Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jul 3.
Published in final edited form as: Transl Stroke Res. 2025 Jan 3;16(5):1496–1508. doi: 10.1007/s12975-024-01321-1

Escape of Kdm6a from X Chromosome Is Detrimental to Ischemic Brains via IRF5 Signaling

Conelius Ngwa 1, Afzal Misrani 1, Kanaka Valli Manyam 1, Yan Xu 1, Shaohua Qi 1, Romana Sharmeen 1, Juneyoung Lee 1, Long-Jun Wu 2, Louise McCullough 1, Fudong Liu 1
PMCID: PMC12222549  NIHMSID: NIHMS2070799  PMID: 39752046

Abstract

The role of chromatin biology and epigenetics in disease progression is gaining increasing recognition. Genes that escape X chromosome inactivation (XCI) can impact neuroinflammation through epigenetic mechanisms. Our previous study has suggested that the X escapee genes Kdm6a and Kdm5c are involved in microglial activation after stroke in aged mice. However, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We hypothesized that Kdm6a/5c demethylate H3K27Me3/H3K4Me3 in microglia, respectively, and mediate the transcription of interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) and IRF4, leading to microglial pro-inflammatory responses and exacerbated stroke injury. Aged (17–20 months) Kdm6a/5c microglial conditional knockout (CKO) female mice (one allele of the gene) were subjected to a 60-min middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). Gene floxed females (two alleles) and males (one allele) were included as controls. Infarct volume and behavioral deficits were quantified 3 days after stroke. Immune responses including microglial activation and infiltration of peripheral leukocytes in the ischemic brain were assessed by flow cytometry. Epigenetic modification of IRF5/4 by Kdm6a/5c was analyzed by CUT&RUN assay. The demethylation of H3K27Me3 by kdm6a increased IRF5 transcription; meanwhile, Kdm5c demethylated H3K4Me3 to repress IRF5. Both Kdm6afl/fl and Kdm5cfl/fl mice had worse stroke outcomes compared to fl/y and CKO mice. Gene floxed females showed more robust expression of CD68 in microglia and elevated brain and plasma levels of IL-1β or TNF-α, after stroke. We concluded that IRF5 signaling plays a critical role in mediating the deleterious effect of Kdm6a, whereas Kdm5c’s effect is independent of IRF5.

Keywords: Aging, Kdm6a/5c, Microglia, Epigenetics, Ischemia, IRF

Introduction

Stroke sensitivity in the aged is driven primarily by sex chromosomes [1, 2] and through a variety of processes including gene epigenetic modifications such as histone methylation [35] and demethylation [3, 4]. Histone modifications can affect how accessible the chromatin is to transcriptional regulators and indispensable in the regulation of genes for microglial polarization [68] and the pathological process of ischemia [811], including Jumonji domain-containing histone demethylases [12] and enhancer of zeste homolog 2 [13]. In humans, histone modification patterns are associated with X chromosome, especially those genes that escape X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) [14]. Generally, X-linked genes escape XCI at the embryonic stage [15], but it is also suggested that some genes escape with aging [16, 17], leading to gene dosage imbalanced between males and females. Lysine demethylase 6a (Kdm6a) and Kdm5c are escapee genes that encode demethylases of H3K27Me3 [3, 18] and H3K4Me3 [4, 5], respectively. The demethylated form H3K27Me1 is active [1921] and H3K4Me1 suppressive for gene transcription [21, 22]. It has been reported that Kdm6a plays a sex-specific role by H3K27Me3 demethylation in controlling the expression of transcription factors critical for energy homeostasis [23] and inflammatory responses [24]. Modulating Kdm5c gene dosage in XX female mice to levels that are normally present in males resulted in reduced body weight and fat content [25].

Our previous studies have shown that (1) microglial interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) and IRF4 regulate neuroinflammation in young [26] and aged mice [27], (2) X chromosomal complement contributes to stroke sensitivity in aged animals [28], and (3) the X escapee genes Kdm6a and Kdm5c were involved in IRF5/4 expression and neuroinflammation after stroke [29]. However, the mechanism by which Kdm6a/Kdm5c modulates IRF5/4 gene signaling and neuroinflammation after stroke is still elusive. We hypothesized that Kdm6a/5c regulates IRF5/4 expression through epigenetic modification of histones, mediates microglial activation/neuroinflammation after stroke, and impacts outcomes. To test our hypothesis, we generated microglial Kdm6a or Kdm5c conditional knockout (CKO) mice, in which one allele of Kdm6a or Kdm5c is deleted and subjected the mice to a 60-min middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). Since stroke is a disease that mainly affects the elderly, aged mice (17–20 months) were used in the present study to enhance the translational research potential.

Materials and Methods

Animal Models

Kdm6a or Kdm5c (CKO) mice were generated by mating Kdm6a/5c flox/+ female mice (provided by Dr. Author Arnold, UCLA) with CX3CR1-CreER (strain # 021160, The Jackson Laboratory) males, followed by tamoxifen (TMX) induction [30]. Kdm6a/5c CKO female (there is only one allele of the gene in microglia), Kdm6a/5c flox/flox (fl/fl; two alleles) female, and Kdm6a/5c flox/y (fl/y; one allele) male, aged mice (17–20 months-old) were used in all experiments. All mice were group-housed under pathogen-free conditions with a 12-to-12-h day-night cycle and had access to food and water ad libitum. Mice were randomly chosen and used after they were examined free of aberrations or other abnormalities. All studies were conducted in accordance with NIH guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston McGovern Medical School.

Ischemic Stroke Model

Cerebral ischemia was induced in mice by reversible MCAO and under isoflurane anesthesia as previously described [26, 28, 31, 32]. Briefly, a midline ventral neck incision was made, and unilateral MCAO was performed by inserting a 6–0 silicone-coated suture into the right internal carotid artery 6 mm from the internal carotid/pterygopalatine artery bifurcation via an external carotid artery stump. Reperfusion was performed by withdrawing the suture 60 min after the occlusion. Rectal temperature was maintained at 36.5 ± 0.5 °C during surgery with an automated TC-1000 temperature-control feedback system (CWE, Inc., Ardmore, PA, USA). All mice were monitored on a daily basis and then euthanized at 2 days (for microglial transcriptional changes) or 3 days (for stroke outcomes and immune responses) of reperfusion because (1) gene transcriptional changes always happen earlier than outcome changes and (2) microglia yields are higher at 2 days vs. 3 days after stroke. Sham-operated animals underwent the same procedure including exposure to isoflurane and a midline ventral neck incision, but the suture was not advanced into the MCA. Laser Doppler flowmetry (Moor Instruments Ltd., UK) was applied to measure CBF through the skull at the right temporal fossa. Only the mice whose CBF showed a drop of over 85% of baseline after MCAO were included in the following experiments. The mortality after MCAO was 25% after 2 days of stroke and 35% after 3 days of stroke, for both Kdm6a and Kdm5c mouse models. The size of the MCAO-induced infarct was measured by cresyl violet (CV) staining as described in [28].

Flow Cytometry

Flow cytometry was performed as previously described with modifications [27]. Briefly, mice were euthanized and transcardially perfused with 1% heparin in cold PBS, and the brains were harvested. The ipsilateral hemispheres were diced and placed in complete RPMI 1640 (cat # 30-200, ATCC) medium and mechanically and enzymatically digested in collagenase/dispase (1 mg/mL) and DNAse (10 mg/mL) purchased from Roche Diagnostics, for 1 h, and at 37 °C. The cell suspension was diluted in regular RPMI 1640 and then filtered through a 70 μm filter and placed into a 70%/30% Percoll gradient. Cells were harvested from the interphase portion of the gradient, washed, and blocked with purified rat anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (mouse BD FC block, cat # 553142) and then stained for extracellular or intracellular markers and using primary antibody-conjugated fluorophores including anti-Ly6C Brilliant violet 605 (cat # 128035) and anti-IL-10 PerCP-Cy5.5 (cat # 505028) purchased from BioLegend. Anti-CD45.2 eF450 (cat # 48-0451-82), anti-CD11b AF488 (cat # 53-0112-82), anti-IL-1β PE (cat # 12-7114-82), anti-Ly6G PE-eFluor 610 (cat # 61-9668-82), anti-TNFα PE-Cy7 (cat # 25-7321-82), anti-IL-4 APC (cat # 17-7041-82), anti-CD206 AF700 (cat # 56-2061-82), and anti-CD68 APC-eF780 (cat # 47-0681-82) were purchased from ThermoFisher Scientific. For live/dead cell discrimination, a fixable viability dye, carboxylic acid succinimidyl ester (CASE-AF350, Invitrogen), was used. Fluorescence minus ones (FMOs) and bead compensations were used for all staining experiments. Data were acquired on Cytoflex_AS41045 (Beckman Coulter) and analyzed using FlowJo (Treestar Inc.).

mRNA Extraction and Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)

RT-PCR was performed as in [33] with slight modifications. Briefly, total RNA was extracted using RNeasy Mini Kit_74104 (QIAGEN, Germantown, MD, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and quantified using NANODROP ONE (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The RNA was converted to cDNA by iScript Reverse Transcription Supermix_1708841. C1000 Touch Thermal Cycler CFX384 Real-Time System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and the SsoAdvanced Universal SYBR Green Supermix_1725274 (Bio-Rad) were used to perform qPCR. The following gene primers from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA, USA) were used: Kdm6a F_CCAATCCCCGCAGAGCTTACCT, R_TTGCTCGGAGCTGTTCCAAGTG; Kdm5c F_ACCCACCTGGCAAAAACATTGG, R_ACTGTCGAAGGGGGATGCTGTG; and the housekeeping gene GAPDHF_GTGTTCCTACCCCCAATGTGT, R_ATTGTCATACCAGGAAATGAGCTT [29]. The results are reported as normalized fold changes in mRNA, which were determined by the ΔΔCt method using the threshold cycle (Ct) value.

Neurologic Deficit Scores (NDS)

Neurological deficits were assessed by the Benderson score system from 0 to 4 as in [26, 27]. Briefly, 0-no deficit; 1-forelimb weakness, torso turning to the ipsilateral side when held by the tail; 2-circling to the affected side; 3-unable to bear weight on affected side; and 4-no spontaneous activity or barrel rolling.

Open Field

The open field test (OFT) is a common measure of exploratory behavior, general activity, and anxiety-like behavior in rodents, where both the quality and quantity of the activity can be measured [34]. Briefly, mice were placed in a single arena facing the middle of a wall. Mice were allowed to explore the arena for 20 min [28]. After the 20-min duration, the mice were returned to the home cage and arena cleaned with 70% ethanol. The distance moved was analyzed as the locomotor and exploratory behavior of the mice.

Grip Strength

We used the conventional forelimb grip strength test to assess motor function in the mice [3537]. Briefly, a mouse was gently pulled by its tail ensuring the mouse grips the top portion of the grid, and the torso remains horizontal and record the maximal grip strength value of the mouse that is displayed on the screen. This procedure was repeated 3 times to obtain 3 forelimb grip strength measurements for each mouse, and the average strength was calculated.

Cleavage Under Targets and Release Using Nuclease (CUT&RUN) Assays

IRF DNA binding to histones in microglia was measured by using the CUTANA ChIC/CUT&RUN Kit (cat # 14-1048, Epicypher) [38] and CUTANA DNA purification Kit (cat # 14-0050) [39], with modifications. Briefly, microglia were isolated for CUT&RUN from mouse brain tissue, using ANTI-PE MICROBEADS (cat # 130-048-801, Miltenyi Biotech) [40] and PE-TMEM119 monoclonal antibody (cat # 12-6119-86) binding assays. The ANTI-PE MICROBEADS isolated microglia were washed with spermidine formulated wash-buffer and then bound onto activated concanavalin A conjugated paramagnetic beads (cat # 21-1401, Epicypher) by gentle agitation for 10 min and at RT. The cells bound to concanavalin A beads were then incubated overnight with 2 μg of anti-H3K4Me1 (cat # 13-0057, Epicypher), anti-H3K4Me3 (cat # 13-0041, Epicypher), anti-H3K27Me1 (cat # 61,015, Active Motive), or anti-H3K27Me3 (cat # 13-0055, Epicypher) antibody. After overnight incubation, the antibody-cell-bead complex was washed with wash buffer containing 5% digitonin (permeabilization buffer), and then 3 μL of the cleavage CUTANA pAG-MNase enzyme (cat# 15-1016, Epicypher) [41] was added and incubated at RT for 10 min with no agitation. The complex was further washed with permeabilization buffer and then resuspended in permeabilization buffer (50 μL) and cooled in ice for 4 min. Digestion, by the pAG-MNase enzyme incorporated into the cells, was induced by addition of calcium chloride (100 mM, 1 μL), followed by incubation for 2 h and at 4 °C. At the end of the digestion step, stop buffer (33 μL, cat # 14-1048, Epicypher) was added to the digestion complex and the complex incubated for 30 min and at 37 °C without shaking, in order to release DNA fragments. The supernatant containing the released DNA fragments was collected by centrifugation at 16,000 × g, at 4 °C and for 2 min. We pooled ANTI-PE MICROBEADS isolated microglia from 2 ipsilateral hemispheres as one sample, so that cell numbers are enough per sample for this assay. Total DNA was purified by the CUTANA DNA purification Kit (cat # 14-0050) following the vendor’s specifications. DNA was quantified using NANODROP ONE (Thermo Scientific). IRF5 and IRF4 in the purified DNA were quantified by qPCR in duplicates and using primers including: IRF5 F_5′-GTTTGGTCTGGGTTTTGAGTC-3′, R_5′-ATGTCTGTAACCCTAGCACTTG-3′; IRF4 F_5′-AATGGGAAACTCCGACAGTG-3′, R_5′-TCACGATTGTAGTCCTGCTTG-3′; GAPDH F_5′-GTGTTCCTACCCCCAATGTGT3′, R_5′-ATTGTCATACCAGGAAATGAGCTT-3′. The results are reported as mean of normalized fold changes in DNA gene expression from 8 mice (4 pairs of pooled ipsilateral hemispheres; n = 4), which were determined by the ΔΔCt method using the threshold cycle (Ct) value for gene of interest.

Plasma and Brain Cytokine Levels by Conventional Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

We used the same procedure as in [27, 29] with modification. Briefly, blood samples were obtained by cardiac puncture with EDTA-soaked syringed needles and then centrifuged at 15,000 RPM for 20 min and at 4 °C. Brain tissue in non-pyrogenic 5 mL polystyrene round-bottom tubes (Ref # 352235, Corning USA) was homogenized using glass pistons, in complete NP40 buffer, and also centrifuged at 15,000 RPM for 20 min, and at 4 °C. After centrifugation, the supernatant was collected and analyzed with Nunc MaxiSorp ELISA plates_423501 and the ELISA MAX Deluxe kits including TNF_430904, IL-1β_432604, IL-4_431104, and IL-10_431414 (BioLegend USA). Signals were measured at 450 nm in EnSpire Multimode Plate Reader (Perkin Elmer USA).

Statistical Analysis

Data from individual experiments were presented as mean ± SEM and assessed by Student’s t-test, one-way ANOVA, or 2-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test for multiple comparisons using GraphPad Prism Software 10.1.2 (324). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Investigators were blinded to mouse strains for stroke surgery, behavioral testing, infarct, and inflammation analysis.

Results

Validation of Microglial Kdm6a/Kdm5c CKO Mouse Model

We generated microglial Kdm6a and Kdm5c CKO female mouse models by injecting TMX (75 mg/kg) to Kdm6a or Kdm5cfl/+: CX3CR1-CreER mice (16 months). Four weeks after the TMX injection, the mice were ready for downstream experiments. We validated the CKO mouse model (deletion of one allele of Kdm6a or Kdm5c in microglia) by isolating microglia (using anti-Tmem119 antibody and ANTI-PE microbeads), followed by q-PCR for Kdm6a/Kdm5c mRNA gene expression (fold change) (Fig. 1). The Kdm6a/Kdm5c mRNA fold change was significantly reduced in CKO vs. fl/fl microglia (Fig. 1A, B), indicating the success of the CKO model.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Kdm6a and Kdm5c mRNA levels in microglia from Kdm6a fl/fl vs. CKO (A) and Kdm5c fl/fl vs. CKO (B) mice. Data were analyzed by unpaired t-test. n = 5–6 mice per group; *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.0005

Kdm6a Modulates IRF5 Through H3K27Me3 Demethylation

Our previous study [29] has suggested that Kdm6a is involved in regulation of IRF5 (pro-inflammatory) signaling. Here, we further tested if Kdm6a, a demethylase of histone, can epigenetically modulate IRF5 transcription. We performed MCAO in three strains of mice: Kdm6afl/y (male; one allele of Kdm6a), Kdm6afl/fl (female; two alleles), and Kdm6a CKO (female; one allele). At 2 days after MCAO, microglia were isolated, and CUT&RUN was performed to detect the amount of IRF5 DNA binding to either H3K27Me1 (active form for gene expression) or H3K27Me3 (suppressive form). The ratio of IRF5 DNA binding with H3K27Me1 over H3K27Me3 is indicative of the predominance of IRF5 active or suppressive transcription. There was a significant increase in IRF5 DNA binding to H3K27Me3 in Kdm6a CKO vs. fl/fl, although no difference was found between strains in H3K27Me1 binding (Fig. 2A, B). The binding ratio of H3K27Me1/H3K27Me3 was significantly higher in microglia isolated from Kdm6a fl/fl mouse, when compared with either fl/y or CKO (Fig. 2C). There was no significant difference in IRF5 DNA binding to H3K4 between strains (Fig. 2D, E, F). We also examined another transcription factor IRF4 (anti-inflammatory) but found IRF4 DNA binding to either H3K27 or H3K4 did not show any difference between groups (Suppl. 1 AF).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

IRF5 DNA binding to histones assayed by CUT&RUN and qPCR after MCAO in Kdm6a fl/y, fl/fl, and CKO mice. A, B IRF5 DNA binding to H3K27Me1 and H3K27Me3. C Ratio of IRF5 DNA binding to H3K27Me1/H3K27Me3. D, E IRF5 DNA binding to H3K4Me1 and H3K4Me3. F Ratio of IRF5 DNA binding to H3K4Me1/H3K4Me3. n = 4 per group (4 pairs of ipsilateral hemispheres from 8 animals). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005

Kdm5c Represses IRF5 Transcription Through H3K4Me3 Demethylation

Next, we examined the effect of another histone demethylase/X escapee gene, Kdm5c, on IRF5’s transcription with CUT&RUN assay, as Kdm5c was also previously found to be involved [29]. The demethylation of microglial H3K4Me3 (active form) by two alleles of Kdm5c in Kdm5cfl/fl mice induced a significant increase in IRF5 DNA binding to H3K4Me1 form (suppressive) compared with fl/y or CKO mice (both have one allele of Kdm5c) (Fig. 3A). The binding ratio of H3K4Me1/H3K4Me3 was significantly higher in the microglia from Kdm5cfl/fl vs. fl/y or CKO mice. (Fig. 3AC). We did not observe any significant difference in IRF5 DNA binding to H3K27 between strains (Suppl. 2 AC). Again, IRF4 DNA binding to either H3K27 or H3K4 did not show difference in these mice (Suppl. 2 DI). Taken together, data of Figs. 2 and 3 suggest that IRF5 transcription is regulated by both Kdm6a and Kdm5c, with an active effect by the former but a suppressive effect by the latter.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

IRF5 DNA binding to histones assayed by CUT&RUN and qPCR after MCAO in Kdm5c fl/y, fl/fl, and CKO mice. A, B IRF5 DNA binding to H3K4Me1 and H3K4Me3. C Ratio of IRF5 DNA binding to H3K4Me1/H3K4Me3. n = 4 per group (4 pairs of ipsilateral hemispheres from 8 animals). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. *P < 0.05, **P ≤ 0.005

Kdm6a/5c Signaling Are Pro-inflammatory After Stroke

Inflammatory responses to stroke can be determined by examination of infiltrating immune cells in the brain, microglial cell membrane and intracellular inflammatory mediator levels, and plasma and brain cytokine levels [26, 27, 42]. We first examined membrane and intracellular inflammatory markers in microglia by flow cytometry. The gating strategy for all immune cells is as shown in Suppl. 3. CD68 and CD206 are established cell membrane markers for pro- and anti-inflammatory response of microglia, respectively [27, 4345]. In stroke groups, CD68 was significantly increased in the microglia from Kdm6afl/fl vs. fl/y mice, and Kdm5cfl/fl mice had significantly higher CD68 than either fl/y or CKO mice (Fig. 4B, E). However, CD206 expression on microglia did not differ between strains (Fig. 4C, F). We also examined intracellular markers (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-4, and IL-10) in microglia, but two alleles of Kdm6a or Kdm5c did not induce higher expression of any of the cytokines compared with one allele of the two genes (Suppl. 4). Kdm6afl/fl mice had significantly higher plasma levels of IL-1β than fl/y mice; whereas Kdm5cfl/fl mice had higher levels of TNF-α than either fl/y and CKO mice after stroke (Fig. 5A, B). Negative results were found in other cytokines in these mice (Suppl. 5). For cytokines assayed in whole brain homogenates, both Kdm6afl/fl and Kdm5cfl/fl mice had significantly higher levels of TNF-α than either CKO mice after stroke (Fig. 6A, C). Meanwhile, Kdm6afl/fl (but not Kdm5cfl/fl) mice showed a significant increase in IL-1β when compared with CKO (Fig. 6B, D). For anti-inflammatory cytokines, we only found a significant decrease in IL-4 in the Kdm6afl/fl vs. CKO mice brains after stroke (Suppl. 6A). We also observed significantly greater lymphocyte infiltration in the brains of Kdm5cfl/fl mice compared to fl/y or CKO mice after stroke, although there was no significant difference in monocyte or neutrophil infiltration between the strains (Suppl. 7). All these data suggest that Kdm6a and Kdm5c signaling are pro-inflammatory after stroke in the aged.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Expression of membrane inflammatory markers on microglia by flow cytometry. A Representative flow plots of CD68/CD206 expression on microglia from Kdm6a fl/y, fl/fl, and CKO mice. B, C Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CD68 (B) and CD206 (C) in microglia from sham and stroke mice. D Representative flow plots of CD68/CD206 expression on microglia from Kdm5c fl/y, fl/fl, and CKO mice. E, F MFI of CD68 (E) and CD206 (F) in microglia from sham and stroke mice. n = 4 per sham and n = 6–8 per stroke group; 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. *P < 0.05

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Plasma cytokine levels after stroke. A IL-1β levels in plasma from Kdm6a fl/y, fl/fl, and CKO mice. B TNF-α levels in plasma from Kdm5c fl/y, fl/fl, and CKO mice. n = 4 per sham and n = 6–8 per stroke group; 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. *P < 0.05

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Brain cytokine levels after stroke. A, B TNF-α and IL-1β levels in Kdm6a fl/y, fl/fl, and CKO mice brains. C, D TNF-α and IL-1β levels in Kdm5c fl/y, fl/fl, and CKO mice brains. n = 4 per sham and n = 6 per stroke group; 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005

Two Alleles of Kdm6a Exacerbate Stroke Injury in the Aged

We next evaluated stroke outcomes in Kdm6afl/fl, fl/y, and CKO aged mice by examining infarct volumes and a battery of neurobehavior tests, 3 days after MCAO. We found that the striatal infarct in Kdm6afl/fl mice was significantly larger vs. fl/y mice. In addition, the fl/fl mice had significantly larger infarct in total ipsilateral hemisphere than fl/y or CKO mice (Fig. 7A, B). However, there were no significant differences between the strains in distance traveled (open field test) (Fig. 7C), grip strength (Fig. 7D), and NDS (Fig. 7E) at the acute timepoint (3 days) after stroke.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Stroke outcomes in Kdm6a fl/y, fl/fl and CKO mice. A Representative brain slices stained with cresyl violet. B Quantification of infarct volumes in the ipsilateral hemisphere. C Distance traveled in open field test. D Grip strength test. E Neurological deficits scores (NDS). n = 6–7 per group. 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005

Kdm5c’s Effect on IRF5 Transcription Does Not Contribute to Stroke Outcomes

We also examined the effect of Kdm5c’s signaling on stroke outcomes and found similar results as that of Kdm6a. Kdm5cfl/fl mice exhibited significantly larger infarcts in the striatum compared to fl/y or CKO mice after 3 days of stroke, but no differences were observed in neurobehavior deficits (Fig. 8AD). Our data showed ischemia impacted striatal region predominantly compared to cortex because the striatum is blood supplied by lenticulostriate arteries that are more susceptible to MCAO than other cerebral arteries [46]. IRF5 signaling is detrimental in stroke [26, 27], but in Fig. 3, we found two alleles of Kdm5c suppressed IRF5 transcription. Our data (Fig. 3 and Fig. 8) suggest Kdm5c’s detrimental effect on stroke injury is independent of IRF5 signaling.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Stroke outcomes in Kdm5c fl/y, fl/fl, and CKO mice. A Representative brain slices stained with cresyl violet. B Quantification of infarct volumes in the ipsilateral hemisphere. C Distance traveled in open field test. D Neurological deficits scores (NDS). n = 6–7 per group for CV staining, distance traveled, and NDS. 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. *P < 0.05

Discussion

It is well known that some X chromosome genes escape XCI [16, 17, 47, 48], leading to gene dosage imbalance between males and females [49, 50], which could impact post-stroke inflammation and outcomes once a stroke occurs. The present study focused on two X chromosome escapee genes, Kdm6a and Kdm5c, and investigated their epigenetic modulation of IRF5/IRF4 via demethylation of H3K27Me3/H3K4Me3 in aged microglia after stroke. IRF5-IRF4 regulatory axis has been previously found to be the determinant pathway that regulates microglial pro-/anti-inflammatory responses [26, 27, 33, 51, 52] and is critical in mediating stroke injury. The current data showed that Kdm6a and Kdm5c signaling both impact on one end of the axis, i.e., IRF5, but in an opposite pattern. Two alleles of Kdm6a led to active transcription of IRF5 through demethylation of H3K27Me3 to H3K27Me1; whereas two alleles of Kdm5c cause suppressive transcription of the pro-inflammatory factor through demethylation of H3K4Me3 to H3K4Me1. Two alleles of either Kdm6a or Kdm5c in microglia induced exacerbated pro-inflammatory responses after stroke, which led to worsened stroke injury. The different effect of the two Kdms on IRF5 transcription suggests that the two X escapee genes impact on stroke outcomes in the aged via different pathways.

Stroke is a sexually dimorphic disease [53, 54]; ischemic stroke sensitivity is mediated primarily by gonadal hormones in young population [55, 56] and by sex chromosomal complement in the aged [2, 28]. The contribution of the second X chromosome to stroke sensitivity in the aged has been observed in our previous study, with the two XCI escapee genes (Kdm6a/Kdm5c) involved [29]. The double expression of the two alleles of Kdm6a/Kdm5c due to the escape has been found also implicated in sex differences in cardiac infarction and adiposity [57, 58]. The current study utilized three animal strains with different allele numbers of active Kdm6a or Kdm5c and demonstrated the detrimental effects of both X escapee genes on stroke injury. Since the Kdm CKO female mice only has one allele of Kdm6a or Kdm5c and without Y chromosome, the comparison between CKO and Kdmfl/fl females is exclusively reflective of the effect of X chromosome dosage but none of Y effect. Therefore, the current data convincingly indicate that the escape of Kdm6a or Kdm5c plays a detrimental role in post-stroke inflammation and stroke injury and support the rationale that the Y chromosome has limited effect on the stroke sensitivity [28].

The current study focused on the effect of Kdm6a/5c escape from XCI in aged microglia on stroke, as microglia play important roles in initiating and perpetuating post-stroke neuroinflammation. The inducible CKO model utilized in the study makes it feasible to investigate gene escape in microglia specifically. Although CX3CR1-CreER system targets both microglia and infiltrating monocytes in the ischemic brain, we did not perform experiments until 6 weeks after TMX induction so that the microglia can be the sole target. Infiltrating monocytes have gone through “turnover” [59, 60] and no longer bear the TMX-induced gene knockout after 6 weeks of TMX induction, whereas microglia still have the KO due to their longevity [61]. Gene escape from XCI is random and has tissue and cell variability [62, 63]. In addition, gene escape from XCI may be affected by various biological homeostasis changes including aging and stroke injury. XCI becomes unstable with age, which is a frequently proposed explanation for the phenotype spectrum of disease in females [48, 64, 65], suggesting some X-linked genes escape more easily with aging. Our previous study has found Kdm6a/5c were significantly higher expressed in sorted aged female vs. male microglia from naïve mice, and the sex difference was lost when evaluated in whole brain tissue in sham mice but present in brain tissue homogenates after stroke [29]. These data suggest that Kdm6a/5c escape from XCI has cell variability and is sensitive to stroke stimulus.

Epigenetic regulation of genes has been widely studied including DNA methylation [66], histone [67], and non-coding RNA [68] modifications, with growing interest in exploring the related regulatory mechanisms underlying neuroinflammation in stroke [11, 69, 70]. Techniques such as chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) [67, 71] and CUT&RUN [38, 72, 73] have accelerated the advance of epigenetic studies by elucidating gene-protein interactions and the downstream targets. Epigenetics involves histones which serve as “gatekeepers” to modulate DNA replication/transcription and gene expression [74]. Kdm6a and Kdm5c are demethylases for H3K27Me3 [75] and H3K4Me3 [76], and the demethylation of the two histones induces active and a transcriptive effect on gene transcription [7780], respectively. Recently, we have demonstrated by ChIP that the inflammatory transcription factors, IRF 5/4, bind to H3K27Me3 or H3K4Me3, suggesting the two IRFs are subjected to the epigenetic modulation of the histones [29]. Histones contain five components: H1, H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 [14], and undergo post-translational modifications of the N-terminal tail by acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, demethylation, and lactylation [8184]. The modifications of histone tails affect the interaction of histones and DNA, alter the structure and stability of chromatin [85], and regulate gene transcription through modulating the affinity of transcription factors and structural gene promoters [16]. X chromosome-linked genes have been shown to play important roles in epigenetic modification of genes related to post-stroke inflammation [28, 86]. Our data show that kdm6a/5c both regulate IRF5 transcription as in (Figs. 2 and 3); however, in an opposite pattern (active vs. suppressive) through different histone demethylation, reflecting the complex nature of histone chromatin accessibility to transcriptional elements of the IRF5 gene after stroke. Epigenetic mechanisms after stroke are critical in the molecular pathophysiology of the disease and are potential therapeutic targets [69, 87] to salvage the hypoperfused ischemic penumbra that has not yet evolved into infarcted tissue [88]. The present study provided potential epigenetic avenues to target XCI escapee genes to regulate the expression of the pro-inflammatory transcription factor IRF5.

IRF5 is a well-established pro-inflammatory transcription factor responsible for mediating microglial production of inflammatory cytokines [26]. Of note, our data demonstrated that Kdm6a and Kdm5c signaling have opposite effects on IRF5 transcription (Figs. 2 and 3). However, the escape of both Kdms from XCI has pro-inflammatory effects including promoting microglial pro-inflammatory response (Fig. 4), increasing plasma/brain levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (Figs. 5 and 6), and both led to exacerbated stroke injury (Figs. 7 and 8). The active effect of Kdm6a on IRF5 transcription is logical to the downstream pro-inflammatory response and worsened stroke injury, but the suppressive effect of Kdm5c on IRF5 seems irrelevant to the downstream outcomes. Different Kdm family proteins finetune the switch of gene expression by manipulating active or repressive histone methylation markers, thus participating in various links of immune cells and inflammatory activities [89, 90]. Kdm6a is a demethylase for H3K27Me3 [91], whereas Kdm5c is responsible for demethylation of H3K4Me3 [92]. Our data are consistent with this as H3K4-IRF5 axis was not affected by Kdm6a (Fig. 2DF) and H3K27-IRF5 not changed by Kdm5c (Suppl. 2 AC). The specific histone target for the two Kdms might be the reason why they have different effect on IRF5 transcription. It is likely that Kdm5c suppresses transcription of some anti-inflammatory genes to confer detrimental effects on neuroinflammation, so that two alleles of Kdm5c cause detrimental effects on stroke regardless of its repressive action on IRF5. The different effects of Kdm6a vs. Kdm5c on IRF5 also suggest there might be redundancy or compensation in histone modification, as histone tails are heavily modified with different modifications such as acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitylation, sumoylation, ADP ribosylation, deamination, biotinylating, butyrylation, N-formylation, and proline isomerization [83]. Future research will explore whether Kdm5c affects other forms of epigenetic modification of IRF5. In the present study, our main focus is the epigenetic effects of Kdm6a and Kdm5c in microglia as we aim to study poststroke inflammation in which microglia play a central role. However, Kdm6a and Kdm5c are also expressed in neurons [23, 93] and play a sex-specific role in regulating the expression of transcription factors and neuropeptides [23], which might also impact on neuroinflammation. Additionally, in women with ankylosing spondylitis, there is an increased ratio of inflammatory Kdm6a to immunomodulatory Kdm5c transcript in T helper 17 cells suggesting a potential role of the two X escapees in adaptive immunity [94]. The roles of Kdm6a/5c in other immune cells warrant further investigation.

The current study has some caveats that we should keep in mind when interpreting the data. We used CUT&RUN technique to investigate IRF5 DNA binding to histones, which is impacted by Kdm6a and/or Kdm5c. The effectiveness of CUT&RUN relies on proper chromatin complex targeting, as large complexes may not diffuse effectively, potentially resulting in low release of targeted DNA from chromatin. Despite this, CUT&RUN remains a sensitive and specific method that requires fewer cells than regular ChIP, making it ideal to study the binding patterns of chromatin-associated proteins [95]. We examined the Kdm-histone-IRF axis in aged microglia only at the acute phase of stroke (3 days after MCAO) and did not include a chronic stage cohort study which is still on-going (years of work). Nevertheless, microglial responses to ischemia peak at 48–72 h after stroke [26, 9698] and the data generated from the current study should reflect the primary effects of the two X escapees on post-stroke neuroinflammation. In the chronic phase, we expect Kdm6a will still exhibit an upregulation effect on IRF5 that hampers tissue repair. Another caveat of the study is that we did not examine Kdm-IRF5 signaling in infiltrating monocytes. It has been reported [99] that demethylation of H3K27Me3 by Kdm6a markedly increased IL-1β expression through a Caspase-1 pathway in macrophages. The infiltrating monocytes in the ischemic brain also express IRF5 [51, 100, 101]. Nevertheless, our previous study has already suggested that the central (microglia) IRF signaling is more important than the IRFs expressed on peripheral immune cells in post-stroke inflammation [42].

In summary, the present study investigated the demethylating effects of Kdm6a/5c on H3K27Me3/H3K4Me3-IRF5/4 signaling in microglia and assessed their impacts on stroke outcomes in aged mice. Our findings reveal that the escape of microglial Kdm6a/5c from XCI exacerbates post-stroke inflammation and worsens outcomes. IRF5 signaling plays a critical role in mediating the deleterious effect of Kdm6a (Fig. 9), whereas Kdm5c’s effect is independent of IRF5. The epigenetic modification of histones by X escapee genes is a novel mechanism in inducing sex differences in stroke among the elderly, highlighting new, sex-specific therapeutic targets for this devastating disease.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Mechanistic diagram. Kdm6a escapes from XCI in aged microglia and demethylates H3K27Me3 (suppressive form) to H3K27Me1 (active). H3K27Me1 then binds IRF5 gene and activates IRF5 transcription, leading to upregulation of the expression of pro-inflammatory mediators

Supplementary Material

Supplementary

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Arthur Arnold from UCLA for his courtesy in providing us Kdm6a and Kdm5c flox mice.

Funding

This work was supported by funding from AHA Grant 23POST1019058 to Conelius Ngwa and NIH Grants R01 NS108779/NS129977 to Fudong Liu.

Abbreviations

ATCC

American Type Culture Collection

BCA

Bicinchoninic acid assay

ChIP

Chromatin immunoprecipitation

CKO

Conditional knock out

CUT&RUN

Cleavage under targets and release using nuclease

ELISA

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

fl/fl

Flox/flox

H3k27Me3

Trimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 27

H3k27Me1

Monomethylation of histone H3 at lysine 27

H3k4Me3

Trimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 4

H3k4Me1

Monomethylation of histone H3 at lysine 4

ISRE

Interferon stimulatory regulatory element

IRF5

Interferon regulatory factor 5

IRF4

Interferon regulatory factor 4

Kdm6a

Lysine-specific demethylase 6A

Kdm5c

Lysine demethylase 5C

MCAO

Middle cerebral artery occlusion

MFI

Mean fluorescence intensity

RPMI

Roswell Park Memorial Institute

RT

Room temperature

USP9X

Ubiquitin-specific peptidase 9 X-linked

XCI X

chromosome inactivation

Footnotes

Declarations

Conflict of Interest The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics Approval All studies were conducted in accordance with NIH guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston McGovern Medical School.

Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-024-01321-1.

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed in the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1.Balderman S, Lichtman MA. A history of the discovery of random X chromosome inactivation in the human female and its significance. Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2011;2(3):e0058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.McCullough LD, et al. Stroke sensitivity in the aged: sex chromosome complement vs. gonadal hormones. Aging (Albany NY). 2016;8(7):1432–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tran N, Broun A, Ge K. Lysine demethylase KDM6A in differentiation, development, and cancer. Mol Cell Biol. 2020;40(20):e00341–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Outchkourov NS, et al. Balancing of histone H3K4 methylation states by the Kdm5c/SMCX histone demethylase modulates promoter and enhancer function. Cell Rep. 2013;3(4):1071–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Leonardi E, et al. Expanding the genetics and phenotypic spectrum of lysine-specific demethylase 5C (KDM5C): a report of 13 novel variants. Eur J Hum Genet. 2023;31(2):202–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cheray M, Joseph B. Epigenetics control microglia plasticity. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Patnala R, et al. HDAC inhibitor sodium butyrate-mediated epigenetic regulation enhances neuroprotective function of microglia during ischemic stroke. Mol Neurobiol. 2017;54:6391–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Qiu M, Xu E, Zhan L. Epigenetic regulations of microglia/macrophage polarization in ischemic stroke. Front Mol Neurosci. 2021;14: 697416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kong Q, et al. HDAC4 in ischemic stroke: mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Clin Epigenetics. 2018;10:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Stanzione R, et al. Pathogenesis of ischemic stroke: role of epigenetic mechanisms. Genes (Basel). 2020;11(1):89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ng GY, et al. Epigenetic regulation of inflammation in stroke. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2018;11:1756286418771815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Batie M, et al. Hypoxia induces rapid changes to histone methylation and reprograms chromatin. Science. 2019;363(6432):1222–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Luo Y, et al. Inhibition of EZH2 (enhancer of zeste homolog 2) attenuates neuroinflammation via H3k27me3/SOCS3/TRAF6/NF-κB (trimethylation of histone 3 lysine 27/suppressor of cytokine signaling 3/tumor necrosis factor receptor family 6/nuclear factor-κB) in a rat model of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2020;51(11):3320–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Brinkman AB, et al. Histone modification patterns associated with the human X chromosome. EMBO Rep. 2006;7(6):628–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Moreira de Mello JC, et al. Early X chromosome inactivation during human preimplantation development revealed by single-cell RNA-sequencing. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):10794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chaligné R, Heard E. X-chromosome inactivation in development and cancer. FEBS Lett. 2014;588(15):2514–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lee JT. Gracefully ageing at 50, X-chromosome inactivation becomes a paradigm for RNA and chromatin control. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2011;12(12):815–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.van Haaften G, et al. Somatic mutations of the histone H3K27 demethylase gene UTX in human cancer. Nat Genet. 2009;41(5):521–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ferrari KJ, et al. Polycomb-dependent H3K27me1 and H3K27me2 regulate active transcription and enhancer fidelity. Mol Cell. 2014;53(1):49–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kim K, et al. H3K27me1 is essential for MMP-9-dependent H3N-terminal tail proteolysis during osteoclastogenesis. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2018;11(1):23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yu Y, et al. H3K27me3-H3K4me1 transition at bivalent promoters instructs lineage specification in development. Cell Biosci. 2023;13(1):66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cheng J, et al. A role for H3K4 monomethylation in gene repression and partitioning of chromatin readers. Mol Cell. 2014;53(6):979–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cabrera Zapata LE, Cambiasso MJ, Arevalo MA. Epigenetic modifier Kdm6a/Utx controls the specification of hypothalamic neuronal subtypes in a sex-dependent manner. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:937875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Li X, et al. Demethylase Kdm6a epigenetically promotes IL-6 and IFN-β production in macrophages. J Autoimmun. 2017;80:85–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Link JC, et al. X chromosome dosage of histone demethylase KDM5C determines sex differences in adiposity. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(11):5688–702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Al Mamun A, et al. Microglial IRF5-IRF4 regulatory axis regulates neuroinflammation after cerebral ischemia and impacts stroke outcomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(3):1742–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ngwa C, et al. Regulation of microglial activation in stroke in aged mice: a translational study. Aging (Albany NY). 2022;14(15):6047–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Qi S, et al. X, but not Y, chromosomal complement contributes to stroke sensitivity in aged animals. Transl Stroke Res. 2023;14(5):776–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Qi S, et al. X chromosome escapee genes are involved in ischemic sexual dimorphism through epigenetic modification of inflammatory signals. J Neuroinflammation. 2021;18(1):70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Al Mamun A, et al. Neuronal CD200 signaling is protective in the acute phase of ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2021;52(10):3362–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Liu F, Schafer DP, McCullough LD. TTC, fluoro-Jade B and NeuN staining confirm evolving phases of infarction induced by middle cerebral artery occlusion. J Neurosci Methods. 2009;179(1):1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Misrani A, et al. Brain endothelial CD200 signaling protects brain against ischemic damage. Brain Res Bull. 2024;207:110864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 33.Ngwa C, et al. Phosphorylation of microglial IRF5 and IRF4 by IRAK4 regulates inflammatory responses to ischemia. Cells. 2021;10(2):276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kraeuter AK, Guest PC, Sarnyai Z. The open field test for measuring locomotor activity and anxiety-like behavior. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1916:99–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Meyer OA, et al. A method for the routine assessment of fore-and hindlimb grip strength of rats and mice. Neurobehav Toxicol. 1979;1(3):233–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cabe PA, et al. A simple recording grip strength device. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1978;8(1):101–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Smith JP, et al. Quantitative measurement of muscle strength in the mouse. J Neurosci Methods. 1995;62(1–2):15–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Agustinus AS, et al. Epigenetic dysregulation from chromosomal transit in micronuclei. Nature. 2023;619(7968):176–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Franklin R, et al. Regulation of chromatin accessibility by the histone chaperone CAF-1 sustains lineage fidelity. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):2350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Barnes E, et al. Ultra-sensitive class I tetramer analysis reveals previously undetectable populations of antiviral CD8+ T cells. Eur J Immunol. 2004;34(6):1570–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Skene PJ, Henikoff S. An efficient targeted nuclease strategy for high-resolution mapping of DNA binding sites. Elife. 2017;6:e21856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ngwa C, et al. Central IRF4/5 signaling are critical for microglial activation and impact on stroke outcomes. Transl Stroke Res. 2023;15:831–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jurga AM, Paleczna M, Kuter KZ. Overview of general and discriminating markers of differential microglia phenotypes. Front Cell Neurosci. 2020;14:198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Butturini E, et al. STAT1 drives M1 microglia activation and neuroinflammation under hypoxia. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2019;669:22–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bok E, et al. Modulation of M1/M2 polarization by capsaicin contributes to the survival of dopaminergic neurons in the lipopolysaccharide-lesioned substantia nigra in vivo. Exp Mol Med. 2018;50(7):1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Decavel P, Vuillier F, Moulin T. Lenticulostriate infarction. Front Neurol Neurosci. 2012;30:115–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Liu Y, et al. The inactive X chromosome accumulates widespread epigenetic variability with age. Clin Epigenetics. 2023;15(1):135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Juchniewicz P, et al. X-chromosome inactivation patterns depend on age and tissue but not conception method in humans. Chromosome Res. 2023;31(1):4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Fang H, Disteche CM, Berletch JB. X inactivation and escape: epigenetic and structural features. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019;7:219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Berletch JB, et al. Genes that escape from X inactivation. Hum Genet. 2011;130(2):237–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Al Mamun A, et al. Interferon regulatory factor 4/5 signaling impacts on microglial activation after ischemic stroke in mice. Eur J Neurosci. 2018;47(2):140–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zhao S-C, et al. Age-related differences in interferon regulatory factor-4 and -5 signaling in ischemic brains of mice. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2017;38(11):1425–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sealy-Jefferson S, et al. Age-and ethnic-specific sex differences in stroke risk. Gend Med. 2012;9(2):121–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Petrea RE, et al. Gender differences in stroke incidence and poststroke disability in the Framingham heart study. Stroke. 2009;40(4):1032–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.McCullough LD, Hurn PD. Estrogen and ischemic neuroprotection: an integrated view. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2003;14(5):228–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Manwani B, et al. Sex differences in ischemic stroke sensitivity are influenced by gonadal hormones, not by sex chromosome complement. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2015;35(2):221–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Li J, et al. The number of X chromosomes influences protection from cardiac ischaemia/reperfusion injury in mice: one X is better than two. Cardiovasc Res. 2014;102(3):375–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Chen X, et al. The number of x chromosomes causes sex differences in adiposity in mice. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(5):e1002709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ronning KE, Karlen SJ, Burns ME. Structural and functional distinctions of co-resident microglia and monocyte-derived macrophages after retinal degeneration. J Neuroinflammation. 2022;19(1):299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Guilliams M, Mildner A, Yona S. Developmental and functional heterogeneity of monocytes. Immunity. 2018;49(4):595–613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Manjally AV, Tay TL. Attack of the clones: microglia in health and disease. Front Cell Neurosci. 2022;16:831747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zito A, et al. Escape from X-inactivation in twins exhibits intra- and inter-individual variability across tissues and is heritable. PLoS Genet. 2023;19(2):e1010556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Werner JM, et al. Variability of cross-tissue X-chromosome inactivation characterizes timing of human embryonic lineage specification events. Dev Cell. 2022;57(16):1995–2008.e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mengel-From J, et al. Skewness of X-chromosome inactivation increases with age and varies across birth cohorts in elderly Danish women. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):4326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Roberts AL, et al. Age acquired skewed X chromosome inactivation is associated with adverse health outcomes in humans. Elife. 2022;11:e78263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Weinhold B Epigenetics: the science of change. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114(3):A160–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res. 2011;21(3):381–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Holoch D, Moazed D. RNA-mediated epigenetic regulation of gene expression. Nat Rev Genet. 2015;16(2):71–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Morris-Blanco KC, et al. Epigenetic mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets in stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2022;42(11):2000–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kumar A, et al. Epigenetics mechanisms in ischemic stroke: a promising avenue? J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021;30(5):105690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gade P, Kalvakolanu DV. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay as a tool for analyzing transcription factor activity. In: Transcriptional Regulation: Methods and Protocols. New York: Springer; 2012. p. 85–104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kaya-Okur HS, et al. CUT&Tag for efficient epigenomic profiling of small samples and single cells. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Salma M, et al. High-throughput methods for the analysis of transcription factors and chromatin modifications: low input, single cell and spatial genomic technologies. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2023;101:102745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Mozzetta C, et al. Sound of silence: the properties and functions of repressive Lys methyltransferases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015;16(8):499–513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Cuyàs E, et al. Metformin directly targets the H3K27me3 demethylase KDM6A/UTX. Aging Cell. 2018;17(4):e12772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Xiao M, et al. Elevated histone demethylase KDM5C increases recurrent miscarriage risk by preventing trophoblast proliferation and invasion. Cell Death Discov. 2022;8(1):495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Chen J, et al. Kdm6a suppresses the alternative activation of macrophages and impairs energy expenditure in obesity. Cell Death Differ. 2021;28(5):1688–704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Abu-Hanna J, et al. Therapeutic potential of inhibiting histone 3 lysine 27 demethylases: a review of the literature. Clin Epigenetics. 2022;14(1):98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Trempenau ML, et al. The histone demethylase KDM5C functions as a tumor suppressor in AML by repression of bivalently marked immature genes. Leukemia. 2023;37(3):593–605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Pavlenko E, et al. Functions and interactions of mammalian KDM5 demethylases. Front Genet. 2022;13:906662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Liu R, et al. Post-translational modifications of histones: mechanisms, biological functions, and therapeutic targets. MedComm (2020). 2023;4(3):e292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Zhang D, et al. Metabolic regulation of gene expression by histone lactylation. Nature. 2019;574(7779):575–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Kouzarides T Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell. 2007;128(4):693–705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Chen LJ, et al. The role of lysine-specific demethylase 6A (KDM6A) in tumorigenesis and its therapeutic potentials in cancer therapy. Bioorg Chem. 2023;133:106409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Strahl BD, Allis CD. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature. 2000;403(6765):41–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Qi S, et al. X chromosome escapee genes are involved in ischemic sexual dimorphism through epigenetic modification of inflammatory signals. J Neuroinflammation. 2021;18:1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Hwang J-Y, Aromolaran KA, Zukin RS. Epigenetic mechanisms in stroke and epilepsy. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38(1):167–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Baron J-C. Protecting the ischaemic penumbra as an adjunct to thrombectomy for acute stroke. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14(6):325–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Qu L, et al. Histone demethylases in the regulation of immunity and inflammation. Cell Death Discov. 2023;9(1):188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Önder Ö, et al. Progress in epigenetic histone modification analysis by mass spectrometry for clinical investigations. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2015;12(5):499–517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Hong S, et al. Identification of JmjC domain-containing UTX and JMJD3 as histone H3 lysine 27 demethylases. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007;104(47):18439–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Zhang S, et al. Targeting epigenetic regulators for inflammation: mechanisms and intervention therapy. MedComm (2020). 2022;3(4):e173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Vallianatos CN, et al. Mutually suppressive roles of KMT2A and KDM5C in behaviour, neuronal structure, and histone H3K4 methylation. Commun Biol. 2020;3(1):278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Fazazi MR, et al. The X-linked histone demethylases KDM5C and KDM6A as regulators of T cell-driven autoimmunity in the central nervous system. Brain Res Bull. 2023;202:110748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Hainer SJ, Fazzio TG. High-resolution chromatin profiling using CUT&RUN. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2019;126(1):e85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Taylor RA, Sansing LH. Microglial responses after ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage. Clin Dev Immunol. 2013;2013:746068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Gelderblom M, et al. Temporal and spatial dynamics of cerebral immune cell accumulation in stroke. Stroke. 2009;40(5):1849–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Stevens SL, et al. The use of flow cytometry to evaluate temporal changes in inflammatory cells following focal cerebral ischemia in mice. Brain Res. 2002;932(1–2):110–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Yang X, et al. Zoledronic acid regulates the synthesis and secretion of IL-1β through histone methylation in macrophages. Cell Death Discov. 2020;6:47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Corbin AL, Gomez-Vazquez M, Berthold DL, Attar M, Arnold IC, Powrie FM, Sansom SN, Udalova IA. IRF5 guides monocytes toward an inflammatory CD11c+ macrophage phenotype and promotes intestinal inflammation. Sci Immunol. 2020;5(47):eaax6085. 10.1126/sciimmunol.aax6085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Yang L, et al. Monocytes from Irf5−/−mice have an intrinsic defect in their response to pristane-induced lupus. J Immunol. 2012;189(7):3741–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed in the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

RESOURCES