Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2025 Jul 15;13:RP95324. doi: 10.7554/eLife.95324

EPHA4 signaling dysregulation links abnormal locomotion and the development of idiopathic scoliosis

Lianlei Wang 1,2,3,4,, Xinyu Yang 1,4,, Sen Zhao 1,5,, Pengfei Zheng 6,, Wen Wen 1,2,3, Kexin Xu 1,2,3, Xi Cheng 1,2,3, Qing Li 1,2,3, Anas M Khanshour 7, Yoshinao Koike 8,9, Junjun Liu 6, Xin Fan 10, Nao Otomo 8,9, Zefu Chen 1,2,3, Yaqi Li 1,2,3, Lulu Li 11, Haibo Xie 6, Panpan Zhu 6, Xiaoxin Li 1,2,12, Yuchen Niu 1,2,12, Shengru Wang 1,2,3, Sen Liu 1,2,3, Suomao Yuan 4, Chikashi Terao 8, Ziquan Li 1,2,3, Shaoke Chen 10, Xiuli Zhao 13, Pengfei Liu 5,14, Jennifer E Posey 14, Zhihong Wu 1,2,3,12, Guixing Qiu 1,2,3,12; DISCO study group (Deciphering Disorders Involving Scoliosis & COmorbidities), Shiro Ikegawa 9, James R Lupski 15,16,17, Jonathan J Rios 7,18,19, Carol A Wise 7,18,19, Jianguo T Zhang 1,2,3,, Chengtian Zhao 6,, Nan Wu 1,2,3,
Editors: Bruce Appel20, Didier YR Stainier21
PMCID: PMC12263152  PMID: 40662934

Abstract

Idiopathic scoliosis (IS) is the most common form of spinal deformity with unclear pathogenesis. In this study, we first reanalyzed the loci associated with IS, drawing upon previous studies. Subsequently, we mapped these loci to candidate genes using either location-based or function-based strategies. To further substantiate our findings, we verified the enrichment of variants within these candidate genes across several large IS cohorts encompassing Chinese, East Asian, and European populations. Consequently, we identified variants in the EPHA4 gene as compelling candidates for IS. To confirm their pathogenicity, we generated zebrafish mutants of epha4a. Remarkably, the zebrafish epha4a mutants exhibited pronounced scoliosis during later stages of development, effectively recapitulating the IS phenotype. We observed that the epha4a mutants displayed defects in left-right coordination during locomotion, which arose from disorganized neural activation in these mutants. Our subsequent experiments indicated that the disruption of the central pattern generator (CPG) network, characterized by abnormal axon guidance of spinal cord interneurons, contributed to the disorganization observed in the mutants. Moreover, when knocked down efnb3b, the ligand for Epha4a, we observed similar CPG defects and disrupted left-right locomotion. These findings suggested that ephrin B3-Epha4 signaling is vital for the proper functioning of CPGs, and defects in this pathway could lead to scoliosis in zebrafish. Furthermore, we identified two cases of IS in NGEF, a downstream molecule in the EPHA4 pathway. Collectively, our data provide compelling evidence that neural patterning impairments and disruptions in CPGs may underlie the pathogenesis of IS.

Research organism: Human, Zebrafish

Introduction

Idiopathic scoliosis (IS) is the most common form of spinal deformity, affecting about 2.5% of the global population (Hresko, 2013; Luk et al., 2010). IS may have long-term physical and mental health consequences, such as cosmetic deformity, cardiopulmonary impairment, and even disability (Weinstein et al., 2003). All these consequences can severely reduce the quality of life. Early intervention with conservative treatments, such as braces, can control scoliosis progression and reduce the need for surgical intervention (Weinstein et al., 2013). However, IS often remains undiagnosed until malformation is evident, emphasizing the importance of risk-prediction measurements in medical management.

Genetic factors are thought to play a significant role in the development of IS, while only a few genes have been associated with the condition to date (Cheng et al., 2015; Miller, 2007). Several single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with susceptibility to IS have been identified through genome-wide association studies (GWASs), including SNPs linked to genes such as LBX1, GPR126, and BNC2. Notably, knockdown or overexpression of zebrafish homologs of these IS-associated genes has yielded body axis defects (Guo et al., 2016; Kou et al., 2019; Kou et al., 2013; Ogura et al., 2015; Zhu et al., 2015). In addition to common SNPs, rare variants with larger effect sizes or causing rare Mendelian disease traits also contribute to IS. Rare variants in FBN1, FBN2, and other extracellular matrix genes are associated with severe IS (Buchan et al., 2014; Haller et al., 2016). Linkage analysis of familial IS suggests that it follows autosomal dominant (AD), X-linked dominant, and multifactorial patterns of inheritance (Miller et al., 2005). Variants in CHD7 and AKAP2 are also implicated in the pathogenesis of Mendelian forms of IS (Gao et al., 2007; Liebeskind et al., 2016). Finally, centriolar protein POC5 and planar cell polarity protein Vang-like protein 1 (VANGL1) were also shown to be associated with IS. Notably, all these genes participate in a wide range of biological processes, and the mechanisms underlying IS progression still require further investigation. Consequently, there is currently no consensus on the etiology of IS (Tang et al., 2021).

In this study, we developed a novel pipeline that combines SNP-to-gene mapping and rare variant association analysis. Using this approach, we analyzed a large Chinese population with IS and further validated our findings in East Asian and European populations. Through these analyses, we identified EPHA4 as a novel gene associated with IS. To confirm the pathogenicity of this gene, we used a zebrafish model and found that impaired EPHA4 pathway components and resulting defects in central pattern generators (CPGs) were associated with asymmetric spinal locomotion, which may serve as a contributory factor in the development of IS. Additionally, we searched for candidate genes related to EPHA4 signaling pathways and identified mutations in the NGEF among IS patients. Overall, our data suggest that the impairment of the EPHA4 pathway and CPGs plays a previously unknown role in the development and progression of IS.

Results

Enrichment analysis of rare variants in IS candidate genes

To identify candidate genes associated with IS, we conducted a comprehensive literature review of SNPs that are linked to IS from 14 published GWASs. This led us to obtain 41 SNPs that showed genome-wide significance (p<5 × 10−8) as detailed in Supplementary file 1. We then employed positional mapping, expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) mapping, or chromatin interaction mapping to identify 156 candidate genes that could be potentially linked to these SNPs. Further analysis of rare variants for the 156 candidate genes using exome data from 411 Chinese probands and 3800 unrelated Chinese controls identified EPHA4 as the only significant gene (p=0.045, OR = 4.09) (Supplementary file 2). EPHA4 is a member of the Eph family of receptor tyrosine kinases which play a vital role in the development of the nervous system (Kania and Klein, 2016). We identified three rare variants in EPHA4 from three IS patients, including one splicing-donor variant and two missense variants (Supplementary file 2). The flowchart of the entire pipeline is shown in Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

Inheritance pattern and functional analyses of variants in EPHA4

We characterized the inheritance pattern of variants in EPHA4 using either trio sequencing data or Sanger sequencing for the parents. None of the parents being tested had scoliosis based on a clinical screening test. Of the three rare variants in EPHA4, two (NM_004438.3: c.1443+1G>C and c.2546G>A [p.Cys849Tyr]) arose de novo (Figure 1A and Table 1). The heterozygous splicing variant (c.1443+1G>C) was identified in a 15-year-old female IS patient (SCO2003P0846) (Figure 1B). Scoliosis in this patient was diagnosed at 13 years of age, with a main curve Cobb angle of 60°. The in vitro minigene assay showed that the c.1443+1G>C variant introduced a new splicing site, resulting in a 36 bp in-frame deletion in exon 6 (Figure 1G and I, Figure 1—figure supplement 2A). The EPHA4 heterozygous missense variant (c.2546G>A, p.Cys849Tyr), identified in a 13-year-old female IS patient (SCO2003P2146) (Figure 1C), is located in the protein tyrosine kinase domain of EPHA4 protein (Figure 1A). The onset of scoliosis in this patient was at 11 years of age with a 70° main curve Cobb angle. Given the critical role of EPHA4 in phosphorylating CDK5, which in turn activates downstream signaling pathways (Fu et al., 2007), a western blot analysis of the EPHA4-c.2546G>A variant was conducted to investigate the protein expression levels of EPHA4 and CDK5 and the amount of phosphorylated CDK5 (pCDK5) in HEK293T cells transfected with EPHA4-mutant or EPHA4-WT plasmid. Our results revealed that the missense variant resulted in a decreased phosphorylation level of CDK5 (p=0.015), suggesting a partial loss-of-function (LoF) of EPHA4 (Figure 1F).

Figure 1. Clinical and genetic information on idiopathic scoliosis (IS) patients and functional effect of EPHA4 variants.

(A) Locations of three EPHA4 single-nucleotide variants relative to the protein domains (top panel) and exons 1–18 (bottom panel). (B-E) Pedigrees and spinal radiographs of four probands with dominant gene variants. Sanger sequencing confirmed the variants. The arrows indicate the probands. The term +/+ denotes the wild-type, and cDNA change/+ denotes the heterozygous variant. (F) Western blot analysis of EPHA4-c.2546G>A variant showing the protein expression levels of EPHA4 and CDK5 and the amount of phosphorylated CDK5 (pCDK5) in HEK293T cells transfected with EPHA4-mutant or EPHA4-WT plasmid. WT: wild-type. Data represent three independent experiments. Error bars show mean ± SD. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. (G) Schematic representation of the effect of the EPHA4-c.1443+1G>C mutation on the splicing process. This variant induced a new splicing site (red box). The yellow box indicates the splicing acceptor. (H) Schematic representation of the effect of the EPHA4-c.1318+10344A>G mutation on the splicing process. This variant induced a new splicing site (red box). The yellow box indicates the splicing acceptor. (I) The minigene assay result showed that the c.1443+1G>C variant introduced a new splicing site, resulting in a 36 bp in-frame deletion in exon 6. (J) The nested PCR showed that the c.1318+10344A>G variant induced exon 5 skipping, resulting in a 339 bp in-frame deletion. (K) NCBI RefSeq genes included in 2q35-q36.2 from UCSC Genome Browser. EPHA4 is shown by the red oval.

Figure 1—source data 1. Original western blots for Figure 1F.

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Flowchart for identification of causative genes.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

The processes of candidate gene mapping and gene-based burden analysis were described. The variants in EPHA4 and NGEF identified in each cohort were displayed. Abbreviations: SNP: single-nucleotide polymorphism; eQTL: expression quantitative trait locus; IS: idiopathic scoliosis.
Figure 1—figure supplement 2. The splicing analysis by the Alamut software.

Figure 1—figure supplement 2.

Results of Alamut analysis for (A) the c.1443+1G>C variant and (B) the c.1318+10344A>G variant using four algorithms (SpliceSiteFinder-like, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, and GeneSplicer).

Table 1. Dominantly inherited variants identified in EPHA4 and NGEF.

Abbreviations: Chr: chromosomal localization; AA: amino acid; AD: autosomal dominant; CNV: copy number variant; ExAC PLI: probability of being loss-of-function intolerant from Exome Aggregation Consortium; CADD: Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion score; gnomAD: Genome Aggregation Database; NA: not applicable.

Patient ID Chr Gene Ethnicity Inheritance pattern cDNA change AA change Variant type ExAC PLI CADD GnomAD frequency In-house frequency
SCO2003P0846 2 EPHA4 Chinese De novo c.1443+1G>C NA Splice donor 1 21.4 0 0
SCO2003P2146 2 EPHA4 Chinese De novo c.2546G>A p.Cys849Tyr Missense 1 28.2 0 0
SCO2003P2080 2 EPHA4 Chinese De novo c.1318+10344A>G NA Intronic 1 NA 0 0
SCO2003P3202 2 EPHA4 Chinese De novo 2q35-36.2
4.6Mb deletion
NA CNV NA NA 0 0
SCO2003P3332 2 NGEF Chinese De novo c.1A>G p.Met1? Start lost 0.95 12.8 0 0
TSRHC01 2 NGEF Non-Hispanic White AD c.857C>T p.Ala286Val Missense 0.95 29.6 0.00002 0

We next investigated de novo noncoding variants of EPHA4 via whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in 116 trio families with IS. A de novo heterozygous EPHA4 intronic variant (c.1318+10344A>G) was identified in a 16-year-old female patient (SCO2003P2080) (Figure 1D and Table 1). She developed scoliosis at 11 years of age with a 70° main curve Cobb angle. This variant is predicted to affect the branch point of the fifth intron of EPHA4 (Figure 1—figure supplement 2B). We performed nested PCR to show that this variant induced exon 5 skipping, resulting in a 339 bp in-frame deletion (Figure 1H and J).

Next, we employed an in-house gene matching approach under the framework of the DISCO study, which identified a 6-year-old patient (SCO2003P3202) who had been previously diagnosed with Waardenburg syndrome caused by a 4.46 Mb de novo deletion at 2q35-q36.2 (Li et al., 2015; Table 1). Intriguingly, the patient also presented mild scoliosis (Figure 1E). The deletion included the entire PAX3 gene, which was responsible for the Waardenburg syndrome phenotype, and 36 neighboring genes, including EPHA4 (Figure 1K). As scoliosis is not typically associated with Waardenburg syndrome caused solely by PAX3 pathogenic variants (Tassabehji et al., 1993), we hypothesize that the deletion of EPHA4 may be responsible for the IS phenotype in this patient.

Notably, the GWAS signal which we mapped to EPHA4 (rs13398147) (Zhu et al., 2015) represents a significant eQTL in esophagus and colon tissues, with the T allele associated with decreased expression of EPHA4. In our East Asian GWAS cohort of 6449 adolescent IS patients and 158,068 controls, we identified another two eQTLs in EPHA4 associated with decreased expression of EPHA4 in brain tissue (Supplementary file 3). In the same GWAS cohort, common SNPs in EPHA4, after aggregation, also showed significant enrichment (p=0.023) in IS patients vs controls. Taken together, the convergence between rare and common variants of EPHA4 that lead to LoF or hypomorphic effects highlights the pivotal role of EPHA4 in the pathogenesis of IS.

IS-like phenotypes in zebrafish epha4 mutants

To investigate the role of EPHA4 in scoliosis, we utilized zebrafish as a model system due to its versatile nature in modeling adolescent IS (Bagnat and Gray, 2020; Boswell and Ciruna, 2017; Grimes et al., 2016; Xie et al., 2022). Zebrafish have two homologs of EPHA4, epha4a and epha4b. Using CRISPR-Cas9, we established a stable epha4a zebrafish mutant line with a 63 bp deletion in exon 3, which introduced a stop codon and resulted in a truncated protein (Figure 2A and B). The homozygous epha4a mutant larvae had no apparent defects in either notochord or body axis development (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A). Consistent with previous reports, the hindbrain rhombomeric boundaries were found to be defective in both the epha4a homozygous mutants and morphants (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B; Cayuso et al., 2019; Cooke et al., 2005). Interestingly, more than 75% adult mutants showed mild scoliosis (88 of 116), and some mutants exhibited severe scoliotic phenotype (4 of 116) (Figure 2C and D, Videos 1 and 2). Remarkably, some heterozygous adult mutants also developed mild scoliosis (14 of 95), whereas none of the wild-type fish showed any signs of scoliosis (0 of 76) (Figure 2C and D). Similarly, we further generated the epha4b mutants with a 25 bp deletion in exon 3, which resulted in a frameshift mutation (Figure 2—figure supplement 2A). The epha4b zebrafish mutants also developed mild scoliosis (28 of 43) (Figure 2—figure supplement 2B and C). Intriguingly, both epha4a and epha4b mutants exhibited early onset scoliosis starting from around 20 days post-fertilization (Figure 2—figure supplement 2D), a stage similar to that of IS patients. Collectively, these data suggest that mutations in Epha4 proteins are linked to the scoliotic phenotype in zebrafish.

Figure 2. Scoliosis in zebrafish epha4a mutants.

(A) Diagram of the protein domains, genomic structures, and sequences of wild-type and corresponding epha4a mutants. Red arrows indicate mutation sites. Blue boxes indicate open reading frames. Underlined sequences indicate the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) region, and red fonts indicate Cas9 binding sites. LBD: ligand binding domain; FN3: fibronectin type 3 domain; TMD: transmembrane domain; PTKc: catalytic domain of the protein tyrosine kinases; SAM: sterile alpha motif. (B) Sanger sequencing results confirmed the deletion of the target region in epha4a mutant transcripts. (C) Bar graph showing the percentages of adult zebrafish with normal, mild, or severe body axis defects in wild-type (n=76), epha4a heterozygote (n=95), or epha4a homozygous (n=116). (D) Representative images of wild-type and homozygous epha4a mutants. Micro CT images are shown on the right. Lateral and dorsal views are shown. Scale bar: 1 cm.

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Phenotypes of epha4a mutants.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

(A) Representative images showing the notochord and external phenotypes of wild-type and epha4a mutants. The red dashed lines indicate the area of the notochord. (B) Whole-mount in situ hybridization results showing the expression of the rfng gene in 18 hr post-fertilization (hpf) wild-type, homozygous mutant, or morphant larvae as indicated. The rfng gene marks boundary cells in the hindbrain. The red arrows indicate boundary expression. The numbers of embryos analyzed are shown on the top right. Scale bars: 200 µm in panel (A), 100 µm in panel (B).
Figure 2—figure supplement 2. Zebrafish epha4b mutants exhibited body axis defects during development.

Figure 2—figure supplement 2.

(A) Diagram showing the protein domains, genomic structures, and sequences of the wild-type and corresponding epha4b mutants. Red arrows indicate mutation sites. (B) Representative images of epha4b mutants. (C) Bar graph showing the percentages of adult fish with normal and body axis defects in wild-type (n=39) and epha4b mutants (n=43). (D) Bright-field and GFP fluorescent images showing scoliosis epha4b mutants at 28 days post-fertilization (dpf) as indicated by Tg(Ola.Sp7:NLS-GFP) transgene, which labels the bone skeleton. Scale bars: 1 cm in panel (B), 2 mm in panel (D).

Video 1. Video showing the swimming of three wild-type fish.

Download video file (2.1MB, mp4)

Video 2. Video showing the swimming of three epha4a mutants with severe or mild scoliosis.

Download video file (1.5MB, mp4)

Abnormal left-right swimming pattern in the absence of Epha4a

While the epha4a mutants seemed to be grossly normal during the larvae stages, they developed spinal curvature gradually during later development. We decided to investigate whether these mutants exhibited any abnormalities in their behavior at the larvae stages using EthoVision XT software. By monitoring the swimming behavior of 8 days post-fertilization (dpf) zebrafish larvae, we found the motion distance and swimming velocity were significantly decreased in epha4a mutants (Figure 3A and B). In addition, we observed a remarkable difference in the relative turning angle and angular velocity between these two groups. The wild-type group changed their swimming direction randomly, showing a relative angle around 0° (Figure 3C and D). In contrast, the epha4a mutants favored turning to one side of their directions (a positive angle reflects a leftward turn) (Figure 3C and D). Moreover, the absolute turn angles and turning speed (angular velocity) were significantly higher in these mutants (Figure 3E and F). To rule out potential off-target effects, we injected epha4a mRNA into epha4a mutants, which significantly restored the swimming coordination defects (Figure 3—figure supplement 1).

Figure 3. Abnormal left-right swimming pattern in the absence of Epha4a.

(A) Dot plots showing the swimming distance of each 8 days post-fertilization (dpf) larva at a duration of 4 min (N=54 for wild-type and N=60 for epha4a mutants). (B) Dot plots showing the swimming velocity of wild-type and mutant larvae as indicated. (C) Diagram showing the turning angle (θ) of the larvae during swimming. (D) Scatter plot showing the relative turning angle of wild-type and mutant larvae. The relative angles were calculated by the sum of turning angles during fish swimming with left (positive) or right (negative) turns. The epha4a mutants favored turning to one side of their directions compared with those of wild-type larvae. (E) Dot plots showing the average absolute turning angle of wild-type and mutant larvae as indicated. (F) Dot plots showing the average absolute angular velocity of wild-type and mutant larvae as indicated. (G) Bar graph showing the percentages of 5 dpf zebrafish larvae with different reactions after tactile stimulation. N=10 for each group; the numbers of tactile stimulations are indicated in each column. (H) Representative images of the total body curvature measurements in zebrafish larvae, with values as the sum of α and β angles shown in the figure. (I) Representative time-series images of 5 dpf wild-type and epha4a mutant zebrafish larvae after tactile stimulation to the head. Each panel represents the points of maximal body curvature for the C-bend and counterbend after the tactile startle response. (J, K) A plot of body curvature angles as measured in panel (H) during swimming in response to tactile head stimulation in 5 dpf wild-type (panel J, N=5 larvae, n=10 stimuli) and epha4a mutants (panel K, N=5 larvae, n=7 stimuli). Each colored curve represents an independent experiment showing the response of a single larva to a stimulus. The positive angle means turning right. (L) The maximum curvature angles during the first C-bend and counterbend after tactile stimulation in wild-type and epha4a mutant larvae.

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Rescue of the epha4a homozygous mutant phenotype by epha4a mRNA injection.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

(A) Scatter plot showing the relative turning angle of wild-type, epha4a homozygous larvae and homozygous larvae injected with the corresponding mRNA. (B) The pie chart shows the proportional distribution of relative turning angles in three groups of larvae. N=30 larvae, n=90 experiments. Larvae that remained stationary during the recording were excluded.

Next, we compared the swimming behavior after startle response between wild-type and epha4a mutants. We used a needle to touch the head or the tail of 5 dpf zebrafish larvae to stimulate swimming behavior. In sibling controls, the larvae responded to the tactile stimulation and swam away quickly (Video 3). Conversely, the epha4a mutants failed to respond to the initial stimulation, and the swimming pattern was defective with an abnormal bending pattern (37 of 62 from tail-stimulation group and 34 of 77 from head-stimulation group) (Figure 3G, Video 4). We further performed a more comprehensive analysis by high-speed video microscopy. After tactile stimulation, wild-type larvae displayed a high-speed C-bend turn followed by a weaker counterbend turn after several milliseconds (Figure 3H and I). This rhythmic left/right swimming pattern ensures that the fish swim away from the frightening stimulus. The turning angles of the control larvae after stimulation changed with a sinusoidal wave pattern (Figure 3J). In contrast, this pattern was dramatically different in epha4a mutants (Figure 3I and K). Of note, although the C-bend turning angles were similar between epha4a mutants and control siblings, the turning angles of the counterbend decreased significantly (Figure 3L), implying a left/right coordination defect. Taken together, both regular swimming and tactile stimulation analyses suggested that the left-right coordination swimming pattern is compromised in the absence of Epha4a.

Video 3. High-speed video showing the startle response in a wild-type larva at 5 days post-fertilization (dpf) triggered by head tactile stimulation.

Download video file (1MB, mp4)

Time units: ms.

Video 4. High-speed video showing the abnormal startle response of an epha4a mutant larva at 5 days post-fertilization (dpf) triggered by head tactile stimulation.

Download video file (2.3MB, mp4)

Time units: ms.

Defects of left-right coordination due to abnormal CPG in the absence of Epha4a

The coordinated left-right locomotion of zebrafish larvae relies on the synchronized contraction of muscle fibers, a process regulated by motor neurons situated on each side of the fish. To explore this intricate mechanism, we utilized a Tg(elavl3:GAL4; UAS: GCaMP) double transgene, allowing the expression of a genetically encoded calcium sensor in all neurons. We observed the rhythmic activation of calcium signaling in motor neurons located within the spinal cord (Figure 4A, Figure 4—figure supplement 1A, Videos 5 and 6). In wild-type larvae, the calcium signals exhibited an alternating pattern between the left and right sides of the body, whereas this coordinated pattern was disrupted in both epha4a mutants and morphants (Figure 4A–B vs A’–B’, Figure 4—figure supplement 1A–B vs A’–B’, Videos 7 and 8). Additionally, we found that the activation frequency of motor neurons on the left and right sides was comparable in wild-type larvae, but significantly different in the absence of Epha4a (Figure 4C and D, Figure 4—figure supplement 1C and D).

Figure 4. Uncoordinated left-right activation of spinal cord neurons in epha4a mutants.

(A, A’) Fluorescent images showing the dorsal view of 24 hr post-fertilization (hpf) Tg(elavl3:GAL4; UAS:GCaMP) double transgenic larvae. The corresponding movies are shown in Videos 5 and 6. (B, B’) Line charts showing the quantification of fluorescence changes of the region of interests (ROIs, circled in A, A’) in wild-type larvae and epha4a mutants. (C) Scatter plot showing the distribution trend of the ratio of the calcium signal frequency between left and right in wild-type (N=14 larvae, n=42 experiments) and epha4a mutants (N=10 larvae, n=30 experiments). (D) Statistical graph of the ratio of the calcium signal frequency between left and right in wild-type larvae and epha4a mutants. Scale bars: 50 μm in panels (A, A’).

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Uncoordinated left-right activation of spinal cord neurons in the absence of Epha4a.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

(A, A’) Fluorescent images showing the dorsal view of 24 hr post-fertilization (hpf) Tg(elavl3:GAL4; UAS:GCaMP) double transgenic larvae. The corresponding movies are shown in Videos 7 and 8. (B, B’) Line charts showing the quantification of fluorescence changes of the region of interests (ROIs, circled in A, A’) in control and epha4a morphants. (C) Scatter plot showing the distribution trend of the ratio of the calcium signal frequency between left and right in control (N=15 larvae, n=38 experiments) and epha4a morphants (N=15 larvae, n=41 experiments). (D) Statistical graph of the ratio of the calcium signal frequency between left and right in control and epha4a morphants. Scale bars: 50 μm in panels (A, A’).

Video 5. Alternated activation of calcium signaling in motor neurons of 24 hr post-fertilization (hpf) wild-type Tg(elavl3:GAL4; UAS: GCaMP) transgenic larva.

Download video file (1.5MB, mp4)

Video 6. Alternated activation of calcium signaling in motor neurons of 24 hr post-fertilization (hpf) wild-type Tg(elavl3:GAL4; UAS: GCaMP) transgenic larva injected with control MO.

Download video file (987KB, mp4)

Video 7. Abnormal activation of calcium signaling in motor neurons of 24 hr post-fertilization (hpf) Tg(elavl3:GAL4; UAS: GCaMP) transgenic larva with homozygous epha4a mutant background.

Download video file (519.7KB, mp4)

Video 8. Abnormal activation of calcium signaling in motor neurons of 24 hr post-fertilization (hpf) Tg(elavl3:GAL4; UAS: GCaMP) transgenic larva injected with epha4a MO.

Download video file (2.5MB, mp4)

One well-established concept regarding left-right coordination involves the presence of CPGs, which are regulated by interneuron circuitry within the spinal cord. We further examined the axon guidance of interneurons in epha4a mutants. First, we investigated the commissural trajectories of reticulospinal (RS) interneurons. In control larvae, the large Mauthner neurons, along with other RS neurons, were symmetrically positioned on each side of the midline and projected their axons to the contralateral sides (Figure 5A). These bilaterally projected axons typically crossed at the midline and subsequently synapsed on motoneurons of the opposite sides, contributing to the generation of spinal cord neural circuits (Hale et al., 2016). However, in epha4a mutant larvae, we observed an abnormal pattern in axonal projections. Specifically, the mutant axons failed to traverse the midline and instead extended ipsilaterally (Figure 5A). In addition, the distance between Mauthner neurons (rhombomere 4) and rhombomere 7 was significantly decreased, and rhombomere 5 was scarcely visible in the mutant larvae (Figure 5A and B). Furthermore, the sites of axon crossing between two Mauthner neurons tended to deviate to one side of the midline in the mutants (Figure 5C–D’).

Figure 5. Disorganized neural patterning in epha4a mutants.

Figure 5.

(A) Confocal images showing reticulospinal neuronal axons in 48 hr post-fertilization (hpf) wild-type and epha4a mutant larvae visualized with anti-neurofilament antibody RMO44. Asterisks indicate the cross sites of Mauthner axons. The green arrow indicates the cell body of the r5/MiD2 neuron in a wild-type larva. The red arrow points to the ipsilaterally projected axon of r6/MiD3 in the mutant larva, which is normally projected to the other side in wild-type fish. (B) Statistical chart showing the distance between r4 and r7 of 48 hpf wild-type and epha4a mutants. (C) Scatter plot showing the distance (d) between the center line and the intersection site of Mauthner axons as indicated in panel C′. (D) The ratio of the distance between the intersection site of Mauthner axons and bilateral axon bundles in 48 hpf wild-type (N=11 larvae) and epha4a mutants (N=12 larvae). The ratios were calculated as in panel D′. Scale bars: 20 µm in panel (A).

Cerebrospinal fluid-contacting neurons (CSF-cNs) represent a unique type of interneuron responsible for modulating the V0 and V2a interneurons, which are integral components of locomotor CPGs (Fidelin et al., 2015; Talpalar et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2021). In wild-type larvae, we observed that the ascending axons of these neurons projected either to the right or left side from the midline, as visualized using Tg(pkd2l1:GAL4;UAS:Kaede) double transgenic larvae (Figure 6A). However, in the absence of Epha4a, the projection of these neurons exhibited notable disorganization, with numerous axons crossing the midline from one side of the trunk. This disorganized pattern was observed in both heterozygotic and homozygotic mutants (Figure 6A and B). Additionally, we employed an optogenetic approach to activate these CSF-cNs, utilizing the Tg(Gal4s1020t; UAS:ChR2) double transgene. Following optical stimulation, we observed robust tail oscillations as previously described (Wyart et al., 2009). In wild-type larvae, these tail oscillations exhibited a symmetrical left-right beating pattern (Figure 6C and D, Video 9). However, a striking disruption of this symmetry was observed in epha4a morphants, as they consistently beat toward one side of the trunk following optical stimulation (a positive angle reflects a rightward turn; Figure 6C’–D’ and E, Video 10). Collectively, these findings demonstrate that the left-right coordination deficiencies observed in epha4a mutants arise from abnormal neural circuit formation, which consequently disrupts the integrity of the CPGs.

Figure 6. Aberrant swimming as a result of abnormal extension of cerebrospinal fluid-contacting neurons (CSF-cNs) axons.

Figure 6.

(A) Fluorescent images showing the distribution of ascending axons of CSF-cNs marked by Tg(pkd2l1:GAL4,UAS:Kaede) in 2 days post-fertilization (dpf) epha4a mutant larvae. Yellow line indicates the midline, and the red arrows indicate aberrantly extended axons in epha4a+/- and epha4a-/- larvae. (B) Bar graph showing the percentages of abnormal extension of CSF-cNs axons in 2 dpf wild-type, epha4a heterozygote, and epha4a homozygous. The numbers of larvae are indicated in each column. (C, C’) Superimposed frames of tail oscillations in 5 dpf control and epha4a morphants. (D, D’) A plot of body curvature angles in panels (C) and (C’). The positive angle means turning right. (E) Percentages of tendentious swing in control (N=8 larvae, n=24 experiments) and epha4a morphants (N=11 larvae, n=33 experiments). The percentages were calculated by the ratio of tendentious tail oscillation during the first eight swings. Scale bars: 50 µm in panel (A).

Video 9. Tail oscillation after light activation of 5 days post-fertilization (dpf) Tg(Gal4s1020t; UAS:ChR2) double transgene larva.

Download video file (3.6MB, mp4)

Video 10. Tail oscillation after light activation of 5 days post-fertilization (dpf) Tg(Gal4s1020t; UAS:ChR2) double transgene larva injected with epha4a MO.

Download video file (3.5MB, mp4)

Ephrin B3-Epha4 signaling regulates interneuron axon extension

To further explore the role of Epha4a during interneuron axon extension, we examined the expression of epha4a during early zebrafish embryonic development. Whole-mount in situ hybridization results showed that both epha4a and epha4b were abundantly expressed in the zebrafish spinal cord (Figure 7—figure supplement 1A). We plotted the expression of these two genes using two published single-cell transcriptome data, which showed that epha4a and epha4b were both expressed in interneurons, suggesting a role for epha4 in interneuron function (Figure 7—figure supplement 1B; Cavone et al., 2021; Scott et al., 2021). Notably, the expression of efnb3b, encoding the ligand of Epha4, was highly enriched in the midline floor plate cells (Figure 7—figure supplement 1B).

Ephrins, through interacting with Eph receptors, play a critical role in repulsive axon guidance during neural development (Egea and Klein, 2007; Flanagan and Vanderhaeghen, 1998). We further analyzed axon guidance in efnb3b morphants. Similar to those of epha4a mutants, the efnb3b morphants also displayed axon guidance defects, as well as uncoordinated calcium activation (Figure 7A–C). In addition, morphants larvae also displayed left-right oscillation defects after optogenetic stimulation (a positive angle reflects a rightward turn) (Figure 7D and E).

Figure 7. Left-right coordination defects in efnb3b morphants.

(A) Fluorescent images showing the distribution of ascending axons of cerebrospinal fluid-contacting neurons (CSF-cNs) marked by Tg(pkd2l1:GAL4,UAS:Kaede) in 2 days post-fertilization (dpf) efnb3b morphants. The red arrows indicate aberrantly extended axons in efnb3b morphants. (B) Fluorescent images showing the dorsal view of 24 hr post-fertilization (hpf) Tg(elavl3:GAL4; UAS:GCaMP) transgenic larvae. (C) The line chart showing the quantification of fluorescence changes of the region of interests (ROIs) in control morphants and efnb3b morphants as indicated in panel B. (D) Superimposed frames of tail oscillations in 5 dpf control and efnb3b morphants. (E) A plot of body curvature angles in panel (D). The positive angle means turning right. Scale bars: 50 μm in panels (A, B).

Figure 7.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1. Expression pattern of epha4 and efnb3 in the spinal cord.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1.

(A) Whole-mount in situ hybridization results showing the expression of epha4a and epha4b genes in the spinal cord in 24 days post-fertilization (dpf) zebrafish larvae. (B) Violin plot showing epha4a, epha4b, efnb3a, and efnb3b gene expression in different cell types. Single-cell transcriptome data were acquired from two different studies (top and bottom) (Cavone et al., 2021; Scott et al., 2021). Scale bars: 200 µm in panel (A).

Candidate variants in the EPHA4-related genes

Our zebrafish studies suggested that EPHA4 signaling is crucial for interneuron axon guidance, hence the formation of functional CPGs. Next, we further asked whether mutation of other components of the EPHA4 signaling can result in IS in humans. By searching for rare variants in EPHA4-related genes (Figure 8—figure supplement 1; Szklarczyk et al., 2019), we identified a heterozygous de novo start-loss variant (c.1A>G, p.Met1?) in NGEF in a 17-year-old male (SCO2003P3332) (Figure 8A and B, Table 1), whose scoliosis was diagnosed at 15 years of age with a main curve Cobb angle of 60°. NGEF encodes the neuronal guanine nucleotide exchange factor Ephexin that differentially affects the activity of GTPases RHOA, RAC1, and CDC42. The activation of Ephexin is triggered by ephrin through EPHA4 (Shamah et al., 2001).

Figure 8. Idiopathic scoliosis (IS) patients with potential NGEF variants.

(A) Protein structure of NGEF protein with the position of potential variants. (B, C) Pedigrees and spinal radiographs of two probands with dominant gene variants. Sanger sequencing results are shown on the right.

Figure 8.

Figure 8—figure supplement 1. Proteins in STRING that interact with EPHA4.

Figure 8—figure supplement 1.

Protein interaction network analysis, as illustrated by STRING v11.5, was used to identify rare variants in genes related to EPHA4. Known and predicted protein-protein interactions are included in the STRING database. Multiple proteins, including Ephexin, are associated with EPHA4 physically or functionally. Ephexin, encoded by NGEF, is a neuronal guanine exchange factor.

Strikingly, in a European-ancestry IS cohort, we further identified a dominant missense variant (c.857G>A, p.Ala286Val) in NGEF in a quad family with three affected members (Figure 8C, Table 1). The proband (II:2, TSRHC01) with onset of scoliosis at 14 years of age has a 58° main curve Cobb angle. This variant, which is located in the RhoGEF domain of Ephexin, is predicted to be highly deleterious (CADD = 29.6).

Altogether, our results suggest that defects of the CPGs owing to abnormal EPHA4 signaling maybe one of the crucial factors responsible for IS.

Discussion

IS is a disease with diverse causes, and the underlying mechanisms can vary even among patients with similar scoliotic phenotypes. Previous genetic studies have highlighted the significance of the extracellular matrix (ECM) in maintaining the balance of axial bone and supporting soft tissues in the spine, thus playing a crucial role in IS development (Haller et al., 2016). For example, the top SNP associated with IS maps to LBX1, an essential molecule for ECM maintenance and bone homeostasis (Takahashi et al., 2011). Additionally, genetic loci in muscle development-related genes have also been associated with the onset of scoliosis, emphasizing the intricate interaction between bones and muscles (Ogura et al., 2015). However, it is worth noting that the variants in these genes explain only a small fraction of the overall heritability of IS. Consequently, it is imperative to establish connections between the extensive genetic findings and biological mechanisms that can elucidate the etiological landscape of IS.

In this study, we mapped 41 significant genome-wide loci to functional genes through positional mapping and functional mapping such as eQTL. Then, we determined the enrichment in patient cohorts of rare variants in these genes, which may have greater impacts compared with common SNPs. This approach revealed the convergence of SNPs and rare variants in EPHA4 that are enriched in patients with IS. We also identified additional high-impact variants in NGEF, which is involved in the EPHA4 pathway.

Our studies using zebrafish have revealed that deficiency of Epha4 can lead to the development of scoliosis. Interestingly, we observed that even heterozygotic epha4a zebrafish mutants displayed mild scoliosis (Figure 2C), which is consistent with the occurrence of this condition in scoliosis patients. Further analysis involving behavior and imaging demonstrated that the absence of Epha4a resulted in defective left-right coordination. This coordination is crucially governed by CPGs, which generate rhythmic patterns of neural activity to coordinate limb movements on both sides of the body (Kiehn, 2006; Marder and Bucher, 2001; Talpalar et al., 2013). Previous studies have reported the involvement of ephrin and its receptors in axon guidance during the maturation of neural circuits, including CPGs (Andersson et al., 2012; Borgius et al., 2014; Iwasato et al., 2007). Ephrin B3, present in radial glial cells at the dorsal midline, serves as a repulsive barrier to axons expressing Epha4 (Imondi et al., 2000). Axon guidance is disrupted when this repulsive pathway is inactivated, leading to midline invasion (Butt et al., 2005; Kullander et al., 2001; Paixão et al., 2013). In Epha4 and Efnb3 knockout mice, a ‘hopping’ gait is observed, which is attributed to the aberrant crossing of motor neurons expressing Epha4 (Kullander et al., 2003). Consistent with these observations, we observed disrupted axon guidance in the interneurons, which are integral components of CPGs, in both epha4a mutants and efnb3b morphants. This finding suggests that CPG malfunction may be a significant contributing factor to the scoliosis phenotype observed in these genetic backgrounds. It is highly likely that the lack of coordinated left-right locomotion generates imbalanced mechanical forces on the spine, gradually leading to spinal curvature during later stages of development (Figure 9).

Figure 9. The proposed mechanism of idiopathic scoliosis (IS) mediated by EPHA4 dysfunction.

Figure 9.

In healthy individuals, EphrinB3-activated EPHA4 phosphorylates CDK5, leading to the phosphorylation of Ephexin, a protein encoded by NGEF. Phosphorylated Ephexin can regulate axon guidance through either activating RHOA or suppressing CDC42 and RAC1 signaling. These processes are critical in maintaining the normal function of the central pattern generator (CPG), the local neural network that provides coordinated bilateral muscle control. Impairment of the EPHA4 pathway and CPG may cause an imbalance of the motor drive from the spinal cord during development, thus causing the uncoordinated left/right swimming behavior in zebrafish larvae and the asymmetry of the bilateral muscular pull in a young child. Although the appearance is normal in early childhood, the dysfunction produces a scoliotic curve during the growth spurt.

Thus, our data provided a novel biological mechanism of IS, i.e., the impairment of neural patterning and CPG. Previous studies have provided clues on the role of CPGs in IS. Patients with adolescent IS showed asymmetric trunk movement during gait, as characterized by increased relative forward rotation of the right upper body in relation to the pelvis (Kramers-de Quervain et al., 2004; Nishida et al., 2017). An electromyography (EMG) study also showed asymmetric activation of paraspinal muscles between the convex and concave sides at the scoliosis curve apex (Shimode et al., 2003). In a child with a strong family history of IS, asymmetric hyperactivity was observed by EMG months before scoliosis was evident (Valentino et al., 1985). These left-right locomotor coordination abnormalities indicated the maldevelopment of CPGs as a potential cause of IS. The CPG asymmetry may induce an imbalance in trunk muscle strength, resulting in asymmetric rib drooping. This leads to an abnormal vertebral rotation and then the onset of IS. Moreover, in a companion study, Wang et al. identified a number of rare variants in SLC6A9, which encodes glycine transporter 1 (GLYT1), in familial and sporadic adolescent IS cases. The slc6a9 mutant zebrafish also exhibited discoordination of spinal neural activities with pronounced lateral spinal curvature, recapitulating the human IS phenotype (Wang et al., 2024). Taken together, we propose that the dysfunction of CPGs would cause an imbalance in the motor drive from the spinal cord and the asymmetric transversospinalis muscle pull, eventually producing a scoliotic curve (Figure 9).

In summary, our study demonstrates that both common and rare variants within the EPHA4 pathway contribute to the genetic architecture of IS. EPHA4 pathway dysfunction causes axon pathfinding defects, resulting in impaired coordinated left-right locomotion by disrupting neural patterning and the function of CPGs, thereby potentially leading to IS.

Materials and methods

Mapping of candidate genes utilizing previous association studies

Through a systematic literature review, we identified IS-associated SNPs reported in GWASs and meta-analyses of GWAS. The literature search was carried out using MEDLINE (via https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and Web of Science (via Clarivate Analytics) and was limited to English-language articles published from January 1980 to October 2020. The following keywords were combined to perform the search: ‘idiopathic scoliosis’ AND ‘GWAS’ OR ‘SNP’ OR ‘single nucleotide polymorphism’ OR ‘variant’ (Supplementary file 4). The inclusion/exclusion criteria of abstracts are provided in Supplementary file 5. After screening the titles and abstracts, we obtained from the full-text articles the rsID, chromosome, and position for SNPs with a threshold for genome-wide significance of p<5.0 × 10−8. For SNPs identified in multiple studies, we recorded the lowest p-value.

SNPs reported in previous studies were first pruned using Functional Mapping and Annotation (FUMA, v1.4.1, https://fuma.ctglab.nl/; Watanabe et al., 2017). Significant SNPs were considered independent at r2<0.6. All known SNPs (available in the 1000 Genomes reference panel, https://www.internationalgenome.org/) were included for further gene mapping if they were in a linkage disequilibrium (LD) block (r2≥0.6) with a significant independent SNP. Three SNP-to-gene strategies were used:

  1. For positional mapping of significant independent SNPs, we used annotations obtained from ANNOVAR (http://annovar.openbioinformatics.org). A 10 kb maximum distance was applied for intergenic SNPs.

  2. For the eQTL mapping, we mapped significant independent SNPs and SNPs in an LD block to eQTLs across 44 GTEx tissue types (release v8) (Aguet et al., 2020). SNP-gene pairs with a false discovery rate (FDR)≤0.05 were considered significant.

  3. For chromatin interaction mapping, we overlapped the significant independent SNPs and those in LD blocks with one end of significantly interacting regions across various tissue and cell types. Information on the interacting regions was derived from Hi-C datasets of 21 tissues and cell types provided by GSE87112. The significance of interactions for Hi-C datasets was computed by Fit-Hi-C, with an FDR≤10–6 considered significant. Genes were mapped if their promoter regions overlapped with another end of the significant interactions. The promoter region was defined as the region from −250 bp to +500 bp relative to the transcription start site.

Cohort description

The Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) cohort: The PUMCH cohort comprised 411 unrelated Chinese patients with severe IS (Cobb angle≥40°) who underwent spinal surgery in the PUMCH between October 2017 and March 2022 as part of the Deciphering disorders Involving Scoliosis and COmorbidities (DISCO) study (http://www.discostudy.org/). The clinical diagnosis was confirmed using standing full-spine radiographs, three-dimensional computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. These patients did not show any congenital or neuromuscular defect at the time of recruitment. The control cohort consisted of 3800 individuals without observable scoliosis and with exome sequencing or genome sequencing performed at PUMCH for clinical or research purposes. Individuals with vertebrae malformation or congenital developmental defects were excluded. A patient with a 2q35-36.2 deletion, including the EPHA4 gene, was also recruited through in-house gene matching of the DISCO study (Li et al., 2015). This patient was subsequently evaluated for scoliosis by examination and radiography.

The East Asian cohort: The East Asian cohort includes totally 6449 IS patients and 158,068 controls from four independent datasets (Japanese dataset 1, Kou et al., 2013; Takahashi et al., 2011): 1261 cases, 15,019 controls; Japanese dataset 2 (Ogura et al., 2015): 878 cases, 21,334 controls; Japanese dataset 3 (Kou et al., 2019): 3333 cases, 119,630 controls; Hong Kong dataset: 977 cases, 2085 controls. The inclusion criteria for IS subjects were the same as our previous studies (Fan et al., 2012; Kou et al., 2019).

The Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children (TSRHC) cohort: We used a replication cohort of European-ancestry patients with IS from the TSRHC. Cases considered for inclusion in the study met criteria for a positive diagnosis of IS: lateral deviation from the midline greater than 15° as measured by the Cobb angle method from standing spinal radiographs, axial rotation toward the side of the deviation, and exclusion of relevant coexisting diagnoses.

Blood sample collection

In the PUMCH cohort, genomic DNA samples were extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes of each subject using a QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Purified DNA was qualified by NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and quantified by Qubit 3.0 using the dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). DNA samples were stored at 4°C until used.

In the East Asian and TSRHC cohort, genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood or saliva using a standard protocol.

DNA sequencing and variant calling

In the PUMCH cohort, whole exome sequencing or WGS was performed on peripheral blood DNA from all individuals and available family members (Supplementary file 6). A SureSelect Human All Exon V6+UTR r2 core design (91 Mb, Agilent) was used for exon capture. The exomes were then sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 4000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For WGS, sequencing libraries were prepared using the KAPA Hyper Prep kit (KAPA Biosystems, Kusatsu, Japan) with an optimized manufacturer’s protocol. We performed multiplex sequencing using an Illumina HiSeq X-Ten sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Variant calling and annotation were done in-house using the Peking Union Medical College Hospital Pipeline (PUMP) as described previously (Chen et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2021).

In the TSRHC cohort, subjects in 162 adolescent IS families were sequenced as part of the Gabriella Miller Kids First Pediatric Research Consortium (GMKF) at The HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology (Huntsville, AL, USA). In summary, DNA was normalized, sheared, and then ligated to Illumina paired-end adaptors. The purified ligated DNA was amplified, and exome sequencing was performed on the Illumina HiSeq X platform. The sample’s sequences were aligned into GRCh38, and genotypes were joint-called per each family by the GMKF’s Data Resource Center (DRC) at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia following GATK best practices as detailed here (Mukhopadhyay et al., 2020). GMKF DRC’s alignment and joint genotyping pipelines are open source and made available to the public via GitHub (https://github.com/kids-first/kf-alignment-workflow copy archived at Miller, 2025a, and https://github.com/kids-first/kf-jointgenotyping-workflow copy archived at Miller, 2025b).

Rare variant association analysis of the candidate genes

To determine the contribution of rare variants in GWAS candidate genes to IS, we analyzed the gene-based mutational burden for 156 candidate genes. Only ultra-rare variants with a gnomAD population-max allele frequency ≤0.01% and a cohort allele count ≤3 were analyzed. Each variant was assigned a weight, and the mutational burden of a given gene was defined as the maximum weight value among all ultra-rare variants carried by the individual. The SAIGE-GENE+ package was used to determine the weighted mutational burden test for each gene (Zhou et al., 2022).

Weighting criteria for the weighted burden analysis were developed according to the variant types and in silico results. The LoF variants (canonical splicing variants, nonsense variants, or variants that cause frameshift, stop-gain, or start-loss) were calculated together with the protein-altering variants, including missense variants and in-frame indels. Each variant was assigned a weight range from 0 to 1, and the mutational burden for a given gene was defined as the maximum weight value among all ultra-rare variants carried by the individual. The LoF variants annotated as ‘high confidence’ by the loss-of-function transcript effect estimator (LOFTEE) (Karczewski et al., 2020) were assigned a weight value of 1.0. The LoF variants annotated as ‘low confidence’ or unlabeled by LOFTEE, the noncanonical splicing variants with a SpliceAI score >0.5, and the missense variants with a rare exome variant ensemble learner (REVEL) (Ioannidis et al., 2016) score of 0.8 were assigned a weight value of 0.8. The in-frame insertions/deletions (indels) with a Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) (Kircher et al., 2014) score >20 and the missense variants with a REVEL score >0.6 and ≤0.8 were assigned a weight value of 0.6. The in-frame indels with a CADD score >10 and ≤20 and the missense variants with a REVEL score >0.4 and ≤0.6 were assigned a weight value of 0.4. The in-frame indels and the missense variants with a REVEL score >0.2 and ≤0.4 were assigned a weight value of 0.2. The remaining missense variants were assigned a weight value of 0.

Sanger sequencing of familial participants

Sanger sequencing of familial participants was performed to determine the origin of variants in EPHA4 and NGEF. All LoF variants and protein-altering variants identified in familial participants were validated. Variant-encoding gene regions were amplified by PCR from genomic DNA obtained from probands, as well as from parents for trios, to determine the origin of the variants. The amplicons were purified using an Axygen AP-GX-50 kit (Corning, NY, USA) and sequenced by Sanger sequencing on an ABI 3730xl instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

Minigene assay

The splicing variant (EPHA4: c.1443+1G>C) was characterized by a minigene assay. Genomic DNA from the heterozygous patient was amplified by PCR using a high-fidelity DNA polymerase. Amplicons included exon 6, intron 6, exon 7, intron 7, and exon 8 of the EPHA4 gene. PCR products were cloned into the vector via the restriction sites BamHI and MluI for pCAS2, which is based on the pcDNA3.1 plasmid (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Clones with wild-type or mutant genomic inserts were selected and verified by sequencing the cloned DNA fragments. The recombinant plasmids were transfected into 293T cells using Lipofectamine 3000 reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). For RT-qPCR, total RNA was isolated from the transfected cells using Trizol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and reverse transcription was performed using the GoScript Reverse Transcription System (Promega, Madison, MI, USA). PCR amplification was performed using the pCAS2-RT-F and pCAS2-RT-R primers, and the products were sequenced using pCAS2-RT-F.

Primers sequences for the minigene assay were as follows:

  • pCAS2-RT-F: 5′-CTGACCCTGCTGACCCTCCT-3′

  • pCAS2-RT-R: 5′-TTGCTGAGAAGGCGTGGTAGAG-3′

Nested PCR

The splicing variant (EPHA4: c.1318+10344A>G) was characterized by nested PCR. RNA was extracted from the whole blood of the patient using the TRIzon Reagent (CWBIO, Hangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. The cDNA was synthesized using HiScript II 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit with a gDNA wiper (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. Nested PCR was performed as described previously (Yao and Tavis, 2005). Nested PCRs in 50 μl included 2 μl cDNA from the reverse transcription reaction as the template for the first round of PCR or 2 μl of first-round PCR product as the template for the second PCR, 1.5 μl 10 μM sense primer, 1.5 μl 10 μM anti-sense primer, 5 μl nucleotide mix (2 mM each dNTP), 5 μl 10× KOD Buffer, 1 μl 1 unit/μl Kod-Plus-Neo polymerase, 3 μl 25 mM MgSO4 and 31 μl ddH2O. The PCR program was (94°C for 2 min, 98°C for 10 s, 55°C for 30 s, 68°C for 60 s)×20 cycles and then (94°C for 2 min, 98°C for 10 s, 57°C for 30 s, 68°C for 60 s)×30 cycles. Primers sequences:

For the first round:

  • F: 5′-GGCTCCTGTGTCAACAACTC-3′

  • R: 5′-GTTGGGATCTTCGTACGTAA-3′

For the second round:

  • F: 5′-AACTGCCTATGCAACGCTGG-3′

  • R: 5′-AGCTGCAATGAGAATTACC-3′

Western blots

This study utilized the HEK293T cell line, which was obtained from the Pricella Biotechnology Co. (catalog number CL-0005). The cell line was authenticated by short tandem repeat profiling. Mycoplasma testing confirmed that the HEK293T were free from contamination. HEK293T was selected for its high transfection efficiency to assess the impact of EPHA4 missense variant on protein expression. First, HEK293T cells were transfected with EPHA4-C1-pEGFP plasmid or the corresponding wild-type vector to detect the missense variant in EPHA4 (c.2546G>A, p.Cys849Tyr). Cells were cultured in six-well plates and transfected with DNA (2 mg/well) using Lipofectamine 3000 reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). After 48 hr, cells were harvested, and protein extracts were prepared as described (Ding et al., 2017). The mutant proteins and wild-type proteins were fused to GFP. The expression of the two proteins was compared by western blots with a GFP antibody using the ECL detection system. The GFP antibody was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA). The CDK5 antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). A phospho-specific antibody against CDK5 phosphorylated at Tyr (GeneTex, Irvine, CA, USA) was purchased from GeneTex. Western blot experiments were repeated twice with similar results for the replicates.

Genotyping and imputation of GWAS

In the East Asian Japanese cohort, genotyping was performed by Illumina Human610 Genotyping BeadChip, Illumina HumanOmniExpressExome, and HumanOmniExpress as our previous GWASs (Kou et al., 2019; Kou et al., 2013; Ogura et al., 2015; Takahashi et al., 2011). For quality control (QC), subjects with a call rate < 0.98, high-degree relatedness with other subjects, and outliers of East Asian ethnicity were excluded. For variants QC, the exclusion criteria of variants were as follows: call rate < 0.99, p-value for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium < 1.0  ×  10−6, and minor allele count <10. The reference panel for imputation, namely JEWEL7K, was composed of 1000 Genomes Project phase 3 (v5) (Auton et al., 2015) and Japanese whole-genome sequence data (Das et al., 2016) with 3256 high-depth subjects (≥30 read counts) and 4216 low-depth subjects (≤15 read counts). Using EAGLE 2.4.1 (https://alkesgroup.broadinstitute.org/Eagle/) to determine the haplotypes, pre-phasing was conducted. Genotypes were imputed using Minimac4 (v1.0.0) (Das et al., 2016). After imputation, we excluded variants with minor allele frequency (MAF) <0.005 and low imputation quality (R2 < 0.3).

In the East Asian Hong Kong cohort, samples were genotyped with Illumina Human Omni ZhongHua-8 Beadchips. Illumina Genome Studio v2.0 was used to convert raw data into PLINK format. The QC steps of samples and variants were described in a previous study (Marees et al., 2018). Genotype phasing and imputing were executed using SHAPEIT v2.r900 (Delaneau et al., 2012) and IMPUTE2 (Marchini et al., 2007). The imputed data was filtered using the following parameters: INFO >0.6, Certainty >0.8, and MAF >0.01. Association analysis was performed using PLINK v1.9 logistic regression with covariates: sex, age, and top 20 principal components of the variance-standardized relationship matrix.

East Asian GWAS meta-analysis for IS

For the meta-analysis of the four datasets (three Japanese datasets and one Hong Kong dataset), an inverse-variance-based method was performed by METAL (v2011-03-25) (Willer et al., 2010). SNPs in three or more of the four cohorts were used in subsequent analyses.

Gene-based common variant analysis and eQTL analysis

SNPs in EPHA4 or within 20 kb flanking EPHA4 with a significant association with IS were retrieved. SNPs were matched to potential eQTLs according to the GTEx database (v8, https://gtexportal.org). Gene-based common variant analyses were performed using Multi-marker Analysis of GenoMic Annotation (MAGMA) (de Leeuw et al., 2015) and FUMA (Watanabe et al., 2017) using default settings with LD information from the 1000 Genomes Project East Asian population (1KGP EAS) as a reference. SNPs located within 2 kb upstream and 1 kb downstream from EPHA4 were included in the gene-based analysis.

Zebrafish strains, mutants, and morphants

Zebrafish Tuebingen (TU) strains were maintained at 28°C on a 14 hr/10 hr light/dark cycle. Embryos were raised at 28.5°C in E3 medium (5 mM NaCl, 0.17 mM KCl, 0.39 mM CaCl2, 0.67 mM MgSO4) following standard protocols. Zebrafish have two homologs of EPHA4, epha4a and epha4b. The CRISPR/Cas9 system was used to generate zebrafish epha4a and epha4b mutants. To increase efficiency, we injected Cas9 mRNA together with multiple single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) for each gene. The sgRNA sequences for epha4a and epha4b are listed in Supplementary file 7. Morpholino sequences for epha4a and efnb3b knockdown analysis are also listed in Supplementary file 7.

Micro CT imaging

Adult zebrafish epha4a mutants or wild-type siblings were euthanized with tricaine methanesulfonate and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. Micro CT images were captured using a PerkinElmer Quantum GX2. Planar images acquired over 360° of rotation were reconstructed using QuantumGX. Three-dimensional renders of the skeleton were made with Analyze 12.0 software (AnalyzeDirect).

Behavioral recordings and analysis

For behavior analysis, individual zebrafish larvae were transferred into a 24-well plate with fresh E3 medium at 8 dpf. Then, the plate was placed inside the Daniovision (Noldus) observation chamber for further behavior analysis. Video tracking of swimming activity and further statistical analysis were performed using the EthoVision XT10 software. Behavioral data were shown as total swim distance (mm), average velocity (mm/s), average relative turn angle (°), average absolute turn angle (degree), and average absolute angular velocity (°/s) at a duration for 4 min. A positive angle reflects a leftward turn.

For tactile stimulation, zebrafish larvae were placed in a concave slide, and tactile stimulation was performed with glass capillaries to the head or tail sides. Larval startle responses were recorded using a high-speed video camera (Mikrotron, EoSens Mini1) at 1000 fps. Automated analysis of larval movement was performed using the FLOTE software package (Jain et al., 2014).

For optogenetic studies, the Tg(Gal4s1020t; UAS:ChR2) transgenic embryos were injected with control, epha4a or efnb3b morpholinos at one cell stage. At 5 dpf, the head of injected larva was mounted in 1% low melting point agarose (Sigma), and the body was exposed in glass-bottom dishes (WPI). Leica M165FC fluorescence microscope was used to irradiate with a blue laser at 488 nm wavelength. Larval responses were recorded using a high-speed video camera (Mikrotron, EoSens Mini1) at 500 fps. Body curvature analysis of larval movement was performed using the FLOTE software package.

Whole-mount in situ hybridization and immunofluorescence

The primer sequences used to amplify epha4a, epha4b, and rfng genes were listed in Supplementary file 7. Probe synthesis and whole-mount in situ hybridization were performed according to standard protocols. For RS neurons immunostaining, embryos were fixed in 2% trichloroacetic acid at 48 hpf for 3–4 hr, washed twice in 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS and blocked in 0.5% Triton X-100, 10% normal goat serum, 0.1% bovine serum albumin (Solarbio) in PBS for 1 hr. The embryos were stained by monoclonal anti-neurofilament 160 antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) overnight at 4°C, then stained by goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen) after washing.

Analysis of neuronal calcium signals activity

Control, epha4a or efnb3b morpholinos were injected into Tg(elavl3:GAL4; UAS:GCaMP) transgenic embryos at one cell stage. At 24 hpf, embryos were paralyzed with 0.5 mg/ml α-bungarotoxin (Alomone Labs), then mounted in 1% low melting point agarose (Sigma) in glass-bottom dishes (WPI). Neuronal calcium signal images were collected with IXON-L-888 EMCCD camera equipped on Dragonfly 200 Spinning Disk Confocal Microscope using a ×20/0.55 objective within 1 min at a frame rate of 10 fps.

Images were analyzed with ImageJ software. To quantify the change in fluorescence intensity, a region of interest was defined, and the fluorescence intensity Ft of different frames was normalized to Ft/Fmin based on the minimum fluorescence intensity Fmin in all frames. To compare the left-right alternation pattern of neuronal calcium signals, the ratio of the left-side calcium signals frequency (fleft) to the right-side calcium signals frequency (fright) was logarithmically transformed (log-transformed).

Quantification and statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS (v15.0). Unpaired Student’s t-test, Welch one-way ANOVA, or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test was applied when appropriate. All experiments were replicated at least three times independently. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Acknowledgements

We appreciate all the patients, their families, and clinical research coordinators, including physicians who participated in this project. The authors also acknowledge the Texas Advanced Computing Center (TACC) at The University of Texas at Austin for providing computing resources that have contributed to the results related to the TSRHC cohort. URL: http://www.tacc.utexas.edu. The Department of Molecular and Human Genetics at Baylor College of Medicine derives revenue from the chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA by aCGH and/or SNP arrays), clinical exome sequencing (cES), and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) offered in the Baylor Genetics (BG) Laboratory (http://bmgl.com).

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Jianguo T Zhang, Email: jgzhang_pumch@yahoo.com.

Chengtian Zhao, Email: chengtian_zhao@ouc.edu.cn.

Nan Wu, Email: dr.wunan@pumch.cn.

Bruce Appel, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, United States.

Didier YR Stainier, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFC2509700 to Lianlei Wang.

  • National Natural Science Foundation of China 81822030 to Nan Wu.

  • National Natural Science Foundation of China 82102522 to Lianlei Wang.

  • National Natural Science Foundation of China 31991194 & 32125015 to Chengtian Zhao.

  • National Natural Science Foundation of China 82172382 to Jianguo T Zhang.

  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Initiative for Innovative Medicine 2021-I2M-1-051 to Nan Wu.

  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Initiative for Innovative Medicine 2021-I2M-1-052 to Zhihong Wu.

  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Initiative for Innovative Medicine 2020-I2M-C&T-B-030 to Jianguo T Zhang.

  • Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality 7222133 to Shengru Wang.

  • Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences No. 2019PT320025 to Nan Wu.

  • National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding 2022-PUMCH-D-004 to Jianguo T Zhang.

  • National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding 2022-PUMCH-C-033 to Nan Wu.

  • Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR202102210113 to Lianlei Wang.

  • Taishan Scholar Project of Shandong Province to Lianlei Wang.

  • Gabriella Miller Kids First Program grant X01 HL132375-01A1 to Jonathan J Rios.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

affiliated to Baylor Genetics, Houston.

J.R.L has stock ownership in 23andMe, is a paid consultant for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Novartis, and is a co-inventor on multiple United States and European patents related to molecular diagnostics for inherited neuropathies, eye diseases and bacterial genomic fingerprinting.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Project administration.

Conceptualization, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Supervision, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Project administration.

Software, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft.

Data curation, Software, Investigation.

Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft.

Data curation, Software, Formal analysis.

Data curation, Software, Methodology.

Resources, Data curation.

Resources, Data curation.

Resources, Software.

Investigation.

Data curation, Software.

Resources, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology.

Data curation.

Investigation.

Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision.

Software, Investigation.

Resources, Investigation.

Supervision, Project administration.

Supervision, Funding acquisition, Project administration.

Resources, Project administration.

Resources, Supervision.

Supervision, Methodology, Project administration.

Resources.

Resources, Supervision, Project administration.

Resources, Project administration.

Data curation, Supervision, Methodology, Project administration.

Resources.

Conceptualization, Resources.

Supervision, Project administration.

Methodology, Project administration, Resources.

Supervision, Project administration.

Resources, Supervision, Methodology, Project administration.

Supervision, Funding acquisition, Project administration.

Resources, Project administration.

Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing.

Ethics

Human subjects: Approval for the study was obtained from the ethics committee at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital (JS-098, JS-2364), the medical ethics committee of the Keio University Hospital (No. 20080129), the ethical committee of RIKEN Yokohama Institute (No. H20-17(8)), and the Institutional Review Board of the University Texas Southwestern Medical Center (protocol STU 112010‐150). Written informed consent was obtained from each participating individuals and families in the three cohorts. For the control group, the protocols were approved by the ethics committee at Peking Union Medical College Hospital.

Animal experimentation: All zebrafish studies were approved by the Animal Care Committee of the Ocean University of China (Animal protocol number: OUC2012316).

Additional files

Supplementary file 1. Summary of the 14 studies and their corresponding single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) included in the candidate genes mapping.
elife-95324-supp1.docx (18.2KB, docx)
Supplementary file 2. Summarized results of burden analysis.
elife-95324-supp2.docx (17.1KB, docx)
Supplementary file 3. The significant single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the EPHA4 region identified from East Asian genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis.
elife-95324-supp3.xlsx (24.2KB, xlsx)
Supplementary file 4. Search strategies for each database.
elife-95324-supp4.docx (14.5KB, docx)
Supplementary file 5. Inclusion and exclusion criteria of literature review.
elife-95324-supp5.docx (14.6KB, docx)
Supplementary file 6. Sequencing information of PUMCH idiopathic scoliosis (IS) cohort.
elife-95324-supp6.docx (15KB, docx)
Supplementary file 7. Sequences information of single guide RNA (sgRNA) and primers for zebrafish study.
elife-95324-supp7.docx (15.5KB, docx)
MDAR checklist

Data availability

The raw whole exome/genome sequencing data from this study have been uploaded in the Genome Sequence Archive in BIG Data Center (https://bigd.big.ac.cn/), Beijing Institute of Genomics (BIG), Chinese Academy of Sciences (Accession Number: HRA011763, HRA006052). Other datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are described in supplementary files, figure supplements, and the section of "Materials and Methods".

The following datasets were generated:

Wu N, Zhang J, Wu Z. 2025. EPHA4 signaling dysregulation links abnormal locomotion and the development of idiopathic scoliosis. National Genomics Data center. HRA011763

Wu N, Zhang J, Wu Z. 2023. control sequencing data. National Genomics Data center. HRA006052

References

  1. Aguet F, Anand S, Ardlie KG, Gabriel S, Getz GA, Graubert A, Hadley K, Handsaker RE, Huang KH, Kashin S, Li X, MacArthur DG, Meier SR, Nedzel JL, Nguyen DT, Segrè AV, Todres E, Balliu B, Barbeira AN, Battle A, Bonazzola R, Brown A, Brown CD, Castel SE, Conrad DF, Cotter DJ, Cox N, Das S, de Goede OM, Dermitzakis ET, Einson J, Engelhardt BE, Eskin E, Eulalio TY, Ferraro NM, Flynn ED, Fresard L, Gamazon ER, Garrido-Martín D, Gay NR, Gloudemans MJ, Guigó R, Hame AR, He Y, Hoffman PJ, Hormozdiari F, Hou L, Im HK, Jo B, Kasela S, Kellis M, Kim-Hellmuth S, Kwong A, Lappalainen T, Li X, Liang Y, Mangul S, Mohammadi P, Montgomery SB, Muñoz-Aguirre M, Nachun DC, Nobel AB, Oliva M, Park Y, Park Y, Parsana P, Rao AS, Reverter F, Rouhana JM, Sabatti C, Saha A, Stephens M, Stranger BE, Strober BJ, Teran NA, Viñuela A, Wang G, Wen X, Wright F, Wucher V, Zou Y, Ferreira PG, Li G, Melé M, Yeger-Lotem E, Barcus ME, Bradbury D, Krubit T, McLean JA, Qi L, Robinson K, Roche NV, Smith AM, Sobin L, Tabor DE, Undale A, Bridge J, Brigham LE, Foster BA, Gillard BM, Hasz R, Hunter M, Johns C, Johnson M, Karasik E, Kopen G, Leinweber WF, McDonald A, Moser MT, Myer K, Ramsey KD, Roe B, Shad S, Thomas JA, Walters G, Washington M, Wheeler J, Jewell SD, Rohrer DC, Valley DR, Davis DA, Mash DC, Branton PA, Barker LK, Gardiner HM, Mosavel M, Siminoff LA, Flicek P, Haeussler M, Juettemann T, Kent WJ, Lee CM, Powell CC, Rosenbloom KR, Ruffier M, Sheppard D, Taylor K, Trevanion SJ, Zerbino DR, Abell NS, Akey J, Chen L, Demanelis K, Doherty JA, Feinberg AP, Hansen KD, Hickey PF, Jasmine F, Jiang L, Kaul R, Kibriya MG, Li JB, Li Q, Lin S, Linder SE, Pierce BL, Rizzardi LF, Skol AD, Smith KS, Snyder M, Stamatoyannopoulos J, Tang H, Wang M, Carithers LJ, Guan P, Koester SE, Little AR, Moore HM, Nierras CR, Rao AK, Vaught JB, Volpi S. The GTEx Consortium atlas of genetic regulatory effects across human tissues. Science. 2020;369:1318–1330. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz1776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersson LS, Larhammar M, Memic F, Wootz H, Schwochow D, Rubin C-J, Patra K, Arnason T, Wellbring L, Hjälm G, Imsland F, Petersen JL, McCue ME, Mickelson JR, Cothran G, Ahituv N, Roepstorff L, Mikko S, Vallstedt A, Lindgren G, Andersson L, Kullander K. Mutations in DMRT3 affect locomotion in horses and spinal circuit function in mice. Nature. 2012;488:642–646. doi: 10.1038/nature11399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, Garrison EP, Kang HM, Korbel JO, Marchini JL, McCarthy S, McVean GA, Abecasis GR, 1000 Genomes Project Consortium A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 2015;526:68–74. doi: 10.1038/nature15393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bagnat M, Gray RS. Development of a straight vertebrate body axis. Development. 2020;147:dev175794. doi: 10.1242/dev.175794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Borgius L, Nishimaru H, Caldeira V, Kunugise Y, Löw P, Reig R, Itohara S, Iwasato T, Kiehn O. Spinal glutamatergic neurons defined by EphA4 signaling are essential components of normal locomotor circuits. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2014;34:3841–3853. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4992-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Boswell CW, Ciruna B. Understanding idiopathic scoliosis: a new zebrafish school of thought. Trends in Genetics. 2017;33:183–196. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2017.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Buchan JG, Alvarado DM, Haller GE, Cruchaga C, Harms MB, Zhang T, Willing MC, Grange DK, Braverman AC, Miller NH, Morcuende JA, Tang NL-S, Lam T-P, Ng BK-W, Cheng JC-Y, Dobbs MB, Gurnett CA. Rare variants in FBN1 and FBN2 are associated with severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Human Molecular Genetics. 2014;23:5271–5282. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Butt SJB, Lundfald L, Kiehn O. EphA4 defines a class of excitatory locomotor-related interneurons. PNAS. 2005;102:14098–14103. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503317102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cavone L, McCann T, Drake LK, Aguzzi EA, Oprişoreanu AM, Pedersen E, Sandi S, Selvarajah J, Tsarouchas TM, Wehner D, Keatinge M, Mysiak KS, Henderson BEP, Dobie R, Henderson NC, Becker T, Becker CG. A unique macrophage subpopulation signals directly to progenitor cells to promote regenerative neurogenesis in the zebrafish spinal cord. Developmental Cell. 2021;56:1617–1630. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2021.04.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cayuso J, Xu Q, Addison M, Wilkinson DG. Actomyosin regulation by Eph receptor signaling couples boundary cell formation to border sharpness. eLife. 2019;8:e49696. doi: 10.7554/eLife.49696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen N, Zhao S, Jolly A, Wang L, Pan H, Yuan J, Chen S, Koch A, Ma C, Tian W, Jia Z, Kang J, Zhao L, Qin C, Fan X, Rall K, Coban-Akdemir Z, Chen Z, Jhangiani S, Liang Z, Niu Y, Li X, Yan Z, Wu Y, Dong S, Song C, Qiu G, Zhang S, Liu P, Posey JE, Zhang F, Luo G, Wu Z, Su J, Zhang J, Chen EY, Rouskas K, Glentis S, Bacopoulou F, Deligeoroglou E, Chrousos G, Lyonnet S, Polak M, Rosenberg C, Dingeldein I, Bonilla X, Borel C, Gibbs RA, Dietrich JE, Dimas AS, Antonarakis SE, Brucker SY, Lupski JR, Wu N, Zhu L, Deciphering Disorders Involving Scoliosis and COmorbidities study group Perturbations of genes essential for Müllerian duct and Wölffian duct development in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. American Journal of Human Genetics. 2021;108:337–345. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.12.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cheng JC, Castelein RM, Chu WC, Danielsson AJ, Dobbs MB, Grivas TB, Gurnett CA, Luk KD, Moreau A, Newton PO, Stokes IA, Weinstein SL, Burwell RG. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Nature Reviews. Disease Primers. 2015;1:15030. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cooke JE, Kemp HA, Moens CB. EphA4 is required for cell adhesion and rhombomere-boundary formation in the zebrafish. Current Biology. 2005;15:536–542. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Das S, Forer L, Schönherr S, Sidore C, Locke AE, Kwong A, Vrieze SI, Chew EY, Levy S, McGue M, Schlessinger D, Stambolian D, Loh PR, Iacono WG, Swaroop A, Scott LJ, Cucca F, Kronenberg F, Boehnke M, Abecasis GR, Fuchsberger C. Next-generation genotype imputation service and methods. Nature Genetics. 2016;48:1284–1287. doi: 10.1038/ng.3656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Delaneau O, Marchini J, Zagury JF. A linear complexity phasing method for thousands of genomes. Nature Methods. 2012;9:179–181. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. de Leeuw CA, Mooij JM, Heskes T, Posthuma D. MAGMA: generalized gene-set analysis of GWAS data. PLOS Computational Biology. 2015;11:e1004219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ding L, Shen Y, Ni J, Ou Y, Ou Y, Liu H. EphA4 promotes cell proliferation and cell adhesion-mediated drug resistance via the AKT pathway in multiple myeloma. Tumour Biology. 2017;39:1010428317694298. doi: 10.1177/1010428317694298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Egea J, Klein R. Bidirectional Eph-ephrin signaling during axon guidance. Trends in Cell Biology. 2007;17:230–238. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2007.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fan YH, Song YQ, Chan D, Takahashi Y, Ikegawa S, Matsumoto M, Kou I, Cheah KSE, Sham P, Cheung KMC, Luk KDK. SNP rs11190870 near LBX1 is associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in southern Chinese. Journal of Human Genetics. 2012;57:244–246. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2012.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fidelin K, Djenoune L, Stokes C, Prendergast A, Gomez J, Baradel A, Del Bene F, Wyart C. State-dependent modulation of locomotion by gabaergic spinal sensory neurons. Current Biology. 2015;25:3035–3047. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.09.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Flanagan JG, Vanderhaeghen P. The ephrins and Eph receptors in neural development. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 1998;21:309–345. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.21.1.309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fu WY, Chen Y, Sahin M, Zhao XS, Shi L, Bikoff JB, Lai KO, Yung WH, Fu AKY, Greenberg ME, Ip NY. Cdk5 regulates EphA4-mediated dendritic spine retraction through an ephexin1-dependent mechanism. Nature Neuroscience. 2007;10:67–76. doi: 10.1038/nn1811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gao X, Gordon D, Zhang D, Browne R, Helms C, Gillum J, Weber S, Devroy S, Swaney S, Dobbs M, Morcuende J, Sheffield V, Lovett M, Bowcock A, Herring J, Wise C. CHD7 gene polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to idiopathic scoliosis. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 2007;80:957–965. doi: 10.1086/513571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Grimes DT, Boswell CW, Morante NFC, Henkelman RM, Burdine RD, Ciruna B. Zebrafish models of idiopathic scoliosis link cerebrospinal fluid flow defects to spine curvature. Science. 2016;352:1341–1344. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf6419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Guo L, Yamashita H, Kou I, Takimoto A, Meguro-Horike M, Horike S, Sakuma T, Miura S, Adachi T, Yamamoto T, Ikegawa S, Hiraki Y, Shukunami C. Functional investigation of a non-coding variant associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in zebrafish: elevated expression of the ladybird homeobox gene causes body axis deformation. PLOS Genetics. 2016;12:e1005802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hale ME, Katz HR, Peek MY, Fremont RT. Neural circuits that drive startle behavior, with a focus on the Mauthner cells and spiral fiber neurons of fishes. Journal of Neurogenetics. 2016;30:89–100. doi: 10.1080/01677063.2016.1182526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Haller G, Alvarado D, Mccall K, Yang P, Cruchaga C, Harms M, Goate A, Willing M, Morcuende JA, Baschal E, Miller NH, Wise C, Dobbs MB, Gurnett CA. A polygenic burden of rare variants across extracellular matrix genes among individuals with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Human Molecular Genetics. 2016;25:202–209. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hresko MT. Clinical practice: Idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2013;368:834–841. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1209063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Imondi R, Wideman C, Kaprielian Z. Complementary expression of transmembrane ephrins and their receptors in the mouse spinal cord: a possible role in constraining the orientation of longitudinally projecting axons. Development. 2000;127:1397–1410. doi: 10.1242/dev.127.7.1397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ioannidis NM, Rothstein JH, Pejaver V, Middha S, McDonnell SK, Baheti S, Musolf A, Li Q, Holzinger E, Karyadi D, Cannon-Albright LA, Teerlink CC, Stanford JL, Isaacs WB, Xu J, Cooney KA, Lange EM, Schleutker J, Carpten JD, Powell IJ, Cussenot O, Cancel-Tassin G, Giles GG, MacInnis RJ, Maier C, Hsieh CL, Wiklund F, Catalona WJ, Foulkes WD, Mandal D, Eeles RA, Kote-Jarai Z, Bustamante CD, Schaid DJ, Hastie T, Ostrander EA, Bailey-Wilson JE, Radivojac P, Thibodeau SN, Whittemore AS, Sieh W. REVEL: An ensemble method for predicting the pathogenicity of rare missense variants. American Journal of Human Genetics. 2016;99:877–885. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.08.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Iwasato T, Katoh H, Nishimaru H, Ishikawa Y, Inoue H, Saito YM, Ando R, Iwama M, Takahashi R, Negishi M, Itohara S. Rac-GAP alpha-chimerin regulates motor-circuit formation as a key mediator of EphrinB3/EphA4 forward signaling. Cell. 2007;130:742–753. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jain RA, Bell H, Lim A, Chien CB, Granato M. Mirror movement-like defects in startle behavior of zebrafish dcc mutants are caused by aberrant midline guidance of identified descending hindbrain neurons. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2014;34:2898–2909. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2420-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kania A, Klein R. Mechanisms of ephrin-Eph signalling in development, physiology and disease. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 2016;17:240–256. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2015.16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Karczewski KJ, Francioli LC, Tiao G, Cummings BB, Alföldi J, Wang Q, Collins RL, Laricchia KM, Ganna A, Birnbaum DP, Gauthier LD, Brand H, Solomonson M, Watts NA, Rhodes D, Singer-Berk M, England EM, Seaby EG, Kosmicki JA, Walters RK, Tashman K, Farjoun Y, Banks E, Poterba T, Wang A, Seed C, Whiffin N, Chong JX, Samocha KE, Pierce-Hoffman E, Zappala Z, O’Donnell-Luria AH, Minikel EV, Weisburd B, Lek M, Ware JS, Vittal C, Armean IM, Bergelson L, Cibulskis K, Connolly KM, Covarrubias M, Donnelly S, Ferriera S, Gabriel S, Gentry J, Gupta N, Jeandet T, Kaplan D, Llanwarne C, Munshi R, Novod S, Petrillo N, Roazen D, Ruano-Rubio V, Saltzman A, Schleicher M, Soto J, Tibbetts K, Tolonen C, Wade G, Talkowski ME, Aguilar Salinas CA, Ahmad T, Albert CM, Ardissino D, Atzmon G, Barnard J, Beaugerie L, Benjamin EJ, Boehnke M, Bonnycastle LL, Bottinger EP, Bowden DW, Bown MJ, Chambers JC, Chan JC, Chasman D, Cho J, Chung MK, Cohen B, Correa A, Dabelea D, Daly MJ, Darbar D, Duggirala R, Dupuis J, Ellinor PT, Elosua R, Erdmann J, Esko T, Färkkilä M, Florez J, Franke A, Getz G, Glaser B, Glatt SJ, Goldstein D, Gonzalez C, Groop L, Haiman C, Hanis C, Harms M, Hiltunen M, Holi MM, Hultman CM, Kallela M, Kaprio J, Kathiresan S, Kim B-J, Kim YJ, Kirov G, Kooner J, Koskinen S, Krumholz HM, Kugathasan S, Kwak SH, Laakso M, Lehtimäki T, Loos RJF, Lubitz SA, Ma RCW, MacArthur DG, Marrugat J, Mattila KM, McCarroll S, McCarthy MI, McGovern D, McPherson R, Meigs JB, Melander O, Metspalu A, Neale BM, Nilsson PM, O’Donovan MC, Ongur D, Orozco L, Owen MJ, Palmer CNA, Palotie A, Park KS, Pato C, Pulver AE, Rahman N, Remes AM, Rioux JD, Ripatti S, Roden DM, Saleheen D, Salomaa V, Samani NJ, Scharf J, Schunkert H, Shoemaker MB, Sklar P, Soininen H, Sokol H, Spector T, Sullivan PF, Suvisaari J, Tai ES, Teo YY, Tiinamaija T, Tsuang M, Turner D, Tusie-Luna T, Vartiainen E, Vawter MP, Ware JS, Watkins H, Weersma RK, Wessman M, Wilson JG, Xavier RJ, Neale BM, Daly MJ, MacArthur DG, Genome Aggregation Database Consortium The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature. 2020;581:434–443. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kiehn O. Locomotor circuits in the mammalian spinal cord. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2006;29:279–306. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kircher M, Witten DM, Jain P, O’Roak BJ, Cooper GM, Shendure J. A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants. Nature Genetics. 2014;46:310–315. doi: 10.1038/ng.2892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kou I, Takahashi Y, Johnson TA, Takahashi A, Guo L, Dai J, Qiu X, Sharma S, Takimoto A, Ogura Y, Jiang H, Yan H, Kono K, Kawakami N, Uno K, Ito M, Minami S, Yanagida H, Taneichi H, Hosono N, Tsuji T, Suzuki T, Sudo H, Kotani T, Yonezawa I, Londono D, Gordon D, Herring JA, Watanabe K, Chiba K, Kamatani N, Jiang Q, Hiraki Y, Kubo M, Toyama Y, Tsunoda T, Wise CA, Qiu Y, Shukunami C, Matsumoto M, Ikegawa S. Genetic variants in GPR126 are associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Nature Genetics. 2013;45:676–679. doi: 10.1038/ng.2639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kou I, Otomo N, Takeda K, Momozawa Y, Lu HF, Kubo M, Kamatani Y, Ogura Y, Takahashi Y, Nakajima M, Minami S, Uno K, Kawakami N, Ito M, Yonezawa I, Watanabe K, Kaito T, Yanagida H, Taneichi H, Harimaya K, Taniguchi Y, Shigematsu H, Iida T, Demura S, Sugawara R, Fujita N, Yagi M, Okada E, Hosogane N, Kono K, Nakamura M, Chiba K, Kotani T, Sakuma T, Akazawa T, Suzuki T, Nishida K, Kakutani K, Tsuji T, Sudo H, Iwata A, Sato T, Inami S, Matsumoto M, Terao C, Watanabe K, Ikegawa S. Genome-wide association study identifies 14 previously unreported susceptibility loci for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in Japanese. Nature Communications. 2019;10:3685. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11596-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kramers-de Quervain IA, Müller R, Stacoff A, Grob D, Stüssi E. Gait analysis in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. European Spine Journal. 2004;13:449–456. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0588-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kullander K, Croll SD, Zimmer M, Pan L, McClain J, Hughes V, Zabski S, DeChiara TM, Klein R, Yancopoulos GD, Gale NW. Ephrin-B3 is the midline barrier that prevents corticospinal tract axons from recrossing, allowing for unilateral motor control. Genes & Development. 2001;15:877–888. doi: 10.1101/gad.868901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kullander K, Butt SJB, Lebret JM, Lundfald L, Restrepo CE, Rydström A, Klein R, Kiehn O. Role of EphA4 and EphrinB3 in local neuronal circuits that control walking. Science. 2003;299:1889–1892. doi: 10.1126/science.1079641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Li C, Chen R, Fan X, Luo J, Qian J, Wang J, Xie B, Shen Y, Chen S. EPHA4 haploinsufficiency is responsible for the short stature of a patient with 2q35-q36.2 deletion and Waardenburg syndrome. BMC Medical Genetics. 2015;16:23. doi: 10.1186/s12881-015-0165-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Liebeskind BJ, Hillis DM, Zakon HH, Hofmann HA. Complex homology and the evolution of nervous systems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2016;31:127–135. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Luk KDK, Lee CF, Cheung KMC, Cheng JCY, Ng BKW, Lam TP, Mak KH, Yip PSF, Fong DYT. Clinical effectiveness of school screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a large population-based retrospective cohort study. Spine. 2010;35:1607–1614. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c7cb8c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Marchini J, Howie B, Myers S, McVean G, Donnelly P. A new multipoint method for genome-wide association studies by imputation of genotypes. Nature Genetics. 2007;39:906–913. doi: 10.1038/ng2088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Marder E, Bucher D. Central pattern generators and the control of rhythmic movements. Current Biology. 2001;11:R986–R996. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00581-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Marees AT, de Kluiver H, Stringer S, Vorspan F, Curis E, Marie-Claire C, Derks EM. A tutorial on conducting genome-wide association studies: Quality control and statistical analysis. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research. 2018;27:e1608. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Miller NH, Justice CM, Marosy B, Doheny KF, Pugh E, Zhang J, Wilson AF, Dietz HC. Identification of candidate regions for familial idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2005;30:1181–1187. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000162282.46160.0a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Miller NH. Genetics of familial idiopathic scoliosis. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2007;462:6–10. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e318126c062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Miller D. Kf-alignment-workflow. swh:1:rev:a3c8c71ff745f6826769f9f571797a4f9e556a41Software Heritage. 2025a https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:dir:8e4777e6dbce9b75afb0a6e5fb55290e3d3bd0ef;origin=https://github.com/kids-first/kf-alignment-workflow;visit=swh:1:snp:06762c34962e7b2cbcbedb8dd99f05f6c3175e88;anchor=swh:1:rev:a3c8c71ff745f6826769f9f571797a4f9e556a41
  51. Miller D. Kf-jointgenotyping-workflow. swh:1:rev:04bb690ce736d90d76a0c05cf50d716b95d02bf3Software Heritage. 2025b https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:dir:8be06808ffaa93198b51cc5eddf7821b2735a403;origin=https://github.com/kids-first/kf-jointgenotyping-workflow;visit=swh:1:snp:6974fd4e8137999a6cf02bb737923240463eca19;anchor=swh:1:rev:04bb690ce736d90d76a0c05cf50d716b95d02bf3
  52. Mukhopadhyay N, Bishop M, Mortillo M, Chopra P, Hetmanski JB, Taub MA, Moreno LM, Valencia-Ramirez LC, Restrepo C, Wehby GL, Hecht JT, Deleyiannis F, Butali A, Weinberg SM, Beaty TH, Murray JC, Leslie EJ, Feingold E, Marazita ML. Whole genome sequencing of orofacial cleft trios from the Gabriella Miller Kids First Pediatric Research Consortium identifies a new locus on chromosome 21. Human Genetics. 2020;139:215–226. doi: 10.1007/s00439-019-02099-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Nishida M, Nagura T, Fujita N, Hosogane N, Tsuji T, Nakamura M, Matsumoto M, Watanabe K. Position of the major curve influences asymmetrical trunk kinematics during gait in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Gait & Posture. 2017;51:142–148. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ogura Y, Kou I, Miura S, Takahashi A, Xu L, Takeda K, Takahashi Y, Kono K, Kawakami N, Uno K, Ito M, Minami S, Yonezawa I, Yanagida H, Taneichi H, Zhu Z, Tsuji T, Suzuki T, Sudo H, Kotani T, Watanabe K, Hosogane N, Okada E, Iida A, Nakajima M, Sudo A, Chiba K, Hiraki Y, Toyama Y, Qiu Y, Shukunami C, Kamatani Y, Kubo M, Matsumoto M, Ikegawa S. A functional SNP in BNC2 is associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. American Journal of Human Genetics. 2015;97:337–342. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.06.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Paixão S, Balijepalli A, Serradj N, Niu J, Luo W, Martin JH, Klein R. EphrinB3/EphA4-mediated guidance of ascending and descending spinal tracts. Neuron. 2013;80:1407–1420. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Scott K, O’Rourke R, Winkler CC, Kearns CA, Appel B. Temporal single-cell transcriptomes of zebrafish spinal cord pMN progenitors reveal distinct neuronal and glial progenitor populations. Developmental Biology. 2021;479:37–50. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2021.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Shamah SM, Lin MZ, Goldberg JL, Estrach S, Sahin M, Hu L, Bazalakova M, Neve RL, Corfas G, Debant A, Greenberg ME. EphA receptors regulate growth cone dynamics through the novel guanine nucleotide exchange factor ephexin. Cell. 2001;105:233–244. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00314-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Shimode M, Ryouji A, Kozo N. Asymmetry of premotor time in the back muscles of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2003;28:2535–2539. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000092375.61922.D1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Szklarczyk D, Gable AL, Lyon D, Junge A, Wyder S, Huerta-Cepas J, Simonovic M, Doncheva NT, Morris JH, Bork P, Jensen LJ, Mering vob C. STRING v11: protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Research. 2019;47:D607–D613. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Takahashi Y, Kou I, Takahashi A, Johnson TA, Kono K, Kawakami N, Uno K, Ito M, Minami S, Yanagida H, Taneichi H, Tsuji T, Suzuki T, Sudo H, Kotani T, Watanabe K, Chiba K, Hosono N, Kamatani N, Tsunoda T, Toyama Y, Kubo M, Matsumoto M, Ikegawa S. A genome-wide association study identifies common variants near LBX1 associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Nature Genetics. 2011;43:1237–1240. doi: 10.1038/ng.974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Talpalar AE, Bouvier J, Borgius L, Fortin G, Pierani A, Kiehn O. Dual-mode operation of neuronal networks involved in left-right alternation. Nature. 2013;500:85–88. doi: 10.1038/nature12286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Tang NLS, Dobbs MB, Gurnett CA, Qiu Y, Lam TP, Cheng JCY, Hadley-Miller N. A decade in review after idiopathic scoliosis was first called a complex trait-a tribute to the Late Dr Yves Cotrel for his support in studies of etiology of scoliosis. Genes. 2021;12:1033. doi: 10.3390/genes12071033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Tassabehji M, Read AP, Newton VE, Patton M, Gruss P, Harris R, Strachan T. Mutations in the PAX3 gene causing Waardenburg syndrome type 1 and type 2. Nature Genetics. 1993;3:26–30. doi: 10.1038/ng0193-26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Valentino B, Maccauro L, Mango G, Melito F, Fabozzo A. Electromyography for the investigation and early diagnosis of scoliosis. Anatomia Clinica. 1985;7:55–59. doi: 10.1007/BF01654630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Wang X, Yue M, Cheung JPY, Cheung PWH, Fan Y, Wu M, Wang X, Zhao S, Khanshour AM, Rios JJ, Chen Z, Wang X, Tu W, Chan D, Yuan Q, Qin D, Qiu G, Wu Z, Zhang TJ, Ikegawa S, Wu N, Wise CA, Hu Y, Luk KDK, Song Y-Q, Gao B. Impaired glycine neurotransmission causes adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2024;134:e168783. doi: 10.1172/JCI168783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Watanabe K, Taskesen E, van Bochoven A, Posthuma D. Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations with FUMA. Nature Communications. 2017;8:1826. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01261-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Spratt KF, Peterson KK, Spoonamore MJ, Ponseti IV. Health and function of patients with untreated idiopathic scoliosis: a 50-year natural history study. JAMA. 2003;289:559–567. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.5.559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Wright JG, Dobbs MB. Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2013;369:1512–1521. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1307337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Willer CJ, Li Y, Abecasis GR. METAL: fast and efficient meta-analysis of genomewide association scans. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2190–2191. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Wu MY, Carbo TM, Mirat O, Lejeune FX, Roussel J, Quan FB, Fidelin K, Wyart C. Spinal sensory neurons project onto the hindbrain to stabilize posture and enhance locomotor speed. Current Biology. 2021;31:3315–3329. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.05.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Wyart C, Del Bene F, Warp E, Scott EK, Trauner D, Baier H, Isacoff EY. Optogenetic dissection of a behavioural module in the vertebrate spinal cord. Nature. 2009;461:407–410. doi: 10.1038/nature08323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Xie H, Li M, Kang Y, Zhang J, Zhao C. Zebrafish: an important model for understanding scoliosis. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2022;79:1–16. doi: 10.1007/s00018-022-04534-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Yao E, Tavis JE. A general method for nested RT-PCR amplification and sequencing the complete HCV genotype 1 open reading frame. Virology Journal. 2005;2:1–9. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-2-88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhao S, Zhang Y, Chen W, Li W, Wang S, Wang L, Zhao Y, Lin M, Ye Y, Lin J, Zheng Y, Liu J, Zhao H, Yan Z, Yang Y, Huang Y, Lin G, Chen Z, Zhang Z, Liu S, Jin L, Wang Z, Chen J, Niu Y, Li X, Wu Y, Wang Y, Du R, Gao N, Zhao H, Yang Y, Liu Y, Tian Y, Li W, Zhao Y, Liu J, Yu B, Zhang N, Yu K, Yang X, Li S, Xu Y, Hu J, Liu Z, Shen J, Zhang S, Su J, Khanshour AM, Kidane YH, Ramo B, Rios JJ, Liu P, Sutton VR, Posey JE, Wu Z, Qiu G, Wise CA, Zhang F, Lupski JR, Zhang J, Wu N, Deciphering Disorders Involving Scoliosis and COmorbidities (DISCO) study Diagnostic yield and clinical impact of exome sequencing in early-onset scoliosis (EOS) Journal of Medical Genetics. 2021;58:41–47. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhou W, Bi W, Zhao Z, Dey KK, Jagadeesh KA, Karczewski KJ, Daly MJ, Neale BM, Lee S. SAIGE-GENE+ improves the efficiency and accuracy of set-based rare variant association tests. Nature Genetics. 2022;54:1466–1469. doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01178-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Zhu Z, Tang NLS, Xu L, Qin X, Mao S, Song Y, Liu L, Li F, Liu P, Yi L, Chang J, Jiang L, Ng BKW, Shi B, Zhang W, Qiao J, Sun X, Qiu X, Wang Z, Wang F, Xie D, Chen L, Chen Z, Jin M, Han X, Hu Z, Zhang Z, Liu Z, Zhu F, Qian BP, Yu Y, Wang B, Lee KM, Lee WYW, Lam TP, Qiu Y, Cheng JCY. Genome-wide association study identifies new susceptibility loci for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in Chinese girls. Nature Communications. 2015;6:8355. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

eLife Assessment

Bruce Appel 1

Genetic variants have been strongly implicated in idiopathic scoliosis (IS), however, the list of variants that are causative of IS is not complete and the cellular and molecular mechanisms that underlie IS are poorly understood. These authors combined human genetic analysis with zebrafish experiments to produce valuable evidence that alleles that impair function of EPHA4 cause IS, thereby extending our understanding of the basis of IS. The human genetic data are quite convincing but the zebrafish work lacks some validations and details.

Reviewer #2 (Public review):

Anonymous

Summary:

Idiopathic scoliosis (IS) is a common spinal deformity. Various studies have linked genes to IS, but underlying mechanisms are unclear such that we still lack understanding of the causes of IS. The current manuscript analyzes IS patient populations and identified EPHA4 as a novel associated gene, finding three rare variants in EPHA4 from three patients (one disrupting splicing and two missense variants) as well as a large deletion (encompassing EPHA4) in a Waardenburg syndrome patient with scoliosis. EPHA4 is a member of the Eph receptor family. Drawing on data from zebrafish experiments, the authors argue that EPHA4 loss of function disrupts central pattern generator (CPG) function necessary for motor coordination.

Strengths:

The main strength of this manuscript is the human genetic data, which provide convincing evidence linking EPHA4 variants to IS. The loss of function experiments in zebrafish strongly support the conclusion that EPHA4 variants that reduce function lead to IS.

Weaknesses:

The conclusion that disruption of CPG function causes spinal curves in the zebrafish model is not fully supported. The authors' final model is that a disrupted CPG leads to asymmetric mechanical loading on the spine and, over time, the development of curves. This is a reasonable idea, but currently not strongly backed up by data in the manuscript. Potentially, the impaired larval movements simply coincide with, but do not cause, juvenile-onset scoliosis. Support for the authors' conclusion would require independent methods of disrupting CPG function and determining if this is accompanied by spine curvature. Nevertheless, the data showing correlations between spine curvature and abnormal neural patterning, neuronal firing, and swimming in eph4a loss-of-function mutant larvae are sound.

Comments on revisions:

I think the authors misunderstood my point about genetic nomenclature for the zebrafish alleles. The nomenclature guidelines are described at ZFIN, and ZFIN will ask for appropriate allele designations.

eLife. 2025 Jul 15;13:RP95324. doi: 10.7554/eLife.95324.3.sa2

Author response

Lianlei Wang 1, Xinyu Yang 2, Sen Zhao 3, Pengfei Zheng 4, Wen Wen 5, Kexin Xu 6, Xi Cheng 7, Qing Li 8, Anas M Khanshour 9, Yoshinao Koike 10, Junjun Liu 11, Xin Fan 12, Nao Otomo 13, Zefu Chen 14, Yaqi Li 15, Lulu Li 16, Haibo Xie 17, Panpan Zhu 18, Xiaoxin Li 19, Yuchen Niu 20, Shengru Wang 21, Sen Liu 22, Suomao Yuan 23, Chikashi Terao 24, Ziquan Li 25, Shaoke Chen 26, Xiuli Zhao 27, Pengfei Liu 28, Jennifer E Posey 29, Zhihong Wu 30, Guixing Qiu 31, Shiro Ikegawa 32, James Lupski 33, Jonathan J Rios 34, Carol A Wise 35, Jianguo Zhang 36, Chengtian Zhao 37, Nan Wu 38

The following is the authors’ response to the original reviews

Joint Public Review:

Idiopathic scoliosis (IS) is a common spinal deformity. Various studies have linked genes to IS, but underlying mechanisms are unclear such that we still lack understanding of the causes of IS. The current manuscript analyzes IS patient populations and identifies EPHA4 as a novel associated gene, finding three rare variants in EPHA4 from three patients (one disrupting splicing and two missense variants) as well as a large deletion (encompassing EPHA4) in a Waardenburg syndrome patient with scoliosis. EPHA4 is a member of the Eph receptor family. Drawing on data from zebrafish experiments, the authors argue that EPHA4 loss of function disrupts the central pattern generator (CPG) function necessary for motor coordination.

The main strength of this manuscript is the human genetic data, which provides convincing evidence linking EPHA4 variants to IS. The loss of function experiments in zebrafish strongly support the conclusion that EPHA4 variants that reduce function lead to IS.

The conclusion that disruption of CPG function causes spinal curves in the zebrafish model is not well supported. The authors' final model is that a disrupted CPG leads to asymmetric mechanical loading on the spine and, over time, the development of curves. This is a reasonable idea, but currently not strongly backed up by data in the manuscript. Potentially, the impaired larval movements simply coincide with, but do not cause, juvenile-onset scoliosis. Support for the authors' conclusion would require independent methods of disrupting CPG function and determining if this is accompanied by spine curvature. At a minimum, the language of the manuscript could be toned down, with the CPG defects put forward as a potential explanation for scoliosis in the discussion rather than as something this manuscript has "shown". An additional weakness of the manuscript is that the zebrafish genetic tools are not sufficiently validated to provide full confidence in the data and conclusions.

We highly appreciate the reviewer’s insightful comments and the acknowledgment of the main values of our study. We agree with the reviewer that further experiments are needed to fully establish the relationship between CPG and scoliosis. In response, we have revised the conclusion in the manuscript to better reflect this. Additionally, we conducted further analyses on the mutants to provide additional evidence supporting this concept.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

Epha4a mutant zebrafish exhibited mild spinal curves, mostly laterally and in the tail. This was 75% of homozyous mutants but also, surprisingly, about 20% of heterozygotes. epha4b mutants also developed some mild scoliosis. If the two zebrafish paralogs can compensate for each other (partial redundancy), we might expect more severe scoliosis in double mutants. Did the authors generate and analyze double mutants? I believe it would be very useful for this study to report the zebrafish phenotype of loss of both paralogs together.

We appreciate the reviewer’s insightful comment regarding the potential value of reporting the phenotype of eph4a/eph4b double mutants. While we fully agree that this analysis would be valuable, our attempts to generate double mutants have been unsuccessful. These two genes are closely linked on the chromosome, with less than 100 kb separating them, which makes it challenging to generate double mutants through standard genetic crossing. Establishing a double mutant line would require more than a year due to the technical constraints of the process. Although we are unable to address this question directly at this time, we hypothesize that eph4a/eph4b double mutants may exhibit a higher likelihood of body axis abnormalities based on the phenotypes observed in single mutants and the known functions of these genes.

We hope this perspective will provide some useful context despite the limitations.

In Figure 1F, a pCDK5 western blot is performed as a readout of EPH4A signaling after either WT or C849Y mutant EPH4A is transfected into HEK 293T cells. It would be useful to mention in the text, or at least the figure legend, how this experiment was performed/where the protein samples came from. It is included in the methods, but in the main text, it simply says "we conducted western blotting" without mentioning whether the protein samples were from cell lines, patients, or another source.

Sorry for our ignorance. A detailed description of the western blotting conduction was supplemented at both “results” part (page 8, line 187-190) and the Figure 1 legend.

Was the relative turn angle biased to the left or right side of the fish? (i.e. is a positive angle a rightward or leftward turn?)

We are sorry for our unclear description. In Figure 3D, positive angle means turning left, while negative angle means turning right. In wild-type larvae, the average turning angle over a 4-minute period is approximately 0, whereas in mutants, this value deviates from 0, indicating a directional preference (positive for leftward and negative for rightward turns) in swimming behavior during the recording period. We have also made the necessary supplementation in the text and figure legend.

In Figure 4, morpholinos rather than mutants are used, but it is not clear why. Has it been established that the MO used disrupts gene function specifically? Can the effect of the MO be rescued by expressing a wild-type mRNA of Epha4a? Does MO knockdown induce spinal curves if fish are raised? Indeed, this could be a way to determine whether the spinal curves are caused by early events in development (when MOs are active).

Thanks for the comments. The efficacy of relevant MOs has been well-documented in numerous previous studies (Addison et al., 2018; Cavodeassi et al., 2013; Letelier et al., 2018; Royet et al., 2017). Following this reviewer’s suggestion, we have raised the epha4a morphants into adults, while no scoliosis were observed, suggesting that the spinal curvature formation may be induced by long-term defects in the absence of Epha4a. Additionally, we reconfirmed the abnormal motor neuron activation frequency phenotype in the mutants background. The corresponding data have replaced the original Figure 4 in the manuscript.

References

(1) Addison, M., Xu, Q., Cayuso, J., and Wilkinson, D.G. (2018). Cell Identity Switching Regulated by Retinoic Acid Signaling Maintains Homogeneous Segments in the Hindbrain. Dev Cell 45, 606-620 e603.

(2) Cavodeassi, F., Ivanovitch, K., and Wilson, S.W. (2013). Eph/Ephrin signalling maintains eye field segregation from adjacent neural plate territories during forebrain morphogenesis. Development 140, 4193-4202.

(3) Letelier, J., Terriente, J., Belzunce, I., Voltes, A., Undurraga, C.A., Polvillo, R., Devos, L., Tena, J.J., Maeso, I., Retaux, S., et al. (2018). Evolutionary emergence of the rac3b/rfng/sgca regulatory cluster refined mechanisms for hindbrain boundaries formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115, E3731-E3740.

(4) Royet, A., Broutier, L., Coissieux, M.M., Malleval, C., Gadot, N., Maillet, D., Gratadou-Hupon, L., Bernet, A., Nony, P., Treilleux, I., et al. (2017). Ephrin-B3 supports glioblastoma growth by inhibiting apoptosis induced by the dependence receptor EphA4. Oncotarget 8, 23750-23759.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

Supplementary Table 3 is missing.

Sorry for any inconvenience caused to the reviewers. Due to the size of the supplementary Table 3, we have separately uploaded an Excel file as supplementary materials. We have also double-checked during the resubmission process of the revised manuscript. Thanks for your thorough review.

The authors report only a single mutant allele for zebrafish epha4a and epha4b. Additionally, they provide no information about how many generations each allele has been outcrossed. The authors should provide some type of validation that the phenotypes they describe result from loss of function of the targeted gene and not from an off-targeting event.

Thanks for the comments. For epha4a and epha4b mutants, each homozygous mutant was initially derived from the self-crossing of first filial generation heterozygotes, and subsequent homozygous generations were maintained for fewer than three rounds of in-crossing. Interestingly, we observed a reduction in the incidence of scoliosis across successive generations. This trend may be attributed to potential genetic compensation mechanisms, which could mitigate the phenotypic severity over time. To address concerns about possible off-target effects, we synthesized and injected epha4a mRNA to test for phenotypic rescue. Our data show that epha4a mRNA injection partially restored swimming coordination in the mutants (Fig. S5). Moreover, similar motor coordination defects have been reported in Epha4-deficient mice, as documented in previous studies (Kullander et al., 2003; Borgius et al., 2014). These findings collectively strengthen the hypothesis that Epha4a plays a critical role in regulating motor coordination.

References

(1) Borgius, L., Nishimaru, H., Caldeira, V., Kunugise, Y., Low, P., Reig, R., Itohara, S., Iwasato, T., and Kiehn, O. (2014). Spinal glutamatergic neurons defined by EphA4 signaling are essential components of normal locomotor circuits. J Neurosci 34, 3841-3853.

(2) Kullander, K., Butt, S.J., Lebret, J.M., Lundfald, L., Restrepo, C.E., Rydstrom, A., Klein, R., and Kiehn, O. (2003). Role of EphA4 and EphrinB3 in local neuronal circuits that control walking. Science 299, 1889-1892.

The authors need to provide allele designations for the mutant alleles following accepted nomenclature guidelines.

Thank you for your careful review! We have reviewed and made revisions to the genes and mutation symbols throughout the entire text.

The three antisense morpholino oligonucleotides need to be validated for efficacy and specificity.

Thanks for the comments. The morpholinos were extensively used and validated in previous studies, and the efficacy of these morpholinos has been thoroughly validated in multiple studies (Addison et al., 2018; Cavodeassi et al., 2013; Letelier et al., 2018; Royet et al., 2017). Furthermore, we also performed swimming behavior analysis in the mutant background, which showed similar results as the morphants. Moreover, we also performed rescue experiments to confirm the specificity of the mutants (Fig. S5). Finally, we reconfirmed the abnormal calcium signaling in the mutants (Fig. 4), which further support our previous knockdown results.

References

(1) Addison, M., Xu, Q., Cayuso, J., and Wilkinson, D.G. (2018). Cell Identity Switching Regulated by Retinoic Acid Signaling Maintains Homogeneous Segments in the Hindbrain. Dev Cell 45, 606-620 e603.

(2) Cavodeassi, F., Ivanovitch, K., and Wilson, S.W. (2013). Eph/Ephrin signalling maintains eye field segregation from adjacent neural plate territories during forebrain morphogenesis. Development 140, 4193-4202.

(3) Letelier, J., Terriente, J., Belzunce, I., Voltes, A., Undurraga, C.A., Polvillo, R., Devos, L., Tena, J.J., Maeso, I., Retaux, S., et al. (2018). Evolutionary emergence of the rac3b/rfng/sgca regulatory cluster refined mechanisms for hindbrain boundaries formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115, E3731-E3740.

(4) Royet, A., Broutier, L., Coissieux, M.M., Malleval, C., Gadot, N., Maillet, D., Gratadou-Hupon, L., Bernet, A., Nony, P., Treilleux, I., et al. (2017). Ephrin-B3 supports glioblastoma growth by inhibiting apoptosis induced by the dependence receptor EphA4. Oncotarget 8, 23750-23759.

Line 229. "While in consistent with previous reports, the hindbrain rhombomeric boundaries were found to be defective....". This sentence is not clear. Please describe how it is "inconsistent".

Thanks for the comments and sorry for the unclear description, we have described this more clearly in our revised manuscript (page 9, line 229-230).

Animals frequently are described as "heterozygous mutants" or "mutants". Please make clear that the latter are homozygous mutant animals.

Thanks for the comments. In the manuscript, all references to mutants specifically indicate homozygous mutants. Heterozygous mutants are explicitly identified as such.

The chromatin interaction portion of the Methods does not include any information on how these experiments were conducted or where the data were obtained. This information needs to be provided.

Thanks for your advice. The detailed information of chromatin interaction mapping has been provided in “Methods and Materials” (page 18-19, line 450-455). Information about the interacting regions was derived from Hi-C datasets of 21 tissues and cell types provided by GSE87112. The significance of interactions for Hi-C datasets was computed by Fit-Hi-C, with an FDR ≤ 10-6 considered significant.

The authors present single-cell RNA-seq data in Supplementary Figure 5 for which they cite Cavone et al, 2021. This seems like an odd database to use. Can the authors provide an explanation for choosing it? In any case, the citation should also be made in the Supplementary Figure 5 legend.

Thank you for your rigorous comment, we have cited this literature in the proper place of the revised manuscript. Cavone et al. used the her4.3:GFP line to label ependymo-radial glia (ERG) progenitor cells and performed single-cell RNA-seq on FACS-isolated fluorescent cells. The isolated cells included not only ERG progenitors but also undifferentiated and differentiated neurons and oligodendrocytes. The authors attributed this to the relative stability of the GFP protein, which remained in the progeny of GFP-expressing her4.3+ ERG progenitor cells, thus effectively acting as a short-term cell lineage tracer. Indeed, clustering analysis of this data successfully identifies neural progenitors and other neural clusters. Therefore, we consider that this scRNA-seq data encompasses a comprehensive range of neural cell types and is suitable for analyzing the expression of genes of interest. Furthermore, we downloaded and analyzed the scRNA-seq data of the zebrafish nervous system reported by Scott et al. in 2021 (Fig. S7B) (Scott et al., 2021). Despite differences in the developmental stages of the larvae analyzed (Cavone et al. examined larvae at 4 dpf, whereas Scott et al. analyzed larvae at 24, 36, and 48 hpf), our findings are consistent. Specifically, epha4a and epha4b are expressed in interneurons, whereas efnb3a and efnb3b are enriched in floor plate cells.

References

(1) Scott, K., O'Rourke, R., Winkler, C.C., Kearns, C.A., and Appel, B. (2021). Temporal single-cell transcriptomes of zebrafish spinal cord pMN progenitors reveal distinct neuronal and glial progenitor populations. Dev Biol 479, 37-50.

In Figure Legend 1, "expressed from the EPHA4-mutant plasmid" is not an accurate description of the experiment.

Sorry for the previous inaccurate description. The description has been revised to accurately reflect the experiment. “Western blot analysis of EPHA4-c.2546G>A variant showing the protein expression levels of EPHA4 and CDK5 and the amount of phosphorylated CDK5 (pCDK5) in HEK293T cells transfected with EPHA4-mutant or EPHA4-WT plasmid”.

Figure 3 panels J and K need more explanation. I don't understand what the different colors represent nor do I understand what are wild type and what are mutant data.

Thank you for your valuable feedback. We apologize for the lack of clarity in the original figure legend. To address this, we have revised the legend of Figure 3 to provide a more detailed explanation. In panels J and K, each color-coded curve represents the response of an individual larva from an independent experimental trial to the stimulus. Specifically, panel J depicts the response data for the wild-type larvae, whereas panel K presents the response data for the homozygous epha4a mutants.

Please provide the genotypes for the images in Figure 5A.

Thanks for the comments and we are sorry for our unclear description, we have described this more clearly in the Figure 5.

Figure legend 6B should also note the heterozygote data with the wild type and homozygous mutant data.

Thanks for the comments, the data are now included in Figure 6B.

Epha4 and Efnb3 have well-established roles in axon guidance. Although this is noted in the Discussion, I think a more extensive description of prior findings would be helpful.

Thanks for your valuable feedback. A more detailed description of the roles of Epha4 and Efnb3 in axon guidance was provided in the “Discussion” (page 16, line 388-396).

The main conclusion of this manuscript is that EPHA4 variants cause IS by disrupting central pattern generator function. I think this is misleading. I think that the more valid conclusion is that EPHA4 loss of function causes axon pathfinding defects that impair locomotion by disrupting CPG activity, thereby leading to IS. I urge the authors to consider this more nuanced interpretation.

Thank you for your insightful comments. We appreciate your suggestion to refine our main conclusion. We agree that the proposed revision more accurately reflects our findings and will revise the manuscript accordingly to state that “EPHA4 loss of function causes axon pathfinding defects, which impair locomotion by disrupting central pattern generator activity, potentially leading to IS.”

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Wu N, Zhang J, Wu Z. 2025. EPHA4 signaling dysregulation links abnormal locomotion and the development of idiopathic scoliosis. National Genomics Data center. HRA011763 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
    2. Wu N, Zhang J, Wu Z. 2023. control sequencing data. National Genomics Data center. HRA006052

    Supplementary Materials

    Figure 1—source data 1. Original western blots for Figure 1F.
    Supplementary file 1. Summary of the 14 studies and their corresponding single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) included in the candidate genes mapping.
    elife-95324-supp1.docx (18.2KB, docx)
    Supplementary file 2. Summarized results of burden analysis.
    elife-95324-supp2.docx (17.1KB, docx)
    Supplementary file 3. The significant single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the EPHA4 region identified from East Asian genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis.
    elife-95324-supp3.xlsx (24.2KB, xlsx)
    Supplementary file 4. Search strategies for each database.
    elife-95324-supp4.docx (14.5KB, docx)
    Supplementary file 5. Inclusion and exclusion criteria of literature review.
    elife-95324-supp5.docx (14.6KB, docx)
    Supplementary file 6. Sequencing information of PUMCH idiopathic scoliosis (IS) cohort.
    elife-95324-supp6.docx (15KB, docx)
    Supplementary file 7. Sequences information of single guide RNA (sgRNA) and primers for zebrafish study.
    elife-95324-supp7.docx (15.5KB, docx)
    MDAR checklist

    Data Availability Statement

    The raw whole exome/genome sequencing data from this study have been uploaded in the Genome Sequence Archive in BIG Data Center (https://bigd.big.ac.cn/), Beijing Institute of Genomics (BIG), Chinese Academy of Sciences (Accession Number: HRA011763, HRA006052). Other datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are described in supplementary files, figure supplements, and the section of "Materials and Methods".

    The following datasets were generated:

    Wu N, Zhang J, Wu Z. 2025. EPHA4 signaling dysregulation links abnormal locomotion and the development of idiopathic scoliosis. National Genomics Data center. HRA011763

    Wu N, Zhang J, Wu Z. 2023. control sequencing data. National Genomics Data center. HRA006052


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES