Abstract
The present study aims to develop and optimize sustainable biocomposite ceiling tiles by partially replacing gypsum with pearl millet waste, combined with Waste Wheat Flour (WWF) and waste paper. It aims to provide a sustainable alternative to conventional gypsum-based product, maintaining thermal insulation and flexural strength. Taguchi method was employed for experimental design, by varying key parameters such as gypsum, Pearl Millet Seed Covering (PMSC), and ceiling tile thickness. The signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio was used to identify the optimal composition and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with regression analysis determines the significance of each factor on thermal conductivity and flexural strength. The optimized composition for minimum thermal conductivity (0.065 W/m·K) was identified as 45% PMSC and 10% gypsum at 12 mm thickness. For maximum flexural strength (1.24 MPa), the optimal mix was 55% PMSC and 30% gypsum at 14 mm thickness. The finding underscore the critical influence of gypsum and tile thickness in enhancing material performance. The developed regression models exhibited predictive R2 value of 96.90% for thermal conductivity and 94.44% for flexural strength and an error margin below 3%, confirming the robustness of the approach. This study is original and introduces pearl millet waste biocomposites as eco-friendly alternatives to gypsum ceiling tiles. These tiles hold practical implications in ceiling, partition walls and decorative finishes across various geographic regions, contributing significantly to environmental sustainability and energy-efficient building solutions.
Graphical abstract
Keywords: Agricultural waste management, Biocomposite, Taguchi optimization method, Sustainable thermal insulation, Pearl millet
Subject terms: Mechanical engineering, Sustainability
Introduction
The building sector consumes nearly one third of the energy consumption globally. This makes it a critical sector of interest focusing on energy efficiency and sustainable development1,2. A significant portion of this energy is used for heating and cooling facilities to maintain indoor comfort under different weather conditions3. The combined emissions of buildings sector contribute substantially to climate change and environmental degradation. Energy consumption can be reduced by incorporating insulation to minimize heat transfer, thereby reducing need for artificial climate control, promoting sustainable building practices4. Effective insulation helps in maintaining stable indoor temperature, reducing the heating and cooling equipment loads5,6.
Gypsum ceiling tiles are widely used in building sector for several benefits, including aesthetic appearance and thermal insulation. Generally, such tiles have a thermal conductivity between 0.121 and 0.205 W/mK, making them effective indoor comfort materials7. While gypsum is a common choice for ceiling tiles, it has several limitations. It is derived from non-renewable sources and is non-biodegradable in nature. The extraction and processing of gypsum contribute to landscape degradation and intensive energy consumption8. Additionally, gypsum ceiling tiles have relatively low impact resistance9. Such tiles poses disposal challenge, as it releases hazardous hydrogen sulfide in landfills, contaminating recycling and health risks10. These limitations underscore the need for sustainable alternatives to gypsum ceiling tiles.
Globally, a large amount of agricultural waste is generated every year, reaching to approximately 140 billion metric tons11,12. Common disposal methods such as open burning and landfilling negatively impacts air, soil and water quality13,14. In particular, the burning of agricultural waste significantly contributes to climate change by releasing carbon and particulate matter, thereby increasing greenhouse gas concentrations15,16. Among various crop residues, pearl millet waste is commonly subjected to open burning due to the lack of sustainable disposal alternatives, further exacerbating environmental degradation. The total amount of crop residue (CR) generated estimated based on residue to crop ratio (N). The dry matter to crop residue ratio (D) was the factor that was used to calculate the dry matter from residue generation. The total dry matter generated was calculated by multiplying the crop production (P) by the residue to crop ratio and the dry matter to crop residue ratio (Eq. 1)17,18. According to government estimates, the average pearl millet production between 2020 and 2024 was around 10.71 million tonnes19. Using a residue to crop ratio (N) of 1.2 and a dry matter to residue ratio (D) of 0.9, the total amount of crop residue (CR) was estimated to be approximately 11.56 million tonnes20–22.
![]() |
1 |
Transforming agricultural waste into value-added products presents an effective solution to minimize the environmental damage associated with these practices. Moreover, it reduces the dependence on gypsum, a key raw material in the production of ceiling tiles23. Since agricultural waste is typically abundant and easily accessible, it can offers a cost-effective alternative that can partially replace gypsum, thereby lowering material expenses. The increasing demand for sustainable materials for indoor applications stems from the push toward energy efficiency and environmental sustainability. Natural fibers and their composites, offer excellent thermal performance and have lower environmental impacts24. These materials align with circular economy principles by reducing resource depletion and promoting waste recovery, contributing to eco-friendly construction practices25.
Several studies shown in Table 1 have explored agricultural waste to develop composites for indoor applications. Agricultural waste-based composites offer notable thermal insulation and mechanical properties, making them ideal for energy-efficient indoor applications. Studies highlight materials such as rice husk, coir, sugarcane bagasse, and wheat straw as key contributors to reducing thermal conductivity, with values as low as 0.047 W/mK26–28. Developed composites including hybrid blends of groundnut shells and coir or fiber-reinforced gypsum further optimize insulation performance29. By leveraging these sustainable materials, buildings can achieve better temperature regulation, reduced energy consumption and environmental benefits.
Table 1.
Flexural and thermal properties of agricultural waste composites.
| Agricultural waste | Flexural strength | Thermal insulation properties |
|---|---|---|
| Rice husk and coir fibers26 | The study reports increase in flexural strength up to a 187% (5.6 MPa) compared to pure gypsum | Composites resulted decrease in thermal conductivity compared to pure gypsum, 0.075 W/mK |
| Coconut coir and sugarcane bagasse27 | Flexural Strength increases with an increase in fiber content. 29.7 MPa and 39.9 MPa for 20% of sugarcane bagasse and coconut coir | Thermal conductivity decreases with an increase in fiber content. 0.342 W/mK and 0.303 W/mK for 20% of sugarcane bagasse and coconut coir |
| Wheat straw and corn husk28 | The flexural strength reported, reaching about 0.80 MPa | The thermal conductivity values for the composites were found to be 0.047 W/mK |
| Groundnut Shell and Coir29 | Hybrid composites reports increase in flexural strength, exhibited highest flexural strength of 3.6 MPa | The lowest thermal conductivity (0.066 W/mK) was observed in the composite with a balanced mix of waste |
| Rice Husk, Vine Pruning, Cork, Prickly Pear30 | Inclusion of rice husk positively influences the flexural strength, ranged from 0.08 MPa to 0.28 MPa | Rice husk contributes to the low thermal conductivity ranges from 0.0495 W/mK to 0.0917 W/mK |
| Wheat straw and rice husk32 | Composites reports increase in flexural strength, 1 MPa as per standards, except for the 10% wheat straw level, recorded 0.81 MPa | Composites leads to improved thermal insulation properties. 29% lower thermal conductivity was found (0.127 W/mK) |
| Wool and Coir Fibers32 | Fiber-reinforced gypsum can be increased up to 90% when using an optimal fiber content of 30% | The study reports effective thermal conductivity for the hybrid composites range from 0.250 to 0.276 W/mK |
| Groundnut Shell and Rice Husk33 | The flexural strength of the composites was reported to range from 27.2 to 37.6 MPa, depending on the composition | The thermal conductivity of the composites found range from 0.156 to 0.270 W/mK |
| Sugarcane Bagasse34 | Composites demonstrated 63% higher flexural strength compared to commercially available gypsum-based ceiling tiles | Composites exhibited good thermal stability, maintaining their integrity up to 250 °C |
| Rice husk and seashells35 | The highest recorded flexural strength was 8.14 MPa | Thermal conductivity of the ceramic boards recorded relatively low, 0.102 W/mK to 0.153 |
| Laterite-based bricks with pearl millet waste36,37 | Mechanical strength was found to be lower as per increased porosity and reduced material density | Thermal conductivity of the bricks reported 1.4 W/mK for pure laterite blocks and 0.29 W/mK for laterite blocks with millet waste |
Several studies have demonstrated the potential of natural fibers in enhancing the performance of composite materials, particularly in lightweight and sustainable applications, as summarized in Table 2. Methodology including Taguchi Design of Experiments (DOE) and hybrid optimization techniques has been a common approach across these studies, enabling precise optimization of various material properties. DOE is a statistical technique used to plan, conduct, and analyze experiments efficiently. It helps in understanding the effects of multiple variables simultaneously and optimizing process performance38. It is particularly useful in optimizing the performance of construction materials such as ceiling tiles by systematically analyzing and improving their properties39.
Table 2.
Optimized agricultural waste composites using Taguchi method.
| Natural fiber | Composite type | Methodology | Advantages | Application |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sisal fibers40 | Hybrid composites (sisal and glass fibers) | Taguchi optimization technique | Improved mechanical performance with weight reduction. | Structures components aimed at reducing weight and carbon emissions. |
| Abaca and Basalt41 | Hybrid Abaca-Basalt Fiber Reinforced Epoxy | L9 Orthogonal Array (Taguchi Method) and ANOVA | Improved strength-to-weight ratio compared to synthetic fibers. | Engineering applications requiring lightweight and strong materials. |
| Areca Fruit Husk Fiber42 | Polymer composite reinforced natural fibers | Taguchi DOE and single response analysis | Improved strength as reinforcement and mechanical properties. | Potential substitute for synthetic fibers in various applications. |
| Chambira (Astrocaryum Chambira)43 | Hybrid epoxy matrix reinforced with natural fibers |
Taguchi method with Response Surface Methodology |
Lightweight with reasonable mechanical properties. | Automotive industry and Civil construction. |
| Bamboo fiber44 | Bamboo fiber reinforced unsaturated polyester composites | Hybrid Taguchi - Grey Relational Analysis Method | Low density leading to weight reduction and Good insulating properties. | Engineering materials, automotive components and construction materials. |
| Banana fiber45 | Polyester-banana fiber composite | Taguchi method (using L9 orthogonal array) | High strength, stiffness and lightweight. | Automotive components and Construction materials. |
| Jute, hemp, flax, and sisal46 | Combinations of natural fibers with polymers | Taguchi DOE | Improved mechanical properties and lightweight. | Automotive components and construction materials. |
| Jute fiber and Kenaf fiber46 | Epoxy composites reinforced with kenaf and jute fibers | Taguchi design with Response Surface Methodology | Improved mechanical properties. | Automotive industry. |
Natural fibers such as jute, hemp, flax, sisal, banana, bamboo, abaca, and kenaf have been widely explored as reinforcements. Combining such fibers as reinforcements improves strength-to-weight ratios and contribute to sustainable practice. The application of composites, such as sisal-glass fiber or abaca-basalt fiber reinforcements, has resulted in enhanced mechanical performance and lightweight properties, suitable for automotive, construction, and engineering industries40,41. Further, fibers such as Chambira and areca fruit husk have shown potential as cost-effective alternatives with reasonable mechanical properties, positioning them as viable substitutes for synthetic fibers42,43. Similarly, bamboo fiber-reinforced composites have demonstrated excellent insulating properties and low density, making them ideal for engineering and construction materials44. Composites development from banana fiber has also been highlighted for their high strength, stiffness, and lightweight characteristics, essential for automotive and civil applications45. Collectively, these studies emphasize the growing importance of natural fiber-reinforced composites as sustainable solutions for engineering and construction materials, aligning with the global shift towards eco-friendly innovation. In parallel, studies using millet waste in masonry applications have also reported promising results. Laterite-based bricks reinforced with pearl millet waste, finds thermal conductivity was significantly reduced from 1.4 W/mK in pure laterite to 0.29 W/mK in bricks with millet waste. Mechanical strength decreased due to increased porosity and reduced material density36,37.
Despite extensive research on agricultural waste and natural fiber-reinforced composites, significant gaps remain in the exploration of less conventional bio-residues. Previous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of rice husk, sugarcane bagasse, wheat straw and natural fibers such as jute, hemp, and sisal in enhancing thermal insulation and mechanical properties of construction materials. However, the potential of pearl millet waste has remained largely unexamined. The development of biocomposites incorporating waste as a functional material has not been reported in prior literature. Moreover, there is a notable absence of optimization studies using the Taguchi framework in the context of such waste-based biocomposites, remaining mechanical and thermal behavior underexplored.
The novelty lies in utilizing pearl millet waste in ceiling tiles in non-load-bearing construction element and evaluate its combined thermal and mechanical performance through Taguchi optimization framework. This dual focus on sustainability and functional efficiency, supported by statistical optimization, addresses a key gap in the literature and positions pearl millet waste as a viable alternative to gypsum in eco-friendly building applications such as ceiling, partition walls and decorative finishes across various geographic regions. Moreover, by diverting pearl millet waste to value-added product it addresses environmental challenge of open burning thereby promoting circular economy principles and sustainable waste management.
In this context, the present study addresses these research gaps by using Pearl Millet Seed Coverings (PMSC) as agricultural waste in the formulation of biocomposite ceiling tiles, wherein gypsum is partially replaced by waste and combined with waste wheat flour (WWF) and waste paper. The Taguchi method is employed to systematically optimize material properties through a limited number of experimental trials, focusing on gypsum content, waste proportion and tile thickness. Flexural properties used to analyze the mechanical strength, followed by thermal insulation performance through thermal conductivity measurements.
Methodology
Various Design of Experiment (DOE) techniques, coupled with optimization methods, help derive optimal combinations of process variables. These techniques identify influential parameters, their interactions, and their individual effects on output variables48. Optimization involves selecting the best solution among different alternatives to maximize or minimize an objective function49. Taguchi method allows systematic and efficient investigation of multiple parameter with a minimal number of experiments, which in turn lowers the time and cost involved in the experimental process50–52. The Method was applied in this study to optimize the composition of biocomposites by partial replacing gypsum with pearl millet waste, focusing on thermal conductivity and flexural strength.
Selection of parameters and levels
Using an L9 orthogonal array, three critical parameters were considered, as shown in Table 3. PMSC varied at 35%, 45%, and 55% levels, gypsum adjusted to 30%, 20%, and 10%, and ceiling tile thickness set at 0.12 mm, 0.13 mm, and 0.14 mm. The selection of gypsum, waste, and tile thickness as control parameters was informed by pilot studies conducted prior to the formal optimization phase. Each parameter was assigned levels based on their experimental significance. The number of levels refers to the distinct values or settings assigned to each parameter under investigation. The number of levels can vary depending on the specific problem and experimental requirements. While the Taguchi method can accommodate various levels of factors, it is common to use two to three levels for each factor to keep the experiment size manageable, while still obtaining reliable and efficient results53,54.
Table 3.
Taguchi design factors and Levels.
| Parameter | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gypsum (%) | 30 | 20 | 10 |
| PMSC (%) | 35 | 45 | 55 |
| Thickness (mm) | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.14 |
Orthogonal array
Orthogonal arrays are matrices used in the Taguchi method to systematically arrange the levels of various factors in an experiment55. Common orthogonal arrays include L4, L8, L16, L32 for two-level factors, and L9, L27 for three-level factors56. An L9 orthogonal array was selected, enabling the evaluation of three parameters or factors at three levels across nine compositions, illustrated in Table 4. All experiments were conducted under controlled laboratory conditions to ensure consistency.
Table 4.
L9 orthogonal array layout.
| Composition | Selected orthogonal array and levels | Orthogonal array layout for experiment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gypsum | PMSC | Thickness | Gypsum (%) | PMSC (%) | Thickness (mm) | |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 30 | 35 | 12 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 30 | 45 | 13 |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 30 | 55 | 14 |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 20 | 35 | 13 |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 20 | 45 | 14 |
| 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 20 | 55 | 12 |
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 35 | 14 |
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 45 | 12 |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 55 | 13 |
Biocomposite preparation
Pearl millet waste used as a reinforcing material, collected from agricultural fields, cleaned to remove impurities and grinded into fine particles. Waste paper was incorporated as an additional fiber reinforcement. It was soaked in water for 10–12 h at a paper-to-water ratio of 1:4 (by weight) to soften the fibers and facilitate pulp formation. The inclusion of paper pulp fibers enhances the mechanical properties. Specifically, the cellulose fibers in paper waste contribute to increased strength and reduced brittleness of the composites (Balti et al., 2023). The soaked paper was further grinded to convert into pulp to prepare combined paste with WWF. WWF was sourced from a local flour mill and employed as a natural binder. It was prepared into paste form. The paste was prepared by mixing WWF and water in a 1:10 ratio by weight. The binding ability of wheat gluten arises from its unique composition of glutenin and gliadin proteins, which allow it to make it an effective binder for diverse applications57–60. In the second stage, the prepared combined paste of WWF and paper pulp mixed in a mechanical mixture with waste and gypsum. Gypsum serves as the primary matrix, providing a stable framework to bind all components (Barbero-Barrera et al., 2019; Murillo et al., 2024). The proposed mixture comprises 35–55% PMSC and 10–30% gypsum while keeping waste paper and WWF constant to 20% and 15%, respectively. The Design mix proportions in a dry state (% by wt.) are shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Design mix proportions.
The prepared dough was placed into a mold with dimensions of 210 × 210 mm2 for molding. A thin layer of gypsum powder, approximately 0.5 mm thick, was applied to the outer surface of the molded tiles to enhance surface protection, improve aesthetics and increase resistance to impact and wear. Following molding, the tiles were subjected to drying and curing processes. Figure 2 presents the methodological framework.
Fig. 2.
Flowchart of experimental method.
Testing procedures
Thermal conductivity test
The guarded hot plate method, a widely recognized and precise technique for measuring the thermal conductivity of materials. It was employed in accordance with standard ASTM C177, 1961, within the temperature range of 60 °C. Figure 3a,b illustrate the schematic diagram and the actual setup of the guarded hot plate apparatus. The specimens were prepared by cutting the developed dried tile into standardized dimensions. The apparatus comprises a hot and cold plate with the test specimen sandwiched between them. The hot plate maintained at a higher temperature than the cold plate, resulting in a temperature gradient across the specimen. The temperatures at the hot plate surface (T1 and T3) and the cold plate surface (T2 and T4) were recorded to calculate the temperature gradient
across the test specimen using expression in Eq. (2).
![]() |
2 |
Fig. 3.
Schematic diagram (a) Actual setup (b) of thermal conductivity apparatus.
Additionally, the temperatures at the guard plate (T5 and T6) were monitored to ensure uniform heat distribution and to minimize lateral heat losses, thereby maintaining a one-dimensional heat flow (
), ensuring minimal lateral heat dissipation. A steady-state temperature gradient was established between the hot and cold plates. Once steady-state condition was achieved, the temperatures at the hot, cold, and guard plates were recorded. The heat flux (Q) passing through the specimen was determined based on the applied voltage (V) and current (I) using Eq. (3).
![]() |
3 |
The thermal conductivity (Kcond) was then calculated in W/mK, using Eq. (4). Where d specimen thickness (m), A is the surface areas (m2) and
is the temperature difference in (K).
![]() |
4 |
Flexural strength test
Flexural strength refers to the ability of material to resist deformation under bending or flexural loads. This property is critical for determining the material resistance to fracture or deform under bending stresses, thereby ensuring its structural strength62,63. In the present study, the flexural strength was evaluated using the three-point bending test, the most common method for this purpose. The specimen was supported at both ends and the load was applied at the midpoint until the specimen fractures. The specimens were loaded to Instron 34SC-5, a single-column Universal Testing Machine (UTM) equipped with a 5 kN load cell. The testing was conducted in accordance with the standard ASTM C47364–67. The load was applied at a strain rate of 1 mm/minute. The setup, featuring the Universal Testing Machine and specimen, is depicted in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Universal testing machine setup for flexural strength.
Data analysis
Signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio
Taguchi method uses Signal-to-Noise (S/N) ratio to quantify the quality of the applied characteristics68,69. The term signal represents the desirable value (mean) of the output characteristic, while noise denotes the undesirable variation (standard deviation) within the output. A higher S/N ratio signifies that the desired output is substantially greater than the random effects caused by noise factors. To optimize process parameters and minimize variability, Taguchi method employs objective functions tailored to the experimental goals, including Nominal-the-Best, Larger-the-Better and Smaller-the-Better70,71. In this study, achieving lower thermal conductivity and higher flexural strength was the primary objective. Consequently, Smaller-the-Better and Larger-the-Better S/N ratio characteristic was adopted for thermal conductivity and flexural strength, shown in Eqs. (5) and (6), respectively. Additionally, rank and delta values were used to determine the most influential parameters. The delta values represent the difference between the highest and lowest S/N ratios for each parameter, providing further insights into their significance.
![]() |
5 |
![]() |
6 |
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
ANOVA is used to determine the significance of individual factors and their contributions to the overall response72,73. It offers a measure of confidence by analyzing data variance, computing sums of squares, variances, and relative contributions of each significant input parameter74–76. F-ratio measures the contribution of each factor or interaction to the variance of the response. A higher F-ratio indicates a more significant factor. P-value tests the statistical significance of each factor and interaction. A p-value ≤ 0.10 indicates significance at the 90% confidence level, while a p-value < 0.05 indicates significance at the 95% confidence level77,78. The results were analyzed with a 95% confidence interval using MINITAB 24 software (Version 21.4.3).
Regression analysis
Regression analysis is a statistical method used to model the relationship between a dependent variable (y) and one or more independent variables (x1, x2, …, xn)79–81. The main goal is to estimate the coefficients of the regression equation, explaining the relationship between the variables82. Additionally, normal probability plot (NPP) was included to assess the residuals from model. This is crucial in regression analysis, as normality of residuals is a key assumption for the validity of the model.
Regression Equation for thermal conductivity and flexural strength depicted in Eqs. (7) and (8)
![]() |
7 |
![]() |
8 |
where,
Thermal conductivity of the false ceiling tile (W/mK).
Flexural strength of the false ceiling tile (MPa). Gypsum: Percentage of gypsum used in the composite (% by weight). PMSC: Percentage of Pearl Millet Seed Coverings in the composite (% by weight). Thickness: Tile thickness (mm).
Regression coefficients for thermal conductivity and flexural strength respectively.
Results and discussion
Three samples were prepared and tested for each composition to ensure the reliability of the experimental results. This approach allowed for the assessment of variability within each test condition and contributed to the statistical robustness of the findings.
Experimental results
The experiments were conducted on the biocomposite ceiling tiles to determine thermal conductivity and flexural strength. The analyzed results, presented in Fig. 5, reveals that the thermal conductivity varied across the tested compositions. The minimum thermal conductivity value of 0.0652 W/mK was observed in a composition containing 10% gypsum and 45% pearl millet waste at a thickness of 12 mm. This value is comparable to that of gypsum ceiling tile, which has a thermal conductivity of 0.0598 W/mK. This indicates that reducing the gypsum while increasing the proportion of waste significantly enhances the thermal insulation properties of the ceiling tile. It aligns closely with results for groundnut shell and coir composites (0.066 W/mK)29 and wheat straw and corn husk (0.047 W/mK)28. These findings align with the insulating nature of natural fibers, which contribute to lower thermal conductivity.
Fig. 5.
Thermal conductivity and flexural strength.
The maximum flexural strength of 1.24 MPa was achieved with a composition comprising 30% gypsum and 55% pearl millet waste for 14 mm of thickness. The value is closely comparable to commercially available gypsum ceiling tile, which have a flexural strength of 1.33 MPa. The result indicates that increasing the proportion of waste and gypsum positively affects the mechanical strength of the tiles, with a thicker composition enhancing structural integrity. However, excessive gypsum reduction negatively affected flexural strength, suggesting the need for a balanced composition to achieve mechanical robustness. It surpasses the results reported for composites reinforced with rice husk and vine pruning (0.08–0.28 MPa)30 and those with wheat straw and corn husk (0.80 MPa)28. While higher flexural strength values were reported in studies using materials such as groundnut shell and coir, up to 3.6 MPa29.
The standard deviation reveals the consistency experimental outcomes. Among the three thicknesses, 12 mm tiles exhibited relatively stable thermal behavior with lower deviations. As tile thickness increased, a gradual rise in variability was observed. This suggests that thicker tiles may be more susceptible to uneven distribution during mixing and moulding processes. The standard deviation analysis of flexural strength indicates that tiles with 12 mm and 13 mm thicknesses exhibited lower variability in flexural performance, indicating a more uniform load distribution and better bonding among the constituents. In contrast, the 14 mm thick tiles showed higher standard deviation values across multiple compositions, suggesting greater deviation in mechanical properties. This could be attributed to internal structural imperfections or uneven stress distribution during testing, which are more pronounced in thicker samples.
Signal-to-Noise (S/N) ratio analysis
The results of the S/N ratio analysis for thermal conductivity and flexural strength are summarized in the response Table 5 and main effect plot, Fig. 6a,b. The main effects plot shows how different levels of a parameter affect the response characteristic, such as the S/N ratio. A main effect exists when varying levels of a parameter, results in different response characteristics. The slope of the lines in the main effects plot indicates the relative magnitude of the parameter effects. A steeper slope suggests a more significant effect on the response variable83,84. Among selected parameter ceiling tile thickness is identified as the most influential parameter for thermal conductivity, with the highest delta value (1.38) and the highest rank, followed by gypsum (delta = 0.80) and PMSC (delta = 0.20). For thickness, the smallest level (12 mm) results in the highest S/N ratio, suggesting that reducing the thickness minimizes thermal conductivity. Similarly, for gypsum (10%) and pearl millet waste (55%), the levels corresponding to the highest S/N ratios are optimal for achieving better thermal performance.
Table 5.
Signal to noise Ratios.
| Level | S/N ratio (thermal conductivity) | Level | S/N ratio (flexural strength) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gypsum | PMSC | Thickness | Gypsum | PMSC | Thickness | ||
| 1 | 23.02 | 22.48 | 23.25 | 1 | −5.629 | −2.353 | −2.726 |
| 2 | 22.50 | 22.59 | 22.62 | 2 | −2.126 | −2.113 | −2.017 |
| 3 | 22.22 | 22.68 | 21.87 | 3 | 1.240 | −2.048 | −1.771 |
| Delta | 0.80 | 0.20 | 1.38 | Delta | 6.869 | 0.305 | 0.955 |
| Rank | 2 | 3 | 1 | Rank | 1 | 3 | 2 |
Fig. 6.
Main effect Plot for SN ratio (a) Thermal conductivity (b) Flexural strength.
The Larger-the-Better S/N ratio was applied for flexural strength to maximize the ability material to resist bending stresses. The S/N ratio reveals that gypsum is the most influential parameter, with the highest delta value (6.869) and the highest rank. This is followed by thickness (delta = 0.955, rank 2) and PMSC (delta = 0.305, rank 3). The main effect plot highlights that for gypsum, the third level (30%) yields the highest S/N ratio, indicating optimal flexural strength performance. For thickness, the highest S/N ratio is observed at the largest level (14 mm), while PMSC shows minimal variation across levels, indicating a relatively lesser impact on flexural strength.
While the results clearly identify the dominant factors, a deeper understanding of their influence enhances the interpretation. Thinner ceiling tiles reduce the overall distance for heat transfer, limiting thermal conduction paths and thereby lowering thermal conductivity. Moreover, the compact structure in thinner tiles may minimize air gaps, further enhancing insulation. On the other hand, role of gypsum in flexural strength attributed to its function as a continuous matrix phase, which reinforces structural rigidity and improves the ability of material to resist bending stresses. In contrast, pearl millet waste serves primarily as a thermal insulator with lower mechanical contribution. This distinction clarifies that the thickness governs thermal performance, while gypsum significantly affects mechanical strength.
Interaction plot analysis
The main effects plot shows how different levels of a parameter affect the response (thermal conductivity and flexural strength) characteristic, such as the S/N ratio. The interaction plots were generated to examine the effect of one parameter on the level of another parameter. The association between parameters can be analyzed based on the orientation of the lines. Parallel lines indicate no association between parameters, while non-parallel lines suggest the presence of interaction effects. The strongest association are observed when lines are nearly perpendicular85,86. In Fig. 7a the subplots between pearl millet waste and gypsum signifying strong association. In most cases, higher waste content with gypsum corresponds to an increase in thermal conductivity. However, the degree of increase is dependent on both gypsum and thickness. The trend shows that as gypsum increases from 10 to 30%, the thermal conductivity varies in a non-linear manner, indicating gypsum influences the thermal properties depending on the waste and thickness. The results presented in Fig. 7b highlight that flexural strength is determined by complex interplay of material composition (waste and gypsum) and thickness, rather than single parameter. The most pronounced association appear between waste and thickness. Additionally, the interaction between gypsum and waste is evident, as the flexural strength varies non-linearly when changing the PMSC and gypsum content.
Fig. 7.
Interaction plot (a) Thermal conductivity (b) Flexural strength.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
For thermal conductivity (Table 6), the regression model demonstrated a high coefficient of determination (R2 = 98.88%), indicating that the model effectively explains the variability in the data. The adjusted R2 (98.21%) and predicted R2 (96.90%) further validate the robustness of the model. Among the individual parameters, gypsum and tiles thickness exhibited significant effects on thermal conductivity, with F-values of 107.87 and 330.18, respectively, and corresponding P-values < 0.05, signifying their strong influence. In contrast, PMSC showed a marginal effect (P-value = 0.08), suggesting limited contribution to thermal conductivity under the given experimental conditions.
Table 6.
ANOVA model summary for thermal conductivity.
| Source | DF | Adj SS | Adj MS | F-Value | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regression | 3 | 0.000281 | 0.000094 | 147.61 | 0.00 |
| Gypsum | 1 | 0.000068 | 0.000068 | 107.87 | 0.00 |
| PMSC | 1 | 0.000003 | 0.000003 | 4.78 | 0.08 |
| Thickness | 1 | 0.000210 | 0.000210 | 330.18 | 0.00 |
| Error | 5 | 0.000003 | 0.000001 | ||
| Total | 8 | 0.000284 | |||
| S | R-sq | R-sq (adj) | R-sq (pred) | ||
| 0.0007968 | 98.88% | 98.21% | 96.90% | ||
For flexural strength (Table 7), the regression model revealed a high level of accuracy, with R2adjusted R2and predicted R2 values of 98.09%, 96.95%, and 94.44%, respectively. Gypsum emerged as the most influential factor, with an F-value of 249.19 and a P-value < 0.05, underscoring its dominant role in determining flexural strength. The tile thickness was significantly affected flexural strength (F-value = 61.25, P-value = 0.05). However, the effect of PMSC was insignificant (P-value = 0.26), suggesting that it lacks in contribute to enhance the flexural properties.
Table 7.
ANOVA model summary for flexural strength.
| Source | DF | Adj SS | Adj MS | F-Value | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regression | 3 | 0.620417 | 0.206806 | 85.65 | 0.00 |
| Gypsum | 1 | 0.601667 | 0.601667 | 249.19 | 0.00 |
| PMSC | 1 | 0.003750 | 0.003750 | 1.55 | 0.26 |
| Thickness | 1 | 0.015000 | 0.015000 | 6.21 | 0.05 |
| Error | 5 | 0.012072 | 0.002414 | ||
| Total | 8 | 0.632489 | |||
| S | R-sq | R-sq (adj) | R-sq (pred) | ||
| 0.0491370 | 98.09% | 96.95% | 94.44% | ||
Although pearl millet waste constitutes a significant proportion of the biocomposite formulation, its statistical influence on thermal conductivity (P = 0.08) and flexural strength (P = 0.26) was found to be marginal. This can be attributed to its secondary role as a fibrous reinforcement. waste contributes to thermal insulation through its inherent low thermal conductivity, but this effect becomes prominent in interaction with other parameters, particularly gypsum and tile thickness. In terms of load-bearing capacity of the biocomposite under flexural strength, gypsum forms a rigid and cohesive matrix capable of distributing applied loads across the tile while waste acts as reinforcement tends to poor bonding. As a result, under flexural loading, the biocomposite weakens at the matrix-fiber interface, thereby falling potential of waste to enhance strength. Thus, despite its sustainability value and role in reducing material density, influence of waste on flexural performance remains marginal when compared to the dominant structural contribution of gypsum.
Regression analysis
Regression analysis was conducted to model the relationships between the independent variables (gypsum, PMSC and thickness) and the dependent performance metrics such as thermal conductivity and flexural strength. The analysis provided predictive Eqs. (9) and (10) and quantified the influence of each parameter. Thickness had the most significant influence for both thermal conductivity and flexural strength. Additionally, Gypsum emerge as strong contributors to flexural strength with minor but positive impact of PMSC, suggesting its potential as a secondary reinforcing material. Similarly, PMSC incorporation contributes to a minor reduction in thermal conductivity.
![]() |
9 |
![]() |
10 |
where
thermal conductivity of the false ceiling tile (W/mK).
flexural strength of the false ceiling tile (MPa). Gypsum: Percentage of gypsum used in the composite (% by weight). PMSC: Percentage of Pearl Millet Seed Coverings in the composite (% by weight). Thickness: Tile thickness (mm).
The comparison between experimental and regression values for thermal conductivity is depicted in Fig. 8a. The trend demonstrate a high degree of agreement between the experimental values and regression values across the nine compositions. The predicted values closely follow the experimental trend, with minimal deviations, indicating the reliability of regression model. The normal probability plots of regression standardized residuals, shown in Fig. 8b for thermal conductivity demonstrate the goodness-of-fit of the regression models.
Fig. 8.
(a) Comparison of experimental and regression values of thermal conductivity (b) Normal probability plot of residuals.
The regression values of flexural strength align well with the experimental results, shown in Fig. 9a. It reflecting the ability of model to accurately predict the output responses. The minor discrepancies observed can be attributed to experimental unaccounted variability. The normal probability plots of regression standardized residuals, shown in Fig. 9b for flexural strength demonstrate the goodness-of-fit of the regression model.
Fig. 9.
(a) Comparison of experimental and regression values of flexural strength (b) Normal probability plot of residuals.
Figure 10 illustrates the error percentages between the experimental and regression-predicted values for thermal conductivity (W/mK) and flexural strength (MPa) across nine experiments. The error percentages for most experiments remain within acceptable limits, demonstrating the robustness and accuracy of the regression model in predicting these properties. The optimal parameter combinations for these properties are highlighted within the plot. In set of experiment 3, the optimum parameter combination for flexural strength achieves a low error percentage of −2.26%, indicating significant predictive accuracy. Similarly, in set of experiment 8, the optimal parameter combination for thermal conductivity yields a minimal error percentage of −0.13%, further validating the reliability of the regression model in accurately predicting these properties.
Fig. 10.
Error percentage in thermal conductivity and flexural strength.
The determination of optimal parameter combinations ensures the desired performance characteristics of the developed biocomposites. Based on the Signal-to-Noise (S/N) ratio and statistical evaluations, the optimal levels of each factor were identified (Table 8) to achieve the best outcomes for both thermal conductivity and flexural strength. For thermal conductivity, the optimal combination was found to consist of 10% gypsum, 45% PMSC and thickness of 12 mm, resulting in a thermal conductivity value of 0.0653 W/mK. This combination minimizes heat transfer and aligns with the objective of enhanced thermal insulation properties. In contrast, for flexural strength, the optimal combination was identified as 30% gypsum, 55% PMSC and an thickness of 14 mm, yielding a flexural strength of 1.24 MPa. This combination ensures maximum material strength, making the tiles suitable for structural applications.
Table 8.
Optimum set of response.
| Gypsum (%) | PMSC (%) | Thickness (mm) | Thermal conductivity (W/mK) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 45 | 12 | 0.0653 |
| Gypsum (%) | PMSC (%) | Thickness (mm) |
Flexural Strength (MPa) |
| 30 | 55 | 14 | 1.24 |
Contour plot
The Contour Plot serves as a visual tool to complement the statistical findings by mapping the combined effects of two input parameters on the response variable in a two-dimensional space87. This enhances the interpretation of association identified earlier and aids in identifying optimal process conditions. The contour plots presented in Fig. 11 illustrate the influence of varying pearl millet waste, gypsum and thickness on the thermal conductivity and flexural strength. In Fig. 11a, the combination of higher waste (around 50–55%) and moderate gypsum (15–20%) is associated with the lowest thermal conductivity values (< 0.065 W/mK), highlighting the synergistic effect of these components in enhancing insulation properties. Similarly, Fig. 11b shows that reducing thickness below 0.013 m further decreases thermal conductivity, reflecting improved energy efficiency in thinner tiles. Figure 11c indicates that optimal mechanical performance (> 1.2 MPa) is achieved at higher waste levels (50–55%) and higher gypsum levels. Furthermore, Fig. 11d reveals a positive correlation between thickness and flexural strength, with thicker tiles (> 0.013 m) exhibiting more mechanical robustness. These results collectively highlight that the thermal and mechanical properties can be fine-tuned by adjusting the proportions of waste, gypsum, and thickness.
Fig. 11.
Contour plots showing the effect of gypsum, PMSC and tile thickness on thermal conductivity and flexural strength.
Enhancement in biocomposite performance at specific gypsum levels can be attributed to the hydration reaction of gypsum during setting88. At moderate gypsum levels (20-30%), the matrix is sufficiently continuous to ensure strong interfacial bonding with the embedded waste and other components, enabling effective stress transfer under flexural loads. Simultaneously, the partially porous nature of the hydrated gypsum network allows for moderate insulation by entrapping air pockets. However, excessively high or low gypsum disrupts this balance. Higher gypsum increases thermal conductivity due to its higher intrinsic conductivity, while lower compromises the structural cohesiveness and binding strength. Thus, an optimal range of gypsum supports structural performance through strong bonding and uniform matrix formation along with controls heat transfer characteristics, contributing to the overall functionality of the ceiling tile.
The performance of the developed biocomposite ceiling tiles demonstrates potential when compared to existing studies on pearl millet waste-based composites. Using millet waste in formation of laterite-based bricks significantly reduced thermal conductivity, from 1.4 W/mK for dry pure laterite blocks to 0.29 W/mK, while dropping mechanical strength, as per the increased porosity and lower material density36,37. The finding aligns with the present study, where the integration of waste reduces the thermal conductivity of biocomposite. The comparative statement provides insight of waste used in construction materials validating its performance as sustainable alternative.
Conclusions
This study demonstrates the development and optimization of ceiling tiles by partially replacing gypsum with pearl millet waste. The integration of PMSC as an agricultural waste, coupled with gypsum, waste paper and WWF, presents a novel approach addressing the environmental challenges associated with gypsum extraction, waste burning and energy efficiency in building materials. The optimization process, employing the Taguchi DOE, systematically analyzed the effects of gypsum, waste proportion, and tile thickness on the thermal and mechanical properties. These tiles offer practical applications in ceilings, partition walls, and decorative finishes across diverse geographic regions, making a meaningful contribution to environmental sustainability and the advancement of energy-efficient building solutions.
The findings underscore the significance of these parameters in achieving optimal performance. The present study finds experimental results highlights minimum thermal conductivity of 0.065 W/mK, comparable to gypsum tiles founds at 10% gypsum, 45% waste, and 12 mm thickness. For flexural strength, the ideal composition was 30% gypsum, 55% waste, and 14 mm thickness, reaching 1.24 MPa. The S/N ratio analysis revealed the relative influence of each parameter. Thickness emerged as the most significant factor for thermal conductivity (Δ = 1.38), due to its direct effect on heat transfer pathways. Gypsum content, with a delta value of 0.80, also played a substantial role due to its higher conductivity. In contrast, PMSC had a minimal effect (Δ = 0.20), due to its contribution to insulation. For flexural strength, gypsum content dominated with the highest delta (Δ = 6.869), confirming its role in matrix formation and mechanical load bearing. Thickness followed (Δ = 0.955), while PMSC had the least influence (Δ = 0.305), consistent with its limited bonding capacity and lack of structural stiffness. ANOVA results supported these conclusions statistically. For thermal conductivity, gypsum and thickness had statistically significant effects (P = 0.00), however PMSC had a P-value of 0.08, indicating marginal impact. Similarly, for flexural strength, gypsum (P = 0.00) and thickness (P = 0.05) were statistically significant, while PMSC (P = 0.26) was not. These findings suggest that while pearl millet waste contributes to sustainability and thermal insulation, it functions more as a passive filler than an active strengthener.
The developed regression models attained high accuracy for thermal conductivity and flexural strength, with R2 values of 96.90% and 94.44%, respectively. The low error percentages (< 3%) between experimental and predicted values validated the reliability of the models. Additionally, interaction and contour plots revealed that optimal performance is achieved through a balanced mix. With moderate gypsum content for matrix integrity, higher waste for insulation and controlled thickness to tune thermal and mechanical properties. A strong association between waste and gypsum was observed in interaction plot for thermal conductivity. Similarly, the strongest interaction for flexural strength was observed between waste content and thickness, indicating their significant combined influence. The contour plots demonstrate an optimal blend of 50–55% waste and 15–20% gypsum significantly reduces thermal conductivity (< 0.065 W/mK), enhancing insulation. Additionally, thinner tiles (< 0.013 m) improve energy efficiency. For mechanical performance, higher waste and gypsum content (> 1.2 MPa flexural strength) strengthen the tiles, while greater thickness (> 0.013 m) enhances structural integrity.
Research contributions and future scope
Beyond material performance, this study offers substantial practical and environmental benefits. pearl millet waste, being an abundant agricultural by-product, is readily available at low or no cost, making the production of ceiling tile biocomposite more economical. By reducing gypsum usage, the process also lowers environmental impact associated with mining, processing and landfill waste. Utilisation of biodegradable components such as pearl millet waste, WWF and waste paper pulp further enhances recyclability at the end phase. Additionally, the fabrication process relies on low-energy mechanical mixing and ambient drying, makes it feasible for small-scale or decentralized production in rural or resource-limited settings.
This study provides an original contribution to sustainable construction materials by introducing PMSC as a key component in partially replacing gypsum in ceiling tile. The findings serve as a foundation for future research on agricultural waste-based biocomposites, with potential applications in various sectors of the construction industry. Further studies can explore the cost analysis, ageing studies, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), acoustic properties, and fire resistance of biocomposite ceiling tile to broaden their applicability. Additionally, scaling up to mass-production and assessing recyclability of these tiles in real-world applications are areas for future investigation. Conducting a LCA will provide insights into the environmental impact across the lifespan of the tile. In addition to material performance evaluation, future studies should also examine the scalability and manufacturing feasibility of the developed biocomposite ceiling tiles. Investigating the potential for large-scale production using low-cost, readily available technologies is essential to determine their suitability for commercial deployment.
Author contributions
K.H.A. involved in writing original draft, investigation, experiment and software. S. R. involved in funding, supervision, project administration, review and editing. R. S. involved in review and editing.S. K. involved in writing, experiment and software.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Birla Institute of Technology and Science. This work is funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Department of Science and Technology, Science for Equity Empowerment and Development (SEED) Division, Government of India, New Delhi, and is funded through the project Sanction No: SEED/ASACODER-018/2018(G) dated 25.06.2021.
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this article.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Wang, Z. et al. Inorganic thermal insulation material prepared from pitchstone. J. Build. Eng.32, 101745 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhang, X., Hu, J., Fan, X. & Yu, X. Naturally grown mycelium-composite as sustainable Building insulation materials. J. Clean. Prod.342, 130784 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 3.Xu, Y., Sun, L., Huang, X., Yu, X. & Qian, Y. Superhydrophobic foamed concrete based on response surface method: mix design and its potential application in roofing systems. Structures69, 107441 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mazaherifar, M. H., Coşereanu, C., Timar, C. M. & Georgescu, S. V. Physical and mechanical properties of foam-type panels manufactured from recycled cardboard. Constr. Build. Mater.411, 134685 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 5.Annaba, K. et al. Thermomechanical characterization and thermal simulation of a new multilayer mortar and a light-weight pozzolanic concrete for Building energy efficiency. Constr. Build. Mater.346, 128479 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ha, Y. & Jeon, J. Thermogravimetric analysis and pyrolysis characterization of expanded–polystyrene and polyurethane–foam insulation materials. Case Stud. Therm. Eng.54, 104002 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ding, X., Huang, W., Li, Y., Hu, Z. & Shan, Z. Study on retarding feature and retardation mechanism of various retarding materials on gypsum as a construction material: A review. J. Build. Eng.72, 106569 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 8.Weimann, K., Adam, C., Buchert, M. & Sutter, J. Environmental evaluation of gypsum plasterboard recycling. Minerals11, 101 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 9.Laksham, S. & Hitish, H. Experimental investigations of epoxy-resin-banana-fiber-saw dust bio-composite material for potential application as partitioning board. Mater. Today Proc.10.1016/j.matpr.2023.01.237 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 10.River, A. J. & Navarro, J. G. Management of end-of-life gypsum in a circular economy. Woodhead Publ Adv. Constr. Demolition Waste Recycl10.1016/B978-0-12-819055-5.00005-X (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li, S. & Chen, G. Agricultural waste-derived superabsorbent hydrogels: preparation, performance, and socioeconomic impacts. J. Clean. Prod.251, 119669 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ullah, K. et al. Assessing the lignocellulosic biomass resources potential in developing countries: A critical review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.51, 682–698 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 13.Debnath, B., Haldar, D. & Purkait, M. K. A critical review on the techniques used for the synthesis and applications of crystalline cellulose derived from agricultural wastes and forest residues. Carbohydr. Polym.273, 118537 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sahoo, K., Kumar, A. & Chakraborty, J. P. A comparative study on valuable products: bio-oil, biochar, non-condensable gases from pyrolysis of agricultural residues. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 23, 186–204 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 15.Deshpande, M. V., Kumar, N., Pillai, D., Krishna, V. V. & Jain, M. Greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural residue burning have increased by 75% since 2011 across India. Sci. Total Environ.904, 166944 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ravindra, K., Singh, T. & Mor, S. Emissions of air pollutants from primary crop residue burning in India and their mitigation strategies for cleaner emissions. J. Clean. Prod.208, 261–273 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 17.IPCC. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2006). https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gl/invs1.html
- 18.Kanabkaew, T. & Kim Oanh, N. T. Development of Spatial and Temporal emission inventory for crop residue field burning. Environ. Model. Assess.16, 453–464 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 19.ESED. Agricultural Statistics at a Glance. (2023). https://desagri.gov.in/document-report-category/agriculture-statistics-at-a-glance/
- 20.Sahai, S., Sharma, C., Singh, S. K. & Gupta, P. K. Assessment of trace gases, carbon and nitrogen emissions from field burning of agricultural residues in India. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosystems. 89, 143–157 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 21.Singh, J. & Gu, S. Biomass conversion to energy in India—A critique. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.14, 1367–1378 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- 22.Vallack, H., Rypdal, K., Branco, G., Hao, J. & Bhattacharya, S. The Global Atmospheric Pollution Forum Air Pollutant Emission Inventory Manual. (2010).
- 23.Firoozi, A. A., Firoozi, A. A., Oyejobi, D. O., Avudaiappan, S. & Flores, E. S. Emerging trends in sustainable Building materials: technological innovations, enhanced performance, and future directions. Results Eng.24, 103521 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 24.Elfaleh, I. et al. A comprehensive review of natural fibers and their composites: an eco-friendly alternative to conventional materials. Results Eng.19, 101271 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chen, L. et al. Conversion of waste into sustainable construction materials: A review of recent developments and prospects. Mater. Today Sustain.27, 100930 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 26.Aramwit, P., Sheng, D. C. V., Krishna Moorthy, D., Guna, G., Reddy, N. & V. & Rice husk and Coir fibers as sustainable and green reinforcements for high performance gypsum composites. Constr. Build. Mater.393, 132065 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hassan, T. et al. Acoustic, mechanical and thermal properties of green composites reinforced with natural fibers waste. Polymers12, 654 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rojas, C. et al. Thermal insulation materials based on agricultural residual wheat straw and corn husk biomass, for application in sustainable buildings. Sustain. Mater. Technol.20, e00102 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sheng, D. D. C. V., Ramegowda, N. S., Guna, V. & Reddy, N. Groundnut shell and Coir reinforced hybrid bio composites as alternative to gypsum ceiling tiles. J. Build. Eng.57, 104892 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 30.Maderuelo-Sanz, R. et al. Mechanical, thermal and acoustical evaluation of biocomposites made of agricultural waste for ceiling tiles. Appl. Acoust.191, 108689 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ejaz, M. F. et al. Physico-Mechanical characterization of Gypsum-Agricultural waste composites for developing Eco-Friendly false ceiling tiles. Sustainability14, 9797 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 32.Guna, V. et al. Wool and Coir fiber reinforced gypsum ceiling tiles with enhanced stability and acoustic and thermal resistance. J. Build. Eng.41, 102433 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 33.Guna, V. et al. Groundnut shell / rice husk agro-waste reinforced polypropylene hybrid biocomposites. J. Build. Eng.27, 100991 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 34.Guna, V., Ilangovan, M., Hu, C., Venkatesh, K. & Reddy, N. Valorization of sugarcane Bagasse by developing completely biodegradable composites for industrial applications. Ind. Crops Prod.131, 25–31 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hossain, S. K. S. & Roy, P. K. Fabrication of sustainable ceramic board using solid-wastes for construction purpose. Constr. Build. Mater.222, 26–40 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bal, H., Jannot, Y., Gaye, S. & Demeurie, F. Measurement and modelisation of the thermal conductivity of a wet composite porous medium: laterite based bricks with millet waste additive. Constr. Build. Mater.41, 586–593 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bal, H., Jannot, Y., Quenette, N., Chenu, A. & Gaye, S. Water content dependence of the porosity, density and thermal capacity of laterite based bricks with millet waste additive. Constr. Build. Mater.31, 144–150 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 38.Karbuz, P., Dogu, M. & Ozbek, B. Manufacturing of hexagonal cross-section thermoplastic matrix composite parts with automatic filament winding system. J. Manuf. Process.129, 62–76 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 39.Prakash, D. Development of PCM tile for residential buildings in hot and dry climate: design and optimization. J. Eng. Appl. Sci.71, 202 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 40.Esangbedo, M. O. & Samuel, B. O. Application of machine learning and grey Taguchi technique for the development and optimization of a natural fiber hybrid reinforced polymer composite for aircraft body manufacture. Oxf. Open. Mater. Sci.4, itae004 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sanman, S., Manjunath, A., P Prashanth, K., Shadakshari, R. & K Sunil, S. An experimental study on two body abrasive wear behavior of natural fiber reinforced hybrid polymer matrix composites using Taguchi analysis. Mater. Today Proc.72, 2021–2026 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 42.Binoj, J. S. et al. Taguchi’s optimization of Areca fruit husk Fiber mechanical properties for polymer composite applications. Fibers Polym.23, 3207–3213 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 43.Toapanta, O. G., Paredes, J., Meneses, M. & Salinas, G. Validation of DOE factorial/taguchi/surface response models of mechanical properties of synthetic and natural Fiber reinforced epoxy matrix hybrid material. Polymers16, 2051 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Onyekwere, O. S., Oladeinde, M. H. & Edokpia, R. O. Multi-Response optimization of bamboo Fiber reinforced unsaturated polyester composites using hybrid Taguchi – Grey relational analysis method. J. Ind. Prod. Eng.38, 98–107 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sampath, B. et al. Experimental comparative study of banana fiber composite with glass fiber composite material using Taguchi method. Mater. Today Proc.49, 1475–1480 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 46.Antony, J. et al. Application of Taguchi design of experiments in the food industry: a systematic literature review. Total Qual. Manag Bus. Excell. 35, 687–712 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 47.Haniel, Bawono, B. & Anggoro, P. W. Optimization of characteristics polymer composite reinforced Kenaf and jute Fiber using Taguchi-Response surface methodology approach. J. Nat. Fibers. 20, 2204453 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jaisingh Sheoran, A. & Kumar, H. Fused deposition modeling process parameters optimization and effect on mechanical properties and part quality: review and reflection on present research. Int. Conf. Mech. Energy Technol.21, 1659–1672 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gupta, D., Das, A. & Mitra, S. Role of modeling and artificial intelligence in process parameter optimization of biochar: A review. Bioresour Technol.390, 129792 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bayrak, Z. U. & Celik, N. Determining the effects of operating conditions on current density of a PEMFC by using Taguchi method and ANOVA. Arab. J. Sci. Eng.49, 10741–10752 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 51.Jiang, L. et al. Optimization of multi-stage constant current charging pattern based on Taguchi method for Li-Ion battery. Appl. Energy. 259, 114148 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 52.Soni, A., Patel, R. M., Kumar, K. & Pareek, K. Optimization for maximum extraction of solder from waste PCBs through grey relational analysis and Taguchi technique. Min. Eng.175, 107294 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 53.Behera, A., Sahu, P. S. & Patel, S. K. Application of Taguchi methodology for optimization of process parameters in laser bending of Al sheet. 10th Int. Conf. Mater. Process. Charact. 26, 2323–2327 (2020).
- 54.Sutherland, L. S., Shenoi, R. A. & Lewis, S. M. Size and scale effects in composites: II. Unidirectional laminates. Compos. Sci. Technol.59, 221–233 (1999). [Google Scholar]
- 55.Atencio, E., Plaza-Muñoz, F., Muñoz-La Rivera, F. & Lozano-Galant, J. A. Calibration of UAV flight parameters for pavement pothole detection using orthogonal arrays. Autom. Constr.143, 104545 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 56.Chen, G. L., Chen, G. B., Li, Y. H. & Wu, W. T. A study of thermal pyrolysis for castor meal using the Taguchi method. Energy71, 62–70 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 57.Day, L., Augustin, M. A., Batey, I. L. & Wrigley, C. W. Wheat-gluten uses and industry needs. Trends Food Sci. Technol.17, 82–90 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 58.Drago, S. R. & González, R. J. Foaming properties of enzymatically hydrolysed wheat gluten. Nutr. Meet Food. 1, 269–273 (2000). [Google Scholar]
- 59.Markowski, M., Żuk-Gołaszewska, K. & Kwiatkowski, D. Influence of variety on selected physical and mechanical properties of wheat. Ind. Crops Prod.47, 113–117 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wieser, H., Koehler, P. & Scherf, K. A. Chapter 5 - Wheat-based Raw materials. in Wheat - An Exceptional Crop (eds Wieser, H., Koehler, P. & Scherf, K. A.) 103–131 (Woodhead Publishing, doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-821715-3.00005-8. (2020).
- 61.ASTM C177. Test method for Steady-State heat flux measurements and thermal transmission properties by means of the Guarded-Hot-Plate apparatus. (19) 10.1520/C0177-19
- 62.Mondal, M. S., Hussain, S. Z., Roy, P. & Halder, C. Development of high-performance composite via innovative route using water hyacinth extracted nanocellulose and analysis of its physical properties. Heliyon9, e23095 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Raju, B. S., Manjunatha, L. H., Jagadeeswaran, N. & Santosh & Fabrication & characterization of ZnS micro particulate filled glass and jute fibre reinforced hybrid polymer composites. Int. Conf. Recent. Res. Emerg. Trends Mater. Mech. Eng.20, 125–133 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 64.ASTM C473. Standard Test Methods for Physical Testing of Gypsum Panel Products, C11 Committee. http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?C473-15 (2015). 10.1520/C0473-15
- 65.Aghaee, K., Yazdi, M. A. & Yang, J. Flexural properties of composite gypsum partition panel. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Eng. Sustain.168, 258–263 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 66.Rubio-Avalos, J. C. et al. Flexural behavior and microstructure analysis of a gypsum-SBR composite material. Mater. Lett.59, 230–233 (2005). [Google Scholar]
- 67.Selamat, M. E. et al. Comparative study of oil palm trunk and rice husk as fillers in gypsum composite for Building material. Constr. Build. Mater.197, 526–532 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 68.Karaca, E., Çakar, T. & Karaca, M. Hüseyin Miraç gül, H. Designing restorative landscapes for students: A Kansei engineering approach enhanced by VR and EEG technologies. Ain Shams Eng. J.15, 102901 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 69.Nghiep, T. N., Sarhan, A. A. D. & Aoyama, H. Analysis of tool Deflection errors in precision CNC end milling of aerospace aluminum 6061-T6 alloy. Measurement125, 476–495 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 70.Hsiang, S. H. & Lin, Y. W. Investigation of the influence of process parameters on hot extrusion of magnesium alloy tubes. Seventh Asia Pac. Conf. Mater. Process.7th APCMP 2006, 192–193 (2007).
- 71.Vidakis, N. et al. Critical quality indicators of high-performance polyetherimide (ULTEM) over the MEX 3D printing key generic control parameters: prospects for personalized equipment in the defense industry. Def. Technol.10.1016/j.dt.2024.08.001 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 72.Bao, M., Lin, J., Zhang, F. & Yang, J. Discrete element method study of parameter optimization and particle mixing behaviour in a soil mixer. Particuology81, 1–14 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 73.Grujicic, M. & Chittajallu, K. M. Design and optimization of polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cells. Appl. Surf. Sci.227, 56–72 (2004). [Google Scholar]
- 74.Hai, T. et al. Energy and environmental analyses of a sustainable multi-generation municipal solid waste-to-energy integrated system for hydrogen production. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot.177, 307–321 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 75.Chaudhary, N. Parametric sensitivity analysis to investigate the effects of operating and design parameters on single direct methane steam reforming solid oxide fuel cell performance and thermal impacts generation. Energy Convers. Manag X. 18, 100374 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 76.Rana, R., Gill, A. S., Deol, P. K. & Kaur, I. P. Investigation of cellulose acetate electrospun films for controlled drug permeability. J. Drug Deliv Sci. Technol.91, 105263 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 77.Aslan, N. & Ünal, İ. Multi-response optimization of oil agglomeration with multiple performance characteristics. Fuel Process. Technol.92, 1157–1163 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 78.Dubey, A. K. & Yadava, V. Optimization of Kerf quality during pulsed laser cutting of aluminium alloy sheet. J. Mater. Process. Technol.204, 412–418 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- 79.Ateş, F. & Erginel, N. The regression analysis of fast pyrolysis product yields and determination of product quality. Spec. Sect. ACS Clean. Coal. 102, 681–690 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 80.Bhatti, U. A. et al. Global production patterns: Understanding the relationship between greenhouse gas emissions, agriculture greening and climate variability. Environ. Res.245, 118049 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Gulcan, B., Eksioglu, S. D., Song, Y., Roni, M. & Chen, Q. Optimization models for integrated biorefinery operations. Optim. Lett.16, 909–951 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 82.Rueda, R., Cuéllar, M. P., Ruiz, L. G. B. & Pegalajar, M. C. A similarity measure for straight line programs and its application to control diversity in genetic programming. Expert Syst. Appl.194, 116415 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 83.Ghosh, S., Chandra Mandal, M. & Ray, A. Exploring the influence of critical parameters on green supply chain management performance of small and medium-sized enterprise: an integrated multivariate analysis-robust design approach. Clean. Logist Supply Chain. 4, 100057 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 84.Lu, Y. et al. Influence mechanism of Magnetron sputtering process parameters on diamond surface preprocessing interface for chip heat sink. Diam. Relat. Mater.150, 111695 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 85.Balachandran, M., Devanathan, S., Muraleekrishnan, R. & Bhagawan, S. S. Optimizing properties of nanoclay–nitrile rubber (NBR) composites using face centred central composite design. New. Rubber Mater. Test. Methods Process.35, 854–862 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 86.Hassannayebi, E., Boroun, M., Alaei Jordehi, S. & Kor, H. Train schedule optimization in a high-speed railway system using a hybrid simulation and meta-model approach. Comput. Ind. Eng.138, 106110 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 87.Kiaee, N. & Aghaie-Khafri, M. Optimization of gas tungsten Arc welding process by response surface methodology. Mater. Des. 1980–2015. 54, 25–31 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 88.Jian, S. et al. Optimizing hydration and performance of phosphogypsum based cementitious system through multiphase composites. Constr. Build. Mater.472, 140848 (2025). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this article.






















