Skip to main content
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP logoLink to Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP
. 2025;26(4):1225–1231. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2025.26.4.1225

The Role of Oral Microbiota in the Development of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using MicroRNA and Apoptosis-Related Gene Expression: An Exploratory Study

Abdolreza Mohamadnia 1,2, Mohammad Bayat 3, Melika Norouzi 4, Zahra Gharayagh Zandi 4, Fereshteh Shirzadian 4, Mehdi Kazempour Dizaji 5, Mohammad Hossein Soltani 6, Seyedeh Zahra Fotook Kiaei 7, Mohammad Varahram 5,*, Farnaz Ahmadi 8, Shadi Shafaghi 8,*, Naghmeh Bahrami 3,9,*
PMCID: PMC12227961  PMID: 40302074

Abstract

Background and Objective:

Oral cancer is one of the malignant tumors of the head and neck region, which is associated with high mortality rates and has various negative effects on the aesthetics of patients. Therefore, access to high-quality care for early detection and appropriate surgical and drug treatments is crucial. To this end, researchers are investigating the mechanisms of carcinogenesis in cells and identifying the factors that affect it. The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanisms by which oral microbiota contributes to carcinogenesis.

Materials and Methods:

Sixty peripheral blood samples were collected from oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients with (30 samples) and without (30 samples) of oral infection, referred to the Cancer Institute of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Real-time PCR was performed to determine the expression levels of miR-92, miR-26, miR-486, Bak, Bax, and Caspase-8 genes.

Results:

MiR-92 and miR-26 relative expression were higher in the OSCC patients with oral infection compared to OSCC patients without oral infection. However, relative expression of miR-486, Bak, Bax, and Caspase-8 was significantly decreased in patients with oral infection compared to OSCC patients without oral infection.

Conclusion:

The results showed that oral microbiome prevents apoptosis and promotes the development of cancerous tissue in OSCC patients. The identification of a link between oral infection and microRNA and apoptosis-related gene expression could provide researchers with the opportunity to formulate innovative methods for the prevention or management of OSCC.

Key Words: Oral squamous cell carcinoma, Oral microbiome, MicroRNA, Apoptosis-related genes

Introduction

Carcinogenesis is a complex process involving various signaling pathways triggered by abnormal oncogenic signals [1]. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth most prevalent cancer globally, and it comprises a biologically diverse group of tumors [2]. Over 90% of HNSCCs occur in the mucosal surfaces of the oropharynx and larynx [3], with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) accounting for over 90% of oral cancers [4]. Oral cancers, which develop in the mouth, lip, and tongue, have a significant impact on morbidity and mortality [5], particularly in low socioeconomic status groups [6]. In the developing world, oral cancer is responsible for two-thirds of all cancer-related deaths [7]. Unfortunately, two-thirds of oral cancer cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage [8, 3].

Despite recent advances in the multidisciplinary treatment of oral cancer, patients with locally advanced disease have a poor prognosis, and disease-free patients are at high risk of relapse [9]. Therefore, researchers are striving to gain a better understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms that initiate oral tumors and facilitate metastasis [10, 11].

OSCC is the most common oral cavity malignancy, characterized by a poor prognosis and low survival rate. The etiology of this cancer is multifactorial, with tobacco and alcohol consumption being the most significant risk factors [12]. Alterations in the oral microbiome can disrupt the symbiotic relationship between microorganisms and humans, potentially leading to diseases [13]. There is increasing evidence pointing to the role of bacteria in oral cancer development. Recent studies have suggested that the oral microbiota may contribute to oral squamous cell carcinoma through the direct metabolism of carcinogens and inflammatory effects [14]. However, the association between oral microbiota and OSCC development, as well as the underlying mechanisms, are not fully understood. Therefore, it is essential to comprehend the mechanism of OSCC development to identify potential targets for molecular therapy of OSCC.

Microribonucleic acids (miRNAs) are a group of non-coding RNAs that are 19-25 nucleotides in length and play a crucial role in regulating several essential biological functions such as cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis [15, 16]. Consequently, abnormal expression of miRNA may be linked to the onset and progression of cancers. Some studies indicate that the abnormal expression of miRNAs is associated with the development of OSCC [17-19].

Caspases, a family of cysteine-dependent aspartate-directed proteases, play a central role in the apoptotic cell death process [20]. The localization of caspases and the translocation of their active products are crucial for the development of the apoptotic process [21]. Studies have suggested that caspases may serve as a genetic biomarker for personal risk of various cancer types, including oral cancer [22].

The BCL-2 protein family is essential in regulating apoptotic cell death, which includes anti-apoptotic and pro-apoptotic proteins. The anti-apoptotic proteins are Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL, while the pro-apoptotic proteins consist of Bax and Bak [23]. Abnormal overexpression of pro-survival BCL-2 family members or abnormal reduction of pro-apoptotic BCL-2 family proteins, both resulting in the inhibition of apoptosis, are frequently found in different malignancies [24]. Given both cell proliferation and a reduced rate of apoptosis are implicated in the pathogenesis of carcinogenesis, in this study, we aim to investigate the mechanisms by which oral microbiota contributes to carcinogenesis through examining the expression of miR-26, miR-92, miR-486, Caspase-8, Bak, and Bax.

Materials and Methods

The blood samples were collected from OSCC patients with oral infection (n = 30) and OSCC patients without oral infection (n = 30) referring to the Cancer Institute of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (ethical code: IR.SBMU.NRITLD.REC.1402.116). Patients with only primary untreated OSCC, including chemotherapy or radiotherapy, were recruited. Patients with chronic or acute inflammatory diseases were excluded.

RNA extraction

The blood was allowed to clot for 45 minutes to separate the serum, and then it was processed according to the instructions provided by Mircury Exiqon (Denmark). Next, the blood samples were spun at 2,500 ×g at 4°C for 15 minutes, and the resulting fluid was spun again at full speed for 15 minutes at 4°C to eliminate any remaining contaminants, including erythrocytes. The serum was stored at -70°C until it was ready to be processed for total RNA isolation. Total RNA was extracted from the serum samples using Mircury Exiqon, following the manufacturer’s protocol, and miRNeasy Mini Kits and miRNeasy serum (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) were used to extract miRs from the serum samples. The optical densities for RNA extraction were determined to be 260/280 ratio according to the manufacturer’s guidelines.

cDNA synthesis

All cDNA samples were normalized to 2 μg, followed by microRNA cDNA synthesis using a reverse transcription system kit (Zist Royesh, Iran) and Viva 2-step RT-PCR Kit (Cat no. RTPL12) for Bax, Bak, and Caspase 8. Synthesized cDNAs from the total RNA stem-loop were used in real-time RT-PCR. Reverse transcriptase (RT) reactions contained 2 μg of RNA sample, 50 nmol/L of stem-loop RT primer, 2× RT buffer, 0.5 mmol/L of each dNTP, and 4 U/μL of M-MLV RT. The reactions (20 μL) were incubated in a PCR system at 37°C for 50 minutes and 85°C for 5 minutes, followed by holding the samples at 4°C. RNA18S was used as a housekeeping gene to normalize the expression of genes. The primer sequences of Bak, Bax, and Caspase-8 are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Real-Time Primer Sequences

Parameters Bak Bax Caspase 8
F primer ACGCTATGACTCAGAGTTCC5 TCAGGATGCGTCCACCAAGAAG AGAAGAGGGTCATCCTGGGAGA
R primer CTTCGTACCACAAACTGGCC5 TGTGTCCACGGCGGCAATCATC TCAGGACTTCCTTCAAGGCTGC

Real-time PCR

Real-time PCR was carried out for miRs by SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Zist Royesh, Iran) and for Bak, Bax, and Caspase-8 using CinnaGreen qPCR Mix, 2X (Cat No.MM2041) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions on a real-time PCR instrument. Each reaction was performed in a 20 μL volume, comprising 50 ng of cDNA, 2 μL of universal primer, and 10 pmol of each primer, in addition to 10 μL of 2× QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR Master Mix. The PCR amplification reaction involved denaturation at 95°C for 10 seconds, followed by 40 cycles at 62°C for 20 seconds and 72°C for 30 seconds. All reactions were performed in triplicate, and the comparative Ct method was used to analyze the expression level differences in each group.

Statistical analysis

All the data were analyzed using SPSS 20.0 Software. Differences between the groups were examined for statistical significance with an unpaired t-test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

There were no significant differences in age between the two groups. The mean standard deviation of the age for OSCC patients with oral infection and OSCC patients without oral infection were 45.2 (8.8) and 44.6 (8.1) years, respectively (p = 0.36). In 30 OSCC patients with oral infection, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Streptococcus anginosus, Streptococcus mitis, Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus aureus Candida albicans were found. However, no evidence for the presence of oral microbiota was found in OSCC patients without oral infection.

Expression levels of miR-92, miR-26, and miR-486

The results revealed that the expression of miR-92 and miR-26 markers were detected in 86% (26 out of 30), and 93% (28 out of 30) of OSCC patients with oral infection, respectively. Statistical comparison of the positive percentage of miR-92, and miR-26 markers indicated that OSCC patients with oral infection had higher expression of these markers compared with OSCC patients without oral infection (P-value < 0.001; Figure 1). Whereas the proportion of positive miR-486 significantly decreased in OSCC patients with oral infection compared with OSCC patients without oral infection (P-value < 0.001; Figure 1). Results obtained by the ΔΔCT method showed that miR-92 and miR-26 relative expression were 1.47 and 1.34 times higher in the OSCC patients with oral infection compared to OSCC patients without oral infection (Figure 2). However, miR-486 relative expression was significantly decreased in patients with oral infection compared to OSCC patients without oral infection (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Percentage of Positive miR-92, miR-26, and miR-486 in Patients with Oral Infection and OSCC Patients without Oral Infection.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Expression levels of miR-92, miR-26, and miR-486 in Patients with Oral Infection and OSCC Patients without Oral Infection were Measured by RT-qPCR.

Expression levels of Bak, Bax, and Caspase 8

The expression levels of Bak, Bax, and Caspase 8 in the above cases showed the opposite trend of the expression levels. According to the findings, Bak, Bax, and Caspase 8 were detected in 40% (12 out of 30) and 27% (8 out of 30) of OSCC patients with oral infection, indicating a lower expression of these markers in comparison to OSCC patients without oral infection (P-value < 0.001, as shown in Figure 3). Furthermore, the relative expression of Bak, Bax, and Caspase 8 was significantly decreased in patients with oral infection compared to OSCC patients without oral infection (Figure 4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Percentage of Positive Bak, Bax, and Caspase 8 in Patients with Oral Infection and OSCC Patients without Oral Infection

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Expression Levels of Bak, Bax, and Caspase 8 in Patients with Oral Infection and OSCC Patients without Oral Infection were Measured by RT-qPCR.

Discussion

As mounting evidence suggests that bacteria may play a role in the development of various types of cancer, it is intriguing to consider the mechanisms by which they may contribute to the carcinogenic process. In this study, we observed an increase in the expression of miR-26 and MiR-92, while miR-486, Bax, Bak, and Caspase-8 showed a decrease in OSCC patients with oral infections. Our data suggest that oral pathogens may contribute to tumorigenesis by decreasing the expression of proapoptotic genes and increasing the expression of antiapoptotic genes.

MicroRNAs are a type of single-stranded non-coding RNAs that are highly conserved and typically consist of 19-25 nucleotides [25]. Over the past decade, there has been significant research into the expression, functions, and mechanisms of microRNAs in cancer[26]. The overwhelming evidence suggests that microRNAs play a vital role in the critical processes of carcinogenesis and the subsequent development of cancers [26, 27]. MiRNAs not only have a role in the formation of tumors but they have also been linked to tumor suppression [28, 29]. To accurately classify specific miRNAs as oncogenes or tumor suppressors, a more in-depth analysis of their functional roles in vivo is required. Despite extensive research, there has been a lack of studies examining the role of miRNAs in OSCC. MiR-26 has been sparsely studied to date, and its relevance to the oncogenic process is only beginning to be elucidated. It has been shown that miR-26a is overexpressed in a subset of high-grade gliomas and directly targets the PTEN transcript [30]. Moreover, a previous study has reported a negative correlation between PTEN and miR-26a expression in patients with colorectal cancer. This suggests that miR-26a could potentially serve as a biomarker for tumor development [31]. Besides, growing evidence suggests that miR-92 is another oncomir which highly overexpressed in several cancers in association with cancer development and progression. Some studies identified high expression of miR-92a in lung, breast, and colon cancers [32-34]. MiR-92a has been implicated in the suppression of the proapoptotic BH3-only protein Bim in human colorectal carcinoma [32]. Upon comparing the expression of miR-92a in benign breast tissue and breast cancer, it was found that miR-92a was upregulated in the most aggressive tumors exhibiting higher tumor grades and triple-negative receptor statuses [34]. In light of the role of miR-26 and miR-92 as an oncomir in cancer progression, our study has found that existence of pathogenic bacteria in the oral cavity can upregulate miR-26 and miR-92 expression in OSCC patients with oral infections.

In addition to the miR-26 and miR-92, miR-486 is also involved in the development and progression of tumors and can function as both a tumor suppressor and an oncogene. The decreased expression of miR-486 has been observed to promote the progression of lung cancer, breast cancer, HCC, and osteosarcoma, while it is typically upregulated in pancreatic cancer, chronic myeloid leukemia, and gliomas [35]. It also suggested that downregulation of miR-486-5p contributes to tumor progression and metastasis by targeting protumor genic ARHGAP5 in lung cancer [36]. In this context, our study also exhibited that miR-486 expression was reduced in OSCC patients with oral infection. It appears that oral infection can lead to the progression of OSCC cancer through the downregulation of miR-486 expression.

The Bcl2 family of genes plays a crucial role in the mitochondria-dependent pathway of apoptosis and is closely associated with the process of carcinogenesis [37]. Among the family members, Bak and Bax are death-promoting genes [38]. Bcl-2 protein plays a key role in the process of gastric cancer formation and is associated with the growth of definite types of gastric cancer. Also, there is evidence that the Bcl-2 protein plays a crucial role in the process of stomach cancer development and is associated with the growth of certain types of stomach cancer [39]. Furthermore, evidence suggested that overexpression of Bax induces apoptosis in lung cancer cell lines, but not normal cell lines [38]. Importantly, it has been shown that Chlamydia trachomatis infection inhibits both Bax and Bak activation. This observation has provided new information on the mechanisms of bacterial antiapoptotic activity [40]. Our findings are consistent with this evidence, showing that the presence of infection can lead to disruption of apoptosis and contribute to carcinogenesis by reducing the expression of Bax and Bak.

Caspase-8 is an important caspase that triggers programmed cell death following the attachment of death receptors. Its critical role in apoptosis has resulted in significant medical interest in regulating caspase-8 expression. However, Caspase-8 also performs various non-apoptotic functions in cells, including activating NF-kappaB signaling, controlling autophagy and changing endosomal trafficking, and improving cellular adhesion and movement [41]. As a result, depending on the particular cellular scenario, caspase-8 may either boost or inhibit tumor malignancy [41]. Earlier research has revealed a correlation between the level of CASP8 expression and the tumor stage or disease prognosis. For instance, medulloblastoma patients with low CASP8 expression tend to have a poor prognosis. Similarly, a significant correlation between reduced CASP8 expression and the stage of HNSCC has been reported in previous studies [42, 43]. Furthermore, reduced expression of CASP8 has been demonstrated in breast cancer tissues when compared to adjacent normal tissues [44]. Given that caspase-3 activation is identified as the key biomarker of the apoptotic pathway, methylation status of caspase-8 can affect the survival of human glioma cells by promoting anti-apoptotic mechanisms, which prevents the cells from undergoing programmed cell death. This can lead to the proliferation of cancerous cells and the progression of glioma [45]. CASP8 -652 6 N ins/del polymorphism affects patient susceptibility to multiple cancer types, including cancer of the oral squamous carcinoma, lungs, esophagus, stomach, colorectum, breast, and cervix in Chinese populations and cutaneous melanoma in Caucasian populations and may be used as a biomarker for this disease [41, 46]. It is intriguing to note that bacterial pathogens like Shigella can prevent caspase-8 apoptosis when they invade the colonic epithelium during infection [47]. Parallel to previous evidence, the present study revealed that

oral pathogens can be involved in the prevention of apoptosis by reducing caspase-8 in cancer cells and this mechanism can contribute to the development of cancerous tissue in patients with OSCC.

In Conclusion, these findings suggest that oral pathogens may be involved in the inhibition of apoptosis in cancer cells and play a significant role in tumorigenesis in OSCC tissue in affected patients. Understanding the mechanisms involved can help in developing new strategies for cancer prevention and treatment. Therefore, further studies are needed to investigate the role of oral microbiome in the development and progression of tumors in OSCC patients.

Author Contribution Statement

Naghmeh Bahrami, Mohammad Bayat, Melika Norouzi, Zahra Gharayagh Zandi , Fereshteh Shirzadian contributed to the study design and manuscript drafting. Mehdi Kazempour dizaji, Abdolreza Mohamadnia , Mohammad Hossein Soltani, Farnaz Ahmadi , Shadi Shafaghi were responsible for data collection and analysis. Abdolreza Mohamadnia, Seyedeh Zahra Fotook Kiaei, Mohammad Varahram contributed to the interpretation of findings. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Availability of data

The data supporting this study’s findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Ethics statement

The study protocol was approved (ethical code: IR.SBMU.NRITLD.REC.1402.116)

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this study.

References

  • 1.Ambasta RK. Molecular signalling saga in tumour biology. J Tumor. 2015;3(2):309–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Crowe DL, Hacia JG, Hsieh CL, Sinha UK, Rice H. Molecular pathology of head and neck cancer. Histol Histopathol. 2002;17(3):909–14. doi: 10.14670/HH-17.909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vigneswaran N, Williams MD. Epidemiologic trends in head and neck cancer and aids in diagnosis. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2014;26(2):123–41. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2014.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Feller L, Lemmer J. Oral squamous cell carcinoma: epidemiology, clinical presentation and treatment. Journal of cancer therapy. 2012;3(4):263–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Konduru R, Newtonraj A, Arun S, Velavan A, Singh Z. Oral cancer awareness of the general public in coastal village areas of tamilnadu, india: A population based cross sectional study. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2016;3(7):1932–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Johnson S, McDonald JT, Corsten M. Oral cancer screening and socioeconomic status. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;41(2):102–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Khan Z. An overview of oral cancer in Indian subcontinent and recommendations to decrease its incidence. WebmedCentral Cancer. 2012;3(8):1–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ali J, Sabiha B, Jan HU, Haider SA, Khan AA, Ali SS. Genetic etiology of oral cancer. Oral Oncol. 2017:70:23–8. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Haddad RI, Shin DM. Recent advances in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(11):1143–54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0707975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lee W-H, Chen H-M, Yang S-F, Liang C, Peng C-Y, Lin F-M, et al. Bacterial alterations in salivary microbiota and their association in oral cancer. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):16540 . doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16418-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gold KA, Lee HY, Kim ES. Targeted therapies in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer. 2009;115(5):922–35. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lafuente Ibáñez de Mendoza I, Maritxalar Mendia X, Garcia de la Fuente AM, Quindos Andres G, Aguirre Urizar JM. Role of porphyromonas gingivalis in oral squamous cell carcinoma development: A systematic review. J Periodontal Res. 2020;55(1):13–22. doi: 10.1111/jre.12691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yang S-F, Huang H-D, Fan W-L, Jong Y-J, Chen M-K, Huang C-N, et al. Compositional and functional variations of oral microbiota associated with the mutational changes in oral cancer. Oral oncol. 2018;77:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang L, Ganly I. The oral microbiome and oral cancer. Clin Lab Med. 2014;34(4):711–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2014.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yongzhi X, Fang F, Jinghui W, Chunli Z, Jingyang Z, Peng D. Expression, proliferation and apoptosis of mir92b in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Iran J Public Health. 2020;49(3):479–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cao Z-G, Li C-Z. A single nucleotide polymorphism in the matrix metalloproteinase-1 promoter enhances oral squamous cell carcinoma susceptibility in a chinese population. Oral oncol. 2006;42(1):31–7. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2004.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zheng T, Cen K. Mir-92a inhibits proliferation and promotes apoptosis of oscc cells through wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24(9):4803–9. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202005_21169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Soga D, Yoshiba S, Shiogama S, Miyazaki H, Kondo S, Shintani S. Microrna expression profiles in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2013;30(2):579–83. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Manikandan M, Deva Magendhra Rao AK, Arunkumar G, Manickavasagam M, Rajkumar KS, Rajaraman R, et al. Oral squamous cell carcinoma: Microrna expression profiling and integrative analyses for elucidation of tumourigenesis mechanism. Mol cancer. 2016;15(1):1–17. doi: 10.1186/s12943-016-0512-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Alnemri ES, Livingston DJ, Nicholson DW, Salvesen G, Thornberry NA, Wong WW, et al. Human ice/ced-3 protease nomenclature. Cell. 1996;87(2):171 . doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81334-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rao RV, Ellerby H, Bredesen DE. Coupling endoplasmic reticulum stress to the cell death program. Cell Death Differ. 2004;11(4):372–80. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shih L-C, Tsai C-W, Sun K-T, Hsu H-M, Shen T-C, Tsai Y-T, et al. Association of caspase-8 genotypes with oral cancer risk in taiwan. In Vivo. 2019;33(4):1151–6. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Garewal J, Garewal R, Sircar K. Expression of bcl-2 and mib-1 markers in oral squamous cell carcinoma (oscc)-a comparative study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(7):QC01. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/6474.4562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kaloni D, Diepstraten ST, Strasser A, Kelly GL. Bcl-2 protein family: Attractive targets for cancer therapy. Apoptosis. 2023;28(1-2):20–38. doi: 10.1007/s10495-022-01780-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Makhlouf SJ, Khabour OF, Rawashdeh HM, Sakee BL. Polymorphisms in microrna biogenesis genes and the risk of preeclampsia in jordan. Biomed Biotechnol Res J. 2024;8(3):375–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Al-Mawlah YH, Mohamed AaH, Abd-Alameer AM, Hadi AM, Abdulabbas HS, Shaheed SH, et al. Assessment of the specificity and stability of micro-rnas as a forensic gene marker. Biomed Biotechnol Res J. 2023;7(4):569–76. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zamzam YA, Mansour TF, Salem RM, Aziz RSA, Elsendiony SA. Serum mir-124a and mir-34a as potential biomarkers for rheumatoid arthritis. Biomed Biotechnol Res J. 2024;8(2):166–71. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ventura A, Jacks T. Micrornas and cancer: Short rnas go a long way. Cell. 2009;136(4):586–91. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Taher HM, Aziz IH. The relationship between microrna 195 -3p expression and breast cancer females. Biomed Biotechnol Res J. 2023;7(3):420–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Huse JT, Brennan C, Hambardzumyan D, Wee B, Pena J, Rouhanifard SH, et al. The pten-regulating microrna mir-26a is amplified in high-grade glioma and facilitates gliomagenesis in vivo. Genes Dev. 2009;23(11):1327–37. doi: 10.1101/gad.1777409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Coronel-Hernández J, López-Urrutia E, Contreras-Romero C, Delgado-Waldo I, Figueroa-González G, Campos-Parra AD, et al. Cell migration and proliferation are regulated by mir-26a in colorectal cancer via the pten–akt axis. Cancer Cell International. 2019;19:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s12935-019-0802-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tsuchida A, Ohno S, Wu W, Borjigin N, Fujita K, Aoki T, et al. Mir‐92 is a key oncogenic component of the mir‐17–92 cluster in colon cancer. Cancer sci. 2011;102(12):2264–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.02081.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hayashita Y, Osada H, Tatematsu Y, Yamada H, Yanagisawa K, Tomida S, et al. A polycistronic microrna cluster, mir-17-92, is overexpressed in human lung cancers and enhances cell proliferation. Cancer Res. 2005;65(21):9628–32. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Moi L, Braaten T, Al-Shibli K, Lund E, Busund L-TR. Differential expression of the mir-17-92 cluster and mir-17 family in breast cancer according to tumor type; results from the norwegian women and cancer (nowac) study. J transl med. 2019;17(1):1–20. doi: 10.1186/s12967-019-2086-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jiang M, Li X, Quan X, Yang X, Zheng C, Hao X, et al. Mir-486 as an effective biomarker in cancer diagnosis and prognosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2018;9(17):13948. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wang J, Tian X, Han R, Zhang X, Wang X, Shen H, et al. Downregulation of mir-486-5p contributes to tumor progression and metastasis by targeting protumorigenic arhgap5 in lung cancer. Oncogene. 2014;33(9):1181–9. doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Adams JM, Cory S. Life-or-death decisions by the bcl-2 protein family. Trends biochem sci. 2001;26(1):61–6. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)01740-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kaliberov SA, Buchsbaum DJ, Gillespie GY, Curiel DT, Arafat WO, Carpenter M, et al. Adenovirus-mediated transfer of bax driven by the vascular endothelial growth factor promoter induces apoptosis in lung cancer cells. Mol Ther. 2002;6(2):190–8. doi: 10.1006/mthe.2002.0648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gryko M, Pryczynicz A, Zareba K, Kędra B, Kemona A, Guzińska-Ustymowicz K. The expression of bcl-2 and bid in gastric cancer cells. J Immunol Res. 2014;2014:953203. doi: 10.1155/2014/953203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Xiao Y, Zhong Y, Greene W, Dong F, Zhong G. Chlamydia trachomatis infection inhibits both bax and bak activation induced by staurosporine. Infect Immun. 2004;72(9):5470–4. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.9.5470-5474.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Stupack DG. Caspase-8 as a therapeutic target in cancer. Cancer lett. 2013;332(2):133–40. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.07.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Elrod HA, Fan S, Muller S, Chen GZ, Pan L, Tighiouart M, et al. Analysis of death receptor 5 and caspase-8 expression in primary and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and their prognostic impact. PloS one. 2010;5(8):e12178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Pingoud-Meier C, Lang D, Janss AJ, Rorke LB, Phillips PC, Shalaby T, et al. Loss of caspase-8 protein expression correlates with unfavorable survival outcome in childhood medulloblastoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9(17):6401–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Aghababazadeh M, Dorraki N, Javan FA, Fattahi AS, Gharib M, Pasdar A. Downregulation of caspase 8 in a group of iranian breast cancer patients–a pilot study. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2017;29(4):191–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jnci.2017.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Teng Y, Dong YC, Liu Z, Zou Y, Xie H, Zhao Y, et al. DNA methylation-mediated caspase-8 downregulation is associated with anti-apoptotic activity and human malignant glioma grade. Int J Mol Med. 2017;39(3):725–33. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2017.2881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tang Y, Liu Y, Zhao W, Yu T, Yu H. Caspase-8 polymorphisms and risk of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Exp Ther Med. 2015;10(6):2267–76. doi: 10.3892/etm.2015.2832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ashida H, Sasakawa C, Suzuki T. A unique bacterial tactic to circumvent the cell death crosstalk induced by blockade of caspase‐8. EMBO J. 2020;39(17):e104469. doi: 10.15252/embj.2020104469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting this study’s findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP are provided here courtesy of West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention

RESOURCES