Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Apr 22.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2025 Apr 22;21(8):495–509. doi: 10.1038/s41574-025-01107-x

Neuro–immuno–endocrinology of the skin: how environment regulates body homeostasis

Radomir M Slominski 1, Raman Chander 2, Anton M Jetten 3, Andrzej T Slominski 2,4,5,
PMCID: PMC12239263  NIHMSID: NIHMS2094708  PMID: 40263492

Abstract

The skin, including the hypodermis, is the largest organ of the body. The epidermis, the uppermost layer, is in direct contact with the environment and is exposed to environmental stressors, including solar radiation and biological, chemical and physical factors. These environmental factors trigger local responses within the skin that modulate homeostasis on both the cutaneous and systemic levels. Using mediators in common with brain pathways, immune and neuroendocrine systems within the skin regulate these responses to activate various signal transduction pathways and influence the systemic endocrine and immune systems in a context-dependent manner. This skin neuro–immuno–endocrine system is compartmentalized through the formation of epidermal, dermal, hypodermal and adnexal regulatory units. These units can act separately or in concert to preserve skin integrity, allow for adaptation to a changing environment and prevent the development of pathological processes. Through activation of peripheral nerve endings, the release of neurotransmitters, hormones, neuropeptides, and cytokines and/or chemokines into the circulation, or by priming circulating and resident immune cells, this system affects central coordinating centres and global homeostasis, thus adjusting the body’s homeostasis and allostasis to optimally respond to the changing environment.

Introduction

Skin, integument, is the largest body organ, composed of three functionally different layers: epidermis, dermis and hypodermis. These three layers are of different embryonal origin (the epidermis and skin appendages are predominantly of ectodermal origin and the dermis and hypodermis are of mesenchymal origin) and differ in their constitutive and reactive functions depending on their anatomical location (scalp, face, torso, extremities and acral skin; Box 1), innervation and the nature of environmental factors13 (Box 2). Skin structure, appearance and main functions vary across different species, determined by habitat, geographical and climatic environments (including latitude), and daily or nocturnal activity, with many functions being conserved across different animal taxa46. The conserved functions of the skin include barrier function and, to different degrees, sensing the environment, protection from and reaction against pathogens, allergens, physical, chemical and biological factors, social communication and, in the case of animals, camouflage.

Box 1 |. Skin: an overview.

The skin forms a self-regulating, biologically and metabolically active barrier between external and internal environments2. This barrier is supported by the skin immune system (composed of resident and circulating non-resident cells31), the pigmentary system14, the vasculature, and a neural network composed of adrenergic nerves, cholinergic nerves, and sensory unmyelinated and myelinated fibres48,167. Histologically, skin comprises the epidermis, dermis and the inner layer hypodermis, which is composed predominantly of adipose and loose connective tissues. The dermis and hypodermis are penetrated by adnexal structures (appendages), including hair follicles and sebaceous, eccrine and apocrine glands that are connected to the epidermis. Embryologically, the epidermis and adnexal structures are predominantly of ectodermal origin, while dermal and hypodermal elements are of mesodermal origins4.

The structure, thickness and composition of the main elements and the function of the skin vary depending on their anatomic location. The cutaneous functions are affected by spinal sensory innervation of dermatomes (areas of skin supplied by afferent nerve fibres from spinal nerve ganglions) of the torso, extremities, posterior scalp and neck, and innervation of most of the scalp, face and upper anterior neck by branches of the trigeminal nerve1. Examples of this anatomical variability are: the scalp containing numerous hair follicles producing terminal hair shafts190; acral skin consisting of a thick, cornified granular layer with numerous sweat glands and sensory nerve endings but without pilosebaceous elements; facial skin with numerous vellus hair follicles and sebaceous glands; skin of the axilla and groin being rich in apocrine glands; and back skin having thick reticular dermis1,4,5.

The epidermis — the outermost skin layer — predominantly develops from differentiating keratinocytes, which are cells of neuroectodermal origin, in the stratum basale. These keratinocytes give rise to the suprabasale, spinosum, granulosum and, finally, acellular stratum corneum, of which viable layers have immune–endocrine capabilities18. The epidermis contains cells of neural crest origin that exhibit neuro–endocrine–immune capabilities, including melanin-producing melanocytes and sensory Merkel cells, as well as circulating and resident immune cells of mesenchymal origin, including Langerhans cells that can also produce neurohormones17,18. Sensory nerves also penetrate the epidermis up to the stratum corneum level36,167,169.

The dermis, divided into the papillary dermis adjacent to the basement membrane and the reticular dermis, is composed of fibroblasts and fibrocytes, myofibroblasts, adipocytes, resident and circulating immune cells, and resident mast cells with neuro– endocrine–immune functions. With the hypodermis, these dermal layers contain hair follicles, sebaceous and eccrine glands, smooth muscle, nerves, and vascular and lymphatic structures1,4.

The structural integrity of the skin and its functions are facilitated by the close connections between these compartments, the mutual signalling between them, and intercellular connections. These interactions are facilitated by the sensory neural network and circulating immune cells that, together with the vascular network, are crucial in transmitting skin signals to central and other peripheral organs.

Box 2 |. Environmental factors affecting the skin.

A major factor influencing the skin is solar radiation with its different wavelengths, including infrared (>700 nm), visible (400–700 nm) and ultraviolet (UV) (280–400 nm) light. The majority of the biological impact of light is exerted by UV light, both UVB (290–315 nm) and UVA (315–400 nm), which represent 3% of the radiation of the sun at zenith that reaches the Earth’s surface6. Each spectrum of solar radiation affects the skin via a different mechanism of action, with UVB acting through chromophores and UVA or visible light predominantly acting through reactive oxygen species with a lesser contribution from chromophores. Different wavelengths also penetrate the skin to different depths, with UVB reaching only papillary dermis, UVA reaching the reticular dermis and visible light penetrating deep into the hypodermis. Although the negative effects of UV are well established (including the induction of carcinogenesis, skin ageing and other pathologies1), the positive effects of UV light on skin and systemic immune and global homeostasis, aside from vitamin D3 production145,191, are gradually becoming appreciated, which involve different mechanisms of action such as activation of sensory nerves, stimulation of production of neuroendocrine and immune factors as well as production of vitamin D3, lumisterol and tachysterol3,6. Cutaneous photoreceptors for visible light and UVA have been identified over the past 10 years177,178,192,193, and the existence of UVB receptors has been proposed3,43.

The biological factors affecting the skin encompass microorganisms (bacteria, fungi and viruses) contributing to skin infection or damage or to inflammatory responses via pathogen-associated molecular patterns binding to pattern-recognition receptors or other microbial molecules activating the cutaneous immune system, sensory nerve endings, or epithelial cells of the epidermis or adnexal structures19,21,38,123,194. Different allergens, toxins or other biological factors of plant, microbial or animal origin can also induce allergic and inflammatory responses or lead to skin damage and/or necrosis. The positive effects of the skin microbiome on skin cutaneous homeostasis, similar to that described for the gastrointestinal tract29, have been considered by several authors20,42,44,195,196.

Chemical factors affecting the skin include nociceptive factors40,171 and different classes of environmental pollutants acting directly on the epidermis, adnexa or dermis through receptor-dependent or receptor-independent mechanisms10,11. Physical factors, in addition to touch and vibration detected by specialized sensory cells or nerves170, include positive or negative thermal energy in the form of heat or cold. This thermal energy can be detected by sensory nerves or transient receptor potential channels expressed on skin cells169,197. Finally, mechanical breaking of the skin structure induces the wound-healing process181, which also contains neuro–immuno–endocrine components182187.

Skin physiology, histology, cellular and structural composition (encompassing skin-resident cells (keratinocytes, melanocytes, fibroblasts and adipocytes), immune cells, nerves, muscles and vasculature) are detailed in Box 1. These aspects of skin physiology can vary substantially across different anatomical locations and species2,4,7. The species difference is exemplified by differences between human and mouse skin, both in anatomy, cytoarchitecture, physiology and main functions, which in mice is dependent on the phase of the hair cycle4,8,9, whereas in humans both epidermal and dermal compartments are affected by exposure to environmental factors2,10,11, with different wavelengths of solar radiation being the predominant ones6,12,13. Important intrinsic systems that affect not only skin functions but also systemic homeostasis and social communication are melanin pigmentary13,14, adnexal (hair follicles, sebaceous, eccrine and apocrine glands)15,16, immune12 and local neuroendocrine17,18 systems, which can act in concert to regulate local and systemic homeostasis. These systems can also communicate with the epidermal microbiome in a reciprocal fashion, affecting skin physiology or pathology1921.

The main environmental factors affecting the skin of diurnal animals and humans are outlined in Box 2. These encompass ultraviolet, visible and infrared light3,6,22,23, biological factors (such as microorganisms, allergens and biological pollutants)20,21, chemical factors, including pollutants, and wound-inducing trauma or physical stressors2,10,11,24. In reaction to these factors, the skin can launch highly organized stress responses to counteract the damaging insults or restore and/or protect local homeostasis through the coordinated action of cutaneous neuroendocrine17,18 and immune12,21 systems, which act in coordination with central organs to affect systemic homeostasis. The skin also senses non-insulting environmental changes, including different wavelengths of solar light, humidity, temperature, pheromone-like signals and products of the commensal microbiome. These environmental changes are translated into signals that initiate homeostatic responses through an elaborate skin neuro–immuno–endocrine system that communicates with its counterparts at the central level3,18.

In this Review, we present evidence for the concerted neuro– immuno–endocrine activities of the skin triggered by environmental changes that influence central and systemic homeostasis. The mechanistic background for such skin-based systems will be offered in the context of the evolution of stress responses and their regulation by the central neuro–immune axis2527.

Skin as an immune organ

The unique features of the skin as a peripheral immune system involve its direct contact with the external environment in contrast to other barrier organs1, such as the gastrointestinal system, respiratory system and genitourinary systems, and are defined by the variety of immune responses from different cell types2830. Thus, in addition to cells of haematopoietic origin, the skin is composed of resident cells, such as keratinocytes and melanocytes, that sense antigens and react to environmental stressors through the release of cytokines or chemokines1,12,31, affecting the local and systemic neuroendocrine system3,18,32. Cells of the adnexa affect the local immune activity, with hair follicles having a privileged immune function33,34. Furthermore, circulating immune cells (moving through or from the skin) differ in function as determined by their phenotype, anatomical location, and the presence or absence of different pathological conditions. For example, Langerhans cells, mast cells, dendritic cells and macrophages reside in the skin, while T cells, B cells, neutrophils, monocytes, eosinophils and basophils migrate from the circulation to specific skin locations after stressful insults or trauma. These components in concert protect the structural and functional integrity of the skin.

The innate and adaptive immune responses are both engaged in the skin. In adaptive immunity, antigen-presenting skin cells initiate T cell responses, leading to T helper 1 (TH1), TH2 and TH17 responses. Langerhans and mast cells, keratinocytes and, to a certain degree, other skin-resident cells activate the adaptive immune system by presenting antigens to T cells and by producing a variety of immune mediators. The innate immune responses involve several innate immune cells that produce various cytokines, chemokines, antibacterial and anti-fungal peptides, prostaglandins, H2O2, reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, and other factors1,12,31. Immunocompetent skin-resident cells (Supplementary Table 1) and circulating immune cells have the capability to produce neuroendocrine factors and express corresponding receptors25,35. Sensory nerves detect biological signals and regulate local immune responses accordingly3639, while cytokines (such as IL-1, IL-6 and TNF) produced by skin cells can regulate the central neuroendocrine system3,32,40. An important component of the skin immune system is the local microbiome that can not only modulate immune functions21,41 but also the epidermal barrier19,20 as well as cutaneous endocrine functions4244.

Skin as a neuro–immuno–endocrine organ

The original hypothesis that the skin is a neuroendocrine organ that secretes neuroendocrine and immune mediators to regulate local responses against environmental stress with systemic implications17,45 has been validated and supported both experimentally and conceptually2,3,16,36,4649. We provide evidence in this section that this peripheral neuroendocrine system, in concert with its immune component and sensory nerve endings, can sense environmental signals and affect systemic homeostasis. These functions are achieved by the production of neuroendocrine factors by skin-resident cells and circulating immune cells, which is further complemented by sensory nerves releasing different neurotransmitters locally (Supplementary Table 1) and by the bidirectional communication between the local endocrine systems and the cutaneous microbiome42,43 (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1 |. Skin homeostasis and allostasis are regulated by the local neuro–immuno–endocrine system in response to environmental factors.

Fig. 1 |

The skin neuro–immuno–endocrine system is composed of epidermal, dermal, hypodermal and adnexal immune–endocrine units, the activities of which are coordinated by sensory nerves. The main cellular coordinating components are epidermal and follicular keratinocytes and melanocytes, Merkel cells, Langerhans cells and mast cells, with some contributions from fibroblasts, endothelial and immune cells, and sebocytes and adipocytes. Important coordinators are sensory nerves, which penetrate the epidermal and dermal structures and are in contact with their main cellular components. These immuno–endocrine units communicate among themselves through soluble factors released by skin cells or circulating immune cells or through rapid transmission by directly or indirectly activated sensory nerves in a bidirectional manner, allowing efficient communication among different compartments. The degree and specificity of the activation of immuno–endocrine units by environmental factors depends on their nature and penetration into different compartments of the skin as well as on neural intra-compartmental communications. Nerve endings up to the level of the stratum corneum can not only sense the environment but also release neuropeptides or neurotransmitters in response to stress to affect closely located cells. The cutaneous microbiome can also communicate with epidermal or adnexal immuno–endocrine units through the release of different soluble factors or neurotransmitters. UV, ultraviolet.

POMC-derived neuropeptides

The central role of the proopiomelanocortin (POMC) system in the regulation of body homeostasis is widely recognized. POMC is expressed in different brain regions, including the hypothalamus and the pituitary, as well as in immune cells and a variety of non-neuronal peripheral organs45,5053. Almost all skin cell types, including keratinocytes, melanocytes, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, sebocytes, adipocytes, Merkel cells, Langerhans cells, dendritic cells, mast cells, lymphocytes, monocytes and macrophages, and other haematopoietic cells, express POMC precursor protein and process it in a context-dependent and cell type-dependent manner to produce the corresponding regulatory peptides. These regulatory peptides include adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and its shortened forms (ACTH 1–13 and ACTH 1–17), melanocyte-stimulating hormones (αMSH, βMSH and γ1–3-MSH), β-lipoprotein and β-endorphin peptides, which are released into the extracellular environment14,16,18,45,47,54.

POMC processing in the skin is like that in the brain and pituitary. Melanocytes, keratinocytes, fibroblasts, sebocytes and immune cells express functional PC1 and PC2 convertases and the regulatory protein 7B2. The coordinated activities of these proteins determine the nature of the final peptide and whether these are ACTH or β-lipoprotein or their processed products, αMSH, γMSH or βMSH and β-endorphin, respectively45,52,5557, resulting in both differential and overlapping downstream phenotypic effects45,55,56,58,59. These neuropeptides, through interaction with the corresponding G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) melanocortin receptor types 1–5 (MC1–MC5) or opioid receptors, can regulate the phenotype of resident and circulating cells via paracrine, autocrine or intracrine mechanisms45,55,56,5860. Specifically, they stimulate epidermal and follicular melanogenesis, strengthen the cutaneous epidermal barrier, have cytoprotective effects, modulate hair growth, and stimulate lipogenesis, sebum production and eccrine gland functions8,14,16,5456,59. In addition, these POMC-derived neuropeptides have immunosuppressive, antimicrobial, antifibrotic, radioprotective and thermoregulatory effects, influence nociception through action on corresponding receptors on nerve endings16,18,45,47,5456,6064, and can affect the central energy control systems50,52.

The best characterized of these effects are the stimulatory actions of αMSH on melanocytes or the inhibitory activity of αMSH on fibroblasts or immune cells via activation of, predominantly, MC1, with possible contribution of MC3 or MC4 activation54. Actions on melanocytes are diverse and include stimulation of dendrite formation, melanogenesis, and cytoprotective mechanisms against oxidative stress, modulation of cell proliferation, inhibition of adhesion molecules, chemokine receptor expression and downregulation of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB)14,45,54,55,59,65,66. Anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressive and anti-pyretic functions of αMSH are widely recognized both in the skin and immune system45,52,54,55,64,67. αMSH also inhibits proliferation and fibrogenic activity of fibroblasts as well as their pro-inflammatory functions54,55,68. ACTH, the precursor of αMSH, aside from being a natural ligand of MC2, also acts on MC1 with similar but less pronounced phenotypic effects than those of αMSH, which include stimulation of melanogenesis, dendrite formation and modulation of cell proliferation as well as anti-inflammatory effects. Activation of MC1 (and, to some degree, of MC3 and MC4) by αMSH can be attenuated via receptor antagonism by agouti signalling protein (ASIP), agouti-related protein (AGRP) or β-defensin 3 (HBD3), depending on the species6971.

Additional mechanisms of action of POMC peptides within the skin include their activation of sensory nerve endings or the release of POMC peptides by skin cells, which can then enter the circulation with possible actions in peripheral organs such as immune organs or endocrine glands18,54,64,7276. The cutaneous production and local activity of POMC-derived αMSH, ACTH or β-endorphin is regulated by multiple stressors that include ultraviolet B (UVB) light, with lesser contribution from UVA3,6,75,77,78, physical trauma including wounding, microbial macromolecules such as lipopolysaccharides and peptidoglycans, and pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6 and TNF18,39,61,79,80. In addition, aberrant local POMC activity has been noted in pathological dermatoses39,58 and during epidermal carcinogenesis or melanoma development and progression79,81. These aberrant activities included increased expression of POMC and the processed peptides during melanoma progression or epidermal carcinogenesis, generating an immunosuppressive and pro-tumorigenic environment (discussed and reviewed in refs. 79,81). Once released into the circulation, POMC peptides can regulate systemic homeostasis through direct or indirect inhibition of immune activities, effects on endocrine glands or peripheral organs, or regulation of brain functions2,79.

CRH and CRH-like peptides

Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), a hypothalamic regulator of the pituitary–adrenal axis82, and the related urocortins are also expressed in the extrahypothalamic sites of the brain, endocrine organs, immune cells and several peripheral organs, where they regulate homeostatic functions via activation of CRH receptor type 1 (CRHR1) and CRHR2 (refs. 58,80,8284). CRH and urocortins are produced by all skin-resident cells and several immune cell types in skin and can be released by sensory nerve endings58,80,8587. CRH and urocortins act on CRHR1 or CRHR2, coupled to either cAMP, IP3 or Ca2+ signalling, to regulate epidermal barrier function, pigmentary activity, hair follicle cycling, secretory sebaceous gland activity, and immune activities via paracrine, autocrine, neurocrine and intracrine mechanisms18,58,80,84,85,8793. While the cutaneous and immune phenotypic effects are predominantly mediated through activation of CRHR1α (CRH and urocortin 1) or CRHR2α and/or CRHR2β (CRH, urocortins 1–3), alternatively spliced forms of both receptors can alter the phenotypic functions of the primary isoforms58,94. For example, membrane-bound alternatively spliced CRHR1 forms modify CRHR1α activity, while soluble receptor isoforms can negatively regulate the local availability of CRH and urocortin ligands through binding the ligand in the vicinity of the cells these peptides would act on58. In addition, CRH-binding protein (CRHBP) is expressed in skin cells, adding a further level of complexity to this regulatory process58. Importantly, there are substantial differences in CRH and/or urocortin signalling between human and rodent skin, with the latter predominantly dependent on the composition of urocortins and receptor isoforms, which are controlled by the phase of the hair cycle58,95.

Production of CRH and urocortins by skin-resident cells and immune cells can be directly stimulated by cutaneous stressors, including UV radiation (predominantly UVB), by microbial antigens and physical trauma (including injury), or indirectly by pro-inflammatory cytokines induced by CRH and other stimulants2,3,72,77,80,92,9698. UVB and other environmental factors regulate the expression and composition of CRHR1 isoforms58,94,99,100. Specifically, UVB stimulates expression of the main functional isoforms CRHR1α and CRHR1g; however, continuous exposure to UVB not only reduces the viability of keratinocytes but also increases the number of expressed CRHR1 isoforms, suggesting that receptor heterogeneity can improve the probability of keratinocyte survival94,100. In addition, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate and factors that increase cAMP levels caused increased expression of CRHR1α and CRHR1g100, while increased cell contact (confluent cultures) favoured expression of only one isoform, CRHR1α94. Depending on the type and intensity of the cutaneous stressor, CRH and related urocortins can enter the systemic circulation and affect the central neuroendocrine system and functions of other organs3,39,72,74. It is worthwhile to recognize that direct effects of CRH and urocortin in the periphery are pro-inflammatory80,93, while indirect effects are anti-inflammatory. These anti-inflammatory indirect effects are mediated through stimulation of the production and/or release of POMC peptides and production and/or release of ACTH-stimulated cortisol or corticosterone along with activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis52,53,58,82.

The cutaneous HPA axis

The HPA axis, at the central level, encompasses CRH production in the hypothalamus in response to stress. CRH is then delivered to the anterior pituitary, where it activates CRHR1α, stimulating the release of ACTH. In the adrenal cortex, ACTH activates MC2 to stimulate the release of cortisol, which counteracts stress and inhibits production of CRH and ACTH through a negative feedback mechanism. Pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1, IL-6 and TNF, can also stimulate production of CRH and ACTH both in the hypothalamus and pituitary67,101. HPA axis-like functional organizations composed of combined CRH and POMC signalling also operate in peripheral organs, including skin18,30,47,102104, and to some degree in the immune system2,105.

In this context, the cutaneous HPA axis is activated directly by environmental stressors and forms complex regulatory networks involving CRH and/or urocortins, CRHR1, POMC-derived ACTH and locally produced corticosteroids. All of these factors interact with cutaneous pro-inflammatory cytokines and are in close spatial proximity to each other. This contrasts with the central HPA axis, which is anatomically separated between distinct organs, that is, the brain, pituitary and adrenals2,3,18. Therefore, these interactions in the skin can self-organize into truncated circuitries composed of selected or full elements of the cutaneous HPA axis, including cytokines (IL-6, IL-6 and TNF), with phenotypic outcomes that include immunosuppression, stimulation of melanin pigmentation, stimulation of hair growth or secretory activity of sebaceous glands, which are discussed in depth in refs. 58,79. Although it has been hypothesized that the order of factors in the cutaneous HPA axis induced by various external stressors follows the classic organization of the central HPA axis (CRH and/or urocortin to CRHR1 to POMC to ACTH to cortisol or corticosterone to phenotype), several probable departures from this order have been proposed18,58 (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2 |. Cutaneous equivalents of the central HPA axis.

Fig. 2 |

The central hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis is composed of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), CRH receptor type 1 (CRHR1) and proopiomelanocortin (POMC)-derived adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), which acts on the MC2 receptor to stimulate cortisol and corticosterone secretion and production. The HPA axis is activated by stress or pro-inflammatory cytokines. In addition to this central HPA axis, truncated regulatory pathways composed of selected elements of the HPA axis within the skin (the cutaneous HPA axis) have been envisioned. These pathways include the stimulation of CRH and/or urocortin by stress or cytokines, which activates CRHR1 and/or CRHR2 and leads to increased expression of POMC. POMC is then processed to ACTH and β-lipotropin (βLPH), which are, respectively, processed to α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (αMSH) and β-endorphin without stimulation of the glucocorticoids (GCs) cortisol and/or corticosterone by ACTH. Shorter pathways represent direct stimulation of POMC expression by stress or cytokines. POMC is then processed to ACTH and βLPH, which are, respectively, processed to αMSH and β-endorphin. ACTH can then either stimulate or fail to stimulate the production of cortisol and/or corticosterone. Other shorter pathways include the stimulation of CRH and/or urocortin, which leads to pro-inflammatory and cytoprotective responses via activation of CRHR1 or CRHR2. Finally, direct stimulation of cortisol and/or corticosterone production by cytokines is envisioned. In the pathways described above, cortisol and/or corticosterone would inhibit the upper regulators, including CHR and/or urocortins, POMC-derived peptides, and cytokines, and attenuate the activities of corresponding receptors. Lack of cortisol and/or corticosterone production could lead to skin pathology.

The direct stimulation of cytokine production by CRH and urocortin has pro-inflammatory effects and stimulates cytokine production and NF-κB activity in keratinocytes97,106,107 (reviewed in ref. 58). Inhibition of such pro-inflammatory activity by POMC peptides stimulated by CRH has also been envisioned58,91,102104,108. In the scenarios described in Fig. 2, cortisol and/or corticosterone would inhibit the upper regulatory axes of these pathways, including CHR and/or urocortins, POMC peptides and cytokines, and would attenuate the activity of their corresponding receptors. On the other hand, production of CRH and POMC peptides would be self-amplified via CRHR1 and/or CRHR2 and MC1 through activation of cAMP or Ca2+ signalling, resulting in increased cAMP or Ca2+ levels, which are well-recognized regulators of CRH or POMC peptide production58,91,96. Such interactions would be defined by local histoarchitecture, cell lineage and the specific nature of the stressor. In pathological conditions (for example, dermatoses, skin ageing, pigmentary and hyperproliferative disorders, or oncogenesis and tumour progression), the organizational structures of the cutaneous HPA axis would be impaired, leading to intracrine, autocrine and paracrine mechanisms permitting pathology to develop or self-amplify. Such processes can potentially affect local and central circadian rhythms as levels of ACTH and corticosterone and/or cortisol fluctuate along the circadian rhythm79.

In line with these considerations, it has been proposed that HPA axis organization, with attendant immune signalling, developed first in the integument (skin) to promote optimal responses against pathogens and other physical or chemical stressors and was then adapted and perfected by the central neuroendocrine system communicating with the immune system27.

Brain, pituitary hormones, and other hormones and/or neuropeptides

Many hypothalamic and pituitary hormones are produced by skin-resident cells and immune cells that reside in or migrate into the skin. In the cutaneous context, these hormones regulate skin barrier, adnexal, dermal, hypodermal and immune functions through interactions with their corresponding membrane-bound receptors (Supplementary Table 1). These functions include the production of hypothalamic thyroid-releasing hormone (TRH), which can have direct and indirect modulatory effects on epidermal and follicular keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation, hair follicle cycling, and the wound-healing process. In addition, TRH has anti-apoptotic effects, regulates mitochondrial functions and stimulates melanogenesis2,47,71,109113. The indirect effects of TRH follow an organization of the local hypothalamic–pituitary–thyroid axis that includes stimulation of cutaneous production of thyroid-stimulating hormone, resulting in an increase in thyroxine and triiodothyronine that can subsequently affect skin physiology2,47,109112.

Oxytocin is a hormone produced centrally by the hypothalamus and released in the posterior pituitary. Oxytocin is also produced by keratinocytes and can regulate epidermal functions and immune activities through interaction with the GPCR oxytocin receptor114,115. Among the pituitary hormones that deserve attention is prolactin, which is produced locally in the skin, where it regulates epidermal, hair follicle and immune functions through interaction with the GPCR prolactin receptor47. In addition, growth hormone (GH), which profoundly affects skin physiology and pathology by action on keratinocytes, fibroblasts, immune cells, hair follicles and sebaceous glands, can be produced by dermal cells and immune cells47,116119. GH-releasing hormone is also expressed in hair follicle keratinocytes and dermal papilla cells, with co-expression of corresponding receptors to regulate hair follicle functions120. GH action in the skin involves direct effects through activation of the GH receptor (a GPCR) or indirect effects through stimulation of dermal production of IGF1 (ref. 47) or additional mechanisms as has been described in hair follicles120. Somatostatin, a neuropeptide produced in the hypothalamus and gastrointestinal tract, is also expressed in skin, where it can regulate hair follicle cycling and help to maintain the hair follicle as an immune-privileged site. In addition, somatostatin contributes to epidermal barrier function, wound healing, and dermal fibroblast and endothelial cell functions and can exhibit immunoregulatory properties18,47,121. Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide, originally purified from the hypothalamic extract, in addition to being produced in the central nervous system, is also produced in the immune system and peripheral organs, including skin122,123. It has a role in skin inflammatory responses, vascular functions and antimicrobial activities at the systemic level. Neuropeptide Y, mainly produced in the brain and autonomic nervous system, is also produced by resident and immune skin cells with local regulatory functions (reviewed in 2022 (ref. 124)).

The cutaneous opioid system, along with the previously mentioned POMC-derived endorphins, encompasses locally produced or released enkephalins and dynorphins (products of, respectively, the precursors proenkephalin or prodynorphin) or endomorphins as well as the corresponding GPCR opioid receptors (μ, κ and δ) and nociceptin receptors (NOP or OPRL1)2,61,125,126. These opioid peptides, in addition to being released from sensory nerve endings in different cutaneous compartments, are produced by the main epidermal, follicular and dermal cells (keratinocytes, melanocytes, sebocytes and fibroblasts) and by skin-resident and circulating immune cells. The expression of opioid receptors on cutaneous non-immune (epidermal and follicular keratinocytes and melanocytes, sebocytes, fibroblasts, adipocytes, endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells) and immune cells as well as on sensory nerve endings forms a local opioid neuro–immuno–endocrine system that can regulate skin homeostasis. This system can affect the central nervous and systemic immune systems through the release of opioids into the circulation or through activation of opioid receptors expressed on sensory neurons that project to the brain or other organs, triggering reflex mechanisms2,18,40,61,125128.

Another group of neuropeptides that, in addition to their origin and/or release from cutaneous sensory nerve endings, are also produced by immune and skin-resident cells are calcitonin gene-related peptide, neurotensin, parathyroid hormone (PTH), PTH-related protein, vasoactive intestinal peptide, pancreatic polypeptide Y and tachykinins such as substance P and neurokinin A. The local production of these neuropeptides and their role in modulating functions of different skin compartments (epidermal, dermal and adnexal), including immune cells, via transmission of the signals to the brain after activation of the corresponding sensory nerve endings, have been the subject of more than 25 years of investigation17,18,38,47,80,122,128. Similarly, the role of locally produced neurotrophins, including neuron growth factor, in skin physiology and pathology has been investigated for more than 30 years17,129,130. Also worthy of mention is the cutaneous leptin system, encompassing locally produced leptin and expression of the leptin receptor131. Interestingly, UV radiation can inhibit leptin release from the skin132. Given that leptin is widely recognized to have immunoregulatory properties and interactions with POMC and/or CRH signalling, it is possible that the cutaneous leptin system could have a direct or indirect role in the regulation of local physiological functions through inhibition of POMC or CRH signalling. Alternatively, the cutaneous leptin system might affect body homeostasis and central activity when released from the dermis or hypodermis into the circulation.

Steroidogenesis in the skin

Human skin compartments, including the epidermis, pilosebaceous units, dermis and hypodermis (subcutaneous adipose and connective tissue), are recognized as extra-adrenal and extra-gonadal steroidogenic tissues capable of locally producing corticosteroids and sex hormones directly from cholesterol. This synthesis starts with cleavage of cholesterol by CYP11A1 to pregnenolone, the precursor to all steroid hormones, or from their precursors delivered from the circulation (dehydroepiandrosterone and progesterone)30,133136. Production of glucocorticoids in epidermal and dermal skin cells has been well documented over the past two decades, as has their role in skin pathophysiology77,102104,135139. CYP11A1, the rate-limiting enzyme of steroidogenesis, is expressed in activated immune cells and drives the production of glucocorticoids, oestrogens and androgens along with their precursors35,105,140. The local production and metabolism of steroids, including glucocorticoids, oestrogens and androgens, can not only regulate functions of peripheral organs and local and systemic immune activities but also have a role in the communication of the skin with different organs under physiological and pathological conditions30,79,105,133,134,141.

Production of glucocorticoids in the skin can be stimulated by local and systemic stressors, including UVB, physical trauma (including wounding), changes in humidity, microbial factors and cutaneous pathological conditions (such as dermatoses, cancer and melanoma) through mechanisms that involve actions of CRH, ACTH, cytokines and factors that raise intracellular cAMP levels3,77,102,103,137139. Importantly, UVB, in addition to stimulating the cutaneous HPA axis, also stimulates systemic glucocorticoid release and/or production in the adrenals through activation of the central HPA axis6,72,74 with the pituitary having a critical role in this process. However, the rapid responses to UVB (30–90 min after exposure of back skin to UVB) do not involve the pituitary and seem to involve neural transmission from sensory neurons in the skin to the spleen72.

Worth mentioning is the pathway initiated by enzymatic cleavage of the side chain of 7-dehydrocholesterol by CYP11A1 to produce 7-dehydropregnenolone that is further converted into 7Δ-steroids, which exhibit biological activity in immune and skin cells, as has been extensively described over the past 20 years142,143. This system also operates in the skin, in which 7Δ-steroids, after exposure to UVB, are photochemically converted to vitamin D-like, lumisterol-like and tachysterol-like compounds that have biological activity on skin cells, including antiproliferative, pro-differentiation, antifibrotic, photo-protective, anticancer and immunomodulatory effects143,144. These studies identified a new family of steroidal and secosteroidal compounds that are produced (or potentially produced) in the skin. However, most of the systemic and/or immunoregulatory functions of these compounds remain to be investigated and their corresponding nuclear receptors remain to be identified. We also note that 7-dehydropregnenolone has been identified in honey and insects43, opening new areas for investigation, as CYP11A1 is expressed only in vertebrates.

Vitamin D3 and its derivatives

More than 95% of systemic vitamin D3 is derived from the skin through UVB-induced phototransformation of 7-dehydrocholesterol to vitamin D3, lumisterol3, and tachysterol3 and is dependent on total energy exposure and temperature145,146 (Box 3). In the canonical pathway, vitamin D3 is activated through sequential hydroxylation at C25 and at C1α to produce biologically active 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3). CYP27B1 (also known as C1α-hydroxylase), the main regulator of local and systemic levels of 1,25(OH)2D3, is expressed in the skin, kidneys and various other organs and immune cells. 1,25(OH)2D3 exerts its biological activity through interaction with the vitamin D receptor145,146, is an important regulator of skin barrier and adnexal functions, and can regulate local and systemic immune system through inhibition of adaptive immunity and stimulation of innate immunity146.

Box 3 |. Vitamin D, lumisterol and tachysterol as prohormones.

The absorption of ultraviolet B (UVB) energy by the unsaturated B-ring of 7-dehydrocholesterol in the skin generates pre-vitamin D3, which, being thermodynamically unstable, undergoes isomerization to either vitamin D3 or, under high doses of UVB, to tachysterol or lumisterol145,146. Although the role of vitamin D3 as a pro-hormone is well established145,146, a similar function for lumisterol and tachysterol has been proposed only in the past few years143,144,147.

To exert its biological activity, vitamin D3 is activated by sequential hydroxylations either locally in the skin or at the systemic level145,146. In the traditional pathway, vitamin D3 is hydroxylated at C25 by CYP2R1 or CYP27A1 to 25-hydroxyvitamin D3, which is then hydroxylated at C1α by CYP27B1 to generate 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3). The inactivation of 1,25(OH)2D3 is mediated by CYP24A1, which shortens its side chain resulting in the production of calcitroic acid145,146.

Over the past 20 years, an alternative pathway of vitamin D activation has been discovered, which starts with hydroxylation of the vitamin D side chain by the steroidogenic enzyme CYP11A1 (ref. 144). The main product of vitamin D, 20(OH)D3, or other monohydroxy derivatives, can be hydroxylated by CYP11A1 to dihydroxy products and trihydroxy products, which can also be modified by CYP27A1, CYP24A1, CYP2R1, CYP3A4 and/or CYP27B1; except for 17,20,23(OH)3D3. At least 18 hydroxy metabolites of vitamin D3 have been identified143,144. In addition, lumisterol and tachysterol can be hydroxylated by CYP11A1 and CYP27A1 to produce monohydroxy metabolites and dihydroxy metabolites, with chemical structures established for five lumisterol and two tachysterol products143,144,147. Many of these metabolites are detectable in human skin or skin cells, serum, placenta, and bovine adrenals143,144,147,198.

1,25(OH)2D3, in addition to regulating calcium homeostasis, has several pleiotropic effects that affect almost all physiological and developmental functions in the body, exerting antiproliferative, anticancerogenic, radioprotective, anti-oxidative, anti-inflammatory, antifibrotic and antimicrobial effects145,146. Its phenotypic activities are predominantly mediated through interaction with the vitamin D receptor. Similarly, CYP11A1-derived vitamin D3 hydroxy metabolites exert similar biological effects to classical 1,25(OH)2D3, as demonstrated in in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo models143,144. The compounds without C1α(OH) act as ligands on liver X receptor, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) and aryl hydrocarbon receptor, and as inverse agonists on retinoid-related orphan receptor-α (RORα) and RORγ. However, the compounds with C1α(OH) show selectivity for the vitamin D receptor. Lumisterol and tachysterol are also biologically active by acting on the above-mentioned receptors with selectivity defined by their chemical structure143,144,147.

Thus, UVB-exposed skin can generate a large number of biologically active sterol and secosteroidal photoproducts that regulate local and global homeostasis after entry into the circulation, explaining many of the beneficial effects of UVB that cannot be achieved by oral vitamin D delivery.

New alternative pathways of vitamin D3 activation by CYP11A1 have been discovered143,144. These alternative pathways lead to the production of hydroxyderivatives, of which 18 have been discovered thus far143,144 (Box 3). Furthermore, lumisterol3 and tachysterol3 (previously considered inactive photoproducts of prolonged exposure to UVB) can be enzymatically activated to biologically active derivatives by either CYP11A1 or CYP27A1 (refs. 143,147). Many of these compounds are detectable not only in the human body144,147 but also in insects and honey, indicating their wide distribution in nature despite functions traditionally reserved for vertebrates43. In the mammalian system, vitamin D3, lumisterol3 and, potentially, tachysterol3 derivatives can regulate skin functions and have immunomodulatory effects similar to those of 1,25(OH)2D3 by acting on alternative nuclear receptors, such as retinoid-related orphan receptor-γ (RORγ) and/or RORα, aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), liver X receptor-α (LXRα) and/or LXRβ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ), and perhaps others, in addition to the vitamin D receptor143,147. These compounds can serve as endocrine cutaneous messengers of the sun, regulating systemic homeostasis in a manner defined by the nature of the nuclear receptors upon which they act.

Biogenic amines and melatonin

Skin and its immune system are recognized targets for biogenic amines, melatonin and their metabolites. The production of hista-mine by skin cells and its local effects are well known1,2,80; therefore, we will focus our analysis on local serotoninergic, melatoninergic and catecholaminergic systems.

Human and rodent skin can transform l-tryptophan to serotonin, which is further metabolized to N-acetylserotonin and finally to melatonin148152. All skin-resident cells have this capability and the property is also shared by the majority of immune cells153. Melatonin can be further metabolized through indolic or kynuric pathways to biologically active metabolites that can also be produced in the epidermis through the non-enzymatic action of UV radiation154,155. Regulation and protection of skin homeostasis by melatonin and its metabolites are mediated via interaction with membrane-bound serotonin receptors2,80,156, melatonin MT1 and MT2 receptors157, and the AhR or PPARγ152,158. Receptor-independent mechanisms of melatonin action also have a role in cytoprotective responses. It must be noted that serotonin and melatonin are also produced by bacteria and many unicellular organisms43,153,159; therefore, the cutaneous microbiome can potentially contribute to skin serotoninergic and melatoninergic systems, as has been reported for the gastrointestinal system153,159.

It is well established that skin-resident cells and immune cells have the capability to produce catecholamines and l-dihydrophenylalanine (l-DOPA)2,48,160,161. Although their role in the regulation of the functions of different cutaneous compartments and the immune system has been established2,48,160163, their regulation of the cutaneous microbiome was also proposed in a 2020 study42. l-DOPA, products of its auto-oxidation, products of catecholamine auto-oxidation and intermediates of melanogenesis all have powerful receptor-independent immunosuppressive effects (reviewed in refs. 161,162). As adrenaline is a recognized regulator of melatonin release and synthesis through stimulation of serotonin acetylation, a role for the cutaneous catecholaminergic system48 in the regulation of local serotonergic and/or melatonergic systems has been suggested2,151.

Cutaneous cholinergic and cannabinoid systems

Human skin expresses a local, non-neuronal cholinergic system encompassing the production of acetylcholine by keratinocytes, fibroblasts, endothelial cells and circulating immune cells48,49,164. This system is composed of choline, locally produced acetylcholine, and their corresponding muscarinic and nicotinic receptors expressed by skin-resident and immune cells. This cholinergic system modulates epidermal, sweat gland, hair follicle and other adnexal functions as well as the local vascular system and immune responses through autocrine, paracrine and endocrine mechanisms of action49,164,165. It also interacts with the local adrenergic system through action on corresponding nicotinic and muscarinic receptors on skin cells that can produce catecholamines or are targets for catecholamine phenotypic activity48. These cutaneous non-neuronal functions are in addition to the cholinergic activity of the local cutaneous nerves.

The cutaneous endocannabinoid system is well recognized2,166. It is composed of cutaneously produced endocannabinoids that act on corresponding endocannabinoid receptors in autocrine, paracrine and neurocrine fashions166. This system affects diverse local physiopatho-logical processes and communicates with the skin’s local neurosensory system166 with the potential to transmit signals to the brain through ascending nerves after activation of corresponding receptors on nerve endings; this has potential modulatory effects on learning and memory, emotions, control of pain, eating and sleep behaviour.

Role of the cutaneous neural network in the regulation of skin functions

The cutaneous neural system is composed of networks of somatosensory and autonomic nerves terminating in each skin layer, with sensory nerve endings even penetrating the non-viable stratum corneum of the epidermis in addition to penetration of the dermal, hypodermal and adnexal structures36,40,122,167170. The concerted activity of these neurons in reaction to environmental factors and their interactions with the skin immune, endocrine and microbiome systems can regulate the physiological functions of the skin or can counteract or contribute to skin pathology such as inflammatory and hyperproliferative disorders, skin ageing, and skin tumours (extensively described in several reviews3,18,36,39,40,44,61,79,122,167169,171,172) (Box 2). Briefly, depending on the direct environmental stimuli (for example, different wavelengths of solar radiation, temperature, wound response, microbial or chemical insults, or changes in humidity) or through their indirect effects via local production of stress neurohormones or cytokines, sensory nerve endings can be activated. They can release neurotransmitters, various neuropeptides, neurotrophins, neurohormones or even gases (nitric oxide or carbon monoxide) that act on effector skin and immune cells as well as on adnexal structures, smooth muscle, cutaneous vasculature and adipose tissue. After activation, cutaneous sensory nerve fibres transmit these signals through antidromic signalling (efferently, releasing neurotransmitters on the effector skin cells) to achieve optimal homeostatic communication between distal cutaneous compartments or through orthodromic signalling (afferently to the spinal cord and brain) to regulate global homeostasis via endocrine glands and/or immune organs or to directly affect other internal organs17 (Fig. 1). These mechanisms are consistent with newly developing concepts of global neuroimmune regulation involving the central nervous system and its bidirectional communication with the immune system25,36,173,174.

Environmental regulation of the skin neuro–immuno–endocrine system

Diverse environmental factors affect skin homeostasis and allostasis in a manner defined by the nature of environmental factors or disturbances of the environment and involving activation of local neuro–immuno–endocrine systems (Fig. 1 and Box 2). These environmental factors include the action of different wavelengths of solar radiation, such as UV radiation and visible and infrared light, which induce physicochemical changes in the skin. Solar light induces changes in local chemical composition (ionic composition, ionic strength, reactive oxygen or nitrogen species) or in the structure of extracellular organic molecules or organic molecules released from damaged cells. These molecules are then detected by sensory nerves and by the environmentally induced release of mediators from skin cells or priming immune cells and act as cellular ‘photo-messengers’ to regulate local and systemic homeostasis and/or allostasis3,6,12,132,175,176 (Figs. 1 and 3, Boxes 2 and 3, and Supplementary Table 1). UV radiation and visible light can be sensed by cutaneous photoreceptors3,6,22,175,177,178. In addition, variations in the composition of UV radiation depending on the elevation of the sun and differences in atmospheric absorption will have allostatic effects on the skin. For example, the appearance and gradual increase of the UVB fraction in solar radiation reaching the Earth throughout the day will be sensed by 7Δ-dienes, leading to their phototransformation to vitamin D, lumisterol and tachysterol3,43,143,179. Active forms of vitamin D, lumisterol and tachysterol all induce the assembly of protective mechanisms in anticipation of incoming radiation or oxidative damage. Similarly, UV radiation can affect cutaneous allostasis through stimulation of the pigmentary system3,14,18, preparing the skin for incoming increased UV radiation doses with potential to induce damage in the skin. Both of these systems are examples of cutaneous allostasis, that is, preparation of the skin for incoming damages and environmental changes.

Fig. 3 |. Skin can regulate global body homeostasis and allostasis.

Fig. 3 |

Regulation by the skin (red arrows) is indirect and secondary to the activation of the brain or spinal cord, endocrine glands (yellow arrows), systemic immune system (teal arrows) and distant internal organs (orange arrows). Soluble factors and immune cells from the skin affect the activities of these coordinating centres, the immune system and various internal organs in a reciprocal fashion, following a hierarchical structure involving inter-organ communication via the circulatory system. The signals from the skin to the central nervous system (CNS) or immune cells are also transmitted by sensory nerves (light blue arrows) that sense environmentally induced disturbances in the cutaneous ecosystem. The retrograde signals can also be sent from activated immune cells to the skin or be directly transmitted to the brain. After receiving and computing all the afferent signals sent from the skin, or other organs affected by skin factors, the brain makes decisions about how to regulate skin and other organs through the autonomic system (dark blue arrows). These CNS-dependent and CNS-independent connections affect global homeostasis and allostasis.

Various pollutants can affect skin homeostasis through action on cutaneous neuro–immuno–endocrine elements, including AhR signalling, as discussed in several reviews from the past 2 years10,11,44 (Fig. 1). The extreme form of these insults are represented by warfare vesicants180. In addition, the wound-healing process in response to trauma also involves neuro–immuno–endocrine components as discussed in previous publications181187. Finally, biological insults, including allergens, toxins or microorganisms, are sensed by different components of the local neuro–immuno–endocrine system, which can launch local and systemic homeostatic responses as discussed in Box 2 and in papers from the past two decades21,25,36,42,44,173,174. The cutaneous microbiome can also have positive effects on the skin and, indirectly, on global homeostasis via the production of regulatory factors that act on the epidermis or adnexal structures, in a mechanistically similar manner to that described in the gastrointestinal system20,21,42,153,159,188 (Fig. 1).

Communication between the skin, brain, and central endocrine and immune systems

The skin communicates with the brain, endocrine and immune systems, and internal organs in a reciprocal and organized fashion (Fig. 3). This communication, and the resulting modulation of body homeostasis and allostasis, is context dependent and defined by the nature of the signals generated in the skin and modes of their transmission, for example, through the circulation or sensory nerves (Fig. 3). Factors transmitted via the circulation include hormones, cytokines, chemokines or hormone precursors, of which vitamin D, lumisterol and tachysterol and their derivatives are examples3,143,144 (Supplementary Table 1). The sensory neurons provide rapid routes of sending information from the skin to the brain or other central coordinating organs. Both of these mechanisms exemplify the role of the skin in systemic allostasis, preparing the body for seasonal changes marked by the degree of sun exposure. Thus, environmental stress, stimuli or changes in the local environment will impact the nature of the cutaneous neuro–immuno–endocrine messengers (Fig. 1 and Boxes 2 and 3). These messengers also include locally primed circulating immune cells acting on the systemic levels in a neuro–immuno–endocrine fashion.

Conclusions

The skin, as a neuro–immuno–endocrine organ, can directly or indirectly (through central neuro–immuno–endocrine systems) regulate both local and global homeostasis and allostasis in a manner defined by the environment and its capability to generate diverse signals in a context-dependent fashion (Figs. 1 and 3). The discussed environmental–skin connections place this organ as a central player in allostasis189, a mechanism by which the body predicts and adjusts physiological mechanisms in relation to a changing environment. The allostatic and homeostatic functions of the skin represent the evolutionary conservation of a primordial role of the integument, in which the majority of homeostatic responses to the environment would have developed27.

The clinical implications of the neuro–immuno–endocrinology of the skin in dermatology have been discussed18,47,49. These implications can be further extended into systemic diseases such as autoimmune (for example, rheumatoid arthritis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease and multiple sclerosis), neurodegenerative, cardiovascular, and mood disorders, metabolic syndrome, addiction3,6, or internal cancers79,81, with potential beneficial effects of different wavelengths of solar radiation on these processes. The positive effects of solar radiation would provide an additional credence for phototherapeutic approaches including UV therapy in the treatment of systemic disorders.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary table 1

Supplementary information The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-025-01107-x.

Key points.

  • The skin separates the internal milieu from the environment and is composed of the predominantly neuroectoderm-derived epidermis, an adjacent, predominantly mesoderm-derived dermis with hypodermis largely composed of fibroadipose tissue.

  • Skin is exposed to a variety of environmental signals, including solar radiation of different wavelengths, biological, physical and chemical insults, and pollutants.

  • Locally produced mediators, including classic pituitary and hypothalamic hormones, neuropeptides, cytokines and chemokines, biogenic amines, serotonin, melatonin, cannabinoids, steroids, and secosteroids, supported by a cutaneous neural network, regulate protective responses against environmental insults.

  • The skin neuro–immuno–endocrine system communicates with the local microbiome, neural, endocrine and immune systems through the production of soluble factors, priming circulating immune cells or neural transmission.

  • Environmental changes are detected and analysed locally and are transmitted to the central coordinating centres to regulate local and central homeostasis.

  • Selective activation of the skin neuro–immuno–endocrine system can have a role in protection against skin pathologies and in the prevention and treatment of systemic disorders, including autoimmune, neurodegenerative and cardiovascular disorders or carcinogenesis.

Acknowledgements

The authors were supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants 1R01AR073004, R01AR071189 and R21AI149267, VA Merit grant 2I01BX004293, and US Department of Defense grant #W81XWH2210689 and by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH Z01-ES-101586. We thank T.-K. Kim for his help in the preparation of the original versions of Figs. 1 and 2. Previous support by National Science Foundation grants IOS-0918934, IBN-9604364, 9896030 and 049087 and NIH grants RO1AR052190, 1R01AR056666, R21AR0665051 and AR-047079 to A.T.S., which contributed to the development of the presented concepts, is acknowledged.

Footnotes

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Bolognia JL, Schaffer JV & Cerroni L Dermatology 5th edn, Vol. 1–2 (Elsevier, 2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Slominski AT et al. Sensing the environment: regulation of local and global homeostasis by the skin’s neuroendocrine system. Adv. Anat. Embryol. Cell Biol 212, 1–115 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Slominski RM, Chen JY, Raman C & Slominski AT Photo-neuro-immuno-endocrinology: how the ultraviolet radiation regulates the body, brain, and immune system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2308374121 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Plikus MV & Chuong C-M Understanding skin morphogenesis across developmental, regenerative and evolutionary levels. Exp. Dermatol 28, 327–331 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Akat E et al. Comparison of vertebrate skin structure at class level: a review. Anat. Rec 305, 3543–3608 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Slominski AT, Zmijewski MA, Plonka PM, Szaflarski JP & Paus R How UV light touches the brain and endocrine system through skin, and why. Endocrinology 159, 1992–2007 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zwick RK, Guerrero-Juarez CF, Horsley V & Plikus MV Anatomical, physiological, and functional diversity of adipose tissue. Cell Metab. 27, 68–83 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Slominski A et al. Hair follicle pigmentation. J. Invest. Dermatol 124, 13–21 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tobin DJ, Slominski A, Botchkarev V & Paus R The fate of hair follicle melanocytes during the hair growth cycle. J. Invest. Dermatol. Symp. Proc 4, 323–332 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bocheva G, Slominski RM & Slominski AT Environmental air pollutants affecting skin functions with systemic implications. Int. J. Mol. Sci 24, 10502 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gu X, Li Z & Su J Air pollution and skin diseases: a comprehensive evaluation of the associated mechanism. Ecotoxicol. Env. Saf 278, 116429 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bernard JJ, Gallo RL & Krutmann J Photoimmunology: how ultraviolet radiation affects the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol 19, 688–701 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jablonski NG The evolution of human skin pigmentation involved the interactions of genetic, environmental, and cultural variables. Pigment. Cell Melanoma Res 34, 707–729 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Slominski A, Tobin DJ, Shibahara S & Wortsman J Melanin pigmentation in mammalian skin and its hormonal regulation. Physiol. Rev 84, 1155–1228 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.O’Sullivan JDB et al. The biology of human hair greying. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc 96, 107–128 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Clayton RW et al. Neuroendocrinology and neurobiology of sebaceous glands. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc 95, 592–624 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Slominski A & Wortsman J Neuroendocrinology of the skin. Endocr. Rev 21, 457–487 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Slominski AT et al. Neuroendocrine signaling in the skin with a special focus on the epidermal neuropeptides. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol 323, C1757–C1776 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Harris-Tryon TA & Grice EA Microbiota and maintenance of skin barrier function. Science 376, 940–945 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Almoughrabie S et al. Commensal Cutibacterium acnes induce epidermal lipid synthesis important for skin barrier function. Sci. Adv 9, eadg6262 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nakatsuji T, Cheng JY & Gallo RL Mechanisms for control of skin immune function by the microbiome. Curr. Opin. Immunol 72, 324–330 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hernández-Bule ML, Naharro-Rodríguez J, Bacci S & Fernández-Guarino M Unlocking the power of light on the skin: a comprehensive review on photobiomodulation. Int. J. Mol. Sci 25, 4483 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mineroff J et al. Photobiomodulation CME part II: clinical applications in dermatology. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol 91, 805–815 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Parrado C et al. Environmental stressors on skin aging. Mechanistic insights. Front. Pharmacol 10, 759 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dantzer R Neuroimmune interactions: from the brain to the immune system and vice versa. Physiol. Rev 98, 477–504 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jin H, Li M, Jeong E, Castro-Martinez F & Zuker CS A body–brain circuit that regulates body inflammatory responses. Nature 630, 695–703 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Slominski A A nervous breakdown in the skin: stress and the epidermal barrier. J. Clin. Invest 117, 3166–3169 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Aburto MR & Cryan JF Gastrointestinal and brain barriers: unlocking gates of communication across the microbiota–gut–brain axis. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol 21, 222–247 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mayer EA, Nance K & Chen S The gut-brain axis. Annu. Rev. Med 73, 439–453 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Merk VM, Phan TS & Brunner T Regulation of tissue immune responses by local glucocorticoids at epithelial barriers and their impact on interorgan crosstalk. Front. Immunol 12, 672808 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Trompette A & Ubags ND Skin barrier immunology from early life to adulthood. Mucosal Immunol. 16, 194–207 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Salvador AF, de Lima KA & Kipnis J Neuromodulation by the immune system: a focus on cytokines. Nat. Rev. Immunol 21, 526–541 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Paus R, Nickoloff BJ & Ito T A ‘hairy’ privilege. Trends Immunol. 26, 32–40 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Harries MJ, Meyer KC & Paus R Hair loss as a result of cutaneous autoimmunity: frontiers in the immunopathogenesis of primary cicatricial alopecia. Autoimmun. Rev 8, 478–483 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Slominski RM et al. Extra-adrenal glucocorticoid biosynthesis: implications for autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. Genes Immun. 21, 150–168 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Feng X, Zhan H & Sokol CL Sensory neuronal control of skin barrier immunity. Trends Immunol. 45, 371–380 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Saraiva-Santos T, Zaninelli TH & Pinho-Ribeiro FA Modulation of host immunity by sensory neurons. Trends Immunol. 45, 381–396 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kulalert W et al. The neuroimmune CGRP-RAMP1 axis tunes cutaneous adaptive immunity to the microbiota. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2322574121 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Marek-Jozefowicz L et al. The brain-skin axis in psoriasis-psychological, psychiatric, hormonal, and dermatological aspects. Int. J. Mol. Sci 23, 669 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cevikbas F & Lerner EA Physiology and pathophysiology of itch. Physiol. Rev 100, 945–982 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Belkaid Y & Tamoutounour S The influence of skin microorganisms on cutaneous immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol 16, 353–366 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Racine PJ et al. Dialog between skin and its microbiota: emergence of “Cutaneous Bacterial Endocrinology”. Exp. Dermatol 29, 790–800 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kim TK et al. Evolutionary formation of melatonin and vitamin D in early life forms: insects take centre stage. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc 99, 1772–1790 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Duarte M, Pedrosa SS, Khusial PR & Madureira AR Exploring the interplay between stress mediators and skin microbiota in shaping age-related hallmarks: a review. Mech. Ageing Dev 220, 111956 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Slominski A, Wortsman J, Luger T, Paus R & Solomon S Corticotropin releasing hormone and proopiomelanocortin involvement in the cutaneous response to stress. Physiol. Rev 80, 979–1020 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tobin DJ Biochemistry of human skin-our brain on the outside. Chem. Soc. Rev 35,52–67 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ramot Y, Bohm M & Paus R Translational neuroendocrinology of human skin: concepts and perspectives. Trends Mol. Med 27, 60–74 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Grando SA, Pittelkow MR & Schallreuter KU Adrenergic and cholinergic control in the biology of epidermis: physiological and clinical significance. J. Invest. Dermatol 126, 1948–1965 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Grando SA Cholinergic control of epidermal cohesion. Exp. Dermatol 15, 265–282 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Quarta C et al. POMC neuronal heterogeneity in energy balance and beyond: an integrated view. Nat. Metab 3, 299–308 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Toda C, Santoro A, Kim JD & Diano S POMC neurons: from birth to death. Annu. Rev. Physiol 79, 209–236 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Harno E, Gali Ramamoorthy T, Coll AP & White A POMC: the physiological power of hormone processing. Physiol. Rev 98, 2381–2430 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chrousos GP Stress and disorders of the stress system. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol 5, 374–381 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Brzoska T, Luger TA, Maaser C, Abels C & Bohm M α-Melanocyte-stimulating hormone and related tripeptides: biochemistry, antiinflammatory and protective effects in vitro and in vivo, and future perspectives for the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Endocr. Rev 29, 581–602 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bohm M, Luger TA, Tobin DJ & Garcia-Borron JC Melanocortin receptor ligands: new horizons for skin biology and clinical dermatology. J. Invest. Dermatol 126, 1966–1975 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tobin DJ & Kauser S β-Endorphin: the forgotten hair follicle melanotropin. J. Invest. Dermatol. Symp. Proc 10, 212–216 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mazurkiewicz JE, Corliss D & Slominski A Spatiotemporal expression, distribution, and processing of POMC and POMC-derived peptides in murine skin. J. Histochem. Cytochem 48, 905–914 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Slominski AT et al. Key role of CRF in the skin stress response system. Endocr. Rev 34, 827–884 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Upadhyay PR, Swope VB, Starner RJ, Koikov L & Abdel-Malek ZA Journey through the spectacular landscape of melanocortin 1 receptor. Pigment. Cell Melanoma Res 37, 667–680 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Bigliardi PL, Tobin DJ, Gaveriaux-Ruff C & Bigliardi-Qi M Opioids and the skin-where do we stand? Exp. Dermatol 18, 424–430 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Bigliardi PL, Dancik Y, Neumann C & Bigliardi-Qi M Opioids and skin homeostasis, regeneration and ageing — what’s the evidence? Exp. Dermatol 25, 586–591 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Singh M & Mukhopadhyay K Alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone: an emerging anti-inflammatory antimicrobial peptide. Biomed. Res. Int 2014, 874610 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Charnley M, Moir AJ, Douglas CW & Haycock JW Anti-microbial action of melanocortin peptides and identification of a novel X-Pro-D/L-Val sequence in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Peptides 29, 1004–1009 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Eves PC & Haycock JW Melanocortin signalling mechanisms. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol 681, 19–28 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Eves PC, MacNeil S & Haycock JW α-Melanocyte stimulating hormone, inflammation and human melanoma. Peptides 27, 444–452 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Bohm M et al. α-Melanocyte-stimulating hormone protects from ultraviolet radiation-induced apoptosis and DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem 280, 5795–5802 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Besedovsky HO & del Rey A Immune-neuro-endocrine interactions: facts and hypotheses. Endocr. Rev 17, 64–102 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hill RP, MacNeil S & Haycock JW Melanocyte stimulating hormone peptides inhibit TNF-α signaling in human dermal fibroblast cells. Peptides 27, 421–430 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Nix MA et al. Molecular and functional analysis of human β-defensin 3 action at melanocortin receptors. Chem. Biol 20, 784–795 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Jackson PJ et al. Structural and molecular evolutionary analysis of Agouti and Agouti-related proteins. Chem. Biol 13, 1297–1305 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Slominski A et al. Preservation of eumelanin hair pigmentation in proopiomelanocortin-deficient mice on a nonagouti (a/a) genetic background. Endocrinology 146, 1245–1253 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Skobowiat C, Postlethwaite AE & Slominski AT Skin exposure to ultraviolet B rapidly activates systemic neuroendocrine and immunosuppressive responses. Photochem. Photobiol 93, 1008–1015 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Skobowiat C & Slominski AT Ultraviolet B stimulates proopiomelanocortin signalling in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus in mice. Exp. Dermatol 25, 120–123 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Skobowiat C & Slominski AT UVB activates hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in C57BL/6 mice. J. Invest. Dermatol 135, 1638–1648 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Fell GL, Robinson KC, Mao J, Woolf CJ & Fisher DE Skin β-endorphin mediates addiction to UV light. Cell 157, 1527–1534 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Millington GWM & Palmer HE Proopiomelanocortin (POMC) and psychodermatology. Skin Health Dis. 3, e201 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Skobowiat C, Dowdy JC, Sayre RM, Tuckey RC & Slominski A Cutaneous hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis homolog: regulation by ultraviolet radiation. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab 301, E484–E493 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Schiller M et al. Solar-simulated ultraviolet radiation-induced upregulation of the melanocortin-1 receptor, proopiomelanocortin, and α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone in human epidermis in vivo. J. Invest. Dermatol 122, 468–476 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Slominski RM, Raman C, Chen JY & Slominski AT How cancer hijacks the body’s homeostasis through the neuroendocrine system. Trends Neurosci. 46, 263–275 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Theoharides TC Neuroendocrinology of mast cells: challenges and controversies. Exp. Dermatol 26, 751–759 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Slominski RM et al. Malignant melanoma: an overview, new perspectives, and vitamin D signaling. Cancers 16, 2262 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Chrousos GP & Zoumakis E Milestones in CRH research. Curr. Mol. Pharmacol 10, 259–263 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Grammatopoulos DK & Ourailidou S CRH receptor signalling: potential roles in pathophysiology. Curr. Mol. Pharmacol 10, 296–310 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Seres J et al. Corticotropin-releasing hormone system in human adipose tissue. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab 89, 965–970 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Slominski A, Pisarchik A, Tobin DJ, Mazurkiewicz JE & Wortsman J Differential expression of a cutaneous corticotropin-releasing hormone system. Endocrinology 145, 941–950 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Roloff B et al. Hair cycle-dependent expression of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and CRF receptors in murine skin. FASEB J. 12, 287–297 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kauser S, Slominski A, Wei ET & Tobin DJ Modulation of the human hair follicle pigmentary unit by corticotropin-releasing hormone and urocortin peptides. FASEB J. 20, 882–895 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Slominski A et al. CRH functions as a growth factor/cytokine in the skin. J. Cell Physiol 206, 780–791 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Zouboulis CC et al. Corticotropin-releasing hormone: an autocrine hormone that promotes lipogenesis in human sebocytes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 7148–7153 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Slominski A et al. The skin produces urocortin. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab 85, 815–823 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Slominski A et al. Corticotropin releasing hormone and the skin. Front. Biosci 11, 2230–2248 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Fischer TW et al. New effects of caffeine on corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH)-induced stress along the intrafollicular classical hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis (CRH-R1/2, IP(3) -R, ACTH, MC-R2) and the neurogenic non-HPA axis (substance P, p75(NTR) and TrkA) in ex vivo human male androgenetic scalp hair follicles. Br. J. Dermatol 184, 96–110 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Rassouli O, Liapakis G & Venihaki M Role of central and peripheral CRH in skin. Curr. Mol. Pharmacol 11, 72–80 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Zmijewski MA & Slominski AT CRF1 receptor splicing in epidermal keratinocytes: potential biological role and environmental regulations. J. Cell Physiol 218, 593–602 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Slominski A et al. Cutaneous expression of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), urocortin, and CRH receptors. FASEB J. 15, 1678–1693 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Zbytek B, Wortsman J & Slominski A Characterization of a ultraviolet B-induced corticotropin-releasing hormone-proopiomelanocortin system in human melanocytes. Mol. Endocrinol 20, 2539–2547 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Zbytek B & Slominski AT CRH mediates inflammation induced by lipopolysaccharide in human adult epidermal keratinocytes. J. Invest. Dermatol 127, 730–732 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Isard O et al. Cutaneous induction of corticotropin releasing hormone by Propionibacterium acnes extracts. Dermatoendocrinol 1, 96–99 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Zmijewski MA & Slominski AT Emerging role of alternative splicing of CRF1 receptor in CRF signaling. Acta Biochim. Pol 57, 1–13 (2010). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Pisarchik A & Slominski AT Alternative splicing of CRH-R1 receptors in human and mouse skin: identification of new variants and their differential expression. FASEB J. 15, 2754–2756 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Turnbull AV & Rivier CL Regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis by cytokines: actions and mechanisms of action. Physiol. Rev 79, 1–71 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Slominski A et al. CRH stimulation of corticosteroids production in melanocytes is mediated by ACTH. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab 288, E701–E706 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Slominski A, Zbytek B, Semak I, Sweatman T & Wortsman J CRH stimulates POMC activity and corticosterone production in dermal fibroblasts. J. Neuroimmunol 162, 97–102 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Ito N et al. Human hair follicles display a functional equivalent of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and synthesize cortisol. FASEB J. 19, 1332–1334 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Chakraborty S, Pramanik J & Mahata B Revisiting steroidogenesis and its role in immune regulation with the advanced tools and technologies. Genes Immun. 22, 125–140 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Karalis K et al. Autocrine or paracrine inflammatory actions of corticotropin-releasing hormone in vivo. Science 254, 421–423 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Zbytek B, Pfeffer LM & Slominski AT Corticotropin-releasing hormone stimulates NF-κB in human epidermal keratinocytes. J. Endocrinol 181, R1–R7 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Zbytek B, Pfeffer LM & Slominski AT CRH inhibits NF-κB signaling in human melanocytes. Peptides 27, 3276–3283 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Slominski A et al. Expression of hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis related genes in the human skin. J. Invest. Dermatol 119, 1449–1455 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Paus R Exploring the “thyroid-skin connection”: concepts, questions, and clinical relevance. J. Invest. Dermatol 130, 7–10 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Vidali S et al. Hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis hormones stimulate mitochondrial function and biogenesis in human hair follicles. J. Invest. Dermatol 134, 33–42 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Bodo E et al. Thyroid-stimulating hormone, a novel, locally produced modulator of human epidermal functions, is regulated by thyrotropin-releasing hormone and thyroid hormones. Endocrinology 151, 1633–1642 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Gaspar E et al. Thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH): a new player in human hair-growth control. FASEB J. 24, 393–403 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Deing V et al. Oxytocin modulates proliferation and stress responses of human skin cells: implications for atopic dermatitis. Exp. Dermatol 22, 399–405 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Fujimoto K, Inada K, Oka K & Ito E Revisiting oxytocin generation in keratinocytes. Biophys. Physicobiol 20, e200003 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Harvey S, Martínez-Moreno CG, Luna M & Arámburo C Autocrine/paracrine roles of extrapituitary growth hormone and prolactin in health and disease: an overview. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol 220, 103–111 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Taghizadeh B et al. The protection role of human growth hormone on skin cells following ultraviolet B exposure. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol 257, 112961 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Kanaka-Gantenbein C, Kogia C, Abdel-Naser MB & Chrousos GP Skin manifestations of growth hormone-induced diseases. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord 17, 259–267 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Horesh EJ, Cheret J & Paus R Growth hormone and the human hair follicle. Int. J. Mol. Sci 22, 13205 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Horesh EJ et al. Human hair follicles operate a functional peripheral equivalent of the hypothalamic-pituitary-somatotropic axis ex vivo. J. Invest. Dermatol 143, 868–871.e7 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Breitkopf T et al. Somatostatin expression in human hair follicles and its potential role in immune privilege. J. Invest. Dermatol 133, 1722–1730 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Choi JE & Di Nardo A Skin neurogenic inflammation. Semin. Immunopathol 40, 249–259 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Lee EY et al. PACAP is a pathogen-inducible resident antimicrobial neuropeptide affording rapid and contextual molecular host defense of the brain. Proc. Natl Acad.Sci. USA 118, e1917623117 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Anderson ZT, Dawson AD, Slominski AT & Harris ML Current insights into the role of neuropeptide Y in skin physiology and pathology. Front. Endocrinol 13, 838434 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Bigliardi P et al. The opioid receptor influences circadian rhythms in human keratinocytes through the β-arrestin pathway. Cells 13, 232 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Slominski AT et al. Regulated proenkephalin expression in human skin and cultured skin cells. J. Invest. Dermatol 131, 613–622 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Shime H et al. Proenkephalin+ regulatory T cells expanded by ultraviolet B exposure maintain skin homeostasis with a healing function. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 20696–20705 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Cirillo N The local neuropeptide system of keratinocytes. Biomedicines 9, 1854 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Truzzi F, Marconi A & Pincelli C Neurotrophins in healthy and diseased skin. Dermatoendocrinology 3, 32–36 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Botchkarev VA et al. Neurotrophins in skin biology and pathology. J. Invest. Dermatol 126, 1719–1727 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Poeggeler B et al. Leptin and the skin: a new frontier. Exp. Dermatol 19, 12–18 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Quan QL et al. UV irradiation increases appetite and prevents body weight gain through the upregulation of norepinephrine in mice. J. Invest. Dermatol 144, 2273–2284 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Slominski A et al. Steroidogenesis in the skin: implications for local immune functions. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol 137, 107–123 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Nikolakis G, Stratakis CA, Kanaki T, Slominski A & Zouboulis CC Skin steroidogenesis in health and disease. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord 17, 247–258 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Slominski RM et al. The significance of CYP11A1 expression in skin physiology and pathology. Mol. Cell Endocrinol 530, 111238 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Phan TS et al. Keratinocytes control skin immune homeostasis through de novo-synthesized glucocorticoids. Sci. Adv 7, eabe0337 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Hannen R et al. Dysfunctional skin-derived glucocorticoid synthesis is a pathogenic mechanism of psoriasis. J. Invest. Dermatol 137, 1630–1637 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Cirillo N & Prime SS Keratinocytes synthesize and activate cortisol. J. Cell Biochem 112, 1499–1505 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Vukelic S et al. Cortisol synthesis in epidermis is induced by IL-1 and tissue injury. J. Biol. Chem 286, 10265–10275 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Jia Y et al. Steroidogenic enzyme Cyp11a1 regulates Type 2 CD8+ T cell skewing in allergic lung disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 8152–8157 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Chi L et al. Sexual dimorphism in skin immunity is mediated by an androgen-ILC2-dendritic cell axis. Science 384, eadk6200 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Slominski AT et al. Cytochrome P450scc-dependent metabolism of 7-dehydrocholesterol in placenta and epidermal keratinocytes. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol 44, 2003–2018 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Slominski AT et al. Biological effects of CYP11A1-derived vitamin D and lumisterol metabolites in the skin. J. Invest. Dermatol 144, 2145–2161 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Slominski AT Tuckey RC, Jenkinson C, Li W & Jetten AM in Feldman and Pike’s Vitamin D 5th edn, Vol. 1, Ch. 6 (eds Hewison M et al. ) 85–109 (Academic Press, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Holick MF Vitamin D deficiency. N. Engl. J. Med 357, 266–281 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Hewison M et al. in Feldman and Pike’s Vitamin D 5th edn (Academic Press, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Slominski AT et al. Metabolic activation of tachysterol3 to biologically active hydroxyderivatives that act on VDR, AhR, LXRs, and PPARγ receptors. FASEB J. 36, e22451 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Slominski A et al. Serotoninergic and melatoninergic systems are fully expressed in human skin. FASEB J. 16, 896–898 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Slominski A, Wortsman J & Tobin DJ The cutaneous serotoninergic/melatoninergic system: securing a place under the sun. FASEB J. 19, 176–194 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Slominski AT et al. Characterization of serotonin and N-acetylserotonin systems in the human epidermis and skin cells. J. Pineal Res 68, e12626 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Kobayashi H et al. A role of melatonin in neuroectodermal-mesodermal interactions: the hair follicle synthesizes melatonin and expresses functional melatonin receptors. FASEB J. 19, 1710–1712 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Slominski AT et al. Melatonin and the skin: current progress and perspectives for human health. J. Invest. Dermatol 10.1016/j.jid.2024.11.012 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Reiter RJ et al. Dual sources of melatonin and evidence for different primary functions. Front. Endocrinol 15, 1414463 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Kim TK et al. Metabolism of melatonin and biological activity of intermediates of melatoninergic pathway in human skin cells. FASEB J. 27, 2742–2755 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Fischer TW et al. Constitutive and UV-induced metabolism of melatonin in keratinocytes and cell-free systems. FASEB J. 20, 1564–1566 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Slominski A et al. Functional activity of serotoninergic and melatoninergic systems expressed in the skin. J. Cell Physiol 196, 144–153 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Slominski RM, Reiter RJ, Schlabritz-Loutsevitch N, Ostrom RS & Slominski AT Melatonin membrane receptors in peripheral tissues: distribution and functions. Mol. Cell Endocrinol 351, 152–166 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Slominski AT et al. Melatonin and its metabolites can serve as agonists on the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma. Int. J. Mol. Sci 24, 15496 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Sanidad KZ et al. Gut bacteria-derived serotonin promotes immune tolerance in early life. Sci. Immunol 9, eadj4775 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Sivamani RK, Lam ST & Isseroff RR Beta adrenergic receptors in keratinocytes. Dermatol. Clin 25, 643–653 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Slominski A, Zmijewski MA & Pawelek J L-tyrosine and L-dihydroxyphenylalanine as hormone-like regulators of melanocyte functions. Pigment. Cell Melanoma Res 25, 14–27 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Slominski RM et al. Melanoma, melanin, and melanogenesis: the yin and yang relationship. Front. Oncol 12, 842496 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Doepner M et al. Endogenous DOPA inhibits melanoma through suppression of CHRM1 signaling. Sci. Adv 8, eabn4007 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Kurzen H, Wessler I, Kirkpatrick CJ, Kawashima K & Grando SA The non-neuronal cholinergic system of human skin. Horm. Metab. Res 39, 125–135 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Grando SA, Kawashima K & Wessler I Introduction: the non-neuronal cholinergic system in humans. Life Sci. 72, 2009–2012 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Biro T, Toth BI, Hasko G, Paus R & Pacher P The endocannabinoid system of the skin in health and disease: novel perspectives and therapeutic opportunities. Trends Pharmacol. Sci 30, 411–420 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Ständer S & Schmelz M Skin innervation. J. Invest. Dermatol 144, 1716–1723 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Erbacher C et al. Interaction of human keratinocytes and nerve fiber terminals at the neuro-cutaneous unit. eLife 13, e77761 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Misery L, Loser K & Stander S Sensitive skin. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol 30, 2–8 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Bennett-Kennett R et al. Sensory neuron activation from topical treatments modulates the sensorial perception of human skin. PNAS Nexus 2, pgad292 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Baumbauer KM et al. Keratinocytes can modulate and directly initiate nociceptive responses. eLife 4, e09674 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Riol-Blanco L et al. Nociceptive sensory neurons drive interleukin-23-mediated psoriasiform skin inflammation. Nature 510, 157–161 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Wu M et al. Innervation of nociceptor neurons in the spleen promotes germinal center responses and humoral immunity. Cell 187, 2935–2951.e19 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Deng L, Gillis JE, Chiu IM & Kaplan DH Sensory neurons: an integrated component of innate immunity. Immunity 57, 815–831 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Sua-Cespedes C et al. Melanopsin (OPN4) is a novel player in skin homeostasis and attenuates UVA-induced effects. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol 242, 112702 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.de Assis LVM, Moraes MN, Magalhaes-Marques KK & Castrucci AML Melanopsin and rhodopsin mediate UVA-induced immediate pigment darkening: unravelling the photosensitive system of the skin. Eur. J. Cell Biol 97, 150–162 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Castellano-Pellicena I et al. Does blue light restore human epidermal barrier function via activation of Opsin during cutaneous wound healing? Lasers Surg. Med 51, 370–382 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.de Assis LVM, Tonolli PN, Moraes MN, Baptista MS & de Lauro Castrucci AM How does the skin sense sun light? An integrative view of light sensing molecules. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev 47, 100403 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Holick MF & Slominski AT in Feldman and Pike’s Vitamin D 5th edn, Vol. 1, Ch. 3 (eds Hewison M et al. ) 27–45 (Academic Press, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Muzaffar S, Khan J, Srivastava R, Gorbatyuk MS & Athar M Mechanistic understanding of the toxic effects of arsenic and warfare arsenicals on human health and environment. Cell Biol. Toxicol 39, 85–110 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Plikus MV, Guerrero-Juarez CF, Treffeisen E & Gay DL Epigenetic control of skin and hair regeneration after wounding. Exp. Dermatol 24, 167–170 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Tiganescu A et al. Increased glucocorticoid activation during mouse skin wound healing. J. Endocrinol 221, 51–61 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Pullar CE, Rizzo A & Isseroff RR β-Adrenergic receptor antagonists accelerate skin wound healing: evidence for a catecholamine synthesis network in the epidermis. J. Biol. Chem 281, 21225–21235 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Slominski AT & Zmijewski MA Glucocorticoids inhibit wound healing: novel mechanism of action. J. Invest. Dermatol 137, 1012–1014 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Jozic I et al. Stress signals, mediated by membranous glucocorticoid receptor, activate PLC/PKC/GSK-3β/β-catenin pathway to inhibit wound closure. J. Invest. Dermatol 137, 1144–1154 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Yang DJ et al. Leucine-enkephalin promotes wound repair through the regulation of hemidesmosome dynamics and matrix metalloprotease. Peptides 76, 57–64 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Nguyen VT et al. Re-epithelialization of pathological cutaneous wounds is improved by local mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism. J. Invest. Dermatol 136, 2080–2089 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Giampazolias E et al. Vitamin D regulates microbiome-dependent cancer immunity. Science 384, 428–437 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Schulkin J Allostasis, Homeostasis, and the Costs of Physiological Adaptation (Cambridge University Press, 2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Geyfman M, Plikus MV, Treffeisen E, Andersen B & Paus R Resting no more: re-defining telogen, the maintenance stage of the hair growth cycle. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc 90, 1179–1196 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Bikle DD Vitamin D: newer concepts of its metabolism and function at the basic and clinical level. J. Endocr. Soc 4, bvz038 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Regazzetti C et al. Melanocytes sense blue light and regulate pigmentation through opsin-3. J. Invest. Dermatol 138, 171–178 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Olinski LE, Lin EM & Oancea E Illuminating insights into opsin 3 function in the skin. Adv. Biol. Regul 75, 100668 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Gribonika I et al. Skin autonomous antibody production regulates host-microbiota interactions. Nature 638, 1043–1053 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Ito Y & Amagai M Dissecting skin microbiota and microenvironment for the development of therapeutic strategies. Curr. Opin. Microbiol 74, 102311 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Voigt AY et al. Skin microbiome variation with cancer progression in human cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J. Invest. Dermatol 142, 2773–2782.e16 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Lei J et al. Involvement of skin TRPV3 in temperature detection regulated by TMEM79 in mice. Nat. Commun 14, 4104 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Slominski AT et al. Detection of novel CYP11A1-derived secosteroids in the human epidermis and serum and pig adrenal gland. Sci. Rep 5, 14875 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary table 1

RESOURCES