Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1994 Nov;67(5):1816–1822. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80663-0

Attempts to define functional domains of gap junction proteins with synthetic peptides.

G Dahl 1, W Nonner 1, R Werner 1
PMCID: PMC1225555  PMID: 7858120

Abstract

To map the binding sites involved in channel formation, synthetic peptides representing sequences of connexin 32 were tested for their ability to inhibit cell-cell channel formation. Both large peptides representing most of the two presumed extracellular loops of connexin32 and shorter peptides representing subsets of these larger peptides were found to inhibit cell-cell channel formation. The properties of the peptide inhibition suggested that the binding site is complex, involving several segments of both extracellular loops. One of the peptides (a 12-mer) did not inhibit but instead was found to form channels in membranes. Both in oocyte membranes and in bilayers, the channels formed by the peptide were asymmetrically voltage dependent. Their unit conductances ranged from 20 to 160 pS. These data are discussed in the form of a model in which the connexin sequence represented by the peptide is part of a beta structure providing the lining of the channel pore.

Full text

PDF
1816

Images in this article

1818FIGURE 2
on p.1818
1820FIGURE 6
on p.1820

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Akabas M. H., Stauffer D. A., Xu M., Karlin A. Acetylcholine receptor channel structure probed in cysteine-substitution mutants. Science. 1992 Oct 9;258(5080):307–310. doi: 10.1126/science.1384130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bennett M. V., Barrio L. C., Bargiello T. A., Spray D. C., Hertzberg E., Sáez J. C. Gap junctions: new tools, new answers, new questions. Neuron. 1991 Mar;6(3):305–320. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90241-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dahl G., Levine E., Rabadan-Diehl C., Werner R. Cell/cell channel formation involves disulfide exchange. Eur J Biochem. 1991 Apr 10;197(1):141–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1991.tb15892.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dahl G., Miller T., Paul D., Voellmy R., Werner R. Expression of functional cell-cell channels from cloned rat liver gap junction complementary DNA. Science. 1987 Jun 5;236(4806):1290–1293. doi: 10.1126/science.3035715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Durell S. R., Guy H. R. Atomic scale structure and functional models of voltage-gated potassium channels. Biophys J. 1992 Apr;62(1):238–250. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81809-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gilula N. B. Topology of gap junction protein and channel function. Ciba Found Symp. 1987;125:128–139. doi: 10.1002/9780470513408.ch8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goodenough D. A., Paul D. L., Jesaitis L. Topological distribution of two connexin32 antigenic sites in intact and split rodent hepatocyte gap junctions. J Cell Biol. 1988 Nov;107(5):1817–1824. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.5.1817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Heinemann S. H., Terlau H., Stühmer W., Imoto K., Numa S. Calcium channel characteristics conferred on the sodium channel by single mutations. Nature. 1992 Apr 2;356(6368):441–443. doi: 10.1038/356441a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hertzberg E. L., Disher R. M., Tiller A. A., Zhou Y., Cook R. G. Topology of the Mr 27,000 liver gap junction protein. Cytoplasmic localization of amino- and carboxyl termini and a hydrophilic domain which is protease-hypersensitive. J Biol Chem. 1988 Dec 15;263(35):19105–19111. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kamboj R. K., Gariepy J., Siu C. H. Identification of an octapeptide involved in homophilic interaction of the cell adhesion molecule gp80 of dictyostelium discoideum. Cell. 1989 Nov 17;59(4):615–625. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90007-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kozak M. Context effects and inefficient initiation at non-AUG codons in eucaryotic cell-free translation systems. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Nov;9(11):5073–5080. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.11.5073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kunkel T. A. Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jan;82(2):488–492. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.2.488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Laird D. W., Revel J. P. Biochemical and immunochemical analysis of the arrangement of connexin43 in rat heart gap junction membranes. J Cell Sci. 1990 Sep;97(Pt 1):109–117. doi: 10.1242/jcs.97.1.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Levine E., Werner R., Dahl G. Cell-cell channel formation and lectins. Am J Physiol. 1991 Dec;261(6 Pt 1):C1025–C1032. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1991.261.6.C1025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lis H., Sharon N. Protein glycosylation. Structural and functional aspects. Eur J Biochem. 1993 Nov 15;218(1):1–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb18347.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Makowski L., Caspar D. L., Phillips W. C., Goodenough D. A. Gap junction structures. II. Analysis of the x-ray diffraction data. J Cell Biol. 1977 Aug;74(2):629–645. doi: 10.1083/jcb.74.2.629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Manjunath C. K., Page E. Rat heart gap junctions as disulfide-bonded connexon multimers: their depolymerization and solubilization in deoxycholate. J Membr Biol. 1986;90(1):43–57. doi: 10.1007/BF01869685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Meyer R. A., Laird D. W., Revel J. P., Johnson R. G. Inhibition of gap junction and adherens junction assembly by connexin and A-CAM antibodies. J Cell Biol. 1992 Oct;119(1):179–189. doi: 10.1083/jcb.119.1.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Montal M. Molecular anatomy and molecular design of channel proteins. FASEB J. 1990 Jun;4(9):2623–2635. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.4.9.1693348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Paul D. L., Ebihara L., Takemoto L. J., Swenson K. I., Goodenough D. A. Connexin46, a novel lens gap junction protein, induces voltage-gated currents in nonjunctional plasma membrane of Xenopus oocytes. J Cell Biol. 1991 Nov;115(4):1077–1089. doi: 10.1083/jcb.115.4.1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Paul D. L. Molecular cloning of cDNA for rat liver gap junction protein. J Cell Biol. 1986 Jul;103(1):123–134. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.1.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Spray D. C., Harris A. L., Bennett M. V. Equilibrium properties of a voltage-dependent junctional conductance. J Gen Physiol. 1981 Jan;77(1):77–93. doi: 10.1085/jgp.77.1.77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Suarez-Isla B. A., Wan K., Lindstrom J., Montal M. Single-channel recordings from purified acetylcholine receptors reconstituted in bilayers formed at the tip of patch pipets. Biochemistry. 1983 May 10;22(10):2319–2323. doi: 10.1021/bi00279a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tosteson M. T., Auld D. S., Tosteson D. C. Voltage-gated channels formed in lipid bilayers by a positively charged segment of the Na-channel polypeptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Jan;86(2):707–710. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.2.707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Walian P. J., Jap B. K. Three-dimensional electron diffraction of PhoE porin to 2.8 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):429–438. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80362-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Werner R., Levine E., Rabadan-Diehl C., Dahl G. Formation of hybrid cell-cell channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Jul;86(14):5380–5384. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.14.5380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Werner R., Levine E., Rabadan-Diehl C., Dahl G. Gating properties of connexin32 cell-cell channels and their mutants expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Proc Biol Sci. 1991 Jan 22;243(1306):5–11. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1991.0002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhang J. T., Ling V. Study of membrane orientation and glycosylated extracellular loops of mouse P-glycoprotein by in vitro translation. J Biol Chem. 1991 Sep 25;266(27):18224–18232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES