Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2025 Jul 1;15:22260. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06304-2

Robustness of quantum correlations in photonic systems under non-Markovian dephasing: theoretical analysis in the experimental range

Kamal Berrada 1, Smail Bougouffa 1,
PMCID: PMC12216927  PMID: 40594374

Abstract

We investigate the preservation and dynamics of entanglement and Bell nonlocality in a two-photon system subject to local dephasing, particularly emphasizing environments exhibiting non-Markovian memory effects. By analyzing the interplay between entanglement, as measured by concurrence, and Bell inequality violation, we identify time regions where Bell inequality is not violated, even when concurrence remains high. This indicates that strongly entangled states do not always exhibit nonclassical correlations with certainty. Our study further explores the effects of refractive index variations, spectral width, and interaction symmetry, demonstrating how structured environments and controlled environmental interactions can mitigate decoherence and enhance the resilience of quantum correlations. We propose that these theoretical predictions can be tested using modifications of recent experimental optical setups. These findings provide valuable insights into the conditions under which quantum correlations remain irreproducible by classical local hidden-variable models, with direct implications for quantum communication, quantum information processing, and foundational studies in quantum mechanics. Furthermore, our findings highlight the crucial importance of quantum coherence in maintaining entanglement and nonlocality over extended time evolution. These results show remarkable alignment with the experimental observations, demonstrating high accuracy and consistency within the expected parameter range.

Subject terms: Quantum information, Quantum mechanics, Qubits, Theoretical physics, Quantum physics

Introduction

Controlling entanglement dynamics and mitigating decoherence is crucial for quantum information processing. In photonic systems14, decoherence from environmental interactions can lead to sudden entanglement death (ESD)5,6, imposing constraints on quantum communication and computation. Unlike solid-state systems, photonic platforms offer advantages such as long coherence times and high-speed information transfer, making them ideal for quantum networking7,8. However, photon loss, phase damping, and spectral diffusion challenge preserving quantum correlations. Entanglement and nonlocality are fundamental yet distinct quantum resources. While nonlocal states must be entangled, not all entangled states exhibit nonlocality. Extensive research has focused on their detection, quantification, and evolution in open quantum systems. A key challenge in quantum information processing is decoherence from environmental interactions, which degrades quantum resources and impacts protocol reliability. Understanding entanglement and nonlocality under noise is crucial for designing robust quantum technologies. This has driven research into sustaining quantum correlations, with non-Markovian environments913 enabling entanglement and nonlocality revivals. Additionally, the quantum Zeno effect and structured environments support entanglement trapping, enhancing correlation resilience. To address these challenges, hybrid quantum systems leverage structured photonic environments, engineered reservoirs, and controlled spectral profiles to enhance entanglement resilience via non-Markovian memory effects. Quantum networking across fiber-optic and free-space channels is emerging as a scalable approach14. These advancements support key applications such as security-proof quantum key distribution15,16, quantum teleportation17, and quantum communication complexity, all relying on quantum correlations and nonlocality18. Bell inequality violations remain essential in confirming correlation robustness, underscoring their importance in quantum information science19. A deeper understanding of Markovian and non-Markovian decoherence, especially in photonic systems10,20, is vital for optimizing quantum protocols and ensuring the resilience of photonic quantum technologies.

Certain bipartite mixed entangled states exhibit correlations describable by a local hidden variable model, meaning they can be classically reproduced21. This implies that in practical scenarios involving mixed states, entanglement alone cannot guarantee fundamentally nonclassical correlations. To distinguish such cases, we introduce inherently nonlocal correlations (INCs) as quantum correlations that no classical local model can replicate. INCs are crucial in quantum mechanics, particularly in device-independent quantum cryptography, security-proof quantum key distribution22,23, and quantum computing. A key indicator of INCs in bipartite systems is Bell inequality violation, confirmed through a Bell function19,24. A central question is identifying entanglement-related quantum features essential for quantum computation and impossible to classically mimic. In two-qubit systems, the relationship between concurrence25 and Bell inequality violations24 has been extensively studied, characterizing the violation range for a given concurrence value26. It has been shown that for every bipartite entangled state, a protocol using an auxiliary state and local filtering ensure the resulting state cannot be classically reproduced27. However, not all entangled states are directly usable for tasks requiring INCs. Recent investigations have offered significant advancements in understanding the nature of quantum entanglement and the limitations of local hidden variable models. A notable study provides a rigorous reexamination of entanglement, differentiating between correlations that originate from quantum entanglement and those that can be attributed to local realistic models28. Another explores hidden-variable models for multipartite entangled states and measurements, advancing the understanding of classical simulations of quantum correlations29. These developments help delineate the boundaries between quantum and classical correlations, especially for mixed states.

Quantum coherence forms a foundational element of quantum physics, capturing essential features ranging from superposition to quantum correlations30. Its importance is evident in multiple quantum information and metrological tasks, where coherence offers a decisive advantage over classical methods31. More broadly, coherence serves as an indispensable resource in low-temperature thermodynamics32,33, facilitates exciton and electron transport in biomolecular complexes3436, and underpins various processes at the nanoscale37. Historically, quantum optics has provided a strong framework for studying coherence in specific scenarios3841. However, a more general information-theoretic approach has recently emerged, allowing for the quantification of coherence across arbitrary states42,43. This approach defines a set of incoherent states along with “incoherent operations,” which are operations that preserve this set42. Analogous to the resource theory of entanglement, where local operations and classical communication maintain separable states44, this formalism treats coherence as a quantifiable resource, linking it more directly to modern quantum information science.

Expanding on the foundational concepts discussed previously, this paper presents a detailed study of entanglement, Bell nonlocality, and coherence within a two-photon system, focusing specifically on the transition between Markovian and non-Markovian regimes. These transitions are especially significant in realistic environments, as decoherence and the resulting loss of quantum properties greatly affect nonlocal phenomena. Here, we model a two-photon setup subject to local dephasing and examine how such interactions govern the time evolution of quantum correlations. By pinpointing the conditions that give rise to these effects, we show that they are attainable with contemporary optical techniques. Crucially, we reveal that states displaying high entanglement (quantified through concurrence) do not always violate Bell inequality, underlining that strong entanglement need not consistently manifest nonclassical attributes. We further investigate situations where entanglement persists over prolonged intervals, contrasting these with intervals where INCs remain robust. Since each photon interacts with a memory-capable environment, revivals of entanglement, coherence, and Bell nonlocality are feasible when parameters are carefully chosen, suggesting a concrete strategy for addressing decoherence in open quantum systems. In addition, we provide a systematic analysis of how refractive index differences, spectral bandwidth, and symmetry or asymmetry in coupling determine the resilience of these quantum resources in the presence of noise. Finally, we propose that modest modifications to current experimental optical setups can validate these theoretical results, offering a practical avenue for verification and deeper insight into preserving entanglement, nonlocality, and coherence in photonic systems.

The paper is organized as follows. In Sect. Photon dynamics and interactions, we present the physical model and the quantum formalism that describe the two-photon system, focusing on its interaction with local dephasing. This section also explains the dependence of the system’s quantum properties on key parameters such as the dephasing rate, initial state, and the nature of symmetric and asymmetric interactions. Section Bell nonlocality and entanglement details the quantum quantifiers used in the analysis and provides an in-depth discussion of the results. In Sect. Conclusion, we summarize the key findings of this study, highlighting their importance in enhancing our understanding of open quantum systems and their implications for quantum optics and information science.

Photon dynamics and interactions

In this section, we investigate the non-Markovian framework, beginning with a thorough analysis of the one-photon model before extending to the two-photon scenario. This approach allows us to examine the manifestation of non-Markovian effects across varying photon quantities, promoting understanding applicable to more complex systems.

In the present study, we assume weak coupling between the system and the environment, where it describes a weak interaction that leads to pure dephasing without energy exchange–a common scenario in photonic systems exposed to dispersive media. This assumption is realistic because photonic systems, such as those involving photons in optical fibers or birefringent materials like quartz plates, typically experience weak interactions that cause dephasing rather than strong coupling effects like energy transfer. The manuscript supports this with experimental parameters, including a small refractive index difference and spectral width, which are consistent with weak coupling and align with referenced experimental studies (e.g., Ref.9).

In the beginning, we outline the procedure for deriving the dynamics of multiple independent bodies that interact locally with s, without limiting the nature of all noise when the dynamics of a single body are known. Subsequently, we will use this approach to explicitly examine the coherence and Bell non-locality of two qubits interacting locally with a non-Markovian.

We consider a qubit (S) and its associated environment (Inline graphic) in the initial state Inline graphic, where Inline graphic (with Inline graphic) represents the polarization state and Inline graphic denotes the time-evolved polarization state is given by:

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6304_Article_Equ1.gif 1

where Inline graphic is the quantum map, and Inline graphic is the time evolution operator, and Inline graphic is the interaction Hamiltonian of the system.

To extend our discussion to two-qubit systems, we consider a composite system consisting of Inline graphic, where the subsystems Inline graphic and Inline graphic each interact with their respective s, Inline graphic and Inline graphic. For each qubit (denoted as S), the reduced density matrix evolves according to the following equation:

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6304_Article_Equ2.gif 2

This is expressed in terms of the Kraus operators Inline graphic4547.

Furthermore, the time evolution operator for the total system can be factored as Inline graphic. Consequently, the reduced density matrix for the two-qubit system is represented as follows:

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6304_Article_Equ3.gif 3

On the other hand, the evolution of each qubit is described by:

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6304_Article_Equ4.gif 4

where the matrix elements are:

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6304_Article_Equ5.gif 5

For the two-qubit system, the dynamics are similarly given by:

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6304_Article_Equ6.gif 6

This formulation illustrates the independent dynamics of the two qubits and their interactions with their respective environments.

Using the previous findings to examine the non-Markovian effects on quantum coherence and Bell nonlocality in a system of two independent qubits, each interacting exclusively and independently with its respective local environment. Specifically, our focus will be on analyzing the non-Markovian dynamics of an open quantum system in which the polarization state of a photon constitutes the primary system. At the same time, its frequency acts as the al degree of freedom. To simulate and study the behavior of the system, we utilize a carefully designed experimental setup comprising a rotatable Fabry–Pérot (FP) cavity, an interference filter, and a quartz plate (Fig. 1)9,20,4850. The (FP) cavity generates a frequency comb for the photon, which is subsequently refined by the interference filter to isolate two dominant peaks. The resulting frequency distribution, Inline graphic, characterizes the probability density of finding the photon in a mode with frequency Inline graphic. A two-peaked Gaussian profile mathematically represents this distribution51:

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6304_Article_Equ7.gif 7

Here, Inline graphic and Inline graphic represent the central frequencies, Inline graphic defines the width, and Inline graphic governs the relative weighting of the peaks. The deviation angle of the FP cavity provides precise control over Inline graphic, enabling fine-tuning of the distribution.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic theoretical setup for studying quantum correlations in photonic systems. (a) Single-photon configuration including optical elements: HWP (half-wave plate) for polarization adjustment, QWP (quarter-wave plate) for linear-circular polarization conversion, IF (interference filter) for selecting wavelength ranges, QP (quartz plate) for introducing phase shifts, PBS (polarizing beam splitter) for separating or combining beams by polarization, FP cavity for isolating resonant frequencies, and SPD (single-photon detector) for high-precision photon detection. (b) Two-photon configuration extending the setup to investigate entanglement, Bell nonlocality, and coherence under non-Markovian dephasing.

In contrast, this configuration represents a structured setting frequently encountered in practical quantum optical setups, such as those utilizing cavities or interference-filtering methodologies. It is analytically manageable and offers versatile manipulation of environmental features like peak separation, width, and relative amplitudes through the parameter Inline graphic. Additionally, previous studies have notably employed these dual-peaked spectra to investigate non-Markovian dynamics in photonic systems9,20,49.

Following the filtering process, the polarization state experiences non-Markovian dephasing due to its interaction with the frequency modes within the quartz plate. Hamiltonian mathematically characterizes this interaction citeLaine2013:

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6304_Article_Equ8.gif 8

where Inline graphic and Inline graphic are the refractive indices for horizontal and vertical polarizations, respectively, inducing a differential phase shift based on frequency. This interaction results in non-Markovian dynamics for the photon’s polarization.

For an initial state Inline graphic, where Inline graphic (with Inline graphic) represents the polarization state and Inline graphic is the al state, the polarization state with time-evolved is given by:

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6304_Article_Equ1.gif 9

where Inline graphic is the quantum map, and Inline graphic is the time evolution operator.

The density matrix for the polarization is expressed as9:

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6304_Article_Equ10.gif 10

Using the distribution Inline graphicfrom Eq. (7), the dephasing rate Inline graphic can be determined,

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6304_Article_Equ11.gif 11

where Inline graphic. The formula for Inline graphic allows for the analysis of single-photon dynamics, as outlined in Eq. (10). This also leads to the derivation of two-photon dynamics by employing the reduced dynamics of a single photon. Using this framework, one can obtain insights into the quantum coherence and Bell nonlocality that can arise in the two-photon dynamics.

Using the reduced density matrix derived for the degree of freedom of polarization, as given in Eq. (10)52, we extend the construction to obtain the full reduced density matrix, Inline graphic, for the two-qubit system comprising nonidentical qubits. The basis considered for this system is defined as46,47:

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6304_Article_Equ21.gif

We use the previous procedure, to obtain the full reduced density matrix, Inline graphic, at any given time t. Using the procedure described previously, we obtain the complete reduced density matrix, Inline graphic, at any given time t.

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6304_Article_Equ12.gif 12

Since Inline graphic, where Inline graphic is a Hermitian operator, Eq. (12) can be used to determine the time evolution of the two-qubit density matrix for any given initial state.

With this foundation, we are now prepared to investigate the impact of non-Markovian dynamics in a bipartite system, with particular attention to its insightful and advantageous aspects.

Bell nonlocality and entanglement

To quantify entanglement in a two-qubit state, we use concurrence, a well-established measure determining whether a quantum state is entangled or separable. For a general X-structured density matrix, the concurrence is defined as25,5359:

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6304_Article_Equ13.gif 13

where

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6304_Article_Equ14.gif 14

This formulation ensures that the concurrence is nonzero if and only if the state is entangled, and it vanishes for separable states. It thus provides a clear quantitative measure of how entanglement evolves. In particular, for Bell-like states, which form a subset of X states, the system starts in a maximally entangled pure state:

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6304_Article_Equ15.gif 15

where Inline graphic. These Bell-like states are instrumental in many quantum information protocols due to their maximal entanglement. Under the evolution induced by Eq. (12), we get

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6304_Article_Equ16.gif 16
graphic file with name 41598_2025_6304_Article_Equ17.gif 17

With this formalism, we can analyze the correlation dynamics by evaluating how the polarization systems evolve, considering their identical and distinct dephasing rates.

Bell nonlocality, another fundamental feature of quantum mechanics, provides a distinct way to probe quantum correlations that defy the classical explanation. The Bell-CHSH inequality is frequently employed to quantify the extent of nonlocality in quantum systems. A violation of the B-C-H-S-H inequality characterizes nonlocality, and this violation can be expressed in terms of the following:

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6304_Article_Equ18.gif 18

where Inline graphic and Inline graphic. The terms Inline graphic, Inline graphic, and Inline graphic are related to the elements of the density matrix, defined as:

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6304_Article_Equ19.gif 19

In this study, our objective is to identify regions where the Bell inequality remains below the classical bound Inline graphic, despite the presence of entanglement, thus exploring the circumstances under which quantum correlations fail to exhibit non-locality. The expressions illustrate how the off-diagonal elements of the density matrix directly influence the nonlocal properties of the system. It is significant to note that Inline graphic is generally larger than Inline graphic, ensuring that the Bell-CHSH inequality reflects the maximum violation of the system at Inline graphic. This framework is particularly applied to two-qubit X states, where the structure of the density matrix simplifies the calculations, offering a clearer path to understanding non-locality in such systems.

The characteristics of quantum coherence in a system are intricately related to the off-diagonal elements of its density matrix. The ability to quantify coherence allows for a deeper understanding of its role and the challenges that decoherence poses in open systems. One well-established method of quantifying coherence is based on relative entropy, which quantifies it as the “distance” between a quantum state and its closest incoherent state. The relative entropy of coherence is expressed as:

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6304_Article_Equ20.gif 20

where Inline graphic denotes the von Neumann entropy, and Inline graphic is the diagonalized version of Inline graphic, representing the incoherent state. This measure provides a deeper understanding of the intrinsic information content carried by quantum coherence. The relative entropy is particularly valuable in quantum information theory, as it serves as a reliable indicator of the degree of “quantum-ness” of a system. In particular, the relative entropy is a monotonic measure, which means that coherence cannot increase under incoherent operations.

Figure 2 presents the time evolution of entanglement, Bell nonlocality, and quantum coherence under different Markovian and non-Markovian conditions, illustrating how quantum resources degrade and revive depending on system-environment interactions. The figure comprises two subplots corresponding to symmetric (Inline graphic) and asymmetric (Inline graphic) system-environment interactions, with distinct line styles representing various degrees of non-Markovianity. The system parameters, including refractive index difference Inline graphic, spectral width Inline graphic THz, and central photon frequencies Inline graphic PHz (Inline graphic nm) and Inline graphic PHz (Inline graphic nm), define the spectral characteristics governing the decoherence and memory effects in the photon system. The red, blue, and black curves represent entanglement, Bell nonlocality, and coherence measures, respectively, with different line styles corresponding to various values of Inline graphic and Inline graphic, which determine the degree of non-Markovianity in each environment. A fundamental distinction in quantum physics is that while nonlocal states must necessarily be entangled, an entangled state does not always exhibit nonlocality. The violation of the C-H-S-H Bell inequality, where Inline graphic, serves as a definitive indicator of INCs, which cannot be reproduced by any classical local model. Although such violations always occur for pure entangled states, they are not necessarily guaranteed for mixed states, making it essential to identify regions where the Bell inequality remains below the classical bound Inline graphic despite the presence of entanglement. The figure depicts the regions where Inline graphic as functions of time and the degree of entanglement. When both environments are fully Markovian (Inline graphic), where no memory effects are present, all three measures exhibit monotonic decay where system correlations are negligible and information is permanently lost. Furthermore, the entanglement undergoes sudden death after a finite time, while Bell’s nonlocality vanishes earlier, confirming that entanglement alone is not a sufficient condition for nonlocality. As non-Markovianity increases with both environments (Inline graphic), quantum measures display revival oscillations due to periodic information backflow from the environment. It is observed that Inline graphic reaches the classical threshold value Inline graphic slightly before the first occurrence of the disappearance of the entanglement Inline graphic as time progresses. In the strongly non-Markovian regime (Inline graphic), all three measures exhibit significant revival oscillations, where the figure illustrates the regions of revivals of Bell inequality violations and entanglement. These regions correspond to a return, after finite intervals during which Inline graphic and Inline graphic, of INCs and entanglement, respectively. Introducing non-Markovian effects in one environment (Inline graphic), the system exhibits partial memory effects, leading to asymmetric decay patterns of quantumness measures and decreasing the time intervals of partial revivals. Furthermore, comparing the symmetric and asymmetric cases, it is noted that asymmetric system-environment interactions exacerbate decoherence, leading to an accelerated degradation of quantum resources during the dynamics. These results highlight the crucial role of non-Markovian memory effects in extending quantum properties in photonic systems, the importance of symmetry in shaping quantum dynamics, and the ability to tune quantum resources through the independent control of Inline graphic and Inline graphic.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Time evolution of quantum measures as a function of time t for different angle values Inline graphic under both Markovian and non-Markovian dynamics. Subfigures (a) and (b) represent symmetric (Inline graphic) and asymmetric (Inline graphic), respectively. The system parameters are set as Inline graphic, Inline graphic THz, Inline graphic PHz (approximately 704.5 nm), and Inline graphic PHz (approximately 700.3 nm)9. The color code in the plots is such that: the black, blue, and red curves correspond to coherence, nonlocality, and entanglement measures, respectively. The color coding follows: solid lines represent Inline graphic in (a) and Inline graphic in (b); large-dashed lines correspond to Inline graphic in (a) and Inline graphic in (b); dot-dashed lines indicate Inline graphic in (a) and Inline graphic in (b).

Figure 3 illustrates the dynamics of entanglement, Bell nonlocality, and quantum coherence under different spectral width values (Inline graphic) in both Markovian and non-Markovian regimes, revealing how these quantum resources evolve in the two-photon system. Crucially, variations in the spectral width modulate the rate of decoherence. In fact, broader spectra (Inline graphic) lead to rapid deterioration of all three quantmness measures, while narrower ones (Inline graphic) slow down decoherence, enhancing the lifetimes of quantum resources. In the Markovian case, a larger spectral width (Inline graphic THz) accelerates decoherence, leading to earlier entanglement sudden death and faster disappearance of Bell nonlocality, whereas a smaller spectral width (Inline graphic THz) allows coherence and quantum correlations to persist longer. In the non-Markovian regime, memory effects enable reviving of coherence and quantum correlations; however, increasing the spectral width weakens these revivals by reducing the information backflow from the environment. These findings emphasize that optimizing the spectral width is crucial for enhancing the resilience of quantum coherence and preserving entanglement and nonlocality, making it a key parameter in decoherence suppression and quantum resource management in noisy quantum systems.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Time evolution of quantum measures as a function of time t for different spectral width values Inline graphic under both Markovian and non-Markovian dynamics. Subfigures (a) and (b) correspond to Markovian Inline graphic and non-Markovian Inline graphic dynamics, respectively. The system parameters are set as Inline graphic, Inline graphic PHz, and Inline graphic PHz. The color code in the plots is such that the black, blue, and red curves correspond to coherence, nonlocality, and entanglement measures, respectively. The color coding follows: solid lines represent Inline graphic; large-dashed lines correspond to Inline graphic; dot-dashed lines correspond to Inline graphic.

In Fig. 4, the effect of the parameter Inline graphic on entanglement, Bell nonlocality, and quantum coherence is explored within both Markovian and non-Markovian frameworks. The figure underscores how the refractive index difference between horizontal and vertical polarizations critically shapes both the decay rate and any possible resurgence of quantum resources. The results indicate that smaller refractive index differences (Inline graphic) slow the decay of quantumness measures, resulting in a longer persistence of coherence, entanglement, and nonlocality, while also allowing more pronounced and extended revival under non-Markovian conditions. Interestingly, a smaller Inline graphic leads to a less pronounced phase shift between the polarization components, thereby slowing the loss of off-diagonal density matrix elements. In contrast, larger refractive index differences (Inline graphic) accelerate dephasing, leading to the degradation of quantumness measures and suppressing revival effects in the non-Markovian regime. Intermediate values (Inline graphic) produce moderate behaviors, balancing slower decay rates with weaker revival oscillations. The long protection of quantum resources with small Inline graphic thus highlights how the refractive index not only pertains to optical considerations but also plays a crucial role in defining the timescales for quantum resources loss and recovery, influencing the robustness of quantum information in open systems. Therefore, tuning the refractive index difference can serve as an effective tool to control the longevity and revival characteristics of quantum resources during dynamics.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Time evolution of quantum measures as a function of time t for various values of refractive index differences Inline graphic under both Markovian and non-Markovian dynamics. Subfigures (a) and (b) correspond to Markovian Inline graphic and non-Markovian Inline graphic dynamics, respectively. The system parameters are set as Inline graphic THz, Inline graphic PHz, and Inline graphic PHz. The black, blue, and red curves correspond to coherence, nonlocality, and entanglement measures, respectively. The color coding follows: solid lines represent Inline graphic; large-dashed lines correspond to Inline graphic; dot-dashed lines correspond to Inline graphic.

Finally, in Fig. 5 we present a detailed comparison of how varying the initial state parameter Inline graphic affects the evolution of entanglement, Bell nonlocality, and coherence under Markovian and non-Markovian dephasing. Physically, Inline graphic sets the balance between the Inline graphic (or Inline graphic) and Inline graphic (or Inline graphic) components of the initial Bell-like state. Near Inline graphic or Inline graphic, the system starts with relatively weak correlations, leading to rapid decay of quantum resources and scant revival behavior even when non-Markovian memory effects are present. In contrast, states initialized around Inline graphic are almost maximally entangled and display more pronounced resilience: their coherence and Bell inequality violations last longer, and they can partially recover after initial decay in non-Markovian environments. Consequently, tuning Inline graphic provides a direct means to control how robustly and persistently quantum correlations manifest during evolution, revealing a clear strategy for protocols based on optimizing quantum resources in open photonic systems.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Time evolution of quantum measures as a function of time t and the initial state parameter under both Markovian and non-Markovian dynamics. Subfigures (a), (c), and (e) correspond to the Markovian regime with Inline graphic, where the system undergoes memoryless decoherence. Subfigures (b), (d), and (f) correspond to the non-Markovian regime with Inline graphic, where all memory effects lead to information backflow and quantum correlation revivals. The system parameters are set as Inline graphic, Inline graphic THz, Inline graphic PHz (approximately 704.5 nm), and Inline graphic PHz (approximately 700.3 nm).

Conclusion

In summary, our theoretical investigation demonstrates that a two-photon system subjected to local dephasing can maintain high levels of entanglement, Bell nonlocality, and coherence for extended periods, provided that the environment is suitably structured and exhibits non-Markovian memory effects. We have shown that strong entanglement does not necessarily guarantee Bell violation, highlighting the need to distinguish genuinely nonlocal correlations from those describable by classical models. By exploring variations in experimentally relevant physical parameters—particularly spectral width, differences in refractive index, interaction symmetry, and initial state configuration—we have identified accessible strategies to mitigate decoherence. These include narrowing the spectral bandwidth to slow dephasing, engineering smaller refractive index contrasts to reduce phase mismatches, and preparing initial states near maximal entanglement to better leverage environmental memory effects. Crucially, the values chosen for these parameters fall within typical experimental ranges, enabling direct testing and validation using contemporary photonic setups. Our findings thus provide practical design guidelines for preserving quantum resources, with potential applications in long-distance quantum communication, high-fidelity quantum computation, and foundational quantum optics. Moreover, the proposed modifications to existing optical experiments offer an experimentally accessible pathway to verify and expand on these theoretical predictions, ultimately strengthening our understanding of open quantum systems and their technological potential. As a future study, we plan to investigate N-photon systems to characterize multipartite entanglement and nonlocality under non-Markovian dephasing, enhancing our understanding of preserving quantum resources in complex open quantum systems.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported and funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU) (grant number IMSIU-DDRSP2503).

Author contributions

K.B. and S.B wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Caspar, P. et al. Heralded distribution of single-photon path entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 110506. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.110506 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Caspar, P. et al. Local and scalable detection of genuine multipartite single-photon path entanglement. Quantum6, 671. 10.22331/q-2022-03-22-671 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gräfe, M. et al. On-chip generation of high-order single-photon w-states. Nat. Photonics8, 791. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.204 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shimizu, H. et al. Entanglement swapping via lossy channels using photon-number-encoded states. Phys. Rev. A110, 052603. 10.1103/PhysRevA.110.052603 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yu, T. & Eberly, J. H. Finite-time disentanglement via spontaneous emission. Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 140404. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.140404 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yu, T. & Eberly, J. H. Sudden death of entanglement. Science323, 598. 10.1126/science.1167343 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lenhard, A., Brito, J., Bock, M., Becher, C. & Eschner, J. Coherence and entanglement preservation of frequency-converted heralded single photons. Opt. Express25, 11187. 10.1364/oe.25.011187 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zo, W. et al. Entanglement swapping via lossy channels using photon-number-encoded states. Phys. Rev. A110, 052603. 10.1103/PhysRevA.110.052603 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Liu, B.-H. et al. Experimental control of the transition from Markovian to non-Markovian dynamics of open quantum systems. Nat. Phys.7, 931. 10.1038/nphys2085 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Breuer, H.-P., Laine, E.-M., Piilo, J. & Vacchini, B. Colloquium: Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems. Rev. Modern Phys.88, 021002. 10.1103/RevModPhys.88.021002 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chruściński, D. & Maniscalco, S. Degree of non-Markovianity of quantum evolution. Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 120404. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.120404 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lo Franco, R., D’Arrigo, A., Falci, G., Compagno, G. & Paladino, E. Preserving entanglement and nonlocality in solid-state qubits by dynamical decoupling. Phys. Rev. B90, 054304. 10.1103/physrevb.90.054304 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lo Franco, R. Nonlocality threshold for entanglement under general dephasing evolutions: A case study. Quantum Inf. Process.15, 2393. 10.1007/s11128-016-1290-3 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kimble, H. J. The quantum internet. Nature453, 1023. 10.1038/nature07127 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W. & Zbinden, H. Quantum cryptography. Rev. Modern Phys.74, 145. 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.145 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Scarani, V. et al. The security of practical quantum key distribution. Rev. Modern Phys.81, 1301. 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1301 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bouwmeester, D. et al. Experimental quantum teleportation. Nature390, 575. 10.1038/37539 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vedral, V. Foundations of quantum discord. Nat. Commun.5, 3. 10.1007/978-3-319-53412-1_1 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bell, J. S. On the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox. Physics1, 195. 10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195 (1964). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Xu, J.-S. et al. Experimental demonstration of photonic entanglement collapse and revival. Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 100502. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.100502 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Werner, R. F. Quantum states with Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model. Phys. Rev. A40, 4277. 10.1103/PhysRevA.40.4277 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Acïn, A., Gisin, N. & Masanes, L. From bell’s theorem to secure quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 120405. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.120405 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gisin, N. & Thew, R. Quantum communication. Nat. Photonics1, 165. 10.1038/nphoton.2007.22 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A. & Holt, R. A. Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett.23, 880. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880 (1969). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wootters, W. K. Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 2245. 10.1103/physrevlett.80.2245 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Verstraete, F. & Wolf, M. M. Entanglement versus bell violations and their behavior under local filtering operations. Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 170401. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.170401 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Masanes, L., Liang, Y.-C. & Doherty, A. C. All bipartite entangled states display some hidden nonlocality. Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 090403. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.090403 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kindler, R. et al. State-independent quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. A109, 40. 10.1103/physreva.109.012614 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.von Selzam, N. & Marquardt, F. Discovering local hidden-variable models for arbitrary multipartite entangled states and arbitrary measurements. PRX Quantum6, 020317. 10.1103/prxquantum.6.020317 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Leggett, A. J. Macroscopic quantum systems and the quantum theory of measurement. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.69, 80. 10.1143/PTP.69.80 (1980). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S. & Maccone, L. Advances in quantum metrology. Nat. Photonics5, 222. 10.1038/nphoton.2011.35 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lostaglio, M., Jennings, D. & Rudolph, T. Description of quantum coherence in thermodynamic processes requires constraints beyond free energy. Nat. Commun.6, 6383. 10.1038/ncomms7383 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lostaglio, M., Korzekwa, K., Jennings, D. & Rudolph, T. Quantum coherence, time-translation symmetry, and thermodynamics. Phys. Rev. X5, 021001. 10.1103/physrevx.5.021001 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li, C.-M., Lambert, N., Chen, Y.-N., Chen, G.-Y. & Nori, F. Witnessing quantum coherence: From solid-state to biological systems. Sci. Rep.2, 885. 10.1038/srep00885 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Huelga, S. & Plenio, M. Vibrations, quanta and biology. Contemp. Phys.54, 181. 10.1080/00405000.2013.829687 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Plenio, M. B. & Huelga, S. F. Dephasing-assisted transport: Quantum networks and biomolecules. New J. Phys.10, 113019. 10.1088/1367-2630/10/11/113019 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vazquez, H. et al. Probing the conductance superposition law in single-molecule circuits with parallel paths. Nat. Nanotechnol.7, 663. 10.1038/nnano.2012.147 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Streltsov, A., Singh, U., Dhar, H. S., Bera, M. N. & Adesso, G. Measuring quantum coherence with entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 020403. 10.1103/physrevlett.115.020403 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Richter, T. & Vogel, W. Nonclassicality of quantum states: A hierarchy of observable conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 283601. 10.1103/physrevlett.89.283601 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Vogel, W. & Sperling, J. Unified quantification of nonclassicality and entanglement. Phys. Rev. A89, 052302. 10.1103/physreva.89.052302 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mraz, M., Sperling, J., Vogel, W. & Hage, B. Witnessing the degree of nonclassicality of light. Phys. Rev. A90, 033812. 10.1103/physreva.90.033812 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Baumgratz, T., Cramer, M. & Plenio, M. B. Quantifying coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 140401. 10.1103/physrevlett.113.140401 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Girolami, D. Observable measure of quantum coherence in finite dimensional systems. Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 170401. 10.1103/physrevlett.113.170401 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Brandão, F. G. S. L., Horodecki, M., Oppenheim, J., Renes, J. M. & Spekkens, R. W. Resource theory of quantum states out of thermal equilibrium. Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 250404. 10.1103/physrevlett.111.250404 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wootters, W. K. Optimal information transfer and real-vector-space quantum theory. In Quantum Theory: Informational Foundations and Foils 21–43 (Springer, Cham, 2015). 10.1007/978-94-017-7303-4_2. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bellomo, B., Franco, R. L. & Compagno, G. Non-Markovian effects on the dynamics of entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 160502. 10.1103/physrevlett.99.160502 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bellomo, B., Lo Franco, R. & Compagno, G. Entanglement dynamics of two independent qubits in environments with and without memory. Phys. Rev. A77, 032342. 10.1103/physreva.77.032342 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Deffner, S. & Lutz, E. Quantum speed limit for non-Markovian dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 010402. 10.1103/physrevlett.111.010402 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tang, J.-S. et al. Measuring non-Markovianity of processes with controllable system-environment interaction. EPL (Europhysics Letters)97, 10002. 10.1209/0295-5075/97/10002 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gu, W., Li, T., Tian, Y., Yi, Z. & Li, G.-X. Two-photon dynamics in non-Markovian waveguide QED with a giant atom. Phys. Rev. A110, 033707. 10.1103/PhysRevA.110.033707 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Born, M. & Wolf, E. Principles of Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019). 10.1017/9781108769914. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Xu, Z.-Y. & Zhu, S.-Q. Quantum speed limit of a photon under non-Markovian dynamics. Chin. Phys. Lett.31, 020301. 10.1088/0256-307X/31/2/020301 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wootters, W. K. Entanglement of formation and concurrence. Quantum Inf. Comput.1, 27. 10.26421/qic1.1-3 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Walborn, S., Souto Ribeiro, P., Davidovich, L., Mintert, F. & Buchleitner, A. Experimental determination of entanglement with a single measurement. Nature440, 1022. 10.1038/nature04627 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bougouffa, S. & Hindi, A. Entanglement dynamics of a bipartite system in squeezed vacuum reservoirs. Phys. Scr.T143, 014006. 10.1088/0031-8949/2011/t143/014006 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bougouffa, S. & Ficek, Z. Delayed transfer of entanglement to initially populated qubits. Phys. Rev. A102, 043720. 10.1103/PhysRevA.102.043720 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bougouffa, S. & Ficek, Z. Evidence of indistinguishability and entanglement determined by the energy-time uncertainty principle in a system of two strongly coupled bosonic modes. Phys. Rev. A93, 063848. 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.063848 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Bougouffa, S. & Ficek, Z. Atoms versus photons as carriers of quantum states. Phys. Rev. A88, 022317. 10.1103/PhysRevA.88.022317 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Castelano, L., Fanchini, F. & Berrada, K. Open quantum system description of singlet-triplet qubits in quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B94, 235433. 10.1103/physrevb.94.235433 (2016). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES