Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jul 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2024 Jul 23;146(31):21815–21823. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c06080

Total Synthesis Facilitates in vitro Reconstitution of the C–S Bond Forming P450 in Griseoviridin Biosynthesis

Carter N Stout §,, Hans Renata §,*
PMCID: PMC12239663  NIHMSID: NIHMS2028329  PMID: 39042396

Abstract

Griseoviridin is a group A streptogramin natural product from Streptomyces with broad-spectrum antibacterial activity. A hybrid polyketide-non-ribosomal peptide, it comprises a 23-membered macrocycle, an embedded oxazole motif, and a macrolactone with a unique ene-thiol linkage. Recent analysis of the griseoviridin biosynthetic gene cluster implicated SgvP, a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase, in late-stage installation of the critical C–S bond. While genetic and crystallographic experiments provided indirect evidence to support this hypothesis, the exact function of SgvP has never been confirmed biochemically. Herein, we report a convergent total synthesis of pre-griseoviridin, the putative substrate of P450 SgvP and precursor to griseoviridin. Our strategy features concise and rapid assembly of two fragments joined via sequential peptide coupling and Stille macrocyclization. Access to pre-griseoviridin then enabled in vitro validation of SgvP as the C–S bond forming P450 during griseoviridin biosynthesis, culminating in a 9-step chemoenzymatic synthesis of griseoviridin.

INTRODUCTION

Cytochromes P450 constitute a large family of heme-dependent enzymes that are involved in a multitude of oxidative transformations.1 Among Nature’s most ubiquitous oxidation catalysts, these enzymes are found across all domains of life, participating in fundamental biological processes such as drug metabolism,2 xenobiotic degradation,3 and natural product biosynthesis.4 Indeed, P450s are known to mediate hydroxylation,5 epoxidation,6 N- and S-oxidation,7 oxidative coupling,8 and C–N/S bond formation,9 among many other transformations.10 This versatility has long attracted the attention of the scientific community, and owing to improved technologies for genome mining and bioinformatics,11 the number of annotated P450-encoding genes has increased drastically over the last decade.12

Likewise, advances in enzyme engineering and protein expression have generated myriad opportunities for the merger of biocatalysis and organic synthesis,13 where P450s and other enzymes are employed in diverse contexts.14 In the synthesis of complex natural products, for example, P450s are effective catalysts for regio-, chemo-, and stereoselective C–H oxidation.15 This transformation is highly valuable since (1) the hydroxyl group serves as a key handle that enables further downstream functionalization, and (2) traditional methods struggle to match the selectivity of P450s in a variety of settings.15 On the other hand, works by Arnold,16 Narayan,17 and others18 have established powerful methods for C–C bond formation using engineered P450s or variants thereof, providing concise access to stereochemically enriched small molecules. Beyond C–O and C–C bonds, however, the biocatalytic repertoire of P450s remains largely underexplored.

In particular, a growing number of sulfur-containing secondary metabolites are thought to have arisen from P450-mediated C–S bond forming events.9 Investigations into the biosyntheses of camalexin,19 cyclobrassinin, and spirobrassinin20 in plants uncovered several P450s responsible for intramolecular C–S bond installation (Figure 1A). More recently, the intramolecular S-heterocyclization event in chuangxinmycin biosynthesis was attributed to P450 CxnD, its activity confirmed through biochemical and crystallographic characterization.21 In addition to their biosynthetic roles, P450s can also effect C–S bond formation with non-native substrates or via non-natural reactivity. Studies from Abe and coworkers have demonstrated the ability of P450 TleB, which performs intramolecular indole amination during indolactam V biosynthesis,22 to instead catalyze C–S bond formation toward unnatural sulfur-containing indolactams.23 Conversely, the Arnold lab reported an engineered P450 capable of lactone-carbene S–H insertion to produce α-thio-γ-lactones.24 Nevertheless, while P450s are implicated in the construction of several other C–S bonds in natural products,21 thorough characterization of these enzymes remains elusive.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(A) Representative natural products containing C–S bonds installed by cytochromes P450. (B) Chemical structures of griseoviridin (1), viridogrisein, and related streptogramin antibiotics. (C) Proposed C–S bond formation during the final step of griseoviridin biosynthesis.

Griseoviridin (1) is a sulfur-containing, group A streptogramin natural product isolated concurrently with the group B streptogramin viridogrisein from Streptomyces griseoviridis (Figure 1B).25 Despite bearing no chemical resemblance, group A and B streptogramins are frequently isolated together due to colocalization of their biosynthetic gene clusters.26 Group A streptogramins feature a hybrid polyketide-non-ribosomal peptide macrocycle and exhibit synergistic antibacterial activity when co-administered with group B streptogramins.27 For instance, Synercid is a formulation of quinupristin, a group A derivative, and dalfopristin, a group B derivative, approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) bacteremia.28 In contrast to other group A streptogramins, such as the madumycins and virginiamycins, griseoviridin bears a unique nine-membered, vinyl thioether-containing macrolactone essential for biological activity.29 A single prior synthesis of griseoviridin has been reported,30 and the lactone motif remains challenging to access despite several published approaches (Schemes S1 and S2).31

In 2012, Ju and coworkers identified the biosynthetic gene cluster responsible for griseoviridin production in S. griseoviridis.32 Bioinformatic analyses revealed only one tailoring enzyme: SgvP, which was annotated as a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase with unknown function. Subsequent genetic29 and structural33 studies provided preliminary evidence that SgvP forges the key C–S bond of the macrolactone, though this activity was not confirmed in vitro (Figure 1C). Importantly, the presumed biosynthetic precursor to griseoviridin and putative substrate of SgvP – pre-griseoviridin (2) – was neither isolable nor identifiable in any capacity. Inactivation of sgvP in the producing strain instead led to accumulation of two desulfurized compounds, thereby precluding biochemical characterization and mechanistic studies. This observation also highlights some of the shortcomings of deciphering tailoring steps in natural product biosynthesis by purely genetic means, which are liable to polar effects and the whims of metabolic regulation. The inability to isolate 2 also raised the question about its overall stability and potential susceptibility to degradation.

Herein, we disclose a concise and scalable total synthesis of pre-griseoviridin (2) that features a convergent approach inspired by recent synthetic entries to streptogramin natural products.34 Access to 2 not only facilitated in vitro confirmation of SgvP’s role in C–S bond formation during griseoviridin biosynthesis and preliminary analysis of its key active site residues, but also enabled a chemoenzymatic total synthesis of griseoviridin in nine steps (longest linear sequence, or LLS). This work highlights the inherent potential of chemoenzymatic synthesis as a platform for evaluating biosynthetic hypotheses and enzyme activity.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Synthesis of pre-griseoviridin.

We envisioned that pre-griseoviridin (2) could be accessed via the suitably protected macrocyclic precursor 3 (Figure 2). Taking inspiration from Seiple and coworkers,34 we partitioned 3 into two complex fragments, one bearing a carboxylic acid and a vinyl iodide (A, 4) and the other an amine and a vinyl stannane (B, 5). These fragments could feasibly be joined through sequential peptide coupling and palladium-catalyzed Stille macrocyclization. We opted for de novo construction of the oxazole motif of 4, which traces this compound back to a serine derivative and carboxylic acid 6. Conveniently, 6 maps directly onto commercially available syn-1,3-diol 7, an inexpensive (~$1.45/g) building block used in the synthesis of statin-based pharmaceuticals. On the other hand, we anticipated that 5 could arise from Steglich esterification of secondary alcohol 8 with a D-cysteine derivative, while the vinyl stannane could be introduced via functionalization of methyl ester 9. In turn, 9 would be obtained from vinylmagnesium bromide addition to (R)-(+)-propylene oxide (10) and subsequent cross metathesis.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Retrosynthetic analysis of protected macrocycle 3, the direct precursor to pre-griseoviridin (2).

Synthesis of 4 commenced from syn-1,3-diol 7, which was homologated to vinyl iodide 11 via the E-selective Takai olefination (Scheme 1A).35 Though preliminary efforts gave high yields, a mediocre 2.5:1 E/Z ratio was observed (Table S1). We noted several reports touting the ability of 1,4-dioxane to improve E/Z selectivity in analogous systems.36 Pleasingly, upon assessment of different mixtures of 1,4-dioxane and tetrahydrofuran (THF), the E/Z ratio increased to nearly 10:1. This procedure proved amenable to decagram scale synthesis, delivering over 20 g of 11 in a single batch. With 11 in hand, we initially targeted a two-step, one-pot approach to serinate 12. Therein, treatment with thionyl chloride (SOCl2) and catalytic N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) furnished an intermediate acid chloride,37 which was then trapped with the hydrochloride salt of L-serine methyl ester (L-Ser-OMe•HCl). While serinate 12 was isolated in acceptable yield, reaction efficiency suffered greatly upon scale-up, as the acetonide moiety is unstable to trace acid. To mitigate these issues, we opted for a stepwise workaround, first subjecting ester 11 to lithium hydroxide (LiOH)-mediated hydrolysis. The crude carboxylic acid was then converted to the acid fluoride in situ and coupled with L-Ser-OMe•HCl to provide serinate 12 in 87% yield on decagram scale. Furthermore, the two olefin isomers were separable at this juncture, enabling us to proceed with only the desired E vinyl iodide.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

A. Synthesis of Fragment A (4) from 1,3-Diol 7. B. Synthesis of Fragment B (5) from Chiral Epoxide 10.

The stage thus set for oxazole formation, we converted 12 to the corresponding oxazoline by the action of Deoxo-Fluor, which provided a cleaner reaction than diethylaminosulfur trifluoride (DAST). Following oxidation with bromotrichloromethane (BrCCl3) and 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU), oxazole 13 was obtained in 79% yield over two steps. Upon optimization, this sequence was telescoped to a one-pot procedure without appreciable loss of yield or scalability. Finally, hydrolysis of the methyl ester afforded 4 in nearly quantitative fashion, completing a five-step synthesis in 38% overall yield.

In parallel, our synthesis of fragment B began with the known transformation of (R)-(+)-propylene oxide (10) to homoallylic alcohol 14 mediated by vinylmagnesium bromide and copper(I) iodide (CuI) (Scheme 1B).38 Cross metathesis with methyl acrylate was achieved with Hoveyda-Grubbs second generation catalyst (HG-II), furnishing ester 9 in 85% yield. Then, treatment of 9 with propargylamine and trimethylaluminum (AlMe3) resulted in the formation of propargyl amide 15. Careful control of reaction duration and temperature was required to minimize elimination of the free secondary alcohol in the presence of strong Lewis acid. Copper-mediated hydrostannylation converted the terminal alkyne to vinyl stannane 8 in high yield, with nearly 20 g isolated from a single reaction. Lastly, the D-cysteine fragment was introduced as S-Trt-N-Fmoc-D-Cys-OH in a one-pot Steglich esterification/Fmoc deprotection sequence from secondary alcohol 8, completing the synthesis of amine S-1 in five steps and 50% overall yield (Scheme S3).

Having accessed fragments A and B, we focused our efforts on macrocycle formation. Fragment coupling was accomplished with hexafluorophosphate azabenzotriazole tetramethyl uronium (HATU) and N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA), delivering the linear Stille coupling precursor S-2 (Scheme S3). Next, a variety of conditions were explored to effect palladium-catalyzed Stille macrocyclization (Table S1). The traditional combination of triphenylarsine (Ph3As) and Pd(0) failed to produce any appreciable amount of macrocycle S-3.39 Similar results were observed when JackiePhos or various Buchwald palladacycle catalysts were used. Conversely, the Buchwald ligands XPhos and RuPhos in conjunction with Pd(0) gave 27% and 34% yield of S-3, respectively. In search of more efficacious conditions, we tested Fürstner’s modified Stille protocol but saw substantial degradation regardless of reaction temperature.40 Gratifyingly, when we omitted phosphine ligands altogether and utilized a simplified system of tris(dibenzylidineacetone)dipalladium(0) (Pd2(dba)3) and lithium chloride (LiCl), macrocycle S-3 was cleanly generated in 64% yield. This result not only served as an example of successful macrocyclization – a notoriously difficult transformation to achieve with high efficiency41 – but also brought us within one step of pre-griseoviridin.

Given the lability of trityl and acetonide protecting groups under acidic conditions, we envisioned concomitant liberation of the thiol and 1,3-diol in a single operation. Preliminary efforts examined various Brønsted and Lewis acids in a range of solvents (Table S2). It became immediately evident that acetonide deprotection was facile and rapid, often proceeding completely within minutes or even seconds. However, the trityl moiety was substantially more resilient, and the free 1,3-diol would eliminate long before any trityl deprotection was observed. To facilitate more targeted screening, we accessed free diol S-4 by treating acetonide S-3 with DOWEX cation exchange resin in methanol (MeOH). Again, no conditions were able to unmask the thiol, the reactions dominated by elimination and general degradation. We next assayed oxidative reagents, such as mercuric acetate (Hg(OAc)2) or cuprous chloride (CuCl), seeking to deprotect the thiol of S-3 selectively. Disappointingly, complex reaction profiles were consistently obtained and no free thiol was formed.

At this point, we opted to exchange the trityl group for a more labile functionality – 4-monomethoxytrityl (MMTr), which is known to cleave more readily under acidic conditions due to increased cation stability.42 To modify our synthesis of fragment B, Steglich esterification of 8 was performed with commercially available S-MMTr-N-Fmoc-D-Cys-OH (Scheme 1B). Further optimizations included the use of 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC) instead of diisopropylcarbodiimide (DIC) for esterification and piperidine instead of diethylamine for Fmoc removal. These modifications enabled preparation of MMTr-protected fragment B (5) in 89% yield on multigram scale. Coupling of 4 and 5 gave MMTr-protected Stille precursor 24, which was subjected to the palladium-catalyzed macrocyclization conditions elucidated previously (Scheme 2). Similar yield (61%) was obtained, but closer inspection of the reaction profile suggested that an isomerized byproduct comprised a notable portion of the remaining mass. With this knowledge, we increased the equivalents of LiCl, which successfully attenuated isomerization and improved the yield of 25 to 71% on 7.4-g scale.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2.

Fragment Coupling and Deprotection Toward Pre-Griseoviridin (2).

Initial deprotection screening with 25 suggested nearly identical reactivity to S-3, wherein rapid acetonide deprotection would precede elimination and degradation without any trace of MMTr removal. However, treatment of 25 with trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and triethylsilane (Et3SiH) in chloroform (CHCl3) produced a compound that had never been observed previously. Subsequent NMR and HRMS analyses confirmed this compound as pre-griseoviridin (2). This combination of TFA/Et3SiH/CHCl3 was subjected to extensive optimization, as even minute variations in temperature, equivalents, and duration were found to drastically impact reaction outcome (Table S4). Eventually, the finalized protocol afforded 49% isolated yield of 2 on multigram scale. It should be noted that other thiol protecting groups were screened without success. Access to 2 provided an opportunity to evaluate its stability for the first time. Under air at ambient temperature, 2 was found to be remarkably stable, with no discernable degradation even after two weeks. Having accomplished deprotection, we achieved the first total synthesis, isolation, and characterization of pre-griseoviridin (2) in eight steps (LLS).

Reconstitution and analysis of P450 SgvP.

With pre-griseoviridin (2) in hand, we first sought to benchmark the proposed enzymatic C–S bond formation against several chemical oxidants. Treatment of 2 with m-chloroperbenzoic acid (mCPBA) led to an intractable mixture based on crude NMR analysis, though we were tentatively able to detect the presence of the sulfinic and sulfonic acids of 2 by LC-MS. On the other hand, a series of basic hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) conditions gave ester hydrolysis, S-oxidation, or broad degradation. Crucially, we did not observe the production of 1 in any of these attempts.

As prior reports have demonstrated the efficacy of self-sufficient P450-reductase chimeras for biocatalysis,43 we commenced investigations into SgvP by fusing it with RhFRed, the reductase domain of P450RhF, to generate a chimera referred to as SgvP-RhFRed. Once solubility was confirmed via SDS-PAGE, overexpression of the N-His6-tagged protein in E. coli aided by GroES/EL chaperones44 gave sufficient yield of pure SgvP-RhFRed for preliminary studies. Initial incubation of 2 with SgvP-RhFRed in the presence of NADP+ and sodium phosphite dehydrogenase Opt13 for NADPH regeneration45 yielded only disulfide based on LC-MS (Figure 3A). To probe whether enzyme activity or auto-oxidation was responsible for disulfide formation, we performed the same reaction (1) in the absence of SgvP-RhFRed or (2) in buffer and co-solvent alone. In both instances, we detected disulfide as the only product, suggesting that thiol oxidation occurs spontaneously upon exposure to oxygen under aqueous conditions. By adding tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP) to the reaction mixture as a reductant, disulfide formation was effectively prevented, but no conversion to griseoviridin (1) was observed. Furthermore, varying the reaction buffer, pH, additives, and temperature had no effect on the outcome, nor did performing the reaction in crude lysates of E. coli expressing SgvP-RhFRed. A Genome Neighborhood Network (GNN) analysis of SgvP identified three homologs, named “FNS2”, “NK82”, and “YY64”, with high sequence identity (>80%) and similar genomic context (i.e., acting in the production of griseoviridin-like compounds) (Figure S1).46 These enzymes were subsequently assembled as the corresponding P450-RhFRed chimeras. As with SgvP-RhFRed, however, none of the homologs exhibited any activity with 2 in cell lysates across a range of conditions.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

(A) Assessment of P450-catalyzed C–S bond formation en route to griseoviridin (1). *Entry 1 was conducted in the absence of TCEP. (B) Type I binding spectra obtained from titration of SgvP with 2 (0 to 100 μM) and determination of SgvP–2 Kd via nonlinear regression of the difference in type I binding spectra (λ386λ421) plotted against the concentration of 2.

At this stage, we surmised that the appended reductase domain could be interfering with SgvP activity. Such concerns are well-documented in the study and application of P450-reductase chimeras, which can suffer from P450-reductase decoupling or unfavorable domain-domain interactions, among other issues.43b With this in mind, we switched our focus to an alternative reconstitution system comprising standalone SgvP and two different pairs of surrogate redox partners: spinach ferredoxin (Fdx)/ferredoxin reductase (Fdr) and putidaredoxin (CamB)/putidaredoxin reductase (CamA). To our delight, incubation of pre-griseoviridin (2) with SgvP, Fdx/Fdr, and Opt13 in the presence of NADP+ and TCEP gave nearly full conversion to griseoviridin (1) in approximately three hours. We did not detect the presence of any apparent intermediates during the course of the reaction. Analogous results were obtained in the presence of CamB/CamA, suggesting their viability as alternative redox partners for SgvP. Moreover, a preparative scale procedure with Fdx/Fdr successfully delivered 78% isolated yield of griseoviridin (1). Our findings not only provided the first biochemical confirmation that P450 SgvP installs the key C–S bond during griseoviridin biosynthesis, but also constituted the final step in an expedient chemoenzymatic synthesis of griseoviridin (9 steps, LLS).

In vitro reconstitution of SgvP provided an opportunity to conduct further biochemical characterization of the enzyme. Upon incubating SgvP with various concentrations of pre-griseoviridin (2), a characteristic type I binding spectrum was observed, in which λmax shifted from 421 nm to 386 nm (Figure 3B). By performing nonlinear regression on the absorption difference between λ386 and λ421, we calculated a dissociation constant (Kd) of 7.13 ± 0.39 μM for the SgvP–2 complex. Relative to other P450s from secondary metabolite biosyntheses, SgvP possesses a Kd one order of magnitude higher than that of PtmO5 (Kd = 0.86 ± 0.07 μM)47 and 2.5-fold lower than that of TleB (Kd = 18.9 ± 3.3 μM).22 Furthermore, while previously characterized C–S bond forming P450s catalyze oxidative modification of electron rich aromatics, SgvP acts on an electron-deficient alkene, effecting macrocyclization to a 9-membered ring with high strain energy.48

To glean further insight into the nature of SgvP-catalyzed C–S bond formation, we generated a series of mutants informed by sequence alignment with other biosynthetic P450s (Figure 4A). Notably, the I-helix of SgvP does not contain the usual conserved acid-alcohol pair (i.e., D/E-T/S) responsible for dioxygen activation. Instead, the latter residue is substituted by a proline (P237) that has been implicated in both substrate recognition and protein stability by prior computational studies.33 Though this proline is conserved in SgvP homologs FNS2, KN82 and YY64, it is absent in other C–S bond forming P450s, further emphasizing that this feature is unique to SgvP and its homologs rather than to C–S bond installation.1921 In fact, investigations into CxnD – the only other functionally characterized P450 that natively catalyzes C–S bond formation – found that activity is greatly decreased upon mutation of threonine to proline or alanine.21 Another structural anomaly appears within the cysteine-ligand loop, which features leucine (L337) rather than phenylalanine in the conserved FxxGxHxCxG sequence. As the impact of these residues on catalytic activity was unknown, we prepared SgvP single mutants P237T, P237A, and L337F via site-directed mutagenesis. Under the same reaction conditions developed for wild-type SgvP, variants P237T and P237A showed significantly diminished activity, giving 7% and 12% percent NMR yield of griseoviridin, respectively (Figure 4B). Intriguingly, the activity of P237T could be partially rescued by mutating A238 to threonine, which increased the NMR yield to 25%. Furthermore, LC-MS analysis revealed that several oxidized by-products had formed during the course of the reaction with these mutants (Figure 4C). Unfortunately, all attempts to isolate these compounds were unsuccessful, and crude NMR spectra predominantly showed 1 and 2 (Figure S5). These results suggest that, while not essential for catalysis, residue P237 exerts strong influence on the activity and reaction profile of SgvP. On the other hand, variant L337F showed comparable – if not slightly enhanced – activity to the wild-type enzyme. Overall, this work is expected to lay the foundation for future studies into the mechanism of SgvP-catalyzed C–S bond formation, which is currently unelucidated.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

(A) Sequence alignment of SgvP with other biosynthetic P450s. The positions of key residues are highlighted with a red box. (B) NMR yield of reactions conducted with SgvP and four SgvP mutants. (C) UV absorbance spectra of in vitro enzymatic reactions with SgvP and SgvP mutants. All enzymatic reactions were conducted using the standard conditions described in the Supporting Information, and the control reaction was carried out in the absence of P450. Peaks labeled with an asterisk (*) contain m/z = 496 and m/z = 512, which correspond to singly- and doubly-oxidized by-products, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Implementing concise and convergent synthetic logic, we executed the first total synthesis of pre-griseoviridin (2), the putative substrate for P450 SgvP, in eight steps (LLS) on multigram scale and provided initial assessments of its stability and behavior under several oxidative conditions. Synthetic access to pre-griseoviridin enabled (1) in vitro reconstitution of SgvP and confirmation of its role in C–S bond formation during griseoviridin biosynthesis, only the second functional characterization of such a P450; and (2) an expedient chemoenzymatic total synthesis of griseoviridin (1) in nine steps (LLS). Furthermore, mutational studies of several active-site residues revealed the importance of residue P237 for efficient C–S bond formation by SgvP. This work reiterates the complementary relationship between total synthesis, biocatalysis, and biosynthetic analysis, demonstrating that strategies and results from one discipline can greatly enrich the others. In particular, it highlights the unique role that synthetic chemistry can play in assisting biochemical studies and addressing knowledge gaps in biosynthesis that cannot be solved with genetic studies alone.49 We anticipate that this interdisciplinary approach will continue to create opportunities in each of these fields. Further investigations into SgvP, especially regarding the precise mechanism of C–S bond formation, are currently in progress.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Funding for this work was provided by the National Institutes of Health (grant R35 GM128895). Plasmids encoding for Fdx/Fdr and CamA/CamB were generously provided by Profs. David H. Sherman and Ben Shen, respectively. We acknowledge the Ball, Hartgerink, Kürti, and Segatori laboratories for gracious access to reagents and equipment. We thank Prof. Jianhua Ju for valuable discussions on SgvP. C.N.S. was supported in part by the Reba and Nat Newman Endowed Fellowship in the Skaggs Graduate School of Chemical and Biological Sciences.

ABBREVIATIONS

CM

cross metathesis

dba

dibenzylidineacetone

DBU

1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene

DIC

diisopropylcarbodiimide

DIPEA

N,N-diisopropylethylamine

DMAP

4-dimethylaminopyridine

DMF

N,N-dimethylformamide

DMSO

dimethylsulfoxide

EDC

1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide

Fmoc

fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl

HATU

hexafluorophosphate azabenzotriazole tetramethyl uronium

HRMS

high resolution mass spectrometry

KPi

inorganic phosphate

LC-MS

liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry

LLS

longest linear sequence

mCPBA

meta-chloroperbenzoic acid

MMTr

4-monomethoxytrityl

NADP+/NADPH

nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidized/reduced

NMR

nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

SDS-PAGE

sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

TCEP

tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine

TFA

trifluoroacetic acid

TFFH

tetramethylfluoroformamidinium hexafluorophosphate

THF

tetrahydrofuran

Footnotes

Supporting Information

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website.

Experimental procedure, protein and DNA sequences, Schemes S1S3, Figures S1S5, Tables S1S8, NMR spectra (PDF)

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bernhardt R Cytochromes P450 as Versatile Biocatalysts. J. Biotechnol 2006, 124, 126–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhao M; Ma J; Li M; Zhang Y; Jiang B; Zhao X; Huai C; Shen L; Zhang N; He L; Qin S Cytochrome P450 Enzymes and Drug Metabolism in Humans. Int. J. Mol. Sci 2021, 22, 12808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nebert DW; Russell DW Clinical Importance of the Cytochromes P450. Lancet 2002, 360, 1155–1162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.(a) Podust LM; Sherman DH Diversity of P450 Enzymes in the Biosynthesis of Natural Products. Nat. Prod. Rep 2012, 29, 1251–1266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Rudolf JD; Chang C-Y; Ma M; Shen B Cytochromes P450 for Natural Products Biosynthesis in Streptomyces: Sequence, Structure, and Function. Nat. Prod. Rep 2017, 34, 1141–1172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Zhang X; Guo J; Cheng F; Li S Cytochrome P450 Enzymes in Fungal Natural Products Biosynthesis. Nat. Prod. Rep 2021, 38, 1072–1099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ortiz de Montellano PR Hydrocarbon Hydroxylation by Cytochrome P450 Enzymes. Chem. Rev 2010, 2, 932–948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Espinoza RV; Maskeri MA; Turlik A; Nangia A; Khatri Y; Montgomery J; Houk KN; Sherman DH Epoxidation and Late-Stage C–H Functionalization by P450 TamI Are Mediated by Variant Heme-Iron Oxidizing Species. ACS Catal 2022, 12, 3731–3742. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.(a) Hyland R; Jones BC; Smith DA Identification of the Cytochrome P450 Enzymes Involved in the N-Oxidation of Voriconazole. Drug Metab. Dispos 2003, 31, 540–547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Rydberg P; Ryde U; Olsen L Sulfoxide, Sulfur, and Nitrogen Oxidation and Dealkylation by Cytochrome P450. J. Chem. Theory Comput 2008, 4, 1369–1377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.(a) Howard-Jones AR; Walsh CT Nonenzymatic Oxidative Steps Accompanying Action of the Cytochrome P450 Enzymes StaP and RebP in the Biosynthesis of Staurosporine and Rebeccamycin. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2007, 129, 11016–11017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Woithe K; Geib N; Zerbe K; Li DB; Heck M; Fournier-Rousset S; Meyer O; Vitali F; Matoba N; Abou-Hadeed K Robinson JA Oxidative Phenol Coupling Reactions Catalyzed by OxyB: A Cytochrome P450 from the Vancomycin Producing Organism. Implications for Vancomycin Biosynthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2007, 129, 6887–6895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ushimaru R; Abe I C–N and C–S Bond Formation by Cytochrome P450 Enzymes. Trends Chem 2023, 5, 526–536. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Isin EM; Guengerich FP Complex Reactions Catalyzed by Cytochrome P450 Enzymes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2007, 1770, 314–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.(a) Harvey AL; Edrada-Ebel F; Quinn RJ The Re-Emergence of Natural Products for Drug Discovery in the Genomics Era. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2015, 14, 111–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Walsh CT; Fischbach MA Natural Products Version 2.0: Connecting Genes to Molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2010, 132, 2469–2493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Zhang MM; Qiao Y; Ang EL; Zhao H Using Natural Products for Drug Discovery: The Impact of the Genomics Era. Expert Opin. Drug Discovery 2017, 12, 475–487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.(a) Meunier B; de Visser SP; Shaik S Mechanism of Oxidation Reactions Catalyzed by Cytochrome P450 Enzymes. Chem. Rev 2004, 104, 3947–3980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Nelson DR Cytochrome P450 Diversity in the Tree of Life. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Proteins Proteom 2018, 1866, 141–154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pyser JB; Chakrabarty S; Romero EO; Narayan ARH State-of-the-Art Biocatalysis. ACS Cent. Sci 2021, 7, 1105–1116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.(a) Fasan R Tuning P450 Enzymes as Oxidation Catalysts. ACS Catal 2012, 2, 647–666. [Google Scholar]; (b) Li Z; Jiang Y; Guengerich FB; Ma L; Li S; Zhang W Engineering Cytochrome P450 Enzymes for Biomedical and Biotechnological Applications. J. Biol. Chem 2019, 295, 833–849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Stout CN; Wasfy N; Chen F; Renata H Charting the Evolution of Chemoenzymatic Strategies in the Syntheses of Complex Natural Products. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2023, 145, 18161–18181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Wu S; Snajdrova R; Moore JC; Baldenius K; Bornscheuer UT Biocatalysis: Enzymatic Synthesis for Industrial Applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2020, 60, 88–119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.(a) Li F; Deng H; Renata H Remote B-Ring Oxidation of Sclareol with an Engineered P450 Facilitates Divergent Access to Complex Meroterpenoids. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2022, 144, 7616–7621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Li F; Renata H A Chiral-Pool-Based Strategy to Access Trans-Syn-Fused Drimane Meroterpenoids: Chemoenzymatic Total Synthesis of Polysin, N-Acetyl-Polyveoline, and the Chrodrimanins. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2022, 144, 18280–18286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Li F; Chen F; Renata H Concise Chemoenzymatic Synthesis of Gedunin. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2022, 144, 19238–19242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Li J; Li F; King-Smith E; Renata H Merging Chemoenzymatic and Radical-Based Retrosynthetic Logic for Rapid and Modular Synthesis of Oxidized Meroterpenoids. Nat. Chem 2020, 12, 173–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Loskot SA; Romney DK; Arnold FH; Stoltz BM Enantioselective Total Synthesis of Nigelladine A via Late-Stage C–H Oxidation Enabled by an Engineered P450 Enzyme. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 109, 10196–10199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Zhang X; King-Smith E; Dong L-B; Yang L-C; Rudolf JD; Shen B; Renata H Divergent Synthesis of Complex Diterpenes Through a Hybrid Oxidative Approach. Science 2020, 369, 799–806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.(a) Chen K; Huang X; Kan JSB; Zhang RK; Arnold FH Enzymatic Construction of Highly Strained Carbocycles. Science 2018, 360, 71–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Zhang RK; Chen K; Huang X; Wohlschlager L; Renata H; Arnold FH Enzymatic Assembly of Carbon–Carbon Bonds via Iron-Catalysed sp3 C–H Functionalization. Nature 2019, 603, 67–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zetzsche LE; Yazarians JA; Chakrabarty S; Hinze ME; Murray LAM; Lukowski AL; Joyce LA; Narayan ARH Biocatalytic Oxidative Cross-Coupling Reactions for Biaryl Bond Formation. Nature 2022, 603, 79–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.(a) Aldemir H; Shu S; Schaefers F; Hong H; Richarz R; Harteis S; Einsiedler M; Milzarek TM; Schneider S; Gulder TAM Carrier Protein-Free Enzymatic Biaryl Coupling in Arylomycin A2 Assembly and Structure of the Cytochrome P450 AryC. Chem. Eur. J 2022, 28, e202103389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Molinaro C; Kawasaki Y; Wanyoike G; Nishioka T; Yamamoto T; Snedecor B; Robinson SJ; Gosselin F Engineered Cytochrome P450-Catalyzed Oxidative Biaryl Coupling Provides a Scalable Entry into Arylomycin Antibiotics. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2022, 144, 14838–14845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.(a) Glawischnig E; Hansen BG; Olsen CE; Halkier BA Camalexin is Synthesized From Indole-3-Acetaldoxime, a Key Branching Point Between Primary and Secondary Metabolism in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 8245–8250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Klein AP; Anarat-Cappillino G; Sattely ES Minimum Set of Cytochromes P450 for Reconstituting the Biosynthesis of Camalexin, a Major Arabidopsis Antibiotic. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2013, 52, 13625–13628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Mucha S; Heinzlmeir S; Kriechbaumer V; Strickland B; Kirchhelle C; Choudary M; Kowalski N; Eichmann R; Hückelhoven R; Grill E; Kuster B; Glawischnig E The Formation of a Camalexin Biosynthetic Metabolon. Plant Cell 2019, 31, 2697–2710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Klein AP; Sattely ES Two Cytochromes P450 Catalyze S-Heterocyclizations in Cabbage Phytoalexin Biosynthesis. Nat. Chem. Biol 2015, 11, 837–839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shi Y; Jiang Z; Hu X; Hu X; Gu R; Jiang B; Zuo L; Li X; Sun H; Zhang C; Wang L; Wu L; Hong B The Cytochrome P450 Catalyzing C–S Bond Formation in S-Heterocyclization of Chuangxinmycin Biosynthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2021, 60, 15399–15404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.He F; Mori T; Morita I; Nakamura H; Alblova M; Hoshino S; Awakawa T; Abe I Molecular Basis for the P450-Catalyzed C–N Bond Formation in Indolactam Biosynthesis. Nat. Chem. Biol 2019, 15, 1206–1213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Morita I; Mori T; Mitsuhashi T; Hoshino S; Taniguchi Y; Kikuchi T; Nagae K; Nasu N; Fujita M; Ohwada T; Abe I Exploiting a C–N Bond Forming Cytochrome P450 Monooxygenase for C–S Bond Formation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2020, 132, 4017–4022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chen K; Zhang S-Q; Brandenberg OF; Hong X; Arnold FH Alternate Heme Ligation Steers Activity and Selectivity in Engineered Cytochrome P450-Catalyzed Carbene-Transfer Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 16402–16407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bartz QR; Standiford J; Mold FR; Johannessen DW; Ryder A; Maretzki A; Haskell TH Griseoviridin and Viridogrisein: Isolation and Characterization. Antibiotics. Ann 1955, 1954, 777–783. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mast Y; Wohlleben W Streptogramins – Two Are Better Than One! Int. J. Med. Microbiol 2014, 304, 44–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Beyer D; Pepper K The Streptogramin Antibiotics: Update on Their Mechanism of Action. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 1998, 7, 591–599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.(a) Delgado G; Neuhauser MM; Bearden DT; Danziger LH Quinupristin-Dalfopristin: An Overview. Pharmacotherapy 2000, 20, 1469–1485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Moellering RC; Linken PK; Reinhardt J; Blumberg EA; Bompart F; Talbot GH The Efficacy and Safety of Quinupristin/Dalfopristin for the Treatment of Infections Caused by Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium. Synercid Emergency-Use Study Group. J. Antimicrob. Chemother 1999, 44, 92–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Xie Y; Li Q; Song Y; Ma J; Ju J Involvement of SgvP in Carbon–Sulfur Bond Formation During Griseoviridin Biosynthesis. ChemBioChem 2014, 15, 1183–1189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dvorak CA; Schmitz WD; Poon D,J; Pryde DC; Lawson JP; Amos RA; Meyers AI The Synthesis of Streptogramin Antibiotics: (–)-Griseoviridin and Its C-8 Epimer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2000, 39, 1665–1666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.(a) Meyers AI; Amos RA Studies Directed Toward the Total Synthesis of Streptogramin Antibiotics. Enantiospecific Approach to the Nine-Membered Macrocycle of Griseoviridin. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1980, 102, 870–872. [Google Scholar]; (b) Butera J; Rini J; Helquist P Synthesis of α-Carbalkoxy Enethiols: A Class of Tautomeric Thiopyruvate Derivatives. Application to Griseoviridin. J. Org. Chem 1985, 50, 3676–3678. [Google Scholar]; (c) Liu L; Tanke RS; Miller MJ Electrophilic Sulfur Transfer Reactions in Organic Synthesis. Preparation of a Diastereomer of the Key Macrocyclic Component of Griseoviridin. J. Org. Chem 1986, 51, 5332–5337. [Google Scholar]; (d) Marcantoni E; Massaccesi M; Petrini M; Bartoli G; Belluci MC; Bosco M; Sambri L A Novel Route to the Vinyl Sulfide Nine-Membered Macrocycle Moiety of Griseoviridin. J. Org. Chem 2000, 65, 4553–4559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Kuligowski C; Bezzenine-Lafollée S; Chaum G; Mahuteau J; Barrière J-C; Bacqué E; Pancrazi A; Ardisson J Approach Toward the Total Synthesis of Griseoviridin: Formation of Thioethynyl and Thiovinyl Ether-Containing Nine-Membered Lactones through a Thioalkynylation-Macrolactonization-Hydrostannylation Sequence. J. Org. Chem 2002, 67, 4565–4568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Moreau X; Campagne J-M Approaches Toward the Total Synthesis of the Nine-Membered Thio-Lactone Core of Griseoviridin. J. Org. Chem 2003, 68, 5346–5350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Xie Y; Wang B; Liu J; Zhou J; Ma J; Huang H; Ju J Identification of the Biosynthetic Gene Cluster and Regulatory Cascade for the Synergistic Antibacterial Antibiotics Griseoviridin and Viridogrisein in Streptomyces griseoviridis. ChemBioChem 2012, 13, 2745–2757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Li Q; Chen Y; Zhang G; Zhang H Structural Analysis of SgvP Involved in Carbon–Sulfur Bond Formation During Griseoviridin Biosynthesis. FEBS Lett 2017, 591, 1295–1304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.(a) Li Q; Seiple IB Modular, Scalable Synthesis of Group A Streptogramin Antibiotics. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 13304–13307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Li Q; Pellegrino J; Lee DJ; Tran AA; Chaires HA; Wang R; Park JE; Ji K; Chow D; Zhang N; Brilot AF; Biel JT; van Zundert G; Borrelli K; Shinabarger D; Wolfe C; Murray B; Jacobson MP; Mühle E; Chesneau O; Fraser JS; Seiple IB Synthetic Group A Streptogramin Antibiotics that Overcome Vat Resistance. Nature 2020, 586, 145–150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Okazoe T; Takai K; Utimoto K (E)-Selective Olefination of Aldehydes by Means of gem-Dichromium Reagents Derived by Reduction of gem-Diiodoalkanes with Chromium(II) Chloride. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1987, 109, 951–953. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.(a) Tortosa M; Yakelis NA; Roush WR Total Synthesis of (+)-Superstolide A. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130, 2722–2723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Dieckmann M; Kretschmer M; Li P; Rudolph S; Herkommer D; Menche D Total Synthesis of Rhizopodin. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2012, 51, 5667–5670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Greenberg JA; Sammakia T The Conversion of tert-Butyl Esters to Acid Chlorides Using Thionyl Chloride. J. Org. Chem 2017, 82, 3245–3251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.(a) Kumar P; Gupta P; Naidu SV A Simple and Efficient Approach to 1,3-Polyols: Application to the Synthesis of Cryptocarya Diacetate. Chem. Eur. J 2006, 12, 1397–1402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Rideau E; You H; Sidera M; Claridge TDW; Fletcher SP Mechanistic Studies on a Cu-Catalyzed Asymmetric Allylic Alkylation with Cyclic Racemic Starting Materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 5614–5624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Farina V; Krishnan B Large Rate Accelerations in the Stille Reaction with Tri-2-Furylphosphine and Triphenylarsine as Palladium Ligands: Mechanistic and Synthetic Implications. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1991, 113, 9585–9595. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Fürstner A; Funel J-A; Tremblay M; Bouchez LC; Nevado C; Waser M; Ackerstaff J; Stimson CC A Versatile Protocol for Stille–Migita Cross Coupling Reactions. Chem. Commun 2008, 25, 2873–2875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Saridakis I; Kaiser D; Maulide N Unconventional Macrocyclizations in Natural Product Synthesis. ACS Cent. Sci 2020, 6, 1869–1889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dubowchik GM; Radia S Monomethoxytrityl (MMT) as a Versatile Amino Protecting Group for Complex Prodrugs of Anticancer Compounds Sensitive to Strong Acids, Bases and Nucleophiles. Tetrahedron Lett 1997, 38, 5257–5260. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.(a) Li S; Podust LM; Sherman DH Engineering and Analysis of a Self-Sufficient Biosynthetic Cytochrome P450 PikC Fused to the RhFRED Reductase Domain. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2007, 129, 12940–12941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Renata H Engineering Catalytically Self-Sufficient P450s. Biochemistry 2023, 62, 253–261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Thomas JG; Ayling A; Baneyx F Molecular Chaperones, Folding Catalysts, and the Recovery of Active Recombinant Proteins from E. coli: To Fold or to Refold. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol 1997, 66, 197–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.McLachlan MJ; Johannes TW; Zhao H Further Improvement of Phosphite Dehydrogenase Thermostability by Saturation Mutagenesis. Biotechnol. Bioeng 2008, 99, 268–274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zallot R,Z; Oberg N; Gerlt JA The EFI Web Resource for Genomic Enzymology Tools: Leveraging Protein, Genome, and Metagenome Databases to Discover Novel Enzymes and Metabolic Pathways. Biochemistry 2019, 58, 4169–4182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rudolf JD; Dong L-B; Zhang X; Renata H; Shen B Cytochrome P450-Catalyzed Hydroxylation Initiating Ether Formation in Platensimycin Biosynthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 12349–12353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Birnbaum GI; Hall SR Structure of the Antibiotic Griseoviridin. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1976, 98, 1926–1931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.For a seminal example of this type of study, see Udwary DW; Casillas LK; Townsend CA Synthesis of 11-Hydroxyl O-Methylsterigmatocystin and the Role of Cytochrome P-450 in the Final Step of Aflatoxin Biosynthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2002, 124, 5294–5303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

RESOURCES