Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jul 11.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Apr 4;21(7):493–516. doi: 10.1038/s41575-024-00914-3

The changing metabolic landscape of bile acids – keys to metabolism and immune regulation

Ipsita Mohanty 1, Celeste Allaband 2, Helena Mannochio-Russo 1, Yasin El Abiead 1, Lee R Hagey 4, Rob Knight 2,6,7,8, Pieter C Dorrestein 1,3,5,6,*
PMCID: PMC12248421  NIHMSID: NIHMS2078385  PMID: 38575682

Abstract

Bile acids regulate nutrient absorption and mitochondrial function, they establish and maintain gut microbial community composition and mediate inflammation, and they serve as signaling molecules that regulate appetite and energy homeostasis. The observation that there are hundreds of bile acids, especially many amidated bile acids, necessitates a revision of many of the classical descriptions of bile acids and bile acid enzyme functions. For example, bile acid hydrolases also have transferase activity. There are now hundreds of known modifications to bile acids and thousands of bile acid-associated genes, especially when including the microbiome, distributed throughout the human body (for example, there are >2,300 bile salt hydrolases alone). The fact that so much of our genetic and small-molecule repertoire, in both amount and diversity, is dedicated to bile acid function highlights the centrality of bile acids as key regulators of metabolism and immune homeostasis, which is, in large part, communicated via the gut microbiome.

TOC blurb

Bile acids have important roles in human metabolism and immune regulation. In this Perspective, Dorrestein and colleagues discuss the technologies and data science-related approaches that are improving our understanding of the diversity of bile acids and their multifaceted roles.

Introduction

Our understanding of the relationship between bile acids and the gut microbiome has undergone several major paradigm shifts. In each case, the main driver of new insights is an improvement in analytical techniques, expanding the pool of known bile acid structures. The first discovered bile acid product, which is biosynthesized by the gut microbiome, was deoxycholic acid (the 7-dehydroxylated product of cholic acid)1,2. Later, lithocholic acid was described as the corresponding 7-dehydroxylation product of chenodeoxycholic acid2,3. Both compounds were hydrophobic, and much attention was focused on their toxicity to both bacteria and intestinal cells. The development of high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) for the analysis of bile acid structures in human intestinal content and feces increased the number of described bile acid structures to nearly 100, and led to the concepts of bile acid ‘damage’ and ‘repair’ to describe alterations in bile acids caused by the gut microbiome 4,5. In this paradigm, a small set of primary bile acids, which are exposed in the intestine to the microbiome, are chemically altered (damaged) and transformed into a larger set that is recycled via the enterohepatic circulation to the liver, where their structure is restored (repaired). However, this model was overturned in the 1990s by the gradual realization that bile acids, including those produced by the gut microbiome, are hormones with signaling properties. Bile acids were discovered to be the previously unknown ligands for the farnesoid X receptor (FXR)68, a protein that, in turn, regulates the activity of many other genes911. Subsequently, bile acids were found to be ligands for a number of other protein receptors12, including transmembrane G-coupled protein receptor 5 (TGR5)13,14, the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling pathway15, pregnane X receptor (PXR)16,17, liver X receptor-α18, vitamin D receptor (VDR)19, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 220, and the nuclear hormone receptor NR4A121. Using the analytical technique LC-MS(/MS) and large-scale screens of human intestinal content, we and others have now discovered that there are hundreds, and perhaps tens of thousands, of different bile acid structures formed by the gut microbiome. This astronomical rise in the number of bile acids calls for a new understanding of the relationship of the microbiome to its host. In this Perspective, we discuss the mass spectrometry-based technologies and data science-related approaches that are fueling the discovery of modified bile acids, many of which are introduced by the microbiota. Our Perspective emphasizes the discovery of new amino acid or amine-conjugated bile acids (bile acid amidates), as this is leading to the discovery of a very large array of different modifications. However, we acknowledge that there are also other modifications (such as esterification, sulfation, and glucuronidation) and organisms or genes responsible for the introduction of these bile acid modifications that have been reported in the past few years and are discussed in detail in other literature2228. Although the world of bile acids ranges from C27 bile alcohols to C27 bile acids to C24 bile acids, in this article we only consider C24 bile acids as those are the main bile acids found in humans. We further highlight the distribution of bile acids and bile acid-related genes and gene products in organs outside the enterohepatic system, leading to an encoder-decoder hypothesis in which the microbiome influences the function of distant organelles, cells, tissues, and organs. In this regard, we provide a perspective on outstanding challenges and future research avenues, especially in light of the recent findings.

Bile acid amidate conjugates are not exclusively made in the liver

Bile acids originate from the oxidation of cholesterol and are conjugated, a process generally described as being associated with the liver, resulting in glycine and taurine amidates of the bile acids (Figure 1).29 Bile acids span many orders of magnitude in concentration, from pM to 100s of mM (BOX 1). The dominant congeners of bile acids in bile are generally considered to be taurocholic acid and glycocholic acid (also known as cholylglycine and cholyltaurine, respectively) and are thought to be exclusively produced by the liver. However, the notion that these bile acids are only biosynthesized in the liver warrants a revision. First, the RNA transcripts for the bile acid-CoA:amino acid N-acyltransferase responsible for amidation can be found in other organs in animals, including humans, such as the gallbladder, spleen, ovary and brain, suggesting that other organs outside the liver might be able to carry out amidation conjugation reactions30. Second, glycine-conjugated C24 cholic and deoxycholic acid can be synthesized by gut bacteria which originally was demonstrated only with oceanic flavobacteria.. It has been proposed that microorganisms can use them as external biosurfactants to repel competitors31,32. That gut bacteria and fungi have been shown to couple glycine and cholic acid to furnish the glycocholic acid amidate, along with other glycine bile acid amidates, highlights that there is a blurring of the distinction between host or microbially derived bile acids33,34. This picture of host-microbial production has the potential to be even further blurred, as microorganisms were also found to be capable of synthesizing cholesterol and oxysterols35. The level of microbial contribution to the cholesterol pool and the animal glycine amidate bile pool is yet unknown. This could either be a minimal contribution or microbial production could be the major source, or it could be that microorganisms stimulate host production, as seen with other important human molecules. For example, commensal microorganisms can make serotonin and as much as 90% of the total human serotonin content is produced when commensals are present3638. In germ-free mice, the glycocholic acid conjugates were decreased compared with colonized mice, often below detectable levels39, highlighting that microorganisms likely substantially complement their production by host liver and therefore that glycine bile acid conjugates should no longer be considered only primary host-derived metabolites.

Figure 1. Diversity of known bile acid chemical modifications.

Figure 1.

The outer circle (blue) reports the producer organism for these modifications if known. The inner circle (pink) shows where these bile acid modifications have been observed: humans, animals, or microorganisms. Substructures (red) represent the modification introduced by the specified reaction. Modifications of the bile acid core: Hydroxylation33,213215; Dehydroxylation33,216218; Epimerization153,219224; Oxidation153,225227 and reduction226; Dehydrogenation228; Dehydration229230 and reduction 231. Modifications of the carboxyl: Thioesterification41; Taurine amidation232; Glycine amidation232; Other amino acid Amidation40,42,121124; Polypeptides/proteins amidation125; Amine/polyamine amidation124,233,234; Carboxylate reduction235,236; Esterification/addition of sugar74; Oxidative amidation68. Modifications of the hydroxyl: Sulfation/desulfation70,71; Esterification77; Methylation76; Ether formation or addition of sugar72,73,75; Acetylation42; Acylation77,80,82; (Poly)amine substitution237. Ring-opening and bio-transformations: Ring-opening67; Pseudomonas sp63; Rhodococcus ruber64; Streptomyces rubescens65.

BOX 1. Bile acid concentrations.

Bile acids are among the most abundant molecules in the body and have large intrapersonal and interpersonal variations113. They are reported from not detectable (below pM) to high mM quantities. Up to 300 mM concentrations are found in the gallbladder243. Passage from the gallbladder to the digestive tract results in dilution - 0–70 μg/ml (0 to ~150 mM) wet weight in feces113,244. It was reported to be at 0.6 mM in the cecum245 or >500 mg/kg dry weight244. Another dilution is observed as they pass to plasma/blood, although up to ~3 mM has been reported. Some reports mention that the majority were sulfated83, but other work highlights much lower concentrations in blood. Their reported blood concentrations are in the range of 6–200 nM246,247. It could be that both reports are correct as the bile acid pool is very dynamic, but this warrants a deeper analysis. In general, however, the average total bile acid levels are reported to be ~20–50 μM in portal blood and ~5 μM in venous blood113,248. The average values reported for individual bile acids in the HMDB, which cataloged concentration values from papers published in the literature from blood and bile, revealed that cholic acid is the most concentrated reported bile acid in both blood and bile with an average of 48.5 μM249 and 32 mM250, respectively (Supplementary Figure 1). As bile acids leave the enterohepatic system, they can be concentrated, as mM quantities have been reported in urine (e.g., ~9 mM reported, majority reported to be sulfated83). Sulfated and glucuronidated bile acids are believed to be the dominant species in urine (μM-mM)83.

Microbial bile acids such as deoxycholic acid were measured in fecal samples of mice at ~20 pmol/mg wet weight (20 μM), at 450–700 μM in mice cecal contents245, and has been measured at 150 μM in the small intestine of mice251. Another study also reported concentrations of the microbial derived bile acids lithocholic acid, deoxycholic acid, and hyocholic acid to be in the range of 0.02–0.1 μM in fasting plasma252.

Microbial bile acid amidates such as phenylalanine-conjugated cholic acid have average concentrations reported (female mice) of 147 nmol/g tissue weight in jejunum (~147 μM - assuming the density of feces is close to 1 g/ml), with the highest value measured in one sample at 447 nmol/g (~447 μM). In the ileum the concentration was 84 nmol/g (~84 μM), and dropped down to 4.7 nmol/g (~4.7 μM) in the cecum and to 11.6 nmol/g (~11.6 μM) in colon42. Other quantifications from mouse cecal contents found cholic acid amidated with phenylalanine at 0.3–11.4 nmol/g (~0.3–11.4 μM), with tyrosine at 0.3–0.5 nmol/g (~0.3–0.5 μM), leucine at 1.1–11.3 nmol/g (~1.1–11.3 μM), tryptophan at 0.4–1.0 nmol/g (~0.4–1.0 μM), serine at 0.4–8.5 nmol/g (~0.4–8.5 μM), alanine at 1.2–6.0 nmol/g (~1.2–6.0 μM) and glutamate at 0.5–2.6 nmol/g (~0.5–2.6 μM)158. The trend of changing concentrations down the digestive tract of microbial amidates was also observed in humans43,44. Concentrations of glutamine and serine conjugated to a trihydroxylated bile acid in the human intestine was estimated to be in the range of 0 to ~1000 ng/mL (~1.86 μM) and from 0 up to ~8000 ng/mL (~16.15 μM) and in stool from 0 to ~200 ng/mL (~0.37 μM) and 70 ng/mL (~0.14 μM), respectively43.

Bile acids concentrations often appear to be inconsistent from study to study, but there are good reasons for this. In humans, the levels of each of the different bile acids can change by at least an order of magnitude throughout the day, and can also be experiment-dependent, with the taurine and glycine conjugates peaking around lunch and dinner and the unconjugated cholic acid, lithocholate, deoxycholate, ursodeoxycholate and chenodeoxycholate peaking around midnight and remaining fairly stable until around awakening but before breakfast253,254. Although this highlights bile acids concentrations diurnally, there are other factors that can cause rapid changes in bile acid concentrations aside from eating or fasting. The serum levels of bile acids in humans are rapidly affected by exercise, with measured average concentrations of cholic acid changing from 0.16 μM to 0.06 μM after exercise255. Microbial bile acids are also affected as deoxycholic acid changes from 0.32 μM to 0.1 μM255. Systematic assessments of bile acids and their levels on the basis of different human lifestyles and diurnal and circadian physiology are still needed to fully understand bile acid dynamics.

Journey of bile acids along the digestive tract

Considering the modifications that can be introduced to a bile acid, their diversity is astonishing, especially when combinations of modifications are observed. Much of this bile acid diversification post-synthesis occurs when the gallbladder is emptied. When we consume a meal, the gallbladder, where bile acids are stored post-synthesis from cholesterol, is emptied into the duodenum. In humans, the most common amidated bile acids in the gallbladder are the taurine and glycine amidates of cholic, chenodeoxycholic, and deoxycholic acid, but many other amidates may be present, including glycine, alanine, arginine, asparagine, glutamine, leucine/isoleucine, lysine, phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan40. Upon entry into the duodenum, microbial processing of bile acids begins and continues down the length of the digestive tract to create secondary bile acids, a dynamic series of changes in which the original bile acid molecule can be altered to such an extent that it is no longer recognized as a bile acid (Figure 1). Within the intestinal environment, bile acids undergo many different transformations (Figure 1)4144. One of the re-amidation reactions couples bile acids to dietary proteins, whereupon they promote protein digestion by pancreatic proteases45. This observation is corroborated by the involvement of bile acids in protein digestion45, nutrient absorption from the gut, proper functioning of our energy supply, temperature regulation, mitochondrial bioenergetics, and also for the proper functioning of the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus responsible for protein synthesis4649. Using pull-down assays, it has been shown that many mitochondrial, endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus proteins bind to bile acids, or related molecules, including bile acid biosynthetic enzymes, hydrolases/lipases and sulfatases50.

As the bile acids move along the digestive tract from the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum (in rodents as in humans this is a 2.4-inch region near the appendix but does not appear to be a separately functional organ), and colon, including the appendix51, they are continuously modified by the gut microbiota, often in a region-specific manner that is also dependent on age (BOX 2), diurnal timing, sex and health status. In addition, given the sheer diversity of microorganisms that are associated with humans, the genetic potential to encode enzymes with bile acid-modifying capabilities for human-associated microorganisms is at least 1.5–2 million times larger than the potential associated with the human genome52. In the digestive tract, bile acids can modulate intestinal permeability and gastric motility, processes that are regulated by the microbiota, through the stimulation of the enteric nervous system5356. By the time bile acids reach the cecum, taurine and glycine bile acid levels are greatly reduced, and, in their place, bile acids are now decorated with proteinogenic and non-proteinogenic amino acids, dipeptides, fatty acids, sulfate, cholesterol, saccharides, and other modifications as highlighted in Figure 1.

BOX 2. Bile acids and age.

The unborn intestinal tract is generally considered to be sterile and, thus, is unable to produce microbial bile acids; only those bile acids that they make themselves or that pass through the umbilical cord are present256. Surprisingly, fetal and neonatal bile acids show a great diversity in their structures257, many of which are not present in the adult biliary profile. This population of bile acids participates in shaping the nutritional uptake, energy homeostasis, and inflammatory landscape of the developing human before birth258. For example, B-ring oxysterols bind to and activate the 7-transmembrane receptor known as Smoothened. When activated, Smoothened can inhibit hedgehog signaling (hedgehog signal transduction is an ancient pathway that regulates the differentiation of embryonic cells). In humans with Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome, the overproduction of a B-ring oxysterol 3β-hydroxy-6-oxo-5α-cholesten-7,8-ene results in deficient hedgehog signalling259. The fetal meconium is largely composed of unusual polyhydroxylated bile acids that are likely the metabolic reflections of oxysterols initially synthesized for alternative functions.

Even the bile acid-modifying enzymes change post-birth. For example, hyocholic acid is formed using the hydroxylating enzyme CYP3A7, starting 20 weeks pre-birth. After birth, the enzyme CYP3A4 replaces CYP3A7 for hyocholic acid synthesis260. We hypothesize that the entirety of the bile acid pool while in the womb and during the first few years are critical in the establishment of the immune system, energy homeostasis and receptor development within the developing unborn.

Upon birth, bile acids such as cholate and chenodeoxycholate are already present in colostrum and breast milk, serving both to contribute to fat digestion and to aid the child’s development261. Bile acids drive maturation of the microbiome in the developing infant262. Tetrahydroxylated bile acids, which are selectively capable of reversing liver damage in mice263, rapidly increase in the first 5 days postpartum, followed by a rapid decline in urine, but continue to be detected in the first year in blood. They have prognostic value for cholestasis and are an underappreciated class of bile acids. Early in life, little microbial processing of bile acids is observed, but as the infant matures, the diversity of intestinal bile acid structures increases. A disruption of the bile acid trajectory by antibiotics given to the mother changes the bile acid profile of the developing infant and affects long-term health264267. The timing of the transition from the neonatal bile acid pattern to one characterized by microbial bile acids is associated with islet autoimmune disease, which might contribute to conditions such as type 1 diabetes and other immune disorders268. Changes in bile acid repertoires due to the early application of antibiotics should not be overlooked when examining the causative mechanisms for a subsequent rise in immune and metabolic disorders.

Upon reaching older age, there is a shift in the bile acid population that favors conjugates, traditionally being thought of as the glycine and taurine conjugates, which can fine-tune amphiphilicity and receptor interactions269271. Shifts in microbial bile acid products such as lithocholic acid and deoxycholic acid have been linked to the development of Alzheimer disease95,272,273. In general, microbial bile acids seem to be related to age and cognitive risk factors274. SXR/PXR activation and increased levels of lithocholic acid, a Vitamin D receptor agonist, might contribute to osteoporosis275277. Such observations suggest that the bile acid metabolic network changes, and that changes to this trajectory can have a critical role in the preconditioning of health homeostasis in older age. It is not implausible that alterations in microbial composition early in life (that is, treatment with antibiotics), with its subsequent effect on bile acid metabolism278, might lead to increased occurrence of immunological and/or metabolic disorders (e.g., allergies, asthma, inflammatory bowel disease, atherosclerosis, diabetes, and polycystic ovary syndrome) later in life279. Antibiotics have been shown to alter the bile acid pool of the large intestine, liver, and plasma in mice280. These changes decreased insulin sensitivity281. In centenarians, the right types of microbial bile acid modifications can lead to improved metabolic health. For example, centenarians have been shown to have increased amounts of microbial-mediated oxidation–reduction reactions and epimerization modifications to bile acids, resulting in larger quantities of iso-lithocholic acid, 3-oxo-lithocholic acid, allolithocholic acid, 3-oxo-allo-lithocholic acid, and iso-allolithocholic acid282. All of these are extreme hydrophobic bile acids with nanomolar effects on cellular receptors. It might be that such bile acids result in altered mitochondrial function and, therefore, in altered energy homeostasis, as lithocholic acid accumulation in yeast mitochondria resulted in an anti-ageing cellular phenotype283. At least one of these lithocholic acid isomers has been found to inhibit Gram-positive microorganisms, which might reduce the risk for systemic infections and aid in the maintenance of health. The presence of the common microbiome 7α-dehydroxylating bacteria and bacteria with bile salt hydrolase in the intestine is sufficient to alter the growth of C. difficile69,284286. Thus, as we age and our bile acid profiles change, so too does our bile acid preconditioning to disease susceptibility.

In general, it is said that the bulk of unmodified bile acids are reabsorbed in the terminal ileum, before reaching the large intestine, but this statement has been made by monitoring only a few bile acids. What has been misunderstood is that the depletion of bile acids by the time they reach the cecum or colon is an analytical artifact in that we are unable to detect bile acids that are modified beyond recognition using the assays that have been widely used in the past few decades5759. There is currently not a single bile acid detection protocol that can fully capture the true diversity of the metabolic changes undergone by bile acids, and, as a result, the ability to comprehensively detect and describe the extensive bile acid metabolic network truly represents a major 21st-century analytical challenge.

How many modifications?

To represent a lower bound for the count of modifications associated with known bile acids (excluding stereoisomers), we summarized information in metabolomics and lipidomics databases (Figure 2a). For the purpose of this estimate, tetracyclic steroidal cores with the carboxyl tail that have two methyl groups attached to the carbon skeleton were considered. Their stereochemistry was not considered as not all the structures in the structural databases had stereochemistry information. We retrieved 223 different bile acid structures in the BILELIB1940 reference dataset, which is part of the Global Natural Product Social Molecular Networking (GNPS) untargeted mass spectrometry data analysis infrastructure60. Human metabolome database (HMDB)61 had 299 bile acids, with 23 quantified in blood and/or bile (Figure 2a, BOX 1). LipidMAPS62 consists of 379 such bile acids. When bile acids of all three resources were combined, they represented 692 different bile acids. They include 20 ring/core modifications and 110 carboxy tails modifications. These would be observable as 97 unique delta masses relative to the unconjugated bile acids (Figure 2b).

Figure 2. Modifications of known bile acids.

Figure 2.

a) Bile acid overlap in the structural and mass spectrometry databases for GNPS/MassIVE BILELIB1940, Human Metabolome Database (HMDB)61 (only considering detected bile acids), and LipidMAPS62 was derived from deposited SMILES codes (links to databases are provided in the code availability section). For the purpose of this figure to visualize the data in the three repositories, all SMILES238 with the (SMARTS string-defined) substructure “C-,=C12-,=C-,=C-,=C-,=C-,=C-,=1-,=C-,=C-,=C3-,=C4-,=C-,=C-,=C-,=C-,=4(-,=C-,=C-,=C-,=3-,=2)-,=C” and a carboxylic acid ester (“C(=O)O”), (thio)ester (“C(=O)S”), or amide (“C(=O)N”) in their caboxy-tail were considered as bile acids. Substructure searches were conducted via RDKit (http://www.rdkit.org). Diastereomeric information was not considered for the comparisons across bile acids. b) Mass shifts were calculated by subtracting the mass of the unconjugated bile acid (e.g., C24H40+xO2+x with x = ‘number of hydroxyl modifications’ on the respective bile acid for C24 bile acids; formula was adjusted for C22-C28 bile acids (as defined in LipidMAPS), respectively) from the mass of the (potentially) conjugated bile acid. Only mass differences > 40 m/z are shown.

This is a lower bound of modifications, as these resources are incomplete and are limited by our ability to identify the massive number of bile acids which we are currently incapable of detecting. The biological patterns that drive bile acid modifications and/or absorption are still poorly understood and thus still represent another enormous research opportunity. Also, there is no single resource available that actively creates a digital archive of published bile acid-related studies or emerging studies, or that has aggregate information of all known bile acids and their levels in relation to different biological conditions that the community can browse through or reuse. Although bile acids that are synthesized by the host from cholesterol or derived from our diet constitute the defining pillars of the overall bile acid metabolic network, the majority of structurally unique bile acids in the network of bile acids are created by microorganisms (Figure 1)39,42.

Expanding to thousands of structures

Given the potential for the existence of thousands of bile acid modifications, it raises the question: how can a few host-synthesized bile acids expand into thousands of structures? Our understanding of the nature, role, and types of bile acid structures is currently undergoing a revolution, as the number of known structures is exploding. The source of this diversity stems from what can be thought of as two ‘halos’ of change of the core and then decoration of the core (Figure 1). All bile acids are derived from the cholesterol at its core, and, as such, contain a stable structure consisting of four rings as well as a hydroxyl group at C-3. The first ‘halo’ consists of changes directly to the four rings. Such changes occur at the ‘macro’ level of analytical chemistry and most of the known structures of bile acids fall into this halo. The major human gallbladder bile acids include ring hydroxylation at specific positions and stereochemistry - 3α, 7α, and 12α - along with conjugation with the amino acids taurine or glycine at the side-chain carboxylic acid. Then, the microbiome alters these bile acids by multiple biochemical processes (BOX 3). In addition, as bile acids are released into the environment, they can also undergo biotransformations by microorganisms (observed for Streptomyces rubescens, Pseudomonas sp., and Rhodococcus ruber), resulting in very different metabolites with only the C and D rings of the bile acid core intact (Figure 1)6366. Although these individual microorganisms have been found in the environment and/or have been isolated from wastewater, such bile acid transformations have not yet been observed to be mediated by the microbiota. We hypothesize the likelihood of many such or related reaction products to be carried out by the microbiota in animals, including humans. In support of this hypothesis, 3,4-Seco-12α-hydroxy-5β-cholan-3,4,24-trioic acid, as the product of a steroid core ring opening of deoxycholic acid, has been isolated from the bile of a common ringtail possum67.

BOX 3. Bile acid modifications.

Bile acids fundamentally originate from cholesterol. Modifications can take place in various parts of the bile acid structure, including directly in the bile acid core, in the carboxyl group, and in the hydroxyl groups. These modifications are known as:

  • (re)deconjugation – taurine/glycine conjugated to bile acids by the host enzyme bile. acid-CoA:amino acid N-acyltransferase (BAAT)231 can be removed157, a reaction that is catalyzed by bile salt hydrolases (BSH) characterized from multiple gut bacteria (discussed in the section ‘A new function of bile salt hydrolases’). BSHs can also catalyze re-conjugation of bile acids with amino acids or amines158,168. Early findings documented in a preprint show that conjugation with polyamines, has also been observed233, with an additional preprint supporting the observations that the polyamine precursor, GABA, exists in humans and that they are conjugated by human gut microbes234.

  • hydroxylation – which can occur in several positions of the bile acid core213,214; an example would be conversion of deoxycholic acid to hyodeoxycholic acid (which is a C-6 hydroxylation) catalyzed by Collinsella stercoris33. Another biotransformation of methyl cholate to a tetrahydroxy bile acid with a hydroxy group inserted on C-15β was shown in the fungus Aspergillus niger215. The enzymes responsible for this reaction have not been characterized.

  • dehydroxylation – an example is the removal of the 7α-hydroxyl group mediated by a relatively small number of anaerobes, which nevertheless are extremely active153,216218; the dehydroxylation at C-7 is carried out by seven different enzymes, catalyzing a total of 8 reactions. There is also 12α-dehydroxylation - removal of the 12α-hydroxyl group mediated by the gut bacteria Collinsella stercoris and Ruminococcus gnavus33.

  • 7α-dehydration – loss of 7α hydroxyl group as a water molecule inserting a double bond at C-6, which is known to be catalyzed by the enzyme 7α-dehydratase in Clostridium hylemonae TN271229,230. The reverse reaction (reduction) by a flavin-dependent squalene desaturase was found in the human gut bacterium Clostridium scindens ATCC 35704231.

  • ketone formation – widely observed conversion of hydroxyl groups into ketones benefits those bacteria that have an intact Wood-Ljungdahl pathway, which utilize the captured protons to convert CO2 into acetate225. For example, the hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase enzyme, 12α-HSDH, from Collinsella tanakaei YIT 12063 and Collinsella stercoris DSM 13279 oxidizes 12α hydroxyl to 12 ketone153 and in Dorea sp. AM58–8, BaiA, a promiscuous bile acid 3-dehydrogenase enzyme produces 3 keto bile acids226. The reduction of the keto bile acids can be furnished by the same enzyme227.

  • dehydrogenation - removal of hydrogen to give a double bond, catalyzed by several stereospecific NAD(H)-dependent 7β-hydroxy-3-oxo-Δ4-cholenoic acid oxidoreductases in Clostridium scindens VPI 12708228.

  • vii) α-oxidation – commonly seen with 23R-hydroxylation (a bile acid seen in humans)287, this modification has only been observed in rodent and human bile, but the enzymes responsible have not yet been determined.

  • viii) hydroxyl group epimerization – flipping the orientation of the ring hydroxyl groups from the usual α-position (below the rings) to the β-position (above the rings) stretches out the overall shape of the four rings, which in turn alters their interactions with transporters and receptors153,219,220. There are a relatively small number of gut bacterial species converting bile acid 3α-hydroxy groups into 3β-hydroxyl groups, including Eggerthella lenta221, Clostridium perfringens222,223, Ruminococcus gnavus and a Lachnospiraceae species224.

  • ix) side-chain epimerization – where the 17β conformation of the sidechain derived from cholesterol is flipped to 17α288.

  • x) loss of the side-chain – this degradation process shown in the terrestrial bacterium Azoarcus sp. strain Aa7 removes the sidechain at C-17, leaving behind a ketone group289.

  • xi) opening of the B ring – hydroxylation at C-9 leads to the spontaneous opening of the B-ring by a reverse vinylogous aldol reaction, creating a new series of 9,10-secosteroids observed in Pseudomonas sp290.

  • xii) reduction of the carboxylic acid group at C-24235,236.

  • xiii) A-ring opening, which is speculated to be achieved by an enzymatic pathway similar to the Baeyer-Villiger oxidation. Initially, a 3-oxo bile acid is converted to a pair of regioisomers, which could serve as a precursor for the 3,4-seco bile acid biosynthesis67, and alterations to the A and B ring junction – the 7α-dehydroxylation of the cholic acid in humans yields deoxycholic acid as a major product. A side reaction in the process flattens the four sterol rings and creates a parallel set of bile acids known as allo-bile acids291.

Beyond the first halo, there is an extensive outer halo of bile acid structures found at the ‘micro’ level of analytical chemistry, where partial information exists on thousands of structures, few of which have been completely characterized. This outer halo consists of a large pool of metabolites either attached to ring substituents or, in much larger part, based on new amidates re-conjugated to the side-chain carboxylic acid. Host-conjugated taurine or glycine is readily removed from the initial amidates, and the microbiome rapidly and readily replaces these two amino acids with any and all amino acids, along with a large number of other metabolites in animals and humans (Figure 1, Figure 2b)42. The ammonia amide conjugate of the carboxylate is created by the action of the copper-dependent human peptidylglycine alpha-amidating monooxygenase of glycine bile acid amidates68. Any attachments to the terminal carboxylic acid of bile acids results in a multiplication of the potential structures found in the inner halo. Re-conjugated bile acids produced by microorganisms can be present at quantities higher than the host-derived taurine amidates69. The inner halo of hydroxyl groups can also be expanded by attachment to sulfates70,71, sugars7275, acetyl and methyl groups42,76, methyl amino acids77 and fatty acids78 (discussed and referenced later) both in ether7981 and ester linkages77,80,82. Although these forms tend to be less studied as the standards are not readily available, the sulfated and glucuronidated forms are thought to be dominant in human urine8385 (BOX 1), highlighting the need for more comprehensive bile acid detection methods. The astonishing discovery of an undetected massive outer halo of micro-scale but biologically active compounds has completely overthrown our previous understanding of the nature and purpose of bile acids and their intimate relationship to the microbiome.

The fate of microbial bile acids

The first target of these modified bile acids is the microbiome itself. Bacterial species are riddled with auxotrophies, in which individual members either contain, lack, or emphasize certain metabolic pathways and outputs at the expense of others86. The re-conjugation of metabolites to the bile acid structure specifically targets those bacteria that have the bile acid membrane transport systems, hydrolases, and enzymes capable of interacting with bile acids – properties that make up a definition of the microbiome and exclude other bacterial species. One of the most studied representative systems is the BaiG bile acid uptake transporter87. The second target is the intestine, with multiple cell types, including an extensive array of neurons. It is not surprising that the bile acid-gut-brain axis, rising to the brain and back down to organs of immunity, is a major target of microbial products. In the river-like flow of bile salts across the intestinal wall to reach the portal circulation, neurons wait like fishermen, continuously sampling the waters. The third target is the portal vein, which opens the doorway to the systemic delivery of bile acids in organs beyond the liver. As bile acids move down the digestive tract, they are absorbed into the circulatory system to reach tissues, organelles and cells connected to the vascular system and define a key highway for gut microbiome-to-organ communication. There are bile acid-associated proteins, transporters and receptors in all tissues that have been analyzed by proteomics, consistent with a systemic role of bile acids as opposed to those proteins that serve a role in the enterohepatic circulatory system (Figure 3c, d)30. Some of the bile acid receptors that are extensively studied in the liver and intestine, such as FXR, PXR and TGR5, can also be detected in distant tissues such as the brain, adipose tissue, gallbladder, and the breast (Figure 3c, d)6,14,16,30.

Figure 3. Distribution of bile acids and related transcripts or proteins.

Figure 3.

Distribution of observed bile acids as documented with the mass spectrometry reanalysis of data user interface (ReDU)139 in a) humans and b) mice. Briefly, sample information and metadata available in the public repositories were filtered for ‘homo sapiens’ and ‘mus/rattus’. A search list adapted specifically for bile acids was used to subset a list of files for which bile acids (only those that are curated in the Global Natural Product Social molecular networking (GNPS) spectral library) were detected. Total count of such files across different body regions as defined by the UBERONBodyPartName ontology239 in ReDU was calculated, grouped based on modification of bile acid (unconjugated, glycine-conjugated, taurine-conjugated, other amino acid-conjugated, methylated and oxidized to form ketones) and described for humans and mice. For transcript locations, all matches discussed are to “bile” in the c) Human Protein Atlas30 and d) mouse gene expression databases240. Numbers in parts c and d represent the number of bile acid-associated genes or gene products observed in respective body locations. Overlaid is the information about the bile acid receptor proteins, FXR, SXR (humans), PXR (mouse), and TGR5 and the N-acyltransferase enzyme bile acid-CoA:amino acid N-acyltransferase (BAAT). All panels are made using Biorender.com. Data and codes used for the reanalysis of public data to create this figure are made available in the Data availability section. It should be noted that inferences of differential distribution should not be inferred between organisms from this figure but rather as a documentation of where transcripts, proteins, and bile acids have been detected. It is also an incomplete picture as many organs or biofluids have not been studied by transcriptomics, proteomics, or metabolomics, let alone under all conditions that might alter the detection, but it gives an overview of just how widely the bile acid metabolic and gene network is distributed throughout the body. BSH, bile salt hydrolase.

Interestingly, in humans, the largest number of bile acid-associated proteins are found in the brain, followed by the liver and testes30.The diversity of possible bile acid proteins and transcripts in the different organs supports the hypothesis that bile acids have different effects on the brain, testes and thymus function, likely via microbiota crosstalk88,89. Microbial bile acids are critical for the proper functioning of our immune system. In the gut, microbial bile acids are involved in T cell regulation and differentiation9092. In addition, the large number of bile acid genes in other organs such as spleen and thymus (as detected in mouse transcriptomic atlas)30 potentiates their influence on immune response in these organs. The thymus and spleen are two critical organs for the defense against pathogens, tumors and response to tissue damage. There is a key thymus-endocrine-liver pathway, but the role of bile acids in this pathway, if any, has not been investigated93. Removal of the spleen in patients with cirrhosis, as part of an observational study in an effort to understand the spleen’s involvement with the microbiome and metabolome to reverse liver cirrhosis, lead to altered levels of bile acids that more closely resemble healthy volunteers suggesting there is also a potential spleen-gut pathway 94.

Bile acids themselves have been detected in human brains (and are altered in patients with Alzheimer disease), and are also readily detected in the brains of healthy mice (Figure 3a, b)55,9598. Bile acids are neuroactive in brains96. Both cholate and chenodeoxycholate are agonists of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), an excitatory neurotransmitter in the human brain, and γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAa), a receptor that inhibits ganglia99. The brain can hydroxylate cholesterol at C-24, forming the 24S stereoisomer. As a result, brain tissue contains about 80% of the total 24(S)-hydroxycholesterol content in the body100. Once formed, 24(S)-hydroxycholesterol joins the bile acid synthetic pathway, including via systemic redistribution 100. The brain, like the liver, has a source of cholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid, possibly delivered from the enterohepatic system, and is likely able to make bile acid amidates, as the enzyme BAAT is expressed there as well (Figure 3d)101. This suggests that bile acids represent a unique communication channel between the gut-microbiota-brain axis and the rest of the nervous system98. The understanding of the gut’s relationship to other potential organ axes remains underexplored with respect to bile acid biology.

Although an argument regarding contamination of the tissues or samples with blood and, hence, the detection in each of the tissues can be made, a strong argument can be made against this idea, in that there are unique bile acid profiles across different locations compared with those in blood. In addition, sample collection strategies such as skin swabs do not contain blood (Figure 3a, b)39,42,102. Thus, a gut-organ axis of a diverse bile acid metabolic network exists. One could think of this as a highway for gut-to-other-organ signaling. Documented examples include the gut-lung axis103, gut-liver axis104, gut-brain axis98, gut-muscle axis105,106, and gut-bone axis107,108. There is also likely a gut-skin axis109, but perhaps the skin itself is capable of synthesizing bile acids via microbial transformations110. Many skin microorganisms also carry bile salt hydrolases (BSHs), the enzymes responsible for deconjugating and amidating bile acids. It is not yet established whether these BSHs found in skin microorganisms have similar functions to the homologous BSH enzymes from gut-derived microorganisms that have been characterized. Thus, a bile acid metabolic network that functions for any of the organs in the body is likely the rule rather than the exception. It is becoming increasingly clear that the gut microbiome can utilize bile acids to influence the function of distant organs, at least in part, through the modifications the microorganisms themselves introduced into bile acids.

Driving the rapid pace of discovery

Advances in analytical chemistry and DNA sequencing technologies, modern computational solutions, publicly available data resources, and an interest in understanding the functional role of the microbiota are all re-igniting interest in bile acids and their discovery. One of the main drivers of discovery of new bile acids is the explosion in the development of experimental and bioinformatic workflows in mass spectrometry and the search for bile acids outside of blood/plasma, urine, or liver matrices, where glycine and taurine bile amidates, sulfates and their hydrolyzed versions dominate. These developments have resulted in the discovery of hundreds of additional bile acids, many of which are produced by the human microbiota, in the past 3 years alone, as discussed later.Bile acids have a critical role in wide-ranging health outcomes111, including liver diseases, atherosclerosis, Alzheimer disease, inflammatory bowel disease, depression, sleep disruption, diabetes, polycystic ovarian syndrome112, and obesity113,114, and are used as treatments in modern healthcare115119. The most recent example is the US FDA’s approval in September 2022 as an orphan drug status to phenylbutyrate and taurursodiol as a potential candidate to prolong life by 10 months in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (although the efficacy is still being evaluated)120. Given these instances of the importance of bile acids in healthcare, it is surprising that the scientific community is still in the puzzle piece collection phase for the discovery of new bile acids.

New scientific approaches and technologies are driving the discovery of the puzzle pieces that make up the bile acid metabolic network and will be key to understanding their functional role (Table 1). Reports describing amidates other than with taurine and glycine in the 1960–1990s do exist: amino acids such as arginine and ornithine in rat liver121, ornithine in bile from patients with cholelithiasis122, lysine and ornithine from ox bile123, (2-aminoethyl) phosphonic acid from bovine bile124 and the dipeptide glycyl-taurine from rabbit bile125. Lithocholic acid also binds to lysine residues in proteins126. However, it was not until the most recent discovery from our own laboratory and collaborators using molecular networking, a spectral alignment algorithm that we and others introduced in 201260,127, that led to the discovery of three new amidates and linked them to microbial production. These were also found in animals and humans (tyrosine, phenylalanine and leucine).42 In addition to the three new microbial amino acids validated in the study using synthetic standards, other bile acids were observed that are yet to annotated, including sulfated bile acids, acetylated bile acids in germ-free mice only, and, when cultured with microorganisms, a hydroxyl group of the three new amidates is oxidized to a ketone within the cholic acid core, all highlighting that even in one study, there are still many uncharacterized bile acids. This computational mass spectrometry observation resulted in the rapid and ongoing development of new mass spectrometry analytical and algorithmic strategies, which are already leading to the discovery of hundreds of new bile acids40,128134.

Table 1.

Computational and experimental approaches used in bile acid discovery

Approach Application Output or results Additional requirements
Computational approaches
Molecular networking60 Hypothesis-free visualization of MS/MS spectral/molecular families Global analysis;
discovery of new analogues by propagation of annotations
Orthogonal techniques required to confirm structure of metabolites
MASST128 Exploration of public data repository with MS/MS spectra for translational biological inferences between different organisms Public datasets where the query MS/MS spectrum is detected; metadata of these datasets (from ReDU139) Limited by the availability of public (meta)data, and biological interpretations depend on systemic metadata associated with a study
MassQL141 (preprint) Development of MS-based query to search for specific chemical classes MS/MS spectra that adhere to the restrictions outlined in the MassQL query Prior knowledge of fragmentation spectra is required
Reverse metabolomics40 Searching of MS/MS spectra against the public repository to understand its disease state, organism distribution and source observations (e.g. blood, fecal, brain). Data table of occurrence of the MS/MS spectrum in public data and then also reporting sample information or metadata for each of the samples (e.g., NCBI taxonomy, UBERON ontology, Disease ontology) Access to the MS/MS spectrum (e.g., via synthesis, isolation to get the molecules from which a MS/MS is generated); high-resolution mass spectrometer
Experimental approaches
Untargeted LC-MS
(Discovery mass spectrometry)
Broad metabolite profiling in complex biological samples (emphasizing relative quantification, not annotation) Raw data files in vendor-specific format with profile of accurate masses along with the chromatographic separation Liquid chromatography system; high-resolution mass spectrometer; feature extraction tool (e.g., MZmine 3207, MS-DIAL208, XCMS209, Metaboscape, OpenMS210)
Untargeted LC-MS/MS
(Discovery mass spectrometry)
Broad metabolite profiling in complex biological samples
(emphasizes annotations, although noisier due to poorer peak shapes, can be used for relative quantification)

Raw files in vendor-specific format with profile of accurate masses along with the chromatographic separation with additional MS/MS spectral data allowing for metabolite annotations by matching to MS/MS reference libraries of known bile acids Liquid chromatography system; high-resolution mass spectrometer with MS/MS capabilities; advanced computational tools needed to deconvolute MS/MS spectra and aid in metabolite annotation
Targeted LC-MS
(Quantitative mass spectrometry)
Quantitative measurement of known bile acids Quantitative values for analyzed bile acids Liquid chromatography system; mass spectrometer; retention time information for bile acids to be quantified; analytical standards for calibration curves; isotope-labeled standard for increased quantitative reliability
Targeted LC-MS/MS
(Quantitative mass spectrometry)
Sensitive and highly selective quantitative measurement of known bile acids Quantitative values for analyzed bile acids Mass spectrometer with MS/MS capabilities (e.g., QQQ-MS); retention time information for bile acids to be quantified; fragmentation behavior information of bile acids to be analyzed; analytical standards for calibration curves; isotope-labeled standard for increased quantitative reliability
Polarity switching MRM211 Facilitation of real-time switching of polarity to capture both positive and negative ions from a single sample injection Raw files in vendor-specific format with positive and negative scans allowing for more information on analyzed metabolites A mass spectrometer that can do polarity switching
Ion mobility MS212 Separation of isomeric ions, in addition to chromatographic retention time prevalent in bile acids Raw files in vendor-specific format with additional ion mobility dimension separating molecules using their collisional cross section Ion mobility unit; mass spectrometer; software capable of deconvoluting mass spectrometry data with an ion mobility dimension (e.g., MZmine 3207, MS-DIAL208, XCMS209, Metaboscape, OpenMS210)
Culturing techniques Providing specific building blocks to cultured cells enabling a more targeted testing of biochemical hypothesis for downstream analytical workflows Testable hypothesis; further targeted/untargeted analytical analysis needed (specifics depend on designed experiment) Prior information about growth conditions of microorganisms required

These same microbial bile acid conjugates were also found in human data using the mass spectrometry search tool (MASST)128. MASST enables searching for unknown mass spectrometry fragmentation data in a spectral repository, another key advancement that searches for new microbial or animal-derived molecules in human studies, facilitating translation128. Although MASST searches cannot differentiate between stereo and regio- isomers, such as muricholic acids or cholic acids, MASST readily identifies the tri-hydroxylation state and the conjugations attached to the bile acid. MASST also provides information on the datasets in which they were found. The majority of amino-acid conjugates detected with MASST are subsequently matched with chromatographic retention times against human and rodent samples40,42,128. Not only were these conjugates found in humans, but they were also associated with patients with pancreatic-insufficient cystic fibrosis, diabetes, and intestinal bowel disorders, especially the dysbiosis state of Crohn’s disease. The first new dihydroxy bile acid - deoxycholic acid-phenylalanine amidate - was observed in fecal samples of a human twin study on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease128. Using in silico predictions of candidate bile acids, detection of 626 potential candidates were found to match130, two of which were validated via organic synthesis.

A third strategy called reverse metabolomics was able to find not only many new amidated bile acids, but also lipid esters40. In total, MS/MS for 174 of the 176 bile acid amidates, which were synthesized combinatorially to be reference standards, were found in public data from humans, animals and microorganisms. They were most observed in the cecum and feces but also in the gallbladder, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, skin and to a much lesser degree in blood, urine, and the liver, which were dominated with MS/MS matches to glycine and taurine conjugates. Of the 96 cholic and deoxycholic acid fatty acid esters synthesized, matches to five were observed using reverse metabolomics - the C14:0, C18:1, C18:2, C18:3, C20:4 fatty acid esters to cholic acid - which is consistent with other observations of fatty acid acylated bile acids in human feces82. As previously described, MASST does not (yet) differentiate between bile acid isomers, and therefore the lipids could be attached to other tri- or dihydroxylated bile acids that are isomers of cholic acid or deoxycholic acid. Fatty acid acylated bile acids could potentially be esterified by lipases in vitro, but the link between this family of enzymes and acylation of bile acids in biological specimens has not (yet) been established135. In total, 62 bile acid conjugates (amidates) were verified to be present in humans and associated with Crohn’s disease40,42. These previously overlooked bile acid amidates are strongly associated with Crohn’s disease40,42. Microorganisms from the bacterial classes Actinobacteria, Bacilli, Clostridia, Fusobacteria and to a lesser degree Bacteroidia were all able to amidate the bile acids cholate and deoxycholate with 15 different proteinogenic and non-proteinogenic amines and amino acids40. Replicating the synthetic strategy described previously, via combinatorially synthesizing reference standards and LC-MS analysis, 40 and 7 different conjugated bile acids were found in fecal and plasma samples of extremely premature infants, respectively, in a preprint article134.

Other strategies, for example, culturing in combination with manual analysis, have similarly uncovered evidence for new microbial bile acids, including a study that included the addition of cholic acid, chenodeoxycholic acid, or deoxycholic acid to the human microbiota33. This study was consistent with the observations of our group and others that Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria produced 15 proteinogenic amino acid bile acid amidates, representing 44 bile acids, including the glycine amidate40,42. This work supported the observations described previously that the microbiota produces proteinogenic amino acid and bile acid conjugations, although it should be noted that, due to the absence of synthetic standards, one cannot exclude the possibility that the bile acids are connected as esters on a hydroxyl group, highlighting the importance of verification using standards. In another study, in which chenodeoxycholate and 3-oxo-chenodeoxycholate were added to fresh human fecal material, tens to low hundreds of new bile acids were generated77. This work also provided support for eight proteinogenic amino acid conjugations and another ten putative conjugations. Through manual interpretation of fragment ions, but without validation using synthetic standards, the researchers proposed that some of these conjugations are possibly conjugated as esters instead of amidates.

Excitingly, some additional dedicated mass spectrometry workflows using ion mobility mass spectrometry or polarity-switching multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mass spectrometry, in combination with computational strategies, are now being introduced to detect new bile acids. These techniques have enabled the observation of serine, valine, threonine, cysteine, asparagine, aspartate, lysine, glutamine, glutamate, methionine, histidine, arginine, isoleucine, and tryptophan bile acid conjugates from microorganisms, mice and human feces133. A strength of polarity switching is that it increases the number of diagnostic MS2-fragments, which increases the diversity of discoverable modified bile acids, even in the absence of any standards. Still, diastereomers cannot be distinguished, limiting annotations to mono-, di-, tri-, and tetra-hydroxylated bile acid conjugates as opposed to identifying a specific bile acid core with location of the hydroxyl groups and their stereochemistry and is useful already as it allows one to find modified bile acids, but it is important to be aware of its limitations. Even when one standard is available, polarity switching cannot exclude the possibility that other isomers overlap with the same retention time. In contrast, ion mobility-based mass spectrometry provides improved resolution to the specificity of the bile acid cores that are attached to the conjugations as different stereochemistry and conjugations have different drift times. The combination of retention time and ion mobility has enabled the separation and identification of nearly 300 different bile acids, including the leucine/isoleucine isomers. This has been used to reveal the effect of antibiotics in mice and fecal transplants in humans on the changes in bile acid amidates136. It could be envisioned that a combination of both approaches might become a future key strategy to discover all possible bile acids in a sample, especially as most bile acids are not readily available as pure standards.

Finally, although not exclusively designed to find bile acids, a N,N-dimethylethylenediamine tagging strategy that enhances detection of metabolites with a free carboxylic acid in combination with molecular networking60,127 led to the discovery of phenylacetyl acylated deoxycholic acids, which was further validated with synthetic standards137.

We expect that a combination of new methodologies, including new metabolomics repository scale analysis tools such as repository scale molecular networking138, ReDU metadata tracking139, MASST128, microbeMASST140, MassQL141, reverse metabolomics, total metabolomics strategies60,142146, and other creative molecular networking and modification tolerant data mining tools such as Mass2Motif147, MS2Deepscore148, SIMILE149, and hybrid searches150, will be used to complement molecular networks to discover new bile acids. These analytical approaches will not only enable the discovery of new bile acids but will also aid in our ability to understand their associations with microbial production or host production, and to trace the organ or biofluid distribution and relation to phenotypes.

Embracing data science

Total bile acid content is used as a key clinical measurement. However, total bile acid measurement is based on a few of the bile acids thought to be the only major ones59. Although such a narrow selection of bile acids can provide practically useful data, it is not clear how representative they will be of the total bile acid content, because the types of bile acids vary so dramatically. A simplified view of the bile acids from representative public untargeted metabolomics human data in urine, blood, and feces reveals a highly heterogeneous distribution of bile acid classes (Figure 4). Similar observations of heterogeneity were reported in a study profiling the fecal and plasma bile acid composition in more than 200 individuals with obesity113, and in another study in which distinct bile acid profiles were demonstrated in intestinal samples from 15 healthy individuals43. Many additional bile acid patterns can be expected to be observed depending on the level of resolution with which one analyzes the data; the maximum diversity analysis can be performed at the individual molecule level or by grouping bile acids. Given that detection strategies might not always distinguish between bile acid isomers, we should report them as a group of related bile acids. This also supports the need to build a bile acid ontology that embraces the true bile acid complexity and ensures consistency in the usage of this ontology by the community. An example of similar complexity is the microbiome, for which questions are asked at different phylogenetic levels, such as phylum, genus, species, or strain, depending on the hypothesis to be tested. We expect that, similarly, bile acid analysis will require different levels of resolution depending on the questions asked. Such levels of resolution can vary from the clinically useful measurement of a few major bile acids, as used today, to a far deeper identification that embraces the true diversity of bile acids and their detailed association with phenotype and mechanism. Future analyses at higher resolution will also enable better integration with microbiome data, which is a key driver of the bile acid metabolic network fluxes.

Figure 4. Proportion of bile acids in humans.

Figure 4.

Data available in ReDU139 represented as normalized ion intensities across three biological matrices - a) urine b) blood, c) fecal. Each stacked bar represents a unique individual. Colors represent the seven bile acid groups - unconjugated, glycine conjugated, taurine conjugated, amino acid conjugated, oxidized, sulfated and tetrahydroxylated. The information that is visualized is from untargeted MS/MS datasets acquired on a high-resolution mass spectrometer, a Q-Exactive, and with associated metadata filtered from ReDU. Reprocessing these files by living data in Global Natural Product Social molecular networking (GNPS)60 yielded spectral matches to bile acids in the GNPS libraries. The precursor ion intensities of these bile acids were extracted from the classical molecular network and represented as sum normalized ion intensities of all female and male samples across three biological matrices.

A new function of bile salt hydrolases

Visualizing bile acids as the basis for a chemical language requires a substantial increase in the number of known structures151,152. Most of this pool of previously hidden structures will be present in such low amounts that they lie at or beyond the current detection limitations of analytical instruments and/or are in high enough concentrations but are outside the purview of discovery even with modern algorithms. As a carrier of information, the core structure of the bile acid (the bent A/B bile acid ring structure and the amphipathic nature of the bile acid nucleus) provides master key access to sites and organelles within the host, while the ‘message’ is attached to the flexible sidechain in an easy-to-remove linkage. Here, the common host bile acids that are taurine or glycine conjugated can be seen as inert biochemical precursors that become activated when exposed to the microbiome. The initial step is the removal of the taurine or glycine conjugate, a process accomplished by microbial hydrolases with the protein encoded by the bsh gene. BSHs belong to the protein family of enzymes that also include aminotransferases. There are an astonishing number of such hydrolases with great structural diversity, having only a recognizable active site in common. An examination of 16,936 bacterial genomes found a putative bsh gene in 2,456 of genomes153155. Although BSH is responsible for taurine or glycine removal, the reaction can work in reverse, and the term ‘hydrolase’ can be expanded to call these same enzymes ‘transferases’. Working as a transferase, the BSH enzymes can reattach substrates (including all the amino acids) to the bile acid, which will serve as the carrier of the attachment (Figure 5a)17,152,156,157. In this transfer reaction, taurine serves an analogous function as coenzyme A, where it functions as a cofactor in BAAT (Figure 5a). There are also observations that when unconjugated bile acids are fed to microorganisms that contain BSHs, they have the ability to amidate using any number of amines or amino acids, though the mechanisms of activation of the bile acid are not yet known33,40,158. Growing evidence suggests that the microbially produced bile acids made by the BSH should not be dismissed as just minor, low-concentration variants with no biological importance (BOX 1). For example, in fecal samples from patients with IBD40, 25% of the cohort contained microbial bile acid amidates that were present at the same or higher concentration as the host-synthesized taurine and glycine amidates40. We and others have also observed the cholic acid-phenylalanine amidate in healthy female mice at 82 mg/kg in the jejunum (highest measured value was 248 mg/kg in the jejunum), 46 mg/kg in the ileum, 3 mg/kg in the cecum, and 6 mg/kg in the colon42. Larger amounts of the same conjugate have been detected in the upper colon (where mice have a cecum) of healthy humans43. BSHs have different hydrolytic specificities and Yao and colleagues, by knocking out the bacterial gene for bile salt deconjugation in a mouse model, demonstrated that this single change was responsible for multiple transcriptional changes in host metabolism, circadian rhythm, and immune pathways. BSH and/or their hydrolytic and amidate products also affect T cells, host stem cell differentiation, microbial biofilm formation and germination of C.difficile spores.17,40,69,159,160. It will likely take the scientific community decades to fully tease apart the functional roles of the ever-expanding global bile acid pool that have been, and will be uncovered, over the next decade.

Figure 5. The known deconjugation and re-conjugation of bile acids by BAAT and BSH enzymes.

Figure 5.

a) Representative reactions carried out by BSH and BAAT. Although other amidates, aside from taurine, can serve as substrates for the transamination reaction carried out by bile salt hydrolase (BSH), the taurine conjugates are the key molecules converted to the microbial bile acid amidates. Different BSH enzymes have different specificities of amine and bile acid for the transamination reaction. b) Representative structures of amino acid conjugated to cholic acid catalyzed by bacterial BSH belonging to the genera Lactobacillus, Enterocluster, Bifidobacteria and Bacteroides. BAAT, bile acid-CoA:amino acid N-acyltransferase.

A single organism with a single BSH is fully capable of altering host metabolic, circadian rhythm gene expression, and immune pathways. When colonized with different strains of gut bacteria of genus Turicibacter, gnotobiotic mice revealed very different bile acid and lipid profiles161. Metabolic changes that are the direct result of a BSH include changes in glucose, triglyceride, and cholesterol levels, as well as the uptake of oxygen17. Although the general shape of BSHs is fairly conserved across microbial species, they vary widely in substrate preference and efficiency22. Thus, we should begin to think of varying patterns of BSHs in relation to the larger bile acid metabolic network when doing functional bile acid metabolic network assessments, especially once the substrate specificities are better understood. For example, there are varying BSH patterns observed in sequencing data from fecal samples in different countries154, possibly due to different diet patterns that promote the growth of different microorganisms, but one can also expect such patterns to change with health status, medication use and other characteristics that influence the microbiome. The vast repertoire of potential BSHs and homologue genes remains uncharacterized154,162. Much remains to be understood, implying many opportunities for the scientific community. For example, depending on the BSH/transferase, taurine, glycine or other amidates are more efficiently utilized and the free acid can be converted. However, the mechanism of free carboxylate activation is unknown. Even though certain bile acid core structures, amidates and free amines can serve as preferential substrates for BSH/transferases, we anticipate host-derived taurine amidates to be some of the most important substrates for the transferase reaction. This is consistent with the observation of taurocholic acid acting as a substrate for BSH from bacterial species of Lactobacillus spp., Enterocloster bolteae (formerly Clostridium bolteae), Bifidobacteria longum and Bacteroides fragilis to furnish amino acid-conjugated bile acids, as highlighted by representative examples from literature (Figure 5b)42,158. In addition, germ-free and/or antibiotic-treated mice predominantly have taurine amidates and reduced glycine amidates, which we now know can also be made by microorganisms39,102,163. In other words, without microorganisms to carry out the transferase reaction, bile acid taurine conjugates tend to accumulate. The release of free taurine after the microbial BSH-catalyzed deconjugation of taurocholate and re-amidation with other amino acids also helps in promoting host health by maintaining the balance between taurine and taurocholate, and is guided by the microbiome164. The amino acid taurine itself serves as an energy source for the microbiota, provides cytoprotection and aids in neuromodulation165, with its highest concentrations observed in brain and heart of animals and humans166 - organs in which bile acid-related genes and receptors have also been detected. Organisms with different clades of bsh gene sequences act on different conjugated bile acids17,69,158,167,168. It is known that some microorganisms do not contain the genetic sequence for a classical BSH, yet are still capable of forming bile acid amidates, suggesting that other mechanisms of bile acid conjugation remain undiscovered168. To that effect, there are bile acid aminotransferase homologues observed in microorganisms, and hydrolases, lipases, proteases that can form amide (or ester) bonds155,169.

These observations suggest that BSH research needs to be reinterpreted in the context of this new information, in which transferase activities mediated by BSH represent key mechanisms for the diversification of bile acids. Each BSH produces its own unique set of modified bile acids leading to thousands of different bile acids. Other enzymes can be speculated to carry out similar de-conjugation and re-conjugation reactions and even form esters instead of amidates of the free carboxylic acid17,77,170. This is an opportunity for the community to research the patterns of all BSHs known to date, in addition to how they contribute to the metabolic bile acid network via de-conjugation and re-conjugation specificities - a key requisite to enable mechanistic explanation for the role of all BSH/transferase enzymes in health outcomes. This begs the question, why do we need so many different bile acids? There is a clear need to functionally understand the roles of the many newly discovered and yet-to-be-discovered bile acids. Large-scale functional screens with as many bile acids as possible will be necessary to discover their functional roles and to complement hypothesis-driven analysis of the thousands of bile acids with unassigned functional roles at this time, including their functions as possible immune regulators.

Bile acids are immune regulators

Similar to many other cholesterol-derived steroids, modified bile acids, including microbially modified bile acids and amidates, are being discovered to regulate the immune system (Figure 6). An important role of bile acids in innate immunity and inflammation control is illustrated by the observation that bile acid receptor activation results in the reduced expression of human NF-κB-dependent signaling pathways171,172. In addition, major bile acid sensors (including FXR and TGR5) are found in the intestinal interface between the microbiome and host173. Bile acids - such as chenodeoxycholic acid, deoxycholic acid, and cholic acid - bind to these sensors and regulate innate immune cell responses in macrophages, dendritic cells and natural killer T (NKT) cells8. Upon binding, deoxycholic acid reduced the secretion of inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12p70 and TNFα through TGR5 signaling in mice174. Mice fed an inulin-rich diet had changes in bile acid levels, especially cholic acid, which in turn caused a type 2 inflammation in the intestine and lungs, characterized by IL-33 production, activation of group 2 innate lymphoid cells and eosinophilia175. In non-tumor liver tissue from patients with primary liver cancer, chenodeoxycholic acid levels correlate with CXCL16 expression and NKT cell accumulation, whereas glycolithocholate show an inverse correlation176. Specifically in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, glycodeoxycholic acid recovered ovarian function by inducing intestinal group 3 innate lymphoid cell IL-22 secretion through GATA binding protein 3177.Taurine-conjugated ursodeoxycholic acid is an agonist of the membrane receptor TGR5, leading to an increase in intracellular cAMP levels in microglia, which induces anti-inflammatory markers providing neuroprotection in diseases such as Alzheimer disease, Parkinson disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis178.

Figure 6. Bile acids and receptor interactions.

Figure 6.

Interactions of known microbially modified bile acids (conjugated and unconjugated) with common host-ligand receptors and the phenotypic response, when characterized, are highlighted. The unconjugated bile acids isoallolithocholic acid (isoallo-LCA), 3-oxo cholic acid (3-oxo-CA), isodeoxycholic acid (isoDCA), deoxycholic acid (DCA), and lithocholic acid (LCA) bind to the nuclear receptors VDR, FXR and TGR5 and induce cytokines production and increases differentiation of regulatory T (Treg) cells, reducing inflammation90,91,179,241. DCA and LCA activate FXR, which downregulates interleukin-1 (IL-1), leading to vasodilation in endothelial cells242. Cholic acid (CA) binds to FXR and increases production of IL-33, activating eosinophilia in stromal cell175.Taurine-conjugated ursodeoxycholic acid (Tau-UDCA) is an agonist of the membrane receptor TGR5, leading to an increase in intracellular cAMP levels in microglia, which induces anti-inflammatory markers providing neuroprotection in conditions such as Alzheimer disease, Parkinson disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis98,178. Glycine-conjugated deoxycholic acid (Gly-DCA) induces production of IL-22 on binding to TGR5, causing recovery of ovarian function in women with PCOS177. In the case of microbially conjugated bile acids, the studies highlighting ligand interactions are limited given the novelty of such discoveries, but highlighted in this figure are some important observations from recent studies. Although only tested in mice ileum so far, tyrosine (Tyr), phenylalanine (Phe) and isoleucine (Ile) conjugated to cholic acid have binding affinity to FXR and regulate bile acid biosynthesis genes42. Elevated amounts of these amino acid conjugates furnished by treating mice with a cocktail of BSH enzymes also led to inhibition of C. difficile spore germination and prevented its colonization69. The mechanism for the inhibition of spore germination and the bile acid receptors involved are still unknown. Glutamate (Glu) conjugated to cholic and chenodeoxycholic acid are agonists of multiple nuclear receptors in vitro in human cells, however the phenotypic response has not yet been explored158. The amino acids alanine (Ala), serine (Ser), tryptophan (Trp), Tyr, Phe, and Ile bind to FXR and TGR5, increasing WNT signaling and stem cell differentiation160

In adaptive immunity, responses are modulated by regulatory T cells (Treg cells), and several bile acids have been demonstrated to alter Treg cell populations in the intestine. A combination of two secondary unconjugated microbial bile acids - lithocholic acid and 3-oxo-lithocholic acid - regulate the levels of colonic nuclear hormone receptor RORγ+ Treg cells (Figure 6) through the VDR bile acid receptor90. In this study, germ-free mice mono-colonized with BSH-knockouts of Bacteroides fragilis had both altered levels of bile acids and reduced colonic RORγ+ Treg cells, showing that certain primary and secondary bile acid species preferentially regulate this cell type. The secondary bile acid isodeoxycholic acid also enhances expression of Treg cells while concurrently increasing induction of the transcription factor FOXP3 in mice179. Another study reported an increase of ileal FOXP3+ Treg cells in mice administered a combination of 3-oxo-lithocholic acid and isoallolithocholic acid91. Both bile acids were detected in the feces of patients with colitis and completely disappeared in germ-free mice. A follow-up to this study was provided by Li and colleagues, who identified the genes in gut bacteria from the phylum Bacteroidetes that catalyze the conversion of 3-oxolithocholic acid to isoallolithocholic acid21. They also observed a reduction in levels of isoallolithocholic acid and the genes responsible in patients with IBD, reaffirming the role of this bile acid in increasing the differentiation of anti-inflammatory Treg cells. In contrast to Treg cells, 3-oxolithocholic acid inhibits the differentiation of proinflammatory Th17 cells21. Other studies have also reported a decrease in Th17 cell differentiation by both isolithocholic acid180 and lithocholic acid-3-sulfate181. Taurine-amidated ursodeoxycholic acid also reduces the differentiation of Th17, and dampens the innate inflammatory response to IFNγ182, leading to an intriguing question based on the information contained in this Perspective: are these observed phenotypes due to the production of new microbially produced amidates via the conversion of taurine-activated bile amidates by BSHs or other microbial modifications? Oral administration in mice of Bacteroides uniformis led to production of more bile acids, such as isolithocholic acid and isochodeoxycholic acid, which regulated the NF-κB and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways in colonic tissues and the differentiation of Th17 cells183.

The functional role of microbial bile acid amidates is even less understood and much more research is needed. Amino acids threonine-amidated to cholic acid and glutamate-amidated to deoxycholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid bind to PXR40. Such binding has the potential to decrease T cell proliferation by decreasing the expression of CD25 and IFNγ and decreasing phosphorylated NF-κB and MEK1/2184. In the same way that canonical bile acids activate FXR and regulate immune functions, microbial bile amidates such as glutamate, isoleucine, leucine, methionine, and tryptophan amidated to chenodeoxycholic acid have now been reported to bind to FXR42,158,160 and could potentially have critical roles in immunity. A large number of amino acid-amidated bile acids bind to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR)158, which has multiple roles in T cell and dendritic cell signaling185. Cholic acid amidates with phenylalanine, tyrosine, tryptophan and glutamate modulate signaling via human and mice FXR and TGR5, and also promote WNT signaling and intestinal stem cell proliferation160.

Immune regulation is a key component of enterohepatic system-organ communication, and bile acids serve as bidirectional mediators between the host and the microbiome186. Given that so many bile acids are being discovered, and only a small proportion of these have been tested for immune-regulatory properties, evaluation of bile acids for immune-regulatory properties and their receptor interactions will need to continue into the future.

Bile acids as mediators of communication

Outside of the intestine, there is another site in vertebrates that includes a similar microbiome: scent glands, in which a host-specific microbiome is carefully cultured in tissues. In these regions, the host supplies nutrition to a bacterial population that, in turn, forms a complex and extensive chemical mixture of volatile and semi-volatile compounds used in depositing scent marks. What is surprising about the components of scent is that none of the structures present are derived from the host187189. Instead, all are bacterial metabolites, which combine to create an extensive chemical message readily interpreted by conspecifics as being derived from the same vertebrate190. Here, the ‘sender’ is a vertebrate, the ‘message’ is written by bacteria, and it is received by another vertebrate.

By analogy, we propose that the human host synthesizes a small pool of bile acid structures, and releases them into the intestinal environment, where the microbiome converts the bile acids into an extensive ‘first half’ of a chemical message of a size equal to or greater than a thousand, if not tens of thousands, of compounds. Here, the sender is the host, the message is written by bacteria, and the message is intended for and delivered back into the host. In any communication system, there are two halves, the sender and the receiver. How does the microbiome get the attention of the host, that is, the second half of the message? By providing something that it needs. The microbiome generates an extensive buffet of essential nutrients and signal compounds that, in turn, are conjugated to, carried, and delivered by the reusable stable bile acid platform. From the viewpoint of the vertebrate host, the most interesting of the small molecules moved by the bile acid carriers are those derived predominantly or exclusively from the microbiota, using their million-fold greater metabolic genomic capacity. Following absorption by the host, bile acids become ubiquitous throughout the body, delivering their micro cargos to individual cellular organelles. As a result, the different kingdoms of vertebrate hosts and bacterial microbiomes are interlocked in continuous dynamic chemical communication with each other.

The bile acid encoder-decoder hypothesis

It is now well established, and has been discussed comprehensively in many reviews, that microbially modified bile acids can act as signaling molecules and activate host-ligand receptors, which regulates host health and metabolism in multiple ways191,192, including in conditions such as IBD, colitis, neurodegeneration, etc. (Figure 6). The recent burgeoning of studies continuously expanding the repertoire of new bile acids paves the path to exploration of their binding affinities to both known and yet unknown bile acid receptors and the subsequent implications for human health and disease. Addressing the need for such huge diversity of bile acids and their interactions with specific receptors to regulate host health, we hypothesize that microorganisms use a bile acid communication highway to signal and communicate across scales, from organelles, to cells (both microbial and host cells), tissues and organs, with each bile acid carrying specific information. We propose that the host and the microbiota encode for the diverse array of bile acids that are then decoded by bile acid receptors and transporters (Figure 7). At concentrations far below those of critical micellar concentration, the concentration in which detergents such as taurine bile acid conjugates form micelles, we propose a micro-mechanism (BOX 4) of bile acid nutrient transport in which each bile acid is a unique carrier, and this uniqueness in each bile acid is encoded by bile acid enzymes, transporters and receptors12 that have often been demonstrated to present different selectivity, in essence decoding the information of the bile acids themselves. While a macro-mechanism of bile acid-mediated nutrient absorption occurs using millimolar amounts of bile acids in micelles that ‘trap’ nutrients to be transported systemically, we hypothesize that this view needs to be greatly expanded by a micro-mechanism in which pM-to-μM amounts of bile acids not only participate in nutrient delivery via the macro-mechanism to organelles, cells, tissues and/or organs, but also specific and targeted communication and possibly targeted signaling, communication from the gut to other organs or delivery of nutrients across membranes. Thus, although micelles are indeed part of a system of nutrient transport, micelle formation requires high bile acid concentrations that are orders of magnitude above the concentrations needed for the bile acid transporters and receptors to recognize bile acids (active in the pM-to-μM range).The full scope of specificity of encoding and decoding is not yet known, but the process of conjugating bile acids has been shown to facilitate uptake and requires the correct stereochemistry193,194.

Figure 7. The bile acid encoder-decoder hypothesis.

Figure 7.

Visualization of the encoder-decoder hypothesis. In this hypothesis, cholesterol is modified by host and microbial enzymes to encode the message that is then decoded by the receptors and transporters to enable communications at the organelle, cell (microbial or host cells) and tissue/organ levels. Figure 7 was created with BioRender.com.

BOX 4. Microscale bile acid cargos in health and disease.

The hypothesis of a bile acid carrier that delivers microbiome-mediated micro cargos throughout the body has major implications for normal host health. There are multiple ways in which this pathway can be disrupted or disconnected. Genetic defects in the pathway necessary to convert cholesterol into bile acids, albeit rare, disrupt the bile acid structure as a carrier. Invariably, these defects are either fatal to the developing fetus or, if seen in the neonate, are associated with brain developmental defects292,293 (emphasizing the importance of a gut-brain axis) and a failure to thrive. The standard of treatment for bile acid defects is to administer normal human bile acids, which are recognizable by both the host and the microbiome, which restores communication. The rise in the use of antibiotics, particularly in the developing neonate and infant, breaks the link between the microbiome and its host. The loss of this linkage (and cargo for the bile acid carriers) has been associated with a corresponding rise in multiple downstream effects featuring negative health outcomes over the past 70 years294,295. For example, current epidemiological studies link alterations in the microbiome to obesity, asthma, allergy, metabolic disease, and colorectal cancer296. The narrowing of the microbiome diversity seen in the modern Western diet concurrently limits diversity in the potential nature of bile acid cargo. The loss of a macronutrient (for example, vitamin C in scurvy) has an effect seen on the scale of months. One would anticipate that the loss of a micronutrient that is no longer synthesized by the microbiome would have far more subtle effects and appear in the host over a longer time scale. The microbiome is progressively altered with age297 and a more limited delivery of cargo might parallel declines in health associated with ageing. In addition, use of probiotics has been attributed to support favorable gut microbial alterations and help in maintaining host health298. This can be viewed as a means of establishing a microbiome that provides the bile acid carriers with cargos needed for host metabolism.

A key question that remains is how can the delivery of nutrients, more specifically building blocks to make proteins or lipids and energy, be coordinated and specific to only organelles, cells, tissues, and organs that need them, avoiding delivery to all at the same time? This is a fundamental question in biology that has not been answered. We suggest that bile acids serve as active delivery vehicles moving nutrients, or form communication lines, to specific cells (microorganisms and host) and function in a web of communication between the gut, brain, all other organs, and the immune system. That bile acids might have the ability to selectively deliver messages and cargo to targets has already been reported for Trojan drugs, where the drug of choice is attached to bile acids as a means to enhance their efficacy195. This targeted cargo delivery through a co-factor encoding and decoding hypothesis is consistent with the observations of a differential bile acid distribution across different body regions and the presence of different bile acid-related proteins in different tissues. Activity-based probe and subsequent pulldown assays reveal that many of the proteins that interact with bile acids also interact with proteins from the microbiota71, mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi apparatus50, which are key organelles in energy metabolism and delivery of proteins to lysosomes, plasma membrane, or for secretion. It is unclear how bile acids alter mitochondrial energetics196198, however, metabolomics studies of chronic fatigue syndrome, which is associated with mitochondrial dysfunction, found chenodeoxycholic acid levels as one of key metabolic compounds diagnostic for the disease, and that low concentrations of mitochondrial taurine conjugation regulates bile acid production, and thus low levels of taurine in diet leads to mitochondrial disease197201. Perhaps bile acids can serve a similar role to carnitines, which enable transport of attachments across the membrane, serve as a systemic transport mechanism or serve as cofactors in reactions like coenzyme A. It is also not yet known how endoplasmic reticulum stress regulates bile acid synthesis, or the role bile acids play in Golgi membrane fission202204. It is likely that we do not yet know all the different genes and proteins that are part of or control the encoding and decoding information. Moreover, imagining bile acids as the central components in a communication system implies that new puzzle pieces of what constitutes the ‘message’ remain to be discovered. Although we anticipate that bile acids are key messages in the encoder and decoder hypothesis, other classes of molecules might also fulfill this role205,206. To our knowledge, there are currently no data that argues against the encoder-decoder hypothesis, but even if such data were to become available, it will be critical to explain why there are so many bile acids needed in the biology of complex organisms such as humans. It is, however, clear that, as central regulators of biology, there is a need to discover all bile acids found in humans and to understand how the patterns of bile acid modifications change. A detailed understanding of their roles will lead to improved control of the gut-microbiome-brain-other organ metabolic network, which is influenced by diet, medications and other exposures, microbiota, sex, age, season and time of day, and data science will be instrumental to understand the encoding and decoding strategies employed by the human body (Figure 7).

Future outlook

There are already at least 692 different bile acids, not considering stereochemistry (Figure 2a, b), and it is reasonable to predict that thousands of additional new bile acids will be discovered in the coming years owing to the fast advancement of mass spectrometry-related analytical tools. To keep track of this projected astronomical increase in the number of bile acids, a uniform digital inventory of curated bile acids will be beneficial and essential for the research community. In addition, an open access database specific to bile acids and its related literature, similar to GNPS, HMDB etc., will accelerate the pace of bile acid research. The discovery of bile acids as ligands of orphan receptors and their role as hormones challenged the traditional idea that bile acids are produced only in the liver, stored in the gallbladder, and released into the intestine for fat digestion. Consistent with a more systemic role for bile acids, the exercise of searching for bile acids in locations other than the enterohepatic circulation was pushed forward and supported the role of bile acids in a wider gut microbiome-to-organ axis. However, there is still immense scope for further research in tracing bile acid locations and routes of transport, especially with the discovery of new bile acid conjugates. In addition to finding the bile acids themselves, their biosynthetic enzymes and genes encoding them also warrant attention. It will be important to establish who makes what, where and when? While the first two studies on the aminoacyl transferase activity of BSH is a monumental step in this direction, further experiments are required to explore their substrate specificity and the number of different BSHs involved. Existing bile acids, both host and microbial-derived, have been shown to serve as agonists for multiple transcription factors and receptors, which has also been discussed extensively in this Perspective. With the discovery of new bile acids and their microbially derived amidates, it is pertinent to test the interaction of these new bile acids with existing receptors and against other orphan receptors. This knowledge would also percolate down to our understanding of the physiological importance of bile acids. An important avenue for future research involves exploring and providing more functional insights into the encoder-decoder hypothesis put forth in this Perspective. Use of labeled precursors coupled with untargeted metabolomics can be used to trace the role of these new bile acid conjugates as mediators in the cross talk between the microbiome and the host and exhibit influence on nutrition, energy, and immune regulation of the host. A somewhat tantalizing prospect that presents itself is the idea of leveraging bile acids as the medium of communication to provide specific cargos (metabolites of interest) and genetically modified BSHs in vivo to furnish ‘designer’ bile acid conjugates. Although bile acid chemical biology started more than 170 years ago, we still do not understand their diversity let alone their functions. We anticipate this Perspective to provide motivation for additional future research in this area, as bile acids have fundamental roles in human biology.

Supplementary Material

SI

Acknowledgements

P.C.D. and R.K. would like to acknowledge support from NIH U19 AG063744, and support for the collaborative microbial metabolite center to P.C.D. and R.K. (1U24DK133658), R.K. also acknowledges DP1AT010885.

Footnotes

Competing interests

P.C.D. is an advisor and has equity in Cybele and is a scientific co-founder and holds equity in Enveda, Arome and Ometa with prior approval by UC San Diego. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Data availability

Structural databases referred to in Figure 2 and BOX 1 can be accessed and downloaded from https://hmdb.ca/downloads (HMDB), https://gnps-external.ucsd.edu/gnpslibrary (BILELIB19), and https://www.lipidmaps.org/data/structure/download.php (LIPIDMAPS).

The source code used for generation of Figure 2 and BOX 1 can be accessed at https://github.com/YasinEl/Bile_Acid_Review_2022; Figures 3a, b, 4, can be accessed at https://github.com/mohantyipsita/Bile_Acid_Review_2022; Figures 3(c, d) can be accessed at https://github.com/callaband/Bile_Acid_Review_2022

References

  • 1.Norman A. & Sjövall J. On the transformation and enterohepatic circulation of cholic acid in the rat. J. Biol. Chem 233, 872–885 (1958). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Norman A. & Sjövall J. Formation of lithocholic acid from chenodeoxycholic acid in the rat. Acta Chem. Scand 14, 1815–1818 (1960). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Carey JB Jr, Wilson ID, Zaki FG & Hanson RF The metabolism of bile acids with special reference to liver injury. Medicine 45, 461 (1966). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hofmann AF & Hagey LR Key discoveries in bile acid chemistry and biology and their clinical applications: history of the last eight decades. J. Lipid Res 55, 1553–1595 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hofmann AF & Hagey LR Bile acids and biliary disease: peaceful coexistence versus deadly warfare. in Gut and Liver (ed. Blum HE, Bode C, Bode JC, Sartor RB) 85–103 (Lancaster, Pa: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Makishima M. et al. Identification of a nuclear receptor for bile acids. Science 284, 1362–1365 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang H, Chen J, Hollister K, Sowers LC & Forman BM Endogenous bile acids are ligands for the nuclear receptor FXR/BAR. Mol. Cell 3, 543–553 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Parks DJ et al. Bile acids: natural ligands for an orphan nuclear receptor. Science 284, 1365–1368 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Matsubara T, Li F. & Gonzalez FJ FXR signaling in the enterohepatic system. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol 368, 17–29 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gonzalez FJ Nuclear receptor control of enterohepatic circulation. Compr. Physiol 2, 2811–2828 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Porez G, Prawitt J, Gross B. & Staels B. Bile acid receptors as targets for the treatment of dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease. J. Lipid Res 53, 1723–1737 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Režen T. et al. The role of bile acids in carcinogenesis. Cell. Mol. Life Sci 79, 243 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Maruyama T. et al. Identification of membrane-type receptor for bile acids (M-BAR). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 298, 714–719 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kawamata Y. et al. A G protein-coupled receptor responsive to bile acids. J. Biol. Chem 278, 9435–9440 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Miyake JH, Wang SL & Davis RA Bile acid induction of cytokine expression by macrophages correlates with repression of hepatic cholesterol 7alpha-hydroxylase. J. Biol. Chem 275, 21805–21808 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Staudinger JL et al. The nuclear receptor PXR is a lithocholic acid sensor that protects against liver toxicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 98, 3369–3374 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yao L. et al. A selective gut bacterial bile salt hydrolase alters host metabolism. Elife 7, (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Song C, Hiipakka RA & Liao S. Selective activation of liver X receptor alpha by 6α-hydroxy bile acids and analogs. Steroids 65, 423–427 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Makishima M. et al. Vitamin D receptor as an intestinal bile acid sensor. Science 296, 1313–1316 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Studer E. et al. Conjugated bile acids activate the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 in primary rodent hepatocytes. Hepatology 55, 267–276 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Li W. et al. A bacterial bile acid metabolite modulates Treg activity through the nuclear hormone receptor NR4A1. Cell Host Microbe 29, 1366–1377.e9 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ridlon JM, Kang D-J & Hylemon PB Bile salt biotransformations by human intestinal bacteria. J. Lipid Res 47, 241–259 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ridlon JM, Harris SC, Bhowmik S, Kang D-J & Hylemon PB Consequences of bile salt biotransformations by intestinal bacteria. Gut Microbes 7, 22–39 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Doden HL & Ridlon JM Microbial Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenases: From Alpha to Omega. Microorganisms 9, (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Guzior DV & Quinn RA Review: microbial transformations of human bile acids. Microbiome 9, 140 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Joyce SA & Gahan CGM Bile Acid Modifications at the Microbe-Host Interface: Potential for Nutraceutical and Pharmaceutical Interventions in Host Health. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol 7, 313–333 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Larabi AB, Masson HLP & Bäumler AJ Bile acids as modulators of gut microbiota composition and function. Gut Microbes 15, 2172671 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Alnouti Y. Bile Acid sulfation: a pathway of bile acid elimination and detoxification. Toxicol. Sci 108, 225–246 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Keitel V, Kubitz R. & Häussinger D. Endocrine and paracrine role of bile acids. World J. Gastroenterol 14, 5620–5629 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sjöstedt E. et al. An atlas of the protein-coding genes in the human, pig, and mouse brain. Science 367, (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Maneerat S, Nitoda T, Kanzaki H. & Kawai F. Bile acids are new products of a marine bacterium, Myroides sp. strain SM1. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol 67, 679–683 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kim D. et al. Biosynthesis of bile acids in a variety of marine bacterial taxa. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol 17, 403–407 (2007). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lucas LN et al. Dominant Bacterial Phyla from the Human Gut Show Widespread Ability To Transform and Conjugate Bile Acids. mSystems e0080521 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 34.Ohashi K, Miyagawa Y, Nakamura Y. & Shibuya H. Bioproduction of bile acids and the glycine conjugates by Penicillium fungus. J. Nat. Med 62, 83–86 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lee AK, Wei JH & Welander PV De novo cholesterol biosynthesis in bacteria. Nat. Commun 14, 2904 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yano JM et al. Indigenous bacteria from the gut microbiota regulate host serotonin biosynthesis. Cell 161, 264–276 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Reigstad CS et al. Gut microbes promote colonic serotonin production through an effect of short-chain fatty acids on enterochromaffin cells. FASEB J. 29, 1395–1403 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.De Vadder F. et al. Gut microbiota regulates maturation of the adult enteric nervous system via enteric serotonin networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 115, 6458–6463 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Swann JR et al. Systemic gut microbial modulation of bile acid metabolism in host tissue compartments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 108 Suppl 1, 4523–4530 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gentry EC et al. Reverse metabolomics for the discovery of chemical structures from humans. Nature 626, 419–426 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Neugebauer KA et al. Bile acid-CoA:amino acid N-acyltransferase gene knockout alters early life development, the gut microbiome and reveals unusual bile acid conjugates in mice. J. Lipid Res 63 (12):100297 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Quinn RA et al. Global chemical effects of the microbiome include new bile-acid conjugations. Nature 579, 123–129 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Shalon D. et al. Profiling the human intestinal environment under physiological conditions. Nature 617, 581–591 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Folz J. et al. Human metabolome variation along the upper intestinal tract. Nat Metab 5, 777–788 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gass J, Vora H, Hofmann AF, Gray GM & Khosla C. Enhancement of dietary protein digestion by conjugated bile acids. Gastroenterology 133, 16–23 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yoon YM et al. Tauroursodeoxycholic acid reduces ER stress by regulating of Akt-dependent cellular prion protein. Sci. Rep 6, 39838 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cummings BP et al. Bile-acid-mediated decrease in endoplasmic reticulum stress: a potential contributor to the metabolic benefits of ileal interposition surgery in UCD-T2DM rats. Dis. Model. Mech 6, 443–456 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Thomas C, Pellicciari R, Pruzanski M, Auwerx J. & Schoonjans K. Targeting bile-acid signalling for metabolic diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov 7, 678–693 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Li H. et al. Integrative systems analysis identifies genetic and dietary modulators of bile acid homeostasis. Cell Metab. (2022) doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2022.08.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 50.Zhuang S, Li Q, Cai L, Wang C. & Lei X. Chemoproteomic Profiling of Bile Acid Interacting Proteins. ACS Cent. Sci 3, 501–509 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Chen J, Sali A. & Vitetta L. The gallbladder and vermiform appendix influence the assemblage of intestinal microorganisms. Future Microbiol. 15, 541–555 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zhu B, Wang X. & Li L. Human gut microbiome: the second genome of human body. Protein Cell 1, 718–725 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sun Y, Fihn B-M, Sjövall H. & Jodal M. Enteric neurones modulate the colonic permeability response to luminal bile acids in rat colon in vivo. Gut 53, 362–367 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Poole DP et al. Expression and function of the bile acid receptor GpBAR1 (TGR5) in the murine enteric nervous system. Neurogastroenterol. Motil 22, 814–25, e227–8 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wang S-Z, Yu Y-J & Adeli K. Role of Gut Microbiota in Neuroendocrine Regulation of Carbohydrate and Lipid Metabolism via the Microbiota-Gut-Brain-Liver Axis. Microorganisms 8, (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Li N. et al. Microbiome-encoded bile acid metabolism modulates colonic transit times. iScience 24, 102508 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Porter JL et al. Accurate enzymatic measurement of fecal bile acids in patients with malabsorption. J. Lab. Clin. Med 141, 411–418 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Cai J, Rimal B, Jiang C, Chiang JYL & Patterson AD Bile acid metabolism and signaling, the microbiota, and metabolic disease. Pharmacol. Ther 237, 108238 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Dutta M, Cai J, Gui W. & Patterson AD A review of analytical platforms for accurate bile acid measurement. Anal. Bioanal. Chem 411, 4541–4549 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wang M. et al. Sharing and community curation of mass spectrometry data with Global Natural Products Social Molecular Networking. Nat. Biotechnol 34, 828–837 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wishart DS et al. HMDB 5.0: the Human Metabolome Database for 2022. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D622–D631 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Fahy E, Sud M, Cotter D. & Subramaniam S. LIPID MAPS online tools for lipid research. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W606–12 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Holert J. et al. Identification of bypass reactions leading to the formation of one central steroid degradation intermediate in metabolism of different bile salts in Pseudomonas sp. strain Chol1. Environ. Microbiol 18, 3373–3389 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Grandini A. et al. Biotransformation of Waste Bile Acids: A New Possible Sustainable Approach to Anti-Fungal Molecules for Crop Plant Bioprotection? Int. J. Mol. Sci 23, (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hayakawa S, Hashimoto S. & Onaka T. Microbiological degradation of bile acids. Nitrogenous hexahydroindane derivatives formed from cholic acid by Streptomyces rubescens. Biochem. J 160, 745–755 (1976). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Costa S, Giovannini PP, Fantin G, Medici A. & Pedrini P. New 9,10-secosteroids from biotransformations of hyodeoxycholic acid with Rhodococcusspp. Helv. Chim. Acta 96, 1062–1071 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Sekiguchi S. et al. 3,4-Seco-12α-hydroxy-5β-cholan-3,4,24-trioic Acid, a Novel Secondary Bile Acid: Isolation from the Bile of the Common Ringtail Possum (Pseudocheirus peregrinus) and Chemical Synthesis. J. Pharmacogn. Nat. Prod 03, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 68.King L 3rd et al. The enzymatic formation of novel bile acid primary amides. Arch. Biochem. Biophys 374, 107–117 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Foley MH et al. Bile salt hydrolases shape the bile acid landscape and restrict Clostridioides difficile growth in the murine gut. Nat Microbiol 8, 611–628 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Yao L. et al. A biosynthetic pathway for the selective sulfonation of steroidal metabolites by human gut bacteria. Nat. Microbiol 7, 1404–1418 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Le HH, Lee M-T, Besler KR, Comrie JMC & Johnson EL Characterization of interactions of dietary cholesterol with the murine and human gut microbiome. Nat. Microbiol 7, 1390–1403 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Pellock SJ & Redinbo MR Glucuronides in the gut: Sugar-driven symbioses between microbe and host. J. Biol. Chem 292, 8569–8576 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Marschall HU et al. Bile acid N-acetylglucosaminidation. In vivo and in vitro evidence for a selective conjugation reaction of 7 beta-hydroxylated bile acids in humans. J. Clin. Invest 89, 1981–1987 (1992). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Goto T. et al. Identification of a novel conjugate in human urine: bile acid acyl galactosides. Steroids 70, 185–192 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Abdel-Khalik J. et al. Bile acid biosynthesis in Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome bypassing cholesterol: Potential importance of pathway intermediates. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol 206, 105794 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Li H. et al. Bile acid derivatives from a sponge-associated bacterium Psychrobacter sp. Arch. Pharm. Res 32, 857–862 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Garcia CJ, Kosek V, Beltrán D, Tomás-Barberán FA & Hajslova J. Production of New Microbially Conjugated Bile Acids by Human Gut Microbiota. Biomolecules 12, (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Kelsey MI, Molina JE, Huang SK & Hwang KK The identification of microbial metabolites of sulfolithocholic acid. J. Lipid Res 21, 751–759 (1980). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Cohen BI et al. Differing effects of nor-ursodeoxycholic or ursodeoxycholic acid on hepatic histology and bile acid metabolism in the rabbit. Gastroenterology 91, 189–197 (1986). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Lake JR et al. Inhibition of Na+/H+ exchange in the rat is associated with decreased ursodeoxycholate hypercholeresis, decreased secretion of unconjugated urodeoxycholate, and increased ursodeoxycholate glucuronidation. Gastroenterology 95, 454–463 (1988). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Perreault M. et al. Role of glucuronidation for hepatic detoxification and urinary elimination of toxic bile acids during biliary obstruction. PLoS One 8, e80994 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Takei H. et al. Characterization of long-chain fatty acid-linked bile acids: a major conjugation form of 3β-hydroxy bile acids in feces. J. Lipid Res 63, 100275 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Thakare R, Alamoudi JA, Gautam N, Rodrigues AD & Alnouti Y. Species differences in bile acids I. Plasma and urine bile acid composition. J. Appl. Toxicol 38, 1323–1335 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Stiehl A, Raedsch R, Rudolph G, Gundert-Remy U. & Senn M. Biliary and urinary excretion of sulfated, glucuronidated and tetrahydroxylated bile acids in cirrhotic patients. Hepatology 5, 492–495 (1985). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Takikawa H, Beppu T. & Seyama Y. Profiles of bile acids and their glucuronide and sulphate conjugates in the serum, urine and bile from patients undergoing bile drainage. Gut 26, 38–42 (1985). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Mee MT, Collins JJ, Church GM & Wang HH Syntrophic exchange in synthetic microbial communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 111, E2149–56 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Mallonee DH & Hylemon PB Sequencing and expression of a gene encoding a bile acid transporter from Eubacterium sp. strain VPI 12708. J. Bacteriol 178, 7053–7058 (1996). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Mertens KL, Kalsbeek A, Soeters MR & Eggink HM Bile Acid Signaling Pathways from the Enterohepatic Circulation to the Central Nervous System. Front. Neurosci 11, 617 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Zegarra-Ruiz DF et al. Thymic development of gut-microbiota-specific T cells. Nature 594, 413–417 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Song X. et al. Microbial bile acid metabolites modulate gut RORγ+ regulatory T cell homeostasis. Nature 577, 410–415 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Hang S. et al. Bile acid metabolites control TH17 and Treg cell differentiation. Nature 576, 143–148 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Chiang JYL Bile acids: regulation of synthesis. J. Lipid Res 50, 1955–1966 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Li L, Zhou JH, Xing ST & Lau BH Thymus-neuroendocrine-liver pathway. Med. Hypotheses 41, 470–472 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Liu Y. et al. Splenectomy Leads to Amelioration of Altered Gut Microbiota and Metabolome in Liver Cirrhosis Patients. Front. Microbiol 9, 963 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.MahmoudianDehkordi S. et al. Altered bile acid profile associates with cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease-An emerging role for gut microbiome. Alzheimers. Dement 15, 76–92 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Baloni P. et al. Metabolic Network Analysis Reveals Altered Bile Acid Synthesis and Metabolism in Alzheimer’s Disease. Cell Rep. Med 1, 100138 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Labus JS et al. Interactions between brain and bile acid ratio profiles predict baseline cognitive status. Alzheimers. Dement 18, (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Monteiro-Cardoso VF, Corlianò M. & Singaraja RR Bile Acids: A Communication Channel in the Gut-Brain Axis. Neuromolecular Med. 23, 99–117 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Schubring SR, Fleischer W, Lin JS, Haas HL & Sergeeva OA The bile steroid chenodeoxycholate is a potent antagonist at NMDA and GABA(A) receptors. Neurosci. Lett 506, 322–326 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Lütjohann D. et al. Cholesterol homeostasis in human brain: evidence for an age-dependent flux of 24S-hydroxycholesterol from the brain into the circulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 93, 9799–9804 (1996). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Kirilenko BM, Hagey LR, Barnes S, Falany CN & Hiller M. Evolutionary Analysis of Bile Acid-Conjugating Enzymes Reveals a Complex Duplication and Reciprocal Loss History. Genome Biol. Evol 11, 3256–3268 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Zarei I. et al. Tissue-wide metabolomics reveals wide impact of gut microbiota on mice metabolite composition. Sci. Rep 12, 15018 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Flynn S. et al. Bile Acid Signal Molecules Associate Temporally with Respiratory Inflammation and Microbiome Signatures in Clinically Stable Cystic Fibrosis Patients. Microorganisms 8, (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Chiang JYL & Ferrell JM Bile acid metabolism in liver pathobiology. Gene Expr. 18, 71–87 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Qiu Y. et al. Depletion of gut microbiota induces skeletal muscle atrophy by FXR-FGF15/19 signalling. Ann. Med 53, 508–522 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Aoi W. et al. Exercise-acclimated Microbiota improves skeletal muscle metabolism via circulating bile acid deconjugation. SSRN Electron. J (2022) doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4149948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 107.Zhao Y-X et al. Association between bile acid metabolism and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Clinics 75, e1486 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Cho SW et al. Positive regulation of osteogenesis by bile acid through FXR. J. Bone Miner. Res 28, 2109–2121 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Szántó M. et al. Targeting the gut-skin axis-Probiotics as new tools for skin disorder management? Exp. Dermatol 28, 1210–1218 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Clark VC et al. An endogenous bile acid and dietary sucrose from skin secretions of alkaloid-sequestering poison frogs. J. Nat. Prod 75, 473–478 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Collins SL, Stine JG, Bisanz JE, Okafor CD & Patterson AD Bile acids and the gut microbiota: metabolic interactions and impacts on disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol (2022) doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00805-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 112.Guo J. et al. Gut Microbiota in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: a Systematic Review. Reprod. Sci 29, 69–83 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Chen L. et al. Genetic and Microbial Associations to Plasma and Fecal Bile Acids in Obesity Relate to Plasma Lipids and Liver Fat Content. Cell Rep. 33, 108212 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Li T. & Chiang JYL Bile acid signaling in metabolic disease and drug therapy. Pharmacol. Rev 66, 948–983 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Poupon R. Ursodeoxycholic acid and bile-acid mimetics as therapeutic agents for cholestatic liver diseases: an overview of their mechanisms of action. Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol 36 Suppl 1, S3–12 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Boatright JH, Nickerson JM, Moring AG & Pardue MT Bile acids in treatment of ocular disease. J. Ocul. Biol. Dis. Infor 2, 149–159 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Neuschwander-Tetri BA et al. Farnesoid X nuclear receptor ligand obeticholic acid for non-cirrhotic, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (FLINT): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 385, 956–965 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Younossi ZM et al. Obeticholic acid for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: interim analysis from a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 394, 2184–2196 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.MahmoudianDehkordi S. et al. Gut Microbiome-Linked Metabolites in the Pathobiology of Major Depression With or Without Anxiety-A Role for Bile Acids. Front. Neurosci 16, 937906 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Jiang J, Wang Y. & Deng M. New developments and opportunities in drugs being trialed for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis from 2020 to 2022. Front. Pharmacol 13, 1054006 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Myher JJ, Marai L, Kuksis A, Yousef IM & Fisher MM Identification of ornithine and arginine conjugates of cholic acid by mass spectrometry. Can. J. Biochem 53, 583–590 (1975). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Peric-Golia L. & Jones RS Ornithocholanic acids and cholelithiasis in man. Science 142, 245–246 (1963). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Gordon BA, Kuksis A. & Beveridge JM Separation of bile acid conjugates by ion exchange chromatography. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol 41, 77–89 (1963). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Tamari M, Ogawa M. & Kametaka M. A new bile acid conjugate, ciliatocholic acid, from bovine gall bladder bile. J. Biochem 80, 371–377 (1976). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Hagey LR, Schteingart CD, Rossi SS, Ton-Nu HT & Hofmann AF An N-acyl glycyltaurine conjugate of deoxycholic acid in the biliary bile acids of the rabbit. J. Lipid Res 39, 2119–2124 (1998). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Nair PP, Solomon R, Bankoski J. & Plapinger R. Bile acids in tissues: binding of lithocholic acid to protein. Lipids 13, 966–978 (1978). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Watrous J. et al. Mass spectral molecular networking of living microbial colonies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 109, E1743–52 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Wang M. et al. Mass spectrometry searches using MASST. Nat. Biotechnol 38, 23–26 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Petras D. et al. Chemical Proportionality within Molecular Networks. Anal. Chem 93, 12833–12839 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Hoffmann MA et al. High-confidence structural annotation of metabolites absent from spectral libraries. Nat. Biotechnol 40, 411–421 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Zhang Y. et al. Expanding the Scope of Targeted Metabolomics by One-pot Microscale Synthesis and Tailored Metabolite Profiling: Investigation of Bile Acid-Amino Acid Conjugates. Anal. Chem 94, 16596–16603 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Zhu Q-F et al. Alternating Dual-Collision Energy Scanning Mass Spectrometry Approach: Discovery of Novel Microbial Bile-Acid Conjugates. Anal. Chem 94, 2655–2664 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Wang Y-Z et al. A strategy for screening and identification of new amino acid-conjugated bile acids with high coverage by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 1239, 340691 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Pristner M. et al. Neuroactive metabolites and bile acids are altered in extremely premature infants with brain injury. medRxiv 2023–2005 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 135.Baldessari A. & García Liñares G. Lipase-Catalyzed Acetylation and Esterification of Bile Acids. Methods Mol. Biol 1835, 337–350 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Stewart AK et al. Using Multidimensional Separations to Distinguish Isomeric Amino Acid-Bile Acid Conjugates and Assess Their Presence and Perturbations in Model Systems. Anal. Chem 95, 15357–15366 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Wang Y-Z et al. Uncovering the Carboxylated Metabolome in Gut Microbiota-Host Co-metabolism: A Chemical Derivatization-Molecular Networking Approach. Anal. Chem 95, 11550–11557 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Bittremieux W. et al. Open access repository-scale propagated nearest neighbor suspect spectral library for untargeted metabolomics. Nat. Commun 14, 8488 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Jarmusch AK et al. ReDU: a framework to find and reanalyze public mass spectrometry data. Nat. Methods 17, 901–904 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Zuffa S. et al. microbeMASST: a taxonomically informed mass spectrometry search tool for microbial metabolomics data. Nat. Microbiol 9, 336–345 (2–24). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Jarmusch AK et al. A Universal Language for Finding Mass Spectrometry Data Patterns. bioRxiv (2022) doi: 10.1101/2022.08.06.503000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 142.Helf MJ, Fox BW, Artyukhin AB, Zhang YK & Schroeder FC Comparative metabolomics with Metaboseek reveals functions of a conserved fat metabolism pathway in C. elegans. Nat. Commun 13, 782 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Chen L. et al. Metabolite discovery through global annotation of untargeted metabolomics data. Nat. Methods 18, 1377–1385 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Shen X. et al. TidyMass an object-oriented reproducible analysis framework for LC-MS Data. Nat. Commun 13, 4365 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Giné R. et al. HERMES: a molecular-formula-oriented method to target the metabolome. Nat. Methods 18, 1370–1376 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Xing S, Shen S, Xu B. & Huan T. BUDDY: molecular formula discovery via bottom-up MS/MS interrogation. Nat. Methods 20, 881–890 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.van der Hooft JJJ, Wandy J, Barrett MP, Burgess KEV & Rogers S. Topic modeling for untargeted substructure exploration in metabolomics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 113, 13738–13743 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Huber F, van der Burg S, van der Hooft JJJ & Ridder L. MS2DeepScore: a novel deep learning similarity measure to compare tandem mass spectra. J. Cheminform 13, 84 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Treen DGC et al. SIMILE enables alignment of tandem mass spectra with statistical significance. Nat. Commun 13, 2510 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Cooper BT et al. Hybrid Search: A Method for Identifying Metabolites Absent from Tandem Mass Spectrometry Libraries. Anal. Chem 91, 13924–13932 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Joyce SA, Shanahan F, Hill C. & Gahan CGM Bacterial bile salt hydrolase in host metabolism: Potential for influencing gastrointestinal microbe-host crosstalk. Gut Microbes 5, 669–674 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Foley MH, O’Flaherty S, Barrangou R. & Theriot CM Bile salt hydrolases: Gatekeepers of bile acid metabolism and host-microbiome crosstalk in the gastrointestinal tract. PLoS Pathog. 15, e1007581 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Doden HL et al. Completion of the gut microbial epi-bile acid pathway. Gut Microbes 13, 1–20 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Song Z. et al. Taxonomic profiling and populational patterns of bacterial bile salt hydrolase (BSH) genes based on worldwide human gut microbiome. Microbiome 7, 9 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Daly JW, Keely SJ & Gahan CGM Functional and Phylogenetic Diversity of BSH and PVA Enzymes. Microorganisms 9, (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.O’Flaherty S, Briner Crawley A, Theriot CM & Barrangou R. The Lactobacillus Bile Salt Hydrolase Repertoire Reveals Niche-Specific Adaptation. mSphere 3, (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Dong Z. & Lee BH Bile salt hydrolases: Structure and function, substrate preference, and inhibitor development. Protein Sci. 27, 1742–1754 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Rimal B, et al. Bile salt hydrolase catalyses formation of amine-conjugated bile acids. Nature (2024). 10.1038/s41586-023-06990-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 159.Aguirre AM & Sorg JA Clostridioides difficile bile salt hydrolase activity has substrate specificity and affects biofilm formation. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 8, 94 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Fu T. et al. Paired microbiome and metabolome analyses associate bile acid changes with colorectal cancer progression. Cell Rep. 112997 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 161.Lynch JB et al. Gut microbiota Turicibacter strains differentially modify bile acids and host lipids. Nat. Commun 14, 3669 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Jones BV, Begley M, Hill C, Gahan CGM & Marchesi JR Functional and comparative metagenomic analysis of bile salt hydrolase activity in the human gut microbiome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 105, 13580–13585 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Marion S. et al. Biogeography of microbial bile acid transformations along the murine gut. J. Lipid Res 61, 1450–1463 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Duszka K. Versatile Triad Alliance: Bile Acid, Taurine and Microbiota. Cells 11, (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Lourenço R. & Camilo ME Taurine: a conditionally essential amino acid in humans? An overview in health and disease. Nutr. Hosp 17, 262–270 (2002). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Ripps H. & Shen W. Review: taurine: a ‘very essential’ amino acid. Mol. Vis 18, 2673–2686 (2012). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Adhikari AA et al. Development of a covalent inhibitor of gut bacterial bile salt hydrolases. Nat. Chem. Biol 16, 318–326 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Guzior D. et al. Bile salt hydrolase acyltransferase activity expands bile acid diversity. Nature (2024). 10.1038/s41586-024-07017-8. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 169.Linhorst A. & Lübke T. The Human Ntn-Hydrolase Superfamily: Structure, Functions and Perspectives. Cells 11, (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Garcia CJ, García-Villalba R, Beltrán D, Frutos-Lisón MD & Tomás-Barberán FA MS/MS fragmentation pattern analysis confirms the production of the new esterified bile acids by the human gut microbiota. bioRxiv (2023) doi: 10.1101/2023.11.07.564921. [DOI]
  • 171.Vavassori P, Mencarelli A, Renga B, Distrutti E. & Fiorucci S. The bile acid receptor FXR is a modulator of intestinal innate immunity. J. Immunol 183, 6251–6261 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Pols TWH et al. TGR5 activation inhibits atherosclerosis by reducing macrophage inflammation and lipid loading. Cell Metab. 14, 747–757 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Fiorucci S, Biagioli M, Zampella A. & Distrutti E. Bile Acids Activated Receptors Regulate Innate Immunity. Front. Immunol 9, 1853 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Hu J. et al. Gut microbiota-mediated secondary bile acids regulate dendritic cells to attenuate autoimmune uveitis through TGR5 signaling. Cell Rep. 36, 109726 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Arifuzzaman M. et al. Inulin fibre promotes microbiota-derived bile acids and type 2 inflammation. Nature 611, 578–584 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Ma C. et al. Gut microbiome-mediated bile acid metabolism regulates liver cancer via NKT cells. Science 360, (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Qi X. et al. Gut microbiota-bile acid-interleukin-22 axis orchestrates polycystic ovary syndrome. Nat. Med 25, 1225–1233 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Yanguas-Casás N, Barreda-Manso MA, Nieto-Sampedro M. & Romero-Ramírez L. TUDCA: An Agonist of the Bile Acid Receptor GPBAR1/TGR5 With Anti-Inflammatory Effects in Microglial Cells. J. Cell. Physiol 232, 2231–2245 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Campbell C. et al. Bacterial metabolism of bile acids promotes generation of peripheral regulatory T cells. Nature 581, 475–479 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Paik D. et al. Human gut bacteria produce ΤΗ17-modulating bile acid metabolites. Nature 603, 907–912 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Xiao R. et al. Synthesis and identification of lithocholic acid 3-sulfate as RORγt ligand to inhibit Th17 cell differentiation. J. Leukoc. Biol 112, 835–843 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Haring E. et al. Bile acids regulate intestinal antigen presentation and reduce graft-versus-host disease without impairing the graft-versus-leukemia effect. Haematologica 106, 2131–2146 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Yan Y. et al. Bacteroides uniformis-induced perturbations in colonic microbiota and bile acid levels inhibit TH17 differentiation and ameliorate colitis developments. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 9, 56 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Dubrac S, Elentner A, Ebner S, Horejs-Hoeck J. & Schmuth M. Modulation of T lymphocyte function by the pregnane X receptor. J. Immunol 184, 2949–2957 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Gutiérrez-Vázquez C. & Quintana FJ Regulation of the Immune Response by the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor. Immunity 48, 19–33 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Godlewska U, Bulanda E. & Wypych TP Bile acids in immunity: Bidirectional mediators between the host and the microbiota. Front. Immunol 13, 949033 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Albone ES & Fox MW Anal gland secretion of the red fox. Nature 233, 569–570 (1971). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Salamon M. & Davies NW Identification and Variation of Volatile Compounds in Sternal Gland Secretions of Male Koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus). J. Chem. Ecol 24, 1659–1676 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Albone ES Mammalian semiochemistry: The investigation of chemical signals between mammals. (Wiley–Blackwell, 1984). [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Hagey L. & MacDonald E. Chemical cues identify gender and individuality in Giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca). J. Chem. Ecol 29, 1479–1488 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Lin S. et al. Bile acids and their receptors in regulation of gut health and diseases. Prog. Lipid Res 89, 101210 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Perino A, Demagny H, Velazquez-Villegas L. & Schoonjans K. Molecular Physiology of Bile Acid Signaling in Health, Disease, and Aging. Physiol. Rev 101, 683–731 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Petzinger E, Wickboldt A, Pagels P, Starke D. & Kramer W. Hepatobiliary transport of bile acid amino acid, bile acid peptide, and bile acid oligonucleotide conjugates in rats. Hepatology 30, 1257–1268 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Kågedahl M. et al. Use of the intestinal bile acid transporter for the uptake of cholic acid conjugates with HIV-1 protease inhibitory activity. Pharm. Res 14, 176–180 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Lei K. et al. Research progress in the application of bile acid-drug conjugates: A ‘trojan horse’ strategy. Steroids 173, 108879 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Rolo AP, Oliveira PJ, Moreno AJ & Palmeira CM Bile acids affect liver mitochondrial bioenergetics: possible relevance for cholestasis therapy. Toxicol. Sci 57, 177–185 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Naviaux RK et al. Metabolic features of chronic fatigue syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 113, E5472–80 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Miyazaki T. et al. Impaired bile acid metabolism with defectives of mitochondrial-tRNA taurine modification and bile acid taurine conjugation in the taurine depleted cats. Sci. Rep 10, 4915 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Bland JS Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Functional Mitochondriopathy, and Enterohepatic Dysfunction. Integr. Med 16, 18–21 (2017). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Germain A, Ruppert D, Levine SM & Hanson MR Metabolic profiling of a myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome discovery cohort reveals disturbances in fatty acid and lipid metabolism. Mol. Biosyst 13, 371–379 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Huth TK, Eaton-Fitch N, Staines D. & Marshall-Gradisnik S. A systematic review of metabolomic dysregulation in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Systemic Exertion Intolerance Disease (CFS/ME/SEID). J. Transl. Med 18, 198 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Guo G. Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Emerges as Novel Regulator for Bile Acid Synthesis. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 3, 135 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Byrne A-M et al. Bile acids modulate the Golgi membrane fission process via a protein kinase Ceta and protein kinase D-dependent pathway in colonic epithelial cells. Carcinogenesis 31, 737–744 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Byrne A-M et al. Golgi phosphoprotein 2 (GOLPH2) is a novel bile acid-responsive modulator of oesophageal cell migration and invasion. Br. J. Cancer 113, 1332–1342 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Busquets-García A, Bolaños JP & Marsicano G. Metabolic Messengers: endocannabinoids. Nat Metab 4, 848–855 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Rezende B, Alencar AKN, de Bem GF, Fontes-Dantas FL & Montes GC Endocannabinoid System: Chemical Characteristics and Biological Activity. Pharmaceuticals 16, (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Pluskal T, Castillo S, Villar-Briones A. & Oresic M. MZmine 2: modular framework for processing, visualizing, and analyzing mass spectrometry-based molecular profile data. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 395 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Tsugawa H. et al. MS-DIAL: data-independent MS/MS deconvolution for comprehensive metabolome analysis. Nat. Methods 12, 523–526 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Tautenhahn R, Böttcher C. & Neumann S. Highly sensitive feature detection for high resolution LC/MS. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 504 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Röst HL et al. OpenMS: a flexible open-source software platform for mass spectrometry data analysis. Nat. Methods 13, 741–748 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Yuan M, Breitkopf SB, Yang X. & Asara JM A positive/negative ion-switching, targeted mass spectrometry-based metabolomics platform for bodily fluids, cells, and fresh and fixed tissue. Nat. Protoc 7, 872–881 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Luo M. et al. A mass spectrum-oriented computational method for ion mobility-resolved untargeted metabolomics. Nat. Commun 14, 1813 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Kimura A. et al. Perinatal bile acid metabolism: analysis of urinary bile acids in pregnant women and newborns. J. Lipid Res 38, 1954–1962 (1997). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Petersen AØ et al. Conjugated C-6 hydroxylated bile acids in serum relate to human metabolic health and gut Clostridia species. Sci. Rep 11, 13252 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Al-Aboudi A. et al. Biotransformation of methyl cholate by Aspergillus niger. Steroids 74, 483–486 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Ridlon JM, Daniel SL & Gaskins HR The Hylemon-Björkhem pathway of bile acid 7-dehydroxylation: history, biochemistry, and microbiology. J. Lipid Res 64, 100392 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Devendran S. et al. Clostridium scindens ATCC 35704: Integration of Nutritional Requirements, the Complete Genome Sequence, and Global Transcriptional Responses to Bile Acids. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 85, (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Kim KH et al. Identification and Characterization of Major Bile Acid 7α-Dehydroxylating Bacteria in the Human Gut. mSystems 7, e0045522 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Lepercq P. et al. Epimerization of chenodeoxycholic acid to ursodeoxycholic acid by Clostridium baratii isolated from human feces. FEMS Microbiol. Lett 235, 65–72 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.González PM, Lagos CF, Ward WC & Polli JE Structural requirements of the human sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (hASBT): role of 3- and 7-OH moieties on binding and translocation of bile acids. Mol. Pharm 11, 588–598 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Hirano S. & Masuda N. Transformation of bile acids by Eubacterium lentum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 42, 912–915 (1981). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Hirano S, Masuda N, Oda H. & Mukai H. Transformation of bile acids by Clostridium perfringens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 42, 394–399 (1981). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Macdonald IA et al. Metabolism of primary bile acids by Clostridium perfringens. J. Steroid Biochem 18, 97–104 (1983). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Devlin AS & Fischbach MA A biosynthetic pathway for a prominent class of microbiota-derived bile acids. Nat. Chem. Biol 11, 685–690 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Harris SC et al. Bile acid oxidation by Eggerthella lenta strains C592 and DSM 2243T. Gut Microbes 9, 523–539 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Bhowmik S. et al. Structural and functional characterization of BaiA, an enzyme involved in secondary bile acid synthesis in human gut microbe. Proteins 82, 216–229 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Bai Y, Zhao T, Gao M, Zou Y. & Lei X. A Novel Gene Alignment in Dorea sp. AM58–8 Produces 7-Dehydroxy-3β Bile Acids from Primary Bile Acids. Biochemistry 61, 2870–2878 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Kang D-J, Ridlon JM, Moore DR 2nd, Barnes S. & Hylemon PB Clostridium scindens baiCD and baiH genes encode stereo-specific 7alpha/7beta-hydroxy-3-oxo-delta4-cholenoic acid oxidoreductases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1781, 16–25 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Dawson JA, Mallonee DH, Björkhem I. & Hylemon PB Expression and characterization of a C24 bile acid 7 alpha-dehydratase from Eubacterium sp. strain VPI 12708 in Escherichia coli. J. Lipid Res 37, 1258–1267 (1996). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Ridlon JM, Kang D-J & Hylemon PB Isolation and characterization of a bile acid inducible 7alpha-dehydroxylating operon in Clostridium hylemonae TN271. Anaerobe 16, 137–146 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Harris SC et al. Identification of a gene encoding a flavoprotein involved in bile acid metabolism by the human gut bacterium Clostridium scindens ATCC 35704. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 1863, 276–283 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Falany CN, Johnson MR, Barnes S. & Diasio RB Glycine and taurine conjugation of bile acids by a single enzyme. Molecular cloning and expression of human liver bile acid CoA:amino acid N-acyltransferase. J. Biol. Chem 269, 19375–19379 (1994). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Mohanty I. et al. The Underappreciated Diversity of Bile Acid Modifications. (2023) doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4436846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 234.Mullowney MW et al. Microbially-catalyzed conjugation of GABA and tyramine to bile acids. J. Bacteriol 206, e00426–23 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Haslewood GA & Tökés L. Comparative studies of bile salts. Bile salts of the lamprey Petromyzon marinus L. Biochem. J 114, 179–184 (1969). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Hagey LR, Takagi K, Schteingart CD, H-T T-N & Hofmann AF C24 bile acid reduction into bile alcohols: a novel ubiquitous minor pathway of cholesterol elimination in vertebrates. Hepatology 20, 263A (1994). [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Moore KS et al. Squalamine: an aminosterol antibiotic from the shark. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 90, 1354–1358 (1993). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Weininger D. SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. J. Chem. Inf. Model 28, 31–36 (1988). [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Mungall CJ, Torniai C, Gkoutos GV, Lewis SE & Haendel MA Uberon, an integrative multi-species anatomy ontology. Genome Biol. 13, R5 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Baldarelli RM et al. The mouse Gene Expression Database (GXD): 2021 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D924–D931 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Gadaleta RM et al. Farnesoid X receptor activation inhibits inflammation and preserves the intestinal barrier in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 60, 463–472 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Zhang R. et al. Overview of bile acid signaling in the cardiovascular system. World J Clin Cases 9, 308–320 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Hofmann AF Bile Acids: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. News Physiol. Sci 14, 24–29 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.James SC et al. Concentrations of Fecal Bile Acids in Participants with Functional Gut Disorders and Healthy Controls. Metabolites 11, (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Hamilton JP et al. Human cecal bile acids: concentration and spectrum. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol 293, G256–63 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Trottier J. et al. Profiling serum bile acid glucuronides in humans: gender divergences, genetic determinants, and response to fenofibrate. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther 94, 533–543 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Choucair I. et al. Quantification of bile acids: a mass spectrometry platform for studying gut microbe connection to metabolic diseases. J. Lipid Res 61, 159–177 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248.Hofmann AF The continuing importance of bile acids in liver and intestinal disease. Arch. Intern. Med 159, 2647–2658 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.Batta AK et al. Characterization of serum and urinary bile acids in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis by gas-liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry: effect of ursodeoxycholic acid treatment. J. Lipid Res 30, 1953–1962 (1989). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250.Tadano T, Kanoh M, Matsumoto M, Sakamoto K. & Kamano T. Studies of serum and feces bile acids determination by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Rinsho Byori 54, 103–110 (2006). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251.Meier KHU et al. Metabolic landscape of the male mouse gut identifies different niches determined by microbial activities. Nat Metab 5, 968–980 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252.Sangaraju D. et al. Establishment of baseline profiles of 50 bile acids in preclinical toxicity species: A comprehensive assessment of translational differences and study design considerations for biomarker development. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol 443, 116008 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253.McRae M. et al. Plasma bile acid concentrations in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection receiving protease inhibitor therapy: possible implications for hepatotoxicity. Pharmacotherapy 30, 17–24 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254.Steiner C. et al. Bile acid metabolites in serum: intraindividual variation and associations with coronary heart disease, metabolic syndrome and diabetes mellitus. PLoS One 6, e25006 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255.Danese E. et al. Middle-distance running acutely influences the concentration and composition of serum bile acids: Potential implications for cancer risk? Oncotarget 8, 52775–52782 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256.Perez-Muñoz ME, Arrieta M-C, Ramer-Tait AE & Walter J. A critical assessment of the ‘sterile womb’ and ‘in utero colonization’ hypotheses: implications for research on the pioneer infant microbiome. Microbiome 5, 48 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257.Lester R, St Pyrek J, Little JM & Adcock EW Diversity of bile acids in the fetus and newborn infant. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr 2, 355–364 (1983). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258.Wang Y, Yutuc E. & Griffiths WJ Cholesterol metabolism pathways - are the intermediates more important than the products? FEBS J. 288, 3727–3745 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259.Blassberg R, Macrae JI, Briscoe J. & Jacob J. Reduced cholesterol levels impair Smoothened activation in Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet 25, 693–705 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260.Lundell K. & Wikvall K. Species-specific and age-dependent bile acid composition: aspects on CYP8B and CYP4A subfamilies in bile acid biosynthesis. Curr. Drug Metab 9, 323–331 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 261.Forsyth JS, Ross PE & Bouchier IA Bile salts in breast milk. Eur. J. Pediatr 140, 126–127 (1983). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262.van Best N. et al. Bile acids drive the newborn’s gut microbiota maturation. Nat. Commun 11, 3692 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263.Sheps JA, Wang R, Wang J. & Ling V. The protective role of hydrophilic tetrahydroxylated bile acids (THBA). Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 1866, 158925 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 264.Patton L. et al. Antibiotics Effects on the Fecal Metabolome in Preterm Infants. Metabolites 10, (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265.Uzan-Yulzari A. et al. Neonatal antibiotic exposure impairs child growth during the first six years of life by perturbing intestinal microbial colonization. Nat. Commun 12, 443 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 266.Russell JT et al. Antibiotics and the developing intestinal microbiome, metabolome and inflammatory environment in a randomized trial of preterm infants. Sci. Rep 11, 1943 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267.Shane A. Missing Microbes: How the Overuse of Antibiotics Is Fueling Our Modern Plagues. Emerg. Infect. Dis 20, 1961 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 268.Lamichhane S. et al. Dynamics of gut microbiome – mediated bile acid metabolism in progression to islet autoimmunity. medRxiv (2021) doi: 10.1101/2021.08.20.21262371. [DOI]
  • 269.Singla P. & Salunke DB Recent advances in steroid amino acid conjugates: Old scaffolds with new dimensions. Eur. J. Med. Chem 187, 111909 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270.Lee G, Lee H, Hong J, Lee SH & Jung BH Quantitative profiling of bile acids in rat bile using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-orbitrap mass spectrometry: Alteration of the bile acid composition with aging. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci 1031, 37–49 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271.Bárcena C. et al. Healthspan and lifespan extension by fecal microbiota transplantation into progeroid mice. Nat. Med 25, 1234–1242 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272.Marksteiner J, Blasko I, Kemmler G, Koal T. & Humpel C. Bile acid quantification of 20 plasma metabolites identifies lithocholic acid as a putative biomarker in Alzheimer’s disease. Metabolomics 14, 1 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273.Ghosh TS, Shanahan F. & O’Toole PW The gut microbiome as a modulator of healthy ageing. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol 19, 565–584 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274.Connell E. et al. Microbial-derived metabolites as a risk factor of age-related cognitive decline and dementia. Mol. Neurodegener 17, 43 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275.Adachi R. et al. Selective activation of vitamin D receptor by lithocholic acid acetate, a bile acid derivative. J. Lipid Res 46, 46–57 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276.Ichikawa T, Horie-Inoue K, Ikeda K, Blumberg B. & Inoue S. Steroid and xenobiotic receptor SXR mediates vitamin K2-activated transcription of extracellular matrix-related genes and collagen accumulation in osteoblastic cells. J. Biol. Chem 281, 16927–16934 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 277.Xie W. et al. An essential role for nuclear receptors SXR/PXR in detoxification of cholestatic bile acids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 98, 3375–3380 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 278.Vrbanac A. et al. Evaluating Organism-Wide Changes in the Metabolome and Microbiome following a Single Dose of Antibiotic. mSystems 5, e00340–20 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 279.Frommherz L. et al. Age-Related Changes of Plasma Bile Acid Concentrations in Healthy Adults--Results from the Cross-Sectional KarMeN Study. PLoS One 11, e0153959 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 280.Zhang Y, Limaye PB, Renaud HJ & Klaassen CD Effect of various antibiotics on modulation of intestinal microbiota and bile acid profile in mice. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol 277, 138–145 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 281.Vrieze A. et al. Impact of oral vancomycin on gut microbiota, bile acid metabolism, and insulin sensitivity. J. Hepatol 60, 824–831 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 282.Sato Y. et al. Novel bile acid biosynthetic pathways are enriched in the microbiome of centenarians. Nature 599, 458–464 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 283.Beach A. et al. Lithocholic bile acid accumulated in yeast mitochondria orchestrates a development of an anti-aging cellular pattern by causing age-related changes in cellular proteome. Cell Cycle 14, 1643–1656 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 284.Buffie CG et al. Precision microbiome reconstitution restores bile acid mediated resistance to Clostridium difficile. Nature 517, 205–208 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 285.Thanissery R, Winston JA & Theriot CM Inhibition of spore germination, growth, and toxin activity of clinically relevant C. difficile strains by gut microbiota derived secondary bile acids. Anaerobe 45, 86–100 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 286.Sorg JA & Sonenshein AL Inhibiting the initiation of Clostridium difficile spore germination using analogs of chenodeoxycholic acid, a bile acid. J. Bacteriol 192, 4983–4990 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 287.Merrill JR et al. Hepatic biotransformation in rodents and physicochemical properties of 23(R)-hydroxychenodeoxycholic acid, a natural alpha-hydroxy bile acid. J. Lipid Res 37, 98–112 (1996). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 288.Lance VA, Patton ML & Hagey LR Identification of a series of C21O2 pregnanes from fecal extracts of a pregnant black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis minor). Steroids 66, 875–881 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 289.Yücel O, Borgert SR, Poehlein A, Niermann K. & Philipp B. The 7α-hydroxysteroid dehydratase Hsh2 is essential for anaerobic degradation of the steroid skeleton of 7α-hydroxyl bile salts in the novel denitrifying bacterium Azoarcus sp. strain Aa7. Environ. Microbiol 21, 800–813 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 290.Park RJ Phenolic 9,10-secosteroids as products of the catabolism of bile acids by a Pseudomonas sp. Steroids 44, 175–193 (1984). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 291.Hylemon PB, Melone PD, Franklund CV, Lund E. & Björkhem I. Mechanism of intestinal 7 alpha-dehydroxylation of cholic acid: evidence that allo-deoxycholic acid is an inducible side-product. J. Lipid Res 32, 89–96 (1991). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 292.Jeyaraj R. et al. The Genetics of Inherited Cholestatic Disorders in Neonates and Infants: Evolving Challenges. Genes 12, (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 293.Sundaram SS, Bove KE, Lovell MA & Sokol RJ Mechanisms of disease: Inborn errors of bile acid synthesis. Nat. Clin. Pract. Gastroenterol. Hepatol 5, 456–468 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 294.Fan Y. & Pedersen O. Gut microbiota in human metabolic health and disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 19, 55–71 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 295.Vijay A. & Valdes AM Role of the gut microbiome in chronic diseases: a narrative review. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr 76, 489–501 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 296.Gough EK The impact of mass drug administration of antibiotics on the gut microbiota of target populations. Infect. Dis. Poverty 11, 76 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 297.Yatsunenko T. et al. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature 486, 222–227 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 298.Bloemendaal M. et al. Probiotics-induced changes in gut microbial composition and its effects on cognitive performance after stress: exploratory analyses. Transl. Psychiatry 11, 300 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SI

Data Availability Statement

Structural databases referred to in Figure 2 and BOX 1 can be accessed and downloaded from https://hmdb.ca/downloads (HMDB), https://gnps-external.ucsd.edu/gnpslibrary (BILELIB19), and https://www.lipidmaps.org/data/structure/download.php (LIPIDMAPS).

The source code used for generation of Figure 2 and BOX 1 can be accessed at https://github.com/YasinEl/Bile_Acid_Review_2022; Figures 3a, b, 4, can be accessed at https://github.com/mohantyipsita/Bile_Acid_Review_2022; Figures 3(c, d) can be accessed at https://github.com/callaband/Bile_Acid_Review_2022

RESOURCES