Skip to main content
PLOS Pathogens logoLink to PLOS Pathogens
. 2025 Jul 3;21(7):e1012832. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012832

Hexosamine biosynthesis disruption impairs GPI production and arrests Plasmodium falciparum growth at schizont stages

María Pía Alberione 1,2, Yunuen Avalos-Padilla 1,3, Gabriel W Rangel 4, Miriam Ramírez 1,2, Tais Romero-Uruñuela 1,2, Àngel Fenollar 1,2, Jonathan Ortega-Barrionuevo 1,2, Marcell Crispim 1,2,5,6, Terry K Smith 7, Manuel Llinás 4,8, Luis Izquierdo 1,2,9,*
Editor: Laura Kirkman10
PMCID: PMC12251206  PMID: 40608817

Abstract

UDP-N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc) is a crucial sugar nucleotide for glycan synthesis in eukaryotes. In the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum, UDP-GlcNAc is synthesized via the hexosamine biosynthetic pathway (HBP) and is essential for glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor production, the most prominent form of protein glycosylation in the parasite. In this study, we explore a conditional knockout of glucosamine-6-phosphate N-acetyltransferase (PfGNA1), a key HBP enzyme. PfGNA1 depletion led to significant disruptions in HBP metabolites, impairing GPI biosynthesis and causing mislocalization of the merozoite surface protein 1 (MSP1), the most abundant GPI-anchored protein in the parasite. Furthermore, parasites were arrested at the schizont stage, exhibiting severe segmentation defects and an incomplete rupture of the parasitophorous vacuole membrane (PVM), preventing egress from host red blood cells. Our findings demonstrate the critical role of HBP and GPI biosynthesis in P. falciparum asexual blood stage development and underscore the potential of targeting these pathways as a therapeutic strategy against malaria.

Author summary

Malaria remains a major cause of illness and death, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, with increasing resistance to treatments highlighting the urgent need for new strategies. Malaria parasites rely on the hexosamine biosynthetic pathway to produce UDP-N-acetylglucosamine, an essential metabolite for glycosylphosphatidylinositol synthesis. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol molecules anchor vital proteins to the parasite’s surface and, as free glycolipids, serve as structural components of its membranes. Our study examined the effects of disrupting PfGNA1, a key enzyme in the hexosamine biosynthetic pathway, which is distinct from its human counterparts. Disruption of PfGNA1 blocked the production of glycosylphosphatidylinositol, leading to improper protein localization, developmental arrest, and failure of the parasites to mature or exit infected red blood cells. Our results underscore the central role of the hexosamine biosynthetic pathway and glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesis, which are essential for parasite survival. This pathway represents a promising target for developing novel antimalarial therapies.

Introduction

Malaria is a major global health problem that kills more than 600,000 people a year, mainly children under the age of five and pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa [1]. The disease is caused by parasites of the genus Plasmodium and, out of the five species infecting humans, P. falciparum causes the most severe form of malaria and accounts for the greatest number of deaths [2]. P. falciparum has a complex life cycle involving two different hosts, Anopheles mosquitoes and humans. The infection starts with the injection of parasite sporozoites into the human bloodstream, by the bite of an infected mosquito. Sporozoites travel through the blood vessels to the liver to invade hepatocytes and initiate the pre-erythrocytic stage of the disease. Once mature, infected hepatocytes burst releasing exoerythrocytic merozoites that invade erythrocytes, starting the cyclic asexual blood stages. After erythrocyte invasion the parasite develops through three main morphological stages in each 48-hour cycle —the ring, trophozoite and schizont stages— finally replicating into 16–32 daughter merozoites that invade new erythrocytes upon parasite egress [3]. The asexual stages are responsible for malaria clinical symptoms, but some parasites sexually commit and differentiate into male and female gametocytes. Mature sexual forms ingested by mosquitoes undergo several transformations within the Anopheline vector and ultimately infect new human hosts during subsequent blood meals [4].

The malaria parasite relies upon the hexosamine biosynthetic pathway (HBP) for survival during the asexual blood stages [5,6]. Recent research highlights that the HBP is also important during the liver stage development of murine malaria parasite [7]. The end product of the HBP is uridine diphosphate N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc), a crucial sugar nucleotide used by glycosyltransferases to synthesize GlcNAc-containing glycoconjugates [8]. Given the limited scope for protein and lipid glycosylation in P. falciparum, UDP-GlcNAc appears to serve exclusively as a precursor for the generation of N-glycans and glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) glycolipids (S1 Fig) [9,10]. Some previous work reports that O-GlcNAcylation, a dynamic post-translational modification involved in cellular regulation and signalling, is also present in P. falciparum, although the enzymes responsible for this modification have not been identified [11]. N-glycosylation is a post-translational modification which involves the synthesis of a glycan donor initiated by GlcNAc-dependent glycosyltransferases. This precursor is then transferred to proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) by an oligosaccharyltransferase [12]. P. falciparum produces highly truncated N-glycan donors containing only one or two GlcNAc residues [13]. However, proteins with these minimal N-glycans have not been fully characterized [14]. On the other hand, GPI glycolipids are the best characterized and most prominent glycoconjugates in the malaria parasite [15]. GPIs are synthesized through a multistep pathway conserved in eukaryotes, beginning on the cytoplasmic side of the ER with the transfer of GlcNAc, from UDP-GlcNAc, to membrane-bound phosphatidylinositol (PI). The molecule is then de-N-acetylated and moved to the lumenal side of the ER, where subsequent biosynthetic reactions culminate in GPI glycolipid generation. Finally, the protein precursor of GPI-anchored proteins is processed by GPI-transamidase for GPI attachment [16,17].

GPIs are attached to the C-terminus of surface proteins, anchoring them to the external leaflet of the plasma membrane [18,19]. P. falciparum expresses more than 30 different GPI-anchored proteins along its life cycle, including asexual [20], sexual [21], sporozoite [22] and pre-erythrocytic stages [23]. Many of these proteins play key roles in host cell adhesion, invasion, and egress. Thus, GPI anchors are considered vital at various stages of the parasite life cycle. Additionally, protein-free GPIs are present on the parasite surface and are four to five times more abundant than GPIs linked to proteins [15,24]. In other protozoan parasites these free glycolipids are involved in motility and cell invasion and are essential for growth [25,26]. Furthermore, free GPIs released into the blood during egress also act as proinflammatory toxins, exerting immunomodulatory effects, which may contribute to the severity of malaria [27,28]. This underpins the importance of these glycoconjugates not only for parasite development through multiple stages but also for malaria pathogenesis.

In this work, we characterized the effects of disrupting the HBP, causing a depletion in UDP-GlcNAc in the asexual intraerythrocytic stages of P. falciparum. Our findings show that these disruptions severely impair GPI biosynthesis, leading to the mislocalization of merozoite surface protein 1 (MSP1), a key GPI-anchored protein on the merozoite cell surface. Additionally, the parasite exhibits significant defects in segmentation and completely fails to egress, leading to termination of the asexual life cycle.

Results

PfGNA1-depleted parasites fail to progress to the next developmental cycle

P. falciparum synthesizes the amino sugar UDP-GlcNAc through a classical HBP involving five enzymatic steps (Fig 1A and S1 Table). This metabolite is key for the production of GPI anchors and N-glycans in the malaria parasite [9]. In a previous study, a rapamycin-inducible conditional knockout was engineered in P. falciparum targeting glucosamine-6-phosphate N-acetyltransferase (PfGNA1) (S2A Fig), the enzyme responsible for the acetylation of glucosamine 6-phosphate in the HBP [5]. Parasite growth was arrested after three intraerythrocytic developmental cycles (IDC) following rapamycin-induced gna1 gene excision, revealing that both this enzyme and the HBP are critical for asexual blood stage growth [5]. To determine the specific cause of growth arrest and parasite death following gna1 disruption, we synchronized parasites to a 5-hour window and treated them with rapamycin immediately after synchronization at the early ring stage (Fig 1B). To assess the dynamics of gna1 gene excision, we performed PCR amplification of the gna1 locus after treating tightly synchronized early ring-stage parasites (cycle 0) with 10 nM rapamycin. At 30 hours post-treatment, a significant amount of the non-excised 1546 bp PCR product was still detected, indicating that the gene remained partially intact at least during the trophozoite stage. Complete excision, marked by the exclusive presence of a 738 bp product, was observed from 42 hours post-treatment in cycle 0 (Fig 1C). This excision pattern likely explains the partial parasite growth during the transition from cycle 0 to cycle 1 (S2B and S2C Fig), despite the dramatic reduction of gna1 transcripts (S3 Fig). In cycle 0, the continued presence of the gna1 gene —and PfGNA1 enzyme— throughout most of this cycle, combined with the expected existence of a residual pool of UDP-GlcNAc [29], may allow for limited parasite development. As a result, parasite growth is only marginally affected during cycle 0, with the most pronounced defects, including complete developmental arrest and total loss of viability, occurring in cycle 1. Remarkably, although gna1 was completely excised by the start of cycle 1, the parasites were still able to mature into late trophozoites and schizonts (Fig 1D). Nevertheless, these parasites were unable to expand from cycle 1 to cycle 2, showing an invasion rate lower than 1 (Fig 1E). Notably, 100 µM GlcNAc supplementation at the beginning of cycle 1 rescued rapamycin-treated parasites, supporting the essential enzymatic role of PfGNA1 in UDP-GlcNAc biosynthesis and survival (S4 Fig).

Fig 1. PfGNA1 is essential for parasite growth during asexual development.

Fig 1

A) Diagram illustrating the enzymatic reactions involved in UDP-GlcNAc biosynthesis through the Hexosamine Biosynthetic Pathway. Glucosamine-phosphate N-acetyltransferase (GNA1) converts glucosamine-6-phosphate (GlcN6P) to N-acetylglucosamine-6-phosphate (GlcN6P). The chemical structures of the pathway intermediates are shown. B) Scheme outlining the timing of rapamycin (or mock, DMSO) treatment, administered at cycle 0 after tight synchronization of parasites within a 5-hour window. The times at which samples were collected for gene excision (white arrowheads) and protein expression (black arrowhead) analyses are also shown. C) PCR analysis of gna1 was conducted at different times post-DMSO (D) or rapamycin (R) treatment, using primers P5 and P6 specified S2A Fig and S2 Table. D) Parasite growth across cycles 1 and 2 following PfGNA1 disruption assessed by flow cytometry. E) Invasion rates for parasites treated with either DMSO or rapamycin were measured during the transition between developmental cycle 1 and 2. F) Western blot (left) with anti-HA antibody and Coomassie-stained gel (right) as loading control showing protein from trophozoites at cycle 1, treated with DMSO (D) or rapamycin (R) during cycle 0. The arrowhead indicates a band of approximately 30-35 kDa, efficiently depleted upon rapamycin addition. In panels D and E the graph shows mean ± SD values of three independent biological replicates. Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired t test. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. Abbreviations: G6PI: Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase; GFPT: Glucosamine-fructose-6-phosphate aminotransferase; GNA1: Glucosamine-phosphate N-acetyltransferase; PAGM: Phosphoacetylglucosamine mutase; UAP: UDP-N-acetylglucosamine pyrophosphorylase.

To study PfGNA1 expression, we engineered the II3 gna1-3xHA-loxP line, a new strain bearing a triple hemagglutinin A (HA) epitope at the N-terminus region of the enzyme (S5 Fig) in which the gna1 locus could still be excised in a regulatable manner by the addition of rapamycin. Consistent with the full disruption of gna1 by the end of cycle 0, we confirmed the absence of PfGNA1 in cycle 1 by Western blot (Fig 1F).

Metabolic profiling reveals significant disruptions in the HBP and related intermediates

To confirm that PfGNA1-depleted cells exhibited alterations in the HBP, we conducted metabolic profiling of cycle 1 trophozoites (Fig 2A). This analysis included rapamycin-treated, DMSO-treated (control), and the parental cell lines. Disruption of the HBP at the GNA1 enzymatic step led to a substantial reduction in UDP-GlcNAc levels, the pathway’s final product (Fig 2B). Importantly, levels of the intermediates, GlcNAc-1-phosphate and GlcNAc-6-phosphate, downstream of PfGNA1, were also reduced. However, our experimental setup could not distinguish between these two phosphorylated metabolites (Fig 2C). These metabolic changes were evident when comparing both the mock-treated and parental cell lines to the rapamycin-treated line (S6 Fig). Additionally, we observed a significant accumulation of GDP-mannose, a key precursor for the synthesis of dolichol-phosphate-mannose, the mannose donor in GPI anchor biosynthesis (Fig 2D). This accumulation may suggest a reduced availability of glucosamine-phosphatidylinositol (GlcN-PI) as mannose acceptor in the GPI biosynthetic pathway.

Fig 2. PfGNA1-disrupted parasites show depletion of HBP intermediates and UDP-GlcNAc.

Fig 2

A) Volcano plot showing global metabolomic changes between PfGNA1-disrupted and DMSO-treated parasites. Detailed analyses of GlcNAc-1/6-P (B), UDP-GlcNAc (C) and GDP-Man (D) levels in PfGNA1-disrupted parasites (treated with rapamycin), non-disrupted parasites (DMSO-treated) and the parental cell line. Data represent the mean and standard deviation from four independent replicates. p-values from two-sided Student’s t-tests are shown in B, C and D, comparing the specified conditions. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001. Abbreviations: GlcNAc-1/6-P, N-acetylglucosamine-1/6-phosphate; UDP-GlcNAc, uridine diphosphate N-acetylglucosamine; GDP-Man, Guanosine diphosphate mannose.

Furthermore, parasites treated with either rapamycin or DMSO (control) were grown, and total lipids were extracted and analysed by electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry (ES-MS-MS). Lipidomic analysis revealed an accumulation of phosphatidylinositol (PI) molecules, relative to phosphatidylinositol phosphate (PIP) species. This finding could be explained by the depletion of UDP-GlcNAc, which utilizes PI as an acceptor in the first steps of GPI biosynthesis (S7 Fig). Evidence of the presence of either GlcN-PI or GlcNAc-PI species in the WT was also investigated, however none was observed as it was likely below the level of detection.

HBP disruption disturbs GPI biosynthesis and alters MSP1 localization in malaria parasites

GPI anchors rely upon UDP-GlcNAc for their biosynthesis and are the most abundant glycoconjugates in P. falciparum, thereby playing a crucial role in parasite viability [15,30,31]. Given that UDP-GlcNAc depletion coincided with the accumulation of other upstream GPI biosynthetic precursors, such as GDP-Man, required for mannosylation reactions, we focused our analysis on GPI anchor molecules. Furthermore, the relatively rapid death of parasites following PfGNA1 depletion suggested that N-glycans are unlikely to be involved in the observed phenotype. This is because the inhibition of N-glycans —another class of GlcNAc-containing glycoconjugate [14]—leads to a delayed death phenotype [32]. Indeed, PfGNA1-disrupted parasites arrest prior to any detectable effect of tunicamycin, a specific inhibitor of N-glycosylation [33], suggesting that the loss of PfGNA1 function precedes and is likely independent of N-glycosylation related pathways (S8 and S9 Figs). In contrast, GPI quantification revealed a striking reduction in the level of total GPI molecules in cycle 1 rapamycin-treated schizonts (Fig 3A), with a less pronounced, but still detectable decrease already apparent in cycle 0 schizonts (S10 Fig).

Fig 3. GPI synthesis is altered in PfGNA1-deficient parasites, disrupting the localization of the GPI-anchored protein MSP1.

Fig 3

A) Quantification of GPI molecules per cell in DMSO- and rapamycin-treated segmented schizonts from cycle 1. B) Immunofluorescence microscopy showing MSP1 distribution in segmented schizonts. MSP1 was labelled with a mouse anti-MSP1 antibody (green), and nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 dye (blue). Scale bar is 5 µm. C) Subcellular fractionation of schizonts treated with DMSO or rapamycin was performed sequentially using saponin, followed by Triton X-100 extraction. Both fractions were analysed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting, using anti-MSP1 (left), anti-AMA1 (middle) and anti-BiP (right) antibodies, respectively. Bands migrating at varying heights, likely reflecting initial MSP1 and AMA1 processing, are observed and indicated in the Triton lanes (left panel). FL: Full-length. Panels B and C display representative images from four independent biological replicates.

The surface of the malaria parasite is densely populated with GPI-anchored proteins, with MSP1 (PF3D7_0930300) being a major component, accounting for approximately one-third of these GPI-anchored proteins on the merozoite surface [20]. MSP1 is essential for the P. falciparum asexual stages, facilitating both invasion and egress [3436]. Given the reduced GPI anchor content in PfGNA1-disrupted parasites, we investigated MSP1 localization using immunofluorescence microscopy. In DMSO-treated parasites, MSP1 was found to encircle the merozoites in mature schizonts, based upon its location around the Hoechst-stained merozoite nuclei. However, in most PfGNA1-disrupted parasites, MSP1 appeared to be untethered, shifting away from the merozoite nuclei and diffusing towards the periphery of the schizont plasma membrane (Fig 3B). However, a small subset of PfGNA1-disrupted parasites appear to retain the typical MSP1 distribution observed in untreated parasites (S11 Fig).

Our results indicated that alterations in GPI anchor content, due to PfGNA1 disruption, partially affected the localization of GPI-anchored MSP1. We then hypothesized that non-anchored and mislocalized MSP1 might be secreted into the parasitophorous vacuole (PV) lumen, based upon the immunofluorescence microscopy observations. To investigate this, we treated parasites with saponin, a detergent that selectively permeabilizes the erythrocyte and parasitophorous vacuole membrane (PVM), allowing extraction of soluble proteins present in those compartments without affecting the parasite plasma membrane. The remaining pellets were further extracted with Triton X-100. Western blot analysis revealed that, in PfGNA1-disrupted parasites, MSP1 partially leaked into the PV, suggesting secretion to the peripheral space. In contrast, no such leakage was observed in DMSO-treated controls (Fig 3C, left panel). Additionally, MSP1 processing appeared reduced in PfGNA1-disrupted parasites compared to DMSO-treated parasites [36], as indicated by the weaker processed fragments in the Triton X-100 fraction (S11B and S11C Fig). This observation suggests decreased processing, potentially due to the absence of GPI anchoring. As controls, we also conducted Western blot analyses for apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1, PF3D7_1133400), a transmembrane protein, and BiP (PF3D7_0917900), a protein member of the endoplasmic reticulum chaperone complex, to confirm that their localization remained unaffected by the disruption of PfGNA1 and GPI biosynthesis. Both proteins were detected in the expected fraction after protein extraction (Fig 3C, middle and right panel, respectively).

PfGNA1 disruption prevents egress and reinvasion of P. falciparum

To determine what impedes parasite growth during cycle 1, we synchronized parasites over a 5-hour window using sequential 70% Percoll centrifugation followed by sorbitol lysis and monitored their development using flow cytometry and light microscopy. Flow cytometry revealed DNA replication, marking the transition from ring (77 hours post-Percoll) to trophozoite and schizont stages (91 hours post-Percoll) [37], in both control and PfGNA1-disrupted parasites (Fig 4A). However, upon careful observation of Giemsa-stained preparations, we found that, although PfGNA1-disrupted parasites appeared to develop into mature stages, they failed to progress further. These parasites often displayed aberrant morphology and did not form fully segmented, multinucleated schizonts with distinct nuclei (Fig 4B). Additionally, these parasites failed to egress, as evidenced by live-cell imaging (S1 Movie), which showed a clear egress defect in rapamycin-treated parasites compared to controls, and by the persistent presence of mature parasites during the transition between cycles 1 and 2, and the lack of new ring forms, as confirmed by flow cytometry (Fig 4C). To further support our observations, we mechanically released the daughter merozoites from mature parasites by passing them through a 1.2 μm filter [35]. Virtually no fully mature merozoites were isolated from PfGNA1-disrupted parasites relative to control parasites (Fig 4D). Moreover, these mechanically released merozoites were unable to reinvade new host red blood cells (S12 Fig). Overall, the disruption of PfGNA1 led to the inability of mature parasites to egress and reinvade new host red blood cells presumably through disruption of the HBP and GPI biosynthesis pathways, thereby halting parasite development.

Fig 4. Disruption of PfGNA1 hints at segmentation defects and prevents parasite egress.

Fig 4

A) Histograms showing a population shift from ring stages to trophozoite/schizont stages. For flow cytometry analysis, the DNA of parasite cultures was stained with SYTO 11, and RBCs were gated using bivariate plots (SSC-H vs. FSC-H), recording 50,000 events within this region. The recorded events were then plotted as a function of fluorescence intensity detected through Filter 1, where subpopulations are distinguished according to their DNA content. B) Microscopy images of Giemsa-stained smears from tightly synchronized (5-hour window) PfGNA1 conditional knockout parasites treated with DMSO (control) or rapamycin. The images show time points during cycle 1 and the transition to cycle 2. Scale bar is 5 µm. C) Egress of synchronized (5-hour window) PfGNA1 conditional knockout parasites treated with DMSO (control) and rapamycin. Total parasitemia and the levels of young forms (rings) and mature forms (trophozoites-schizonts) were measured every two hours by flow cytometry during the transition between cycles 1 and 2, as described in A. The percentage of mature forms at each time point was normalized to the percentage observed at 91 hpp, when the trophozoite-schizont peak was reached. The ring levels are represented as an absolute number (hpp: hours post-Percoll). D) PfGNA1 conditional knockout parasite, treated with either rapamycin or DMSO, were enriched using Percoll, and merozoites were mechanically released by filtration. The number of merozoites post-filtration was measured by flow cytometry and normalized to the percentage of schizonts in culture before filtration. Panels A and B shows a representative image from four biological replicates. Panels C and D are based on three independent biological replicates, each with technical replicates. The graphs depict the means and standard deviation derived from one representative biological replicate, averaged over technical triplicates. The statistical analysis of panels C and D were performed using unpaired t test. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.

HBP and GPI biosynthesis disruption causes segmentation defects and prevents full PVM rupture in PfGNA1-deficient parasites

To further investigate the morphological defects observed in mature schizonts, we performed transmission electron microscopy on rapamycin-induced PfGNA1-disrupted parasites and DMSO-treated controls synchronized at late stages. In DMSO-treated schizonts (Fig 5A), segmentation occurred normally, with each merozoite individually enclosed by a membrane and exhibiting classical structures, including nuclei and apical organelles. In contrast, PfGNA1-disrupted schizonts displayed clear segmentation defects, with only some schizonts achieving proper segmentation (S13A Fig). Although nuclear division was observed, the developing merozoites appeared conjoined within a single membrane, indicating a failure in the formation of individual membranes required to separate the incipient merozoites (Fig 5B). Some apical organelles appeared well-formed in the mutant strain (Fig 5C), but multiple stacks of membranes were observed in PfGNA1-disrupted parasites (Fig 5D and 5E, arrowheads). Interestingly, in both DMSO- and rapamycin-treated parasites, a uniform contrast across the PVM was observed (Fig 5A and 5C). This suggests that the contents of the red blood cell cytoplasm and the vacuole had mixed, indicating that, although the PVM appears intact, it has likely undergone poration, which is a precursor to PVM rupture, as observed in [38,39].

Fig 5. PfGNA1 disrupted parasites show a severe segmentation defect.

Fig 5

Transmission electron microscopy showing the ultrastructure of PfGNA1 conditional-knockout schizonts treated with DMSO (control) or rapamycin, with or without E64 exposure. A) DMSO-treated parasites show multiple merozoites (M) along with distinct structures, including nuclei (N), apical organelles (AO), and food vacuoles (FV) containing hemozoin crystals (H). B) Rapamycin-treated parasites exhibited multinucleated, fused merozoites enclosed within the parasitophorous membrane (PVM). C) Zoom from B) showing the proper formation of apical organelles. D) and E) Detail of a PfGNA1-disrupted parasite surrounded by multiple layers of stacked membranes (indicated by arrowheads). F) An E64-treated, DMSO-control parasite, showing isolated merozoites with their respective organelles. Membrane vesicle whorls, marked by an asterisk are also visible. G) An E64-exposed, rapamycin-treated parasite with ribosomes (R) dispersed irregularly throughout the cytoplasm. Multiple nuclei display distinct chromatin condensation. H) Zoom of a FV in a PfGNA1-disrupted parasite as in G), containing internal membranous structures. A square highlights a ruptured FV with liberated hemozoin crystals. I) Detail of a nucleus of an E64-exposed, rapamycin-treated parasite showing chromatin condensation. J) Numerous stacked membrane layers are also observed.

When parasites were treated with E64, a cysteine protease inhibitor that prevents red blood cell membrane rupture while allowing the breakdown of the PVM [40], it became evident that DMSO-treated schizonts were correctly formed. Single merozoites with well-defined organelles were clearly observed in the absence of the PVM (Fig 5F). A clear change in contrast, resulting from the mixing of vacuolar contents with the host cell cytoplasm, indicated the loss of the PVM as a distinct barrier. Additionally, whorls of membrane vesicles, likely remnants of the PVM [38], were observed, providing further confirmation of this effect (Fig 5F, asterisk). In PfGNA1-disrupted schizonts, partial PVM disruption was observed in some parasites as shown by whorls of membrane vesicles in the RBC cytoplasm (Fig 5G, asterisk). However, in the majority of the observed parasites, schizonts were unable to rupture the PVM (S13B and S13C Fig), suggesting that the egress defect associated with HBP disruption and altered GPI biosynthesis occurs before full PVM rupture and is unrelated to host red blood cell membrane breakdown [36]. Food vacuoles containing internal membranous structures were also present (Fig 5H), with occasional ruptures of the vacuole membrane, releasing hemozoin crystals (Fig 5H, square). These ruptures were further indicated by altered staining patterns with a pH-sensitive fluorescent dye in rapamycin-treated parasites (S14 Fig). The fused merozoites exhibited chromatin condensation at the nuclear periphery, an indicator of irreversible cell damage (Fig 5G and 5J) [41]. Additionally, the ribosomes appeared irregularly distributed throughout the cytoplasm, potentially due to a deficiency in endoplasmic reticulum presence (Fig 5G, 5I, and 5J). Irregular ribosome distribution has also been observed in Plasmodium undergoing apoptosis after chalcone treatment. However, this study reported a reduction in ribosome abundance [42], which differs from the increased ribosome presence seen in PfGNA1-disrupted parasites. Thus, despite some features being consistent with programmed cell death changes, further validation is necessary.

In summary, our data shows that PfGNA1 disruption depletes the UDP-GlcNAc pool, which greatly impacts the synthesis of GPI-anchors. Consequently, the localization of MSP1, a key GPI-anchored protein in the membrane of merozoites, is disrupted. Likewise, membrane biogenesis is severely altered during schizont maturation. This results in defects in egress and invasion, thereby halting growth at the schizont stage and ultimately leading to parasite death (Fig 6).

Fig 6. Diagram depicting impaired parasite egress following disruptions in HBP and GPI biosynthesis.

Fig 6

Rapamycin-treated PfGNA1-disrupted parasites show a marked reduction in GPI molecule levels, compromising MSP1 anchoring to the merozoite membrane and causing it to diffuse away. These parasites also display severe abnormalities during schizont development, characterized by aberrant morphology and the inability to form fully segmented, multinucleated schizonts with distinct nuclei. Furthermore, they fail to fully rupture the PVM, which prevents later breakdown of the red blood cell host membrane and ultimately blocks egress.

Discussion

Our data confirms that PfGNA1 disruption leads to a reduction in the HBP intermediates GlcNAc-1-phosphate and GlcNAc-6-phosphate, and to the depletion of UDP-GlcNAc, the final product of the pathway [5]. UDP-GlcNAc acts as donor for GlcNAc-dependent glycosyltransferase reactions. In P. falciparum a basic N-glycosylation mechanism is conserved although the extent, number, and significance of N-glycosylated proteins remain unclear [13,14]. N-glycosylation is essential for eukaryotic organisms and, notably, the initial steps of the process involve the action of GlcNAc-dependent glycosyltransferases in the ER [9]. However, disrupting N-glycosylation does not immediately halt P. falciparum growth. Instead, the parasites continue to grow and invade new red blood cells, where they progress until the early trophozoite stages, at which point their development is halted [32]. This phenomenon, known as delayed death, is commonly, but not exclusively, linked to compounds targeting the apicoplast in P. falciparum and related apicomplexans. During delayed death, the disruption of specific cellular functions does not kill the parasite immediately but rather results in the death of its progeny in the following developmental cycle [4345]. The rapid death of parasites within the first developmental cycle following complete PfGNA1 depletion, coupled with the hallmark stall in schizont stages, strongly suggests that interference with N-glycosylation is not responsible for the arrest caused by the alteration of the HBP. Likewise, previous studies have identified a limited number of O-GlcNAcylated proteins in the ring and trophozoite stages of P. falciparum [11]. Some of these proteins are involved in critical processes, such as glycolysis and chaperone functions, highlighting roles comparable to those of O-GlcNAcylated proteins in other eukaryotic organisms [46]. However, similar to other apicomplexan parasites [47], P. falciparum lacks known orthologs of the enzymes O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT) and O-GlcNAcase (OGA), which are needed for regulating this modification [11,48]. Furthermore, culturing parasites with various concentrations of compounds that interfere with O-GlcNAcylation does not impact their viability [11]. Taken together, these observations suggest that O-GlcNAcylation is not a key factor in the effects resulting from UDP-GlcNAc depletion in the parasite.

UDP-GlcNAc is crucial for initiating the biosynthesis of GPI glycoconjugates, which are abundant on parasite surfaces, either as free molecules or tethering key proteins to the membrane [15]. Our data shows that UDP-GlcNAc depletion leads to a major reduction in GPI molecules. This depletion is accompanied by a concomitant accumulation of GDP-mannose and phosphatidylinositol species, which are unused precursors in the GPI biosynthetic pathway [17,49]. The reduced availability of GPI anchors results in the mislocalization of MSP1, a major GPI-anchored protein on the surface of P. falciparum. MSP1, along with MSP2, constitutes approximately two-thirds of all GPI-anchored proteins on the merozoite surface [20]. Without sufficient GPI anchors, MSP1 is released into the parasitophorous vacuole via the secretory pathway, as it can no longer remain tethered to the parasite membrane [36]. The mislocalization of MSP1 is consistent with findings in other studies, where disruptions in GPI anchor biosynthesis during P. falciparum asexual blood stages led to comparable effects [50,51]. Similar alterations have also been observed in the related apicomplexan parasite Toxoplasma gondii, where HBP disruption also impairs GPI formation, resulting in the aberrant localization of key GPI-anchored proteins and affecting parasite survival [52]. The dramatic reduction in GPI glycoconjugates in PfGNA1-disrupted parasites, along with the persistence of typical MSP1 distribution in some parasites, suggests that malaria parasites may prioritize preserving crucial GPI-anchored proteins like MSP1, while sacrificing free GPIs and less essential GPI-anchored proteins. This likely helps sustain the intraerythrocytic life cycle, despite disruptions to HBP/GPI biosynthesis ultimately stall asexual development. Moreover, the severe depletion of freshly biosynthesized GPI anchors may also cause proteins that are normally GPI-anchored to remain associated with the ER membrane, either through interactions with membrane-bound proteins or due to incomplete processing by the GPI-transamidase complex. Thus, our findings demonstrate that hindering the HBP severely impacts GPI anchor biosynthesis, and underscore the importance of these glycoconjugates for the proper localization and function of essential P. falciparum proteins.

