Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2024 Oct 31;96(2):381–444. doi: 10.1007/s11126-024-10096-5

Global Overview of Suicidal Behavior and Risk Factors among General Population during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Regression

Sriyani Padmalatha Konara Mudiyanselage 2,5,7, Yi-Tseng Tsai 1,6,, Maithreepala Sujeewa Dilhani 2,4, Yi-Jing Tsai 2, Ya-Han Yang 1, Zan-Ting Lu 1, Nai-Ying Ko 2,3
PMCID: PMC12213960  PMID: 39480625

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted mental health worldwide, leading to increased rates of suicidal behavior. This systematic review and meta-regression aim to investigate the global prevalence and risk factors associated with suicidal behaviors in the general population during the pandemic. The study included 202 articles from January 1, 2019, to October 31, 2023, sourced from databases such as Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The meta-analysis revealed a prevalence of 13.5% for suicidal ideation, 10.4% for suicide attempts, and a death rate of 0.5%, translating to 4.52 per 100,000 person-years. Significant risk factors identified include being transgender, young adults (18–44 years), unmarried status, low education, retirement, living alone, low social support, a history of suicide attempts, substance use, depression, anxiety, PTSD, sleep problems, poor perceived physical health, loneliness, quarantine, and residing in the Americas or multiple regions. The findings underscore the urgent need for targeted mental health interventions during pandemics, focusing on high-risk groups such as young adults, transgender individuals, those with low social support, and people with mental health issues. This comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights for policymakers and healthcare providers to develop effective strategies to mitigate the heightened risk of suicide during global health crises.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11126-024-10096-5.

Keywords: Suicidal ideation, Suicide attempts, Deaths by suicide, COVID-19, Mental health, Risk factors

Background

Social isolation, loneliness and mental illness are strongly associated with suicide among general population [13]. In 2019 a large context of lockdowns and social distancing took place due to the COVID-19 pandemic causing a severe global health crisis and subsequent declining mental health among the general population resulting in premature mortality and suicide [3, 4]. An estimated 9% to 46% of the general population suffered from depressive symptoms during the pandemic due to social separation and associated pandemic health policies such as quarantine and lockdown measures that directly influenced daily activities, physical contact hours, and behavioral patterns among people [3, 5].

Female gender, younger age, being a healthcare professional, low income, preexisting mental health issues, loneliness, and substance abuse are known risk factors associated with psychological issues and suicidal ideation during the pandemic [3, 5]. Progressing rise in anxiety, depression, insomnia, fear of contamination and losing loved ones are also associated with pandemic associated suicidal ideation, thoughts, and self-harm [6]. Compared with being employed; unemployment can cause threefold rise in risk of death due to suicide [1]. Therefore, pandemic raised demands of psychological support services worldwide.

Some studies were conducted to identify the adequacy of resource allocation, measure to understand severity, and frequency of suicidal ideation, attempt and self-harm during the pandemic among some specific populations loke adolescents [7]. However, understanding and empirical data on the prevalence and risk factors of suicidal ideation among general population is inconclusive.

Suicides are preventable, and early identification of risk factors plays a crucial role in this process. Investigating the multifaceted nature of suicide risk factors within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic is crucial for advancing suicide prevention strategies, especially in anticipation of upcoming emerging diseases. Understanding the complex relationships between psychological distress, economic instability, social isolation, sleep problems, status of gender, level of education, loneliness, unemployment, use of recreational drugs during times of this crisis is essential to design effective interventions to mitigate suicide risk specifically for pandemic and other epidemics. There are some reviews, limited to small number of studies (38 studies for SR and 12studies for meta-analysis) [8] (16 studies for SR) [6]assessing the impact on suicide during COVID-19. Previous studies included small number of studies and reported high heterogeneity (I2 = 100%, τ2 = 0.0077, p = 0) [8] and did not explore specific covariates causing suicidal outcomes through meta-regression, leaving a gap in understanding the factors contributing to suicidal behaviors during the pandemic. These studies were often limited to both the beginning and peak of the pandemic and lacked a global perspective. We conducted a systematic review and meta-regression analysis across countries including observational cohort and cross-sectional studies, identifying risk factors influencing suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and deaths during the pandemic. English, Chinese, or Sinhala articles were included, enhancing the reliability and generalizability of our results in identifying key risk factors influencing suicidal outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective of study was to explore the worldwide prevalence and identify the risk factors associated with suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and deaths by suicide during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

This review has been registered in the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PROSPERO, Reg No: CRD42023481933).

Definitions of Suicide Behaviors’ Related Outcomes

The terminology utilized to characterize self-harm varies among different contexts and research endeavors. While some studies adopt a broad definition of self-harm encompassing all forms of self-injurious behavior regardless of suicidal intent, others restrict the term solely to non-suicidal self-injury. Due to our inability to assess the individual intent behind instances of self-harm, we relied on classifications and descriptions as defined by the studies included. Our criteria for identifying suicide-related outcomes aligned with methodologies employed in similar meta-analyses.

Search Strategy

This study involved a comprehensive search across five databases: Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to identify studies on the prevalence of suicidal behavior and risk factors during the COVID-19 pandemic. The search spanned the period from January 1, 2019, to October 31, 2023, and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA) [911]. English synonyms, such as Coronavirus, 2019-nCoV, COVID-19, and SARS-CoV, were employed in the search across each database. Control phrases were utilized for the Emtree and MeSH databases, including terms like "coronavirus," "SARS-related coronavirus," "Wuhan seafood market pneumonia virus," "Wuhan coronavirus," "SARS Coronavirus," "MERS-CoV," "suicidal behavior," "automutilation," and "suicide" for Emtree, and "self-injurious behavior" for MeSH. Supplementary searches were conducted using the Endnote X9 bibliographical database. Additionally, manual screening of publications citing the identified papers, as well as examination of the reference lists of pertinent articles and previous systematic reviews, was performed to ensure the sensitivity of the search strategy [12].

Eligibility Criteria

The inclusion criteria for this study were as follows: 1) The study provided primary data on the prevalence or incidence of suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, or suicide-related deaths. It included all suicidal behaviors, such as self-injurious behavior, which were measured using validated assessment tools or coded medical report data within a population-based study; 2) participants were assessed during the COVID-19 pandemic; and 3) observational studies, including all types of cohorts and cross-sectional studies, were included if they were in English, Chinese, or Sinhala, and published between 2019 and 2023. Exclusion criteria encompassed studies where the population did not exhibit suicidal behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as qualitative research and review studies. After removing duplicates using the Endnote X9 bibliographical database, titles and abstracts underwent independent screening by three researchers based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subsequently, the full texts of the selected studies were independently reviewed by four researchers, with any discrepancies resolved by a fifth researcher to mitigate selection bias.

Quality Assessment

The quality of evidence in all eligible studies was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Prevalence Studies Scale (CACPSS). This scale comprises nine items with four possible responses (yes, no, unclear, and not applicable) [13]. Studies scoring 8 or above on the total scale were classified as possessing high-quality evidence and were consequently included in this systematic review. The assessment of study quality and risk of bias was conducted independently by four researchers, with any disparities resolved through consultation with a fifth researcher.

Data Extraction

Data extraction encompassed the retrieval of information including authors' names, year of publication, study type, World Health Organization (WHO) region, country, sample size, participant demographics such as ethnicity, age range, and sex. Additional extracted details involved the measurement tool employed for suicide assessment, prevalence rates of suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and deaths by suicide, as well as identified risk factors. Quality scores for the included studies were independently assigned by four authors following the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [9]. Discrepancies in scoring were resolved through discussions involving all five authors.

Statistical Analysis

For the identification of statistical outcomes related to three specific suicidal behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic, a meta-analysis was conducted using eligible studies. The pooled prevalence of suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, or death by suicide was analyzed by converting the number of events into risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p-values. A fitted model based on the degree of heterogeneity determined whether a random-effects model or a fixed-effects model was utilized for analyzing suicidal behaviors during COVID-19. Proportions were transformed using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine method before data pooling for the incident rate of suicide, and heterogeneity was assessed using the DerSimonian-Laird estimator by I2, the Cochran Q test, and Tau2 for the included studies [1418]. A heterogeneity value of zero indicated the absence of heterogeneity, 25% indicated no or low significance, 50% indicated moderate heterogeneity, and 75% indicated significant heterogeneity. In this study, a range of 75–100% indicated significant heterogeneity, and the Q statistic and p-value were employed to validate the heterogeneity results. A meta-analysis with I2 > 75% and p > 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

To assess publication bias, funnel plots were employed, and Egger's Q statistic was applied to ascertain the correlation between the effect estimate and variances in the results for suicidal behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic using CMA software. Additionally, a visual examination of the funnel plots was conducted [19, 20]. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. We used the following variables as subgroups for this study: age, sex, marital status, education level, living situation, housing type, social support, lifestyle factors, smoking, alcohol and substance use, psychiatric disorders, sleep disorders, quarantine experience, and WHO regions.

In the meta-regression, the pool of effect size data was introduced individually into the models. A simultaneous test was carried out to determine whether all coefficients in the model were zero. The null hypothesis model was utilized for the effect size comparison. Statistical analyses were conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software version 3.0 (Biostat, Englewood, New Jersey, USA) [21].

Results

Study Identification

The search across the five databases yielded 4,899 articles published between January 1, 2019, and October 31, 2023. Following the removal of 843 duplicate articles using the Endnote X9 bibliographical database, the titles and abstracts of 1,411 articles were screened, and 1,813 articles met the inclusion criteria. Each article's full text was then examined for eligibility, leading to the exclusion of 1,445 articles for various reasons: 118 had no relevance to the COVID-19 pandemic; 980 did not mention suicidal behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic; 160 did not clearly assess the outcome variables; and 65 were unavailable in full text format. After quality assessment, 124 articles were excluded due to low-quality scores in peer review. Additionally, two records identified from website reports were assessed for eligibility. Consequently, 200 articles met the criteria for inclusion in the systematic review and meta-regression (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

PRISMA flow diagram of the included studies

Study Characteristics

The studies were conducted across 41 countries. Among the included studies, as categorized by WHO region, five were conducted in the African Region, five in the Eastern Mediterranean Region, 53 in the European Region, 51 in the Region of the Americas, 14 in the South-East Asia Region, Three studies included data from multiple countries, each belonging to different WHO regions, and 71 in the Western Pacific Region (Table 1).

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included 200 studies

Author,
Year of
publication
Type of study WHO region Country Sample
size
Age
Mean (SD)
Sex Measurement tool for suicide Suicide
ideation
(n) (%)
Suicide
attempts
(n) (%)
Deaths by suicide
(n) (%)
Risk factor
Cheung, T. et al. (2020) (1) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas, European Region, Western Pacific Region United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Brazil, Philippines, Korea, Turkey, China (Hong Kong, Macau) 25,053 N/A

M: 5,687 (22.7%)

F: 19,366 (77.3%)

Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) 3,891 (15.66%) N/A N/A Younger age, male, married, differences in health beliefs
Graell, M. et al. (2020) (2) Retrospective study European Region Spain 365

Day hospital: 13.18 (3.03)

outpatient clinic: 14.74 (2.33)

M: 44 (12.1%)

F: 321 (87.94%)

N/A

35

(25%)

N/A N/A N/A
Mamun, M. A. et al. (2020) (3) Cross-sectional study South-East Asia Region Bangladesh 3,388 30.1 (6.4)

M: 1,634 (48.2%)

F: 1,754 (51.8%)

N/A

206

(6.08%)

N/A N/A Female, being divorced, and having no child
Tasnim, R. et al. (2020) (4) Cross-sectional study South-East Asia Region Bangladesh 3,331 21.4 (1.9)

M: 1,979 (59.4%)

F: 1,352 (40.6%)

Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21)

427

(12.82%)

N/A N/A Less sleep, excess sleep, cigarette smoking, past suicidal thoughts, suicide attempt history, family history of suicidality, depression, anxiety, and stress

Antonelli-Salgado, T

et al. (2021) (5)

Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas Brazil 8,104 38.6(14.1)

M: 1,094 (13.5%)

F: 7,010 (86.5%)

Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9)

22.60%

(n = 1,831)

N/A N/A Living alone, number of days practicing social distancing, loneliness
Auny, F. M. et al. (2021) (6) Cross-sectional study South-East Asia Region Bangladesh 324

All: 26.99 (8.17)

Non-suicidal: 27.23 (8.37)

Suicidal: 23.52 (2.58)

M: 213 (65.7%)

F: 111 (34.3%)

Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9)

6.48%

(n = 21)

N/A N/A N/A
Ayuso-Mateos, J. L. et al. (2021) (7) Cross-sectional study European Region Spain 1,103 54.82 (16.35)

M: 437 (39.6%)

F: 666 (60.4%)

Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 3.0)

2.18%

(n = 24)

N/A N/A N/A
Bond, Allison E. et al. (2021) (8) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas United States 3,499 N/A N/A Past month’s suicidal ideation was assessed with the Self‐Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview‐Revised

3.20%

(n = 462)

N/A N/A Black, indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC)
Bonsaksen, T. et al. (2021) (9) Cross-sectional study European Region Norway 4,527 N/A N/A N/A

3.60%

(n = 163)

0.20%

(n = 9)

N/A Suicide attempts, lower age, daily alcohol use, being in the risk group for COVID-19 complications, and having economic concerns related to the pandemic
Briggs, R. et al. (2021) (10) Longitudinal study European Region Ireland 8,174

Non-suicidal: 63.9

Suicidal: 62.3

M: 3,746 (45.8%)

F: 4,428 (54.2%)

Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression

Scale (CES-D)

3.50%

(n = 279)

N/A N/A Both persistent loneliness and depressive symptoms
Bruffaerts, R. et al. (2021) (11) Cross-sectional study European Region Belgium 6,409 N/A N/A Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9)

1.50%

(n = 96)

N/A N/A Depression
Chakrabarti, S. et al. (2021) (12) Observational study South-East Asia Region India 590 37.8 (5.6)

M: 355 (60.1%)

F: 235 (39.9%)

Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

5.08%

(n = 30)

N/A N/A Separated or divorced, cancer, suburban residence, graduates
Chen, Y. et al. (2021) (13) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 2,700 N/A

M: 673 (24.9%)

F: 2,027 (75.1%)

1. Positive and Negative Suicidal ideation (PANSI). 2. Social Support Scale (SSRS)

5.40%

(n = 146)

N/A N/A Residence before returning to school, lower objective support, poorer relationship with the mother
Czeisler, M. E. et al. (2021) (14) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas United States 1,648 N/A

M: 838 (50.8%)

F: 789 (47.9%)

N/A

30.58%

(n = 504)

N/A N/A N/A
Czeisler, M. E. et al. (2021) (15) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas United States 1,362 N/A

M: 679 (49.9%)

F: 683 (50.1%)

Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4)

33.33%

(n = 454)

N/A N/A Young people
DeVylder, J. et al. (2021) (16) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas United States 16,315 24.75 (8.60)

M: 6,549 (40.1%)

F: 9,212 (56.5%)

Trans or other: 553 (3.4%)

N/A

13.42%

(n = 2,190)

1.30%

(n = 209)

N/A COVID-19
Du, N. et al. (2021) (17) Retrospective study Western Pacific Region China 609

Non-suicidal: 15.37 (1.75)

Suicidal: 15.33 (1.74)

M: 77 (12.6%)

F: 532 (87.4%)

N/A N/A

51.23%

(n = 312)

N/A Female, older age, having a single parent, having experienced trauma, having experienced social isolation from peers, having experienced body-focused bullying, overuse of a mobile phone in the parents' opinions, having attempted suicide during the pandemic
Efstathiou, V. et al. (2021) (18) Longitudinal study European Region Greece 811 27.19 (12.96)

M: 202 (24.91%)

F: 607 (74.85%)

Other: 2 (0.10%)

Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

4.32%

(n = 35)

N/A N/A Anxiety, depression, suicidal ideation, living with a person with frail health and vulnerable to severe COVID-19 infection emerged
Gesi, C. et al. (2021) (19) Retrospective study European Region Italy 195 N/A N/A N/A

17.95%

(n = 35)

2.05%

(n = 4)

N/A N/A
Habu, H. et al. (2021) (20) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Japan 47,770 60.6 (26.8)

M: 16,864 (35.30%)

F: 23,336 (48.85%)

N/A N/A

0.98%

(n = 467)

N/A Female, aged 25–49 years
Han, J. M. et al. (2021) (21) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Korea 54,948 N/A

M: 28,353 (51.9)

F: 26,595 (48.1)

N/A

10.90%

(n = 5,989)

N/A N/A Lower perceived household economic status
Hermosillo-de-la-Torre, A. E. et al. (2021) (22) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas Mexico 8,033 16

M: 3910 (487%)

F: 4123 (51.3%)

The suicidal behaviors schedule (Cédula de Conductas Suicidas (CCS) N/A

11.17%

(n = 897)

N/A Female sex, depression, hopelessness, anxiety, alcohol and tobacco use, childhood trauma, and having to self-rely on are issues affecting attachment and low self-esteem
Hou, T. et al. (2021) (23) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 761 N/A N/A Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

36.40%

(n = 277)

10.38%

(n = 79)

N/A

Suicidal ideation: parental educational level, maladaptive strategies, anxiety, depression

Suicidal attempts: Age, maladaptive strategies, anxiety, depression

Keshavarzi, F. et al. (2021) (24) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Malaysia 383 N/A

M: 166 (43.3%)

F: 217 (56.7%)

Overall Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS)

11.23%

(n = 43)

N/A N/A Loneliness, feeling social isolation
Khosravani, V. et al. (2021) (25) Cross-sectional study Eastern Mediterranean Region Iran 304 35.8 (11.80)

M: 126 (41.4%)

F: 178 (58.6%)

Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) N/A

22.70%

(n = 69)

N/A Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD)
Killgore, W. D. S. et al. (2021) (26) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas United States 1,013 36.74 (12.09) N/A Beck Depression Inventory-II. Patient Health Questionnaire-9

17.57%

(n = 178)

N/A N/A N/A
Kim, S. Y. et al. (2021) (27) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Korea 92,659 15.1 (1.7)

M: 48,020 (51.8%)

F: 44,639 (48.2%)

N/A

11.45%

(n = 

10,609)

2.20%

(n = 

2,043)

N/A N/A
Landi, G. et al. (2021) (28) Cross-sectional study European Region Italy 652 38.8 (13.2)

M: 161 (24.7%)

F: 491 (75.3%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

15.34%

(n = 100)

N/A N/A Mental pain intensity
Le, S. et al. (2021) (29) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 56,679 N/A

M: 27,149 (47.9%)

F: 29,530 (52.1%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

16.45%

(n = 9,322)

N/A N/A Experience of quarantine, unemployment, psychological stress
Liu, L. et al. (2021) (30) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas Canada 11,324 N/A

M: 5,574 (49.22%)

F: 5,750 (50.78%)

N/A

2.44%

(n = 276)

N/A N/A Under 65 years, a frontline worker, job loss, loneliness, isolation, highly stressful or traumatic event, lower household income, lower educational attainment
Lopez Steinmetz, L. C. et al. (2021) (31) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas Argentina 1,202 N/A N/A Self-reported suicidal thoughts and severe distress (IES-R)

43.09%

(n = 518)

8.15%

(n = 98)

N/A N/A
Lu, X. et al. (2021) (32) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 1,630 COVID-19: 37.4 (10.9). Non-COVID-19: 36.8 (10.4)

M: 639 (39.2%)

F: 991 (60.8%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

11.72%

(n = 191)

N/A N/A N/A
Lueck, J. A. et al. (2021) (33) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas United States 5,001 44.5 (16.92)

M: 2,486 (49.7%)

F: 2,515 (50.3%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

48.35%

(n = 2,418)

N/A N/A Worsening mental health overall
Mamun, M. A. et al. (2021) (34) Cross-sectional study South-East Asia Region Bangladesh 756 22.24 (4.39)

M: 446 (59%)

F: 310 (41%)

Patient Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ-4)

8.20%

(n = 62)

0.70%

(n = 5)

N/A Taking drugs, performing less physical activity, poor self-reporting health condition, comorbid, higher COVID-19 risk, fear of COVID-19 infection, depression, anxiety
Mamun, M. A. et al. (2021) (35) Cross-sectional study South-East Asia Region Bangladesh 10,067 29.94 (9.63)

M: 5650 (56.1%)

F: 4406 (43.9%)

Patient Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ-4)

5.03%

(n = 506)

N/A N/A Young, female, smoker, comorbid diseases, fear of COVID-19 infection, insomnia
McAuliffe, C. et al. (2021) (36) Cross-sectional study European Region United Kingdom 7,002 N/A

M: 3,350 (47.8%)

F: 3,577 (51.1%)

Transgender: 29 (0.5%)

Other: 46 (0.6%)

N/A

6.18%

(n = 433)

N/A N/A Financial, relationship, substance use, COVID-19 exposure
Menculini, G. et al. (2021) (37) Retrospective study European Region Italy 447 N/A N/A N/A

9.17%

(n = 41)

9.84%

(n = 44)

N/A Living with marital family, suicidality-related phenomena, and adjustment disorders
Mortier, P. et al. (2021) (38) Cross-sectional study European Region Spain 3,500 49.6 (17.0)

M: 1,538 (48.5%)

F: 1,962 (51.5%)

Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale

1.83%

(n = 64)

0.10%

(n = 5)

N/A Mental disorders, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, panic attacks, alcohol or substance use disorder
Mortier, P. et al. (2021) (39) Cross-sectional study European Region Spain 5,450 N/A N/A Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8)

2.74%

(n = 96)

0.14%

(n = 5)

N/A Anxiety disorder
Nichter, B. et al. (2021) (40) Prospective study Region of the Americas United States 2,746

All: 63.2 (14.7)

Non-suicidal: 64.5 (14.2)

Suicidal: 57.8 (14.8)

M: 2,467 (89.8)

F: 279 (10.2)

N/A

2.99%

(n = 82)

N/A N/A Low social support, suicide attempt history, lifetime posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, alcohol use disorder, COVID-19 infection, worsening of social relationships
Nomura, K. et al. (2021) (41) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Japan 2,449 20.5 (3.5)

M: 1,308 (53.8)

F: 1,119 (46.2)

Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

6.61%

(n = 162)

N/A N/A alcohol use
Okubo, R. et al. (2021) (42) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Japan 24,819 N/A

M: 12,394 (49.9%)

F: 12,425 (51.1%)

Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6)

3.49%

(n =)

N/A N/A Higher urbanization level and greater neighborhood deprivation (lower neighborhood-level socioeconomic status)
Papadopoulou, A. et al. (2021) (43) Cross-sectional study European Region Greece 5,748 N/A

M: 1,434 (24.9%)

F: 4,217 (73.4%) Other: 5 (0.1%)

Not available: 92 (1.6%)

Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2)

4.63%

(n =)

N/A N/A Unmarried or divorced marital status, mental health history, poor perceived quality of physical health, impaired family functioning, anxiety, and depression
Peng, X. D. et al. (2021) (44) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 39,751 14.79 (1.7)

M: 18,966 (47.7%)

F: 20,785 (52.3%)

Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

20.30%

(n =)

N/A N/A Female, junior high school, poor overall sleep quality, poor academic performance, worried about being infected during COVID-19, depression, anxiety
Rahman, M. E. et al. (2021) (45) Cross-sectional study South-East Asia Region Bangladesh 1,415 25.42 (8.78)

M: 875 (61.8%)

F: 540 (38.2%)

Suicide behaviors questionnaire-revised (SBQ-R)

33.50%

(n =)

N/A N/A Females, divorced or widowed, low educational attainment
Rodríguez U. E. et al. (2021) (46) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas Colombian 484 30 (11) N/A Okasha’s Suicidality Scale (OSS)

40.08%

(n =)

N/A N/A Females, and under 20 years
Sahimi, H. M. S. et al. (2021) (47) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Malaysia 171 N/A N/A Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

11.11%

(n =)

N/A N/A Depression
Sasaki, N. et al. (2021) (48) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Japan 875 N/A

M: 463 (52.9%)

F: 412 (47.1%)

N/A

28.69%

(n =)

N/A N/A Younger people (aged < 39 years) and mental health conditions
Shongwe, M. C. et al. (2021) (49) Cross-sectional study African Region Eswatini 933 N/A

M: 275 (27.7%)

F: 718 (72.3%)

Kessler 6-item Psychological Distress Scale (K6)

1.71%

(n =)

N/A N/A N/A
Tong, Y. et al. (2021) (50) Case–control study Western Pacific Region China 7,337

COVID-19: 26.8 (11.4)

Non-COVID-19: 22.1 (8.1)

M: 2414(32.9%)

F: 4923 (67.1%)

N/A N/A

7.78%

(n =)

N/A Suicide attempt history
Travis-Lumer, Y. et al. (2021) (51) Quasi-experimental study European Region Israel 852,233 11.71 (4.44)

M: 424,240 (49.8%)

F: 427,993 (50.2%)

N/A N/A N/A

0.13%

(n = 1,148) 2. 134.7/ per 100,000

COVID-19
Tsai, J. et al. (2021) (52) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas United States 6,607 N/A N/A Patient Health Questionnaire-2(PHQ-2)

31.24%

(n = 2,064)

N/A N/A N/A
Vassalini, P. et al. (2021) (53) Cross-sectional study European Region Italy 115 57

M: 62 (54%)

F: 53 (46%)

Patient Health

Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

6.09%

(n = 7)

N/A N/A N/A
Vrublevska, J. et al. (2021) (54) Cross-sectional study European Region Latvia 2,609 N/A

M: 1,260 (48%)

F: 1,344 (51%)

Other: 4 (1%)

Risk Assessment of Suicidality Scale (RASS) N/A

6.13%

(n = 160)

N/A N/A
Wang, D. et al. (2021) (55) Case–control study Western Pacific Region China 67,905 20.23 (1.63)

M: 21,270 (31.3%)

F: 46,635 (68.7%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)

17.65%

(n = 

11,984)

N/A N/A Sleep disturbance, short sleep duration
Wang, M. et al. (2021) (56) Case–control study Western Pacific Region China 460 N/A

M: 163(35.43%)

F: 297(64.57%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15)

23.26%

(n = 107)

N/A N/A Lower education levels and abnormal body temperature
Xu, L. Z. et al. (2021) (57) Case–control study Western Pacific Region China 18,521 N/A

M: 3,909 (21.1%)

F: 14,612 (78.9%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)

Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15)

0.53%

(n = 99)

N/A N/A N/A
Xu, X. et al. (2021) (58) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 11,507 33.37 (8.22) N/A

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15)

6.47%

(n = 744)

N/A N/A The infection of family members or relatives, poor marital status, poor self-rated health, the need for psychological intervention, perceived high stress, low support, depression, and anxiety
Xu, Y. et al. (2021) (59) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 11,254 N/A M: 4,054 (36.02%) F:7,200 (63.98%) Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

2.03%

(n = 229)

N/A N/A Distant relationship with parents, changes in lifestyle, alcohol use, mental health symptoms
Yang, X. et al. (2021) (60) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 1,070 N/A

M: 346 (32.3%)

F: 724 (67.7%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

1.59%

(n = 17)

N/A N/A N/A
Zhao, L. et al. (2021) (61) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 1,154 N/A N/A Chinese Depression Screening Scale

60.31%

(n = 696)

N/A N/A N/A
Zhou, S. J. et al. (2021) (62) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 11,133 N/A M: 4,195 (37.7%) F: 6,938 (62.3%) Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

7.28%

(n = 810)

N/A N/A N/A
Zhu, S. et al. (2021) (63) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 1,381 N/A

M: 634 (45.9%)

F: 747 (54.1%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

32.46%

(n = 484)

N/A N/A Anxiety, trait anxiety, life satisfaction
Zilinskas, E. et al. (2021) (64) Cross-sectional study European Region Lithuania 1,001 20.8 (2.8)

M: 225 (22.5%)

F: 776 (77.5%)

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

45.55%

(n = 456)

1.69%

(n = 17)

N/A Anxiety, depression
Agyapong, B. et al. (2022) (65) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas Canada 146 N/A N/A Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

17.81%

(n = 26)

N/A N/A Alcohol abuse
Ali, M. et al. (2022) (66) Cross-sectional study South-East Asia Region Bangladesh 731 N/A

M: 376 (51.44%)

F: 355 (48.56%)

N/A

16.28%

(n = 119)

N/A N/A Sociodemographic factors, illness, behavior, institution, and subject-related issues
Alleaume, C. et al. (2022) (67) Cross-sectional study European Region France 1,736 N/A

M: 826 (47.59%)

F: 910 (52.41%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

8.31%

(n = 231)

N/A N/A Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
Ansari, S. K. et al. (2022) (68) Cross-sectional study Eastern Mediterranean Region Pakistan 510 21.74 (2.24) N/A Coronavirus Reassurance-Seeking Behaviours Scale (CRBS)

23.53%

(n = 120)

N/A N/A Anxiety
Arnon, S. et al. (2022) (69) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas United States 10,414 12.0 (0.7)

M: 5,452 (52.4%)

F: 4,962 (47.6%)

N/A

7.24%

(n = 785)

1.45%

(n = 152)

N/A Cyberbullying
Batterham, P. J. et al. (2022) (70) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Australia 1,296 46.0 (17.3)

M: 645 (49.8%)

F: 649 (50.1%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

30.48%

(n = 395)

N/A N/A Higher pandemic-related work and social impairment, recent adversity, loneliness, younger
Bell, C. et al. (2022) (71) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region New Zealand 3,389 N/A

M: 1461 (43.1%)

F: 649 (56.9%)

Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10)

4.16%

(n = 188)

1.46%

(n = 49)

N/A Alcohol use
Benatov, J. et al. (2022) (72) Cross-sectional study European Region Germany, Israel, Poland, and Slovenia 1,723 30.74 (5.74)

M: 789 (46%)

F: 935 (54%)

Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8)

36.74%

(n = 633)

N/A N/A Student, depression
Benavente-Fernandez, A. et al. (2022) (73) Cross-sectional study European Region Spain 36 69.8 (14.31)

M: 19 (52.78%)

F: 17 (47.22%)

Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS). Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) N/A

8.33%

(n = 3)

N/A Active treatment of a psychiatric illness, active smoking
Bismark, M. et al. (2022) (74) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Australia 7,795 N/A

M: 1,452 (19%)

F: 6,300 (81%)

Non-binary / prefer not to say: 43 (1%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

10.46%

(n = 815)

N/A N/A Who had friends or family infected with COVID-19, were living alone, were younger, male, had increased alcohol use, poor physical health, increased income worries, or prior mental illness
Bismark, M. et al. (2022) (75) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Australia 7,795 N/A

M: 1,452 (19%)

F: 6,300 (81%)

Non-binary / prefer not to say: 43 (1%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

3.36%

(n = 262)

N/A N/A N/A
Blomqvist, S. et al. (2022) (76) Cohort study European Region Sweden 65,530 N/A

M: 30,857 (47.08%)

F: 34,473 (52.92%)

N/A N/A

1.37%

(n = 896)

N/A Job insecurity
Brailovskaia, J. et al. (2022) (77) Cross-sectional study European Region Germany 406 27.69 (6.88) N/A Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire – Revised (SBQ-R)

30.00%

(n = 122)

N/A N/A N/A
Caballero-Dominguez, C. C. et al. (2022) (78) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas Colombia 700 37.1 (12.7)

M: 224 (32%)

F: 476 (68.0%)

N/A

7..57%

(n = 53)

N/A N/A A depressive episode, insomnia
Caravaca-Sanchez, F. et al. (2022) (79) Cross-sectional study European Region Spain 517 N/A N/A Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R)

25.53%

(n = 132)

N/A N/A Anxiety, alcohol use, cannabis use
Dale, R. et al. (2022) (80) Cross-sectional study European Region Austria 1,257 16.3 (1.4) N/A Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

45.74%

(n = 682)

N/A N/A N/A
Dogan, F. S. et al. (2022) (81) Retrospective study European Region United States 4,296

31.70

(12.64)

M: 3,286 (76.5%)

F: 1,010 (23.5%)

N/A N/A N/A

2.77%

(n = 119)

N/A
Dolsen, E. A. et al. (2022) (82) Cross-sectional study

Region of the

Americas

United States 837 37.1

M: 168 (20.1%)

F: 616 (73.6%)

Other: 53 (2.5%)

Beck Depression Inventory-II

27.96%

(n = 234)

N/A N/A Younger age, lower income, single relationship status, sexual orientation other than heterosexual specifically identifying as bisexual, non-full-time employment, living in a town
Dominguez-Gonzalez, A. D. et al. (2022) (83) Cross-sectional study

Region of the

Americas

Mexico 247 N/A

M: 78 (31.6%)

F: 169 (68.4%)

Plutchik Suicidal Risk Scale (PSRS)

18.62%

(n = 46)

N/A N/A Depression
Doran, N. et al. (2022) (84) Retrospective study

Region of the

Americas

United States 771,570 58.7

M: 678,210 (87.9%)

F: 93,360(12.1%)

N/A N/A

0.22%

(n = 1,722)

0.01%

(n = 89)

N/A
Duarte, F. et al. (2022) (85) Retrospective study Region of the Americas Chile 20,760 43.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A

7.57% (n = 1,571)

8.07/100,000

N/A
Efstathiou, V. et al. (2022) (86) Cross-sectional study European Region Greece 720

45.09

(12.16)

M: 189 (26.2%)

F: 531 (73.8%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)

4.72%

(n = 34)

N/A N/A Depression, anxiety
El Frenn, Y. et al. (2022) (87) Cross-sectional study Eastern Mediterranean Region Lebanon 402

27.85

(10.93)

M: 125 (31.1%)

F: 277 (68.9%)

Columbia‑Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C‑SSRS)

18.20%

(n = 73)

N/A N/A Depression, fear of COVID-19, older age
Fadhli, S. A. M. et al. (2022) (88) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Malaysia 1,290 14.48

M: 385 (29.8%)

F: 905 (70.2%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

11.94%

(n = 154)

8.37%

(n = 108)

N/A Cyberbullying victimization
Gainza Perez, M. A. et al. (2022) (89) Cross-sectional study

Region of the

Americas

United States 159 37.64 (11.92)

M: 82 (51.6%)

F: 77 (48.4%)

Suicidal Ideation Attributes SScale (SIDAS)

27.67%

(n = 44)

N/A N/A Low adherence
Galletta, M. A. K. et al. (2022) (90) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas Brazil 182 30.84 (6.62)

M: 0 (0%)

F: 182 (100%)

Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)

14.29%

(n = 26)

N/A N/A N/A
Geda, N. et al. (2022) (91) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas Canada 4,005 N/A

M: 1,930 (48.2%)

F: 2059 (51.4%)

Other: 16 (0.4%)

N/A

12.01%

(n = 481)

N/A N/A Social isolation, depression, anxiety, and substance use (cannabis)
Hagerty, S. L. et al. (2022) (92) Cross-sectional study

Region of the

Americas

United States 1,122 39.29

M: 3,498 (11.2%)

F: 7,603 (88.8%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

15.42%

(n = 173)

N/A N/A Moral injury, loneliness
Holler, I. et al. (2022) (93) Cross-sectional study European Region Germany 1,311 30.96 (8.48)

M: 41 (3.1%)

F: 1,270 (96.9%)

The German version of the Suicide

Ideation and Behaviour Scale (SSEV)

21.74%

(n = 285)

0.53%

(n = 7)

N/A Depression, agitation, perceived burdensomeness, previous suicide attempt
Hyland, P. et al. (2022) (94) Retrospective study European Region Ireland 1,032 N/A N/A Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

29.46%

(n = 304)

11.24%

(n = 116)

N/A

Suicidal ideation: male, unemployed, higher loneliness, and lower religiosity

Suicide attempt: ethnic minority status, lower education, lower income, PTSD, depression, and history of mental health treatment

Hyland, P. et al. (2022) (95) Retrospective study European Region Ireland 1,110 N/A N/A Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) N/A

11.17%

(n = 124)

N/A N/A
Ide, K. et al. (2022) (96) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Japan 2,813 N/A

M: 735 (3.1%)

F: 2,078 (73.87%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

8.64%

(n = 243)

N/A N/A Mental health
Jadir, D. S. et al. (2022) (97) Cross-sectional study United States: Region of the Americas. Italy: European Region. Spain: European Region. Saudi Arabia: Eastern Mediterranean Region. India: South-East Asia Region United States, Italy, Spain, Saudi Arabia, and India 2,482 37.1 (13.03)

M: 1,251 (50.4%)

F: 1,231 (49.6%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

39.69%

(n = 985)

N/A N/A Racial/ethnic minorities
Jones, L. B. et al. (2022) (98) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas Canada 4,693 N/A

M: 1,628 (34.69%)

F: 1,235 (63.05%)

WHO World Mental Health-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WHO WMH-CIDI)

18.88%

(n = 886)

N/A N/A Chinese or as another non-Indigenous ethnic minority; experiencing current symptoms of depression or anxiety; having a history of suicidal planning or attempts
Kaggwa, M. M. et al. (2022) (99) Cross-sectional study African Region Uganda 540 23.3 (2.64)

F: 177 (32.78%)

M: 363 (67.22%)

General Health Questionnaire

31.85%

(n = 172)

N/A N/A

Suicidal ideation: having difficulty paying university tuition fees

Suicide attempts: having a history of sexual abuse, having difficulty paying university tuition fees

Kaggwa, M. M. et al. (2022) (100) Cross-sectional study African Region Uganda 540

All: 23.3 (2.64)

Non-suicidal:

23.41 (2.74) Suicidal: 22.61 (1.77)

M: 363 (67.22%)

F: 177 (32.78%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

13.89%

(n = 75)

N/A N/A Smoking cigarettes and marijuana and having financial tuition constraints
Kaggwa, M. M. et al. (2022) (101) Retrospective study African Region Uganda 215,427

All suicide: 27.16 (14.71)

Non-fatal suicide

attempt: 28.49 (14.61)

Completed suicide: 20.69 (13.72)

N/A N/A N/A

0.06%. Per 60/ 100,000 people

(n = 130)

0.01% Per 3/ 100,000 people

(n = 26)

N/A
Kajai, C. et al. (2022) (102) Cross-sectional study South-East Asia Region Thailand 447 N/A

M: 180 (40.27%)

F: 267 (59.73%)

Psychiatric Inpatient Suicide Risk Assessment (PISRA)

0.22%

(n = 1)

N/A N/A Stress, stress-coping behaviors
Kaltschik, S. et al. (2022) (103) Cross-sectional study European Region Austria 599 16.65 (1.47)

M: 122 (20.36%)

F: 477 (79.63%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

6.01%

(n = 36)

N/A N/A N/A
Kang, S. et al. (2022) (104) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Korea 54,948

No economic impact

due to

COVID-19: 15.14 (0.02) Economic

deterioration due to

COVID-19: 15.31 (0.02)

M: 28,353 (51.59%)

F: 26,595 (48.41%)

N/A

10.88%

(n = 5,979)

2.04%

(n = 1,121)

N/A Economic deterioration, low socioeconomic status
Kantorski, L. P. et al. (2022) (105) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas Brazil 890 N/A

M: 135 (15.2%)

F: 755 (84.8%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

7.42%

(n = 66)

N/A N/A Use of psychotropic drugs
Keyworth, C. et al. (2022) (106) Cross-sectional study European Region United Kingdom 1,029 45.55 (14.23)

M: 340 (33.0%)

F: 671 (62.5%)

Other/prefer not to say: 18 (1.8%)

History of non‑suicidal self‑harm (NSSH)

7.77%

(n = 80)

0.38%

(n = 4)

N/A Higher levels of perceived symptomatic (or physiological) reactions to COVID-19
Kim, D. et al. (2022) (107) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Korea 46,475 N/A N/A N/A

10.30%

(n = 4,789)

N/A N/A N/A
Kim, H. Y. et al. (2022) (108) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Korea 300 N/A N/A Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) N/A

2.33%

(n = 7)

N/A Fear of COVID-19, depression
Kim, S. et al. (2022) (109) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Korea 973,711 N/A

M: 550,983(56.6%)

F:422,728(43.4%)

N/A N/A

0.30%

(n = 2,962)

N/A N/A
Kirič, B. et al. (2022) (110) Retrospective study European Region Slovenia 1,966 16.28 (1.72)

M: 604 (30.7%)

F: 1,362 (69.3%)

N/A

54.48%

(n = 1,071)

28.99%

(n = 570)

N/A N/A
Knowles, J. R. P. et al. (2022) (111) Cross-sectional study European Region United Kingdom 12,989 N/A

F: 10,391 (80.0%)

M: 2490 (19.2%)

Other: 25(0.2%) Prefer not to say/no response: 83 (0.6%)

Kessler Distress Scale

9.28%

(n = 1,205)

0.63%

(n = 83)

N/A Food insecurity, domestic abuse, relationship problems, redundancy, social isolation, financial problems
Kone, A. et al. (2022) (112) Cross-sectional study

Region of the

Americas

United States 22,862 N/A

M: 3,853 (16.4%)

F: 19,397 (82.6%)

Transgender or nonbinary: 220 (0.9%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

8.11%

(n = 1,853)

N/A N/A N/A
Kundu, A. et al. (2022) (113) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas Canada 1,414

All: 21.90 (3.78) non-suicidal: 23.06 (3.71)

Suicidal: 21.22 (3.63)

N/A N/A

60.61%

(n = 857)

N/A N/A Mental disorders, substance use, insulted by parents or adults in childhood, age in years, past week feeling depressed, lifetime diagnosis of mental illness, lifetime diagnosis of depressive disorder, past week feeling sad, ever pretending to be straight or cisgender to be accepted, urban areas, unemployed
Lantos, J. D. et al. (2022) (114) Cross-sectional study

Region of the

Americas

United States 9,984 15

M: 4,443 (44.5%)

F: 5,540 (55.5%)

Missing:1 (0.0%)

Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ)

12.25%

(n = 1,223)

N/A N/A Older age, female, public versus private insurance
Li, G. et al. (2022) (115) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 1,609 N/A

M: 588 (36.5%)

F: 1021 (63.5%)

Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R)

31.57%

(n = 322)

N/A N/A Daytime sleepiness, depression
Li, Y. et al. (2022) (116) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 67,905 20.23 (1.63)

M: 21,270 (31.3%)

F: 46,635 (68.7%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

7.63%

(n = 5,178)

N/A N/A Short sleep
Li, Y. C. et al. (2022) (117) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 905

Bipolar disorder: 29.64

(11.58) Schizophre-nia: 32.42 (11.34)

M: 269 (29.73%)

F: 636 (70.27%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)

47.40%

(n = 429)

30.27%

(n = 274)

N/A Younger age, experience of cyberbullying, a history of suicide ideation among family or friends, fatigue, physical pain, inpatient status, depression
Liang, Y. J. et al. (2022) (118) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 1,159 56.1 (6.0)

M: 412 (35.5%)

F: 747 (64.5%)

Common mental health problems (CMHPs)

4.06%

(n = 47)

N/A N/A Marital status of ‘others’ disagreement regarding the successful containment of the pandemic, physical health problems, and common mental health problems (CMHPs)
Lin, C. Y. et al. (2022) (119) Cross-sectional study Eastern Mediterranean Region Iran 10,843 35.54 (12.0)

M: 4,092 (52.3%)

F: 6,751 (62.3%)

Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

20.77%

(n = 2,252)

N/A N/A N/A
Liu, R. et al. (2022) (120) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 1,063 All: 62.80 (9.44) non-suicidal: 63.03 (9.51) Suicidal: 61.02 (8.71)

M: 347 (32.6%)

F: 716 (67.4%)

Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

11.76%

(n = 125)

N/A N/A Poor treatment adherence, perceived illness worsening during the COVID-19 outbreak, major depressive disorder, PHQ-9 total score, NPRS total score
Lixia, W. et al. (2022) (121) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 33,706 N/A

M: 7,846 (23.3%)

F: 25,860 (76.7%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

Patient Health Questionnaire Somatic Symptom Severity Scale-15 (PHQ-15)

Suicidal and self-injurious ideation (SSI)

1.33%

(n = 447)

N/A N/A Female, psychological assistance needs, contact with severe COVID-19 patients, high stress at work, single or divorced marital status, insufficient social support, depression, anxiety, PTSD
Llistosella, M. et al. (2022) (122) Longitudinal study European Region Spain 2,005 N/A

M: 965 (48.5%)

F: 1,040 (51.5%)

Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviours (STB)

13.77%

(n = 276)

N/A N/A Individuals with very low resilience
Llorca-Bofí, V. et al. (2022) (123) Retrospective study European Region Spain 342 N/A N/A N/A

13.16%

(n = 45)

13.45%

(n = 46)

N/A Female, living with relatives, depression
Ma, Z. et al. (2022) (124) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 5,670

50.48

(13.21) Non-suicidal: 50.98 (12.87) Suicidal: 48.41 (13.79)

M: 2,978 (52.5%)

F: 2,692 (47.5%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

13.32%

(n = 755)

N/A N/A

Suicidal ideation: mental disorders, longer time since cancer diagnosis, regional and distant tumor stage, depression, anxiety, hostility, Fear of COVID-19

Suicide attempts: mental disorders

Ma, Z. et al. (2022) (125) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 67,905 20.23 (1.63)

M: 21,270 (31.33%)

F: 46,635 (68.67%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)

10%

(n = 6,791)

N/A N/A Depression, mental disorders
MacDonald, B. V. et al. (2022) (126) Retrospective study

Region of the

Americas

United States 3,609 14.8 (2.0)

M: 21,270 (31.33%)

F: 46,635 (68.67%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

1.47%

(n = 53)

N/A N/A Depression
Mamun, M. A. et al. (2022) (127) Cross-sectional study South-East Asia Region Bangladesh 490 36.97 (10.56)

M: 228 (46.5%)

F: 262 (53.5%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)

33.06%

(n = 162)

1.83%

(n = 9)

N/A Males, lower age, lower educational grade, low-earning jobs, living in a government-provided house, family history of mental health and suicide, anxiety, insomnia
Mensi, M. M. et al. (2022) (128) Cross-sectional study European Region Italy 481

All: 15.04 (1.93)

M: 14.95 (1.88)

F: 15.08 (1.95)

M: 184 (38.25%)

F: 297 (61.75%)

N/A

26.90%

(n = 144)

N/A N/A N/A
Mucci, M. et al. (2022) (129) Retrospective study European Region Italy 241 N/A N/A Columbia–Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

10.37%

(n = 25)

19.90%

(n = 40)

N/A N/A
Nomura, K. et al. (2022) (130) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Japan 1,564 20.6 (2.9)

M: 824 (52.7%)

F: 617 (39.5%)

Unknown:123 (7.9%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

7.29%

(n = 114)

N/A N/A Financial insecurity, academic performance
Park, J. Y. et al. (2022) (131) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Korea 784 14.38 (1.76)

M: 372 (47.4%)

F: 412 (52.6%)

N/A

9.18%

(n = 72)

2.29%

(n = 18)

N/A Sexual intercourse experience, depressive mood, unhappiness
Que, J. Y. et al. (2022) (132) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 16,220 N/A

M: 3401 (21%)

F: 12,819 (79%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

13.35%

(n = 2,165)

N/A N/A Nightmares but not insomnia, depression, anxiety
Rahman, Q. M. et al. (2022) (133) Cross-sectional study South-East Asia Region Bangladesh 2,100 22.58 (2.22)

M: 1176 (56%)

F: 924 (44%)

Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R) scale

47.90%

(n = 1,006)

N/A N/A Females, keep their distance from friends or family, have relationship problems, are a burden to families, and are stressed about lockdown
Raifman, J. et al. (2022) (134) Cross-sectional study

Region of the

Americas

United States 1,415 46.0 (16.5)

M: 708 (50%)

F: 707 (50%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

16.33%

(n = 231)

N/A N/A Difficulty paying rent, feeling alone
Raviv, G. et al. (2022) (135) Retrospective study European Region Israel 15,175,791 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.001% (n = 233) per 18.424 100,000/year N/A
Roy, N. et al. (2022) (136) Cross-sectional study South-East Asia Region Bangladesh 410 30.73 (10.85)

M: 276 (67.3%)

F: 134 (44.5%)

N/A

23.90%

(n = 98)

N/A N/A Age above 35 years, female, acquiring a disability later in life, lack of sleep, and current substance use
Rozental, A. et al. (2022) (137) Cross-sectional study European Region Sweden 4,513 35.05 (12.1)

M: 1,072 (23.7%)

F: 3,210 (71.1%)

Non-binary: 231 (5.2%)

Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

54.72%

(n = 2,335)

0.02%

(n = 1,384)

N/A N/A
Sacco, D. L. et al. (2022) (138) Retrospective study

Region of the

Americas

United States 615 43.3 (15.5)

M: 331 (53.8%)

F: 284 (46.2%)

N/A

31.38%

(n = 193)

N/A N/A N/A
Sasaki, N. et al. (2022) (139) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Japan 12,249

43.29

(11.70)

M: 7,095 (57.9%)

F: 5,154 (42.1%)

N/A

8.50%

(n = 1,041)

N/A N/A Temporary employment
Schluter, P. J. et al. (2022) (140) Cross-sectional study 1. Region of the Americas: Canada, United States. 2. European Region: England, Switzerland, Belgium. 3. Western Pacific Region: Hong Kong, Philippines, New Zealand 8-country (Canada, the United States, England, Switzerland, Belgium, Hong Kong, Philippines, and New Zealand) 17,883 N/A

M: 8,629 (48.4%)

F: 9,204 (51.6%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

25.82%

(n = 4,617)

N/A N/A N/A
Shiraly, R. et al. (2022) (141) Cross-sectional study Eastern Mediterranean Region Iran 803 All: 68.1 (4.73) Non-suicidal: 67.8 (4.7). Suicidal: 68.1 (4.8)

M: 408 (50.8%)

F: 395 (49.2%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)

Ask Suicide-Screening Questionnaire (ASQ)

Depression, not being married, inability to pay medical bills, low perceived social support, and limited social network
Smirnova, D. et al. (2022) (142) Cross-sectional study European Region Russian Federation 7,777 32.9 (11.94)

M: 2,836 (36.47%)

F: 4,736 (60.90%)

Other: 205 (2.64%)

Risk Assessment Suicidality Scale (RASS)

16.63%

(n = 1,293)

N/A N/A N/A
Stickley, A. et al. (2022) (143) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Japan 1,452 N/A

M: 704 (48.5%)

F: 748 (51.5%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

11.71%

(n = 170)

N/A N/A Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
Suarez-Soto, E. et al. (2022) (144) Cross-sectional study European Region Spain 160 15.81 (1.03)

M: 53 (33.1%)

F: 107 (66.9%)

The DetectaWeb-Distress scale

20.63%

(n = 33)

7.50%

(n = 12)

N/A N/A
Sueki, H. et al. (2022) (145) Prospective study Western Pacific Region Japan 6,683 46.5 (13.8) non-suicidal: 49.2 (13.9). Suicidal: 43.5 (13)

M: 3,422 (51.2%)

F: 3261 (48.8%)

N/A

47.36%

(n = 3,165)

N/A N/A Younger, with unstable employment, without children, with low income, receiving psychiatric care
Turner, B. J. et al. (2022) (146) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas Canada 809 15.67 (1.37)

M: 353 (44%)

F: 453 (56%)

N/A

17.25%

(n = 139)

N/A N/A Youth, transgender, non-binary, or gender fluid, not residing with both parents, psychiatric concerns, frequent cannabis use
Valladares-Garrido, M. J. et al. (2022) (147) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas Peru 514 22

M: 492 (95.7%)

F: 22 (4.3%)

N/A

14.01%

(n = 72)

N/A N/A Family history of mental health, insomnia, and anxiety
Villanueva-Silvestre, V. et al. (2022) (148) Cross-sectional study European Region Spain 921 24.8 (3)

M: 385 (45%)

F: 507 (55%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

6.51%

(n = 60)

N/A N/A N/A
Villarreal Sotelo, K. et al. (2022) (149) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas Mexico 659 22.56 (7.26)

F: 465 (70.5%)

M: 194 (29.5%)

N/A

39.94%

(n = 262)

18.29%

(n = 120)

N/A Female, knowing a person infected with COVID-19, confinement for more than 40 days
Walther, A. et al. (2022) (150) Cross-sectional study European Region Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, and Belgium 490 25.7 (9.7)

M: 490 (100%)

F: 0 (0%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

49.98%

(n = 240)

23.27%

(n = 114)

N/A Status loss, depression
Wathelet, M. et al. (2022) (151) Cross-sectional study European Region France 44,898 19

M: 12,429 (27.7%)

F: 31,728 (70.7%)

Other: 741 (1.6%)

Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)

13.80%

(n = 6,196)

N/A N/A Nonbinary respondents
Wong, S. M. Y. et al. (2022) (152) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 2,540 N/A N/A Columbia–Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). Beck’s Hopelessness Inventory (BDI)

20.98%

(n = 533)

N/A N/A

Suicidal ideation: suicide-related rumination, poorer cognitive ability, 12-month major depressive disorder

Suicide attempt: COVID-19 stressors, poorer family functioning, personal life stressors, and non-suicidal self-harm

Wu, O. et al. (2022) (153) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 686 17.79 (0.78)

M: 438 (63.85%)

F:248 (36.15%)

N/A

5.25%

(n = 36)

N/A N/A Social avoidance, emotional vulnerability
Yamashita, T. et al. (2022) (154) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Japan 310 26.0 (5.1)

M: 124 (62%)

F:248 (38%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

14.84%

(n = 46)

N/A N/A Age, experience of deprivation about food expenses, deprivation about cellphone bills
Yamazaki, J. et al. (2022) (155) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Japan 113 N/A

M:62 (63.3%)

F: 36 (36.7%)

Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)

17.70%

(n = 20)

N/A N/A Less frequent conversations (those with less than one conversation per week)
Yu, Y. et al. (2022) (156) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 1,248 16.80

F: 831 (66.59%)

M: 417 (33.41%)

N/A

14.34%

(n = 179)

8.17%

(n = 102)

N/A Suffered family hurt, junior and senior school, and sexism
Zhang, L. et al. (2022) (157) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 1,718 31.59 (14.43)

M: 479 (29.9%)

F:1,239(70.1%)

N/A

33.35%

(n = 577)

39.35%

(n = 676)

N/A Urban, unemployed, cyberbullying, history of suicide among family or friends, fatigue, physical pain, depression
Zhu, J. et al. (2022) (158) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 5,175 13.37 (0.02)

M: 2,673 (51.65%)

F:2,502 (48.35%)

N/A

20.83%

(n = 1,078)

11.79%

(n = 610)

N/A

Female, quarreling with parents, insomnia

Male: Quarreling with parents, insomnia, previous suicide attempt history, previous SI history, and feeling depressed during the lockdown pandemic

Female: having emptiness inside, quarreling with parents, insomnia, feeling anxious, and longing for father's emotional warmth

Alberto Gómez-García, J. A. et al. (2023) (159) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas Mexico 79,665 N/A

M: 31,258 (39.3%)

F:48,407 (60.7%)

N/A

16.22%

(n = 

12,918)

N/A N/A Female, young women, education, single, unemployment, social distancing, living alone, loss of family member due to COVID-19, depression, physical violence, excessive alcohol consumption, drug use, suspicion or diagnosis of COVID-19
Bowersox, N. W. et al. (2023) (160) Retrospective study

Region of the

Americas

United States 52,916

No SMI: 59.93 (16.84)

SMI: 59.57 (14.74)

M: 46,938 (88.7%)

F: 5,978 (11.3%)

N/A

1.09%

(n = 579)

N/A N/A N/A
Cai, H. et al. (2023) (161) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 1,009 15.3 (2.1) N/A Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

14.07%

(n = 142)

7.82%

(n = 79)

N/A Depression, anxiety
Carlos, K. M. et al. (2023) (162) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas United States 134 25.75 (2.3)

M: 71 (44.4%)

F: 89 (55.6%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) 23 (17.16%) N/A N/A Higher levels of impostor feelings
Castellvi Obiols, P. et al. (2023) (163) Longitudinal study European Region Spain 1,357 N/A N/A Suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STB)

7.66%

(n = 104)

0.36%

(n = 5)

N/A N/A
Chen, C. et al. (2023) (164) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Japan 5,688 N/A N/A N/A 857 (15.07%) N/A N/A History of psychiatric disorders, infectious disease other than colds during pregnancy, and feeling of loneliness
Chen, X. et al. (2023) (165) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 1,297 N/A

M: 563 (56.60%)

F: 734 (43.40%)

N/A

6.71%

(n = 87)

N/A N/A History of psychological or emotional counseling before COVID-19 infection, fatigue, higher self-reported COVID-19 related stigma, sleep disorder
Davies, H. L. et al. (2023) (166) Cross-sectional study European Region United Kingdom 36,715 N/A

M: 10,874 (29.6%)

F: 25,728 (70.1%)

Missing: 113 (0.3%)

N/A

49.14%

(n = 

18,040)

N/A N/A Having a lifetime psychiatric disorder, not being in paid employment, higher pandemic worry scores, and being racially minoritized
Vega Sánchez, D. de la. et al. (2023) (167) Cross-sectional study European Region Spain 3,140 47.8

M: 1,990 (63.4%)

F: 1,140 (36.3%)

Not specified: 10 (0.3%)

N/A

17.32%

(n = 544)

N/A N/A Female, presence of previous suicide attempts, taking a psychotropic drug, working in a different area during the pandemic
Essadek, A. et al. (2023) (168) Cross-sectional study European Region France 823 21.23 (2.11)

M: 413 (50.18%)

F: 410 (49.82%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) 209 (25.39%) N/A N/A Food insecurity (less than one meal per day)
Fischer, I. C. et al. (2023) (169) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas United States 2,441 63.2 (14)

M: 2182 (92.1%)

F: 259 (7.9%)

Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised \(SBQ-R) 207 (8.48%)

74

(3.03%)

N/A Higher education, lifetime substance use disorder, pre-pandemic loneliness, lower pre-pandemic purpose in life, higher pre-pandemic psychiatric distress, and lower pre-pandemic purpose in life
Frajerman, A. et al. (2023) (170) Cross-sectional study European Region France 18,875 N/A

M: 2182 (14.5%)

F: 97 (85.5%)

Composite International Diagnostic Interview -Short Form (CIDI-SF) questionnaire 1,690 (8.95%) N/A N/A Study field (human/social sciences), having failed midterms exams or dropout, and important subjective financial difficulties
Gibb, K. et al. (2023) (171) Cross-sectional study

Region of the

Americas

United States 21,949 N/A

M: 1,990 (63.4%)

F: 1,140 (36.3%)

Not specified: 10 (0.3%)

N/A

33.0%

(n = 7,243)

N/A N/A Production and service workers were the priority occupation groups for depressed mood
Gomez-Garcia, J. A. et al. (2023) (172) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas Mexico 79,665 N/A

M: 31,258 (39.3%)

F: 48,407 (60.7%)

N/A 12,918 (16.22%) N/A N/A Being a woman, young women, education, single, unemployment, social distancing, living alone, loss of family member due to Covid-19, depression diagnosis, physical violence, excessive alcohol consumption, drug use, and suspicion or diagnosis of Covid-19
Hall, B. J. et al. (2023) (173) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 3,230 32

M: 1,657 (55.5%)

F: 1,563 (44.3%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ)

4.49%

(n = 145)

N/A N/A Lockdown stressors: food insecurity, job and income loss, lockdown-related fears
Han, K. M. et al. (2023) (174) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Korea 1,364 N/A

M: 767 (56.23%)

F: 597 (43.77%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) 325 (23.83%) N/A N/A Job loss, lower income, lower education level
Hannan, C. et al. (2023) (175) Cross-sectional study

Region of the

Americas

United States 121,380 15.7

M: 50,750 (50.1%)

F: 50,531 (49.9%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-Modified (PHQ-9-M)

5.79%

(n = 7,029)

N/A N/A Depression
He, Z. et al. (2023) (176) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 10,388 35.5 (8.1)

M: 3,032 (29.2%)

F: 7,356 (70.8%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

8.84%

(n = 918)

N/A N/A Moral injury, medical error, workplace violence, depression, anxiety, PTSD
Kasal, A. et al. (2023) (177) Cross-sectional study European Region Czech 6,021 46 (29)

M: 2,906 (48.3%)

F: 3,115 (51.7%)

Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)

13.22%

(n = 796)

N/A N/A Mental disorders
Landi, G. et al. (2023) (178) Cross-sectional study European Region Italy 652 38.8 (13.2)

M: 161 (24.7%)

F: 491 (75.3%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

15.31%

(n = 100)

N/A N/A Mental pain intensity
Lee, E. W. et al. (2023) (179) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Korea 2,000 N/A

M: 1016 (50.8%)

F: 984 (49.2%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) 166 (8.3%) N/A N/A Women whose economic status worsened
Li, S. et al. (2023) (180) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 14,690 N/A

M: 6,271 (42.69%)

F: 8,419 (57.31%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

9.04%

(n = 1,328)

N/A N/A Ethnic minority, age, history of mental disorders, daily life disturbance due to health problems, being around someone with COVID-19, being uncertain about effective disease control, and having depressive symptoms, insomnia symptoms, and psychological distress
Li, Z. Y. et al. (2023) (181) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 1,343 26

M: 428 (31.87%)

F: 915 (68.13%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) 130 (9.68%) N/A N/A Depression
Lippard, E. T. C. et al. (2023) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas United States 214 33

M: 428 (31.87%)

F: 915 (61%)

Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) 90 (45.33%) N/A N/A Frequency of alcohol use, drugs use, PTSD symptoms, perceived early life trauma, COVID-related worry
Liu, L. et al. (2023) (182) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas Canada 18,936 N/A

M: 8,082 (49.2%)

F:10,818 (50.6%)

N/A

3.06%

(n = 579)

N/A N/A Adverse experiences related to the pandemic, alcohol or cannabis use, violence in their home, depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder
Lo, H. K. Y. et al. (2023) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 407

M: 261 (65.6%)

F:146 (34.4%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) 128 (31.45%) N/A N/A Depression
Lu, Y. et al. (2023) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 1,901 31.31 (6.04)

M: 70 (3.7%)

F: 1831 (96.3%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

320

(16.83%)

206 (10.84%) N/A Workplace bullying
Martínez-Arriaga, R. J. et al. (2023) (183) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas Mexico 626 All: 35 (8.4) non-suicidal: 35.8 (8.5) Suicidal: 34.4 (8.3)

M: 106 (17%)

F: 515 (82.7%)

Other: 2 (0.3%)

N/A

49.20%

(n = 308)

1.75%

(n = 11)

N/A Secondary traumatic stress, high depressive affect, low positive affect, emotional insecurity, interpersonal problems, and medication use
Narita, Z. et al. (2023) (184) Cross-sectional study

Region of the

Americas

United States 1,071 N/A

M: 509 (48.6%)

F: 538 (51.4%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)

Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale

30.16%

(n = 323)

N/A N/A Consistently self-isolated
Narita, Z. et al. (2023) (185) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Japan 2,862 39.5 (12.0)

M: 856 (29.9%)

F: 2,006 (70.1%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ–9)

3.77%

(n = 108)

N/A N/A COVID-19-related discrimination, depression
Nguyen, T. H. et al. (2023) (186) Retrospective study

Region of the

Americas

United States 13,605 15 (1.7)

M: 856 (50.6%)

F: 2,006 (49.4%)

N/A

18.50%

(n = 2,517)

8.90%

(n = 1,211)

N/A Bullied
Ramos-Martín, J. et al. (2023) (187) Cross-sectional study European Region Spain 2,212 21.28 (2.51)

M: 672 (30.4%)

F: 1,540 (69.6%)

Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview (SITBI)

744

(33.36%)

5.74% N/A Psychological distress, and family and social support
Reinke, M. et al. (2023) (188) Cross-sectional study

Region of the

Americas

United States 172,113,599 N/A

F: 99,028,073 (57.5%)

M: 73,085,526 (38.1%)

N/A

0.09%

(n = 

160,320)

0.01%

(n = 

19,719)

N/A COVID-19 patients
Roy, N. et al. (2023) (189) Cross-sectional study South-East Asia Region Bangladesh 410

30.73

(10.85)

M: 276 (67.3%)

F: 134 (32.7%)

Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21) 98 (23.9%) N/A N/A Age above 35 years, being female, acquiring a disability later in life, lack of sleep and current substance use
Rukundo, G. Z. et al. (2023) (190) Cross-sectional study African Region Uganda 431 40

M: 120 (27.8%)

F: 311 (72.2%)

Self-reported suicidal thoughts and severe distress (IES-R)

22.04%

(n = 95)

N/A N/A Depression
Seidler, Z. E. et al. (2023) (191) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Australia 700 50.3 (15.2)

Heterosexual: 495 (70.7%)

Gay: 150 (21.4%)

Bisexual: 43 (6.1%) Other: 12 (1.7%)

Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced inventory (Brief-COPE) 203 (29%) N/A N/A Employment, and social support
Solomonov, N. et al. (2023) (192) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas United States 16,164

70.9

(5.0)

M: 6233 (29.6%)

F: 9931 (61.4%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ–9) 1,144 (7.08%) N/A N/A Social support
Sotelo, K. V. et al. (2023) (193) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas Mexico 659 22.56 (7.26)

M: 194 (29.5%)

F: 465 (70.5%)

Severity Rating Scale

39.94%

(n = 262)

18.29%

(n = 120)

N/A Female, knowing a person infected with COVID-19, Confinement for more than 40 days
Tachikawa, H. et al. (2023) (194) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region Japan 11,816 N/A

M: 6,436 (54.4%)

F: 5,380 (45.6%)

Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6)

15.66%

(n = 1,850)

N/A N/A Female, loneliness
Tantirattanakulchai, P. et al. (2023) (195) Cross-sectional study South-East Asia Region Thailand 314

71.42

(7.83)

M: 130 (41.4%)

F: 184 (58.6%)

Columbia–Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

32.48%

(n = 102)

N/A N/A Diabetic retinopathy, depression
Turner, B. J. et al. (2023) (196) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas Canada 16,972 N/A N/A Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ–9)

5.06%

(n = 859)

N/A N/A Suspected or confirmed COVID-19 exposure, potential COVID-19 exposure at work, medical vulnerability toward COVID-19, insecure employment or unemployment, income loss
Valentini, E. et al. (2023) (197) Retrospective study European Region Italy 850 N/A

M: 430 (49.4%)

F: 420 (50.6%)

N/A

14.12%

(n = 120)

N/A N/A Females, separated, personality disorders, borderline personality disorder
Varin, M. et al. (2023) (198) Cross-sectional study Region of the Americas Canada 14,689 N/A N/A Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ–9)

2.57%

(n = 316)

N/A N/A Alcohol use
Wei, Y. et al. (2023) (199) Cross-sectional study Western Pacific Region China 1,338 26

M: 426 (31.8%)

F: 912 (68.20%)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ–9) 130 (9.72%) N/A N/A Loneliness, social isolation, and mental disorders
Zhang, X. et al. (2023) (200) Retrospective study Western Pacific Region China 674 N/A N/A N/A N/A

33.83%

(n = 228)

N/A N/A

CI—Confidence Interval, M: Male, F: Female, JBI: Joanna Briggs Institute

A total of 144 studies incorporated suicide assessment tools, predominantly utilizing the Patient Health Questionnaire in 86 studies followed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) in 9 studies. Furthermore, the Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R) was employed in 7 studies. Regarding study design, four studies were conducted as case–control studies, 169 as cross-sectional studies, 20 as retrospective studies, four as longitudinal studies, two as prospective studies, one as a cohort study, one as an observational study, and one as a quasi-experimental study. The studies included in this analysis were published between 2020 and 2023, with 138 studies published in the last two years (2022 and beyond) (Table 1).

Participant Characteristics

The collective participant counts across the 200 studies amounted to 19,815,536. Among these, 88 studies comprised male participants, totaling 321,155 individuals, while 89 studies incorporated female participants, with a cumulative total of 486,261. Four studies included transgender participants, accounting for 385 individuals, and 10 studies categorized participants as "other," with an aggregated total of 2,497 individuals. Additionally, 29 studies provided information on participants' age distribution, with four studies including participants aged over 18 years, 29 studies including individuals aged 18–24 years, another 29 studies involving those aged 25–34 years, 29 studies [2250] encompassing participants aged 35–44 years, 26 studies featuring individuals aged 45–54 years, 18 studies with participants aged 55–64 years, and 12 studies involving individuals aged 65 years and above (Table 1).

Regarding suicidal behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic, 41 studies evaluated both suicidal ideation and suicide attempts, 186 studies solely examined the prevalence of suicidal ideation, 56 studies focused on the prevalence of suicide attempts, and three studies assessed the incidence of death by suicide (Table 1).

Prevalence of Suicidal Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic

The manuscript focuses on the prevalence and incidence of suicidal behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 184 studies analyzed the prevalence of suicidal ideations, 56 studies examined the prevalence of suicidal attempts, and 5 studies investigated the prevalence of death by suicide. Suicide behavior events were reported in 228,342 out of 19,815,536 participants. Among these, three studies conducted in Multiple areas demonstrated the highest rates (25.9%) of suicide behavior events, while five studies in the Eastern Mediterranean region showed the highest rates (18%) of such events. Following a meta-analysis, the pooled prevalence of suicide behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic was determined to be 11.5% (95% CI: 9.9–13.3%, p < 0.001) across 202 studies, indicating a high level of heterogeneity (I2 = 99.92, Q = 253533.416, Tau2 = 1.428, p < 0.001, Table 2).

Table 2.

Meta- analysis and Meta-regression according to subgroup used to identify factors affecting heterogeneity in included studies

Meta- analysis and
meta-analysis
Meta- analysis Meta-regression
Variable No of study Suicide (n) Sample (n) Prevalence (%) (95% CI) p-value I2 Coefficient Standardized error 95% confidence
interval
p-value
Prevalence rate (%) 202 228,342 19,815,536 11·5 (9·9–13·3)  < 0·001 99·92
Incidence rate (per 100,000 people year) 4 3,082 16,264,211 55·28 (20·1–90·5)  < 0·001 99·97
Sex 89 115,535 810,298 13·7 (12·3–15·4)  < 0·001 99·72
Male 88 42,161 321,155 12·1 (10·0–14·4)  < 0·001 99·69 Reference
Female 89 72,520 486,261 14·4 (12·2–16·8)  < 0·001 99·77 0·199 0·138  − 0·072–0·470 0·151
Transgender 4 274 385 44·8 (16·8–76·5)  < 0·001 91·32 1·847 0·534 0·800–2·894  < 0·001
Other 10 580 2,497 20·2 (11·9–32·1)  < 0·001 95·12 0·596 0·349  − 0·089–1·282 0·088
Age 29 63,215 1,356,357 10·5 (8·5–13·0)  < 0·001 99·84
55 ~ 64 years old 17 6,200 28,680 5·3 (2·2–12·0)  < 0·001 99·72 Reference
 ≥ 65 years old 12 4,860 14,687 7·2 (1·7–25·3)  < 0·001 99·65 0·383 0·478  − 0·555–1·322 0.423
45 ~ 54 years old 26 8,343 58,996 9·3 (6·0–14·1)  < 0·001 99·65 0·597 0·389  − 0·166–1·362 0·125
35 ~ 44 years old 28 12,444 96,212 12·5 (9·3–16·4)  < 0·001 99·55 0·905 0·384 0·151–1·660 0·018
25 ~ 34 years old 29 14,973 99,687 12·5 (9·8–15·9)  < 0·001 99·46 0·915 0·381 0·168–1·663 0.016
18 ~ 24 years old 29 11,209 70,112 16·0 (12·8–19·8)  < 0·001 99·21 1·197 0·381 0·450–1·944 0·001
 > 18 years old 4 5,186 987,983 5·6 (0·4–48·4)  < 0·001 99·98 0·045 0·680  − 0·288–1·379 0·946
Marital status 44 42,380 325,095 14·1 (14·1–12·4)  < 0·001 99·37
Marriage 43 22,027 190,044 10·8 (8·8–13·1)  < 0·001 99·48 Reference
Unmarried 44 17,927 117,598 14·9 (11·8–18·7)  < 0·001 99·49 0·376 0·177 0·029–0·724 0·033

Separated/ divorced

/widowed

24 2,213 15,184 22·1 (16·2–29·4)  < 0·001 97·68 0·844 0·217 0·417–1·271  < 0·001
Partner 5 213 325,095 12·2 (7·4–19·5)  < 0·001 90·11 0·162 0·405  − 0·632–0·957 0·688
Education level 43 67,556 420,043 15·2 (13·0–17·7)  < 0·001 99·73
University or higher 29 20,773 116,165 12·3 (9·0–16·5)  < 0·001 99·71 Reference
Junior college 43 30,607 236,728 14·7 (11·4–18·7)  < 0·001 99·76 0.210 0·240  − 0·261–0·682 0·381
High school or lower 37 16,176 67,150 18·4 (13·5–24·6)  < 0·001 99·64 0.489 0·249 0·001–0·978 0·049
Employment status 19 36,552 226,072 16·9 (14·7–19·5)  < 0·001 99·37
Employment 33 14,679 100,883 16·2 (11·9–21·7)  < 0·001 99·60 Reference
Unemployment 30 19,732 109,059 20·9 (16·5–26·2)  < 0·001 99·54 0·306 0·237  − 0·159–0·771 0·197
Retired 9 157 1,623 6·3 (2·5–14·8)  < 0·001 95·33  − 0·979 0·386  − 1·737– − 0·221 0·011
Housewife 11 855 5,356 17·1 (9·5–28·6)  < 0·001 99·05 0·066 0·338  − 0·597–0·730 0·844
Student 13 871 8,409 18·0 (10·6–28·9)  < 0·001 97·99 0·118 0·314  − 0·499–0·735 0·707
Other 7 258 742 13·8 (3·4–42·3)  < 0·001 96·55  − 0·128 0·437  − 0·986–0·729 0·769
Monthly income 26 24,754 181,169 15·2 (13·2–17·6)  < 0·001 99·21
High income 24 6,210 56,275 13·1 (10·2–16·7)  < 0·001 98·78 Reference
Medium income 24 7,536 60,303 15·5 (11·6–20·3)  < 0·001 99·29 0.197 0·221  − 0·237–0·632 0·372
Low income 26 10,251 50,921 19·9 (15·7–24·8)  < 0·001 99·05 0·498 0·218 0·070–0·926 0·022
Other 3 757 13,670 7·6 (2·9–18·4)  < 0·001 98·60  − 0·601 0·480  − 1·543–0·341 0·211
Income worries 3 2,071 56,450 15·3 (3·9–44·2)  < 0·001 99.88
Income worries 3 1,389 18,747 17·3 (2·5–62·7)  < 0·001 99·90 Reference
No income worries 3 682 37,703 13·5 (1·0–70·0)  < 0·001 99·59 0.300 1.565  − 2.767 − 3.368 0·847
Profession 7 6,708 83,081 9·3 (6·5–13·0)  < 0·001 99·42
Medicine 6 627 20,038 7·1 (2·3–19·9)  < 0·001 99·44 Reference
Nurse 7 2,294 33,347 10·4 (5·3–19·4)  < 0·001 99·58 0.430 0.586  − 0.718 − 1.580 0·462

Allied health/ Other

medical

6 477 9,250 7·9 (3·3–17·4)  < 0·001 98·78 0.119 0.609  − 1.076 − 1.314 0·844
Other 5 3,310 20,446 13·1 (7·8–21·2)  < 0·001 97·71 0.698 0.639  − 0.555 − 1.952 0·275
Having children 7 12,359 83,350 11·0 (6·9–17·1)  < 0·001 99·77
No children 7 9,792 62,369 9·3 (4·0–19·9)  < 0·001 99·71 Reference
Having children 7 2,567 20,981 13·0 (6·4–24·7)  < 0·001 99·83  − 0·382 0·589  − 1·537–0·773 0·516
Lives alone 13 17,526 125,130 17·4 (14·5–20·6)  < 0·001 98·90
No lives alone 13 14,654 106,664 13·0 (10·0–16·8)  < 0·001 99·14 Reference
Lives alone 13 2,872 18,466 24·3 (17·4–32·9)  < 0·001 98·49 0·732 0·243 0·255–1·209 0.002
Religion 5 1,344 13,311 15·9 (11·5–21·5)  < 0·001 95·79
Religion 5 352 2,371 16·5 (10·4–25·3)  < 0·001 94·93 Reference
No religion 5 992 10,940 14·4 (9·6–21·1)  < 0·001 92·41  − 0·121 0·360  − 0·828–0·585 0.736
House type 4 1,408 8,888 14·6 (11·7–18·2)  < 0·001 93·20
High 4 383 3,397 10·0 (5·4–17·7)  < 0·001 95·41 Reference
Middle 4 473 2,913 15·7 (13·3–18·6) 0·075 56·54 0·387 0·305  − 0·212–0·986 0.205
Lower 4 543 2,511 21·7 (17·5–26·0) 0·035 65·21 0·765 0·314 0·149–1·381 0.014
Other 1 9 67 13·4 (7·1–23·8) 1·00 0·00 0·267 0·563  − 0·836–1·372 0.634
Resident type 4 1,341 3,437 34·2 (22·0–49·1)  < 0·001 98·21
Own 4 1,037 2,509 28·7 (12·2–53·9)  < 0·001 99·15 Reference
Rented 4 212 571 44·7 (20·8–71·4)  < 0·001 96·95 0·692 0·760  − 0·801–2·185 0.363
Hostel/ mess 2 92 357 27·3 (12·4–49·8)  < 0·001 93·77  − 0·073 0·929  − 1·894–1·748 0.937
Residence 24 31,712 236,762 14·0 (12·1–16·6)  < 0·001 99·49
Rural/ Regional 24 8,218 67,120 14·1 (11·0–18·0)  < 0·001 99·10 Reference
Urban 24 23,494 169,120 14·2 (11·2–17·9)  < 0·001 96·65  − 0·163 0·369  − 0·886–0·560 0.659
Low social support 3 384 9,237 4·8 (2·6–8·7)  < 0·001 96·99
No low social support 3 126 5,943 2·6 (1·6–4·1) 0·001 85·08 Reference
Low social support 3 258 3,294 8·4 (6·3–11·0) 0·018 75·27 1·266 0·281 0·715–1·818  < 0·001
Physical exercise 3 775 15,316 7·2 (3·1–16·2)  < 0·001 99·26
Physical exercise 3 243 6,403 5·8 (1·7–17·8)  < 0·001 98·74 Reference
No physical exercise 3 532 8,913 9·0 (2·2–29·9)  < 0·001 99·56 0·467 1·011  − 1·514–2·450 0·643
Satisfaction with studies 3 5,335 50,537 12·2 (9·5–15·7)  < 0·001 98·46

Satisfaction with

studies

3 2,987 33,278 8·9 (6·0–12·9)  < 0·001 93·80 Reference

Dissatisfaction with

studies

3 2,348 17,259 16·4 (12·6–21·0)  < 0·001 94·83 0·701 0·247 0·216–1·186 0·004
Suicidal attempt history 5 583 7,427 18·7 (6·5–43·3)  < 0·001 99·11

No suicidal attempt

history

5 469 7,054 6·0 (1·0–29·1)  < 0·001 99·56 Reference
Suicidal attempt history 5 114 373 43·4 (21·2–68·5)  < 0·001 92·45 2·704 1·284 0·186–5·221 0·035
Family history of suicidal 6 3,139 8,740 44·4 (30·2–59·5)  < 0·001 99·25

No family history of

suicidality

6 2,075 6,916 31·0 (16·1–51·2)  < 0·001 99·52 Reference

Family history of

suicidal

6 1,064 1,824 59·5 (36·1–79·2)  < 0·001 97·85 1·193 0·632  − 0·046–2·433 0·059
Tested positive for COVID-19 17 18,239 148,066 21·3 (16·0–27·9)  < 0·001 99·61
Negative 16 14,429 130,197 16·9 (10·1–26·7)  < 0·001 99·76 Reference
Positive 17 2,872 13,423 29·2 (17·2–45·0)  < 0·001 98·74 0·695 0·440  − 0·168–1·560 0·114
Untested 2 938 4,446 21·1 (20·0–22·4) 0·187 42·54  − 0·277 1·063  − 2·360–1·806 0·794
Experiencing COVID-19 like symptoms 3 233 2,136 9·1 (4·9–16·5)  < 0·001 93·63
Never 3 180 885 16·8 (10·4–26·0)  < 0·001 87·81 Reference
Fewer 3 26 608 7·4 (0·9–40·4)  < 0·001 95·72  − 0·312 0·844  − 1·966–1·341 0·711
Frequently 3 21 313 10·1 (1·5–45·5)  < 0·001 93·05  − 0·787 0·827  − 2·409–0·833 0·341
Almost times 2 6 330 3·7 (0·4–27·6) 0·010 84·92  − 1·580 0·989  − 3·518–0·358 0·110
Fear of getting severely sick or dying 10 3,651 40,826 13·8 (10·3–18·2)  < 0·001 98·72

Fear of getting severely

sick or dying

10 2,323 23,959 14·6 (9·6–21·6)  < 0·001 98·99 Reference

No fear of getting

severely sick or dying

10 1,328 16,867 13·0 (8·1–20·3)  < 0·001 98·40 0·134 0·358  − 0·567–0·836 0·707
Family member tested positive for COVID-19 7 2,730 31,946 10·5 (6·9–15·9)  < 0·001 99·10
Negative 7 2,117 28,136 8·6 (4·8–15·0)  < 0·001 99·38 Reference
Positive 7 613 3,810 13·2 (7·2–23·0)  < 0·001 97·08 0·475 0·466  − 0·438–1·388 0·307
Know who died of COVID-19 5 13,866 85,727 19·0 (14·3–24·9)  < 0·001 99·07
Unknow 5 11,779 76,792 16·0 (9·4–25·9)  < 0·001 99·26 Reference
Know 5 2,087 8,935 23·9 (14·5–36·6)  < 0·001 94·19 0·498 0·460  − 0·403–1·400 0·278
Family history of mental disorders 5 11,283 71,044 24·0 (12·8–40·4)  < 0·001 99·70

No family history of

mental disorders

5 309 1,139 23·4 (7·8–52·5)  < 0·001 99·87 Reference

Family history of

mental disorders

5 10,719 67,689 31·6 (11·8–61·5)  < 0·001 98·30 0·415 0·940  − 1·427–2·258 0·658
Unknown 2 255 2,216 11·8 (1·1–62·5)  < 0·001 99·61  − 0·826 1·240  − 3·257–1·604 0·505
History of mental disorders 4 1,652 36,886 15·8 (3·2–51·3)  < 0·001 99·84
Good or excellent 4 646 32,725 7·8 (0·5–56·5)  < 0·001 99·87 Reference
Poor or fair 4 1,006 4,161 29·3 (4·3–79·3)  < 0·001 99·77 1·592 1·813  − 1·962–5·147 0·379
Tobacco/ Smoker use 16 16,101 112,086 12·5 (9·4–16·5)  < 0·001 99·50

No Tobacco/ Smoker

use

16 14,266 102,888 9·0 (5·8–13·8)  < 0·001 99·71 Reference
Tobacco/ Smoker use 16 1,835 9,198 17·5 (12·2–24·6)  < 0·001 98·01 0·762 0·343 0·089–1·435 0·026
Alcohol use 20 24,629 200,375 14·7 (12·4–17·3)  < 0·001 99·37
No alcohol use 20 18,168 166,000 11·6 (9·3–14·3)  < 0·001 99·34 Reference
Alcohol use 20 6,461 34,375 18·5 (14·2–23·7)  < 0·001 99·00 0·540 0·191 0·165–0·914 0·004
Substance use 8 14,483 92,437 17·6 (10·6–27·7)  < 0·001 99·69
No substance use 8 12,095 86,568 10·7 (5·6–19·5) 0·003 99·52 Reference
Substance use 8 2,388 5,869 28·1 (15·5–45·5)  < 0·001 98·78 1·184 0·519 0·5165–2·203 0·022
Marijuana/ Cannabis use 6 2,033 20,006 20·0 (14·5–27·1)  < 0·001 98·10

Not use Marijuana/

Cannabis use

6 1,553 17,717 12·5 (8·3–18·3)  < 0·001 98·27 Reference
Marijuana/ Cannabis use 6 480 2,289 28·8 (21·4–37·5)  < 0·001 87·77 1·188 0·336 0·529–1·848  < 0·001
Depression 22 19,342 149,191 12·1 (9·0–16·1)  < 0·001 99·65
No Depression 21 11,242 121,730 4·9 (3·5–6·9)  < 0·001 99·19 Reference
Depression 22 8,100 27,461 25·5 (18·6–33·9) 0·204 99·37 1·894 0·275 1·353–2·434  < 0·001
Anxiety 14 4,509 49,846 10·3 (7·2–14·5)  < 0·001 99·22
No Anxiety 14 1,658 33,591 5·2 (2·7–10·1)  < 0·001 99·29 Reference
Anxiety 14 2,851 16,255 18·8 (13·9–24·9)  < 0·001 98·40 1·434 0·372 0·705–2·163  < 0·001
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) 4 926 21,524 6·4 (2·1–18·4)  < 0·001 99·55
No PTSD 4 253 18,070 2·0 (1·3–3·1)  < 0·001 90·46 Reference
PTSD 4 673 3,454 16·6 (8·6–29·6)  < 0·001 97·58 2·211 0·466 1·297–3·125  < 0·001
Stress 9 2,313 49,559 9·4 (4·0–20·7)  < 0·001 99·68
No stress 9 421 11,393 5·7 (1·5–19·4)  < 0·001 99·21 Reference
Stress 9 1,892 37,166 15·1 (4·4–40·6)  < 0·001 99·81 1·083 0·976  − 0·829–2·996 0·267
History of sleep problems 6 10,096 73,452 10·1 (7·2–14·0)  < 0·001 99·36
No sleep problems 6 6,158 51,992 6·0 (2·3–14·8)  < 0·001 99·35 Reference
Sleep problems 6 3,938 21,460 17·7 (9·5–30·3)  < 0·001 99·07 1·219 0·603 0·037–2·401 0·043
Nighttime sleeping hour 5 5,531 51,357 15·2 (12·2–18·7)  < 0·001 97·91
Normal (7–9 h) 5 949 11,341 12·7 (7·8–20·2)  < 0·001 97·65 Reference

More than normal > 9

hrs

5 1,844 20,402 12·5 (7·4–20·2)  < 0·001 90·96 –0·025 0·410 –0·830–0·779 0·949
Less than normal < 7 h 5 2,738 19,614 20·4 (13·2–30·4)  < 0·001 97·08 0·568 0·382 –0·181–1·317 0·137
Chronic disease 10 9,079 73,428 14·3 (11·1–18·2)  < 0·001 98·95
No chronic disease 10 7,321 61,295 12·0 (9·0–15·8)  < 0·001 98·59 Reference
Chronic disease 10 1,758 12,133 17·0 (9·4–28·8)  < 0·001 98·97 0·393 0·310 –0·214–1·002 0·204
Perceived quality of physical health 8 8,105 77,201 17·7 (12·1–25·1)  < 0·001 99·65
Good 8 4,548 59,360 10·2 (5·9–16·9)  < 0·001 99·60 Reference
Fair 7 2,572 14,101 24·6 (12·2–43·4)  < 0·001 99·52 1·062 0·477 0·126–1·999 0·026
Poor 3 985 3,740 26·4 (25·0–27·8) 0·081 60·19 1·405 0·633 0·163–2·648 0·027
Physical health problems 6 3,818 26,219 19·4 (10·7–32·4)  < 0·001 99·64

No physical health

problems

6 2,376 22,846 13·2 (7·7–21·5)  < 0·001 99·28 Reference

Physical health

problems

6 1,442 3,373 27·9 (12·9–50·1)  < 0·001 99·18 0·947 0·506 –0·045–1·939 0·061
Instrumental ADL impairmenta 4 828 12,692 14·2 (5·6–31·6)  < 0·001 99·38
No ADL impairments 4 615 11,346 9·8 (1·8–39·4)  < 0·001 99·72 Reference
ADL impairmenta 4 213 1,346 19·3 (13·1–27·4)  < 0·001 88·21 0·855 1·116 –1·332–3·043 0·443
Frequency of loneliness 4 1,283 16,193 8·7 (5·0–14·6)  < 0·001 98·88
Rarely or never 4 350 10,703 3·3 (1·3–8·1)  < 0·001 98·46 Reference
Some of the time 4 488 2,808 11·2 (5·1–22·9)  < 0·001 97·84 1·319 0·597 0·147–2·490 0·027

Moderate amount of

time

2 251 1,413 16·1 (9·8–25·4)  < 0·001 92·13 1·726 0·718 0·317–3·135 0·016
All of the time 2 194 1,269 18·3 (9·5–32·5)  < 0·001 94·51 1·897 0·719 0·486–3·308 0·008
Having dependent elderly at home 3 382 4,065 9·7 (6·2–14·7)  < 0·001 99·13

No having dependent

elderly at home

3 270 2,886 10·1 (3·9–23·8)  < 0·001 96·82 Reference

Having dependent

elderly at home

3 112 1,179 9·1 (6·0–13·6)  < 0·001 80·22 –0·153 0·590 –1·311–1·003 0·794
Race 7 20,963 57,847 31·2 (22·3–41·7)  < 0·001 99·58
White 7 19,044 51,879 28·6 (11·8–54·5)  < 0·001 99·89 Reference
Black 7 340 1,882 26·0 (11·2–49·5)  < 0·001 98·09 –0·130 0·764 –1·629–1·368 0·864
Asian 6 366 1,023 32·4 (16·6–53·6)  < 0·001 96·48 0·174 0·797 –1·387–1·737 0·826
Hispanic 3 257 824 30·7 (9·4–65·3)  < 0·001 98·28 0·097 0·983 –1·830–2·024 0·921
Other 7 956 2,239 38·8 (22·5–58·0)  < 0·001 98·15 0·478 0·765 –1·021–1·978 0·531
Participate in frontline work 3 10,513 101,887 5·5 (2·7–10·9)  < 0·001 99·86

No participate in

frontline work

3 8,079 59,325 4·9 (2·0–12·0)  < 0·001 99·74 Reference

Participate in

frontline work

3 2,416 42,562 6·1 (0·9–32·9)  < 0·001 99·92 0·243 1·089 –1·892–2·379 0·823
Direct contact with COVID-19 patients 10 6,133 97,471 9·9 (7·1–13·6)  < 0·001 99·43

No direct contact with

COVID-19 patients

10 4,082 75,240 8·7 (5·1–14·5)  < 0·001 99·65 Reference

Direct contact with

COVID-19 patients

10 2,051 22,231 11·2 (7·6–16·0)  < 0·001 98·53 0·270 0·382 –0·479–1·020 0·480
Experienced quarantine during the COVID-19 pandemic 8 29.581 185.203 15·4 (13·3–17·7)  < 0·001 99·08

No experienced

quarantine

8 13.660 99.759 11·8 (9·4–14·6)  < 0·001 98·99 Reference
Experienced quarantine 8 15,921 85,444 20·4 (17·8–23·3)  < 0·001 96·76 0·609 0·158 0·298–0·920  < 0·001
Social mediause 5 2,147 27,354 8·8 (6·6–11·5)  < 0·001 96·92
No social mediause 5 406 5,900 8·4 (5·0–13·7)  < 0·001 95·43 Reference
Social mediause 5 1,741 21,454 9·2 (6·1–13·6)  < 0·001 98·00 0·099 0·341 –0·569–0·768 0·770
Service duration (year) 3 786 35,767 6·2 (2·4–15·0)  < 0·001 99·37
 > 10 years 3 246 13,812 3·9 (0·4–28·5)  < 0·001 99·48 Reference
4–10 years 3 266 10,268 6·6 (0·8–38·4)  < 0·001 99·56 0·569 1·563 –2·494–3·634 0·715
1–3 years 3 274 11,687 8·9 (1·3–42·2)  < 0·001 99·48 0·887 1·565 –2·181–3·956 0·570
Working hours per week 5 1,730 16,119 14·6 (10·2–20·6)  < 0·001 98·06
≦ 20 h 2 151 1,379 15·1 (6·0–33·1)  < 0·001 95·01 Reference
21–40 h 5 556 4,824 11·2 (5·4–22·1)  < 0·001 97·70 –0·374 0·898 –2·136–1·386 0·676
41–60 h 5 784 8,420 13·5 (5·6–28·9)  < 0·001 98·90 –0·144 0·886 –1·881–1·592 0·870
 > 60 h 5 239 1,496 19·7 (6·8–45·0)  < 0·001 98·15 0·311 0·889 –1·431–2·053 0·726
WHO region 202 228,342 19,815,536 11·5 (9·9–13·3)  < 0·001 99·92
African Region 5 489 217,931 4·5 (0·2–47·2) 0·042 99·88 Reference
European region 53 43,515 16,304,495 9·6 (5·9–15·2)  < 0·001 99·94 0·815 0·576 –0·313–1·944 0·157

Region of the

Americas

51 700,386 1,361,684 14·1 (10·7–18·4)  < 0·001 99·93 1·254 0·577 0·124–2·385 0·030

South-East Asian

region

14 3,312 24,773 13·5 (7·6–22·6)  < 0·001 99·55 1·191 0·643 –0·070–2·452 0·064

Eastern

Mediterranean region

5 2,583 12,862 18·0 (13·6–23·5)  < 0·001 94·25 1·536 0·778 0·013–·3·060 0·048

Western Pacific

region

71 98,564 1,848,577 10·8 (8·8–13·2)  < 0·001 99·91 0·949 0·569 –0·167–·2·065 0·096
Multiple areas 3 9,493 45,214 25·9 (16·1–38·7) 0·001 99·83 2·006 0·895 0·251–·3·760 0·025
Sample size 202 228,342 19,815,536 11·5 (9·9–13·3)  < 0·001 99.92
 > 500 169 226,113 19,805,263 10·6 (9·0–12.5)  < 0·001 99·93 Reference
 ≤ 500 33 2,229 10,273 18·1 (14·9–21·9)  < 0·001 99·32 0·553 0·231 0·100–1·007 0·017

Sex_other: Non-binary/Two-spirit/Pansexual/Heteroflexible/Genderqueer/nonconforming/Not listed/Prefer not to answer

Prevalence of Suicidal Ideations

Across 37 countries, 184 studies analyzed the prevalence of suicidal ideations. Suicide ideation events were reported in 216,723 out of 1,669,436 participants. Among these, three studies conducted in Multiple areas demonstrated the highest rates (25.9%) of suicide ideation events, while four studies in the Eastern Mediterranean region showed the highest rates (17%) of such events (Table 2). Following a meta-analysis, the pooled prevalence of suicide ideations during the COVID-19 pandemic was determined to be 13.5% (95% CI: 12.1–14.9%, p < 0.001) across 184 studies, indicating a high level of heterogeneity (I2 = 99.83, Q = 110,988.396, Tau2 = 0.667, p < 0.001, Supplemental Fig. 1).

Prevalence of Suicide Attempts

Across 23 countries, 56 studies analyzed the prevalence of suicide attempts. Suicide attempt events were reported in 44,454 out of 17,524,835 participants. Among these, one study conducted in the Eastern Mediterranean region demonstrated the highest rates (22.7%) of suicide attempt events, while two studies in the South-East Asian region showed the highest rates (17%) of such events (Table 2). Following a meta-analysis, the pooled prevalence of suicide attempts during the COVID-19 pandemic was determined to be 10.4% (95% CI: 6.6–16.1%, p < 0.001) across 56 studies, indicating a high level of heterogeneity (I2 = 99.95, Q = 115204.965, Tau2 = 1.884, p < 0.001, Supplemental Fig. 2).

Prevalence and Incidence of Death by Suicide

Five studies conducted in five countries reported the prevalence of suicides, encompassing 4,690 out of 1,862,286 participants. Among these studies, those in the Region of the Americas showed the highest suicide prevalence rates (7.57%). Additionally, three studies conducted in three countries reported the prevalence of suicides, involving 2,745 out of 1,088,420 participants. Again, studies in the Region of the Americas exhibited the highest suicide prevalence rates (8.07 per 100,000 people/year) (Table 2). According to the meta-analysis results, the pooled prevalence of death by suicide was 0.5% (95% CI: 0.1–3.5%, p < 0.001), with significant heterogeneity across the five studies (I2 = 99.97%, Q = 15084.524, Tau2 = 4.775, p < 0.001, Supplemental Fig. 3a). The pooled incidence rate, calculated using people-year (PY) for three studies, was 4.51 (95% CI: 1.78–7.25%, p < 0.001) per 100,000 PY with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 99.34%, Q = 12640.154, Tau2 = 5.813, p < 0.001, Supplemental Fig. 3b).

Meta-Regression Analysis to Identify Risk Factors for Suicidal Behaviors

Following the meta-analysis, significant heterogeneity was observed in all outcome variables. To explore the factors contributing to this heterogeneity and understand the drivers within subgroups, a meta-regression analysis was conducted. The meta-regression model incorporated various risk factors for the three suicidal behaviors (Table 2).

The following risk factors were identified as significantly associated with suicidal behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic: According to Transgender [R = 1.84, 95% CI: 0.80 − 2.89, p = 0.0273], age include 18 ~ 24 years old [R = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.45 − 1.94, p = 0.001], 25 ~ 34 years old [R = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.16 − 1.66, p = 0.016], 35 ~ 44 years old [R = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.15–1.66, p = 0.018], unmarried [R = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.02–0.72, p = 0.033], separated/ divorced/ widowed [R = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.41–1.27, p < 0.001], education level of high school or lower [R = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.00–0.97, p = 0.049], employment status of retired [R =  − 0·97, 95% CI: − 1·73– − 0·22, p = 0.011], lives alone [R = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.25–1.20, p = 0.002], house type of lower [R = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.14–1.38, p = 0.014], low social support [R = 1.26, 95% CI: 0.71–1.81, p < 0.001], dissatisfaction with studies [R = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.21–1.18, p = 0.004], suicidal attempt history [R = 2.70, 95% CI: 0.18–5.22, p = 0.035], tobacco/ smoker [R = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.08–1.43, p = 0.026], alcohol [R = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.16–0.91, p = 0.004], substance use [R = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.51–2.20, p = 0.022], marijuana/ cannabis [R = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.52–1.84, p < 0.001], depression [R = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.35–2.43, p < 0.001], anxiety [R = 1.43, 95% CI: 0.70–2.16, p < 0.001], PTSD [R = 2.21, 95% CI: 1.29–3.12, p < 0.001], sleep problems [R = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.03–2.40, p = 0.043], perceived quality of physical health were fair [R = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.12–1.99, p = 0.026], and poor [R = 1.40, 95% CI: 0.16–2.64, p = 0.027], frequency of loneliness of some of the time [R = 1.31, 95% CI: 0.14–2.49, p = 0.027], moderate amount of time [R = 1.72, 95% CI: 0.31–3.13, p = 0.016], and All of the time [R = 1.89, 95% CI: 0.48–3.30, p = 0.008], experienced quarantine [R = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.29–0.92, p < 0.001], region of the Americas [R = 1.25, 95% CI: 0.12–2.38, p = 0.030], Eastern Mediterranean region [R = 1.53, 95% CI: 0.01–3.06, p = 0.048], and multiple areas [R = 2.00, 95% CI: 0.25–3.76, p = 0.025] (Table 2).

Risk Factors for Suicidal Ideation

The results of the meta-analysis and meta-regression identified the following risk factors associated with suicidal ideation during the COVID-19 pandemic: transgender [R = 1.81, 95% CI: 0.76–2.86, p < 0.001], 18 ~ 24 years old [R = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.58–1.80, p < 0.001], 25 ~ 34 years old [R = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.30–1.51, p = 0.003], 35 ~ 44 years old [R = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.29–1.52, p = 0.004], unmarried [R = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.02–0.72, p = 0.033], separated/ divorced/ widowed [R = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.41–1.27, p < 0.001], education level of high school or lower [R = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.00–0.97, p = 0.049], employment status of retired [R =  − 0·97, 95% CI: − 1·73– − 0·22, p = 0.011], lives alone [R = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.25–1.20, p = 0.002], house type of lower [R = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.14–1.38, p = 0.014], low social support [R = 1.26, 95% CI: 0.71–1.81, p < 0.001], dissatisfaction with studies [R = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.21–1.18, p = 0.004], suicidal attempt history [R = 2.70, 95% CI: 0.18–5.22, p = 0.035], alcohol [R = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.13–0.92, p = 0.008], substance use [R = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.51–2.20, p = 0.022], marijuana/ cannabis [R = 1.49, 95% CI: 0.52–2.46, p < 0.001], depression [R = 1.77, 95% CI: 1.16–2.38, p < 0.001], anxiety [R = 1.42, 95% CI: 0.57–2.26, p < 0.001], PTSD [R = 2.21, 95% CI: 1.29–3.12, p < 0.001], sleep problems [R = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.03–2.40, p = 0.043], perceived quality of physical health were fair [R = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.12–1.99, p = 0.026], and poor [R = 1.40, 95% CI: 0.16–2.64, p = 0.027], Frequency of loneliness of some of the time [R = 1.31, 95% CI: 0.14–2.49, p = 0.027], moderate amount of time [R = 1.72, 95% CI: 0.31–3.13, p = 0.016], and all of the time [R = 1.89, 95% CI: 0.48–3.30, p = 0.008], experienced quarantine [R = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.29–0.92, p < 0.001], and multiple areas [R = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.06–1.90, p = 0.036]; and sample size ≤ 500 [R = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.24–0.90, p < 0.001] (Supplemental Table 2).

Risk Factors for Suicide Attempts

The results of the meta-analysis and meta-regression identified the following risk factors associated with suicidal attempts during the COVID-19 pandemic: family history of suicidal [R = 1.93, 95% CI: 0.73–3.12, p = 0.001], depression [R = 2.41, 95% CI: 1.31–3.50, p < 0.001], European region [R = 5.12, 95% CI: 1.17–9.08, p = 0.011], region of the Americas [R = 5.65, 95% CI: 1.60–9.71, p = 0.006], South-East Asian region [R = 5.82, 95% CI: 1.35–10.29, p = 0.010], Eastern Mediterranean region [R = 6.18, 95% CI: 0.71–11.66, p = 0.026], and Western Pacific region [R = 5.37, 95% CI: 1.40–9.35, p = 0.008] (Supplemental Table 3).

Publication Bias

Publication bias in suicidal behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic for the 202 studies was assessed using a funnel plot and Egger's test. The funnel plot did not reveal evidence of asymmetry, suggesting a minor probability of publication bias. However, statistically significant publication bias was observed based on Egger's results (Q = 253533.416, p < 0.001, I2 = 99.92%, Fig. 2), likely attributed to the diversity in sample sizes across the studies.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Funnel plots describing publication bias bases on suicidal behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. Total (95% CI) = 202, IR 0.115 (0.099–0.133), p < .001, Events 388,429/ 176,753,344. Heterogeneity = Random model, Q value 253533.416, p < .001, I2 = 99.92, Tau.2 1.428

Discussion

This study provides the first large-scale meta-analysis and regression estimate of global prevalence of suicidal behaviors and risk factors associated with suicidal ideation, attempts, and deaths during the entire COVID-19 pandemic. Study findings are strengthened with over 200 observational type studies. Overall suicide behaviors prevalence nearly 11% during the pandemic, 13.5% suicide ideation prevalence and 10% suicide attempts in general population. These results emphasize the importance of prioritizing mental health support and intervention strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic. It's crucial for communities and governments to invest in mental health services, raise awareness, reduce stigma, and promote resilience-building measures to address these alarming rates of suicidal behavior. If you or someone you know is struggling with suicidal thoughts or behaviors, it's essential to reach out to mental health professionals or helplines for support and assistance.

Prior studies show, being female, being a healthcare professional, younger age, low income, preexisting mental health issues, loneliness, and substance abuse were the risk factors associated with suicidal ideation during the pandemic [51]. Our study finds the similar results and additionally we found some specific risk factors associated with suicidal ideation such as transgender, age 18 ~ 24 years, unmarried, separated/ divorced/ widowed, retired employees, low social support, dissatisfaction with studies, having suicidal attempt history and having experience of quarantine. However, some studies suggest number of days of social distancing does not cause incidence of suicidal ideation [3].

Studies found that that the people who received social support shown lesser risk of developing suicidal ideation [5]. Therefore, having a partner, substantial social support through friends, relatives or healthcare provider are important in reducing suicides during times like pandemics. Special psychological support is also necessary for the health professionals during new normal situations like COVID-19 pandemics [3]. Additional help for younger generation, transgender, people who do not have partner and retired employees may need. Quarantine centers require innovative approaches to assess and stabilize the mental health of residents. Implementing digital health technologies, such as telemedicine for remote psychological counseling and mental health monitoring apps, can provide real-time support. Virtual support groups and social interaction platforms can help reduce feelings of isolation and loneliness, while AI-driven mental health assessment tools could offer early detection of distress. Additionally, integrating mindfulness programs, online therapy, and resilience-building activities tailored to the specific needs of quarantine residents can create a more holistic approach to mental health care in these settings.

COVID-19 pandemic elevated the risk of suicide regardless of the individual’s status of with or without mental disorders such as depression and anxiety [52]. Interpersonal theory of suicide explains the association between loneliness and suicidal ideation. According to the theory of suicidal ideation suicide can be induced by feeling of being a burden on others [3]. Therefore, reciprocal care and psychological reassurance during isolation are vital for those experiencing loneliness. Future interventions targeting suicidal issues need to incorporate theories along with intervention plans for better effectiveness.

This study has number of strengths such as use of comprehensive search strategy, use of multiple bibliographic databases, incorporate large number of observational studies, large sample size, application of both meta-analysis and regression techniques and use of rigorous review process maximize the comprehensiveness and generalizability of results. Previous reviews were limited to studies less than 13 for metanalysis and a smaller number of studies on suicide during the pandemic [1, 6].

A few limitations of this study are seen such as high heterogeneity in outcome variables and considerable publication bias as a result of diversity of sample characteristics, sizes and conducted countries among included studies. Our study has some limitations. Suicidal behaviors were measured using different assessment tools, which may have contributed to significant heterogeneity. However, meta-regression analysis reveals risk factors affecting heterogeneity for the suicidal behaviors (ideation and attempt) in this study are associated with: being transgender, age 18 ~ 24, 25 ~ 34, 35 ~ 44 years old, living without partner/ lives alone, retired senior, low social support, dissatisfaction with studies, suicidal attempt history, alcohol and substance usage, depression, anxiety, sleep problems, quarantine exposure, region of the Americas and Eastern Mediterranean region. Previous meta-analysis also reported heterogeneous population as a reason for significant heterogeneity in study results [1]. Additionally, since none of our team members are native speakers of languages such as French or Spanish, this posed a limitation in our review. We recommend conducting further studies that include sources in other languages to address this gap.

Conclusions

In a global pandemics ongoing monitoring and support for mental health is critical for the vulnerable communities such as younger age, transgender, living alone, un-employees, and individual with substance abuse. This can significantly reduce depression, anxiety, suicide risk and associated deaths through systematic therapeutic and social support. Ongoing longitudinal and cross-sectional studies are studies are needed to assess the current status of the situation. Qualitative studies may help to understand the experience, ethnic and cultural influences on suicidal ideation and risk factors due to the pandemic. Future interventions to prevent suicide during such situations need to incorporate theories like Interpersonal theory of suicide, Crisis theory and Theory of planned behavior. This study will immensely be helpful in designing effective interventional and epidemiological studies in future to prevent pandemic or emerging infectious disease related social isolation, loneliness, suicidal attempts and death.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

We thank the volunteers who supported this research.

Biographies

Sriyani Padmalatha Konara Mudiyanselage

is a National Cheng Kung University distinguished nursing professional and researcher currently serving as a Research Fellow at Institute of Behavioral Medicine, The National Cheng Kung University, in Taiwan. With a PhD in Nursing from National Cheng Kung University, her extensive research focuses on mental health, particularly the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on suicidal behaviors. Dr. Padmalatha’s career spans significant clinical experience at the National Hospital of Sri Lanka and academic roles at various institutions, including the University of Sri Jayewardenepura. She chairs the Nursing and Midwifery Working Group at the International Society for Telemedicine & eHealth and has earned numerous accolades, including the Nursing Excellence Award from the President of Sri Lanka. Her contributions to healthcare and nursing education underscore her dedication to advancing the field through research, teaching, and leadership.

Yi-Tseng Tsai

is a dedicated nurse supervisor and accomplished researcher at the Department of Nursing, An Nan Hospital, China Medical University in Tainan, Taiwan and College of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung. With a PhD in Nursing, Dr. Tsai has made significant contributions to understanding mental health, particularly focusing on suicidal behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. Her work is distinguished by a methodical approach to investigating risk factors and prevalence rates, using systematic reviews and meta-regression analyses. Dr. Tsai’s dedication to advancing healthcare through research, coupled with her supervisory role, underscores her commitment to improving patient outcomes and supporting the nursing profession. Her contributions have been instrumental in providing valuable insights for mental health interventions during global health crises.

Maithreepala Sujeewa Dilhani

is a PhD candidate at the Department of Nursing,College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan and lecture at  Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. With a solid foundation in nursing, she is actively involved in advanced research, focusing on mental health and its various dimensions. Her current research explores the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on suicidal behaviors, contributing significantly to the field through systematic reviews and meta-regression analyses. Dilhani’s work is characterized by her meticulous methodology and dedication to understanding complex health issues, making her a valuable contributor to both academic research and practical healthcare solutions.

Yi-Jing Tsai

is a dedicated PhD candidate at the Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan. With a strong background in nursing and a commitment to advancing healthcare, her research focuses on critical mental health issues, particularly the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on suicidal behaviors. Tsai’s work employs systematic reviews and meta-regression analyses to uncover significant insights into risk factors and prevalence rates. Her scholarly contributions are integral to developing effective mental health interventions and policies. Tsai’s dedication to research and her pursuit of academic excellence highlight her as a promising figure in the field of nursing and mental health.

Ya-Han Yang

is a dedicated Registered Nurse at An Nan Hospital, China Medical University, Tainan, Taiwan. With a Bachelor of Science in Nursing, she brings a strong clinical background and a commitment to patient care. Yang’s contributions to research, particularly in understanding the mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, are significant. Her involvement in systematic reviews and meta-regression analyses has provided valuable insights into the prevalence and risk factors of suicidal behaviors during the pandemic. Yang’s dedication to advancing healthcare through research and her clinical expertise make her an invaluable asset to the nursing profession and mental health field.

Zan-Ting Lu

is a committed Registered Nurse at An Nan Hospital, China Medical University, Tainan, Taiwan. Holding a Bachelor of Science in Nursing, Lu has demonstrated exceptional dedication to both patient care and academic research. Her work focuses on the mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly through systematic reviews and meta-regression analyses to investigate suicidal behaviors. Lu’s contributions have been instrumental in identifying key risk factors and prevalence rates, providing crucial insights for the development of effective mental health interventions.

Nai-Ying Ko

is a distinguished academic and the Vice Dean at international affairs at College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan. With a PhD in Public Health, Prof. Ko’s extensive research focuses on mental health, HIV/AIDS, and public health nursing. Her work is characterized by rigorous methodology and impactful findings, contributing significantly to the understanding and improvement of healthcare systems. Prof. Ko’s leadership and expertise have been instrumental in advancing nursing education and research, making her a prominent figure in the global health community. Her numerous publications and ongoing research projects underscore her commitment to excellence in healthcare.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Sriyani Padmalatha Konara Mudiyanselage, Yi-Tseng Tsai, Yi-Jing Tsai, Nai-Ying Ko; Methodology: Sriyani Padmalatha Konara Mudiyanselage, Yi-Tseng Tsai, Ya-Han Yang, Zan-Ting Lu, Nai-Ying Ko; Formal analysis and investigation: Sriyani Padmalatha Konara Mudiyanselage, Yi-Tseng Tsai, Maithreepala Sujeewa Dilhani, Yi-Jing Tsai, Ya-Han Yang, Zan-Ting Lu, Nai-Ying Ko; Writing—original draft preparation: Sriyani Padmalatha Konara Mudiyanselage, Yi-Tseng Tsai, Maithreepala Sujeewa Dilhani; Writing—review and editing: Sriyani Padmalatha Konara Mudiyanselage, Maithreepala Sujeewa Dilhani; Funding acquisition: Yi-Tseng Tsai; Resources: Yi-Tseng Tsai, Yi-Jing Tsai, Ya-Han Yang, Zan-Ting Lu, Nai-Ying Ko; Supervision: Sriyani Padmalatha Konara Mudiyanselage, Yi-Tseng Tsai, Nai-Ying Ko.

Funding

The research was supported by the An Nan Hospital, China Medical University, Tainan, Taiwan, under Grant No. ANHRF113-26.

Data Availability

Data analyzed in this study were a re-analysis of existing data, which are openly available at locations cited in the reference section. However, extracted and re-analyzed data and code can be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics Approval

None.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Farooq S, Tunmore J, Ali W, Ayub M. Suicide, self-harm and suicidal ideation during COVID-19: A systematic review. Psychiatry Res. 2021;306:114228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Liang YJ, Deng F, Liang P, Zhong BL. Suicidal Ideation and Mental Health Help-Seeking Behaviors Among Older Chinese Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2022;35(2):245–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Antonelli-Salgado T, Monteiro GMC, Marcon G, Roza TH, Zimerman A, Hoffmann MS, et al. Loneliness, but not social distancing, is associated with the incidence of suicidal ideation during the COVID-19 outbreak: a longitudinal study. J Affect Disord. 2021;290:52–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Reinke M, Falke C, Cohen K, Anderson D, Cullen KR, Nielson JL. Increased suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in COVID-19 patients in the United States: Statistics from a large national insurance billing database. Psychiatry Res. 2023;323:115164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ayuso-Mateos JL, Morillo D, Haro JM, Olaya B, Lara E, Miret M. Changes on depression and suicidal ideation under severe lockdown restrictions during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain: a longitudinal study in the general population. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2023;32:e55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 6.Shobhana SS, Raviraj KG. Global trends of suicidal thought, suicidal ideation, and self-harm during COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Egypt J Forensic Sci. 2022;12(1):28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Madigan S, Korczak DJ, Vaillancourt T, Racine N, Hopkins WG, Pador P, et al. Comparison of paediatric emergency department visits for attempted suicide, self-harm, and suicidal ideation before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2023;10(5):342–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Farooq S, Tunmore J, Wajid Ali M, Ayub M. Suicide, self-harm and suicidal ideation during COVID-19: A systematic review. Psychiatry Res. 2021;306:114228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein H. Regression in Meta-Analysis June 8, 2017 [Available from: https://www.meta-analysis.com/downloads/MRManual.pdf. Accessed 8 June 2017
  • 10.Page MJ, Moher D. Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review. Syst Rev. 2017;6(1):263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD, McGrath TA, Bossuyt PM, Clifford T, et al. Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement. JAMA. 2018;319(4):388–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Badiee J, Moore DJ, Atkinson JH, Vaida F, Gerard M, Duarte NA, et al. Lifetime suicidal ideation and attempt are common among HIV+ individuals. J Affect Disord. 2012;136(3):993–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bantjes J, Kagee A, Saal W. Suicidal ideation and behaviour among persons seeking HIV testing in peri-urban areas of Cape Town, South Africa: a lost opportunity for suicide prevention. AIDS Care. 2017;29(7):919–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Carrieri MP, Marcellin F, Fressard L, Preau M, Sagaon-Teyssier L, Suzan-Monti M, et al. Suicide risk in a representative sample of people receiving HIV care: Time to target most-at-risk populations (ANRS VESPA2 French national survey). Plos One. 2017;12(2):e0171645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Borges Migliavaca C, Stein C, Colpani V, Barker TH, Munn Z, Falavigna M. How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20(1):96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.DerSimonian R, Kacker R. Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007;28(2):105–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Munn Z, Moola S, Lisy K, Riitano D, Tufanaru C. Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):147–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L. Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. JAMA. 2006;295(6):676–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Borenstein MRH, Sutton, A. Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments: Wiley; February 2006 [Available from: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Publication+Bias+in+Meta+Analysis:+Prevention,+Assessment+and+Adjustments-p-9780470870143. Accessed Feb 2006
  • 21.Moola SZ, Munn Z, Tufanaru C, Aromataris E, Sears K, Sfetcu R, Currie M, Qureshi R, Mattis P, Lisy KM, Mu PF. Systematic reviews of etiology and risk. In: Joanna Briggs Institute reviewer’s manual 2017 (Vol. 5, pp. 217–69). Adelaide, Australia: The Joanna Briggs Institute.
  • 22.Cheung T, Lam SC, Lee PH, Xiang YT, Yip PS, International Research Collaboration on COVID-19. Global imperative of suicidal ideation in 10 countries amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Psychiatry. 2021; 11:588781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 23.Auny FM, Akter T, Guo T, Mamun MA. How has the covid-19 pandemic changed bmi status and physical activity – its associations with mental health conditions, suicidality: An exploratory study. Risk Manag Healthcare Policy. 2021;14:2527–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chakrabarti S. Mental health in hospitalised COVID 19 patients in quarantine during second wave in a south Indian private teaching hospital. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021;14:2777–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Czeisler MÉ, Board A, Thierry JM, Czeisler CA, Rajaratnam SMW, Howard ME, et al. Mental Health and Substance Use Among Adults with Disabilities During the COVID-19 Pandemic - United States, February-March 2021. MMWR: Morbidity Mortality Weekly Rep. 2021;70(34):1142–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 26.Le S, Jian-Yu Q, Zheng-An L, Yi-Miao G, Lin L, Yun-He W, et al. Prevalence and correlates of suicidal ideation among the general population in China during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur Psychiatry. 2021;64(1):1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.McAuliffe C, Pumarino J, Thomson KC, Richardson C, Slemon A, Salway T, et al. Correlates of suicidal ideation related to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Repeated cross-sectional nationally representative Canadian data. SSM - Population Health. 2021;16:100988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Papadopoulou A, Efstathiou V, Yotsidi V, Pomini V, Michopoulos I, Markopoulou E, et al. Suicidal ideation during COVID-19 lockdown in Greece: Prevalence in the community, risk and protective factors. Psych Res. 2021;297:113713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sahimi HMS, Daud TIM, Chan LF, Shah SA, Rahman FHA, Jaafar NRN. Depression and Suicidal Ideation in a Sample of Malaysian Healthcare Workers: A Preliminary Study During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Psych. 2021;12:9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sasaki N, Kuroda R, Tsuno K, Imamura K, Kawakami N. Increased suicidal ideation in the COVID-19 pandemic: an employee cohort in Japan. BJPsych Open. 2021;7(6):e199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 31.Xu LZ, Cheng P, Zheng WH, Xu SM, Li LJ, Zhang L, et al. Factors Associated With Preference of Psychological Intervention and Mental Status Among Chinese Teachers During Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Large Cross-Sectional Survey. Front Psych. 2021;12:11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Agyapong B, Shalaby R, Eboreime E, Wei Y, Agyapong VIO. Self-Reported Alcohol Abuse and the Desire to Receive Mental Health Counselling Predict Suicidal Thoughts/Thoughts of Self-Harm among Female Residents of Fort McMurray. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Electronic Resource]. 2022;19(20):20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bismark M, Scurrah K, Pascoe A, Willis K, Jain R, Smallwood N. Thoughts of suicide or self-harm among Australian healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2022;56(12):1555–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bismark M, Smallwood N, Jain R, Willis K. Thoughts of suicide or self-harm among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: qualitative analysis of open-ended survey responses. BJPsych Open. 2022;8(4):e113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 35.Ide K, Asami T, Suda A, Yoshimi A, Fujita J, Shiraishi Y, et al. The psychological distress and suicide-related ideation in hospital workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: Second results from repeated cross-sectional surveys. PloS one. 2022;17(11 November):e0277174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lixia W, Xiaoming X, Lei S, Su H, Wo W, Xin F, et al. A cross-sectional study of the psychological status of 33,706 hospital workers at the late stage of the COVID-19 outbreak. J Affect Disord. 2022;297:156–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mamun MA, Al-Mamun F, Islam J, Muhit M. Prevalence and associated factors of suicidal behaviors among Bangladeshi rural community people: Findings from the “BD ComMen Study.” PloS one. 2022;17(12 December):e0279271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Raifman J, Ettman CK, Dean LT, Abdalla SM, Skinner A, Barry CL, et al. Economic precarity, loneliness, and suicidal ideation during the COVID-19 pandemic. PloS one. 2022;17(11 November):e0275973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Roy N, Amin MB, Mamun MA, Hossain E, Aktarujjaman M, Sarker B. Suicidal ideation among people with disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh: prevalence and associated factors. BJPsych Open. 2022;9(1):8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sasaki N, Tabuchi T, Okubo R, Ishimaru T, Kataoka M, Nishi D. Temporary employment and suicidal ideation in COVID-19 pandemic in Japan: A cross-sectional nationwide survey. J Occup Health. 2022;64(1):e12319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sueki H, Ueda M. Short-Term Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Suicidal Ideation. Crisis: J Crisis Intervention Suicide. 2022;43(4):315–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chen C, Okubo R, Okawa S, Hagiwara K, Mizumoto T, Higuchi N, et al. The prevalence and risk factors of suicidal ideation in women with and without postpartum depression. J Affect Disord. 2023;340:427–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Davies HL, Hubel C, Herle M, Kakar S, Mundy J, Peel AJ, et al. Risk and protective factors for new-onset binge eating, low weight, and self-harm symptoms in >35,000 individuals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Eat Disord. 2023;56(1):91–107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gomez-Garcia JA, Rivera-Rivera L, Astudillo-Garcia CI, Castillo-Castillo LE, Morales-Chaine S, Tejadilla-Orozco DI. Social determinants associated with suicidal ideation during the Covid-19 pandemic in Mexico. Salud Publica Mex. 2023;65(1):1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hall BJ, Li G, Chen W, Shelley D, Tang W. Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation during the Shanghai 2022 Lockdown: A cross-sectional study. J Affect Disord. 2023;330:283–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.He Z, Lei Q, Hu X, Xiong M, Liu J, Wen J, et al. Moral injury and suicidal ideation among health professionals: The role of mental health. J Affect Disord. 2023;333:58–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lee EW, Nam JY. Is a change in economic status associated with anxiety, depression and suicide ideation during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Korean adults?. J Public Health. 2023;45(4):870–7. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 48.Li S, Liu S, Zhang P, Lin Y, Cui Y, Gu Y, et al. Suicidal ideation in the general population in China after the COVID-19 pandemic was initially controlled. J Affect Disord. 2023;323:834–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Roy N, Amin MdB, Mamun MA, Hossain E, Aktarujjaman Md, Sarker B. Suicidal ideation among people with disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh: prevalence and associated factors. BJPsych Open. 2023;9(1):e3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 50.Rukundo GZ, Wakida EK, Karungi CK, Asasira J, Kumakech E, Obua C. Depression, suicidality, substance-use and associated factors among people living with HIV the COVID-19 pandemic in Uganda. PLoS ONE. 2023;18(5):e0285310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Shou Y, Farrer LM, Gulliver A, McCallum SM, et al. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on suicidal ideation in a representative Australian population sample–Longitudinal cohort study. J Affect Disord. 2022;300:385–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kasal A, Kuklova M, Kagstrom A, Winkler P, Formanek T. Suicide Risk in Individuals With and Without Mental Disorders Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Analysis of Three Nationwide Cross-Sectional Surveys in Czechia. Arch Suicide Res. 2022;27(2):671–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Data analyzed in this study were a re-analysis of existing data, which are openly available at locations cited in the reference section. However, extracted and re-analyzed data and code can be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from The Psychiatric Quarterly are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES