Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1994 Aug;67(2):532–547. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80513-2

Statistical analysis of synaptic transmission: model discrimination and confidence limits.

C Stricker 1, S Redman 1, D Daley 1
PMCID: PMC1225397  PMID: 7948672

Abstract

Procedures for discriminating between competing statistical models of synaptic transmission, and for providing confidence limits on the parameters of these models, have been developed. These procedures were tested against simulated data and were used to analyze the fluctuations in synaptic currents evoked in hippocampal neurones. All models were fitted to data using the Expectation-Maximization algorithm and a maximum likelihood criterion. Competing models were evaluated using the log-likelihood ratio (Wilks statistic). When the competing models were not nested, Monte Carlo sampling of the model used as the null hypothesis (H0) provided density functions against which H0 and the alternate model (H1) were tested. The statistic for the log-likelihood ratio was determined from the fit of H0 and H1 to these probability densities. This statistic was used to determine the significance level at which H0 could be rejected for the original data. When the competing models were nested, log-likelihood ratios and the chi 2 statistic were used to determine the confidence level for rejection. Once the model that provided the best statistical fit to the data was identified, many estimates for the model parameters were calculated by resampling the original data. Bootstrap techniques were then used to obtain the confidence limits of these parameters.

Full text

PDF
532

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bekkers J. M., Richerson G. B., Stevens C. F. Origin of variability in quantal size in cultured hippocampal neurons and hippocampal slices. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jul;87(14):5359–5362. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.14.5359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bekkers J. M., Stevens C. F. Presynaptic mechanism for long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature. 1990 Aug 23;346(6286):724–729. doi: 10.1038/346724a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clamann H. P., Rioult-Pedotti M. S., Lüscher H. R. The influence of noise on quantal EPSP size obtained by deconvolution in spinal motoneurons in the cat. J Neurophysiol. 1991 Jan;65(1):67–75. doi: 10.1152/jn.1991.65.1.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clements J. D., Forsythe I. D., Redman S. J. Presynaptic inhibition of synaptic potentials evoked in cat spinal motoneurones by impulses in single group Ia axons. J Physiol. 1987 Feb;383:153–169. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clements J. Quantal synaptic transmission? Nature. 1991 Oct 3;353(6343):396–396. doi: 10.1038/353396a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. Quantal components of the end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1954 Jun 28;124(3):560–573. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Foster T. C., McNaughton B. L. Long-term enhancement of CA1 synaptic transmission is due to increased quantal size, not quantal content. Hippocampus. 1991 Jan;1(1):79–91. doi: 10.1002/hipo.450010108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jack J. J., Redman S. J., Wong K. The components of synaptic potentials evoked in cat spinal motoneurones by impulses in single group Ia afferents. J Physiol. 1981 Dec;321:65–96. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Korn H., Mallet A., Triller A., Faber D. S. Transmission at a central inhibitory synapse. II. Quantal description of release, with a physical correlate for binomial n. J Neurophysiol. 1982 Sep;48(3):679–707. doi: 10.1152/jn.1982.48.3.679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Liao D., Jones A., Malinow R. Direct measurement of quantal changes underlying long-term potentiation in CA1 hippocampus. Neuron. 1992 Dec;9(6):1089–1097. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90068-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Malinow R., Tsien R. W. Presynaptic enhancement shown by whole-cell recordings of long-term potentiation in hippocampal slices. Nature. 1990 Jul 12;346(6280):177–180. doi: 10.1038/346177a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sayer R. J., Redman S. J., Andersen P. Amplitude fluctuations in small EPSPs recorded from CA1 pyramidal cells in the guinea pig hippocampal slice. J Neurosci. 1989 Mar;9(3):840–850. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-03-00840.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Turner D. A., West M. Bayesian analysis of mixtures applied to post-synaptic potential fluctuations. J Neurosci Methods. 1993 Apr;47(1-2):1–21. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(93)90017-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Voronin L. L., Kuhnt U., Ivanov N. V., Gusev A. G. Reliability of quantal parameter estimates and their changes during long-term potentiation in guinea pig hippocampal slices. Neurosci Lett. 1992 Oct 26;146(1):111–114. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(92)90185-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Walmsley B., Edwards F. R., Tracey D. J. Nonuniform release probabilities underlie quantal synaptic transmission at a mammalian excitatory central synapse. J Neurophysiol. 1988 Sep;60(3):889–908. doi: 10.1152/jn.1988.60.3.889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Walmsley B., Edwards F. R., Tracey D. J. The probabilistic nature of synaptic transmission at a mammalian excitatory central synapse. J Neurosci. 1987 Apr;7(4):1037–1046. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.07-04-01037.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wong K., Redman S. The recovery of a random variable from a noisy record with application to the study of fluctuations in synaptic potentials. J Neurosci Methods. 1980 Aug;2(4):389–409. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(80)90005-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES