Abstract
The pseudo Ruddlesden–Popper phase Li2CaTa2O7 is converted to ZnCaTa2O7, FeCaTa2O7, or CoCaTa2O7 by reaction with the corresponding transition-metal dichloride. Diffraction data reveal that ZnCaTa2O7 adopts a polar crystal structure (P2cm) with the Zn2+cations ordered into stripes within the interlayer coordination sites, and the TaO6 units adopt an a – b – c +/–(a – b –)c + tilting pattern. In contrast, FeCaTa2O7 and CoCaTa2O7 adopt polar structures (P21 nm) with the transition-metal cations ordered in a checkerboard pattern within the interlayer coordination sites, and the TaO6 units adopt an a – b – c +/ b – a – c + tilting pattern. The different polar structures adopted are rationalized on the basis of the size of the interlayer transition-metal cation. On cooling, FeCaTa2O7 (T N = 40 K) and CoCaTa2O7 (T N = 25 K) adopt antiferromagnetically ordered states with spins aligned parallel to the crystallographic stacking axis and arranged in a G-type manner. Close inspection of the NPD data collected from FeCaTa2O7 at low temperature reveals a diffuse component to the magnetic scattering, which, in combination with magnetization data, suggest a glassy component to the low-temperature magnetic state. Neither FeCaTa2O7 nor CoCaTa2O7 shows significant lattice parameter anomalies around their respective Néel temperatures, in contrast to the previously reported manganese analogue MnCaTa2O7.


Introduction
Materials which simultaneously exhibit a spontaneous, switchable electrical polarization (ferroelectricity) and a spontaneous, switchable magnetic polarization (ferromagnetism) are highly desired because such magnetoelectric materials − could allow the preparation of novel devices with applications in data manipulation and storage. , However, the preparation of novel magnetoelectric materials is challenging because the two constituent behaviors, ferromagnetism and ferroelectricity, are contraindicated. This is principally because the noncentrosymmetric structural distortions which are a prerequisite of ferroelectric behavior are typically driven by a second-order Jahn–Teller (SOJT) instability arising from the presence of either octahedrally coordinated d0 transition-metal cations (e.g., Ti4+ in BaTiO3) , or ns2 post-transition-metal cations (e.g., Pb2+ in PbZrO3) , and these species are diamagnetic, so cannot contribute to the desired ferromagnetic behavior.
Recently an alternative ‘trilinear-coupled hybrid-improper’ mechanism for stabilizing ferroelectric structural distortions has been attracting attention. , In this scheme, two nonpolar structural distortions (typically the tilting distortions of layered perovskite phases) couple together to stabilize a third, polar distortion (trilinear coupling) which is energetically unfavorable in the absence of the nonpolar distortions. The polar distortion stabilized by this mechanism is not the primary order parameter of the associated ferroelectric phase transition, so polar materials of this type are often referred to as ‘hybrid improper’ ferroelectrics. ,
In principle the hybrid-improper stabilization mechanism does not impose any restrictions on the chemical composition of polar phases, as it is geometric in nature. Thus, paramagnetic species should be easy to incorporate into hybrid-improper ferroelectric phases in an attempt to prepare magnetoelectric materials, as demonstrated by Ca3Mn3O7, the first material theoretically identified as a hybrid-improper ferroelectric. In practice, however, the requirement to have two distinct octahedral tilting distortions does impose quite strict chemical constraints on the makeup of hybrid improper ferroelectric phases because such highly distorted frameworks are only stable in materials with Goldschmitt tolerance factors (t = < A-O>/√2 < B–O>) smaller than around t = 0.87. , This small tolerance factor excludes a large number of combinations of A- and B-cations, including the majority of Ruddlesden–Popper and Dion-Jacobson phases which can be prepared with paramagnetic transition-metal cations on their B-sites.
Recently we have been using the facile exchange reactions of the monovalent cations in A’AB 2O7 (A’ = Cs, Rb) Dion-Jacobson − and Li2 AB 2O7 pseudo Ruddlesden–Popper phases to prepare metastable layered perovskite oxides with tolerance factors which are small enough to exhibit polar structures stabilized by the hybrid-improper mechanism. Building on this we have also shown that substitution of 2 Li+ cations with a divalent paramagnetic ion, such as Mn2+, allows magnetic behavior to be introduced. , Thus, for example, the hybrid-improper polar phase Li2SrTa2O7 can be converted to MnSrTa2O7, a paramagnetic polar material which exhibits signatures of magnetoelectric coupling.
Here we describe the preparation and characterization of FeCaTa2O7, CoCaTa2O7 and ZnCaTa2O7 prepared by analogous cation exchange reactions from Li2CaTa2O7, like the previously reported phase MnCaTa2O7.
Experimental Section
Synthesis of Li2CaTa2O7
Polycrystalline samples of Li2CaTa2O7 were prepared by combining suitable stoichiometric ratios of CaCO3 (99.997%) and Ta2O5 (99%, dried at 900 °C) with a 3% stoichiometric excess of Li2CO3 (99.99%) to compensate for lithium loss due to volatility at high temperature. The mixture was ground in an agate pestle and mortar, placed in an alumina crucible and heated at 800 °C in air for 12 h. The mixture was then reground, pressed into 13 mm pellets, placed in an alumina crucible and heated to 1200 °C at a rate of 5 °C/min and then held there for 2 h. The sample was then removed from the furnace, reground and pressed into pellets and then directly inserted into a furnace at 1200 °C and heated for 2 h, before being quenched to room temperature. Synchrotron X-ray diffraction data collected from Li2CaTa2O7 could be fit well by the reported structure , to yield lattice parameters in good agreement with literature values, as described previously.
Synthesis of FeCaTa2O7, CoCaTa2O7 and ZnCaTa2O7
Polycrystalline samples of FeCaTa2O7, CoCaTa2O7 and ZnCaTa2O7 were prepared via cation exchange reactions from Li2CaTa2O7. Approximately 4 g of Li2CaTa2O7 was combined with 10-mol equiv of anhydrous FeCl2 (99.5%), CoCl2 (99.7%) or ZnCl2 (99.99%). The mixtures were ground in an agate pestle and mortar in an argon-filled glovebox, loaded into Pyrex tubes and sealed under vacuum. The separate samples of FeCaTa2O7, CoCaTa2O7 and ZnCaTa2O7 were then heated at a ramp rate of 2 °C/min to 350, 360, and 400 °C, respectively, for two periods of 48 h, followed by cooling at 5 °C/min to room temperature. The reaction tube containing ZnCl2 was placed vertically in a furnace because ZnCl2 has a melting point of 290 °C so the reaction medium is molten at the synthesis temperature. Between heating cycles, the samples were washed with distilled water to remove any unreacted transition-metal chloride, and LiCl byproduct, and then combined with fresh anhydrous transition-metal chloride for the following cycle.
Characterization
X-ray powder diffraction data were collected using a PANalytical X’pert diffractometer incorporating an X’celerator position-sensitive detector (monochromatic Cu Kα1 radiation). High-resolution synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction (SXRD) data were collected using the I11 instrument at the Diamond Light Source Ltd. Diffraction patterns were collected using Si-calibrated X-rays with an approximate wavelength of 0.825 Å from samples, sealed in 0.3 mm diameter borosilicate glass capillaries. Time-of-flight neutron powder diffraction (NPD) data were collected using the WISH diffractometer located at the ISIS neutron source, from the samples loaded in vanadium cans. Rietveld refinements were performed using the TOPAS Academic (V6). Second harmonic generation (SHG) response of samples was measured from powder samples with the SHG intensity compared to a standard samples of potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KDP) or AgGaS2. No index matching fluid was used in any of the experiments. A detailed description of the experimental setup and process has been reported previously. DC magnetization data were collected using a Quantum Design MPMS SQUID magnetometer from samples contained in gelatin capsules.
Results
Structural Characterization of ZnCaTa2O7
Powder SHG data collected from ZnCaTa2O7, using a laser of wavelength 1064 nm, exhibit an activity that is 0.07 times that of a KDP standard, indicating that ZnCaTa2O7 adopts a noncentrosymmetric structure (Figure S1). SXRD data collected from ZnCaTa2O7 at room temperature can be indexed using a primitive orthorhombic unit cell (a = 5.382 Å, b = 5.538 Å, c = 19.764 Å) consistent with a √2 × √2 × 1 geometric expansion of an undistorted n = 2 Ruddlesden–Popper unit cell, and the data showed no indications of any secondary phases.
NPD data collected from ZnCaTa2O7 at 100 K could also be indexed using a primitive orthorhombic unit cell (a = 5.38116(7) Å, b = 5.54170(7) Å, c = 19.78286(25) Å). A detailed symmetry analysis of the n = 2 Ruddlesden–Popper structure was used to generate a series of distorted, chemically plausible structural models for ZnCaTa2O7 based on the cooperative tilting of the TaO6 units, as described previously. By considering the reflection conditions observed in the NPD data, and the fact that ZnCaTa2O7 adopts a noncentrosymmetric crystal structure, it was possible to narrow down the list of possible distorted structures to two candidates: an a – b – c +/b – a – c + distorted structure described in space group P21 nm (#31) or an a – b – c +/-(a – b –)c + distorted structure described in space group P2cm (#28). Thus, structural models were constructed for the two distortions based on the structure of Li2CaTa2O7 but with each lithium replaced by 0.5 Zn2+ ions. Refinement of these Zn-disordered models against the NPD data revealed the P2cm symmetry model gave a better fit to the data (P2cm: wRp = 7.47; P21 nm: wRp = 13.07).
The possibility of Zn occupational-order was then considered because the two structural models have multiple crystallographically distinct Zn sites: 4 distinct sites in the P2cm model (2 × 2a, 2 × 2b) and 2 distinct sites in the P21 nm model (2 × 4b). Ordering the Zn cations onto one of the 4b sites within the P21 nm model would lead to a chequerboard ordering of the Zn cations within the ZnO layers. However, refinement of the Zn site occupancies within the P21 nm model led to no variation of the disordered distribution of the Zn cations and no improvement to the fit to the data (wRp = 13.07). In contrast, refinement of the Zn site occupancies within the P2cm model (within the constraint that the ZnCaTa2O7 composition was maintained) rapidly lead to an occupancy of 0.98(3) for one 2a and one 2b site with the remaining sites having occupancies of 0.02(3) yielding a structure in which the Zn cations are arranged in stripes within the ZnO layers. This Zn-ordered model fit the NPD data better than the Zn-disorder model (wRp = 4.76) and setting the occupancies of the filled sites to unity made no difference to the fitting statistics. We therefore conclude that the structure of ZnCaTa2O7 is best described by a Zn-stripe ordered model with an a – b – c +/-(a – b –)c + tilting distortion described in space group P2cm as detailed in Table S1, with selected bond lengths given in Table S2, fits to the data shown in Figure S2 and a representation of the structure shown in Figure .
1.
Crystal structures of ZnCaTa2O7 and FeCaTa2O7 viewed down their respective [110] axes. Insets show interlayer planes viewed down respective [001] axes.
Structural Characterization of FeCaTa2O7
Powder SHG data collected from FeCaTa2O7, using a laser of wavelength 2090 nm, indicate an activity that is 0.4 times that of an AgGaS2 standard, indicating that FeCaTa2O7 adopts a noncentrosymmetric structure (Figure S1).
SXRD data collected from FeCaTa2O7 at room temperature could be indexed using a metrically tetragonal unit cell (a = 5.513 Å, c = 18.658 Å) as could the NPD data collected at 200 K. However, symmetry analysis of the n = 2 Ruddlesden–Popper system revealed that there are no cooperative tilting distortions which yield tetragonal, noncentrosymmetric structures, so collective distortions which yield orthorhombic noncentrosymmetric structures were considered. Of the 4 tilting distortions which yield noncentrosymmetric orthorhombic structures (a – a – c +/a – a – c +, A21 am; a – b – c +/ b – a – c +, P21 nm; a – a – c +/-(a – a – c +), B2cm; a – b – c +/-(a – b –)c +, P2cm) only those described in space groups P21 nm and P2cm have reflection conditions compatible with the NPD data. Thus, structural models were constructed for FeCaTa2O7 in the space groups P21 nm and P2cm based on the structure of Li2CaTa2O7 but with each lithium ion replaced by 0.5 Fe2+ cations.
Refinement of these models against the NPD data revealed the P21 nm symmetry model gave a much better visual and statistical fit (wRp = 7.39) to the data than the P2cm model (wRp = 12.13), so the a – b – c +/ b – a – c + distorted, P21 nm symmetry model was chosen to describe the structure of FeCaTa2O7. Close inspection of the P21 nm model revealed the Fe2+ cations can reside on 2 separate 4b crystallographic sites, allowing Fe occupationally ordered structures to be described. Refinement of the occupancies of these two sites, under the constraint that the FeCaTa2O7 composition was conserved, led to a rapid filling of one site and emptying of the other to yield a fully Fe-cation ordered structure. This was accompanied by a significant improvement to the visual and statistical fit (wRp = 4.25). Full details of the refined structure of FeCaTa2O7 are described in Table S3, with selected bond lengths given in Table S4, fits to the data shown in Figure S3 and a representation of the structure shown in Figure .
It should be noted that a cooperative a – b 0 c 0/ b – a 0 c 0 distortion of an n = 2 framework yields a tetragonal structure described in space group P42/mnm, which can be seen as a special case of the a – b – c +/ b – a – c + distortion refined for FeCaTa2O7. Close inspection of the refined structure of FeCaTa2O7 reveals that while the a-tilt angle (20.3(4)°) is significantly larger than the b-tilt (2.1(4)°) or c-tilt (5.7(8)°) angles, the latter two tilts have nonzero magnitudes, confirming the choice of a noncentrosymmetric orthorhombic P21 nm symmetry model, rather than a centrosymmetric tetragonal P42/mnm model.
Structural Characterization of CoCaTa2O7
Powder SHG data collected from CoCaTa2O7, using a laser of wavelength 2090 nm, indicate an activity that is 0.7 times that of an AgGaS2 standard, indicating that CoCaTa2O7 adopts a noncentrosymmetric structure (Figure S1). SXRD data collected from CoCaTa2O7 at room temperature could be indexed using a metrically tetragonal unit cell (a = 5.516 Å, c = 18.59 Å) as could the NPD data collected at 100 K. Using logic analogous to that described above for the structural analysis of FeCaTa2O7, a – b – c +/ b – a – c + and a – b – c +/-(a – b –)c + distorted structural models were constructed for CoCaTa2O7 in the space groups P21 nm and P2cm respectively, based on the structure of Li2CaTa2O7 but with each lithium ion replaced by 0.5 Co2+ cations.
As cobalt has a relatively weak neutron scattering power (2.49 fm) these structural models were simultaneously refined against both the NPD and SXRD data collected at 100 K. Again, the P21 nm model gave a better visual and statistical fit (wRp = 4.78) to the data than the P2cm model (wRp = 6.45), and when the occupancies of the cobalt sites were refined a fully Co occupationally ordered model resulted, again with a significant improvement to the visual and statistical fit (wRp = 2.07). Full details of the refined structure of CoCaTa2O7 are described in Table S5, with selected bond lengths given in Table S6, fits to the data shown in Figure S4 and S5.
Close inspection of the refined structure of CoCaTa2O7 revealed the a-tilt angle (23.0(3)°) was again significantly larger than the b-tilt (1.1(3)°) or c-tilt (1.7(7)°) angles. However, all three tilt angles are have nonzero magnitudes, confirming the choice of a noncentrosymmetric orthorhombic P21 nm symmetry model, rather than a centrosymmetric tetragonal P42/mnm model for CoCaTa2O7.
Magnetic Characterization of FeCaTa2O7
Magnetization data collected from FeCaTa2O7 in an applied field of 100 Oe (Figure ) can be fit by the Curie–Weiss law in the temperature range 150 < T/K < 300, yielding values of C = 4.21(3) cm3 K mol–1 and θ = −107.2(5) K. The observed Curie constant is significantly larger than that expected for a spin-only S = 2 ion (C expected = 3 cm3 K mol–1) suggesting an unquenched orbital contribution to the moment via second-order spin–orbit coupling. The ZFC and FC data diverge weakly below 120 K which we attribute to the presence of a small quantity of Fe3O4 (Verwey transition T ∼ 120 K). There is a much stronger divergence between ZFC and FC data observed below T ∼ 50 K and a local maximum in the ZFC data at T = 38 K which is accompanied by an inflection in the FC data. Magnetization data collected as a function of applied field at 300 K are linear and pass through the origin (Figure ). Analogous data collected at 5 K, after cooling in an applied field of 5 T, are displaced from the origin suggesting a glassy component to the magnetic behavior, although AC susceptibility data collected in the range 35 < T/K < 45 show no strong frequency dependence as described in detail in the Supporting Information.
2.

(top) ZFC and FC data collected from FeCaTa2O7 in an applied field of 100 Oe. Inset shows fit to Curie–Weiss law. (bottom) magnetization-field data collected from FeCaTa2O7 at 5 and 300 K.
NPD data collected from FeCaTa2O7 at 1.5 K exhibit a series of additional reflections, not observed in analogous data collected at 200 K (Figure a), which are attributed to magnetic order. These additional reflections can be indexed by the crystallographic unit cell, suggesting a propagation vector k = (0, 0, 0). A series of magnetic models were constructed on this basis using the ISODISTORT software package , and refined against the NPD data. The best fit was achieved using a model obtained by applying the mΓ2 magnetic irreducible to the P21 nm crystallographic structure to yield a model described in magnetic space group P21 n’m’ (#31.127). The components of the ordered moments parallel to the x- and y-axes refined to zero, within error, while the z-component converged to a value of 3.09(1) μB, yielding a model which can be thought of as a G-type antiferromagnetic ordering, as shown in the inset to Figure b and described in detail in Table S7.
3.

a) NPD data collected from FeCaTa2O7 at temperature indicated. Arrows indicate magnetic Bragg peaks. b) Plot of ordered magnetic moment as a function of temperature. Inset shows magnetic structure of FeCaTa2O7 (blue, gray and green and red spheres represent Ta, Ca, Fe, and O respectively).c) Expanded view of NPD data showing diffuse magnetic scattering at d ∼ 5.3 Å.
NPD data collected from FeCaTa2O7 on warming from 1.5 K can be fit by the same combined nuclear and magnetic model and reveal the ordered moment of the system declines with increasing temperature, as shown in Figure a, with no magnetic diffraction intensity observed above 40 K. The temperature dependence of the ordered moment shown in Figure b cannot easily be fit by a power law.
Close inspection of the fit of the combined structural and magnetic model to the NPD data collected from FeCaTa2O7 at 1.5 K reveal a broad, weak diffraction feature centered at d ∼ 5.3 Å, as shown in Figure c, which declines in intensity on warming in a manner akin to the main magnetic scattering features. The presence of this diffuse magnetic scattering helps to explain the relatively small size of the observed ordered moment on the Fe centers (3.09 μB compared to an expected value of 4 μB) and when combined with the displaced magnetization-field data shown in Figure , suggests there is a disordered or glassy component to the low temperature magnetic state.
Magnetic Characterization of CoCaTa2O7
Magnetization data collected from CoCaTa2O7 in an applied field of 100 Oe (Figure ) can be fit by the Curie–Weiss law in the temperature range 100 < T/K < 300, yielding values of C = 1.988(1) cm3 K mol–1 and θ = −38.4(8) K, and a temperature independent contribution of 1.75(6) × 10–3 cm3 mol–1. Again, the observed Curie constant is significantly larger than that expected for a spin-only S = 3/2 ion (C expected = 1.875 cm3 K mol–1) consistent with second-order spin–orbit coupling. On cooling below T = 50 K both ZFC and FC data exhibit a sharp increase before diverging at T = 28 K. Magnetization-field data collected at 300 K (Figure ) are linear and pass through the origin, while data collected at 5 K, after cooling in an applied field of 5 T, are sigmoidal and exhibit hysteresis, consistent with canted antiferromagnetic behavior. Analogous data collected on warming show no hysteresis above 28 K and become linear at T = 35 K as shown in the Supporting Information.
4.

(top) ZFC and FC data collected from CoCaTa2O7 in an applied field of 100 Oe. Inset shows fit to Curie–Weiss law after subtraction of the temperature independent component. (bottom) magnetization-field data collected from CoCaTa2O7 at 5 and 300 K.
NPD data collected from CoCaTa2O7 at 1.5 K exhibit a series of additional reflections not observed in analogous data collected at 100 K (Figure a), which are attributed to magnetic order. In common with FeCaTa2O7 the additional reflections can be indexed using the crystallographic cell and are best fit by a model obtained by applying the mΓ2 magnetic irreducible to the P21 nm crystallographic structure to yield a model described in space group P21 n’m’ (#31.127). On refinement the components of the ordered moments parallel to the x- and y-axes refined to zero, within error, while the z-component converged to a value of 3.07(1) μB, yielding a model directly analogous to that of FeCaTa2O7, shown in Figure and described in detail in Table S8.
5.

a) NPD data collected from CoCaTa2O7 at temperature indicated. Arrows indicate magnetic Bragg peaks. b) Plot of ordered magnetic moment as a function of temperature.
NPD data collected from CoCaTa2O7 on warming from 1.5 K can be fit by the same combined nuclear and magnetic model and reveal the ordered moment of the system declines with increasing temperature, as shown in Figure b, with no magnetic diffraction intensity observed above 25 K. Again, the temperature dependence of the ordered moment cannot easily be fit by a power law.
Discussion
Substitution of the lithium cations in Li2CaTa2O7 with Co2+ or Fe2+ yields MCaTa2O7 phases which are isostructural with MnCaTa2O7 (space group P21 nm) in which the transition metal cations adopt a chequerboard vacancy-ordered arrangement within the sites previously occupied by lithium (Figure ) which stabilizes an a – b – c +/ b – a – c + tilting distortion of the TaO6 octahedra. In contrast, the Zn substituted phase ZnCaTa2O7 adopts a structure in which the Zn2+ cations are ordered into stripes within the interlayer coordination sites (Figure ) which stabilizes an a – b – c +/-(a – b –)c + tilting distortion of the TaO6 octahedra, described in space group P2cm.
Thus, we can see that both the P21 nm symmetry structure adopted by the Mn, Co and Fe phases, and the P2cm symmetry structure adopted by ZnCaTa2O7 contain a – b – c + tilted CaTa2O7 perovskite layers, with one difference between the two structure types being how the distortions in adjacent layers are oriented relative to each other. In the P21 nm symmetry, a – b – c +/ b – a – c + distorted structure there is a 90° rotation around the z-axis of the tilt configuration between adjacent a – b – c + distorted layers. In the P2cm symmetry a – b – c +/-(a – b –)c + distorted structure there is an inversion in the direction of the out-of-phase tilts in the xy-plane between adjacent a – b – c + distorted layers.
This difference between the adjacent-layer orientation of the CaTa2O7 tilting distortions can be attributed to the differing interlayer cation ordering schemes of the phases: chequerboard order for MCaTa2O7 (M = Mn, Fe, Co), stripe order for ZnCaTa2O7. Analogous interlayer cation ordering patterns are observed in LiNdNb2O7 (stripes) and NaNdNb2O7 (chequerboard) – two phases prepared via cation exchange from RbNdNb2O7. In these ANdNb2O7 phases the differing cation ordering arrangements adopted by the Li and Na phases are rationalized by considering the competition between the desire to minimize A-A cation repulsion, and the need to optimize the metal–oxygen bonding in the AO4 local coordination polyhedra. The chequerboard cation ordering in NaNdNb2O7 consists of sheets of corner-linked NaO4 units, and thus minimizes Na–Na cation repulsion in line with Pauling’s third crystallographic rule. However, this cation arrangement does not allow the size of the NaO4 coordination polyhedra to be modified via the tilting of the NbO6 octahedra. The stripe-ordered structure of LiNdNb2O7 consists of sheets of edge-sharing LiO4 units and thus has a higher degree of A-A cation repulsion than the chequerboard arrangement, but crucially in this configuration the tilting of the NbO6 units can optimize the size of the LiO4 polyhedra. Thus, large cations (i.e., Na+) adopt a chequerboard ordered structure to minimize A-A repulsion, while small cations (i.e., Li+) adopt stripe ordered structures because optimizing (shortening) the A-O bonds in the local AO4 units becomes the energetic priority.
This rationalization can be transferred directly to the MCaTa2O7 phases, with the larger M 2+ cations (Mn, Fe, Co) adopting chequerboard ordered structures and the smaller M 2+ cations (Zn) adopting stripe ordered structures, and is supported by the observation that the Mn, Fe and Co cations are under bonded in the MCaTa2O7 phases (Mn BVS = +1.85; Fe BVS = +1.81; Co BVS = +1.80) while the bonding of the ZnO4 units in ZnCaTa2O7 has been optimized (Zn BVS = +2.01, + 1.99). Thus, it can be seen that the size of the M 2+ interlayer cations determines the relative orientation of the tilting distortions of adjacent CaTa2O7 layers.
FeCaTa2O7, CoCaTa2O7, and isostructural MnCaTa2O7 adopt analogous magnetically ordered structures at low temperature, with ordering temperatures which scale with the size of the local moment (CoCaTa2O7: T N = 25K, Co2+ S = 3/2 ; FeCaTa2O7: T N = 40K, Fe2+ S = 2; MnCaTa2O7: T N = 56K, Mn2+ S = 5/2). This ‘G-type’ antiferromagnetic order indicates that nearest neighbor antiferromagnetic couplings are the dominant interaction. The signatures of a glassy component to the low-temperature magnetic state of FeCaTa2O7 can be explained by observing that, in a tetrahedral coordination, Fe2+ has a nonspherical e3t2 3 electronic configuration (compared to spherical Co2+ e4t2 3 and Mn2+ e2t2 3) which could lead to the presence of some ferromagnetic nearest-neighbor couplings which will compete with, and partially frustrate, the dominant antiferromagnetic interactions.
A key reason to prepare cation-exchanged MAB 2O7 phases which contain paramagnetic M-cations within polar AB 2O7 frameworks, is to study the coupling between the magnetic and electrical polarizations in these materials which often becomes apparent at the magnetic ordering temperatures of the phases. For example, MnSrTa2O7 and MnCaTa2O7 exhibit large lattice parameter anomalies around 5 K below their respective Néel temperatures (referred to as T A) which are associated with a step change (MnSrTa2O7) or local maximum (MnCaTa2O7) in the Γ5 – polar distortion mode of the phases and are taken as indications of coupling between the magnetic and electrical polarizations present. , Figure shows plots of the lattice parameters of FeCaTa2O7 and CoCaTa2O7 as a function of temperature around their respective Néel temperatures. Neither set of data show anomalies analogous to those seen in the MnATa2O7 phases. Furthermore, if the magnitudes of the X2 +, X3 – and Γ5 – distortion modes (required to obtain the P21 nm symmetry structures of FeCaTa2O7 and CoCaTa2O7 from an aristotype I4/mmm phase) are plotted as a function of temperature over the same ranges (Figures S9 and S10) these also show no significant anomalies, and thus provide no evidence for magnetoelectric coupling in FeCaTa2O7 or CoCaTa2O7.
6.

Lattice parameters plotted as a function of temperature for (top) FeCaTa2O7 and (bottom) CoCaTa2O7. Dashed lines indicate the Néel temperatures of the two phases.
Conclusion
FeCaTa2O7, CoCaTa2O7 and ZnCaTa2O7 adopt polar crystal structures consistent with the trilinear-coupled hybrid-improper stabilization mechanism. FeCaTa2O7 and CoCaTa2O7 adopt structures described in space group P21 nm. Comparison of these structures to an I4/mmm, transition-metal-disordered aristotype phase reveals they are related by the application 4 symmetry lowering distortions with significant magnitude: M2 + (chequerboard cation order); X2 +(0; a) (a 0 a 0 c +/ a 0 a 0 c + tilt); X3 –(b; c) (a – b – c 0/ b – a – c 0 tilt); Γ5 – (polar distortion), with the presence of the X2 +(0; a), X3 –(b; c) and Γ5 – modes consistent with the trilinear-coupled hybrid-improper stabilization mechanism. In contrast, ZnCaTa2O7 adopts a crystal structure described in space group P2cm which is related to a Zn-disordered, I4/mmm symmetry aristotype structure by the application only 3 symmetry lowering distortions with significant magnitude: X4 – (a, b) (combined Zn stripe-order and a – b – c 0/-(a – b –)c 0 tilt); X2 +(a; 0) (a 0 a 0 c +/ a 0 a 0 c + tilt) and Γ5 – (polar distortion) which are also symmetry compatible with a trilinear coupling hybrid-improper stabilization mechanism for the observed polar structure.
FeCaTa2O7 and CoCaTa2O7 adopt ordered antiferromagnetic states at low temperature with a G-type arrangement, directly analogous to that of MnCaTa2O7. However, in contrast to the Mn phase, neither FeCaTa2O7 nor CoCaTa2O7 show lattice parameter anomalies close to their respective Néel temperatures, and thus show no evidence for magnetoelectric coupling. This lack of magnetoelectric coupling is puzzling given the behavior of the related phases MnCaTa2O7 and MnSrTa2O7, and suggests the interactions between the electrical and magnetic polarizations in these phases are subtle and may depend on a further, as yet unidentified parameter.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Diffraction experiments at the Diamond Light Source were performed as part of the Block Allocation Group award “Oxford Solid State Chemistry BAG to probe composition-structure-property relationships in solids” (CY25166). Experiments at the ISIS pulsed neutron facility were supported by a beam time allocation from the STFC (10.5286/ISIS.E.RB2310209). RC acknowledges funding from the EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Inorganic Chemistry for Future Manufacturing (OxICFM), EP/S023828/1. YZ and PSH thank the Welch Foundation (Grant E – 1457) for support.
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5c01951.
SHG data from all samples. Complete details of refined structures of ZnCaTa2O7, FeCaTa2O7 and CoCaTa2O7 including selected bond lengths. AC susceptibility of FeCaTa2O7 and magnetization-filed isotherms of CoCaTa2O7 (PDF)
The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- Eerenstein W., Mathur N. D., Scott J. F.. Multiferroic and magnetoelectric materials. Nature. 2006;442:759–765. doi: 10.1038/nature05023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheong S. W., Mostovoy M.. Multiferroics: a magnetic twist for ferroelectricity. Nat. Mater. 2007;6(1):13–20. doi: 10.1038/nmat1804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kimura T., Goto T., Shintani H., Ishizaka K., Arima T., Tokura Y.. Magnetic control of ferroelectric polarization. Nature. 2003;426(6962):55–58. doi: 10.1038/nature02018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bibes M., Barthelemy A.. Multiferroics: Towards a magnetoelectric memory. Nat. Mater. 2008;7(6):425–426. doi: 10.1038/nmat2189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scott J. F.. Data storage - Multiferroic memories. Nat. Mater. 2007;6(4):256–257. doi: 10.1038/nmat1868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill N. A.. Why Are There So Few Magnetic Ferroelectrics? J. Phys. Chem. B. 2000;104:6694–6709. doi: 10.1021/jp000114x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pearson R. G.. The 2nd-Order Jahn-Teller Effect. J. Mol. Struct.:THEOCHEM. 1983;12(AUG):25–34. doi: 10.1016/0166-1280(83)85006-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kunz M., Brown I. D.. Out-of-Center Distortions around Octahedrally Coordinated d0 Transition-Metals. J. Solid State Chem. 1995;115(2):395–406. doi: 10.1006/jssc.1995.1150. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cohen R. E.. Origin of Ferroelectricity in Perovskite Oxides. Nature. 1992;358(6382):136–138. doi: 10.1038/358136a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Stoltzfus M. W., Woodward P. M., Seshadri R., Klepeis J. H., Bursten B.. Structure and Bonding in SnWO4, PbWO4, and BiVO4: Lone Pairs vs Inert Pairs. Inorg. Chem. 2007;46(10):3839–3850. doi: 10.1021/ic061157g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seshadri R., Hill N. A.. Visualizing the Role of Bi 6s ‘Lone Pairs’ in the Off-Center Distortion in Ferromagnetic BiMnO(3) Chem. Mater. 2001;13(9):2892–2899. doi: 10.1021/cm010090m. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Benedek N. A., Fennie C. J.. Hybrid Improper Ferroelectricity: A Mechanism for Controllable Polarization-Magnetization Coupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011;106(10):107204. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.107204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Benedek N. A., Mulder A. T., Fennie C. J.. Polar octahedral rotations: A path to new multifunctional materials. J. Solid State Chem. 2012;195:11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2012.04.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Benedek N. A.. Origin of Ferroelectricity in a Family of Polar Oxides: The Dion-Jacobson Phases. Inorg. Chem. 2014;53(7):3769–3777. doi: 10.1021/ic500106a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Benedek N. A., Hayward M. A.. Hybrid Improper Ferroelectricity: A Theoretical, Computational, and Synthetic Perspective. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2022;52:331–355. doi: 10.1146/annurev-matsci-080819-010313. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Goldschmidt V. M.. Die Gesetze der Krystallochemie. Naturwissenschaften. 1926;14:477–485. doi: 10.1007/BF01507527. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yoshida S., Akamatsu H., Tsuji R., Hernandez O., Padmanabhan H., Sen Gupta A., Gibbs A. S., Mibu K., Murai S., Rondinelli J. M., Gopalan V., Tanaka K., Fujita K.. Hybrid Improper Ferroelectricity in (Sr, Ca)3Sn2O7 and Beyond: Universal Relationship between Ferroelectric Transition Temperature and Tolerance Factor in n = 2 Ruddlesden-Popper Phases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140(46):15690–15700. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b07998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu T., Khalsa G., Havas D. M., Gibbs A. S., Zhang W., Halasyamani P., Benedek N. A., Hayward M. A.. Cation Exchange as a Mechanism to Engineer Polarity in Layered Perovskites. Chem. Mater. 2018;30:8915–8924. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b04136. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mallick S., Gibbs A. S., Zhang W. G., Halasyamani P. S., Benedek N. A., Hayward M. A.. Polar Structures of KNdNb2O7 and KNdTa2O7 . Chem. Mater. 2020;32(18):7965–7972. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02846. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mallick S., Khalsa G., Kaaret J. Z., Zhang W., Batuk M., Gibbs A. S., Hadermann J., Halasyamani P. S., Benedek N. A., Hayward M. A.. The influence of the 6s2 configuration of Bi3+ on the strucutres of A’BiNb2O7 (A’ = Rb, Na, Li) layered perovskite oxides. Dalton Trans. 2021;50:15359–15369. doi: 10.1039/D1DT02974F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mallick S., Zhang W. G., Batuk M., Gibbs A. S., Hadermann J., Halasyamani P. S., Hayward M. A.. The crystal and defect structures of polar KBiNb2O7 . Dalton Trans. 2022;51(5):1866–1873. doi: 10.1039/D1DT04064B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mallick S., Fortes A. D., Zhang W., Halasyamani P. S., Hayward M. A.. Switching between Proper and Hybrid-Improper Polar Strucutres via Cation Substitution in A2La(TaTi)O7 (A = Li, Na) Chem. Mater. 2021;33:2666–2672. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c00599. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu T., Orlandi F., Manuel P., Gibbs A. S., Zhang W., Halasyamani P. S., Hayward M. A.. Directed synthesis of a hybrid improper magnetoelectric multiferroic material. Nat. Commun. 2021;12(1):4945. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25098-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mallick S., Orlandi F., Manuel P., Zhang W. G., Halasyamani P. S., Hayward M. A.. MnCaTa2O7 -A Magnetically Ordered Polar Phase Prepared via Cation Exchange. Chem. Mater. 2023;35(18):7839–7846. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c01850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galven, C. ; Mounier, D. ; Bouchevreau, B. ; Suard, E. ; Bulou, A. ; Crosnier-Lopez, M. P. ; Le Berre, F. . Phase Transitions in the Ruddlesden-Popper Phase Li2CaTa2O7: X-ray and Neutron Powder Thermodiffraction, TEM, Raman, and SHG Experiments Inorg. Chem. 2016. 55 5 2309 2323. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b02659 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang B. H., Hu Z. Z., Chen B. H., Liu X. Q., Chen X. M.. Room-temperature ferroelectricity in A-site ordered Ruddlesden-Popper Li2CaTa2O7 ceramics. Journal of Materiomics. 2020;6(3):593–599. doi: 10.1016/j.jmat.2020.04.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chapon L. C., Manuel P., Radaelli P. G., Bensin C., Perrott L., Ansell S., Rhodes N. J., Raspino D., Duxbury D., Spill E., Norriss J.. Wish: The New Powder and Single Crystal Magnetic Diffractometer on the Second Target Station. Neutron News. 2011;22:22–25. doi: 10.1080/10448632.2011.569650. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Coelho A. A.. TOPAS and TOPAS-Academic: an optimization program integrating computer algebra and crystallographic objects written in C plus. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2018;51:210–218. doi: 10.1107/S1600576718000183. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ok K. M., Chi E. O., Halasyamani P. S.. Bulk characterization methods for non-centrosymmetric materials: second-harmonic generation, piezoelectricity, pyroelectricity, and ferroelectricity. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006;35:710–717. doi: 10.1039/b511119f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sears V. F.. Neutron Scattering Lengths and Cross Sections. Neutron News. 1992;3:26–37. doi: 10.1080/10448639208218770. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Walz F.. The Verwey transition - a topical review. J. Phys.:Condens. Matter. 2002;14(12):R285–R340. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/14/12/203. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Campbell B. J., Stokes H. T., Tanner D. E., Hatch D. M.. ISODISPLACE: a web-based tool for exploring structural distortions. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2006;39:607–614. doi: 10.1107/S0021889806014075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- ISOTROPY Software Suite; iso.byu.edu, 2007. (accessed 2022–03–05).
- Pauling L.. The Principles Determining the Strucutre of Complex Ionic Crystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1929;51:1010–1026. doi: 10.1021/ja01379a006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Brese N. E., O'Keeffe M.. Bond-Valence Parameters for Solids. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Strucut. Sci. 1991;B47:192–197. doi: 10.1107/S0108768190011041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

