Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1996 Jan;70(1):418–429. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79585-1

Directional loading of the kinesin motor molecule as it buckles a microtubule.

F Gittes 1, E Meyhöfer 1, S Baek 1, J Howard 1
PMCID: PMC1224940  PMID: 8770218

Abstract

Single kinesin motor molecules were observed to buckle the microtubules along which they moved in a modified in vitro gliding assay. In this assay a central portion of the microtubule was clamped to the glass substrate via biotin-streptavidin bonds, while the plus end of the microtubule was free to interact with motors adsorbed at low density to the substrate. A statistical analysis of the length of microtubules buckled by single motors showed a decreasing probability of buckling for loads greater than 4-6 pN parallel to the filament. This is consistent with kinesin stalling forces found in other experiments. A detailed analysis of some buckling events allowed us to estimate both the magnitude and direction of the loading force as it developed a perpendicular component tending to pull the motor away from the microtubule. We also estimated the motor speed as a function of this changing vector force. The kinesin motors consistently reached unexpectedly high speeds as the force became nonparallel to the direction of motor movement. Our results suggest that a perpendicular component of load does not hinder the kinesin motor, but on the contrary causes the motor to move faster against a given parallel load. Because the perpendicular force component speeds up the motor but does no net work, perpendicular force acts as a mechanical catalyst for the reaction. A simple explanation is that there is a spatial motion of the kinesin molecule during its cycle that is rate-limiting under load; mechanical catalysis results if this motion is oriented away from the surface of the microtubule.

Full text

PDF
418

Images in this article

419FIGURE 2
on p.419

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen R. D., Weiss D. G., Hayden J. H., Brown D. T., Fujiwake H., Simpson M. Gliding movement of and bidirectional transport along single native microtubules from squid axoplasm: evidence for an active role of microtubules in cytoplasmic transport. J Cell Biol. 1985 May;100(5):1736–1752. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.5.1736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amos L. A., Amos W. B. The bending of sliding microtubules imaged by confocal light microscopy and negative stain electron microscopy. J Cell Sci Suppl. 1991;14:95–101. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1991.supplement_14.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Block S. M., Goldstein L. S., Schnapp B. J. Bead movement by single kinesin molecules studied with optical tweezers. Nature. 1990 Nov 22;348(6299):348–352. doi: 10.1038/348348a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bourdieu L, Duke T, Elowitz MB, Winkelmann DA, Leibler S, Libchaber A. Spiral defects in motility assays: A measure of motor protein force. Phys Rev Lett. 1995 Jul 3;75(1):176–179. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brady S. T. A novel brain ATPase with properties expected for the fast axonal transport motor. Nature. 1985 Sep 5;317(6032):73–75. doi: 10.1038/317073a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chrétien D., Metoz F., Verde F., Karsenti E., Wade R. H. Lattice defects in microtubules: protofilament numbers vary within individual microtubules. J Cell Biol. 1992 Jun;117(5):1031–1040. doi: 10.1083/jcb.117.5.1031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gittes F., Mickey B., Nettleton J., Howard J. Flexural rigidity of microtubules and actin filaments measured from thermal fluctuations in shape. J Cell Biol. 1993 Feb;120(4):923–934. doi: 10.1083/jcb.120.4.923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HUXLEY A. F. Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem. 1957;7:255–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hill T. L. Theoretical formalism for the sliding filament model of contraction of striated muscle. Part I. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1974;28:267–340. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(74)90020-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Howard J., Hudspeth A. J., Vale R. D. Movement of microtubules by single kinesin molecules. Nature. 1989 Nov 9;342(6246):154–158. doi: 10.1038/342154a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Howard J., Hunt A. J., Baek S. Assay of microtubule movement driven by single kinesin molecules. Methods Cell Biol. 1993;39:137–147. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60167-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Howard J., Hyman A. A. Preparation of marked microtubules for the assay of the polarity of microtubule-based motors by fluorescence microscopy. Methods Cell Biol. 1993;39:105–113. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60164-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hunt A. J., Gittes F., Howard J. The force exerted by a single kinesin molecule against a viscous load. Biophys J. 1994 Aug;67(2):766–781. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80537-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hunt A. J., Howard J. Kinesin swivels to permit microtubule movement in any direction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Dec 15;90(24):11653–11657. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.24.11653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hyman A., Drechsel D., Kellogg D., Salser S., Sawin K., Steffen P., Wordeman L., Mitchison T. Preparation of modified tubulins. Methods Enzymol. 1991;196:478–485. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)96041-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Leibler S., Huse D. A. Porters versus rowers: a unified stochastic model of motor proteins. J Cell Biol. 1993 Jun;121(6):1357–1368. doi: 10.1083/jcb.121.6.1357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Meyhöfer E., Howard J. The force generated by a single kinesin molecule against an elastic load. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jan 17;92(2):574–578. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.2.574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Peskin C. S., Oster G. Coordinated hydrolysis explains the mechanical behavior of kinesin. Biophys J. 1995 Apr;68(4 Suppl):202S–211S. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ray S., Meyhöfer E., Milligan R. A., Howard J. Kinesin follows the microtubule's protofilament axis. J Cell Biol. 1993 Jun;121(5):1083–1093. doi: 10.1083/jcb.121.5.1083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Svoboda K., Block S. M. Force and velocity measured for single kinesin molecules. Cell. 1994 Jun 3;77(5):773–784. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90060-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Vale R. D., Reese T. S., Sheetz M. P. Identification of a novel force-generating protein, kinesin, involved in microtubule-based motility. Cell. 1985 Aug;42(1):39–50. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80099-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wagner M. C., Pfister K. K., Brady S. T., Bloom G. S. Purification of kinesin from bovine brain and assay of microtubule-stimulated ATPase activity. Methods Enzymol. 1991;196:157–175. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)96016-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Weingarten M. D., Suter M. M., Littman D. R., Kirschner M. W. Properties of the depolymerization products of microtubules from mammalian brain. Biochemistry. 1974 Dec 31;13(27):5529–5537. doi: 10.1021/bi00724a012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES