ABSTRACT
Bifidobacterium longum plays a critical role in the human gut and exhibits diverse probiotic functions. Achieving high‐density fermentation of B. longum largely depends on the composition of the culture medium and fermentation conditions. This study aimed to optimize the medium composition and fermentation parameters for B. longum HSBL001, using viable cell counts and optical density at 600 nm (OD600) as indicators. The goal was to improve biomass yield and support the development and industrial application of highly active probiotic preparations. The optimal medium composition and culture conditions were established using a combination of single‐factor experiments, the Plackett–Burman design, the steepest ascent method, and the central composite design. The optimized culture medium consisted of yeast extract (19.524 g/L), yeast peptone (25.85 g/L), arginine (0.599 g/L), glucose (27.36 g/L), MnSO4 (0.09 g/L), MgSO4 (0.8 g/L), Tween‐80 (1 g/L), l‐cysteine hydrochloride (0.24 g/L), and methionine (0.15 g/L). The optimal culture conditions included an initial pH of 7.0, 5% inoculum size, and incubation at 37°C, yielding a final viable cell count of 4.20 × 109 colony‐forming units (CFU/mL). In a 3 L bioreactor, the viable cell count reached 1.17 × 1010 CFU/mL, which was 1.786 times higher than that achieved with the modified MRS medium. These findings demonstrate that the optimized medium and fermentation conditions are well‐suited for high‐density cultivation of B. longum HSBL001 and provide a basis for its industrial application.
Keywords: anaerobic fermentation, Bifidobacterium longum, high cell density culture, medium optimization, response surface methodology
The optimal culture medium formula and fermentation process of Bifidobacterium longum HSBL001 were determined, and the fermentation level reached 1.17 × 1010 colony‐forming units/mL, which lays a foundation for the industrial application of B. longum.

1. Introduction
Bifidobacterium is among the earliest microbial genera to colonize the human intestinal tract, and its abundance and diversity are closely associated with overall health (He et al. 2022). Within this genus, Bifidobacterium longum is considered a key member of the human intestinal microbiota and is the most abundant species in the intestinal tract of infants (Mills et al. 2023). Currently, it is widely applied in the food, pharmaceutical, animal feed, and healthcare industries and is recognized both domestically and internationally as a safe microbial strain for food processing (Takeda et al. 2023; Xiao et al. 2022; McCarville et al. 2017). Several studies have demonstrated the health benefits of B. longum, including the alleviation of irritable bowel syndrome (Lewis et al. 2020), improvement of inflammatory bowel disease (Yao et al. 2021), relief of constipation (Russo et al. 2017), improvement of immune function (Finamore et al. 2019), support of cognitive development (Inoue et al. 2018), mitigation of atopic dermatitis (Navarro‐López et al. 2018), management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (K. Gao et al. 2023), promotion of bone healing (Roberts et al. 2023), and facilitation of wound healing (Panagiotou et al. 2023).
The cultivation of Bifidobacterium requires a variety of nutrients, including carbon and nitrogen sources, essential growth factors, and mineral elements, as well as an anaerobic environment (Dang et al. 2021). Although several studies have explored the high‐density cultivation of Bifidobacterium, the methods developed are often unsuitable for large‐scale production due to low cell yields (D. Wang, Wang, et al. 2018), complex procedures (Lu 2005), and high costs (Lv and Liang 2016). Additionally, significant strain‐specific differences exist among different strains (X. Gao et al. 2021). Therefore, it is necessary to optimize the culture medium and fermentation conditions for newly identified strains with probiotic potential. The response surface methodology, which integrates factorial design and regression analysis, is a collection of statistical techniques used to design experiments, build predictive models, evaluate the effects of multiple factors, and identify optimal conditions for achieving target outcomes (Dong et al. 2014). This method is particularly more suitable for multifactorial experimental designs. This method has been widely employed in the optimization of medium formulations and fermentation processes, yielding promising results across various applications (Guan et al. 2023; Zalila‐Kolsi et al. 2022; Falah et al. 2021; Ras El Gherab et al. 2019).
In this study, B. longum HSBL001 was selected as the research subject, and a modified de Mann–Rogosa–Sharpe (MRS) medium was used as the basal culture medium. The composition of the growth medium for B. longum HSBL001 was optimized using a series of experimental approaches, including single‐factor analysis, Plackett–Burman design (PBD), the method of steepest ascent, and central composite design (CCD) response surface methodology. Additionally, the fermentation process was optimized and validated in a 3 L fermentor to provide a reference framework for the industrial application and large‐scale production of B. longum HSBL001.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Optimization of Carbon and Nitrogen Sources
The results of carbon source optimization are shown in Figure 1a. Among the tested carbon sources, maltose, glucose, and lactose showed a more favorable effect on the growth of B. longum HSBL001. The viable counts reached (1.745 ± 0.1061) × 109 colony‐forming units (CFU/mL) for maltose, (1.525 ± 0.1768) × 109 CFU/mL for glucose, and (1.47 ± 0.1131) × 109 CFU/mL for lactose. As an essential nutrient for microbial growth, the carbon source plays a critical role in both biomass accumulation (Kundu et al. 2013) and the activity of microbial metabolites (Zhang et al. 2021). When maltose was used at a concentration of 20 g/L, the viable cell count was the highest. However, since no statistically significant difference was observed among the three carbon sources (p > 0.05), glucose was selected for subsequent medium optimization due to its lower cost.
Figure 1.

Effect of carbon source and nitrogen sources on the growth of Bifidobacterium longum HSBL001. (a) Type of carbon source, (b) type of nitrogen source, (c) compound nitrogen sources, (d) the proportion of YE/YP, (e) the proportion of carbon and nitrogen sources, and (f) the total amount of carbon and nitrogen sources. BE, beef extract; P, peptone; SP, soy peptone; TP, tryptone; YE, yeast extract; YP, yeast peptone.
The screening and combination of nitrogen sources are shown in Figure 1b–d. The viable cell counts, ranked from highest to lowest, were observed in media containing yeast extract, beef extract, yeast peptone, and soybean peptone. The combination of yeast extract and yeast peptone yielded significantly higher viable counts compared to other groups, reaching (2.46 ± 0.2007) × 109 CFU/mL. When the ratio of yeast extract and yeast peptone was 1:2, the viable counts reached (2.3933 ± 0.0351) × 109 CFU/mL. As a key nutritional substrate, the nitrogen source plays a vital role in the growth of lactic acid bacteria. Due to the presence of proteolytic enzymes, different lactic acid bacteria exhibit varying preferences for nitrogen sources (Sun et al. 2021). The ability of B. longum to utilize a nitrogen source depends on its richness in growth‐promoting factors, with a preference for yeast‐based nitrogen sources (X. Gao et al. 2021). Compared with single nitrogen sources, compound nitrogen sources are generally more favorable for microbial growth. However, the effect of combining yeast‐derived nitrogen with other types of nitrogen sources can vary depending on the specific strain.
The optimization results for the carbon‐to‐nitrogen ratio are shown in Figure 1e,f. The best growth performance was achieved at a carbon‐to‐nitrogen ratio of 2:3. When the total concentration of carbon and nitrogen reached 60 g/L, the highest viable count was observed, reaching (2.7633 ± 0.0451) × 109 CFU/mL. The optimal carbon‐to‐nitrogen ratio varies among different Bifidobacterium strains (Yun et al. 2020). Maintaining a stable carbon source concentration, such as through carbon feeding based on alkali consumption, can significantly increase cell density (Cui et al. 2019). In addition, the optimal carbon‐to‐nitrogen ratio is equivalent to the consumption ratio at the point where the microbial growth rate begins to decline. At this stage, osmotic pressure can significantly affect cell growth and viability (Cui et al. 2021). Therefore, considering both cost efficiency and the influence of osmotic pressure, a total carbon and nitrogen concentration of 60 g/L was selected for subsequent optimization.
2.2. Optimization of Trace Elements and Growth Factors
The growth of B. longum HSBL001 initially increased and then decreased with increasing concentrations of Tween‐80 and l‐cysteine hydrochloride. As shown in Figure 2a,b, the optimal concentrations were 1 g/L for Tween‐80 and 0.3 g/L for l‐cysteine hydrochloride, resulting in viable counts of (3.27 ± 0.05) × 109 CFU/mL and (3.26 ± 0.0346) × 109 CFU/mL, respectively. The effects of metal ions on the growth of B. longum HSBL001 are shown in Figure 2c–e. Zinc sulfate, ferrous sulfate, and copper sulfate exhibited varying degrees of inhibitory effects on cell growth. In contrast, magnesium sulfate at 600 mg/L and manganese sulfate at 60 mg/L significantly promoted B. longum HSBL001 growth.
Figure 2.

Effect of the trace elements and growth factors on the growth of Bifidobacterium longum HSBL001. (a) Tween‐80, (b) l‐cysteine hydrochloride, (c) ZnSO4, FeSO4, and CuSO4, (d) MnSO4, (e) MgSO4, (f) amino acid, (g) nucleotide and vitamin, and (h) selected growth factors.
As a surfactant, Tween‐80 reduces cell agglutination and affects cell membrane permeability, thereby enhancing cell growth and promoting the extracellular release of metabolites (Y. Wang, Li, et al. 2018). l‐cysteine hydrochloride, a known reducing agent, lowers the redox potential of the fermentation broth and is thus considered a suitable additive for the cultivation of Bifidobacterium, which is highly sensitive to oxygen and hydrogen peroxide (Shu et al. 2013). Metal ions, serving as enzyme cofactors, can promote enzymatic reactions (X. Gao et al. 2021). Appropriate supplementation of trace elements can promote bacterial growth, whereas excessive amounts may exert toxic effects on bacterial cells (Boontun et al. 2021). Trace elements typically function as components of biologically active substances or serve as activators of enzymes.
Preliminary screening of growth factors based on cell density is shown in Figure 2f,g. The cell densities observed with the addition of arginine, glutamic acid, alanine, lysine, serine, glycine, methionine, guanine, adenine, thymine, vitamin B5, and vitamin C were higher than those of the control group. Therefore, viable cell counts for these selected growth factors were further evaluated, as shown in Figure 2h. The results indicated that specific concentrations of these compounds could enhance cell growth. Among them, 0.1 g/L methionine and 0.4 g/L arginine yielded significantly different viable counts, reaching (3.8867 ± 0.0814) × 109 CFU/mL and (3.767 ± 0.0814) × 109 CFU/mL, respectively.
Bifidobacterium is classified as a growth factor‐dependent heterotrophic microorganism. The addition of certain compounds, particularly those that are essential for regulating growth or metabolism but difficult for lactic acid bacteria to synthesize, can significantly enhance their growth (Yang et al. 2019). For example, tomato juice, which is rich in vitamins and minerals, has been shown to promote the growth of Bifidobacterium. The viable cell count of Bifidobacterium L‐DT reached 1.5 × 109 CFU/mL with the addition of 3% tomato juice (Lu 2005). Similarly, hydrolysates of yak κ‐casein using different proteases served as nitrogen sources for Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB12 and B. longum BBMN68, with amino acids such as alanine, methionine, tyrosine, phenylalanine, and arginine showing growth‐promoting effects (Tang et al. 2013), which aligns with our findings. Genome‐scale modeling has also revealed that methionine can serve as both the only amino acid and sulfur source for the growth of B. longum BB‐46 and Bifidobacterium lactis BB‐12 (Schöpping et al. 2021). Moreover, coenzyme A and pantothenic acid were found to promote growth in both strains, while vitamin B3 promoted only Bifidobacterium lactis BB‐12, and vitamin K was effective only for B. longum BB‐46. These findings underscore the strain‐specific requirements for growth factors. In this study, methionine and arginine were identified as the most effective compounds in promoting the growth of B. longum HSBL001.
2.3. PBD and Steepest Ascent Experiment
The Plackett–Burman experimental design and corresponding results are shown in Table 1. Nine factors were selected for evaluation: glucose (A), yeast extract (B), yeast peptone (C), magnesium sulfate heptahydrate (D), manganese sulfate monohydrate (E), Tween‐80 (F), l‐cysteine hydrochloride (G), methionine (H), and arginine (J). The results of the analysis of variance (ANOVA), shown in Table 2, indicate that the model is statistically significant, with a high correlation coefficient (R 2) of 0.9899, suggesting a strong correlation. Among the tested variables, yeast extract, yeast peptone, and arginine were identified as significant factors influencing cell growth. On the basis of predictions generated by Design‐Expert software, the optimized concentrations for the nonsignificant factors were as follows: glucose (27.36 g/L), manganese sulfate (0.09 g/L), magnesium sulfate (0.8 g/L), Tween‐80 (1 g/L), l‐cysteine hydrochloride (0.24 g/L), and methionine (0.15 g/L).
Table 1.
Plackett–Burman experiment design and results.
| Run order | A (g/L) | B (g/L) | C (g/L) | D (g/L) | E (g/L) | F (g/L) | G (g/L) | H (g/L) | J (g/L) | Actual viable cells (109 CFU/mL) | Predicted viable cells (109 CFU/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 3.52 | 3.4233 |
| 2 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 3.6133 | 3.71 |
| 3 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 3.1667 | 3.1089 |
| 4 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.7533 | 3.6956 |
| 5 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 3.94 | 3.8433 |
| 6 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 2.48 | 2.5378 |
| 7 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1.7867 | 1.8444 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 3.1733 | 3.27 |
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 3.5333 | 3.4367 |
| 10 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 3.6467 | 3.7044 |
| 11 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 3.6267 | 3.7233 |
| 12 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1.34 | 1.2822 |
Note: A, glucose; B, yeast extract; C, yeast peptone; D, manganese sulfate; E, magnesium sulfate; F, Tween‐80; G, l‐cysteine hydrochloride; H, methionine; J, arginine.
Table 2.
Variance analysis of Plackett–Burman experiment design.
| Source | Sum of squares | df | Mean square | F value | p value | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 7.46 | 9 | 0.8294 | 21.8 | 0.0446 | * |
| A | 0.0001 | 1 | 0.0001 | 0.0024 | 0.9651 | |
| B | 2 | 1 | 2 | 52.59 | 0.0185 | * |
| C | 2.5 | 1 | 2.5 | 65.62 | 0.0149 | * |
| D | 0.6565 | 1 | 0.6565 | 17.26 | 0.0534 | |
| E | 0.7008 | 1 | 0.7008 | 18.42 | 0.0502 | |
| F | 0.4058 | 1 | 0.4058 | 10.67 | 0.0823 | |
| G | 0.0695 | 1 | 0.0695 | 1.83 | 0.309 | |
| H | 0.1526 | 1 | 0.1526 | 4.01 | 0.1831 | |
| J | 0.9822 | 1 | 0.9822 | 25.82 | 0.0366 | * |
Note: A, glucose; B, yeast extract; C, yeast peptone; D, manganese sulfate; E, magnesium sulfate; F, Tween‐80; G, l‐cysteine hydrochloride; H, methionine; J, arginine.
R 2 = 0.9899, R 2 Adj = 0.9445; CV = 6.23%, Adeq Precision = 14.3838.
p < 0.05.
Table 2 shows that the sum of squares for yeast extract, yeast peptone, and arginine was all positive, indicating that their concentrations were positively correlated with cell growth in the PBD. Therefore, their levels were gradually increased in the steepest ascent experiment. As shown in Table 3, the fourth formulation yielded the highest viable cell count and was thus selected as the central point for the subsequent CCD experiment.
Table 3.
Steepest ascent coordination path and result.
| Step | B (g/L) | C (g/L) | J (g/L) | Viable cells (109 CFU/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base | 12 | 24 | 0.4 | 3.56 |
| Base + δ | 14 | 26 | 0.44 | 3.7467 |
| Base + 2δ | 16 | 28 | 0.48 | 3.88 |
| Base + 3δ | 18 | 30 | 0.52 | 4.1667 |
| Base + 4δ | 20 | 32 | 0.56 | 3.8267 |
| Base + 5δ | 22 | 34 | 0.6 | 3.58 |
Note: B, yeast extract; C, yeast peptone; J, arginine.
2.4. CCD Response Surface Experiment
On the basis of regression analysis of the experimental data, the quadratic polynomial regression equation describing the relationship between viable counts and the concentrations of yeast extract, yeast peptone, and arginine was derived as follows:
As shown in Table 4, the model was highly significant (p < 0.01), and the lack‐of‐fit term was not significant (p > 0.05). On the basis of the F values of the model terms, the order of influence on cell proliferation was as follows: yeast extract > arginine > yeast peptone. The linear terms A, C, A2, and C2 had significant effects on cell proliferation. Interaction terms AC and BC also showed significant effects on cell proliferation, while the other terms were not statistically significant. The correlation coefficients R 2 and R 2 Adj were 0.9523 and 0.9094, respectively, indicating that the model reliably explains most of the variability in the response. The Adeq Precision of the model was 16.0420, which is well above the commonly accepted threshold of 4, indicating a strong signal‐to‐noise ratio and high model credibility. A coefficient of variation below 10% is generally considered acceptable, with lower values indicating higher test reliability. The coefficient of variation of this model was 1.81%, further confirming the reliability of the experimental results (QX Cheng and Xiong 2020).
Table 4.
Variance analyses of the regression equation.
| Source | Sum of squares | df | Mean square | F value | p value | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modol | 0.9599 | 9 | 0.1067 | 22.1844 | < 0.0001 | ** |
| A | 0.2890 | 1 | 0.2890 | 60.1146 | < 0.0001 | ** |
| B | 0.0017 | 1 | 0.0017 | 0.3601 | 0.5618 | |
| C | 0.0533 | 1 | 0.0533 | 11.0836 | 0.0076 | ** |
| AB | 0.0028 | 1 | 0.0028 | 0.5842 | 0.4623 | |
| AC | 0.0246 | 1 | 0.0246 | 5.1095 | 0.0473 | * |
| BC | 0.0325 | 1 | 0.0325 | 6.7601 | 0.0265 | * |
| A2 | 0.5289 | 1 | 0.5289 | 110.0181 | < 0.0001 | ** |
| B2 | 0.0106 | 1 | 0.0106 | 2.2137 | 0.1676 | |
| C2 | 0.0553 | 1 | 0.0553 | 11.4966 | 0.0069 | ** |
| Residual | 0.0481 | 10 | 0.0048 | |||
| Lack of fit | 0.0329 | 5 | 0.0066 | 2.1629 | 0.2086 | |
| Pure error | 0.0152 | 5 | 0.0030 | |||
| Cor total | 1.0080 | 19 |
Note: A, yeast extract; B, yeast peptone; C, arginine; R 2 = 0.9523, R 2 Adj = 0.9094; CV = 1.81%; Adeq Precision = 16.0426.
p < 0.05
p < 0.01.
By maintaining one of the factors constant, the response surfaces illustrating the effects of the other two factors on viable cell counts were generated. The steeper the slope of the response surface, the more pronounced the influence of the factors on the response value. Moreover, an obliquely elliptical contour plot suggests significant interaction between the two factors (XY Cheng et al. 2023). The response surface plots and corresponding contour maps are shown in Figure 3. Viable cell counts initially increased and then decreased with increasing levels of each factor. Contour plots revealed a significant interaction between arginine (C) and both yeast extract (A) and yeast peptone (B) in influencing viable cell counts (Y) (p < 0.05).
Figure 3.

Effects of interaction among yeast extract, yeast peptone, and arginine on the cell density of Bifidobacterium longum HSBL001. a1, a2: Representing AB interaction when C is constant. b1, b2: Representing AC interaction when B is constant. c1, c2: Representing BC interaction when A is constant. Blue color indicates the lowest response viable cells count, while the red color shows the highest value of response viable cells count.
On the basis of the regression model, the optimal concentrations for maximizing viable cell counts were determined as follows: yeast extract 19.524 g/L, yeast peptone 25.85 g/L, and arginine 0.599 g/L. The predicted viable count under these conditions was 4.06103 × 109 CFU/mL. To validate the reliability of the model and optimization results, verification experiments were conducted, yielding an actual viable count of (3.93 ± 0.0794) × 109 CFU/mL. This value represents a 2.58‐fold increase compared to the modified MRS medium. The close agreement between the predicted and experimental values confirms the reliability of the model, demonstrating that it can effectively predict the effect of medium composition on bacterial growth. Similar findings have been reported in recent studies. For example, the application of a Box–Behnken design for medium optimization increased the viable cell count of Lactobacillus plantarum Y44 by 6.11‐fold (Ding et al. 2023). Another study using a response surface methodology achieved a 107% increase in the cell dry weight of L. plantarum Pi06 (Hwang et al. 2012).
2.5. Optimization of Culture Condition
The optimization results for fermentation parameters are shown in Figure 4. The viable cell count of B. longum HSBL001 initially increased and then decreased with increasing initial pH, inoculation size, and fermentation temperature. At an initial pH of 6, the highest viable cell count was observed, reaching (4.0833 ± 0.1041) × 109 CFU/mL. An appropriate initial pH enhances cell membrane fluidity and maintains its integrity by increasing the degree of unsaturation of membrane fatty acids (Sun et al. 2022). The highest viable cell count of (4.2267 ± 0.0462) × 109 CFU/mL was obtained at an inoculum size of 5% (v/v). Inoculum size significantly affects the entire fermentation process. A low inoculation level may extend the fermentation time, while excessive inoculation can result in rapid nutrient depletion, thereby shortening the logarithmic and stationary phases and affecting bacterial viability (YW Lin et al. 2017). The viable cell count reached (4.1867 ± 0.0808) × 109 CFU/mL at 37°C, which was significantly higher than the counts observed at other temperatures. A recent study reported that the optimal cultivation temperature for B. longum ranges from 37°C to 42°C (D. Wang, Wang, et al. 2018). Temperature plays a critical role in regulating intracellular enzyme activity in cells. Deviations from the optimal range, either too high or too low, can impair metabolic functions and inhibit bacterial growth (Choi et al. 2021).
Figure 4.

Effects of culture conditions on the growth of Bifidobacterium longum HSBL001. (a) Temperature, (b) inoculation volume, and (c) pH value.
2.6. Comparison of Optimized and Modified MRS Medium in a Bioreactor
The growth curve of B. longum HSBL001 cultured in modified MRS medium and then optimized medium under identical conditions (37°C, pH 6.0, 150 rpm, 5% inoculum) is shown in Figure 5. In both the modified MRS medium and the optimized formulation, the cell density of Bifidobacterium HSBL001 remained relatively constant from 0 to 2 h. A rapid increase in cell density was observed starting at 4 h, reaching maximum values of 1.6 and 1.77 at 12 h in the modified and optimized media, respectively, after which growth stabilized. These results indicate that the specific growth rate of Bifidobacterium HSBL001 was higher in the optimized medium compared to the modified MRS medium. As shown in Figure 5, both media exhibited a lag phase from 0 to 4 h, an exponential growth phase from 4 to 10 h, and a stationary phase after 10 h. The viable cell count in the modified MRS medium reached (6.53 ± 0.61) × 109 CFU/mL at 20 h, whereas the optimized formulation achieved (1.17 ± 0.05) × 1010 CFU/mL at 24 h, representing a 1.786‐fold increase over the modified MRS medium.
Figure 5.

The growth curve of Bifidobacterium longum HSBL001 in modified MRS medium and optimized medium. MRS, de Mann–Rogosa–Sharpe.
Three strains of B. longum have been reported to achieve high cell densities using different concentrations of glucose, yeast extract, and MgSO4 as medium components. Under fermentation conditions of 5% inoculum and a constant pH of 5.0, the final viable cell counts in the fermentation broth reached 0.79 × 1010, 0.95 × 1010, and 1.1 × 1010 CFU/mL, respectively (X. Gao et al. 2021). Similarly, L. plantarum 200655 achieved a viable count of 9.56 log CFU/mL in MRS medium, while the optimized medium formula increased this to 10.03 log CFU/mL (YW Lin et al. 2017). Currently, industrial‐scale production primarily relies on pH‐controlled batch fermentation. Higher fermentation efficiency can be achieved by maintaining an optimal carbon‐to‐nitrogen ratio and mitigating osmotic stress during the process (Zhang et al. 2022). Furthermore, continuous fermentation with an integrated membrane filtration system has been shown to enhance nutrient utilization, biomass, and metabolite production (Mende et al. 2012). However, this approach carries a higher risk of microbial contamination. Future advancements may focus on the application of targeted nutritional supplementation to further improve fermentation performance.
3. Conclusion
In this study, the culture medium composition and fermentation conditions for B. longum HSBL001 were systematically optimized. The resulting optimal medium formulation consisted of yeast extract (19.524 g/L), yeast peptone (25.85 g/L), arginine (0.599 g/L), glucose (27.36 g/L), manganese sulfate (0.09 g/L), magnesium sulfate (0.8 g/L), Tween‐80 (1 g/L), l‐cysteine (0.24 g/L), methionine (0.15 g/L), potassium dihydrogen phosphate (2 g/L), sodium acetate (4 g/L), and ammonium citrate (2 g/L). The optimal culture conditions included a 5% inoculum size, fermentation temperature of 37°C, and an initial pH of 6.0, under which a viable cell count of 4.20 × 109 CFU/mL was achieved in shaking flask fermentation. When scaled up to a 3 L bioreactor, the viable cell count reached 1.17 × 1010 CFU/mL, representing a 1.786‐fold increase compared to the modified MRS medium. These results showed that the optimized medium and fermentation strategy significantly enhance the growth of B. longum HSBL001, providing a valuable reference for its future industrial‐scale production.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Microbial Strain and Medium
B. longum HSBL001, originally isolated from the feces of healthy infants, has been used commercially in the probiotic formulation BIFIDO (Jincheng Health Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Jincheng, China) for over 20 years (Fu Huiling and Wei 2002; Bai Xiaoru et al. 2003). The strain was preserved in glycerol cryovials at −80°C and revived on MRS agar supplemented with 0.05% l‐cysteine hydrochloride. Cultures were incubated anaerobically at 37°C for 48 −72 h. A single colony was then selected and transferred into modified MRS broth for 24 h. This activation procedure was repeated twice to obtain a viable working culture for subsequent experiments (Averina et al. 2023). Fermentation conditions for the preculture were as follows: initial pH of 7.0, inoculum size of 2%, and anaerobic incubation at 37°C for 18 h. All culture operations were conducted in an anaerobic workstation (A35 Anaero Workstation, Don Whitley Scientific Ltd., UK) to ensure strict anaerobic conditions.
4.2. Single‐Factor Optimization of Medium Composition
Single‐factor experiments were conducted to optimize the composition of the growth medium, including carbon and nitrogen sources, their ratio and total concentration, Tween‐80, l‐cysteine hydrochloride, trace elements, and growth factors. All experiments were carried out in a 50 mL fermentation system. To determine the optimal carbon source, six carbohydrates, sucrose, glucose, lactose, fructose, maltose, and trehalose, were each added at a concentration of 20 g/L. For nitrogen source optimization, 25 g/L of each of the following was tested: peptone, soybean peptone, yeast extract, beef extract powder, casein peptone, and tryptone. The best‐performing nitrogen source was then combined at a 1:1 ratio with the others to identify the most effective nitrogen source combination. Next, the optimal mixing ratio of compound nitrogen sources was evaluated using seven proportions: 1:3, 1:2, 2:3, 1:1, 3:2, 2:1, and 3:1. Keeping the total carbon and nitrogen concentration constant at 60 g/L, single‐factor experiments were conducted to determine the best carbon‐to‐nitrogen ratio using the same set of proportions. Finally, the total concentrations of carbon and nitrogen were tested at 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 g/L to identify the ideal overall nutrient composition. On the basis of these results, Tween‐80 was tested at concentrations of 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, and 1.5 g/L, while l‐cysteine hydrochloride was tested at 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, and 0.9 g/L to determine the optimal levels of these additives.
Trace element optimization was performed by evaluating the viable cell counts in a culture medium supplemented with different concentrations of zinc sulfate heptahydrate, ferric sulfate heptahydrate, copper sulfate pentahydrate, manganese sulfate monohydrate, and magnesium sulfate heptahydrate. To identify suitable factors, the OD600 was measured in media containing 15 amino acids (aspartic acid, arginine, glutamic acid, alanine, lysine, serine, glycine, methionine, phenylalanine, asparagine, proline, histidine, isoleucine, valine, and threonine), five nucleotides (uracil, guanine, adenine, cytosine, and thymine), and five vitamins (VB1, VB2, VB5, VB6, and VC). Final selections and concentrations of optimal growth factors were then determined based on viable cell counts.
4.3. PBD and Steepest Ascent Method
On the basis of the results of the preliminary single‐factor optimization experiments, a PBD was employed to identify the most significant factors influencing the growth of B. longum HSBL001. The variables selected for evaluation included glucose (A), yeast extract (B), yeast peptone (C), magnesium sulfate heptahydrate (D), manganese sulfate monohydrate (E), Tween‐80 (F), l‐cysteine hydrochloride (G), methionine (H), and arginine (J). Each factor was tested at two levels, coded as −1 (low) and +1 (high). The left side of the design matrix represents the low level (−1), while the right side represents the high level (+1). The specific values and coding of each variable are presented in Table 5. Following the PB screening, the factors with statistically significant effects were identified based on their regression coefficients. These selected variables were then subjected to the steepest ascent method to determine the optimal direction and magnitude for increasing the response value. This process facilitated the identification of the region near the optimal response and provided the central point for the subsequent CCD experiments. The design and results of the steepest ascent experiment are shown in Table 6.
Table 5.
Factors and levels of Plackett–Burman design.
| Factors | Coding | Low level (−1) (g/L) | High level (+1) (g/L) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose | A | 19 | 29 |
| Yeast extract | B | 7 | 17 |
| Yeast peptone | C | 19 | 29 |
| Magnesium sulfate heptahydrate | D | 0.03 | 0.09 |
| Manganese sulfate monohydrate | E | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Tween‐80 | F | 0.5 | 1 |
| l‐cysteine hydrochloride | G | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Methionine | H | 0.05 | 0.15 |
| Arginine | J | 0.3 | 0.5 |
Note: A, glucose; B, yeast extract; C, yeast peptone; D, manganese sulfate; E, magnesium sulfate; F, Tween‐80; G, l‐cysteine hydrochloride; H, methionine; J, arginine.
Table 6.
Steepest ascent method design.
| Step | B | C | J |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base | 12 | 24 | 0.4 |
| δ | 2 | 2 | 0.04 |
| Base + δ | 14 | 26 | 0.44 |
| Base + 2δ | 16 | 28 | 0.48 |
| Base + 3δ | 18 | 30 | 0.52 |
| Base + 4δ | 20 | 32 | 0.56 |
| Base + 5δ | 22 | 34 | 0.6 |
Note: B, yeast extract; C, yeast peptone; J, arginine.
4.4. Response Surface Methodology
On the basis of the previous PBD and the steepest ascent method, the central point for a CCD was determined. CCD was employed to further optimize the medium composition by exploring the interactions and quadratic effects of the key variables. Using Design‐Expert software, a CCD matrix was constructed, incorporating three significant factors at five coded levels each, as shown in Table 7. The experimental design consisted of 14 factorial and axial points, along with six replicates at the center point, to estimate experimental error, yielding a total of 20 experimental runs (Table 8). Regression analysis of the test results obtained from the CCD was performed and fitted to a quadratic polynomial model to predict the optimal medium formulation.
Table 7.
Factors range of central composite design experiments.
| Factors | Unit | Level | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1.68179 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 1.68179 | ||
| Yeast extract | g/L | 9.59 | 13 | 18 | 23 | 26.41 |
| Yeast peptone | g/L | 21.59 | 25 | 30 | 35 | 38.41 |
| Arginine | g/L | 0.35 | 0.42 | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.69 |
Table 8.
Experimental design and results for response surface analysis.
| Run | A (g/L) | B (g/L) | C (g/L) | Actual viable cells (109 CFU/mL) | Predicted viable cells (109 CFU/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 3.4467 | 3.145 |
| 2 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 3.78 | 3.6598 |
| 3 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 3.6033 | 3.4194 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 3.93 | 3.8594 |
| 5 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 3.78 | 3.756 |
| 6 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 3.96 | 3.898 |
| 7 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 3.75 | 3.6016 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.7867 | 3.6688 |
| 9 | −1.68179 | 0 | 0 | 3.1233 | 3.233374742 |
| 10 | 1.68179 | 0 | 0 | 3.7833 | 3.722775632 |
| 11 | 0 | −1.68179 | 0 | 3.9033 | 3.924062814 |
| 12 | 0 | 1.68179 | 0 | 3.9333 | 3.962071268 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | −1.68179 | 3.72 | 3.347705107 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 1.68179 | 3.92 | 3.701217365 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.06 | 4.02 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.10 | 4.02 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.04 | 4.02 |
| 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.98 | 4.02 |
| 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.96 | 4.02 |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.98 | 4.02 |
Note: A, yeast extract; B, yeast peptone; C, arginine.
4.5. Effects of Fermentation Conditions
To determine the optimal culture conditions for B. longum HSBL001, the effects of initial pH, fermentation temperature, and inoculation amount on viable cell counts were systematically evaluated. The initial pH of the culture medium was adjusted to values ranging from 5.0 to 8.0 using 1 M HCl or 1 M NaOH. Fermentation temperatures were set between 27°C and 42°C. Inoculation levels were set between 1% and 9% (v/v). Each fermentation trial was conducted under anaerobic conditions for 18 h, and the viable cell counts were measured to identify the optimal combination of fermentation parameters.
4.6. Scale‐Up Fermentation of Optimized Medium
Scale‐up fermentation of B. longum HSBL001 using the optimized medium and conditions was performed in a 3 L bioreactor with a working volume of 2 L. The fermentation medium was inoculated with 5% (v/v) of seed culture, previously grown in the optimized medium for 18 h. The temperature was controlled at 37°C, and the pH was maintained at 6.0 by automated addition of 1 M NaOH. The agitation speed was set to 150 rpm. To ensure strict anaerobic conditions, nitrogen gas was continuously sparged to remove residual oxygen and maintain a vessel pressure of 0.05 MPa. Fermentation using the modified MRS medium was conducted in parallel under identical conditions as a control. OD600 and viable cell counts were measured every 2 h over 24 h.
4.7. Assay of Cell Density (OD600) and Viable Cell Counts
The optical density of B. longum HSBL001 fermentation broth was measured using a multimode microplate reader (EnSight, PerkinElmer Ltd., USA) at a wavelength of 600 nm. The uninoculated medium served as the blank control. For viable cell enumeration, fermentation broth samples were serially diluted in sterile phosphate‐buffered saline, and appropriate dilutions were plated using the pour plate method on modified MRS agar. The plates were incubated anaerobically at 37°C for 48 h, after which CFU/mL were calculated.
4.8. Statistical Analysis
All experiments were performed independently in triplicate, and the results are presented as mean ± standard error (SE). PBD and CCD were implemented using Design‐Expert software (version 13) for experimental design and regression analysis. ANOVA was performed using Jamovi software (version 2.4.8). A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Author Contributions
Hao Cheng: conceptualization (lead), data curation (equal), formal analysis (lead), investigation (equal), methodology (lead), writing – original draft (lead), writing – review and editing (equal). Jiangbin Liu: formal analysis (equal), investigation (equal), visualization (equal), writing – original draft (supporting). Liya Mei: investigation (equal), writing – original draft (equal). Wei Liu: investigation (equal), validation (equal). Fengxi Yang: investigation (equal), validation (equal). Xiaojuan Ma: investigation (equal). Yan Zhang: investigation (equal). Youfa Xie: supervision (equal), writing – review and editing (equal). Yang Zhang: supervision (equal), writing – review and editing (equal). Yanxia Xiong: supervision (equal), writing – review and editing (equal).
Conflicts of Interest
None declared.
Contributor Information
Youfa Xie, Email: xieyoufa@crjz.com.
Yang Zhang, Email: zhangyang647@crjz.com.
Yanxia Xiong, Email: xiongyx@crjz.com.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
References
- Averina, O. V. , Kovtun A. S., Mavletova D. A., et al. 2023. “Oxidative Stress Response of Probiotic Strain Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum GT15.” Foods 12: 3356. 10.3390/foods12183356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bai Xiaoru, C. J. , Yanli P., and Jianuo W.. 2003. “Study the Effects on 289 Irrtable Bowel Syndromf Patients Used With BIFIDO.” Chinese Journal of Microecology 15: 156. [Google Scholar]
- Boontun, C. , Vatanyoopaisarn S., Hankla S., et al. 2021. “Modification of Media Using Food‐Grade Components for the Fermentation of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus Strains in Large‐Scale Bioreactors.” Preparative Biochemistry and Biotechnology 54, no. 8: 1017–1027. 10.1080/10826068.2020.1861009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choi, G. H. , Lee N. K., and Paik H. D.. 2021. “Optimization of Medium Composition for Biomass Production of Lactobacillus plantarum 200655 Using Response Surface Methodology.” Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 31: 717–725. 10.4014/jmb.2103.03018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cui, S. , Sadiq F. A., Mao B., et al. 2019. “High‐Density Cultivation of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium Using an Automatic Feedback Feeding Method.” LWT 112: 108232. 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.05.130. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cui, S. , Zhu D., Mao B., et al. 2021. “Rapid Evaluation of Optimal Growth Substrates and Improvement of Industrial Production of Bifidobacterium adolescentis Based on the Automatic Feedback Feeding Method.” LWT 143: 110960. 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.110960. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Dang, T. D. , Yong C. C., Rheem S., and Oh S.. 2021. “Optimizing the Composition of the Medium for the Viable Cells of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis JNU306 Using Response Surface Methodology.” Journal of Animal Science and Technology 63: 603–613. 10.5187/jast.2021.e43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ding, X. , Qian F., Mu G., and Tuo Y.. 2023. “Optimization of Medium Composition of Lactobacillus plantarum Y44 Using Plackett–Burman and Box–Behnken Designs.” Preparative Biochemistry & Biotechnology 53: 1058–1066. 10.1080/10826068.2023.2166957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dong, Z. , Gu L., Zhang J., et al. 2014. “Optimisation for High Cell Density Cultivation. High Cell Density Cultivation of Lactobacillus salivarius BBE 09‐18 With Response Surface Methodology.” International Dairy Journal 34: 230–236. 10.1016/j.idairyj.2013.07.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Falah, F. , Vasiee A., Alizadeh Behbahani B., Tabatabaee Yazdi F., and Mortazavi S. A.. 2021. “Optimization of Gamma‐Aminobutyric Acid Production. Gamma‐Aminobutyric Acid Production by Lactobacillus brevis Brevis PML1 in Dairy Sludge‐Based Culture Medium Through Response Surface Methodology.” Food Science & Nutrition 9: 3317–3326. 10.1002/fsn3.2304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Finamore, A. , Roselli M., Donini L., et al. 2019. “Supplementation With Bifidobacterium longum Bar33 and Lactobacillus helveticus Bar13 Mixture Improves Immunity in Elderly Humans (Over 75 Years) and Aged Mice.” Nutrition 63–64: 184–192. 10.1016/j.nut.2019.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fu Huiling, Z. B. , and Wei W.. 2002. “Clinical Observation on the Treatment of Diarrhea With BIFIDO.” Chinese Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics 17: 681–682. [Google Scholar]
- Gao, X. , Cui S., Tang X., et al. 2021. “Optimization of Substrate in High‐Density Fermentation of Bifidobacterium longum .” Food and Fermentation Industries 47: 12–20. [Google Scholar]
- Gao, K. , Ren X., Chen C., et al. 2023. “Oral Administration of Bifidobacterium longum WHH2270 Ameliorates Type 2 Diabetes in Rats.” Journal of Food Science 88: 3967–3983. 10.1111/1750-3841.16727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guan, X. , Zhang J., Xu N., et al. 2023. “Optimization of Culture Medium and Scale‐Up Production of Astaxanthin Using Corn Steep Liquor as Substrate by Response Surface Methodology.” Preparative Biochemistry & Biotechnology 53: 443–453. 10.1080/10826068.2022.2098324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- He, B. L. , Xiong Y., Hu T. G., et al. 2022. “ Bifidobacterium spp. as Functional Foods: A Review of Current Status, Challenges, and Strategies.” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 63, no. 26: 8048–8065. 10.1080/10408398.2022.2054934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hwang, C. F. , Chang J. H., Houng J. Y., Tsai C. C., Lin C. K., and Tsen H. Y.. 2012. “Optimization of Medium Composition for Improving Biomass Production of Lactobacillus plantarum Pi06 Using the Taguchi Array Design and the Box–Behnken Method.” Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering 17: 827–834. [Google Scholar]
- Inoue, T. , Kobayashi Y., Mori N., et al. 2018. “Effect of Combined Bifidobacteria Supplementation and Resistance Training on Cognitive Function, Body Composition and Bowel Habits of Healthy Elderly Subjects.” Beneficial Microbes 9: 843–854. 10.3920/BM2017.0193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kundu, K. , Bergmann I., Hahnke S., Klocke M., Sharma S., and Sreekrishnan T. R.. 2013. “Carbon Source—A Strong Determinant of Microbial Community Structure and Performance of an Anaerobic Reactor.” Journal of Biotechnology 168: 616–624. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewis, E. D. , Antony J. M., Crowley D. C., et al. 2020. “Efficacy of Lactobacillus paracasei HA‐196 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175 in Alleviating Symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS): A Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled Study.” Nutrients 12: 1159. 10.3390/nu12041159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu, L. Y. X. X. Q. 2005. “High Cell Density Culture of Lactobacillus sp. by Semi‐Continuous Way.” Science & Technology of Food Industry 26: 47–49. [Google Scholar]
- Lv, X. , and Liang J.. 2016. “Breeding of Oxygen‐Resistant Bifidobacterium longum and Its High‐Density Fermentation Conditions.” Science & Technology of Food Industry 37: 159–163. [Google Scholar]
- McCarville, J. L. , Dong J., Caminero A., et al. 2017. “A Commensal Bifidobacterium longum Strain Prevents Gluten‐Related Immunopathology in Mice Through Expression of a Serine Protease Inhibitor.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 83. 10.1128/AEM.01323-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mende, S. , Krzyzanowski L., Weber J., Jaros D., and Rohm H.. 2012. “Growth and Exopolysaccharide Yield of Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus DSM 20081 in Batch and Continuous Bioreactor Experiments at Constant pH.” Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 113: 185–191. 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2011.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mills, S. , Yang B., Smith G. J., Stanton C., and Ross R. P.. 2023. “Efficacy of Bifidobacterium longum Alone or in Multi‐Strain Probiotic Formulations During Early Life and Beyond.” Gut Microbes 15: 2186098. 10.1080/19490976.2023.2186098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Navarro‐López, V. , Ramírez‐Boscá A., Ramón‐Vidal D., et al. 2018. “Effect of Oral Administration of a Mixture of Probiotic Strains on SCORAD Index and Use of Topical Steroids in Young Patients With Moderate Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.” JAMA Dermatology 154: 37–43. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.3647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Panagiotou, D. , Filidou E., Gaitanidou M., et al. 2023. “Role of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum UBLP‐40, Lactobacillus rhamnosus UBLR‐58 and Bifidobacterium longum UBBL‐64 in the Wound Healing Process of the Excisional Skin.” Nutrients 15: 1822. 10.3390/nu15081822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, H. , Qin X., and Xiong T.. 2020. “Response Surface Optimization of Production of Lactic Acid Bacteria Fermented Lycium barbarum Powder by Spray Drying.” Journal of Nanchang University (Natural Science) 44: 135–142. [Google Scholar]
- Ras El Gherab, F. Z. , Hassaine O., Zadi‐Karam H., and Karam N. E.. 2019. “Statistical Optimization for the Development of a Culture Medium Based on the Juice of Waste‐Dates for Growth of Lactococcus lactis LCL Strain by Using the Plackett–Burman and Response Surface Methodology.” Waste and Biomass Valorization 10: 2943–2957. 10.1007/s12649-018-0283-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Roberts, J. L. , Golloshi M., Harding D. B., Conduah M., Liu G., and Drissi H.. 2023. “ Bifidobacterium longum Supplementation Improves Age‐Related Delays in Fracture Repair.” Aging Cell 22: e13786. 10.1111/acel.13786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Russo, M. , Giugliano F. P., Quitadamo P., Mancusi V., Miele E., and Staiano A.. 2017. “Efficacy of a Mixture of Probiotic Agents as Complementary Therapy for Chronic Functional Constipation in Childhood.” Italian Journal of Pediatrics 43: 24. 10.1186/s13052-017-0334-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schöpping, M. , Gaspar P., Neves A. R., Franzén C. J., and Zeidan A. A.. 2021. “Identifying the Essential Nutritional Requirements of the Probiotic Bacteria Bifidobacterium animalis and Bifidobacterium longum Through Genome‐Scale Modeling.” NPJ Systems Biology and Applications 7: 47. 10.1038/s41540-021-00207-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shu, G. , Yang H., Tao Q., and He C.. 2013. “Effect of Ascorbic Acid and Cysteine Hydrochloride on Growth of Bifidobacterium bifidum .” Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology 5: 678–681. 10.19026/ajfst.5.3148. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sun, Y. , Cui S., Tang X., et al. 2021. “Growth Limiting Factors of Lactobacillus fermentum and Optimization of Its High‐Density Cultivation.” Food and Fermentation Industries 47: 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, Y. , Huang H., Liu Z., et al. 2022. “Optimization of Medium Composition and Culture Conditions of Lactobacillus plantarum NCU137.” Journal of Chinese Institute Of Food Science and Technology 22: 223–233. [Google Scholar]
- Takeda, T. , Asaoka D., Nojiri S., et al. 2023. “Usefulness of Bifidobacterium longum BB536 in Elderly Individuals With Chronic Constipation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” American Journal of Gastroenterology 118: 561–568. 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tang, X. , Tian Q., Cheng X., et al. 2013. “Bifidobacterial Growth–Promoting Effect of Yak Milk κ‐Casein Hydrolysates Produced With Different Proteases.” International Journal of Food Science & Technology 48: 1682–1687. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, D. , Wang S., Liu L., et al. 2018. “High Density Culture of Bifidobacterium longum L‐DT.” Journal of China Agricultural University 23: 106–113. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y. , Li Q., and Li P.. 2018. “Optimization of Fermentation Conditions for Plantaricin Production by Lactobacillus plantarum LPL‐1 by Response Surface Methodology and Its Physicochemical Properties.” Food Science 39: 101–109. [Google Scholar]
- Xiao, F. , Dong F., Li X., et al. 2022. “ Bifidobacterium longum CECT 7894 Improves the Efficacy of Infliximab for DSS‐Induced Colitis via Regulating the Gut Microbiota and Bile Acid Metabolism.” Frontiers in Pharmacology 13: 902337. 10.3389/fphar.2022.902337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, H. , Ma X., Liu J., et al. 2023. “Optimization of Fermentation Process of Pueraria Yogurt by Response Surface Methodology.” China Food Additives 34: 174–181. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, R. , Li B., Wang Y., et al. 2019. “Optimization of High Cell Density Culture of Lactobacillus buchneri IMAU80233.” Food Science 40: 147–154. [Google Scholar]
- Yao, S. , Zhao Z., Wang W., and Liu X.. 2021. “ Bifidobacterium longum: Protection Against Inflammatory Bowel Disease.” Journal of Immunology Research 2021: 8030297. 10.1155/2021/8030297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yun, H. , Ahyun L., Kim J. E., et al. 2020. “Optimization of Cell Viability and Environmental Factor for the High Cell Density Cultivation of Bifidobacterium sp.” Korean Society for Biotechnology and Bioengineering Journal 35: 34–43. 10.7841/ksbbj.2020.35.1.34. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lin, X. , Yin W., Zhang Z., et al. 2017. “Optimization of Fermentation Conditions for Bifidobacrium animalis Production on Design‐Expert.” Food Research and Development 38: 144–148. [Google Scholar]
- Zalila‐Kolsi, I. , Kessentini S., Tounsi S., and Jamoussi K.. 2022. “Optimization of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BLB369 Culture Medium by Response Surface Methodology for Low Cost Production of Antifungal Activity.” Microorganisms 10: 830. 10.3390/microorganisms10040830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y. , Dai X., Jin H., Man C., and Jiang Y.. 2021. “The Effect of Optimized Carbon Source on the Synthesis and Composition of Exopolysaccharides Produced by Lactobacillus paracasei .” Journal of Dairy Science 104: 4023–4032. 10.3168/jds.2020-19448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y. , Mao B., Tang X., et al. 2022. “Integrative Genome and Metabolome Analysis Reveal the Potential Mechanism of Osmotic Stress Tolerance in Bifidobacterium bifidum .” LWT 159: 113199. 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113199. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
