Abstract
Archaeological excavations of an Early Bronze Age III (c. 2900–2600/2550 BCE) domestic neighborhood at the site of Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath, Israel, uncovered four complete skeletons of young female donkeys that were buried immediately below house floors as ritual foundation deposits. Multi-isotope analyses (carbon, oxygen and strontium) of their teeth document that each of the donkeys was born and raised in Egypt before being brought to Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath where they were slaughtered and buried beneath house floors in a non-elite domestic neighborhood. In contrast, isotopic analysis of teeth from a single isolated donkey mandible and additional sheep and goat teeth that displayed evidence of being used for food consumption and not associated with a complete burial, identify the donkey as born and raised among local livestock in the vicinity of Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath. The intentionally buried of specifically imported and highly valued young jennies reveal what appears to be a ritually charged characteristic when constructing domestic residences at the site.
Introduction
Archaeological excavations in an Early Bronze Age III (c. 2900–2600/2550 BCE) domestic neighborhood at the site of Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath uncovered four complete young female donkey skeletons (EQ1-EQ4) buried immediately below house floors. The first excavated donkey (EQ1 – also known as a sacrificial ass) is a clear sacrificial foundation deposit [1]. Isotopic analyses indicated that it was born and raised in Egypt before being brought to the site where it was slaughtered [2]. The isotopic study has been completed on the three additional complete donkey burials excavated at the site in 2016 (EQ2 and EQ3) and 2017 (EQ4). For comparative purposes, isotopic analyses were also conducted on a loose equid mandible that was recovered in 2017 (EQ21), as well as on livestock (sheep and goat) specimens from the same deposits at the site. In addition, bioavailable strontium from the surroundings of the site were also analyzed. The results presented here confirm exchange connections between Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath and Old Kingdom Egypt as proposed by the isotopic data from EQ1. They further reveal a decision to sacrifice young and healthy female animals, those exclusively imported from Egypt.
Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath
The archaeological site of Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath (modern Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi; ancient Gath) is in central Israel about 20 km from the Mediterranean coast on the southern bank of the Elah Valley. It is located on top of a natural limestone outcrop at the westernmost edge of the Judean Foothills (Shephelah in Hebrew) and overlooks the modern southern Coastal Plain of Israel [3] (Fig 1). This location allowed access to fresh water and exploitation of a rich variety and abundance of natural food resources from both the rolling foothills and coastal plain [4–7]. The site is positioned along or near several major transportation routes that transect the locality to regions to the north, south, east and west. These include the north-south “Trough Valley” along the base of the Judean Mountains to the east of the site; the north-south road along the coastal plain to the west of the site; and the east-west route that extends from the coast to the Judean highlands through the Elah Valley) [8,9].
Fig 1. Location of Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath and regions and features (Canaan) mentioned in text.
During the Early Bronze Age III (c. 2900–2600/2550 BCE), the site reaches urban proportions typical for this region (c. 24 ha in size) (Fig 2) and becomes one of the largest and most important of Early Bronze urban centers in the southern Levant [10–15]. It is surrounded by a thick and tall stone-based fortification system [16–24]. As a result of systematic surface collection and excavation, there is now evidence for an extensive Early Bronze (EB) occupation across the entire tell (or mound) [12,15].
Fig 2. Map of Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath.
Excavation areas are labeled by letters and Area E is in bold.
Excavations conducted over the course of several seasons (2004–2017) at the eastern end of the site (Area E), uncovered part of an EB III urban residential (domestic) neighborhood [12,14]. The urban character of the site on whole during the EB III is seen through the extensive fortifications, evidence of social hierarchy and bureaucracy [25], and finds indicating economic connectivity [6,26–28] with broad regions in the Levant and beyond.
In the excavation of Area E of the site, parts of several non-elite domestic residential buildings and an alleyway were intensively excavated and the remains studied (Fig 3). Three major strata of urban renewal occurred toward the end of the EB III period. In the earliest Stratum E5c (dated to the later EB III, c. 2700−2600 BCE), the buildings established in earlier strata (Strata E6-E7) are demolished and built anew. In the two subsequent strata (E5b and E5a), the buildings undergo further renovations where rooms are subdivided. After Stratum E5a, the site is abandoned/destroyed and there is no occupation in this area for more than a thousand years [29–31]. In the earliest E5c stratum, just before the walls were built, at least four donkeys were sacrificed and buried beneath the beaten earth floors of each building room. A thick (10−20 cm) layer of grey ashy soil accumulated above the floors during the occupation before the next strata of renewal occurred (E5b and a) [1,32–34]. Two radiocarbon contexts from Stratum E5c were measured from Building 134307, in which EQ1 was buried. The modeled 68.3% results range between 2870−2670 BCE for layer E5c, with three to four more likely ranges of years within those 200 years of probability distributions.
Fig 3. Plan of the E5c Stratum buildings in Area E at Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath with donkey burial locations.
The zooarchaeological sample
Four of the donkey specimens (EQ1–4) are from Stratum E5c and are completely articulated skeletons found buried beneath the earthen floor of the courtyards, at the layers of the floor infrastructure, in two large buildings on either side of the alleyway (Fig 3 and Fig 4a, b, c, d; Supplementary S1 Table). Each of the donkeys is buried in shallow pits about 20–30 cm beneath the floors in the time just before the floors were laid down as the neighborhood is being renewed. There is no evidence that they are later intrusions since they are sealed by the Stratum E5c dirt floor. All the burial pits were found without any other finds, only the equid skeletons. This contrasts with the rest of the infrastructure layers, where non-indicative pottery was found.
Fig 4. a, b, c, d. Photographs of the four donkey burials of Stratum E5c in Area E at Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath.
One skeleton lies below the floor of Building 134307 (EQ1), while three lie below the floor of Building 17E82D08 across the alley (EQ2–4). In EQ1, the front and hind legs were tied together (trussed) below the abdomen, and the upper neck (cervical) vertebra and cranium were dismembered. It is evident that the animal was sacrificed as the head is fully cut off and carefully placed on the abdomen facing in the opposite direction [1]. The head rests on its left side.
The three other complete skeletons are found across the alleyway buried beneath Courtyard 17E82D08 of Building 17E82D08. They also lie on their left sides, but without any clear evidence of dismemberment. Their legs also appear to have been trussed, as the feet are brought close together or overlap beneath their abdomens.
While there are no artefacts associated with these interments, the deposits are ritual interments [1,9], with each of the skeletons carefully laid out in the same manner. Each is placed in a separate pit with the head facing east (possibly toward the rising sun) [33]. Further, all are either old subadults or young adults and healthy females who were killed in the prime of their lives. Fragments of donkey figurine and zoomorphic vessel carrying loads were also found in Stratum E5a. That the skulls of all four donkeys face eastwards, as well as their similar age and sex, suggests a cultic/ritual choice. Such an eastern orientation of skeletal remains is similar to preferences seen in Anatolia [35] and elsewhere in the southern Levant [36].
In contrast, EQ21 (Stratum E7) is the only incomplete skeleton discussed here (L20E93A12; B20E93A139). It is represented by an isolated mandible with teeth (LPM2–4 and M1-3, but M3 is only visible in the crypt). It was found in the collapse of a Stratum E7 building amidst a concentration of stones (L20E93A11) likely representing a floor in Stratum E7. It was selected for comparison with the four donkey burials as it was an example of an equid consumed, and its remains discarded afterwards.
In addition, isotopic analysis for several sheep and goat specimens from the same horizons and bioavailable strontium specimens from surroundings of the site were also included to form a regional isoscape and baseline for comparison with the donkey remains. Each of these are discussed below to interpret the four donkeys ritually buried beneath the floors of buildings as the neighborhood is being renewed.
Isotopic analyses in zooarchaeology
Isotope signatures are incorporated into animal tissues and are stored for variable periods of time, depending on the turnover rate of the different tissues. As tooth enamel does not turnover once formed, [37] isotopic analysis provides a picture of the animal’s diet, seasonality and/or mobility at the time of formation. Hoppe et al. [38] utilized radiographic and optical analyses to determine the timing of tooth enamel biomineralization in horses. Their results indicate that the Molar 1 (M1) begins to mineralize around two weeks of age and continues to mineralize for approximately one year after eruption (occurring between 8 months and one year). As such, the first molar records isotopic signatures of diet and mobility up to approximately two years of age. The second molar (LM2) begins to mineralize before eruption at approximately six months of age, the tooth erupts between 20–26 months and will continue to mineralize for an additional 30 months. Mineralization of molar 3 (M3) starts when M1 and M2 erupt (~6–8 months), while M3 erupts between 3.5 and 4 years. The intra-tooth sampling of teeth utilized here will reveal information on shifts in diet (carbon), water (oxygen) and mobility (strontium) from birth to approximately five years of age. As each equid is aged through tooth eruption and wear and epiphyseal fusion at approximately five years of age1 this sampling strategy documents their entire lifespan.
The use of stable carbon isotopes to reconstruct diet is well-established in archaeology. Terrestrial plants in the southern Levant can be divided into two groups (C3, C4) based on their differential means of fixing atmospheric CO2. These differential mechanisms result in distinct δ13C values. These differences in the δ13C values of the plants consumed are reflected in the tissues of the animals that consume them [39–41]. While C3 vegetation is dominant in Mediterranean climate zones [42], C4 grasses are also part of the flora of Mediterranean regions [43] and their abundance increases in steppe and desert environments [44].
Oxygen isotope composition in the tooth enamel in mammals is linked to the isotopic composition of environmental water they consume [45,46]. As the isotopic composition of the water is correlated with temperature and evapotranspiration, it will vary seasonally. In mid- to high- latitudes the lowest δ18O values are seen in the coldest months and the highest δ18O values during the summer months [47].
Strontium isotopes are useful as biogeochemical tracers in the study of mobility as they are characteristic of the local geology [48]. Strontium 87Sr/86Sr ratios vary locally with changes in local bedrock geology, bedrock weathering, and the contribution of atmospheric dust [49]. Soil and plants are in isotopic equilibrium with local soils and share similar isotopic ratios for bioavailable strontium. Animals consuming these plants incorporate strontium in the mineral structure of bones and teeth as calcium substitutes during tissue formation. Measurement of the strontium ratio will provide a measure of the relative importance of foods from areas of variable lithologies [50]. As a result, migration studies should utilize biologically available strontium rather than only substrate geology. Plants, soil, rodents and/or invertebrates may be collected for this purpose.
Results
Isotope results are presented in Fig 5 and 6 and in Supplementary S2 and S3 Tables. Descriptive statistics are presented in Table 1.
Fig 5. Sequential isotopic carbon, oxygen and strontium sampling of EQ2, EQ3 and EQ4 mandibular teeth from Area E of Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath.
Fig 6. Sequential isotopic carbon, oxygen and strontium sampling of EQ21 mandibular teeth from Area E of Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath.
Table 1. Descriptive statistics for the isotopic analysis of the Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath domestic donkeys.
| 87Sr/86Sr | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Locus | Indivdual | Tooth | n | Mean | 2 s.d | min | max | ∆min-max |
| 114506 | EQ1* | M1 | 7 | 0.708247 | 0.00005 | 0.708208 | 0.708287 | 0.00008 |
| 114506 | EQ1* | M2 | 6 | 0.708242 | 0.00007 | 0.708202 | 0.708245 | 0.00004 |
| 114506 | EQ1* | M3 | 10 | 0.70836 | 0.00025 | 0.708198 | 0.708579 | 0.00038 |
| 19E82D04 | EQ2 | M1 | 11 | 0.70825 | 0.00007 | 0.708214 | 0.708296 | 0.00008 |
| 19E82D04 | EQ2 | M2 | 14 | 0.708245 | 0.00007 | 0.708194 | 0.708308 | 0.00011 |
| 19E82D04 | EQ2 | M3 | 9 | 0.708218 | 0.00008 | 0.708178 | 0.708294 | 0.00012 |
| 19E83C09 | EQ3 | M1 | 7 | 0.708302 | 0.00007 | 0.708231 | 0.708332 | 0.00010 |
| 19E83C09 | EQ3 | M2 | 8 | 0.708273 | 0.00008 | 0.708225 | 0.708332 | 0.00011 |
| 19E83C09 | EQ3 | M3 | 8 | 0.708234 | 0.00009 | 0.708134 | 0.708282 | 0.00015 |
| 20E93A05 | EQ4 | M1 | 9 | 0.708257 | 0.00009 | 0.7082 | 0.708308 | 0.00011 |
| 20E93A05 | EQ4 | M2 | 12 | 0.708227 | 0.00005 | 0.708199 | 0.708278 | 0.00008 |
| 20E93A05 | EQ4 | M3 | 3 | 0.708259 | 0.00006 | 0.708222 | 0.708282 | 0.00006 |
| 20E93A12 | EQ5 | M1 | 15 | 0.708394 | 0.00003 | 0.708356 | 0.708415 | 0.00006 |
| 20E93A12 | EQ5 | M2 | 16 | 0.708392 | 0.00003 | 0.70837 | 0.708416 | 0.00005 |
| 20E93A12 | EQ5 | M3 | 9 | 0.708397 | 0.00004 | 0.708386 | 0.708439 | 0.00005 |
| δ13C | ||||||||
| Locus | Indivdual | Tooth | n | Mean | s.d | min | max | ∆min-max |
| 114506 | EQ1* | M1 | 7 | −3.7 | 0.8 | −4.8 | −2.3 | 2.5 |
| 114506 | EQ1* | M2 | 8 | −3.2 | 0.6 | −4.1 | −2.4 | 1.7 |
| 114506 | EQ1* | M3 | 10 | −5.4 | 2.8 | −10.3 | −2.4 | 7.9 |
| 19E82D04 | EQ2 | M1 | 10 | −0.5 | 0.8 | −1.7 | 0.7 | 2.4 |
| 19E82D04 | EQ2 | M2 | 12 | −2.4 | 1.7 | −5.3 | 0 | 5.3 |
| 19E82D04 | EQ2 | M3 | 10 | −3.6 | 1.6 | −7 | −1.6 | 5.4 |
| 19E83C09 | EQ3 | M1 | 8 | −1.5 | 1.6 | −3.6 | 0.4 | 4 |
| 19E83C09 | EQ3 | M2 | 7 | −0.5 | 0.9 | −2.2 | 0.5 | 2.7 |
| 19E83C09 | EQ3 | M3 | 8 | −2.7 | 0.5 | −3.6 | −1.9 | 1.7 |
| 20E93A05 | EQ4 | M1 | 12 | −3.8 | 1.3 | −7.1 | −1.3 | 5.8 |
| 20E93A05 | EQ4 | M2 | 12 | −4.4 | 0.9 | −7.5 | −2.8 | 4.7 |
| 20E93A05 | EQ4 | M3 | 3 | −5.8 | 1.6 | −6.8 | −5 | 1.8 |
| 20E93A12 | EQ5 | M1 | 16 | −10.7 | 0.3 | −11.2 | −10.2 | 1 |
