Abstract
1. Transnasal pressure (delta p) in Pa and gas flow in cm3 s-1 were measured in men breathing gases of different density, assuming flow through each nostril (f) to be half the measured total flow. Measurements were also made in children with allergic rhinitis before and after nasal antigen challenge. 2. Flow always showed evidence of turbulence when transnasal pressure exceeded 40-80 Pa breathing air and Reynolds number exceeded 2400 (1800 in the presence of nasal obstruction). 3. Changes in effective mean nasal airway diameter (D) after nasal challenge can be determined at points of similar pressure from the relation log (D2/D1) = 0.368 log (f2/f1) when flow is turbulent. 4. Absolute estimates of airway diameter in cm can be obtained from the relation 4.75 log D = 1.75 log f--log delta p+log L--4.756 breathing air when flow is turbulent (since the relation between pressure and flow approximates to that found in a long cylinder) and these estimates are only marginally affected by differing assumptions about nasal airway length (L). 5. Because pressure and flow are non-linearly related, and changing nasal dimensions have a profound effect on the flow at which turbulence occurs, it is suggested that measures of nasal conductance at delta p greater than or equal to 0.1 kPa are preferable to the more conventional measures of nasal resistance at a specified flow rate.
Full text
PDF
Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Britton M. G., Empey D. W., John G. C., McDonnell K. A., Hughes D. T. Histamine challenge and anterior nasal rhinometry: their use in the assessment of pseudoephedrine and triprolidine as nasal decongestants in subjects with hayfever. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1978 Jul;6(1):51–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1978.tb01681.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cockcroft D. W., Hargreave F. E., Pengelly L. D. The effect of helium on nasal resistance and nasal flows. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1979 Sep;120(3):697–699. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1979.120.3.697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cockcroft D. W., MacCormack D. W., Tarlo S. M., Hargreave F. E., Pengelly L. D. Nasal airway inspiratory resistance. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1979 Jun;119(6):921–926. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1979.119.6.921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Connell J. T. An instrument for measuring the effective cross-sectional nasal airway. J Allergy. 1966 Mar;37(3):127–134. doi: 10.1016/0021-8707(66)90087-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foxen E. H., Preston T. D., Lack J. A. The assessment of nasal air-flow: a review of past and present methods. J Laryngol Otol. 1971 Aug;85(8):811–825. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100074107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jaeger M. J., Matthys H. The pattern of flow in the upper human airways. Respir Physiol. 1968 Dec;6(1):113–127. doi: 10.1016/0034-5687(68)90021-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mackay I. S. Measurement of nasal airflow and resistance. J R Soc Med. 1979 Nov;72(11):852–855. doi: 10.1177/014107687907201113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McLean J. A., Ciarkowski A. A., Solomon W. R., Mathews K. P. An improved technique for nasal inhalation challenge tests. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1976 Feb;57(2):153–163. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(76)90034-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nolte D., Lüder-Lühr I. Comparing measurements of nasal resistance by body plethysmography and by rhinomanometry. Respiration. 1973;30(1):31–38. doi: 10.1159/000192973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SOLOMON W. R., MCLEAN J. A., COOKINGHAM C., AHRONHEIM G., DEMUTH G. R. MEASUREMENT OF NASAL AIRWAY RESISTANCE. J Allergy. 1965 Jan-Feb;36:62–69. doi: 10.1016/0021-8707(65)90033-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor G., Shivalkar P. R. Changes in nasal airways resistance on antigenic challenge in allergic rhinitis. Clin Allergy. 1971 Mar;1(1):63–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1971.tb02448.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]