Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1996 Feb;70(2):654–668. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79606-6

Quantal transmitter release at somatic motor-nerve terminals: stochastic analysis of the subunit hypothesis.

M R Bennett 1, L Farnell 1, W G Gibson 1
PMCID: PMC1224966  PMID: 8789083

Abstract

Here we analyze the problem of determining whether experimentally measured spontaneous miniature end-plate currents (MEPCs) indicate that quanta are composed of subunits. The properties of MEPCs at end plates with or without secondary clefts at the neuromuscular junction are investigated, using both stochastic and deterministic models of the action of a quantum of transmitter. It is shown that as the amount of transmitter in a quantum is increased above about 4000 acetylcholine (ACh) molecules there is a linear increase in the size of the MEPC. It is possible to then use amplitude-frequency histograms of such MEPCs to detect a subunit structure, as there is little potentiation effect above 4000 ACh molecules. Autocorrelation and power spectral analyses of such histograms establish that their subunit structure can be detected if the coefficient of variation of the subunit size is less than about 0.12 or, if electrical noise is added, about 0.1. Positive gradients relate the rise time and half-decay times of MEPCs to their amplitude, even in the absence of potentiating effects; these gradients are shallower at motor nerve terminals that possess secondary clefts. The effect of asynchronous release of subunits is also investigated. The criteria determined by this analysis for identifying a subunit composition in the quantum are applied to an amplitude-frequency histogram of MEPCs recorded from a small group of active zones at a visualized amphibian motor-nerve terminal. This did not provide evidence for a subunit structure.

Full text

PDF
654

Images in this article

666FIGURE 18
on p.666

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Auerbach A. A statistical analysis of acetylcholine receptor activation in Xenopus myocytes: stepwise versus concerted models of gating. J Physiol. 1993 Feb;461:339–378. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartol T. M., Jr, Land B. R., Salpeter E. E., Salpeter M. M. Monte Carlo simulation of miniature endplate current generation in the vertebrate neuromuscular junction. Biophys J. 1991 Jun;59(6):1290–1307. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82344-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bennett M. R., Jones P., Lavidis N. A. The probability of quantal secretion along visualized terminal branches at amphibian (Bufo marinus) neuromuscular synapses. J Physiol. 1986 Oct;379:257–274. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bennett M. R., Pettigrew A. G. The formation of synapses in amphibian striated muscle during development. J Physiol. 1975 Oct;252(1):203–239. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carlson C. G., Kriebel M. E. Neostigmine increases the size of subunits composing the quantum of transmitter release at mouse neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1985 Oct;367:489–502. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cherki-Vakil R., Ginsburg S., Meiri H. The difference in shape of spontaneous and uniquantal evoked synaptic potentials in frog muscle. J Physiol. 1995 Feb 1;482(Pt 3):641–650. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Edwards F. A., Konnerth A., Sakmann B. Quantal analysis of inhibitory synaptic transmission in the dentate gyrus of rat hippocampal slices: a patch-clamp study. J Physiol. 1990 Nov;430:213–249. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Erxleben C., Kriebel M. E. Characteristics of spontaneous miniature and subminiature end-plate currents at the mouse neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1988 Jun;400:645–658. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Garcia-Segura L. M., Muller D., Dunant Y. Increase in the number of presynaptic large intramembrane particles during synaptic transmission at the Torpedo nerve-electroplaque junction. Neuroscience. 1986 Sep;19(1):63–79. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(86)90006-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Girod R., Corrèges P., Jacquet J., Dunant Y. Space and time characteristics of transmitter release at the nerve-electroplaque junction of Torpedo. J Physiol. 1993 Nov;471:129–157. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hamill O. P., Sakmann B. Multiple conductance states of single acetylcholine receptor channels in embryonic muscle cells. Nature. 1981 Dec 3;294(5840):462–464. doi: 10.1038/294462a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hartzell H. C., Kuffler S. W., Yoshikami D. Post-synaptic potentiation: interaction between quanta of acetylcholine at the skeletal neuromuscular synapse. J Physiol. 1975 Oct;251(2):427–463. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Katz B., Miledi R. The binding of acetylcholine to receptors and its removal from the synaptic cleft. J Physiol. 1973 Jun;231(3):549–574. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Khanin R., Parnas H., Segel L. Diffusion cannot govern the discharge of neurotransmitter in fast synapses. Biophys J. 1994 Sep;67(3):966–972. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80562-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kriebel M. E., Gross C. E. Multimodal distribution of frog miniature endplate potentials in adult denervated and tadpole leg muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1974 Jul;64(1):85–103. doi: 10.1085/jgp.64.1.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kriebel M. E., Llados F., Matteson D. R. Histograms of the unitary evoked potential of the mouse diaphragm show multiple peaks. J Physiol. 1982 Jan;322:211–222. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Land B. R., Harris W. V., Salpeter E. E., Salpeter M. M. Diffusion and binding constants for acetylcholine derived from the falling phase of miniature endplate currents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Mar;81(5):1594–1598. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.5.1594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Land B. R., Salpeter E. E., Salpeter M. M. Acetylcholine receptor site density affects the rising phase of miniature endplate currents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jun;77(6):3736–3740. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.6.3736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Land B. R., Salpeter E. E., Salpeter M. M. Kinetic parameters for acetylcholine interaction in intact neuromuscular junction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Nov;78(11):7200–7204. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.11.7200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Linder T. M., Pennefather P., Quastel D. M. The time course of miniature endplate currents and its modification by receptor blockade and ethanol. J Gen Physiol. 1984 Mar;83(3):435–468. doi: 10.1085/jgp.83.3.435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Magleby K. L., Miller D. C. Is the quantum of transmitter release composed of subunits? A critical analysis in the mouse and frog. J Physiol. 1981 Feb;311:267–287. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Matteson D. R., Kriebel M. E., Llados F. A statistical model indicates that miniature end-plate potentials and unitary evoked end-plate potentials are composed of subunits. J Theor Biol. 1981 Jun 7;90(3):337–363. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(81)90316-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Monck J. R., Fernandez J. M. The exocytotic fusion pore and neurotransmitter release. Neuron. 1994 Apr;12(4):707–716. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90325-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Vautrin J., Kriebel M. E. Characteristics of slow-miniature endplate currents show a subunit composition. Neuroscience. 1991;41(1):71–88. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(91)90201-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Vautrin J., Schaffner A. E., Fontas B., Barker J. L. Frequency modulation of transmitter release. J Physiol Paris. 1993;87(1):51–73. doi: 10.1016/0928-4257(93)90024-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Vautrin J. Subunits in quantal transmission at the mouse neuromuscular junction: tests of peak intervals in amplitude distributions. J Theor Biol. 1986 Jun 7;120(3):363–370. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(86)80207-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Walrond J. P., Reese T. S. Structure of axon terminals and active zones at synapses on lizard twitch and tonic muscle fibers. J Neurosci. 1985 May;5(5):1118–1131. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-05-01118.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wathey J. C., Nass M. M., Lester H. A. Numerical reconstruction of the quantal event at nicotinic synapses. Biophys J. 1979 Jul;27(1):145–164. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(79)85208-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES