Skip to main content
BMC Microbiology logoLink to BMC Microbiology
. 2025 Jul 2;25:388. doi: 10.1186/s12866-025-04090-5

Biofilm formation ability and swarming motility are associated with some virulence genes in Proteus mirabilis

Mahin Veisi 1, Hossein Hosseini-Nave 1, Omid Tadjrobehkar 1,
PMCID: PMC12220229  PMID: 40604381

Abstract

Proteus mirabilis (P. mirabilis) is one of the frequent causes of urinary tract infection in humans. This pathogen armed by diverse virulence associated factors. Biofilm formation and swarming motility are two surface living behaviors of P. mirabilis and their association with virulence associated genes was investigated in the present study. Biofilm formation ability and swarming motility were evaluated by microtiter plate assay and top-agar travel tracking in 91 P. mirabilis isolates respectively. The polymerase chain reaction method was used for screening of 10 virulence associated genes. Association of virulence associated genes with biofilm formation ability and also swarming motility was analyzed statistically. The zapA (100%) and hlyA (41.8%) genes had maximum and minimum frequency respectively. Forty-one, 35 and 15 isolates were categorized as weak, intermediate and strong biofilm producers respectively. While, 11%, 38.5% and 50.5% of isolates were grouped as weak, intermediate and strong swarmers respectively. Adhesin encoding genes such as mrpA were more prevalent in strong biofilm producers in comparison to the other isolates. Reversal association of rsmA gene with swarming motility was detected. The frequency of hlyA gene was associated directly with swarming motility and in opposite way with biofilm formation. Reverse correlation of biofilm formation ability and swarming motility was estimated. Based on the study findings it is hypothesized that P. mirabilis benefited from adhesins such as MR/P fimbriae for production of biofilm and successful colonization and then they shift from biofilm formers to strong swarmers in order to reach deeper urinary organs and HlyA toxin is used to overcome the immune system cells. However, it has to confirmed trough future studies.

Keywords: Proteus mirabilis, Virulence associated genes, Biofilm formation, Swarming motility, MrpA gene, HlyA gene

Introduction

Proteus is a Gram-negative rod that was reported first time by Hauser in 1885 [1]. Proteus genus is classified in Enterobacteriaceae and contains several species. Proteus mirabilis (P. mirabilis) is well known bacterial species that is involved in different kind of Human infections including urinary tract infections (UTIs), respiratory tract infections, soft tissue infections, skin and wound infections and even sepsis [24]. Proteus species armed by many virulence factors including diverse adhesions, hemolysins, endotoxin, swarming motility, urease activity, biofilm formation, iron acquisition systems and immune evasion associated proteins [3]. Multiple fimbriae were introduced as the most important adhesions from Proteus [5]. The fimbriae are known as effective factors in biofilm formation and also colonization of P. mirabilis and its colonization into the host tissue [6]. The five most investigated fimbriae are mannose Proteus like(MR/P) fimbriae, Proteus mirabilis fimbriae (PMF), ambient temperature fimbriae (ATF), Proteus mirabilis fimbriae (PMF) and uroepithelial cell adhesin (UCA) that also is known as non-agglutinating fimbriae (NAF) [7]. Association of some fimbrial genes such as mrpA, ucaA and pmfA with biofilm formation ability was reported formerly [8, 9]. Two hemolysins HpmA and HlyA have reported as the major toxins from Proteus [10]. The rsmA gene in Proteus mirabilis had some homolog genes in other bacteria such as csrA in Escherichia coli and majority of these genes have regulatory activity on some metabolic pathways, motility and even biofilm formation [11]. The fliL gene is encoding a flagellar protein in basal body of flagellum in Proteobacteria and involved in regulation of stator activity in this region [12].

Ability of Proteus species to grow in single or multispecies communities in biofilm structures has confirmed its role in virulence, survival and pathogenesis of this bacterium especially in UTIs. P. mirabilis is reported from less than 2% of community acquired UTIs and also 5% of hospital acquired UTIs [13]. P. mirabilis also is one of the leading cause of catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) that could complicated with urinary stone formation and blockage of the catheter [14]. P. mirabilis is naturally resistant against nitrofurans, tetracyclines, tigecycline and polymyxins and decreased susceptibility against cephalosporins and carbapenem agents also were reported frequently [15]. Many cell surface compartments such as lipopolysaccharide, diverse fimbriae, surface hydrophobicity and even flagellar motility plays a role in different stages of biofilm formation process [6, 8, 16]. Microbial biofilms estimated to play roles in 80% of all human infections. High resistance of pathogens in biofilm matrix against antimicrobial agents and also immune system activities were reported recently [17].

P. mirabilis is well known for its prominent swarming motility and biofilm formation that those were reported as obvious surface living behaviors of many pathogenic bacteria. Swarmer cells are elongated 5 to 40 folds and armed by huge number of flagella [18]. Amazing properties of P. mirabilis for shape-shifting from short, hypo-flagellated swimmer cells to the long, hyper-flagellated swarmer cells enable them to migrate across the surface efficiently and access environments rich of needed nutrients and also it is associated with the virulence of bacterium [9, 18, 19]. Migration of P. mirabilis swarmer cells on the agar media and their periodically differentiation to the normal swimmer cells is resulted to appearance of some concentric circles on the agar surface [18]. Critical role of biofilm formation ability and swarming motility in different steps of P. mirabilis pathogenesis including maintenance of bacteria in urinary system, protection against immune system and antimicrobial agents and successful migration of P. mirabilis on catheter surface toward the uroepithelium were reported before [20].

In spite of few studies that were performed formerly in order to evaluate the associations between biofilm formation ability and also swarming motility of P. mirabilis with different virulence associated genes, many aspects of these associations are unknown. Therefore, the present study designed to reveal such associations and if it reaches trustable results then it could introduce suitable targets for future anti-virulent therapy at next step. Such drug targets may propose revision of current treatment strategies specially against complicated biofilm associated UTIs or transmission of P. mirabilis using swarming motility in different devise associated infections.

Results

Frequency of virulence associated genes

All studied VAGs were found in studied isolates with diverse frequency. The zapA (100%) was most prevalent gene and hlyA (41.8%) gene had minimum frequency (Fig. 1). Twelve (13.2%) isolates out of 91 isolates had all studied VAGs. Adhesin genes(ucaA, mrpA, pmfA and atfA) were detected in 45 (49.5%) isolates.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Frequency of different VAGs among P. mirabilis isolates

Biofilm formation ability

Data analysis showed that all isolates were biofilm producers. In a way that, 41 (45.5%), 35 (38.5%) and 15 (16.5%) were categorized as weak, intermediate and strong biofilm producer respectively (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Biofilm formation assessment by microtiter plate test. Strong biofilm formers, moderate biofilm formers and weak biofilm formers were observed in comparison to no-biofilm condition (negative control = broth medium enriched with 1% glucose)

Swarming motility

Swarming motility was detected in all studied isolates. Swarming measurements (on the agar surface) revealed a range of 1–8 cm (centimeter) swarming motility among the studied isolates. The most frequent swarming value was 5 cm that was observed in 12 isolates (13.2%). Mean swarming motility was 5.2 cm. Swarming values below 2.7 cm were regarded as weak, values ranging from 2.8 cm to 5.3 were regarded as intermediate swarming and the higher values were regarded as strong swarming motility. Observations revealed, 10 isolates (11%) were regarded as weak swarmer and 35 isolates (38.5%) were regarded as intermediate swarmer and 46 isolates (50.5%) were regarded as strong swarmers (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Swarming motility on the agar plate after 18 h incubation period at 37 °C. a weak swarmer, b intermediate swarmer and c strong swarmer

Smears stained from different zone of concentric circles of swarming phenomenon showed that bacteria from swarmer zone were significantly longer than bacteria in swimmer zone (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Gram-stained smears from concentric circles in swarming phenomenon. a swarmers zone, b swimmers zone

Prevalence of studied VAGs among P. mirabilis isolates with various biofilm formation ability

Chi-square analysis showed frequency of hlyA and mrpA genes were significantly different (p ≤ 0.001) among isolates with different biofilm formation ability. The hlyA gene was detected among 2 (13.3%) of strong biofilm formers, while it was found in 26 (63.4%) and 10 (28.6%) of weak biofilm formers and intermediate biofilm formers respectively. Frequency of mrpA gene was 24 (58.5%), 35 (100%) and 15 (100%) among weak, moderate and strong biofilm formers respectively. Frequency of other VAGs were not significantly different regarding biofilm formation ability (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Frequency of different VAGs regarding biofilm formation ability among P. mirabilis isolates. *p < 0.001

Logistic regression analysis showed hlyA gene is a predictor for weak biofilm formation ability (p = 0.001 and OR = 6.477).