| 20E93A12 | EQ5 | M2 | 13 | −10.6 | 0.3 | −11.1 | −9.9 | 1.2 |
| 20E93A12 | EQ5 | M3 | 8 | −10.1 | 0.2 | −10.5 | −9.8 | 0.7 |
| δ18O | ||||||||
| Locus | Indivdual | Tooth | n | Mean | s.d | min | max | ∆min-max |
| 114506 | EQ1* | M1 | 7 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 2.6 | 1.7 |
| 114506 | EQ1* | M2 | 8 | 1.4 | 1.2 | −1.6 | 2.2 | 3.8 |
| 114506 | EQ1* | M3 | 10 | −0.1 | 1.5 | −2.3 | 1.8 | 4.1 |
| 19E82D04 | EQ2 | M1 | 10 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.9 | 1.7 |
| 19E82D04 | EQ2 | M2 | 12 | 0.3 | 0.8 | −1.2 | 1.4 | 2.6 |
| 19E82D04 | EQ2 | M3 | 10 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.9 | 1.7 |
| 19E83C09 | EQ3 | M1 | 8 | 1.1 | 0.7 | −0.5 | 2 | 2.5 |
| 19E83C09 | EQ3 | M2 | 7 | 0.3 | 0.4 | −0.1 | 0.9 | 1 |
| 19E83C09 | EQ3 | M3 | 8 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 2.5 | 1.2 |
| 20E93A05 | EQ4 | M1 | 12 | 0.4 | 0.4 | −0.9 | 1.3 | 2.2 |
| 20E93A05 | EQ4 | M2 | 12 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 20E93A05 | EQ4 | M3 | 3 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.3 |
| 20E93A12 | EQ5 | M1 | 16 | −1.8 | 1.1 | −3.5 | −0.1 | 3.4 |
| 20E93A12 | EQ5 | M2 | 13 | −2.2 | 0.4 | −2.8 | −1.4 | 1.4 |
| 20E93A12 | EQ5 | M3 | 8 | −2.8 | 0.6 | −3.3 | −1.6 | 1.7 |
* previously published data [2].
Carbon isotopes
EQ2, EQ3, and EQ4 (n = 9 molars; 82 samples) have mean carbon isotope values of −2.7‰ and ranges from −7.5‰ to 0.7‰ (S2 Table, Fig 5) while EQ21 (n = 3 molars; 37 samples) has a = −10.5‰ and a range between −11.2‰ to −9.8‰ (Fig 6). These values suggest that EQ2, EQ3 and EQ4 were eating vegetation from a mixed C3/C4 environment with a high proportion of C4 vegetation as was seen with EQ1 [2]. EQ21’s carbon values show a diet of >90% C3 from all molar samples, which indicates the dominance of C3 vegetation in the diet, matching the diet of previously sampled caprines (abbreviated OC for Ovis/Capra including both sheep and goat) [51].
Strontium isotopes
EQ2, EQ3 and EQ4 (n = 9 teeth, 81 samples) have average strontium ratios of 0.70824, and ranges of 0.70813 to 0.70833 (S3 Table, Fig 5). There are obvious similarities to the strontium ratios of the first and second molars of EQ1. EQ21 (n = 3 teeth; 40 samples) has an average of 0.70839, and ranges between 0.70836 to 0.70844 (Fig 6).
Oxygen isotopes
The mean δ18O values for EQ2, EQ3, and EQ4 (n = 9 teeth; 82 samples) = 0.96‰ and values range between −1.6 -to 2.6‰ (S2 Table, Fig 5). Modern oxygen isotope values for the Nile River before the construction of Aswan Dam provide an average δ18O (VSMOW) of 0.74‰ and measured in shallow groundwater reservoirs [52]. These values align with the mean oxygen isotope values for Egyptian archaeological human tooth and bone carbonate values analyzed at different locations along the Nile valley (1.05 ± 1.02‰) [53]. The seasonal fluctuation in the δ18O values of sacrificial donkeys EQ2, EQ3, and EQ4, record short negative spikes (~−1‰ relative to adjacent samples and marked by green shaded areas in Fig 5). These correspond to summer season incorporation of Blue Nile water from the Ethiopian highland with measured [55]. Calculating the mean δ18O values of all the molar teeth of EQ2, EQ3 and EQ4 excluding the negative pulses highlights the significance of these shifts. The average of EQ2 molars minus the two negative samples at 6.4 mm and 34 mm (n = 30) is 0.8 ± 0.56‰ (1 std. dev.) vs. 0.95‰, the mean of the two negative pulses, a difference more than two standard deviations lower than the average. This pattern is repeated in EQ3 (n = 22; 1.2 + 0.8‰ vs. −0.5‰) and EQ4 (n = 22; 0.7 + 0.4‰ vs. −0.4‰). The oxygen isotope values for EQ21 are more negative = −2.3‰ than those of the donkeys (2 tail t-test assuming equal variance p > 0.00001) and range between −0.1 to −3.5‰ (Fig 6). EQ21 values agree with oxygen isotope values measured in caprines from Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath [51] and correspond to mean modern δ18O values of rainfall of the southern Levant in proximity to the site between −3.5– (−5)‰ (VSMOW) [54].
Statistical analyses
The statistical procedure PROC DISTANCE in SAS was used to assess all of the isotope data (carbon, oxygen and strontium) currently available from Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath (EQ1 [2]; all caprines [51]) and the three additional equids (EQ2, EQ3, EQ4 and EQ21) discussed here. The DISTANCE procedure computes measures of dissimilarity or similarity between the observations. The output data set was then used as input to the MDS procedures. The MDS PROC performed multidimensional scaling to create Dimensions 1–4 (see Supplementary S4 Table). Dimensions 3 and 4 are all near zero and are redundant. As such, only Dimensions 1 and 2 are graphed (Fig 7).
Fig 7. MDS Procedure plot of all domestic animals.
The unique pattern of OC#3 is highlighted. Arrows indicate the final three samples of the third molar of EQ1.
Discussion: Egyptian origins
Previous isotopic analyses of EQ1 utilized carbon, oxygen and strontium isotopic proxies as evidence that this individual was born and lived in the Nile Valley prior to travel and eventual sacrifice at the site of Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath [2]. EQ1 completed its early tooth development in the Nile Valley and later migrated to Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath where it completed the formation of its third molar. The three samples closest to the root/enamel junction (REJ) are the last to mineralize and reflect the shift in diet, water source and local geology (highlighted with arrows in Fig 7). This corroborates textual and other archaeological information that already pointed toward the existence of long-distance trade of donkey caravans between Egypt and Canaan during this early urban period.
The analyses of four additional equids (from 3 burials and a single loose mandible) presented here provides additional direct evidence for the import of equids from Egypt to the site of Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath. While all four burials point to an Egyptian origin, the single loose mandible isotopic signature suggests a local origin from around the site. This is mirrored by the results of the other domestic livestock and bioavailable strontium analyses. While a single caprine was also identified as having an Egyptian origin, all the other caprines sampled (n = 16) reflect discrete values that indicate their life history was focused locally at Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath [2,51].
The primary indicator for Nile Valley origins of EQ1–4 is the dominance of C4 vegetation (>50%) in their diet, as indicated by the δ13C carbonate values measured in the early tooth formation of the EQ1 (M1 + M2) and in all three molar teeth of EQ2, EQ3 and EQ4 (Fig 5). As has been previously asserted [1] the Nile Valley is the nearest geographic location where C4 vegetation can serve as primary fodder for herbivores [55,56]. Seasonal shifts in carbon isotope values can be associated with agricultural cycles in the Nile Valley. C4 plants are not the sole forage or fodder source in Egypt but serve as a good food source for livestock. It is evident that on a seasonal basis donkeys might eat more C3 plants (by-products of agricultural production). The expected pattern of change in carbon isotopes for an animal moving from the Nile River Valley to the interior of the southern Levant would be a shift from a C4 plant dominant diet to a predominant C3 diet (Fig 8).
Fig 8. Local vs. Nile Valley bivariate plotting of mean intra and inter-tooth isotope values.
This pattern is reflected in all equids showing a greater C3 contribution to the diet in their third molars. In contrast, the δ13C values of the sampled caprines predominantly reflect the C3 vegetation that dominates the Mediterranean climate with only a minor contribution of C4 vegetation [51]. EQ21’s carbon values show a diet of >90% C3 from all molar samples which indicates the dominance of C3 vegetation in the diet (Fig 6).
EQ1 δ18O values match archaeological human tooth and bone carbonate values that were analyzed at different locations along the Nile valley (+1.05 ± 1.02‰)54 and the same is true for EQ2, EQ3 and EQ4. In addition, the oxygen isotopes of EQ2, EQ3 and EQ4 provide an important secondary marker for Egyptian origin with the observation of the Blue Nile negative oxygen isotope pulses along the teeth. Sequential sampling along first and second molars display a negative dip (~1‰) of oxygen isotope values at around 33−43 mm from the root-enamel-junction (REJ) that is congruent with seasonal flow of tributary water into the Nile River. These low points are associated with late summer flooding caused by the Blue Nile input. The flow of monsoon water from the highlands of Ethiopia into the Blue Nile occurs during late summer months and provides a pulse of 18O depleted water that dominate premodern Nile volume (85% of Nile flow) and composition [57,58]. The summer main rainy season mean oxygen isotope composition of the Blue Nile from the highlands of Ethiopia is −2.3‰ [57]. The intensity of Blue Nile water flow varies between years in agreement with ENSO (El Nino Southern Oscillation) [59]. It is therefore unsurprising to see variability in the expression of Blue Nile signal within and between individuals. Further, a second negative dip in the oxygen isotope values is suggested by trends in the final samples of the teeth indicating a complete seasonal cycle.
In contrast, the oxygen isotope values for EQ21 are more negative = −2.3‰ and match the δ18O values in caprine (OC) teeth studied at Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath [51]. Values vary between 0 – (−2) ‰ (n = 13, and are comparable to prehistoric gazelles originating in low topographies of the eastern Galilee and much higher than the negative values measured in high topography gazelles [60]. This pattern suggests that the EB caprine herds, and EQ21 were herded eastwards from the site to the lower reaches of the Judean Mountains. Even though the Judean Mountains elevation reaches ~1000 m above modern sea level, there is no indication that they were herded into the higher reaches of the Judean Mountains since their isotopic values are comparable to the gazelle’s low topographies values.
Arnold et al. [2] detail plant collection strategy and results that allowed creation of a local isoscape surrounding the site of Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath. There is an 87Sr/86 Sr range of 0.7084–0.7085 for the rendzina soils that cover the area east of the site. This hilly region is very suitable for the herding of both grazers (sheep) and browsers (goats), while the flatter dark brown alluvium vertisol soils located west of the site that extend to the seashore are more suitable for rainfed cereal agriculture [61]. Plant sampling also took place on Holocene alluvium soils (vertisols) to the west of the site. However, this sampling cannot provide a credible estimate for all alluvial soils as alluvium strontium ratios vary depending on parent bedrock weathering and atmospheric deposition. Terra rossa (FAO: Cambisols and Phaeozems) soils develop on hard marine sedimentary bedrock (limestone and dolomite) primarily through atmospheric deposition [49,61]. This is evident from examination of plants growing on these soils since they incorporate bioavailable strontium with 87Sr/86Sr ratios of 0.7086 ± 0.0003. Moffat et al. [62] report two soil data points in the vicinity of the site that agree with 87Sr/86Sr ratios ranging from 0.70828–0.70870.
In contrast, isoscapes are not as well developed in Egypt. A literature review of isotopic studies for the Nile Valley presents a median based on both animal and human data of 0.7076 ± 0.0003. However, the analyzed faunal samples show sizeable ranges and much wider ranges than the majority of the human samples. While the data from Tell el-Dab‘a (Hutwaret/Avaris) in the northeastern Nile Delta fits this range [63], it is problematically drawn from six archaeological bone samples. Strontium analysis from bone is problematic due to the greater impact of diagenesis on bone [64] as there is no accepted pretreatment that can fully deal with the issue of diagenesis in bone [65]. In addition, one of the Egyptian “baseline” animals is an equid, which is potentially a very mobile animal in the landscape as is argued here. Human burials from the Nile Valley yield tighter ratio ranges. For example, Memphis in Lower Egypt, =0.7078 ± 0.003; range 0.7074–0.7087 [66]. Although not exclusive to the Nile Valley, the strontium ratios do not contradict the other two independent lines of isotopic evidence – carbon and oxygen, that argue for Egyptian origins of EQ2, EQ3 and EQ4.
The statistical analyses display two clusters. The first and second molars of EQ1 (while that individual lived in Egypt), EQ2, EQ3 and EQ4 all cluster on the right side of the graph (Fig 7). As does OC (Caprine) #3 – previously identified as having an Egyptian origin [2,51]. EQ21 and most caprines (apart from OC#3) all cluster on the left side of the graph. Also, on the left side of the graph, are the two samples closest to the REJ of EQ1’s M3 as these are the final samples to mineralize and thereby incorporate the isotopic signatures surrounding the site. From the pooled data of carbon, oxygen and strontium isotope values, we define a foreign cluster (EQ2, EQ3, EQ4, EQ1 first and second molars and OC#3) versus a local cluster at the site that includes EQ21, all other OC, the two final samples of EQ1’s third molar, one final sample of EQ2 and the two final samples of EQ4.
Discussion: Selection for sacrifice
All equids imported from Egypt are buried, fully articulated in household contexts and under habitation floors. Only equids receive this treatment and only equids from Egypt. One goat indicates Egyptian origins but was not intentionally buried [51]. Rather it was butchered, eaten and its remains discarded in a midden. One donkey (EQ21) does not have isotopic values that indicate its origin in Egypt, and it was also not intentionally buried. It was butchered and its remains were discarded.
From our analysis, the donkeys imported from Egypt had greater social value than those raised and utilized locally. Cross-culturally, the selection of sacrificial animals is known to be based on criteria such as age, sex, species [67] and even coat color when preservation allows [68,69], but never seemingly selected based on geographic origin. From the perspective of the isotope studies, it is the Egyptian import status that is one of the key criteria for an animal to be selected for sacrifice. Being young and female are the other two variables. Thus, young female donkeys from Egypt are the ideal sacrificial animal at Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath during the EB III. Perhaps, as noted elsewhere, they represented a distinct totem animal linked with the identity of inhabitants as merchants/traders [9]. These stand in contrast to a local equid (EQ21 – unable to determine sex) that was butchered and likely eaten. EQ21 derives from an earlier deposit at the site (Stratum E7) which slightly pre-dates the four completely articulated equid burials (probably less than 50 years).
It is suggested that even within this preferred group, EQ1 is noteworthy. EQ1 was buried with the front and hind legs tied together (trussed) below the abdomen, and the upper neck (cervical) vertebra and cranium dismembered and placed on the abdomen facing east. It is evident the animal was sacrificed, the head entirely cut off and carefully placed on the abdomen facing in the opposite direction [1]. In contrast, the other equids were buried without trussed limbs and without decapitation. In addition, it appears that EQ1 alone was prepared for sacrifice as the isotopic data indicates her residence at the site for several months prior to sacrifice as is evident from the three final data points (on M3 closest to REJ) as has been previously argued [2]. These final strontium ratios are also more radiogenic than the other equids and local livestock. These ratios reflect agricultural areas on terra rosa soils like those found to the west of Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath [51]. It can be deduced that even though EQ1 was grazed locally toward the end of her life, she was treated slightly differently from the other local equids. This imported donkey was kept penned and foddered with hay that was harvested in the valley, a product of dry farmed cereals. This donkey was never herded with other livestock east of the site.
The archaeological, iconographic and textual evidence from the broader region surrounding the site of Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath highlights the centrality of equids in the culture and societies of the mid-3rd millennium BCE. Equids are known as work animals within the agricultural systems, used for plowing, threshing and as draft animals. In addition, equids played a significant role in trade, not only moving goods on their backs but also as valuable trade items themselves [33,70–72].
It is clear that some equids were elevated to the status of prestige animals as evidenced by their intentional sacrifice and burial at sites across the Levant, Syria and Mesopotamia. Notably, these burials occur in a variety of different contexts, both domestic [33] and elite [70,73,74], singularly and in pairs [75], both males and females and varying in age from nine months [75] to nine years [76]. This suggests regional preferences for specific types of equids for sacrifice, such as those from Egypt, as is proposed here. Further, the textual data also discusses selective breeding of equids and desired qualities of animals for particular purposes [73,75].
Our analysis has demonstrated that the non-local donkeys (young females in particular) were preferentially selected for sacrifice and burial beneath the floors of buildings as the neighborhood is being renewed in the Early Bronze III urban center at Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath. The isotopic analysis suggests that imported Egyptian asses were preferentially selected as sacrificial animals, while locally raised equids were butchered and likely eaten.
The data further highlights the charged ritual significance and value of select donkeys in this period of early complex state-level urban societies in the region. It was not any donkey that was deemed worthy of sacrifice at Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath, but only Egyptian young females. This suggests the function of these sacrifices is not simply a totem animal or an occupation marker but was socially and ritually charged by having come from Egypt. The importance and charged significance of the display of economic, and likely social and political connections with Egypt, was an integral part of the sacrificial ritual. Thus, an Egyptian donkey might have been seen as an exotic and special animal, worthy of specific ritual use.
Materials and methods
All necessary permits were obtained for the study described, which complied with all relevant regulations. Excavation permits were issued to Aren Maeir by the Israel Antiquities Authority (Permit #, G-56/2008, G-51/2010, G-66/2016, G-62/2017). Permits for export of material from Israel were issued to Aren Maeir by the Israel Antiquities Authority (Permit # 13840 – July 25, 2012). Additional information regarding the ethical, cultural, and scientific considerations specific to inclusivity in global research is included in the Supporting Information (Supplementary S1 Checklist)
Two radiocarbon contexts (RTD 6830 and RTD 6844) from Stratum E5c were measured from Building 134307, in which donkey (EQ1) was buried. The samples were taken from an installation (E15AM09) (Fig 9). Sample RTD 6830 (Basket # TS12E15AM100) was taken within broken sherds of a holemouth cooking pot found inside a cooking installation built of stones. Seeds were measured in three separate targets to reach a higher precision for the context. For sample RTD 6844 (Basket # TS12E15AM083), seeds were taken from a thin white layer of phytoliths covering the cooking installation. Four separate targets were measured for a high precision date. For the sampling, pretreatment and measurement protocols [77–81] of the Dangoor Research Accelerator Spectroemter at the Weizmann Institute. The radiocarbon dates were calibrated using Oxcal v4.4.4 Bronk Ramsey (2021) software based on the calibration curve Reimer et al 2020 [81]. The measurements of each context were combined using the Rcombine function in the Oxcal v4.4.4 program, and both contexts passed the χ2 test. We built a small model using Oxcal v4.4.4 software [80,81] together with the samples from Stratum E5a [14], including a sequential boundary between the layers, since no samples from Stratum E5b were measured from this room. The agreement of the model is 61%. The modeled 68.3% results range between 2870−2670 BC for layer E5c, with three to four more likely ranges of years within those 200 years of probability distributions (Fig 10 and Table 2).
Fig 9. Contexts of the radiocarbon samples from stratum E5c, Ins. E15AM09.
Fig 10. Modeled probability distributions of radiocarbon dates from layers E5c and E5a.
The 68.3% probability distributions are plotted in darker color and marked by a line underneath the plots.
Table 2. Radiocarbon dates and their calibrated ranges from layer E5c. The Rcomb refers to the average of the multiple radiocarbon determinations for the same sample material. Modelled Rcomb refers to the calibrated range of the sample after Bayesian analysis modelling. The modelled distribution is influenced by the presence of the samples in layer E5a as shown in Fig 10 in yellow.
| Laboratory # | Libby Age year BP |
± 1σ | Calibrated range BC 68.3% probability | Calibrated range BC 95.4% probability | Context Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTD 6830.1 | 4090 | 35 | 2836 (11.9%) 2818 2666 (13.8%) 2646 2636 (42.6%) 2579 |
2851(19.3%) 2808 2747 (5.0%) 2726 2698 (70.3%) 2572 2512 (0.9%) 2505 |
L.E15AM08 B.TS12E15AM100 Seeds in phytoliths layer |
| RTD 6830.2 | 4100 | 35 | |||
| RTD 6830.3 | 4095 | 35 | |||
| Rcomb 6830 X2-Test: df = 2 T = 0.0(5% 6.0) | 4095 | 18 | |||
| Modelled Rcomb6830 | 2851 (37.8%) 281 2747 (15.6%) 2727 2698 (14.8%) 2667 |
2861 (44.2%) 2806 2756 (21.5%) 2718 2704(29.8%) 2634 |
|||
| RTD 6844.1 | 4155 | 35 | 2872 (14.8%) 2849 2810 (8.1%) 2796 2784 (25.0%) 2745 2728 (20.3%) 2696 |
2878 (19.6%) 2838 2816(75.4%) 2668 2643 (0.4%) 2640 |
L.E15AM08 B.TS12E15AM083 seeds in cooking installation |
| RTD 6844.2 | 4210 | 35 | |||
| RTD 6844.3 | 4160 | 35 | |||
| RTD 6844.4 | 4135 | 35 | |||
| Rcomb RTD 6844 X2-Test: df = 3 T = 2.5(5% 7.8) | 4165 | 18 | |||
| Modelled Rcomb6844 | 2868 (19.1%) 2837 2814 (9.0%) 2798 2759 (19.5%) 2716 2708 (20.7%) 2668 |
2874 (91.9%) 2662 2652 (3.5%) 2636 |
As each analyzed equid individual had an intact mandible, it was possible to sample all three molar teeth from each individual (Table 3). The total number of teeth per sample was determined by the size of the tooth. The third molar from EQ4 was sampled less due to breakage. Sequential sampling of teeth followed methods outlined by Bocherens et al. [82]. A series of 1.0 mm bands were drilled sequentially along the mesial lobe of each molar tooth. Dentin and cementum were removed from the equine teeth [83] prior to enamel sampling.
Table 3. Sample description from Area E at Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath.
| Locus | Individual | Tooth | Total # of samples/tooth |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19E82D04 | EQ2 | M1 | 20 |
| 19E82D04 | EQ2 | M2 | 26 |
| 19E82D04 | EQ2 | M3 | 19 |
| 19E83C09 | EQ3 | M1 | 14 |
| 19E83C09 | EQ3 | M2 | 16 |
| 19E83C09 | EQ3 | M3 | 16 |
| 20E93A05 | EQ4 | M1 | 19 |
| 20E93A05 | EQ4 | M2 | 24 |
| 20E93A05 | EQ4 | M3 | 6 |
| 20E93A12 | EQ21 | M1 | 31 |
| 20E93A12 | EQ21 | M2 | 26 |
| 20E93A12 | EQ21 | M3 | 17 |
Pretreatment of the samples followed the methods of Balasse and colleagues [84–86]. The tooth enamel was treated with a 2.5% NaOCl (sodium hypochlorite) solution overnight to remove organics and then rinsed five times with distilled water and treated with 0.1M CH3COOH (acetic acid, pH3) for four hours to remove diagenetic carbonates. The samples were then rinsed five times with distilled water and freeze-dried. Even-numbered samples were analyzed for strontium isotope ratios and odd-numbered samples were analyzed for carbon and oxygen isotope compositions. Strontium isotope measurements were performed on a Nu Plasma HR multi-collector inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometer (MC-ICP-MS) at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Geology Department. Tooth enamel samples were dissolved in 0.5 ml of 3N nitric acid (HNO3) under clean lab conditions. Cation exchange columns loaded with Eichrom® Sr spec resin and pre-conditioned with 3N HNO3 were prepared and the 0.5 ml samples were then loaded. Column blanks consisted of 0.5 ml of 3N HNO3. Columns were washed four times with 0.3 ml of 3N HNO3 and then strontium was eluted into 4 ml Teflon® vials with 1 ml of 0.05N HNO3 and 3 ml of ultrapure deionized water (Milli-Q, Millipore) following Horwitz et al. [87]. Sample concentrations are measured and corrected to optimal range. Linear normalization of sample results was applied based on within-run trends in SRM 987 relative to its accepted value (0.710255). Analytical precision on repeated standard measurements was ± 0.00003.
Carbon and oxygen isotopic analyses were performed in the Department of Anthropology’s Stable Isotope Laboratory and the Mass Spectrometry Laboratory of the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Approximately 700 μg of the prepared sample was weighed into individual vessels and reacted with 100% phosphoric acid (H3PO4) at 70°C in an automated Kiel III carbonate device in which CO2 is liberated from enamel, cryogenically distilled, and subsequently flowed to a Finnigan MAT 252 isotopic ratio mass spectrometer. Two laboratory standards (NBS18 and NBS 19) were interspersed, and replicates were run to ensure accuracy. Analytical precision is typically ±0.07‰ for δ13C and ±0.14‰ for δ18O.
Supporting information
(DOCX)
(DOCX)
(DOCX)
(XLSX)
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
We are grateful for the assistance of Stanley H. Ambrose, Tom Johnson, and Craig Lundstrom for lab access and assistance with technical issues, Phil Slater, Norbert Gajos, Matthew Fort and Stanley Anderson for technical support at the University of Illinois (Urbana-Champaign), Annie Brown for selection and preparation of some of the samples (University of Manitoba), and Susan Mendoza and Rachel Powers for guidance to the Student Summer Scholar Program (Grand Valley State University). Thanks are extended to the Statistical Consulting Center at GVSU for invaluable statistics assistance. Finally, we gratefully acknowledge and thank the dedicated work of the staff and team members of the Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath Archaeological Project, and the host of colleagues and students from around the world who participated in the excavations. Without their unstinting support, this research could not have been successfully carried out. Any errors are the responsibility of the authors. We would like to acknowledge the following organizations for their support: The Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath Archaeological Project and its staff and team members; Bar-Ilan University and the Martin (Szusz) Department of Land of Israel Studies and Archaeology at Bar-Ilan University; the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Faculty of Arts, St. Paul’s College and Near Eastern and Biblical Archaeology Laboratory of the University of Manitoba; Grand Valley State University; and the Jewish and Catholic Foundations of Manitoba. The Radiocarbon research was supported by the Exilarch Foundation for the Dangoor Research Accelerator Mass Spectrometer (D-REAMS) Laboratory and the Radiocarbon Field work was supported by the Kimmel Center for Archaeological Science and George Schwartzman Fund.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
The research was funded by the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Grants #895‐2011‐1005; and 410-2009-1303). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Greenfield HJ, Shai I, Maeir A. Being an “ass”: an Early Bronze Age burial of a donkey from Tell es-Safi/Gath, Israel. Bioarchaeology of the Near East. 2012;6:21–52. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Arnold ER, Hartman G, Greenfield HJ, Shai I, Babcock LE, Maeir AM. Isotopic Evidence for Early Trade in Animals between Old Kingdom Egypt and Canaan. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0157650. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157650 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Maeir AM. Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath I: Report on the 1996–2005 Seasons. 1. Ägypten und Altes Testament. 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ackermann O, Bruins HJ. In Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath I: the 1996-2005 Seasons (ed Aren M. Maeir) 123-132. Harrassowitz Verlag; 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Frumin S, Melamed Y, Weiss E. Tell it in Gath. In: Shai I, et al. Editors. Studies in the History and Archaeology of Israel. Essays in Honor of Aren M. Maeir on the Occasion of His Sixtieth Birthday. Zaphon. 2018. p. 386–413. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Frumin S, Melamed Y, Maeir AM, Greenfield HJ, Weiss E. Agricultural subsistence, land use and long-distance mobility within the Early Bronze Age southern Levant: Archaeobotanical evidence from the urban site of Tell eṣ-Ṣâfī/Gath. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports. 2021;37:102873. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Greenfield HJ, Ross J, Albaz S, Greenfield TL, Beller JA, Frumin S, Weiss E, Maeir AM. Household Archaeology During the Early Bronze III of Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath. No Place Like Home.;28:127. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dorsey DA. The roads and highways of ancient Israel. Wipf and Stock Publishers. 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Greenfield HJ, Ross J, Greenfield TL, Albaz S, Richardson SJ, Maeir AM. Household rituals and merchant caravanners: the phenomenon of Early Bronze Age donkey burials from Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath, Israel. Animals. 2022;12(15):1931. doi: 10.3390/ani12151931 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Maeir AM. Vol. 1: Text. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag in Kommission. 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Greenfield HJ, Shai I, Maeir AM. In Proceedings of 9th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East (June 9-13, 2014, Basel), Vol. 3 (eds Rolf A. Stucky, Oskar Kaelin, & Hans-Peter Mathys). Harrassowitz Verlag, 2016;479–85. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Greenfield HJ, Shai I, Maeir AM. The early bronze age at tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath. Near Eastern Archaeology. 2017;80(4):247–54. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Shai I, Greenfield HJ, Regev J, Boaretto E, Eliyahu-Behar A, Maeir AM. The Early Bronze Age Remains at Tell eṣ-Ṣāfi/Gath: An Interim Report. Tel Aviv. 2014;41(1):20–49. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shai I, Greenfield HJ, Maeir AM. The Stratigraphy of the Early Bronze Age (2004–2014). Zaphon, Münster; 2023. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Uziel J, Maeir AM. In Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath I: Report on the 1996–2005 Seasons. Ägypten und Altes Testament 69 (vol. 1/text).
- 16.Bliss FJ, Macalister RA. Excavations in Palestine during the Years 1898-1900. Committee of the Palestine Exploration Fund. 1902. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chadwick JR, Uziel J, Welch EL, Maeir AM. Walled up to heaven! Early and Middle Bronze Age fortifications at Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath. Near East Archaeol. 2017;80(4):285–91. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lewis RS, Maeir AM. New insights into Bliss and Macalister’s excavations at Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath. Near Eastern Archaeology. 2017;80(4):241–3. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Levy-Reifer A. In Maeir AM. Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath I: Report on the 1996–2005 Seasons. Ägypten und Altes Testament 69 (vol. 1/text).
- 20.Levy-Reifer A. Settlement processes during the Early Bronze Age in the Judean Shephelah. Cathedra. 2016;161:7–36. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Miroschedji PD. Rise and collapse in the Southern Levant in the Early Bronze Age. Scienze dell’Antichità. 2009;15:101–29. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Shai I, Chadwick JR, Welch E, Katz J, Greenfield HJ, Maeir AM. The early bronze age fortifications at tell es-Safi/Gath, Israel. Palestine Exploration Quarterly. 2016;148(1):42–58. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Welch E. Exploring the Holy Land: 150 years of the Palestine Exploration Fund: edited by D. Gurevich and A. Kidron, Sheffield, Equinox, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chadwick JR, Welch EL, Maeir AM. In Tell Es-Safi/Gath III: Studies on the Early Bronze Age (eds Itzhaq Shai, Haskel J. Greenfield, & Aren M. Maeir) Ch. 2023;3;41–54. Zaphon. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Albaz S, Greenfield HJ, Greenfield TL, Maeir AM. Evidence for administration and leisure/recreation at early Bronze Age Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath. Near Eastern Archaeology. 2017;80(4):270–2. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Arnold E, Beller J, Behar A, Ben-Shlomo D, Greenfield TL, Greenfield HJ. Interregional Trade and Exchange at Early Bronze Age Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath. Near Eastern Archaeology. 2017;80(4):264–7. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Greenfield HJ, Greenfield TL, Arnold E, Shai I, Albaz S, Maeir AM. Evidence for movement of goods and animals from Egypt to Canaan during the early bronze of the southern Levant: A view from Tell Eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath. Ägypten und Levante/Egypt and the Levant. 2020;30:377–97. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Smith ME. How can archaeologists identify early cities? Definitions, types, and attributes. Eurasia at the dawn of history: Urbanization and social change. 2016. p. 153–68. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Maeir AM. In The Canaanite Was Then in the Land (Gen. 12: 6): Selected Studies on the Late Bronze and Early Iron Ages of Southern Canaan (eds A. M. Maeir, I. Shai, & C. McKinny) 1-18 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG; 2019. Jul 8. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Shai I, Uziel J, Maeir AM. In Tell es-Safi/Gath II: Excavations and Studies. 2020:1–52. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shai I, Uziel J, Chadwick JR, Maeir AM. The Late Bronze Age at Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath. Near Eastern Archaeology. 2017;80(4):292–5. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Greenfield HJ, Ross J, Greenfield TL, Maeir AM. Sacred and the profane: donkey burial and consumption at Early Bronze Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath. Fierce lions, angry mice and fat-tailed sheep: Animal encounters in the ancient Near East. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Greenfield HJ, Greenfield TL, Shai I, Albaz S, Maeir AM. Household rituals and sacrificial donkeys: why are there so many domestic donkeys buried in an early bronze age neighborhood at Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath?. Near Eastern Archaeology. 2018;81(3):202–11. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shai I, Greenfield HJ, Albaz S, Ross J, Maeir AM. In Shai I, Greenfield HJ, Maeir AM, editors. Tell Es-Safi/Gath III: Studies on the Early Bronze Age. Zaphon; 2023. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ökse AT, Blum SW, Efe T, Kienlin TL, Pernicka E. From past to present: studies in memory of Manfred O. Korfmann. Bonn: Verlag Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH. 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hershkovitz I, Arbel G, Bar-Yosef O, Goren A. The relationship between nawamis entrance orientations and sunset direction. Tel Aviv. 1985;12(2):204–11. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Teeth HS. Cambridge University Press; 2005. Jul 21. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hoppe KA, Stover SM, Pascoe JR, Amundson R. Tooth enamel biomineralization in extant horses: implications for isotopic microsampling. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 2004;206(3–4):355–65. [Google Scholar]
- 39.DeNiro MJ, Epstein S. Influence of diet on the distribution of carbon isotopes in animals. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 1978;42(5):495–506. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Vogel JC, Van Der Merwe NJ. Isotopic evidence for early maize cultivation in New York State. American Antiquity. 1977;42(2):238–42. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Vogel JC. Isotopic assessment of the dietary habits of ungulates. South African Journal of Science. 1978;74(8):298. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hartman G. Impacts of environmental deterioration on the carbon isotope values of modern vegetation and gazelles in the southern Levant: predicting the severity of the Younger Dryas. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 2012;321:55–64. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Danin A. Distribution atlas of plants in the Flora Palaestina area. Israel academy of sciences and humanities. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Vogel JC, Fuls A, Danin A. Geographical and environmental distribution of C3 and C4 grasses in the Sinai, Negev, and Judean deserts. Oecologia. 1986;70(2):258–65. doi: 10.1007/BF00379249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Land 46, Lundelius EL, Valastro S. Isotopic ecology of deer bones. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 1980;32:143–51. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Longinelli A. Oxygen isotopes in mammal bone phosphate: a new tool for paleohydrological and paleoclimatological research?. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 1984;48(2):385–90. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Dansgaard W. Stable isotopes in precipitation. Tellus. 1964;16(4):436–68. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ericson JE. Strontium isotope characterization in the study of prehistoric human ecology. Journal of Human Evolution. 1985;14(5):503–14. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hartman G, Richards M. Mapping and defining sources of variability in bioavailable strontium isotope ratios in the Eastern Mediterranean. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 2014;126:250–64. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sealy JC, van der Merwe NJ, Sillen A, Kruger FJ, Krueger HW. 87Sr86Sr as a dietary indicator in modern and archaeological bone. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1991;18(3):399–416. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Arnold E, Greenfield H, Hartman G, Greenfield T, Shai I, Carter-McGee P, et al. Provisioning the Early Bronze Age city of Tell es-Safi/Gath, Israel: isotopic analyses of domestic livestock management patterns. Open Quaternary. 2018;4(1). [Google Scholar]
- 52.Salem ZE, Sefelnasr A, Hasan SS. As a water resources management tool, groundwater quality assessment for irrigation in the Young Alluvial Plain of Western Nile Delta, Egypt. Sustainability of groundwater in the Nile Valley, Egypt. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 2022. p. 179–99. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Buzon MR, Bowen GJ. Oxygen and carbon isotope analysis of human tooth enamel from the New Kingdom site of Tombos in Nubia. Archaeometry. 2010;52(5):855–68. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ayalon A, Bar-Matthews M, Schilman B. Rainfall isotopic characteristics at various sites in Israel and the relationships with unsaturated zone water. The Ministry. 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bernhardt CE, Horton BP, Stanley JD. Nile Delta vegetation response to Holocene climate variability. Geology. 2012;40(7):615–8. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Thompson AH, Richards MP, Shortland A, Zakrzewski SR. Isotopic palaeodiet studies of ancient Egyptian fauna and humans. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2005;32(3):451–63. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Tekleab S, Wenninger J, Uhlenbrook S. Characterisation of stable isotopes to identify residence times and runoff components in two meso-scale catchments in the Abay/Upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 2014;18(6):2415–31. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Levin NE, Zipser EJ, Cerling TE. Isotopic composition of waters from Ethiopia and Kenya: Insights into moisture sources for eastern Africa. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 2009;114(D23). [Google Scholar]
- 59.Le T, Ha KJ, Bae DH, Kim SH. Causal effects of Indian Ocean Dipole on El Niño–Southern Oscillation during 1950–2014 based on high-resolution models and reanalysis data. Environmental Research Letters. 2020;15(10):1040b6. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hartman G, Hovers E, Hublin JJ, Richards M. Isotopic evidence for Last Glacial climatic impacts on Neanderthal gazelle hunting territories at Amud Cave, Israel. Journal of Human Evolution. 2015;84:71–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Singer A. The soils of Israel, The Soils of Israel. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 2007. Available from: doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-71734-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Moffat I, Rudd R, Willmes M, Mortimer G, Kinsley L, McMorrow L, et al. Bioavailable soil and rock strontium isotope data from Israel. Earth System Science Data. 2020;12(4):3641–52. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Stantis C, Schutkowski H. Stable Isotope Analyses to Investigate Hyksos Identity and Origins. The Enigma of the Hyksos Volume I ASOR Conference Boston 2017− ICAANE Conference Munich 2018–Collected Papers. Otto Harrassowitz. 2019. p. 321–38. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hoppe KA, Koch PL, Furutani TT. Assessing the preservation of biogenic strontium in fossil bones and tooth enamel. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. 2003;13(1–2):20–8. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Slovak NM, Paytan A. Applications of Sr isotopes in archaeology. Handbook of Environmental Isotope Geochemistry. 2012. p. 743–68. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Buzon MR, Simonetti A. Strontium isotope (87Sr/86Sr) variability in the Nile Valley: identifying residential mobility during ancient Egyptian and Nubian sociopolitical changes in the New Kingdom and Napatan periods. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2013;151(1):1–9. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22235 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Schwartz GM. Archaeology and sacrifice. Sacred killing: the archaeology of sacrifice in the ancient Near East. 2012. p. 1–32. [Google Scholar]
- 68.Ekroth G. Animal sacrifice in antiquity. The Oxford handbook of animals in classical thought and life. 2014. p. 324–54. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Goepfert N, Dufour E, Prieto G, Verano J. Herds for the gods? Selection criteria and herd management at the mass sacrifice site of Huanchaquito-Las Llamas during the Chimú period, northern coast of Peru. Environmental Archaeology. 2020;25(3):296–309. [Google Scholar]
- 70.Stantis C, Compton GS, Kharobi A, Maaranen N, Nowell GM, Macpherson C, et al. Mobility and connection among the Early Bronze Age Syrian elite. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports. 2023;51:104142. [Google Scholar]
- 71.Shai I, Greenfield HJ, Brown A, Albaz S, Maeir AM. The importance of the donkey as a pack animal in the Early Bronze Age southern Levant: A view from “Tell eṣ-Ṣāfī”/Gath. Zeitschrift des Deutschen Palästina-Vereins. 2016;:1–25. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Dolce R. Equids as luxury gifts at the centre of interregional economic dynamics in the archaic urban cultures of the ancient near east. Syria Archéologie, art et histoire. 2014;91:55–75. [Google Scholar]
- 73.Weber JA. Elite equids: redefining equid burials of the mid-to late 3rd millennium BC from Umm el-Marra, Syria. MOM Éditions. 2008;49(1):499–519. [Google Scholar]
- 74.Postgate N, Uerpmann HP. Equids of Sumer, again. Naturwissenschaften. 1991;19(2). [Google Scholar]
- 75.Sapir-Hen L, Gadot Y, Lipschits O. Ceremonial donkey burial, social status, and settlement hierarchy in the Early Bronze III: The case of Tel Azekah. The Wide Lens in Archaeology: Honoring Brian Hesse’s Contributions to Anthropological Archaeology. 2017. p. 259–70. [Google Scholar]
- 76.De Miroschedji P, Sadeq M, Faltings D, Boulez V, Naggiar-Moliner L, Sykes N, et al. Les fouilles de Tell es-Sakan (Gaza) nouvelles données sur les contacts égypto-cananéens aux Iv e-III e millénaires. Paléorient. 2001;:75–104. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Boaretto E. Dating materials in good archaeological contexts: the next challenge for radiocarbon analysis. Radiocarbon. 2009;51(1):275–81. [Google Scholar]
- 78.Regev L, Steier P, Shachar Y, Mintz E, Wild EM, Kutschera W, et al. D-REAMS: a new compact AMS system for radiocarbon measurements at the Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. Radiocarbon. 2017;59(3):775–84. [Google Scholar]
- 79.Regev J, Gadot Y, Uziel J, Chalaf O, Shalev Y, Roth H, et al. Radiocarbon chronology of Iron Age Jerusalem reveals calibration offsets and architectural developments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024;121(19):e2321024121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2321024121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Ramsey CB. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon. 2009;51(1):337–60. [Google Scholar]
- 81.Reimer PJ, Austin WE, Bard E, Bayliss A, Blackwell PG, Ramsey CB, et al. The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere radiocarbon age calibration curve (0–55 cal kBP). Radiocarbon. 2020;62(4):725–57. [Google Scholar]
- 82.Bocherens H, Mashkour M, Billiou D, Pellé E, Mariotti A. A new approach for studying prehistoric herd management in arid areas: intra-tooth isotopic analyses of archaeological caprine from Iran. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences-Series IIA-Earth and Planetary Science. 2001;332(1):67–74. [Google Scholar]
- 83.Hoppe KA. Late Pleistocene mammoth herd structure, migration patterns, and Clovis hunting strategies inferred from isotopic analyses of multiple death assemblages. Paleobiology. 2004;30(1). [Google Scholar]
- 84.Balasse M, Ambrose SH, Smith AB, Price TD. The seasonal mobility model for prehistoric herders in the south-western Cape of South Africa assessed by isotopic analysis of sheep tooth enamel. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2002;29(9):917–32. [Google Scholar]
- 85.Balasse M. Potential biases in sampling design and interpretation of intra‐tooth isotope analysis. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. 2003;13(1–2):3–10. [Google Scholar]
- 86.Balasse M. Reconstructing dietary and environmental history from enamel isotopic analysis: time resolution of intra‐tooth sequential sampling. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. 2002;12(3):155–65. [Google Scholar]
- 87.Horwitz PE, Chiarizia R, Dietz ML. A novel strontium-selective extraction chromatographic resin. Solvent extraction and ion exchange. 1992;10(2):313–36. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
(DOCX)
(DOCX)
(DOCX)
(XLSX)
(DOCX)
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.










