Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2025 Jul 9;262(2):44. doi: 10.1007/s00425-025-04758-2

Carbon quantum dots as versatile nanomaterials for improving soil health and plant stress tolerance: a comprehensive review

Nida Andleeb 1, Saira Zafar 1, Zainab Rahim 1, Muhammad Mubashar Iqbal 2, Rattan Lal 3, Muhammad Ansar Farooq 1,3,
PMCID: PMC12241225  PMID: 40632315

Abstract

Main conclusion

This review summarizes the synthesis, purification/separation, and characterization techniques for carbon quantum dots (CQDs) and highlights their versatile applications as low-toxicity, multifunctional nanomaterials with particular focus on improving soil health, plant stress tolerance, and promoting sustainable agriculture.

Abstract

Carbon quantum dots (CQDs) have recently emerged as highly versatile nanomaterials with a broad spectrum of applications. This review provides a comprehensive overview of various aspects of CQDs, including their synthesis via both top–down and bottom–up approaches, along with the critical separation and purification techniques required to fully harness their potential. This article highlights the multifaceted roles of both pristine and engineered CQDs in soil and plant systems, with a particular emphasis on soil biochemical processes and different stages of plant life cycle. A special attention has been given to the role of CQDs in enhancing plant tolerance to various biotic and abiotic stresses, such as nutritional imbalance, salinity, drought, heat, and heavy metal stress, with studies showing an improvement in stress tolerance, and considerable increase in seed germination rates when seeds are primed with CQDs. We have also discussed the crucial role of CQDs-mediated gene delivery in plants along with their influence on various soil characteristics. Moreover, the application of CQDs in the detection of agrochemical residues has been discussed with detection sensitivity reported as low as 0.1 µg L−1 for certain pesticides along with their broader utility in environmental remediation, food safety, and therapeutic applications demonstrating their unique properties and multi-functionality for sustainable use. This review also addresses the emerging concerns surrounding the potential toxicity of CQDs, particularly in plants, the food chain, and human health. While most studies report low toxicity at concentration below 100 mg L−1, understanding these risks is important to ensure the safe deployment of CQDs in real-world scenarios. In short, advanced research knowledge is provided as a basis for CQDs future development research toward efficient non-toxic delivery system for sustainable agriculture and other applications.

Highlights

  • Comprehensive exploration of synthesis methodologies for CQDs.

  • The multifaceted role of CQDs in improving soil health and plant stress tolerance is discussed.

  • Explores the nutritional significance of CQDs-coated fertilizers and their potential to revolutionize agricultural practices.

  • Highlights the diverse application of CQDs in environmental remediation and biomedical field, emphasizing their cross disciplinary impact.

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name 425_2025_4758_Figa_HTML.jpg

Keywords: CQDs, Nanomaterials, Soil health, Plant stress, Sustainable agriculture

Introduction

In recent years, nanomaterials have gained considerable attention owing to their usefulness in various fields (Dimkpa and Bindrban 2017; Omran 2020; Salem et al. 2022). They belong to the class of materials which have unique biological, chemical, and physical characteristics relative to their bulk forms and measure between 1 and 100 nm in size (Salem et al. 2022). The use of nanomaterials has revolutionized various industries by innovating areas, such as drug delivery, energy storage, material synthesis, etc., due to their small size, high surface-to-volume ratio, and special optical qualities (Ioannou et al. 2020). Among nanomaterials, carbon-based nanomaterials (CNMs) have gained much popularity due to their unique physico-chemical and optical characteristics (Tavan et al. 2025). Examples of CNMs include carbon nanotubes (CNTs), carbon quantum dots (CQDs), graphene quantum dots (GQDs), and polymer dots (PDs), etc. (Rao et al. 2018; Younes et al. 2019; Díez-Pascual 2024; Magesh et al. 2022; Jayaprakash et al. 2024). The existence of various types of CNMs reflects the possibilities and ease with which the size and properties of these versatile materials can be modified and tailored for specific applications. Among CNMs, CNTs represent cylindrical tubes of graphene, with low water solubility and biocompatibility but excellent electrical conductivity—limiting their suitability for reinforcement materials as well as nanocarriers (Mittal et al. 2020) (Table 1). Conversely, other types of CNMs, viz., CQDs, GQDs, and PDs, slightly differ in their structural properties but usually have moderate-to-high-water solubility as well as biocompatibility (Li et al. 2010) (Table 1). In addition to that, due to their good optical properties (photoluminescence, electrical conductivity, tunable emission, etc.), CNMs demonstrate a wide array of applications in biomedical, environmental remediations, and agricultural sustainability (Li et al. 2010; Mittal et al. 2020).

Table 1.

Types of carbon-based nanomaterials and their characteristics including different fields of application

Sr no CNM type Structure Bio-compatibility Toxicity Water solubility Optical properties Applications References
1 CNTs Cylindrical tubes of graphene Moderate Moderate to high Insoluble Excellent electrical conductivity Nanocarriers, reinforcement materials Rao et al. 2018; Díez-Pascual 2024; Jayaprakash et al. 2024
2 CQDs Spherical, amorphous or crystalline core High Low Water-soluble Strong photoluminescence, tunable emission Biosensing, bioimaging, agriculture Díez-Pascual 2024; Li et al. 2010
3 GQDs

Graphene-based sheets

 < 10 nm

High Low to moderate Moderate Photoluminescence, good charge transport Imaging, drug delivery Díez-Pascual 2024; Jayaprakash et al. 2024; Wang et al. 2019a, b
4 PDs Polymer-based dots High Very low High Bright luminescence Biomedical, environmental Díez-Pascual 2024; Jayaprakash et al. 2024; Wang et al. 2019a, b

To this end, CQDs in their pristine as well as functionalized forms exhibit excellent aqueous solubility and fluorescence characteristics suitable for broad range of applications (Díez-Pascual 2024; Kumar et al. 2022; Jan et al. 2024; Dong et al. 2024). Recent advances in nanotechnology have enabled facile, low-cost synthesis of CQDs that are typically < 10 nm in size (Cui et al. 2021; Guan et al. 2023). When compared to other CNMs, these zero-dimensional nanomaterials possess several advantageous characteristics, such as high stability, strong photoluminescence, and excellent biocompatibility that render them suitable for use in biosensors, bioimaging, environmental monitoring, food packaging, safety, and quality monitoring (Cui et al. 2021; Guan et al. 2023; Harish et al. 2022; Rasheed et al. 2023). Based on high-water solubility coupled with low cytotoxicity, the potential use of CQDs for sustainable crop production is an emerging area of research (Li et al. 2010; Boruah et al. 2022).

Pristine and engineered CQDs have been reported to impart multiple ex-planta and in-planta benefits that increase plant growth and productivity under normal as well as stress conditions (Nowack and Bucheli 2007; Riding et al. 2012; Li et al. 2010). CQDs application is reported to improve soil health by modulating soil microbial activities, rhizospheric pH, enzymatic activities, as well as soil carbon and nutrient dynamics (Vijeata et al. 2022; Sadeghi et al. 2023). Seed priming with CQDs has been reported to increase seed germination and early plant growth. Their hydrophilicity enables absorption of water and germination of seeds, having a favorable influence during early stages of plant life (An et al. 2020; Ashoknarayanan et al. 2021). The nutritional significance of CQDs-coated fertilizers as efficient carriers of nutrients and tailored nutrient supply is an important area of research (Elemike et al. 2019; Li et al. 2020a, b). Plants absorb CQDs from soil as well as from leaves via foliar application. Plant uptake and transport of CQDs is mediated through mechanisms, such as carrier proteins, ion channels, plasmodesmata, and endocytosis (Lin et al. 2009; Chen et al. 2010). Once taken up by plants, CQDs impart numerous benefits including enhanced tolerance against multiple biotic and abiotic stresses (Li et al. 2010; Younes et al. 2019). These positive effects could be ascribed to the impact of CQDs in driving photosynthetic processes and in collecting solar energy (Maholiya et al. 2023). CQDs-induced antioxidative and antimicrobial properties help reduce the adverse impact of environmental stressors, which in turn improve crop health and yield. Other known innovations include the role of CQDs as nanocarriers for gene delivery in plants, agrochemicals residues detection, use in mitochondrial nano-pesticides and nano-emulsions, which are environmentally friendly alternatives to traditional methods (Li et al. 2016; Ndolo et al. 2019; Mittal et al. 2020).

The role of CQDs as versatile nanomaterials in plant science depends on their unique surface properties and other physico-chemical characteristics. Therefore, the choice of synthesis methods determining shape, size, optical properties, and surface chemistry of CQDs should be carefully made. Eco-friendly synthesis methods should be employed for maximum agronomic and environmental benefits. With this aim, this review comprehensively covers the latest literature on the multifunctional roles of CQDs in sustainable agriculture. Besides the synthesis methods, sources, and the applications in plant stress management, there is an expanded coverage of topics not covered in previously published reviews on CQDs. These encompass the interactions of CQDs with the soil environment, focusing on their impact on soil health. In addition, the article discusses the mechanisms of CQDs-induced plant stress management, their role as nanocarriers in gene delivery, and sensing agrochemical residues and contributes to the development of precision farming. Furthermore, an overview of emerging applications of CQDs in food technology, and biomedical and environmental remediation is given. A section has been dedicated to toxicity and environmental impacts of CQDs as an attempt to guide future research toward the safe and sustainable application of these nanomaterials in plant stress management and beyond.

Synthesis, separation, purification, and characterization techniques for CQDs

Synthesis techniques

Since the invention of CQDs, their physico-chemical attributes, such as surface area, optical absorbance, photoluminescence, electroluminescence, and the distribution of surface functional groups, have undergone modification using various synthetic techniques (De Medeiros et al. 2019). The choice of synthetic techniques is determined by specific applications in food industry, biomedical, agriculture, and environmental remediations (Guan et al. 2023). It is worth noting that the efficacy and usefulness of CQDs is greatly impacted by the post-synthetic treatments, especially the separation and purification steps, which are outlined in detail in later sections.

CQDs can be synthesized via two principal approaches: the top–down and bottom–up approaches (Fig. 1). Machines employing physical, chemical, and/or electrochemical processes can be instrumental (Magesh et al. 2022). In the top–down method, techniques like arc discharge, laser ablation, electrochemical exfoliation, and ultrasonic and chemical oxidation methods are employed in the disintegration of large carbonaceous materials to nanoscale powders. While in the bottom–up method, small organic molecules or even individual atoms are bonded chemically to synthesize carbon nanostructures through pyrolysis and hydrothermal or solvothermal processes, or microwave-assisted, template-based, and plasma treatment techniques (Fig. 1). Chemical aerobic or thermal energy inputs usually power this assembly (Arole et al. 2014). All of these strategies have unique limitations and benefits, such as cost, scale, environmental issues, and manipulation of CQDs characteristics. A summary comparison of top–down and bottom–up synthesis techniques for CQDs with distinct quantum yield, and size range along with advantages and disadvantages of each technique is provided in Table 2.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

An overview of CQDs processing techniques, viz., synthesis via top–down and bottom–up approaches, purification, and characterization

Table 2.

Top–down and bottom–up synthesis techniques for CQDs with each method having its own advantages and disadvantages

Sr. no Synthetic techniques Size range (nm) Quantum yield (%) Advantages Disadvantages References
1 Arc discharge 1–5 16 Most attainable method Harsh conditions possess low quantum yield and composite method Biazar et al. 2018; Chao-Mujica et al. 2021; Dey et al. 2014
2 Laser ablation 5 4–10 Effortlessness, effective technique, tunable surface states Large amounts of carbon matter is required, poor control over sizes, low quantum yield Koshizaki et al. 2011
3 Electrochemical 6–8 2.8–8.9 Stable method, extent of CDs can be managed by changing current density, water-soluble CDs can also be prepared Complex method Anwar et al. 2019
4 Ultrasonic method 1–6 60–65 Water-soluble, radioactively stable, weakly toxic and photostable, Requires high energy, pressure and temperature Huang et al. 2018; Kumar et al. 2020; Yang et al. 2016
5 Chemical Oxidation 3.2 8.6 Enhance water dispersibility, strong fluorescence, high stability and high purity Non-uniform size distribution, use of aggressive oxidizing agents Feng et al. 2019; Iannazzo et al. 2018; Malavika et al. 2022
6 Thermal/combustion technique 2–6 0.1–3 Easy and straightforward method, have fluorescence property, appropriate method for particles (on milligram scale) Low quantum yield Arole et al. 2014; Bera and Aruna 2017; Thoda et al. 2018
7 Microwave-assisted 4–5 4–6.1 Simple and convenient method, inexpensive and eco-friendly method Poor control over sizes Medeiros et al. 2019; Romero et al. 2021
8 Hydrothermal and aqueous-based 10 Up to 90 Highly water dispersible carbon dots can be prepared, inexpensive, non-toxic Poor control over sizes Shen et al. 2018; de Yro et al. 2019
9 Template-based 2–5 22 CDs have biocompatibility and colloidal stability Time-consuming and expensive method have limited quantum yield Du et al. 2021; Hong et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2015
10 Plasma treatment 1–2 5 Monodispersed in size, good water solubility, CQDs will be rich in oxygen content, Fluorescent Complex and high-cost restrictions Dager et al. 2020; Ma et al. 2019

Top–down approaches

Arc discharge method

The process which begins with an arc discharge or electrical breakdown of gas, leading to the formation of plasma, is subdivided into steps. A chamber with two electrodes set horizontally or vertically is built for this technique. The anode is filled with a powdered carbon precursor and a metal catalyst, while the cathode is a pure graphite rod. The chamber may be filled with gas or liquid. For starting the arc, electrodes are first touched and then pulled away to a fixed distance of 1–2 mm (Chao-Mujica et al. 2021). To prevent and sustain continual, non-oscillating discharge, the electrodes are dynamically held at this distance by automated closed loop systems. This leads to plasma being produced at a remarkably high temperature (around 4000–6000 K). The energy temporarily stored in the arc is used to vaporize the carbon precursor contained within the anode. The gas phase carbon, which is supercooled by now, moves toward the temperature of the colder electrode, solidifying at that electrode’s surface resulting in the created carbon being condensed.

After a few minutes of applying the arc, the discharge process is stopped, and the soot containing the NPs (with CQDs included) is scraped off the chamber walls (Arora and Sharma 2014). Due to the different sizes of carbon particles produced during the discharge process, the CQDs produced by this method are of a wide particle-size distribution. Quasi-spherical CQDs suffer from too high average particle sizes, which greatly reduce the specific surface area, thus may lessen the active reaction sites during the electrocatalytic process (Rasal et al. 2021).

Laser ablation method

Laser ablation (LA) is a new method which shows promise in preparing NMs and is particularly suitable for CQDs because of the rapid rate of processing (Xu et al. 2019). In the process of LA, a solid target is subjected to a high-powered laser, such that it generates zones of localized high pressure and temperature. This enables pulverization of the solid target material into nano- or micrometer-sized particulates, and thermodynamic residues are not an issue. Plasma is generated in the region, which cools down and crystallizes to yield pure nanoparticles (Cui et al. 2021). This is a very efficient method for producing CQDs that can have narrow size distribution (as low as 5 nm), are highly water soluble, and have favorable fluorescent properties such as quantum yield approaching 40%. This method does have some drawbacks, such as the notorious need for large volumes of precursor bulk material, overly complex processes, and exorbitantly high prices. Although, this method does show promise compared to others (Gonçalves et al. 2010; Goodwin et al. 1997; Singh et al. 2012). Cui et al. (2021) employed this technique for synthesized homogeneous CQDs with ultrafast dual-beam pulsed LA for bioimaging of plant and animal cells.

Electrochemical method

The electrochemical technique entails carefully regulating the reduction or oxidation of electricity to carbon containing precursors to produce carbon-based materials on the nanometer scale. For this purpose, an electrochemical cell is made by taking a certain carbon precursor as the cathode or anode and placing it into a bath of non-aqueous or aqueous solvent based on the intended qualities of the resulting CQDs (Wang 2022). The reason why electrolyte formulation is important is that it determines the properties of the synthesized CQDs. Their properties are given by the control of the crucial parameters in the electrochemical synthesis which are temperature, reaction time, current density, and voltage. These parameters can control the morphology, surface properties, and the particle-size distribution of the CQDs produced (Kalita et al. 2020). This method is very useful, since it is simple and can be carried out at room temperature and pressure.

It is reported that some particles of the synthesized CQDs can have a photoluminescence yield between 2.8 and 8.9% (Anwar et al. 2019). Blue-emitting CQDs with an average particle size of 2.4 nm were produced by electrochemical carbonization of urea and sodium citrate in deionized water (Hou et al. 2015). It has properties that make it a highly sensitive detector of mercury ion in wastewater and plants. Although this procedure is relatively commonplace to produce high-performance electrocatalysts, the application of CQDs as electrocatalyst is rather uncommon (Thakur and Kumar 2022).

Ultrasonic method

Ultrasonication is an efficient method for synthesizing carbon quantum dots (CQDs) due to its low cost and speed as well as relatively low ecological impact (Li et al. 2011; Huang et al. 2018). This method starts with the opening and closing of a bubble when a liquid is subjected to a high and low ultrasonic intensity, which starts low and high oscillating sound waves (Li et al. 2011). After rolling and collapsing these gases or tiny bubbles strengthen by all cavitation leading to creating an environment of high temperature as well as high pressure and sudden breakdown of dormant carbon ancestors along with extensive raising of CQDs suspended growth environment. Managing several reaction parameters, including duration of reaction, ratio of carbon source, solvent, pumping power, and other ultrasound sources, respectively, permits accurate control on CQDs properties. Numerous researchers have shown food waste, carbon fibers, multiwall carbon nanotube, and even graphitic materials to be very effective for CQDs synthesis (Li et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2019; Yang et al. 2016). The waste-soluble CQDs turn out to be radioactively stable and luminescent while being weakly toxic and photostable, were produced when food waste was sonicated in ethanol (Baker and Baker 2010). In addition, nitrogen and sulfur can be used to easily fabricate heteroatom-doped CQDs, which alter the characteristics of these due structured CQDs and their optical and electronic properties. Most of the luminescent doped CQDs are blue and behave in a particulate like manner with a diameter of about 1 to 6 nm (Huang et al. 2018).

Chemical oxidation method

This method is important for CQDs synthesis due to its effectiveness in converting bulk carbon to nanoparticles (Rasal et al. 2021). Using this approach to produce CQDs is favorable because of the greater simplicity, better efficiency, and higher level of feasibility accompanying the method. Beyond just reducing the size of carbon materials, this process adds hydrophilic functional groups such as –OH and –COOH, which enhances the dispersibility of CQDs in biological and aqueous environments. Examples of strong oxidizing reagents which can oxidize carbonaceous constituents of Chinese ink and coke include sodium chlorate, nitric acid, and sulfuric acid (Dong et al. 2010; Yang et al. 2014). Hydrothermal reactions with oxidized carbon nanoparticles and precursors with sodium hydrosulfide dimethyl formamide and sodium selenide enable the introduction of heteroatoms such as selenium, sulfur, and nitrogen. The photoluminescence and quantum yield of CQDs are significantly improved when heteroatoms are incorporated into the structures of CQDs (Yan et al. 2014). These CQDs obtained from acidic oxidation are reported to be used ionically for electrocatalysis and drug delivery, in addition to being utilized in electrochemical sensing and cell imaging (Feng and Zhang 2019; Iannazzo et al. 2018). Nevertheless, this approach is not without its drawbacks, because it entails the use of aggressive oxidizing agents which need to be closely monitored and requires a lot of processing to yield high purity CQDs.

Bottom–up approaches

Thermal/combustion method

This burns the precursor material to combust liquids into gases which can be functionalized with different groups and conjugated (Arole and Munde 2014). Surface functionalized carbon nanoparticles are produced by the thermal carbonization of a myriad of ammonium citrate salts. In particular, the carbonization of octadecyl ammonium citrate salt results in the formation of organophilic CQDs, whereas the use of 2-(2-aminoethoxy)-ethanol salt yields hydrophilic CQDs. During the process, the thermal dehydration of the ammonium carboxylate fragment results in the bond formation of –NHCO– between the organic moiety and carbon core (Tian et al. 2020). In addition, it has been reported that the photoluminescence features of the end products are greatly dependent on the reaction temperature. Following this, these CQDs need to be dialysed to remove any residual contaminants. Alternatively, it is achievable to produce monodispersed CQDs with an average diameter of less than 10 nm by varying the parameters of the experiments. It offers high surface area electrostatic active materials in the form of nanoparticles with abundant functional groups which enhance their performance in electrochemical processes (Bera and Aruna 2017; Thoda et al. 2018). Besides being elementary and easily adaptable, this technique is also precise, low-cost, and non-polluting, making it much more attractive than the current available methods for producing large quantities of CQDs (Arole and Munde 2014).

Microwave-assisted method

For the microwave-assisted synthesis of carbohydrate quantum dots (CQDs), the precursor materials, which typically include saccharides, are first dissolved in water and then microwaved. This method permits the formation of various morphologies of CQDs, such as hydrophobic, hydrophilic, and amphiphilic. This is a simple, fast, and low-cost CQDs fabrication technique which can be performed with little-to-no care to waste management to obtain oxygen-doped CQDs that serve as metal-binding sites for carbon-based electrocatalysts (Medeiros et al. 2019; Zhao et al. 2019). Tan et al. (2021) reported the extraction of CQDs from empty fruit bunch (EFB) biochar using a greener acid-free microwave technique. Enhancing the application of CQDs on rice (C3) and corn (C4) leaves were studied using their ability to assimilate carbon dioxide (CO2) and then measuring stomatal conductance. They concluded that for the artificially grown crops, the incorporation of CQDs in their cultivation significantly enhances their rate of photosynthesis, showcasing the potential role of CQDs in agriculture.

Hydrothermal and aqueous-based method

According to Singh et al. (2018), the most employed techniques for producing CQDs include polymerization, dehydration, passivation, and carbonization. These techniques generally begin by mixing small organic molecules and polymers with either water or an organic solvent to form a precursor solution that is subsequently loaded into a stainless-steel autoclave Teflon case. Organic compounds and/or polymers offer thermally decomposed at elevated temperatures to generate CQDs with a core seed of carbon which have sizes below 10 nm (Shen et al. 2018; de-Yro et al. 2019). Han et al. (2020) synthesized CQDs using hydrothermal processes and analyzed their use as probes for chlorogenic acid in coffee and honeysuckle. The simplicity with which CQDs can be synthesized and heteroatom doped makes this method one that will accelerate the development of electrocatalysts with designed structural and compositional features.

Template method

Using this procedure, a surrogate in the form of polymer, surfactant, or even a biological molecule can be used to control the dimensions, shape, and surface features of CQDs. A constructed mold serves as a matrix which guides the CQDs to take the desired shape. Generally, the CQDs form through the carbonization of precursor molecules, organic or inorganic compounds, within a template. The template allows both templates assisted growth and nucleation which results in well-defined CQDs with specified surface chemistry, optical characteristics, and dimensions. Assisted synthesis is one parameter which along with the type of precursors employed and the template used, can be modified to change CQDs characteristics thus improving their functionality in drug delivery, optoelectronics, and bioimaging (Hong et al. 2019; Du et al. 2021; Rasal et al. 2021).

Plasma treatment

With plasma technology, Jiang et al. (2010) found a single-step approach to producing monodisperse CQDs which was previously thought to be impossible. Surface functionalization and fabrication are accomplished simultaneously in this approach. Free radicals were generated onto the surface of CQDs using a submerged arc plasma reactor, which is easier to be functionalized with EDTA in a benzene solution.

Eco-friendly synthesis approaches

Conventional synthesis techniques, i.e., chemical oxidation, microwave-assisted, or hydrothermal techniques, are common ways to synthesize nanomaterials, but it often leads to the production of dangerous byproducts, consumes a lot of energy, and makes the process less eco-friendly. Environmentally compatible synthesis techniques, mainly those based on green chemistry, have sustainable options to use biological materials and moderate reaction conditions (Manikandan and Lee 2022). Green synthetic techniques use substances from plants, bacteria, fungi, and algae to produce CQDs. They are gaining popularity, because they are cost-effective, easy to use, could have large-scale production and friendly to the environment (Manikandan and Lee 2022). Extracts from different plants have a wide variety of phytochemicals, such as flavonoids, phenolics, and terpenoids which support both the removal of metal ions and improve the nanoparticle properties, making them more stable and functional (Malavika et al. 2022).

Similarly, some microbes like Bacillus subtilis, Aspergillus niger, and Chlorella vulgaris create nanoparticles inside their cells or outside, making the synthesis process controlled and allowing us to manage the shape and size of the nanoparticles (Koul et al. 2021). A study reported the green synthesis of N-doped CQDs from Moringa oleifera roots as a precursor. Their application to sorghum seedlings resulted in extremely low toxicity of N-CQDs and they also facilitated pathogen detection, i.e., sulcotrione. The study also concluded that CQDs have a great potential to be used as green pesticides (Wang et al. 2021a, b).

Separation, purification, and characterization techniques of CQDs

Separation and purification techniques

CQDs are often found in emulsions rather than monodispersed or fully purified. CQDs often appear in the form of aggregates or coagulates, so their surface properties and functionality can be maximized only if effective purification and separation methods are observed. Techniques of separation or purification can vary based on the synthetic method used and the properties of the CQD’s surface. Different methods of centrifugation, distillation, size-selective precipitation filtration, membrane dialysis or other electrophoresis, and size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) are being utilized for the CQDs’ purification and separation (Alamo-Nole et al. 2012; Carrillo-Carri on et al. 2011; Shen et al. 2013).

Sun et al. (2023) used membrane dialysis on CQDs doped with nickel (Ni) that were synthesized using electrochemical techniques. The Ni-CQD powder was freeze dried and the electrolyte solution was dialyzed in DI water using a dialysis bag (3500 Da). Zhou (2021) described that differential centrifugation makes it possible to achieve size-dependent tenability for property specific perovskite QD-based optoelectronic devices which makes the process novel. Vibhute et al. (2022) used centrifugation to purify the CQDs synthesized from 1,5-diaminonaphtaline (DAN) and citric acid by the hydrothermal technique, so the CQDs were monodispersed and purified.

Characterization techniques

CQDs formed from different precursors can be found in amorphous and graphitic structures. Sizes of CQDs may be achieved using different nanocomposites. Various methods are used to characterize CQDs which include X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscope (TEM), UV–Vis, fluorescence, dynamic light scattering (DLS), Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) autograph spectrometer, atomic force microscope (AFM), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (John et al. 2022).

The average number (NAD) and weight (WAD) distributions of CQDs are calculated from AFM and TEM while their stoichiometric composition is substantiated by XPS and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). XRD reveals whether the CQDs are crystalline or amorphous. FTIR methods confirm CQDs with such functional groups as C–O–C, COOH, C–OH, C–H, and C–C. Fluorescence and scan of ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) are used for studying optical properties of CQDs (Choppadandi et al. 2021).

Structural features and potential properties of CQDs

The way CQDs make possible the retrieval of stressed plants is simply unique due to their structural characteristics. These include size and shape, adjustable fluorescence emission with enhanced photo stability, increased light absorption, and high-water solubility. Furthermore, CQDs are quite favorable in agriculture owing to their possibility of efficient electron transfer as well as up-conversion (Li et al. 2019; Li et al. 2023a, b). One of the most prominent features of CQDs is their nanoscale dimensions, which give them remarkable physical and chemical properties with numerous applications. Several reports have underscored the importance of CQDs size on their mobility within the plant systems, and, consequently, the translocation of nutrients both in normal and stress conditions. These unique characteristic CQDs enable them to enter plant cells through open pores and cavities between cells. For instance, 4 nm CQDs were reported to swiftly move through mung bean seeds and eventually spread into the root, stem, and leaf. Unlike the former, other CQDs with 5 nm average sizes are known to be stuck in the leaf stomata and cell walls of wheat plants (Gong and Dong 2021).

Another important feature of the structure of CQDs is the binding positions of surface functional groups, such as -COOH, -OH, and -NH2, which are known to be important in relation to plants. The antioxidant activity of these functional groups is further increased along with their fluorescence and electron transfer activity. Indeed, tolerance to a wide range of heavy metal stress (et al. Lu et al. 2025; Falak et al. 2025; Chai et al. 2024) is provided in addition to improving photosynthetic performance. With the help of such functional groups as -NH2 and -COOH, the CQDs possess remarkable ability to scavenge ROS, which relieve stress on the plants (Singh et al. 2024). Furthermore, due to their remarkable fluorescence capable of monitoring plant metabolites and detecting agrochemicals, CQDs possess multifunctional potential in agriculture.

Synthesis sources

The synthesis of nanomaterials through carbon-rich substances such as renewable biomass is possible. The scope of available precursors permits CQD properties to be modified effectively and sustainably. Because of their renewability, the biomass byproducts have attracted considerable interest and make such materials advantageous for the industrial-scale production of CQDs.

Natural or biomass products

Rather recent research has sought to advance methods for synthesizing carbon precursors that are cost-effective and environmentally benign due to the prospective harm on flora, humans, and the soil ecosystem from the toxic chemicals used in manufacturing CQDs. Non-toxic biomass-derived products as carbon precursors are ideal, since they are rich in oxygen, heteroatoms, and carbon. These sources are relatively inexpensive, easier to procure, and environmentally friendly compared to traditional alternatives, making them commercially viable (Gao et al. 2017; Kong et al. 2024). Using waste biomass for the fabrication of CQDs contributes to waste management and the green economy and is also associated with enhanced photoluminescent properties (Liu et al. 2019).

Biomass-sourced CQDs have demonstrated considerable potential in different studies. For example, Jagannathan et al. (2021) synthesized white-emissive CQDs from burning corn seeds. In Shahba et al. (2020), CQDs derived from pinecones using ball-milling and hydrothermal techniques exhibited higher photocatalytic activities, as well as higher adsorption capacity for Cd ions (Li et al. 2018a, b). Liu et al. (2012) produced nitrogen-doped photoluminescent polymer nanodots from grass and noted that the fluorescence intensity and quantum yield increased as the reaction temperature increased. Raikwar (2022) illustrated the bioimaging of plant cells and the manufacturing of nanocomposites using aloe-vera biomass thermal carbonized CQDs. Also, Nguyen et al. (2022) produced blue, fluorescent CQDs from banana peels using a new one-pot hydrothermal approach, while Wang et al. (2020) produced CQDs from tangerine peels and ginkgo biloba leaves via hydrothermal treatment with a base. Finally, Wang et al. (2016) prepared wool-derived CQDs through microwave pyrolysis, yielding very monodisperse and stable nanoparticles. Boruah et al. (2020) produced CQDs from taro scalp, garlic skin, and sugarcane bagasse via an ultrasound-assisted wet chemical oxidation process, while Xu et al. (2021a, b) produced CQDs from an oak cup. Conducting biomass-sourced CQDs research enables progress toward sustainability, because, in most instances, their precursors stem from biological origin, primarily plants and animals.

Other carbon sources

Zhou et al. (2007) pioneered the synthesis of CQDs via electrochemical method in a carbon vapor deposition system with multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) acting as the working electrodes. The CQDs produced were noted to fluoresce blue. Liang et al. (2023) synthesized CQDs from plastic waste to be utilized as nano-inhibitors that enhanced germination of pea seeds and increased the amount of water in the roots. Huo et al. (2015) used sodium hydroxide and acetone as precursors and synthesized CQDs that resulted in dark brown solid products. Ren et al. (2019) work on nitrogen-doped CQDs showcased the use of the pulsed laser ablation (LA) technique with formulated bellflower wood which achieved a dual-wavelength photoluminescence emission with quantum yield of 32.4%. Small organic molecules are often used as precursors in the process for synthesizing CQDs. Zheng et al. (2015) developed a simple technology to produce luminescent CQDs from small organic molecules containing vitamin moiety and a benzene ring. Similarly, Yu et al. (2015) used unfocused laser irradiation for the synthesis of CQDs from toluene. In sharp comparison, Zhai et al. (2012) derived polyaspartic acid and glucose microwave-assisted carbonization technique CQDs. Table 3 summarizes a comparison of different precursors of CQDs synthesis, i.e., biomass-derived, synthetic, industrial waste in terms of their cost, environmental impact, and quality of synthesized CQDs.

Table 3.

A comparison of different precursors used for CQDs synthesis, i.e., biomass-derived, synthetic, and industrial waste

Sr no Precursor type Cost of synthesis Environmental impacts Quality of CQDs References
1 Biomass derived Low Very low- (biodegradable and renewable) Moderate to high (depending on source) Wang et al. 2020; Nayak et al. 2025
2 Synthetic High (pure chemicals are used) Moderate to high (toxic solvents/byproducts) High (controlled size & purity) Cui et al. 2021
3 Industrial wastes Very low Low to moderate (needs pre-treatment) Variable (depends on waste type) Parveen et al. 2025

Uptake, transport, and accumulation of CQDs in plants

CQDs usually enter plant systems through roots’ absorption or foliar application. Different types of microscopes can be used to trace CQDs in plants to understand their uptake, translocation, and accumulation in plants. Figure 2 illustrates that CQDs are absorbed by root hairs and then transported to vascular bundles, i.e., xylem and phloem of stem and leaves. The pathway through which CQDs will move inside plant body mainly depends on their size and surface functional properties. Plant cells have several pores in their cell wall and their pore width is usually between 3.5 and 5 nm (Carpita et al. 1979). CQDs with sizes less than 5 nm enter cells through these pores of cell wall via cell membrane while CQDs with sizes greater than 5 nm are unable to penetrate these pores and get adsorbed on the outside surfaces of cell walls. Root hairs in plants are responsible for the absorption of water and nutrients from the soil and this high specific surface area of root hair is responsible for CQDs absorption from soil to plants. This flow of water and nutrients facilitates the movement of CQDs in plants along with them. The CQDs (< 5 nm) adsorbed on the cell wall move through apoplastic pathway, i.e., movement through cell wall and intercellular spaces, while the CQDs (> 5 nm) inside the cell move through symplastic pathway, i.e., movement through cytoplasm via plasmodesmata (Khan et al. 2022). After passing through the whole cortex of roots, CQDs enter the vascular bundles and are transported to the aerial parts of plants, i.e., leaf veins and stomata. A study by Gong and Dong (2021) employed a wheat model for studying the transfer, transport, and accumulation of Ce-doped CQDs. The observation revealed that the dilated hair roots of wheat plants absorbed Ce-CQDs and they were subsequently translocated through the fibro vascular tissues of the stems and leaves via the vascular system. They suggested that this phenomenon may be due to two aspects. First, CQDs with small size accumulated on cell walls and roots, while large size CQDs failed to enter cells are transported to leaves through vascular bundles and get accumulated in their tissues. Second, the decomposition of some Ce-doped CQD during the upward translocation in plants reduce their concentration in aerial parts. Dong et al. (2022) confirmed that mung bean roots took up Ce-CQDs and they were subsequently translocated through the vascular system and apoplastic routes to the stems, intercellular spaces, cilia, stomata, and the veins of the leaves and aggregated in the vascular system (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Schematic representation of the potential uptake and translocation pathways of CQDs in plants. CQDs can be introduced through foliar application or soil application. Uptake occurs via root hairs in the soil or through leaf surfaces, where CQDs can penetrate through the cuticle and stomatal pathways. Once inside the plant, CQDs are transported through apoplastic and symplastic pathways, reaching different tissues, including xylem and phloem, facilitating distribution all over the plant

This information describes the great efforts that are being undertaken in understanding the processes involved in CQDs uptake, translocation, and accumulation inside the plants. The promising results obtained from this study could form the foundation for further research and development of CQDs tracking devices make accurate detection of the location of each signal possible within the plant systems. Moving forward in this space may open new ways to using CQDs in agriculture.

CQDs impact on plant growth under normal and stress conditions

Literature surveys for scholarly publications on CQDs (2017–2024) indicate growing global interest in their application in agriculture due to their multifunctional roles (Fig. 3). Several studies have been conducted in various regions across the globe—investigating the versatile role of CQDs for enhanced seed germination through seed priming, improved nutrient use efficiency of CQDs-coated fertilizers, implications for soil health improvement, as well as their potential to improve plant resilience against (a)biotic stresses (Tables 4 and 5).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

a A bar chart showing the trend in scholarly output on the applications of CQDs in agriculture, from 2017 to 2024. b The pie chart illustrates the geographical distribution of contributing countries to the scholarly output, highlighting global interest and involvement in CQDs-based agricultural studies

Table 4.

Impact of seed priming with CQDs and doped CQDs and their effects on the overall plant’s life cycle particularly on seed germination

Sr. no CQDs types Source Plant type Type of stress Treated plant stage Priming concentrations Effects on plants (increasing parameters) Effects on plants (decreasing parameters) References
1 Cerium (Ce)-doped CQDs (nanoceria) Poly (acrylic acid)-coated Ce oxide nanoparticles (PNC) Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Salinity Seeds 500 mg L−1 PNC in water (24 h) Seedling root length (56%), root vitality (114%), fresh weight (41%), and dry weight (38%), modified root anatomical structure ROS accumulation in seedling roots (46%) An et al. 2020
2 Plastic-derived NPs (PDNs) Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) Peas (Pisum sativum) Seeds 0.25–2 mg mL−1 Seed germination rate, shoot and root elongation, biomass accumulation, and root moisture levels Liang et al. 2023
3 Zinc-doped CQDs Zinc-oxide (ZnO) Lupine plants (Lupinus termis), Black gram (Vigna mungo) Salinity Seeds 20, 40, 60 mg L−1 Photosynthetic pigments, adjusted osmoregulation Lowered the contents of MDA Latef et al. 2017
4 Putrescine-functionalized- CQDs (Put-CQDs) Putrescine and citric acid Grapevines (Vitis vinifera) Salinity Seeds 5, 10 mg L−1 Fresh and dry weight, enhanced ionic homeostasis, increased chlorophyll, and carotenoid concentrations, antioxidant enzymatic activities Reduced cellular damage (lowering the concentrations of H2O2 and MDA), neutralized proline and total phenolic compounds Gohari et al. 2021a, b
5 Graphene-doped CQDs Graphene Tomato - Seeds 10, 100, 250, 500, and 1000 mg L−1 Concentration of photosynthetic pigments (chlorophylls and carotenoids), enhanced enzyme activity Reduced H2O2 concentrations López-Vargas et al. 2020
6 Nitrogen-doped CQDs (N-CQDs) Melamine and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid Tomato and corn seedlings Biotic stresses (e.g., diseases) Seeds Tomato (10 mg L−1) Corn (50 mg L−1) Enhanced ROS scavenging, exhibiting higher oxidative stress alleviation, activation of salicylic acid and jasmonic acid dependent systematic acquired resistance Reduced ROS levels Luo et al. 2021; Wang et al. 2021a

Table 5.

Selected studies showing CQDs-induced improvement (%) in physiological parameters of plants exposed to different abiotic stresses

Sr. no CQDs type Plant type Type of stress Optimum dose (ppm) Exposure duration (days) Improvement (%) in plant physiological parameters References
1 Mg-CQDs

Rice

(Oryza sativa)

Salinity 150 23 Chlorophyll (36.2); Carotenoid (16.21); K (21.46) contents Liu et al. 2024
2 Ce- CQDs

Mung bean

(Vigna radiata)

Salinity 2 15 Chlorophyll contents (90); POD (77); SOD (76); CAT activity (77); Total protein (76) contents Dong et al. 2022
3 Mg, N-CQDs

Rice

(Oryza sativa)

Light 300 16 Chlorophyll a (14.39); Chlorophyll b (26.54); Photosynthetic efficiency (127.16); Electron transport rate (104.48); RuBisCO activity (6.62) Li et al. 2021
4 Polyacrylic acid-CDs

Maize

(Zea mays)

Drought 5 - Net photosynthetic rate (206.8); Root proline contents (36.3); Root ABA contents (6.9) Wang et al. 2022
5 CQDs & CQDs-Cu

Sunflower

(Helianthus annuus)

Nutrient deficiency 20 30 Chlorophyll a (24.25); Carotenoid contents (21.33) Ahmed et al. 2022
6 Biomass-derived carbon dots (B-CDs) Pakchoi (Brassica chinensis L.) Nutrient deficiency 7 Promoted chlorophyll synthesis (30–100%); Ferredoxin (40–80%); RuBisCO activity (20–110); Net photosynthetic rate (130–300%) Cheng et al. 2023
7 Fungal exopolysaccharide-derived carbon dots (EPS-CDs)

Maize

(Zea mays)

Cd2 150 10 Chlorophyll content (24.3); Dissolved organic carbon in soil (39.9) Sadeghi et al. 2023
8 CDs Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) As 3.65 6 Membrane stability (33); Enhanced proline (95%); Glutathione contents (198%) Chandrakar et al. 2020
9 CQDs

Green mustard

(Brassica juncea)

150 42 CO₂ assimilation rate (58); Rubisco activity (33) Chowmasundaram et al. 2025

Priming effects on seed germination

Seed priming with either pure CQDs or doped CQDs presents an innovative approach to enhancing early plant growth. This technique is highly effective in overcoming seed dormancy, promoting synchronized germination, and improving overall seedling health. Table 4 summarizes various plant species subjected to seed priming and its effects throughout their life cycle. Enhancement in plant morphological characteristics following CQDs treatment, highlighting their role as effective growth stimulators. Further to germination, these advantages of CQDs priming also include improved growth and developmental processes of the plant, increased tolerance toward different environmental stresses, early flowering, and eventually raised plant growth, development and productivity (Table 4).

Nutritional significance of CQDs-coated fertilizers

Over the past few years, the application of CQDs in coating fertilizers has seen considerable growth as a method to enhance plant absorption of nutrients (Khan et al. 2022). CQD-coated fertilizers are superior to the modern and even contemporary polymer-type fertilizers because of their high surface area-to-volume ratio (Elemike et al. 2019). Compared to the traditional mixtures, these fertilizers allow a decrease with increased efficiency in the use of chemical inputs, improve stress resistance, and change the ecological impact for the better (Dimkpa and Bindraban 2017). Moreover, CQDs coated with fertilizers slow the releasing of nutrients to the plants to synchronically match with plant growth phases, ensuring adequate nutrition absorption and plant growth while limiting nutrient losses from poor soil interaction. Li et al. (2023b) observed that the application of selenium-doped CQDs (Se-CQDs) coated fertilizers resulted in indirect absorption by the plants enhancing the biomass yield, mineral constituents, and the quality of fruits. Likewise, Tan et al. (2023) synthesized water-soluble nano-fertilizers in the form of nitrogen-doped CQDs and greatly enhanced the chlorophyll contents, light energy conversion efficiency, Rubisco activity, and electronic transmission activity. Despite these positive outcomes, there still remains a gap to properly understanding the nutritional value of these CQD-coated fertilizers which need to be further investigated.

Impact of CQDs on soil properties

Application of nanotechnology particularly CQDs into soil ecosystem is a growing area of research and has the immense potential to affect soil nutrient availability, microbial populations, and pollutant dynamics. Various soil aspects, such as soil pH, organic and inorganic compounds, and soil microbes such as bacteria, and fungi (e.g., arbuscular mycorrhizae), play a crucial role in modulating the behavior of nanoscale micronutrients and they can also affect CQDs by influencing their dissolution, aggregation, and surface properties (e.g., charge and coatings) potentially leading toward altered soil and plant outcomes. Therefore, evaluating the impacts of CQDs on soil environment is critical for determining CQDs role in sustainable agriculture practices. Next, we will look at how CQDs alter soil microbiota, pH/nutrient availability, and enzymatic activities.

Influence of CQDs on microbial activity in the rhizosphere

Soil, as an open biogeochemical system, is a key recipient of nanomaterials and microbial activity is a critical indicator of soil health, reflecting the soil's response to environmental changes (Nowack and Bucheli 2007; Riding et al. 2012). CQDs owing to their nanoscale size can easily interact with soil microorganisms and thereby influence their growth and activities. For instance, Yin et al. (2024) reported enhanced diversity and relative abundance of soil bacterial communities such as Actinobacteria phylum by the application of selenium-doped CQDs (Se-CQDs), this phylum Actinobacteria is considered beneficial in plant growth promoting substances. Such rhizosphere microorganisms and root exudates, both play important roles in maintaining plant health and increasing plant tolerance to stress. Examples include root exudates such as organic acids (lactic acid, citric acid, and formic acid) and carbohydrates (glucoside) (Song et al. 2012; Xu et al. 2021b). In another study, Yang et al. (2022) documented significant increase in the microbial population of Conocybe (122.6%), Nitrospira (126.2%), Sphingomonas (233.3%), and Pseudomonas (344.4%). Their study demonstrated that foliar application of carbon-based nanomaterials synthesized via a hydrothermal method using citric acid and ethylenediamine as carbon sources increased root exudates, including succinic acid and pyruvic acid (tenfold increase), and betaine (11.8-fold increase). This enrichment of root exudates stimulated microbial growth in the plant rhizosphere, subsequently increasing soil available P by 16.8% and N by 33.5%. Similarly, Ji et al. (2023) found that foliar application of carbon-based nanomaterials increased root secretion (e.g., auxins, organic acids, and amino acids) and attracted beneficial microorganisms, such as Ascomycota, Actinobacteria, Glomeromycota, and Acidobacteria, facilitating soil N activation.

CQDs role in modifying soil pH, carbon contents, and nutrient availability

The introduction of CQDs into the soil could change some of its fundamental features, such as soil C retention, pH levels, and nutrient profile. These effects are highly dependent on the soil properties and CQDs source being used. Prior research indicates that CQDs have the potential to improve soil health, organic C content, and nutrient retention, which can promote plant growth and overall soil health (Vijeata et al. 2022; Sadeghi et al. 2023). For instance, Vijeata et al. (2022) reported that CQDs derived from Aegle marmelos did not cause significant changes to soil pH levels which means that their acid neutralizing and base forming effects are tangibly weak. Nonetheless, the application did greatly enhance the oxidizable organic C contents from a low range of 0.100–0.300 and to a doubled medium range of 0.505–0.750, while soil phosphate, nitrate, and ammoniacal N levels were 22–56, 20, and 10 kg ha−1, respectively.

In another study, Sadeghi et al. (2023) highlighted that CQDs produced from fungal exopolysaccharides elevated the levels of dissolved organic C content (DOC) by 39.9% in Cd polluted soils and 77.9% in the non-contaminated soils. Moreover, microbial biomass in CQDs treated soils increased by 54.9%, suggesting CQDs ability to stimulate C cycling in soil ecosystem. Additionally, CQDs can act as excellent adsorbents for example, Li et al. (2019) documented that Cd-CQDs can effectively reduce freely dissolved Cd ion concentration in nutrient medium by 22.5% through its adsorption capacity. Similarly, Li et al. (2018a, 2018b) reported that CQDs act as high-performance adsorbents for Cd, with a maximum adsorption capacity of 2.42 mg g−1, particularly in soils with a pH range of 4–7.

Effect of CQDs on soil enzymatic activities

Soil enzymatic activities are excellent mediators of organic matter decomposition and nutrient cycling for sustainable soil health, which makes them sensitive indicators of soil microbial activity. Soil application of nanomaterials like CQDs can modulate the enzymatic activities as well as stimulate or inhibit microbial-mediated biochemical processes in soil (Sahu et al. 2017). Due to their small size and high surface reactivity, CQDs can interact with the soil enzymes either directly or indirectly through impacting soil microbial communities which can influence soil metabolic functions (Tusher 2023). Therefore, understanding CQDs’ potential impacts on soil enzyme dynamics is crucial for understanding the ecological soil systems.

Different soil enzymes including urease and fluorescein diacetate esterase (FDAE) are critical indicators of soil microbial activity due to their fundamental role in nutrient cycling. In a 90-d incubation study, Liu et al. (2015) observed detrimental impacts on soil enzyme activities with the introduction of varying concentrations of carbon-based nanomaterials. This substantial effect was varied based on their dosage levels, exposure time, and the type of enzymes studied. At first, they observed no drastic changes in activity levels of enzymes studied under different treatment levels; however, they observed modest decrease in FDAE activities with increasing exposure duration. Opposite to this, urease exhibited a clear decline in activity with prolonged exposure time and dosage concentration, specifically with higher doses of 10 μg g−1. They further demonstrated that this inhibitory effect in urease activity was only temporary as urease activity restored to normal conditions after 30-d of tested incubation. This recovery phase is likely the result of microbial adaptation under these conditions, where microbes might have started to utilize them as an alternative C source. These studies suggest that carbon-based nanomaterials can produce dose-dependent and transitory fluctuations in soil enzyme activities with soil microbes gradually adapting to these conditions.

All above discussed studies highlight the multipurpose role of CQDs as a transformative nano-agent to enhance soil health by stimulating beneficial microbial activity, enhancing nutrient availability and C cycling, and modulating soil enzymatic activities, ultimately leading toward sustainable farming practices. However, long-term field scale studies are required on soil–CQDs interactions to better understand how CQDs would impact soil physio-chemical characteristics and especially soil organic matter stabilization and microbial community resilience. Understanding these interaction dynamics of soil–CQDs is thus fundamental to crafting new strategies ensuring long-term soil vitality and agricultural sustainability.

CQDs-induced improved tolerance against abiotic stressors

The growth and development of plants relies on certain mineral nutrients and water to be at optimal levels. Nevertheless, during a drought, heavy metal contamination, salinization, extreme temperatures, ultraviolet radiation, and several other factors limit the environment's ability to supersede a minimum budget. These plants have a unique and intricate multidisciplinary and subspecialty response which melds together numerous static and dynamic biochemical, physiological, and molecular processes. Reduced efficiency in photosynthesis is one of the many effects caused by abiotic stress nature. This stems from increased photo-inhibition that occurs concurrently with stomatal closure that restricts CO2 use. One of the phenomena which aid in explaining stress-induced growth of plants is the increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation (Younes et al. 2024). These molecules can cause severe damage to vital cellular components like proteins, carbs, fats, and even DNA (Farooq et al. 2019). CQDs and doped CQDs have been reported to mitigate various abiotic stressors, including light, salinity, heat, drought, nutrient deficiencies, and heavy metal toxicity by improving key physiological parameters, such as chlorophyll contents and strengthened antioxidant response that protects the photosynthetic machinery against oxidative damage (Table 5). One significant contributor to enhanced tolerance is the calcium Ca2+ signal transduction system, which plays a vital role in plant defense and precedes the release of ROS. CQDs also facilitate stress adaptation by improving Ca2+ signaling and acting as ROS scavengers (Li et al. 2020a, b; Li et al. 2023a). Application of CQDs is reported to efficiently relocate Ca2+ via CNGCs (cyclic nucleotide-gated channels) while amplifying signaling pathways (Table 5).

Ultraviolet radiation and heat stress

Red-emissive carbon dots (RCDs) emit light in the range of 550–800 nm, aligning closely with the red and far-red wavelengths required by plants for efficient photosynthesis. While plants typically absorb UV and yellowish green light less efficiently, RCDs enhance the red and far-red components of sunlight without significantly altering the blue portion of the spectrum, thereby improving overall plant photosynthetic performance (Li et al. 2021). Similarly, Mu and Han, (2024) observed that using magnesium and nitrogen-doped carbon quantum dots (Mg-N-CQDs) to wheat seedlings when exposed to UV-B stress, it can promote both seed germination and development by controlling physiological responses. Sun et al. (2025) reported that Ce-CQDs enhanced wheat seedling tolerance under UV-B stress by increasing the activities of key antioxidant enzymes to detoxify ROS. Godínez-Mendoza et al. (2023) showed that the biomass-based CQDs synthesized from agave bagasse exhibited strong UV-blue luminescent features and enhanced plant growth while shielding against harmful UV rays. These CQDs were also reported to enhance seed germination and development of seedlings. Besides, Wang et al. (2021a, b) showed that applying CQDs to the foliage of Italian lettuce enhanced the activity of POD, SOD, CAT, protein contents, and soluble sugars, while decreasing proline and MDA, which are both signs of osmotic and oxidative stress. By reducing oxidative damage and stabilizing physiological processes, CQDs contribute significantly to plant growth and development under heat stress.

Salinity

The challenge of salinity is one of the primary aspects affecting agricultural production globally. Plants under salt stress suffer various physiological and biochemical breakdowns, such as ionic and osmotic imbalance, oxidative stress, and stunted growth. The pristine and doped CQDs application has reasonably good salinity mitigation results. Sarkar et al. (2022) investigated the effects of two sugar-terminated carbon nanodots (CNDs) to alleviate salinity stress in V. radiata seedlings. Both types of CNDs improved seed germination, chlorophyll pigment components, antioxidant defense mechanisms, and helped increase osmotic and ionic homeostasis. Moreover, it has been shown that CQDs increase the non-enzymatic and enzymatic salt stress antioxidant capabilities of plants. Under conditions of stress, proline is a compound that helps to protect plants from over-damage; however, CQDs aid in suppressing proline accumulation while maintaining ionic balance under salt stress. Abdel Latef et al. (2017) showed that grapevine plants grown under salt stress and treated with CQDs demonstrated functional modulation of proline contents and enhanced salt stress resistance. Likewise, Gohari et al. (2021a) showed that putrescine functionalized CQDs (put-CQDs) alleviated salt stress in grapevine by increasing the fresh and dry weights of leaves, K+ content, photosynthetic pigments, chlorophyll fluorescence, proline content, phenolics, and antioxidant enzymatic activities while lowering Na+ content, electrolyte leakage (EL), malondialdehyde (MDA), and H2O2 level. Furthermore, Gohari et al. (2021b) mentioned that proline functionalized CQDs (pro-CQDs) enhanced grapevine tolerance to salinity stress by improving its physiological performance. In addition, Liu et al. (2022) reported that the application of cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO2 NMs) on the plant leaves enhanced salt tolerance in maize. In addition, Guo et al. (2022a, b) has shown that magnesium–nitrogen co-doped CQDs have positively influenced plant growth and decreased oxidative damage in salinized tobacco plants, suggesting the role that doped CQDs can have in stress alleviation.

Dong et al. (2022) showed further that mung bean seeds treated with Ce-CQDs under saline stress conditions had better root length, leaf length, and height than untreated plants. Moreover, Ce-CQDs improved the functions of the key antioxidant enzymes and decreased the markers of stress, such as MDA and proline. Surprisingly, mung bean plant uptake of Ce-CQDs was associated with a reduction in NaCl uptake of 21.8%; in addition, there was an increase in stomatal opening which led to better metabolic and salt excretion efficiency. Li et al. (2021) showed that CQDs very efficiently non-specifically scavenge ROS in plant cells which prevents oxidative damage and improves salt stress tolerance in lettuce. Considering the promising results, it is important to study biomass-derived CQDs further, so this could lead to improvements in plant tolerance to salinity. Their biodegradability, low toxicity, and sustainable synthesis render CQDs useful for application aimed at improving stress tolerance and crop productivity in agriculture.

Drought

Environmental concerns, such as water shortages, meteorological droughts, as well as global warming, have considerably worsened in the last twenty years, being referred to as global issues (Zhou 2021). It is expected that during the year 2030, over 20% of developing countries will face water shortages (Cheng et al. 2023). Likewise, agronomical drought has developed as a principal restriction on agricultural output, lowering yields by up to 50% (Kurunc et al. 2021). Thus, enhancing drought resistance in crops is critical for ensuring global food security. In this context, CQDs and other carbon-based NMs have shown promise in mitigating drought stress through nano-agricultural strategies. Under drought stress, CQDs application either via seed priming or foliar application enhances photosynthetic efficiency, improves physiological performance, and ultimately supports crop growth and yield (Wang et al. 2019). Their high electron transfer capability enables CQDs to mitigate drought-induced stress and improve plant growth by enhancing antioxidative defense, water retention, and metabolic activity (Farhangi‑Abriz et al. 2024). In their recent study, Farhangi‑Abriz et al. (2024) reported that foliar application of CQDs in drought-stressed soybean significantly improved numerous agronomic and physiological traits: leaf area (by 21%), leaf water contents, antioxidative activities, osmolyte production, maximum efficiency of photosystem II (by 19%), chlorophyll contents (by 18%), relative photosynthetic electron transport rate (by 3%), ground green cover (by 14%), and grain yield by 25%. Moreover, CQDs decreased ROS production, lipid peroxidation, and the osmotic stress in field grown soybean plants.

Mechanistically, foliar application of CQDs not only improves photosynthesis but also induces the synthesis of signaling molecules such as abscisic acid (ABA) and proline (Pro) in plant leaves. These signals are then transported from leaves to roots, where increased ABA and Pro levels up-regulate aquaporins (AQP) expression, reducing osmotic pressure and improving water uptake. Once drought stress subsides, root-to-shoot signaling downregulates ABA synthesis, promotes stomatal re-opening, and restores normal plant growth (Wang et al. 2022). Yang et al. (2022) further reported that the foliar-applied CQDs improved carbohydrate metabolism and promoted maize growth under the drought stress. Similar findings were reported in wheat by Gong and Dong (2021), who observed improved growth and productivity following foliar application of CQDs.

In addition to foliar application, soil-based delivery of CQDs has also demonstrated great promise. Wang et al. (2022) reported that soil application of CQDs increased the nutritional quality and growth of soybean by regulating rhizosphere processes, improving N bioavailability, and increasing water uptake under drought stress. The surface modification of CQDs with polyacrylic acid increases the chloroplasts'capability of CQD penetration, while the doping of N-CQDs with ROS scavenging functionalities enhances the surface. Wang et al. (2021a, b) noted that foliar application of polyacrylic acid-functionalized N-doped CQDs (PNDs) decreased ROS accumulation, along with improving photosynthetic performance, and increasing root ABA contents.

Proline concentrations enhanced maize growth under drought stress. Additionally, Kou et al. (2021) found that the synthesized NMs from glucose and cysteine via hydrothermal method CQDs, augmented seed water absorption, seed germination rate, and drought resistance index, along with the enhancement of these NMs. Treatment also augmented the activities of POD and SOD, stress-relief dominant antioxidant enzymes. Kara et al. (2023) using molasses-derived carbon dots (MCDs), which enhanced the activities of antioxidative enzymes and proline accumulation while lowering MDA levels, a lipid peroxidation marker, reported a dose-dependent growth enhancement in tobacco plants under drought and salt stresses.

Nutrient deficiency

Reduced CQDs and doped CQDs can also reduce deficiency in plant nutrients by acting nanocarriers. These NMs with enhanced penetration because of their small size can directly supply required nutrients to nutrient tissues within the plant. When doped with macro- and micronutrients, especially with N, P, and K, these CQDs are capable of augmenting plant growth and productivity. Li et al. (2020a, b) observed the stimulation of growth in rice plants due to the application of CQDs for increasing nutrient supply and uptake into the plants. Li et al. (2023) reported the same for wheat growth because of high permeability of CQDs through biological membranes leading to better nutrient delivery and increased water uptake. Cheng et al. (2023) made CQDs from walnut (Juglans regia), soybean (Glycine max), walnut Juglans regia, and dried laver using hydrothermal method. The released important nutrients like magnesium (2.5%), copper (0.45%), and iron (6.0%) greatly enhanced the growth of lettuce which is otherwise stunted due to nutrient deficiency. Treated plants improved in chlorophyll contents, photosynthesis, biomass accumulation, and normal development. In addition, reports indicated that CQDs enhanced K use efficiency by activating cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channels, which improved root physiology and increased K accumulation. This accumulation further facilitated photosynthesis and mitigated oxidative stress in K-deficient leaves.

Heavy metal and hydrocarbon

Carbon quantum dots (CQDs) have emerged as a viable option for managing heavy metal stress in plants, chiefly Cd (cadmium) toxicity. As cited by Li et al. (2019), the application of CQDs mitigated the uptake of Cd in Citrus maxima seedlings by over 50% while also decreasing the oxidative stress caused by Cd. This was made possible primarily by the adsorption of Cd ions by CQDs which lowered the translocation of Cd from roots to shoots due to lower free ionic concentration of Cd. Moreover, CQDs enhanced the activities of the antioxidant enzymes which helped in alleviating the Cd damage to plant cellular membranes. Other investigators also monitored the effect of fungal driven CQDs on reducing the Cadmium toxicity in the plants. Sadeghi et al. (2023) showed less Cd uptake, while the chlorophyll contents and dissolved organic matter (DOC), plant dry biomass, and soil organic carbon increased by 68%. These results indicate the capability of bio-derived CQDs to enhance the cadmium stress tolerant capacity of various plants. Apart from cadmium, CQDs have also been reported to reduce plant toxicity of arsenic (As). For example, Chandrakar et al. (2020) noticed that the application of CDs on Cicer arietinum L. (Chickpeas) crops mitigated the detrimental effect of asparagus by decreasing the uptake of as and ROS detoxification. In addition, it further contributed to the overexpression of many defenses-related genes and antioxidants including proline and glutathione. Collectively, these findings suggest that CQDs may have the potential to lessen the impact of heavy metal contamination in soils (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Illustration demonstrating multifaceted roles of CQDs in mitigating plant abiotic (salinity, UV/heat stress, heavy metals toxicity, nutrient deficiency, and drought) and biotic stresses (pests/weeds and pathogenic microbes) through diverse mechanisms

CQDs-induced improved tolerance against biotic stresses

One of the most challenging biotic strains to control in crop production is the infection by a phytopathogen (Li et al. 2018a, b; Abdelrhim et al. 2021). CQDs are reported to demonstrate great biotic stress alleviation potential through the improvement of nutrient uptake, hormonal modulation, and stimulating the plant's pathogens’ biological defense mechanisms (Fig. 4) (Servin et al. 2015). In addition, the effects of CQDs on phytohormones [e.g., salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA)], which serve protective functions against biotrophic and necrotrophic pests, have also been shown (Wang et al 2021a, b). As an example, Li et al. (2018a, b) noted that the use of CQDs on rice boosted its defense against the blast disease by provoking overexpression of a thionin (Os06g32600) defense gene. This gene codes for a thionin, which is part of the class of pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins. Further, CQDs have the ability to transform into growth hormone acting CO2 analogs which enhance plant growth. CO2 was transformed into carbohydrates due to the Calvin cycle of photosynthesis further metabolism of plants (Lahiani et al. 2016). Plant energy during periods of stress may also be preserved in the form of carbohydrates which can be utilized to fuel the Calvin cycle. Due to the ability to penetrate plant cells and their biocompatible nature, CQDs have shown broad-spectrum antimicrobial activities against a wide range of phytopathogenic fungi, oomycetes, and bacteria. Wang et al. (2021a, b) used an eco-friendly synthesis method to derive N-doped carbon quantum dots (N-CQDs) from the roots of Moringa oleifera. These N-CQDs were able to inhibit Phytophthora nicotianae and Corynespora cassiicola by 75.3% and 82.8%, respectively. The alternative result was noted by Kostov et al. (2022). In the year of 2022, it was shown that CQDs inhibited actions of Phytophthora infestans and other fungal pathogens, such as Botrytis cinerea, Alternaria alternata, and Fusarium oxysporum. This reduction in the severity of wilt corresponds to the previously noted enhance stimulation of antioxidative enzyme activities in the plants and the reduction of pathogen-induced oxidative stress (Fujita et al. 2022).

Luo and coworkers (2021) discovered that N-CDs were 1.56 times more effective than pristine CDs (P-CDs) and were able to suppress bacterial wilt severity in tomatoes by 71.19%. This lower wilt severity was ascribed to higher stimulation of the antioxidative enzyme activities in the plants, and thereby lessened the oxidative stress caused by the pathogen, showing that enhanced immunity in these plants was supported by strengthened antioxidative defense system, i.e., increased activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD). The antimicrobial activity of the CDs, that were obtained from cigarette smoke, was emphasized as an activity of broad-spectrum nature, even to the drug-resistant pathogens. Curious quantum dots also demonstrated the ability to decrease the mycelial growth of Phytophthora infestans and sporangia of other pathogens, which was illustrated by the decrease in the optical density of spore suspensions. The work of Wang et al. (2014) analyzed the antifungal activity of CDs on F. graminearum and F. poae, where they hypothesized that the water uptake inhibition and catalysis of plasmolysis were the two main reasons for their antifungal activity due to reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation and plasmolysis. All these studies indicate that CQDs can serve as a promising ecological substitute for chemical pesticides for pathogen control and protection of plants.

CQDs role in functional genomics and gene expression modulation under stress

The use of different omics technologies, such as transcriptomics, genomics, metabolomics, and proteomics, is transforming the understanding of mechanisms of plant responses to different nanomaterials at molecular levels. These techniques help to elaborate how these nanomaterials alter gene expressions, metabolic pathways, and protein synthesis processes (Chen et al. 2024).

Different studies related to genomic and transcriptomic techniques have showed that exposure to nanomaterials can up-regulate or down-regulate the gene expressions, such as nutrient uptake, hormonal signaling, and stress responses (Khan et al. 2022). The effects of translational modifications and changes in gene expressions are further assessed by Proteomics (Munir et al. 2023). For example, a study was done at proteome level, and it compared the phytotoxicity of three different metal-based nanoparticles (Al2O3, ZnO, and Ag) in soybean seedling. It was observed that ZnO and Ag nanoparticles severely affect plant growth and root tissues by giving them oxidative stress. Whereas, Al2O3 had less damage than ZnO and Ag, and it also regulated the proteins involved in responding the oxidative stress and hormonal signaling (Hossain et al. 2016).

Incorporating data from multiple omics technologies into analysis could help us understand the systems better and find markers of nano-toxicity, nutrient uptake by plants, and improved growth. With this knowledge, experts can develop new products for different crops while keeping in mind the safety of the environment (Danai-Varsou et al. 2023). With omics technologies becoming easier to use and accessible, their applications in nano-agriculture are likely to expand to promote sustainability and data-driven innovations along with regulatory goals (Zhang et al. 2021).

CQDs as nanocarriers for gene delivery in plants

Over recent years, nanotechnology has provided novel ways to plant genetic engineering, with CQDs emerging as viable nanocarriers for gene delivery vehicles. CQDs due to their nanoscale size, excellent biocompatibility, and photoluminescence have been investigated for delivering nucleic acids, such as RNA, DNA, and small interfering RNA (siRNA) into plant cells, allowing for both modulation of gene expression and functional studies. CQDs can be functionalized with numerous chemical groups to improve their capability to bind and transport the genetic material across the plant cell walls and membranes. For instance, carbon-based nanocarriers derived from glucose or saccharose and specified with branched polyethyleneimines (PEI) have been shown to efficiently delivery the double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) into the cucumber leaves, which resulted in a 50-fold rise of dsRNA uptake as compared to the naked dsRNA. This delivery method also resulted in the production of small interfering RNA (siRNA) by 13-fold, demonstrating efficient gene silencing mechanisms (Delgado-Martín et al. 2022). This biomolecule carrying ability of CQDs opens new opportunities for crop development, functional genomics, and stress response studies in plants.

CQDs applications in gene expression modulation and gene silencing

Gene silencing and expression modulation are both critical methods in plant biotechnology, allowing careful control of gene expression to increase the desirable features while suppressing detrimental ones. These methods, which include mechanisms such as microRNA (miRNA) and RNA interference (RNAi) pathways, influence gene expression at both transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels (Zhao et al. 2024). The use of these methods has considerably expanded crop improvement techniques, enabling improved plant nutritional profiles, better tolerance to environmental challenges, and disease resistant crop varieties (Zhao et al. 2024). The integration of nanotechnology, particularly the use of CQDs, has further augmented these methods by providing effective delivery routes for genetic materials, thereby expanding the potential for precise gene regulation in plants. The successful use of CQDs for gene delivery has been confirmed in several plant species including tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and Nicotiana benthamiana (Schwartz et al. 2020), mung bean (Phaseolus radiatus), rice (Oryza sativa japonica), wheat (Triticum aestivum) (Wang et al. 2020), and Arabidopsis thaliana (Lin et al. (2023).

Lin et al. (2023) achieved efficient gene delivery and expression regulation in Arabidopsis thaliana by demonstrating the CQDs multifunctional role. Their findings showed that CQDs could successfully deliver the plasmid DNA into plant cells by forming stable nanocomplexes with plasmid DNA, which allowed the expression of an Argonaute family genes without the requirement of any mechanical transformation techniques. Their work also demonstrated the intracellular localization and real-time imaging capabilities of CQDs, hence bolstering their application as effective nanocarriers for cellular tracking and gene delivery.

Polyethyleneimine (PEI) and CQDs were combined by Wang et al. (2020b) to develop a nanocomposite (CDP) which served as an effective vector for gene transfection in both plant and animal cells. Their work showed that the expression of functional genes including β-glucuronidase (GUS) and hygromycin resistance gene could be successfully delivered and expressed transiently in a variety of plant tissues, such as wheat leaves, mung bean leaves and roots, and leaves of rice plants. Notably, the CDP offered highly effective DNA delivery system for immediate gene expression in plants by facilitating plasmid transport into cells and shielding DNA from DNase degradation. Schwartz et al. (2020) used low-pressure spray application of CQDs–siRNA formulations in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and benth (Nicotiana benthamiana), which significantly silenced the GFP transgenes and endogenous genes involved in chlorophyll synthesis, including magnesium chelatase subunits. Overall, their study demonstrated the CQDs potential in supporting RNA interference (RNAi) for crop improvement and plant functional genomics.

Implications under stress conditions

Under conditions of biotic and abiotic stresses, the ability to rapidly modulate gene expression is critical for adaptation and survival of plants. CQDs-mediated delivery methods were recently investigated for their ability to activate plant immunity against viruses, signifying their utility in stress reduction measures. For example, Xu et al. (2023) evaluated the anti-viral efficacy of three dsRNA-loaded NPs-CQDs, amine-functionalized silica nano-powder (ASNP), and chitosan quaternary ammonium salt (CQAS)—against the potato virus Y (PVY) by spraying, root soaking, and infiltration delivery methods. Among these, CQD–dsRNA NPs revealed remarkable efficiency, providing systemic protection for up to 21-d post-application against PYY by foliar spraying. Furthermore, fluorescence imaging confirmed the uptake and transport of these NPs within plant tissues, highlighting the potential of CQDs as effective nanocarriers for dsRNA delivery in plant anti-viral strategies. This efficient delivery of CQD–dsRNA enhanced the RNAi mechanisms to combat viral infections.

In another study, Wang et al. (2020) evaluated the effectiveness of three different NPs-chitosan, Lipofectamine2000, and CQDs—as carriers for dsRNA targeting the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PDH) gene in the rice striped stem borer (Chilo suppressalis). Among these, CQD–dsRNA complexes exhibited the highest gene silencing efficiency and larval mortality rates. Their work also demonstrated a strong correlation between RNAi efficiency and hemolymph dsRNA content, indicating the stability and superior delivery of CQD–dsRNA complexes.

Kostov et al. (2022) examined the CQDs dual role in controlling various plant pathogens and improving gene silencing methods. Their findings demonstrated that CQDs not only inhibited the development of oomycete plant pathogens (Phytophthora infestans) and other fungal plant pathogens (Alternaria alternate, Fusarium oxysporum, and Botrytis cinerea) but also enhanced the efficiency of dsRNA-induced gene silencing. The CQDs–dsRNA combination resulted in significant drop in target gene transcripts in developing sporangia, demonstrating CQDs potential as effective nanocarriers for RNAi-based plant protection approaches. Notably, they observed no cytotoxic effects on human keratinocytes at pathogen-effective concentrations, implying their safety for broader agricultural uses. These findings highlight CQDs’ potential as excellent nanocarrier for RNAi-based pest management techniques making them a significant tool for functional research in plant biology and with applications in precision agriculture.

While the current research on CQDs-mediated plant gene delivery illustrates its promising role, further research is needed to optimize the CQDs delivery efficiency, stability in gene modifications, as well as comprehension of its long-term effects. Advancements in CQDs synthesis and functionalization are projected to broaden its uses in plant biotechnology, aiding promote crop improvement strategies and sustainable agriculture.

CQDs’ applications in agrochemical residue detection

To meet the demands of growing world population, the reliance on chemical fertilizers and various agrochemicals, such as pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides, continue to rise (Li et al. 2016). This increasing usage leads to the accumulation of toxic, carcinogenic, and non-biodegradable substances in soil and food ecosystems, posing serious threats to sustainable agriculture and environmental health. Conventional techniques for agrochemical residue detection, including high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, enzyme-linked immune-sorbent assays (ELISA), and electrochemical methods, often suffer from limitations, such as high costs, complex sample preparation, and time-consuming procedures. CQDs offer a versatile, cost-effective, and efficient alternative for agrochemical detection (Fig. 4). Their fluorescence quenching or enhancement properties are central to their function as nano-sensors. CQDs-based sensing relies on their interaction with target analytes, primarily through fluorescence quenching mechanisms, such as fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), the inner filter effect (IFE), and photo-induced electron transfer (PET). These mechanisms enable sensitive and selective detection of trace agrochemicals residues. Furthermore, the selectivity and sensitivity of these sensors can be fine-tuned by adjusting CQDs size, surface functionality, and doping of CQDs, enhancing their applicability in various environmental contexts. Some of these sensors developed are CQD-enzyme biosensors, CQD-aptamer APT biosensors, CQD-molecular imprinted polymer MIP sensors, and independent CQD fluorescence biosensors.

Pesticides and herbicides

CQDs have become some of the most sensitive and selective fluorescent sensors for detecting pestilent compounds. For instance, Joji et al. (2024) reported their detection of numerous pesticides, including tetradifon, hurdane, atrazine, imidacloprid, and diethyl chlorothiophosphate with low detection limits using quenching enabled photoluminescent CQDs. Wu et al. (2017) exhibited FRET-based CQDs sensors of exceptional precision and sensitivity for organophosphate detection. Furthermore, sulfur and nitrogen-doped CQDs were also applied for extremely sensitive detection of carbamate pesticides (Li et al. 2016). Panda et al. (2018) demonstrated “light on” photoluminescent CQD systems for detection of flumioxazin and atrazine and detection limits of 3 pM and 0.05 nM for organophosphates and atrazine, respectively. These results emphasize the flexibility and remarkable effectiveness CQDs in detecting herbicides and pesticides. Along with the benefits of modern breeding practices, applying pesticides and herbicides, integrated agriculture chemicals have inflicted profound pollution in biodiversity, soil, and water sources along with the loss of biological species (Khan et al. 2023). The elevated residue amounts of these products pose threats to health of organism (animal and human) of serious concern (Ali et al. 2021).

Fungicides and insecticides

Fungicides and insecticides are frequently used to control fungal pathogens and insect pests, but their excessive use leads to serious environmental concerns. Various studies have been conducted toward identifying such residues using efficient fluorescence sensors. For example, Yang et al. (2018) generated those CQDs by electrochemical chemiluminescence methods and applied it as sensor for pentachlorophenol (PCP) which is one of the most widespread herbicides having detection limit of 1.3 × 10⁻12 g L⁻1. Furthermore, CQDs-based biosensors developed with DNA aptamers have achieved high sensitivity detection of insecticide acetamiprid compared to the FRET-based techniques with lower detection limits. Other advancements include the utilization of molecularly imprinted silica-wrapped CQDs for fipronil identification via fluorescence quenching (Ren et al. 2024) along with an electrochemical sensor to identify 1,4-DCP exhibiting improved catalytic performance (Feng et al. 2024). Such CQD-based sensors feature enhanced sensitivity, decreased detection limit, and can be employed for real-time monitoring.

Emerging applications of CQDs in food technology, and biomedical and environmental remediation

CQDs have attracted considerable interest beyond their traditional uses in the field of agriculture, emerging as multipurpose nanomaterials with applications spanning food industry, environmental remediation, and biomedicals due to their strong fluorescence, excellent biocompatibility, and tunable surface functionalities, electrical, and optical characteristics (Si et al. 2020; Singh et al. 2024) (Table 6). These properties enable smooth integration of CQDs into water purification processes, active food packaging systems, real-time food quality monitoring devices, and advanced medical therapies (Singh et al. 2024).

Table 6.

CQDs application in various fields, including photocatalysis, active food packaging, food preservation, fluorescence sensing, food analysis, environmental remediation, drug metabolism tracking, cancer diagnosis, and treatment

Sr. no Applications Description References
1 Photocatalysis Enhancing photocatalytic effects Si et al. 2020
2 Active food packaging Antibacterial and antioxidant properties for active food packaging Ezati et al. 2022, 2023
3 Food preservation Antibacterial materials in edible coatings for prolonging shelf life Fan et al. 2019
4 Fluorescence sensing Fluorescence sensing platform for detecting Hg2+ ions Zhang and Chen 2014
5 Food analysis Probes for food analysis, particularly for detecting food safety Ye et al. 2017
6 Environmental remediation Detecting heavy metal ions, removing pollutants, and photocatalytic degradation of wastewater contaminants Si et al. 2020; Rani et al. 2020
7 Drug metabolism tracking Fluorescent markers for tracking drug metabolism Badıllı et al. 2020; Tavan et al. 2025
8 Cancer diagnosis and treatment CQDs-based therapy and delivery systems for cancer diagnosis and treatment Pareek et al. 2025; Tavan et al. 2025

Food packaging, safety, and quality monitoring

As functional fillers in active food packaging films, CQDs are excellent candidates due to their remarkable antioxidant and antibacterial properties. In addition, their high-water solubility and biocompatibility enable easy incorporation with various biopolymer films. These films can inhibit the growth of food-borne pathogens. For instance, Ezati et al. (2022) described the incorporation of CQDs in edible food coatings for fresh fruits and vegetables to enhance their shelf life and safety. Fan et al. (2019) demonstrated that applying a chitosan-based coating containing kelp-derived CQDs led to significant improvements in the quality of fresh cucumbers stored at 4 °C by reducing weight loss and suppressing peroxidase activity. Additionally, Zhang and Chen (2014) reported that N-CQDs are effective as a fluorescence sensing platform for the sensitive, label-free detection of Hg2+ ions with a detection limit of 0.23 µM. Ye et al. (2017) stated that although CQDs-based probes had great promise in food analysis, their use in food safety monitoring still needs improvement. Recently, the development of intelligent nano-sensors for food quality control has been researched using CQDs (Table 6).

CQDs also have the ability to detect food spoilage. Usually, CQDs react with specific molecules or environmental cues to adjust their optical characteristics. Such variations can be interpreted as changes in food quality/contamination and chemical or physical properties (Ma et al. 2021; Mohammadi and Jafari 2020). Food packaging films embedded with CQDs have the ability to change their color in response to any change in pH due to their fluorescence sensitivity to changes in pH. This gives a visual cue about freshness of food. For instance, fluorescent CQDs synthesized from tangerine peel were used for pH sensing (Ezati et al. 2023).

Biomedical and environmental applications

CQDs have been used in numerous applications of biomedical field because of their high hydrophilicity, low toxicity, chemical stability, excitation wavelength-dependent photoluminescence, and water solubility (Salvi et al. 2024). For example, CQDs-based drug delivery involves adsorption or binding drugs onto CQDs to achieve site-specific drug delivery with minimum side effects (Lim et al. 2015; Zhu et al. 2015; Guerrero et al. 2021). The bond between drugs and CQDs complex gets broken in acidic environment at the diseased site or under other triggering conditions (Li et al. 2020a, b). This enables smooth delivery of drugs to the targeted sites and free CQDs easily excreted by hepatobiliary or renal system (Tian et al. 2020). CQDs are also used as fluorescent tags to monitor drug metabolism (Badilli et al. 2020). CQDs also serve a substantial role in diagnosis and treatment of cancer-related disorders (Palashuddin et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2015; Zhao and Zhu 2016; Gao et al. 2017; Ghosh et al. 2019). To date, a number of antibacterial and anticancer drugs have already been effectively delivered by several modified CQDs (Molaei 2019; Verma et al. 2020; Mahani et al. 2021).

CQDs have also shown promise in the degradation of environmental pollutants including pharmaceutical toxins such as ciprofloxacin and tetracycline and wastewater treatment (Rasheed et al. 2023; Rani et al. 2020). CQDs large surface area and photoluminescent characteristics allow efficient degradation of these toxins under light irradiation. In their report, Rani et al. (2020) mentioned CQDs’ effectiveness in the detection of heavy metal ions, the removal of organic and inorganic pollutants, and photocatalytic degradation of wastewater.

Toxicity and environmental impacts of CQDs

The escalating application of carbon quantum dots (CQDs) in solar cells, bioimaging, diodes, electrochromic devices, and chemical sensors raises greater concerns regarding their ecological and biological consequences, especially in agriculture (Omran 2020). The low-cost CQDs are appealing because of their high biocompatibility and photoluminescence, and relatively eco-friendly synthetic pathways. However, with their increasing utilization comes the need to comprehensively evaluate their toxicological profile and governance framework. There is a significant gap between agri-environmental policy and science, because CQDs have not been addressed in preset regulatory frameworks, such as exposure limits (PELs). CQDs have no defined thresholds for limitation or regulation which stands as a policy void in regime of cross science regulation (Liu et al. 2022). CQD toxicity is specifically adverse concerning the synthesis method, particle size, surface charge, dosage, and exposure conditions (Truskewycz et al. 2022). Take, for instance, hydrothermal methods of synthesizing CQDs. These methods tend to produce toxic byproducts such as aldehydes, ketones, and carboxylic acids, which are the result of partial decomposition of organic precursors. These compounds may either generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) or serve as environmental pollutants. Detection is particularly challenging, because the compounds are often non-fluorescent, requiring FTIR, GC–MS, or HPLC for identification (Peralta-Videa et al. 2020).

Functional groups that are covalently bonded to CQDs derive from the reagents used which dictate the method of synthesis, and hence, the toxicity of CQDs. CQDs derived from biomass or green-synthesized pathways are less toxic due to the absence of harsh chemicals. Biologically synthesized CQDs possess no toxic functional groups as opposed to chemically synthesized ones which increases environmental burden. With positive surface charges, smaller CQDs are more likely to be taken up by cells and disrupt membranes (Leal et al. 2023). CQDs have a dose-dependent and species-specific effects in plants. In low doses, they tend to stimulate root and seed germination, while higher doses stifle growth and induce oxidative stress. For instance, Vijeata et al. (2022) observed that 50 ppm of CQDs on Allium sativum seedlings did not exhibit any genotoxic effects, however, exposed with more than 100 ppm resulted in chromosomal aberrations, decreased mitotic index which suggested dosage-dependent toxicity. Also, controlled toxicity experiments with microalgae, Scenedesmus obliquus, provided evidence to the theory of dose determination responses (Yao et al. 2018).

In addition to terrestrial systems, CQDs have also exhibited Phyto persistence and bioaccumulation potential in the aquatic system. Li et al. (2020a, b) described a case where 78% of photonic CQDs remained suspended in seawater due to phytotoxic effects resulting from stranded light, which degraded the biomass of the alga Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Subsequently, these CQDs were filtered by Artemia salina, which resulted in appetite for feeding and filtration posing significant threats for disproportionate trophic transfer and disruption in the food web of marine ecosystems. In human macrophages and other mammalian cells, the smaller positive CQD morphologies were more cytotoxic. Nevertheless, as Leal et al. (2023) suggest, many CQDs are readily digestible and can be excreted, which may reduce long-term risks. The lack of regulatory exposure limits and longitudinal field data, particularly relating to biosafety in ecological contexts agricultural environments where direct application might be made underscores the need for such research into evaluating chronic exposure, bioaccumulation potential, and ecological risks.

Conclusions and future perspectives

Carbon quantum dots (CQDs) application has proven useful in multiple disciplines, such as agriculture, environmental monitoring, food safety, and biomedicine. Their small size, high-water solubility, photoluminescence, and surface modification make them stand out as novel nanomaterials. Also, their biocompatibility makes them beneficial in wide array of biological applications, including agriculture both ex-planta and in-planta. Ex-planta benefits include improved soil health characteristics crucial for both plant and human health. Moreover, CQDs in their nutritional context improve plant resilience against chronic crop (a)biotic stresses, ranging from nutritional imbalance, salinity, drought, heat, and heavy metal toxicity as well as pathogens attack. CQDs-induced improved plant growth and productivity is ascribed to enhanced photosynthesis through induced osmotic stress (IOS), which increases antioxidative defense, osmolyte, and hormone secretion downstream. At the same time, CQDs are able to detect pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, and even insecticides via fluorescence which makes them sensitive, safe, and efficient in comparison to traditional methods. Nonetheless, unrestricted use of CQDs poses could raise serious concerns from an environmental or toxicology viewpoint. While low concentrations of CQDs may be helpful, higher concentrations tend to cause oxidative stress and cellular damage, plant mutagenicity, and disrupt balance in aquatic ecosystems. Biologically, CQDs are dependent on the method of synthesis, surface chemistry, concentration, and the conditions to which they are exposed.

The absence of legal frameworks and rigorous long-term assessments of safety outcomes intensifies the scrutiny needed regarding their use. There is an important gap in the literature that deals with the synthesis of environmentally unfriendly byproducts with natural precursors which aims to curtail their toxic byproduct synthesis. There is also an urgent need to develop ecotoxicological studies concerning the behavior, degradation, and accumulation of CQDs in various ecosystems. Agricultural or environmentally useful CQDs will require standardized methodologies and exposure limits for safe use. Moreover, the incorporation of CQDs into smart farming and precision agriculture will transform crop telemetry and inputs management. Designing multifunctional CQDs that construct a sustainable framework on agriculture and environmental safety by integrating precise controlled release with real-time monitoring will greatly advance the field.

Abbreviations

AFM

Atomic force microscopy

CNGCs

Cyclic nucleotide-gated channels

CNMs

Carbon-based nanomaterials

CNTs

Carbon nanotubes

CQDs

Carbon quantum dots

-COOH

Carboxyl

DOC

Dissolved organic carbon content

DMF

Dimethyl formamide

EFB

Empty fruit bunch

EDTA

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

ELISA

Enzyme-linked immune-sorbent assays

FDAE

Fluorescein diacetate esterase

FRET

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer

FTIR

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

GQDs

Graphene quantum dots

HPLC

High-performance liquid chromatography

HNO3

Nitric acid

H2SO4

Sulfuric acid

LA

Laser ablation

LecRKs

Lectin receptor kinases

MWCNTs

Multiwalled carbon nanotubes

NaClO3

Sodium chlorate

NaHS

Sodium hydrosulfide

NaHSe

Sodium selenide

NMs

Nanomaterials

N-CQDs

Nitrogen-doped CQDs

OH

Hydroxyl

PCP

Pentachlorophenol

P-CDs

Pristine CDs

PET

Photo-induced electron transfer

PD

Polymer dots

PNDs

Polyacrylic acid-functionalized N-doped CQDs

TEM

Transmission electron microscopy

XPS

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

XRD

X-ray diffraction

Author contribution

This review was conceptualized and supervised by MAF. While NA together with SZ and ZR developed the first draft of the manuscript and all three contributed equally to this work. MMI contributed specific sections and helped in review and editing. RL and MAF reviewed, edited and revised the manuscript for finalization. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Data availability

Not applicable.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Abdelrhim AS, Mazrou YSA, Nehela Y, Atallah OO, El-Ashmony RM, Dawood MFA (2021) Silicon dioxide nanoparticles induce innate immune responses and activate antioxidant machinery in wheat against Rhizoctonia solani. Plants 10(12):2758. 10.3390/plants10122758 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmed HB, Mahmoud NE, Mahdi AA, Emam HE, Abdelhameed RM (2022) Affinity of carbon quantum dots anchored within metal organic framework matrix as enhancer of plant nourishment. Heliyon. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12396 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alamo-Nole L, Bailon-Ruiz S, Perales-Perez O, Roman FR (2012) Preparative size-exclusion chromatography for separation and purification of water-stable Cd-based quantum dots. Anal Methods 4(10):3127–3132. 10.1039/C2AY25629K [Google Scholar]
  4. Ali S, Ullah MI, Sajjad A, Shakeel Q, Hussain A (2021) Environmental and health effects of pesticide residues. Sust Agric Rev 48:311–336. 10.1007/978-3-030-54719-6_8 [Google Scholar]
  5. An J, Hu P, Li F, Wu H, Shen Y, White JC, Giraldo JP (2020) Emerging investigator series: molecular mechanisms of plant salinity stress tolerance improvement by seed priming with cerium oxide nanoparticles. Environ Sci Nano 7(8):2214–2228. 10.1039/D0EN00387E [Google Scholar]
  6. Anwar S, Ding H, Xu M, Hu X, Li Z, Wang J, Bi H (2019) Recent advances in synthesis, optical properties, and biomedical applications of carbon dots. ACS Appl Bio Mater 2(6):2317–2338. 10.1021/acsabm.9b00112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Arole VM, Munde SV (2014) Fabrication of nanomaterials by top–down and bottom–up approaches—an overview. J Mater Sci 1: 89–93. https://www.milliyaresearchportal.org/sites/default/files/25.Abst_29.pdf
  8. Arora N, Sharma NN (2014) Arc discharge synthesis of carbon nanotubes: comprehensive review. DRM 50:135–150. 10.1016/j.diamond.2014.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Ashoknarayanan S, Sundareswaran S, Raja K, Moorthy PS (2021) Engineered zinc oxide quantum dots for enhancing seed germination and seedling vigour in blackgram (Vigna mungo). J Pharm Innov 10(11):312–318. https://www.thepharmajournal.com/archives/2021/vol10issue11/PartE/10-10-329-310.pdf
  10. Baker and Baker (2010) 10.1002/anie.200906623
  11. Badıllı U, Mollarasouli F, Bakirhan NK, Ozkan Y, Ozkan SA (2020) Role of quantum dots in pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, and its application in drug delivery. Trends Anal Chem 131:116013. 10.1016/j.trac.2020.116013 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bera P, Aruna ST (2017). Solution combustion synthesis, characterization, and catalytic properties of oxide materials. In: nanotechnology in catalysis: applications in the chemical industry, energy development, and environment protection, pp. 91–118. 10.1002/9783527699827.ch5
  13. Biazar N, Poursalehi R (1920) Optical and structural properties of carbon dots/TiO₂ nanostructures prepared via DC arc discharge in liquid. AIP Conf Proc 1:1–5. 10.1063/1.5018965 [Google Scholar]
  14. Boruah A, Saikia M, Das T, Goswamee RL, Saikia BK (2020) Blue-emitting fluorescent carbon quantum dots from waste biomass sources and their application in fluoride ion detection in water. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 209:111940. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2020.111940 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Boruah JS, Deb A, Gogoi J, Phukan K, Gogoi N, Chowdhury D (2022) A review of carbon dots–a versatile carbon nanomaterial. In: novel applications of carbon-based nanomaterials, pp. 54–79. 10.1201/9781003183549
  16. Carpita N, Sabularse D, Montezinos D, Delmer DP (1979) Determination of the pore size of cell walls of living plant cells. Science 205(4411):1144–1147. 10.1126/SCIENCE.205.4411.1144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Carrillo-Carrión C, Moliner-Martínez Y, Simonet BM, Valcárcel M (2011) Capillary electrophoresis method for the characterization and separation of CdSe quantum dots. Anal Chem 83(7):2807–2813. 10.1021/ac2001719 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chai S, Deng W, Yang J, Guo L, Liu W (2024) Physiological and molecular mechanisms of ZnO quantum dots mitigating cadmium stress in Salvia miltiorrhiza. J Hazard Mater 470:134245. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chandrakar V, Yadu B, Korram J, Satnami M, Dubey A, Kumar M, Keshav S (2020) Carbon dot induces tolerance to arsenic by regulating arsenic uptake, reactive oxygen species detoxification and defense-related gene expression in Cicer arietinum L. Plant Physiol Biochem 156:78–86. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chao-Mujica FJ, Garcia-Hernández L, Camacho-López S, Camacho-López M, Camacho-López MA, Reyes Contreras D, Desdin-García LF (2021) Carbon quantum dots by submerged arc discharge in water: synthesis, characterization, and mechanism of formation. J Appl Phys 129(16):164301. 10.1063/5.0040322 [Google Scholar]
  21. Chen R, Ratnikova TA, Stone MB, Lin S, Lard M, Huang G, Hudson JAS, Ke PC (2010) Differential uptake of carbon nanoparticles by plant and mammalian cells. Small 6(5):612–617. 10.1002/smll.200901911 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cheng B, Yang Z, Chen F, Yue L, Cao X, Li J, Qian HL, Yan XP, Wang C, Wang Z (2023) Biomass-derived carbon dots with light conversion and nutrient provisioning capabilities facilitate plant photosynthesis. Sci Total Environ 901:165973. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165973 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen L, Zhu L, Liu X, Chen L, Zhou H, Ma H, Sun G, Nyande A, Li Z, Wu H (2024) Recent omics progress in nanobiotechnology for plant abiotic stress tolerance improvement. Crop J 12(5):1274–1279. 10.1016/j.cj.2024.05.017 [Google Scholar]
  24. Choppadandi M, Guduru AT, Gondaliya P, Arya N, Kalia K, Kumar H, Kapusetti G (2021) Structural features regulated photoluminescence intensity and cell internalization of carbon and graphene quantum dots for bioimaging. Mater Sci Eng C 129:112366. 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112366 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Chowmasundaram YA, Tan TL, Fadzil NI, Nulit R, Jusoh M, Rashid SA (2025) Foliar application of carbon quantum dots photosynthesis enhancer for enhancing the growth and development of green mustard (Brassica juncea) in indoor hydroponics. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2025.116475 [Google Scholar]
  26. Cui L, Ren X, Sun M, Liu H, Xia L (2021) Carbon dots: synthesis, properties and applications. Nanomater 11(12):3419. 10.3390/nano11123419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Dager A, Baliyan A, Kurosu S, Maekawa T, Tachibana M (2020) Ultrafast synthesis of carbon quantum dots from fenugreek seeds using microwave plasma enhanced decomposition: application of C-QDs to grow fluorescent protein. Sci Rep 10:12333. 10.1038/s41598-020-69264-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Danai-Varsou D, Zhang P, Afantitis A, Guo Z, Lynch I, Melagraki G (2023) Nanoinformatics and artificial intelligence for nano-enabled sustainable agriculture. In: Zhang P, Lynch I, White JC, Handy RD (eds) Nano-enabled sustainable and precision agriculture. Elsevier, pp 503–531. 10.1016/B978-0-323-91233-4.00015-6
  29. De Medeiros TV, Manioudakis J, Noun F, Macairan JR, Victoria F, Naccache R (2019) Microwave-assisted synthesis of carbon dots and their applications. J Mater Chem C 7(24):7175–7195. 10.1039/C9TC01640F [Google Scholar]
  30. De Yro PAN, Quaichon GMO, Cruz RAT, Emolaga CS, Que MCO, Magdaluyo ER, Basilia BA (2019) Hydrothermal synthesis of carbon quantum dots from biowaste for bio-imaging. AIP Conf Proc. 10.1063/1.5094310 [Google Scholar]
  31. Delgado-Martín J, Delgado-Olidén A, Velasco L (2022) Carbon dots boost dsRNA delivery in plants and increase local and systemic siRNA production. Int J Molecular Sci 23:5338. 10.3390/ijms23105338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Dey S, Govindaraj A, Biswas K, Rao CNR (2014) Luminescence properties of boron and nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots prepared from arc-discharge-generated doped graphene samples. Chem Phys Lett 595:203–208. 10.1016/j.cplett.2014.02.012 [Google Scholar]
  33. Díez-Pascual AM (2024) Carbon-based nanomaterials. Int J Mol Sci 14:7726. 10.3390/ijms22147726 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Dimkpa CO, Bindraban PS (2017) Nanofertilizers: new products for the industry? J Agric Food Chem 66:6462–6473. 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Dong Y, Zhou N, Lin X, Lin J, Chi Y, Chen G (2010) Extraction of electro-chemiluminescent oxidized carbon quantum dots from activated carbon. Chem Mater 22:5895–5899. 10.1021/cm1018844 [Google Scholar]
  36. Dong Z, Gong Y, Zhao J (2022) Cerium-doped carbon quantum dots trigger mung bean seeds to help mitigate salt stress by increasing the degree of stomata opening. Carbon Lett 32(7):1715–1727. 10.1007/s42823-022-00376-0 [Google Scholar]
  37. Dong Z, Qi J, Yue L, Zhou H, Chen L, Gu J, Wu H (2024) Biomass-based carbon quantum dots and their agricultural applications. Plant Stress. 10.1016/j.stress.2024.100411 [Google Scholar]
  38. Du XY, Wang CF, Wu G, Chen S (2021) The rapid and large-scale production of carbon quantum dots and their integration with polymers. Angew Chem Int Ed 60(16):8585–8595. 10.1002/anie.202004109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Elemike EE, Uzoh IM, Onwudiwe DC, Babalola O (2019) The role of nanotechnology in the fortification of plant nutrients and improvement of crop production. Appl Sci 9(3):499. 10.3390/app9030499 [Google Scholar]
  40. Ezati P, Priyadarshi R, Rhim JW (2022) Prospects of sustainable and renewable source-based carbon quantum dots for food packaging applications. Sustain Mater Technol 33:e00494. 10.1016/j.susmat.2022.e00494 [Google Scholar]
  41. Ezati P, Khan A, Rhim JW, Kim JT, Molaei R (2023) pH-responsive strips integrated with resazurin and carbon dots for monitoring shrimp freshness. Colloids Surf B 221:113013. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.113013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Falak A, Anas M, Khan A, Hayat A, Shahzad Z (2025) Efficacy of ascorbic acid coated quantum dots in alleviating lead-induced oxidative damage and enhancing growth parameters in rice (Oryzasativa L.) for sustainable agriculture. J Trace Elem Med Biol 88:127603. 10.1016/j.jtemb.2025.127603 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Fan K, Zhang M, Fan D, Jiang F (2019) Effect of carbon dots with chitosan coating on microorganisms and storage quality of modified-atmosphere-packaged fresh-cut cucumber. Sci Food Agric 99:6032–6041. 10.1002/jsfa.9879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Farhangi-Abriz S, Ghassemi-Golezani K, Torabian S, Rahimzadeh S, Osati F, Safarpour H (2024) Response of soybean plants to the foliar application of carbon quantum dots under drought stress: a field study. J Plant Growth Regul. 10.1007/s00344-024-11464-y [Google Scholar]
  45. Farooq MA, Niazi AK, Akhtar J, Saifullah FM, Souri Z, Karimi N, Rengel Z (2019) Acquiring control: the evolution of ROS-induced oxidative stress and redox signaling pathways in plant stress responses. Plant Physiol Biochem 141:353–369. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.04.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Feng X, Zhang Y (2019) A simple and green synthesis of carbon quantum dots from coke for white light-emitting devices. RSC Adv 9(58):33789–33793. 10.1039/C9RA06946A [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Feng Y, Luan S, Yi J, Zhang Y, Li X, Lv S, Cong Y (2024) A novel electrochemical sensor for simultaneous determination of 2,4-dichlorophenol and 3-chlorophenol. Environ Sci Nano 11(10):4348–4358. 10.1039/D4EN00588K [Google Scholar]
  48. Fujita M, Hasanuzzaman M (2022) Approaches to enhancing antioxidant defense in plants. Antiox 11(5):925. 10.3390/antiox11050925 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Gao G, Jiang YW, Yang J, Wu FG (2017) Mitochondria-targetable carbon quantum dots for differentiating cancerous cells from normal cells. Nanoscale 9:18368–18378. 10.1039/C7NR06764J [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Ghosh S, Ghosal K, Mohammad SA, Sarkar K (2019) Dendrimer functionalized carbon quantum dot for selective detection of breast cancer and gene therapy. Chem Eng J 373:468–484 [Google Scholar]
  51. Godínez-Mendoza PL, Rico-Chávez AK, Ferrusquía-Jimenez NI, Carbajal-Valenzuela IA, Villagómez-Aranda AL, Torres-Pacheco I, Guevara-González RG (2023) Plant hormesis: Revisiting concepts of biostimulation, elicitation and their application in sustainable agricultural production. Sci Total Environ 894:164883. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164883 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Gohari G, Panahirad S, Sadeghi M, Akbari A, Zareei E, Zahedi SM, Bahrami MK, Fotopoulos V (2021a) Putrescine-functionalized carbon quantum dot (Put-CQD) nanoparticles effectively prime grapevine (Vitis vinifera cv. ‘Sultana’) against salt stress. BMC Plant Biol 21:120. 10.1186/s12870-021-02901-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Gohari G, Panahirad S, Sepehri N, Akbari A, Zahedi SM, Jafari H, Fotopoulos V (2021b) Enhanced tolerance to salinity stress in grapevine plants through application of carbon quantum dots functionalized by proline. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:42877–42890. 10.1007/s11356-021-13794-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Gonçalves H, Jorge PA, Fernandes JRA, da Silva JCE (2010) Hg (II) sensing based on functionalized carbon dots obtained by direct laser ablation. Sens Actuators B Chem 145(2):702–707. 10.1016/j.snb.2010.01.031 [Google Scholar]
  55. Gong Y, Dong Z (2021) Transfer, transportation, and accumulation of cerium-doped carbon quantum dots: promoting growth and development in wheat. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 226:112852. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112852 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Goodwin TJ, Leppert VJ, Risbud SH, Kennedy IM, Lee HW (1997) Synthesis of gallium nitride quantum dots through reactive laser ablation. Appl Phys Lett 70(23):3122–3124. 10.1063/1.119109 [Google Scholar]
  57. Guan X, Li Z, Geng X, Lei Z, Karakoti A, Wu T, Kumar P, Yi J, Vinu A (2023) Emerging trends of carbon-based quantum dots: nano-architectonics and applications. Small 19:2207181. 10.1002/smll.202207181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Guerrero ED, Lopez-Velazquez AM, Ahlawat J, Narayan M (2021) Carbon quantum dots for treatment of amyloid disorders. ACS Appl Nano Mater 4:2423–2433. 10.1021/acsanm.0c02792 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Guo B, Liu G, Li W, Hu C, Lei B, Zhuang J, Zheng M, Liu Y (2022a) The role of carbon dots in the life cycle of crops. Ind Crops Prod 187:115427. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115427 [Google Scholar]
  60. Guo B, Liu G, Wei H, Qiu J, Zhuang J, Zhang X, Liu Y (2022b) The role of fluorescent carbon dots in crops: mechanism and applications. SmartMat 3(2):208–225. 10.1002/smm2.1111 [Google Scholar]
  61. Han Z, He L, Pan S, Liu H, Hu X (2020) Hydrothermal synthesis of carbon dots and their application for detection of chlorogenic acid. Luminescence 35(7):989–997. 10.1002/bio.3803 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Harish V, Tewari D, Gaur M, Yadav AB, Swaroop S, Bechelany M, Barhoum A (2022) Review on nanoparticles and nanostructured materials: bioimaging, biosensing, drug delivery, tissue engineering, antimicrobial, and agro-food applications. NANO 12(3):457. 10.3390/nano12030457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Hong W, Zhang Y, Yang L, Tian Y, Ge P, Hu J, Ji X (2019) Carbon quantum dot micelles tailored hollow carbon anode for fast potassium and sodium storage. Nano Energy 65:38–40. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104038 [Google Scholar]
  64. Hou H, Banks CE, Jing M, Zhang Y, Ji X (2015) Carbon quantum dots and their derivative 3D porous carbon frameworks for sodium-ion batteries with ultralong cycle life. Adv Mater 27:7861–7866. 10.1002/adma.201503816 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Huang H, Cui Y, Liu M, Chen J, Wan Q, Wen Y et al (2018) A one-step ultrasonic irradiation assisted strategy for the preparation of polymer-functionalized carbon quantum dots and their biological imaging. J Colloid Interface Sci 532:767–773. 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.07.099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Hossain Z, Mustafa G, Sakata K, Komatsu S (2016) Insights into the proteomic response of soybean towards Al2O3, ZnO, and Ag nanoparticles stress. J Hazard Mater 304:291–305. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.10.071 [DOI] [PubMed]
  67. Iannazzo D, Pistone A, Ferro S, De Luca L (2018) Graphene quantum dots-based systems as HIV inhibitors. Bioconjug Chem 29(9):3084–3093. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00448 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Ioannou A, Gohari G, Papaphilippou P, Panahirad S, Akbari A, Dadpour MR, Krasia-Christoforou T, Fotopoulos V (2020) Advanced nanomaterials in agriculture under a changing climate: the way to the future? Environ Exp Bot 176:104048. 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104048 [Google Scholar]
  69. Jagannathan M, Dhinasekaran D, Soundharraj P, Rajendran S, Vo D-VN, Prakasarao A, Ganesan S (2021) Green synthesis of white light-emitting carbon quantum dots: fabrication of white, fluorescent film and optical sensor applications. J Hazard Mater 416:125091. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125091 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Jan A, Batool M, Akram S, Malik AH, Khanday WA, Wani WA, Sheikh RA, Rather JA, Kannan P (2024) Functionalized graphene quantum dots (FGQDs): a review of their synthesis, properties, and emerging biomedical applications. Carbon Trends 18:100442. 10.1016/j.cartre.2024.100442 [Google Scholar]
  71. Jayaprakash N, Elumalai K, Manickam S, Bakthavatchalam G, Tamilselvan P (2024) Carbon nanomaterials: Revolutionizing biomedical applications with promising potential. Nano Mater Sci, in Press. 10.1016/j.nanoms.2024.11.004 [Google Scholar]
  72. Ji Y, Le Y, Xuesong C, Feiran C, Jing L, Jiangshan Z, Chuanxi W, Zhenyu W, Baoshan X (2023) Carbon dots promoted soybean photosynthesis and amino acid biosynthesis under drought stress: Reactive oxygen species scavenging and nitrogen metabolism. Sci Total Environ 856:159125. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Jiang H, Chen F, Lagally MG, Denes FS (2010) New strategy for synthesis and functionalization of carbon nanoparticles. Langmuir 26:1991–1995. 10.1021/la9022163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. John BK, Abraham T, Mathew B (2022) A review on characterization techniques for carbon quantum dots and their applications in agrochemical residue detection. J Fluor 32:449–471. 10.1007/s10895-021-02852-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Joji RR, Tomar A, Rana M (2024) Application of nanobiotechnology in detection and diagnosis of phytopathogens. In: Antimicrobial resistance in agriculture and its consequences. CRC Press. pp. 61–8210.1201/9781003269380-4
  76. Kalita H, Palaparthy VS, Baghini MS, Aslam M (2020) Electrochemical synthesis of graphene quantum dots from graphene oxide at room temperature and its soil moisture sensing properties. Carbon 165:9–17. 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.04.021 [Google Scholar]
  77. Kara M, Seçgin Z, Arslanoğlu ŞF, Dinç S (2023) Endogenous food-borne sugar beet molasses carbon dots for alleviating drought and salt stress in tobacco plant. J Plant Growth Reg 42:4541–4556. 10.1007/s00344-023-10923-2 [Google Scholar]
  78. Khan MAU, Arshad H, Majid A (2022) Transport mechanism from quantum dots to plant systems. Quantum dots for plant systems. Springer, Cham, pp 103–136 [Google Scholar]
  79. Khan BA, Haider S, Ashfaq M, Khan AM, Akhtar MJ, Akram A, Shah MR, Khan AA (2023) Pesticides: impacts on agriculture productivity, environment, and management strategies. Emerging contaminants and plants: interactions, adaptations and remediation technologies. Springer, Cham, pp 109–134 [Google Scholar]
  80. Kou L, Gao J, Zhou J, Shen J, Wang X (2021) Nitrogen and sulfur co-doped carbon quantum dots enhance drought resistance in tomato and mung bean plants. ACS Appl Bio Mater 4(8):6093–6102. 10.1021/acsabm.1c00427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Koul B, Poonia AK, Yadav D, Jin JO (2021) Microbe-Mediated Biosynthesis of Nanoparticles: Applications and Future Prospects. Biomolecules. 11(6):886. 10.3390/biom11060886 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Kong J, Yang S, Liu Z, Wang Y, Zhang Q, Li Y, Wang W, Dong C (2024) Carbon quantum dots: properties, preparation, and applications. Molecules. 10.3390/molecules29092002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Kostov K, Andonova-Lilova B, Smagghe G (2022) Inhibitory activity of carbon quantum dots against Phytophthora infestans and fungal plant pathogens and their effect on dsRNA-induced gene silencing. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 36:949–959. 10.1080/13102818.2022.2146533 [Google Scholar]
  84. Kumar R, Kumar V, Gedanken A (2020) Sonochemical synthesis of carbon dots, mechanism, effect of parameters, and catalytic, energy, biomedical and tissue engineering applications. Ultrason Sonochem 64:105009. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Kumar P, Dua S, Kaur R, Kumar M, Bhatt G (2022) A review on advancements in carbon quantum dots and their application in photovoltaics. RSC Adv 12(8):4714–4759. 10.1039/D1RA08452F [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Kurunc A (2021) Effects of water and salinity stresses on growth, yield, and water use of iceberg lettuce. J Sci Food Agric 101:5688–5696. 10.1002/jsfa.11223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Lahiani MH, Dervishi E, Ivanov I, Chen J, Khodakovskaya M (2016) Comparative study of plant responses to carbon-based nanomaterials with different morphologies. Nanotech 27:265102. 10.1088/0957-4484/27/26/265102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Latef AAH, Abu Alhmad MF, Abdelfattah KE (2017) The possible roles of priming with ZnO nanoparticles in mitigation of salinity stress in lupine (Lupinus termis) plants. J Plant Growth Reg 36:60–70. 10.1007/s00344-016-9618-x [Google Scholar]
  89. Leal MFC, Catarino RI, Pimenta AM, Souto MRS (2023) The influence of the biometals Cu, Fe, and Zn and the toxic metals Cd and Pb on human health and disease. Trace Elem Electrolytes 40:1. 10.5414/TE500038 [Google Scholar]
  90. Li X, Wang H, Shimizu Y, Pyatenko A, Kawaguchi K, Koshizaki N (2010) Preparation of carbon quantum dots with tunable photoluminescence by rapid laser passivation in ordinary organic solvents. Chem Commun 47:932–934. 10.1039/C0CC03552A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Li H, He X, Kang Z, Huang H, Liu Y, Liu J, Lian S, Tsang CHA, Yang X, Lee ST (2011) Synthesis of fluorescent carbon nanoparticles directly from active carbon via a one-step ultrasonic treatment. Mater Res Bull 46:147–151. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2010.10.013 [Google Scholar]
  92. Li H, Sun C, Vijayaraghavan R, Zhou F, Zhang X, MacFarlane DR (2016) Long lifetime photoluminescence in N, S co-doped carbon quantum dots from an ionic liquid and their applications in ultrasensitive detection of pesticides. Carbon 104:33–39. 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.03.040 [Google Scholar]
  93. Li H, Huang J, Lu F, Liu Y, Song Y, Sun Y, Zhong J, Hunag H, Wang Y, Li S, Lifshitz Y, Lee ST, Kang Z (2018a) Impacts of carbon dots on rice plants: boosting growth and improving disease resistance. ACS Appl Biomater 1:663–672. 10.1021/acsabm.8b00345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Li Y, Yang T, Chen M, Wang J (2018b) Supported carbon dots serve as high-performance adsorbent for the retention of trace cadmium. Talanta 180:18–24. 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.12.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Li J, Lian YC, Yuxuan C, Yunqiang W, Xilong W, Liyun D (2019) Applications of carbon quantum dots to alleviate Cd2+ phytotoxicity in Citrus maxima seedlings. Chemo 236:124385. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124385 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Li Y, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Zhang C, Gao Y, Wang Z (2020a) Carbon dots as a protective agent alleviating abiotic stress on rice (Oryza sativa L.) through promoting nutrition assimilation and the defense system. ACS Appl Mater Inter 12:33575–33585. 10.1021/acsami.0c11724 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Li Y, Kang Z, Li X, Chen N, Liu Y, Zhang C (2020b) A review on the effects of carbon dots in plant systems. Mater Chem Front 4:437–448. 10.1039/C9QM00614A [Google Scholar]
  98. Li Y, Zhao H, Zhang C, Gao Y, Wang Y (2021) Magnesium–nitrogen co-doped carbon dots enhance plant growth through multifunctional regulation in photosynthesis. Chemic Eng J 422:130114. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.130114 [Google Scholar]
  99. Li G, Xu J, Xu K (2023) Physiological functions of carbon dots and their applications in agriculture: a review. Nanomaterials 13(19):2684. 10.3390/nano13192684 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Li G, Xu J, Xu K (2023a) Physiological functions of carbon dots and their applications in agriculture production. Nanomaterials 13:2684. 10.3390/nano13192684 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Li J, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Lin C, Xu B, Wang M (2023b) Novel selenium-doped carbon quantum dots derived from algae effectively enhanced the delivery and accumulation of selenium in tomato plants (Lycopersicum esculentum) via foliar application. Environ Sci Nano 10:866–878. 10.1039/D2EN00918H [Google Scholar]
  102. Liang L, Wong SC, Lisak G (2023) Effects of plastic-derived carbon dots on germination and growth of pea (Pisum sativum) via seed nano-priming. Chemo 316:137868. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.137868 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Lim SY, Shen W, Gao Z (2015) Carbon quantum dots and their applications. Chem Soc Rev 44:362–381. 10.1039/C4CS00269E [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Lin S, Reppert J, Hu Q, Hudson JS, Reid ML, Ratnikova TA, Rao AM, Luo H, Ke PC (2009) Uptake, translocation, and transmission of carbon nanomaterials in rice plants. Small 5:1128–1132. 10.1002/smll.200801556 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Lin Z, Ali MM, Yi X, Zhang L, Wang S, Chen F (2023) Unlocking the potential of carbon quantum dots for cell imaging, intracellular localization, and gene expression control in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Int J Mol Sci 24:15700 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Liu S, Tian J, Wang L, Zhang Y, Qin X, Luo Y, Asiri AM, Al-Youbi AO, Sun X (2012) Hydrothermal treatment of grass: A low-cost, green route to nitrogen-doped, carbon-rich, photoluminescent polymer nanodots as an effective fluorescent sensing platform for label-free detection of Cu (II) ions. Adv Mater 24:2037–2041. 10.1002/adma.201200164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Liu W, Yao J, Chai H, Zhao Z, Zhang C, Jin J, Martin MFC (2015) Concentration-dependent effect of photoluminescent carbon dots on the microbial activity of the soil studied by combination methods. Envrion Toxic Pharm 39(2):857–863. 10.1016/j.etap.2015.02.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Liu H, Ding J, Zhang K, Ding L (2019) Construction of biomass carbon dots-based fluorescence sensors and their applications in chemical and biological analysis. Trends Anal Chem 118:315–337. 10.1016/j.trac.2019.05.051 [Google Scholar]
  109. Liu Q, Ding X, Pang Y, Cao Y, Lei J, Wu J, Zhang T (2022) New insights into the safety assessment of quantum dots: potential release pathways, environmental transformations, and health risks. Environ Sci Nano 9(9):3277–3311. 10.1039/D2EN00252C [Google Scholar]
  110. Liu Y, Liu D, Han X, Chen Z, Li M, Jiang L, Zeng J (2024) Magnesium-doped carbon quantum dot nanomaterials alleviate salt stress in rice by scavenging reactive oxygen species to increase photosynthesis. ACS Nano 18(45):31188–31203. 10.1021/acsnano.4c09001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. López-Vargas ER, Ortega-Ortíz H, Cadenas-Pliego G, Delgado-Alvarado A, Cabrera-De La Fuente M (2020) Seed priming with carbon nanomaterials to modify the germination, growth, and antioxidant status of tomato seedlings. Agronomy 10:639. 10.3390/agronomy10050639 [Google Scholar]
  112. Lu Z, Li Y, Chen K, Chai S, Su G, Wu C, Sun M, Wang Y, Feng S, Hao M, Rao H, Liu D (2025) Multi-activity ferruginated carbon quantum dots nanozyme improves wheat seedling growth and Cd tolerance. Crop J 13(2):510–523. 10.1016/j.cj.2025.01.016 [Google Scholar]
  113. Luo X, Dong Y, Li C, Yang J, Liu J, Yin Y (2021) Nitrogen-doped carbon dots alleviate the damage from tomato bacterial wilt syndrome: systemic acquired resistance activation and reactive oxygen species scavenging. Environ Sci Nano 8:3806–3819. 10.1039/D1EN00715G [Google Scholar]
  114. Ma X, Li S, Hessel V, Lin L, Meskers S, Gallucci F (2019) Synthesis of luminescent carbon quantum dots by microplasma process. Chem Eng Proc 140:29–35. 10.1016/j.cep.2019.04.017 [Google Scholar]
  115. Ma Q, Lu X, Wang W, Hubbe MA, Liu Y, Mu J, Wang J, Sun J, Rojas OJ (2021) Recent developments in colorimetric and optical indicators stimulated by volatile base nitrogen to monitor seafood freshness. Food Pack Shelf Life 28:100634. 10.1016/j.fpsl.2021.100634 [Google Scholar]
  116. Magesh V, Sundramoorthy AK, Ganapathy D (2022) Recent advances on synthesis and potential applications of carbon quantum dots. Front Mater Sci 9:906838. 10.3389/fmats.2022.906838 [Google Scholar]
  117. Mahani M, Pourrahmani-Sarbanani M, Yoosefian M, Divsar F, Mousavi SM, Nomani A (2021) Doxorubicin delivery to breast cancer cells with transfer intargeted carbon quantum dots: an in vitro and in silico study. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 62:102342. 10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102342 [Google Scholar]
  118. Manikandan V, Lee NY (2022) Green synthesis of carbon quantum dots and their environmental applications. Environmental Research 212(Pt B). 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113283 [DOI] [PubMed]
  119. Maholiya A, Mishra P, Chauhan R, Singh R (2023) An insight into the role of carbon dots in agriculture system: a review. Environ Sci Nano 10:959–995. 10.1039/D2EN00954D [Google Scholar]
  120. Malavika JP, Shobana C, Sundarraj S, Ganeshbabu M, Kumar P, Selvan RK (2022) Green synthesis of multifunctional carbon quantum dots: an approach in cancer theranostics. Bamater Adv 136:212756. 10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.212756 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Mittal D, Rana A, Yadav A, Chauhan R (2020) Nanoparticle-based sustainable agriculture and food science: recent advances and outlook. Front Nanotech 2:579954. 10.3389/fnano.2020.579954 [Google Scholar]
  122. Mohammadi Z, Jafari SM (2020) Detection of food spoilage and adulteration by novel nanomaterial-based sensors. Adv Colloid Inter Sci 286:102297. 10.1016/j.cis.2020.102297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Molaei MJ (2019) Carbon quantum dots and their biomedical and therapeutic applications: a review. RSC Adv 9:6460–6481. 10.1039/C8RA08088G [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Mu T, Han R (2024) Magnesium and nitrogen co-doped carbon dots alleviate UV-B radiation damage in wheat seedlings. Pak J Bot 56(1):227–237. 10.30848/pjb2024-1(33) [Google Scholar]
  125. Munir N, Gulzar W, Abideen Z, Hasanuzzaman M, El‑Keblawy A, Zhao F (2023) Plant–nanoparticle interactions: transcriptomic and proteomic insights. Agronomy 13(8):2112. 10.3390/agronomy13082112
  126. Nayak RR, Khairun H, Parveen G, Garg A, Chumachenko YA, Shu R, Gupta NK (2025) A review on biomass-derived carbon quantum dots: emerging catalysts for hydrogenation catalysis. Chem Asian J 20:e202401005. 10.1002/asia.202401005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Ndolo D, Fatunbi AO, Salami AT, Ayilara MS, Adebayo AG (2019) Research and development of biopesticides: challenges and prospects. Outlooks Pest Manag 30:267–276. 10.1564/v30_dec_08 [Google Scholar]
  128. Nguyen TN, Le PA, Phung VBT (2022) Facile green synthesis of carbon quantum dots and biomass-derived activated carbon from banana peels: synthesis and investigation. Bio Conv Bioref 12:2407–2416. 10.1007/s13399-020-00839-2 [Google Scholar]
  129. Nowack B, Bucheli TD (2007) Occurrence, behavior and effects of nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Pollut 150:5–22. 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Omran BA (2020) Nanobiotechnology: a multidisciplinary field of science. Springer, Cham, pp 145–184 [Google Scholar]
  131. Palashuddin M, Goswami U, Ghosh SS, Ghosh BC, Chattopadhyay A (2015) Cu2+-embedded carbon nanoparticles as anticancer agents. J Mater Chem B 3:5673–5677. 10.1039/c5tb00567a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Panda S, Jadav A, Panda N, Mohapatra S (2018) A novel carbon quantum dot-based fluorescent nanosensor for selective detection of flumioxazin in real samples. New J Chem 42:2074–2080. 10.1039/C7NJ04358A [Google Scholar]
  133. Pareek A, Kumar D, Pareek A, Gupta MM (2025) Advancing cancer therapy with quantum dots and other nanostructures: a review of drug delivery innovations, applications, and challenges. Cancers 17(5):878. 10.3390/cancers17050878 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Parveen S, Singh G, Husain S (2025) Synthesis of carbon dots from waste: an efficient approach for sustainable environment. Waste-Derived Carbon Nanomater. 10.1021/bk-2025-1494.ch011 [Google Scholar]
  135. Peralta-Videa J, Sreenivasan ST, Narayan M (2020) Influence of carbon quantum dots on the biome. Processes 8:445. 10.3390/pr8040445 [Google Scholar]
  136. Raikwar VR (2022) Synthesis and study of carbon quantum dots (CQDs) for enhancement of luminescence intensity of CQD@LaPO₄:Eu3⁺ nanocomposite. Mater Chem Phys 275:125277. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.125277 [Google Scholar]
  137. Rani U A, Law Y N, Ching Y N, Ebrahim M (2020) A review of carbon quantum dots and their applications in wastewater treatment. Adv Colloid Inter Sci, 278: 102124. 10.1016/j.cis.2020.102124 [DOI] [PubMed]
  138. Rao R, Pint CL, Islam AE, Weatherup RS, Hofmann S, Meshot ER, Wu F, Zhou C, Dee N, Amama PB, Carpena-Nunez J (2018) Carbon nanotubes and related nanomaterials: critical advances and challenges for synthesis toward mainstream commercial applications. ACS Nano 12:11756–11784. 10.1021/acsnano.8b06511 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Rasal AS, Yadav S, Yadav A, Kashale AA, Manjunatha ST, Altaee A, Chang JY (2021) Carbon quantum dots for energy applications: a review. ACS Appl Nano Mater 4(7):6515–6541. 10.1021/acsanm.1c01372 [Google Scholar]
  140. Rasheed T, Muha A, Darim B, Amjad A, Muhammad I (2023) Zero-dimensional luminescent carbon dots as fascinating analytical tools for the treatment of pharmaceutical based contaminants in aqueous media. Environ Sci Water Res Technol 10:12–28. 10.1039/D3EW00220A [Google Scholar]
  141. Ren X, Zhang F, Guo BP, Gao N, Zhang XL (2019) Synthesis of N-doped micropore carbon quantum dots with high quantum yield and dual-wavelength photoluminescence emission from biomass for cellular imaging. Nanomater 9:495. 10.3390/nano9040495 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Ren H, Tai SM, Barimah AO, Mao M, Peng C, Xu J, Wang Z (2024) Advancement of pesticides fluorescence detection: From sensing strategies to application prospect. Trends Food Sci Technol. 10.1016/j.tifs.2024.104682 [Google Scholar]
  143. Riding MJ, Martin FL, Trevisan J, Llabjani V, Patel II, Jones KC, Semple KT (2012) Concentration-dependent effects of carbon nanoparticles in gram-negative bacteria determined by infrared spectroscopy with multivariate analysis. Environ Pollut 163:226–234. 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.12.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Romero MP, Alves F, Stringasci MD, Buzzá HH, Ciol H, Inada NM, Bagnato VS (2021) One-pot microwave-assisted synthesis of carbon dots and in vivo and in vitro antimicrobial photodynamic applications. Front Microbiol 12:149–662. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.662149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Roy P, Chen PC, Periasamy AP, Chen YN, Chang HT (2015) Photoluminescent carbon nanodots: synthesis, physico-chemical properties and analytical applications. Mater Today 18(8):447–458. 10.1016/j.mattod.2015.04.005 [Google Scholar]
  146. Sadeghi J, Lakzian A, Halajnia A, Alikhani M (2023) Effects of fungal carbon dots application on growth characteristics and cadmium uptake in maize. Plant Physiol Biochem 204:108102. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.108102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Sahu N, Vasu D, Sahu A, Lal N, Singh SK (2017) Strength of microbes in nutrient cycling: a key to soil health. In: Agriculturally important microbes for sustainable agriculture: volume I: plant-soil-microbe nexus, pp. 69–86.
  148. Salem SS, Hammad EN, Mohamed AA, El-Dougdoug W (2022) A comprehensive review of nanomaterials: types, synthesis, characterization, and applications. Bioint Res Appl Chem 13(1):41. 10.33263/BRIAC131.041 [Google Scholar]
  149. Salvi A, Saarthak K, Preeti T, Manish S, Atul T (2024) Biomedical application of carbon quantum dots: a review. Carbon Trends 17:100407. 10.1016/j.cartre.2024.100407 [Google Scholar]
  150. Schwartz SH, Hendrix B, Hoffer P, Sanders RA, Zheng W (2020) Carbon dots for efficient small interfering RNA delivery and gene silencing in plants. Plant Physiol 184(2):647–657. 10.1104/pp.20.00733 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Servin A, Elmer W, Mukherjee A, De la Torre-Roche R, Hamdi H, White JC, Dimkpa C (2015) A review of the use of engineered nanomaterials to suppress plant disease and enhance crop yield. J Nano Res 17:1–21. 10.1007/s11051-015-2907-7 [Google Scholar]
  152. Shahba H, Sabet M (2020) Two-step and green synthesis of highly fluorescent carbon quantum dots and carbon nanofibers from pine fruit. J Fluor 30(4):927–938. 10.1007/s10895-020-02562-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Shen Y, Gee MY, Tan R, Pellechia PJ, Greytak AB (2013) Purification of quantum dots by gel permeation chromatography and the effect of excess ligands on shell growth and ligand exchange. Chem Mater 25(14):2838–2847. 10.1021/cm4012734 [Google Scholar]
  154. Shen T, Wang Q, Guo Z, Kuang J, Cao W (2018) Hydrothermal synthesis of carbon quantum dots using different precursors and their combination with TiO2 for enhanced photocatalytic activity. Ceramics Int 44(10):11828–11834. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.03.271 [Google Scholar]
  155. Si QS, Guo WQ, Wang HZ, Liu BH, Ren NQ (2020) Carbon quantum dots-based semiconductor preparation methods, applications and mechanisms in environmental contamination. Chinese Chem Lett 31(10):2556–2566. 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.08.036 [Google Scholar]
  156. Singh MK, Mathpal MC, Agarwal A (2012) Optical properties of SnO2 quantum dots synthesized by laser ablation in liquid. Chem Phys Lett 536:87–91. 10.1016/j.cplett.2012.03.084 [Google Scholar]
  157. Singh I, Arora R, Dhiman H, Pahwa R (2018) Carbon quantum dots: synthesis, characterization and biomedical applications. J Pharm Sci 15(2):219–230. 10.4274/tjps.63497 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Singh AK, Itkor P, Lee M, Saenjaiban A, Lee YS (2024) Synergistic integration of carbon quantum dots in biopolymer matrices: an overview of current advancements in antioxidant and antimicrobial active packaging. Molecules 29:5138. 10.3390/molecules29215138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Song F, Han X, Zhu X, Herbert SJ (2012) Response to water stress of soil enzymes and root exudates from drought and non-drought tolerant corn hybrids at different growth stages. Can J Soil Sci 92(3):501–507. 10.4141/cjss2010-057 [Google Scholar]
  160. Sun S, Sun Y, Yang F, Che S, Zhang X, Zhang G, Li Y (2023) Electrochemical synthesis of Ni doped carbon quantum dots for simultaneous fluorometric determination of Fe3⁺ and Cu2⁺ ion facilely. Green Chem Eng 4(1):115–122. 10.1016/j.gce.2022.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  161. Tan A, Yang G, Wan X (2021) Ultra-high quantum yield nitrogen-doped carbon quantum dots and their versatile application in fluorescence sensing, bioimaging and anti-counterfeiting. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 253:119583. 10.1016/j.saa.2021.119583 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Tan TL, Nulit R, Jusoh M, Rashid SA (2023) Recent developments, applications and challenges for carbon quantum dots as a photosynthesis enhancer in agriculture. RSC Adv 13(36):25093–25117. 10.1039/D3RA01217D [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Tavan M, Yousefian Z, Bakhtiar Z, Rahmandoust M, Mirjalili MH (2025) Carbon quatum dots: multifunctional fluorescent nanomaterials for sustainable advances in biomedicine and agriculture. Ind Crop Prod 231:121207. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2025.121207 [Google Scholar]
  164. Thakur A, Kumar A (2022) Recent advances on rapid detection and remediation of environmental pollutants utilizing nanomaterials-based (bio)sensors. Sci Total Environ 834:155219. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Thoda O, Xanthopoulou G, Vekinis G, Chroneos A (2018) Review of recent studies on solution combustion synthesis of nanostructured catalysts. Adv Eng Mater 20(8):1800470. 10.1002/adem.201800047 [Google Scholar]
  166. Tian X, Zeng A, Liu Z, Zheng C, Wei Y, Yang P, Zhang M, Yang F, Xie F (2020) Carbon quantum dots: in vitro and in vivo studies on biocompatibility and bio-interactions for optical imaging. Int J Nano 15:6519–6529. 10.2147/IJN.S257645 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Truskewycz A, Yin H, Halberg N, Lai DT, Ball AS, Truong VK, Cole I (2022) Carbon dot therapeutic platforms: administration, distribution, metabolism, excretion, toxicity, and therapeutic potential. Small 18(16):2106342. 10.1002/smll.202106342 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Tusher MMH (2023) Microbial synthesis of Cadmium selenide quantum dots (CdSe QDs), influencing factors and applications. Opt Quantum Electron 55(4):332. 10.1007/s11082-02304632-z [Google Scholar]
  169. Verma A, Arshad F, Ahmad K, Goswami U, Samanta SK, Sahoo AK et al (2020) Role of surface charge in enhancing antibacterial activity of fluorescent carbon dots. Nanotech 31:095101. 10.1088/1361-6528/ab55b8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Vibhute A, Patil T, Gambhir R, Tiwari AP (2022) Fluorescent carbon quantum dots: synthesis methods, functionalization and biomedical applications. Appl Sur Sci Adv 11:100311. 10.1016/j.apsadv.2022.100311 [Google Scholar]
  171. Vijeata A, Chaudhary S, Chaudhary GR, Umar A, Baskoutas S (2022) Sustainable agronomic response of carbon quantum dots on Allium sativum: translocation, physiological responses and alterations in chromosomal aberrations. Environ Res 212:113559. 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113559 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Wang X, Liu X, Chen J, Han H, Yuan Z (2014) Evaluation and mechanism of antifungal effects of carbon nanomaterials in controlling plant fungal pathogen. Carbon 68:798–806. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.11.072 [Google Scholar]
  173. Wang LW, Peng CW, Chen C, Li Y (2015) Quantum dots-based tissue and in vivo imaging in breast cancer researches: current status and future perspectives. Breast Cancer Res Treat 151:7–17. 10.1007/s10549-015-3363-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Wang L, Bi YD, Hou J, Li HY, Xu Y, Wang B, Ding H, Ding L (2016) Facile, green and clean one-step synthesis of carbon dots from wool: Application as a sensor for glyphosate detection based on the inner filter effect. Talanta 160:268–275. 10.1016/j.talanta.2016.07.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Wang R, Xia G, Zhong W, Chen L, Chen L, Wang Y, Min Y, Li K (2019a) Direct transformation of lignin into fluorescence-switchable graphene quantum dots and their application in ultrasensitive profiling of a physiological oxidant. Green Chem 21:3343–3352. 10.1039/C9GC01012B [Google Scholar]
  176. Wang X, Feng Y, Dong P, Huang J (2019b) A mini review on carbon quantum dots: preparation, properties, and electrocatalytic application. Front Chem 7:71. 10.3389/fchem.2019.00671 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Wang C, Shi H, Yang M, Yan Y, Liu E, Ji Z, Fan J (2020) Facile synthesis of novel carbon quantum dots from biomass waste for highly sensitive detection of iron ions. Mater Res Bull 124:110730. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2019.110730 [Google Scholar]
  178. Wang C, Yang H, Chen F, Yue L, Wang Z, Xing B (2021a) Nitrogen-doped carbon dots increased light conversion and electron supply to improve the corn photosystem and yield. Environ Sci Technol 55(18):12317–12325. 10.1021/acs.est.1c01876 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Wang Z, Liu Q, Leng J, Liu H, Zhang Y, Wang C, Lei H (2021b) The green synthesis of carbon quantum dots and applications for sulcotrione detection and anti-pathogen activities. J Saudi Chem Soc 25(12):101373. 10.1016/j.jscs.2021.101373 [Google Scholar]
  180. Wang C, Yang H, Yue L, Sun W, Chen F, Cao X, Zhao X, Wu F, Wang Z, Xing B (2022) Physiological and molecular level understanding of advanced carbon dots to enhance maize drought tolerance: modulation of photosynthesis and signaling molecules. Environ Sci: Nano 9(10):3821–3832. 10.1039/D2EN00176D [Google Scholar]
  181. Wang Y (2022) Electrochemical studies of the applications of novel carbon-based materials. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:28052537-a596-4fb7-907a-1da60479ff5c
  182. Wu X, Song Y, Yan X, Zhu C, Ma Y, Du D, Lin Y (2017) Carbon quantum dots as fluorescence resonance energy transfer sensors for organophosphate pesticides determination. Biosens Bioelectron 94:292–297. 10.1016/j.bios.2017.03.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Xu Y, Yan L, Li X, Xu H (2019) Fabrication of transition metal dichalcogenides quantum dots based on femtosecond laser ablation. Sci Rep 9(1):29–31. 10.1038/s41598-019-38929-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Xu N, Gao S, Xu C, Fang Y, Xu L, Zhang W (2021a) Carbon quantum dots derived from waste acorn cups and its application as an ultraviolet absorbent for polyvinyl alcohol film. Appl Sur Sci 556:149774. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149774 [Google Scholar]
  185. Xu Q, Fu H, Zhu B, Hussain HA, Zhang K, Tian X, Duan M, Xie X, Wang L (2021b) Potassium improves drought stress tolerance in plants by affecting root morphology, root exudates, and microbial diversity. Metabolites 11:131. 10.3390/metabo11030131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Xu X, Tingting Y, Daoshun Z, Hongping S, Kun H, Yong W et al (2023) Evaluation of the anti-viral efficacy of three different dsRNA nanoparticles against potato virus Y using various delivery methods. Ecotox Environ Safe 255:114775. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.114775 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Yan Z, Xiao A, Lu H, Liu Z, Chen J (2014) Determination of metronidazole by a flow-injection chemiluminescence method using ZnO-doped carbon quantum dots. New Carbon Mater 29:216–224. 10.1016/S1872-5805(14)60136-0 [Google Scholar]
  188. Yang S, Li Y, Wang S, Wang M, Chu M, Xia B (2014) Large-scale fabrication of heavy doped carbon quantum dots with tunable photoluminescence and sensitive fluorescence detection. J Mater Chem A 2(23):8660. 10.1016/j.mtadv.2023.100376 [Google Scholar]
  189. Yang W, Yang H, Ding W, Zhang B, Zhang L, Wang L, Yu M, Zhang Q (2016) High quantum yield ZnO quantum dots synthesizing via an ultrasonication microreactor method. Ultrason Sonochem 33:106–117. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.04.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. Yang S, Li Y, Wang S, Wang M, Chu M, Xia B (2018) Advances in the use of carbonaceous materials for the electrochemical determination of persistent organic pollutants. A review. Microchim Acta 185:1–14. 10.1007/s00604-017-2638-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  191. Yang H, Wang C, Chen F, Yue L, Cao X, Li J, Zhao X, Wu F, Wang Z, Xing B (2022) Foliar carbon dot amendment modulates carbohydrate metabolism, rhizospheric properties and drought tolerance in maize seedling. Sci Total Environ 809:151105. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. Yao K, Lv X, Zheng G, Chen Z, Jiang Y, Zhu X, Cai Z (2018) Effects of carbon quantum dots on aquatic environments: comparison of toxicity to organisms at different trophic levels. Environ Sci Technol 52(24):14445–14451. 10.1021/acs.est.8b04235 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. Ye S-L, Huang J, Luo L, Fu H, Sun Y, Shen Y, Xu Z (2017) Preparation of carbon dots and their application in food analysis as signal probe. Chin J Anal Chem 45(11):1571–1581. 10.1016/S1872-2040(17)61045-4 [Google Scholar]
  194. Zhu Ye, Liu Y, Wang W, Singh V P, Ren L (2021) A global perspective on the probability of propagation of drought: From meteorological to soil moisture. J Hydrol 603:26907. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021JHyd..60326907Z/abstract
  195. Yin K, Bao Q, Li J, Wang M, Wang F, Sun B, Lian F (2024) Molecular mechanisms of growth promotion and selenium enrichment in tomato plants by novel selenium-doped carbon quantum dots. Chemo 364:143175. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  196. Younes NA, Dawood MFA, Wardany AA (2019) Biosafety assessment of graphene nanosheets on leaf ultrastructure, physiological and yield traits of Capsicum annuum L. and Solanum melongena L. Chemo 228:318–327. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  197. Younes NA, El-Sherbiny M, Alkharpotly AA, Sayed OA, Dawood AFA, Hossain MA, Abdelrhim AS, Dawood MFA (2024) Rice-husks synthesized-silica nanoparticles modulate silicon content, ionic homeostasis, and antioxidants defense under limited irrigation regime in eggplants. Plant Stress 11:100330. 10.1016/j.stress.2023.100330 [Google Scholar]
  198. Yu H, Li X, Zeng X, Lu Y (2015) Preparation of carbon dots by non-focusing pulsed laser irradiation in toluene. Chem Commun 52:819–822. 10.1039/C5CC08384B [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  199. Zhai XY, Zhang P, Liu CJ, Bai T, Li WC, Dai LM, Liu WG (2012) Highly luminescent carbon nanodots by microwave-assisted pyrolysis. Chem Commun 48:7955–7957. 10.1039/C2CC33869F [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  200. Zhang R, Chen W (2014) Nitrogen-doped carbon quantum dots: facile synthesis and application as a “turn-off” fluorescent probe for detection of Hg2+ ions. Biosens Bioelectron 55:83–90. 10.1016/j.bios.2013.11.074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  201. Zhang J, Abbasi F, Claverie J (2015) An efficient templating approach for the synthesis of redispersible size-controllable carbon quantum dots from graphitic polymeric micelles. Chem Eur J 21(43):15142–15147. 10.1002/chem.201502158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  202. Zhao X (2024) Significance of gene silencing in modern agriculture: mechanisms and benefits. J Plant Pathol Microbiol 15:710. 10.35248/2157-7471.24.15.710 [Google Scholar]
  203. Zhao MX, Zhu BJ (2016) The research and applications of quantum dots as nano-carriers for targeted drug delivery and cancer therapy. Nanoscale Res Lett 11:207. 10.1186/s11671-016-1394-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  204. Zhao C, Li X, Cheng C, Yang Y (2019) Green and microwave-assisted synthesis of carbon dots and application for visual detection of cobalt (II) ions and pH sensing. Microchem J 147:183–190. 10.1016/j.microc.2019.03.029 [Google Scholar]
  205. Zhang P, Guo Z, Ullah S, Melagraki G, Afantitis A, Lynch I (2021) Nanotechnology and artificial intelligence to enable sustainable and precision agriculture. Nat Plants 7(8):864–876. 10.1038/s41477-021-00946-6 [DOI] [PubMed]
  206. Zheng YW, Yang D, Wu X, Yan HR, Zhao YC, Feng B, Duan K, Weng J, Wang JX (2015) A facile approach for the synthesis of highly luminescent carbon dots using vitamin-based small organic molecules with benzene ring structure as precursors. RSC Adv 5:90245–90254. 10.1039/C5RA14720D [Google Scholar]
  207. Zhou S (2021) Rapid separation and purification of lead halide perovskite quantum dots through differential centrifugation in nonpolar solvent. RSC Adv 11(45):28410–28419. 10.1039/D1RA04578D [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  208. Zhou JG, Booker C, Li RY, Zhou XT, Sham TK, Sun XL, Ding ZF (2007) An electrochemical avenue to blue luminescent nanocrystals from multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). J Amer Chem Soc 129:744–745. 10.1021/ja0669070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  209. Zhu S, Song Y, Zhao X, Shao J, Zhang J, Yang B (2015) The photoluminescence mechanism in carbon dots (graphene quantum dots, carbon nanodots, and polymer dots): current state and future perspective. Nano Res 8:355–381. 10.1007/s12274-014-0644-3 [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Planta are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES