Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1994 Dec;67(6):2251–2260. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80709-X

Calculation of electrostatic effects at the amino terminus of an alpha helix.

D Sitkoff 1, D J Lockhart 1, K A Sharp 1, B Honig 1
PMCID: PMC1225608  PMID: 7696466

Abstract

It is generally believed that the electrostatic field arising from the dipolar charge distribution in alpha helices is important for protein structure and function. We report a calculation of the electrostatic potential and field at the amino terminus of an alpha helix in water, obtained from a finite difference solution to the Poisson-Boltzmann equation. This method takes into account the detailed helix shape and charge distribution, as well as solvent, and generalized ionic strength effects. The calculated potential and field are found to be in good agreement with the experimentally observed helix-induced Stark effect and pKa shifts of a probe at the N-terminus of a stable, monomeric alpha-helical peptide (Lockhart and Kim, 1992, 1993). Ionic screening effects are reproduced at low salt concentrations. Deviations at higher salt concentrations may result from specific ion effects (specific ion-solute and/or ion-solvent interactions). The FDPB method was used to analyze the contributions from each residue, charged side chains, and solvent to the helix potential and field. Backbone contributions come primarily from the first one to two helical turns. Charged side chains contribute to helix-induced pKa shifts for certain probe-peptide combinations, even at relatively large distances from the probe (> 14 A).

Full text

PDF
2251

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anni H., Vanderkooi J. M., Sharp K. A., Yonetani T., Hopkins S. C., Herenyi L., Fidy J. Electric field and conformational effects of cytochrome c and solvent on cytochrome c peroxidase studied by high-resolution fluorescence spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 1994 Mar 29;33(12):3475–3486. doi: 10.1021/bi00178a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Antosiewicz J., McCammon J. A., Gilson M. K. Prediction of pH-dependent properties of proteins. J Mol Biol. 1994 May 6;238(3):415–436. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aqvist J., Luecke H., Quiocho F. A., Warshel A. Dipoles localized at helix termini of proteins stabilize charges. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Mar 1;88(5):2026–2030. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.5.2026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bashford D., Gerwert K. Electrostatic calculations of the pKa values of ionizable groups in bacteriorhodopsin. J Mol Biol. 1992 Mar 20;224(2):473–486. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)91009-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bashford D., Karplus M. pKa's of ionizable groups in proteins: atomic detail from a continuum electrostatic model. Biochemistry. 1990 Nov 6;29(44):10219–10225. doi: 10.1021/bi00496a010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Beroza P., Fredkin D. R., Okamura M. Y., Feher G. Protonation of interacting residues in a protein by a Monte Carlo method: application to lysozyme and the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jul 1;88(13):5804–5808. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.13.5804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gilson M. K., Honig B. H. Energetics of charge-charge interactions in proteins. Proteins. 1988;3(1):32–52. doi: 10.1002/prot.340030104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gilson M. K. Multiple-site titration and molecular modeling: two rapid methods for computing energies and forces for ionizable groups in proteins. Proteins. 1993 Mar;15(3):266–282. doi: 10.1002/prot.340150305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gilson M. K., Rashin A., Fine R., Honig B. On the calculation of electrostatic interactions in proteins. J Mol Biol. 1985 Aug 5;184(3):503–516. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90297-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Goodman E. M., Kim P. S. Folding of a peptide corresponding to the alpha-helix in bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. Biochemistry. 1989 May 16;28(10):4343–4347. doi: 10.1021/bi00436a033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hamaguchi N., Charifson P., Darden T., Xiao L., Padmanabhan K., Tulinsky A., Hiskey R., Pedersen L. Molecular dynamics simulation of bovine prothrombin fragment 1 in the presence of calcium ions. Biochemistry. 1992 Sep 22;31(37):8840–8848. doi: 10.1021/bi00152a021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hol W. G. The role of the alpha-helix dipole in protein function and structure. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1985;45(3):149–195. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(85)90001-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kitson D. H., Hagler A. T. Theoretical studies of the structure and molecular dynamics of a peptide crystal. Biochemistry. 1988 Jul 12;27(14):5246–5257. doi: 10.1021/bi00414a045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lockhart D. J., Kim P. S. Electrostatic screening of charge and dipole interactions with the helix backbone. Science. 1993 Apr 9;260(5105):198–202. doi: 10.1126/science.8469972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lockhart D. J., Kim P. S. Internal stark effect measurement of the electric field at the amino terminus of an alpha helix. Science. 1992 Aug 14;257(5072):947–951. doi: 10.1126/science.1502559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lodi P. J., Knowles J. R. Direct evidence for the exploitation of an alpha-helix in the catalytic mechanism of triosephosphate isomerase. Biochemistry. 1993 Apr 27;32(16):4338–4343. doi: 10.1021/bi00067a024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Loewenthal R., Sancho J., Reinikainen T., Fersht A. R. Long-range surface charge-charge interactions in proteins. Comparison of experimental results with calculations from a theoretical method. J Mol Biol. 1993 Jul 20;232(2):574–583. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Loncharich R. J., Brooks B. R. The effects of truncating long-range forces on protein dynamics. Proteins. 1989;6(1):32–45. doi: 10.1002/prot.340060104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nicholson H., Anderson D. E., Dao-pin S., Matthews B. W. Analysis of the interaction between charged side chains and the alpha-helix dipole using designed thermostable mutants of phage T4 lysozyme. Biochemistry. 1991 Oct 15;30(41):9816–9828. doi: 10.1021/bi00105a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sancho J., Neira J. L., Fersht A. R. An N-terminal fragment of barnase has residual helical structure similar to that in a refolding intermediate. J Mol Biol. 1992 Apr 5;224(3):749–758. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90559-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Schreiber H., Steinhauser O. Cutoff size does strongly influence molecular dynamics results on solvated polypeptides. Biochemistry. 1992 Jun 30;31(25):5856–5860. doi: 10.1021/bi00140a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sharp K. A., Honig B. Electrostatic interactions in macromolecules: theory and applications. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1990;19:301–332. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.19.060190.001505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shoemaker K. R., Kim P. S., York E. J., Stewart J. M., Baldwin R. L. Tests of the helix dipole model for stabilization of alpha-helices. Nature. 1987 Apr 9;326(6113):563–567. doi: 10.1038/326563a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tidor B., Karplus M. Simulation analysis of the stability mutant R96H of T4 lysozyme. Biochemistry. 1991 Apr 2;30(13):3217–3228. doi: 10.1021/bi00227a009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Yang A. S., Gunner M. R., Sampogna R., Sharp K., Honig B. On the calculation of pKas in proteins. Proteins. 1993 Mar;15(3):252–265. doi: 10.1002/prot.340150304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES