Skip to main content
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
. 2025 Jun 19;15:1623241. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1623241

Tracing the evolutionary trajectory of the IncP-2 plasmid co-harboring bla IMP-45 and bla VIM-1: an outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa co-producing IMP-45 and VIM-1 carbapenemases in China

Yiqun Ma 1,2,3, Zichen Lei 2,3,4, Yulin Zhang 2,3, Qi Liu 2,3,4, Feilong Zhang 2,3,5, Hao Zu 6, Xinrui Yang 2,3,5, Ziyao Li 2,3,5, Binghuai Lu 1,2,3,4,5,*
PMCID: PMC12222221  PMID: 40612392

Abstract

Background

Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) poses a significant global health risk, particularly for immunocompromised individuals. This study documents an outbreak of CRPA strains co-harboring bla VIM-1 and bla IMP-45 on IncP-2 plasmids in a Chinese tertiary hospital, resulting in poor outcomes for transplant patients.

Methods

17 ST313 VIM-1-IMP-45 CRPA strains were collected from transplant patients, and antibiotic susceptibility was tested via microbroth dilution. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) identified drug resistance and virulence mechanisms, analyzed ST313 P. aeruginosa phylogeny, and traced bla VIM-1 and bla IMP-45 origins. Conjugation experiments were conducted to assess the conjugative potential of the IncP-2 plasmid co-harboring bla VIM-1 and bla IMP-45. Structural and molecular docking studies explored the PBP3 (P527S) mutation’s role in aztreonam resistance.

Results

From February 2022 to July 2024, 17 ST313 VIM-1-IMP-45 CRPA strains from 10 transplant patients were identified. All strains were extensively drug-resistant but sensitive to colistin and cefiderocol. WGS showed bla IMP-45 and bla VIM-1 on an IncP-2 megaplasmid. Phylogenetic analysis indicated high homology with plasmids carrying bla IMP-45. Further analysis of the genetic environment showed that the IncP-2 plasmid co-harboring bla VIM-1 and bla IMP-45 was formed by the insertion of a Tn3-family transposon carrying bla VIM-1 into the IncP-2 plasmid carrying bla IMP-45. In addition aztreonam-resistant strains (14/15) had a PBP3 (P527S) mutation, with molecular docking studies suggesting reduced aztreonam binding.

Conclusions

This study reports a clonal outbreak of ST313 P. aeruginosa strains co-producing IMP-45 and VIM-1 carbapenemases in a tertiary hospital. The evolutionary path of the IncP-2 plasmid co-harboring bla IMP-45 and bla VIM-1 was elucidated.

Keywords: carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa , CRPA, horizontal gene transfer (HGT), nosocomial infection, metallo-beta-lactamases (MBL), resistance dissemination

Introduction

Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) is a major global public health threat, significantly increasing morbidity and mortality rates, especially among immunocompromised individuals (Azam and Khan, 2019). The treatment of CRPA infections is challenging due to its remarkable ability to resist multiple antibiotics (Pang et al., 2019). One of the mechanisms for carbapenem resistance is the production of metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs), mainly consisting of Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase (VIM) and imipenemase (IMP) (Cornaglia et al., 2011). Typically, VIM-1 is commonly found in Enterobacteriaceae ( Walsh et al., 2005; Vatopoulos, 2008). Additionally, P. aeruginosa isolates with VIM-1 have been identified in Spain and Turkey (Malkoçoğlu et al., 2017; PÉrez-VÁzquez et al., 2020), but are rarely reported in China (Hong et al., 2015). Currently, only a few sporadic studies of VIM-1-producing P. aeruginosa have been reported in China (Kong et al., 2015; Cai et al., 2016; Jing et al., 2018; Kang et al., 2023).

In China, the presence of MBL genes such as bla IMP-1, bla IMP-4, bla IMP-6, bla IMP-8, bla IMP-9, bla IMP-10, and bla IMP-45 ( Hong et al., 2015) has been documented. Initially, bla IMP-9 was detected in P. aeruginosa isolates from Guangzhou (Xiong et al., 2006), with subsequent outbreaks occurring in 2000 and between 2005 and 2007, respectively (Xiong et al., 2006; Chao et al., 2008). IMP-45, distinguished by a single amino acid substitution (G214S) in IMP-9, was first reported in 2014 in a P. aeruginosa strain of canine originated from Beijing, demonstrating increased resistance to meropenem compared to imipenem (Wang et al., 2014).

In this study, we report an outbreak of CRPA strains co-harboring bla VIM-1 and bla IMP-45 on IncP-2 plasmids in a tertiary hospital in China, leading to poor prognosis in transplant patients.

Material and methods

Bacterial isolation and clinical data collection and antimicrobial susceptibility testing

During February 2022 to July 2024, 17 nonduplicated CRPA strains co-harboring bla VIM-1 and bla IMP-45, collected from 10 patients, were enrolled in the study. Demographics and relevant clinical data of the patients were obtained through review of medical records. Susceptibility to ticarcillin-clavulanic acid, ceftazidime, cefoperazone-sulbactam, cefepime, meropenem, imipenem, amikacin, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and colistin were measured using VITEK®2 system (BioMérieux, Marcy l’Étoile, France) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for cefiderocol, piperacillin-tazobactam, aztreonam (AZT) and ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) by broth microdilution method and interpretation was according to recommendations of the CLSI (Lewis and James, 2022), P. aeruginosa ATCC27853 served as quality control strains.

Comparative genomic analysis of bla IMP-45 carrying plasmids

To better understand the features of genetic environments surrounding bla IMP-45 and bla VIM-1 genes, we searched the Genbank database on NCBI and obtained 15 intact plasmids harboring bla IMP-45 worldwide from China as of October 1, 2024.

Phylogenetic analysis

As of October 1, 2024, 53 P. aeruginosa genomes assigned to ST313 were downloaded from the RefSeq database on NCBI, We excluded strains with unknown country of origin and collection time, retaining 46 ST313 P. aeruginosa isolates and 17 ST313 VIM-1-IMP-45 CRPA strains for phylogenetic analysis. The phylogenetic tree for all ST313 P. aeruginosa genomes was constructed according to their SNPs by using Snippy version 4.6.0 (https://github.com/tseemann/snippy). ST313 P. aeruginosa genomes’ SNPs were filtered to remove recombination using Gubbins v3.3.5 (Croucher et al., 2015). The phylogenetic tree of the IncP-2 plasmids carrying blaIMP-45 and the IncP-2 plasmids co-harboring bla VIM-1 and bla IMP-45 were also constructed based on their SNPs using Snippy version 4.6.0. All maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees were inferred from a core genome alignment by using Raxml v8.2.12 (Stamatakis, 2014). The specific parameters for Snippy were: alignment coverage threshold –minfrac = 0.9 and minimum depth –mincov = 10. For Gubbins, we used maximum iterations = 5 and P-value threshold = 0.05. All trees were visualized in iTOL (https://itol.embl.de).

Cefiderocol induction resistance experiments and conjugation assay of plasmid co-carrying bla VIM-1 and bla IMP-45

To induce cefiderocol resistance in P. aeruginosa, we followed a previously reported method (Nurjadi et al., 2022) with slightly modifications. Briefly, The amikacin-sensitive clinical single colony of P. aeruginosa AS01 strain grown on Columbia agar supplemented with 5% sheep blood was inoculated into 5 mL of cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CA-MHB) (BD Diagnostics, Germany) and incubated at 37°C with constant shaking at 200 rpm for 18 hours. After overnight incubation, 100 μL of the culture was transferred into a fresh 5 mL of CA-MHB, and cefiderocol (Shionogi, Japan) was added to achieve a final concentration of 0.5 mg/L. The culture was then incubated under the same conditions as the initial culture. This process was repeated daily, with the cefiderocol concentration doubled at each passage, until no visible turbidity or bacterial growth was observed after overnight incubation, or until the cefiderocol concentration reached 64 mg/L. For population analysis profiling, 10 μL of the bacterial suspension from the overnight culture was plated onto Columbia blood agar, and 10 single colonies were randomly selected for cefiderocol susceptibility testing using broth microdilution. Conjugation experiments were performed with strain AS02, which exhibited resistance to cefiderocol but remained susceptible to amikacin and was selected as the recipient strain, while strain CJ05 served as the donor strain. Donor and recipient bacteria were separately cultured in LB broth at 37°C until reaching logarithmic growth phase (OD600 = 0.6-0.8), then mixed in a 1:1 ratio and incubated at 37°C overnight for conjugation. The conjugation mixture was subjected to 10-fold serial dilution and plated on Mueller-Hinton agar containing cefiderocol (4 mg/L) and amikacin (16 mg/L), followed by incubation at 37°C for 18–24 hours. Putative transconjugants were confirmed by whole-genome sequencing. Additional conjugation experiments were conducted using Escherichia coli J53 as an alternative recipient strain. Each conjugation experiment was repeated three times. The antimicrobial susceptibility tests mentioned above were performed on strains AS01, AS02, and transconjugant TC01 using the VITEK®2 system and broth microdilution.

Whole-genome sequencing and bioinformatics analysis

Genomic DNA from VIM-1-IMP-45-CRPA strains CJ01-CJ17, and transconjugant strain TC01 was extracted and were sequenced using an Illumina NovaSeq PE150 at the Beijing Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd. Raw reads were filtered to remove low-quality sequences and adaptors. De novo assembly was conducted using SOAP de novo 2.04 (Li et al., 2008; Li et al., 2010), SPAdes 3.10.0 (Bankevich et al., 2012), and ABySS 1.3.7 (Simpson et al., 2009). The assembly results were integrated with CISA 1.3 software. The gap in preliminary assembly results was filled using Gapcloser 1.12. In addition, whole-genome sequences for CJ05, AS01 and AS02 were obtained through Illumina NovaSeq PE150 and nanopore sequencing on MinION flow cells. Hybrid assemblies of Illumina short reads and MinION long reads were prepared with Unicycler version 0.4.8 (Wick et al., 2017). Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was performed by using an MLST tool (https://github.com/tseemann/mlst). Antimicrobial drug resistance and virulence genes were identified with ABRicate version 1.0.0 (https://github.com/tseemann/abricate) according to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) AMRFinderPlus (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and virulence factor (http://www.mgc.ac.cn/VFs) databases. Pairwise single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) distance was evaluated with Snp-dists (https://github.com/tseemann/snp-dists). Sequence comparisons were performed by using Easyfig version 2.2.3 and annotated by Prokka and Bakta (Seemann, 2014; Schwengers et al., 2021). Alignments and visualization of plasmids were generated by BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG) software version 0.95 (https://sourceforge.net/projects/brig). Linear alignments of blaIMP-45-bearing structures were generated using ggplot2 and gggenes in R-4.4.2. The heatmap was translated using TBtools-II (Chen et al., 2023). Platon (Schwengers et al., 2020) was used to predict plasmids in transconjugant TC01 and all ST313 VIM-1-IMP-45-CRPA except CJ05.

Structure modeling and molecular docking

Retrieving the RCSB Protein Data Bank (PDB), the crystal structures of PBP3 complexed with aztreonam (PDB DOI: https://doi.org/10.2210/pdb3PBS/pdb) was applied as the structure template in the present study (Han et al., 2010). After PSI-BLAST (Altschul et al., 1997) and MUSCLE alignment (Edgar, 2022), the homology models of PBP3(P527S) were both built in Schrödinger. The protein structure was refined and preprocessed using the OPLS4 force field (Lu et al., 2021), following the ligands preparing for diverse ionization states and isomers. In the covalent docking, the aztreonam of PBP3 complexed with aztreonam was set as the centroid of grid box, and the β-lactam was chosen as reaction type for pose prediction. After completion of docking, the Prime MM-GBSA scores of the top one output poses for each ligand was calculated for comparing the binding affinities of the ligands (Li et al., 2011).

Result

Outbreak of ST313 P. aeruginosa co-harboring bla IMP-45 and bla VIM-1

During 2022-2024, 17 ST313 P. aeruginosa strains co-harboring bla IMP-45 and bla VIM-1 were identified, including 2 isolates from 2022, 11 from 2023, and 4 from 2024. Following comprehensive disinfection measures implemented in the ward, no further occurrences of VIM-1-IMP-45-CRPA strains were detected. The VIM-1-IMP-45-CRPA strains were isolated from 10 immunocompromised patients, all of whom had undergone lung or kidney transplants ( Table 1 ). The cohort consisted of 9 males and 1 female, aged between 40 and 70 years, all of whom presented with complex medical histories. Among the 10 patients, 8 had VIM-1-IMP-45-CRPA detected in their bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), of whom 7 received ceftazidime/avibactam combined with aztreonam (CZA+AZT) treatment. Another 2 patients had VIM-1-IMP-45-CRPA detected in their blood but did not receive CZA+AZT treatment. Among patients who received CZA+AZT treatment, the mortality rate was 12.5% (1/8), while among patients who did not receive CZA+AZT treatment, the mortality rate was 100% (3/3), with 66.7% (2/3) of the deaths associated with bloodstream infections ( Table 1 ). Through phylogenetic analysis of 63 ST313 genomes, (46 from the NCBI Reference Sequence database and 17 from this study), using the midpoint rooting method, we found that ST313 P. aeruginosa can be divided into two subgroups ( Figure 1 ), revealing contrasting evolutionary trajectories and transmission dynamics. Subgroup 2 demonstrated tight clonal clustering with multiple closely related strains predominantly originating from China during 2017-2024, indicating recent clonal expansion and suggesting a single-source outbreak with rapid person-to-person transmission capabilities. In contrast, subgroup 1 exhibited greater phylogenetic diversity with strains distributed across multiple countries and spanning a broader temporal range (1997-2022), reflecting longer evolutionary timescales and endemic circulation patterns. The transmission timeline analysis revealed two distinct epidemiological phases: a recent epidemic emergence in subgroup 2 concentrated within a 2-year period, and historical global circulation in subgroup 1 spanning over two decades. Notably, the evolutionary relationship analysis demonstrated that while Subgroup 1 maintained ancestral ecological flexibility with 27.5% (11/40) environmental or animal isolates ( Supplementary Table S3 ) distributed throughout the phylogeny, subgroup 2 exhibited marked anthropocentric specialization with only a single animal isolate among an otherwise exclusively human-derived population.

Table 1.

Clinical data of 10 patients infected by Pseudomonas aeruginosa co-producing VIM-1 and IMP-45 carbapenemases, 2022–2024α.

Patient ID Strain ST Age(year) Gender Ward Medical history Specimen collection date Antibiotic treatment Specimen type Outcome/date
1 CJ01 ST313 70 Male LTD Post-lung transplantation 2022.04.04 COL, CZA+AZT, AZT+COL BALF Death/2023.02.24
CJ03 ST313 2023.02.18
2 CJ02 ST313 66 Male LTD Post-lung transplantation 2022.10.09 MEM+LVX, FOS+COL Blood Death/2023.10.18
3 CJ04 ST313 55 Male LTD Post-lung transplantation 2023.04.20 CZA+AZT, TZP+AZT, AZT BALF Discharge/2024.06.25
4 CJ05 ST313 40 Female LTD Post-lung transplantation 2023.05.16 CZA+TZP BALF Death/2023.05.20
5 CJ06 ST313 61 Male PCCM Post-kindey transplantation 2023.06.20 CZA+AZT, TZP, SCF, CZA+COL BALF Discharge/2023.07.22
6 CJ07 ST313 31 Male LTD Post-lung transplantation 2023.07.07 MEM, CZA+AZT BALF Discharge/2023.07.19
7 CJ08 ST313 45 Male LTD Post-lung transplantation 2023.08.16 CZA+AZT, AZT, COL BALF Discharge/2024.07.08
8 CJ09 ST313 66 Male LTD Post-lung transplantation 2023.08.31 CZA+AZT, COL BALF Discharge/2024.09.30
CJ13 ST313 2023.10.25
CJ15 ST313 2024.02.29
9 CJ10 ST313 66 Male LTD Post-lung transplantation 2023.09.19 CZA, AZT+COL, CZA+AZT, TZP BALF Discharge/2024.08.23
CJ11 ST313 2023.09.28
CJ12 ST313 2023.10.12
CJ14 ST313 2024.01.18
10 CJ16 ST313 61 Male LTD Post-lung transplantation 2024.07.29 MEM Blood Death/2024.07.31
CJ17 ST313

αAZT, aztreonam; BALF, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; COL, colistin; CZA, ceftazidime/avibactam; FOS, fosfomycin; IMP, imipenemase; LTD, lung transplantation department; LVX, levofloxacin; MEM, meropenem; PCCM, pulmonary and critical care medicine; SCF, sulbactam/cefoperazone; TZP, piperacillin/tazobactam; VIM, Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase.

Figure 1.

Phylogenetic tree and heat map showing the presence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes in various bacterial strains. The tree illustrates evolutionary relationships, with colored branches representing different clusters. The heat map indicates AMR gene presence (blue) and absence (light blue) across strains listed by their name, year, and country of origin. AMR genes are categorized into groups, such as aminoglycosides and β-lactams, with specific genes listed at the top. A scale bar signifies the genetic distance in the phylogenetic tree.

Phylogenetic analysis and epidemic distribution of ST313 P. aeruginosa. 63 ST313 P. aeruginosa phylogenetic analysis, bla VIM-1 and bla IMP-45 resistance genes and strains carrying bla VIM-1 and bla IMP-45 genes are marked in red, AMR gene: Antimicrobial resistance gene. In the strains, red markings indicate VIM-1–IMP-45 CRPA strain. In the phylogenetic tree, the blue branches represent subgroup1, and the red branches represent subgroup2.

Characteristics of VIM-1-IMP-45-CRPA strains

All 17 VIM-1-IMP-45-CRPA strains isolates shared almost identical resistance genes, differing by 0–192 SNPs. Except for strain CJ05, the differences among the remaining strains range from 0 to 79 SNPs, demonstrating a high degree of relatedness among those isolates and clonal transmission of -producing P. aeruginosa ST313 in China ( Supplementary Figure S1 ). Notably, all 17 ST313 VIM-1-IMP-45-CRPA strains possessed virulence genes similar to the highly virulent strain PA14, including the type III secretion system genotypes exoU+, exoS+ and exoY+( Supplementary Figure S2 ).

Drug susceptibility testing showed that, except for the CJ13 and CJ04, intermediate and sensitive to aztreonam, respectively, all ST313 VIM-1-IMP-45-CRPA strains were resistant to carbapenems (meropenem and imipenem), several β-lactams (ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoperazone/sulbactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, aztreonam), quinolones (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin), and aminoglycosides (amikacin, tobramycin). But all strains remained sensitive to colistin and cefiderocol ( Table 2 ).

Table 2.

Antimicrobial drug susceptibility profiles for the 17 VIM-1–IMP-45–CRPA strains from China*.

Strains MIC (μg/mL)
MEM IMP CAZ TCC FEP AZT AK TOB LEV CIP P/T CZA COL SCF FDC
CJ01 >16 >16 >64 >128 >32 >32 >64 >16 >8 >4 >128/4 >128/4 ≤0.5 >64 0.5
CJ02 >16 >16 >64 >128 >32 >32 >64 >16 >8 >4 >128/4 >128/4 ≤0.5 >64 0.5
CJ03 >16 >16 >64 >128 >32 >32 >64 >16 >8 >4 >128/4 >128/4 ≤0.5 >64 0.5
CJ04 >16 >16 >64 >128 >32 2 >64 >16 >8 >4 >128/4 >128/4 ≤0.5 >64 1
CJ05 >16 >16 >64 >128 >32 >32 >64 >16 >8 >4 >128/4 >128/4 ≤0.5 >64 0.25
CJ06 >16 >16 >64 >128 >32 >32 >64 >16 >8 >4 >128/4 >128/4 ≤0.5 >64 0.125
CJ07 >16 >16 >64 >128 >32 >32 >64 >16 >8 >4 >128/4 >128/4 ≤0.5 >64 0.5
CJ08 >16 >16 >64 >128 >32 >32 >64 >16 >8 >4 >128/4 >128/4 ≤0.5 >64 0.5
CJ09 >16 >16 >64 >128 >32 >32 >64 >16 >8 >4 >128/4 >128/4 ≤0.5 >64 0.5
CJ10 >16 >16 >64 >128 >32 >32 >64 >16 >8 >4 >128/4 >128/4 ≤0.5 >64 0.5
CJ11 >16 >16 >64 >128 >32 >32 >64 >16 >8 >4 >128/4 >128/4 ≤0.5 >64 0.5
CJ12 >16 >16 >64 >128 >32 >32 >64 >16 >8 >4 >128/4 >128/4 ≤0.5 >64 0.06
CJ13 >16 >16 >64 >128 >32 16 >64 >16 >8 >4 64/4 >128/4 ≤0.5 >64 0.125
CJ14 >16 >16 >64 >128 >32 >32 >64 >16 >8 >4 >128/4 >128/4 ≤0.5 >64 0.5
CJ15 >16 >16 >64 >128 >32 >32 >64 >16 >8 >4 >128/4 >128/4 ≤0.5 >64 0.5
CJ16 >16 >16 >64 >128 >32 >32 >64 >16 >8 >4 >128/4 >128/4 ≤0.5 >64 0.5
CJ17 >16 >16 >64 >128 >32 >32 >64 >16 >8 >4 >128/4 >128/4 ≤0.5 >64 0.5
ATCC 27853 0.5 2 2 16 2 2 ≤2 ≤1 1 0.5 1/4 0.5/4 2 ≤8 0.125

* AK, amikacin; ATCC, American Type Culture Collection (https://www.atcc.org); AZT, aztreonam; CAZ, ceftazidime; CIP, ciprofloxacin; COL, colistin; CRPA, carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa; CZA, ceftazidime/avibactam; FDC, cefiderocol; FEP, cefepime; IPM, imipenem; VIM, Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase; LEV, levofloxacin; MEM, meropenem; NA, not applicable; P/T, piperacillin/tazobactam; ST313, sequence type 313;SCF,cefoperazone/sulbactam; TOB, tobramycin; TCC, ticarcillin/clavulanic acid.

Interestingly, almost all aztreonam-resistant VIM-1-IMP-45-CRPA strains (14/15) harbored a mistranslation mutation (P527S) in PBP3. The non-mutated PBP3 protein was consistent with the PBP3 protein of the standard strain PAO1.Based on the PBP3(PAO1) structure in the RCSB PDB database, we used Schrödinger to predict the structure of the point-mutated PBP3 (P527S) to analyze interactions with aztreonam. Subsequently, molecular docking of aztreonam with both PBP3(PAO1) and PBP3(P527S) was performed using Schrodinger software ( Supplementary Figure S4 ). The docking score of the PBP3(P527S) protein decreased (docking score: -9.911kcal/mol to -8.770kcal/mol). Subsequently the MM/GBSA binding free energy from the top docking pose of aztreonam to PBP3 was calculated. From our analysis, PBP3(P527S) exhibited less negative binding free energy values for aztreonam (-21.36 kcal/mol for PBP3(PAO1), -20.06 kcal/mol for PBP3(P527S)), suggesting the weakened binding affinity to PBP3(P527S).

Evaluating the transferability of the IncP-2 plasmid co-harboring bla VIM-1 and bla IMP-45

To assess plasmid transferability, we selected strain CJ05 for further experiment. CJ05 strain contains an IncP-2 megaplasmid co-harboring bla VIM-1 and bla IMP-45 by whole-genome sequencing. Given all VIM-1-IMP-45-CRPA strains were resistance to amikacin but sensitive to cefiderocol, we chosen a clinical amikacin-susceptible P. aeruginosa strain AS01 for cefiderocol induction resistance experiments. An cefiderocol induced resistance P. aeruginosa strain, AS02, was used for conjugation experiments. The AS01 strain was identified as ST463 P. aeruginosa. The whole-genome sequencing revealed that it harbors a plasmid of 41,101 bp in size carrying the bla KPC-2 gene. Other resistance genes, including aph(3’)-IIb, bla PAO, bla OXA-486, fosA, catB7, and crpP, are located on the chromosome. Antibiotic susceptibility testing showed that the strain is resistant to carbapenems (meropenem and imipenem), several β-lactams (ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoperazone/sulbactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, aztreonam), and quinolones (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin). However, it remains sensitive to aminoglycosides (amikacin, tobramycin), colistin, and cefiderocol ( Supplementary Table S2 ). By analyzing the genome of the AS02 strain, we found that the bla KPC-2 gene on its plasmid had evolved into bla KPC-33, while other resistance genes remained identical to those in the AS01 strain. The antibiotic susceptibility profile of AS02 was similar to that of AS01, except that AS02 exhibited resistance to cefiderocol ( Supplementary Table S2 ). Additionally, we observed mutations in certain genes in the AS02 strain, including hasR. Furthermore, conjugation experiments were conducted using E. coli J53 as the recipient strain. Conjugation experiments showed that the IncP-2 plasmid could be transferred within P. aeruginosa, but not to E. coli I53. Using Platon to analyze the plasmid sequence of the transconjugant TC01 revealed the presence of resistance genes, including aac(6’)-Ib3, armA, bla KPC-33, bla IMP-45 and bla VIM-1. Drug susceptibility test showed that it was resistant to amikacin and cefiderocol, but only sensitive to colistin ( Supplementary Table S2 ).

Evolutionary trajectory of the IncP-2 plasmid co-harboring bla VIM-1 and bla IMP-45

Using Platon predict plasmids in transconjugant TC01 and all ST313 VIM-1-IMP-45-CRPA strains except CJ05. Phylogenetic analysis of the system shows high homology in the IncP-2 plasmids of ST313 VIM-1-IMP-45-CRPA and transconjugant TC01 in the VIM-1-IMP-45-CRPA plasmids ( Supplementary Figure S3 ).

Third-generation sequencing reveals that the genome of the CJ05 strain contains a chromosome and an IncP-2 megaplasmid ( Figure 2A ). This plasmid carries bla VIM, bla IMP, and other resistance genes like tmexCD3-toprJ3. The bla VIM-1 gene is located on a Tn3 family transposon ( Figure 2C ), including a complete Tn402 module. The genetic background of bla IMP-45 is similar to previously reported IncP-2 plasmids carrying bla IMP-45( Supplementary Table S1 ), situated on a Tn6485-like transposon ( Figures 2B and 3 ). The bla IMP-45 gene is found directly downstream of the transposable element TnAs1 and within a class 1 integron, In786, with the gene arrangement intI1-aacA4-blaIMP-45-blaOXA-1-catB3. In786 is located within a Tn6485-like transposon. Similar genetic contexts have been detected or reported in several other IncP-2 plasmids, including pPA166-2-MDR, pR31014-IMP, pNF143349, and pPAHT-1 ( Figure 2B ). Subsequent snp-based phylogenetic analysis of the bla IMP-45-carrying IncP-2 plasmid revealed that pCJ05 is homologous to other bla IMP-45-carrying IncP-2 plasmids ( Figure 3 ). Based on this observation, we hypothesize that pCJ05 acquired bla VIM-1 through horizontal gene transfer (HGT) from a bla IMP-45-carrying IncP-2 plasmid. Further analysis of the genetic context surrounding bla VIM-1 revealed direct evidence of transposition. Specifically, we identified both direct repeat (DR) and inverted repeat (IR) sequences flanking bla VIM-1. We discovered that bla VIM-1 is carried by a Tn402-like transposon, which subsequently inserted into a Tn3-family transposon harboring partial mer operon genes, resulting in the formation of a novel Tn3-family transposon ( Figure 4 ).The Tn402-like transposon was found to carry a complete tniABQR transposition module, while the Tn3-family transposon with partial mer operon contained tnpA but lacked tnpR. Comparative analysis using the NCBI database identified two plasmids carrying these transposons, pVIM-1-ZDHY316(CP064944) and pTTS12(CP009975), respectively. Based on these findings, we propose an evolutionary trajectory for the co-harboring bla VIM-1 and bla IMP-45 IncP-2 plasmid. First of all, the Tn402-like transposon carrying bla VIM-1 transposed into the Tn3-family transposon containing partial mer operon genes, forming a novel bla VIM-1-carrying Tn3-family transposon. This composite transposon was subsequently mobilized onto the bla IMP-45-harboring IncP-2 plasmid, ultimately resulting in the emergence of an IncP-2 plasmid co-harboring both bla VIM-1 and bla IMP-45 ( Figure 4 ).

Figure 2.

Circular genomic map labeled A showing genetic elements including Tn3-like and Tn6485-like sequences. Diagram B illustrates comparative genomic structures highlighting Tn6485-like elements with antimicrobial resistance markers. Diagram C shows Tn3 family transposons with associated genes. Color coding indicates different elements like resistance and mobile genes. A legend explains color meanings.

Genetic context of bla IMP-45 and bla VIM-1. (A) Genome comparison of plasmid pCJ05 co-harboring bla VIM-1 and bla IMP-45. Schematic map of plasmid pCJ05, this plasmid sequence was compared with plasmids pPA166-2(accession number:JAKHEW010000003), pR31014-IMP(accession number:MF344571), pNF143349(accession number:CP114762), and pPAHT-1(accession number:CP163545); (B, C) Linear characterization of Tn6485-like transposon carrying bla IMP-45 and Tn3-family transposon carrying bla VIM-1 in pCJ05 plasmid with similar sequence. Red, blue, and yellow arrows denote antimicrobial resistance genes, mobile elements, and other protein-encoding genes, respectively. The Δ symbol indicates that the gene is truncated.

Figure 3.

Phylogenetic tree, heatmap, and plasmid map comparison of bacterial strains. The phylogenetic tree on the left depicts genetic relationships among strains. The accompanying heatmap shows strain details such as year, sequence type, host, strain, sample, and country/province, each represented by distinct colors. The right panel provides a legend for the color codes. Below, a linear plasmid map illustrates gene arrangements for various AMR genes and mobile genetic elements, with a key for gene identification using color-coded arrows.

Evolution relationship and comprehensive information among IncP-2 plasmids carrying bla IMP-45. Plasmids were colored according to year, STs, host, strains, sample, country/province, and genetic context of blaIMP-45. The snp-based maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was built by RaxML with pOZ176 as the reference. The Interactive Tree of Life (https://itol.embl.de) was used for visualization.

Figure 4.

Diagram showing a genetic transfer mechanism between plasmids in bacteria. Step 1 involves a Tn402 transposon carrying the bla<sub>VIM-1</sub> gene, merging with a Tn3 family plasmid. Step 2 depicts an IncP-2 plasmid acquiring bla<sub>AMP-45</sub> and eventually co-carrying bla<sub>AMP-45</sub> and bla<sub>VIM-1</sub>. Visual elements include DNA sequences, bacterial cells labeled Pseudomonas putida and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and color-coded genes representing antimicrobial resistance, mobile elements, and other genes, with inverted and direct repeats indicated.

Evolutionary trajectory for the co-harboring bla VIM-1 and bla IMP-45 IncP-2 plasmids. Proposed formation mechanism of co-harboring bla VIM-1 and bla IMP-45 IncP-2 plasmids is as follows by sequence alignment. Step 1: Tn402-like transposon carrying bla VIM-1 was infused to Tn3-family transposon containing partial mer operon genes to generate a new Tn3-family transposon carrying bla VIM-1. Step 2: The new Tn3-family transposon mobilized onto the bla IMP-45-harboring IncP-2 plasmid, resulting in the emergence of the IncP-2 plasmid co-harboring both bla VIM-1 and bla IMP-45. Figure was created with BioRender.

Discussion

CRPA carrying carbapenemases is an opportunistic Gram-negative pathogen and a common cause of nosocomial infections, particularly respiratory tract infections. The IncP-2 plasmid harboring the bla IMP-45 gene was initially identified in China and subsequently disseminated rapidly across the country. In 2014, canine-derived P. aeruginosa carrying bla IMP-45 on IncP-2 plasmids was first reported in Beijing (Wang et al., 2014). Subsequently, the IncP-2 plasmids harboring bla IMP-45 was identified in P. aeruginosa isolates from various regions in China, spanning multiple sequence types (STs), including high-risk STs such as ST277 and ST463, indicating that P. aeruginosa with IncP-2 plasmids carrying bla IMP-45 has been disseminated in the country. IncP-2 plasmid subtypes facilitate the spread of bla IMP-45 among genetically diverse P. aeruginosa and have incorporated various resistance genes during their evolution, such as bla AFM-1, bla PER-1, tmexCD-oprJ, armA, and qnrVC1 ( Zhang et al., 2021; Dong et al., 2022; Zhou et al., 2023). In 2018, the ST277 P. aeruginosa strain PA298 (CP040127), co-harboring bla VIM-1 and bla IMP-45, was identified in Guangzhou, China, with both resistance genes located on the IncP-2 plasmid pBM908 (CP040126). Later, in 2022, VIM-1–IMP-45-CRPA strains NF143349 (CP114761) and PAHT-1 (CP163544) were detected in Guangzhou, Zhuhai, and Shanxi, belonging to MLST types ST277 and ST188, respectively. Comparative analysis revealed that their plasmids shared 97% and 98% coverage, with 99.1% and 100% identity to pCJ05, respectively. A recent study also revealed that IncP-2 plasmids carrying bla NDM-1 and bla VIM-2 have caused neonatal sepsis in Morocco (Daaboul et al., 2024). IncP-2 plasmids are increasingly becoming reservoirs for metallo-β-lactamases in Pseudomonas spp worldwide.

In the study, we documented an outbreak of P. aeruginosa co-producing the VIM-1 and IMP-45 in the IncP-2 plasmid among transplant patients in a tertiary hospital in China. Our study documented the persistent clonal dissemination of VIM-1–IMP-45 CRPA strains in a tertiary hospital and investigates a possible evolutionary trajectory for the emergence of these strains. In our study, among 10 patients infected with the VIM-1-IMP-45-CRPA strain, two patients who did not receive CZA+AZT combination therapy developed bloodstream infections caused by the VIM-1-IMP-45-CRPA strains. This suggests that CZA+AZT combination therapy may reduce the risk of bloodstream infections caused by the VIM-1-IMP-45-CRPA strains in transplant patients. Our research also indicates that cefiderocol could be a better treatment option for VIM-1–IMP-45 CRPA strains. Furthermore, PBP3 has been shown to be a common adaptive target among P. aeruginosa isolates from patients treated with β-lactams (Clark et al., 2019). In addition, the mechanisms of aztreonam resistance in P. aeruginosa are diverse, including the overexpression of the mexAB-oprM efflux system, alterations in ftsI (PBP3) leading to disrupted drug binding, and mutations or overexpression of chromosomal ampC β-lactamase or changes in its coding sequence, which enhance active drug efflux. Previous studies (Jorth et al., 2017; Clark et al., 2019; McLean et al., 2019), as well as our research, have identified the PBP3 (P527S) mutation in clinical P. aeruginosa strains resistant to aztreonam. The P527S mutation is hypothesized to contribute to resistance, not conclusively demonstrated. Through molecular docking analysis, structural bioinformatics revealed that the PBP3 (P527S) mutation results in reduced binding affinity to aztreonam. However, whether this slight reduction in binding affinity is sufficient to cause a significant increase in aztreonam MIC values requires further investigation to confirm. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an outbreak of VIM-1–IMP-45 CRPA strains among transplant patients.

In summary, the VIM-1–IMP-45 CRPA strains exhibit extensive antimicrobial resistance and resulted in a high mortality rate, enabling them to withstand host defenses and clinical interventions in transplant patients, thereby facilitating their sustained transmission. Infections caused by these strains are associated with high mortality rates, particularly among immunocompromised transplant recipients, indicating the critical need for effective infection prevention and control strategies.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (grant number CIFMS 2021-I2M-1-030).

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, BioProject: PRJNA1222284.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the ethics committee of the China-Japan Friendship Hospital (2022-KY-054). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The human samples used in this study were acquired from a by-product of routine care or industry. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

YM: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Data curation, Investigation. ZCL: Data curation, Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis. YZ: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. QL: Writing – review & editing, Data curation. FZ: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. HZ: Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis. XY: Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis. ZYL: Writing – review & editing, Data curation. BL: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Resources, Project administration.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2025.1623241/full#supplementary-material

DataSheet1.docx (7.9MB, docx)

References

  1. Altschul S. F., Madden T.L., Schäffer A. A., Zhang J., Zhang Z., Miller W., et al. (1997). Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389–3402. doi:  10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Azam M. W., Khan A. U. (2019). Updates on the pathogenicity status of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Drug Discov. Today 24, 350–359. doi:  10.1016/j.drudis.2018.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bankevich A., Nurk S., Antipov D., Gurevich A. A., Dvorkin M., Kulikov A. S., et al. (2012). SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 19, 455–477. doi:  10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cai S., Chen Y., Song D., Kong J., Wu Y., Lu H. (2016). Study on the resistance mechanism via outer membrane protein OprD2 and metal β-lactamase expression in the cell wall of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Exp. Ther. Med. 12, 2869–2872. doi:  10.3892/etm.2016.3690 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chao Z., Xiao-Feng W., Dan-Hong S., Jin-Ping Y., Nan-Shan Z. (2008). Outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing IMP-9-type metallo-beta-lactamase in Guangzhou, China. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 32, 363–365. doi:  10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen C., Wu Y., Li J., Wang X., Zeng Z., Xu J., et al. (2023). TBtools-II: A "one for all, all for one" bioinformatics platform for biological big-data mining. Mol Plant. 16(11), 1733–1742. doi:  10.1016/j.molp.2023.09.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Clark S. T., Sinha U., Zhang Y., Wang P. W., Donaldson S. L., Coburn B., et al. (2019). Penicillin-binding protein 3 is a common adaptive target among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from adult cystic fibrosis patients treated with β-lactams. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 53, 620–628. doi:  10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.01.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cornaglia G., Giamarellou H., Rossolini G. M. (2011). Metallo-β-lactamases: a last frontier for β-lactams? Lancet Infect. Dis. 11, 381–393. doi:  10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70056-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Croucher N.J., Page A. J., Connor T. R., Delaney A. J., Keane J. A., Bentley S. D., et al. (2015). Rapid phylogenetic analysis of large samples of recombinant bacterial whole genome sequences using Gubbins. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e15. doi:  10.1093/nar/gku1196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Daaboul D., Osman M., Kassem I. I., Yassine I., Girlich D., Proust A., et al. (2024). Neonatal sepsis due to NDM-1 and VIM-2 co-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Morocco. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 79, 1614–1618. doi:  10.1093/jac/dkae153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dong N., Liu C., Hu Y., Lu J., Zeng Y., Chen G., et al. (2022). Emergence of an extensive drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain of chicken origin carrying bla(IMP-45), tet(X6), and tmexCD3-toprJ3 on an Inc(pRBL16) plasmid. Microbiol. Spectr. 10, e0228322. doi:  10.1128/spectrum.02283-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Edgar R. C. (2022). Muscle5: High-accuracy alignment ensembles enable unbiased assessments of sequence homology and phylogeny. Nat. Commun. 13, 6968. doi:  10.1038/s41467-022-34630-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Han S., Zaniewski R. P., Marr E. S., Lacey B. M., Tomaras A. P., Evdokimov A., et al. (2010). Structural basis for effectiveness of siderophore-conjugated monocarbams against clinically relevant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 22002–22007. doi:  10.1073/pnas.1013092107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hong D. J., Bae I. K., Jang I. H., Jeong S. H., Kang H. K., Lee K. (2015). Epidemiology and characteristics of Metallo-β-Lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect. Chemother. 47, 81–97. doi:  10.3947/ic.2015.47.2.81 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jing X., Zhou H., Min X., Zhang X., Yang Q., Du S., et al. (2018). The Simplified Carbapenem Inactivation Method (sCIM) for simple and accurate detection of carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacilli. Front. Microbiol. 9, 2391. doi:  10.3389/fmicb.2018.02391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jorth P., McLean K., Ratjen A., Secor P. R., Bautista G. E., Ravishankar S., et al. (2017). Evolved aztreonam resistance is multifactorial and can produce hypervirulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. mBio 8(5), e00517–17. doi:  10.1128/mBio.00517-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kang Y., Xie L., Yang J., Cui J. (2023). Optimal treatment of ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam against bloodstream infections or lower respiratory tract infections caused by extensively drug-resistant or pan drug-resistant (XDR/PDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 13, 1023948. doi:  10.3389/fcimb.2023.1023948 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kong L. B., Ma Q., Gao J., Qiu G. S., Wang L. X., Zhao S. M., et al. (2015). Effect of Qiguiyin Decoction on multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in rats. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 21, 916–921. doi:  10.1007/s11655-015-2089-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lewis I., James S. J. (2022). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. (Malvern, Pennsylvania, USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)). [Google Scholar]
  20. Li R., Li Y., Kristiansen K., Wang J. (2008). SOAP: short oligonucleotide alignment program. Bioinformatics 24, 713–714. doi:  10.1093/bioinformatics/btn025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Li R., Zhu H., Ruan J., Qian W., Fang X., Shi Z., et al. (2010). De novo assembly of human genomes with massively parallel short read sequencing. Genome Res. 20, 265–272. doi:  10.1101/gr.097261.109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Li J., Abel R., Zhu K., Cao Y., Zhao S., Friesner R. A. (2011). The VSGB 2.0 model: a next generation energy model for high resolution protein structure modeling. Proteins 79, 2794–2812. doi:  10.1002/prot.v79.10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lu C., Wu C., Ghoreishi D., Chen W., Wang L., Damm W., et al. (2021). OPLS4: improving force field accuracy on challenging regimes of chemical space. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 4291–4300. doi:  10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Malkoçoğlu G., Aktaş E., Bayraktar B., Otlu B., Otlu M. E. (2017). VIM-1, VIM-2, and GES-5 carbapenemases among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates at a tertiary hospital in Istanbul, Turkey. Microb. Drug Resist. 23, 328–334. doi:  10.1089/mdr.2016.0012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. McLean K., Lee D., Holmes E. A., Penewit K., Waalkes A., Ren M., et al. (2019). Genomic analysis identifies novel Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance genes under selection during inhaled aztreonam therapy in vivo . Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 63(9), e00866–19. doi:  10.1128/AAC.00866-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nurjadi D., Kocer K., Chanthalangsy Q., Klein S., Heeg K., Boutin S. (2022). New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase facilitates the emergence of cefiderocol resistance in enterobacter cloacae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 66, e0201121. doi:  10.1128/aac.02011-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pang Z., Raudonis R., Glick B. R., Lin T. J., Cheng Z. (2019). Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: mechanisms and alternative therapeutic strategies. Biotechnol. Adv. 37, 177–192. doi:  10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.11.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pérez-Vázquez M., Sola-Campoy P. J., Zurita M. Á., Ávila A., Gómez-Bertomeu F., Solís S., et al. (2020). Carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Spain: interregional dissemination of the high-risk clones ST175 and ST244 carrying bla(VIM-2), bla(VIM-1), bla(IMP-8), bla(VIM-20) and bla(KPC-2). Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 56, 106026. doi:  10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schwengers O., Barth P., Falgenhauer L., Hain T., Chakraborty T., Goesmann A. (2020). Platon: identification and characterization of bacterial plasmid contigs in short-read draft assemblies exploiting protein sequence-based replicon distribution scores. Microb. Genom. 6(10), mgen000398. doi:  10.1099/mgen.0.000398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schwengers O., Jelonek L., Dieckmann M. A., Beyvers S., Blom J., Goesmann A. (2021). Bakta: rapid and standardized annotation of bacterial genomes via alignment-free sequence identification. Microb. Genom. 7(11), 000685. doi:  10.1101/2021.09.02.458689 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Simpson J. T., Wong K., Jackman S. D., Schein J. E., Jones S. J., Birol I. (2014). Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068–2069. doi:  10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Simpson J. T., Wong K., Jackman S. D., Schein J. E., Jones S. J., Birol I. (2009). ABySS: a parallel assembler for short read sequence data. Genome Res. 19, 1117–1123. doi:  10.1101/gr.089532.108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Stamatakis A. (2014). RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313. doi:  10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Vatopoulos A. (2008). High rates of metallo-beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Greece–a review of the current evidence. Euro Surveill. 13(4):8023. doi:  10.2807/ese.13.04.08023-en [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Walsh T. R., Toleman M. A., Poirel L., Nordmann P. (2005). Metallo-beta-lactamases: the quiet before the storm? Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 18, 306–325. doi:  10.1128/CMR.18.2.306-325.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang Y., Wang X., Schwarz S., Zhang R., Lei L., Liu X., et al. (2014). IMP-45-producing multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa of canine origin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 69, 2579–2581. doi:  10.1093/jac/dku133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wick R. R., Judd L. M., Gorrie C. L., Holt K. E. (2017). Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PloS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005595. doi:  10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Xiong J., Hynes M. F., Ye H., Chen H., Yang Y., M'Zali F., et al. (2006). bla(IMP-9) and its association with large plasmids carried by Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from the people’s republic of China. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50, 355–358. doi:  10.1128/AAC.50.1.355-358.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang X., Wang L., Li D., Li P., Yuan L., Yang F., et al. (2021). An IncP-2 plasmid sublineage associated with dissemination of bla(IMP-45) among carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 10, 442–449. doi:  10.1080/22221751.2021.1894903 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhou L., Yang C., Zhang X., Yao J., Chen L., Tu Y., et al. (2023). Characterization of a novel Tn6485h transposon carrying both blaIMP-45 and blaAFM-1 integrated into the IncP-2 plasmid in a carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 35, 307–313. doi:  10.1016/j.jgar.2023.10.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

DataSheet1.docx (7.9MB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, BioProject: PRJNA1222284.


Articles from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES