Skip to main content
Sage Open Pediatrics logoLink to Sage Open Pediatrics
. 2025 May 28;12:30502225251339245. doi: 10.1177/30502225251339245

Congenital Anomalies in Iran: National and Sub-National Analysis From 1990 to 2021

Moslem Taheri Soodejani 1, Maedeh Arshadi 1, Maryam Kazemi 1,✉
PMCID: PMC12220910  PMID: 40612160

Abstract

Background:

Congenital abnormalities are a major cause of infant mortality, impacting healthcare and quality of life. This study analyzed trends in incidence and mortality from 1990 to 2021 using secondary data.

Methods:

An ecological study was conducted using the 2021 Global Burden of Disease dataset. Joinpoint regression analysis examined trends, while ArcMap GIS and the Moran I test assessed spatial distribution.

Results:

Mortality rates declined annually by 6.3% in males and 4.2% in females, while incidence rates decreased by 0.5% and 0.9%, respectively. Hot spots for incidence in 2021 were Sistan and Baluchestan and Khorasan Razavi, while Kerman had the highest neonatal mortality.

Conclusion:

Incidence and mortality of congenital abnormalities are decreasing in Iran, but eastern provinces remain high-risk areas.

Keywords: congenital malformation, congenital birth defects, incidence, death, mortality

Introduction

Congenital abnormalities are a range of structural or functional malformations that can be diagnosed before birth, at birth, or in later stages of life.1,2 Congenital abnormalities are the main cause of infant mortality and can have a significant impact on the health care system and the quality of life of the individuals and families. For instance, mothers of newborns with major congenital abnormalities demonstrated a higher utilization of healthcare resources, and following the delivery of an impacted offspring, the utilization of psychiatric services rose by 13 years.3 -5 Globally, after controlling child mortality due to infectious diseases, deaths caused by congenital abnormalities have been increasing. 6

Worldwide, about 6% of newborns had some kind of congenital abnormalities, and every year more than 170 000 children die between 1 and 59 months due to congenital abnormalities. 7 In 2019, congenital abnormalities were introduced as the fourth leading cause of death for children under 5 years of age. 8 Congenital heart malformation is the second cause of death in infancy the main cause of death in children under 5 years of age and the third cause of death in children aged 5 to 14 years. 9

Since deaths due to congenital abnormalities occur early in life, years of life lost (YLL) increase. 10 Studies have shown that these abnormalities occur more often in countries with lower socio-economic status and are considered one of the important causes of infant mortality in these countries.11 -13

A wide range of factors, including environmental, genetic, and social factors can cause congenital abnormalities.14,15 Also, studies have shown the effect of factors such as family marriages, contraceptive methods, alcohol and smoking during pregnancy, family history of genetic disorders, and mother’s age in the occurrence of congenital abnormalities.16 -20 In Iran, in the city of Tabriz between 2000 and 2011, the prevalence of congenital abnormalities was estimated to be 202.3 per 10 000 births. 21

Since no study has examined the incidence and mortality of congenital abnormalities in Iran, and due to the lack of information hindering effective health policies, this study aims to investigate the incidence of congenital abnormalities at birth and the mortality of congenital abnormalities in Children under 28 days in Iran during 1990 to 2021 was designed using secondary data.

Method

Study Design & Data Access

This ecological study was conducted by using the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study last version dataset (2021). This resource is freely accessible to all researchers and offers estimates for various metrics including incidence and mortality. These metrics are available for both genders and across different age groups, enabling comparisons over the period from 1990 to 2021. 22

data on the incidence and death rates of congenital abnormalities were collected from 1990 to 2021. The data was categorized by sex and focused on both Iran as a whole and its individual provinces. Incidence data pertained to cases occurring at birth, while death data included cases within the first 28 days of life.

Congenital Abnormalities

Congenital abnormalities are abnormalities in body structure or function that originate prenatally and may be visible at birth or remain hidden. 23 This study encompasses a range of conditions such as neural tube defects, congenital heart anomalies, orofacial clefts, Down syndrome, Turner syndrome, Klinefelter syndrome, other chromosomal abnormalities, congenital musculoskeletal and limb anomalies, urogenital congenital anomalies, digestive congenital anomalies, and various other congenital abnormalities (The corresponding ICD-10 codes for these conditions are provided at the end of the manuscript).

Statistical Analyses

To investigate the trends in the incidence and mortality rates associated with congenital abnormalities from 1990 to 2021, we employed Joinpoint regression analysis using the Joinpoint Regression Program. In this approach, we utilize the annual incidence and mortality rates for the specific disease, along with the standard error (SE) as inputs for the model. We then calculate the annual percentage change (APC) with a 95% confidence interval for years exhibiting a change in trend. Additionally, we estimate the average annual percentage change (AAPC) for both genders in diverse geographic regions.

The model is based on the equation logyx=b0+b1x , where b0 and b1 represent the coefficients of the regression model. The percentage change from year x to year x + 1 is calculated using the formula:

APC=(eb1−1)×100

Connection points, representing years with trend changes, are identified, and the significance of these trends is determined using the Monte Carlo permutation method. This allows us to assess the trend changes between these points and evaluate their statistical significance.

Furthermore, we employed ArcMap GIS software and the Moran I test to analyze the spatial distribution and geographical correlations.

Results

Trend Analysis

The AAPC in mortality from congenital abnormalities showed an annual decrease of 6.3% for males and 4.2% for females. Additionally, the AAPC in the incidence of congenital abnormalities decreased by 0.5% for males and 0.9% for females.

Table 1 presents the details of the AAPC and the APC, while Figure 1 illustrates the trends in incidence and mortality due to congenital abnormalities. Table 2 also shows the values of the AAPC related to the occurrence and mortality of this disease in the provinces.

Table 1.

The Trend of Incidence and Mortality Rates (per 100 000 people) Related to Congenital Abnormalities in Iran From 1990 to 2021.

Indicators Sex Segments APC 95% CI P AAPC 95% CI P
Mortality Male 1990-2013 −3.36 −3.50, −3.18 <.001
2013-2019 −10.30 −10.89, −9.29 <.001 −6.3 −6.47, −6.09 <.001
2019-2021 −24.76 −27.61, −20.00 <.001
Female 1990-2013 −3.19 −3.36, −3.00 <.001 −4.2 −6.34, −6.00 <.001
2013-2019 −10.60 −11.18, −9.61 <.001
2019-2021 −24.24 −26.61, −26.71 <.001
Incidence Male 1990-1995 −0.67 −0.97, −0.50 <.001
1995-2000 0.74 0.55, 1.05 <.001
2000-2005 −1.12 −1.47, −0.92 <.001 −0.5 −0.49, −0.43 <.001
2005-2012 −0.38 −0.49, −0.03 .039
2012-2019 −1.01 −1.30, −0.90 <.001
2019-2021 0.47 −0.25, 0.85 .151
Female 1990-1994 −1.10 −1.41, −0.94 <.001
1994-2000 −0.73 −0.84, −0.48 .003
2000-2005 0.00 −0.13, 0.17 .996
2005-2010 −1.20 −1.36, −1.08 <.001 −0.9 −0.87, −0.84 <.001
2010-2015 −0.33 −0.43, −0.17 .001
2015-2019 −0.33 −2.60, −2.36 <.001
2019-2021 −0.07 −0.39, 0.20 .603

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(a) Incidence rate in female, (b) incidence rate in male, (c) mortality rate in female, and (d) mortality rate in male.

Table 2.

The Trend of Incidence and Mortality Rates (per 100 000 People) Related to Congenital Abnormalities Across the Provinces of Iran From 1990 to 2021.

Province Sex Incidence Mortality
AAPC 95% CI P-value AAPC 95% CI P-value
Alborz Male −0.63 −0.66, −0.59 <.001 −6.34 −7.23, −6.84 <.001
Female −0.88 −0.90, −0.85 <.001 −6.83 −7.05, −6.60 <.001
Ardebil Male −0.73 −0.85, −0.66 <.001 −7.21 −7.37, −7.04 <.001
Female −1.12 −1.14, −1.10 <.001 −6.71 −6.88, −6.54 <.001
Bushehr Male −0.49 −0.52, −0.46 <.001 −5.86 −6.01, −5.71 <.001
Female −0.73 −0.87, −0.82 <.001 −5.71 −5.86, −5.57 <.001
Chahar Mahaal and Bakhtiari Male −0.60 −0.61, −0.57 <.001 −7.64 −7.74, −7.47 <.001
Female −1.07 −1.12, −1.03 <.001 −7.37 −7.55, −7.22 <.001
East Azarbayejan Male −0.52 −0.55, −0.50 <.001 −7.19 −7.45, −6.96 <.001
Female −0.91 −0.93, −0.89 <.001 −6.98 −7.22, −6.78 <.001
Fars Male −0.28 −0.30, −0.24 <.001 −5.30 −5.52, −5.10 <.001
Female −0.74 −0.77, −0.71 <.001 −5.06 −5.26, −4.89 <.001
Gilan Male −0.55 −0.57, −0.53 <.001 −9.19 −9.48, −9.89 <.001
Female −0.95 -1.00, −0.91 <.001 −8.68 −8.91, −8.46 <.001
Golestan Male −0.51 −0.57, −0.47 <.001 −6.59 −6.74, −6.44 <.001
Female −0.84 −0.85, −0.83 <.001 −6.62 −6.77, −6.47 <.001
Hamadan Male −0.49 −0.52, −0.47 <.001 −6.13 −6.32, −5.87 <.001
Female −0.97 −0.98, −0.95 <.001 −5.97 −6.14, −6.80 <.001
Hormozgan Male −0.51 −0.54, −0.46 <.001 −6.09 −6.26, −5.94 <.001
Female −0.91 −0.98, −0.83 <.001 −5.85 −6.01, −5.71 <.001
Ilam Male −0.42 −0.45, −0.39 <.001 −6.03 −6.25, −5.87 <.001
Female −0.81 −0.83, −0.79 <.001 −6.08 −6.24, −5.93 <.001
Isfahan Male −0.21 −0.23, −0.19 <.001 −5.95 −6.28, −5.69 <.001
Female −0.67 −0.70, −0.64 <.001 −5.73 −5.94, −5.48 <.001
Kerman Male −0.37 −0.39, −0.34 <.001 −4.71 −4.88, −4.51 <.001
Female −0.61 −0.62, −0.59 <.001 −4.58 −4.74, −4.40 <.001
Kermanshah Male −0.44 −0.46, −0.42 <.001 −6.11 −6.24, −5.96 <.001
Female −0.98 −1.01, −0.96 <.001 −6.04 −6.15, −5.89 <.001
Khorasan-e-Razavi Male −0.55 −0.57, −0.54 <.001 −6.69 −6.98, −6.43  .001
Female -1.00 −1.03, −0.99 <.001 −6.48 −6.72, −6.22 <.001
Khuzestan Male −0.39 −0.42, −0.37 <.001 −5.83 −6.02, −5.65 <.001
Female −0.64 −0.69, −0.59 <.001 −5.50 −5.64, −5.32 <.001
Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Male −0.64 −0.70, −0.59 <.001 −7.32 −7.53, −7.14 <.001
Female −1.03 −1.08, −0.98 <.001 −7.28 −7.42, −7.14 <.001
Kordestan Male −0.79 −0.86, −0.74 <.001 −6.81 −6.92, −6.69 <.001
Female −1.24 −1.25, −1.22 <.001 −6.71 −6.82, −6.68 <.001
Lorestan Male −0.54 −0.56, −0.53 <.001 −8.27 −8.41, −8.10 <.001
Female −1.10 −1.15, −1.07 <.001 −8.29 −8.47, −8.11 <.001
Markazi Male −0.49 −0.53, −0.45 <.001 −6.40 −6.51, −6.29 <.001
Female −0.90 −0.93, −0.85 <.001 −6.14 −6.25, −6.01 <.001
Mazandaran Male −0.56 −0.65, −0.49 <.001 −7.75 −7.92, −7.57 <.001
Female −0.92 -1.00, −0.87 <.001 −7.32 −7.51, −7.13 <.001
North Khorasan Male −0.75 −0.77, −0.74 <.001 −6.97 −7.12, −6.79 <.001
Female −1.13 −1.14, −1.11 <.001 −6.69 −6.82, −6.52 <.001
Qazvin Male −0.73 −0.73, −0.72 <.001 −6.84 −7.00, −6.70 <.001
Female −1.17 −1.19, −1.14 <.001 −6.69 −6.83, −6.51 <.001
Qom Male −0.57 −0.58, −0.56 <.001 −6.88 −7.10, −6.67 <.001
Female −0.87 −0.92, −0.82 <.001 −6.87 −7.05, −6.69 <.001
Semnan Male −0.24 −0.64, −0.58 <.001 −6.29 −6.54, −6.09 <.001
Female −0.93 −0.95, −0.91 <.001 −6.19 −6.37, −6.02 <.001
Sistan and Baluchistan Male −0.36 −0.38, −0.33 <.001 −5.81 −5.97, −5.67 <.001
Female −0.62 −0.65, −0.59 <.001 −5.35 −5.83, −5.18 <.001
South Khorasan Male −0.73 −0.75, −0.71 <.001 −6.60 −6.75, −6.44 <.001
Female −1.03 −1.06, -1.00 <.001 −6.45 −6.61, −6.32 <.001
Tehran Male −0.39 −0.42, −0.36 <.001 −5.97 −6.18, −5.76 <.001
Female −0.79 −0.82, −0.75 <.001 −6.00 −6.21, −5.80 <.001
West Azarbayejan Male −0.69 −0.71, −0.67 <.001 −6.32 −6.56, −6.07 <.001
Female −1.04 −1.06, −1.02 <.001 −6.18 −6.35, −6.01 <.001
Yazd Male −0.47 −0.49, −0.44 <.001 −5.37 −5.53, −5.20 <.001
Female −0.80 −0.82, −0.78 <.001 −5.20 −5.34, −5.06 <.001
Zanjan Male −0.60 −0.62, −0.57 <.001 −6.12 −6.26, −5.98 <.001
Female −1.02 −1.06, −0.99 <.001 −6.34 −6.48, −6.19 <.001

Geographical Distribution

Based on the data, the incidence of congenital abnormalities in 2021 in Iran was approximately 4413 and 5426 per 100 000 individuals for females and males, respectively. Additionally, the mortality rate in 2021 in Iran was around 885 and 1131 per 100 000 individuals for females and males, respectively.

In 2021, the most common cause of death among both males and females was linked to cardiac issues. Additionally, the greatest occurrence rates in females and males that year were associated with heart problems and congenital musculoskeletal and limb anomalies, respectively.

Figures 2 and 3 provide a detailed overview of the geographical distribution of the incidence and mortality rates associated with congenital anomalies, highlighting hot spots and geographical correlations.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(a) incidence rate in female, (b) geographical correlation for incidence rate in female with P-value: <.001 and Z-score: 4.48, (c) incidence rate in male, d:) geographical correlation for incidence rate in male with P-value: <.001 and Z-score: 4.32.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

(a) mortality rate in female, b:) geographical correlation for mortality rate in female with P-value: <.001 and Z-score: 3.51, (c) mortality rate in male, (d) geographical correlation for mortality rate in male with P-value: <.001 and Z-score: 3.16.

The hot spots for the incidence rate in 2021 for both males and females included the provinces of Sistan & Baluchestan as well as Razavi Khorasan, while the cold spots included Tehran, Isfahan, Qom, Mazandaran, Alborz, Hamadan, and Markazi.

For the death rate due to this disease in children under 28 days in 2021, the hot spot for both males and females was Kerman province. The cold spots for males included Hamedan, Markazi, Qom, Tehran, Alborz, and Qazvin provinces, while for females, the cold spots included Hamadan, Qom, Markazi, and Tehran provinces.

Discussion

Congenital abnormalities can increase neonatal mortality rates. 24 They stand as the primary reason for infant deaths in the United States and rank fourth globally, causing around 295 000 deaths each year. 25 Several studies have highlighted the substantial occurrence and fatality of congenital abnormalities, notably during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iran.26 -28 In Iran, the expansion of healthcare coverage, with 90% of the population now covered by insurance, has significantly improved access to medical services. Additionally, increased health literacy and awareness among women have contributed to better health outcomes and a reduction in congenital abnormality related morbidity and mortality.29,30 This study showed an overall decrease in the morbidity and mortality rates of congenital anomalies among both sexes in Iran, likely due to the aforementioned factors as well as the decline in birth rates (Table 3).

Table 3.

The Trend of Live Births in Iran During 1990 to 2021.

Age group Segments APC P-value AAPC P-value
15-19 years 1990-1995 −7.69 <.001
1995-1998 −6.20 <.001
1998-2001 −8.15 <.001
2001-2005 −4.41 .045 −3.03 <.001
2005-2011 8.78 .021
2011-2015 −0.81 .044
2015-2021 −6.46 <.001
20-24 years 1990-1992 −9.62 <.001
1992-1995 −6.42 <.001
1995-1999 −2.99 <.001
1999-2006 −4.29 <.001 −3.07 <.001
2006-2010 3.95 <.001
2010-2016 0.24 .287
2016-2021 −6.00 <.001
25-29 years 1990-1996 −5.43 <.001
1996-2005 −2.74 <.001 −2.09 <.001
2005-2015 1.77 <.001
2015-2021 −3.99 <.001
30-34 years 1990-1992 −7.72 <.001
1992-2000 −5.74 <.001
2000-2006 −1.88 <.001 −2.68 <.001
2006-2015 2.18 <.001
2015-2021 −4.69 <.001
35-39 years 1990-1992 −8.24 <.001
1992-1995 −6.66 <.001
1995-2000 −10.59 <.001
2000-2006 −2.34 <.001 −3.66 <.001
2006-2011 1.44 .057
2011-2015 4.02 .018
2015-2021 −4.96 <.001
40-44 years 1990-1996 −11.15 <.001
1996-1999 −21.33 <.001
1999-2011 −2.43 <.001 −4.91 <.001
2011-2016 6.24 <.001
2016-2021 −2.75 .004
45-49 years 1990-1995 −10.51 <.001
1995-2000 −21.78 <.001
2000-2007 −8.22 <.001 −9.32 <.001
2007-2011 −17.37 <.001
2011-2016 5.10 <.001
2016-2021 −2.70 .001

Only a limited number of studies conducted in Iran have explored the prevalence of congenital abnormalities, yielding conflicting findings. One instance is a study from northern Iran employing the Tabriz Congenital Abnormalities Registration Program (TRoCA), which documented a rise in these conditions between 2000 and 2020. Conversely, research in Shahrekord indicated a decline in congenital hypothyroidism cases from 2006 to 2014.31,32 Additionally, investigations in Chongqing noted a downward trend in these ailments from 2007 to 2020, while a study in Ethiopia observed an uptick in cases from 2017 to 2019.33,34

Research indicates a strong connection between parental consanguinity and the presence of congenital abnormalities. 35 Our study highlighted that the highest rate of such conditions was found in Sistan and Baluchistan province. This trend can be attributed to cultural norms, ethnic factors, and limited access to screening services in the region. This aspect could not be examined in this descriptive study, highlighting one of its limitations.

Just like our research, several studies have indicated that the primary form of congenital abnormality is associated with cardiac malformations.7,36 A research conducted in South Africa in 2018 revealed a central birth prevalence rate of 15.57 per 1000 live births for congenital abnormalities, with the musculoskeletal system (32%) being the most commonly affected, followed by circulatory system malformations (19%). 37 Similarly, a study in Santa Catarina found that the average prevalence of congenital abnormalities during the same period was 8.9 per 1000 live births, slightly increasing from 9.4 per 1000 live births in 2010 and 8.2 per 1000 in 2018. 38

In a meta-analysis conducted in 2020, it was found that there has been a notable increase in the survival rates of children with specific birth defects in recent years. Additionally, a study in the United States revealed a declining trend in the mortality rates associated with congenital heart defects from 1999 to 2017.39,40

This study provides an important overview of the current status of congenital anomalies in Iran, highlighting trends in incidence and mortality. Given the high prevalence of consanguineous marriages, the aging population, and recent national policies promoting higher birth rates, monitoring congenital anomalies is crucial for healthcare planning and preventive strategies. Understanding these trends can help policymakers and healthcare providers develop targeted interventions to reduce the burden of these conditions. However, as a descriptive study, this research is limited in establishing causal relationships, and further analytical studies are needed to explore the underlying determinants of these trends.

Conclusion

This research showed that, overall, there is a decreasing trend in the incidence and mortality rates of congenital anomalies in both females and males in Iran. The hot spots for occurrence and death caused by these anomalies are concentrated in the east of Iran. For a more detailed analysis, future studies are recommended to investigate the subsets of congenital anomalies more deeply.

ICD-10 Codes for Congenital Abnormalities

The following table provides the ICD-10 codes for the congenital abnormalities discussed in this study:

  • Neural tube defects: Q00-Q01.9, Q05-Q05.9, Q07.01, Q07.03

  • Congenital heart anomalies: Q20-Q27, Q27.1-Q28.9

  • Orofacial clefts: Q35-Q37.9

  • Down syndrome: Q90-Q90.9

  • Turner syndrome: Q96-Q96.9

  • Klinefelter syndrome: Q98-Q98.9

  • Other chromosomal abnormalities: Q74.8, Q75.1, Q75.4, Q75.8, Q79.6, Q87-Q87.89, Q91-Q93.9, Q95, Q95.9, Q97-Q97.9, Q99-Q99.9

  • Congenital musculoskeletal and limb anomalies: Q65-Q65.2, Q65.8-Q66.1, Q68, Q68.1-Q68.2, Q68.6-Q74, Q74.1-Q74.5, Q74.9-Q75.0, Q75.5-Q76, Q76.1-Q76.49, Q76.8-Q79, Q79.8-Q79.9

  • Urogenital congenital anomalies: P96.0, Q50-Q52.2, Q52.4, Q52.6-Q52.9, Q54-Q55.2, Q55.22-Q57, Q64-Q64.19

  • Digestive congenital anomalies: Q38-Q38.0, Q38.3-Q38.4, Q38.6-Q43, Q43.1-Q45.8, Q79.0-Q79.59

  • Other congenital abnormalities: G71.2, Q02-Q04.9, Q06-Q07.0, Q07.9, Q10-Q15.9, Q17-Q18.9, Q27.0, Q30-Q34.9, Q38.1-Q38.2, Q38.5, Q39.0, Q41.9, Q53.0-Q53.9, Q56.20-Q56.21, Q63.3, Q65.3-Q65.6, Q66.2-Q67.8, Q68.0, Q68.3-Q68.8, Q74.0, Q75.2-Q75.3, Q76.0, Q76.5-Q76.7, Q80-Q86.8, Q89-Q89.8, Q95.0-Q95.11

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the Vice-Chancellor of Research of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical.

Footnotes

Ethical Considerations: This study was supported by Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences (Ethical code: IR.SSU.SPH.REC.1403.119)

Author Contributions: MTS: Conception and design. MK and MA: provision of study materials and collection of data. MK and MTS: Data analysis and interpretation. MTS serves as the lead author and guarantor. All the authors contributed to the research and agreed to be responsible for all aspects of this study.

Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Patient Involvement: Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

References

  • 1. WHO. Birth defects Report by the Secretariat [Internet]. 2010. Accessed 2024. https://apps.who.int/
  • 2. WHO. Congenital anomalies news room [Internet]. 2023. Accessed 2024. https://www.who.int/
  • 3. Lynn MK, Aquino MSR, Self SCW, Kanyangarara M, Campbell BA, Nolan MS. TORCH congenital syndrome infections in Central America’s northern triangle. Microorganisms. 2023;11(2):257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Acharya K, Rholl E, Malin K, et al. Parent health-related quality of life for infants with congenital anomalies receiving neonatal intensive care. J Pediatr. 2022;245(39-46):39-46.e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Shah NR, Kim KM, Wong V, et al. Mothers of children with major congenital anomalies have increased health care utilization over a 20-year post-birth time horizon. PLoS One. 2021;16(12):e0260962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Hug L, Alexander M, You D, Alkema L. National, regional, and global levels and trends in neonatal mortality between 1990 and 2017, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(6):e710-e720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Kang L, Cao G, Jing W, Liu J, Liu M. Global, regional, and national incidence and mortality of congenital birth defects from 1990 to 2019. Eur J Pediatr. 2023;182(4):1781-1792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Paulson KR, Kamath AM, Alam T. Global, regional, and national progress towards Sustainable Development Goal 3.2 for neonatal and child health: all-cause and cause-specific mortality findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2021;398(10303):870-905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Gianino MM, Lenzi J, Bonaudo M, et al. Patterns of amenable child mortality over time in 34 member countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD): evidence from a 15-year time trend analysis (2001–2015). BMJ Open. 2019;9(5):e027909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2095-2128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ameen SK, Alalaf SK, Shabila NP. Pattern of congenital anomalies at birth and their correlations with maternal characteristics in the maternity teaching hospital, Erbil city, Iraq. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kurdi AM, Majeed-Saidan MA, Al Rakaf MS, et al. Congenital anomalies and associated risk factors in a Saudi population: a cohort study from pregnancy to age 2 years. BMJ Open. 2019;9(9):e026351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Zaganjor I, Sekkarie A, Tsang BL, et al. Describing the prevalence of neural tube defects worldwide: a systematic literature review. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0151586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Kassa AM, Dahl M, Strinnholm M, Engstrand Lilja H. Attention difficulties and physical dysfunction common in children with complex congenital malformations: a study of preschool children with VACTERL association. Acta Paediatr. 2020;109(4):783-789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ahn D, Kim J, Kang J, Kim YH, Kim K. Congenital anomalies and maternal age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022;101(5):484-498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Daliri S, Sayehmiri K, Asadollahi K, Rezaei N, Saroukhani D, Karimi A. Prevalence of congenital anomalies in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran J Neonatol. 2018;9(2):21-32. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Dastgiri S, Heidarzadeh M, Dastgiri A. Tabriz registry of Congenital Anomalies: A report of 10 years of monitoring birth defects in I ran. Congenit Anom. 2013;53(2):98-99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Mashhadi Abdolahi H, Kargar Maher MH, Afsharnia F, Dastgiri S. Prevalence of congenital anomalies: a community-based study in the Northwest of Iran. Int Sch Res Notices. 2014;2014:1-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Rahnama F, Hasehmiyan M, Akbarzadeh R, Akabari A. The incidence of apparent congenital anomalies in neonates in Mobini Maternity Hospital in Sabzevar Iran in 2005-6. J Sabzevar Univ Med Sci. 1970;15(4):231-236. [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Sedighi I, Nouri S, Sabzehei MK, et al. Determining the risk factors of congenital anomalies of newborns in Hamadan province. J Compr Pediatr. 2020;11(2):e90907. [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Vatankhah S, Jalilvand M, Sarkhosh S, Azarmi M, Mohseni M. Prevalence of congenital anomalies in Iran: a review article. Iran J Public Health. 2017;46(6):733-743. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Global Burden of Disease; 2021. Accessed 2024. https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results
  • 23. Melo DG, Sanseverino MTV, Schmalfuss TO, Larrandaburu M. Why are birth defects surveillance programs important? Front Public Health. 2021;9:753342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Faal G, Abbasi R, Bijari B. The prevalence of major congenital anomalies among live births in Birjand, Iran. Mod Care J. 2018;15(2):e81084. doi: 10.5812/modernc.81084. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Verma RP. Evaluation and risk assessment of congenital anomalies in neonates. Children. 2021;8(10):862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Dashtaki NM, Hosseinpour M, Maracy MR. Incidence and associated factors of major congenital anomalies in newborns in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari, southwest of Iran. Int J Prev Med. 2022;13:150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Heidarzadeh M, Taheri M, Mazaheripour Z, Abbasi-Khameneh F. The incidence of congenital anomalies in newborns before and during the covid-19 pandemic. Ital J Pediatr. 2022;48(1):174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Nezami A, Heidari G, Tarhani F, Kariminia M. Prevalence of congenital heart disease among children in Khorramabad (West of Iran). Cardiovasc Hematol Disord Drug Targets. 2021;21(1):61-65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Khabiri R. A brief overview on the health insurance situation in Iran. Dep Health. 2023;14(4):393-396. [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Khosravipour E, Khosravipour B. The effect of media literacy education on facilitating women's entrepreneurship in social networks in Iran. News Sci Quart. 2024;12(3):85-107. [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Tarighat F, Golshan E, Dastgiri S. Prevalence of congenital anomalies in the northwest of Iran. Dep Health. 2021;12(4):417-425. doi: 10.34172/doh.2021.39. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Taheri Soodejani M, Tabatabaei SM, Shoraka HR, Fallahzadeh H, Ghaderi A. Trend of congenital hypothyroidism incidence and its affecting factors in Shahr-e-Kord, Western Iran. Iran J Public Health. 2020;49(5):989-994. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Song QX, Yang L, Feng M, et al. [Prevalence and trend analysis of severe multiple disabling birth defects in Chongqing City from 2007 to 2020]. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022;56(9):1257-1262. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20211104-01021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Silesh M, Lemma T, Fenta B, Biyazin T. Prevalence and trends of congenital anomalies among neonates at Jimma Medical Center, Jimma, Ethiopia: a three-year retrospective study. Pediatric Health Med Ther. 2021;12:61-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Asemi-Rad A, Heidari Z, Mahmoudzadeh-Sagheb H, et al. Prevalence of congenital anomalies and related factors in live births in Zahedan, Southeast of Iran: a cross-sectional study. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2023;21(8):647-656. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v21i8.14020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Chen L-J, Chiou J-Y, Huang J-Y, Su P-H, Chen J-Y. Birth defects in Taiwan: A 10-year nationwide population-based, cohort study. J Formos Med Assoc. 2020;119(1, Part 3):553-559. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2019.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Saib MZ, Dhada BL, Aldous C, Malherbe HL. Observed birth prevalence of congenital anomalies among live births at a regional facility in KwaZulu Natal Province, South Africa. PLoS One. 2021;16(8):e0255456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Vanassi BM, Parma GC, Magalhaes VS, Santos ACCD, Iser BPM. Congenital anomalies in Santa Catarina: case distribution and trends in 2010–2018. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2021;40:e2020331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Glinianaia SV, Morris JK, Best KE, et al. Long-term survival of children born with congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies. PLoS Med. 2020;17(9):e1003356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Lopez KN, Morris SA, Sexson Tejtel SK, Espaillat A, Salemi JL. US mortality attributable to congenital heart disease across the lifespan from 1999 through 2017 exposes persistent racial/ethnic disparities. Circulation. 2020;142(12):1132-1147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Sage Open Pediatrics are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES