Abstract
Background
Despite the prevalence and impacts of pregnancy loss, there is a lack of statutory or workplace-based supports for workers experiencing pregnancy loss, especially before the point of viability. As reproductive and working ages overlap, workplaces can play a significant role in pregnancy loss experiences.
Objective
The aim of this study is to map the available literature on workplace supports for pregnancy loss before viability.
Methods
We conducted a scoping review following JBI Guidance and a pre-registered protocol. We searched eight academic databases/platforms, grey literature sources, and reference lists for eligible documents (2012–2022).
Results
Following title and abstract screening and full-text review, 48 records were included for analysis: 18 reports, 15 journal articles, 6 guides/codes of practice, 3 theses, 2 book/book chapters, and 4 other narrative records. Secondary research was the most common methodology employed (n = 16) followed by primary research (n = 14). Reports mainly originated from South-East Asia, while all empirical studies took place in high-income, English-speaking countries. Leave from work was the most discussed/important form of workplace support. Helpful organisational measures were also identified.
Conclusions
Our review found a lack of empirical research on workplace supports and experiences of pregnancy loss. Further research is needed to understand experiences and develop and implement appropriate supports.
Keywords: employment, leave, miscarriage, occupational groups, work
Introduction
Between one in four and one in five pregnancies end in miscarriage, stillbirth or neonatal death. Impacts–physical, psychological, and economic–can be significant, for individuals who experience pregnancy loss and societies.1,2 As reproductive years significantly overlap with working years, workplace environments play an important role in experiences of pregnancy loss.
While many countries offer mandatory workplace leave for people who experience the loss of a pregnancy from the point of ‘viability’ (i.e., a stillbirth), similar provisions often do not extend to earlier pregnancy losses, in the form of first and second trimester miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, molar pregnancy, or termination of pregnancy/abortion. Approximately one in ten women will experience one miscarriage in their lifetime, 2 while globally the rate of abortions is 39 per 1000 women aged 15–49 years. 3 Though many first trimester miscarriages resolve without treatment, sometimes medical or surgical management is required to remove fetal tissue, which can result in days of bleeding, pelvic pain, and admission to hospital, amongst other side effects.2,4,5 Similar is observed for termination of pregnancy given the overlapping medical management strategies.
In recent years, a number of countries have recognised the impacts of such earlier pregnancy losses, and the need for greater supports within the workplace. In 2021, New Zealand introduced three days paid bereavement leave for women and their partners who have experienced a miscarriage, but not a termination of pregnancy. 6 Later that year, the Australian Government passed an amendment to the Fair Work Act 2009 which provides for two days of compassionate leave for those experiencing a pregnancy loss under 20 weeks’ gestation. 7 Countries such as the Republic of Ireland8,9 and the United Kingdom 10 are also exploring such leave provisions.
A scoping review of the scientific literature on the experiences of workers coping with perinatal loss and the resulting bereavement by Meunier and colleagues 11 found qualitative research describing the experiences of returning to work following a perinatal loss, but it primarily included participants experiencing late perinatal loss (20 weeks’ gestation or more). Some studies have since been published which report experiences of miscarriage in the workplace and associated supports.12–14 These note that support can often be informally received from colleagues and managers, rather than formally provided through the organisation. 13 In addition, people report taking leave around the time of miscarriage (a median of seven days reported in an Australian study), with many using paid sick or annual leave for this. 13 Barriers to taking leave include inadequate resources, poor support from managers, or stigma; professional consequences; and personal feelings associated with taking leave, such as guilt and shame. 12 Additional organisational supports can include referral to Employee Assistance Programmes or counselling, and flexible working arrangements. 14
To inform discussions relating to the types of supports needed within workplaces for people who experience earlier pregnancy loss (i.e., before the point of viability and/or stillbirth, where mandatory leave may be provided), a review of existing literature is warranted, one which adopts a systematic approach to identifying and describing literature that meets the inclusion criteria. Specifically, this review needs to address the following research questions, to examine the scope of the available evidence and any gaps:
Which workplace supports (e.g., legislative, policy, psychological, social) are, or should be, available for people who experience pregnancy loss before viability?
What are people's experiences of workplace supports for pregnancy loss before viability?
We use the term ‘pregnancy loss before viability’ to be as specific as possible about our area of focus. It is not ideal, and not without critique. 15 We are particularly interested in pregnancies that end before this period, and which are not classified as ‘stillbirth’. Internationally, definitions of miscarriage, stillbirth and viability vary, by gestational age and/or fetal weight. 2 Miscarriage is generally defined as the loss of pregnancy before viability – this can range from 20 to 28 weeks of gestation, depending on geographical region. 16 For the purpose of this review, a pregnancy loss is defined by any form of pregnancy loss (e.g., miscarriage, termination of pregnancy), before the point at which it would be considered a stillbirth in the country it occurred in. In Ireland, a pregnancy loss is considered a stillbirth at 24 weeks gestation and/or with a fetal weight of 500 grammes or more. 16
Methods
Protocol and registration
We conducted a scoping review according to a pre-registered protocol 17 following JBI guidance.18–21 A scoping review ‘addresses an exploratory research question aimed at mapping key concepts, types of evidence, and gaps in research related to a defined area or field’ [ 22 :1292–1294] and thus was appropriate to address our aim and research questions. We followed the five stages as per this guidance: (1) identifying the research question, (2) identifying relevant studies, (3) study selection, (4) charting the data, and (5) collating, summarising and reporting the results. We report our scoping review in line with the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines; 23 see Supplementary File A. This study, as a scoping review of literature, did not require ethical approval.
Knowledge user engagement
This work was conducted as part of the PLACES (Pregnancy Loss in Workplaces: Informing policymakers on support mechanisms) Project which was commissioned and funded by the Department of Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth in the Republic of Ireland. 9 Decision-makers from the Department, in addition to people with lived experience, were involved in discussions which informed the conduct and reporting of this scoping review. In addition, members of the research team (KOD, DN) are involved in the care of people–including workers–who experience pregnancy loss. The team engaged in reflexivity throughout the study, individually and during group discussions. This included reflecting on their positionality and assumptions and how they might affect the research process.
Eligibility criteria
Our inclusion and exclusion criteria are detailed in our protocol. 17 In brief, included documents addressed pregnancy loss before viability in the context of paid employment/work, in terms of experiences and/or supports. The search covered the publication period from 2012 to 2022, given the increasing attention on this issue in recent years. We did not restrict by study design, language or geographical location.
Information sources
We searched the following databases/platforms in December 2022 to identify potentially relevant records: EMBASE (Elsevier), CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost), Business Source Complete (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (Ovid), SCOPUS (Elsevier), Academic Search Complete (EBSCOhost), ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (Clarivate), PsycINFO (APA), and Web of Science (Clarivate). We also searched for grey literature via Google Scholar and relevant organisational websites encompassing Human Resources/Occupational Health (n = 11), Miscarriage/Early Pregnancy Loss (n = 8) and General (n = 2) (detailed in Protocol 17 ). Finally, we conducted backward and forward citation searches (via hand searches of citation lists and Google Scholar, respectively) on all included documents.
Search strategy
We developed our search strategy using the PCC (population, concept, and context) framework. 19 Search terms were informed by previous reviews.11,24 We developed the search strategy in EMBASE and adapted it for each included information source. We adapted searches for each organisational website, depending on the functionality of the website. Full search strategies for each source are available in Supplementary File B.
Selection of sources of evidence
Identified records were downloaded to Endnote X9 and duplicates automatically identified and removed before being imported into Rayyan software. 25 Two reviewers (RKH and MH) independently screened the titles and abstracts of 25 randomly selected records against the inclusion criteria; 96% agreement was reached and conflicts were resolved through discussion. The remaining titles and abstracts were then screened by the first author, in line with the review protocol. Full texts were subsequently retrieved and independently screened by two reviewers (RKH and MH); conflicts were resolved through discussion with a third reviewer (SL), where necessary.
Data extraction/charting process
Information was extracted and documented from included records in a data extraction table, including specific details about the participants, concept, context, study methods, and key findings relevant to the review questions. Initially two reviewers (RKH and MH) independently extracted data from 10% of included records and met to determine whether approach to data extraction was consistent with the research question and purpose, and captured the data appropriately. One reviewer (RKH) then extracted the remaining data, and these were independently checked by a second reviewer (MH).
Critical appraisal of sources of evidence
In line with guidance on scoping review conduct, we did not appraise the methodological quality or risk of bias of included articles. 19
Collating, summarising, and reporting the results
For quantitative data, descriptives of concepts, populations, or locations, and other data categories were created and are presented within tables, accompanied by narrative summaries. Selected characteristics of included records are presented in graphs and maps, using Excel. For qualitative results, conventional content analysis 26 was used across studies to identify key characteristics.
Results
We identified 26,013 records following database/platform and website searches. Following title and abstract screening (n = 10,938), and subsequent full text review (n = 95), we included 46 records in our review. We identified a further five records following backward and forward citation searches, two of which were included, resulting in the final inclusion of 48 records. Full details are available in the PRISMA flow diagram in Supplementary File C. Excluded records are detailed in Supplementary File D.
Table 1 provides an overview of the characteristics of included records, by year of publication, country of publication, focus/aim, and methodology, while Table 2 displays the population, concept, and context details of included records.
Table 1.
Characteristics of included records.
| Author/Year [Source] | Title | Country/Countries of Origin | Focus/Aim | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reports | ||||
| Addati et al. (2014) 27 | Maternity and paternity at work: Law and practice across the world | International | Review national law and practice on both maternity and paternity at work across the world- including leave, benefits, employment protection, health protection, breastfeeding arrangements at work and childcare; statistical coverage in law and in practice of paid maternity leave; as well as statutory provision of paternity, parental and adoption leaves | Secondary research: Analysis of data from ILO Working Conditions Laws Database – Maternity Protection; Review national legislative provisions on maternity protection at work in 185 countries and territories |
| Bober et al. (2022) 42 | Social Dialogue Report 2022: Collective bargaining for an inclusive, sustainable and resilient recovery | International | Analyse collective agreements across sectors and countries which were in force during 2020–2021 and examine their contribution to an inclusive, effective, and sustainable social and economic recovery from the Covid 19 pandemic | Primary and secondary research: Analysis of national legislation (N = 125); gathering data on regulatory coverage of collective agreements (98 countries); examination of 512 collective agreements; in-depth country studies (case studies); interviews with key informants in 21 countries; secondary data |
| Chung (2021) 43 | Reforms of the employment insurance system of the Republic of Korea to cope with the COVID-19 crisis | Korea | Describe the scope and reform of the employment insurance system of the Republic of Korea, including adaptations made to cope with the Covid-19 crisis | Secondary research: Desk research (narrative) |
| Fuller et al. (2018) 30 | Death before birth: Understanding, informing and supporting choices made by people who have experienced miscarriage, termination and still birth | UK | Examine the law surrounding the disposal of the remains of pregnancy and the ways in which it is interpreted, and to examine the narratives of women and those who support them, focusing on metaphor as a commonly-used resource for expressing the inexpressible | Primary research: Qualitative interviews (N = 51): Workers in: bereavement care in NHS hospitals in England, funeral industry, and bereavement charities; women who experienced stillbirth, miscarriage, termination following diagnosis of fetal anomaly; their partners and friends. 4 focus groups: Women who experienced miscarriage and stillbirth; partners of women who experienced stillbirth. |
| Goulding (2013) 44 | Gender dimensions of national employment policies: A 24 country study | International | Review and document the gender dimensions of various national employment policies and strategies | Secondary research: Policy analysis |
| Infante Villarroel & Tar (2021) 45 | Assessment of drivers and constraints for occupational safety and health in the construction global supply chain in Myanmar | Myanmar | Assess occupational safety and health (OSH) drivers and constraints in the construction global supply chain in Myanmar, to help identify potential interventions models that can help address OSH deficits in the sector | Primary and secondary research: Desk research/scoping; value chain analysis (including online consultation; online focus group discussions); workplace observation (interviews with construction site managers, and site visits (n = 11)) |
| ILO (2016) 33 | Study on maternity protection insurance in Sri Lanka | Sri Lanka, Singapore, Malaysia, Hong Kong, Japan, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam | Review maternity protection in Sri Lanka and other countries in the region, and make recommendations for Sri Lanka | Secondary research: Documentary analysis |
| Maffii et al. (2012) 59 | Action-oriented research on gender equality and the working and living conditions of garment factory workers in Cambodia | Cambodia | Increase understanding on gender equality and discrimination in Cambodia's garment industry with a view to improve the economic and social well-being of its mostly female workforce and inform the further development of a responsible corporate model of garment production | Primary and secondary research: Desk research; focus group discussions (N = 90) with owners, managers, workplace union leaders, representatives of the government, employers’ and workers’ organisations; interviews (N = 240) with female and male workers in Cambodia's garment factories |
| Miller & Suff (2022b) 60 | Workplace support for employees experiencing pregnancy or baby loss: Survey report | UK | Explore support in UK workplaces for employees experiencing pregnancy or baby loss | Primary research: Online surveys. (N = 295 employees; N = 2023 senior HR professionals & decision-makers) |
| Olivier (2018) 27 | Social protection for migrant workers in ASEAN: Developments, challenges, and prospects | Southeast Asia | Provide overview of policies & regulations of social protection for migrant workers within ASEAN, with particular reference to certain relevant developments, challenges, and prospects | Secondary research: Documentary analysis |
| Ramírez López et al. (2021) 46 | Adapting social insurance to women's life courses: A gender impact assessment of Viet Nam | Viet Nam | Analysis of the gender dimensions of the social insurance system – focusing on benefits for old-age, survivors, maternity & sickness, regulated by the Social Insurance Law, as amended in 2014 | Secondary research: Documentary analysis |
| Scheil-Adlung (2014) 47 | Can productivity in SMEs be increased by investing in workers health? Taking stock of findings on health protection of workers in small and medium-sized enterprises and their impacts on productivity | International | Understand whether, and how, effective social protection policies in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) with between 50 and 250 employees can generate positive outcomes for firms as well as for the broader economy | Secondary research: Literature review |
| Srivastava (2013) 53 | A social protection floor for India | India | Examine the innovations, opportunities, challenges and trends in the area of social protection and recommend measures for progressively extending social protection to all workers in the informal economy, particularly those who are most disadvantaged | Primary and secondary research: Documentary analysis; survey (N = ∼150 informal workers in Delhi, Uttar Pradesh (Allahabad), and Maharashtra (Nanded, Beed, Pandarpur, Pune, Aurangabad)-primarily waste pickers, headloaders and domestic and construction workers) |
| Tsuruga et al. (2021) 49 | Policy design for unemployment benefits in Myanmar: The social security law, 2012, and social security rules, 2014 | Myanmar | Illustrate the policy design of unemployment protections in Myanmar | Secondary research: Review of existing legal provisions and information and data from official and primary references |
| Tsuruga & Moo (2021) 50 | Employment termination in Myanmar: Rules and payments on separation | Myanmar | Create knowledge base for advanced studies and policy dialogue on employees’ rights and employers’ liabilities on employment termination | Secondary research: Desk research – Reviewing legal provisions and data from official and primary sources on employment termination rules |
| Theile et al. (2017) 40 | Summary report: Assessment-based national dialogue on social protection Lao People's Democratic Republic | Lao | Assess existing social protection programmes and to develop appropriate recommendations regarding the extension of a social protection floor, providing basic income security for all, especially the poor and vulnerable | Secondary research: Documentary analysis, along with a series of consultative meetings and national dialogue workshops (participatory methods) |
| Tommy's (2022) 67 | Pregnancy and parenting at work survey findings June 2022 | UK | Describe experiences of pregnancy and pregnancy/baby loss, and supports, in the workplace | Primary research: Mixed methods survey [432 responses in 2022, 1000 responses in 2021] |
| UN Women (2021) 41 | Country gender equality profile: Viet Nam 2021 | Viet Nam | Provide a snapshot of gender equality progress against key socio-economic indicators, and to offer analysis and recommendations for addressing barriers to progress and closing gender gaps | Secondary research: Documentary analysis [Review of reports, legislation, datasets, thematic literature, budgets, and statistical reports. Follow ups with content specialists. Aid from an External Technical Advisory Group] |
| Journal articles | ||||
| Behari (2016) 28 | Daddy's home: The promotion of paternity leave and family responsibilities in the South African workplace | South Africa | Analyse South African paternity leave and its influence on child-rearing culture | Narrative |
| Boncori & Smith (2019) 63 | I lost my baby today: Embodied writing and learning in organisations | UK | Miscarriage and the sharing of intimate experiences as an example of alternative writing that can be used to challenge and resist dominant masculine discourse in academia [Describes the author's own experience of a very early miscarriage while at a work conference] | Primary research: Multi-voice-autoethnography/Embodied narrative |
| Breen et al. (2022) 54 | Grief literacy: A call to action for compassionate communities | International | Theorise how grief could be better conceptualised and operationalised in society | Narrative [Literature review of grief literacy and development of vignettes] |
| Castillo-Angeles et al. (2022) 64 | Pregnancy during surgical training: Are residency programs truly supporting their trainees? | USA | Describe residency programmes and colleague support of trainees for pregnancy related needs | Primary research: Quantitative survey; (N = 258 female surgical residents and fellows). |
| Fisk (2022) 29 | The complexity and embeddedness of grief at work: A social-ecological model | Canada | Provide an integrated and multi-layered view of the grief and bereavement literature as it relates to work and organizations | Secondary research: Literature review/Narrative |
| Goonetilleke (2016) 55 | Maternity legislation in Sri Lanka: Are women equal, special or different? | Sri Lanka | Study and critically analyse the laws governing maternity benefits in Sri Lanka – including maternity and paternity leave and pay, nursing intervals, job security, health and safety of mother and child, creche facilities | Secondary research: Documentary analysis |
| Keep et al. (2021) 13 | Experiences of Australian women on returning to work after miscarriage | Australia | Examine experiences of women returning to work after early pregnancy loss | Primary research: Quantitative/qualitative survey (N = 607) |
| Meunier et al. (2021) 11 | Workplace experiences of parents coping with perinatal loss: A scoping review | Canada/International | Scope the extent of scientific literature on the experiences of workers coping with perinatal loss | Secondary research: Scoping review |
| Modgil (2021) 36 | Surrogate mothers in Indian maternity benefit law: A blind spot or a blind eye? | India | Focus on the rights of gestational surrogates which have been ignored under Indian law, make a case for extending maternity leave to surrogates and to understand the possible rationale of the Government in having ignored their inclusion in the 2020 code | Narrative |
| Musodza et al. (2021) 70 | Experiences of maternity healthcare professionals returning to work following a personal perinatal loss: A scoping review of the literature | Australia/International | Scope the extent of literature on the experiences of midwives/maternity professionals when they return to work following a personal pregnancy loss/neonatal death | Secondary research: Scoping review |
| Obst et al. (2022) 14 | Australian men's experiences of leave provisions and workplace support following pregnancy loss or neonatal death | Australia | Explore the types of workplace leave offered to men following pregnancy/baby loss, and how men perceive leave and support provided by their employers | Primary research: Quantitative/qualitative survey (N = 220) |
| Porschitz & Siler (2017) 65 | Miscarriage in the workplace: An autoethnography | USA | Describe and analyse miscarriage as it relates to the workplace | Primary research: Autoethnography (N = 2) |
| Rahayuningsih (2016) 38 | Analysis on psychological impacts due to violation of the rights of women workers | Indonesia | Investigate the violations of the labour rights of women, and the psychological impacts these violations have | Primary and secondary research: Collective case study – qualitative interviews; observation; documentary analysis. Involved 16 companies |
| Rose & Oxlad (2022) 39 | LGBTQ + people's experience of workplace leave and support following pregnancy loss | Australia | Explore workplace leave and support experiences following pregnancy losses of LGBTQ + people as gestational or non-gestational parents | Primary research: Qualitative interviews (N = 12) |
| Watson & Jewell (2018) 71 | Journey interrupted: A phenomenological exploration of miscarriage | USA | Investigate the impact of miscarriage on relationships, perceptions of motherhood and the meaning of occupation | Primary research: Qualitative interviews (N = 4) |
| Guides and Codes of Practice | ||||
| CIPD (2022a) 61 | Workplace support for employees experiencing pregnancy or baby loss: A guide for managers | UK | Guide for managers on developing capabilities in behavioural areas to support their employees | N/A: Guide [Drawing on their previous research of management behaviours and competencies, and pregnancy loss research by Tommy's and Miscarriage Association] |
| ILO (2013) 98 | Practical guidelines for employers for promoting equality and preventing discrimination at work in Indonesia: Equality in company practices | Indonesia | Practical guidelines for employers for promoting equality and preventing discrimination at work in Indonesia | N/A: Guide and code of practice |
| ILO (2020b) 58 | Introduction to Myanmar labour law 2020 | Myanmar | Guide to Myanmar's labour laws | N/A: Guide |
| ILO (2022) 57 | Safety and health in construction: ILO code of practice | International | Practical guidance for those who have rights and responsibilities regarding safety and health in construction | N/A: Code of practice |
| Miller & Suff (2022a) 62 | Workplace support for employees experiencing pregnancy or baby loss: A guide for people professionals | UK | Guide for HR professionals on developing organisational support for pregnancy loss in the workplace | N/A: Guide |
| Thompson et al. (2019) 48 | Voluntary labour compliance assessment for Myanmar Garment Manufacturers Association | Myanmar | Describe the Voluntary Labour Compliance Assessment (VLCA) tool, how to use it and its contribution to the development of the garment sector | N/A: Guide |
| Theses [Doctoral] | ||||
| Light (2022) 68 | Labour pains: the multiple and conflicting roles of academic mothers | USA | Investigate the lived experiences of tenure-line academic mothers | Primary research: Qualitative interviews: 12 tenured academic mothers at 5 midwestern higher education institutions |
| McNiven (2014) 69 | (Re)collections: engaging feminist geography with embodied and relational experiences of pregnancy losses | UK | Explore lived experiences of pregnancy losses, and the ways in which spaces and places are intimately involved | Primary research: Qualitative interviews (N = 24): 21 women, 1 male partner and 2 siblings (1 male, 1 female) |
| Silverman (2020) 66 | Women's return to work experience post miscarriage | USA | Explore experiences going back to work after miscarriage | Primary research: Qualitative interviews (N = 12) |
| Books/book chapters | ||||
| Hackney et al. (2020) 56 | Invisible grief: an examination of miscarriage in the workplace | USA | Insight into the impact of miscarriage on women in the workplace | Secondary research: Literature Review |
| Ministry of Employment and Labor (2013) 35 | 2013 employment and labour policy in Korea | Korea | Describe the major achievements of Korea's employment and labour policies | N/A – Narrative |
| Case studies | ||||
| CIPD (2022b) 51 | Workplace support for employees experiencing pregnancy or baby loss: Case study – The Co-operative Group | UK | Co-op's dedicated policy to support employees who have been affected by pregnancy and baby loss, including its development, outcomes and next steps | N/A: Case Study – Narrative |
| CIPD (2022c) 52 | Workplace support for employees experiencing pregnancy or baby loss: Case study – Vodafone UK (Vodafone) | UK | Vodafone UK's new policy new policy to provide support to people who experience pregnancy loss at any stage, under a ‘compassionate leave’ policy, | N/A: Case Study – Narrative |
| Note | ||||
| ILO (2020a) 97 | Short-term policy responses to COVID-19 in the world of work | India | Recommend possible actions to be considered during the COVID-19 crisis to protect workers & workplaces with a focus on vulnerable groups | N/A: Note |
| Training module | ||||
| ILO (2015) 32 | Rural road maintenance training modules for contractors. Module-8: Occupational health & safety, environmental issues and decent work | India | For management staff and contractors, with guidelines for management of road maintenance works | N/A: Training module |
Table 2.
Population, concept, and context details of included records.
| Author/Year [Source] | Population | Definition of pregnancy loss used | Concept | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Addati et al. (2014) 27 | Women – miscarriage | None provided | Special periods of leave for miscarriage, stillbirth, death, or other complications arising from childbirth. | Global workforce |
| Behari (2016) 28 | Women – miscarriage | None provided | Provision of maternity leave for incidents of miscarriage | South Africa's workforce |
| Bober et al. (2022) 42 | Women – miscarriage and abortion | None provided | Some collective agreements provide for paid maternity leave in case of miscarriage (or abortion) [4 For example, sectoral level (CBA-India#498, CBA-Uganda#311), and enterprise level (CBA-Australia#197, CBA-Brazil#162, CBA-Colombia#87, CBA-Indonesia#417, CBA-Uganda#183). Some of these also specify using leave in the case of abortion] | International workforces |
| Boncori & Smith (2019) 63 | Woman – Miscarriage | None provided. Early loss (shortly after positive pregnancy test) | Author's experience of miscarriage at work | Academic workplace |
| Breen et al. (2022) 54 | Men – Miscarriage | None provided | Legal and workplace support for miscarriages | International workforce |
| Castillo-Angeles et al. (2022) 64 | Women – miscarriage | Under 20 weeks gestation | Leave taken and support experiences of those who had a miscarriage | UK – Surgical residency programmes |
| Chung (2021) 43 | Women – miscarriage | None provided | Employment insurance in South Korea provides maternity leave in cases of miscarriage (Insured labour providers and artists specified) | Workforce in South Korea |
| CIPD (2022a) 61 | Women and partners – pregnancy and baby loss | Term ‘pregnancy or baby loss’ refers to many different types of loss | Impact of pregnancy loss on employees, why and how managers need to support them through these experiences in the workplace | Workplaces in UK |
| CIPD (2022b) 51 | Parents (men and women; baby's surrogate) and family members who experience pregnancy loss, embryo transfer loss | Miscarriage, stillbirth, ectopic pregnancy, molar pregnancy, neonatal loss, embryo transfer loss and termination of pregnancy (for any reason). | Workplace support policy for pregnancy and baby loss – leave; time off; adjustments; access to counselling and support; access to GP; signposting to relevant organisations. Policy implementation supported by manager's guide, leadership, communication and advocacy. Includes narrative regarding people's views/experiences of workplace supports | The Co-operative Group, UK |
| CIPD (2022c) 52 | All parents/expected parents, including adopters, foster parents, and guardians/parents of a child born to a surrogate, who experience pregnancy loss at any stage | Pregnancy loss at any stage | Parents are granted paid compassionate leave for pregnancy or child loss (two weeks). Additional supports: 24/7 remote GP, counselling, peer support networks with practical help, policy signposting, wellbeing support, buddying opportunities. Policy implementation supported by leadership, communication, mandated manager training. Includes people's views/experiences of workplace supports. | Vodafone UK |
| Fisk (2022) 29 | People who experience miscarriage | None provided | Different types of grief including miscarriage can impact work and require workplace and legislative support. Policies that extend duration of leave, acknowledge a wider range of grief experiences, and account for the unique needs of some individuals and groups could over time shape collective attitudes toward and behavioural norms around grief | International workforce |
| Fuller et al. (2018) 30 | Women, partners, and professionals who support them – miscarriage, termination, stillbirth | None provided | Experiences of workplace leave following miscarriage or termination | England – workplaces |
| Goonetilleke (2016) 55 | Women – miscarriage | Before 28 weeks gestation | Laws governing leave entitlement for miscarriage and the lack of these entitlements. | Sri Lanka workforce |
| Goulding (2013) 44 | Women – miscarriage and stillbirth | None provided | The Employment Insurance system provides childcare leave benefits including miscarriage or stillbirth leave/benefits | Workforce in Korea |
| Hackney et al. (2020) 56 | Women – miscarriage | <20 weeks of pregnancy | Miscarriage is relevant to the workplace and work can impact employees’ experience of their miscarriage and vice versa | Workplaces |
| ILO (2013) 98 | Women – miscarriage | None provided | Women who suffer a miscarriage are entitled to 1.5 months paid leave under article 82 of the Manpower Act | Workforce in Indonesia |
| ILO (2015) 32 | Women workers – miscarriage | None provided | Legal entitlements to leave and benefits in case of miscarriage | Workforce in India |
| ILO (2016) 33 | Women – miscarriage | None provided | (In the Philippines) women's leave entitlements for miscarriage | Workforce in Sri Lanka and neighbouring countries |
| ILO (2020a) 97 | Women – miscarriages and abortions | None provided | During Covid-19, counselling is essential, including for managing abortions, and on miscarriages. | Workforce in India, with special focus on state level and informal sector |
| ILO (2020b) 58 | Women workers – miscarriage | None provided | Entitlements to maternity leave for miscarriage | Workforce in Myanmar |
| ILO (2022) 57 | Women in construction sector – miscarriage | None provided | Compliance with national laws/regulations on miscarriage leave | Construction sector |
| Infante Villarroel & Tar (2021) 45 | Insured workers – miscarriage | None provided | Insured workers are entitled to miscarriage cash benefits | Myanmar workforce |
| Keep et al. (2021) 13 | Women – miscarriage | Spontaneous loss before 20 weeks | Workplace support following pregnancy loss | Australia – workplaces |
| Light (2022) 68 | Woman – miscarriage | None provided | Workplace culture towards pregnancy and loss | Academic workplaces in USA |
| Maffii et al. (2012) 59 | Woman – miscarriage | None provided | The difficulty of obtaining sick/miscarriage leave from employers | Garment and footwear factories in Cambodia |
| McNiven (2014) 69 | Women, partners and siblings – all pregnancy losses | Chemical, early, ectopic, anembryonic, missed and/or late miscarriages (<24 weeks); terminations (early and elective, and late following positive prenatal diagnosis); pre-partum stillbirth (>24 weeks, officially/legally recognised as deaths) and early neonatal death (<one week after birth). | Workplace experiences following pregnancy loss | UK – Workplaces |
| Meunier et al. (2021) 11 | Women, men – Perinatal loss | Death of a child during pregnancy, childbirth, or first 28 days of life | Workplace experiences of people coping with perinatal loss | Global – workplaces |
| Miller & Suff (2022a) 62 | Women and partners – pregnancy or baby loss | Miscarriage (the loss of a baby during the first 24 weeks), stillbirth (the loss of a baby after 24 weeks), termination for any reason, ectopic pregnancy, molar pregnancy, chemical pregnancy, embryo transfer loss, and neonatal loss | Impact of pregnancy loss and need for workplace support, guide on creating supportive workplaces/policies | Workplaces in UK |
| Miller & Suff (2022b) 60 | Women and partners – pregnancy and baby loss | Miscarriage: loss of a baby during the first 24 weeks; ectopic pregnancy: a fertilised egg attaches itself somewhere outside the uterus. Molar pregnancy: a foetus doesn’t form properly in the womb. Termination for medical reasons. Stillbirth: a baby dies before or during labour after 24 completed weeks of pregnancy. | Employees’ and employers’ experiences of pregnancy loss in the workplace and supports | Workplaces in UK |
| Ministry of Employment and Labor (2013) 35 | Women – miscarriage and stillbirth | None provided | Women are granted maternity leave for miscarriage or stillbirth | Workforce in Korea |
| Modgil (2021) 36 | Women undergoing miscarriage or medical termination of pregnancy | None provided | Women who have a miscarriage or medical termination of pregnancy are entitled to maternity benefits | Workplaces in India |
| Musodza et al. (2021) 70 | Women – Perinatal Loss | Miscarriage: pregnancy losses before 20 weeks’ gestation; stillbirths: foetal deaths at and beyond 20 weeks’ gestation; neonatal deaths: deaths of babies within 28 days of birth | Experiences of returning to work and support received following perinatal loss | Maternity-related workplaces – international |
| Obst et al. (2022) 14 | Men – Pregnancy Loss or Neonatal Death | Ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage (<20 weeks of gestation), termination of pregnancy for nonviable foetal anomaly (any stage of gestation), stillbirth. Neonatal death: death of a baby within 28 days of birth. | Workplace leave and other support experienced by men following a pregnancy loss | Workplaces in Australia |
| Olivier (2018) 37 | Migrant workers – women – miscarriage | None provided | Migrant workers are entitled to social security benefits including miscarriage benefit | Workforce in Lao |
| Porschitz & Siler (2017) 65 | Women – miscarriage | First trimester miscarriage | Documenting their experiences of first-trimester miscarriage while employed as academics | University (workplaces) in USA |
| Rahayuningsih (2016) 38 | Women – miscarriage | None provided | Women's statutory right to miscarriage leave | Workplaces in Indonesia |
| Ramírez López et al. (2021) 46 | Women – Pregnancy loss | Miscarriage, abortion, stillbirth, pathological abortion | Women's statutory entitlement to maternity leave for pregnancy loss | Workplaces in Vietnam |
| Rose & Oxlad (2022) 39 | LGBTQ + people who are gestational or non-gestational parents – Pregnancy Loss | Ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, stillbirth, surrogacy | Employees’ experiences of workplace leave and supports following pregnancy loss | Workplaces in Australia |
| Scheil-Adlung (2014) 47 | Women – miscarriage or medical termination of pregnancy | None provided | Women's statutory entitlement to maternity leave for miscarriage/medical termination of pregnancy | Workforce in India |
| Silverman (2020) 66 | Women – miscarriage | Before 20 weeks of pregnancy | Women's experiences returning to work following a miscarriage | Workplaces in USA |
| Srivastava (2013) 53 | Construction workers – miscarriage/abortion | None provided | Assistance for abortion/miscarriage | Construction industry in the Tamil Nadu state in India |
| Theile et al. (2017) 40 | Women – miscarriage | None provided | Women's statutory right to maternity leave in the event of a miscarriage | Workforce in Lao People's Democratic Republic |
| Thompson et al. (2019) 48 | Women insured with Social Security Board – miscarriage | None provided | Insured women are eligible to receive miscarriage benefits | Workforce in Myanmar |
| Tommy's (2022) 67 | Employees – pregnancy and baby loss | None provided | Experiences of workplace policies and support following pregnancy and baby loss | Workplaces in UK |
| Tsuruga et al. (2021) 49 | Insured female workers – miscarriage | None provided | Insured workers entitlements to miscarriage leave | Workforce in Myanmar |
| Tsuruga & Moo (2021) 50 | Women – miscarriage | None provided | Paid leave entitlements for miscarriage | Workforce in Myanmar |
| UN Women (2021) 41 | Women – miscarriage, abortion and stillbirth | None provided | Leave entitlements in cases of miscarriage, abortion and stillbirth | Workforce in Viet Nam |
| Watson & Jewell (2018) 71 | Women – Miscarriage | Under 20 weeks of pregnancy | The impact of working after/around the time of miscarriage, on their experience of miscarriage | Workplaces in USA |
Characteristics of included records
Records included were published between 2012 and 2022, with an increase in publications in the past three years; 2012–2015 (n = 9); 2016–2019 (n = 11); 2020–2023 (n = 28) (see Figure 1). The majority of records were published in and/or focused on the UK (n = 9), North America (n = 8) and Southeast Asia (n = 13) (Figure 2). Publication types included reports (n = 18), journal articles (n = 15), codes of practice or guides (n = 6), books/book chapters (n = 2), theses (n = 3), and other: case study, note, and training module (n = 4) (see Table 1). Secondary research, including scoping reviews, literature reviews, documentary analysis, and other methods, was the most common type of methodology employed (n = 16). Primary research (n = 13) included qualitative interview studies, quantitative surveys, mixed method surveys, and autoethnographies. Some records (n = 5) employed both primary and secondary research methods, such as desk research and focus groups, or case studies with interviews. The remaining records (n = 14) did not utilise scientific research methods and included narratives, guides, codes of practice, a note and a training module.
Figure 1.
Publication dates of included records (N = 48).
Figure 2.
Country of origin of included records (N = 48).
Note: Nine records included multiple countries/continents and are therefore not represented in this map.
Context
As seen in Table 1 and Figure 2, records spanned most continents, with a concentration of research in Asia (n = 20), North America (n = 7) and Europe (n = 9). Primary research was mainly conducted in high-income countries, while most reports focused on middle-and-lower income countries. As per this review's inclusion criteria, all records included workplace contexts. These included international, national, or industry workforces; workplaces within a particular country, and specific industry workplaces including academia (n = 3), healthcare (n = 2), garment and footwear factories (n = 1), and construction (n = 2) (see Table 2).
Population
Miscarriage was the form of pregnancy loss most commonly discussed in included records (n = 29), though miscarriage was only defined within six records. Among these, ‘less than 20 weeks of pregnancy’ was the most common definition used (n = 5), and one record defined miscarriage as ‘the loss of a pregnancy before 28 weeks gestation’. Some records included all types of pregnancy loss, i.e., losses before and after viability (n = 19). Most records included women experiencing pregnancy loss (n = 33); a minority focused on and/or included men (n = 2). The remainder either included both (n = 9) or did not specify (n = 4).
Concept
Many reports stated or discussed legal rights to time off work or cash benefits following a miscarriage or other pregnancy loss (n = 24). Other records discussed the impact of workplace experiences on pregnancy loss and the need for support and policies (n = 6) or supports for pregnancy loss in specific workforces or workplaces (n = 3). Most records utilising primary research methods, and both scoping reviews, explored participants’ experiences of workplaces and workplace supports following a pregnancy loss (n = 15).
Addressing our research questions
In this review, we first aimed to map the literature with regards to publication characteristics. Secondly, we wanted to examine the literature in relation to two specific issues – workplace supports and experiences of these supports. The results below are presented according to the findings for each research question.
Research question 1: Which workplace supports (e.g., legislative, policy, psychological, social) are, or should be, available to people experiencing pregnancy loss?
Our first research question was addressed by most included records, either through describing or noting existing supports, or illustrating the need for workplace supports to be introduced. Most leave and benefits discussed were a statutory entitlement (n = 15)27–41 while some were achieved through collective agreements (negotiated agreements between trade unions and employers) (n = 2)11,42 and others are available through social insurance and/or only available to insured workers (n = 8).43–50 Certain sectors or workplaces created/implemented their own pregnancy loss supports, as discussed by three records.51–53
The most common types of supports discussed were leave from work (n = 30)11,27–33,35–38,40–44,46,47,49–52,54–60 and benefits or cash benefits (n = 9).32,36,37,44,45,47–49,57 Many records stated the provision of leave entitlements or benefits in the case of miscarriage with no further detail; where provided, specific information provided is summarised in Table 3 (n = 12 records).
Table 3.
Leave entitlements for pregnancy loss documented in records (n = 12).
| Source | Country/Organisation | Details of entitlement |
|---|---|---|
| Addati et al. (2014) 27 | Nicaragua and Panama Mauritius Indonesia |
In accordance with the woman's needs. Two weeks. One and a half months. |
| CIPD (2022b) 51 | The Co-operative Group | Flexible paid leave and time off to attend appointments or support partner |
| CIPD (2022c) 52 | Vodafone | Two weeks paid compassionate leave – can be taken as one block or as two separate periods of one week |
| ILO (2013) 98 | Indonesia | 1.5 months paid leave after a miscarriage |
| ILO (2016) 33 | Philippines | Maternity leave of 4 weeks after miscarriage |
| Ministry of Employment and Labour (2013) 35 | South Korea | Workers are granted 5–90 days of miscarriage or stillbirth leave depending on their pregnancy period and given miscarriage or stillbirth leave benefits |
| Rahayuningsih (2016) 38 | Indonesia | Rest of 1.5 [months] or in accordance with a medical certificate or midwife [not contract employees] |
| Ramírez López et al. (2021) 46 | Vietnam | 10 days (pregnancy <5 weeks); 20 days (5–13 weeks); 40 days (13–25 weeks); 50 days (25 + weeks) |
| Rose & Oxlad (2022) 39 | Australia | Two days of paid leave for women and partners following miscarriage before 20 weeks gestation |
| Scheil-Adlung (2014) 47 | India | 6 weeks leave with average pay for miscarriage or medical termination of pregnancy |
| Theile et al. (2017) 40 | Lao | In the event of a miscarriage, the duration of maternity leave is determined by a doctor. |
| Tsuruga et al. (2021) 49 | Myanmar | 70% of average wage during the leave period for up to six weeks after miscarriage |
| Tsuruga & Moo (2021) 50 | Myanmar | Six weeks paid maternity leave for miscarriage |
Records which discussed workplace policies or collective agreements identified organisational supports such as gradual return to work (n = 2),11,60 flexibility and reasonable adjustments (n = 2),51,60 and training for managers (n = 4).32,51,61,62 Emotional/psychological supports such as counselling, referral to GP, or signposting to peer support groups or relevant organisations were identified by five records.51,52,60,61,62 A minority of records noted or described the need for unspecified supports, provisions, or assistance (n = 3).29,53,55
Research question 2: What are people's views and experiences of workplace supports for pregnancy loss before viability?
A number of included records utilised primary research methods including–but not limited to–surveys, interviews, and focus groups with people who had lived experience of pregnancy loss (n = 14). These studies examined people's experiences of workplace supports (or lack thereof) for pregnancy loss, and views on these supports. Records utilising secondary research methods including scoping reviews, literature reviews, and case studies (n = 5) also included results or discussion pertaining to experiences of support. The most common themes addressed in the literature, drawing on qualitative and/or quantitative data, are described below and findings from individual records are summarised in Table 4.
Table 4.
People's experiences of workplace support for pregnancy loss, by theme.
| Source | Leave | Emotional Support | Organisational Supports | Difficulties in Returning to Work | Disclosure | Stigma and Taboo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary research | ||||||
| Boncori & Smith (2019) 63 | — | — |
|
— | — |
|
| Castillo-Angeles et al. (2022) 64 |
|
|
— | — |
|
— |
| Fuller et al. (2018) 30 |
|
— | — | — | — | |
| Keep et al. (2021) 13 |
|
|
— | — |
|
— |
| Light (2022) 68 | — |
|
— | — | — | — |
| McNiven (2014) 69 | — |
|
— |
|
|
— |
| Miller & Suff (2022b) 60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Obst et al. (2022) 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
| Porschitz & Siler (2017) 65 |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
| Rose & Oxlad (2022) 39 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
| Silverman (2020) 66 |
|
|
|
|
— | |
| Watson & Jewell (2018) 71 | — | — | — |
|
— | — |
| Tommy's (2022) 67 |
|
|
— |
|
— | — |
| Secondary research | ||||||
| Hackney et al. (2020) 56 | — |
|
— |
|
— |
|
| Meunier et al. (2021) 11 | — | — | — |
|
— |
|
| Musodza et al. (2021) 70 | — |
|
|
|
— | — |
| Case studies | ||||||
| CIPD (2022b) 51 |
|
— |
|
— | — | — |
| CIPD (2022c) 52 |
|
— |
|
— | — | — |
| Primary and secondary research | ||||||
| Maffii et al. (2012) 59 |
|
— | — | — | — | — |
Leave from work
Most (n = 13) records explored participants experiences of taking leave from work13,14,30,39,51,52,59,60,63–67 (Table 4). There was heterogeneity in how these records collected data on how much leave participants took, due to methodology used (e.g., quantitative/qualitative) and research focus. Therefore, there is no clear view from the literature of how much leave is needed, or an average of how much is taken. Across records, some participants found returning to work helpful, while others needed time away from work to physically or emotionally recover. Participants generally did not have access to appropriate leave entitlements, and many participants took sick leave, unpaid leave, or were unable to take any leave at all. Participants across the research expressed a desire for paid specific leave.
Emotional support in the workplace
Experiences of collegial or managerial support were reported by 11 records.13,14,39,56,60,64,66–70 The literature found both positive and negative influences that colleagues, supervisors, managers, and employers, could have on participants’ pregnancy loss experiences (Table 4). Sympathy, understanding, and support with workload was valued, while insensitive comments, judgement, or lack of acknowledgement added to participants’ distress.
Organisational supports
Organisational supports were noted by nine records14,39,51,52,56,60,63,66,70 (Table 4). Psychological or medical support through referral to GP, counselling, or Employee Assistance Programmes, were discussed in two records (see Table 4). Records presented available supports, participants’ experiences of these supports, and/or the lack of or need for organisational supports. Generally there is a lack of workplace supports for pregnancy loss, and participants highlighted the need for having the option to work from home, flexibility in hours or workload, and access to counselling.
Difficulties in returning to work
In addition to workplace supports, many studies (n = 10) reported on the difficulties participants faced on returning to work following pregnancy loss.11,14,56,60,65–67,69–71 Physical symptoms, emotional impacts, and interactions in the workplace were cited as impacting the return-to-work experience (Table 4). Attempting to act professional and hide emotions relating to the pregnancy loss was a common difficulty experienced.
Disclosure
Among primary research records, the majority (n = 8) examined participants’ experiences of disclosing their pregnancy loss in their workplace, or choosing to not share it.13,14,39,60,64–66,69 Factors influencing this decision, and responses to disclosure, were discussed across the literature. Many participants did not tell anybody in their workplace about their pregnancy loss, meaning no-one at work knew what they were experiencing. Reasons for non-disclosure included privacy, fear of impact on career, and stigma. Other participants disclosed their pregnancy loss at work, and often found this experience to be uncomfortable or distressing. Participants were motivated to share to access leave or supports, to counteract stigma, or because they had positive relationships in the workplace.
Stigma and taboo
The prevalence and impact of the silence, stigma, and taboo surrounding pregnancy loss was noted in several records (n = 6).11,39,56,60,63,65 Pregnancy loss, especially early pregnancy loss, is often not discussed in society, and particularly not in workplaces. The lack of knowledge, understanding, and conversations surrounding pregnancy loss is posed as a barrier to support across the literature. Included studies show how stigma can enhance difficulties surrounding disclosure, accessing leave, acknowledgement from colleagues, and managing emotions upon return to work.39,60,63,65
Discussion
The aim of this scoping review was to examine the literature pertaining to workplace supports for pregnancy loss before viability, and to identify gaps in the literature. We found a lack of empirical work on this topic, although there has been a notable increase in primary studies in the past five years. Most included records were reports or narratives, many of which concentrated on South-East Asia. Records utilising primary research methods were mainly from Australia and North America, and thus have particular relevance to high-income countries.
Research question 1: Which workplace supports (e.g., legislative, policy, psychological, social) are, or should be, available for people who experience pregnancy loss before viability?
Our findings show that more is needed to adequately respond to workers’ needs. Empirical studies included in this review demonstrate the range and extent of concerns that workers face when returning to the workplace following pregnancy loss, including dealing with the physical and emotional impacts of pregnancy loss, navigating conversations and relationships in the workplace, and managing the workload while potentially feeling unwell or distressed. Pregnancy loss affects many workers throughout the world. Women who carry the pregnancy can face ongoing physical effects including cramping and bleeding, 72 and further complications if medical or surgical management is required. 73 Additionally, both women and men can experience emotional, psychological, and social impacts of pregnancy loss. It is common to experience a period of grief; 74 intense sadness; 75 and isolation. 76 Pregnancy loss also increases the risk of anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder.1,2,77–79 Because of the prevalence and extent of these impacts, it is important that people are supported by their workplaces at a time of potential physical and/or emotional suffering.
Legislative supports for pregnancy loss, in the form of leave and benefits, are primarily found in middle-and-lower income countries, according to the records included in this review. This is reflective of international legislation, whereby high-income countries such as New Zealand and Australia have recently introduced statutory pregnancy loss leave, while lower-and-middle income countries such as China 80 and India 81 have had miscarriage leave since the 1950s and 1960s. 82 Recent years have seen a growing awareness of early pregnancy loss and its impacts, which has resulted in several jurisdictions considering the introduction of pregnancy loss leave; these include Northern Ireland, 83 Alberta, 84 Nova Scotia 85 and Catalunya. 86 As such, further research will be needed to explore the efficacy of newly introduced leave.
Companies and organisations are increasingly investing in workers’ health through workplace adaptation and provision of healthcare, which can save costs through preventing sickness absence, presenteeism, turnover, and loss of creativity. 87 In addition to, or in the absence of, statutory supports, individual workplaces can create pregnancy loss policies which include leave entitlements, practical supports and accommodations for employees returning to work, and training and awareness raising for management or staff. Practical supports found in this review include working from home; flexible working hours; being able to change the location where they work/delegate emotionally charged tasks; reduced workload; modified work demands. Psychological supports for pregnancy loss were infrequently found within this literature, but participants expressed a need for counselling or peer support through Employee Assistance Programmes. This is reflective of the psychological impact of pregnancy loss and the increased risk of depression and anxiety. 2 Social support from management and colleagues were hampered by a lack of awareness and understanding of early pregnancy loss experiences. The lack of understanding about pregnancy loss faced by workers may be alleviated by joining peer support groups, which some workplaces provide referrals to. 52 Taboo and stigma was a factor which reduced the likelihood of disclosure of pregnancy loss, which is often required to access support. Alongside organisational and professional supports, education and awareness-raising in workplaces is essential to support workers’ who are returning to work following a pregnancy loss.
Research question 2: What are people's experiences of workplace supports for pregnancy loss before viability?
While there is a general lack of research in this area, recent primary studies have investigated participants’ experiences of leave provisions or supports in their workplace following a pregnancy loss. Across workplaces and countries, participants’ experiences reported in the publications in this review vary from a total lack of support from their workplace, to a positive return to work. There is variation in the type and length of leave available; the option of working accommodations; and the reactions and support from colleagues and management towards employees who experience pregnancy loss. Recently published and ongoing studies will further inform the growing evidence base in this area.88,89
In addition to the benefits of support policies and programmes to employees, it is important to highlight the advantages to workplaces of supporting and promoting their workers’ health and wellbeing. Poor physical or mental health can result in presenteeism, loss of productivity, reduced creativity, and increased absence, all of which is costly to companies. Conversely, improving work conditions or offering health initiatives results in productivity gains and sickness absence reduction. 87 A meta-analysis of a variety of workplace health promotion programmes found small improvements in outcomes such as sickness absence, work productivity, and work ability. 90 The World Health Organisation recognises the strategic advantage to workplaces of promoting and supporting workers’ health, alongside the moral and sometimes legal obligation to do so. 91 The EU Occupational Safety and Health Association has also found that poor workplace safety and health costs money, and it is worthwhile for companies to invest in their workers’ health. 92
What is the scope of the current evidence and are there any gaps in the research?
While our search strategy yielded over 10,000 results and this review includes 48 records, there is a lack of empirical evidence examining workplace supports for pregnancy loss and people's experiences thereof. Furthermore, of the small number of empirical studies included in this review, 11 included participants who had experienced all types of pregnancy loss, which further limits the extent of evidence available for workplace experiences of pregnancy loss before viability. Many of these studies are very recent (within the past three years), which illustrates the growing awareness and attention on early pregnancy loss worldwide. While many of the reports addressed low-and-middle-income countries, all of the included empirical work was conducted in high-income countries. Furthermore, most reports were examining workers’ rights across all aspects of working life, not focusing specifically on pregnancy loss; as such, the information pertaining to pregnancy loss supports was often vague or brief. Many journal articles included discuss the lack of awareness, discussion, and education surrounding pregnancy loss. The lack of research in this area supports this finding.
In addition to the lack of research in this area, pregnancy loss in the workplace would not appear to be given due attention by organisations which focus on occupational health, given that we did not identify any eligible records from the websites of European Union 93 and United States of America 94 occupational health bodies. However, an exception – and example of guidance for workplaces in Canada – describes what a miscarriage is and what workplaces can do to support workers’ experiencing pregnancy loss. 95 Following on from new research and legislation, guidance from national and international organisations is needed to promote workplace policies and training.
Future research needs to examine the need for, implementation, and impact of workplace supports such as leave (including the optimum duration of same), practical accommodations, and training and education of managers and colleagues about pregnancy loss experiences.
Strengths and limitations
A strength of this work is the involvement of knowledge users, from inception, in the review; such engagement improves the relevance of the research and will also enhance the dissemination and implementation of research findings. 96 Furthermore, we did not restrict by language or geographical location, and included grey literature sources. Our results demonstrate the importance of the latter, given the dearth of empirical work identified. There are some limitations, however. We did not include media reports within our scoping review, in order to keep our review manageable, within the available resources and timelines. We have observed much media reporting of issues relating to pregnancy loss in the workplace in recent years, and this is indeed an area for future research. In addition, we did not conduct general internet searches to identify company policies/supports, or searches of legislative sources; we will examine these separately. 9
Conclusion
Our scoping review of literature published in the past 10 years, has identified a lack of research and broader literature internationally on workplace supports and experiences of early pregnancy loss. Most reports included in our review focused on middle-and-lower-income countries. In recent years, there has been an increase in primary research on workplace experiences of pregnancy loss in high-income countries. This highlights various issues that workers face when returning to work following pregnancy loss, including navigating the physical and emotional impacts, workplace conversations and relationships, and workloads. Our review identified measures such as leave, flexible working arrangements, and access to support, which organisations can implement to support their employees experiencing pregnancy loss. Education and awareness-raising initiatives in workplaces are also required to enable supportive cultures. Further qualitative and quantitative primary research is needed to understand workplace experiences of pregnancy loss, to inform the development and implementation of supports, including appropriate legislation and guidance for organisations on the introduction of pregnancy loss supports to the workplace.
Supplemental Material
Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-wor-10.1177_10519815241305007 for Workplace supports for early pregnancy loss: A scoping review of international literature by Ruadh Kelly-Harrington, Sara Leitao, Keelin O'Donoghue, Caroline Dalton-O'Connor, Mary Donnelly, Claire Murray, Daniel Nuzum, Maeve O'Sullivan and Marita Hennessy in WORK
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
ORCID iD: Marita Hennessy https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7742-8118
Statements and declarations
Ethical approval: Not applicable.
Informed consent: Not applicable.
Funding: This work was supported by the Department of Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth, Ireland. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Supplemental material: Supplemental material for this article is available online.
References
- 1.Heazell AEP, Siassakos D, Blencowe Het al. Lancet Ending Preventable Stillbirths Investigator Group. Stillbirths: economic and psychosocial consequences. Lancet 2016b; 387: 604–616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Quenby S, Gallos ID, Dhillon-Smith RK, et al. Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss. Lancet 2021; 397: 1658–1667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bearak J, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B, et al. Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990-2019. The Lancet Global Health 2020; 8: e1152–e1161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Al Wattar BH, Murugesu N, Tobias A, et al. Management of first-trimester miscarriage: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update 2019; 25: 362–374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Morris A, Meaney S, Spillane Net al. et al. The postnatal morbidity associated with second-trimester miscarriage. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2016; 29: 2786–2790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Employment New Zealand. Bereavement leave [Internet]. Wellington, New Zealand: Employment New Zealand, 2022. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from https://www.employment.govt.nz/leave-and-holidays/bereavement-leave/. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Australian Public Service Commission. Circular 2021/08: Changes to the Fair Work Act 2009 to provide compassionate leave for miscarriage [Internet]. Canberra, Australia: Australian Public Service Commission, 2021. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from https://www.apsc.gov.au/circulars-guidance-and-advice/circular-202108-changes-fair-work-act-2009-provide-compassionate-leave-miscarriage [Google Scholar]
- 8.Houses of the Oireachtas. Organisation of Working Time (Reproductive Health Related Leave) Bill 2021 – No. 38 of 2021 [Internet]. Houses of the Oireachtas, Ireland, 2021. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/bills/bill/2021/38 [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pregnancy Loss Research Group. PLACES | Pregnancy Loss in Workplaces: Informing policymakers on support mechanisms [Internet]. Cork, Ireland: University College Cork, 2024. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from https://www.ucc.ie/en/pregnancyloss/researchprojects/places/ [Google Scholar]
- 10.UK Parliament. Miscarriage Leave Bill – Parliamentary Bills [Internet]. London, UK: UK Parliament, 2022. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/2948 [Google Scholar]
- 11.Meunier S, de Montigny F, Zeghiche S, et al. Workplace experience of parents coping with perinatal loss: a scoping review. Work 2021; 69: 411–421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gilbert SL, Dimoff JK, Brady JM, et al. Pregnancy loss: a qualitative exploration of an experience stigmatized in the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior 2023; 142: 103848. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Keep M, Payne S, Carland JE. Experiences of Australian women on returning to work after miscarriage. Community, Work & Family 2021; 26: 258–267. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Obst KL, Due C, Oxlad Met al. et al. Australian Men’s experiences of leave provisions and workplace support following pregnancy loss or neonatal death. Community, Work & Family 2022; 25: 551–562. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Romanis EC. Is ‘viability’ viable? Abortion, conceptual confusion and the law in England and Wales and the United States. Journal of Law and the Biosciences 2020; 7: lsaa059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kelly K, Meaney S, Leitao Set al. et al. A review of stillbirth definitions: a rationale for change. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 2021; 256: 235–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kelly-Harrington R, Hennessy M, Leitao S, et al. Supports for pregnancy loss in workplaces: A scoping review protocol [Internet]. Open Science Framework, 2022. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from https://osf.io/mv2pa/ [Google Scholar]
- 18.Khalil H, Peters MDJ, Tricco AC, et al. Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2021; 130: 156–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Peters M, Godfrey C, McInerney P, et al. Chapter 11: Scoping reviews. In JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis [Internet]. Adelaide, Australia: JBI, 2020. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from 10.46658/JBIMES-20-12 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Peters MD, Marnie C, Tricco AC, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis 2020; 18: 2119–2126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pollock D, Peters MDJ, Khalil H, et al. Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis 2023; 21: 20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O’Brien KK, et al. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2014; 67: 1291–1294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin WO, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine 2018; 169: 467–473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hennessy M, Dennehy R, Meaney S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for recurrent miscarriage in high-income countries: a systematic review. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2021; 42: 1146–1171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Zet al. et al. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews 2016; 5: 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 2005; 15: 1277–1288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Addati L, Cassirer N, Gilchrist K. Maternity and paternity at work – Law and practice across the world [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: ILO, 2014. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from https://www.ilo.org/publications/maternity-and-paternity-work-law-and-practice-across-world [Google Scholar]
- 28.Behari A. Daddy’s home: the promotion of paternity leave and family responsibilities in the South African workplace. Obiter 2016; 37: 346–361. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fisk GM. The complexity and embeddedness of grief at work: a social-ecological model. Human Resource Management Review 2022; 33: 100929. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fuller D, McGuinness S, Littlemore J, et al. Death Before Birth: Understanding, informing and supporting the choices made by people who have experienced miscarriage, termination, and stillbirth. Preliminary project findings for meeting with representatives of the Department of Health and Social Care [Internet], 2018. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from https://testprojectwebsiteblog.files.wordpress.com/2019/03/summary-of-project-findings-report-for-dhsc.pdf
- 31.International Labour Law. Maternity and paternity at work – Law and practice across the world. Geneva, Switzerland: ILO, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 32.International Labour Organisation. Rural road maintenance training modules for contractors. Module-8: Occupational health & safety, environmental issues and decent work [Internet], 2015. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from http://www.ilo.org/emppolicy/pubs/WCMS_432619/lang–en/index.html
- 33.International Labour Organisation. Study on maternity protection insurance in Sri Lanka [Internet]. Colombo, Sri Lanka: ILO, 2016. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from https://ilo.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay/alma994939093402676/41ILO_INST:41ILO_V2 [Google Scholar]
- 34.International Labour Organisation. Introduction to Myanmar labour law 2020 [Internet]. Yangon, Myanmar: ILO, 2020b [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from http://www.ilo.org/yangon/publications/WCMS_837641/lang–en/index.html. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ministry of Employment and Labor. 2013 Employment and labor policy in Korea. Geneva, Switzerland: ILO, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Modgil N. Surrogate mothers in Indian maternity benefit law: a blind spot or a blind eye? International Journal of Law Management & Humanities 2021; 4: 5346–5353. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Olivier MP. Social protection for migrant workers in ASEAN: Developments, challenges, and prospects. Bangkok, Thailand: ILO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rahayuningsih I. Analysis on psychological impacts due to violation of the rights of women workers. International Journal of Psychological Studies 2016; 8: 65. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rose A, Oxlad M. LGBTQ+ peoples’ experiences of workplace leave and support following pregnancy loss. Community, Work & Family 2022; 26: 268–284. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Theile S, Cichon M, Satriana S. Summary report: Assessment-based national dialogue on social protection in Lao People’s Democratic Republic [Internet]. Vientiane, Lao PDR: ILO, 2017. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from http://www.ilo.org/asia/publications/WCMS_775231/lang–en/index.htm [Google Scholar]
- 41.UN Women. Country gender equality profile Viet Nam 2021 [Internet]. DSpace, 2021. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from https://dspace.agu.edu.vn:8080/handle/agu_library/15040 [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bober M, Castro A, Echeverría Manrique E, et al. Social Dialogue Report 2022: Collective bargaining for an inclusive, sustainable and resilient recovery [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: ILO, 2022. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from http://www.ilo.org/global/publications/books/WCMS_842807/lang–en/index.htm [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chung B-S. Reforms of the employment insurance system of the Republic of Korea to cope with the COVID-19 crisis. Jakarta, Indonesia: ILO, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Goulding K. Gender dimensions of national employment policies [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: ILO, 2013. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from http://ilo.ch/wcmsp5/groups/public/-dgreports/-gender/documents/publication/wcms_232758.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 45.Infante Villarroel M, Tar KA. Assessment of drivers and constraints for occupational safety and health in the construction global supply chain in Myanmar – Vision Zero Fund [Internet]. Yangon, Myanmar: ILO, 2021. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from https://vzf.ilo.org/insights/assessment-of-drivers-and-constraints-for-occupational-safety-and-health-in-the-construction-global-supply-chain-in-myanmar/ [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ramírez López B, Arza C, Doan T-P, et al. Adapting social insurance to women’s life courses: A gender impact assessment of Viet Nam. Geneva, Switzerland: ILO, 2021. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from https://www.ilo.org/publications/adapting-social-insurance-womens-life-courses-gender-impact-assessment-viet [Google Scholar]
- 47.Scheil-Adlung X. Can productivity in SMEs be increased by investing in workers’ health? Taking stock of findings on health protection of workers in small and medium-sized enterprises and their impacts on productivity [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: ILO, 2014. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from http://www.ilo.org/global/topics/dw4sd/WCMS_568686/lang–en/index.html [Google Scholar]
- 48.Thompson D, Salvai P, Chan N, et al. Voluntary labour compliance assessment for Myanmar garment manufacturers Association [Internet]. Yangon, Myanmar: ILO, 2019. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from http://www.ilo.org/actemp/publications/WCMS_737352/lang–en/index.htm [Google Scholar]
- 49.Tsuruga I, Carmona Llano LF, Moo SUL. Policy design for unemployment benefits in Myanmar: The Social Security Law, 2012, and Social Security Rules, 2014 [Internet]. Yangon, Myanmar: ILO, 2021. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from http://www.ilo.org/yangon/publications/WCMS_840696/lang–en/index.htm [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tsuruga I, Moo SUL. Employment termination in Myanmar: Rules and payment on separation [Internet]. Yangon, Myanmar: ILO, 2021. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from http://www.ilo.org/yangon/publications/WCMS_840699/lang–en/index.htm [Google Scholar]
- 51.Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. Workplace support for employees experiencing pregnancy or baby loss. Case Study: The Co-operative Group [Internet]. London, UK: CIPD, 2022b [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from https://www.cipd.org/uk/knowledge/case-studies/pregnancy-baby-loss-co-op/ [Google Scholar]
- 52.Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. Workplace support for employees experiencing pregnancy or baby loss. Case Study: Vodafone UK [Internet]. CIPD, 2022c [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from https://www.cipd.org/globalassets/media/knowledge/knowledge-hub/case-studies/2023-pdfs/pregnancy-baby-loss-case-study-vodafone_tcm18-113224.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 53.Srivastava RS. A social protection floor for India [Internet]. New Delhi, India: ILO, 2013. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from http://www.ilo.org/newdelhi/whatwedo/publications/WCMS_223773/lang–en/index.htm [Google Scholar]
- 54.Breen LJ, Kawashima D, Joy K, et al. Grief literacy: a call to action for compassionate communities. Death Studies 2022; 46: 425–433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Goonetilleke SME. Maternity legislation in Sri Lanka: Are women equal, special or different? OUSL Journal 2016; 11: 53–78. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hackney KJ, Wu C, Nuner JE. Invisible grief: an examination of miscarriage in the workplace. In: Rossi AM, Meurs JA, Perrewé PL. (eds) Stress and quality of working life: finding meaning in grief and suffering. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc, 2020, pp.27–46. [Google Scholar]
- 57.International Labour Organisation. Safety and health in construction: ILO code of practice [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: ILO, 2022. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from https://webapps.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/-ed_dialogue/-sector/documents/normativeinstrument/wcms_861584.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 58.International Labour Organisation. Introduction to Myanmar Labour Law 2020 [Internet]. Yangon, Myanmar: ILO, 2020b [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from http://www.ilo.org/yangon/publications/WCMS_837641/lang–en/index.html [Google Scholar]
- 59.Maffii M, Hong S, Haspels N, et al. Action-oriented research on gender equality and the working and living conditions of garment factory workers in Cambodia [Internet]. Bangkok, Thailand: ILO, 2012. [cited 2024 jan 31]. Available from http://www.ilo.org/asia/publications/WCMS_204166/lang–en/index.html [Google Scholar]
- 60.Miller J, Suff R. Workplace support for employees experiencing pregnancy or baby loss: Survey report [Internet]. London, UK: CIPD, 2022b [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from https://www.cipd.org/uk/knowledge/reports/pregnancy-baby-loss-report/ [Google Scholar]
- 61.Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. Workplace support for employees experiencing pregnancy or baby loss: A guide for managers [Internet]. London, UK: CIPD, 2022a [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from https://www.cipd.org/uk/knowledge/guides/manager-guide-pregnancy-loss/ [Google Scholar]
- 62.Miller J, Suff R. CIPD | Workplace support for employees experiencing pregnancy or baby loss: Guidance for people professionals [Internet]. London, UK: CIPD, 2022a. https://www.cipd.org/en/knowledge/guides/supporting-employees-guidance-pregnancy-baby-loss/ [Google Scholar]
- 63.Boncori I, Smith C. I lost my baby today: embodied writing and learning in organizations. Management Learning 2019; 50: 74–86. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Castillo-Angeles M, Atkinson RB, Easter SR, et al. Pregnancy during surgical training: are residency programs truly supporting their trainees? Journal of Surgical Education 2022; 79: e92–e102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Porschitz ET, Siler EA. Miscarriage in the workplace: an authoethnography. Gender, Work & Organization 2017; 24: 565–578. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Silverman M. Women’s return to work experience post-miscarriage [Doctoral Dissertation, Fielding Graduate University] [Internet]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, 2020. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from https://www.proquest.com/docview/2433214146 [Google Scholar]
- 67.Tommy’s. Pregnancy and parenting at work survey findings [Internet]. London, UK: Tommy’s, 2022. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from https://www.tommys.org/pregnancy-and-parenting-work-survey-findings [Google Scholar]
- 68.Light LB. Labor pains: The multiple and conflicting roles of academic mothers [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Dayton] [Internet]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, 2022. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from https://www.proquest.com/docview/2697335206/abstract/8613EAF373B6478APQ/1 [Google Scholar]
- 69.McNiven A. (re)collections: Engaging feminist geography with embodied and relational experiences of pregnancy losses [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Durham, UK] [Internet]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, 2014. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/re-collections-engaging-feminist-geography-with/docview/1775215852/se-2?accountid=14504 [Google Scholar]
- 70.Musodza W, Sheehan A, Nicholls Det al. et al. Experiences of maternity healthcare professionals returning to work following a personal perinatal loss: a scoping review of the literature. Journal of Death and Dying 2021; 86: 744–768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Watson MA, Jewell VD. Journey interrupted: a phenomenological exploration of miscarriage. Open Journal of Occupational Therapy 2018; 6: 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Jurkovic D, Overton C, Bender-Atik R. Diagnosis and management of first trimester miscarriage. BMJ 2013; 346: f3676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Black KI, de Vries BS, Moses F, et al. The impact of introducing medical management on conservative and surgical management for early pregnancy miscarriage. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2017; 57: 93–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Meaney S, Corcoran P, Spillane Net al. et al. Experience of miscarriage: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. BMJ Open 2017; 7: e011382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Joyce CM, Coulter J, Kenneally C, et al. Experience of women on the Irish national gestational trophoblastic disease registry. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2022; 272: 206–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Doka K. Disenfranchised grief in historical and cultural perspective. In: Stroebe MS, Hansson RO, Schut H, et al. (eds) Handbook of bereavement research and practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2008, pp.223–240. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Broen AN, Moum T, Bødtker ASet al. et al. The course of mental health after miscarriage and induced abortion: a longitudinal, five-year follow-up study. BMC Medicine 2005; 3: 18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Farren J, Jalmbrant M, Ameye L, et al. Post-traumatic stress, anxiety and depression following miscarriage or ectopic pregnancy: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e011864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.van den Berg MMJ, Dancet EAF, Erlikh T, et al. Patient-centered early pregnancy care: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies on the perspectives of women and their partners. Human Reproduction Update 2018; 24: 106–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Mao S. Maternity Leave and Allowances in China [Internet]. Guangzhou, China: China Law Help, 2020. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from https://chinalawhelp.com/maternity-leave-and-allowances-in-china/ [Google Scholar]
- 81.Ministry of Labour & Employment. Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 [Internet]. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Labour & Employment, 1961. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from https://labour.gov.in/sites/default/files/TheMaternityBenefitAct1961.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 82.Kelly-Harrington R, Murray C, Hennessy M, et al. Statutory leave for early pregnancy loss: A comparative study. European Labour Law Journal 2024; 15: 695–710. [Google Scholar]
- 83.Parental Bereavement (Leave and Pay) Act (Northern Ireland) 2022 [Internet]. Government Printer for Northern Ireland. 2022. [cited 2023 Jan 03]. Available from https://www.legislation.gov.uk/nia/2022/5/enacted [Google Scholar]
- 84.Bill 17 Labour Statutes Amendment Act 2022 [Internet]. 2022. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from https://docs.assembly.ab.ca/LADDAR_files/docs/bills/bill/legislature_30/session_3/20220222_bill-017.pdf
- 85.Bill 203-Labour Standards Code (amended), 203 [Internet]. 2022. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Halifax, Nova Scotia. Available from https://nslegislature.ca/legc/bills/64th_1st/1st_read/b203.html
- 86.El Govern de la Generalitat incorpora un permís per dol gestacional en l’àmbit laboral [Internet]. Administració i Funció Pública, 2022. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from http://administraciopublica.gencat.cat/ca/actualitat/221006_NOVES_MESURES_CONCILIACIO [Google Scholar]
- 87.Zwetsloot GIJM, van Scheppingen AR, Dijkman AJ, et al. The organizational benefits of investing in workplace health. International Journal of Workplace Health Management 2010; 3: 143–159. [Google Scholar]
- 88.Brewis J, Newton V, Davies J, et al. Early pregnancy endings and the workplace [Internet]. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University, 2024. [cited 2024 Jun 11]. Available from https://business-school.open.ac.uk/research/projects/early-pregnancy-endings-workplace [Google Scholar]
- 89.Meunier S, de Montigny F, Lalande D, et al. Exploring the experience of presenteeism among fathers returning to work following a perinatal death. Community, Work & Family 2024: 1–14. doi: 10.1080/13668803.2024.2345889 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Rongen A, Robroek SJW, van Lenthe FJet al. et al. Workplace health promotion: a meta-analysis of effectiveness. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2013; 44: 406–415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.World Health Organization; Burton J. WHO healthy workplace framework and model: Background and supporting literature and practices [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2010. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/113144. [Google Scholar]
- 92.European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Good OSH is good for business [Internet]. EU-OSHA, 2024. [cited 2024 Jan 12]. Available from https://osha.europa.eu/en/themes/good-osh-is-good-for-business [Google Scholar]
- 93.European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Directive 92/85/EEC - pregnant workers [Internet]. EU-OSHA, 2021. [cited 2024 Jan 12]. Available from https://osha.europa.eu/en/legislation/directives/10 [Google Scholar]
- 94.US Department of Labour. Reproductive Hazards-Overview | Occupational Safety and Health Administration [Internet]. US Department of Labour, 2024. [cited 2024 Jan 12]. Available from https://www.osha.gov/reproductive-hazards [Google Scholar]
- 95.Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety. CCOHS: Reproductive health - pregnancy in the workplace [Internet]. CCOSH, 2023. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/psychosocial/wh/reproductive-health-pregnancy-in-the-workplace.html [Google Scholar]
- 96.Pollock D, Alexander L, Munn Z, et al. Moving from consultation to co-creation with knowledge users in scoping reviews: guidance from the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group. JBI Evidence Synthesis 2022; 20: 969–979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.International Labour Organisation. Short-term policy responses to COVID-19 in the world of work [Internet]. New Delhi, India: ILO, 2020a [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from http://www.ilo.org/newdelhi/whatwedo/publications/WCMS_739454/lang–en/index.html [Google Scholar]
- 98.International Labour Organisation. Practical guidelines for employers for promoting equality and preventing discrimination at work in Indonesia: Equality in company practices [Internet]. Jakarta, Indonesia: ILO, 2013. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from https://webapps.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/-asia/-ro-bangkok/-ilo-jakarta/documents/publication/wcms_236911.pdf [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-wor-10.1177_10519815241305007 for Workplace supports for early pregnancy loss: A scoping review of international literature by Ruadh Kelly-Harrington, Sara Leitao, Keelin O'Donoghue, Caroline Dalton-O'Connor, Mary Donnelly, Claire Murray, Daniel Nuzum, Maeve O'Sullivan and Marita Hennessy in WORK


