ABSTRACT
Premature ovarian failure (POF) affects 1–3.5% of women under 40 years of age, characterized by irreversible depletion of the follicular pool and decline in oocyte quality, with its pathogenesis remaining incompletely understood. Current mainstream therapies, such as hormone replacement therapy, only alleviate symptoms, fail to reverse the underlying functional decline, and carry long-term risks, necessitating the exploration of novel strategies targeting the etiology. This review systematically dissects the central role of epigenetic regulation in POF. First, DNA methylation governs female reproductive lifespan by reprogramming the dormant-activation balance of primordial follicles and maintaining epigenetic memory in oocytes. Second, histone modification homeostasis determines ovarian endocrine function by influencing granulosa cell senescence and steroid hormone synthesis. Additionally, non-coding RNAs form regulatory hubs by constructing competing endogenous RNA networks that integrate oxidative stress and developmental signaling pathways. These mechanisms provide new insights into the pathological basis of POF, identify potential biomarkers, and offer a theoretical framework for deciphering targeted intervention strategies and developing precision epigenetic therapies to delay POF progression.
KEYWORDS: Premature ovarian failure (POF), epigenetic regulation, DNA methylation, histone acetylation, non-coding RNA
Keypolicy highlights
Promote precision diagnostics using blood-based epigenetic biomarkers like cfDNA methylation and exosomal ncRNAs for early detection.
Support targeted gene therapies by editing or modulating epigenetic mutations.
Explore synergistic therapeutic regimens integrating epigenetic drugs with hormone therapy and antioxidants.
Leverage advanced technologies like single-cell multi-omics and organoid models to predict environment-epigenetic interactions and guide interventions.
Introduction
The ovary, as the core gonadal organ, houses follicles – the non-renewable functional units whose dormant-activation balance directly determines female fertility [1]. Follicular development is a result of multi-factor regulation from intrinsic to extrinsic cues, where the accumulation of pathogenic genetic information and epigenetic disorders collectively play pivotal roles [2]. Epigenetic regulation, one of the core mechanisms governing premature ovarian failure (POF), primarily encompasses DNA methylation, histone modification, and non-coding RNA (ncRNA) regulation [3]. Among these, DNA methylation – a key epigenetic modification – involves reversible addition/removal of methyl groups at the 5’ carbon position of cytosine in CpG islands, catalysed by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) and demethylases (TET). Without altering the DNA sequence, this process regulates gene expression by modifying DNA methylation levels, thereby inducing heritable changes [4,5]. In primordial follicles, DNA methylation levels are relatively low but gradually increase during folliculogenesis, with de novo establishment of specific DNA methylomes occurring during the transition from primary oocytes to secondary follicles [6]. Furthermore, DNA methylation-related molecular biomarkers can serve as indicators for assessing reproductive aging [7]. Histone acetylation, as a dynamic epigenetic modification, also plays a critical role by regulating chromatin conformation and transcriptional processes, and is actively involved in mammalian oocyte maturation [8]. Histone acetylation-modifying enzymes are essential for primordial follicle activation, follicular development, and the maintenance of fertility [9]. However, persistent histone acetylation may lead to reduced gene transcription and ovulatory defects [10]. Thus, histone acetylation not only functions as a key regulator in maintaining reproductive aging homeostasis but also represents a promising therapeutic target for age-related reproductive disorders [11,12]. Furthermore, non-coding (nc)RNAs exert pivotal roles in follicular activation, ovarian function maintenance, and decline by modulating the expression of key folliculogenesis-related genes, redox homeostasis, and the integration of sex hormone-signaling axes [13]. Given the urgent need to extend female reproductive lifespan in an aging society, the current first-line therapy, Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT), has significant limitations, This review systematically elucidates how epigenetic reprogramming influences ovarian aging through the regulation of follicular development dynamics (activation-atresia balance), reproductive endocrine homeostasis, and oocyte quality maintenance, thereby providing novel perspectives for developing targeted intervention strategies.
Premature ovarian failure: an urgent frontier in ovarian health research
POF is a disorder characterized by premature decline of ovarian function before the age of 40, marked by reduced primordial follicles, declining oocyte quality, and abnormal female hormone secretion [14]. Common symptoms include menstrual abnormalities, perimenopausal syndrome, and reduced or even lost fertility [15]. Additionally, patients with POF are prone to multiple complications, significantly affecting their quality of life [16]. Despite extensive research, the etiology and pathological mechanisms of POF remain unclear. The reported non-iatrogenic prevalence has increased from 1% in earlier studies to 3.5% in recent data, with a shift toward earlier onset. This trend highlights its characterization as a complex, multifactorial process [17]. POF may be associated with genomic inheritance [18,19], immune system disorders [20], external environmental factors, and lifestyle disruptions [21]. Currently, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) serves as the primary first-line treatment, supplementing hormones to act on target organs and mimic the physiological cycle. However, it fails to effectively restore ovarian function, with the condition prone to recurrence after discontinuation. Long-term use may increase the risk of breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancers [22]. Given the complexity and irreversibility of POF, exploring its pathogenesis and treatment strategies holds significant applied value and scientific significance.
Association between DNA methylation and POF
DNA methylation in folliculogenesis and meiosis
Genomic methylation undergoes two reprogramming stages during primordial germ cell (PGCs) formation and early embryonic implantation, involving dynamic reconstruction of global demethylation and de novo methylation [23]. During the window of PGC formation, DNA methylation levels are relatively high. By the sixth week of embryogenesis, PGCs enter meiosis via mitosis and arrest in the prophase diplotene stage, ultimately differentiating into primordial follicles with a hypomethylated state. During follicular development in adolescence (particularly during the transition from primordial follicles [FGOs] to secondary follicles), a specific DNA methylation pattern is reconstructed. In the late stage of follicular development, CpG islands undergo widespread methylation, and FGOs exhibit a bimodal cluster methylation distribution [24]. During late oogenesis, germinal vesicle (GV)-stage oocytes undergo chromatin remodelling, transitioning from the non-surrounded nucleolus (NSN) to the surrounded nucleolus (SN) configuration. This structural reorganization is coupled with dynamic DNA methylation reprogramming mediated by Tet enzymes. These epigenetic modifications not only regulate transcriptional silencing in GV oocytes but also establish specific methylation patterns critical for early embryonic developmental competence [25]. Using an ovarian holding (OH) stress model, our study demonstrated that moderate OH stress (37°C, 1 h) enhances normal NSN-to-SN transition. This process is accompanied by optimized histone modifications and improved oocyte competence, indicating that oocyte functionality is directly linked to the integrity of epigenetic reprogramming. Notably, the mere acquisition of SN morphology does not guarantee developmental potential [26]. Notably, this precise regulatory network is disrupted during aging, characterized by aberrant hypermethylation in primordial follicles and impaired methylation establishment at the FGO stage. These epigenetic aberrations lead to dysregulated follicular activation and diminished oocyte quality. Age-related alterations in leukocyte telomere length and blood methylome profiles possibly correlate with reproductive function. These systemic biomarkers may help delineate phenotypic signatures in females experiencing reproductive decline, potentially serving as quantifiable indicators of reproductive aging [27,28].
DNA methylation modifiers in oocyte development
DNA methylation, as a crucial epigenetic modification, participates in regulating gene expression networks through its dynamic establishment and precise control. This process is primarily coordinated by DNMTs and TET family proteins, which constitute a ‘molecular switch’ for DNA methylation homeostasis by catalysing the addition and removal of methyl groups, respectively [29]. In mammals, DNMT family members (including DNMT1, DNMT3A, DNMT3B, and DNMT3L) collectively regulate DNA methylation patterns during development through division of labour. DNMT1 is primarily responsible for maintaining existing methylation marks, while DNMT3A and DNMT3B mediate de novo methylation processes [30]. Recent studies have revealed dynamic expression patterns of these methylation-modifying enzymes during oocyte development. Researchers, such as Fatma Uysal, systematically compared the spatiotemporal expression profiles of DNMT family members in oocytes (GV and MII stages) and early embryos across different mammalian species (mouse, cow, and human). The expression levels and subcellular localization of these enzymes exhibit significant species specificity, developmental stage dependency, and are influenced by factors such as in vitro culture conditions and maternal aging [31]. Significant transcriptomic differences and cellular interactions have been noted between oocytes and granulosa cells (GCs) during follicular development in mice. Notably, maternal DNA methylation- or H3K27me3-imprinted genes exhibit cell-type-specific expression patterns, being actively expressed in GCs but silenced in oocytes. This phenomenon suggests that DNA methylation-related enzymes may participate in follicular development regulation by establishing cell-specific epigenetic marks [32]. Zhou’s research [33] further elucidates the molecular mechanism of DNMT1 in granulosa cells. DNMT1 indirectly regulates the expression level of aromatase CYP19A1 by maintaining the methylation status of the long-noncoding (lnc)RNA IFFD promoter region, thereby inhibiting granulosa cell apoptosis, influencing oestrogen secretion, and ultimately regulating follicular development. Under conditions involving aging and oxidative stress, Dnmt1 promotes methylation of the Sp1 binding site in the LEDGF gene promoter CpG island, suppressing the expression of LEDGF and its target Hsp27, leading to reactive oxygen species (ROS) amplification and cellular damage. These findings elucidate its role in aging via the regulation of ROS [34]. These findings provide new insights into the regulatory network of DNA methylation-modifying enzymes in female germ cell development.
Regulatory factors that specifically bind to methylated DNA
Cullin-RING Ubiquitin Ligase 4 (CRL4) plays a critical role in maintaining oocyte viability and regulating meiotic progression. Yu et al. [35] demonstrated that the E3 ligase DCAF13 of CRL4 regulates oocyte meiosis and maturation by modulating DNA, serving as a key determinant of female fertility. CRL4-DCAF13 interacts with the histone methyltransferase SUV39H1; polyubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of the CRL4 complex lead to rapid oocyte loss, subsequent POF, and silencing of genes essential for fertility maintenance [36]. Damage-specific DNA-binding protein 1 (DDB1), as the adaptor protein of CRL4, acts in concert with the CRL4-associated factor VPRBP (a substrate adaptor of CRL4). VPRBP regulates DNA methylation, sustains oocyte survival, and promotes genomic reprogramming. The complex formed by these components is vital for oocyte development; oocyte-specific deletion of DDB1 or VPRBP alters epigenetic landscapes and delays meiotic resumption [37]. Methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MeCP2), an epigenetic regulator that specifically binds to methylated DNA, causes transcriptional dysregulation, DNA hypermethylation, and genomic instability upon overexpression in growing oocytes, ultimately leading to follicular growth arrest and apoptosis. Zhang et al. [38] found that MeCP2 is abundantly expressed in primordial and primary follicles but undetectable in secondary follicles. Compared with young ovaries, the levels of MeCP2 in oocytes and GCs of aged ovaries demonstrate a significant increase. MeCP2 was identified as a substrate of DCAF13 for recognition and targeted degradation via analyses including reduced representation bisulphite sequencing and RNA sequencing. This mechanism prevents DNA hypermethylation in growing oocytes and maintains normal transcription, indicating that the DCAF13-MeCP2 axis is involved in the regulation of ovarian function. The association between DNA methylation regulators (e.g., DNMTs, TETs) and POF pathogenesis is summarized in Table 1, highlighting key regulatory genes and their functional roles.
Table 1.
The relationships between DNA methylation regulators and POF.
| DNA Methylation Regulators | The Relationship with POF | Ref. |
|---|---|---|
| Dnmt1 | Maintain DNA methylation patterns; participate in oocyte maturation; associate with oocyte apoptosis and autophagy. | [39–41] |
| Dnmt3A | Participate in de novo DNA methylation; engage in oocyte maturation; elevated expression may inhibit cell apoptosis. | [39,40,42] |
| Dnmt3B | Participate in de novo DNA methylation. | [39] |
| Dnmt3L | Differential Expression Patterns and Subcellular Localization in GV vs. MII Oocytes. | [43] |
| TET | Dysregulation of activity is associated with various ovarian diseases; reduced expression may inhibit oocyte apoptosis. | [44,45] |
| UHRF1 | Methylation levels in oocytes are significantly reduced in UHRF1 knockout mice. | [46] |
| DCAF13 | Participate in DNA methylation-mediated regulation of oocyte meiosis and maturation. | [35] |
| DDB1 | Forming a complex with CRL4-associated factor VPRBP is critical for oocyte development. | [37] |
| CRL4-DCAF13 | Interact with the histone methyltransferase SUV39H1 to maintain oocyte viability. | [36] |
| MeCP2 | Prevent DNA hypermethylation and maintain normal transcription in growing oocytes. | [38] |
| Stella | Ensure low methylation levels in the genome of mature oocytes. | [47] |
DNA methylation is involved in the pathogenesis of POF
The hypothalamus, pituitary, and gonads form the HPG axis through hierarchical regulation. The core function of this neuroendocrine system is to integrate neural input signals and coordinate reproductive development and homeostasis via pulsatile hormone release (e.g., GnRH, FSH/LH, sex steroid hormones) [48]. Aberrant DNA methylation of key genes in this axis (e.g., sf-1, cyp19a1a, GnRH) – such as promoter hypermethylation induced by arsenic exposure or hypoxia – can disrupt sex hormone synthesis (e.g., reduced E2 and 11-ketotestosterone [11-KT] levels) through epigenetic silencing. This disrupts the positive and negative feedback loops of the HPG axis, ultimately leading to POF [49,50]. Additionally, environmental pollutant exposure-induced alterations in DNA methylation patterns play a critical role in the pathogenesis of POF. Female rodents exposed to non-toxic concentrations of uranium for nine months exhibited significant changes in ovarian DNMT1 and DNMT3a/b expression, along with global DNA hypomethylation [51]. Exposure to lead or herbicides disrupted the activity and expression patterns of DNMTs in zebrafish [52–54]. In mice exposed to varying concentrations of cadmium, MeRIP-qPCR and microarray analyses revealed a close association between DNA methylation and the differentiation of embryonic stem cells into ovarian GCs [55,56]. Collectively, these animal studies demonstrate that changes in DNA methylation levels drive ovarian functional abnormalities. Clinical research has also confirmed the link between DNA methylation and disease: DNA methylation regulates gene activation or silencing, and alterations in its expression or patterns increase genomic instability, thereby predisposing to disease [57]. Somayeh et al. [21] found that women’s use of plastic containers alters methylation signatures in cumulus cell genes and proteins, with follicular fluid bisphenol A (BPA) concentrations correlating with poor ovarian response. With patient informed consent, GC samples were collected from a reproductive medicine center during in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI) treatments. Downregulation of the demethylase FTO increases m6A levels in senescent GCs, while FTO-knockout GCs exhibit faster senescence-associated phenotypes. Hence, FTO may serve as a potential therapeutic target for ovarian aging by acting as an m6A-mediated senescence-delaying protein [58,59]. In summary, environmental, dietary, and lifestyle factors influence DNA methylation, which may, in turn, induce cellular, tissue, and organ aging.
DNA methylation is associated with stem cell-mediated ovarian function repair
The characteristic pathological changes of ovarian aging include tissue structure atrophy, loss of germ cell regenerative capacity, and functional degradation, making targeted DNA methylation regulation a new strategy. Stem cell therapy, with its multipotent differentiation potential and paracrine effects, has demonstrated the ability to repair ovarian structure, restore hormonal balance, and promote follicle development in animal models, emerging as a research hotspot in regenerative medicine [60,61]. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) and hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), with their multipotent differentiation potential and ability to secrete various cytokines, hold promise as novel therapeutic tools for reversing POF [62]. Multiple studies have confirmed the therapeutic effects of stem cells on POF and their association with DNA methylation. Derany et al. [63] found that epigenetic regulation of signaling pathways, such as TGF-β, Wnt/β-catenin, and Hippo in BM-MSCs, modulates follicular apoptosis and proliferation, contributing to therapeutic effects in radiation-induced POF. Kim et al. [64] demonstrated that repeated transplantation of human placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hPD-MSCs) into aged rats improved ovarian function and promoted follicular resuscitation by regulating DNA methylation expression. Tian et al. [65] established a co-culture system of BM-MSCs and aged GC models, revealing a novel mechanism of m6A methylation modification levels in BM-MSCs during the reversal of GC senescence. As a key regulatory layer for stem cell lineage specification, elucidating the role of DNA methylation in the mechanism of stem cell-mediated ovarian repair may enhance the potential of stem cell therapy for ovarian aging [66].
Association between histone acetylation and POF
Histone acetylation is crucial factor in follicular development
A close relationship between histone acetylation and follicular development and function has been noted. Enhancers exist in mouse oocytes, which play a key role in the transcriptional regulation of follicular development, and specific histone acetylation modifications are involved in enhancer regulation [67]. Researchers performed mass spectrometry analysis on GC samples from patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and non-PCOS controls. The results showed 410 differentially acetylated modification sites in the PCOS group, of which 265 proteins exhibited increased acetylation levels and 68 had decreased levels. Changes in lysine acetylation of key enzymes in GCs may affect oocyte maturation and metabolic homeostasis in the follicular microenvironment [68]. In oocytes, histone acetylation mainly occurs at lysine residues of H3 and H4 subunits and changes dynamically with meiosis. Treating oocytes with different concentrations of trichostatin A (TSA) can promote H3K9 acetylation levels, thereby weakening the meiotic process of oocytes [69]. Immunofluorescence showed that mouse GV-stage oocytes had high acetylation of H4K12 lysine, which decreased at germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD) and disappeared at metaphase II (MII) [70]. H4K5ac, H4K8ac, and H4K16ac signals were strongly enriched in the GV stage, and acetylation was retained to varying degrees in metaphase I (MI) and MII oocytes. Kinetic studies of histone acetylation at specific sites, such as H3K9, H4K12, H4K5, H4K8, and H4K16, have shown that oocyte development is accompanied by changes in acetylation levels, and histone modifications are key epigenetic regulators of oocyte growth [71].
Histone acetylation-modifying enzymes are involved in the process of oocyte development
Histone acetylation and deacetylation play critical and mutually balancing roles in oocyte development. Histone acetylation promotes the formation of loose chromatin structures, facilitating gene expression and providing a material basis for early oocyte development, whereas histone deacetylation is essential for chromatin condensation and the normal progression of oocyte meiosis. This dynamic balance is jointly regulated by histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs) [72]. HATs include three subfamilies: GNAT, MYST, and p300/CBP. Lysine acetyltransferase 8 (KAT8), highly expressed in mouse GV oocytes, was the first HAT confirmed to significantly regulate follicular development in mice. Overexpression of KAT8 leads to abnormal mitochondrial distribution in oocytes, excessive production of ROS, and subsequent mitochondrial dynamic defects, redox imbalance, and spindle/chromosome disorders [73]. MYST4 protein accumulates in the nucleus of GV oocytes, whereas the p300 and CBP subfamilies are constitutively expressed in a gonadotropin-independent manner during follicular growth and ovulation, regulating follicular development by influencing hyaluronic acid synthesis and cumulus expansion [74].
HDACs are responsible for catalysing the deacetylation of histone lysine residues, categorized into 4 classes and 18 subtypes. Most subtypes are highly expressed in primordial follicles, regulating follicular activation, quiescence, development, and atresia. HDAC1 is expressed in both GCs and oocytes of growing follicles. Sustained expression regulates histone acetylation, influences gene transcriptional activity, and is critical for follicular growth and maturation [75]. HDAC2 maintains relatively stable expression during the follicular growth phase. In pre-ovulatory follicles, its phosphorylation activation synchronizes with histone deacetylation. Silencing or inhibiting HDAC2 leads to reduced gene transcription and ovulation defects [76]. HDAC3 participates in gonadotropin-mediated regulation of oocyte meiosis in granulosa cells. Before the LH surge, FOXO1 recruits HDAC3 to the Areg promoter region to inhibit oocyte maturation; after the LH surge, HDAC3 levels decrease, allowing oocytes to resume meiosis and ovulate [77]. HDAC8 is widely distributed in the cytoplasm of GV-stage oocytes and accumulates around chromosomes after GVBD. Inhibiting its activity causes spindle defects and chromosome misalignment during oocyte meiotic maturation. Panobinostat (PB), an HDAC inhibitor (HDACi) used in clinical cancer treatment, alters histone markers and reduces the number of follicles at all stages in mouse ovaries when administered at 5 mg/kg every other day [78]. The selective HDAC3 inhibitor RGFP966 suppresses HDAC3 activity, leading to hyperacetylation of α-tubulin during oocyte meiosis, which hinders cumulus cell expansion and oocyte meiotic progression [79]. HDAC6 forms complexes with TSC2, TGF-β, NGF, and BDNF, playing a critical role in the transition between primordial follicle quiescence and activation. High HDAC6 expression reduces NGF levels, increases the reserve of primordial follicles in mice, delays their activation, and extends reproductive lifespan, holding promise as a drug target for regulating primordial follicle in vitro activation [80]. Sirtuins (SIRT), NAD±dependent silent regulatory proteins, are crucial for maintaining reproductive aging homeostasis, with SIRT1, SIRT2, SIRT3, and SIRT6 promoting oocyte maturation [81]. HDAC11, the smallest member of the HDAC family, shows gradually decreased expression from the GV to MII stages in oocytes, and inhibiting its activity slows the oocyte maturation rate [82]. In summary, the synergistic action of HATs and HDACs establishes histone acetylation as a key component of the epigenetic modification network in mammalian oocytes. Histone acetylation regulators, including HATs and HDACs, demonstrate significant correlations with POF progression, as detailed in Table 2.
Table 2.
The relationship between histone acetylation regulators and POF.
| Histone acetylation regulators | The relationship with POF | Ref. |
|---|---|---|
| HDAC1 | It is expressed in both granulosa cells and oocytes of growing follicles, supporting follicular growth and maturation. | [75] |
| HDAC2 | Reduced gene transcription and ovulation defects occur when it is silenced or inhibited. | [76] |
| HDAC3 | It mediates the regulation of gonadotropins on the meiotic process of oocytes. | [77] |
| HDAC8 | It participates in the polar positioning of the spindle during oocyte meiosis. | [78] |
| HDAC6 | It controls the transition between the quiescent and activated states of primordial follicles. | [80] |
| HDAC11 | Inhibiting HDAC11 activity reduces the maturation rate of oocytes. | [82] |
| Sirtuins (SIRTs) |
Improves the capacity for oocyte maturation; participates in ovarian reserve, granulosa cell (GC) function, and oocyte maturation, etc. | [81,83] |
| SIRT1 | p53-SIRT1 mediates or activates the SIRT1/AKT signaling pathway to exert protective activity on damaged granulosa cells (GCs). | [84–86] |
| SIRT2 | It is involved in regulating spindle assembly during oocyte meiosis. | [87] |
| SIRT3 | It alleviates oxidative stress and enhances mitochondrial function in ovarian granulosa cells. | [88] |
| SIRT5 | It provides a basis for the treatment of POI through the protein expression of FOXO3a. | [89] |
| SIRT6 | Reducing the level of H3K9AC alleviates POF and reduces oxidative stress. | [90] |
| HATs | It regulates follicular development by influencing hyaluronic acid synthesis and cumulus expansion. | [74] |
| KAT8 | Overexpression induces mitochondrial dynamics defects, redox imbalance, and spindle/chromosome disorders in oocytes. | [73] |
Histone acetylation is involved in the onset of POF and treatment
In terms of the pathogenesis of POF, the impact of environmental factors on POF cannot be overlooked. Taking hexavalent chromium (Cr (VI)) as an example, studies from Sivakumar’s laboratory have shown that prenatal exposure to Cr (VI) leads to premature ovarian failure through an acetylation-p53-mediated pathway. In experiments with adult sows, normal drinking water and water containing Cr (VI) were administered during days 9.5–14.5 of pregnancy. Exposure to Cr (VI) in F1 offspring ovaries increased the apoptosis rate of germ cells and reduced the co-localization of acetyl-p53-SIRT1. These findings reveal a novel mechanism by which Cr (VI)-induced ovarian cell apoptosis is mediated by the p53-SIRT1 network [84] and underscore the importance of environmental factors affecting POF through histone acetylation. However, current research on environmental factors is relatively limited, and comprehensive investigations into the combined effects of diet, lifestyle, and other factors on histone acetylation in POF are needed in the future.
In the therapeutic research for POF, studies on female germline stem cells (FGSCs) have elucidated novel perspectives. Treatment of FGSCs with metformin modulates their activity via the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, with tumour necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 2 (Traf2) identified as a key target of histone 3 lysine 27 acetylation (H3K27ac) during FGSC proliferation. These findings suggest that metformin may exert therapeutic effects on POF through histone acetylation. Moreover, they highlight the potential for other pharmacological agents to influence POF progression via similar epigenetic mechanisms, although current research in this area remains limited [91]. Additionally, multiple substances have demonstrated potential therapeutic value. He et al. [85] found that compound J2 significantly improves the survival rate of GCs damaged by cisplatin, improves cell morphology, reduces apoptosis, and increases oestradiol (E2) levels. J2 exerts its effects by activating the SIRT1/AKT signaling pathway. Given that SIRT1 is characterized as an HDAC, J2 influences histone acetylation. Similarly, Chen et al. [86] found that Danggui Shaoyao San (DSS) upregulates SIRT1 expression and downregulates p53 expression, exerting anti-apoptotic, anti-oxidative stress, and ovarian protective effects. Moreover, SIRT6 reduces H3K9AC and p66SHC levels and weakens p66SHC promoter activity, and overexpression of p66SHC helps alleviate POF symptoms and reduce oxidative stress [90]. Kuntai Capsule (KTC) provides an experimental basis for the treatment of POI by regulating the protein expression of SIRT5 and FOXO3a [89]. These studies indicate that the close association between the SIRT family and histone acetylation through autophagy and oxidative stress is worthy of in-depth exploration. In summary, DNA methylation and histone acetylation regulate follicle formation, development, and meiosis processes (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

DNA methylation and histone acetylation regulation of follicle development and meiosis.
DNA methylation and histone acetylation synergistically influence germ cells
Interaction between DNMTs and HDACs
DNMTs and HDACs jointly regulate gene expression and demonstrate a bidirectional regulatory relationship. The transcriptional repression domain of Dnmt1 can recruit the HDACs, which indicates a more direct connection between DNA methylation and histone acetylation. The DNA methylation process mediated by DNMT1 May alter the chromatin state through the activity of HDACs [92]. Both DNMT1 and DNMT3a can bind to the histone methyltransferase SUV39H1, which restricts gene expression by methylating H3K9. The non-catalytic amino-terminal of DNMT1 binds to DNMT1-associated protein (DMAP1) and HDAC2 to jointly mediate transcriptional repression. During the S phase of DNA synthesis, DMAP1 interacts with the distal N-terminal of DNMT1 to bind to replication foci in a targeted manner, and HDAC2 joins in the late S phase to provide a platform for histone deacetylation in post-replication heterochromatin [93]. Both DNMT3A and DNMT3L contain an ATRX-DNMT3-DNMT3L (ADD) domain, which can recognize the unmethylated histone H3 tail lysine-4 (H3K4me0). Mutations in the DNMT3A-ADD or DNMT3L-ADD domain in germ cells will reduce the global CG methylation level to varying degrees [94].
Association between DNMTs with H3K4
Histone H3K4 is typically present in promoter regions, and H3K4me3 near it can prevent DNMT3A and DNMT3B from binding to DNA, thereby ensuring that the gene promoter region is not methylated. The gene is typically silenced upon promoter methylation. Abnormalities in H3K4 can increase the DNA methylation level in oocytes, which is an important factor leading to the abnormal developmental potential of oocytes [95]. In vivo experiments using chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis have shown that after the LH surge during ovulation, the levels of histone H4 acetylation (Ac-H4) and H3K4me3 in the steroidogenic acute regulatory (StAR) promoter increase, whereas the levels of H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 decrease; in the aromatase (Cyp19a1) promoter, the levels of Ac-H3, Ac-H4, and H3K4me3 decrease, whereas the level of H3K27me3 increases. These results confirm that DNA methylation and histone modifications jointly influence the expression of StAR and Cyp19a1 and are involved in regulating the chromatin structure of GC promoters during luteinization in ovulation in rats [96].
Synergistic regulation of Stella, UHRF1 with H3K9 and HDAC1
In 2018, a team of Chinese scientists discovered that DNA methylation regulates the gene Stella (also known as PCG7 or DPPA3). In somatic cells, overexpression of Stella leads to the formation of a complex with the DNA methylation regulator UHRF1, interfering with the maintenance of DNA methylation modifications during mitosis. In oocytes, high expression of Stella prevents the accumulation of UHRF1 in the nucleus, maintaining a low methylation level in the genome of mature eggs. After knocking out Stella, the DNA methylation level in oocytes of female mice increases abnormally, primarily in silent gene regions, which remarkably impairs egg quality and leads to infertility. The unique methylation profile of the maternal genome depends on the stability of unmethylated regions. The region with histone H3K9 dimethylation (H3K9me2) binds to Stella, which serves to protect these regions from the active demethylation mediated by TET3. Therefore, Stella is crucial in the overall DNA methylation and histone acetylation processes [47]. UHRF1, as a hemimethylated CG-binding protein, plays a critical role in maintaining DNA methylation by recruiting DNMT1 to hemimethylated CG sites. Oocytes from mice with UHRF1 knockout exhibit a significant reduction in methylation levels, highlighting its importance in maintaining oocyte methylation [46]. UHRF1 binds to histone H3K9me2/3 and is regulated by HDAC1. Acetylation of UHRF1 at K490 weakens its binding affinity to hemimethylated DNA. Mutating endogenous UHRF1 with acetylation mimics leads to DNA methylation defects in cells, indicating that precise regulation of UHRF1 acetylation is crucial for maintaining DNA methylation during cell division [97]. Table 3 reveals the distinct patterns of DNA methylation and histone acetylation dynamics across key developmental stages during oocyte maturation.
Table 3.
Stage-specific dynamics of DNA methylation and histone acetylation during oocyte maturation.
| Stage | Key DNA Methylation/Histone Acetylation Events | Key Regulators | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| GV | 1.Chromatin remodeling from the NSN to SN configuration is accompanied by dynamic DNA methylation reprogramming. 2. Dnmt3L exhibits species- and stage-specific expression patterns. 3. Increased DNMT1 and abnormal H4K5ac levels are observed in aged mouse oocytes. 4. Intense enrichment of H4K12ac, H4K5ac, H4K8ac, and H4K16ac signals. 5. High expression of KAT8 (MYST1). 6. Nuclear accumulation of MYST4. 7. Constitutive expression of p300/CBP. 8. Widespread cytoplasmic distribution of HDAC8. 9. HDAC11 expression gradually decreases from the GV to MII stage. |
Tet; Dnmt3L; DNMT1; KAT8; MYST4; p300/CBP; HDAC8; HDAC11 |
[25]; [31]; [70]; [71]; [73]; [74]; [82]; [98] |
| GVBD | 1. During dynamic changes in DNA methylation. 2. The level of H4K12ac decreases significantly. 3. HDAC8 aggregates from the cytoplasm to the perichromosomal region. 4. Inhibition of HDAC8 activity leads to spindle defects and chromosome misalignment. |
HDAC8 | [70]; [82] |
| MI | H4K5ac, H4K8ac, and H4K16ac show acetylation retention to varying degrees. | HDACs | [71] |
| MII | 1. Dnmt3L expression (levels/localization exhibit species and stage differences). 2. DNMTs expression shows significant species specificity and developmental stage dependence. 3. H4K12ac disappears. 4. H4K5ac, H4K8ac, and H4K16ac still retain acetylation to varying degrees. 5. HDAC11 expression continues to decrease. 6. Inhibition of HDAC11 activity slows down the maturation rate. |
Dnmt3L; DNMTs; HDAC11 |
[31]; [43]; [70]; [71]; [82] |
Relationship between the pathogenesis of POF and the crosstalk between DNA methylation and histone acetylation
Crosstalk between DNA methylation and histone acetylation is involved in the pathogenesis of POF
Epigenetic mechanisms of environmental exposure and age factors are closely associated with POF. Lactational exposure to Cr (VI) upregulates the expression of DNMT3a/3b and decreases the levels of H3K9ac/H3K27ac in the ovaries of F1 generation mice, leading to follicular apoptosis and developmental disorders [99]. The expression of host defense peptides (HDPs), as important components of the innate immune system, was induced by treating chicken macrophage cell lines with HDACi or DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTi) alone or in combination, reducing the risk of POF often caused by bacterial and inflammatory ovarian damage. This suggests that bacterial infections may regulate HDP expression through DNA methylation and histone acetylation, thereby influencing ovarian function [100]. In an obese mouse model (high-fat diet-induced obesity), obesity activates DNMTs through the cAMP/PKA/CREB pathway, leading to hypermethylation of oocytes and decreasing SIRT1 expression. Conversely, increasing endogenous SIRT1 expression and reducing p53 levels help reduce follicular apoptosis or atresia and maintain ovarian reserve [101,102]. Studies on GV-stage oocytes from young (10–13 weeks) and aged (69–70 weeks) mice have revealed epigenetic changes in aged oocytes, such as increased DNMT1, decreased MeCP2, and abnormal H4K5ac [98]. These findings indicate that obesity and aging affect follicular development potentially by mediating the interaction between DNA methylation and histone modifications, which jointly regulate gene expression and chromatin structure. Dysregulation of these modifications contributes to the pathogenesis of POF, as demonstrated in Figure 2.
Figure 2.

DNA methylation and histone acetylation dysregulation in POF pathogenesis.
Chemotherapeutic drugs can disrupt the ovarian microenvironment through multiple pathways, including inducing stromal fibrosis, angiogenesis disorders, immune dysfunction, oxidative stress imbalance, and stem cell depletion, thereby significantly damaging follicular quantity and quality. This represents one of the core intrinsic mechanisms mediating chemotherapy-associated ovarian damage (CAOD) and POF [103]. Cisplatin-induced POF is closely linked to abnormal DNA methylation. Treatment with DNMT inhibitor (5-Aza-dC) induces conservative global hypomethylation in BM-MSCs and their secretome, which can significantly restore hormonal levels in damaged ovaries, promote follicular development, and improve structural integrity. This therapeutic effect strongly confirms that abnormal DNA methylation is a key intrinsic mechanism of cisplatin-induced ovarian dysfunction [104]. Cyclophosphamide (CTX) inhibits the activity of histone methyltransferase EZH2, reducing the level of histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3), which leads to abnormal activation of pro-apoptotic and transcriptional regulatory genes and induces granulosa cell apoptosis. This finding reveals a new pathway by which chemotherapeutic drugs mediate ovarian damage through interfering with histone methylation [105]. CTX can also reduce the expression of SIRT1, leading to excessive acetylation of the key transcription factor Foxo3a, thereby activating downstream pro-apoptotic pathways (such as PI3K/AKT) and ultimately damaging ovarian reserve function. This indicates that disrupting acetylation homeostasis is an intrinsic mechanism by which CTX mediates POF [106]. In addition, other chemotherapeutic drugs damage the ovaries through mechanisms not dominated by epigenetics. The combined use of cyclophosphamide/busulfan (CY/BUS) induces local and systemic immune disorders in the ovaries and activates the p53/p21/p16 cellular senescence pathway, leading to ovarian structural damage and functional failure [107]. Procarbazine causes follicular oocyte damage and ovarian reserve depletion by directly activating the oocyte apoptosis pathway, inducing local ovarian inflammatory responses, and inhibiting the antioxidant system [108]. Notably, although CY/BUS and procarbazine do not directly focus on DNA methylation or histone acetylation, future studies should explore whether the aforementioned immune disorders, cellular senescence, apoptosis, inflammation, and oxidative stress pathways are regulated by upstream epigenetic modifications to more comprehensively elucidate the complex network of chemotherapy-induced POF. The effects of chemotherapeutic agents on POF, DNA methylation, and histone acetylation are shown in Table 4.
Table 4.
Epigenetic effects of chemotherapeutic agents inducing POF.
| Chemotherapeutic Agent | Primary Pathway to POF | Effect on DNA Methylation | Effect on Histone Acetylation | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cisplatin | Disruption of ovarian microenvironment | Induces global/site-specific hypomethylation | Not directly mentioned | [104] |
| CTX | Disruption of ovarian microenvironment | Not directly mentioned | Inhibits SIRT1 → Foxo3a hyperacetylation; Inhibits EZH2 → H3K27me3 ↓ | [105,106] |
| CY/BUS | Immune dysregulation, activation of p53/p21/p16 senescence pathway | Not directly mentioned | Not directly mentioned | [107] |
| Procarbazine | Activation of oocyte apoptosis pathways, induction of inflammation, suppression of antioxidant system | Not directly mentioned | Not directly mentioned | [108] |
Intrinsic mechanism underlying crosstalk between DNA methylation and histone acetylation in POF
Researchers used a dihydrotestosterone (DHT)-induced prenatal androgenization (PNA) mouse model and performed methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) sequencing and methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) validation on ovarian samples. The results showed that 857 gene promoter regions in PNA mice were methylated to varying degrees, with downregulated Dnmt1 expression and global hypomethylation. Furthermore, increased LC3II protein expression and autophagosomes in GCs were observed, accompanied by significantly enhanced mRNA expression of the genes associated with the MAPK/p53 pathway and the autophagy-related gene Becn1. This suggests that DHT alters DNA methylation levels, possibly linked to the activation of autophagic processes [41]. As a key regulator of apoptosis, p53 is involved in primordial follicle atresia. SIRT1, SIRT2, and SIRT3 inhibit p53 expression by regulating its acetylation level, reducing follicular apoptosis and atresia to maintain ovarian reserve. Inhibition of T-LAK cell-originated protein kinase suppresses GC apoptosis by regulating the p53/SIRT1 axis, playing a critical role in ovarian follicle development [109]. Studies have confirmed the association between DNA methylation and p53 activity, and the regulation of histone deacetylase SIRT1 also influences p53 expression. Thus, modulating p53 has been hypothesized to impact the expression patterns of DNA methylation and histone acetylation, thereby regulating follicular growth and development. Abnormal genomic methylation in embryonic stem cells (ESCs) hinders the differentiation and therapeutic application of their derivatives. Research has found that Sirt1 protein inhibits Dnmt3L transcription and interacts with Dnmt3L protein to deacetylate and destabilize it. By antagonizing Dnmt3L, Sirt1 selectively prevents abnormal DNA methylation of partial developmental genes in mouse ESCs [110].
Oxidative stress is a critical factor affecting oocyte quality. Gene expression differences primarily stem from DNA methylation. In aged human oocytes, mitochondrial dysfunction associated with GC senescence leads to increased ROS production in mice.Female mouse cells generate more ROS and have fewer antioxidant substances, rendering them more susceptible to oxidative stress damage. Exposure of cells to DNMTi can block methylation-induced gene expression differences [111]. The SIRT family plays a key role in genome maintenance, metabolism, and aging, participating in regulating physiological processes such as ovarian reserve and follicle development [83]. SIRT2 is primarily located in the cytoplasm and regulates spindle assembly and chromosome segregation during oocyte meiosis. A low acetylation level of spindle assembly checkpoint protein 1 (BubR1) reduces the incidence of spindle assembly errors and chromosome segregation abnormalities in oocytes, improving egg quality [87]. SIRT3 is mainly localized in mitochondria and serves as an important mitochondrial deacetylase; its deficiency accelerates ovarian aging. The SIRT pathway can mitigate oxidative stress damage, enhance mitochondrial function, protect against cisplatin-induced apoptosis of ovarian granulosa cells, maintain ovarian peroxide levels, promote follicle development, and delay ovarian aging [88]. Therefore, oxidative stress may be one of the mechanisms through which the crosstalk between DNA methylation and histone acetylation regulates follicular growth and development.
Exploring new mechanisms for diagnosis and treatment of POF based on the crosstalk between DNA methylation and histone acetylation
Improving POF through environmental signals, such as diet
Caloric restriction (CR), a strategy that reduces caloric intake while ensuring essential nutrient intake, has been studied for its effects on DNA methylation markers of aging. CR can alter aging-related molecules and slow down the aging process [112]. With age, DNA methylation patterns drift, characterized by increased or decreased methylation levels at different loci. In rhesus monkeys subjected to CR, age-related methylation drift was significantly mitigated, resulting in a blood methylation age approximately seven years younger than their chronological age [113]. The histone N-α-terminal acetyltransferase NAT4 regulates cellular lifespan. NAT4 deficiency prolongs the replicative lifespan of yeast, and the longevity attributed to NAT4 activity exhibits penetrance with the effects of CR; its expression weakens CR-mediated lifespan extension [114]. These findings indicate that CR is closely linked to DNA methylation and histone acetylation, participating in aging retardation through environmental signals, such as diet. This provides new insights for the prevention and treatment of POF, suggesting that lifestyle modifications may protect ovarian function. The crosstalk between DNA methylation and histone acetylation drives POF progression through synergistic epigenetic modifications (Figure 3).
Figure 3.

Crosstalk mechanism between DNA methylation and histone acetylation in POF.
Improving POF through the interaction of DNA methylation, histone modifications, and ncRnas
DNA methylation and histone modifications form an epigenetic-transcriptomic cascade network by regulating the expression and function of ncRNAs, jointly maintaining ovarian granulosa cell homeostasis and follicular development. The TAB2 antisense long non-coding RNA (TAB2-AS) functions with DNA methylation modifications to co-activate antioxidant factors such as SOD1 and P50/P65, inhibit GC oxidative stress and apoptosis, promote proliferation, and accelerate follicular growth [115]. The ‘DNA methylation-TAB2-AS-TAB2’ pathway reveals the dual role of ncRNAs as epigenetic effectors; they are not only regulated by DNA methylation but also enhance target gene stability through RNA-RNA interactions. Histone deacetylases (such as SIRT1/SIRT2) participate in ovarian aging by regulating ncRNA activity. miR-181a promotes FoxO1 acetylation-mediated granulosa cell apoptosis by inhibiting SIRT1, forming an ‘acetylation-miRNA-apoptosis’ positive feedback loop that can interfere with ovarian function [116]. Acetylation at the K512 site of heat shock cognate protein Hsc70 enhances chaperone-mediated autophagy activity, significantly alleviating GC senescence, whereas the activity of its deacetylase SIRT2 can be indirectly regulated by ncRNA, forming an ‘acetylation modification – ncRNA – cellular homeostasis’ regulatory loop [117]. Additionally, metformin activates the MAPK signaling pathway and promotes FGSC proliferation by enhancing histone H3K27 acetylation at the Traf2 gene locus, demonstrating that small-molecule drugs can reverse ncRNA-mediated stem cell functional defects by remodelling histone modification landscapes [91]. These studies have established an intervention pathway of ‘modifying enzyme regulation → histone/DNA modification → ncRNA network → cellular function.’ In the future, combining single-cell epigenomic sequencing technologies to dynamically monitor the spatiotemporal interaction patterns between ncRNAs and epigenetic modifications is expected to develop precision intervention strategies based on triple regulation of ‘acetylation-methylation-ncRNA,’ demonstrating a novel strategy for clinical translation in POF.
Cross-regulation of DNA methylation and histone acetylation in assisted reproductive technologies
With the widespread application of assisted reproductive technologies, the impact of epigenetic modifications on embryonic development has become increasingly prominent. Cai et al. [118] summarized the main epigenetic modifications in mammals and their synergistic effects, analysing their regulatory mechanisms from oogenesis to embryonic development. They found that imbalances in nutrition (proteins, lipids, and one-carbon metabolism) can disrupt epigenetic modifications, leading to abnormal oocyte development. By reviewing modifications at key loci and their underlying molecular mechanisms, nutritional status was elucidated to influence oocyte and embryo development during in vitro fertilization, through factors such as DNA methylation and histone acetylation. Oocyte cryopreservation is a critical component of in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection, but vitrification freezing can influence the epigenetics of oocytes and embryos. Compared with the control group, the vitrification group showed significantly reduced relative transcriptional abundances of DNMT1, DNMT3B, HDAC1, and SUV39H1 in oocytes, as well as significantly decreased DNA methylation levels and H3K9 acetylation levels in two-cell embryos. Hence, oocyte vitrification may interfere with key stages of epigenetic reprogramming during preimplantation embryo development [119]. DNMTs are affected by in vitro culture conditions, and abnormal DNA methylation can lead to increased cell stress and apoptosis, thereby reducing blastocyst quality. In a mouse in vitro culture experiment, after adding baicalin, the expression of Dnmt1 decreased and that of Dnmt3a increased in in vitro-cultured blastocysts, and reducing cell stress and apoptosis and improving embryonic developmental capacity [42]. Additionally, acetylation changes at the histone H4 lysine 12 (acH4K12) site in mouse oocytes influenced fertilization and subsequent embryonic development. Significantly increased AcH4K12 levels in aged oocytes may alter acetylation patterns during fertilization and reduce oocyte developmental potential [120]. Therefore, a deeper understanding of epigenetic regulatory mechanisms in assisted reproductive technologies is of great significance for optimizing technical procedures and improving success rates. The components involved in the cross-talk between DNA methylation and histone acetylation in modulating POF-related pathways are systematically compared in Table 5, elucidating potential synergistic mechanisms.
Table 5.
Cross-talk of DNA methylation and histone acetylation and POF.
| The Crosstalk between DNA Methylation and Histone Acetylation Regulates POF | Ref. | |
|---|---|---|
| Dnmt1 and HDACs | The transcriptional repression domain of Dnmt1 exerts its function by recruiting the activity of HDACs. | [92] |
| Dnmt1 and HDAC2 | Participates in the S phase of DNA synthesis and jointly mediates transcriptional repression. | [93] |
| ADD and H3K4me0 | The ADD domain binds to the unmethylated histone H3 tail at H3K4me0. | [94] |
| DNMT3A/B and H3K4 | Ensures that the gene promoter region is not methylated by DNA. | [95] |
| UHRF1 and HDAC1 | UHRF1 is regulated by HDAC1, and acetylation of UHRF1 weakens its binding affinity to hemimethylated DNA. | [97] |
| Stella and H3K9me2 | The H3K9me2 region binds to Stella to protect it from active demethylation by TET3. | [47] |
| DNMT3a/3b and H3K9ac | Increasing DNMT3a/3b and decreasing H3K9ac and H3K27ac disrupt follicular development. | [99] |
| DNMT1 and H4K5ac | Show synergistic effects in the extrachromatin of aging oocytes. | [98] |
| DNA methylation and SIRT3 regulate p53 | Regulates cell apoptosis and primordial follicles by modulating p53. | [109] |
| Sirt1 and Dnmt3L | Sirt1 deacetylates Dnmt3L protein and loses its stability | [110] |
| Oxidative stress in follicles | DNA methylation and histone acetylation cross-regulate the oxidation and antioxidation processes in female germ cells and follicles. | [83,111, 121–123] |
| DNMT1、DNMT3B、HDAC1 and SUV39H1 | The transcriptional abundance in vitrified oocytes is reduced. | [119] |
Summary and prospects
As important components of epigenetics, DNA methylation and histone acetylation are involved in all stages of follicular development from primordial germ cells and are crucial for the establishment of oocyte competence, normal follicular growth, and maturation. Their dynamic changes are finely regulated by DNMTs, TETs, HATs, HDACs, and related factors. Furthermore, DNA methylation and histone modifications interact through diverse mechanisms to jointly regulate gene expression and chromatin states, thereby influencing ovarian function and reproductive health. In the diagnosis and treatment of POF, environmental signals, such as diet (e.g., caloric restriction), stem cell repair, and assisted reproductive technologies are closely related to the regulation of DNA methylation and histone acetylation, providing new strategies, mechanisms, ideas, and research directions for improving ovarian function, treating POF, and enhancing the success rate of assisted reproduction. These mechanisms confirm that epigenetic disorders are the core drivers of POF and may serve as key targets for treating age-related reproductive issues. Regulating the expression of related target genes or modifying enzymes is expected to improve POF, providing a theoretical basis for targeted interventions.
These findings offer promising avenues for further exploration; however, sufficient relevant evidence is needed for clinical applications in the treatment of ovarian aging. Future research should mainly focus on the following aspects: (1) In-depth mechanism analysis: Mapping ovarian-specific epigenetic landscapes, elucidation of the interaction network between DNA methylation clocks and histone modification markers, and dissecting epigenetic regulatory axes, such as their coupling with molecular signaling pathways related to ovarian function. (2) Precision diagnostic applications: Development of blood-based epigenetic markers (e.g., cfDNA methylation, exosomal ncRNA) for early warning of ovarian reserve decline, which could serve as new methods for early diagnosis of ovarian aging. (3) Breakthroughs in targeted therapy: Employing gene editing technologies to target and correct relevant epigenetic mutations (e.g., abnormal FOXO3 methylation); use of high-throughput screening to identify small-molecule compounds or biological agents that regulate epigenetic expression or activity, such as DNMT/HDAC/SIRT modulators; and exploration of synergistic regimens combining epigenetic drugs with traditional therapies (HRT, antioxidants). (4) Integration of technological innovations: Strengthening fundamental research on the physiological functions of epigenetics in the reproductive system and combining emerging technologies, such as single-cell multi-omics and organoid models, to establish a dynamic prediction system for “environment-epigenetics-ovarian function. By dissecting the epigenetic regulatory network from multiple dimensions, precise intervention strategies for extending female reproductive lifespan can be developed.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.
J.L. and Q.L. jointly proposed the study design and established the research framework. J.L. drafted the full manuscript. Q.L. developed the systematic literature review protocol. Y.G. optimized the literature screening criteria and data collection methodologies. J.Z. performed critical information extraction from selected literature and conducted thematic analysis. R.Z. contributed to framework development and methodological validation. Q.L. enhanced the theoretical foundations and contextualized the research findings. All authors participated in study design, data curation, and manuscript revisions. Corresponding author Prof. H.L. coordinated the research process, integrated substantive revisions, and ensured academic rigour throughout the preparation and submission phases.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by [Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province] (Grant No. [2025JJ90029]); [Major Scientific Research Special Programme for High-level Talents in Health and Wellness of Hunan Province] (Grant No. [R2023168]); [Key Guiding Subjects of Scientific Research Projects of Hunan Provincial Health and Wellness Commission] (Grant No. [202305017379]); [Scientific Research Project of Chinese Medicine of Hunan Province] (Grant No. [B2023078]); [Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Postgraduate Research and Innovation Project] (Grant No. [2024CX052]). Authors have received research grants.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Data availability statement
No datasets were generated or analysed in this study.
Consent to publish
Acknowledgement of receipt of consent to publish from all participants.
Ethics approval
This is a review paper and does not require ethical approval.
References
- [1].Grosbois J, Devos M, Demeestere I.. Implications of nonphysiological ovarian primordial follicle activation for fertility preservation. Endocr Rev. 2020;41(6):847–20. doi: 10.1210/endrev/bnaa020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Huang XC, Jiang YN, Bao HJ, et al. Role and mechanism of epigenetic regulation in the aging of germ cells: prospects for targeted interventions. Aging Dis. 2024;16(1):146–167. doi: 10.14336/AD.2024.0126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Xu R, Li C, Liu X, et al. Insights into epigenetic patterns in mammalian early embryos. Protein Cell. 2021;12(1):7–28. doi: 10.1007/s13238-020-00757-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Chao S, Lu J, Li LJ, et al. Maternal obesity may disrupt offspring metabolism by inducing oocyte genome hyper-methylation via increased DNMTs. Elife. 2024;13. doi: 10.7554/eLife.97507.3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Shi Q, Liu R, Chen L. Ferroptosis inhibitor ferrostatin‑1 alleviates homocysteine‑induced ovarian granulosa cell injury by regulating TET activity and DNA methylation. Mol Med Rep. 2022;25(4). doi: 10.3892/mmr.2022.12645 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Zeng Y, Chen T. DNA methylation reprogramming during mammalian development. Genes (Basel). 2019;10(4):257. doi: 10.3390/genes10040257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Anvar Z, Chakchouk I, Demond H, et al. DNA methylation dynamics in the female germline and maternal-effect mutations that disrupt genomic imprinting. Genes (Basel). 2021;12(8):1214. doi: 10.3390/genes12081214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].An HM, Dai YF, Zhu J, et al. MYST family histone acetyltransferases regulate reproductive diapause initiation. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;256(Pt 2):128269. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.128269 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Zhang T, He M, Zhao L, et al. HDAC6 regulates primordial follicle activation through mTOR signaling pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(6):559. doi: 10.1038/s41419-021-03842-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Jin J, Ren P, Li X, et al. Ovulatory signal-triggered chromatin remodeling in ovarian granulosa cells by HDAC2 phosphorylation activation-mediated histone deacetylation. Epigenet Chromatin. 2023;16(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13072-023-00485-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Nishigaki A, Tsubokura H, Tsuzuki-Nakao T, et al. Hypoxia: role of SIRT1 and the protective effect of resveratrol in ovarian function. Reprod Med Biol. 2022;21(1):e12428. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12428 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Gao S, Yang L, Yang X, et al. Sirtuin 7 is essential for the survival and synthesis of oestrogen in yak (Bos grunniens) cumulus granulosa cells. Reprod Domest Anim. 2023;58(2):323–332. doi: 10.1111/rda.14289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Tatone C, Di Emidio G, Battaglia R, et al. Building a human ovarian antioxidant ceRNA network “OvAnOx”: a bioinformatic perspective for research on redox-related ovarian functions and dysfunctions. Antioxidants (Basel). 2024;13(9):1101. doi: 10.3390/antiox13091101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Kirubarajan A, Sohel N, Mayhew A, et al. The association between primary ovarian insufficiency and increased multimorbidity in a large prospective cohort (Canadian longitudinal study on aging). Fertility Sterility. 2024;122(4):e30–e31. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.07.153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Shareghi-Oskoue O, Aghebati-Maleki L, Yousefi M. Transplantation of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells to treat premature ovarian failure. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12(1):454. doi: 10.1186/s13287-021-02529-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Samad N, Nguyen HH, Scott D, et al. Musculoskeletal Health in premature ovarian insufficiency. Part one: muscle. Semin Reprod Med. 2020;38(4–05):277–288. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721797 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Panay N, Anderson RA, Bennie A, et al. Evidence-based guideline: premature ovarian insufficiency. Hum Reprod Open. 2024;2024(4):hoae065. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoae065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Yang X, Yang L. Current understanding of the genomic abnormities in premature ovarian failure: chance for early diagnosis and management. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1194865. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1194865 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Oddsson A, Steinthorsdottir V, Oskarsson GR, et al. Homozygosity for a stop-gain variant in CCDC201 causes primary ovarian insufficiency. Nat Genet. 2024;56(9):1804–1810. doi: 10.1038/s41588-024-01885-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Cacciottola L, Camboni A, Dolmans MM. Immune system regulation of physiological and pathological aspects of the ovarian follicle pool throughout the female reproductive lifespan. Hum Reprod. 2025;40(1):12–22. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Aftabsavad S, Noormohammadi Z, Moini A, et al. Effect of bisphenol a on alterations of ICAM-1 and HLA-G genes expression and DNA methylation profiles in cumulus cells of infertile women with poor response to ovarian stimulation. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):9595. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87175-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Sarrel PM, Sullivan SD, Nelson LM. Hormone replacement therapy in young women with surgical primary ovarian insufficiency. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(7):1580–1587. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Toriyama K, Au Yeung WK, Inoue A, et al. DPPA3 facilitates genome-wide DNA demethylation in mouse primordial germ cells. BMC Genomics. 2024;25(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10192-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Branco MR, Oda M, Reik W. Safeguarding parental identity: Dnmt1 maintains imprints during epigenetic reprogramming in early embryogenesis. Genes Dev. 2008;22(12):1567–1571. doi: 10.1101/gad.1690508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Eleftheriou K, Peter A, Fedorenko I, et al. A transition phase in late mouse oogenesis impacts DNA methylation of the early embryo. Commun Biol. 2022;5(1):1047. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-04008-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Lin J, Chen F, Sun MJ, et al. The relationship between apoptosis, chromatin confi guration, histone modification and competence of oocytes: a study using the mouse ovary-holding stress model. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):28347. doi: 10.1038/srep28347 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Garg A, Seli E. Leukocyte telomere length and DNA methylome as biomarkers of ovarian reserve and embryo aneuploidy: the intricate relationship between somatic and reproductive aging. Fertil Steril. 2024;121(1):26–33. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.11.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Monseur B, Murugappan G, Bentley J, et al. Epigenetic clock measuring age acceleration via DNA methylation levels in blood is associated with decreased oocyte yield. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37(5):1097–1103. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01763-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Davletgildeeva AT, Kuznetsov NA. The role of DNMT methyltransferases and TET dioxygenases in the maintenance of the DNA methylation level. Biomolecules. 2024;14(9):1117. doi: 10.3390/biom14091117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Chen Z, Zhang Y. Role of mammalian DNA methyltransferases in development. Annu Rev Biochem. 2020;89(1):135–158. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-103019-102815 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Uysal F, Akkoyunlu G, Ozturk S. Dynamic expression of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) in oocytes and early embryos. Biochimie. 2015;116:103–113. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2015.06.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Liu W, Chen C, Gao Y, et al. Transcriptome dynamics and cell dialogs between oocytes and granulosa cells in mouse follicle development. Genomics Proteomics Bioinf. 2024;22(2). doi: 10.1093/gpbjnl/qzad001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Zhou X, He Y, Pan X, et al. DNMT1-mediated lncRNA IFFD controls the follicular development via targeting GLI1 by sponging miR-370. Cell Death Differ. 2023;30(2):576–588. doi: 10.1038/s41418-022-01103-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Bhargavan B, Chhunchha B, Kubo E, et al. DNA methylation as an epigenetic mechanism in the regulation of LEDGF expression and biological response in aging and oxidative stress. Cell Death Discov. 2024;10(1):296. doi: 10.1038/s41420-024-02076-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Yu C, Ji SY, Sha QQ, et al. CRL4-DCAF1 ubiquitin E3 ligase directs protein phosphatase 2A degradation to control oocyte meiotic maturation. Nat Commun. 2015;6(1):8017. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Zhang J, Zhang YL, Zhao LW, et al. The CRL4-DCAF13 ubiquitin E3 ligase supports oocyte meiotic resumption by targeting PTEN degradation. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020;77(11):2181–2197. doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03280-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Yu C, Xu YW, Sha QQ, et al. CRL4DCAF1 is required in activated oocytes for follicle maintenance and ovulation. Mol Hum Reprod. 2015;21(2):195–205. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gau103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Ren P, Tong X, Li J, et al. CRL4(DCAF13) E3 ubiquitin ligase targets MeCP2 for degradation to prevent DNA hypermethylation and ensure normal transcription in growing oocytes. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2024;81(1):165. doi: 10.1007/s00018-024-05185-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Uysal F, Ozturk S, Akkoyunlu G. DNMT1, DNMT3A and DNMT3B proteins are differently expressed in mouse oocytes and early embryos. J Mol Histol. 2017;48(5–6):417–426. doi: 10.1007/s10735-017-9739-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Uysal F, Sukur G, Bozdemir N, et al. Unveiling the impact of DNA methylation machinery: Dnmt1 and Dnmt3a in orchestrating oocyte development and cellular homeostasis. Genesis. 2024;62(1):e23579. doi: 10.1002/dvg.23579 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Qin Y, Li T, Zhao H, et al. Integrated transcriptomic and epigenetic study of PCOS: impact of Map3k1 and Map1lc3a promoter methylation on autophagy. Front Genet. 2021;12:620241. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.620241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Qi X, Li H, Cong X, et al. Baicalin increases developmental competence of mouse embryos in vitro by inhibiting cellular apoptosis and modulating HSP70 and DNMT expression. J Reprod Dev. 2016;62(6):561–569. doi: 10.1262/jrd.2016-047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Uysal F, Ozturk S. The loss of global DNA methylation due to decreased DNMT expression in the postnatal mouse ovaries may associate with infertility emerging during ovarian aging. Histochem Cell Biol. 2020;154(3):301–314. doi: 10.1007/s00418-020-01890-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].van der Wijst MG, Venkiteswaran M, Chen H, et al. Local chromatin microenvironment determines DNMT activity: from DNA methyltransferase to DNA demethylase or DNA dehydroxymethylase. Epigenetics. 2015;10(8):671–676. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2015.1062204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Peng X, Tan L, Song J, et al. Geniposide alleviated hydrogen peroxide-induced apoptosis of human hepatocytes via altering DNA methylation. Food Chem Toxicol. 2023;182:114158. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2023.114158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Maenohara S, Unoki M, Toh H, et al. Role of UHRF1 in de novo DNA methylation in oocytes and maintenance methylation in preimplantation embryos. PLOS Genet. 2017;13(10):e1007042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Li Y, Zhang Z, Chen J, et al. Stella safeguards the oocyte methylome by preventing de novo methylation mediated by DNMT1. Nature. 2018;564(7734):136–140. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0751-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Zheng CY, Yu YX, Cao SY, et al. Epigenetics of inflammation in hypothalamus pituitary gonadal and neuroendocrine disorders. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2024;154(Pt C):340–345. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2023.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Rachamalla M, Carlos da Silva F, Putnala SK, et al. Maternal and paternal dietary arsenic exposure impairs reproduction and development in zebrafish offspring: the role of HPG axis dysregulation and altered DNA methylation. Environ Pollut. 2025;380:126528. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126528 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Gu Y, Jin CX, Tong ZH, et al. Expression of genes related to gonadal development and construction of gonadal DNA methylation maps of Trachinotus blochii under hypoxia. Sci Total Environ. 2024;935:173172. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Elmhiri G, Gloaguen C, Grison S, et al. DNA methylation and potential multigenerational epigenetic effects linked to uranium chronic low-dose exposure in gonads of males and females rats. Toxicol Lett. 2018;282:64–70. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Wirbisky-Hershberger SE, Sanchez OF, Horzmann KA, et al. Atrazine exposure decreases the activity of DNMTs, global DNA methylation levels, and dnmt expression. Food Chem Toxicol. 2017;109(Pt 1):727–734. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.08.041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Sanchez OF, Lee J, Yu King Hing N, et al. Lead (Pb) exposure reduces global DNA methylation level by non-competitive inhibition and alteration of dnmt expression. Metallomics. 2017;9(2):149–160. doi: 10.1039/C6MT00198J [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Weber GJ, Sepúlveda MS, Peterson SM, et al. Transcriptome alterations following developmental atrazine exposure in zebrafish are associated with disruption of neuroendocrine and reproductive system function, cell cycle, and carcinogenesis. Toxicol Sci. 2013;132(2):458–466. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kft017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Liu J, Li L, Zhu J, et al. Cadmium disrupts mouse embryonic stem cell differentiation into ovarian granulosa cells through epigenetic mechanisms. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022;235:113431. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113431 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Sun Y, Zong C, Liu J, et al. C-myc promotes miR-92a-2-5p transcription in rat ovarian granulosa cells after cadmium exposure. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2021;421:115536. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2021.115536 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Castillo-Aguilera O, Depreux P, Halby L, et al. DNA methylation targeting: the DNMT/HMT crosstalk challenge. Biomolecules. 2017;7(1):3. doi: 10.3390/biom7010003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Jiang ZX, Wang YN, Li ZY, et al. The m6A mRNA demethylase FTO in granulosa cells retards FOS-dependent ovarian aging. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(8):744. doi: 10.1038/s41419-021-04016-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Zhou L, Han X, Li W, et al. N6-methyladenosine demethylase FTO induces the dysfunctions of ovarian granulosa cells by upregulating flotillin 2. Reprod Sci. 2022;29(4):1305–1315. doi: 10.1007/s43032-021-00664-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Sun Y, Zhang H, Qiu T, et al. Epigenetic regulation of mesenchymal stem cell aging through histone modifications. Genes Dis. 2023;10(6):2443–2456. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2022.10.030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Sadeghi S, Mosaffa N, Huang B, et al. Protective role of stem cells in POI: current status and mechanism of action, a review article. Heliyon. 2024;10(1):e23271. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Wang L, Liu Y, Song Y, et al. Enhancing oocyte quality in aging mice: insights from mesenchymal stem cell therapy and FOXO3a signaling pathway activation. Reprod Sci. 2024;31(8):2392–2408. doi: 10.1007/s43032-024-01509-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].El-Derany MO, Said RS, El-Demerdash E. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells reverse radiotherapy-induced premature ovarian failure: emphasis on signal integration of TGF-β, Wnt/β-catenin and hippo pathways. STEM Cell Rev Rep. 2021;17(4):1429–1445. doi: 10.1007/s12015-021-10135-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Kim KH, Lee KA. Metabolic rewiring by human placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy promotes rejuvenation in aged female rats. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(1):566. doi: 10.3390/ijms23010566 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Tian C, An Y, Zhao J, et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells reversed ovarian aging-related m6A RNA methylation modification profile in aged granulosa cells. STEM Cell Rev Rep. 2023;19(4):953–967. doi: 10.1007/s12015-022-10485-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].Liu L, Wang H, Xu GL, et al. Tet1 deficiency leads to premature ovarian failure. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:644135. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.644135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [67].Liu B, He Y, Wu X, et al. Mapping putative enhancers in mouse oocytes and early embryos reveals TCF3/12 as key folliculogenesis regulators. Nat Cell Biol. 2024;26(6):962–974. doi: 10.1038/s41556-024-01422-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [68].Min Z, Long X, Zhao H, et al. Protein lysine acetylation in ovarian granulosa cells affects metabolic homeostasis and clinical presentations of women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:567028. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.567028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [69].Saraiva NZ, Oliveira CS, Almeida NNC, et al. Epigenetic modifiers during in vitro maturation as a strategy to increase oocyte competence in bovine. Theriogenology. 2022;187:95–101. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2022.04.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [70].Zhang Z, Chen B, Cui H, et al. Dynamic alterations in H4K12 acetylation during meiotic maturation and after parthenogenetic activation of mouse oocytes. Zygote (Cambridge, Engl). 2020;28(5):1–4. doi: 10.1017/S0967199420000192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71].Samarin AM, Samarin AM, Waghmare SG, et al. In vitro post-ovulatory oocyte ageing in grass carp Ctenopharyngodon idella affects H4K12 acetylation pattern and histone acetyltransferase activity. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2023;50(5):2013–2024. doi: 10.1007/s10695-023-01273-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [72].Pontelo TP, Rodrigues SAD, Kawamoto TS, et al. Histone acetylation during the in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes with different levels of competence. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2020;32(7):690–696. doi: 10.1071/RD19218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [73].Wu X, Wang S, Guo Y, et al. KAT8 functions in redox homeostasis and mitochondrial dynamics during mouse oocyte meiosis progression. FASEB J. 2024;38(2):e23435. doi: 10.1096/fj.202301946R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [74].Lin J, Ji Z, Di Z, et al. Overexpression of Tfap2a in mouse oocytes impaired spindle and chromosome organization. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(22):14376. doi: 10.3390/ijms232214376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [75].Xu Y, Fan S, Liu Y, et al. HDAC1 in the ovarian granulosa cells of tan sheep improves cumulus cell expansion and oocyte maturation independently of the EGF-like growth factors. Biology (Basel). 2022;11(10):1464. doi: 10.3390/biology11101464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [76].Ma P, Schultz RM. HDAC1 and HDAC2 in mouse oocytes and preimplantation embryos: specificity versus compensation. Cell Death Differ. 2016;23(7):1119–1127. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2016.31 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [77].Wang H, Cai H, Wang X, et al. HDAC3 maintains oocyte meiosis arrest by repressing amphiregulin expression before the LH surge. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):5719. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13671-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [78].Legoff L, Dali O, De La Mata Santaella E, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibition leads to regulatory histone mark alterations and impairs meiosis in oocytes. Epigenet Chromatin. 2021;14(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13072-021-00413-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [79].Gu L, Li X, Liu X, et al. HDAC3 inhibition disrupts the assembly of meiotic apparatus during porcine oocyte maturation. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(7):10178–10183. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27687 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [80].Zhang T, Tong Y, Zhu R, et al. HDAC6-dependent deacetylation of NGF dictates its ubiquitination and maintains primordial follicle dormancy. Theranostics. 2024;14(6):2345–2366. doi: 10.7150/thno.95164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [81].Ma C, Zhang X, Zhang Y, et al. Sirtuin 5-driven meiotic spindle assembly and actin-based migration in mouse oocyte meiosis. Heliyon. 2024;10(11):e32466. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [82].Shi JQ, Liu XF, Wang C. Progress on the involvement of HDAC11 in the regulation of mammalian oocyte maturation and early embryonic development. Sheng Li Xue Bao. 2024;76(3):438–446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [83].Vo KCT, Sato Y, Kawamura K. Improvement of oocyte quality through the SIRT signaling pathway. Reprod Med Biol. 2023;22(1):e12510. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [84].Sivakumar KK, Stanley JA, Behlen JC, et al. Inhibition of sirtuin-1 hyperacetylates p53 and abrogates sirtuin-1-p53 interaction in Cr(VI)-induced apoptosis in the ovary. Reprod Toxicol. 2022;109:121–134. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2022.03.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [85].He W, Huang Z, Nian C, et al. Discovery and evaluation of novel spiroheterocyclic protective agents via a SIRT1 upregulation mechanism in cisplatin-induced premature ovarian failure. Bioorg Med Chem. 2024;110:117834. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2024.117834 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [86].Chen H, Zhang G, Peng Y, et al. Danggui Shaoyao San protects cyclophosphamide-induced premature ovarian failure by inhibiting apoptosis and oxidative stress through the regulation of the SIRT1/p53 signaling pathway. J Ethnopharmacol. 2024;323:117718. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2024.117718 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [87].Fang X, Xia W, Li S, et al. SIRT2 is critical for sheep oocyte maturation through regulating function of surrounding granulosa cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(9):5013. doi: 10.3390/ijms23095013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [88].Zhu J, Yang Q, Li H, et al. Sirt3 deficiency accelerates ovarian senescence without affecting spermatogenesis in aging mice. Free Radical Biol Med. 2022;193(Pt 2):511–525. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.10.324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [89].Gong L, Hou J, Yang H, et al. Kuntai capsule attenuates premature ovarian insufficiency by activating the FOXO3/SIRT5 signaling pathway in mice: a comprehensive study using UHPLC-LTQ-Orbitrap and integrated pharmacology. J Ethnopharmacol. 2024;322:117625. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2023.117625 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [90].Shen C, Jiang Y, Lin J, et al. SIRT6 reduces the symptoms of premature ovarian failure and alleviates oxidative stress and apoptosis in granulosa cells by degrading p66SHC via H3K9AC. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2023;39(1):2250003. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2023.2250003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [91].Chen J, Wang L, Tian GG, et al. Metformin promotes proliferation of mouse female germline stem cells by histone acetylation modification of Traf2. STEM Cell Rev Rep. 2023;19(7):2329–2340. doi: 10.1007/s12015-023-10575-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [92].Fuks F, Burgers WA, Brehm A, et al. DNA methyltransferase Dnmt1 associates with histone deacetylase activity. Nat Genet. 2000;24(1):88–91. doi: 10.1038/71750 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [93].Rountree MR, Bachman KE, Baylin SB. DNMT1 binds HDAC2 and a new co-repressor, DMAP1, to form a complex at replication foci. Nat Genet. 2000;25(3):269–277. doi: 10.1038/77023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [94].Kubo N, Uehara R, Uemura S, et al. Combined and differential roles of ADD domains of DNMT3A and DNMT3L on DNA methylation landscapes in mouse germ cells. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):3266. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47699-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [95].Mei NH, Guo SM, Zhou Q, et al. H3K4 methylation promotes expression of mitochondrial dynamics regulators to ensure oocyte quality in mice. Adv Sci (Weinheim, baden-Wurttemberg, Ger). 2023;10(12):e2204794. doi: 10.1002/advs.202204794 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [96].Lee L, Asada H, Kizuka F, et al. Changes in histone modification and DNA methylation of the StAR and Cyp19a1 promoter regions in granulosa cells undergoing luteinization during ovulation in rats. Endocrinology. 2013;154(1):458–470. doi: 10.1210/en.2012-1610 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [97].Hahm JY, Park JW, Kang JY, et al. Acetylation of UHRF1 regulates hemi-methylated DNA binding and maintenance of genome-wide DNA methylation. Cell Rep. 2020;32(4):107958. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107958 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [98].Marshall KL, Wang J, Ji T, et al. The effects of biological aging on global DNA methylation, histone modification, and epigenetic modifiers in the mouse germinal vesicle stage oocyte. Anim Reprod. 2018;15(4):1253–1267. doi: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR2018-0087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [99].Dutta S, Sivakumar KK, Erwin JW, et al. Alteration of epigenetic methyl and acetyl marks by postnatal chromium(VI) exposure causes apoptotic changes in the ovary of the F1 offspring. Reprod Toxicol. 2024;123:108492. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2023.108492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [100].Whitmore MA, Li H, Lyu W, et al. Epigenetic regulation of host defense peptide synthesis: synergy between histone deacetylase inhibitors and DNA/Histone methyltransferase inhibitors. Front Immunol. 2022;13:874706. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.874706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [101].Tang S, Wu H, Chen Q, et al. Maternal obesity induces the meiotic defects and epigenetic alterations during fetal oocyte development. Adv Sci (Weinheim, baden-Wurttemberg, Ger). 2024;11(30):e2309184. doi: 10.1002/advs.202309184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [102].Pan MH, Zhu CC, Ju JQ, et al. Single-cell transcriptome analysis reveals that maternal obesity affects DNA repair, histone methylation, and autophagy level in mouse embryos. J Cell Physiol. 2021;236(7):4944–4953. doi: 10.1002/jcp.30201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [103].Guo Y, Xue L, Tang W, et al. Ovarian microenvironment: challenges and opportunities in protecting against chemotherapy-associated ovarian damage. Hum Reprod Update. 2024;30(5):614–647. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmae020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [104].Nabil Salama A, Badr EAE, Holah NS, et al. Conservative hypomethylation of mesenchymal stem cells and their secretome restored the follicular development in cisplatin-induced premature ovarian failure mice. Reprod Sci. 2024;31(4):1053–1068. doi: 10.1007/s43032-023-01389-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [105].Chen Y, Ai L, Zhang Y, et al. The EZH2-H3K27me3 axis modulates aberrant transcription and apoptosis in cyclophosphamide-induced ovarian granulosa cell injury. Cell Death Discov. 2023;9(1):413. doi: 10.1038/s41420-023-01705-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [106].Xiu Z, Tang S, Kong P, et al. Zigui-Yichong-Fang protects against cyclophosphamide-induced premature ovarian insufficiency via the SIRT1/Foxo3a pathway. J Ethnopharmacol. 2023;314:116608. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2023.116608 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [107].Li X, Ye H, Su T, et al. Immunity and reproduction protective effects of chitosan oligosaccharides in cyclophosphamide/Busulfan-induced premature ovarian failure model mice. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1185921. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1185921 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [108].Kartlasmis K, Cakir Gungor AN, Kuyucu Y, et al. Overview of the evaluation of the destructive effect of procarbazine on the ovarian reserve in the apoptotic, inflammatory, and oxidative pathways. Arch Med Sci. 2024;20(6):1793–1796. doi: 10.5114/aoms/184349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [109].Joo NR, Park SA, Park JH, et al. TOPK inhibits TNF-α-induced granulosa cell apoptosis via regulation of SIRT1/p53. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2023;664:128–135. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2023.04.113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [110].Heo J, Lim J, Lee S, et al. Sirt1 regulates DNA methylation and differentiation potential of embryonic stem cells by antagonizing Dnmt3l. Cell Rep. 2017;18(8):1930–1945. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.01.074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [111].Penaloza CG, Cruz M, Germain G, et al. Higher sensitivity of female cells to ethanol: methylation of DNA lowers Cyp2e1, generating more ROS, cell communication and signaling. CCS. 2020;18(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12964-020-00616-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [112].Waziry R, Ryan CP, Corcoran DL, et al. Effect of long-term caloric restriction on DNA methylation measures of biological aging in healthy adults from the CALERIE trial. Nat Aging. 2023;3(3):248–257. doi: 10.1038/s43587-023-00432-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [113].Maegawa S, Lu Y, Tahara T, et al. Caloric restriction delays age-related methylation drift. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):539. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00607-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [114].Molina-Serrano D, Schiza V, Demosthenous C, et al. Loss of Nat4 and its associated histone H4 N-terminal acetylation mediates calorie restriction-induced longevity. EMBO Rep. 2016;17(12):1829–1843. doi: 10.15252/embr.201642540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [115].Li N, Yun B, Zeng L, et al. The antisense lncRNA of TAB2 that prevents oxidative stress to enhance the follicular growth in mammals. Commun Biol. 2024;7(1):1246. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06960-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [116].Zhang M, Zhang Q, Hu Y, et al. miR-181a increases FoxO1 acetylation and promotes granulosa cell apoptosis via SIRT1 downregulation. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8(10):e3088. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [117].Li Y, Wang Y, Yao H, et al. Acetylation of Hsc70 at K512 inhibits goat ovarian granulosa cell senescence by restoring chaperone-mediated autophagy. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;310(Pt 2):143119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.143119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [118].Cai S, Quan S, Yang G, et al. Nutritional status impacts epigenetic regulation in early embryo development: a scoping review. Adv Nutr. 2021;12(5):1877–1892. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmab038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [119].Moulavi F, Saadeldin IM, Swelum AA, et al. Oocyte vitrification induces loss of DNA methylation and histone acetylation in the resulting embryos derived using ICSI in dromedary camel. Zygote. 2021;29(5):383–392. doi: 10.1017/S0967199421000150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [120].Suo L, Meng QG, Pei Y, et al. Changes in acetylation on lysine 12 of histone H4 (acH4K12) of murine oocytes during maternal aging may affect fertilization and subsequent embryo development. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(3):945–951. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [121].Wu J, Gan Z, Zhuo R, et al. Resveratrol attenuates aflatoxin B(1)-induced ROS formation and increase of m(6)A RNA methylation. Animals (Basel). 2020;10(4):677. doi: 10.3390/ani10040677 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [122].Kim DH, Kim JM, Lee EK, et al. Modulation of FoxO1 phosphorylation/acetylation by baicalin during aging. J Nutr Biochem. 2012;23(10):1277–1284. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2011.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [123].Chen Q, Wei Y, Zhao Y, et al. Intervening effects and molecular mechanism of quercitrin on PCV2-induced histone acetylation, oxidative stress and inflammatory response in 3D4/2 cells. Antioxidants (Basel). 2022;11(5):941. doi: 10.3390/antiox11050941 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analysed in this study.