Correlation of biofilm formation ability with swarming motility in P. mirabilis isolates

Chi-square analysis showed rsmA gene was significantly (p = 0.008) less prevalent (45.7%) among strong swarmers in comparison to the intermediate (71.4%) and weak (90%) swarmers. But hlyA gene was significantly (p = 0.043) more prevalent in strong swarmers (52.2%) in comparison to intermediate swarmers (34.3%) and weak swarmers (20%) Frequency of other studied VAGs were not significantly different among the isolates with different swarming motility (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Frequency of different VAGs regarding swarming motility among P. mirabilis isolates. *p < 0.01. **p < 0.05

Predictory role of rsmA gene for weak swarming motility was detected by Logistic regression analysis (p = 0.042 and OR = 21.169). Logistic regression analysis was also showed the predictory role of hlyA gene for strong swarming motility (p = 0.046 and OR = 2.335).

Correlation of biofilm formation ability with swarming motility in studied isolates

Chi-square analysis showed that most of the weak biofilm formers (70.7%) had strong swarming motility and they were significantly different from moderate and strong biofilm formers in this regard (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Swarming motility properties of isolates with different biofilm formation ability. *P < 0.001

Optical density values obtained from biofilm formation assessments and swarming values were used for Pearson correlation analysis and findings revealed that biofilm formation was reversely correlated with swarming motility (p = 0.01. r = − 0.63).

Discussion

P. mirabilis is well known as one of the leading causes of the catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). This bacterium could attach urinary catheters and travel along them towards bladder and even kidneys and severely complicate UTI cases [21]. Sabubba et al., reported that swarmer cells of P. mirabilis also are able to facilitate moving of non-motile bacteria such as Klebsiella pneumoniae on urinary catheters toward infection site [22]. Virulence associated properties of P. mirabilis specially biofilm formation ability and swarming motility play critical role in this respect.

The Proteus mirabilis equipped with different fimbriae that play role in some virulence associated properties such as biofilm formation at attachment and colonization step of P. mirabilis in special cases such as CAUTIs [23]. Data analysis showed mrpA gene was significantly more prevalent among moderate and strong biofilm formers in comparison to weak biofilm formers. Other fimbrial genes such as atfA and ucaA genes were apparently more frequent in strong biofilm formers in comparison to other isolates however, the differences were not statistically significant (Fig. 2). The ATF and UCA fimbriae were known mostly for their association in adhesion to abiotic surface or intestinal epithelium [2]. Majority of studied isolates were obtained for clinical specimens such as urine samples, it may explained different distribution of mrpA gene in comparison to atfA and ucaA genes in isolates with different biofilm formation ability in the present study.

The MR/P fimbriae has recently introduced as most expressed fimbriae of P. mirabilis during biofilm formation process in clinical setting [6, 8]. Therefore, superior role of MR/P fimbriae in comparison to other fimbriae in biofilm formation ability of P. mirabilis could be hypothesized. It could also be introduced as an attractant target for investigating and designing of novel anti-virulence substances with antibiofilm properties or drug targets. Indeed, some supporting reports about such anti-virulence substances have released before [8, 24].

The zapA was most frequent virulence associated gene (100%) among studied virulence associated genes in the present study (Fig. 1). Sun et al., similarly reported zapA as the most frequent gene among similar collection of studied virulence genes [25]. The hlyA gene had minimum frequency (41.8%) among studied virulence associated genes in P. mirabilis isolates (Fig. 1). Similar findings reported recently [4]. Both HlyA and HpmA were known as hemolysins of P. mirabilis but higher frequency of hpmA gene (97.8%) in comparison to the hlyA gene (41.8%) was detected in our findings. Similar finding regarding prevalence of HpmA in comparison to HlyA in Proteus isolates was also reported before [26].

Biofilm formation is an important characteristic of many bacteria that support them for surviving in better condition and also protect them from some environmental harsh condition and also immune system activity [27]. In many situations multi-species bacteria could aggregate through mutualistic interactions in a biofilm matrix [28]. Co-aggregation of P. mirabilis with other bacteria in the biofilm matrix on urinary-catheters is reported recently [29, 30]. Therefore, production of toxic compounds such as HlyA hemolysin could harm other neighbored bacteria and disturb such aggregations totally. Hence, we thought reverse association of hlyA gene with biofilm formation ability that was detected in present study (Fig. 5) is a reasonable finding.

Study findings showed higher frequency of hlyA gene among strong swarmers in comparison to the other isolates (Fig. 6). Direct association of hemolysin production with swarming motility that support our findings was reported recently [13].

Scavone et al., have reported that different fimbriae were not associated with swimming and swarming motility in P. mirabilis [6]. Similar estimation was found regarding association of four fimbrial genes (mrpA, atfA, pmfA and ucaA) with swarming motility in the present study (Fig. 6). In same way, Zonino et al., reported that swimming and swarming motility of P. mirabilis isolates was not affected in mutant isolates that don’t have some fimbrial adhesins [31].

Lower frequency of rsmA gene among strong swarmer isolates in comparison to the isolates with reduced swarming activity was observed in the present study (Fig. 6). Jen Liaw et al., suggested inhibitory activity of rsmA gene on swarming motility and also expression of virulence associated genes in P. mirabilis recently [11]. Therefore, it could suggest that rsmA gene could suppress swarming motility in P. mirabilis isolates.

The present study finding showed most of the strong swarmer isolates (70.7%) had weak biofilm formation capacity and vice-versa condition was detected among weak swarmers (Fig. 7). A reverse correlation was also revealed by Pearson correlation analysis of our data. Therefore, it seems that these two phenomena affect each other antagonistically. Some other studies also support this conclusion, they reported that reversal flagellar rotation, environmental conditions such as surface viscosity and quorum-sensing systems are involved in regulation of surface-associated behaviors such as biofilm formation and swarming motility in a reverse direction [9, 32, 33]. However, in some other studies supporting interaction between swarming and biofilm formation has also hypothesized [34]. Therefore, more complementary studies could help to reach a more trusted conclusion.

Conclusion

Biofilm formation and swarming motility were investigated in association with diverse virulence associated genes in the present study. The study findings showed that different virulence associated genes play role in different step of P. mirabilis infections. Reversal association of biofilm formation with swarming motility that revealed in present study, hypothesized that bacteria may use different fimbrial adhesins for biofilm formation and colonization step, but a bacterial shift from active biofilm producer to a strong swarmer could support bacteria for traveling up to the catheter toward deeper urinary organs. We thought bacteria could overcome bacterial competitors and also immune system cells by production of some toxic substances such as HlyA at this step. However, it has to be investigated with more detailed in future studies. Finally, it seems that mrpA and hlyA genes could introduced as attractive targets for designing future antibacterial agents or antibiotics.

Methods

Bacterial isolates and culture conditions

Ninety-one P. mirabilis isolates that were obtained from different clinical samples through a recent study (not published) were used in all experiment. Bacteria were grown in trypticase soy broth with 20% glycerol and kept in −70 °C.

Biofilm formation assessment

Microtiter plate assay was used for biofilm forming ability assessment. In summary, bacterial suspensions were inoculated into the Mueller-Hinton broth enriched with 1% glucose at final concentration of 5 × 105 CFU/ml in each well of 96-wells flat-bottomed sterile polystyrene microplate. After overnight incubation at 37 °C, microplates were washed with phosphate buffer solution (PBS) and dried. The bacterial biofilms on the microtube walls were stained with 0.1% crystal violet. Subsequently, stained biofilms were washed from microplate walls by 35% acetic acid and were analyzed by microplate reader at 492 nm. Sterile Muller-Hinton broth enriched with 1% glucose was used as control. The ODs higher than OD of control (ODc) were regarded as biofilm producer and they were classified as weak, moderate and heavy biofilm producer if ODc < OD < 2(ODc), 2(ODc) < OD < 4(ODc) and OD > 4(ODc) respectively [35].

Swarming motility assessment

Bacterial isolates were grown in Moeller-Hinton broth (Conda-Spain) at 37 °C overnight. After duplicate washing with PBS, a 5 µl aliquot of bacterial isolates was inoculated in the center of a dried (at 42 °C for 30 min) Muller-Hinton agar plates and incubate at 37 °C. Swarming motility was measured at 30-minute intervals using a stereo microscope through measuring the distance that bacteria were traveled on the medium from the inoculation point in each time period by a standard caliper. Some other confirmatory properties of swarmer cells such as hyper flagellation and cell elongation also were studied by direct microscopic observation [36]. In brief, we prepared smears from different zone of concentric circles on the agar (swimmer zone and swarmer zone) and they were observed microscopically after Gram staining. Studied isolates were categorized into the three weak, intermediate and strong swarmer groups.

Bacterial lysate preparation and DNA extraction

Bacterial lysate was prepared through boiling method. In summary, pure colonies of bacterial isolates were harvested by flame sterilized loop and suspended in the 500 µl of distilled water in microtubes. The mixtures were heated at 100 °C for 10 min. In the next step, they were centrifuged (12,000 rpm for 5 min) and then, the supernatant was separated for PCR amplification [37].

Screening of virulence associated genes

The polymerase chain reaction method was used for detection of virulence associated genes (rsmA, hlyA, rsbA, mrpA, zapA, atfA, hpmA, pmfA, ucaA and fliL) using Biometra thermocycler(Germany) and specific primers that were chosen from previous studies (Table 1). The primer sequences were confirmed trough nucleotide BLAST tool (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and purchased from Bioneer, South Korea. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel (Pharmacia Biotech, Denmark) beside a 100 bp size marker.

Table 1.

Primer sequences were used for screening of virulence associated genes

VAGs Primers Sequences (5´→ 3´) Gene description Product Size(bp) Reference
hlyA

F: AACAAGGATAAGCACTGTTCTGGCT

R: ACCATATAAGCGGTCATTCCCGTCA

HlyA hemolysin subunit 1177 [38]
ucaA

F: GTAAAGTTGTTGCGCAAAC

R: TTGAGCCACTGTGGATACA

Structural UCA fimbrial protein 560 [25]
rsmA

F: TAGCGAGTGTTGACGAGTGG

R: AGCGAGGTGAAGAACGAGAA

Repressor of RsmA regulatory system 562 [25]
rsbA

F: TTGAAGGACGCGATCAGACC

R: ACTCTGCTG TCCTGTGGG TA

Two-component sensor kinase 467 [39]
hpmA

F: GTTGAGGGGCGTTATCAAGAGTC

R: GATAACTGTTTTGCCCTTTTGTGC

HpmA hemolysin subunit 709 [38]
zapA

F: TATCGTCTCCTTCGCCTCCA

R: TGGCGCAAATACGACTACCA

IgA-degrading metalloprotease 332 [40]
mrpA

F: ACACCTGCCCATATGGAAGATACTGGTACA

R: AAGTGATGAAGCTTAGTGATGGTGATGGTGATGAGAGTAAGTCACC

Structural MR/P fimbrial protein 550 [25]
fliL

F: CTCTGCTCGTGGTGGTGTCG

R: GCGTCGTCACCTGATGTGTC

Regulator of flagellar stator activity 770 [25]
pmfA

F: CAAATTAATCTAGAACCACTC

R: ATTATAGAGGATCCCTTGAAGGTA

Structural PMF fimbrial protein 810 [25]
atfA

F: CATAATTTCTAGACCTGCCCTAGCA

R: CTGCTTGGATCCGTAATTTTTAACG

Structural ATF fimbrial protein 537 [25]

Statistical analysis

The data were introduced into the SPSS software version 26. Chi-square and Fischer’s exact test were used in data analysis. Logistic regression was used for analyzing predictory role of virulence associated genes regarding biofilm formation ability and also swarming motility. The p ≤ 0.05 was regarded as significant. Correlation of biofilm formation and swarming motility was analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the kindly cooperation of laboratory staff of the Afzalipour school of medicine, Kerman University of medical sciences.

Abbreviations

Proteus mirabilis

P. mirabilis

MR/P

Mannose Proteus like(MR/P) fimbriae

PMF

Proteus mirabilis fimbriae

ATF

Ambient temperature fimbriae

UCA

Uroepithelial cell adhesin

VAG

Virulence associated gene

UTI

Urinary tract infection

CAUTI

Catheter associated urinary tract infection

PCR

Polymerase chain reaction

PBS

Phosphate buffer solution

SPSS

Statistical product and service solution software

ANOVA

Analysis of variance

Authors’ contributions

OT introduced primary idea and designed the study plan. Resources were provided by OT. MV collected the bacteria isolates. OT, HHN and MV had equal roles in the designing and implementation of actual steps of methods. Statistical analysis and interpretations were done by OT. OT was project administrator and supervised all steps. The original draft of the manuscript was prepared by OT, but it was revised and completed by OT, HHN and MV. The submitted version of this manuscript was also read and accepted by OT, HHN and MV.

Funding

This study was approved by Vice-Chancellor of research and technology of Kerman University of Medical Sciences, but no fund was provided to purpose of publication.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by ethics committee of Kerman university of medical sciences(Ethic’s code: IR.KMU.AH.REC.1401.133). Obtaining consent to participate was waived for this study by ethics committee of Kerman university of medical sciences. In the present study, the bacterial isolates were collected during routine diagnosis and treatment protocol and we obtain them as unnamed bacteria on agar media. Therefore, human or animals were not directly participated as sample source and no sample was taken for this study. However, our study is in compliance with the Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Sellaturay SV, et al. Proteus: mythology to modern times. Indian J Urol. 2012;28(4):388–91. 10.4103/0970-1591.105748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rózalski A, Sidorczyk Z, Kotełko K. Potential virulence factors of Proteus bacilli. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1997;61(1):65–89. 10.1128/mmbr.61.1.65-89.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hamilton AL, et al. Proteus spp. as putative gastrointestinal pathogens. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018;31(3):e00085-17. 10.1128/cmr.00085-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hussein EI, et al. Assessment of pathogenic potential, virulent genes profile, and antibiotic susceptibility of Proteus mirabilis from urinary tract infection. Int J Microbiol. 2020;2020(1):1231807. 10.1155/2020/1231807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kuan L, et al. Characterization of 17 chaperone-usher fimbriae encoded by Proteus mirabilis reveals strong conservation. J Med Microbiol. 2014;63(Pt 7):p911–922. 10.1099/jmm.0.069971-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Scavone P, et al. Fimbriae have distinguishable roles in Proteus mirabilis biofilm formation. Pathog Dis. 2016;74(5):1–9. 10.1093/femspd/ftw033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rocha SP, Pelayo JS, Elias WP. Fimbriae of uropathogenic Proteus mirabilis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2007;51(1):1–7. 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2007.00284.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jacobsen SM, Shirtliff ME. Proteus mirabilis biofilms and catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Virulence. 2011;2(5):460–5. 10.4161/viru.2.5.17783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Filipiak A, et al. Pathogenic factors correlate with antimicrobial resistance among clinical Proteus mirabilis strains. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:579389. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.579389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cestari SE, et al. Molecular detection of HpmA and HlyA hemolysin of uropathogenic Proteus mirabilis. Curr Microbiol. 2013;67(6):703–7. 10.1007/s00284-013-0423-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liaw SJ, et al. Role of RsmA in the regulation of swarming motility and virulence factor expression in Proteus mirabilis. J Med Microbiol. 2003;52(1):19–28. 10.1099/jmm.0.05024-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Partridge JD, Harshey RM. Flagellar protein flil: A many-splendored thing. Mol Microbiol. 2024;122(4):447–54. 10.1111/mmi.15301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chakkour M, et al. Overview of Proteus mirabilis pathogenicity and virulence. Insights into the role of metals. Front Microbiol. 2024;15:1383618. 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1383618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Norsworthy AN, Pearson MM. From catheter to kidney stone: the uropathogenic lifestyle of Proteus mirabilis. Trends Microbiol. 2017;25(4):304–15. 10.1016/j.tim.2016.11.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Girlich D, et al. Genetics of acquired antibiotic resistance genes in Proteus spp. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:256. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Czerwonka G, et al. The role of Proteus mirabilis cell wall features in biofilm formation. Arch Microbiol. 2016;198(9):877–84. 10.1007/s00203-016-1249-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sun F, et al. Biofilm-associated infections: antibiotic resistance and novel therapeutic strategies. Future Microbiol. 2013;8(7):877–86. 10.2217/fmb.13.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Verstraeten N, et al. Living on a surface: swarming and biofilm formation. Trends Microbiol. 2008;16(10):496–506. 10.1016/j.tim.2008.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rather PN. Swarmer cell differentiation in Proteus mirabilis. Environ Microbiol. 2005;7(8):1065–73. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00806.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wasfi R, et al. Proteus mirabilis biofilm: development and therapeutic strategies. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:414. 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Armbruster CE, Hodges SA, Mobley HL. Initiation of swarming motility by Proteus mirabilis occurs in response to specific cues present in urine and requires excess L-glutamine. J Bacteriol. 2013;195(6):1305–19. 10.1128/JB.02136-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sabbuba N, Hughes G, Stickler DJ. The migration of Proteus mirabilis and other urinary tract pathogens over Foley catheters. BJU Int. 2002;89(1):55–60. 10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.01721.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Durgadevi R, et al. Attenuation of Proteus mirabilis colonization and swarming motility on indwelling urinary catheter by antibiofilm impregnation: an in vitro study. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2020;194:111207. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Durgadevi R, et al. Proteomic analysis Deciphers the multi-targeting antivirulence activity of Tannic acid in modulating the expression of mrpa, flhd, urer, HpmA and Nrp system in Proteus mirabilis. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;165(Pt A):1175–86. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sun Y, et al. Association among biofilm formation, virulence gene expression, and antibiotic resistance in Proteus mirabilis isolates from diarrhetic animals in Northeast China. BMC Vet Res. 2020;16(1):176. 10.1186/s12917-020-02372-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Swihart KG, Welch RA. The HpmA hemolysin is more common than HlyA among Proteus isolates. Infect Immun. 1990;58(6):1853–60. 10.1128/iai.58.6.1853-1860.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Noori HG, Tadjrobehkar O, Moazamian E. Biofilm stimulating activity of solanidine and Solasodine in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. BMC Microbiol. 2023;23(1):208. 10.1186/s12866-023-02957-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Joshi RV, Gunawan C, Mann R. We are one: multispecies metabolism of a biofilm consortium and their treatment strategies. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:635432. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.635432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Li X, et al. Biomineralization strongly modulates the formation of Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa dual-species biofilms. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2016;92(12):fiw189DOI. 10.1093/femsec/fiw189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Galvan EM, Mateyca C, Ielpi L. Role of interspecies interactions in dual-species biofilms developed in vitro by uropathogens isolated from polymicrobial urinary catheter-associated bacteriuria. Biofouling. 2016;32(9):1067–77. 10.1080/08927014.2016.1231300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zunino P, et al. Mannose-resistant Proteus-like and P. mirabilis fimbriae have specific and additive roles in P. mirabilis urinary tract infections. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2007;51(1):125–33. 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2007.00285.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Caiazza NC, et al. Inverse regulation of biofilm formation and swarming motility by Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14. J Bacteriol. 2007;189(9):3603–12. 10.1128/JB.01685-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Guttenplan SB, Kearns DB. Regulation of flagellar motility during biofilm formation. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2013;37(6):849–71. 10.1111/1574-6976.12018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Worlitzer VM, et al. Biophysical aspects underlying the swarm to biofilm transition. Sci Adv. 2022;8(24):eabn8152. 10.1126/sciadv.abn8152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Stepanović S, et al. A modified microtiter-plate test for quantification of Staphylococcal biofilm formation. J Microbiol Methods. 2000;40(2):175–9. 0.1016/S0167-7012(00)00122-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Belas R, Schneider R, Melch M. Characterization of Proteus mirabilis precocious swarming mutants: identification of rsba, encoding a regulator of swarming behavior. J Bacteriol. 1998;180(23):6126–39. 10.1128/JB.180.23.6126-6139.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mosaffa F, et al. Correction: Some virulence genes are associated with antibiotic susceptibility in Enterobacter cloacae complex. BMC Infect Dis. 2024;24(1):1167. 10.1186/s12879-024-10060-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Phiri RM, et al. Evaluation of virulence genes in Proteus strains isolated from diabetic foot infections and urinary tract infections. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2024;18(10):1559–65. 10.3855/jidc.18928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.El-Tarabili RM, et al. Prevalence, antibiotic profile, virulence determinants, esbls, and non-beta-lactam encoding genes of MDR Proteus spp. Isolated from infected dogs. Front Genet. 2022;13:952689. 10.3389/fgene.2022.952689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sanches MS, et al. Genotypic and phenotypic profiles of virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance of Proteus mirabilis isolated from chicken carcasses: potential zoonotic risk. Braz J Microbiol. 2019;50(3):685–94. 10.1007/s42770-019-00086-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from BMC Microbiology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES