Abstract
Tick-borne lymphadenopathy (TIBOLA) is a rickettsial infection caused by Rickettsia slovaca. It has been increasingly identified across Europe. We present the case of TIBOLA with a unique erythematous forehead rash, which hasn't been described before. Four days after a tick bite on the scalp, a woman presented to the emergency department with a painful swelling in the right retroauricular area and a headache. Examination revealed a palpable lymph node and fever. No eschar was observed. Initial serology for common tick-borne infections was negative. Three days later, she returned to the hospital with an erythematous rash on her forehead. Despite not receiving antibiotic treatment, the symptoms resolved spontaneously. A follow-up serum sample, taken six weeks later, showed seroconversion for spotted fever group rickettsia, leading to the diagnosis of TIBOLA. TIBOLA often goes unrecognized due to nonspecific symptoms and the hidden location of eschars. This case emphasizes the importance of considering TIBOLA in tick-borne illness diagnoses in Portugal.
Keywords: infectious and tropical diseases, tibola, tick-borne diseases, tick-borne infections, tropical medicine
Introduction
Tick-borne lymphadenopathy (TIBOLA), also known as Dermacentor-borne necrosis erythema and lymphadenopathy (DEBONEL) and scalp eschar and neck lymphadenopathy after a tick bite (SENLAT), is a rickettsial infection transmitted by ticks [1]. The causative agent, Rickettsia (R.) slovaca, was first identified in France in 2002 [2]. It is a member of the spotted fever group (SFG) Rickettsia, such as R. conorii, R. africae, or R. rickettsii. Over the years, it has been reported across several European countries [3,4]. It is considered to be the second most prevalent rickettsiosis in Europe, after Mediterranean Spotted Fever [3], with over 200 cases reported in Spain [5]. This syndrome can, though less commonly, be caused by other microorganisms, such as Candidatus R. rioja, R. massiliae, R. sibirica mongolitimonae, Bartonella henselae, and Francisella tularensis [2]. In Portugal, R. slovaca was first identified in Dermacentor (D.) ticks in 1995 [1]. According to the Portuguese Nationwide Surveillance Program on Vector and Vector-Borne Diseases (REVIVE), D. marginatus and D. reticulatus ticks have a widespread presence in the country, with peak activity in spring and autumn. These ticks were found to carry R. slovaca, Candidatus R. rioja, and R. raoultii [6].
Like other rickettsial diseases, the causative agents are inoculated by the tick, targeting macrophages and dendritic cells and then spreading through the lymphatic system to the regional lymph nodes [7]. TIBOLA's incubation period typically lasts 5 to 10 days [8]. Common symptoms include an inoculation eschar, fever, rash, and painful, enlarged lymph nodes. Other symptoms can include fatigue, scarring alopecia, and vertigo [9,10]. Generally, the disease is mild, although severe cases, such as myopericarditis, have been reported [11]. Diagnosis relies on clinical signs and epidemiological factors [12]. The recommended treatment is a 7-10 day course of doxycycline [4].
We present a case report of TIBOLA diagnosed in northern Portugal with a novel clinical presentation.
Case presentation
We report a case of a woman in her fifties with a medical history of asthma and hypertension. She presented to the emergency department (ED) in April with right-sided neck pain that worsened with movement, accompanied by a painful swelling in her right retroauricular area and a burning headache. She recalled a tick bite to her scalp four days earlier. A tick bite had also been identified on her daughter's scalp two days earlier. Physical examination revealed no inoculation eschar, but a swollen, 1-2 cm lymph node in her right retroauricular area and a fever of 38.2ºC. Initial tests showed a normal blood count, renal function, and ionogram, with no rise in C-reactive protein. Serological tests for Rickettsia conorii, Borrelia spp., and Coxiella burnetii and molecular detection of Rickettsial DNA were also negative.
She was discharged with symptomatic treatment (paracetamol). She returned to the ED three days later, due to the appearance of a pruriginous erythematous rash on her forehead (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Pruriginous erithematous rash in the forehead after tick bite - a novel presentation of TIBOLA.
TIBOLA - tick-borne lymphadenopathy
A small red macula was observed at the site where the tick was removed (Figure 2).
Figure 2. A small red macula (arrow) was observed at the site of tick removal, in the occipital area of the scalp.
Her fever had subsided, but the lymph node remained swollen. She was referred for follow-up at the infectious diseases clinic, where further testing was conducted, and she was medicated with antihistamines. At the six-week follow-up appointment, serological testing using an indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) for Rickettsia showed seroconversion, with reactive titers of ≥ 256 for IgM (cut-off titer ≥ 32) and 2048 for IgG (cut-off titer ≥ 128) against SFG Rickettsia (R. conorii) (Table 1).
Table 1. Comparison of serology results between the emergency department visit and the six week follow up.
Results show a fourfold increase in IgM/IgG serology for SFG Rickettsia. IFA was performed by using the commercial BIOCELL kit slides.
SFG - spotted fever group; IFA: immunofluorescence assay
| Emergency department visit | 6-week follow up | Reference value | |
| Rickettsia conorii (SFG Rickettsia) IgG (IFA) | 128 | 2048 | ≥ 128 |
| Rickettsia conorii (SFG Rickettsia) IgM (IFA) | <32 | ≥ 256 | ≥ 32 |
| Coxiella burnetii IgG (IFA) | <1/16 | <1/16 | ≥1/16 |
| Coxiella burnetii IgM (IFA) | <1/16 | <1/16 | ≥1/16 |
| Borrelia spp IgG | 0.01 | 0.01 | Negative: < 2.0 Positive: ≥ 2.0 |
| Borrelia spp IgM | 0.00 | 0.00 | Negative: < 0.20 Dubious: 0.20 - 0.31 Positive: ≥ 0.32 |
The IFA was performed using commercial BIOCELL kit slides. By the time results were available, the patient's symptoms had resolved. She was contacted three months later and reported no symptom recurrence and no long-term sequelae. Her daughter, who was also bitten by a tick, did not develop any symptoms.
Due to serological cross-reactivity within the SFG Rickettsia, Rickettsia species causing the illness could not be identified [5].
However, considering the patient's history and symptoms, combined with their improvement without specific antibiotic treatment and a fourfold increase in IgM/IgG serology for SFG Rickettsia, TIBOLA was considered the most likely diagnosis. After discussion with the team and the patient, and due to the mild, self-limited nature of her symptoms, it was considered that treatment with doxycycline would be unnecessary.
Discussion
TIBOLA has a seasonal incidence pattern, peaking in spring and autumn, and affects more women and children [13]. Due to its non-specific symptoms and the often concealed location of inoculation eschars, the diagnosis of TIBOLA is frequently delayed [8]. This case reflects the disease's seasonality and typical patient demographic. Unlike TIBOLA, Mediterranean spotted fever peaks in summer due to the seasonal peak activity of Rhipicephalus sanguineus, the main vector [9]. A literature review of TIBOLA cases in Portugal identified one case series of three patients and one isolated case report (Table 1). They all referred to patients in the central region of the country.
Table 2. Characterization of previous case reports of TIBOLA/DEBONEL/SENLAT in Portugal.
NA - not available; ND - not done; PCR - polymerase chain reaction; TIBOLA - tick-borne lymphadenopathy; DEBONEL - Dermacentor-borne necrosis erythema and lymphadenopathy; SENLAT - scalp eschar and neck lymphadenopathy after a tick bite
| Patient one (Sousa et al., 2013 [1]) | Patient two (Sousa et al., 2013 [1]) | Patient three (Sousa et al., 2013 [1]) | Patient dour (Quadros Flores et al., 2022 [14]) | |
| Year | 2010 | 2012 | 2012 | 2024 |
| Age | 50 | 53 | 30 | 37 |
| Sex | Female | Female | Female | Female |
| Season | Autumn | Spring | Spring | Spring |
| Region | Coimbra (centre) | Coimbra (centre) | Coimbra (centre) | Guarda (centre) |
| Incubation period | 4 days | 7 days | NA | 10 days |
| Eschar present | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Fever | Yes | No | No | No |
| PCR from eschar | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Serology seroconversion | Yes | Yes | ND | Yes |
Despite the absence of an eschar, this patient's tick bite, fever, and unilateral painful lymphadenopathy were consistent with TIBOLA symptoms.
Interestingly, cutaneous manifestations of TIBOLA have included facial oedema and macular lesions of the extremities [12]. We have not found a previous description of a pruriginous erythematous rash localised to the forehead in previous case reports. This constitutes a novel presentation that could be a helpful clue to diagnosing further cases.
Although serology testing has limitations, including significant cross-reactivity among Rickettsia species within the SFG and low sensitivity in the acute phase of the disease. Seroconversion, demonstrated by a four-fold increase in antibodies, remains the gold standard for diagnosing recent rickettsial infections [10,15]. Given the patient's symptoms, the infection was likely caused by R. slovaca or R. raoultii. The initial negative IgM result is consistent with expectations, as IgM antibodies may take up to 14 days to become detectable [15,16]. The fact that the infection resolved without any antibiotic treatment is also more consistent with milder rickettsial infections, such as TIBOLA. In retrospect, doxycycline could have been initiated at the time of the presentation to the ED, as the patient's history and symptoms were consistent with a rickettsiosis, and timely initiation of treatment is recommended [10]. Though antibiotic treatment is not always necessary, as seen in this case, it does contribute to shortening the duration of symptoms and lowering the risks of long-term sequelae [9].
Unfortunately, molecular detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing was negative, which hinders the identification of the specific Rickettsia species. PCR for rickettsial infections has limited sensitivity due to the low rickettsiaemia, particularly in localized syndromes such as TIBOLA [16,17], with a case series in France reporting a sensitivity of only 50% [18]. It is not uncommon for TIBOLA cases to lack a clearly identified aetiological agent. A review found that the aetiology was determined in only 149 of 537 cases described in the literature [9].
Reported as an emerging infection, TIBOLA has been identified in various regions of Portugal, although all previous case reports have been from central Portugal [1]. The distribution of both the tick vector and pathogen suggests that TIBOLA may be more prevalent than is currently recognized, highlighting the importance of raising clinical awareness of this rare disease [1,15].
Conclusions
This case reports an unusual presentation of TIBOLA, with an erythematous rash on the forehead. TIBOLA should be considered in patients presenting with fever, painful lymphadenopathy, and localized rashes after a tick bite, even if an eschar is absent. Seroconversion with a fourfold increase in IgM/IgG antibodies is the gold standard for diagnosing rickettsial infections, highlighting the importance of follow-up serological testing. Low rickettsial levels in infections like TIBOLA may lead to negative PCR results from blood samples. PCR testing of eschar or lymph node biopsies can improve diagnostic accuracy for identifying the Rickettsia species involved.
Disclosures
Human subjects: Informed consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Francisca Bartilotti Matos, Luís Malheiro, Rita de Sousa
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Francisca Bartilotti Matos, Luís Malheiro
Drafting of the manuscript: Francisca Bartilotti Matos, Luís Malheiro
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Francisca Bartilotti Matos, Luís Malheiro, Rita de Sousa
Supervision: Luís Malheiro
References
- 1.Rickettsia slovaca infection in humans, Portugal. de Sousa R, Pereira BI, Nazareth C, et al. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19:1627–1629. doi: 10.3201/eid1910.130376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Spotless rickettsiosis caused by Rickettsia slovaca and associated with Dermacentor ticks. Raoult D, Lakos A, Fenollar F, Beytout J, Brouqui P, Fournier PE. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:1331–1336. doi: 10.1086/340100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tick-borne rickettsioses in Europe. Oteo JA, Portillo A. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2012;3:271–278. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2012.10.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tick-borne lymphadenopathy (TIBOLA) acquired in Southwestern Germany. Rieg S, Schmoldt S, Theilacker C, de With K, Wölfel S, Kern WV, Dobler G. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11:167. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tick-Borne Rickettsioses in the Iberian Peninsula. Moerbeck L, Domingos A, Antunes S. Pathogens. 2022;11:1377. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11111377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Centro de Estudos de Vetores e Doenças Infeciosas Doutor Francisco Cambournac. Instituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge; 2023. REVIVE 2022 Report - Culicidae, Ixodidae: Vector Surveillance Network. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pathogenesis of rickettsial diseases: pathogenic and immune mechanisms of an endotheliotropic infection. Sahni A, Fang R, Sahni SK, Walker DH. Annu Rev Pathol. 2019;14:127–152. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012418-012800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Scalp eschar and neck lymphadenopathy by Rickettsia slovaca after Dermacentor marginatus tick bite case report: multidisciplinary approach to a tick-borne disease. Barlozzari G, Romiti F, Zini M, et al. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21:103. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-05807-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tick-borne lymphadenopathy, an emerging disease. Silva-Pinto A, Santos Mde L, Sarmento A. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014;5:656–659. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.The rickettsioses: a practical update. Blanton LS. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2019;33:213–229. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2018.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tickborne lymphadenopathy complicated by acute myopericarditis, Spain. Silva JT, López-Medrano F, Fernández-Ruiz M, Foz ER, Portillo A, Oteo JA, Aguado JM. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:2240–2242. doi: 10.3201/eid2112.150672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Scalp eschar and neck lymph adenopathy after a tick bite (SENLAT) in Tuscany, Italy (2015-2022) Barbiero A, Manciulli T, Spinicci M, et al. Infection. 2023;51:1847–1854. doi: 10.1007/s15010-023-02079-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Scalp eschar and neck lymphadenopathy after tick bite: an emerging syndrome with multiple causes. Dubourg G, Socolovschi C, Del Giudice P, Fournier PE, Raoult D. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33:1449–1456. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2090-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Scalp eschar and neck lymphadenopathy associated with rickettsial infection after a tick bite: a case report. Quadros Flores MA, Cruz Carvalho I, Alves M, Paulo SE, De Sousa R. Acta Med Port. 2024;37:312–314. doi: 10.20344/amp.20914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rare case of rickettsiosis caused by Rickettsia monacensis, Portugal, 2021. de Sousa R, Dos Santos ML, Cruz C, et al. Emerg Infect Dis. 2022;28:1068–1071. doi: 10.3201/eid2805.211836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.State of the art of diagnosis of rickettsial diseases: the use of blood specimens for diagnosis of scrub typhus, spotted fever group rickettsiosis, and murine typhus. Paris DH, Dumler JS. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2016;29:433–439. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Current tools for the diagnosis and detection of spotted fever group Rickettsia. Husin NA, AbuBakar S, Khoo JJ. Acta Trop. 2021;218:105887. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.105887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rickettsia slovaca infection, France. Gouriet F, Rolain JM, Raoult D. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:521–523. doi: 10.3201/eid1203.050911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