During the schizont stage, the parasite undergoes segmentation, dividing into multiple daughter merozoites [37]. This process involves the parasite plasma membrane invaginating and encapsulating the emerging daughter cells, which eventually detach from the remnants of the mother cell [53]. Disruption of the HBP and GPI anchor biosynthesis leads to major segmentation defects, resulting in abnormal merozoite formation. Interestingly, these segmentation defects closely mirror those observed following the partial rescue of asexual parasites after apicoplast inhibition, which also led to GPI depletion [50]. This partial rescue likely affects the metabolism of cis-polyisoprenols and dolichols, which may potentially alter membrane biophysical properties and/or affect parasite development in later stages. However, given that our data stem from the targeted disruption of the HBP, these findings strongly suggest that the observed segmentation defects are not related to changes in these lipid pools, but rather to the resulting disruption of GPI biosynthesis. Thus, a specific, yet unidentified GPI-anchored protein or group of proteins, potentially including their GPI moieties, may play a significant role in the segmentation mechanism during asexual stages. This idea is reinforced by observations in P. falciparum sporozoites, where the GPI anchor of the circumsporozoite protein has been linked to sporozoite budding [54]. Additionally, the analysis of detergent-resistant membranes in asexual stages revealed subsets of GPI-anchored proteins associated with lipid rafts, further suggesting their involvement in critical cellular processes [55]. Finally, the absence of free GPIs on the parasite surface could lead to significant alterations in the plasma membrane, potentially disrupting cytokinesis or other essential processes critical to parasite growth [25].

Disruptions in the HBP and GPI biosynthesis cause malaria parasites to become completely stalled in late schizogony, rendering them incapable of exiting their host red blood cells [50,51]. During egress, newly formed merozoites breach the PVM that encloses them before escaping through the red blood cell membrane [56]. Just prior to PVM rupture, the membrane rounds up [38,39,57] and appears to break at a few initial points before decomposing [38,57], often progressing outward from their breaks [39]. At the same time, a few minutes before rupture, protein kinase G (PKG) is activated by an increase in cyclic GMP levels [58]. This activation triggers the secretion of subtilisin-like protease 1 (SUB1) from parasite exonemes to the parasitophorous vacuole (PV) compartment. SUB1 is thought to play a role in the disassembly of the PVM, although the exact mechanism of membrane rupture remains unclear [56]. SUB1 also facilitates the proteolytic processing and maturation of serine-repeat antigen (SERA) cysteine proteases, including SERA5 [59], as well as merozoite surface proteins like MSP1 [36]. These effectors bind to and destabilize components of the erythrocyte cytoskeleton, enabling the rupture of the erythrocyte membrane and the subsequent egress of merozoites [36,59]. Our data indicate that GPI-disrupted parasites are stalled just before PVM breakdown, with the electron microscopy data hinting at the presence of small perforations in the PVM [38]. These observations clearly align with recent studies suggesting that a GPI-anchored effector may be crucial for PKG activation and/or PVM rupture [50], while also pointing away from a potential direct role of dolichols in maintaining PVM structure. Overall, alterations in sugar nucleotides or dolichol derivative precursors necessary for GPI biosynthesis highlight the critical roles of these glycoconjugates in parasite development, particularly in mediating PVM rupture and enabling successful merozoite formation, egress and subsequent invasion [50,51].

In summary, our findings demonstrate that the ablation of PfGNA1 disrupts the HBP, significantly impairs GPI production, and halts parasite growth at the mature schizont stage. Given the critical role of GPI-anchored proteins throughout various stages of parasite development [2023], our study identifies the HBP-GPI anchor biosynthesis metabolic axis as a promising source of potential drug targets against malaria. Furthermore, considering the unique characteristics of PfGNA1, which belongs to a distinct enzyme family with an independent evolutionary origin in apicomplexans [5,6], our work highlights the potential of targeting this enzyme for the development of selective antimalarial compounds.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

Human erythrocytes (anonymized adult blood samples) were obtained from the Banc de Sang i Teixits (Catalonia, Spain), with approval from the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Hospital Clínic de Barcelona.

P. falciparum culture and transfection

The asexual stages of P. falciparum were cultured at 37 °C in an environment consisting of 92% N2, 2% O2, and 5% CO2. Cultures were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium containing Albumax II with washed red blood cells (RBCs) of blood type B+ at a hematocrit of 3–4%. Parasite growth was monitored by counting infected erythrocytes in Giemsa-stained blood smears using light microscopy. The II3 gna1-3xHA-loxP strain was generated through Cas9-mediated gene replacement. For that, sgRNA and Cas9-expressing construct (pDC2-Cas9-hDHFRyFCU) and linearized pUC19 plasmids were used as backbone. The single guide RNA (sgRNA) targeting the PfGNA1 was chosen using ChopChop [60] and cloned in the pDC2-Cas9-sgRNA plasmid using primers P7/P8. A recodonized version of gna1 with three hemagglutinin residues in the N-terminus PfGNA1 was cloned in pUC19 (S2A Fig). All primers used are described in S2 Table. P. falciparum 3D7 II-3 parasites, which contain the DiCre system inserted into the p230p genomic locus (courtesy of Ellen Knuepfer [61]), were transfected during the ring stages. Briefly, after sorbitol synchronization, 200 μl of infected red blood cells (iRBCs) at <5% parasitemia were electroporated with 60 μg of each plasmid at 310V and 950 millifarads. 24 hours later, transfected parasites were selected using 10 nM WR99210 during 5 days, with resistant parasites emerging in culture 28 days after transfection. Clonal parasite lines were subsequently derived from transfected parasite populations through limiting dilution. Recovered parasites were then harvested for genotyping. Genomic DNA was extracted from these parasites using the QIAmp DNA minikit (Qiagen) in accordance with the manufacturer’s guidelines. The purified DNA samples were used as templates for PCR amplification of the inserted construct.

P. falciparum growth analysis

To calculate growth curves, tightly synchronized parasites were measured via flow cytometry by incubating 5 μl of parasite culture with 0.75 μl SYTO 11 in 900 μl of PBS for 1 min. Stained parasites were analysed on a BD FACSCalibur where fifty thousand events were recorded for each sample. The invasion rate was calculated as the ratio of new iRBCs (%) to iRBCs (%) from the previous cycle. To analyse the morphological development of the parasite, images of Giemsa-stained smears were taken on an Olympus BX51 microscope throughout cycle 1 and 2, increasing the frequency of sampling to 4 hours at the end of cycle 1 and beginning of cycle 2.

Western blot GNA1

To determine GNA1 expression, the parasites were synchronized to ring-stage by sorbitol and treated for three hours with 10 nM rapamycin or DMSO (used as a vehicle control) to induce the gna1 excision at cycle 0. Cycle 1 cultures, with >5% parasitemia, at trophozoite stages were collected and centrifuged, resuspended in 2 volumes of 0.2% saponin in PBS and incubated on ice for 10 min. Then, 10 ml of PBS were added to each sample and the mixture was centrifuged at 1800 x g for 8 min at 4oC. The supernatants were removed and the saponin treatment was repeated one more time. Pellets were transferred to 1.5 ml vials, washed with PBS, resuspended in 100 μL of lysis buffer (2% SDS, 60 mM DTT in 40 mM Tris HCl pH = 9.0 containing protease inhibitor cocktail, purchased from Sigma). Then 20 μl of Laemmli 6X (final concentration 1x) were added, incubated for 5 min at 95 °C and 15 μl of each sample were separated by sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad, 0.45 µm). For this, electro-transfer was performed at a constant 20 V overnight using the Mini Trans-Blot cell module (Bio-Rad) with Dunn’s Transfer Buffer (10 mM CO3HNa, 3 mM CO3Na2 in 20% methanol, pH 9.9) [62]. The following day, the membrane was blocked for 2 hours at room temperature with 5% (w/v) skimmed milk in TBST (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl and 0.05% Tween 20). The primary antibody (anti-HA antibody purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, cod. 2C-7392) was diluted 1 : 5000 in 5% skimmed milk/TBST and incubated overnight. After this, the membrane was washed 3 times in TBST for 10 min and incubated for 1 hour with a peroxidase-labelled anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (Cell Signalling Technology, cod. 7076), diluted 1 : 10,000 in 5% skimmed milk/TBST. Following three washing steps with TBST for 10 min, the membrane was developed with a Clarity Western ECL Substrate (Bio-Rad) and visualized in an ImageQuant LAS 4000 mini biomolecular imager (GE Healthcare).

To determine the expression and subcellular localization of MSP1, AMA1 and BIP, rapamycin and DMSO-treated parasites were collected during cycle 1, after incubation with E64 for 3 hours. Schizonts were enriched with Percoll 70%, washed with 1 ml of PBS/PIC and transferred to 1.5 ml vials. After centrifugation, the pellets were resuspended in 6 volumes of 0.15% saponin in PBS/PIC, incubated 10 min at 4 °C and centrifugated (10,000 g, 15 min, 4 °C). The resulting supernatants were transferred to new tubes and stored at -80 °C. The remaining pellets were washed twice with 1ml PBS/PIC and incubated in 1% Triton X-100 in PBS/PIC for 1 hour at 4 °C under continuous and vigorous shaking, to improve protein extraction. Samples were then sonicated on ice (3 pulse x 10 seconds, 10 seconds off between pulses, amplitude 100%), centrifuged (20,000 g, 15 min, 4 °C) and the supernatants containing membrane-associated and organelle-specific proteins were recovered and stored at -80 °C. A BCA Protein Assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, EUA) was performed, and 10 μg of each extract was resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (#10600003, Amersham, 0.45 µm). Electro-transfer was carried out at a constant 30 V overnight using transfer buffer (25 mM Tris base, 192 mM glycine in 20% methanol). Membranes were blocked for 1 hour with 5% BSA in PBS at room temperature. Mouse anti-MSP1 MRA-880A (MR4) was diluted 1:1000 in 1xPBS/0.1% Tween20/5%BSA and incubated overnight at 4oC. In the case of rabbit anti-AMA1 [63] and rat anti-BIP (MR4) were diluted 1:1000 in 1xPBS/0.1% Tween20/5%BSA and incubated 1 hour at room temperature. After this, the membranes were washed 3 times with 0.1% Tween20/PBS1x for 15 min at room temperature. Secondary antibodies, goat anti-mouse HRP (#12349, Sigma Aldrich), goat anti-rabbit HRP (# ab6721, Abcam) and goat anti-rat HRP (#A10549, Invitrogen), were diluted 1:1000 in 1xPBS/0.1% Tween20/5%BSA and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. Following three washing steps with 0.1% Tween20/PBS1x for 15 min and a final rinse with PBS, the membranes were developed with ECL Western Blotting substrate (#32109, Pierce Thermo Scientific) and visualized in in an ImageQuant LAS 4000 mini biomolecular imager (GE Healthcare).

Harvest of parasites and metabolite extraction for metabolomic analysis

The II3 gna1-loxP line was tightly synchronized over a 5-hour window, using sequential 70% Percoll centrifugation followed by sorbitol lysis, and immediately treated with 10 nM rapamycin or DMSO (control) for one hour. Rapamycin or DMSO were then removed from the culture medium and the parasites were incubated until 57 hours post-Percoll when a new sorbitol synchronization was performed at the beginning of cycle 1. The samples were then incubated for about 81–89 hours post-Percoll and then enriched by magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS).

For High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (HPLC-MS) analysis, 1x108 parasites per replicate were replated in a 6-well plate and incubated for 2.5 hours to allow recovery. At the time of sample collection, the metabolism was quenched through addition of ice-cold PBS. Parasites were pelleted (500 x g, 4 °C, 7 min) and metabolites were extracted from the pellet with 1 ml ice cold 90% methanol, vortexed 30 seconds, and centrifuged for 10 min at maximum speed (16000 x g) at 4 °C. Samples were treated identically and swiftly to ensure reproducible results. The methanol supernatants were stored at -80 °C until analysis, when they were transferred to fresh 1.5 ml tubes, dried down completely under nitrogen gas flow, and the metabolite residues stored at -70 °C.

High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (HPLC-MS) analysis

Once ready for HPLC-MS, samples were resuspended in 100 µl HPLC-grade water with 1 µM chlorpropamide internal standard to account for instrument variation. The samples were then analyzed using a Thermo Scientific Q Exactive Plus Orbitrap MS instrument connected to a Thermo Scientific Dionex Ulitmate 3000 LC setup using a Waters XSelect HSS T3 Column XP (100 x 2.1 mm, 2.5 µM) (Waters, 186006151) at 30˚C. Solvent A was 97% water/3% methanol; 15 mM acetic acid; 10 mM tributylamine; 2.5 µM medronic acid, and solvent B was 100% methanol. The samples ran at 0.200 ml/min with the following gradient: 0-5.0 min: 100% A, 0% B; 5.0-13.0 min: 80% A, 20% B; 13.0-15.0 min: 45% A, 55% B; 15.0-17.5 min: 35% A, 65% B; 17.5-21.0 min: 5% A, 95% B; 21.0-25 min: 100% A, 0% B. Ion detection in negative ion mode was performed using a scan range of 85–1000 m/z with a resolution of 140,000 at m/z 200. The experimental sample run order was randomized with pooled quality control (QC) samples and blanks run regularly throughout the sample queue. Raw data for the metabolomic analysis has been submitted to the NIH Metabolomics Workbench under tracking number ID 5425.

HPLC-MS data analysis

Raw data files from the instrument were converted to centroided.mzML format using MSConvert of the ProteoWizard Software Package [64]. These files were loaded into El Maven [65] for further data processing, including peak calling, alignment, and peak annotation based on expected m/z and the retention time of previously run metabolite standards. Each El-Maven-called peak is visually examined for acceptable gaussian shape and signal intensity, and the areas of curated peaks are exported to Microsoft Excel for further processing and analysis. All raw metabolite signal intensities were corrected for chlorpropamide variation, and the average blank signal for each metabolite was subtracted from experimental conditions (or substituted for experimental conditions if blank average signal was higher than experimental signal). Metabolites were then filtered for reproducibility in HPLC-MS detection using the relative standard deviation (RSD) of the pooled QC samples, discarding any metabolites with a QC RSD > 30. The resulting feature matrices were then exported and further analyzed using tools on MetaboAnalyst.ca and/or the MetaboAnalystR package for R [66,67].

Lipid analysis

For ES-MS-MS, parasites were harvested as explained above. 2.6x108 (Parental), 1.9x108 (DMSO) and 1.8x108 (rapamycin) parasites per replicate were replated and incubated for 1 hour to allow recovery. Parasites were collected and resuspended in 2 volumes of 0.2% saponin in PBS, and incubated on ice for 10 min. Then, 10 ml of PBS was added to each sample and the mixture was centrifuged at 1800 x g for 8 min at 4 °C. Supernatants were removed and the saponin treatment was repeated one more time. Pellets were transferred to 1.5 ml vials and washed with PBS. Total lipids from parasites were subjected to Bligh-Dyer extraction [68]. Briefly, cells were suspended in 100 µl PBS and transferred to a glass tube where 375µl of 1:2 (v/v) CHCl3: MeOH were added and vortexed. The samples were agitated vigorously for a further 10–15min. Samples were made biphasic by adding of 125 µl of CHCl3 followed by vortexing. Then, 125 µl of water was added and the samples were vortexed again. After centrifugation at 1000 g at room temperature for 5 min, the lower phase (organic) was transferred to a new glass vial and the upper phase was re-extracted with fresh CHCl3. The resultant lower phase lipid extract was dried under nitrogen and stored at 4 °C until analysis.

Lipid extracts were analysed on a Thermo Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometer and a ABSciex 4000 QTrap ES-MS-MS. Both positive and negative scans were conducted over various ranges spanning 150–1500 m/z. Lipid identities were confirmed by accurate mass and collision induced fragmentation.

GPI quantification

For GPI quantification, segmented schizonts at 40 hours post-infection from cycle 0 and cycle 1 were isolated by MACS, as described above. For cycle 0, 3.3 × 10⁸ (DMSO) and 2.9 × 10⁸ (Rapamycin) parasites per replicate were replated and incubated for 1 hour to allow recovery. For cycle 1, 4.1 × 10⁸ (DMSO) and 1.9 × 10⁸ (Rapamycin) parasites per replicate were similarly replated and incubated under the same conditions. After recovery, cultures were centrifuged at 500 x g for 7 min at 4˚C and washed twice with cold PBS. Pellets were stored at -80 °C until analysis.

The method utilises the quantification of all GPIs molecules (protein-free GPIs and GPI-anchored proteins) in a cell by conversion of their GlcN to [1-2H]-2,5-anhydromannitol (AHM) as described elsewhere [69]. Briefly, the internal standard of scyllo-inositol (10 ml of 10 mM) was added to each replicate sample of the freeze-dried cells. Various controls with various GlcN and myo-inositol concentrations were prepared and processed in parallel. Samples were subjected to alkaline hydrolysis, by resuspending in 200 µl concentrated aqueous NH3/40% propan-1-ol (1:1, v/v) and incubated at room temperature for >16 h. Samples were subsequently dried under a stream of nitrogen.

Dried samples were dissolved in 30 µl 300 mM sodium acetate buffer. To each sample, 20 µl freshly prepared 1 M sodium nitrite is added and incubated at room temperature for 3 h. Following this nitrous acid deamination, the samples had to be reduced by the sequential addition of 10 µl of 400 mM boric acid followed by ~75 µl 2 M sodium hydroxide and 40 µl freshly prepared 1 M sodium borohydride and left at to reduce at 4°C for 16 h. The samples were desalted using AG50WX12 resin and dried three times with 100 µl 2% acetic acid in methanol to remove the boric acid and once with 200 µl methanol.

Samples were subjected to methanolysis by adding 50 µl of dry methanol containing 0.5 M HCl, transferring to, and flame sealing in capillaries under vacuum and incubating them at 95 °C for 4 h. Upon opening, pyridine (10 µl) with acetic anhydride (10 µl) were added and left for 30 min at RT, to re-N-acetylate any GlcN. Samples were dried from dry methanol (20 µl) twice prior to derivatization with 10 µl of dry pyridine and with 10 µl of N-methyl-N-trimethylsilyl-trifluoroacetamide. After 10 minutes, 2 µl of the mixture was injected onto Agilent GC-MS (MS detector-5973N, GC-6890) with a SE-54column (30 m × 0.25 mm) at 80 °C for 2 min followed by a gradient up to 140 °C at 30 °C/min and a second gradient up to 265 °C at 5 °C/min and held at 265 °C for a further 10 min. Single Ion monitoring of m/z 272 was selected to detect AHM and m/z 318 to detect both scyllo- and myo-inositol. Peak areas of the standard curves allows the molar relative response factor to be calculated, allowing quantification of AHM and hence the number of GPI containing molecules per cell.

Indirect immunofluorescence assays

Parasites were synchronized to ring-stage by sorbitol and treated for one hour with 10nM rapamycin or DMSO (used as a vehicle control) to induce gna1 excision. The cultures were incubated until next cycle (cycle 1) when a new sorbitol synchronization was performed. Thirty-eight hours after the second synchronization, 10 μM E64 was added to the media and incubated during 6 hours. Schizonts were enriched by Percoll 70%, resuspended in 1 ml of compete media and washed three times with PBS. In parallel, an eight-well chamber removable (80841, Ibidi GmbH, Germany) was incubated with 80 μl Concanavalin A (5mg/ml in water, Sigma) per well for 20 min at 37 °C. The Concanavalin A was then removed and the slides were left to dry. Then, 150 μl of schizont suspension were seeded in the pre-treated slides and allowed to settle for 10 min at 37 °C. Unbound RBCs were washed away applying 200 μl PBS per well until a faint RBC monolayer remained and preparations were fixed by adding 200 μl cold methanol (-20 °C) and incubated at -20 °C for 7 min. After washing once with PBS, preparations were blocked by adding 150 μL of 2% BSA in PBS, and incubating them for 30 min at room temperature at 400 rpm, orbital agitation. Preparations were then washed 3 times with PBS and 100 μL of mouse anti-MSP1 8A12 ([70], courtesy of Michael Blackman) diluted 1:50 in 2% BSA/PBS was added and incubated overnight at 4 °C with at 400 rpm. The following day, cells were washed 3 times with PBS to remove the excess of primary antibody. The supernatant was removed and donkey anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) Alexa Fluor 488 (#A21202, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, EUA), and Hoechst 33342 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, EUA), diluted 1:100 and 1:5000 in 2% BSA/PBS, respectively, was added to the cultures and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature at 400 rpm protected from light. Preparations were then washed 3 times with PBS to remove excess secondary antibody and the slides were mounted in Vectashield (#H-1000, Vector Laboratories). Images were obtained using a LSM980 Airyscan 2 microscope (Zeiss). To analyse food vacuole integrity, cultures of DMSO or Rapamycin-treated segmented schizonts from cycle 1 were washed with PBS, suspended in a solution containing Hoechst 33342 (1:5000) and LysoTracker Red DND-99 (10 μM, Thermo Fischer) and incubated 30 min at 37 °C. After washing with PBS, parasites were resuspended in 200 μl RPMIc and 10 μl were transferred to a μ-slide 8 well high ibiTreat plate (80806, Ibidi GmbH, Germany) containing 200 μl of RPMIc. Visualization was performed using a Revvity Opera Phenix HCS confocal microscopy. All the obtained images were processed with ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, USA).

Time-lapse microscopy

Parasites were tightly synchronized using a Percoll gradient followed by sorbitol treatment 5 hours later (cycle 0). Immediately after synchronization, 10 nM rapamycin (or DMSO as control) was added for one hour. Cultures were maintained at 37 °C with daily medium changes for 94 hours post-Percoll, corresponding to the end of developmental cycle 1. At this point, 100 nM ML10 was added to reversibly block parasite egress, and cultures were incubated for 7 hours. Parasites were then purified by Percoll gradient, washed to remove ML10 using pre-warmed RPMIc medium, and resuspended in 100 μl RPMIc. Hoechst 33342 (1:5000 dilution) was added to stain nuclei, and 10 μl of this suspension were transferred into a μ-slide 8-well high ibiTreat plate preloaded with 200 μl of RPMIc. Parasites were imaged using time-lapse differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy on a Revvity Opera Phenix HCS confocal microscope. Imaging began exactly 10 minutes after ML10 removal, and images were captured every 15 seconds. A total of 82 frames were acquired per sample and exported as AVI files at 5 frames per second for analysis.

Egress assays

The II3 gna1-loxP line was tightly synchronized (5 hours) and treated with 10 nM rapamycin or DMSO (control) for one hour. The cultures were incubated up to 56 hours post-Percoll when a new sorbitol synchronization was performed at the beginning of cycle 1. Parasitemia was measured at 77, 88, 91, 93, 95, 97 and 99 hours post-Percoll by flow cytometry on a BD FACSCalibur. The graph represents the percentage of schizonts at each time point relative to the percentage at the peak —observed 91 hours post-Percoll— as well as the absolute number of rings at each timepoint.

Merozoite purification

Merozoite purification was conducted as previously described [35]. Briefly, the II3 gna1-loxP line was sorbitol synchronized and treated with 10 nM rapamycin or DMSO (control) for one hour to induce gna1 disruption. Cultures were incubated for 56 hours when 200 nM of ML10 was added to the media. After 17 hours a Percoll 70% synchronization was performed and the suspension of segmented schizonts was washed with 10 ml of washing media and centrifuged at 2200 x g for 5 min at room temperature. The supernatant was discarded, the pellet resuspended in 10 ml of fresh washing media and passed through a 1.2 μm filter pre-blocked with 1% BSA/PBS for 20 min. The released merozoites were collected in vials previously blocked with 1% BSA/PBS and the filter was washed with 5 ml of washing media, combining the volume with the previous merozoite suspension. Merozoite suspensions were centrifuged at 2200 x g for 15 min at room temperature, and the resultant pellets were resuspended in 100 μl of complete RPMI. Merozoite suspensions were measured by flow cytometry on a BD FACSCalibur by adding 20 μl of Countbright absolute counting beads (LifeTechnologies #C36950) and 2 μL of merozoite suspension in 900 μl of PBS, and staining merozoites with 0.5 μl of SYTO 11 green fluorescent nucleic acid stain for 1 min. The number of merozoites was calculated by the number of SYTO 11 positive population relative to the counting beads, fixing the number of beads at 1000 events.

Flow cytometry-based invasion assay

To study invasion, merozoites were purified following the protocol described before. Cultures of 30 ml containing approx. 4% schizonts treated with DMSO or rapamycin were passed through a pre-blocked 1.2 μm filter. Isolated merozoites were resuspended in 370 μl of complete RMPI and 50 μl of the suspension was placed per triplicate with fresh RBCs in a final volume of 100 μl and 1% hematocrit. The vials were incubated at 37 °C in a shaker for 20 min and transferred to different wells containing 100 μl RPMI, bringing the hematocrit to 0.5%. The 96 well plate was incubated at 37 °C for 24 hours. Parasitemias were measured on a BD FACSCalibur by mixing 900 μl PBS with 20 μl culture and 0.75 μl SYTO 11. The percentage of infected RBCs related to the initial percentage of pre-filtered schizonts was represented in the graph.

Transmission electron microscopy

The II3 gna1-loxP line was synchronized to ring-stage by sorbitol and treated for one hour with 10 nM rapamycin or DMSO (used as a vehicle control) to induce the gna1 excision. The cultures were incubated until the start of the next cycle, at which point a new sorbitol synchronization was performed. 26 hours after sorbitol synchronization, the cultures were split into two groups. Two cultures were treated with 10 μM E64 for 15 hours, while the other two were left untreated. Segmented schizonts were enriched by Percoll 70%. The resultant pellet of iRBC was resuspended in 1 ml of washing media, centrifuged at 400 x g for 5 min and the supernatant discarded. Segmented schizonts were fixed by resuspending the pellet in 500 μl of cold fixation buffer (2% paraformaldehyde, 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer) and incubated at 4 °C during 30 min in a shaker. After centrifugation at 600 x g for 5 min, the samples were washed at 4 °C for 10 min in fixation buffer, and washed four times for 10 min with phosphate buffer 0.1 M pH 7.4 at 4 °C. Then, a solution of 1% osmium tetroxide, 0.8% potassium ferrocyanide and 0.1 M PB pH 7.4 was added to the sample and incubated for 1.5 hours at 4 °C in the dark and washed 4 times for 10 min with double-distilled water at 4 °C to eliminate excess of osmium. After dehydrating the sample with increasing concentrations of acetone, infiltration into the Spurr resin was performed followed by polymerization. Ultrathin 60 nm sections of the resin stub were cut using a Leica UC7 ultramicrotome, stained with Aqueous uranyl acetate and Reynolds lead citrate before observation on a J1010 Transmission electron microscope (Jeol) coupled with an Orius CCD camera (Gatan). Sections were imaged at 80kV. TEM was performed on TEM-SEM Electron Microscopy Unit from Scientific and Technological Centers (CCiTUB), Universitat de Barcelona.

RT-qPCR

Transcriptional analysis was performed as previously described [71]. Briefly, following tight synchronization, trophozoites at 25–30 hours from cycle 0 and cycle 1 were lysed using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen), and total RNA was extracted according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA was subsequently treated with DNase I (Qiagen), purified using the RNeasy MinElute Cleanup Kit (Qiagen), and reverse-transcribed into cDNA using the AMV Reverse Transcription Kit (Promega). Transcript levels were quantified by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) using the standard curve method with Power SYBR Green reagent (Applied Biosystems) in a QuantStudio 7 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). Reactions were performed in triplicate. Thermal cycling conditions consisted of an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 10 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 seconds, 57 °C for 30 seconds, and 60 °C for 30 seconds. The protocol concluded with a final series of steps: 95 °C for 15 seconds, 60 °C for 1 minute, and 95 °C for 15 seconds. Transcript levels of gna1 throughout cycle 0 and cycle 1 were normalized to those of the serine-tRNA ligase gene (seryl, Pf3D7_0717700). Primer pairs used for gna1 (P9 and P10) and seryl (P11 and P12) are listed in S2 Table.

Statistical analysis

All graphs in this study were generated using GraphPad Prism version 8.0.2. Statistical analyses were conducted using an unpaired Student’s t-test to compare the means between two independent groups, with significance defined as a p-value less than 0.05.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Glycosylation pathways involving UDP-GlcNAc in P. falciparum.

The illustration shows the mechanisms of glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor biosynthesis and N-linked glycosylation in the endoplasmic reticulum. Additionally, it includes the presence of a potential O-GlcNAc cycling, which would require O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT) and O-GlcNAcase (OGA), although these enzymes have not been identified in the P. falciparum genome. Red dashed arrows indicate enzymatic reactions that depend on UDP-GlcNAc, the end product of the Hexosamine Biosynthetic Pathway (HBP). The diagram also includes GDP-mannose, a sugar nucleotide critical for GPI biosynthesis.

(TIF)

ppat.1012832.s001.tif (223.4KB, tif)
S2 Fig. Cycle 0 to cycle 1 transition in II3 gna1-loxP parasites.

A) Diagram of rapamycin-induced site-specific excision. The transgenic strain II3 gna1-loxP was generated by CRISPR-Cas9 in a DiCre-expressing strain [5]. The native gna1 gene was replaced by a recodonized version gen floxed by two loxP sites. The addition of rapamycin induces Cre recombinase dimerization, which recognizes the loxP sites and removes the sequence between them, inducing gna1 gene excision. Excision reduces the amplicon from 1,546 bp to 738 bp. The homology regions (HR) used for CRISPR-Cas9-based gna1 locus engineering are indicated. The hybridization sites of the primers P5 and P6 used to confirm gna1 excision are also shown. All primers used are described in S2 Table. B) Parasite growth during cycles 0 and 1 following gna1 gene disruption. The II3 gna1-loxP strain was tightly synchronized (5 hours) and treated with rapamycin or DMSO (control) for one hour. Parasitemia was measured immediately (rings, cycle 0) and 60 hours after sorbitol synchronization (rings, cycle 1) by flow cytometry. C) Invasion rates for II3 gna1-loxP parasites treated with either DMSO or rapamycin were calculated for the transition between developmental cycles 0 and 1. In panels B and C the graph shows mean ± SD values of three independent biological replicates. Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired t test. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

(TIF)

ppat.1012832.s002.tif (133.6KB, tif)
S3 Fig. Relative transcript abundance of gna1 normalized to serine-tRNA ligase gene (seryl, reference gene) in DMSO and Rapamycin-treated parasites.

RNAs were extracted from 25-30 hours trophozoites in both, cycle 0 and cycle 1. Transcript abundance was quantified from qPCR data using standard curves and is shown as mean ± standard deviation from three technical replicates. A reduction in transcript abundance was observed in the rapamycin-treated parasites, which is more pronounced in cycle 1 than in cycle 0. Values represent one biological replicate per condition. Statistical analyses were performed using an unpaired t test. ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.

(TIF)

ppat.1012832.s003.tif (61KB, tif)
S4 Fig. GlcNAc supplementation during cycle 1 following complete PfGNA1 knockout restores parasite growth, indicating that PfGNA1’s essential role in asexual blood stages is enzymatic.

A) Schematic representation of the timing of rapamycin (or mock, DMSO) treatment and GlcNAc supplementation. Rapamycin (or DMSO) were administered for one hour during cycle 0 after tight synchronization of parasites within a 5-hour window. 100 μM GlcNAc was added at the beginning of cycle 1 and maintained until the end of the experiment. The time points at which samples were collected for flow cytometry analysis are also indicated (white arrowheads). B) Parasite growth across cycles 1 and 2 following PfGNA1 disruption, assessed by flow cytometry. C) Invasion rates for parasites treated with either DMSO or rapamycin were measured during the transition from developmental cycle 1–2. In panel C, the graph shows the mean ± SD values of three technical replicates from one representative biological replicate out of three. Statistical analyses were performed using an unpaired t test. ****, P < 0.0001.

(TIF)

ppat.1012832.s004.tif (296.7KB, tif)
S5 Fig. Generation and characterization of the asexual cycle of II3 gna1-3xHA-loxP line A) Diagram depicting the engineering of P. falciparum gna1.

Using Cas9-mediated genome editing, the native gna1 open reading frame was replaced with a recodonized version of the P. falciparum gna1 gene containing three hemagglutinin (HA) epitopes at the N-terminus, with all the insert flanked by two loxP sites. Sequence insertion via double crossover homologous recombination was enabled by Cas9 endonuclease-induced double-strand breaks in the DNA, guided by a single guide RNA (sgRNA) targeting a 20-nucleotide region within gna1. Homology-directed repair was enabled by the addition of homologous sequences flaking the loxP sites. The HA-tag start codon is marked with a red tick mark with an arrowhead. The positions of the start and stop codons for gna1 are indicated by a black tick mark with an arrowhead and a red tick mark with a T-cap, respectively. B) PCR detection of transgenic parasites. PCR-based detection of transgenic parasites was performed using P1 and P2 primers, which amplify a 581 bp of the native gna1. The parental strain (II3) was included as a control. The primers P3 and P4 were used to amplify a 587 bp fragment corresponding to the recodonized version of gna1 in transgenic parasites (Clones A8, B6 and F4). The donor plasmid with the recodonized gna1 sequence, used for the generation of the transgenic lines, was included in the PCR as positive control (C+). All primers used are described in S2 Table. C) Parasite growth during cycles 0 and 1 following gna1 disruption. The II3 gna1-3xHA-loxP strain was tightly synchronized at a 5-hour window and treated with either rapamycin or DMSO (control) for one hour. Parasitemia was assessed immediately (rings, cycle 0) and 55 hours post-sorbitol synchronization (rings, cycle 1) using flow cytometry. D) II3 gna1-3xHA-loxP invasion rates were calculated for the transition between developmental cycle 0 and 1 following treatment with either DMSO or rapamycin. E) Parasite growth during cycle 1 and 2 following gna1 disruption. II3 gna1-3xHA-loxP rings from cycle 1 were adjusted to 1% parasitemia, and parasite growth throughout cycles 1 and 2 was monitored by flow cytometry. Parasitemia was measured immediately after adjustment (rings, cycle 1), 107 hours post-sorbitol (Trophozoites and Schizonts cycle 1) and 130 hours post-Sorbitol (Rings cycle 2 or Trophozoites and Schizonts cycle 1). F) Invasion rates for II3 gna1-3xHA-loxP parasites treated with either DMSO or rapamycin were calculated for the transition between developmental cycles 1 and 2. In panels C to F, analyses were performed on three different clones to account for biological variability.

(TIF)

ppat.1012832.s005.tif (464.3KB, tif)
S6 Fig. Volcano plot showing global, targeted metabolomic changes between PfGNA1-disrupted and parental, non-treated parasites.

A similar trend is observed when PfGNA1-disrupted parasites are compared with DMSO-treated parasites or parental non-treated parasites.

(TIF)

ppat.1012832.s006.tif (673.5KB, tif)
S7 Fig. Lipid analysis of DMSO or rapamycin treated PfGNA1-disrupted parasites.

Bligh-Dyer extracted lipids were analysed by ES-MS-MS, negative ion mode 820–1100 m/z, showing primarily the PI and PIP species. A) DMSO and B) Rapamycin PfGNA1-disrupted. Lipid identities confirmed by accurate mass and collision induced fragmentation.

(TIF)

ppat.1012832.s007.tif (254.3KB, tif)
S8 Fig. GlcNAc supplementation during cycle 0 rescues the growth of PfGNA1-disrupted parasites, but the parasites die at the end of the same cycle following GlcNAc withdrawal.

A) Schematic representation of the timing of rapamycin (or mock, DMSO) treatment and GlcNAc supplementation, administered during cycle 0 after tight synchronization of parasites within a 5-hour window. Rapamycin (or DMSO) were added for one hour while 100 μM GlcNAc was added at the beginning of cycle 0 and removed at the end of the same cycle, during the segmented schizont stage. The time points at which samples were collected for flow cytometry analysis are also indicated (white arrowheads). B) Parasite growth across cycles 0 and 1 following PfGNA1 disruption, assessed by flow cytometry. C) Invasion rates for parasites treated with either DMSO or rapamycin were measured during the transition from developmental cycle 0–1. D) Parasite growth across cycles 1 and 2 following PfGNA1 disruption and GlcNAc removal, assessed by flow cytometry. E) Invasion rates for parasites treated with either DMSO or rapamycin were measured during the transition from developmental cycle 1–2. In panels C and E, the graphs show the mean ± SD values of three technical replicates from one representative biological replicate out of three. Statistical analyses were performed using an unpaired t test. ****, P < 0.0001.

(TIF)

ppat.1012832.s008.tif (283.8KB, tif)
S9 Fig. Parasite death in cycle 1 schizonts results from HBP disruption, leading to UDP-GlcNAc depletion and GPI reduction rather than N-glycosylation defects.

A) Schematic representation of the timing of rapamycin (or mock, DMSO) treatment, GlcNAc supplementation, and tunicamycin treatment. Rapamycin (or DMSO) and GlcNAc were administered during cycle 0 following tight synchronization of parasites within a 5-hour window. Rapamycin and DMSO were added for one hour, while 100 μM GlcNAc was added at the beginning of cycle 0 and removed at the end of the same cycle, during the segmented schizont stage. To dissect the effect of N-glycosylation inhibition on DMSO- (mock) or Rapamycin-treated parasites (PfGNA1- and HBP-disrupted), 20 μM tunicamycin was added at the beginning of cycle 1 and maintained until the end of the experiment. Time points for sample collection by flow cytometry (white arrowheads) and Giemsa staining (black arrowheads) are also indicated. B) Parasite growth from cycle 0 to cycle 3 following PfGNA1 disruption, assessed by flow cytometry. C) Giemsa-stained smear images showing that rapamycin-treated parasites (with or without tunicamycin) failed to progress beyond cycle 1 schizonts, while DMSO-treated parasites exposed to tunicamycin died at the trophozoite stage of cycle 2. Thus, after PfGNA1-disruption parasite death is driven by UDP-GlcNAc depletion which halts GPI biosynthesis, rather than by the effect of tunicamycin. Scale bar represents 5 µm.

(TIF)

ppat.1012832.s009.tif (951KB, tif)
S10 Fig. Quantification of GPI molecules per cell in DMSO- and rapamycin-treated segmented schizonts from cycle 0.

A total of 3.3 × 10⁸ and 2.9 × 10⁸ parasites per replicate were analyzed for the DMSO and Rapamycin conditions, respectively. GPI molecules per cell were also quantified in 3.3 × 10⁸ uninfected RBCs per replicate, and the value obtained was subtracted from the parasite culture values to account for GPI molecules derived from the RBCs.

(TIF)

ppat.1012832.s010.tif (35.7KB, tif)
S11 Fig. Supplementary immunofluorescence and Western blot analyses.

A) Immunofluorescence microscopy showing the typical distribution of MSP1 in less than 6% of PfGNA1-disrupted schizonts. A total of 108 parasites were analyzed. MSP1 was labelled with a mouse anti-MSP1 (green), and nuclei were labelled with Hoechst 33342 (blue). Scale bar represents 5 µm. B) Western blot analysis of MSP1 and quantification of band intensities expressed relative to the control condition, which was set to 100%. Fragments showed a marked reduction in intensity, ranging from approximately 27% to 57% relative to the control. C) Protein bands visualized on the Coomassie-stained gel used as a loading control for the Western blot shown in Fig 3C. A total of 10 μg of protein was loaded for each condition.

(TIF)

ppat.1012832.s011.tif (518.8KB, tif)
S12 Fig. Invasion assay of merozoites released mechanically.

II3 gna1-loxP parasites were treated with rapamycin or DMSO during cycle 0 and incubated until the end of cycle 1. Merozoites were mechanically released from segmented schizonts and subsequently incubated with RBCs to allow invasion. Parasitemia was measured 24 hours later by flow cytometry and reported as the percentage of infected red blood cells relative to the percentage of schizonts before filtration. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired t test. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.

(TIF)

ppat.1012832.s012.tif (35.4KB, tif)
S13 Fig. Transmission electron microscopy of PfGNA1-disrupted parasites.

A) Transmission electron microscopy showing normal segmentation in less than 2% of PfGNA1-disrupted schizonts. A total of 90 parasites were analyzed. From left to right, the images were obtained at 30000x, 50000x and 80000x magnification, respectively. B) Transmission electron microscopy images depicting differences in PVM rupture between PfGNA1 conditional knockout schizonts treated with DMSO (control) and rapamycin, following treatment with E64. Arrowheads indicate parasites with an intact PVM, while asterisks mark those with fully disrupted PVM, evidenced by a lighter, less electron-dense appearance of the cytoplasm after PVM breakdown. Magnification: 5000x C) Comparison of the percentage of fully disrupted PVM in PfGNA1 conditional knockout parasites treated with DMSO (control) or rapamycin. Panel B is representative of more than 200 schizonts. For panel C, approximately 15 images containing over 200 schizonts, were analyzed for each condition. Schizonts were categorized based on whether their PVM was intact or disrupted. The statistical analysis of the boxplot in panel C was performed using unpaired t test. ***, P < 0.001.

(TIF)

ppat.1012832.s013.tif (2.2MB, tif)
S14 Fig. Food vacuole integrity analysis by LysoTracker Red DND-99 staining of DMSO or Rapamycin-treated schizonts from cycle 1.

A) Representative immunofluorescence microscopy images showing Lysotracker staining (orange) in segmented schizonts from cycle 1. Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (blue). LysoTracker Red DND-99 is a fluorescent probe that accumulates in acidic compartments. In DMSO-treated parasites, the food vacuole appeared as a distinct, round-shaped organelle with intense fluorescence signal. In contrast, in rapamycin-treated parasites, the fluorescence was dispersed irregularly throughout the cytoplasm. This pattern suggests disruption of the vacuolar membrane and loss of acidic compartmentalization, likely due to the breakdown of the food vacuole structure. Scale bar is 5 µm. B) Quantification of Lysotracker intensity shown as a scatter plot of individual data points. In rapamycin-treated parasites a reduction in LysoTracker signal intensity is observed. The mean is indicated by a blue line, and the standard error of the mean (SEM) by a red line. At least 500 schizonts were analyzed in each condition. Statistical significance was determined using Welch’s t-test. **** P < 0.0001.

(TIF)

ppat.1012832.s014.tif (787.2KB, tif)
S1 Movie. PfGNA1 disrupted parasites display an egress defect.

Synchronized parasites were treated with 10 nM rapamycin (or DMSO) in cycle 0 and allowed to develop until the end of cycle 1. Egress was reversibly blocked during 7 hours using ML10, followed by Percoll enrichment, ML10 washout, nuclei staining with Hoechst 33342 (1:5000) and live imaging. Parasites were observed by time-lapse DIC microscopy starting 10 minutes after ML10 removal, with images captured every 15 seconds. A total of 82 frames were acquired and exported at 5 frames per second. Rapamycin-treated parasites showed a clear egress defect compared to controls. Time in minutes is indicated in the top right corner of each frame.

(MP4)

Download video file (21MB, mp4)
S1 Table. Enzymes involved in the Hexosamine biosynthetic pathway (HBP) in P. falciparum.

(PDF)

ppat.1012832.s016.pdf (91KB, pdf)
S2 Table. List of primers used in this study.

(PDF)

ppat.1012832.s017.pdf (46.3KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to Michael Blackman for sharing the anti-MSP1 antibody, Viola Introini and Matt Govendir, from Maria Bernabeu’s research group for their assistance with confocal imaging, Alfred Cortés and their team for technical advice and reagents and the TEM-SEM Electron Microscopy Unit from Scientific and Technological Centers (CCiTUB), Universitat de Barcelona, and their staff for their support and advice on TEM technique. The authors would like to acknowledge the Huck Institutes’ Metabolomics Core Facility (RRID:SCR_023864) for maintenance of the Thermo Exactive Plus.

Data Availability

The raw metabolomics data supporting the findings of this study have been deposited in the NIH Metabolomics Workbench under Study ID ST003642 and are publicly available at: https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org. The dataset can be accessed via DOI: 10.21228/M8J242.

Funding Statement

This research is part of the ISGlobal Program on the Molecular Mechanisms of Malaria which is partially supported by the Fundación Ramón Areces. We acknowledge support from the grant CEX2023-0001290-S funded by MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033, and support from the Generalitat de Catalunya through the CERCA Program. LI received support by PID2022-137031OB-I00 grant funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/FEDER, UE. The work is supported by a FI Fellowship from the Generalitat de Catalunya supported by Secretaria d’Universitats i Recerca de la Generalitat de Catalunya and Fons Social Europeu (2021 FI_B 00470) and an EMBO Scientific Exchange Grant (9474) to MPA. GWR was supported by a Penn State Eberly Research Fellowship and grant R21AI174085 from the NIH. Funding to ML was supported by the Eberly College of Science and the Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences at The Pennsylvania State University and NIH grant R21AI174085. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. World Malaria Report. Geneva; 2023. Nov. Available: https://www.who.int/teams/global-malaria-programme/reports/world-malaria-report-2023 [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wassmer SC, Grau GER. Severe malaria: what’s new on the pathogenesis front? Int J Parasitol. 2017;47(2–3):145–52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2016.08.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cowman AF, Healer J, Marapana D, Marsh K. Malaria: Biology and Disease. Cell. 2016;167(3):610–24. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tadesse FG, Meerstein-Kessel L, Gonçalves BP, Drakeley C, Ranford-Cartwright L, Bousema T. Gametocyte Sex Ratio: The Key to Understanding Plasmodium falciparum Transmission? Trends Parasitol. 2019;35(3):226–38. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2018.12.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chi J, Cova M, de Las Rivas M, Medina A, Borges RJ, Leivar P, et al. Plasmodium falciparum Apicomplexan-Specific Glucosamine-6-Phosphate N-Acetyltransferase Is Key for Amino Sugar Metabolism and Asexual Blood Stage Development. mBio. 2020;11(5):e02045-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02045-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cova M, López-Gutiérrez B, Artigas-Jerónimo S, González-Díaz A, Bandini G, Maere S, et al. The Apicomplexa-specific glucosamine-6-phosphate N-acetyltransferase gene family encodes a key enzyme for glycoconjugate synthesis with potential as therapeutic target. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):4005. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22441-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stanway RR, Bushell E, Chiappino-Pepe A, Roques M, Sanderson T, Franke-Fayard B, et al. Genome-Scale Identification of Essential Metabolic Processes for Targeting the Plasmodium Liver Stage. Cell. 2019;179(5):1112-1128.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.10.030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sanz S, Bandini G, Ospina D, Bernabeu M, Mariño K, Fernández-Becerra C, et al. Biosynthesis of GDP-fucose and other sugar nucleotides in the blood stages of Plasmodium falciparum. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(23):16506–17. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.439828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cova M, Rodrigues JA, Smith TK, Izquierdo L. Sugar activation and glycosylation in Plasmodium. Malar J. 2015;14:427. doi: 10.1186/s12936-015-0949-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Izquierdo L. The glycobiology of plasmodium falciparum: New approaches and recent advances. Biotechnol Adv. 2023;66:108178. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2023.108178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kupferschmid M, Aquino-Gil MO, Shams-Eldin H, Schmidt J, Yamakawa N, Krzewinski F, et al. Identification of O-GlcNAcylated proteins in Plasmodium falciparum. Malar J. 2017;16(1):485. doi: 10.1186/s12936-017-2131-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Burda P, Aebi M. The dolichol pathway of N-linked glycosylation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999;1426(2):239–57. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4165(98)00127-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Samuelson J, Banerjee S, Magnelli P, Cui J, Kelleher DJ, Gilmore R, et al. The diversity of dolichol-linked precursors to Asn-linked glycans likely results from secondary loss of sets of glycosyltransferases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(5):1548–53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409460102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bushkin GG, Ratner DM, Cui J, Banerjee S, Duraisingh MT, Jennings CV, et al. Suggestive evidence for Darwinian Selection against asparagine-linked glycans of Plasmodium falciparum and Toxoplasma gondii. Eukaryot Cell. 2010;9(2):228–41. doi: 10.1128/EC.00197-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Naik RS, Branch OH, Woods AS, Vijaykumar M, Perkins DJ, Nahlen BL, et al. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors of Plasmodium falciparum: molecular characterization and naturally elicited antibody response that may provide immunity to malaria pathogenesis. J Exp Med. 2000;192(11):1563–76. doi: 10.1084/jem.192.11.1563 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ferguson MA, Brimacombe JS, Brown JR, Crossman A, Dix A, Field RA, et al. The GPI biosynthetic pathway as a therapeutic target for African sleeping sickness. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999;1455(2–3):327–40. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4439(99)00058-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kinoshita T. Biosynthesis and biology of mammalian GPI-anchored proteins. Open Biol. 2020;10(3):190290. doi: 10.1098/rsob.190290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ferguson MA. The structure, biosynthesis and functions of glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors, and the contributions of trypanosome research. J Cell Sci. 1999;112 ( Pt 17):2799–809. doi: 10.1242/jcs.112.17.2799 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Komath S, Fujita M, Hart G, Ferguson M, Kinoshita T. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol Anchors. Fourth Edition. In: Varki A, Cummings RD, Esko JD, Stanley P, Hart GW, Aebi M, et al. , editors. Essentials of Glycobiology. Fourth Edition. Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2022. doi: 10.1101/GLYCOBIOLOGY.4E.12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gilson PR, Nebl T, Vukcevic D, Moritz RL, Sargeant T, Speed TP, et al. Identification and stoichiometry of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored membrane proteins of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2006;5(7):1286–99. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M600035-MCP200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Singh K, Burkhardt M, Nakuchima S, Herrera R, Muratova O, Gittis AG, et al. Structure and function of a malaria transmission blocking vaccine targeting Pfs230 and Pfs230-Pfs48/45 proteins. Commun Biol. 2020;3(1):395. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-01123-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nagar R, Garcia Castillo SS, Pinzon-Ortiz M, Patray S, Coppi A, Kanatani S, et al. The major surface protein of malaria sporozoites is GPI-Sanchored to the plasma membrane. J Biol Chem. 2024;300(8):107557. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107557 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Arredondo SA, Swearingen KE, Martinson T, Steel R, Dankwa DA, Harupa A, et al. The Micronemal Plasmodium Proteins P36 and P52 Act in Concert to Establish the Replication-Permissive Compartment Within Infected Hepatocytes. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018;8:413. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gowda DC, Gupta P, Davidson EA. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors represent the major carbohydrate modification in proteins of intraerythrocytic stage Plasmodium falciparum. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(10):6428–39. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.10.6428 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ilgoutz SC, Zawadzki JL, Ralton JE, McConville MJ. Evidence that free GPI glycolipids are essential for growth of Leishmania mexicana. EMBO J. 1999;18(10):2746–55. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.10.2746 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Niehus S, Smith TK, Azzouz N, Campos MA, Dubremetz J-F, Gazzinelli RT, et al. Virulent and avirulent strains of Toxoplasma gondii which differ in their glycosylphosphatidylinositol content induce similar biological functions in macrophages. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e85386. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085386 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Krishnegowda G, Hajjar AM, Zhu J, Douglass EJ, Uematsu S, Akira S, et al. Induction of proinflammatory responses in macrophages by the glycosylphosphatidylinositols of Plasmodium falciparum: cell signaling receptors, glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) structural requirement, and regulation of GPI activity. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(9):8606–16. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413541200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schofield L, Hewitt MC, Evans K, Siomos M-A, Seeberger PH. Synthetic GPI as a candidate anti-toxic vaccine in a model of malaria. Nature. 2002;418(6899):785–9. doi: 10.1038/nature00937 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.López-Gutiérrez B, Dinglasan RR, Izquierdo L. Sugar nucleotide quantification by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry reveals a distinct profile in Plasmodium falciparum sexual stage parasites. Biochem J. 2017;474(6):897–905. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20161030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Delorenzi M, Sexton A, Shams-Eldin H, Schwarz RT, Speed T, Schofield L. Genes for glycosylphosphatidylinositol toxin biosynthesis in Plasmodium falciparum. Infect Immun. 2002;70(8):4510–22. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.8.4510-4522.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sanders PR, Kats LM, Drew DR, O’Donnell RA, O’Neill M, Maier AG, et al. A set of glycosylphosphatidyl inositol-anchored membrane proteins of Plasmodium falciparum is refractory to genetic deletion. Infect Immun. 2006;74(7):4330–8. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00054-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fenollar À, Ros-Lucas A, Pía Alberione M, Martínez-Peinado N, Ramírez M, Ángel Rosales-Motos M, et al. Compounds targeting GPI biosynthesis or N-glycosylation are active against Plasmodium falciparum. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2022;20:850–63. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.01.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yoo J, Mashalidis EH, Kuk ACY, Yamamoto K, Kaeser B, Ichikawa S, et al. GlcNAc-1-P-transferase-tunicamycin complex structure reveals basis for inhibition of N-glycosylation. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2018;25(3):217–24. doi: 10.1038/s41594-018-0031-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Baldwin MR, Li X, Hanada T, Liu S-C, Chishti AH. Merozoite surface protein 1 recognition of host glycophorin A mediates malaria parasite invasion of red blood cells. Blood. 2015;125(17):2704–11. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-11-611707 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Boyle MJ, Wilson DW, Richards JS, Riglar DT, Tetteh KKA, Conway DJ, et al. Isolation of viable Plasmodium falciparum merozoites to define erythrocyte invasion events and advance vaccine and drug development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(32):14378–83. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1009198107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Das S, Hertrich N, Perrin AJ, Withers-Martinez C, Collins CR, Jones ML, et al. Processing of Plasmodium falciparum Merozoite Surface Protein MSP1 Activates a Spectrin-Binding Function Enabling Parasite Egress from RBCs. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;18(4):433–44. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.09.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Voß Y, Klaus S, Guizetti J, Ganter M. Plasmodium schizogony, a chronology of the parasite’s cell cycle in the blood stage. PLoS Pathog. 2023;19(3):e1011157. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hale VL, Watermeyer JM, Hackett F, Vizcay-Barrena G, van Ooij C, Thomas JA, et al. Parasitophorous vacuole poration precedes its rupture and rapid host erythrocyte cytoskeleton collapse in Plasmodium falciparum egress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(13):3439–44. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1619441114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Glushakova S, Beck JR, Garten M, Busse BL, Nasamu AS, Tenkova-Heuser T, et al. Rounding precedes rupture and breakdown of vacuolar membranes minutes before malaria parasite egress from erythrocytes. Cell Microbiol. 2018;20(10):e12868. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12868 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Glushakova S, Mazar J, Hohmann-Marriott MF, Hama E, Zimmerberg J. Irreversible effect of cysteine protease inhibitors on the release of malaria parasites from infected erythrocytes. Cell Microbiol. 2009;11(1):95–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2008.01242.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tripathi J, Stoklasa M, Nayak S, En Low K, Qian Hui Lee E, Duong Tien QH, et al. The artemisinin-induced dormant stages of Plasmodium falciparum exhibit hallmarks of cellular quiescence/senescence and drug resilience. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):7485. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51846-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sinha S, Radotra BD, Medhi B, Batovska DI, Markova N, Sehgal R. Ultrastructural alterations in Plasmodium falciparum induced by chalcone derivatives. BMC Res Notes. 2020;13(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05132-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kennedy K, Cobbold SA, Hanssen E, Birnbaum J, Spillman NJ, McHugh E, et al. Delayed death in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum is caused by disruption of prenylation-dependent intracellular trafficking. PLoS Biol. 2019;17(7):e3000376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sherling ES, Knuepfer E, Brzostowski JA, Miller LH, Blackman MJ, van Ooij C. The Plasmodium falciparum rhoptry protein RhopH3 plays essential roles in host cell invasion and nutrient uptake. Elife. 2017;6:e23239. doi: 10.7554/eLife.23239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Thommen BT, Dziekan JM, Achcar F, Tjia S, Passecker A, Buczak K, et al. Genetic validation of PfFKBP35 as an antimalarial drug target. Elife. 2023;12:RP86975. doi: 10.7554/eLife.86975 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yang X, Qian K. Protein O-GlcNAcylation: emerging mechanisms and functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18(7):452–65. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Gas-Pascual E, Ichikawa HT, Sheikh MO, Serji MI, Deng B, Mandalasi M, et al. CRISPR/Cas9 and glycomics tools for Toxoplasma glycobiology. J Biol Chem. 2019;294(4):1104–25. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.006072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bandini G, Albuquerque-Wendt A, Hegermann J, Samuelson J, Routier FH. Protein O- and C-Glycosylation pathways in Toxoplasma gondii and Plasmodium falciparum. Parasitology. 2019;146(14):1755–66. doi: 10.1017/S0031182019000040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yadav U, Khan MA. Targeting the GPI biosynthetic pathway. Pathog Glob Health. 2018;112(3):115–22. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2018.1442764 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bulloch MS, Huynh LK, Kennedy K, Ralton JE, McConville MJ, Ralph SA. Apicoplast-derived isoprenoids are essential for biosynthesis of GPI protein anchors, and consequently for egress and invasion in Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS Pathog. 2024;20(9):e1012484. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Frasse PM, Miller JJ, Polino AJ, Soleimani E, Zhu J-S, Jakeman DL, et al. Enzymatic and structural characterization of HAD5, an essential phosphomannomutase of malaria-causing parasites. J Biol Chem. 2022;298(2):101550. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Alberione MP, González-Ruiz V, von Rohr O, Rudaz S, Soldati-Favre D, Izquierdo L, et al. N-acetylglucosamine supplementation fails to bypass the critical acetylation of glucosamine-6-phosphate required for Toxoplasma gondii replication and invasion. PLoS Pathog. 2024;20(6):e1011979. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Rudlaff RM, Kraemer S, Marshman J, Dvorin JD. Three-dimensional ultrastructure of Plasmodium falciparum throughout cytokinesis. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16(6):e1008587. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008587 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wang Q, Fujioka H, Nussenzweig V. Exit of Plasmodium sporozoites from oocysts is an active process that involves the circumsporozoite protein. PLoS Pathog. 2005;1(1):e9. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0010009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wang L, Mohandas N, Thomas A, Coppel RL. Detection of detergent-resistant membranes in asexual blood-stage parasites of Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2003;130(2):149–53. doi: 10.1016/s0166-6851(03)00165-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Dvorin JD, Goldberg DE. Plasmodium Egress Across the Parasite Life Cycle. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2022;76:67–90. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-041320-020659 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Thomas JA, Tan MSY, Bisson C, Borg A, Umrekar TR, Hackett F, et al. A protease cascade regulates release of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum from host red blood cells. Nat Microbiol. 2018;3(4):447–55. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0111-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Collins CR, Hackett F, Strath M, Penzo M, Withers-Martinez C, Baker DA, et al. Malaria parasite cGMP-dependent protein kinase regulates blood stage merozoite secretory organelle discharge and egress. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(5):e1003344. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yeoh S, O’Donnell RA, Koussis K, Dluzewski AR, Ansell KH, Osborne SA, et al. Subcellular discharge of a serine protease mediates release of invasive malaria parasites from host erythrocytes. Cell. 2007;131(6):1072–83. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Labun K, Montague TG, Krause M, Torres Cleuren YN, Tjeldnes H, Valen E. CHOPCHOP v3: expanding the CRISPR web toolbox beyond genome editing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(W1):W171–4. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Knuepfer E, Napiorkowska M, van Ooij C, Holder AA. Generating conditional gene knockouts in Plasmodium - a toolkit to produce stable DiCre recombinase-expressing parasite lines using CRISPR/Cas9. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):3881. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03984-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Dunn SD. Effects of the modification of transfer buffer composition and the renaturation of proteins in gels on the recognition of proteins on Western blots by monoclonal antibodies. Anal Biochem. 1986;157(1):144–53. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(86)90207-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Nuttall SD, Humberstone KS, Krishnan UV, Carmichael JA, Doughty L, Hattarki M, et al. Selection and affinity maturation of IgNAR variable domains targeting Plasmodium falciparum AMA1. Proteins. 2004;55(1):187–97. doi: 10.1002/prot.20005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Chambers MC, Maclean B, Burke R, Amodei D, Ruderman DL, Neumann S, et al. A cross-platform toolkit for mass spectrometry and proteomics. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30(10):918–20. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2377 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Agrawal S, Kumar S, Sehgal R, George S, Gupta R, Poddar S, et al. El-MAVEN: A Fast, Robust, and User-Friendly Mass Spectrometry Data Processing Engine for Metabolomics. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1978:301–21. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9236-2_19 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Pang Z, Xu L, Viau C, Lu Y, Salavati R, Basu N, et al. MetaboAnalystR 4.0: a unified LC-MS workflow for global metabolomics. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):3675. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48009-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Pang Z, Lu Y, Zhou G, Hui F, Xu L, Viau C, et al. MetaboAnalyst 6.0: towards a unified platform for metabolomics data processing, analysis and interpretation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52(W1):W398–406. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol. 1959;37(8):911–7. doi: 10.1139/o59-099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Macrae JI, Ferguson MAJ. A robust and selective method for the quantification of glycosylphosphatidylinositols in biological samples. Glycobiology. 2005;15(2):131–8. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwh149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Guevara Patiño JA, Holder AA, McBride JS, Blackman MJ. Antibodies that inhibit malaria merozoite surface protein-1 processing and erythrocyte invasion are blocked by naturally acquired human antibodies. J Exp Med. 1997;186(10):1689–99. doi: 10.1084/jem.186.10.1689 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Casas-Vila N, Pickford AK, Portugaliza HP, Tintó-Font E, Cortés A. Transcriptional Analysis of Tightly Synchronized Plasmodium falciparum Intraerythrocytic Stages by RT-qPCR. In: de Pablos LM, Sotillo J, editors. Parasite Genomics: Methods and Protocols. New York, NY: Springer US; 2021. p. 165–185. Available: doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1681-9_10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Laura Kirkman

30 Jan 2025

Hexosamine Biosynthesis Disruption Impairs GPI Production and Arrests Plasmodium falciparum Growth at Schizont Stages

Dear Dr. <!--StartFragment-->Dr Izquierdo<!--EndFragment-->

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Pathogens. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Pathogens's publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript within 60 days Mar 31 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plospathogens@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/ppathogens/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

* A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. This file does not need to include responses to any formatting updates and technical items listed in the 'Journal Requirements' section below.

* A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

* An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, competing interests statement, or data availability statement, please make these updates within the submission form at the time of resubmission. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Laura Kirkman, MD

Academic Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Tracey Lamb

Section Editor

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0003-2946-9497

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Additional Editor Comments:

We had the optimal circumstance of multiple reviewers being interested in your paper and as a result were able to obtain five reviews, with differing opinions on what to do moving forward, but also reflecting the general interest in your work. All commented on the quality of the work but several noted that there was concern for the novelty of work given this knockdown line was previously published. Reviewer 5 has suggested some experimental work that would better support your conclusion in this paper that loss of GPI biosynthesis is responsible for the observed phenotype and provide more mechanistic insight.

Journal Requirements:

1) We noticed that you used the phrase 'data not shown' in the manuscript. We do not allow these references, as the PLOS data access policy requires that all data be either published with the manuscript or made available in a publicly accessible database. Please amend the supplementary material to include the referenced data or remove the references.

2) Please upload all main figures as separate Figure files in .tif or .eps format. For more information about how to convert and format your figure files please see our guidelines:

https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/s/figures

3) We have noticed that you have uploaded Supporting Information files, but you have not included a list of legends. Please add a full list of legends for your Supporting Information files after the references list.

4) Please ensure that the funders and grant numbers match between the Financial Disclosure field and the Funding Information tab in your submission form. Note that the funders must be provided in the same order in both places as well. State what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role in your study, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.".

If you did not receive any funding for this study, please simply state: u201cThe authors received no specific funding for this work.u201d

Reviewers' Comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: The main finding “the disruption of PfGNA1 led to the inability of mature parasites to

egress and reinvade new host red blood cells presumably through disruption of the HBP

and GPI biosynthesis pathways, thereby halting parasite development.”

is novel and relevant

Reviewer #2: Strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty/significance, general conduct and scientific rigour.

The present study is concerned with the inhibition of the biosynthesis of glycosylinositol, a glycolipid that occurs in free and protein-bound forms in the malaria parasite. The protein-bound form serves as an anchor for proteins in the outer leaflet of a membrane. The free forms play a role in the pathogenicity of malaria. In this respect, the present study could contribute to the development of chemotherapy beyond the mere scientific information.

UDP-GlNAc is required as a component of GPIs for biosynthesis. GlcNac is provided via the hexosamine biosynthesis pathway, which starts from D-glucose. By switching off the enzyme glucosamine-6-phosphate N-acetyltransferase which acetylates GlcN-6-P to GlcNAc-6-P, the biosynthesis of UDP-GlcNac is inhibited and, as a consequence, the synthesis of GPIs.

The investigations are carried out using state-of-the-art methods; this concerns the provision of the mutant, the mass spectroscopic investigations of the lipids and the imaging techniques. The new results are the outcome of collaboration between several highly specialized working groups.

The results merit publication.

Reviewer #3: In this manuscript, Alberione et al. have characterized the hexosamine biosynthesis pathway and discovered that PfGNA1 is essential for GPI production, parasite egress and viability. Overall, the study was well designed and supported by good data. There are several issues that should be addressed.

Reviewer #4: It is well established that Plasmodium has limited carbohydrate modifications to its proteins, and an apparent majority of the UDP-GlcNAc pool is used in the synthesis of GPI, which tethers a number of surface proteins to the parasite plasma membrane. In the present study, the authors phenotypically assess the inducible knockout of PfGNA1, which they have previously shown to be essential for parasite replication, presumably through its role in the hexosamine biosynthesis pathway. While the experiments performed here appear to be of high quality, new mechanistic insight is limited.

The authors have already published that inducible deletion of GNA1 blocks parasite replication through the expected biochemical mechanism. They have nice microscopy that shows mislocalization of one GPI-anchored protein (MSP1, which is known to be essential). They also have nice EM showing parasites are nonviable by the time of egress. But given the long time period in assessing phenotype (a full lytic cycle), and the fact that GPI anchored proteins like MSP1 are known to be essential, there isn’t much mechanism to be had here that wasn’t already known. The authors note that a large portion of the GPI in membranes is not anchored to any protein, and suggest it may be required for egress/motility. But no effort was made in the present study to differentiate whether the phenotype is due to a lack of GPI-anchored protein or just free GPI (probably both; I understand that this would be quite difficult to ascertain).

Reviewer #5: This study investigates the consequences of disrupting hexosamine biosynthesis (specifically GlcNAc6P synthesis) in the malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum. Rapamycin inducible knock-down of the gene encoding GlcN6P acetyltransferase (GlcN6P-AT) in asexual blood stages leads to parasite death over 1-2 cycles of infection, and correlates with a reduction in intracellular levels of down-stream intermediates in the hexosamine biosynthesis pathway; GlcNAc1/6P and UDP-GlcNAc. Further, disruption of the pathway leads to significant ultrastructural changes in blood stages, defects in the processing of the major GPI-anchored protein, MSP1, and defects in parasite egress. The authors propose that the observed phenotype primarily reflects the loss of GPI biosynthesis and expression/processing of GPI-anchored proteins, rather than loss of other GlcNAc-dependent pathways such as protein N-glycosylation. There is clear interest in understanding the function of different glycosylation pathways in these parasites and the work described in the manuscript is generally well performed. However, the novelty of this study is unclear. The authors have recently published a paper in which the same enzyme is inducibly knocked-out in the same parasite (Ref 5,6), and several other studies have shown that enzymes/pathways involved in GPI biosynthesis are essential in these parasites. More importantly, while the study provides additional phenotypic analysis of this mutant, the data do not yet support the author’s main conclusion that all of the changes are due to defects in GPI biosynthesis and GPI-protein assembly/trafficking. While the authors provide evidence that loss of GlcNAc6P-AT leads to a global defect in GPI, the study does not address the potential role of free versus protein-linked GPIs, or whether the concurrent loss of dolichol-oligosaccharides and/or protein N-glycosylation could also contribute to the phenotypes and parasite death. Further studies would therefore be needed to support the authors key conclusions and to progress the findings beyond what has been previously reported.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: No absolutely necessary additional experiments.

Reviewer #3: Major:

1, Throughout the paper, the authors refer to the first experimental cycle as cycle 0, which is somewhat misleading. It should be cycle 1 as it indicates the first cycle. The authors need to adjust all the cycle numbers accordingly to avoid any confusion (although the authors’ prior publications used cycle 0 to indicate cycle 1).

2, In addition to TEM, the egress defects should be better illustrated using live cell imaging. If this technique is not immediately available, the authors need to discuss this and indicate the limitations of TEM such as fixation artifacts and etc.

3, The idea that the inducible knockout (iKO) parasite was undergoing apoptosis has not been fully supported by the data. Nuclear condensation was not evident in Fig 5G/J. Other features of ‘apoptosis’ were not investigated.

4, One of the most striking features of the iKO was shown in Fig5, but it was not fully discussed by the authors. iKO seems to have more ribosomes, a phenomenon not just derived from irregular distribution. The authors focused on GPI and GPI-anchored proteins (MSP1) in this study. They should also check the literature to see whether anything is known about hexosamine biosynthesis and ribosome biogenesis.

The citation #40 was not properly used here as the study showed ribosome reduction after drug treatment, which is a totally different phenomenon than ribosome increasement upon knockout of GNA1.

Reviewer #4: (No Response)

Reviewer #5: Fig 1F. The signal for the HA-tagged protein in the immunoblot is very low/indistinct and it is hard to assess whether HA-protein is still expressed in the rapamycin-treated parasites (in which there is no background signal). Importantly, the Commassie Blue stained gels - which are used as a loading control but appear to be from different blots - suggest that less protein was loaded of the rapamycin-treated parasites. Overall, these analyses leave open the possibility that residual GlcNAc6P-AT activity may persist over more than one cycle. This is supported by the LC-MS data shown in Fig 2B-C which showed significant levels of UDP-GlcNAc and GlcNAc1/6P in the rapamycin-treated parasites. Further evidence demonstrating loss of GlcNAc6P-AT activity following knock-down and the kinetics of enzyme loss would assist with the interpretation of the other phenotypic analyses.

The authors conclude that parasite death (and all other preceding phenotypic changes) primarily reflect loss of GPI-protein expression/trafficking, although direct evidence for this conclusion is not provided. In Fig 3A, the authors show that total GPI levels have decreased in rapamycin-treated parasites - however, it is not clear when parasites were harvested (cycle, time point) and to what extent loss of GPIs tracks loss of GlcNAc6P-AT activity. The GC-MS assay also does not distinguish between free GPIs and protein-linked GPIs. Further dissection of dynamics of GPI loss versus loss of UDP-GlcNAc synthesis and parasite death are needed to support the authors conclusions.

The authors suggest that the phenotypes observed following rapamycin-treatment are not due to loss of N-glycosylation, as these effects would only manifest in the second or later cycles. However, I am not aware that this has been demonstrated definitively in the literature and also that it is likely to be very dependent on the mutant studied (for example defects in isoprenoid synthesis have pleiotropic effects). It is also worth noting that disruption of the function of just one protein due to a partial loss of N-glycosylation may be sufficient to cause parasite death. As a result, the authors really need to confirm that N-glycosylation is not affected in the first cycle and that hypo-N-glycolsylation of one or more proteins does not underlie the observed phenotypes.

Previous studies have shown that knock-down of GlcNAc6P-AT can be biochemically by-passed by supplementing cultures with GlcNAc. Inclusion of this control would provide strong support for the function of GlcNAc6PAT being primarily/exclusively enzymatic, rather than non-enzymatic, and should be included.

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: I suggest adding that disrupted parasite are not able to reinvade new RBC to abstract.

Quantification of disrupted or damaged food vacuole seen in 5H would be another killing mechanism important to quantify. You might be able to score existing EM images for rough estimate of disrupted FV like 1% or 10% or more. EM only looks at a single plane and will underestimate. Might a DV membrane protein marker like PfCRT or mdr1 be used to look at the ration of intact DVs. Poosibly a acridine orange stain or another pH marker could quantify percent of ruptured DV with disruption of this pathway.

Line 379 I suggest deleting leading to apoptosis as you have not shown this mechanism. You have other mechanisms of killing. This unsubstantiated mechanism distracts from an substantial body of work.

Minor

Line 84 suggest “some previous work reports”

Line 110-please report “may” contribute. The data is weak compared to other pathogen GPI on an inflammatory response. Malaria parasite number 40 million per mL for a one percent parasitemia and the Plasmodium GPI moiety have some but minor contribution to inflammation.

Reviewer #2: This reviewer suggests that the GPI biosynthetic pathway be presented in a similarly compact fashion to that used for the UDP-GlNAc biosynthetic pathway in Fig. 1A.

This would be helpful for readers outside the GPI domain.

The authors show by imaging techniques that the distribution of GPI-anchored proteins is abnormal compared to normal conditions. In my opinion, further clarification is needed. Is it caused by structural deviations of the GPI parts of the proteins? Are they proteins before transmission of the anchor that are anchored via their non cleaved hydrophobic end in the membrane? This could be clarified in part with the help of phospholipases or glycosidases.

In any case, the authors should at least include these aspects in their discussion.

Reviewer #3: Minor:

1, Fig 1A. Please illustrate the structures of the molecules in the HBP pathway.

2, Fig 1E. Please clearly describe how invasion rate was calculated. Was it the ratio of ring% compared to schizonts% of the prior cycle?

3, Fig 1F. Please comment on the protein expression level of GNA1. How much protein was loaded? The band ~ 30 kDa is barely visible. There is a more abundant band around 10 kDa. Was it a degradation product or a partially cleaved product of GNA1?

4, Line 126, the correct citation should be #5, not #6.

5, Line 233. The authors should indicate how many parasites were investigated and what is the percentage of normal MSP1 distribution in the inducible KO.

6, Fig 3C. In blots with MSP1 and AMA1, please indicate which band is the full-length protein and what are the bands of cleaved (or processed) products.

7, Line 246. This statement should be supported by quantification of band intensities. Fig 3C showed the bands in the Triton/Rapamycin lane were fainter compared to Triton/DMSO. It remains unclear whether MSP1 processing was affected.

8, Line 280. This citation was not numbered.

9, Line 323. The authors need to indicate how many parasites were investigated and what is the percentage of normal segmented parasites in the inducible KO.

10, Line 379. Apoptosis was not fully verified in this study.

11, Supplementary Typos, Line 54, y F4

12, Fig S3A, please indicate the positions of the start and stop codons.

Reviewer #4: (No Response)

Reviewer #5: Do the authors have any thoughts on why other metabolites unrelated to hexosamine synthesis (e.g N-carbamoyl-Asp) are elevated in the knock-out?

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: No

Reviewer #5: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

Figure resubmission:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step. If there are other versions of figure files still present in your submission file inventory at resubmission, please replace them with the PACE-processed versions.

Reproducibility:

?>

Decision Letter 1

Laura Kirkman

2 Jun 2025

Dear Dr. Izquierdo,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Hexosamine Biosynthesis Disruption Impairs GPI Production and Arrests Plasmodium falciparum Growth at Schizont Stages' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Laura Kirkman, MD

Academic Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Tracey Lamb

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Sumita Bhaduri-McIntosh

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0003-2946-9497

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************************************************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #4: The authors have responded productively to each of the reviewers.

Reviewer #5: This study investigates the consequences of disrupting hexosamine biosynthesis (specifically

GlcNAc6P synthesis) in the malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum. In this revised manuscript, the authors have addressed several of the major issues raised in the first review. Specifically, they present new data which support the conclusion that the phenotypes observed following disruption of hexosamine biosynthesis are largely due to a block in GPI biosynthesis rather than N-glycosylation. The use of exogenous GlcNAc to rescue lines until hexosamine synthesis had been inhibited in rapamycin-treated parasites was a clever addition. I thank the authors for their efforts in addressing the comments of all reviewers.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #4: I have no further comments

Reviewer #5: None

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #4: None noted

Reviewer #5: (No Response)

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #4: No

Reviewer #5: No

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers_PPATHOGENS-D-24-02739.docx

ppat.1012832.s018.docx (222.7KB, docx)

Acceptance letter

Laura Kirkman

Dear Dr Izquierdo,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Hexosamine Biosynthesis Disruption Impairs GPI Production and Arrests Plasmodium falciparum Growth at Schizont Stages," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the pre-publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Pearls, Reviews, Opinions, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript, if you opted to have an early version of your article, will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Sumita Bhaduri-McIntosh

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0003-2946-9497

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Glycosylation pathways involving UDP-GlcNAc in P. falciparum.

    The illustration shows the mechanisms of glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor biosynthesis and N-linked glycosylation in the endoplasmic reticulum. Additionally, it includes the presence of a potential O-GlcNAc cycling, which would require O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT) and O-GlcNAcase (OGA), although these enzymes have not been identified in the P. falciparum genome. Red dashed arrows indicate enzymatic reactions that depend on UDP-GlcNAc, the end product of the Hexosamine Biosynthetic Pathway (HBP). The diagram also includes GDP-mannose, a sugar nucleotide critical for GPI biosynthesis.

    (TIF)

    ppat.1012832.s001.tif (223.4KB, tif)
    S2 Fig. Cycle 0 to cycle 1 transition in II3 gna1-loxP parasites.

    A) Diagram of rapamycin-induced site-specific excision. The transgenic strain II3 gna1-loxP was generated by CRISPR-Cas9 in a DiCre-expressing strain [5]. The native gna1 gene was replaced by a recodonized version gen floxed by two loxP sites. The addition of rapamycin induces Cre recombinase dimerization, which recognizes the loxP sites and removes the sequence between them, inducing gna1 gene excision. Excision reduces the amplicon from 1,546 bp to 738 bp. The homology regions (HR) used for CRISPR-Cas9-based gna1 locus engineering are indicated. The hybridization sites of the primers P5 and P6 used to confirm gna1 excision are also shown. All primers used are described in S2 Table. B) Parasite growth during cycles 0 and 1 following gna1 gene disruption. The II3 gna1-loxP strain was tightly synchronized (5 hours) and treated with rapamycin or DMSO (control) for one hour. Parasitemia was measured immediately (rings, cycle 0) and 60 hours after sorbitol synchronization (rings, cycle 1) by flow cytometry. C) Invasion rates for II3 gna1-loxP parasites treated with either DMSO or rapamycin were calculated for the transition between developmental cycles 0 and 1. In panels B and C the graph shows mean ± SD values of three independent biological replicates. Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired t test. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

    (TIF)

    ppat.1012832.s002.tif (133.6KB, tif)
    S3 Fig. Relative transcript abundance of gna1 normalized to serine-tRNA ligase gene (seryl, reference gene) in DMSO and Rapamycin-treated parasites.

    RNAs were extracted from 25-30 hours trophozoites in both, cycle 0 and cycle 1. Transcript abundance was quantified from qPCR data using standard curves and is shown as mean ± standard deviation from three technical replicates. A reduction in transcript abundance was observed in the rapamycin-treated parasites, which is more pronounced in cycle 1 than in cycle 0. Values represent one biological replicate per condition. Statistical analyses were performed using an unpaired t test. ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.

    (TIF)

    ppat.1012832.s003.tif (61KB, tif)
    S4 Fig. GlcNAc supplementation during cycle 1 following complete PfGNA1 knockout restores parasite growth, indicating that PfGNA1’s essential role in asexual blood stages is enzymatic.

    A) Schematic representation of the timing of rapamycin (or mock, DMSO) treatment and GlcNAc supplementation. Rapamycin (or DMSO) were administered for one hour during cycle 0 after tight synchronization of parasites within a 5-hour window. 100 μM GlcNAc was added at the beginning of cycle 1 and maintained until the end of the experiment. The time points at which samples were collected for flow cytometry analysis are also indicated (white arrowheads). B) Parasite growth across cycles 1 and 2 following PfGNA1 disruption, assessed by flow cytometry. C) Invasion rates for parasites treated with either DMSO or rapamycin were measured during the transition from developmental cycle 1–2. In panel C, the graph shows the mean ± SD values of three technical replicates from one representative biological replicate out of three. Statistical analyses were performed using an unpaired t test. ****, P < 0.0001.

    (TIF)

    ppat.1012832.s004.tif (296.7KB, tif)
    S5 Fig. Generation and characterization of the asexual cycle of II3 gna1-3xHA-loxP line A) Diagram depicting the engineering of P. falciparum gna1.

    Using Cas9-mediated genome editing, the native gna1 open reading frame was replaced with a recodonized version of the P. falciparum gna1 gene containing three hemagglutinin (HA) epitopes at the N-terminus, with all the insert flanked by two loxP sites. Sequence insertion via double crossover homologous recombination was enabled by Cas9 endonuclease-induced double-strand breaks in the DNA, guided by a single guide RNA (sgRNA) targeting a 20-nucleotide region within gna1. Homology-directed repair was enabled by the addition of homologous sequences flaking the loxP sites. The HA-tag start codon is marked with a red tick mark with an arrowhead. The positions of the start and stop codons for gna1 are indicated by a black tick mark with an arrowhead and a red tick mark with a T-cap, respectively. B) PCR detection of transgenic parasites. PCR-based detection of transgenic parasites was performed using P1 and P2 primers, which amplify a 581 bp of the native gna1. The parental strain (II3) was included as a control. The primers P3 and P4 were used to amplify a 587 bp fragment corresponding to the recodonized version of gna1 in transgenic parasites (Clones A8, B6 and F4). The donor plasmid with the recodonized gna1 sequence, used for the generation of the transgenic lines, was included in the PCR as positive control (C+). All primers used are described in S2 Table. C) Parasite growth during cycles 0 and 1 following gna1 disruption. The II3 gna1-3xHA-loxP strain was tightly synchronized at a 5-hour window and treated with either rapamycin or DMSO (control) for one hour. Parasitemia was assessed immediately (rings, cycle 0) and 55 hours post-sorbitol synchronization (rings, cycle 1) using flow cytometry. D) II3 gna1-3xHA-loxP invasion rates were calculated for the transition between developmental cycle 0 and 1 following treatment with either DMSO or rapamycin. E) Parasite growth during cycle 1 and 2 following gna1 disruption. II3 gna1-3xHA-loxP rings from cycle 1 were adjusted to 1% parasitemia, and parasite growth throughout cycles 1 and 2 was monitored by flow cytometry. Parasitemia was measured immediately after adjustment (rings, cycle 1), 107 hours post-sorbitol (Trophozoites and Schizonts cycle 1) and 130 hours post-Sorbitol (Rings cycle 2 or Trophozoites and Schizonts cycle 1). F) Invasion rates for II3 gna1-3xHA-loxP parasites treated with either DMSO or rapamycin were calculated for the transition between developmental cycles 1 and 2. In panels C to F, analyses were performed on three different clones to account for biological variability.

    (TIF)

    ppat.1012832.s005.tif (464.3KB, tif)
    S6 Fig. Volcano plot showing global, targeted metabolomic changes between PfGNA1-disrupted and parental, non-treated parasites.

    A similar trend is observed when PfGNA1-disrupted parasites are compared with DMSO-treated parasites or parental non-treated parasites.

    (TIF)

    ppat.1012832.s006.tif (673.5KB, tif)
    S7 Fig. Lipid analysis of DMSO or rapamycin treated PfGNA1-disrupted parasites.

    Bligh-Dyer extracted lipids were analysed by ES-MS-MS, negative ion mode 820–1100 m/z, showing primarily the PI and PIP species. A) DMSO and B) Rapamycin PfGNA1-disrupted. Lipid identities confirmed by accurate mass and collision induced fragmentation.

    (TIF)

    ppat.1012832.s007.tif (254.3KB, tif)
    S8 Fig. GlcNAc supplementation during cycle 0 rescues the growth of PfGNA1-disrupted parasites, but the parasites die at the end of the same cycle following GlcNAc withdrawal.

    A) Schematic representation of the timing of rapamycin (or mock, DMSO) treatment and GlcNAc supplementation, administered during cycle 0 after tight synchronization of parasites within a 5-hour window. Rapamycin (or DMSO) were added for one hour while 100 μM GlcNAc was added at the beginning of cycle 0 and removed at the end of the same cycle, during the segmented schizont stage. The time points at which samples were collected for flow cytometry analysis are also indicated (white arrowheads). B) Parasite growth across cycles 0 and 1 following PfGNA1 disruption, assessed by flow cytometry. C) Invasion rates for parasites treated with either DMSO or rapamycin were measured during the transition from developmental cycle 0–1. D) Parasite growth across cycles 1 and 2 following PfGNA1 disruption and GlcNAc removal, assessed by flow cytometry. E) Invasion rates for parasites treated with either DMSO or rapamycin were measured during the transition from developmental cycle 1–2. In panels C and E, the graphs show the mean ± SD values of three technical replicates from one representative biological replicate out of three. Statistical analyses were performed using an unpaired t test. ****, P < 0.0001.

    (TIF)

    ppat.1012832.s008.tif (283.8KB, tif)
    S9 Fig. Parasite death in cycle 1 schizonts results from HBP disruption, leading to UDP-GlcNAc depletion and GPI reduction rather than N-glycosylation defects.

    A) Schematic representation of the timing of rapamycin (or mock, DMSO) treatment, GlcNAc supplementation, and tunicamycin treatment. Rapamycin (or DMSO) and GlcNAc were administered during cycle 0 following tight synchronization of parasites within a 5-hour window. Rapamycin and DMSO were added for one hour, while 100 μM GlcNAc was added at the beginning of cycle 0 and removed at the end of the same cycle, during the segmented schizont stage. To dissect the effect of N-glycosylation inhibition on DMSO- (mock) or Rapamycin-treated parasites (PfGNA1- and HBP-disrupted), 20 μM tunicamycin was added at the beginning of cycle 1 and maintained until the end of the experiment. Time points for sample collection by flow cytometry (white arrowheads) and Giemsa staining (black arrowheads) are also indicated. B) Parasite growth from cycle 0 to cycle 3 following PfGNA1 disruption, assessed by flow cytometry. C) Giemsa-stained smear images showing that rapamycin-treated parasites (with or without tunicamycin) failed to progress beyond cycle 1 schizonts, while DMSO-treated parasites exposed to tunicamycin died at the trophozoite stage of cycle 2. Thus, after PfGNA1-disruption parasite death is driven by UDP-GlcNAc depletion which halts GPI biosynthesis, rather than by the effect of tunicamycin. Scale bar represents 5 µm.

    (TIF)

    ppat.1012832.s009.tif (951KB, tif)
    S10 Fig. Quantification of GPI molecules per cell in DMSO- and rapamycin-treated segmented schizonts from cycle 0.

    A total of 3.3 × 10⁸ and 2.9 × 10⁸ parasites per replicate were analyzed for the DMSO and Rapamycin conditions, respectively. GPI molecules per cell were also quantified in 3.3 × 10⁸ uninfected RBCs per replicate, and the value obtained was subtracted from the parasite culture values to account for GPI molecules derived from the RBCs.

    (TIF)

    ppat.1012832.s010.tif (35.7KB, tif)
    S11 Fig. Supplementary immunofluorescence and Western blot analyses.

    A) Immunofluorescence microscopy showing the typical distribution of MSP1 in less than 6% of PfGNA1-disrupted schizonts. A total of 108 parasites were analyzed. MSP1 was labelled with a mouse anti-MSP1 (green), and nuclei were labelled with Hoechst 33342 (blue). Scale bar represents 5 µm. B) Western blot analysis of MSP1 and quantification of band intensities expressed relative to the control condition, which was set to 100%. Fragments showed a marked reduction in intensity, ranging from approximately 27% to 57% relative to the control. C) Protein bands visualized on the Coomassie-stained gel used as a loading control for the Western blot shown in Fig 3C. A total of 10 μg of protein was loaded for each condition.

    (TIF)

    ppat.1012832.s011.tif (518.8KB, tif)
    S12 Fig. Invasion assay of merozoites released mechanically.

    II3 gna1-loxP parasites were treated with rapamycin or DMSO during cycle 0 and incubated until the end of cycle 1. Merozoites were mechanically released from segmented schizonts and subsequently incubated with RBCs to allow invasion. Parasitemia was measured 24 hours later by flow cytometry and reported as the percentage of infected red blood cells relative to the percentage of schizonts before filtration. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired t test. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.

    (TIF)

    ppat.1012832.s012.tif (35.4KB, tif)
    S13 Fig. Transmission electron microscopy of PfGNA1-disrupted parasites.

    A) Transmission electron microscopy showing normal segmentation in less than 2% of PfGNA1-disrupted schizonts. A total of 90 parasites were analyzed. From left to right, the images were obtained at 30000x, 50000x and 80000x magnification, respectively. B) Transmission electron microscopy images depicting differences in PVM rupture between PfGNA1 conditional knockout schizonts treated with DMSO (control) and rapamycin, following treatment with E64. Arrowheads indicate parasites with an intact PVM, while asterisks mark those with fully disrupted PVM, evidenced by a lighter, less electron-dense appearance of the cytoplasm after PVM breakdown. Magnification: 5000x C) Comparison of the percentage of fully disrupted PVM in PfGNA1 conditional knockout parasites treated with DMSO (control) or rapamycin. Panel B is representative of more than 200 schizonts. For panel C, approximately 15 images containing over 200 schizonts, were analyzed for each condition. Schizonts were categorized based on whether their PVM was intact or disrupted. The statistical analysis of the boxplot in panel C was performed using unpaired t test. ***, P < 0.001.

    (TIF)

    ppat.1012832.s013.tif (2.2MB, tif)
    S14 Fig. Food vacuole integrity analysis by LysoTracker Red DND-99 staining of DMSO or Rapamycin-treated schizonts from cycle 1.

    A) Representative immunofluorescence microscopy images showing Lysotracker staining (orange) in segmented schizonts from cycle 1. Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (blue). LysoTracker Red DND-99 is a fluorescent probe that accumulates in acidic compartments. In DMSO-treated parasites, the food vacuole appeared as a distinct, round-shaped organelle with intense fluorescence signal. In contrast, in rapamycin-treated parasites, the fluorescence was dispersed irregularly throughout the cytoplasm. This pattern suggests disruption of the vacuolar membrane and loss of acidic compartmentalization, likely due to the breakdown of the food vacuole structure. Scale bar is 5 µm. B) Quantification of Lysotracker intensity shown as a scatter plot of individual data points. In rapamycin-treated parasites a reduction in LysoTracker signal intensity is observed. The mean is indicated by a blue line, and the standard error of the mean (SEM) by a red line. At least 500 schizonts were analyzed in each condition. Statistical significance was determined using Welch’s t-test. **** P < 0.0001.

    (TIF)

    ppat.1012832.s014.tif (787.2KB, tif)
    S1 Movie. PfGNA1 disrupted parasites display an egress defect.

    Synchronized parasites were treated with 10 nM rapamycin (or DMSO) in cycle 0 and allowed to develop until the end of cycle 1. Egress was reversibly blocked during 7 hours using ML10, followed by Percoll enrichment, ML10 washout, nuclei staining with Hoechst 33342 (1:5000) and live imaging. Parasites were observed by time-lapse DIC microscopy starting 10 minutes after ML10 removal, with images captured every 15 seconds. A total of 82 frames were acquired and exported at 5 frames per second. Rapamycin-treated parasites showed a clear egress defect compared to controls. Time in minutes is indicated in the top right corner of each frame.

    (MP4)

    Download video file (21MB, mp4)
    S1 Table. Enzymes involved in the Hexosamine biosynthetic pathway (HBP) in P. falciparum.

    (PDF)

    ppat.1012832.s016.pdf (91KB, pdf)
    S2 Table. List of primers used in this study.

    (PDF)

    ppat.1012832.s017.pdf (46.3KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers_PPATHOGENS-D-24-02739.docx

    ppat.1012832.s018.docx (222.7KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    The raw metabolomics data supporting the findings of this study have been deposited in the NIH Metabolomics Workbench under Study ID ST003642 and are publicly available at: https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org. The dataset can be accessed via DOI: 10.21228/M8J242.


    Articles from PLOS Pathogens are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES