Skip to main content
Science and Technology of Advanced Materials logoLink to Science and Technology of Advanced Materials
. 2025 Jun 18;26(1):2518746. doi: 10.1080/14686996.2025.2518746

Recent progress and challenges in potassium-ion battery anodes: towards high-performance electrodes

Jeseon Lee a,*, Juyeon Lee a,b,*, Eunho Lim a,b,
PMCID: PMC12231330  PMID: 40626267

ABSTRACT

With the growing demand for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) and the rising cost of lithium (Li) resources, potassium-ion batteries (KIBs) have emerged as promising alternatives due to their abundant potassium (K) reserves, cost-effectiveness, and electrochemical similarities to LIBs. However, the commercialization of KIBs hinges on the development of high-performance anode materials with improved capacity, stability, and rate capability. This review provides a comprehensive overview of KIB anode materials, with a particular focus on the key reaction mechanisms, including intercalation, alloying, and conversion. Various material strategies, including carbonaceous structures, metal-based alloys, and conversion-type compounds, are discussed in terms of their advantages, limitations, and recent advancements. Additionally, challenges such as volume expansion, sluggish kinetics, and long-term stability are examined, along with strategies to overcome these issues. Future research directions are also highlighted, including electrolyte optimization, interface engineering, and K metal anodes, which hold great potential for increasing energy density but require solutions for dendrite formation and Coulombic efficiency. By summarizing the latest developments and challenges, this review aims to provide insights into the future design and optimization of KIB anodes for next-generation energy storage systems.

KEYWORDS: Next-generation batteries, potassium-ion battery, anode materials, reaction mechanisms, nanostructured anodes

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

graphic file with name TSTA_A_2518746_UF0001_OC.jpg

IMPACT STATEMENT

This review highlights recent advancements and challenges in potassium-ion battery anodes, offering insights into material design strategies crucial for developing cost-effective, high-performance alternatives to lithium-ion batteries.

1. Introduction

Since the commercialization of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), they have been widely utilized as power sources for a broad range of applications, from small-scale electronic devices such as mobile phones and laptops to large-scale systems including electric vehicles (EVs) and energy storage systems (ESSs) [1–6]. As the demand for LIBs continues to grow, driven by the increasing need for high energy density storage solutions in large-scale applications, the price of lithium (Li) has surged significantly due to its limited geological distribution and constrained reserves [7–10]. Reflecting its growing scarcity and economic importance, Li is now often regarded as a high-value material in the global market. Consequently, substantial research efforts have been dedicated to developing next-generation battery technologies that can serve as viable alternatives to LIBs. Among these, sodium-ion batteries (NIBs) and potassium-ion batteries (KIBs) have garnered considerable attention due to their cost-effectiveness, natural abundance, and chemical and physical similarities to lithium-based systems (Figure 1a) [8,11–14].

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(a) Comparative chart highlighting the distinct characteristics of Li, Na, and K. (b) The relative abundance of Li, Na, and K in the Earth’s crust along with their standard reduction potentials.

With advancements in next-generation battery technologies, NIBs have reached a level of technological maturity close to commercialization, and major battery manufacturers worldwide are actively exploring their implementation in EVs. Given this progress, KIBs are increasingly being recognized as a strong rival to NIBs and as a promising alternative for large-scale energy storage applications. As interest in KIBs continues to grow, the number of research publications on this technology has been steadily increasing, highlighting the rapid advancements in the field [15–19]. Potassium (K) offers several advantages that make KIBs particularly attractive. For instance, while Li is present in the Earth’s crust at approximately 0.002%, sodium (Na) is significantly more abundant at ~2.3%, and K is also plentiful at ~1.5%, ensuring its cost competitiveness (Figure 1b) [20–23]. Moreover, the redox potential of K/K+ (−2.93 V vs. SHE) is comparable to that of Li/Li+ (−3.04 V vs. SHE) and is more favorable than that of Na/Na+ (−2.71 V vs. SHE), indicating that KIBs can achieve higher energy densities than NIBs [24–27]. Although K+ (1.38 Å) has a larger ionic radius than Li+ (0.76 Å) and Na+ (0.96 Å), its Stokes radius in common electrolytes such as ethylene carbonate (EC) and propylene carbonate (PC) is smaller (3.6 Å) than that of Li+ (4.8 Å) and Na+ (4.6 Å), leading to lower desolvation energy and superior ionic conductivity [28–32]. This highlights the need to consider the compatibility between electrode materials and electrolytes, as it plays a decisive role in governing the electrochemical behavior of KIBs. A well-matched electrode – electrolyte pair ensures stable interfacial reactions, suppresses unwanted side reactions, and promotes efficient K+ transport. In particular, the formation and stability of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) are strongly influenced by electrolyte composition, which in turn affects the cycling stability and Coulombic efficiency of the anode [33,34]. Recent studies have demonstrated that the electrolyte plays a pivotal role not only in facilitating K+ transport but also in dictating the nature and stability of the SEI layer, which critically governs the long-term cycling performance of KIB anodes [33,35,36]. The choice of solvent (e.g., carbonate- vs. ether-based systems), potassium salts (e.g., potassium hexafluorophosphate (KPF6), potassium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (KFSI)), and functional additives (e.g., fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC), 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME)) directly influence the SEI’s chemical composition, mechanical integrity, and ionic permeability. An optimally engineered SEI must be electronically insulating, ionically conductive, and mechanically robust to mitigate side reactions and suppress dendrite growth. Furthermore, advanced characterization techniques, such as in-situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), have revealed that SEI formation pathways vary substantially with electrolyte formulation, ultimately impacting Coulombic efficiency and capacity retention [37,38]. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of electrolyte – electrode interfacial chemistry is essential for the rational design of high-performance KIB anodes. Additionally, in LIBs, the reaction between Li+ and aluminium (Al) at 0.3–0.5 V (vs. Li/Li+) necessitates the use of a heavier and more expensive copper (Cu) current collector for the anode [39–41]. In contrast, K+ does not react with Al within the operating voltage range of KIB anodes, allowing for the use of a lightweight and cost-effective Al current collector for both the anode and cathode. These advantages collectively establish KIBs as highly suitable candidates for large-scale energy storage applications.

Since the commercialization of LIBs by Sony in 1991, graphite, with a theoretical capacity of ~372 mA h g−1, has remained the predominant anode material [42–48]. However, ongoing research continues to explore novel anode materials with higher capacities and wider operating voltage windows to enhance energy storage capabilities. For instance, silicon (Si) has gained significant interest due to its ability to alloy with Li+, delivering an exceptionally high theoretical capacity of ~3,579 mA h g−1 [49–53]. This has led to the commercialization of Si/graphite composites containing ~5% Si, and further efforts are being made to develop pure Si anodes and even Li metal anodes. In addition, high-power applications necessitate fast-charging anode materials such as lithium titanate (Li₄Ti₅O₁₂, LTO) and niobium oxide (Nb2O5), which have been actively developed and integrated into LIB systems [54–59]. The evolution of anode materials within LIBs highlights the continuous pursuit of improved electrochemical performance through material innovation. Notably, the nanoscale engineering of electrode materials has been widely reported to enhance capacity, rate performance, and cycling stability [60–66]. These fundamental insights into electrode materials are equally crucial for next-generation battery systems, including KIBs.

As research on KIBs progresses, significant efforts have been devoted to optimizing both anode and cathode materials to maximize electrochemical performance [67–71]. While K metal-based battery technologies such as K – oxygen (K – O₂) and K – sulfur (K – S) batteries have also been explored, this review focuses specifically on KIBs, which are considered the most commercially viable alternative to NIBs. In particular, this paper provides a comprehensive overview of the evolution of KIB anode materials and the various strategies employed to enhance their electrochemical properties. Similar to LIBs, KIB anodes operate via three primary reaction mechanisms: intercalation, alloying, and conversion reactions. Various candidate materials have been extensively investigated for each reaction mechanism, including conventional carbon-based materials such as graphite, as well as metal and metal oxide anodes. In this review, we systematically discuss the characteristics of each reaction mechanism, the advantages and limitations of different anode materials, and recent research trends. Furthermore, we provide insights into future research directions and the development of advanced anode materials that will further propel KIB technology toward commercialization.

2. Reaction mechanisms for K+ in KIB anodes

One of the key advantages of potassium-ion batteries (KIBs) is their operational similarity to lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), allowing for a relatively seamless transition toward commercialization without requiring substantial modifications to existing cell designs, provided that suitable electrode materials, electrolytes, and separators are developed. Similar to LIBs, KIBs store and release energy through the reversible movement of K+ between the cathode and anode. During charging, K+ are extracted from the cathode and migrate through the electrolyte toward the anode, where they combine with electrons traveling through the external circuit and are stored within the electrode structure (Figure 2a). The discharge process is the reverse, wherein the stored K+ migrate back to the cathode while electrons flow through the external circuit, generating power (Figure 2b). The choice of anode material plays a vital role in optimizing KIB performance, as different reaction mechanisms govern K+ storage and influence electrochemical behavior across various capacity ranges (Figure 3) [72–77]. Intercalation and de-intercalation, alloying and de-alloying, and conversion reactions are the primary mechanisms involved. The following sections provide a detailed discussion of these mechanisms.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Schematic illustration of the (a) charging and (b) discharging processes in a KIB.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Working potential and specific capacity of previously reported KIB anode materials categorized by their reaction mechanisms.

2.1. Intercalation reaction mechanism

The intercalation/de-intercalation mechanism in KIBs involves the reversible insertion and extraction of K+ within a layered structure or a three-dimensional (3D) framework. During charging, K+ intercalate into the crystal structure of the anode material, while de-intercalation occurs during discharge as K+ migrate back to the cathode (Figure 4). For effective intercalation/de-intercalation reactions, the electrode material must possess sufficient interlayer spacing and high structural stability [78–80].

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Schematic representation of KIB anode materials based on the intercalation reaction mechanism.

Due to the larger ionic radius of K+ (1.38 Å) compared to Li+ (0.76 Å), conventional KIB anode materials often suffer from severe volume expansion and structural degradation upon K+ intercalation. While graphite is the most widely used intercalation-type anode in LIBs, it exhibits limited capacity and poor electrochemical stability in KIBs due to the sluggish kinetics of K+ intercalation and the formation of KC₈ (the fully intercalated K+ -graphite compound) [81]. To address these challenges, alternative carbonaceous materials with expanded interlayer spacing, such as expanded graphite and porous carbon, have been investigated [82,83]. These materials provide enhanced structural flexibility and improved charge transport, facilitating more efficient K+ intercalation/de-intercalation.

Beyond structural considerations, several critical parameters influence the effectiveness of K+ intercalation. These include the diffusion coefficient of K+ within the electrode host, the activation energy for ion migration, and the charge transfer resistance at the electrode – electrolyte interface. High K+ mobility is favored by wider interlayer gaps, defect engineering, and optimized electrolyte formulations. Theoretical studies using density functional theory (DFT) have shown that tuning the electronic structure of carbonaceous or layered materials can lower the migration barrier for K+ [84,85]. Experimentally, materials with low activation energy and high ionic conductivity, such as heteroatom-doped carbons, have demonstrated improved rate capability and cycling stability [86,87]. Therefore, evaluating these physical and electrochemical parameters is vital for designing high-performance intercalation-type anodes for KIBs.

Layered transition metal chalcogenides (TMCs) and layered oxides have also been explored as promising intercalation-type KIB anodes due to their ability to accommodate K+ within their structural frameworks while maintaining high reversibility [88–92]. The key parameters influencing K+ insertion include the diffusion coefficient of K+ and charge transfer kinetics, prompting extensive research on electrode structural optimization. Despite their high reversibility and stability, intercalation-type anodes may experience capacity degradation over long-term cycling due to the large ionic size of K+. To mitigate this issue, nanostructuring strategies have been actively pursued. A more in-depth review of these strategies is provided in Part 3.

2.2. Alloying reaction mechanism

The alloying/de-alloying reaction mechanism in KIBs involves the reversible formation and decomposition of potassium-metal (K-M) alloys through electrochemical reactions between K+ and metal-based anode materials (Figure 5). Representative alloying-type anodes include Si, Sn, and Sb, which can form various K-M alloys upon reaction with K+ [93–95]. During the alloying reaction, K+ migrate to the anode and react with metal atoms to form K-rich alloy phases, while the de-alloying process during discharge results in the release of K+ and the restoration of the original metal phase. One of the primary advantages of alloying-type anodes is their ability to host multiple K+ per host atom, thereby enabling the transfer of multiple electrons per host atom. This leads to significantly higher theoretical capacities compared to intercalation-based materials. However, a major drawback is the severe volume expansion (>200%) that occurs during the charge/discharge process [96–98].

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Schematic representation of KIB anode materials based on the alloying reaction mechanism.

For instance, Sn-based anodes undergo multiple phase transitions (Sn ↔ K₄Sn₉, KSn, K₅Sn₄), while Sb-based anodes exhibit similar behavior (Sb ↔ K₃Sb, K₅Sb₄), both experiencing substantial volume expansion [99–102]. This structural instability can lead to electrode pulverization, loss of electrical contact, and solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) instability, ultimately deteriorating long-term cycling performance. To overcome these challenges, several strategies have been explored. One approach is nanostructuring, where reducing the particle size mitigates mechanical stress induced by volume expansion and shortens K+ diffusion paths, enhancing reaction kinetics [103]. Another widely studied strategy is the use of carbon-based composites, which serve as a buffering matrix to accommodate volume fluctuations and improve electrical conductivity [104,105]. While alloying-type anodes offer high capacity and low operating voltage, addressing the volume expansion issue remains a critical research focus. Further advancements are required to improve rate capability and long-term cycling stability, and these aspects will be reviewed in detail later in this paper.

2.3. Conversion reaction mechanism

The conversion reaction mechanism in KIBs involves the electrochemical transformation of metal-based compounds (e.g., metal oxides (MOₓ), metal sulfides (MS₂), and metal nitrides (MN)) into metallic nanoparticles and K compounds upon reaction with K+ (Figure 6) [106,107]. The general reaction follows the form:

MaX+bK++beaM+KbX                   where M=metal;X=O,S,N,etc.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Schematic representation of KIB anode materials based on the conversion reaction mechanism.

where the metal cation is reduced, leading to the formation of nanosized metallic clusters within the electrode structure. Conversion-type anodes provide exceptionally high theoretical capacities due to their ability to involve multiple electron transfer reactions per K+. Various materials have been explored for this mechanism, including transition metal oxides (e.g., Fe₃O₄, MnO₂, Co₃O₄), metal sulfides (e.g., MoS₂, FeS₂, VS₂), metal nitrides (e.g., TiN, VN), and metal halides (e.g., FeF₃) [108–111].

While conversion-type anodes enable higher electron storage capacity compared to intercalation-based materials, they suffer from several key challenges, including large structural rearrangements during cycling, leading to mechanical instability, high reaction overpotential, which can reduce energy efficiency, and high initial irreversible capacity loss, which lowers Coulombic efficiency. During cycling, the repeated formation and oxidation of metallic nanoparticles can compromise electrode integrity and degrade long-term cycling performance. Some layered sulfides, such as MoS₂, exhibit a dual-storage mechanism combining both intercalation and conversion reactions, which can enhance structural stability and reversibility [112]. To mitigate these issues, various nanostructuring approaches have been adopted to reduce diffusion limitations and accommodate volume changes, thereby improving cycling stability. Additionally, hybrid electrode designs incorporating carbon composites have been explored to enhance electronic conductivity and prevent aggregation of metal nanoparticles [113]. The development of such hybrid architectures remains a crucial area of research for advancing conversion-type anodes.

Each reaction mechanism – intercalation, alloying, and conversion – offers distinct advantages and challenges in the context of KIB anodes. While intercalation-based materials provide high structural stability and reversibility, they often suffer from limited capacity due to the large ionic radius of K+. Alloying-based materials deliver higher capacity, but severe volume expansion remains a significant drawback. Conversion-based anodes exhibit even higher capacities due to multi-electron transfer reactions, but suffer from structural degradation and high overpotentials. From a thermodynamic standpoint, the intercalation reaction is generally characterized by a low driving force and high reversibility, owing to minimal changes in the host structure [21]. In contrast, alloying and conversion reactions are thermodynamically more favorable, with large negative Gibbs free energy changes, which allow for high capacity but also lead to irreversible structural transformations [20]. Kinetically, intercalation reactions benefit from relatively low activation energy barriers and fast ion diffusion, particularly when the host materials have large interlayer spacings or open frameworks. Alloying reactions involve nucleation and growth of new phases, which introduces diffusion-limited kinetics, while conversion reactions typically suffer from sluggish reaction rates due to phase separation, particle aggregation, and high charge transfer resistance. Furthermore, intermediate phases such as KC36, KC24, and KC8 in graphite-based intercalation, or K4Sn9, KSn, and K5Sn4 in Sn-based alloying, have been observed experimentally via in-situ XRD and TEM analyses [114]. These phases evolve dynamically during cycling and influence the reversibility and capacity retention of the anodes. Understanding these transient species is therefore critical for optimizing the cycling performance of KIB anodes.

To develop commercially viable KIB anodes, ongoing research must focus on improving long-term stability, rate performance, and energy efficiency through advanced material design, nanostructuring, and hybrid composite strategies. These aspects will be further examined in the subsequent sections of this review. In order to effectively implement such strategies, a deeper understanding of the fundamental mechanisms governing electrochemical performance is essential.

Beyond descriptive classification of material types, it is imperative to establish mechanistic connections between material properties and electrochemical behavior. For instance, the diffusion kinetics of K+, which are influenced by factors such as ionic radius, host structure, and interlayer spacing, play a crucial role in determining rate performance and can be significantly improved through nanostructuring or defect engineering. Electronic conductivity, particularly critical for alloying and conversion-type materials, dictates the efficiency of charge transfer processes and is often improved via conductive carbon matrices or heteroatom doping. Structural stability, another key factor, underpins long-term cyclability and is influenced by the extent of volume change and the mechanical robustness of the active material. The optimization of these physicochemical parameters collectively governs a material’s ability to deliver high capacity, excellent rate performance, and long-term cycling stability. As such, future research should aim to unify these mechanistic insights to guide the rational design of next-generation KIB anode materials.

3. Strategies for enhancing the electrochemical performance of anode materials and recent research trends

3.1. Anode materials based on the intercalation mechanism

Carbonaceous materials have been extensively studied and widely utilized as anode materials in lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), making them a natural starting point for potassium-ion battery (KIB) research due to their well-established synthesis methods and relatively low research barriers. Among various carbonaceous materials, graphite is one of the most representative intercalation-type anode materials, characterized by its intrinsic hexagonal layered structure with AB stacking [29,114,115]. When fully intercalated with K+, graphite exhibits a theoretical capacity of ~279 mA h g−1 with a volume expansion of approximately 60%. The first study utilizing graphite as a KIB anode was reported by Ji et al. in 2015, where they demonstrated that K+ intercalation in graphite leads to the formation of KC₈, similar to the LiC₆ phase in LIBs [81]. Ex-situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis confirmed the sequential formation of KC₃₆, KC₂₄, and KC₈ during K+ insertion, with the reverse phase transformations occurring during K+ extraction, restoring the original graphite structure (Figure 7). However, graphite exhibited poor rate capability and rapid capacity fading, prompting researchers to explore soft carbon as an alternative. Soft carbon demonstrated enhanced cycle life and superior rate performance compared to graphite, marking an important milestone in KIB research and laying the foundation for the development of various carbon-based anodes. However, a key limitation of intercalation-type anodes is their relatively low theoretical capacity, which arises from the limited number of available sites for K+ insertion. Furthermore, the large ionic radius of K+ can induce sluggish diffusion kinetics and lattice stress during cycling, potentially leading to structural degradation. These drawbacks necessitate the careful design of host materials with expanded interlayer spacing, enhanced conductivity, and mechanical robustness to maintain long-term cycling stability and rate capability.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

(a) First cycle galvanostatic charge-discharge profiles at 0.1 C. (b) XRD patterns of graphite anode materials at different states of charge (SOCs) corresponding to the points marked in (a). Reproduced with permission from ref [81]. Copyright (2015) American chemical society.

Given the limitations of graphite in KIBs, extensive research has been conducted on alternative carbonaceous materials such as expanded graphite, heteroatom-doped carbon, and porous carbon. Among these, expanded graphite has been widely studied due to its low-cost synthesis from natural graphite and tunable interlayer spacing. Kang et al. optimized the mass ratio of natural graphite and potassium permanganate oxidant via a wet chemical oxidation route to synthesize mildly-expanded graphite (MEG-x), where x represents the mass ratio of potassium permanganate to natural graphite (Figure 8) [116]. The synthesized MEG exhibited a remarkable rate capability, delivering ~88 mA h g−1 at 1500 mA g−1 (operating voltage: 0.01–2.0 V vs. K/K+). Furthermore, long-term cycling tests at 100 mA g−1 demonstrated a capacity retention of ~ 72.3% after 200 cycles, highlighting that precise control over the interlayer spacing of graphite can effectively mitigate its limitations, making it a viable anode material for KIBs.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

High-resolution TEM (HR-TEM) images and interlayer distance measurements of (a) NG and (b–d) MEGs with varying degrees of oxidation. Reproduced with permission from ref [116]. Copyright (2021) Elsevier.

In recent years, significant attention has been given to heteroatom-doped carbonaceous materials, particularly those doped with nitrogen (N), sulfur (S), and boron (B). One of the most accessible and scalable synthesis methods involves doping soft carbon nanofibers with nitrogen (NCNF-x, where x = 650, 950, and 1100 indicates the carbonization temperature). As revealed by the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis in Figure 9a–d, N is uniformly doped throughout the carbon nanofibers, and various N configurations, including pyrrolic N (N-5), pyridinic N (N-6), and quaternary N (N-Q), are present, as shown in Figure 9e [117]. The synthesized NCNF anodes exhibited exceptional electrochemical performance for KIBs. Specifically, NCNF-650 delivered a reversible specific capacity of 248 mA h g−1 at 25 mA g−1 (operating voltage: 0.01–3.0 V vs. K/K+) and maintained an impressive capacity of 101 mA h g−1 even at a high current of 20 A g−1 (Figure 9f). Additionally, after 4000 cycles at 2 A g−1, a stable specific capacity of 146 mA h g−1 was retained. The authors attributed this outstanding performance to the pyrrolic and pyridinic N species, which enhanced the electronic structure and facilitated K+ storage, as confirmed by quantitative analysis and theoretical simulations.

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

(a-d) TEM images with elemental mapping of C, N, and O for NCNF-650 (scale bar: 100 nm). (e) Schematic illustration of the N-doping species. (f) Rate performance of NCNFs at current densities ranging from 0.05 to 20 A g−1. Reproduced with permission from ref [117]. Copyright (2018) Springer nature.

Another promising approach for enhancing KIB performance is the utilization of porous carbon materials. Hwang et al. recently demonstrated that precise control over the nanochannel orientation in mesoporous carbon significantly improves K+ storage capacity [118]. They synthesized two distinct types of model carbon electrodes using a multiscale phase separation method combining block copolymer microphase separation and homopolymer macrophase separation. The synthesized materials were classified as open-end mesoporous carbon spheres (oe-MCS), where the channel ends were open, and closed-end mesoporous carbon spheres (ce-MCS), where the channel ends were closed (Figure 10a). The oe-MCS exhibited enhanced K+ adsorption capacity, reduced K+ diffusion length, and improved ion transport, resulting in superior electrochemical performance. Compared to ce-MCS, which achieved ~145 mA h g−1 and ~80 mA h g−1 at 0.05 and 1.0 A g−1, respectively, oe-MCS demonstrated significantly higher capacities of ~210 mA h g−1 at 0.05 A g−1 and ~120 mA h g−1 at 1.0 A g−1 (operating voltage: 0.01–3.0 V vs. K/K+) (Figure 10b). Notably, cyclic voltammetry (CV) analysis, combined with the i = avb equation (where i and v represent measured current and scan rate, respectively, and a and b are adjustable variables), revealed that the superior rate performance of oe-MCS was primarily due to a higher proportion of surface-controlled reactions compared to ce-MCS. This study underscored the critical role of pore channel orientation in determining the electrochemical properties of porous carbon anodes for KIBs.

Figure 10.

Figure 10.

(a) Schematic illustration of the fabrication process for MCS materials. (b) Rate performance of MCS materials at current densities ranging from 0.05 to 1.0 A g−1. Reproduced with permission from ref [118]. Copyright (2025) Wiley.

3.2. Anode materials based on the alloying reaction mechanism

Similar to LIBs, efforts to enhance the capacity of KIB anodes have been ongoing. Given that graphite exhibits a lower theoretical capacity in KIBs (~279 mA h g−1) compared to LIBs (~372 mA h g−1), the development of high-capacity anode materials is crucial to fully utilize KIBs’ voltage range and energy density. Alloying reaction-based anode materials are particularly attractive as they enable multi-phase transformations, allowing multiple K atoms to be stored per metal atom, thus significantly increasing capacity [99,119,120].

The most commonly studied alloying-type anodes include elements from Group 14 (Si, Ge, Sn, and Pb) and Group 15 (P, Sb, and Bi) [98,121,122]. As illustrated in Figure 11a, these materials exhibit substantially higher theoretical capacities than graphite. However, one of the major challenges associated with alloying-type anodes is their severe volume expansion during charge/discharge cycling, leading to poor cycle life [95,97,103,123]. Although alloying-type anodes offer high theoretical capacities, they typically undergo substantial volume changes, often exceeding 20%, during K+ insertion and extraction. This pronounced volumetric fluctuation induces mechanical stress, resulting in electrode pulverization, disruption of electrical connectivity, and instability of the SEI. These degradation mechanisms significantly accelerate capacity fading over repeated cycles. To address these critical limitations, a variety of advanced strategies in electrode engineering, including structuring at the nanoscale, incorporation of elastic and conductive support materials, and the design of mechanically robust composite architectures, have been proposed to effectively buffer the volume changes and maintain electrode integrity.

Figure 11.

Figure 11.

(a) Gravimetric capacity of KIB anode materials based on the alloying reaction mechanism. (b–c) TEM images and SAED patterns of red P@CN electrodes at 0 V (vs. K/K+) during potassiation. (d) Calculated formation energy during the charge/discharge process of red P@CN electrodes. Reproduced with permission from ref [124]. Copyright (2018) Wiley.

Xu et al. synthesized red phosphorus (P) nanoparticles (10 ~ 20 nm) anchored on a 3D carbon nanosheet framework (Red P@CN) to enhance electronic conductivity and structural stability [124]. The highly conductive 3D porous carbon network facilitated efficient charge transport, enabling Red P@CN to achieve a reversible capacity of ~655 mA h g−1 at 100 mA g−1 (operating voltage: 0.01–2.0 V vs. K/K+) and maintain ~324 mA h g−1 even at 2 A g−1. Notably, the first experimental and theoretical study on the K+ storage mechanism of red P was conducted in this work. TEM (Figure 11b) and density functional theory (DFT, Figure 11d) calculations confirmed the formation of crystalline KP as a potassiation product, which was thermodynamically stable. The proposed reaction, P + K+ + e → KP, corresponded to a theoretical capacity of ~843 mA h g−1, providing fundamental insights into the design of high-performance red P anodes.

Further advancements in alloying-type anodes have focused on structural engineering to improve cycle life. Ryan et al. addressed the volume expansion issues of Sb-based anodes by directly growing highly dense copper silicide (Cu₁₅Si₄) nanowires (NWs) on a Cu mesh substrate to form a 3D current collector (Figure 12a) [125]. This architecture provided strong anchoring effects for Sb and created buffer spaces between NWs to accommodate volume changes. The resulting Sb@Cu₁₅Si₄ NW composite exhibited a high reversible capacity of ~648 mA h g−1 at 50 mA g−1 (operating voltage: 0.01–1.5 V vs. K/K+) and retained ~250 mA h g−1 after 1,250 cycles at 200 mA g−1, corresponding to an impressively low capacity decay rate of ~ 0.028% per cycle (Figure 12b). This study demonstrated that careful electrode design can significantly enhance the long-term stability of alloying-type anodes. In addition, Li et al. utilized a Sb-based electrode material as a promising anode for KIBs. They designed highly dense Ti3C2Tx MXene and graphene dual-encapsulated nano-Sb monolith architectures (HD-Sb@Ti3C2Tx-G), which form an elastic network with high electrical conductivity and a compact dually encapsulated structure, achieving a high volumetric capacity of approximately 1,780 mA h cm−3 and a specific capacity of ~565.0 mA h g−1 in KIBs. Notably, the electrode exhibited excellent long-term stability with a capacity retention of ~ 82% over 500 cycles, along with a high areal capacity of ~8.6 mA h cm−2 [126]. To address the intrinsic challenges of Sb and to harness its high theoretical capacity, considerable efforts have been devoted to confining Sb within well-designed structural networks [127].

Figure 12.

Figure 12.

(a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of the Cu15Si4 NW array current collector and thermal evaporation deposition of Sb, along with magnified views showing the pristine Cu mesh fiber, Cu15Si4 NW grown fiber, and Sb@Cu15Si4 NW fiber. (b) Long-term cycling stability of Sb@Cu15Si4 NW arrays compared to Sb@Cu mesh samples. Reproduced with permission from ref [125]. Copyright (2022) Wiley.

Similarly, Zhu et al. synthesized crystalline silicene (c-silicene) from Zintl phase CaSi₂ to develop a stable silicon-based KIB anode [128]. In-situ synchrotron XRD and TEM analyses revealed a reversible K-Si phase transition, with KSi forming as the dominant discharge product (Figures 13a–f). The c-silicene anode exhibited a reversible capacity of ~180 mA h g−1 at 10 mA g−1 (operating voltage: 0.01–3.0 V vs. K/K+) and an outstanding cycle life, maintaining a Coulombic efficiency of 99.4% over 3,000 cycles at 500 mA g−1 (Figure 13g). These findings challenge the conventional perception of Si as an ‘inert’ material for KIBs and highlight its potential as a high-performance alloying-type anode.

Figure 13.

Figure 13.

In-situ SXRD and TEM characterization. (a) Galvanostatic charge-discharge curves between 0.01 and 3.0 V at 100 mA g−1 during in-situ measurements. (b) in-situ SXRD patterns of c-silicene during the discharge/charge process. (c) in-situ SXRD patterns of the discharge products. (d) TEM images and elemental mapping of K and Si for c-silicene. (e) High-resolution TEM (HR-TEM) images of c-silicene and KSi. (f) Selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of KSi. (g) Long-term cycling performance at a high current density of 500 mA g−1. Reproduced with permission from ref [128]. Copyright (2022) Elsevier.

3.3. Anode materials based on the conversion reaction mechanism

Similar to LIB research, the development of conversion-type anode materials for KIBs has progressed at a slower pace compared to intercalation- and alloying-based anodes. This is primarily due to the inherent challenges associated with conversion reactions, such as significant structural rearrangements during cycling, high reaction overpotentials, and poor energy efficiency [129–131]. These factors lead to substantial capacity fading and hinder the practical application of conversion-type anodes. In particular, the repeated formation and dissolution of electrochemically active phases during charge/discharge cycles induce extensive structural reorganization, which results in high polarization, poor Coulombic efficiency, and instability of the SEI. Moreover, the mechanical stress caused by these transformations often leads to electrode pulverization and electrolyte decomposition, ultimately contributing to short cycle life. Large voltage hysteresis and sluggish reaction kinetics further limit the rate capability and energy efficiency of these systems. To overcome these limitations, extensive research efforts have been directed toward developing novel strategies that enhance their electrochemical performance and long-term cycling stability [132,133]. Among the most promising approaches are the incorporation of nanoconfined active phases within conductive carbon matrices, core – shell structural design, and interface engineering, all of which aim to alleviate structural stress and stabilize electrode – electrolyte interactions.

Guo et al. synthesized amorphous FeVO4 (a-FVO) as a promising anode material for KIBs via a low-temperature synthetic process, which follows a reaction mechanism distinct from conventional conversion reactions [134]. Compared to its crystalline counterparts, FVO-600, FVO-700, and FVO-800, which were obtained through heat treatment at 600, 700, and 800 °C, respectively, a-FVO exhibited a smaller particle size and a larger specific surface area. As a result, a-FVO demonstrated superior specific capacity (~350 mA h g−1 at 100 mA g−1 in the potential range of 0.05–3.0 V vs. K/K+) and enhanced cycling stability compared to its crystalline counterparts (Figure 14a). To further improve electrochemical performance, the authors employed a simple ball-milling approach using Ketjen black carbon as an additive to fabricate an a-FVO/carbon composite (a-FVO/C). This composite electrode exhibited excellent rate capability (~180 mA h g−1 at 2 A g−1) and remarkable cycling stability, maintaining ~ 99.8% Coulombic efficiency over 2,000 cycles (Figure 14b–e). As another example of metal oxide electrode materials based on conversion reactions, Rahman et al. synthesized a hybrid composite of Co₃O₄ and Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles dispersed within a Super P carbon matrix (Co₃O₄-Fe₃O₄/C) using a ball-milling-assisted molten salt method, which is a cost-effective and scalable approach [135]. The resulting Co₃O₄-Fe₃O₄/C composite exhibited a reversible capacity of ~220 mA h g−1 at 50 mA g−1 (operating voltage: 0.01–3.0 V vs. K/K+). Ex-situ XRD analysis confirmed that the conversion reaction was not fully completed during the first cycle but progressively improved, reaching full conversion after approximately 10 charge/discharge cycles. The authors proposed that the reaction mechanisms followed Co₃O₄ + 8K+ +8e ↔ 3Co + 4K₂O and Fe₂O₃ + 6K+ +6e ↔ 2Fe + 3K₂O. The excellent electrochemical performance was attributed to the synergistic combination of highly conductive carbon chains and electrochemically active metal oxides. However, despite the promising capacity, long-term cycling stability remained a challenge, indicating that further material optimization is necessary.

Figure 14.

Figure 14.

(a) Galvanostatic charge-discharge curves during the second cycle. (b) Rate performance of the a-FVO/C composite electrode compared to the a-FVO electrode. Discharge-charge profiles of (c) the a-FVO/C composite electrode and (d) the a-FVO electrode at various current densities (100, 200, 300, 500, 1000, and 2000 mA g−1). (e) Cycling performance of the a-FVO/C composite electrode at 300 mA g−1. Reproduced with permission from ref [134]. Copyright (2019) Elsevier.

Ren et al. explored the potential of Sb₂S₃-based anodes for KIBs by synthesizing amorphous and crystalline Sb₂S₃ nanoparticles (a-Sb₂S₃@NSC and c-Sb₂S₃@NSC) embedded within N/S co-doped carbon composites (Figure 15a–c) [136]. The synthesis was carried out via a combination of carbonization and sulfidation processes followed by an organic coating method. When applied as KIB anodes, c-Sb₂S₃@NSC exhibited a discharge capacity of ~312 mA h g−1 after 50 cycles at 200 mA g−1 and a relatively low rate capability of ~68 mA h g−1 at 2 A g−1 (Figure 15d). In contrast, a-Sb₂S₃@NSC demonstrated superior electrochemical performance, delivering a high discharge capacity of ~416 mA h g−1 and an improved rate capability of ~225 mA h g−1 (operating voltage: 0.01–2.5 V vs. K/K+). The authors attributed the enhanced electrochemical properties of a-Sb₂S₃@NSC to the presence of abundant defects and structural disorder within the amorphous phase, which lowered entropy energy and activation barriers associated with K+ incorporation. This structural advantage facilitated improved K+ transport and storage. Furthermore, the synergistic interactions between amorphous Sb₂S₃ nanoparticles and the N/S co-doped carbon matrix effectively enhanced electron/ion transport kinetics and provided buffering effects to accommodate volume changes during cycling.

Figure 15.

Figure 15.

(a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of a-Sb2S3@NSC and c-Sb2S3@NSC. High-angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) images with corresponding EDS elemental mapping for (b) c-Sb2S3@NSC and (c) a-Sb2S3@NSC. (d) Rate capabilities at various current densities from 0.1 to 2 A g−1. Reproduced with permission from ref [136]. Copyright (2024) Elsevier.

Another promising approach for enhancing the performance of conversion-type anodes is the engineering of two-dimensional (2D) materials with optimized electrode architectures. Huang et al. synthesized octahedrally coordinated MoS₂ (1T phase) on graphene oxide and assembled it into a hydrogel [112]. By employing a capillary tension densification strategy, they successfully fabricated a compact 1T-MoS₂/graphene (CTMG) anode with superior electrochemical properties (Figure 16a). When utilized as a KIB anode, CTMG exhibited a dual-storage mechanism involving both intercalation and conversion reactions, leading to significantly improved rate capability. The pseudocapacitive storage behavior of 1T-MoS₂, coupled with its exceptional K+ transport properties, enabled fast reaction kinetics, resulting in high reversible capacities of 511 mA h g−1 at 0.1 A g−1 and 327 mA h g−1 at 1 A g−1 (operating voltage: 0.01–3.0 V vs. K/K+). Moreover, its compact architecture facilitated a high volumetric capacity of 512 mA h cm−3 at 0.1 A g−1, demonstrating the potential of densified electrode structures for practical KIB applications. Beyond achieving high capacity, long-term cycling stability remains a critical challenge for conversion-type anodes. Remarkably, CTMG maintained a capacity of ~246 mA h g−1 after 800 cycles at 1 A g−1, highlighting the feasibility of extending the cycle life of conversion-based anodes. Ex-situ XRD and TEM analyses confirmed the co-existence of intercalation and conversion mechanisms, providing valuable insights into the reaction pathways of MoS₂-based anodes (Figures 16b–f). In addition, a study demonstrated that ultrathin metallic cobalt selenide (CoSe2) nanosheets were successfully assembled onto three-dimensional nitrogen-doped carbon foam (CSNS/NCF) via Co – C and Co – N – C bonding, significantly enhancing the K+ storage capacity. Specifically, the CSNS/NCF framework not only offered a large surface area for sufficient electrolyte contact and rapid diffusion of electrons and K+, but also provided a robust network with strong chemical bonding for stable K+ storage. Benefiting from these advantages, the optimized CSNS/NCF exhibited an excellent specific capacity of 335 mA h g−1 after 200 cycles at a current density of 50 mA g−1 [137]. These studies collectively demonstrated that conversion-type materials, when properly engineered, can achieve competitive stability and high energy storage capacity, making them highly promising for next-generation KIBs. Lastly, Table 1 summarizes the representative anode materials reported to date for KIBs, comparing their first-cycle de-potassiation specific capacities, initial Coulombic efficiencies (ICE), rate capabilities, and cycling stabilities.

Figure 16.

Figure 16.

(a) Schematic representation of the CTMG synthesis process. (b) Initial discharge voltage – capacity curve and corresponding potassiation reactions of the CTMG electrode. (c) ex-situ XRD patterns of the cycled CTMG electrode. (d) Schematic illustration of K+ storage in CTMG. TEM images of the charged CTMG electrode after (e) the initial cycle and (f) 100 cycles. Reproduced with permission from ref [112]. Copyright (2020) Wiley.

Table 1.

Summary of the electrochemical performance of representative anode materials reported for KIB.

Anodes De-potassiation capacity/
Currenta
ICEb Rate capability/
Currentc
Stabilityd Electrolyte Ref.
Graphite ~263/28 57 ~80/280 ~50/50/140 0.8 M KPF6 in EC/DEC [81]
Soft carbon ~273/7 n/a ~140/1400 ~81/50/560 0.8 M KPF6 in EC/DEC [81]
MEG-1 ~267/25 55 ~50/1500 ~80/100/100 0.5 M KPF6 in EC/DEC [116]
MEG-2 ~269/25 53 ~48/1500 ~72/200/100 0.5 M KPF6 in EC/DEC [116]
MEG-3 ~276/25 52 ~88/1500 ~79/200/100 0.5 M KPF6 in EC/DEC [116]
NCNF-650 ~368/25 50 ~101/20000 ~67/100/25 0.8 M KPF6 in EC/PC [117]
NCNF-950 ~297/25 38 ~75/20000 ~74/100/25 0.8 M KPF6 in EC/PC [117]
NCNF-1100 ~281/25 36 ~25/20000 ~77/100/25 0.8 M KPF6 in EC/PC [117]
oe-MCS ~210/50 27 ~109/1000 ~87/500/1000 1.0 M KFSI in EC/DEC [118]
ce-MCS ~145/50 27 ~77/1000 ~75/500/1000 1.0 M KFSI in EC/DEC [118]
Red P@CN ~655/100 59 ~324/2000 ~65/40/100 0.8 M KPF6 in EC/DEC [124]
Sb@Cu₅Si NWs ~557/50 n/a ~105/4000 ~65/1250/200 4.0 M KFSI in DME [125]
HD-Sb@Ti3C2T -G ~558/100 89 ~106/5000 ~82/500/500 4.0 M KTFSI in EC/DEC [126]
3D SbNPs@C ~461/200 70 ~288/1000 ~78/50/1000 0.8 M KPF6 in EC/DEC [127]
c-silicene ~180/10 33 ~60/500 ~100/3000/500 3.0 M KFSI in DME [128]
a-FVO ~360/100 48 ~50/2000 ~61/200/100 1.5 M KFSI in EC/DEC [134]
Co₃O₄-Fe₃O₄/C n/a 54 n/a n/a 0.75 M KPF6 in EC/DEC [135]
a-Sb₂S₃@NSC ~505/100 69 ~225/2000 ~86/50/200 4 M KFSI in EC/DEC [136]
c-Sb₂S₃@NSC ~502/100 60 ~68/2000 ~64/50/200 4 M KFSI in EC/DEC [136]
CTMG ~511/100 n/a ~234/2000 ~75/800/1000 1 M KFSI in DME [112]
CSNS/NCF ~352/50 70 ~226/2000 ~95/50/200 0.8 M KPF6 in EC/DEC [137]

aDe-potassiation specific capacity and current are expressed in units of mA h g−1 and mA g−1, respectively.

bICE denotes the initial Coulombic efficiency and is expressed as a percentage (%).

cRate capability and current are reported in units of mA h g−1 and mA g−1, respectively.

dStability refers to capacity retention (%), number of cycles (cycle count), and current density (mA g−1).

n/a stands for ‘not available’ and indicates that the information was not provided.

4. Conclusion and future perspective

This review provides a comprehensive summary of KIB anode materials, highlighting the key research strategies that have been employed to enhance their electrochemical performance. Specifically, the fundamental characteristics of intercalation, alloying, and conversion reactions in anodes were discussed, along with a detailed examination of various anode materials based on these mechanisms. Furthermore, recent advancements in electrode design aimed at improving the electrochemical properties of KIB anodes were analyzed. Based on the current research trends, several future perspectives can be considered for the continued development of KIB technology.

First, as KIB research progresses, it has become increasingly evident that factors beyond the electrochemical performance of anode materials significantly impact overall battery performance. While optimizing anode materials remains crucial, it is equally important to enhance the electrochemical properties of cathode materials to ensure a well-balanced system. To maximize the performance of electrode materials, further research should focus on the microscopic aspects of binders, electrolytes, and salts used in electrolytes, as well as the interfacial reactions between electrode materials and K+ and the diffusion behavior of K+ within the electrode bulk. In addition to these microscopic considerations, macroscopic factors such as cell balancing between the cathode and anode, optimization of operating voltage and applied current to mitigate capacity degradation, and the design of cells, modules, and battery packs must be systematically addressed. Achieving a fully optimized KIB system will require a multi-scale approach that integrates material-level innovations with cell- and system-level engineering.

Second, intercalation-based anode materials in KIBs have shown rapid progress and are expected to achieve electrochemical performance comparable to that of lithium-ion battery (LIB) anodes in the near future. However, alloying- and conversion-type anodes still face significant challenges compared to their LIB counterparts, particularly in terms of capacity retention, rate capability, cycling stability, and reaction reversibility. To overcome these limitations, future research should explore the potential of K metal anodes, which offer an exceptionally high theoretical capacity and could significantly enhance the energy density of KIBs. However, K metal anodes present their own challenges, including safety concerns, dendrite formation, and low Coulombic efficiency. Addressing these issues will be critical for their practical implementation.

Ultimately, achieving safe and long-cycle-life KIBs will require an integrated research approach encompassing highly stable electrolytes, precise SEI control, advanced 3D electrode architectures, and solid-state electrolyte-based all-solid-state KIBs. As part of this approach, future electrolyte optimization should particularly focus on designing ether-based electrolytes that can effectively suppress dendrite formation and extend the electrochemical stability window. Additionally, the incorporation of SEI-modifying additives such as FEC or KFSI can enhance interfacial stability and improve Coulombic efficiency over extended cycling. Interface engineering strategies should include the development of artificial SEI layers and atomic layer deposition (ALD)-based surface coatings that mitigate side reactions and promote uniform K deposition, especially for K metal anodes. In particular, developing protective coatings that facilitate a stable interface between K metal anodes and electrolytes will be a key research direction. In addition, critical challenges such as the relatively large volume change of K+ storage materials, the instability of electrode/electrolyte interfaces, and the limited electrochemical stability window of conventional electrolytes must be addressed to ensure the long-term durability of KIB systems. Moreover, to achieve industrial scalability, further efforts are needed to develop cost-effective, environmentally benign, and scalable synthesis methods for electrode and electrolyte materials. Environmental constraints, such as resource sustainability and safe disposal of potassium-containing waste, should also be carefully considered in future research and commercialization strategies. By tackling these challenges, KIBs can move closer to commercialization, establishing themselves as viable next-generation energy storage systems with high energy density and cost-effectiveness.

Biographies

graphic file with name TSTA_A_2518746_ILG0001.gif

Jeseon Lee is currently pursuing a bachelor’s degree in Chemical & Biochemical Engineering at Dongguk University, Republic of Korea, which he is expected to complete in August 2025. Since March 2025, he has been conducting research through an integrated bachelor’s and master’s program. His research interests focus on the precise nanoscale control of battery electrode materials, including the structural tuning of crystal phases, to develop high capacity, high power, and long cycle life electrode materials.

graphic file with name TSTA_A_2518746_ILG0002.gif

Juyeon Lee is currently pursuing a bachelor’s degree in Chemical & Biochemical Engineering at Dongguk University, Republic of Korea, with an expected graduation in August 2025. Since March 2025, she has been engaged in research through an integrated bachelor’s and master’s program. Her research interests lie in the development of highly stable electrode materials by controlling the formation of uniform coating layers on battery electrode materials.

graphic file with name TSTA_A_2518746_ILG0003.gif

Eunho Lim received his Ph.D. in 2017 from POSTECH, Republic of Korea. He then worked as a postdoctoral researcher at the INM–Leibniz Institute for New Materials, Germany. From 2018 to 2024, he served as a senior researcher at the Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology (KRICT). Since September 2024, he has been an assistant professor in the Department of Chemical & Biochemical Engineering at Dongguk University. His research focuses on the rational design of electrode materials and electrocatalysts for use in energy storage and conversion devices.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) [RS-2025-00513443].

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Author contribution

Jeseon Lee and Juyeon Lee equally contributed this work. Jeseon Lee, Juyeon Lee, and Eunho Lim conceived the topic and scope of the review. Jeseon Lee and Juyeon Lee conducted the literature search and analysis, and contributed to data visualization and figure preparation. Jeseon Lee and Juyeon Lee drafted the manuscript under the supervision of Eunho Lim. All authors contributed to the revision of the manuscript and approved the final version.

References

  • [1].Lim E, Shim H, Fleischmann S, et al. Fast and stable lithium-ion storage kinetics of anatase titanium dioxide/carbon onion hybrid electrodes. J Mater Chem A. 2018;6(20):9480–21. doi: 10.1039/c8ta02293c [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Wang Y, Zhang W, Chen L, et al. Quantitative description on structure–property relationships of Li-ion battery materials for high-throughput computations. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2017;18(1):134–146. doi: 10.1080/14686996.2016.1277503 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Oh J, Jang J, Lim E, et al. Synthesis of sodium cobalt fluoride/reduced graphene oxide (NaCoF3/rGO) nanocomposites and investigation of their electrochemical properties as cathodes for Li-ion batteries. Materials. 2021;14(3):547. doi: 10.3390/ma14030547 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Duffner F, Kronemeyer N, Tübke J, et al. Post-lithium-ion battery cell production and its compatibility with lithium-ion cell production infrastructure. Nat Energy. 2021;6(2):123–134. doi: 10.1038/s41560-020-00748-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Lu J, Wu T, Amine K.. State-of-the-art characterization techniques for advanced lithium-ion batteries. Nat Energy. 2017;2(3):1–13. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2017.11 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Ryu J, Park S, Hong D, et al. Intertwining porous silicon with conducting polymer for high-efficiency stable Li-ion battery anodes. Korean J Chem Eng. 2023;40(3):497–503. doi: 10.1007/s11814-022-1227-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Mohd Shumiri MAI, Mohd Najib AS, Fadil NA.. Current status and advances in zinc anodes for rechargeable aqueous zinc-air batteries. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2025;2025(just–accepted):2448418. doi: 10.1080/14686996.2024.2448418 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Lee J, Kim S, Park J-H, et al. A small-strain niobium nitride anode with ordered mesopores for ultra-stable potassium-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A. 2020;8(6):3119–3127. doi: 10.1039/c9ta11663j [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Lee G, Kim K, Lim E, et al. Scalable ambient synthesis of metal–organic frameworks and their derivative nanoporous carbon for superior potassium ion storage. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2024;12(39):14524–14533. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c06002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Kim MS, Lim E, Kim S, et al. General synthesis of N‐doped macroporous graphene‐encapsulated mesoporous metal oxides and their application as new anode materials for sodium‐ion hybrid supercapacitors. Adv Funct Mater. 2017;27(3):1603921. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201603921 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Yabuuchi N, Kubota K, Dahbi M, et al. Research development on sodium-ion batteries. Chem Rev. 2014;114(23):11636–11682. doi: 10.1021/cr500192f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Kim S, Jung H, Lim WG, et al. A versatile strategy for achieving fast‐charging batteries via interfacial engineering: pseudocapacitive potassium storage without nanostructuring. Small. 2022;18(27):2202798. doi: 10.1002/smll.202202798 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Kim H, Lim E, Jo C, et al. Ordered-mesoporous Nb2O5/carbon composite as a sodium insertion material. Nano Energy. 2015;16:62–70. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.05.015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Lim E, Jo C, Kim MS, et al. High‐performance sodium‐ion hybrid supercapacitor based on Nb2O5@ carbon core–shell nanoparticles and reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites. Adv Funct Mater. 2016;26(21):3711–3719. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201505548 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Pramudita JC, Sehrawat D, Goonetilleke D, et al. An initial review of the status of electrode materials for potassium‐ion batteries. Adv Energy Mater. 2017;7(24):1602911. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201602911 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Xu Y, Ding T, Sun D, et al. Recent advances in electrolytes for potassium‐ion batteries. Adv Funct Mater. 2023;33(6):2211290. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202211290 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Wu X, Leonard DP, Ji X. Emerging non-aqueous potassium-ion batteries: challenges and opportunities. Chem Mater. 2017;29(12):5031–5042. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b01764 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Ahmed SM, Suo G, Wang WA, et al. Improvement in potassium ion batteries electrodes: recent developments and efficient approaches. J Energy Chem. 2021;62:307–337. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2021.03.032 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Javed S, Suo G, Mu R, et al. Progress and strategies in transition metal chalcogenides as anode for potassium-ion batteries. J Energy Storage. 2024;97:112781. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2024.112781 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Liu S, Kang L, Henzie J, et al. Recent advances and perspectives of battery-type anode materials for potassium ion storage. ACS Nano. 2021;15(12):18931–18973. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c08428 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Yuan F, Li Z, Zhang D, et al. Fundamental understanding and research progress on the interfacial behaviors for potassium‐ion battery anode. Adv Sci. 2022;9(20):2200683. doi: 10.1002/advs.202200683 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Xiong P, Zhao X, Xu Y. Nitrogen‐doped carbon nanotubes derived from metal–organic frameworks for potassium‐ion battery anodes. ChemSuschem. 2018;11(1):202–208. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201701759 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Chang WC, Wu JH, Chen KT, et al. Red phosphorus potassium‐ion battery anodes. Adv Sci. 2019;6(9):1801354. doi: 10.1002/advs.201801354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Scordilis‐Kelley C, Carlin RT. Lithium and sodium standard reduction potentials in ambient‐temperature chloroaluminate molten salts. J Electrochem Soc. 1993;140(6):1606. doi: 10.1149/1.2221610 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Zhu H, Kee RJ. Computational modeling of sodium-iodine secondary batteries. Electrochim Acta. 2016;219:70–81. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.09.104 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Fan L, Hu Y, Rao AM, et al. Prospects of electrode materials and electrolytes for practical potassium‐based batteries. Small Methods. 2021;5(12):2101131. doi: 10.1002/smtd.202101131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Yang X, Gao Y, Fan L, et al. Skin‐inspired conversion anodes for high‐capacity and stable potassium ion batteries. Adv Energy Mater. 2023;13(43):2302589. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202302589 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Hwang JY, Myung ST, Sun YK. Recent progress in rechargeable potassium batteries. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28(43):1802938. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201802938 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Wang L, Yang J, Li J, et al. Graphite as a potassium ion battery anode in carbonate-based electrolyte and ether-based electrolyte. J Power Sources. 2019;409:24–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.10.092 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Liu J, Chang D, Whitfield P, et al. Ionic conduction in cubic Na3TiP3O9N, a secondary Na-ion battery cathode with extremely low volume change. Chem Mat. 2014;26(10):3295–3305. doi: 10.1021/cm5011218 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Zhang X, Wu F, Lv X, et al. Achieving sustainable and stable potassium‐ion batteries by leaf‐bioinspired nanofluidic flow. Adv Mater. 2022;34(39):2204370. doi: 10.1002/adma.202204370 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Masese T, Kanyolo GM. Advancements in cathode materials for potassium-ion batteries: current landscape, obstacles, and prospects. Energy Adv. 2024;3(1):60–107. doi: 10.1039/D3YA00406F [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Liu Y, Gao C, Dai L, et al. The features and progress of electrolyte for potassium ion batteries. Small. 2020;16(44):2004096. doi: 10.1002/smll.202004096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Lei Y, Han D, Dong J, et al. Unveiling the influence of electrode/electrolyte interface on the capacity fading for typical graphite-based potassium-ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2020;24:319–328. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.07.043 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Wang H, Zhai D, Kang F. Solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) in potassium ion batteries. Energy Environ Sci. 2020;13(12):4583–4608. doi: 10.1039/d0ee01638a [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Sheng C, Yu F, Li C, et al. Diagnosing the SEI layer in a potassium ion battery using distribution of relaxation time. J Phys Chem Lett. 2021;12(8):2064–2071. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Fan L, Chen S, Ma R, et al. Ultrastable potassium storage performance realized by highly effective solid electrolyte interphase layer. Small. 2018;14(30):1801806. doi: 10.1002/smll.201801806 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Su S, Liu Q, Wang J, et al. Control of SEI formation for stable potassium-ion battery anodes by Bi-MOF-derived nanocomposites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(25):22474–22480. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b06379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Zhao Y, Liu B, Yi Y, et al. An anode‐free potassium‐metal battery enabled by a directly grown graphene‐modulated aluminum current collector. Adv Mater. 2022;34(29):2202902. doi: 10.1002/adma.202202902 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Kim HJ, Voronina N, Yashiro H, et al. High-voltage stability in KFSI nonaqueous carbonate solutions for potassium-ion batteries: current collectors and coin-cell components. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(38):42723–42733. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c10471 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Sun J, Du Y, Liu Y, et al. Recent advances in potassium metal batteries: electrodes, interfaces and electrolytes. Chem Soc Rev. 2025;54(5):2543–2594. doi: 10.1039/d4cs00845f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].An SJ, Li J, Daniel C, et al. The state of understanding of the lithium-ion-battery graphite solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) and its relationship to formation cycling. Carbon. 2016;105:52–76. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Nie M, Chalasani D, Abraham DP, et al. Lithium ion battery graphite solid electrolyte interphase revealed by microscopy and spectroscopy. J Phys Chem C. 2013;117(3):1257–1267. doi: 10.1021/jp3118055 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Johnson BA, White RE. Characterization of commercially available lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources. 1998;70(1):48–54. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7753(97)02659-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Lain MJ, Kendrick E. Understanding the limitations of lithium ion batteries at high rates. J Power Sources. 2021;493:229690. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229690 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Cao F, Barsukov IV, Bang HJ, et al. Evaluation of graphite materials as anodes for lithium‐ion batteries. J Electrochem Soc. 2000;147(10):3579. doi: 10.1149/1.1393942 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Jo YJ, Choi NH, Lee JD. Electrochemical performance of graphite/silicon/pitch anode composite prepared by metal etching process. Korean J Chem Eng. 2022;39(4):928–933. doi: 10.1007/s11814-021-1019-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Kim JH, Kim BR, Im JS. Optimization of the molecular weight range of coating pitch and its effect on graphite anodes for lithium-ion batteries. Korean J Chem Eng. 2023;40(12):2839–2846. doi: 10.1007/s11814-023-1529-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Zuo X, Zhu J, Müller-Buschbaum P, et al. Silicon based lithium-ion battery anodes: a chronicle perspective review. Nano Energy. 2017;31:113–143. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.11.013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Guo J, Dong D, Wang J, et al. Silicon‐based lithium ion battery systems: state‐of‐the‐art from half and full cell viewpoint. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;31(34):2102546. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202102546 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Lv X, Wei W, Huang B, et al. Achieving high energy density for lithium-ion battery anodes by Si/C nanostructure design. J Mater Chem A. 2019;7(5):2165–2171. doi: 10.1039/C8TA10936B [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Zhou F, Liao N, Zhang M, et al. Lithiation behavior of graphene-silicon composite as high performance anode for lithium-ion battery: a first principles study. Appl Surf Sci. 2019;463:610–615. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.258 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Lee B-S, Yang H-S, Jung H, et al. Novel multi-layered 1-D nanostructure exhibiting the theoretical capacity of silicon for a super-enhanced lithium-ion battery. Nanoscale. 2014;6(11):5989–5998. doi: 10.1039/C4NR00318G [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Yuan T, Tan Z, Ma C, et al. Challenges of spinel Li4Ti5O12 for lithium‐ion battery industrial applications. Adv Energy Mater. 2017;7(12):1601625. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201601625 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Yi T-F, Jiang L-J, Shu J, et al. Recent development and application of Li4Ti5O12 as anode material of lithium ion battery. J Phys Chem Solids. 2010;71(9):1236–1242. doi: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2010.05.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Lim E, Jo C, Kim H, et al. Facile synthesis of Nb2O5@ carbon core–shell nanocrystals with controlled crystalline structure for high-power anodes in hybrid supercapacitors. ACS Nano. 2015;9(7):7497–7505. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b02601 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Lim E, Kim H, Jo C, et al. Advanced hybrid supercapacitor based on a mesoporous niobium pentoxide/carbon as high-performance anode. ACS Nano. 2014;8(9):8968–8978. doi: 10.1021/nn501972w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Augustyn V, Come J, Lowe MA, et al. High-rate electrochemical energy storage through Li+ intercalation pseudocapacitance. Nat Mater. 2013;12(6):518–522. doi: 10.1038/nmat3601 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Kang E, Jung YS, Kim GH, et al. Highly improved rate capability for a lithium‐ion battery nano‐Li4Ti5O12 negative electrode via carbon‐coated mesoporous uniform pores with a simple self‐assembly method. Adv Funct Mater. 2011;21(22):4349–4357. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201101123 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Osiak M, Geaney H, Armstrong E, et al. Structuring materials for lithium-ion batteries: advancements in nanomaterial structure, composition, and defined assembly on cell performance. J Mater Chem A. 2014;2(25):9433–9460. doi: 10.1039/C4TA00534A [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Yu SH, Lee SH, Lee DJ, et al. Conversion reaction‐based oxide nanomaterials for lithium ion battery anodes. Small. 2016;12(16):2146–2172. doi: 10.1002/smll.201502299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Hwang J, Jo C, Kim MG, et al. Mesoporous Ge/GeO2/carbon lithium-ion battery anodes with high capacity and high reversibility. ACS Nano. 2015;9(5):5299–5309. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b00817 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [63].Ye Y, Jo C, Jeong I, et al. Functional mesoporous materials for energy applications: solar cells, fuel cells, and batteries. Nanoscale. 2013;5(11):4584–4605. doi: 10.1039/C3NR00176H [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [64].Oh MH, Yu T, Yu S-H, et al. Galvanic replacement reactions in metal oxide nanocrystals. Science. 2013;340(6135):964–968. doi: 10.1126/science.1234751 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [65].Jung S-K, Hwang I, Chang D, et al. Nanoscale phenomena in lithium-ion batteries. Chem Rev. 2019;120(14):6684–6737. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [66].Holtz ME, Yu Y, Gunceler D, et al. Nanoscale imaging of lithium ion distribution during in situ operation of battery electrode and electrolyte. Nano Lett. 2014;14(3):1453–1459. doi: 10.1021/nl404577c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [67].Wang B, Peng Y, Yuan F, et al. A comprehensive review of carbons anode for potassium-ion battery: fast kinetic, structure stability and electrochemical. J Power Sources. 2021;484:229244. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229244 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [68].Zhang X, Wei Z, Dinh KN, et al. Layered oxide cathode for potassium‐ion battery: recent progress and prospective. Small. 2020;16(38):2002700. doi: 10.1002/smll.202002700 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [69].Wang L, Zou J, Chen S, et al. TiS2 as a high performance potassium ion battery cathode in ether-based electrolyte. Energy Storage Mater. 2018;12:216–222. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.12.018 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [70].Li F, Gu X, Cui A, et al. In situ structure modulation of cathode‐electrolyte interphase for high‐performance potassium‐ion battery. Adv Funct Mater. 2024;34(19):2313146. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202313146 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [71].Fan L, Ma R, Zhang Q, et al. Graphite anode for a potassium‐ion battery with unprecedented performance. Angew Chem. 2019;131(31):10610–10615. doi: 10.1002/ange.201904258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [72].Voronina N, Jo JH, Konarov A, et al. KTi2(PO4)3 electrode with a long cycling stability for potassium‐ion batteries. Small. 2020;16(20):2001090. doi: 10.1002/smll.202001090 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [73].Ma J, Liu C. Ti3C2 wrapped Prussian blue skeleton as an anode for potassium-ion battery. J Power Sources. 2021;484:229276. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229276 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [74].Nason CA, Vijaya Kumar Saroja AP, Lu Y, et al. Layered potassium titanium niobate/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite as a potassium-ion battery anode. Nano-Micro Lett. 2024;16(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s40820-023-01222-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [75].Miao W, Zhang Y, Li H, et al. ZIF-8/ZIF-67-derived 3D amorphous carbon-encapsulated CoS/NCNTs supported on CoS-coated carbon nanofibers as an advanced potassium-ion battery anode. J Mater Chem A. 2019;7(10):5504–5512. doi: 10.1039/C8TA12457D [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [76].Sultana I, Rahman MM, Ramireddy T, et al. High capacity potassium-ion battery anodes based on black phosphorus. J Mater Chem A. 2017;5(45):23506–23512. doi: 10.1039/C7TA02483E [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [77].Kamiyama A, Kubota K, Nakano T, et al. High-capacity hard carbon synthesized from macroporous phenolic resin for sodium-ion and potassium-ion battery. ACS Appl Energ Mater. 2020;3(1):135–140. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.9b01972 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [78].Le Pham PN, Gabaudan V, Boulaoued A, et al. Potassium-ion batteries using KFSI/DME electrolytes: implications of cation solvation on the K+-graphite (co-) intercalation mechanism. Energy Storage Mater. 2022;45:291–300. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.11.046 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [79].Xu Y, Bahmani F, Zhou M, et al. Enhancing potassium-ion battery performance by defect and interlayer engineering. Nanoscale Horiz. 2019;4(1):202–207. doi: 10.1039/C8NH00305J [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [80].Xing L, Han K, Liu Q, et al. Hierarchical two-atom-layered WSe2/C ultrathin crumpled nanosheets assemblies: engineering the interlayer spacing boosts potassium-ion storage. Energy Storage Mater. 2021;36:309–317. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.01.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [81].Jian Z, Luo W, Ji X. Carbon electrodes for K-ion batteries. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137(36):11566–11569. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b06809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [82].Wang W, Zhou J, Wang Z, et al. Short‐range order in mesoporous carbon boosts potassium‐ion battery performance. Adv Energy Mater. 2018;8(5):1701648. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201701648 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [83].Yang W, Zhou J, Wang S, et al. A three-dimensional carbon framework constructed by N/S co-doped graphene nanosheets with expanded interlayer spacing facilitates potassium ion storage. ACS Energy Lett. 2020;5(5):1653–1661. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00413 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [84].Xu Z, Lv X, Chen J, et al. Dispersion-corrected DFT investigation on defect chemistry and potassium migration in potassium-graphite intercalation compounds for potassium ion batteries anode materials. Carbon. 2016;107:885–894. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.06.101 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [85].Berenjaghi HM, Mansouri S, Beheshtian J. A DFT study on the potential application of pristine, B and N doped carbon nanocones in potassium-ion batteries. J Mol Model. 2021;27(6). doi: 10.1007/s00894-021-04790-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [86].Wu S, Li Y, Chen L, et al. Hexapod cobalt phosphosulfide nanorods encapsulating into multiple hetero-atom doped carbon frameworks for advanced sodium/potassium ion battery anodes. Chin Chem Lett. 2025;36(4):109796. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109796 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [87].Wang S, Wang Q, Liu W, et al. Bamboo-like tubular nitrogen-doped carbon derived from g-C3N4 as an ultra-high performance anode of potassium-ion battery. Appl Surf Sci. 2023;640:158321. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.158321 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [88].Li Z, Sun R, Qin Z, et al. Recent progress of nanostructured metal chalcogenides and their carbon-based hybrids for advanced potassium battery anodes. Mat Chem Front. 2021;5(12):4401–4423. doi: 10.1039/d1qm00085c [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [89].Sajjad M, Cheng F, Lu W. Research progress in transition metal chalcogenide based anodes for K-ion hybrid capacitor applications: a mini-review. RSC Adv. 2021;11(41):25450–25460. doi: 10.1039/d1ra02445k [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [90].Wu Y, Zhang Q, Xu Y, et al. Enhanced potassium storage capability of two-dimensional transition-metal chalcogenides enabled by a collective strategy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(16):18838–18848. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c01891 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [91].Kim H, Seo D-H, Urban A, et al. Stoichiometric layered potassium transition metal oxide for rechargeable potassium batteries. Chem Mat. 2018;30(18):6532–6539. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03228 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [92].Sada K, Senthilkumar B, Barpanda P. Potassium-ion intercalation mechanism in layered Na2Mn3O7. ACS Appl Energ Mater. 2018;1(10):5410–5416. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.8b01016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [93].Sultana I, Rahman MM, Chen Y, et al. Potassium‐ion battery anode materials operating through the alloying–dealloying reaction mechanism. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28(5):1703857. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201703857 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [94].Wang Q, Zhao X, Ni C, et al. Reaction and capacity-fading mechanisms of tin nanoparticles in potassium-ion batteries. J Phys Chem C. 2017;121(23):12652–12657. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b03837 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [95].Xiong P, Wu J, Zhou M, et al. Bismuth–antimony alloy nanoparticle@porous carbon nanosheet composite anode for high-performance potassium-ion batteries. ACS Nano. 2020;14(1):1018–1026. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b08526 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [96].Tan Y, Mo F, Li H. Advanced bismuth-based anode materials for efficient potassium storage: structural features, storage mechanisms and modification strategies. Nano-Micro Lett. 2025;17(1):126. doi: 10.1007/s40820-024-01641-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [97].Luo G, Feng X, Qian M, et al. State-of-art progress and perspectives on alloy-type anode materials for potassium-ion batteries. Mat Chem Front. 2023;7(15):3011–3036. doi: 10.1039/D3QM00031A [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [98].Wang J, Liu Z, Zhou J, et al. Insights into metal/metalloid-based alloying anodes for potassium ion batteries. ACS Mater Lett. 2021;3(11):1572–1598. doi: 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.1c00477 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [99].Wang J, Fan L, Liu Z, et al. In situ alloying strategy for exceptional potassium ion batteries. ACS Nano. 2019;13(3):3703–3713. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b00634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [100].Yu M, Yang L, Sun L, et al. Refined tin nanoparticles by oxidation–reduction treatment for use in potassium-ion batteries. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2021;4(5):4432–4440. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.0c03475 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [101].Zhang J, Zhao J. Recent advances in tin-based anode materials for potassium-ion batteries. J Energy Storage. 2023;72:108366. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2023.108366 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [102].Zhou L, Cao Z, Zhang J, et al. Electrolyte‐mediated stabilization of high‐capacity micro‐sized antimony anodes for potassium‐ion batteries. Adv Mater. 2021;33(8):2005993. doi: 10.1002/adma.202005993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [103].Huang H, Wang J, Yang X, et al. Unveiling the advances of nanostructure design for alloy‐type potassium‐ion battery anodes via in situ TEM. Angew Chem. 2020;132(34):14612–14618. doi: 10.1002/ange.202004193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [104].Zhai K, Liu T-T, Huang H-B, et al. Enhanced potassium-ion battery performance with Bi nanoparticle-infused 3D porous carbon composites. Chem Eng Sci. 2024;298:120353. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2024.120353 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [105].Hsieh Y-Y, Chen K-T, Tuan H-Y. A synergetic SnSb-amorphous carbon composites prepared from polyesterification process as an ultrastable potassium-ion battery anode. Chem Eng J. 2021;420:130451. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.130451 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [106].Pramanik A, Sengupta S, Saju SK, et al. Ternary metal sulfides as electrode materials for Na/K‐ion batteries and electrochemical supercapacitor: advances/challenges and prospects. Adv Energy Mater. 2024;14(36):2401657. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202401657 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [107].Li K-C, Fan C-J, Xu H-T, et al. Fe2O3 nanoparticles anchored on N-doped pinecone-based porous carbon as potential anode for potassium-ion battery. J Phys Chem Solids. 2024;192:112091. doi: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2024.112091 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [108].Chu S, Yu M, Liu B, et al. WO3-x@W2N heterogeneous nanorods cross-linked in carbon nanosheets for electrochemical potassium storage. Chem Eng J. 2022;435:135188. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.135188 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [109].Jiang H, Huang L, Wei Y, et al. Bio-derived hierarchical multicore–shell Fe 2 N-nanoparticle-impregnated N-doped carbon nanofiber bundles: a host material for lithium-/potassium-ion storage. Nano-Micro Lett. 2019;11(1):1–17. doi: 10.1007/s40820-019-0290-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [110].Jiang G, Xu X, Han H, et al. Edge-enriched MoS 2 for kinetics-enhanced potassium storage. Nano Res. 2020;13(10):2763–2769. doi: 10.1007/s12274-020-2925-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [111].Yu M, Li C, Yu H, et al. Core-shell structured Fe2O3@ C hollow nanospheres as a high-performance negative material for potassium-ion batteries. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2025.02.201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [112].Yao K, Xu Z, Ma M, et al. Densified metallic MoS2/graphene enabling fast potassium‐ion storage with superior gravimetric and volumetric capacities. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30(24):2001484. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202001484 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [113].Zhang S, Yin Z, Wang L, et al. Interlayer expansion and conductive networking of MoS2 nanoroses mediated by bio-derived carbon for enhanced potassium-ion storage. Energy Mater. 2024;4(6). doi: 10.20517/energymater.2024.25 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [114].Mao Z, Wang K, Fan QH, et al. Advancements and perspectives on nonaqueous electrolyte engineering for graphite anode in potassium‐ion battery. Small. 2025;21(11):2412419. doi: 10.1002/smll.202412419 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [115].Yuan F, Li Y, Zhang D, et al. A comprehensive review of carbon anode materials for potassium-ion batteries based on specific optimization strategies. Inorg Chem Front. 2023;10(9):2547–2573. doi: 10.1039/D3QI00056G [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [116].Li X, Lei Y, Qin L, et al. Mildly-expanded graphite with adjustable interlayer distance as high-performance anode for potassium-ion batteries. Carbon. 2021;172:200–206. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.10.023 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [117].Xu Y, Zhang C, Zhou M, et al. Highly nitrogen doped carbon nanofibers with superior rate capability and cyclability for potassium ion batteries. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1720. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04190-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [118].Park J, Kim K, Lim E, et al. Tuning internal accessibility via nanochannel orientation of mesoporous carbon spheres for high‐rate potassium‐ion storage in hybrid supercapacitors. Adv Funct Mater. 2025;35(5):2410010. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202410010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [119].Zhang W, Mao J, Li S, et al. Phosphorus-based alloy materials for advanced potassium-ion battery anode. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139(9):3316–3319. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b12185 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [120].Zhou L, Cao Z, Wahyudi W, et al. Electrolyte engineering enables high stability and capacity alloying anodes for sodium and potassium ion batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 2020;5(3):766–776. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00148 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [121].Zhang R, Ren P, Xu S, et al. A new research perspective: the application of potassiated alloy/carbon composite counter electrode in fundamental and practical research of K-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta. 2022;403:139687. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.139687 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [122].Ki H-S, Nazir A, Le HT, et al. Nitrogen-doped carbon with antimony nanoparticles as a stable anode for potassium-ion batteries. J Alloy Compd. 2024;988:174161. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.174161 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [123].Xiang X, Liu D, Song J, et al. Chemical prepotassiation enabling high-efficiency and long-life alloy anodes for potassium-ion batteries. J Alloy Compd. 2023;960:170864. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.170864 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [124].Xiong P, Bai P, Tu S, et al. Red phosphorus nanoparticle@ 3D interconnected carbon nanosheet framework composite for potassium‐ion battery anodes. Small. 2018;14(33):1802140. doi: 10.1002/smll.201802140 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [125].Imtiaz S, Kapuria N, Amiinu IS, et al. Directly deposited antimony on a copper silicide nanowire array as a high‐performance potassium‐ion battery anode with a long cycle life. Adv Funct Mater. 2023;33(2):2209566. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202209566 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [126].Liu Z, Liu X, Wang B, et al. Ultra-thick, dense dual-encapsulated Sb anode architecture with conductively elastic networks promises potassium-ion batteries with high areal and volumetric capacities. eScience. 2023;3(6):100177. doi: 10.1016/j.esci.2023.100177 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [127].Han C, Han K, Wang X, et al. Three-dimensional carbon network confined antimony nanoparticle anodes for high-capacity K-ion batteries. Nanoscale. 2018;10(15):6820–6826. doi: 10.1039/c8nr00237a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [128].Sun Y, Zhao Y, Liang Z, et al. Reversible potassium-ion alloying storage in crystalline silicene. Chem Eng J. 2022;435:134961. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.134961 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [129].Cao K, Zheng R, Wang S, et al. Boosting coulombic efficiency of conversion‐reaction anodes for potassium‐ion batteries via confinement effect. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30(52):2007712. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202007712 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [130].Zhao W, Xu X, Wang L, et al. Boosting lifespan of conversion-reaction anodes for full/half potassium-ion batteries via multi-dimensional carbon nano-architectures confinement effect. J Energy Chem. 2022;75:55–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2022.08.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [131].Cui J, Yao S, Ihsan-Ul-Haq M, et al. Rational exploration of conversion-alloying reaction based anodes for high-performance K-ion batteries. ACS Mater Lett. 2021;3(4):406–413. doi: 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c00627 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [132].Liu Y, Deng Q, Li Y, et al. CoSe@ N-doped carbon nanotubes as a potassium-ion battery anode with high initial coulombic efficiency and superior capacity retention. ACS Nano. 2021;15(1):1121–1132. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c08094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [133].Chong S, Qiao S, Yuan L, et al. Sb2Te3 hexagonal nanoplates as conversion-alloying anode materials for superior potassium-ion storage via physicochemical confinement effect of dual carbon matrix. Chem Eng J. 2023;461:141957. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.141957 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [134].Niu X, Zhang Y, Tan L, et al. Amorphous FeVO4 as a promising anode material for potassium-ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2019;22:160–167. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.01.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [135].Sultana I, Rahman MM, Mateti S, et al. K-ion and Na-ion storage performances of Co3O4–Fe2O3 nanoparticle-decorated super P carbon black prepared by a ball milling process. Nanoscale. 2017;9(10):3646–3654. doi: 10.1039/c6nr09613a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [136].Wen J, Xie Y, Huang J, et al. Amorphous and crystalline Sb2S3 nanoparticles embedded in N/S co-doped carbon as anodes for potassium-ion batteries. J Energy Storage. 2024;96:112589. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2024.112589 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [137].Suo G, Zhang J, Li D, et al. N-doped carbon/ultrathin 2D metallic cobalt selenide core/sheath flexible framework bridged by chemical bonds for high-performance potassium storage. Chem Eng J. 2020;388:124396. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124396 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Science and Technology of Advanced Materials are provided here courtesy of National Institute for Materials Science and Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES