Skip to main content
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia logoLink to Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
. 2025 Jul 15;60(2):s00451809398. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1809398

Medial Thigh Cutaneous Flap Irrigated by Perforating Vessels of the Secondary Pedicle of the Gracilis Muscle: Anatomical Study and Clinical Case Report

Retalho cutâneo medial da coxa irrigado por vasos perfurantes do pedículo secundário do músculo grácil: Estudo anatômico e relato de caso clínico

Gabriel Vique Valeriano 1,, Antonio Carlos da Costa 1, Diego Figueira Falcochio 1, Yussef Ali Abdouni 1
PMCID: PMC12263293  PMID: 40673218

Abstract

Objective

To analyze the anatomy of the perforating vessels irrigating the skin of the medial aspect of the thigh and originating from the secondary vascular pedicle of the gracilis muscle.

Methods

We dissected 33 thighs from cadavers of both sexes to record and analyze the characteristics of the blood vessels irrigating the gracilis muscle in the middle third of the thigh.

Results

All thighs (100%) had a secondary vascular pedicle in the intermuscular septum between the gracilis and vastus medialis/sartorius muscles, with branches irrigating the overlying skin on the medial aspect. The pedicle presented an arterial diameter ranging from 1.3 to 4.6 mm (mean: 2.3 mm) and a length ranging from 28 to 84 mm (mean: 50.6 mm). In 87.8% of the cases, the pedicle irrigated the gracilis muscle and presented vessels to the overlying skin.

Conclusion

Based on the data found, we conclude that it is feasible to obtain a reliable flap from the medial aspect of the middle third of the thigh.

Keywords: gracilis muscle, surgical flaps, thigh

Introduction

Injuries resulting from high-energy trauma, mainly traffic accidents, often involve soft tissue loss and exposure of essential structures, such as bones, tendons, vessels, and nerves. 1 These therapeutic situations are difficult to manage and challenging for the reconstructive surgeon.

The improvements in surgical techniques have increased treatment success rates. Today, free flaps are an effective option among reconstructive techniques. Perforator flaps are an evolution of microsurgical flaps, enabling the creation of thinner flaps and resulting in better functional and esthetic outcomes. 2

In 1967, Fujino 3 documented the distribution of perforating arteries to supply the interstitium, similar to axial arteries. In 1988, Koshima et al. 4 pioneered perforating artery-based flaps exclusively consisting of skin and subcutaneous tissue. Wei et al. 5 defined perforating artery-based flaps as those supplied by arteries crossing the adjacent deep fascia and making it feasible to dissection through the muscle or the intermuscular septum to their vessel of origin, with no need for muscle inclusion in the flap.

Focusing on the medial aspect of the thigh, certain authors, such as Peek et al. 6 and Eom et al., 7 described, in anatomical studies and case reports, a flap from this region based on the perforating arteries originating from the main vascular pedicle of the gracilis muscle. This flap has been widely studied and may be used in its pedicled or free form to cover different defects in the inguinal region or distant areas.

Feng et al., 8 Scaglioni et al., 1 and Zheng et al. 9 also described, through anatomical studies and some clinical cases, the anteromedial thigh flap or lower medial thigh flap based on perforating branches from muscular arteries irrigating the vastus medialis muscle. In 1984, Song et al. 10 described the perforating flap from the deep femoral artery, harvested from the posteromedial aspect of the thigh.

The gracilis muscle, in the medial region of the thigh, is commonly used as a functional free muscle flap. Mathes and Nahai 11 classified its irrigation pattern as type 2, that is, muscle irrigation occurs by a dominant vascular pedicle, able to supply the entire muscle, but with the contribution of several smaller secondary pedicles. Some branches of these vessels cross the deep fascia in the medial region of the thigh and irrigate the subcutaneous tissue and overlying skin. In an anatomical study with arteriography, Peek et al. 6 identified the presence of a secondary pedicle in the intermediate region of the thigh with multiple intramuscular anastomoses with the main vascular pedicle.

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the anatomical parameters of the vessels irrigating the skin and fascia of the medial region of the thigh, originating from the secondary vascular pedicle of the gracilis muscle in the middle third of the thigh, defining its location, diameter, distribution pattern, and anatomical variations, showing the feasibility of obtaining a reliable flap based on this vascular pedicle.

Materials and Methods

The institutional Ethics Committee approved the study under number CAAE: 15621319.1.0000.5479.

We performed microsurgical dissection of 33 thighs from 18 cadavers. In total, 19 thighs were from male cadavers, and 14, from female cadavers. We recorded biometric data of the cadavers, such as age, height, and weight. We excluded cadavers with peripheral vascular disease as the known cause of death and those with scars in the dissection region.

The same surgeon performed all dissections using a surgical magnifying glass with 3.5x magnification. We recorded anatomical parameters of the vascular pedicle, such as vessel length, diameter, location, origin, and distribution, in addition to their relationship with thigh length. We obtained the measurements using a millimeter tape and a digital four-dimensional 150-mm caliper (Digimess Instrumentos de Precisão Ltda.).

The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test assessed the normal distribution of the quantitative outcome variables. The analysis of quantitative variables used the equality of two proportions and Pearson's correlation tests. The statistical confidence interval was of 95%.

Dissection

Initially, we drew a line on the medial aspect of the thigh, from the ischiopubic ramus to the medial femoral epicondyle ( Fig. 1 ). This line coincided with the anterior border of the gracilis muscle. At the midpoint of this line, we drew a circle with a 3-cm radius divided into quadrants. Next, we made the incision following the circle contour. Then, we identified the perforating arteries by gentle dissection of the subcutaneous tissue, following them to the septum between the gracilis muscle and the vastus medialis/sartorius muscle. Most vessels identified in the intermuscular septum had muscular branches to the gracilis muscle and, in a few cases, to the sartorius muscle. These septal vessels gave off perforating branches to irrigate the skin and overlying subcutaneous tissue. The dissection continued deep into the femoral artery, which was identified as the arterial origin in all cases ( Fig. 2 ). The veins, usually two, were tributaries of the femoral vein, not of the great saphenous vein, which was close to the dissection site. The branch leading to the gracilis or sartorius muscle underwent ligation, preserving its proximal part. We did the same thing with the perforating veins leading to the skin, increasing the length of the vessels. We selected and documented vessels with an external diameter greater than 0.5 mm.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Medial aspect of the right thigh with a drawing showing the location of the vascular pedicle.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Dissection of the secondary vascular pedicle of the gracilis muscle with its perforating vessels.

Results

Table 1 shows the anthropometric data of the dissected cadavers, and Table 2 shows the flap vessel features.

Table 1. Anthropometric data.

Thigh number Age (years) Side Sex Height (cm) Weight (kg) Thigh length (inguinal-medial femoral condyle) (cm)
1 56 Right Male 176 70 38
2 56 Left Male 176 70 38
3 62 Right Male 174 66 36
4 62 Left Male 174 66 36
5 56 Right Male 165 88 36
6 52 Right Male 172 78 35
7 52 Left Male 172 78 35
8 56 Right Male 176 84 35
9 52 Right Male 150 43 35
10 52 Left Male 150 43 35
11 64 Right Male 167 61 30
12 64 Left Male 167 61 30
13 58 Right Male 170 70 30
14 58 Left Male 170 70 30
15 59 Right Female 169 95 30
16 59 Left Female 169 95 30
17 42 Right Male 182 76 35
18 42 Left Male 182 76 35
19 66 Left Male 175 74 26
20 58 Right Male 175 86 34
21 58 Left Male 175 86 34
22 92 Right Female 164 68 28
23 92 Left Female 164 68 28
24 47 Right Female 160 65 29
25 47 Left Female 160 65 29
26 36 Right Female 165 70 33
27 36 Left Female 165 70 33
28 92 Right Female 163 55 32
29 92 Left Female 163 55 32
30 85 Right Female 157 42 29
31 85 Left Female 157 42 29
32 38 Right Female 160 62 29
33 38 Left Female 160 62 29
Mean 57.8 162.5 66.5 31.3
Maximum 92 182 95 38
Minimum 36 150 42 26

Table 2. Vascular pedicle features.

Thigh number Pedicle length (mm) Artery diameter (mm) Vein diameter (mm) Origin Irrigated muscle Quadrant Variation
1 53 3.8 3 Femoral Gracilis Anterosuperior
2 48 3.4 3.2 Femoral Gracilis Anterosuperior
3 83 4.2 3.2 Femoral Gracilis Anterosuperior
4 76 4.6 3.6 Femoral Gracilis Anterosuperior
5 32 2.1 1.8 Femoral None Anteroinferior/Anterosuperior No muscular branch
6 41 3.6 3.4 Femoral Gracilis Anteroinferior
7 38 3.4 3.2 Femoral Gracilis Anteroinferior
8 63 3.2 2.8 Femoral Sartorius Anterosuperior Branch to the sartorius muscle
9 38 2 2 Femoral Gracilis Anterosuperior
10 32 2.2 1.8 Femoral Gracilis Anterosuperior
11 32 1.3 1 Femoral Gracilis Anterosuperior
12 28 1.5 1.2 Femoral Gracilis Antroinferior
13 78 1.6 1.4 Femoral Gracilis Anterosuperior
14 45 2.5 2 Femoral Gracilis Anterosuperior
15 84 1.8 1.8 Femoral Gracilis Anterosuperior
16 76 1.6 1.6 Femoral Gracilis Anterosuperior
17 38 1.3 1.2 Femoral Gracilis Anterosuperior
18 40 1.4 1.2 Femoral Gracilis Anterosuperior
19 32 1.6 1.4 Femoral Gracilis Anterosuperior
20 40 2.2 2 Femoral Sartorius Anterosuperior Branch to the sartorius muscle
21 38 2 2 Femoral Sartorius Anterosuperior Branch to the sartorius muscle
22 62 1.5 1.5 Femoral Gracilis Anterosuperior
23 60 1.3 1.5 Femoral Gracilis Anterosuperior
24 58 2 1.8 Femoral Gracilis Antroinferior
25 61 2.4 1.9 Femoral Gracilis Anteroinferior
26 64 2.7 2.2 Femoral Gracilis Anterosuperior
27 68 2.4 2.3 Femoral Gracilis Anterosuperior
28 56 1.8 1.6 Femoral Gracilis Anterosuperior
29 42 2.8 2 Femoral Gracilis Anterosuperior
30 56 2.8 2.3 Femoral Gracilis Anterosuperior
31 58 2.5 2.2 Femoral Gracilis Anterosuperior
32 52 2 1.8 Femoral Gracilis Anterosuperior
33 50 1.8 1.6 Femoral Gracilis Anterosuperior
Mean 50.6 2.3 2.0
Maximum 84 4.6 3.6
Minimum 28 1.3 1

In all dissections (100%), we identified at least 1 artery accompanied by 2 veins and considered them viable for flap creation. All of these vessels were in the intermuscular septum between the gracilis and vastus medialis/sartorius muscles. In 29 (87.8%) of the 33 thighs, the main vessel was a septocutaneous artery with branches to the gracilis muscle; in 3 (9.1%) thighs, the septocutaneous arteries provided branches to the sartorius muscle; and 1 thigh (3%) had two direct septocutaneous arteries with no muscular branches ( Fig. 3 ).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Arterial distribution patterns. Vessels with branches to the gracilis muscle ( A ). Vessels with branches to the sartorius muscle ( B ). Direct perforating vessels, with no muscular ramifications ( C ).

All cases had at least 1 artery and 1 vein with an external diameter greater than 0.5 mm. The largest diameter was of 4.6 mm, and the smallest, of 1.3 mm. The mean artery diameter was of 2.3 mm. In general, there were 2 veins for each artery. The largest vein diameter was of 3.6 mm, and the smallest, of 1.0 mm, with a mean of 2.0 mm ( Fig. 4 ). The length of the vessels, from their origin in the femoral vessels to the smaller branches in the subcutaneous tissue, ranged from 28 mm to 84 mm, with a mean of 53.2 mm.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Isolated flap with an approximate length of 12 cm ( A ). Vascular pedicle ( B ).

The statistical analysis started with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov parametric test to assess the normality of the distribution of the quantitative variables, and we concluded that there was a normal distribution. Regarding the distribution of the relative frequency (percentages) of qualitative factors, by applying the equality of two proportions test, we observed that the pedicle was in the anterosuperior quadrant in 84.8% of the dissected thighs. In addition, we noted that the gracilis was the muscle most commonly irrigated by this pedicle, corresponding to 87.9% ( p  < 0.001) of the cases ( Tables 3 , 4 , respectively).

Table 3. Pedicle location at anteroinferior and anterosuperior quadrants.

n % p -value
Quadrant Anteroinferior
Anterosuperior
5
28
15.2%
84.8%
< 0.001

Table 4. Muscles irrigated by the vascular pedicle.

n % p -value
Irrigated muscle Gracilis
None
Sartorius
29
1
3
87.9%
3.0%
9.1%
< 0.001
< 0.001

The Pearson test analyzed the correlation among these variables. It revealed a significant and directly-proportional association between vessel diameter and thigh length ( p  < 0.001) ( Fig. 5 ).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Relationship between thigh length and artery diameter.

Discussion

According to Giordano et al. 12 and Peek et al., 6 the gracilis muscle receives blood supply from a proximal main pedicle originating from the medial circumflex femoral artery and at least two distal secondary pedicles originating from the femoral or popliteal artery. Most of these primary and secondary pedicles have branches piercing the deep fascia and irrigating a considerable skin area over the gracilis muscle, corresponding to at least twice the width of this muscle. The anatomical characteristics of the main pedicle are well-known, resulting in reliable parameters to create gracilis or musculocutaneous flaps. However, the literature is scarce on secondary pedicles and their potential use as fasciocutaneous flaps.

The most common flaps are the proximal fasciocutaneous flaps of the thigh, irrigated by branches of the main pedicle of the gracilis muscle. Gracilis flaps are used widely in their pedicled and free forms. However, they compromise the main pedicle of the gracilis muscle and require care with the branches of the obturator nerve at the dissection site. The main vascular pedicle flap, harvested from the proximal medial region of the thigh, is in an area more susceptible to contamination and with limited access to postoperative dressings. 6

Scaglioni et al. 1 described some flaps of the anteromedial region in the distal region of the thigh based on the perforating musculocutaneous vessels crossing the vastus medialis. However, an adequate-length pedicle requires intramuscular dissection, and the scar area is more exposed compared with the main pedicle flap. Song et al. 10 and Algan and Tan 13 described a reliable flap originating from perforators of the deep femoral artery in this region, but often the patient's positioning makes it impossible to harvest it.

The proposed flap is on the medial side of the middle third of the thigh. After flap removal, primary closure of the donor area can be performed without the need for a skin graft. The scar is in a region of little exposure. The donor area is further away from the inguinal and perineal regions when compared with the main pedicle flap. Dressing change is more comfortable, and the prevention of contamination and infection is more reliable.

The mean arterial diameter in the current study was of 2.3 mm. According to Jacobson and Suarez, 14 this value is safe for vascular anastomoses in free flaps. The mean length of the pedicle was of 50.6 mm, which is adequate for free or pedicled flaps. However, in one of the dissections, we identified a pedicle shorter than 30 mm (28 mm), that is, a relatively short pedicle that would hinder anastomosis and depend on the area and the recipient's vessel.

Some interesting parameters found in the dissection included the following: all vascular pedicles were in the central region of the medial aspect of the thigh, within a circle with 6 cm in diameter, whose central point coincided with the anterior border of the gracilis muscle; the arterial origin was in the anterosuperior quadrant of the circle in 87.8% of the cases, and most of the vessels (87.8%) were septocutaneous vessels, with branches to the gracilis muscle. The greater saphenous vein requires care, as it is often included in the flap design and should be ligated and included in the flap if it is impossible to isolate.

According to Giordano et al., 12 the width of the skin irrigated by the perforating vessels would correspond to at least twice the width of the underlying gracilis muscles. Closure of the donor area closure could be performed primarily, with relative ease, with no need for skin grafting ( Fig. 6 ).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Primary closure of the donor area.

The parameters found will enable the safe dissection and removal of a microsurgical flap. The skin of the medial region of the thigh is thinner and more versatile. A flap from this region is appropriate for covering small and medium-sized defects (shorter than 15 cm in diameter).

Case series 15 16 conducted in recent years have demonstrated the advantages of using perforating vessel flaps to obtain less bulky and malleable flaps; however, the flap herein presented was not described in any of these studies.

To demonstrate flap viability, we performed surgery on a young male patient who had been involved in a traffic accident and, in addition to multiple fractures on his right foot, had lost skin on the medial surface extending to the plantar surface, exposing tendons and the plantar aponeurosis ( Fig. 7 ). We performed microsurgical coverage with the flap described, with anastomosis of its vessels in branches and tributaries of the posterior tibial vessels. The procedure was successful, thus demonstrating technical viability ( Fig. 7 and Fig. 8 ).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Operated case. Right foot with inferomedial defect coverage ( A ). Medial aspect of the right thigh with a drawing of the flap and location of the vascular pedicle ( B ). Isolated flap ( C ). Defect coverage with anastomosis in the posterior tibial vessels ( D ).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Operated case at three months of postoperative follow-up.

In our opinion, one of the best indications for this flap would be upper limb skin coverage, which requires thin and malleable skin and donor vessels of smaller caliber. We intend to perform a series of cases using this flap type for later publication of the outcomes, showing the positive and negative points.

Conclusion

We found the secondary pedicle of the gracilis muscle, which provides septocutaneous and perforating branches to the skin of the medial thigh, in all dissected thighs (100%). Therefore, this is a reliable option to obtain a fasciocutaneous flap from this region.

Funding Statement

Financial Support The authors declare that they did not receive financial support from agencies in the public, private or non-profit sectors to conduct the present study.

Conflict of Interests The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Authors' Contributions

Each author contributed individually and significantly to the development of the present article. GVV: writing – original draft, cadaveric dissection, clinical case surgery, and data collection and analysis. ACC: clinical case surgery, methodology, formal analysis, and writing – review & editing. DFF: statistical analysis, validation, and writing – review & editing, and formal analysis. YAA: methodology, conceptualization, and writing – review & editing.

Study performed at the Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Irmandade da Santa Casa da Misericórdia de São Paulo (DOT/ISCMSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

References

  • 1.Scaglioni M F, Fakin R M, Giovanoli P, Kuo Y R, Kuo P J. The lower medial thigh perforator (LMTP) flap for lower extremity reconstruction: Preliminary results. Microsurgery. 2016;36(06):474–479. doi: 10.1002/micr.30030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kim J T, Kim S W. Perforator Flap versus Conventional Flap. J Korean Med Sci. 2015;30(05):514–522. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.5.514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fujino T. Contribution of the axial and perforator vasculature to circulation in flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1967;39(02):125–137. doi: 10.1097/00006534-196702000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Koshima I, Soeda S, Yamasaki M, Kyou J. The free or pedicled anteromedial thigh flap. Ann Plast Surg. 1988;21(05):480–485. doi: 10.1097/00000637-198811000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wei F C, Jain V, Suominen S, Chen H C. Confusion among perforator flaps: what is a true perforator flap? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(03):874–876. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200103000-00037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Peek A, Müller M, Ackermann G, Exner K, Baumeister S. The free gracilis perforator flap: anatomical study and clinical refinements of a new perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123(02):578–588. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181956519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Eom J S, Sun S H, Hong J P. Use of the upper medial thigh perforator flap (gracilis perforator flap) for lower extremity reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(02):731–737. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181fed789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Feng C H, Yang J Y, Chuang S S, Huang C Y, Hsiao Y C, Lai C Y. Free medial thigh perforator flap for reconstruction of the dynamic and static complex burn scar contracture. Burns. 2010;36(04):565–571. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2009.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zheng H, Wang H, Zhang F, Yue S. Anatomic basis of perforator flaps of medial vastus muscle. Microsurgery. 2008;28(01):61–64. doi: 10.1002/micr.20446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Song Y G, Chen G Z, Song Y L. The free thigh flap: a new free flap concept based on the septocutaneous artery. Br J Plast Surg. 1984;37(02):149–159. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(84)90002-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mathes S J, Nahai F. Classification of the vascular anatomy of muscles: experimental and clinical correlation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;67(02):177–187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Giordano P A, Abbes M, Pequignot J P. Gracilis blood supply: anatomical and clinical re-evaluation. Br J Plast Surg. 1990;43(03):266–272. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(90)90071-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Algan S, Tan O. Profunda femoris artery perforator flaps: a detailed anatomical study. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2020;54(06):377–381. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2020.1801456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jacobson J H, Suarez E L. Microsurgery in anastomosis of small vessels. Surg Forum. 1960;11:243–245. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Abdelfattah U, Power H A, Song S, Min K, Suh H P, Hong J P. Algorithm for Free Perforator Flap Selection in Lower Extremity Reconstruction Based on 563 Cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144(05):1202–1213. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Scaglioni M F, Meroni M, Knobe M, Fritsche E. Versatility of perforator flaps for lower extremity defect coverage: Technical highlights and single center experience with 87 consecutive cases. Microsurgery. 2022;42(06):548–556. doi: 10.1002/micr.30892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia are provided here courtesy of Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia

RESOURCES