov 6;258(5084):931–936. doi: 10.1126/science.1332192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Rost B., Sander C. Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy. J Mol Biol. 1993 Jul 20;232(2):584–599. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Russell R. B., Sasieni P. D., Sternberg M. J. Supersites within superfolds. Binding site similarity in the absence of homology. J Mol Biol. 1998 Oct 2;282(4):903–918. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Schatz P. J., Beckwith J. Genetic analysis of protein export in Escherichia coli. Annu Rev Genet. 1990;24:215–248. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.24.120190.001243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Scheufler C., Brinker A., Bourenkov G., Pegoraro S., Moroder L., Bartunik H., Hartl F. U., Moarefi I. Structure of TPR domain-peptide complexes: critical elements in the assembly of the Hsp70-Hsp90 multichaperone machine. Cell. 2000 Apr 14;101(2):199–210. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80830-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Schultz J., Milpetz F., Bork P., Ponting C. P. SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool: identification of signaling domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 May 26;95(11):5857–5864. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.11.5857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Shamu C. E., Walter P. Oligomerization and phosphorylation of the Ire1p kinase during intracellular signaling from the endoplasmic reticulum to the nucleus. EMBO J. 1996 Jun 17;15(12):3028–3039. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Shimizu K., Tani M., Watanabe H., Nagamachi Y., Niinaka Y., Shiroishi T., Ohwada S., Raz A., Yokota J. The autocrine motility factor receptor gene encodes a novel type of seven transmembrane protein. FEBS Lett. 1999 Aug 6;456(2):295–300. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(99)00966-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Skowronek M. H., Rotter M., Haas I. G. Molecular characterization of a novel mammalian DnaJ-like Sec63p homolog. Biol Chem. 1999 Sep;380(9):1133–1138. doi: 10.1515/BC.1999.142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sommer T., Wolf D. H. Endoplasmic reticulum degradation: reverse protein flow of no return. FASEB J. 1997 Dec;11(14):1227–1233. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.11.14.9409541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Tatusov R. L., Altschul S. F., Koonin E. V. Detection of conserved segments in proteins: iterative scanning of sequence databases with alignment blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Dec 6;91(25):12091–12095. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.25.12091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Travers K. J., Patil C. K., Wodicka L., Lockhart D. J., Weissman J. S., Walter P. Functional and genomic analyses reveal an essential coordination between the unfolded protein response and ER-associated degradation. Cell. 2000 Apr 28;101(3):249–258. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80835-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Van Der Spuy J., Kana B. D., Dirr H. W., Blatch G. L. Heat shock cognate protein 70 chaperone-binding site in the co-chaperone murine stress-inducible protein 1 maps to within three consecutive tetratricopeptide repeat motifs. Biochem J. 2000 Feb 1;345(Pt 3):645–651. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3450645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wang H. J., Benlimame N., Nabi I. The AMF-R tubule is a smooth ilimaquinone-sensitive subdomain of the endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Sci. 1997 Dec;110(Pt 24):3043–3053. doi: 10.1242/jcs.110.24.3043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ward C. L., Omura S., Kopito R. R. Degradation of CFTR by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Cell. 1995 Oct 6;83(1):121–127. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90240-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Xia Z. X., Dai W. W., Xiong J. P., Hao Z. P., Davidson V. L., White S., Mathews F. S. The three-dimensional structures of methanol dehydrogenase from two methylotrophic bacteria at 2.6-A resolution. J Biol Chem. 1992 Nov 5;267(31):22289–22297. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biochemical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biochemical Society

RESOURCES