Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1994 Oct;67(4):1501–1515. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80624-1

Parallel helix bundles and ion channels: molecular modeling via simulated annealing and restrained molecular dynamics.

I D Kerr 1, R Sankararamakrishnan 1, O S Smart 1, M S Sansom 1
PMCID: PMC1225513  PMID: 7529585

Abstract

A parallel bundle of transmembrane (TM) alpha-helices surrounding a central pore is present in several classes of ion channel, including the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR). We have modeled bundles of hydrophobic and of amphipathic helices using simulated annealing via restrained molecular dynamics. Bundles of Ala20 helices, with N = 4, 5, or 6 helices/bundle were generated. For all three N values the helices formed left-handed coiled coils, with pitches ranging from 160 A (N = 4) to 240 A (N = 6). Pore radius profiles revealed constrictions at residues 3, 6, 10, 13, and 17. A left-handed coiled coil and a similar pattern of pore constrictions were observed for N = 5 bundles of Leu20. In contrast, N = 5 bundles of Ile20 formed right-handed coiled coils, reflecting loosened packing of helices containing beta-branched side chains. Bundles formed by each of two classes of amphipathic helices were examined: (a) M2a, M2b, and M2c derived from sequences of M2 helices of nAChR; and (b) (LSSLLSL)3, a synthetic channel-forming peptide. Both classes of amphipathic helix formed left-handed coiled coils. For (LSSLLSL)3 the pitch of the coil increased as N increased from 4 to 6. The M2c N = 5 helix bundle is discussed in the context of possible models of the pore domain of nAChR.

Full text

PDF
1501

Images in this article

1504FIGURE 1
on p.1504
1507FIGURE 3
on p.1507

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adamson J. G., Zhou N. E., Hodges R. S. Structure, function and application of the coiled-coil protein folding motif. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1993 Aug;4(4):428–437. doi: 10.1016/0958-1669(93)90008-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker E. N., Hubbard R. E. Hydrogen bonding in globular proteins. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1984;44(2):97–179. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(84)90007-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bertrand D., Galzi J. L., Devillers-Thiéry A., Bertrand S., Changeux J. P. Stratification of the channel domain in neurotransmitter receptors. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1993 Aug;5(4):688–693. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(93)90141-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Breed J., Sansom M. S. Alamethicin channels modelled by simulated annealing and molecular dynamics. Biochem Soc Trans. 1994 May;22(2):157S–157S. doi: 10.1042/bst022157s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Changeux J. P., Galzi J. L., Devillers-Thiéry A., Bertrand D. The functional architecture of the acetylcholine nicotinic receptor explored by affinity labelling and site-directed mutagenesis. Q Rev Biophys. 1992 Nov;25(4):395–432. doi: 10.1017/s0033583500004352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Charnet P., Labarca C., Leonard R. J., Vogelaar N. J., Czyzyk L., Gouin A., Davidson N., Lester H. A. An open-channel blocker interacts with adjacent turns of alpha-helices in the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Neuron. 1990 Jan;4(1):87–95. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90445-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chothia C., Levitt M., Richardson D. Helix to helix packing in proteins. J Mol Biol. 1981 Jan 5;145(1):215–250. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90341-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chothia C. Principles that determine the structure of proteins. Annu Rev Biochem. 1984;53:537–572. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.53.070184.002541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chou K. C., Carlacci L. Simulated annealing approach to the study of protein structures. Protein Eng. 1991 Aug;4(6):661–667. doi: 10.1093/protein/4.6.661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cohen C., Parry D. A. Alpha-helical coiled coils and bundles: how to design an alpha-helical protein. Proteins. 1990;7(1):1–15. doi: 10.1002/prot.340070102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cohen C., Parry D. A. Alpha-helical coiled coils: more facts and better predictions. Science. 1994 Jan 28;263(5146):488–489. doi: 10.1126/science.8290957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. DeGrado W. F., Wasserman Z. R., Lear J. D. Protein design, a minimalist approach. Science. 1989 Feb 3;243(4891):622–628. doi: 10.1126/science.2464850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Deber C. M., Brandl C. J., Deber R. B., Hsu L. C., Young X. K. Amino acid composition of the membrane and aqueous domains of integral membrane proteins. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1986 Nov 15;251(1):68–76. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(86)90052-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Eisenman G., Alvarez O. Structure and function of channels and channelogs as studied by computational chemistry. J Membr Biol. 1991 Jan;119(2):109–132. doi: 10.1007/BF01871411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Furois-Corbin S., Pullman A. Theoretical study of the packing of alpha-helices into possible transmembrane bundles. Sequences including alanines, leucines and serines. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1987 Aug 7;902(1):31–45. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(87)90133-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Giraudat J., Dennis M., Heidmann T., Haumont P. Y., Lederer F., Changeux J. P. Structure of the high-affinity binding site for noncompetitive blockers of the acetylcholine receptor: [3H]chlorpromazine labels homologous residues in the beta and delta chains. Biochemistry. 1987 May 5;26(9):2410–2418. doi: 10.1021/bi00383a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gray T. M., Matthews B. W. Intrahelical hydrogen bonding of serine, threonine and cysteine residues within alpha-helices and its relevance to membrane-bound proteins. J Mol Biol. 1984 May 5;175(1):75–81. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90446-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Harbury P. B., Zhang T., Kim P. S., Alber T. A switch between two-, three-, and four-stranded coiled coils in GCN4 leucine zipper mutants. Science. 1993 Nov 26;262(5138):1401–1407. doi: 10.1126/science.8248779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hucho F., Oberthür W., Lottspeich F. The ion channel of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor is formed by the homologous helices M II of the receptor subunits. FEBS Lett. 1986 Sep 1;205(1):137–142. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(86)80881-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jähnig F., Edholm O. Modeling of the structure of bacteriorhodopsin. A molecular dynamics study. J Mol Biol. 1992 Aug 5;226(3):837–850. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90635-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kerr I. D., Sankararamakrishnan R., Sansom M. S. Simplified models of the pore domain of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Biochem Soc Trans. 1994 May;22(2):158S–158S. doi: 10.1042/bst022158s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kerr I. D., Sansom M. S. Hydrophilic surface maps of channel-forming peptides: analysis of amphipathic helices. Eur Biophys J. 1993;22(4):269–277. doi: 10.1007/BF00180261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kienker P. K., DeGrado W. F., Lear J. D. A helical-dipole model describes the single-channel current rectification of an uncharged peptide ion channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 May 24;91(11):4859–4863. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.11.4859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lear J. D., Wasserman Z. R., DeGrado W. F. Synthetic amphiphilic peptide models for protein ion channels. Science. 1988 May 27;240(4856):1177–1181. doi: 10.1126/science.2453923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lemmon M. A., Treutlein H. R., Adams P. D., Brünger A. T., Engelman D. M. A dimerization motif for transmembrane alpha-helices. Nat Struct Biol. 1994 Mar;1(3):157–163. doi: 10.1038/nsb0394-157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Leonard R. J., Labarca C. G., Charnet P., Davidson N., Lester H. A. Evidence that the M2 membrane-spanning region lines the ion channel pore of the nicotinic receptor. Science. 1988 Dec 16;242(4885):1578–1581. doi: 10.1126/science.2462281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lester H. A. The permeation pathway of neurotransmitter-gated ion channels. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1992;21:267–292. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.21.060192.001411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Li S. C., Deber C. M. A measure of helical propensity for amino acids in membrane environments. Nat Struct Biol. 1994 Jun;1(6):368–373. doi: 10.1038/nsb0694-368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Li S. C., Deber C. M. Glycine and beta-branched residues support and modulate peptide helicity in membrane environments. FEBS Lett. 1992 Oct 26;311(3):217–220. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(92)81106-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lovejoy B., Choe S., Cascio D., McRorie D. K., DeGrado W. F., Eisenberg D. Crystal structure of a synthetic triple-stranded alpha-helical bundle. Science. 1993 Feb 26;259(5099):1288–1293. doi: 10.1126/science.8446897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lupas A., Van Dyke M., Stock J. Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences. Science. 1991 May 24;252(5009):1162–1164. doi: 10.1126/science.252.5009.1162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. McGregor M. J., Islam S. A., Sternberg M. J. Analysis of the relationship between side-chain conformation and secondary structure in globular proteins. J Mol Biol. 1987 Nov 20;198(2):295–310. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90314-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mellor I. R., Thomas D. H., Sansom M. S. Properties of ion channels formed by Staphylococcus aureus delta-toxin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1988 Jul 21;942(2):280–294. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(88)90030-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Montal M. O., Iwamoto T., Tomich J. M., Montal M. Design, synthesis and functional characterization of a pentameric channel protein that mimics the presumed pore structure of the nicotinic cholinergic receptor. FEBS Lett. 1993 Apr 12;320(3):261–266. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(93)80599-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Montal M. Molecular anatomy and molecular design of channel proteins. FASEB J. 1990 Jun;4(9):2623–2635. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.4.9.1693348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nilges M., Brünger A. T. Automated modeling of coiled coils: application to the GCN4 dimerization region. Protein Eng. 1991 Aug;4(6):649–659. doi: 10.1093/protein/4.6.649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Nilges M., Brünger A. T. Successful prediction of the coiled coil geometry of the GCN4 leucine zipper domain by simulated annealing: comparison to the X-ray structure. Proteins. 1993 Feb;15(2):133–146. doi: 10.1002/prot.340150205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. O'Shea E. K., Klemm J. D., Kim P. S., Alber T. X-ray structure of the GCN4 leucine zipper, a two-stranded, parallel coiled coil. Science. 1991 Oct 25;254(5031):539–544. doi: 10.1126/science.1948029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Oiki S., Danho W., Madison V., Montal M. M2 delta, a candidate for the structure lining the ionic channel of the nicotinic cholinergic receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Nov;85(22):8703–8707. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.22.8703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Oiki S., Madison V., Montal M. Bundles of amphipathic transmembrane alpha-helices as a structural motif for ion-conducting channel proteins: studies on sodium channels and acetylcholine receptors. Proteins. 1990;8(3):226–236. doi: 10.1002/prot.340080305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Oliver A. E., Deamer D. W. Alpha-helical hydrophobic polypeptides form proton-selective channels in lipid bilayers. Biophys J. 1994 May;66(5):1364–1379. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80927-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Phillips G. N., Jr What is the pitch of the alpha-helical coiled coil? Proteins. 1992 Dec;14(4):425–429. doi: 10.1002/prot.340140403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Raghunathan G., Seetharamulu P., Brooks B. R., Guy H. R. Models of delta-hemolysin membrane channels and crystal structures. Proteins. 1990;8(3):213–225. doi: 10.1002/prot.340080304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Reddy B. V., Blundell T. L. Packing of secondary structural elements in proteins. Analysis and prediction of inter-helix distances. J Mol Biol. 1993 Oct 5;233(3):464–479. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Revah F., Bertrand D., Galzi J. L., Devillers-Thiéry A., Mulle C., Hussy N., Bertrand S., Ballivet M., Changeux J. P. Mutations in the channel domain alter desensitization of a neuronal nicotinic receptor. Nature. 1991 Oct 31;353(6347):846–849. doi: 10.1038/353846a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rozzelle J. E., Jr, Tropsha A., Erickson B. W. Rational design of a three-heptad coiled-coil protein and comparison by molecular dynamics simulation with the GCN4 coiled coil: presence of interior three-center hydrogen bonds. Protein Sci. 1994 Feb;3(2):345–355. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560030217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sansom M. S. Acetylcholine receptors: peering down a pore. Curr Biol. 1993 Apr 1;3(4):240–241. doi: 10.1016/0960-9822(93)90344-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sansom M. S. Alamethicin and related peptaibols--model ion channels. Eur Biophys J. 1993;22(2):105–124. doi: 10.1007/BF00196915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sansom M. S., Kerr I. D. Influenza virus M2 protein: a molecular modelling study of the ion channel. Protein Eng. 1993 Jan;6(1):65–74. doi: 10.1093/protein/6.1.65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sansom M. S. Structure and function of channel-forming peptaibols. Q Rev Biophys. 1993 Nov;26(4):365–421. doi: 10.1017/s0033583500002833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Sansom M. S. The biophysics of peptide models of ion channels. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1991;55(3):139–235. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(91)90004-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Sansom M. S. The roles of serine and threonine sidechains in ion channels: a modelling study. Eur Biophys J. 1992;21(4):281–298. doi: 10.1007/BF00185123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Seo J., Cohen C. Pitch diversity in alpha-helical coiled coils. Proteins. 1993 Mar;15(3):223–234. doi: 10.1002/prot.340150302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Sippl M. J. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J Mol Biol. 1990 Jun 20;213(4):859–883. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80269-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Smart O. S., Goodfellow J. M., Wallace B. A. The pore dimensions of gramicidin A. Biophys J. 1993 Dec;65(6):2455–2460. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81293-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Stroud R. M., McCarthy M. P., Shuster M. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor superfamily of ligand-gated ion channels. Biochemistry. 1990 Dec 18;29(50):11009–11023. doi: 10.1021/bi00502a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Treutlein H. R., Lemmon M. A., Engelman D. M., Brünger A. T. The glycophorin A transmembrane domain dimer: sequence-specific propensity for a right-handed supercoil of helices. Biochemistry. 1992 Dec 29;31(51):12726–12732. doi: 10.1021/bi00166a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Unwin N. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor at 9 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 1993 Feb 20;229(4):1101–1124. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Unwin N. The structure of ion channels in membranes of excitable cells. Neuron. 1989 Dec;3(6):665–676. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(89)90235-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Villarroel A., Herlitze S., Koenen M., Sakmann B. Location of a threonine residue in the alpha-subunit M2 transmembrane segment that determines the ion flow through the acetylcholine receptor channel. Proc Biol Sci. 1991 Jan 22;243(1306):69–74. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1991.0012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhang L., Hermans J. Molecular dynamics study of structure and stability of a model coiled coil. Proteins. 1993 Aug;16(4):384–392. doi: 10.1002/prot.340160407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES