Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1996 Mar;70(3):1096–1104. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79675-3

Factors influencing accuracy of computer-built models: a study based on leucine zipper GCN4 structure.

L Shen 1, R E Bruccoleri 1, S Krystek 1, J Novotny 1
PMCID: PMC1225039  PMID: 8785269

Abstract

A three-dimensional model of the leucine zipper GCN4 built from its amino acid sequence had been reported previously by us. When the two alternative x-ray structures of the GCN4 dimer became available, the root mean square (r.m.s.) shifts between our model and the structures were determined as approximately 2.7 A on all atoms. These values are similar to the r.m.s. shift of 2.8 A between the two GCN4 structures in the different crystal forms (C2 and P2(1)2(1)2(1)). CONGEN conformational searches were run to better understand the conditions that may determine the preference of different conformers in different environments and to test the sensitivity of our current modeling techniques. With a judicious choice of CONGEN search parameters, the backbone r.m.s. deviation improved to 0.8 A and 2.5 A on all atoms. The side-chain conformations of Val and Leu at the helical interface were well reproduced (1.2 A r.m.s.), and the large side-chain misplacements occurred with only a small number of charged amino acids and a tyrosine. Inclusion of the crystal environment (C2 symmetry), as a passive background, into the side-chain conformational search further improved the accuracy of the model to an r.m.s. deviation of 2.1 A. Conformational searches carried out in the two different crystal environments and employing the AMBER protein/DNA forcefield, as implemented in CONGEN, gave the r.m.s. values of 2.2 A (for the C2 symmetry) and 2.5 A (for the P2(1)2(1)2(1) symmetry). In the C2 symmetry crystal, as much as 40% of the surface of each dimer was involved in crystal contacts with other dimers, and the charged residues on the surface often interacted with immobilized water molecules. Thus, occasional large r.m.s. deviations between the model and the x-ray side chains were due to specific conditions that did not occur in solution.

Full text

PDF
1096

Images in this article

1097FIGURE 1
on p.1097
1097FIGURE 2
on p.1097
1102FIGURE 6
on p.1102
1102FIGURE 7
on p.1102
1104FIGURE 9
on p.1104

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bruccoleri R. E., Haber E., Novotný J. Structure of antibody hypervariable loops reproduced by a conformational search algorithm. Nature. 1988 Oct 6;335(6190):564–568. doi: 10.1038/335564a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bruccoleri R. E., Karplus M. Prediction of the folding of short polypeptide segments by uniform conformational sampling. Biopolymers. 1987 Jan;26(1):137–168. doi: 10.1002/bip.360260114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bruccoleri R. E., Novotny J., Keck P., Cohen C. Two-stranded alpha-helical coiled-coils of fibrous proteins: theoretical analysis of supercoil formation. Biophys J. 1986 Jan;49(1):79–81. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(86)83601-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DeLano W. L., Brünger A. T. Helix packing in proteins: prediction and energetic analysis of dimeric, trimeric, and tetrameric GCN4 coiled coil structures. Proteins. 1994 Oct;20(2):105–123. doi: 10.1002/prot.340200202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ellenberger T. E., Brandl C. J., Struhl K., Harrison S. C. The GCN4 basic region leucine zipper binds DNA as a dimer of uninterrupted alpha helices: crystal structure of the protein-DNA complex. Cell. 1992 Dec 24;71(7):1223–1237. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(05)80070-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Harris N. L., Presnell S. R., Cohen F. E. Four helix bundle diversity in globular proteins. J Mol Biol. 1994 Mar 11;236(5):1356–1368. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(94)90063-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Junius F. K., Mackay J. P., Bubb W. A., Jensen S. A., Weiss A. S., King G. F. Nuclear magnetic resonance characterization of the Jun leucine zipper domain: unusual properties of coiled-coil interfacial polar residues. Biochemistry. 1995 May 9;34(18):6164–6174. doi: 10.1021/bi00018a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kouzarides T., Ziff E. The role of the leucine zipper in the fos-jun interaction. Nature. 1988 Dec 15;336(6200):646–651. doi: 10.1038/336646a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Krystek S. R., Jr, Bruccoleri R. E., Novotny J. Stabilities of leucine zipper dimers estimated by an empirical free energy method. Int J Pept Protein Res. 1991 Sep;38(3):229–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3011.1991.tb01433.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Landschulz W. H., Johnson P. F., McKnight S. L. The leucine zipper: a hypothetical structure common to a new class of DNA binding proteins. Science. 1988 Jun 24;240(4860):1759–1764. doi: 10.1126/science.3289117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Marmorstein R., Carey M., Ptashne M., Harrison S. C. DNA recognition by GAL4: structure of a protein-DNA complex. Nature. 1992 Apr 2;356(6368):408–414. doi: 10.1038/356408a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McLachlan A. D., Stewart M. Tropomyosin coiled-coil interactions: evidence for an unstaggered structure. J Mol Biol. 1975 Oct 25;98(2):293–304. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(75)80119-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nicholls A., Sharp K. A., Honig B. Protein folding and association: insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons. Proteins. 1991;11(4):281–296. doi: 10.1002/prot.340110407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nilges M., Brünger A. T. Automated modeling of coiled coils: application to the GCN4 dimerization region. Protein Eng. 1991 Aug;4(6):649–659. doi: 10.1093/protein/4.6.649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nilges M., Brünger A. T. Successful prediction of the coiled coil geometry of the GCN4 leucine zipper domain by simulated annealing: comparison to the X-ray structure. Proteins. 1993 Feb;15(2):133–146. doi: 10.1002/prot.340150205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Novotný J., Bruccoleri R., Karplus M. An analysis of incorrectly folded protein models. Implications for structure predictions. J Mol Biol. 1984 Aug 25;177(4):787–818. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90049-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. O'Shea E. K., Klemm J. D., Kim P. S., Alber T. X-ray structure of the GCN4 leucine zipper, a two-stranded, parallel coiled coil. Science. 1991 Oct 25;254(5031):539–544. doi: 10.1126/science.1948029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. O'Shea E. K., Rutkowski R., Kim P. S. Evidence that the leucine zipper is a coiled coil. Science. 1989 Jan 27;243(4890):538–542. doi: 10.1126/science.2911757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Oas T. G., McIntosh L. P., O'Shea E. K., Dahlquist F. W., Kim P. S. Secondary structure of a leucine zipper determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 1990 Mar 27;29(12):2891–2894. doi: 10.1021/bi00464a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. PAULING L., COREY R. B., BRANSON H. R. The structure of proteins; two hydrogen-bonded helical configurations of the polypeptide chain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1951 Apr;37(4):205–211. doi: 10.1073/pnas.37.4.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Seo J., Cohen C. Pitch diversity in alpha-helical coiled coils. Proteins. 1993 Mar;15(3):223–234. doi: 10.1002/prot.340150302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Vieth M., Kolinski A., Brooks C. L., 3rd, Skolnick J. Prediction of the folding pathways and structure of the GCN4 leucine zipper. J Mol Biol. 1994 Apr 8;237(4):361–367. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang L., Hermans J. Molecular dynamics study of structure and stability of a model coiled coil. Proteins. 1993 Aug;16(4):384–392. doi: 10.1002/prot.340160407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES